Podcasts about dissenting

Dissenting shareholder disputes occur when minority shareholders believe their shares are undervalued in a company transaction, leading to legal dissent. There is a difference between dissenting and oppressed shareholder matters which our expert, Hubert Klein, will explain as well as the legal and valuation standards that are used.   Klein highlights the importance of transparency and professional skepticism and thorough understanding of both sides' perspectives, such as: Common triggers for dissenting shareholder actions Preventing dissenting shareholder issues Reconciling valuation differences Continue reading to learn about key resources available at AICPA-CIMA.com to improve your valuation analyses. Guest: Hubert Klein, CPA/ABV/CFF, Partner and Practice Leader, Eisner Advisory Group LLC  Host: Alex Partin, CPA/ABV, Mueller & Partin  Please share your thoughts about the episode - click here to leave us a review   Want to get involved with future FVS conferences, committees, task forces, or the standing ovation program? Send a message to infoFVS@aicpa-cima.com RESOURCES FOR FURTHER EXPLORATION If you're using a podcast app that does not hyperlink to the resources, please visit our podcast platform to access the show notes with direct links.  2025 AICPA & CIMA Forensic & Valuation Services Conference  check out early bird and special discounts for AICPA and FVS Section members, and ABV, CFF and CVFI credential holders Emerging Partners Toolkit – Section 6 Ownership/buy-sell agreements Exclusive content available with AICPA FVS Section membership: Click here to join this active community of your FVS peers. You will get 16 credits of complimentary CPE and access to rich technical content  AICPA Quick Reference Guide: Standards and Premises of Value (refer to page 7)  The FVS Valuation Podcast archives  Valuation Case Law Update Insights for Navigating Common Issues in Business Valuation The Forensic Accountant's Role in M&A Disputes  LEARN MORE ABOUT THE FOLLOWING AICPA CREDENTIALS: Accredited in Business Valuation (ABV®) – Visit the home page and check out the ABV infographic Certified in the Valuation of Financial Instruments (CVFI®) – Visit the home page and check out the CVFI infographic Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF®) - Visit the home page and check out the CFF infographic This is a podcast from AICPA & CIMA, together as the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. To enjoy more conversations from our global community of accounting and finance professionals, explore our network of free shows here. Your feedback and comments are welcomed at podcast@aicpa-cima.com    

Dissenting shareholder disputes occur when minority shareholders believe their shares are undervalued in a company transaction, leading to legal dissent. There is a difference between dissenting and oppressed shareholder matters which our expert, Hubert Klein, will explain as well as the legal and valuation standards that are used.   Klein highlights the importance of transparency and professional skepticism and thorough understanding of both sides' perspectives, such as: Common triggers for dissenting shareholder actions Preventing dissenting shareholder issues Reconciling valuation differences Continue reading to learn about key resources available at AICPA-CIMA.com to improve your valuation analyses. Guest: Hubert Klein, CPA/ABV/CFF, Partner and Practice Leader, Eisner Advisory Group LLC  Host: Alex Partin, CPA/ABV, Mueller & Partin  Please share your thoughts about the episode - click here to leave us a review   Want to get involved with future FVS conferences, committees, task forces, or the standing ovation program? Send a message to infoFVS@aicpa-cima.com RESOURCES FOR FURTHER EXPLORATION If you're using a podcast app that does not hyperlink to the resources, please visit our podcast platform to access the show notes with direct links.  2025 AICPA & CIMA Forensic & Valuation Services Conference  check out early bird and special discounts for AICPA and FVS Section members, and ABV, CFF and CVFI credential holders Emerging Partners Toolkit – Section 6 Ownership/buy-sell agreements Exclusive content available with AICPA FVS Section membership: Click here to join this active community of your FVS peers. You will get 16 credits of complimentary CPE and access to rich technical content  AICPA Quick Reference Guide: Standards and Premises of Value (refer to page 7)  The FVS Valuation Podcast archives  Valuation Case Law Update Insights for Navigating Common Issues in Business Valuation The Forensic Accountant's Role in M&A Disputes  LEARN MORE ABOUT THE FOLLOWING AICPA CREDENTIALS: Accredited in Business Valuation (ABV®) – Visit the home page and check out the ABV infographic Certified in the Valuation of Financial Instruments (CVFI®) – Visit the home page and check out the CVFI infographic Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF®) - Visit the home page and check out the CFF infographic This is a podcast from AICPA & CIMA, together as the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. To enjoy more conversations from our global community of accounting and finance professionals, explore our network of free shows here. Your feedback and comments are welcomed at podcast@aicpa-cima.com    

John Collett Ryland played an important role in English nonconformist education for forty years. Dissenting academies, as they were called, were necessitated by the reestablishment of the monarchy and state church in 1660. Subsequent legislation made it impossible for conscientious dissenters to gain entrance to English universities. Pre-university education was also difficult because any school had to be licensed by the local bishop. But after the 1720s, non-conformist education began to be recognized and even monetarily subsidized by the government. And so by the time Ryland began to teach, he was generally able to freely run his schools.   For more information about CBTS, visit CBTSeminary.org

John Collett Ryland played an important role in English nonconformist education for forty years. Dissenting academies, as they were called, were necessitated by the reestablishment of the monarchy and state church in 1660. Subsequent legislation made it impossible for conscientious dissenters to gain entrance to English universities. Pre-university education was also difficult because any school had to be licensed by the local bishop. But after the 1720s, non-conformist education began to be recognized and even monetarily subsidized by the government. And so by the time Ryland began to teach, he was generally able to freely run his schools.For more information about CBTS, visit CBTSeminary.org

John Collett Ryland played an important role in English nonconformist education for forty years. Dissenting academies, as they were called, were necessitated by the reestablishment of the monarchy and state church in 1660. Subsequent legislation made it impossible for conscientious dissenters to gain entrance to English universities. Pre-university education was also difficult because any school had to be licensed by the local bishop. But after the 1720s, non-conformist education began to be recognized and even monetarily subsidized by the government. And so by the time Ryland began to teach, he was generally able to freely run his schools.   For more information about CBTS, visit CBTSeminary.org

Readers, we often receive questions from you about our Modern Mrs Darcy Book Club and what actually goes on in our online reading community, and today's guest is here to help Anne take you behind the scenes! You may already know Ginger Horton, our MMD Book Club Community Manager, from her prior appearances here on the podcast or because you interact with her all the time in book club. Today, Ginger and Anne dive into all things book club, like the nitty-gritty details of our approach to choosing the titles, which we have a finely honed philosophy for, to what kinds of books we hear that our readers love the most. Along the way Anne and Ginger talk about specific books that really stand out to Ginger from her own book club experience over the years, plus some perks that our book club members enjoy, like access to our upcoming Summer Reading Guide and live unboxing experience. Whether you're curious about book club or you're honestly not interested at all, we think you'll really enjoy today's conversation. Find the titles and other resources mentioned today at our show notes page at whatshouldireadnextpodcast.com/469. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dem Removed For Disrupting Trump's Address To Congress. Repubs Accuse Dem Mayors Of Having Blood On Their Hands. Alina Habba Says Fired Veterans Are “Not Fit To Have A Job.” Supreme Court Deals Trump A Blow On Foreign Aid Freeze. Hosts: Ana Kasparian SUBSCRIBE on YOUTUBE ☞ https://www.youtube.com/@TheYoungTurks FOLLOW US ON: FACEBOOK ☞ https://www.facebook.com/theyoungturks TWITTER ☞ https://twitter.com/TheYoungTurks INSTAGRAM ☞ https://www.instagram.com/theyoungturks TIKTOK ☞ https://www.tiktok.com/@theyoungturks

This Day in Legal History: Permanent Court of Arbitration EstablishedOn February 6, 1900, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) was officially established following the ratification of the 1899 Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. This marked a major step toward institutionalizing peaceful dispute resolution between nations. The PCA, headquartered in The Hague, Netherlands, became the first international tribunal designed to arbitrate conflicts between states, offering an alternative to war. While not a court in the traditional sense, the PCA provides administrative support for arbitral tribunals, helping resolve territorial, trade, and investment disputes. Recognizing the need for improvement, the 1907 Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes refined its procedures, further solidifying arbitration as a legitimate mechanism for international law. Over the years, the PCA's role expanded beyond state-to-state disputes to include cases involving international organizations, corporations, and even individuals. Today, it operates out of the Peace Palace, home to other key legal institutions like the International Court of Justice. With 109 member states, the PCA continues to handle complex cases, from border conflicts to environmental agreements. Its existence laid the groundwork for later international legal bodies, such as the International Criminal Court and various UN tribunals. By promoting arbitration over conflict, the PCA has helped shape a more structured and rule-based international legal order.Attorney General Pam Bondi announced a major shift in the Justice Department's white-collar enforcement priorities, scaling back efforts in foreign lobbying transparency and foreign bribery cases. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) unit will now focus on bribery cases tied to transnational crime, such as those facilitating human smuggling, drug trafficking, and arms dealing. Other FCPA investigations with no such connection will be deprioritized.Similarly, Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) enforcement will be limited to cases resembling traditional espionage by foreign government actors. The Justice Department's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section will focus more on civil enforcement and regulatory guidance rather than aggressive criminal prosecutions. These changes mark a significant pullback from the increased enforcement seen over the past decade, particularly under Special Counsel Robert Mueller.Bondi also disbanded the National Security Division's corporate enforcement unit, an initiative championed by Biden-era Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco. It's unclear if the division will continue prioritizing corporate crime linked to adversarial nations like China and Iran. These policy shifts were part of a broader series of announcements as Bondi took charge as the nation's top law enforcement official following her confirmation on Tuesday night.Bondi Diminishes Justice Department White Collar Enforcement (1)Google is ending its diversity-based hiring targets and reviewing its broader diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, aligning with a broader corporate trend of scaling back such efforts. The company previously set a goal in 2020 to increase leadership representation from underrepresented groups by 30% by 2025, but Chief People Officer Fiona Cicconi told employees that Google would no longer pursue aspirational hiring goals.This shift follows years of public DEI commitments, especially after the 2020 protests over police killings of George Floyd and other Black Americans. Google had also begun evaluating executives on diversity metrics, but recent SEC filings show it removed language reaffirming its DEI commitments.The Alphabet Workers Union (AWU) criticized the move, calling it part of a broader anti-worker trend in the tech industry. Meanwhile, Google cited legal considerations as a federal contractor, stating it is reviewing compliance with court decisions and executive orders affecting DEI policies.Google will maintain internal employee groups such as “Black Googler Network” and “Trans at Google.” The company's decision follows similar DEI cutbacks at Meta and Amazon, amid increasing conservative pushback and legal challenges after the Supreme Court's 2023 affirmative action ruling.Google scraps diversity-based hiring targets | ReutersMore than 40,000 federal employees have signed up for the Trump administration's buyout offer, which promises pay through September if they resign by the end of February. This represents about 2% of the federal civilian workforce, with officials expecting a surge in applications before the Thursday deadline.The initiative is part of President Trump's second-term effort to reduce the size of the federal government, led by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who heads the Department of Government Efficiency. The White House initially projected that 5% to 10% of federal workers might accept the offer.Federal employee unions oppose the plan, questioning its legality and enforceability. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has warned workers that job cuts are likely, with agency restructurings and layoffs expected. However, key employees in defense, immigration, law enforcement, and postal services are exempt from the deal.With nearly 298,000 federal employees eligible for retirement in the next two years, the administration's strategy could significantly reshape the workforce. Union leaders, like Everett Kelley of the American Federation of Government Employees, have urged workers to reject the offer, calling it misleading and driven by unelected billionaires.Musk ‘Buyout' Taken by 40,000 Federal Workers as Deadline Nears - BloombergOn her first day as U.S. Attorney General, Pam Bondi issued a directive stating that Justice Department lawyers who refuse to advance legal arguments on behalf of the Trump administration could face termination. The memo warns that attorneys who decline to sign briefs, delay cases, or impede the department's mission may be disciplined or fired.The move is part of a broader effort by Trump appointees to assert control over the Justice Department, which has already seen firings and reassignments of career lawyers. Bondi also announced a review of criminal and civil cases brought against Trump and his supporters, including prosecutions related to the January 6 Capitol attack. This "Weaponization Working Group" will scrutinize cases Republicans claim were politically motivated under the Biden administration.Additionally, Bondi scaled back enforcement of foreign influence laws, stating that criminal cases will only be pursued in instances resembling “traditional espionage”, shifting the focus to civil enforcement. These laws, which require individuals lobbying for foreign governments to register as foreign agents, were previously used to prosecute several Trump associates.Bondi's directive reflects Trump allies' long-standing complaints that career DOJ attorneys obstructed his policies, such as resisting lawsuits against Yale's admissions practices and refusing to defend the 2017 travel ban. The memo asserts that DOJ lawyers cannot substitute their personal views for the administration's legal agenda.Trump's attorney general says lawyers who refuse orders could be fired | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

https://thecommunists.org/2024/12/02/news/all-eyes-on-the-enemy-within-prevent-scheme-targets-dissenting-children/

“How did you become a voice of reason on Fox News?” Kanew talks to Jessica Tarlov about being a dissenting voice on Fox News, especially at a time when so many are giving up on talking to people they disagree with — and why Dems should go outside their comfort zones more.

Last week, the FTC, by a 3-2 vote along party lines, adopted its click-to-cancel rule, which purports to make it easier to cancel gym memberships, streaming services, and the like. [We wrote about it here.] The final rule will apply across the economy to any business that offers negative option plans (e.g., subscriptions) and would provide the Commission with the ability to obtain civil penalties from covered entities for any misrepresentation about the underlying product or service. https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/blogs/ad-law-access/why-dissenting-statements-by-ftc-commissioners-matter John Villafranco jvillafranco@kelleydrye.com (202) 342-8423 https://www.kelleydrye.com/people/john-e-villafranco Kate White kwhite@kelleydrye.com (202) 342-8855 https://www.kelleydrye.com/people/katherine-white Subscribe to the Ad Law Access blog - www.kelleydrye.com/subscribe Subscribe to the Ad Law News Newsletter - www.kelleydrye.com/subscribe View the Advertising and Privacy Law Resource Center - www.kelleydrye.com/advertising-and-privacy-law Find all of our links here linktr.ee/KelleyDryeAdLaw Hosted by Simone Roach

Send us a textJohn LaSpina is a returning guest on our show! Be sure to check out his appearances on episode 575, episode 582, and episode 606 of Boundless Body Radio!John LaSpina is a 59-year-old retired middle school teacher of 34 years. John taught Language Arts, Social Studies, Civics, and Video Production. John is a perpetual student, & most of his nutrition education comes from experts in the field of low carbohydrate nutrition.He became fat-adapted about 4 years ago when he started eating ketogenic. Currently, he identifies as a carnivore and claims to have never felt more alive, or more healthy. His YouTube videos serve the purpose of informing and educating viewers about the proper way of eating real, whole foods and the potential benefits that can be experienced through this approach.John encourages viewers to leave comments and questions, assuring them that he will respond to everyone. John creates these YouTube videos for free, offering them to anyone who wants to learn, as he believes knowledge is power. His ultimate goal is to help individuals become the optimized versions of themselves by learning to eat well in order to feel and look well.Find John at-YT- @Carnivore TeacherIG- @carnivoreteacherjohnLK- @Carnivore TeacherFind Boundless Body at- myboundlessbody.com Book a session with us here!

#LondonCalling:  @JosephSternberg @WSJOpinion: The rarely dissenting Fed. Joseph Sternberg, WSJ 1914 Federal Reserve Board

#NewWorldReport:  Brazil forces Musk to remove dissenting voices from X. Joseph Humire @JMHumire @SecureFreeSoc. Ernesto Araujo, Former Foreign Minister Republic of Brazil. #NewWorldReportHumire 1900 Caracas

Summary In this conversation we talk with Graham House, a former senior officer in the RAF. Graham discusses his decision to leave the military due to a serious conflict of values. He highlights instances of alleged cover-ups of rape and war crimes, as well as the mistreatment of whistleblowers. Graham emphasizes the importance of effective governance and the need for individuals in positions of power to ask difficult questions and prioritize serving the public. He also discusses the  tactics used to discredit dissenting voices. Graham discusses the importance of widening belief systems and the need for self-awareness, self-trust, resilience, and self-confidence. He shares his personal journey of rebuilding himself and his house after a destructive phase in his life. Graham emphasizes the need for individuals to take self-responsibility and prepare for tough times, as well as the importance of collaboration and cooperation in public service. He also discusses his involvement in Justice for Troops, an organization that aims to address crimes and cover-ups within the armed forces. Finally, Graham introduces , the Social Impact Academy, which aims to bring together capable people to create positive change. https://thesocialimpactacademy.co.uk KeywordsGraham House, RAF, conflict of values, cover-ups, rape, war crimes, mistreatment of whistleblowers, effective governance, serving the public, mental health, discrediting dissenting voices, belief systems, self-awareness, self-trust, resilience, self-confidence, rebuilding, self-responsibility, collaboration, cooperation, public service, Justice for Troops, crimes, cover-ups, armed forces, Social Impact Academy, positive change

Summary In this conversation we talk with Graham House, a former senior officer in the RAF. Graham discusses his decision to leave the military due to a serious conflict of values. He highlights instances of alleged cover-ups of rape and war crimes, as well as the mistreatment of whistleblowers. Graham emphasizes the importance of effective governance and the need for individuals in positions of power to ask difficult questions and prioritize serving the public. He also discusses the  tactics used to discredit dissenting voices. Graham discusses the importance of widening belief systems and the need for self-awareness, self-trust, resilience, and self-confidence. He shares his personal journey of rebuilding himself and his house after a destructive phase in his life. Graham emphasizes the need for individuals to take self-responsibility and prepare for tough times, as well as the importance of collaboration and cooperation in public service. He also discusses his involvement in Justice for Troops, an organization that aims to address crimes and cover-ups within the armed forces. Finally, Graham introduces , the Social Impact Academy, which aims to bring together capable people to create positive change. https://thesocialimpactacademy.co.uk KeywordsGraham House, RAF, conflict of values, cover-ups, rape, war crimes, mistreatment of whistleblowers, effective governance, serving the public, mental health, discrediting dissenting voices, belief systems, self-awareness, self-trust, resilience, self-confidence, rebuilding, self-responsibility, collaboration, cooperation, public service, Justice for Troops, crimes, cover-ups, armed forces, Social Impact Academy, positive change

The Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision granting Donald Trump partial immunity from special counsel Jack Smith's election subversion case, handing the former president a significant win during his reelection bid. Dissenting justices ripped the ruling as “antithetical” to the constitution.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

According to the Associated Press, on Friday, June 28 the US Supreme Court overturned the decades old Chevron decision. The Supreme Court overturned the Chevron decision, which allowed federal agencies to interpret unclear laws, thereby empowering them in regulatory matters. The Chevron decision, established in 1984, outlines a principle of judicial deference to administrative agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes that they administer. It holds that courts should defer to these agency interpretations as long as they are reasonable and not contrary to the clear intent of Congress. This doctrine has been pivotal in shaping the balance of power between regulatory agencies and the judiciary in the United States. This decision to overturn Chevron is seen as a major win for business interests, potentially affecting regulations across environment, public health, workplace safety, and consumer protections. It impacts regulatory agencies by diminishing their discretion and authority in interpreting and implementing ambiguous statutes. It shifts more decision-making power to the judiciary, requiring courts to independently assess the legality and scope of agency actions without automatically deferring to agency interpretations from subject matter experts. This change potentially complicates the regulatory process, making it harder for agencies to enact and enforce regulations without facing greater scrutiny and challenges in court. The judiciary or the court now has the ability to veto and edit regulations that typically would be deferred to experts like those at the EPA, FDA, OSHA, and other agencies. Instead, judges are now able to make decisions based on their economic interests and personal beliefs surrounding the proposed and enacted regulations. The court's conservative majority, aligned with Justice John Roberts, reinforced the role of courts over agency experts in interpreting statutes, limiting agency discretion. The ruling could lead to challenges worth billions, impacting regulations like the National Marine Fisheries Service's fee requirements for herring fishermen. It also reflects broader conservative efforts to curtail the regulatory state, aligning with previous rulings under the Trump-appointed justices. Dissenting justices, including Kagan, criticized the decision as undermining agency authority and legislative intent, with implications for future regulatory oversight. Industry groups supported the decision for economic reasons, while advocacy groups warned of threats to public safety and environmental protections. A lawyer from Earthjustice stated after the ruling that: “The Supreme Court is pushing the nation into uncharted waters as it seizes power from our elected branches of government to advance its deregulatory agenda. The conservative justices are aggressively reshaping the foundations of our government so that the President and Congress have less power to protect the public, and corporations have more power to challenge regulations in search of profits. This ruling threatens the legitimacy of hundreds of regulations that keep us safe, protect our homes and environment, and create a level playing field for businesses to compete on.”  The ruling shifts power dynamics away from federal agencies toward courts, potentially influencing future regulatory frameworks and major legal challenges. In short, things will now be decided by 9 bureaucrats in robes rather than the public and subject matter experts. Source: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-chevron-regulations-environment-5173bc83d3961a7aaabe415ceaf8d665 --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/outdoor-minimalist/support

Chiefs Head to White House on Heels of Trump Verdict, Plus Dissenting Callers on KCMO | Mundo Clip 5-31-24See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today's Op-Ed discusses the inherent risk posed by Microsoft's new Copilot+ PCs and the Recall feature.  Needless to say, I have thoughts! Give a listen, tell a friend. Dissenting opinions are ALWAYS welcome at darren@thecyburguy.com or at www.linkedin.com/in/darrenmott The article mentioned in this podcast: https://www.techradar.com/computing/windows/microsofts-controversial-recall-feature-for-windows-11-could-already-be-in-legal-hot-water

Welcome to Walking the Way as we continue our journey through the Bible. My name is Ray and I really want to say thank you to everyone for listening in as we share in a regular rhythm of worship and devotion together. Credits Opening Prayer https://www.faithandworship.com/ Bible verse 1 Kings 22:29 Thought for the day Ray Borrett Bible Passage 1 Kings 22 New Revised Standard Version, Updated Edition. Copyright © 2021 National Council of Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. Prayer Handbook Click here to download it Download the Script https://1drv.ms/b/s!AnHHJxf-hxXpuuFNi5cdMfjGOWdG0w?e=ydIi1o Supporting Walking the Way If you want to support Walking the Way, please go to: https://ko-fi.com/S6S4WXLBB or you can subscribe to the channel: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/walkingtheway/subscribe To contact Ray: Please leave a comment or a review. I want to find out what people think and how we make it better. www.rayborrett.co.uk ray.borrett@outlook.com @raybrrtt https://fb.me/walkingthewaypodcast --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/walkingtheway/message

The 700-plus attendees at the 2024 Principles First Summit in Washington DC come from various locations and backgrounds yet attended this event for similar political reasons: all are concerned about authoritarian trends within today's GOP.  Blaire Egan, for example, had been questioning her GOP political orientation since interning on Capitol Hill for a Republican legislator. Jeff Mayhew points to congressional gridlock, especially within the US House, as a major obstacle to functional, representative government. Mike Cantwell has long been a politically engaged military veteran working on election reform, among other issues, from an independent perspective.  These are a few of the many attendees Producer Alex Couraud interviewed at this year's Summit, held the same weekend as the Trump-dominated CPAC.  Tune in to this season four episode to move beyond simplistic labels of red vs. blue, Republican vs. Democrat, and learn about various efforts looking to shore up American democracy at this difficult time.  The Purple Principle is a Fluent Knowledge production—original music by Ryan Adair Rooney.  SHOW NOTES Our Guests: Jeff Mayhugh, Blair Egan, Liam Kerr, and Mike Cantwell  Join Us for Premium Content: Apple: https://link.chtbl.com/PurpleApple Patreon: patreon.com/purpleprinciplepodcast Find us online! Twitter: @purpleprincipl Facebook: @thepurpleprinciplepodcast Youtube: @thepurpleprinciple  Our website: https://bit.ly/2ZCpFaQ Sign up for our newsletter: https://bit.ly/2UfFSja 

With the RSA conference coming in about 10-days, I bring back a topic I mentioned about 7 months ago as it pertains to Cyber Conferences to today's Op-Ed. Are they solving anything?  I have thoughts. Give a listen, tell a friend. Dissenting opinions are welcome at darren@thecyburguy.com

Have you ever wondered why scandals slide off certain politicians like water? Jessica Tarlov, co-host of Fox News Channel's The Five, cable's highest-rated program, actually did her PHD dissertation examining how scandals impact politicians' careers. As the lone, democratic voice on The Five, Jessica shares how she handles the daily debates and how she decides to pick her battles. Given our upcoming elections, Jessica has a lot of thoughts on this topic including the phenomena of teflon Don. Jessica loves her job on The Five and feels fortunate for the opportunity to bring alternative opinions and analysis to the most important news stories.    Topics Discussed (04:10) Political economy professor says none of Trump's scandals have affected his popularity (10:32) People reject the direction that the Democratic Party is going (19:29) 40% of Americans now identify as an independent (21:00) Thoughts on how Fox is covering the Israel war compared to other networks (24:49) What's going on on college campuses (40:25) What it's like to work on The Five   SIGN UP FOR OUR newsletter here Connect with us on Instagram @meantforit and reach out via email at contact@meantforit.com with your thoughts or suggestions for future episodes. Visit www.meantforit.com for more inspiring stories, and if you leave us a review on iTunes, we'll  do a little dance of joy.

In this conversation, AJ Kay discusses her early experiences with writing about COVID-19 and the backlash she faced for challenging the mainstream narrative. She shares how her essay on Medium, titled 'The Curve is Already Flat,' was censored and demonetized, leading to the formation of the Rational Ground group. AJ also talks about the impact of school closures on her children, particularly her daughter with autism and her other daughter with special needs. She highlights the loss of services and support that these children relied on and the detrimental effects of isolation and disrupted routines. The conversation highlights the importance of early intervention and support for children with special needs. They express concern for children diagnosed in 2020 who did not receive in-person help for three years, emphasizing the critical period of neuroplasticity in early childhood.Chapters00:00 Introduction and Background01:16 Early COVID Essays06:37 Censorship on Medium08:03 Formation of Rational Ground22:30 Motivation to Speak Out25:49 Transition to Zoom School31:32 Impact on Children with Special Needs34:16 Lack of In-Person Help for Children with Special Needs39:51 The Effect on College Students45:36 The Purpose of Life and the Importance of Relationships52:55 The Great Barrington Declaration and Consent58:29The Critique of the Great Barrington Declaration01:00:54 The Inhumane Treatment in Nursing HomeTakeaways* AJ K. faced censorship and deplatforming for challenging the mainstream narrative on COVID-19.* The Rational Ground group was formed as a response to the censorship and aimed to provide a platform for independent writers and researchers.* School closures had a significant impact on children with special needs, depriving them of essential services and support.* The isolation and disrupted routines caused by the pandemic had detrimental effects on the mental health and well-being of children. Early intervention and support are crucial for the development of children with special needs.* The period of neuroplasticity in early childhood is finite, and the lack of in-person help during the pandemic may have long-term consequences for children's outcomes.* College closures and isolation measures have had negative effects on young adults' socialization and well-being.* The trade-off between safety and the loss of important relationships and experiences raises questions about the purpose of protection. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.illusionconsensus.com/subscribe

Since Tunisian President Kais Saied seized full governing powers in July 2021, concern has been growing about a crackdown on free speech and dissent in the country. In the last year, about 50 political opponents have been in jail in various cases. Some have been awaiting trial for more than a year. Meanwhile, judges fired by the president have not been reinstated, despite a ruling in their favour. While some Tunisians are speaking out, others feel resigned to their fate. Our correspondents report.

The Trump v. Anderson lead balloon continues to smolder.  This episode looks at the areas wherein the concurring Justices took issue with the per curiam, and they are many.  Indeed, the three Justices who concurred only in the judgment disagree with the scope of the per curiam as well as its particulars, and their concurrence reads more like a dissent.  Can we find areas of agreement with ourselves and the concurrences?  What can we learn from all this?  CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.  

Pastor JD provides a Biblical and practical template to use in discerning what's true or false concerning all the different dissenting and dividing voices teaching Bible prophecy The post Bible Prophecy Update, The Dissenting Voices Teaching Bible Prophecy – Sunday, March 17th 2024 appeared first on Calvary Chapel Kaneohe.

Pastor JD provides a Biblical and practical template to use in discerning what's true or false concerning all the different dissenting and dividing voices teaching Bible prophecy.Social MediaProphecy Website: http://jdfarag.orgMobile/TV Apps: https://subsplash.com/calvarychapelkaneohe/app Church Website: http://www.calvarychapelkaneohe.comTwitter: https://twitter.com/JDFaragFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/JDFaragInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/JDFarag

This Friday Op-Ed deals with the Congressional vote on Tik Tok.  After spending 20 years dealing with Chinese-centric cyber and counterintelligence matters with the FBI, I think I have some thoughts. Dissenting views are always welcome at darren@thecyburguy.com

Alito, joined by Thomas, dissenting from denial of certiorari in Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board, decided Feb 20, 2024.  

The Rebel News podcasts features free audio-only versions of select RebelNews+ content and other Rebel News long-form videos, livestreams, and interviews. Monday to Friday enjoy the audio version of Ezra Levant's daily TV-style show, The Ezra Levant Show, where Ezra gives you his contrarian and conservative take on free speech, politics, and foreign policy through in-depth commentary and interviews. Wednesday evenings you can listen to the audio version of The Gunn Show with Sheila Gunn Reid the Chief Reporter of Rebel News. Sheila brings a western sensibility to Canadian news. With one foot in the oil patch and one foot in agriculture, Sheila challenges mainstream media narratives and stands up for Albertans. If you want to watch the video versions of these podcasts, make sure to begin your free RebelNewsPlus trial by subscribing at http://www.RebelNewsPlus.com

Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari in Smith v. Hamm (January 25, 2024).   Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts

DISCLAMER >>>>>>    The Ditch Lab Coat podcast serves solely for general informational purposes and does not serve as a substitute for professional medical services such as medicine or nursing. It does not establish a doctor/patient relationship, and the use of information from the podcast or linked materials is at the user's own risk. The content does not aim to replace professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, and users should promptly seek guidance from healthcare professionals for any medical conditions.                                                  >>>>>> The expressed opinions belong solely to the hosts and guests, and they do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Hospitals, Clinics, Universities, or any other organization associated with the host or guests.                                                                                  Disclosures: Ditch The Lab Coat podcast is produced by (Podkind.co) and is independent of Dr. Bonta's teaching and research roles at McMaster University, Temerty Faculty of Medicine and Queens University. 1. Introduction and Background of Guests   - Introduction to "Ditch the Lab Coat" podcast emphasizing the focus on Covid-19's past, present, and future.   - Background of Dr. Sumon Chakrabarti as an infectious diseases specialist.   - Dr. Chakrabarti's expertise in tropical medicine and his anecdotal experiences with diseases such as neurocysticercosis.2. Vaccine Efficacy and Policies   - Discussing the stability and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for under 70 populations.   - Debates on COVID-19 booster shots for young, healthy individuals.   - Government policies on vaccinations and the comparison to alcohol and cigarettes accessibility.   - The role of vaccine in individual risk reduction versus transmission prevention.   - Comparison of COVID-19 vaccine with traditional vaccines like measles for public health impact.3. Epidemiological Insights and Disease Transmission   - Concepts of fomite transmission and the role of ventilation in transmission reduction.   - Transmission of infectious diseases like tuberculosis in poorly ventilated spaces.   - The use of masks, especially N95 masks, and related confusion.4. Healthcare Workers' Experiences and Emotional Stress   - Dr. Mark's reflections on emotional stress while working in hospitals.   - Sumon Chakrabarti's personal experiences during the pandemic.   - Healthcare providers' emotional reactions and fears.5. Public Health Messaging and Social Impact   - Regrets over early response and messaging advocating for strict isolation.   - Effects of isolation measures on mental health and widening socioeconomic disparities.   - The credibility of public health messaging and the evolving nature of science.6. Social Media and Public Engagement   - Sumon Chakrabarti's use of Twitter before and after Elon Musk's acquisition.   - The experience of online vitriol and engagement strategies with the public.7. Pandemic Reflections and Measures   - Experiences leading up to the declaration of the pandemic.   - Initial pandemic preparations and avoidance of large gatherings.   - The idea of self-sufficient confinement and its health impacts.8. Impact on Healthcare Systems and Services   - The struggle of healthcare systems with ventilator supplies.   - Halting of non-COVID health services and its consequences.   - Prioritization of COVID-19 patients over other health needs.9. Socioeconomic Factors and Policies   - The shift in perspective on the affected population and the impact of lockdowns.   - Downstream impacts of delayed diagnoses and mental health issues among children.   - Policies crafted by individuals not experiencing the same realities.10. Controversies and Community Perspectives    - Dissenting opinions within the medical community regarding lockdowns.    - The tension between public health guidance and individual freedoms. Summary:- Final thoughts on the episode's discussions.- Acknowledgment of the learning curve throughout the pandemic.- Anticipation for further discussions with Sumon Chakrabarti in upcoming episodes.Timestamps:09:49 Reflecting on pandemic experiences and shift in care.11:15 Fears of death due to pandemic impact.14:40 Medical students sent home due to COVID-19.20:04 Ventilation important in preventing spread of respiratory viruses.21:42 TB spread through air, not just close contact.26:51 Message: Be cautious but don't isolate completely.29:30 Ventilator shortage fears during Covid, healthcare impact.31:12 Implicitly shifting healthcare responsibility to the population.36:22 Frustration over policy makers' lack of experience.39:44 First vaccine dose, limited protection against infection.43:27 COVID vaccine blunts severe disease but not transmission.45:34 COVID vaccines less effective due to mutations.49:22 Healthcare workers struggled as resources dwindled.52:25 Criticism of government's pandemic response and hypocrisy.57:15 Analysis of pandemic impact on various aspects.59:57 Changes take time, hope for better response.© 2024 ditchthelabcoat.com - All Rights Reserved 

As I discuss with Tucker, just how far did government-private partnerships go to suppress dissenting voices like mine? This is how far. --

Today I'll be reading two very brief opinions dissenting from the denial of certiorari in Tingley v. Ferguson, issued back on December 11th, 2023. The first dissent is from Justice Thomas and is only around 4 pages long; the second is Justice Alito's dissent, which is only a few paragraphs long and is written as if it were meant to be read at the end of Thomas' dissent - so, that's what I'm going to do. Enjoy. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-942_kh6o.pdf Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts, or stream directly from your browser at whatscotuswroteus.com

‘We have noticed yesterday a large crowd of Jews carrying banners and over-running the streets shouting words which hurt the feeling and wound the soul. They pretend with open voice that Palestine, which is the Holy Land of our fathers and the graveyard of our ancestors, which has been inhabited by the Arabs for long ages, who loved it and died in defending it, is now a national home for them ... We Arabs, Muslim and Christian, have always sympathized profoundly with the persecuted Jews and their misfortunes in other countries ... but there is wide difference between such sympathy and the acceptance of such a nation ... ruling over us and disposing of our affairs.'   Buy me a Coffee page: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/DSConsciousness   Christian Aid Gaza Appeal: https://www.christianaid.org.uk/appeals/emergencies/middle-east-crisis-appeal   To support the show and for access to the forum: https://payhip.com/b/Sq0ZB   Track: Walk it Off - Jae Ren Music provided by Verde Música Studio Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2l-97PH5R8   Notes The letter that led to the founding of Israel, documentary by Al Jazeera: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLIBZ1Fewco   Zionism: Real Enemy of the Jews: The False Messiah: 1, by Alan Hart: https://tinyurl.com/r4bxftu8   The Muslim-Christian Association: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim-Christian_Associations   The King–Crane Commission: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King%E2%80%93Crane_Commission   The Palin Commission: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palin_Commission   Asher Hirsch Ginsberg (pen name: Ahad Ha'am) at the Jewish Virtual Library: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ahad-ha-rsquo-am

Welcome to the Friday Op-Ed.  Today I use the recent JAXA breach and intrusions into municipal water systems in the US to bring to the forefront the threat that is nation-state actors, and why you need to include them in your cybersecurity strategy. Dissenting opinions are encouraged (if you think I am right, that is good to know also!) Give a listen, tell a friend. #knowledgeisprotection

Justice Thomas, dissenting from the Court's denial of certiorari in E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Abbott (November 20, 2023), a case in which DuPont asked the Court to review the District Court's application of collateral estoppel. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-13_d18e.pdf   Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts. www.whatscotuswroteus.com

In this riveting interview, Kerry Lutz sits down with Mark Shaw, a prominent JFK assassination investigator, to delve into his groundbreaking research that challenges the official narrative of the JFK assassination and sheds light on the enigmatic death of journalist Dorothy Kilgallen. 1. Dorothy Kilgallen's Career and Involvement: Mark Shaw provides a comprehensive overview of Dorothy Kilgallen's illustrious career as a journalist and her significant role in investigating JFK's assassination. Kilgallen's relentless pursuit of the truth led her into a complex web of conspiracy and intrigue. 2. New Revelations and Corruption within the Warren Commission: Shaw exposes startling new revelations and government corruption surrounding the Warren Commission's investigation into JFK's assassination. He uncovers how key commission members were handpicked by President Lyndon B. Johnson and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to support the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. Dissenting opinions were systematically ignored and destroyed. 3. Dorothy Kilgallen's Connection to Carlos Marcello: Shaw delves into Kilgallen's investigation into JFK's assassination and her connection to Carlos Marcello, a powerful mafia figure with a motive to eliminate JFK due to his brother Bobby Kennedy's relentless pursuit of organized crime. The interview unveils new information from Morris Wolfe, who knew Kilgallen, providing further evidence that her knowledge may have cost her life. 4. Government Cover-Up and Destruction of Evidence: Shaw discusses the alarming concerns of Senator Richard Russell and Senator John Sherman Cooper, both disturbed by the cover-up and destruction of crucial evidence during the Warren Commission's investigation. The interview underscores the extent of government corruption that plagued the probe. 5. Reopening the Case of Dorothy Kilgallen: In a thought-provoking conclusion, Lutz and Shaw ponder the possibility of reopening the case of Dorothy Kilgallen, believing that her untimely demise was a result of her relentless pursuit of the truth surrounding JFK's assassination. This discussion leaves viewers with haunting questions about the hidden depths of this enduring mystery. Mark Shaw's research challenges the official narrative of JFK's assassination and brings to light a dark world of government corruption and intrigue. This interview is a must-watch for anyone interested in uncovering the truth behind one of the most significant events in American history and the mysterious death of Dorothy Kilgallen. Visit Mark's site to find out more: Mark Shaw Books Visit Kerry here: FSN

Justice Jackson, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, dissenting from the denial of certiorari in a case involving an Eighth Amendment challenge to a prisoner's conditions of confinement: Johnson v. Prentice (2023). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-693_21p3.pdf   Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts. www.whatscotuswroteus.com  

Welcome to the Friday Op-Ed.  Today, I discuss the gap in the cybersecurity realm that is cyber leadership.  Dissenting opinions are always welcome at darren@thecyburguy.com or at linkedin.com/in/darremott. Have a great weekend.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the leading cause of death of infants in the United States. The US has the highest infant mortality rate in the industrialized world.  And yet the cause of  SIDS is unknown? The the late Dr. David Denton Davis has noted the correlation between toxic chemicals in vaccines and SIDS and autism for years. Join the discussion about his two books and his experiences of dissenting from corporatized medicine with Kathleen and Cynnea Davis.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ninth Circuit correspondent Cory Webster joins us to discuss the court's unusually busy en banc docket and its own species of “shadow docket.” We discuss how parties and judges are moving a few hot-button cases into procedural positions that may suggest what the merits decision will be—but without really touching the merits.We discuss:Gun Rights: The 9th Circuit used a “comeback” procedure to send a case back to the same en banc panel that heard the case before the Supreme Court's new Bruen test. The Procedural Trick: Judge Nelson says this “disenfranchises” other circuit judges who will be cut out of any say on how the old panel approaches the new Bruen test.Abortion Rights: After a 3-judge panel granted a stay motion, thus staying a district court injunction of Idaho's abortion ban, the 9th Circuit voted to rehear the matter en banc, and thus re-implemented the district court's injunction (meaning abortions may go forward despite the law). The Procedural Trick: Now that the en banc has taken up the motion, it will likely hold on to the case on the merits, too. That means expedited briefing and decision, and no possibility of further en banc review.En banc review granted where the 3-judge panel vacated a sentence because a prosecutor breached a plea a greement.En banc review denied, despite 11 judges (very close to a majority) who would have granted.Cory Webster's biography and LinkedIn profile.Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal's weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext's newest technology, CoCounsel, the world's first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.Other items discussed in the episode:Gun Rights: Duncan v. Bonta, No. 23-55805, at *6 (9th Cir. Oct. 10, 2023)Judge Van Dyke's cheeky “concurrence” to his own majority decision last year in McDougall v. County of Ventura. (Ep. 26.)Suspended Judge Newman Discusses Her 'Proclivity of Dissenting' at ABA EventUnited States v. Idaho, No. 23-35440 (9th Cir. Sep. 28, 2023)United States v. State, No. 23-35440 (9th Cir. Oct. 10, 2023)Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal's YouTube channel.

TODAY ON THE ROBERT SCOTT BELL SHOW: Alex Berenson mRNA concerns, Dr. Jason Dean, BraveTV, Censorship, Media hit piece, Homeopathic Hit - Staphysagria, Gut dysbosis, Silver Aloe protocol, Ureaplasma questions, Aspartame warning, Jared St. Clair, Vitality Nutrition, Fact vs Fiction, Dissenting voices, Hypothyroidism and MORE! http://www.robertscottbell.com/natural-remedies/alex-berenson-mrna-concerns-dr-jason-dean-bravetv-censorship-media-hit-piece-homeopathic-hit-staphysagria-gut-dysbosis-silver-aloe-protocol-ureaplasma-questions-aspartame-warning-jared-st/

Thank you for listening to the CyBUr Smart Morning News Update. I am dedicating Fridays to an Op-Ed style podcast.  The topic for this Friday is Cybersecurity Conferences:  Are we solving anything with all of these conferences?  Can we do better?  We should! Probably not a popular opinion, but that is why it is an Op-Ed. Dissenting opinions are welcome at darren@thecyburguy.com or at linkedin.com/in/darrenmott.  You can also read my substack at: https://open.substack.com/pub/cyburguy/p/cyber-conferences-they-are-everywhere?r=1g38xq&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

In this special episode of the CAFE Insider podcast, Joyce Vance interviews Michael Dreeben, while Preet is out. Dreeben served in the Solicitor General's office for over 30 years, including 24 years as the Deputy Solicitor General in charge of the federal government's criminal docket. He is one of only eight people to have ever argued over 100 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. In this excerpt from the show, Dreeben discusses the rightward shift of the Supreme Court and the justices' high-profile rulings from the 2022-2023 term on issues including race, LGBTQ+ rights, and student loans. In the full episode, Dreeben breaks down: – Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's impact during her first term on the Court; – Dissenting opinions written by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, which they read aloud from the bench; and – Cases on the Court's docket for next term. Stay informed. For analysis of the most important legal and political issues of our time, become a member of CAFE Insider. Get 40% for the first year with discount code JUSTICE. Head to: www.cafe.com/insider. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast, and other exclusive content. Discount valid through July 2023.  This podcast is brought to you by CAFE Studios and Vox Media Podcast Network.  Check out other CAFE podcasts: Now & Then, Up Against The Mob Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this week's ASK ME ANYTHING, Ryan Michler takes on your questions from Instagram. Hit Ryan up on Instagram at @ryanmichler and share what's working in your life.  ⠀ SHOW HIGHLIGHTS   (0:00) Episode intro⠀ (3:20) When you have a lot on your plate, how do you keep your sanity and your family in tact? (8:20) Will I ever see you again on the mats in Maine? (9:20) Is there a book you would recommend, along with the Bible, to help with your walk as a Christian? (10:25) How is sobriety and how can I support your journey? (13:30) How do you think people build community when people tend to keep opposing views as far away as possible? (19:00) How do you start a t-shirt printing business without using amazon or bulk ordering? (23:40) How are you dealing with losing your marriage at this early stage? (32:50) How do I allow myself grace when trying to start something new? (40:00) Do you ever find it hard to find motivation? Do you ever want to quit doing your podcast? (42:00) How did you get your son into lifting? (46:00) How do you cope with the “I'm to old to start over” thoughts?     Battle Planners are back in stock. Pick yours up today!   Get your signed copy of Ryan's new book, The Masculinity Manifesto   For more information on the Iron Council brotherhood.   Want maximum health, wealth, relationships, and abundance in your life? Sign up for our free course, 30 Days to Battle Ready

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #LondonCalling: Dissenting the Coronation.  @JosephSternberg @WSJOpinion https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sunak-backs-police-after-criticism-of-heavy-handed-coronation-arrests-tl2g0skc0

Florida Congresswoman Kat Cammack details committee testimony yesterday showing emails between then CDC Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Director of the NIH Dr. Francis Collins, calling for the quick and “devastating takedown” of Doctors who signed on to the Great Barrington Declaration, which dissented from official government COVID protocol and recommendations in 2020. The NIH Director saying in the emails, that these doctors were “getting out of control, and getting too much traction.” The Declaration was signed onto by “a Nobel Prize winner.” As well, as “thousands and thousands of epidemiologists, doctors, and scientists… and the fact that you have not only proof of this communication, where [Fauci and Collins] say there needs to be a quick and devastating takedown of this group, but then that same language pops up months later on March 8, 2021 in communications between the Biden administration and Twitter executives. That right there is the connection of why it is so dangerous, this collusion between big government and big tech, and how then this became the premises, the pretext for the takedown and suppression of dissenting opinions on social media platforms.” The Congresswoman explaining that she “guarantees there are people out there who would have thought twice about succumbing to pressure when it came to vaccines, or would have been better prepared and a little bit more knowledgeable had they had access to this. But instead, that information was suppressed.”See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.