Podcasts about Guthrie

Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke — 21 years with the Bureau, former Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — breaks down two of the biggest cases in the country across three distinct segments.The Nancy Guthrie suspect: Dreeke argues the endless criticism of amateur execution misses the point. The cheap backpack, awkward holster, improvised camera cover — that's not unusually sloppy. That's baseline criminal behavior. Hollywood has created unrealistic expectations. The cases that get solved look exactly like this. The messy execution and four-week evasion are both within normal range.The Nancy Guthrie investigation: federal sources accusing Sheriff Nanos of blocking evidence access, DNA routed to Florida instead of Quantico, crime scene released before the FBI secured it, public contradictions about basic facts. Dreeke's assessment: this is what multi-agency investigations actually look like. The friction exists on every major case. It just stays invisible when no one's watching. National scrutiny creates impossible standards.The Kouri Richins trial: five days of testimony have produced competing narratives. The prosecution's star witness Carmen Lauber claims she bought fentanyl for Kouri — but she was using meth, got immunity from three jurisdictions, and her supplier now contradicts her. Kouri has maintained composure through all of it. Dreeke identifies the behavioral indicators that reveal reliability despite credibility problems, reads Crozier's reversal, assesses Kouri's sustained performance, and addresses when behavioral evidence becomes more persuasive than missing physical evidence.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RobinDreeke #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #FBI #SavannahGuthrie #EricRichins #BehavioralAnalysis #DeceptionDetection #HiddenKillers

FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke spent 21 years with the Bureau, including serving as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. His job was reading people — understanding what behavior reveals about who someone actually is. In this three-part conversation, he applies that lens to two of the biggest cases in the country.On the Nancy Guthrie suspect: the criticism of his apparent amateurism misses the baseline. The cheap backpack, awkward holster, improvised camera cover — that's not unusually sloppy. That's what most offenders look like. Pop culture has created unrealistic expectations. Real crimes are messy. The cases that get solved look exactly like this. We just don't run cable coverage on them.On the Nancy Guthrie investigation: federal sources accusing the sheriff of blocking access, evidence routed to a private lab, a crime scene released before the FBI secured it, public contradictions about basic facts. The assumption is unique dysfunction. Dreeke's counter: this is normal. Multi-agency friction exists on every major case. National scrutiny creates impossible standards.On the Kouri Richins trial: the prosecution's star witness has credibility problems — meth use, immunity deals, a supplier who now contradicts her. Kouri has maintained composure through five days of testimony describing her alleged murder of her husband. Dreeke identifies the behavioral signals that reveal who's telling the truth despite the noise. He reads Crozier's reversal. He assesses Kouri's sustained performance. And he addresses when behavioral evidence becomes more persuasive than the physical evidence that's missing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RobinDreeke #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #FBI #SavannahGuthrie #EricRichins #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #DeceptionDetection

The calls to remove Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos have grown louder since the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie thrust his department into the national spotlight. But the people demanding action may not realize how few options actually exist. Nanos won reelection by just 481 votes in 2024. The Board of Supervisors has requested two separate outside investigations. Deputies within his own department voted no confidence. And yet, under Arizona law, removing an elected sheriff between elections is one of the hardest things to accomplish in American government.In this episode, we lay out the three paths that theoretically exist and explain why each one hits a wall. A recall election would require over 121,000 verified signatures collected in just 120 days — a logistical mountain with no existing infrastructure to support it. Criminal prosecution has been explored twice through Attorney General referrals, with one investigation closing without charges and the other producing no public action. And impeachment, the mechanism people invoke most often, simply does not apply to county officers under the Arizona Constitution. The legislature cannot impeach a sheriff. The governor cannot remove a sheriff. The Board of Supervisors cannot remove a sheriff. This is a constitutional reality rooted in Arizona's founding principles, and it affects every county in the state.Whether you support Nanos or want him gone, this episode is about the system — what it allows, what it doesn't, and what that means for the Guthrie investigation and beyond.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCountySheriff #TrueCrimeToday #RecallElection #ArizonaLaw #SheriffRemoval #SavannahGuthrie #Tucson #LawEnforcement

Sheriff Nanos says one thing. Federal sources say another. The evidence went to Florida instead of Quantico. The crime scene was released before the FBI secured it. The doorbell footage timeline is disputed. For four weeks, the Nancy Guthrie investigation has been criticized as uniquely dysfunctional. Robin Dreeke — who spent 21 years inside the FBI — says this is what most investigations look like. The dysfunction isn't unusual. The visibility is.Dreeke served as Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He's been inside multi-agency cases where jurisdictional friction, evidence disputes, and contradictory public messaging were the norm, not the exception. The only difference with Guthrie is scale of attention. Every decision gets second-guessed in real time. Every contradiction gets amplified. Every resource shift gets interpreted as surrender.The specific criticisms have been constant. Reporters photographed blood on Nancy's front stoop before federal agents secured the property. The home was released, then re-warranted multiple times. DNA samples at the private lab have reportedly hit "challenges." Federal sources accused Nanos of blocking evidence access. Nanos pushed back publicly. Neither side has clarified the footage timeline dispute.Dreeke addresses whether any of this actually impacts outcomes — or whether it's the kind of friction that exists on every major case but usually stays invisible. When Pima County scales back to core detectives and the FBI moves operations to Phoenix, does that signal failure? Or is it the standard transition when an initial surge doesn't produce an arrest? The answer depends on understanding what baseline investigative dysfunction actually looks like.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #RobinDreeke #FBI #ChrisNanos #PimaCounty #HiddenKillersLive #Investigation #TrueCrime #TucsonKidnapping

The endless analysis of the Nancy Guthrie suspect has focused on his apparent amateurism — the cheap backpack, the bad holster placement, the improvised camera obstruction. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke offers a corrective: this is what most criminals look like. We've just been conditioned by fiction to expect something else.Dreeke spent over two decades with the Bureau, including serving as Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He's seen the full spectrum of criminal operations — from trained intelligence officers to desperate opportunists. And most of what he's seen looks closer to this than to anything Hollywood produces.The expectation gap matters because it affects how everyone — investigators, media, public — interprets evidence. When footage doesn't match the fictional standard, people assume something's unusual. They look for explanations that aren't there. They misread desperation as stupidity or luck as skill.Dreeke addresses the uncomfortable reality that sloppy execution doesn't always mean quick capture. This suspect has evaded identification for four weeks despite massive resources, a $1.3 million reward, and round-the-clock national coverage. That's not necessarily sophistication. It might just be circumstance. But distinguishing between the two requires understanding what baseline criminal behavior actually looks like — and that baseline is far messier than most people realize.From his counterintelligence background, Dreeke explains what a genuinely professional operation would have done differently. The gap between tradecraft and what's on the Guthrie footage is real. But that gap exists in almost every case. This one just has cameras on it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #FBI #BehavioralAnalysis #CriminalBehavior #TucsonArizona #Kidnapping #HiddenKillers

Two significant cases warrant examination through listener-driven inquiry: the Nancy Guthrie disappearance and the Kouri Richins murder prosecution.The Guthrie investigation presents persistent questions four weeks post-disappearance. Despite substantial evidence collection—doorbell footage of a suspect, DNA from gloves recovered two miles from the scene, over fifty thousand tips—no identification has occurred. Questions address survival probability given the absence of ransom demands or contact, the genetic genealogy pathway for non-CODIS DNA matches, tip processing methodology at extreme volumes, the implications of failed pacemaker signal detection, and the statistical improbability of complete anonymity despite widespread facial image distribution.The Richins trial requires dual-perspective analysis given the competing narratives presented.Prosecution elements include: Carmen Lauber's testimony regarding four fentanyl transactions; Eric Richins' statements to family expressing belief that Kouri was attempting to poison him; a prior illness incident in Greece; digital evidence including searches for luxury incarceration facilities and lie detector protocols; detection of Kouri's prescription medication in Eric's system; and toxicology showing fentanyl at five times lethal concentration.Defense elements target foundational weaknesses: Lauber's admitted methamphetamine use during the relevant time period; evolving testimony that introduced fentanyl only after investigators disclosed cause of death; her supplier's sworn recantation; interrogation video showing investigators instructing Lauber to provide details ensuring conviction; nineteen negative fentanyl tests on household items; untested medication on the nightstand; destroyed potential evidence through dishwasher processing; missing interview recordings; and multi-year delays in evidence collection.The analytical questions address whether circumstantial prosecution evidence can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt when physical evidence shows significant gaps, and whether defense arguments regarding witness credibility and investigative deficiencies create sufficient reasonable doubt.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #CaseAnalysis #ListenerQA #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #InvestigativeAnalysis #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrimeLaw #DualCaseExamination

Chris Nanos won reelection as Pima County Sheriff by 481 votes. His own Board of Supervisors has twice requested outside investigations into his conduct. Deputies voted no confidence. He placed his political opponent on administrative leave weeks before the election. And now, with the Nancy Guthrie disappearance making national headlines every day, calls for his removal have intensified to a level rarely seen in county-level law enforcement. But what would it actually take to remove him from office before 2028?In this episode, we go beyond the frustration and into the actual legal mechanisms that exist — and don't exist — for removing an elected sheriff in Arizona. We break down the recall process and the math that makes it a near-impossibility: roughly 121,825 valid signatures in 120 days across a sprawling county of over a million people. We examine two Attorney General investigations, one already closed without charges and another that has gone silent. And we explain why the most commonly demanded solution — impeachment — is constitutionally off the table for county officers in Arizona.Drawing on the Arizona Constitution, the 2025 Arizona Supreme Court ruling in Sanchez v. Maricopa County, and the documented record of supervisors' attempts to hold Nanos accountable, this episode reveals a structural reality most people never consider. Arizona's framers designed a system to protect elected officials from political removal. That same system now makes meaningful accountability between elections nearly impossible. Whether you're following the Guthrie investigation or simply want to understand how much power an elected sheriff actually holds, this is the episode that answers the question everyone is asking.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #ArizonaConstitution #RecallElection #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SheriffAccountability #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonAZ

The crime scene was released before the FBI fully secured it. Evidence went to a private Florida lab instead of Quantico. Federal sources accused the sheriff of blocking access. There's been public contradiction about basic facts — even whether the doorbell images were captured on one day or two. For four weeks, the assumption has been that this investigation is uniquely dysfunctional. Robin Dreeke has worked inside the Bureau. His take: this isn't the exception. This is the rule. We just don't usually have a nation watching.Dreeke spent 21 years with the FBI, including serving as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He's been inside multi-agency investigations. He knows what the friction looks like behind closed doors. And what's playing out publicly in the Guthrie case — the tension between federal and local, the evidence routing disputes, the contradictory statements to press — that exists on almost every major case. It just stays invisible because no one's paying attention.The criticism has been relentless. Reporters photographed blood on Nancy's front stoop before the FBI secured the property. The home was released, then re-warranted, then searched again multiple times. DNA went to a private lab while federal sources questioned the decision. Pima County said one thing about the footage; CNN and ABC reported sources saying another. The FBI hasn't clarified.Dreeke addresses whether any of this actually rises to dysfunction — or whether national scrutiny creates an impossible standard that no investigation could meet. The resource drawdown, the operations moving to Phoenix, the home being returned to the family — it looks like surrender. But Dreeke explains what these moves actually signal from inside the system.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #RobinDreeke #FBI #PimaCounty #ChrisNanos #Investigation #TucsonKidnapping #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Two cases. One show. All your questions.The Nancy Guthrie investigation has hit four weeks with no arrest. A suspect captured on camera that nobody can identify. Fifty thousand tips and nothing actionable. DNA on gloves that didn't hit any database. A pacemaker signal that searchers couldn't find. You've been asking if Nancy's still alive, how someone stays invisible when their face is everywhere, what happens next with the DNA, and when cases like this go cold. We're addressing all of it.The Kouri Richins murder trial is a war between two narratives—and you've got questions about both.The prosecution says Kouri poisoned Eric with fentanyl for money and her boyfriend. Carmen Lauber says she bought the drugs. Eric said he thought Kouri was trying to kill him. There's Greece. There's the internet searches. There's his medication in her blood. Five times the lethal dose.The defense says Carmen was high on meth the whole time she's describing. Her story changed. Her supplier says he never gave her fentanyl. Detectives told her to give them details that "ensure conviction." Nineteen items tested—all negative. No pill bottle tested. No glasses collected. Missing recordings. Evidence gathered years too late.Is the prosecution's case strong enough? Is the defense's reasonable doubt real? Can you convict someone of poisoning when you can't prove the poison existed?Your questions on Guthrie. Your questions on both sides of Richins. No guests, no filter.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #ListenerQA #HiddenKillers #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #TucsonMissing #RichinsTrial #YourQuestions #TrueCrime

Two cases that have been dominating your questions. Today we're going through all of them—live.Nancy Guthrie: Four weeks missing. Suspect on camera. Fifty thousand tips. DNA on gloves. No identification. No arrest. Is she alive? How does someone stay unidentified when their face has been broadcast everywhere? What happens with the DNA? When does this go cold?Kouri Richins: Murder trial in full swing. Prosecution and defense telling very different stories.The prosecution has Carmen Lauber saying she bought fentanyl for Kouri four times. They have Eric's own words that he thought his wife was trying to kill him. An incident in Greece. Internet searches for luxury prisons. Kouri's medication in Eric's blood. Five times the lethal dose of fentanyl.The defense has Carmen admitting she was high on meth the entire time period. Her story changing. Her supplier now saying he never gave her fentanyl. Video of detectives telling her to give them details that "ensure conviction." Nineteen items tested for fentanyl—all negative. The pill bottle never tested. The glasses washed. Missing recordings. Evidence collected years after death.Does the prosecution have enough to convict? Does the defense have enough to acquit? Can you prove poisoning when you can't prove the poison?Your questions on Guthrie. Your questions on both sides of Richins. Live answers.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#GuthrieRichinsLive #ListenerQA #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #LiveTrueCrime #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #YourQuestions #TucsonMissing #RichinsTrial

The Nancy Guthrie case presents an investigative profile that defies conventional analysis. Four weeks after the 84-year-old's disappearance, investigators have substantial evidence—doorbell footage of a suspect, DNA recovered from gloves found two miles from the scene, over fifty thousand tips, and $1.3 million in combined rewards—yet no identification has been made and no arrest has occurred. The questions accumulating around this case warrant serious examination.The DNA recovered from the gloves did not produce a CODIS match. The investigative pathway forward likely involves genetic genealogy, but that process carries its own timeline considerations. How long does IGG typically take? What factors accelerate or delay results? Meanwhile, the volume of tips—fifty thousand—raises processing questions. What systems handle that volume? How are tips prioritized? Is it possible a credible lead remains buried in the queue?Nancy Guthrie's pacemaker contains Bluetooth technology with a detection range of approximately two hundred yards. Aerial searches specifically targeted that signal and found nothing. The implications vary: subterranean location, signal-blocking materials, device failure, or distance beyond search parameters. Each possibility carries different investigative and outcome implications.The suspect footage has received extensive media distribution, yet no identification has resulted. The statistical improbability of complete anonymity despite clear facial images raises questions about the suspect's social circumstances, geographic origin, or current status.Additional questions address the mixed DNA profile found inside the residence, the methodology used to dismiss ransom notes as opportunistic frauds, the timeline considerations for case status changes, and whether pattern analysis has connected this case to other incidents involving elderly victims or home invasions in the region.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #InvestigativeAnalysis #CriticalQuestions #GuthrieCase #TucsonMissing #DNAEvidence #GeneticGenealogy #MissingPerson #TrueCrimeLaw #CaseAnalysis

Fifty thousand tips. A million-dollar reward. A suspect's face broadcast nationwide. And four weeks later—nothing. No identification. No arrest. No Nancy. You've been asking questions about the Nancy Guthrie case, and honestly, they're the same questions we've been asking ourselves. So let's get into it.Is Nancy Guthrie still alive? What does a month of silence with no ransom demand tell us? The DNA on those gloves didn't hit in CODIS—what's the next step? Genetic genealogy? How long does that take? How does law enforcement even process fifty thousand tips? Is it possible the real lead is buried somewhere in that pile and nobody's gotten to it yet?Nancy's pacemaker has a Bluetooth signal detectable from over two hundred yards. Helicopters searched for it. Found nothing. What does that mean? And the footage—it shows this man's face clearly. How is it possible that not a single person on earth recognizes him?The mixed DNA inside the residence raises questions about multiple contributors or contamination. The ransom notes were dismissed as fakes sent by opportunists. The neighborhood has cameras everywhere, yet no vehicle was captured. Could he have moved her on foot? Is there a property nearby he had access to?At what point does a case like this go cold? What resources get pulled? What can the family even do at this point? And the speculation online about connections to other cases—other missing elderly women, other home invasions in Arizona—has anyone looked at whether this could be part of a pattern?Your questions. Our thoughts. No guests, no filter.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #GuthrieQA #QuestionsAnswered #TucsonMissing #HiddenKillers #MissingPerson #GuthrieCase #TrueCrime #ListenerQuestions #FindNancyGuthrie

Four weeks into the Nancy Guthrie investigation and the questions keep piling up. You've been sending them in—about the DNA, the footage, the fifty thousand tips, the pacemaker, the silence. Today we're going through them. No guests. Just your questions and our breakdown of what the evidence tells us.Is Nancy still alive? That's the question nobody wants to ask out loud. A month with no ransom demand, no credible sighting, no contact from whoever took her. What does that level of silence actually indicate?The gloves recovered two miles from the house had DNA from an unknown male. It didn't match anyone in CODIS. Are investigators running genetic genealogy? How long does that process take? And in the meantime, how does law enforcement process fifty thousand tips? Is the real lead buried somewhere in that mountain?Nancy has a pacemaker with a Bluetooth signal that helicopters searched for. They found nothing. What does that tell us about where she might be—or whether the pacemaker is still functioning?The footage shows the suspect's face clearly. It's been broadcast everywhere. How is it statistically possible that nobody has recognized him? Not a coworker, not a neighbor, not a single family member? The mixed DNA inside the residence, the fake ransom notes, the affluent neighborhood with no vehicle captured on any camera—we're breaking down what each piece means and what questions remain unanswered.Your questions. Live answers. Let's get into it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrieLive #GuthrieQA #LiveTrueCrime #YourQuestions #TucsonMissing #GuthrieCase #ListenerQuestions #MissingPerson #FindNancy #HiddenKillersLive

Amy and T.J. go over the latest details on the disappearance of 84 year old Nancy Guthrie, exactly one month since she was reported missing by her family. Despite multiple “ransom notes”, the surveillance footage, and the emotional pleas from the Guthrie’s investigators say they are now “refocusing resources.” On this anniversary, the question remains, will we ever know what happened to Nancy Guthrie?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy and T.J. go over the latest details on the disappearance of 84 year old Nancy Guthrie, exactly one month since she was reported missing by her family. Despite multiple “ransom notes”, the surveillance footage, and the emotional pleas from the Guthrie’s investigators say they are now “refocusing resources.” On this anniversary, the question remains, will we ever know what happened to Nancy Guthrie?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy and T.J. go over the latest details on the disappearance of 84 year old Nancy Guthrie, exactly one month since she was reported missing by her family. Despite multiple “ransom notes”, the surveillance footage, and the emotional pleas from the Guthrie’s investigators say they are now “refocusing resources.” On this anniversary, the question remains, will we ever know what happened to Nancy Guthrie?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The 10 Worst Investigative Failures in the Nancy Guthrie Case FBI Investigation The investigative mistakes that set the Guthrie case back. Identifying the subject in the ring camera video. Lack of investigative leadershipo, and cohesion. Poor coordination Pima County Sheriff and the FBI. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Amy and T.J. go over the latest details on the disappearance of 84 year old Nancy Guthrie, exactly one month since she was reported missing by her family. Despite multiple “ransom notes”, the surveillance footage, and the emotional pleas from the Guthrie’s investigators say they are now “refocusing resources.” On this anniversary, the question remains, will we ever know what happened to Nancy Guthrie?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

La Casa Blanca confirma que había ciudadanos estadounidenses en la lancha en Cuba. El Expresidente Bill Clinton testifica ante el congreso en el caso Epstein. EE.UU. ofrece 10 millones de dólares por "El Rana" y "Aquiles". EE.UU. autoriza salida de personal no esencial de Israel. Nuevo video en investigación sobre desaparición de Guthrie. Restringen permiso de trabajo a nuevos solicitantes de asilo. Ponte al día con lo mejor de ‘La Edición Digital del Noticiero N+ Univision' con Carolina Sarassa y Borja Voces.        

Megyn Kelly begins the show by calling out Bill Clinton ahead of his forced deposition related to Jeffrey Epstein, revisiting his long history of connections to Epstein, his obvious lies and spin in public statements over the past couple months, and more. Then Mike Benz, Executive Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, joins to discuss the critical gaps in the Jeffrey Epstein files between 1999 and 2001, why Epstein's earlier Bear Stearns years are critical to understanding the whole picture, why full declassification of CIA and State Department records is essential to understand Epstein's role and relationships, claims that Alex Acosta said Jeffrey Epstein “belonged to intelligence,” what Acosta has said publicly since, why Epstein's intel connections are so crucial to understanding the truth about him, and more. Then Jim Fitzgerald and Maureen O'Connell, former FBI agents, join to discuss Savannah Guthrie's latest Instagram plea emphasizing that the cash reward can be claimed anonymously, whether her appearance was strategically crafted to appeal directly to the abductors, new Ring camera footage showing a white car leaving Nancy Guthrie's neighborhood around the estimated time of her disappearance, conflicting reports about whether the vehicles could be connected to the case, and more. Then Megyn dives into Megan Rapinoe trashing Team USA men's hockey for taking a call from President Trump, her critique of Kash Patel being in the locker room, her constant hate and hypocrisy, the wild story of a top SCOTUS lawyer gambling millions and now going to jail, and more.   Benz- https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber O'Connell- https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/best-case-worst-case/id1240002929 Fitzgerald- https://www.youtube.com/@ColdRedPodcast-tb2lb/featured   Done with Debt: https://www.DoneWithDebt.com & tell them Megyn Kelly sent you! SaunaSpace: Discover why SaunaSpace's infrared FireLight tech is redefining at‑home wellness—visit https://Sauna.Space/MEGYN and use code MEGYN for 10% off your entire order. PureTalk: Tired of big wireless prices? Switch to PureTalk for unlimited talk and text for $25/month—dial #250 and say MEGYN KELLY for 50% off your first month. Birch Gold: Text MK to 989898 and get your free info kit on gold     Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKelly Twitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShow Instagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShow Facebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow  Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

EP900: Bryan and Krissy discuss the recent unrest in Mexico, the Guthrie case and ....Blue?? The dog that doesn't quit makes her 900th appearance on the 900th episode of TCB!  Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

A man has just ben arrested at Nancy Guthrie's home, as prosecutors set to turn over her house back to the Guthrie family. Denise Richards ordered to pay Aaron Phypers in divorce dispute. Plus, Michael Rapaport is here to dish on the Traitors Finale and Reunion! Become a Member of No Filter: ALL ACCESS: https://allaccess.supercast.com/ Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A man has just ben arrested at Nancy Guthrie's home, as prosecutors set to turn over her house back to the Guthrie family. Denise Richards ordered to pay Aaron Phypers in divorce dispute. Plus, Michael Rapaport is here to dish on the Traitors Finale and Reunion!    Become a Member of No Filter: ALL ACCESS: https://allaccess.supercast.com/    Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio    Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi   Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb 

New video of car overnight near Guthrie home; Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifies in Epstein investigation; American citizen among victims in Cuba boat shooting, U.S. officials say; and more on tonight's broadcast. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Two cases demanding psychological analysis. One expert providing the answers.Nancy Guthrie has been missing for three weeks. Her kidnapper hasn't communicated once—no demands, no ransom, no proof she's alive. The silence is total. What does it mean?Eric Richins reportedly told people his wife was trying to poison him. He took protective measures—lawyers, insurance changes, asset protection. Then he stayed married to her. Prosecutors allege Kouri killed him with fentanyl after multiple attempts.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins True Crime Today for comprehensive analysis of both cases. With over thirty years working with victims and perpetrators of violence, Scott examines what the behavioral evidence reveals.On Guthrie: The psychology of kidnappers who don't communicate. In hostage situations, silence isn't neutral—it's evidence. What does three weeks of nothing suggest about the perpetrator's psychology and the case's trajectory?On Richins Part 1: Inside the mind of a partner who allegedly chooses murder. How does killing become the "rational" choice? We analyze the language, the method, and the alleged performance of grief that followed.On Richins Part 2: The victim's experience. Why someone might take protective steps but not leave. How the isolation of an unbelievable suspicion keeps victims trapped. What warning signs others should recognize.This is the full interview—expert psychological insight into criminal silence, partner homicide, and the forces that make the unthinkable happen.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ShavaunScott #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalPsychology #KidnapperSilence #SpouseMurder #VictimPsychology #DomesticHomicide

This wasn't a professional job. The evidence says so.The suspect visited Nancy Guthrie's home before the night she disappeared. When he came back, he didn't know about the doorbell camera. Tried to disable it and failed. Grabbed weeds to cover the lens. That's improvisation. That's someone who thought they had it figured out—and didn't.If this was a burglary that turned into something the perpetrator never intended, what's waiting for them on the other side?Eric Faddis spent years as a felony prosecutor before becoming a defense attorney. He's seen cases like this from both sides of the courtroom. And he's clear about what this person faces.Arizona's felony murder statute doesn't care about intent. If someone dies during the commission of a burglary, that's murder. Add concealment of a body. Add twenty-five days of hiding while the FBI chases 55,000 tips. Add the consciousness of guilt that comes from staying silent while a family begs for answers.The legal exposure is already severe. It gets worse every day.Faddis breaks down what voluntary surrender actually buys—if anything. He explains the difference between coming forward now and getting caught through genetic genealogy later. He addresses the impossible position the defense is in when the body is missing: they can't prove accidental death because their client hid the evidence.And he talks about what happens beyond criminal court. The Guthrie family has resources. Wrongful death is a separate track.For someone sitting with this, Faddis lays out the realistic range. Where cooperation leads. Where getting caught without cooperation leads. The window between those two outcomes is narrowing.This is the legal reality of what's coming.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #FelonyMurder #HiddenKillers #SavannahGuthrie #ArizonaLaw #TrueCrime #BurglaryGoneWrong #CriminalDefense #LegalExplainer

Two cases that defy easy explanation. One expert who can illuminate what the rest of us can't grasp.Nancy Guthrie's kidnapper has maintained complete silence for three weeks. No contact with investigators. No response to the family's desperate pleas. No ransom demand. Just nothing. What does that absence of communication reveal about who has her and what they want?Kouri Richins allegedly chose to kill her husband rather than divorce him—poisoning Eric with fentanyl after allegedly making multiple attempts. But Eric reportedly knew something was wrong. He told people. He consulted lawyers. He took protective measures. And he stayed.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott provides comprehensive psychological analysis of both cases in this full-length interview. With over thirty years working with victims and perpetrators, Scott examines what behavioral evidence tells us.On Guthrie: The psychology of kidnappers who don't communicate. Is the silence strategic? Reactive? Is the act itself the point? What does prolonged silence typically suggest about outcomes?On Richins Part 1: Inside the mind of a partner who allegedly chooses murder. The internal logic that makes killing feel rational. The method of poisoning. The performance of grief that allegedly followed.On Richins Part 2: The victim's psychology. What it's like to suspect your spouse might kill you. Why protective measures don't always mean leaving. What friends and family should recognize as warning signs.This is expert analysis you won't hear anywhere else—three distinct psychological examinations in one comprehensive interview.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillers #CriminalPsychology #KidnapperSilence #SpouseMurder #VictimPsychology #TrueCrime

The clock is running for whoever took Nancy Guthrie.Twenty-five days of silence. Twenty-five days of hiding while genetic genealogy labs work through samples and investigators canvass every gun shop in Arizona with photos of that holster. Twenty-five days of exposure compounding.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins us live to break down exactly what the person responsible is facing—and why the decision they make in the next days or weeks will determine the rest of their life.If this was a break-in that ended with a death the perpetrator didn't intend, Arizona law doesn't offer much comfort. Felony murder means intent doesn't matter. A death during a burglary is a murder charge. Full stop. Concealment of the body is a separate crime. So is evidence tampering. So is flight.Faddis explains what surrendering now actually buys versus getting caught later. Walking in with a lawyer and the location of Nancy Guthrie's body is a different conversation than getting pulled in after a DNA hit. One gives the defense something to negotiate with. The other lets prosecutors argue consciousness of guilt to a jury.The problem: whoever hid Nancy also hid the evidence that could support their own defense. If the claim is "I didn't mean to kill her," how do you prove it when there's no body to examine? Both sides are stuck on cause of death—and that's the defendant's fault.We're also covering the civil side. The Guthrie family has resources. Wrongful death doesn't require a conviction. It's a separate track, and it's coming regardless.Bring your questions. Faddis is answering them live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #FelonyMurder #SavannahGuthrie #LivePodcast #ArizonaLaw #TrueCrime #CriminalDefense #LegalAnalysis

Two of the biggest cases demanding psychological analysis—covered in one comprehensive interview with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott.Nancy Guthrie's kidnapper hasn't said a word in three weeks. No ransom. No demands. No proof of life. The family has begged publicly for any contact. The silence in return has been absolute. What does that mean? What kind of mind takes an 84-year-old woman and refuses to engage?Kouri Richins allegedly chose murder over divorce, poisoning her husband Eric with fentanyl. But Eric reportedly suspected what was happening. He told people. He consulted lawyers. He changed his insurance. And he stayed married to her anyway.Shavaun Scott joins Hidden Killers Live for extended analysis of both cases. With thirty years working with violent offenders and victims, Scott provides the psychological framework these cases demand.On Guthrie: What does criminal silence reveal? When kidnappers don't communicate, what does it tell us about their psychology and intent?On Richins Part 1: How does murder become the "solution"? The internal logic of partners who allegedly choose to kill. The unique psychology of poisoning as a method.On Richins Part 2: Why victims stay with partners they suspect are dangerous. The isolation of unbelievable suspicions. What warning signs others should recognize.Join us live for comprehensive expert analysis—three psychological deep dives in one interview you can't afford to miss.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillersLive #LiveCoverage #CriminalPsychology #SpouseMurder #KidnapperSilence #TrueCrime

On this episode of America at Night with McGraw Milhaven, former DEA Chief of International Operations Mike Vigil detailed the growing reach and sophistication of Mexican cartels, discussing trafficking networks, border security challenges, and the broader national security implications. Next, Matthew McGuire, former U.S. Executive Director of the World Bank, analyzed the latest developments on tariffs, explaining how trade policies are affecting markets, global relationships, and American consumers. Then, Dr. John Baick, professor of history at Western New England University, addressed the fallout from the Guthrie abduction case, focusing on how online accusations have left one family “scared numb,” and what the situation reveals about digital rumor, public reaction, and due process in the social media age. The show wrapped with Bill Clevlin, founder of billontheroad.com, who joined for the weekly travel segment to share stories and insights from his latest journeys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Authorities arrested a 34-year-old man outside Nancy Guthrie's home after he failed a field sobriety test. This as neighbors are find new doorbell camera footage showing multiple vehicles in the area on the night of Guthrie's abduction. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

I speak with retired FBI Agent Brad Garrett in episode #898 of The ANEZ SEZ podcast...

The FBI is reducing its personnel in Tucson and moving its command post to Phoenix as the search for 84‑year‑old Nancy Guthrie enters its fourth week, though investigators stress they are not scaling back the case. With no new work needed at Guthrie’s home, agents are now focused on analyzing 1,500+ tips, DNA evidence, receipts, and security footage as the investigation becomes more analytical. Please Like, Comment and Follow 'Philip Teresi on KMJ' on all platforms: --- Philip Teresi on KMJ is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever else you listen to podcasts. -- Philip Teresi on KMJ Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 AM & 105.9 FM KMJ | Website | Facebook | Instagram | X | Podcast | Amazon | - Everything KMJ KMJNOW App | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Three weeks of silence. No ransom. No demands. No proof of life. Nancy Guthrie's abductor has refused all communication since taking the 84-year-old woman—and that silence is the most revealing evidence we have.The ransom notes investigators received came from opportunists, not the actual perpetrator. Whoever has Nancy Guthrie has made no attempt to leverage her existence for anything at all. No engagement with law enforcement. No response to her family's televised pleas. Just silence.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Hidden Killers Live to break down what this means in real time. With over thirty years working with violent offenders, Scott examines the psychology of kidnappers who don't communicate, who take without demanding, who disappear without negotiation.In hostage situations, communication is currency. It's the mechanism perpetrators use to get what they want. When that mechanism goes unused, what does it tell us? Is this person hiding? Did they panic? Is the silence itself a form of control—maximizing the family's suffering by giving them nothing to hold onto?The Guthrie family has publicly offered to pay whatever is asked. They've begged for any sign their mother is alive. They've received nothing. What does that mean for this case? What does prolonged silence typically suggest about outcomes?Join us live as we unpack the behavioral evidence, examine what this silence reveals about the perpetrator's psychology, and discuss what the trajectory of this case might look like if the silence continues.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #LiveCoverage #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #KidnappingPsychology #MissingPerson #CriminalBehavior #BreakingNews

Three high-profile cases. One defense attorney breaking down what prosecutors face—and where their cases are vulnerable.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta analyzes the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation, the Kouri Richins murder trial, and the Colin Gray prosecution in this comprehensive breakdown.The Guthrie investigation is in trouble. Day 23 with four hundred investigators and forty thousand tips—but no arrest, no vehicle, DNA stuck for potentially a year. Sources say the massive operation is scaling back. Bob explains what that signals and how every delay becomes defense ammunition.The Richins trial started this week with both sides laying out competing narratives. Carmen Lauber—the housekeeper who claims she sold Kouri fentanyl—has immunity, but her supplier recanted. Eric's friends will testify he said "I think my wife tried to poison me." The 15-minute gap before 911. The orange notebook. Bob analyzes every pressure point.The Colin Gray prosecution pushes legal boundaries. Second-degree murder instead of manslaughter—180 years versus the Crumbleys' 10-15. FBI warning in May 2023. "God, I knew it" on body cam. Georgia has no safe storage law. Bob breaks down how you charge murder when no gun laws were broken—and whether this opens floodgates nationwide.Karen McDonald—the Crumbley prosecutor—said her reaction was "rage." She never meant to create this precedent.Three different cases. Three different legal challenges. Bob Motta knows what prosecutions look like when they're building toward conviction—and what they look like when they're not.Expert analysis with no sugarcoating.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BobMotta #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #ColinGray #TrueCrimeToday #DefenseAttorney #LegalAnalysis #ParentalLiability #DNAEvidence #TrueCrime

Three weeks since Nancy Guthrie was taken. Her kidnapper has said nothing. No ransom demand. No proof of life. No communication of any kind. The silence is absolute—and it's the most important piece of evidence we have.The ransom notes that surfaced weren't from the perpetrator. Investigators believe those came from opportunists trying to exploit the situation. The actual person holding Nancy has maintained complete radio silence since the abduction.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott provides in-depth analysis of what this behavioral pattern reveals. In kidnapping cases, communication is the mechanism perpetrators use to extract what they want. When that mechanism goes completely unused—when someone takes a human being and makes no effort to leverage them—it raises critical questions about psychology and intent.Scott examines the spectrum of possibilities. Silence can indicate someone hiding, afraid of detection. It can mean panic set in and the situation spiraled beyond what they planned. It can suggest the act itself was the goal—taking, controlling, possessing—with no need for anything afterward. Or in the most disturbing interpretation, the silence might be intentional, a way of maximizing the family's suffering by giving them nothing.Nancy's family has done everything right. They've gone public. They've offered to pay any amount. They've pleaded for contact. And they've received nothing in return. What does that mean for Nancy? What kind of mind doesn't respond to a family's desperation?This is essential analysis for anyone following the Guthrie case—expert insight into what the silence tells us and what it might mean for the days ahead.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #NancyGuthrieCase #GuthrieKidnapping #ShavaunScott #KidnapperPsychology #MissingPerson #TrueCrime #CriminalMind #ExpertAnalysis

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta delivers expert analysis on three high-profile cases: the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation stalling at day 23, the Kouri Richins murder trial in week one, and the Colin Gray prosecution that could reshape parental liability law.The Guthrie case has problems. Four hundred investigators, forty thousand tips—no arrest. DNA evidence stuck for potentially a year. Sources say the investigation is scaling back. Bob breaks down what that signals and how a defense attorney would exploit every weakness.The Richins trial is underway with powerful evidence on both sides. Carmen Lauber—the housekeeper who claims she sold Kouri fentanyl—has immunity, but her supplier recanted. Eric's friends will testify he said "I think my wife tried to poison me" eighteen days before his death. The 15-minute gap before the 911 call. The orange notebook. Bob analyzes where this case will be won or lost.The Colin Gray prosecution is precedent-setting. Second-degree murder instead of manslaughter. 180 years versus the Crumbleys' 10-15. The FBI warned him in May 2023. Body cam shows "God, I knew it." Georgia has no safe storage law—so the underlying conduct was legal. Bob explains how you charge murder anyway and whether this opens the floodgates for parental prosecutions nationwide.Karen McDonald—the Crumbley prosecutor—said her reaction to Colin Gray being charged was "rage." She never meant to create this.Three cases representing the full spectrum of criminal defense challenges: a stalled investigation, a trial hinging on compromised witnesses, and a prosecution pushing legal boundaries.Bob Motta's expert breakdown of what's really happening.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BobMotta #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #ColinGray #HiddenKillers #DefenseAttorney #LegalAnalysis #ParentalLiability #DNAEvidence #TrueCrime

The Nancy Guthrie case has entered its most disturbing phase. Three weeks since her abduction, the person who took this 84-year-old woman has communicated nothing. No demands. No ransom. No proof she's alive. Just complete, unbroken silence.Investigators have received ransom notes—but those came from opportunists, not the actual kidnapper. The person holding Nancy has made no effort to leverage her for money, negotiate her release, or even acknowledge they have her.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins True Crime Today to analyze what this behavioral pattern means. In kidnapping cases, silence isn't neutral—it's evidence. When someone takes a human being and refuses to engage, it tells investigators something about their psychology, their motives, and potentially their intent.Scott examines the possibilities. Is this silence strategic calculation? Post-crime panic? Or something more disturbing—an offender for whom the act itself was the point, the taking and controlling, with no need for acknowledgment or external reward?The Guthrie family has made repeated public appeals. They've offered payment. They've pleaded on camera for any sign their mother is alive. The response has been nothing. What kind of person remains unmoved by those pleas? What does that tell us about who has Nancy and what they want?This episode provides expert psychological analysis on the most critical question in the Guthrie case: what does three weeks of silence mean—and what does it suggest about what comes next?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #TrueCrimeToday #ShavaunScott #KidnappingCase #CriminalPsychology #MissingPerson #TrueCrime #CaseUpdate #PsychologistAnalysis

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins us live to break down three major cases: the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation, the Kouri Richins murder trial, and the Colin Gray prosecution.The Guthrie case is stalling. Twenty-three days in—no arrest, no vehicle, DNA stuck in a lab for potentially a year. Sources say the investigation is scaling back from four hundred personnel to a small task force. Bob explains what that drawdown signals and how every delay becomes ammunition for the defense.The Richins trial is underway with opening statements complete. The prosecution's key witness has immunity but her supplier recanted. Eric's friends will testify he said "I think my wife tried to poison me" eighteen days before his death. The 15-minute gap before the 911 call. The orange notebook. Bob analyzes where this five-week trial will be decided.The Colin Gray prosecution could change parental liability forever. Second-degree murder instead of manslaughter—180 years versus the Crumbleys' 10-15. The FBI warned him in May 2023. Body cam shows "God, I knew it." No gun laws were broken. Bob breaks down how you charge murder when the underlying conduct was legal.Each case presents different challenges: Can genetic genealogy save an investigation with compromised DNA? Can a defense create doubt when the dead man told friends his wife tried to poison him? How do you prove murder without proving any law was broken?Bob Motta has watched prosecutions build and collapse. Join us live for his expert analysis of where each case stands—and what's coming next.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BobMotta #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #ColinGray #LiveStream #DefenseAttorney #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime #ParentalLiability #HiddenKillers

Today on the show: updating the U.S./Iran talks in Geneva with Natalie Brand from CBS News and Jordana Miller in Jerusalem. Brad Garrett from ABC News updates the Guthrie case. Is online betting getting out of control? Rory O'Neill reports. Plus, tickets to see The Eagles and The Black Crowes! 9am-noon on 95.5 WSB.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Headlines:  – Welcome To Mo News (02:00) – State of the Union Address (05:15) – Savannah Guthrie Releases New Video Offering $1 Million Reward (22:15) – US Lifts Shelter-In-Place in Mexico, But Travel Advisory Remains (26:15) – Canada Summons OpenAI Reps Over School Shooting Suspect's ChatGPT Account (28:30) – Spirit Airlines Plans To Slash Flight, Fleet In Bid To Emerge From Bankruptcy As Early As Spring (31:45) – Drink Coffee To Prevent Dementia? It's Not So Far Fetched (34:15) – On This Day In History (38:30) Thanks To Our Sponsors:  –⁠ Industrious⁠ - Coworking office. 50% off day pass | Code: MONEWS50 – Incogni - 60% off an annual plan| Code: MONEWS – Monarch - 50% off your first year | Code: MONEWS – Factor - 50% off your first box | Code: monews50off – ShipStation - Try for free for 60 days | Code: MONEWS – Shopify – $1 per-month trial | Code: MONEWS – Aura Frames – $35 off Carver Mat Frame | Code: MONEWS

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump touts record and slams Democrats in marathon State of the Union speech, while Democrats protested by staying mostly silent in the room.  The FBI says that new tips have been generated since Nancy Guthrie's family raised the reward to $1 million.  GOP Rep. Tony Gonzales tells CNN that he will not resign amid allegations of an affair with a senior staffer who later died by suicide. Plus, a high school swim team raised $17,000 for a beloved custodian.   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Megyn Kelly is joined by Andrew Klavan, host of "The Andrew Klavan Show," to discuss leftists melting down over Trump's mild joke about the women's USA Olympic hockey team during his men's team call, the absurd charges of sexism about the men's team, the modern left's aversion to patriotism, bizarre praise of Eileen Gu who is competing for China and loves praising herself, shocking incident at BAFTAs involving a Tourette outburst and racism accusations, the truth about Tourette Syndrome, NYC thugs attacking NYPD officers with snowballs, Mayor Mamdani making a joke and referring to "kids" doing it, and more. Then Will Geddes, James Hamilton, and Eric O'Neill, security experts and former law enforcement officers, join to discuss bombshell reports that images of the mystery man at Nancy Guthrie's house are from different nights, the sheriff again refusing to confirm or deny it, what it would mean if the individual was there before the abduction, the new Savannah Guthrie Instagram video revealing Nancy was “taken from her bed,” her decision to up the reward to as much as $1 million, signs the family may be losing hope, a new theory emerging about how Nancy Guthrie could have been removed from her home, new reporting on blood droplets both outside and inside the home house, why multiple people might have been involved, and more.     Klavan- https://www.youtube.com/@AndrewKlavan Geddes- https://www.icpgroupcompanies.com/index.html Hamilton- https://www.hamiltonsecuritygroup.com/ O'Neill- https://ericoneill.net/books/spies_and_lies/   Joi + Blokes: Go to http://joiandblokes.com/MK and use code MK for 65% off your labs and 20% off all supplements PureTalk: Tired of big wireless prices? Switch to PureTalk for unlimited talk and text for $25/month—dial #250 and say MEGYN KELLY for 50% off your first month. Herald Group: Learn more at https://GuardYourCard.com Done with Debt: https://www.DoneWithDebt.com & tell them Megyn Kelly sent you!     Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKelly Twitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShow Instagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShow Facebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow  Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Savannah Guthrie just posted an emotional 4 minute video offering up to $1 million for the recovery of her 84 year old mother Nancy, who has been missing since February 1st. Amy and T.J. play part of her impassioned plea for information where we hear for the first time, Savannah acknowledge that her mom may “already be lost, she may already be gone.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.