The Legal Bytes Podcast is a legal education and commentary podcast grown out of the YouTube channel LegalBytes, which is aimed at making the law more accessible, relatable, and fun for the everyday person. Alyte's goal is to educate people on the law so they can understand the world around them better, make better-informed decisions, and ultimately live their best lives. So come check it out!! 👩ðŸ¼â€âš–ï¸ðŸ½ðŸ’™

⭐️ Don't forget to visit our sponsor Sintra.ai at https://sintra.ai/legalbytes or use the promo code legalbytes at checkout to enjoy an exclusive limited-time 72% discount on all plans. ⚖️ Need a lawyer? Check out the Bytes Law Group here! https://bytes.law TikToker/Instagramer Tamieka Goode moved into a bank-owned mansion worth $2.3 million in Bethesda, Maryland. After she was already convicted of trespassing by squatting at the place, she posted bond for an appeal and immediately returned to the same house. She's since been arrested again for the same crimes, this time triggered by her post-conviction return to the property. But the thing is, this is just the tip of the iceberg with Ms. Goode... TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 3:41 Background 9:56 "Residency Status" 11:10 Adverse Possession 13:15 Defendant's New Attorney 16:00 Defendant's Civil Litigation Record 16:54 Pro Se Litigation Coach 23:10 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⚖️ Need a lawyer? Check out the Bytes Law Group here! https://bytes.law Logan Paul claims Coffeezilla isn't a journalist under Texas law. This is important because, if the court agrees, Coffeezilla can't use the journalist's privilege to protect thousands of documents that Paul wants from him. In this video, we're going over why Paul is wrong. Logan Paul v. Coffeezilla Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgK-q-z8tbezUbVTHPMGmXc CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He then took down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but then, on June 27, 2024, he sued him anyway. Interestingly enough, this was after Logan Paul was sued (along with a number of other defendants) by a group of CryptoZoo investors in a class action case alleging fraud and 26 other causes of action. TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 2:04 The Filings 3:00 Texas's Journalist Privilege, Explained 11:26 Logan Paul's Arguments 16:09 LP's Argument No. 1 24:10 LP's Argument No. 2 31:50 LP's Argument No. 3 34:56 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ You can go to my sponsor https://aura.com/legalbytes to try 14 days for free. That's enough time for Aura to start scrubbing your personal info off these data broker sites, without you lifting a finger. Thanks again to Aura for sponsoring this video! ⚖️ Need a lawyer? Check out the Bytes Law Group here! https://bytes.law In this video, we're talking about Logan Paul's Reply in support of his Motion to Preserve Confidentiality of his deposition. Not only does the Reply not really help his already weak case, but his lawyers do some things that could potentially backfire... Link to Fifth Circuit's opinion in Hoa Le v. Exeter Fi. Corp. (the part in the video started around page 9 of the opinion): https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/20-10377/20-10377-2021-03-08.html Logan Paul v. Coffeezilla Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgK-q-z8tbezUbVTHPMGmXc CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He then took down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but then, on June 27, 2024, he sued him anyway. Interestingly enough, this was after Logan Paul was sued (along with a number of other defendants) by a group of CryptoZoo investors in a class action case alleging fraud and 26 other causes of action. TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 2:53 Motion Practice Explainer 6:00 The Filings Here 6:31 The Reply's Weak Arguments 7:46 Why This Should Be Such a Clear Failure for Logan Paul 12:50 The Potential Backfire - Twisting the Judge's Words 21:00 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

In the Logan Paul / Coffeezilla defamation lawsuit, Logan Paul is desperately trying to keep his entire deposition out of the public eye. Not only does Paul have bad arguments for this, but Coffeezilla may have just laid some heavy hints as to what, exactly, Paul is so worried about regarding his deposition. Logan Paul v. Coffeezilla Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgK-q-z8tbezUbVTHPMGmXc CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He then took down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but then, on June 27, 2024, he sued him anyway. Interestingly enough, this was after Logan Paul was sued (along with a number of other defendants) by a group of CryptoZoo investors in a class action case alleging fraud and 26 other causes of action. TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 1:10 Logan Paul's Motion to Preserve Confidentiality of the Deposition 2:21 Coffeezilla's Opposition 6:45 Response to Paul's First Argument 8:23 Response to Paul's Second Argument 13:22 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Use code "legalbytes" at https://incogni.com/legalbytes to get an exclusive 60% off. Thanks again to Incogni for sponsoring this video! In this video, we're talking about how Logan Paul's previous dismissal of the CryptoZoo class action case actually ended up strengthening the investors' fraud case against him. CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He then took down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but then, on June 27, 2024, he sued him anyway. Interestingly enough, this was after Logan Paul was sued (along with a number of other defendants) by a group of CryptoZoo investors in a class action case alleging fraud and 26 other causes of action. TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 1:04 Why a Defendant Might Not Want to Dismiss a Complaint 5:12 The Plaintiffs' Changes to the Fraud Claim in the SAC 6:05 The Problems with the Previous Fraud Claim 6:42 Materiality 15:03 Reliance 17:57 What Do YOU Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Get an EXTRA 5% discount on NordProtect plans. Go to: https://nordprotect.com/legalbytesprotect and use the code legalbytesprotect at checkout. Thanks again to NordProtect for sponsoring this video! Logan Paul v. Coffeezilla Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgK-q-z8tbezUbVTHPMGmXc This Is the Evidence Logan Paul Was Panicking About | LAWYER EXPLAINS: https://youtu.be/YDzW8NtaMlc CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He then took down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but then, on June 27, 2024, he sued him anyway. Interestingly enough, this was after Logan Paul was sued (along with a number of other defendants) by a group of CryptoZoo investors in a class action case alleging fraud and 26 other causes of action. TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 1:30 Brief Recap 1:45 Logan Paul's Deposition 5:53 Paul's First Argument 9:40 Paul's Second Argument 19:19 Paul's Third Argument 24:15 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Thanks to Huel for sponsoring this video! Get 15% off Huel's newest and existing products by heading to https://huel.yt.link/wAqRvGZ and using code LEGAL (new customers only, min $75 purchase). --------- In this video, we're talking about the dismissal of the CryptoZoo investors' class action lawsuit against Logan Paul. TMZ and others reported that this was an "official" close to the lawsuit and that this meant that the court concluded that "no reasonable juror could find Logan Paul's statements misleading or fraudulent." But that's simply not true. CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He then took down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but then, on June 27, 2024, he sued him anyway. TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 1:04 Explaining the Legal Procedure 4:13 The Report & Recommendation for Logan Paul's Motion to Dismiss 6:13 The TMZ Article 8:06 What the R&R Actually Says 12:30 Why the Claims Were Actually Dismissed 12:45 Suing as an Individual vs Corporate Agent 14:33 Piercing the Corporate Veil 15:22 Other Claim Categories 15:43 The Fraud Claim 22:09 How This Impacts the Coffeezilla Defamation Case 26:22 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ To get 84% off and 4 months free, go to https://www.cyberghostvpn.com/legalbytes right now! Thanks again to CyberGhost VPN for sponsoring this video! In this one, we go over a motion that Coffeezilla filed where he argues that Logan Paul's reputational harm was really caused by... Logan Paul. Specifically, he argues that he should be able to bring in the traditional media (as well as Jake Greenbaum and Eddie Ibanez) as responsible third parties who started talking about the CryptoZoo scandal after Logan Paul's "Thank You Coffeezilla" video. CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. TIME STAMPS: 00:00 Introduction 1:19 The Motion in a Nutshell 6:15 The Legacy Media 9:12 Eddie Ibanez and Jake Greenbaum 10:16 What the Law Says 15:45 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Use code "legalbytes" at https://incogni.com/legalbytes to get an exclusive 60% off. Thanks again to Incogni for sponsoring this video! In this video, we talk about some updates in the Logan Paul v. Coffeezilla defamation case, as well as some (relatively) recent highlights from the CryptoZoo class action lawsuit. Specifically, the class action plaintiffs got a series of pieces of bad news over the summer. But, in the midst of that bad news, the court gave an explanation that seems to hint at some hope, at least for Coffeezilla's defamation defense. CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 1:07 The Bad News 8:27 The Hint at Some Possible Good 9:46 The Defamation Case 10:47 How Do We Define "Scam"? 14:28 "Actual Fraud" 16:22 Why This Is Important 19:25 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Use code legalbytes at https://incogni.com/legalbytes to get an exclusive 60% off. Thanks again to Incogni for sponsoring this video! In this video, we're going over the latest discovery fight between Logan Paul and Coffeezilla (which really shouldn't even be happening, tbh). Coffeezilla recently noticed depositions for three CryptoZoo investors, and Logan Paul's legal team is demanding that the depositions be in-person, even though the witnesses live halfway around the world and can't afford to fly to Texas, AND even though the parties have already done some other depositions remotely via Zoom. TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 3:26 Coffeezilla's Motion to Conduct Video Depositions 7:54 Logan Paul's Anticipated Arguments 9:12 Why This Is Stupid 11:07 What Do You Think? CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Get your $5 sign-up bonus at http://privacy.com/legalbytes . You can use it on your first purchase! Privacy has a free plan with no transaction fees for domestic purchases. Protect your financial identity online with virtual cards. Thanks again to Privacy for sponsoring this video! In this video, we're talking about how Logan Paul may have just painted himself into a corner in his defamation case against Coffeezilla. Paul is seeking discovery from third party Don Holland (the class representative in the CryptoZoo class action case), and now, in order to get what he wants from Holland, he's going to need to help prove Coffeezilla's point in arguing that the two lawsuits should be tried in the same venue. Playlist on the controversy: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgK-q-z8tbezUbVTHPMGmXc TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 0:51 Logan Paul's Motion to Compel Discovery from Don Holland 6:31 Coffeezilla's Motion to Transfer & Stay 8:36 The Elements of Defamation 10:41 Issue Preclusion 13:52 What Do You Think? CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. ------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

Recently, Logan Paul tried to keep some evidence out of the public eye and under a protective order, calling it "irrelevant" and intended only to "harm and embarrass" him. However, that evidence was just revealed in recent filings, and, it's not great for Paul. In this video, we're going over the newly revealed evidence. Playlist on the controversy: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgK-q-z8tbezUbVTHPMGmXc Video Referenced: Graham Bensinger, “5 Months with Logan Paul [Full Episode]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUrQrwgiZ_Y TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 1:49 Background 3:36 Motion Pleadings Generally 5:46 The Motions Involved in This Issue 7:53 Coffeezilla's Whistleblower Claim 14:56 The SEC and FBI Investigations 18:04 What Do You Think? CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

In this video, we're talking about the privacy notices issued by Logan Paul against various channels for content in their videos talking about Paul's text messages, which came to light in the Logan Paul v. Coffeezilla defamation case. Videos Referenced: ➡️ Logan Paul Is TAKING DOWN Videos EXPOSING Him? [Extremely SERIOUS] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8cnLvMEkXA ➡️ Logan Paul THREATENS to SUE ME & DESTROY my CAREER?! Lionel Messi Lawsuit just got SERIOUS! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RjS90y1O38&t=322s CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 0:59 Logan Paul's Privacy Notices 4:35 Logan Paul's Unopposed Motion to Partially Seal 6:39 What's Likely Going On Here 10:10 Improper Disclosures Do Happen 10:55 Best Practices to Avoid Privacy Notices with Legal Documents 15:48 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Use code legalbytes at https://incogni.com/legalbytes to get an exclusive 60% off! Thanks again to Incogni for sponsoring this video! In this video, we're talking about the Logan Paul v. Coffeezilla defamation case, and specifically how Logan Paul has now accused Coffeezilla of using his Motion to Transfer Venue as an improper vehicle to argue later that certain evidence, currently labeled confidential under the case's Protective Order, should be released to the public. Paul says it's intended to humiliate and prejudice him. Playlist on the controversy: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgK-q-z8tbezUbVTHPMGmXc CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 1:10 Background 4:48 Protective Orders 6:52 Logan Paul's Motion to Preserve Confidentiality 10:16 The Protective Order 11:43 How Logan Paul Might Get Confidential Documents Released 13:12 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐ Thanks again to iFLYTEK for sponsoring this video! Get ready for Amazon Prime Day! Grab the iFlytek Smart Recorder for just $199.99. Visit https://amzn.to/3WsfLlN and save an extra $20 with IFLYTEK20. Prefer our website? Visit https://store.iflytek.com/products/iflytek-smart-recorder?utm_source=kol&utm_medium=youtube&utm_campaign=LegalBytes and use KOLSpecial for the same great discount. Don't miss out! In this video we go through the highlights of the Complaint from the lawsuit where Logan Paul is suing Coffeezilla for defamation for statements Coffeezilla allegedly made related to Logan Paul's failed NFT project, Cryptozoo. See our first video on this! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcyZVV3QjpU CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. TIME STAMPS: 0:00 Introduction 1:24 Background 4:28 Logan Paul 8:23 Coffeezilla 9:16 Coffeezilla's Video Series on Cryptozoo as a Scam 13:35 Coffeezilla's Follow-up Videos on Cryptozoo and Logan Paul's Refund 16:57 Logan Paul's Defamation Claims 18:48 Elements of Defamation 23:16 The Actual Malice Element of Defamation 27:14 The Only Play Logan Paul Has to Show Actual Malice 30:39 Logan's Strongest Texts for His Argument 32:06 The Three Alleged Defamatory Statements 35:18 Statement Number 1 38:51 Statement Number 2 42:12 Statement Number 3 47:08 The Biggest Reason This Is a Bad Idea - The Magic of Discovery 51:39 What Do YOU Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this video, we're talking about some of the latest developments in the Logan Paul v. Coffeezilla defamation lawsuit (related very closely to the CryptoZoo class action lawsuit against Logan Paul and the others who created the CryptoZoo NFT). Coffeezilla is requesting to move the case from federal court in San Antonio, TX to Austin, TX so it can be litigated more closely with the CryptoZoo class action case. On the way, he revealed some Logan Paul texts that appear to confirm Logan Paul's true motives in suing Coffeezilla. Playlist on the controversy: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgK-q-z8tbezUbVTHPMGmXc CONTEXT: After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos here: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 1:14 Background 2:48 The Timing of the Defamation Lawsuit 5:15 Coffeezilla's Motion to Transfer Venue 7:29 Logan Paul's "True Motives" for Suing Coffeezilla 8:51 Logan's Improper Discovery Attempts 12:58 Logan's Scummy Texts 16:08 Why These Texts Might Destroy Logan's Case at Trial 20:17 What Do YOU Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

In this video we go over the controversy between Logan Paul and Coffeezilla. After Coffeezilla exposed Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, as well as Andrew Tate's "Hustler Club," he turned his sights on Logan Paul's crypto NFT project, Cryptozoo. See his videos below: Investigating Logan Paul's Biggest Crypto Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386p68_lDHA The Biggest Fraud in Logan Paul's Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvzyDg40-yw Ending Logan Paul's Biggest Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fugWMBwCg In response, Logan Paul posted a short video to his main channel, Logan Paul, in which he threatened Coffeezilla with a defamation lawsuit. He followed this with an episode of his podcast, Impaulsive, where he repeated the same threat. He has since taken down both videos and reached out to Coffeezilla to inform him that he's no longer pursuing litigation--but he still may have opened himself up to liability along the way, nonetheless. TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 0:47 Background 1:40 Cryptozoo and Coffeezilla's Exposé 6:04 Why a Defamation Lawsuit Would've Been Disaster for Logan Paul 10:35 Coffeezilla's Litigation Options 10:51 Anti-SLAPP Motion 12:49 The Magic of Discovery 15:21 Other Legal Trouble for Logan 15:50 Negligent Hiring 23:49 Statements about Other People 24:17 Statements about Coffeezilla 29:10 Statements about Emilio 30:32 Statements about Z Developer 35:00 Last Thoughts To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this video we go into the latest installment of the long saga of Logan Paul and the alleged victims of his NFT project, CryptoZoo. Recently, Logan announced a buy-back program for Base CryptoZoo NFTs. However, when we look at some of the finer points in this program, we can find at least FIVE hidden traps that any claimants NEED to be aware of. TIME STAMPS: 00:00 Introduction 00:45 Background 4:41 The Five Hidden Traps 4:56 Trap No. 1 5:31 Trap No. 2 6:24 Trap No. 3 8:32 Trap No. 4 9:17 Trap No. 5 12:58 Why Logan Paul Is Doing This Refund 15:15 What Do YOU Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

⭐️ MasterClass has great offers this holiday season. If you use my link, you'll get up to 50% off an annual subscription. Head over to https://masterclass.yt.link/CFmu6bF for the current offer and they'll know I sent you! ------------------------ ⚖️ Need a lawyer? Check out the Bytes Law Group here! https://bytes.law In this video, we're talking about the TikToker/DoorDash girl, Olivia Henderson, who accused a customer of SA'ing her when she dropped off a food delivery at his house, because she found him lying on his couch in his living room unclothed from the waist down. The problem is, her characterization isn't exactly accurate, and the decisions she's made since that encounter have already led to some legal consequences—and could lead to even more. TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 1:08 Background 6:49 Was This SA? 11:29 What She Did Wrong 16:06 Criminal Charges 19:17 Potential Civil Claims 23:42 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Get the Exclusive Tinggly Deal: Use code LEGAL for 20% off all experience and hotel gift boxes at https://tinggly.com/legalbytes. Order by December 16th to get your physical box in time for the holidays!! Thanks again to Tinggly for sponsoring this video!! DoorDash Girl, aka Olivia Henderson, recently made her first court appearance, where she pled not guilty. Although it's not all that surprising to enter a plea like this at the very beginning, if she's doing it because she insists she's the victim, she's in for a rude awakening. First Video on DoorDash Girl: https://youtu.be/6GfCWFftDSA TIME STAMPS: 00:00 Introduction 1:48 Background 4:10 The Arraignment 5:18 The Charges 5:28 Dissemination of Unlawful Surveillance 5:47 Unlawful Surveillance 6:30 Element 1 - Intentional surreptitious recording of another 6:57 Element 2 - Person recorded was had intimate parts revealed 7:36 Element 3 - Person had reasonable expectation of privacy 8:41 Element 4 - Recorded person without their knowledge or consent 9:44 Element 5 - Recorded the person for the amusement, entertainment, or profit of another, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing the person 14:02 Her Two Options 14:26 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Get an EXTRA 5% discount on NordProtect plans. Go to: https://nordprotect.com/legalbytesprotect and use the code legalbytesprotect at checkout. Thanks again to NordProtect for sponsoring this video! In this video, we're talking about the crazy case of Alison Gu, aka Alison Ling and around nine other aliases. She not only defrauded banks of over a million dollars, but then, when caught, decided she wasn't done with fraud/scams yet. When it came time to trial, her lawyer realized her client had hired seven actors to play in "roles" as witnesses. You can't make this up... TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 00:45 Background 1:19 The Fraud 4:34 Gu's Icharus Moment 8:15 The Trial 10:43 Ineffective Assistance of Counsel 19:33 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

In this video, we're talking about what happened when a small TikToker who goes by the name Vanessa Tabares accused YouTube megastar Ray William Johnson of not only being her secret father, but also for abandoning her and her mother during the pregnancy. And, we're going over how this could give rise (easily) to a defamation claim. TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 3:04 Background 6:17 The Details of Tabares' Allegations 7:19 Johnson's Response 11:31 Elements of Defamation 12:47 Applying the Elements 18:48 Possible Defense? 21:13 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Thanks to Henson Shaving for sponsoring this video! Head to https://hensonshaving.yt.link/GdfZ3PV and use code legalbytes to receive 100 blades for free (2+ years worth). Just make sure both products are in the cart for the code to take effect. This is the story of Erik Conover, whose YouTube channel is @erikvanconover . After he was arrested for a high speed chase and running over a police officer on the way, he tried to cheat the system by faking a mental illness to escape accountability. When his plan was foiled (by himself), he ended up getting sentenced to 4-10 years in prison (all because he wouldn't pull over for speeding 20 mph over the limit). TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 1:06 Background 3:39 Mental Health 6:18 The Incident 8:09 The Initial Charges 8:31 Insanity Defense 13:30 Trial Outlook 15:41 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Try Rocket Money for free: https://RocketMoney.com/legalbytes Thanks again to Rocket Money for sponsoring this video! In this video, we're talking about the influencer Keith Castillo, also known as @povwolfy across his socials, who has recently been on a nationwide campaign handing out booze, cigarettes, and machetes to homeless people for clicks. Here's why he might see legal consequences (both civil and criminal) as a result. To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- Follow me here! X: https://x.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------

⭐️ Get the Exclusive Tinggly Deal: Use code LEGAL for 33% off all experience and hotel gift boxes at https://tinggly.com/legalbytes. Move quickly to secure this 33% discount as it drops to 25% next week!! Thanks again to Tinggly for sponsoring this video!! In this video, we're talking about a recent jury verdict that compelled defendant Starbucks to pay plaintiff Michael Garcia $50 million for injuries Garcia sustained after a Starbucks employee failed to secure hot tea when handing it off to Garcia at the drive-thru window. Was this excessive, or is Garcia entitled to every penny, considering the extent of his injuries?

In this video, we go over a lawsuit recently filed against Logan Paul and KSI's Prime Hydration. Specifically, the manufacturer that Prime contracted with to make Prime over the next three years is suing Prime for $68 million. Is this story a sign of pending doom for the future of Prime? TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 1:18 The Quick Summary of the Allegations 1:53 What Happened 8:10 How Prime Allegedly Breached the Contract 10:57 Possible Missing Facts? 13:48 Why Basic Contract Principles Protect Refresco 17:25 What Do YOU Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this video we're going over a new lawsuit filed by the US Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC) against Logan Paul's Prime. CONTEXT: While Team USA kicks off their best attempts at the 2024 Paris Olympics, the US Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC) is suing Logan Paul's Prime for "blatant" trademark infringement. It comes from Prime's partnership with basketball star Kevin Durant, who is currently at the Olympics to represent the United States in Team USA's basketball team. TIME STAMPS: 0:00 Introduction 2:10 Trademarks Explained 5:41 Trademark Licensing 8:05 What Prime Is Doing Wrong 12:01 Likelihood of Consumer Confusion 12:55 Why It's Such a Big Blunder for Prime 14:13 What Do YOU Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

⭐️ Thanks again to Care/of for sponsoring this video. For 50% off your first Care/of order, go to https://bit.ly/42Esanq and enter code LEGALBYTES50! OceanGate's Titan submersible caught the attention of the world during its final voyage to the Titanic wreckage when it went missing in late June 2023. After news broke that it likely experienced a catastrophic implosion, it didn't take long for people to ask about the legal fallout. Can the families sue? What about liability waivers? Here's what you need to know. TIME STAMPS 00:00 Introduction 1:23 Background 6:16 Liability 9:05 Fraud 11:23 Marketing 13:55 OceanGate's Messaging 19:00 What Did OceanGate Know? 23:16 The Whistleblower 24:18 The Complaint 29:30 Stockton Rush 30:45 Risk Tolerance 33:11 What Do You Think? To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're continuing with coverage of the sentencing hearing for the convict known as Darrell Brooks. In Day 1, we heard from 46 people giving their victim impact statements. It was heart-wrenching. In Day 2, the hearing begins at 1 pm EST. There are supposedly going to be people speaking on behalf of Darrell Brooks. After this, Judge Dorow will make her determinations as to Brooks' fate on the 70 charges for which she has discretion. The other six convictions (first degree intentional homicide) carry mandatory life sentences in Wisconsin. Joining us: @natalielawyerchick @Runkle Of The Bailey If you would like to donate to the Go Fund Me campaigns to benefit the victims and their families: https://www.gofundme.com/c/act/waukesha-christmas-parade-fundraisers?pc=tw_social&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=bcgfm_tw_fund_Waukesha-Parade -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're watching and commenting on the Darrell Brooks sentencing hearing. This should be a difficult watch (made only more difficult by the courtroom antics by the convicted defendant), as we will be hearing from family members of victims, and (apparently) some friends and/or family members of Darrell Brooks. Link here if you would like to donate to the families of the victims of the Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre: https://www.gofundme.com/c/act/waukesha-christmas-parade-fundraisers?pc=tw_social&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=bcgfm_tw_fund_Waukesha-Parade -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're going over the latest information to come out of the Harvey Weinstein criminal trial and the Danny Masterson criminal trial. Both of them are charged with multiple counts of SA. For more details from Tony Ortega on the Masterson case: Substack: https://tonyortega.substack.com/ YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOTK4ae6wrPbRbYynM95mjA/featured TIMESTAMPS: CONTEXT DANNY MASTERSON: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. HARVEY WEINSTEIN: Harvey Weinstein was one of the first to be accused of SA during the MeToo movement. He is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence following a conviction in New York for SA. In a separate trial in Los Angeles, he has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of r*pe and SA involving CA Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel, and four other women. -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're talking about the latest information to come out about the Harvey Weinstein trial and Danny Masterson trial. For more details from Tony Ortega on this case: Substack: https://tonyortega.substack.com/ YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOTK4ae6wrPbRbYynM95mjA/featured CONTEXT DANNY MASTERSON: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. HARVEY WEINSTEIN: Harvey Weinstein was one of the first to be accused of SA during the MeToo movement. He is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence following a conviction in New York for SA. In a separate trial in Los Angeles, he has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of r*pe and SA involving CA Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel, and four other women. TIMESTAMPS: -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're going over the latest developments that have come out of the Harvey Weinstein and Danny Masterson criminal cases. Come join! If you need support as a victim of SA, here is a link to the National SA Hotline: https://www.rainn.org/resources Tony Ortega's Substack, where you can find detailed transcripts of every court session at trial: https://tonyortega.substack.com/ TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Introduction 13:30 - Harvey Weinstein Trial Update 1:00:00 - Danny Masterson Trial Update CONTEXT DANNY MASTERSON: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. HARVEY WEINSTEIN: Harvey Weinstein was one of the first to be accused of SA during the MeToo movement. He is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence following a conviction in New York for SA. In a separate trial in Los Angeles, he has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of r*pe and SA involving CA Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel, and four other women. -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're talking about the latest updates in the criminal trials against Harvey Weinstein and Danny Masterson. Come join! TIMESTAMPS: CONTEXT DANNY MASTERSON: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. HARVEY WEINSTEIN: Harvey Weinstein was one of the first to be accused of SA during the MeToo movement. He is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence following a conviction in New York for SA. In a separate trial in Los Angeles, he has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of r*pe and SA involving CA Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel, and four other women. -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're talking about what has happened in two criminal trials happening at the same time in Los Angeles, CA: Harvey Weinstein and Danny Masterson. TIMESTAMPS: CONTEXT DANNY MASTERSON: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. HARVEY WEINSTEIN: Harvey Weinstein was one of the first to be accused of SA during the MeToo movement. He is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence following a conviction in New York for SA. In a separate trial in Los Angeles, he has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of r*pe and SA involving CA Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel, and four other women. -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're talking about: - New video released in the murder case against Courtney Clenney p/k/a Courtney Tailor from just two days before she killed her boyfriend, Christian Obumseli - What happened to wrap up Anthony Rapp's SA civil SA case against Kevin Spacey - Danny Masterson's trial began with opening statements, and Scientology is already entering the fray CONTEXT COURTNEY CLENNEY: Courtney Clenney p/k/a Courtney Tailor is an OnlyFans star and Instagram influencer. She was arrested in Hawaii in August 2022 and charged with the murder of her boyfriend Christian "Toby" Obumseli after she killed him with a knife on April 3, 2022 in Miami, Florida. She claims it was self-defense. DANNY MASTERSON: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. KEVIN SPACEY: In 2017, actor Anthony Rapp came forward with SA allegations against actor Kevin Spacey. According to Rapp, back in 1986, the two were at a party in New York City when Spacey allegedly grabbed Rapp's behind, lifted him up, put him on a bed, and rested his body on top of him before making unwanted advances. Rapp sued in September 2020, and trial began on October 6, 2022. -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Membership: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------

In this live stream, we're talking about: - Anne Heche's estate battle - The latest update in the Danny Masterson trial - A new Kat Tenbarge article which claims people are treating Angelina Jolie unfairly by likening her to Amber Heard Come join! NOTE: DHHS National DV Hotline: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/fysb/programs/family-violence-prevention-services/programs/ndvh National DV Hotline: https://www.thehotline.org/get-help/ To call NDVH: 1-800-799-SAFE(7233) To text NDVH: Text "START" to 88788 @Runkle Of The Bailey and @Law & Lumber 's excellently nuanced and sensitive discussion surrounding the Amouranth news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt69pmxY1IY TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 Introduction + Amouranth Statement 13:30 The Battle Over Anne Heche's Estate 32:10 Kat Tenbarge Says Angelina Jolie Is Compared to Amber Heard? 1:11:30 Danny Masterson Jury Gets Screened for Scientology Bias -------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

In this live stream, we're going through the latest in the Danny Masterson trial, the Kevin Spacey Trial, and the Harvey Weinstein trial. CONTEXT DANNY MASTERSON: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. KEVIN SPACEY: In 2017, actor Anthony Rapp came forward with SA allegations against actor Kevin Spacey. According to Rapp, back in 1986, the two were at a party in New York City when Spacey allegedly grabbed Rapp's behind, lifted him up, put him on a bed, and rested his body on top of him before making unwanted advances. Rapp sued in September 2020, and trial began on October 6, 2022. HARVEY WEINSTEIN: Harvey Weinstein was one of the first to be accused of SA during the MeToo movement. He is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence following a conviction in New York for SA. In a separate trial in Los Angeles, he has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of r*pe and SA involving CA Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel, and four other women. -------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

In this live stream, we're going through the latest in the Danny Masterson trial, the Kevin Spacey Trial, and the Harvey Weinstein trial. There is a LOT to cover. TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 Introduction 11:00 Harvey Weinstein Trial 35:00 Danny Masterson Trial 1:14:50 Kevin Spacey Trial CONTEXT DANNY MASTERSON: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. KEVIN SPACEY: In 2017, actor Anthony Rapp came forward with SA allegations against actor Kevin Spacey. According to Rapp, back in 1986, the two were at a party in New York City when Spacey allegedly grabbed Rapp's behind, lifted him up, put him on a bed, and rested his body on top of him before making unwanted advances. Rapp sued in September 2020, and trial began on October 6, 2022. HARVEY WEINSTEIN: Harvey Weinstein was one of the first to be accused of SA during the MeToo movement. He is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence following a conviction in New York for SA. In a separate trial in Los Angeles, he has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of r*pe and SA involving CA Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel, and four other women. -------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

In this live stream, we're talking about the Danny Masterson trial and the Harvey Weinstein trial, both of which pick up today in Los Angeles Superior Court. Although they are entirely separate cases, they deal with similar SA allegations from a number of women. Particularly, we're going to talk about the impact of having a group of people accusing a defendant of SA, as opposed to just one alleged victim. In California, it can make a big difference under the rules of evidence. Are the rules fair to the the defendant? Are they fair to the alleged victim? Let's check it out together. TIMESTAMPS: -------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

In this live stream, we're going over the following topics: - The counter-claims filed by Angelina Jolie in the divorce case between her and Brad Pitt - The settlement of the civil lawsuit filed by the family of Halyna Hutchins against Alec Baldwin and others for the shooting on set the movie Rust - The offer by Elon Musk to buy Twitter amidst a rapidly approaching trial date over his previous backing out of said agreement to buy the platform - A new case taking up by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) to review Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act It's going to be packed and interesting!! Come join!! Joining us: @Uncivil Law @Hoeg Law ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

In this live stream, we're joined by Steve from @Southern Law! We're talking about the latest in all of the Marilyn Manson cases. What's been happening, what does it all mean, and what might we be able to expect moving forward? Come join! CONTEXT: Over the years since 2016, Evan Rachel Wood began speaking publicly about domestic violence, saying she had been abused by two unnamed men. On February 21, 2021, Wood named Brian Warner p/k/a Marilyn Manson as one of her abusers, alleging that he abused her physically and emotionally during their romantic relationship which lasted between 2006 and 2010. On the same day, a handful of other women also made statements claiming to be victims of Warner's abuse. His alleged victims include Ashley Morgan Smithline, Esme Bianco, and Ashley Walters. In June 2022, Ashley Morgan Smithline filed a lawsuit against Marilyn Manson alleging all kinds of abuses against her during a romantic relationship. In March 2022, Marilyn Manson filed a lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood and Ashley Gore aka Illma Gore. In the lawsuit, he alleges four causes of action: defamation per se, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of computer hacking laws, and violation of laws barring impersonation over the internet. TIME STAMPS: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

In this installment of Latest in the Law, we're talking (with @Hoeg Law !) about: - The statement by the authorities in New Mexico hinting that Alec Baldwin and three others might be charged over the death of Halyna Hutchins on the set of the movie Rust - Cardi B easily won her defamation case against Tasha K, winning a judgment of $4M. Now, Tasha K has left for Africa, and Cardi B is working to garnish Tasha K's earnings. Now what? - In 1992, Jeffrey Dahmer was put on trial for murder in Wisconsin v. Jeffrey Dahmer. The case has seen renewed interest over the Netflix show "Dahmer." Let's watch the filmed direct examination of one of the key witnesses responsible for putting Dahmer behind bars. Come join! TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction and WHOOPS! 1:48 A wild Rick appears 2:18 A wild Alyte appears 4:09 The ACTUAL intro 9:19 Cardi B garnishing Tasha K's wages 19:35 Alec Baldwin's likely criminal litigation future 41:42 Dahmer Netflix show and the Dahmer trial 54:38 Dahmer trial: the direct examination of Tracy Edwards ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

In this live stream we're joined by Aaron Smith-Levin from @Growing Up In Scientology ! We're talking all about the criminal and civil cases against the actor Danny Masterson. You might recognize Masterson from his role on That 70s Show. He's also a prominent member of the Church of Scientology. The civil case brought against Masterson also alleges acts by the Church of Scientology in retaliation against them for making their accusations, so there's much to cover! Aaron is a former member of the Church of Scientology, and his channel is dedicated to talking about what it's like growing up in it. He's been covering the Masterson cases closely in addition to other litigation involving prominent members of the Church of Scientology. This should be a very interesting discussion. Come join us! CONTEXT: Danny Masterson is an American actor and prominent member of the Church of Scientology. In February 2017, three women filed SA allegations against Masterson. This prompted the Los Angeles County Police Department (LAPD) to investigate. Within a year, Masterson was fired from his role in The Ranch and let go as a client from United Talent Agency. On August 22, 2019, four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Masterson and Scientology alleging various claims of stalking and harassment in retaliation for making the SA allegations. At the time of this live stream, that case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether the case can go to arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution. On June 17, 2020, Masterson was charged with three counts of r**e by force or fear. At the time of this live stream his case is set to go to trial on October 11, 2022. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

TIME STAMPS: 0:00 Intro 10:15 Nate the Lawyer v. Christopher Bouzy & Bot Sentinel 54:01 Sherri Papini's Interrogation Video - Lawyers React 1:10:11 Tiffany Haddish & Aries Spears - Case Dismissed 1:22:46 Marilyn Manson Litigation Updates Today we're going over a number of topics: - The fast-developing situation between @Nate The Lawyer and Bot Sentinel's Christopher Bouzy. Nate will join to discuss! His legal fund: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=live_chat&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbkg2eWpYY2s5Rnc3UHhVcURYd2Z3NC05QXRFQXxBQ3Jtc0tsVEstNXpVRkRtVFJlM2JlRE1oOHlydWJLSGg1WjBIbmZnalhqZ1RRTnFvRGpiODd0czZCVGlzZ1ZnR1ZuQTVZZU1KUU5VWXBlVTZkVHpETVg4UkhGdjRtS2I1MWw0R2RFUVIzNDloTldQM1plV1F6Yw&q=https%3A%2F%2Fpages.donately.com%2Fnatethelawyer%2Fcampaign%2Fnate-the-lawyer-justice-lawsuit%2F - Sherri Papini (the California mom who was charged with setting up a kidnapping hoax) was convicted the other day, and just yesterday the authorities released the interrogation video where she admitted to some measure of guilt. Let's go over it! - The lawsuit filed against Tiffany Haddish and Aries Spears has been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff. What does that mean? - Marilyn Manson updates: some of the alleged victims (notably, Ashley Morgan-Smithline and Ashley Walters) have been requesting to modify their subpoenas to appear for depositions in the Esme Bianco case. What's happening, what does it mean, and what does it mean for the future of this whole cluster of cases? CONTEXT: SMITHLINE V. MANSON Over the years since 2016, Evan Rachel Wood began speaking publicly about domestic violence, saying she had been abused by two unnamed men. On 2/21/2021, Wood named Brian Warner p/k/a Marilyn Manson as one of her abusers, alleging that he abused her physically and emotionally during their romantic relationship which lasted between 2006 and 2010. On the same day, a handful of other women also made statements claiming to be victims of Warner's abuse. His alleged victims include Ashley Morgan Smithline, Esme Bianco, and Ashley Walters. In 6/2022, Ashley Morgan Smithline filed a lawsuit against Marilyn Manson alleging all kinds of abuses against her during a romantic relationship. In 3/2022, Marilyn Manson, filed a lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood and Ashley Gore aka Illma Gore. In the lawsuit, he alleges four causes of action: defamation per se, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of computer hacking laws, and violation of laws barring impersonation over the internet. -------------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

TIME STAMPS: 0:00 Intro 4:10 Bouzy tea 28:50 Taylor Lorenz's latest article 1:27:30 Adnan Syed from the Serial podcast is now free 1:48:16 Ashley Morgan-Smithline's attorney says she *didn't* fire him. WHAT? Welcome to Legal Tea Tuesday! Today we're going over a few topics: - Adnan Syed, the defendant who was the focus of the true crime podcast "Serial," has just been freed from prison and his murder sentence vacated. The state has 30 days to decide whether to dismiss his case or to set a new trial. - Taylor Lorenz has a new article out on "misogyny on YouTube." She says female creators have a particular target on their backs that men don't. I have thoughts. - Ashley Morgan-Smithline's attorney has filed a response to Brian Warner's (p/k/a Marilyn Manson) opposition to his motion to amend the subpoena for Smithline's deposition. This is the one where Warner's legal team introduced explosive information that implicates Smithline's attorney in some potential professional liability issues. ... And some Bot Sentinel tea. CONTEXT: SMITHLINE V. MANSON Over the years since 2016, Evan Rachel Wood began speaking publicly about domestic violence, saying she had been abused by two unnamed men. On 2/21/2021, Wood named Brian Warner p/k/a Marilyn Manson as one of her abusers, alleging that he abused her physically and emotionally during their romantic relationship which lasted between 2006 and 2010. On the same day, a handful of other women also made statements claiming to be victims of Warner's abuse. His alleged victims include Ashley Morgan Smithline, Esme Bianco, and Ashley Walters. In 6/2022, Ashley Morgan Smithline filed a lawsuit against Marilyn Manson alleging all kinds of abuses against her during a romantic relationship. In 3/2022, Marilyn Manson, filed a lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood and Ashley Gore aka Illma Gore. In the lawsuit, he alleges four causes of action: defamation per se, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of computer hacking laws, and violation of laws barring impersonation over the internet. ADNAN SYED In 1999, Adnan Syed was convicted of murdering his then-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. They both were seniors in high school at the time. In 2014, an investigative journalist by the name of Sarah Koenig published a true crime podcast called Serial, in which she dug into the details of the murder, the investigation, and Syed's conviction. This podcast blew up in popularity, and as a result, a swell of people were calling for an investigation into Syed's conviction. After several unsuccessful attempts to appeal the results (both before and after Serial's publishing), on 9/19/2022, Circuit Court Judge Melissa Phinn vacated Syed's conviction. The state has 30 days to dismiss the case or set a new trial. ----------------- Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join

In this week's installment of Latest in the Law, we're going over four topics! - The new Bot Sentinel report that was just released on 9/13/2022 calling out YouTube channels for alleged misogyny, transphobia, racism, and copyright violations - The Los Angeles County District Attorney's response this week to Marilyn Manson Uncancelled's question about the status of the criminal investigation into Marilyn Manson - The Church of Scientology's appeal to the United States Supreme Court in the civil case brought by the women alleging SA by actor Danny Masterson - The issues of contracts, nondisclosure agreements, and defamation in Ray J's threatened legal action against Kim Kardashian over the infamous tape that made Kim K super famous - And more! Come join us! Along with @Nate The Lawyer @ThatUmbrellaGuy and @Uncivil Law !! TIME STAMPS 0:00 Introduction 5:00 Why Trevor Bauer may be Johnny Depp 2.0 59:30 Marilyn Manson investigation update 1:14:00 Danny Masterson - Scientology's appeal to SCOTUS 1:51:00 Why the new Bot Sentinel report is garbage 3:37:20 Update on Ray J's legal threats against Kim Kardashian Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the latest episode of "Keeping Up with the Kardashians," Kim Kardashian's infamous 15-year-old tape featuring herself and her then-boyfriend Ray J came up after what must have been years of setting aside that event. Ray J has since responded publicly on Instagram and in an interview with the Daily Mail, claiming that MUCH of the predominant narrative about that tape is false, and that he plans to sue Kim K AND her mother Kris Jenner over Kim's most recent comments about it on KUWTK. In this video, we'll go over the *basics* of the background context (without getting into too much detail!

In this live stream we're going over the following topics that have been in the news this week! - Spencer Elden, more famously known as "the Nirvana Baby" has been suing the band Nirvana for the use of his image on their album cover, claiming it's CP and has caused him harm. His case was dismissed, and he's already filed a Notice of Appeal. We'll talk about why the outlook is... a little bleak for him. - Courtney Clenney, p/k/a Courtney Tailor on Instagram and OnlyFans, appeared at a hearing this week, where her attorney argued that evidence should not be made public. It didn't go well for them--here's why. - In the never-ending divorce saga between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, a new surprise: Angelina Jolie claps back at Brad Pitt in filing counterclaims against his complaint and amended complaint filed earlier this year. Let's go over the details to see what this means. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this video we're going over the latest filings in the case filed by Esme Bianco against Brian Warner p/k/a Marilyn Manson. In that case, Manson's attorneys have been trying to depose Ashley Morgan Smithline. Ms. Smithline is a plaintiff in her own case against Manson that is separate from Ms. Bianco's case, although they have alleged similar claims. Ms. Smithline's attorney, Jay Ellwanger, also has been representing Ms. Bianco in her case. Last week, Mr. Ellwanger filed in Ms. Smithline's case a motion to withdraw from representing Ms. Smithline, saying she had made representing her "unreasonably difficult." Then, in Ms. Bianco's case, he filed a request to modify the subpoena for Ms. Smithline's deposition, arguing that she needed time to get new counsel since he had just let her know he would no longer represented. NOW, Manson's attorney has filed an opposition to the Bianco motion, saying that Mr. Ellwanger didn't just quit the representation--Ms. Smithline fired him in April 2022, and produces receipts showing he's apparently been lying to the court, opposing counsel, and even Ms. Smithline. This. Is. NUTS. Continuing discussion on the topic on Eric Hunley's channel, Laid Back News: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nfgEAv2Lpc FOR CONTEXT: Over the years since 2016, Evan Rachel Wood began speaking publicly about domestic violence, saying she had been abused by two unnamed men. On February 21, 2021, Wood named Brian Warner p/k/a Marilyn Manson as one of her abusers, alleging that he abused her physically and emotionally during their romantic relationship which lasted between 2006 and 2010. On the same day, a handful of other women also made statements claiming to be victims of Warner's abuse. His alleged victims include Ashley Morgan Smithline, Esme Bianco, and Ashley Walters. In June 2022, Ashley Morgan Smithline filed a lawsuit against Marilyn Manson alleging all kinds of abuses against her during a romantic relationship. In March 2022, Marilyn Manson, filed a lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood and Ashley Gore aka Illma Gore. In the lawsuit, he alleges four causes of action: defamation per se, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of computer hacking laws, and violation of laws barring impersonation over the internet. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this video, we're going over the most recent filings submitted to the docket to get an understanding of what's happened with the court's decision-making process for Brian Warner's p/k/a Marilyn Manson's Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery. Where does this place the litigation? What does it all mean? We'll go over it all to demystify it for you. Come join!! FOR CONTEXT: Over the years since 2016, Evan Rachel Wood began speaking publicly about domestic violence, saying she had been abused by two unnamed men. On February 21, 2021, Wood named Brian Warner as one of her abusers, alleging that he abused her physically and emotionally during their romantic relationship which lasted between 2006 and 2010. On the same day, a handful of other women also made statements claiming to be victims of Warner's abuse. His alleged victims include Ashley Morgan Smithline, Esme Bianco, and Ashley Walters. In March 2022, Brian Warner, p/k/a Marilyn Manson, filed a lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood and Ashley Gore aka Illma Gore. In the lawsuit, he alleges four causes of action: defamation per se, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of computer hacking laws, and violation of laws barring impersonation over the internet. WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE: In April/May 2022, Wood and Gore filed Anti-SLAPP motions to try to dismiss the bulk of Manson's claims. Filing this kind of motion essentially "freezes" the case until the court decides on the issue. This means the parties cannot serve discovery requests on each other, except by specific request. So in July, Manson filed a Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery, asking to depose five witnesses--including Wood and Gore--arguing that he needs this discovery to oppose the Anti-SLAPP motions. Last week, Wood and Gore filed Oppositions to Manson's Motion. On 8/11/2011, Manson filed his Replies to both Oppositions. The Anti-SLAPP Deep-Dive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6GDfGoPXaw More thoughts on anti-SLAPP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fowRepZaJog&t=2s Marilyn Manson's Discovery Motion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIGu4BLBieA Wood and Gore's Oppositions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhzMEkuDsQc Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join -------------------------------------------------------------------------------