Podcasts about first mondays

My guest today Sam Srauy is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication, Journalism, and Public Relations at Oakland University, Her research examines race, video games, and the political economy of the video game industry. Srauy's work appears in various academic journals including Social Media + Society, First Mondays, Games and Culture, and Television and New Media. She teaches courses on identity, race/racism, digital media production, and video game studies/production. Prior to academia, Srauy worked for over a decade in the high-tech industry. Her experience in that field includes municipal wireless networks, open-source technology, and streaming media systems. About the book:  Race, Culture and the Video Game Industry: A Vicious Circuit (Routledge, 2024) offers a detailed and much needed examination of how systemic racism in the US shaped the culture, market logic, and production practices of video game developers from the 1970s until the 2010s. Offering historical analysis of the video game industries (console, PC, and indie) from a critical, political economic lens, this book specifically examines the history of how such practices created, enabled, and maintained racism through the imagined 'gamer.' The book explores how the cultural and economic landscape of the United States developed from the 1970s through the 2000s and explains how racist attitudes are reflected and maintained in the practices of video games production. These practices constitute a 'Vicious Circuit' that normalizes racism and the centrality of an imagined gamer identity. It also explores how the industry, from indie game developers to larger profit-driven companies, responded to changing attitudes in the 2010s, where racism and lack of diversity in games was frequently being noted. The book concludes by offering potential solutions to combat this 'Vicious Circuit'. A vital contribution to the study of video games that will be welcomed by students and scholars in the fields of media studies, cultural studies, game studies, critical race studies, and beyond. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

My guest today Sam Srauy is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication, Journalism, and Public Relations at Oakland University, Her research examines race, video games, and the political economy of the video game industry. Srauy's work appears in various academic journals including Social Media + Society, First Mondays, Games and Culture, and Television and New Media. She teaches courses on identity, race/racism, digital media production, and video game studies/production. Prior to academia, Srauy worked for over a decade in the high-tech industry. Her experience in that field includes municipal wireless networks, open-source technology, and streaming media systems. About the book:  Race, Culture and the Video Game Industry: A Vicious Circuit (Routledge, 2024) offers a detailed and much needed examination of how systemic racism in the US shaped the culture, market logic, and production practices of video game developers from the 1970s until the 2010s. Offering historical analysis of the video game industries (console, PC, and indie) from a critical, political economic lens, this book specifically examines the history of how such practices created, enabled, and maintained racism through the imagined 'gamer.' The book explores how the cultural and economic landscape of the United States developed from the 1970s through the 2000s and explains how racist attitudes are reflected and maintained in the practices of video games production. These practices constitute a 'Vicious Circuit' that normalizes racism and the centrality of an imagined gamer identity. It also explores how the industry, from indie game developers to larger profit-driven companies, responded to changing attitudes in the 2010s, where racism and lack of diversity in games was frequently being noted. The book concludes by offering potential solutions to combat this 'Vicious Circuit'. A vital contribution to the study of video games that will be welcomed by students and scholars in the fields of media studies, cultural studies, game studies, critical race studies, and beyond. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

My guest today Sam Srauy is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication, Journalism, and Public Relations at Oakland University, Her research examines race, video games, and the political economy of the video game industry. Srauy's work appears in various academic journals including Social Media + Society, First Mondays, Games and Culture, and Television and New Media. She teaches courses on identity, race/racism, digital media production, and video game studies/production. Prior to academia, Srauy worked for over a decade in the high-tech industry. Her experience in that field includes municipal wireless networks, open-source technology, and streaming media systems. About the book:  Race, Culture and the Video Game Industry: A Vicious Circuit (Routledge, 2024) offers a detailed and much needed examination of how systemic racism in the US shaped the culture, market logic, and production practices of video game developers from the 1970s until the 2010s. Offering historical analysis of the video game industries (console, PC, and indie) from a critical, political economic lens, this book specifically examines the history of how such practices created, enabled, and maintained racism through the imagined 'gamer.' The book explores how the cultural and economic landscape of the United States developed from the 1970s through the 2000s and explains how racist attitudes are reflected and maintained in the practices of video games production. These practices constitute a 'Vicious Circuit' that normalizes racism and the centrality of an imagined gamer identity. It also explores how the industry, from indie game developers to larger profit-driven companies, responded to changing attitudes in the 2010s, where racism and lack of diversity in games was frequently being noted. The book concludes by offering potential solutions to combat this 'Vicious Circuit'. A vital contribution to the study of video games that will be welcomed by students and scholars in the fields of media studies, cultural studies, game studies, critical race studies, and beyond. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

My guest today Sam Srauy is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication, Journalism, and Public Relations at Oakland University, Her research examines race, video games, and the political economy of the video game industry. Srauy's work appears in various academic journals including Social Media + Society, First Mondays, Games and Culture, and Television and New Media. She teaches courses on identity, race/racism, digital media production, and video game studies/production. Prior to academia, Srauy worked for over a decade in the high-tech industry. Her experience in that field includes municipal wireless networks, open-source technology, and streaming media systems. About the book:  Race, Culture and the Video Game Industry: A Vicious Circuit (Routledge, 2024) offers a detailed and much needed examination of how systemic racism in the US shaped the culture, market logic, and production practices of video game developers from the 1970s until the 2010s. Offering historical analysis of the video game industries (console, PC, and indie) from a critical, political economic lens, this book specifically examines the history of how such practices created, enabled, and maintained racism through the imagined 'gamer.' The book explores how the cultural and economic landscape of the United States developed from the 1970s through the 2000s and explains how racist attitudes are reflected and maintained in the practices of video games production. These practices constitute a 'Vicious Circuit' that normalizes racism and the centrality of an imagined gamer identity. It also explores how the industry, from indie game developers to larger profit-driven companies, responded to changing attitudes in the 2010s, where racism and lack of diversity in games was frequently being noted. The book concludes by offering potential solutions to combat this 'Vicious Circuit'. A vital contribution to the study of video games that will be welcomed by students and scholars in the fields of media studies, cultural studies, game studies, critical race studies, and beyond. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/politics-and-polemics

My guest today Sam Srauy is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication, Journalism, and Public Relations at Oakland University, Her research examines race, video games, and the political economy of the video game industry. Srauy's work appears in various academic journals including Social Media + Society, First Mondays, Games and Culture, and Television and New Media. She teaches courses on identity, race/racism, digital media production, and video game studies/production. Prior to academia, Srauy worked for over a decade in the high-tech industry. Her experience in that field includes municipal wireless networks, open-source technology, and streaming media systems. About the book:  Race, Culture and the Video Game Industry: A Vicious Circuit (Routledge, 2024) offers a detailed and much needed examination of how systemic racism in the US shaped the culture, market logic, and production practices of video game developers from the 1970s until the 2010s. Offering historical analysis of the video game industries (console, PC, and indie) from a critical, political economic lens, this book specifically examines the history of how such practices created, enabled, and maintained racism through the imagined 'gamer.' The book explores how the cultural and economic landscape of the United States developed from the 1970s through the 2000s and explains how racist attitudes are reflected and maintained in the practices of video games production. These practices constitute a 'Vicious Circuit' that normalizes racism and the centrality of an imagined gamer identity. It also explores how the industry, from indie game developers to larger profit-driven companies, responded to changing attitudes in the 2010s, where racism and lack of diversity in games was frequently being noted. The book concludes by offering potential solutions to combat this 'Vicious Circuit'. A vital contribution to the study of video games that will be welcomed by students and scholars in the fields of media studies, cultural studies, game studies, critical race studies, and beyond. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/communications

My guest today Sam Srauy is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication, Journalism, and Public Relations at Oakland University, Her research examines race, video games, and the political economy of the video game industry. Srauy's work appears in various academic journals including Social Media + Society, First Mondays, Games and Culture, and Television and New Media. She teaches courses on identity, race/racism, digital media production, and video game studies/production. Prior to academia, Srauy worked for over a decade in the high-tech industry. Her experience in that field includes municipal wireless networks, open-source technology, and streaming media systems. About the book:  Race, Culture and the Video Game Industry: A Vicious Circuit (Routledge, 2024) offers a detailed and much needed examination of how systemic racism in the US shaped the culture, market logic, and production practices of video game developers from the 1970s until the 2010s. Offering historical analysis of the video game industries (console, PC, and indie) from a critical, political economic lens, this book specifically examines the history of how such practices created, enabled, and maintained racism through the imagined 'gamer.' The book explores how the cultural and economic landscape of the United States developed from the 1970s through the 2000s and explains how racist attitudes are reflected and maintained in the practices of video games production. These practices constitute a 'Vicious Circuit' that normalizes racism and the centrality of an imagined gamer identity. It also explores how the industry, from indie game developers to larger profit-driven companies, responded to changing attitudes in the 2010s, where racism and lack of diversity in games was frequently being noted. The book concludes by offering potential solutions to combat this 'Vicious Circuit'. A vital contribution to the study of video games that will be welcomed by students and scholars in the fields of media studies, cultural studies, game studies, critical race studies, and beyond. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

My guest today Sam Srauy is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication, Journalism, and Public Relations at Oakland University, Her research examines race, video games, and the political economy of the video game industry. Srauy's work appears in various academic journals including Social Media + Society, First Mondays, Games and Culture, and Television and New Media. She teaches courses on identity, race/racism, digital media production, and video game studies/production. Prior to academia, Srauy worked for over a decade in the high-tech industry. Her experience in that field includes municipal wireless networks, open-source technology, and streaming media systems. About the book:  Race, Culture and the Video Game Industry: A Vicious Circuit (Routledge, 2024) offers a detailed and much needed examination of how systemic racism in the US shaped the culture, market logic, and production practices of video game developers from the 1970s until the 2010s. Offering historical analysis of the video game industries (console, PC, and indie) from a critical, political economic lens, this book specifically examines the history of how such practices created, enabled, and maintained racism through the imagined 'gamer.' The book explores how the cultural and economic landscape of the United States developed from the 1970s through the 2000s and explains how racist attitudes are reflected and maintained in the practices of video games production. These practices constitute a 'Vicious Circuit' that normalizes racism and the centrality of an imagined gamer identity. It also explores how the industry, from indie game developers to larger profit-driven companies, responded to changing attitudes in the 2010s, where racism and lack of diversity in games was frequently being noted. The book concludes by offering potential solutions to combat this 'Vicious Circuit'. A vital contribution to the study of video games that will be welcomed by students and scholars in the fields of media studies, cultural studies, game studies, critical race studies, and beyond. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/technology

At Tuesday's meeting, the Wichita City Council will revisit the new campaign finance ordinance that passed January second, banning contributions from corporations and LLCs. Mayor Wu says she wants to hear from citizens on this issue and others.

This year, cellist Laurence Lesser celebrates his 85th birthday, as well as 50 years at the New England Conservatory, where he is president emeritus. His numerous students appear in concert halls, orchestras, teaching studios and more around the world. He speaks to online editor Davina about his teaching methods and approaches, including the ‘what, why and how' of cello playing, plus how teaching has informed his playing throughout the years. The New England Conservatory will celebrate Larry's 85th Birthday and 50 Years at the Conservatory with a concert at Jordan Hall on 13 November at 7:30pm with pianist Minsoo Sohn. From October to May, Larry will also be curating First Mondays at Jordan Hall, a concert series featuring musical friends and NEC alumni. Each concert is free and open to the public with online RSVP. Find out more here: https://necmusic.edu/concerts Check out thestrad.com for the latest news, articles and reviews on all things to do with string playing. Register and subscribe to access exclusive archival content from 2010 onwards. Student discount! Get 50% off an online subscription! Check it out here: https://bit.ly/3eQ75AB  Find us on social media: Facebook.com/thestrad X: @TheStradMag Instagram: @the_strad_ Bloch - Schelomo (Solomon), Hebraic Rhapsody for Cello and Orchestra Laurence Lesser, cello / NEC Philharmonia / Hugh Wolff, music director and conductor Fauré  - Après un rêve Laurence Lesser, cello / HaeSun Paik, piano Photo credit: Carlin Ma

From First Mondays host and Distinguished Professor of Law Pat Reyhan: Huge amounts of press coverage has been devoted in the last two weeks to the collapse of FTX, a crypto-currency exchange that was heralded just a few months ago as being the savior of crypto currency in general. I don't know about you, but I hardly understand crypto in principal. Nonetheless, as through the centuries, the “law” has had to understand and adapt and you are living through the process as the law does that (just as people living through the industrial and technological revolutions had to do).But, we are lucky because Professor Chung gets this and is willing to share her expertise with us. It is a rare opportunity to watch law adapt in real time and you have the opportunity to observe and participate.

Professors Ted De Barbieri and Pat Reyhan discuss the Federal Reserve, inflation, and monetary policy with best selling autor Christopher Leonard. Leaonard's recent book, The Lords of Easy Money: How the Federal Reserve Broke the American Economy, tells the story of the Fed's quantitative easing program, the implications Fed policy has on the economy, and what it means for law and regulation. First Mondays aims to to enrich the intellectual life of the law school and show students the legal overlay of current issues in the news. Recorded March 7, 2022.

On this episode of the podcast, we talk with theologian and historian Rev. Dr. Jennifer Powell McNutt about the relationship between science and theology. Together we discuss: – How the narrative of a conflict between faith and science developed, and how this story of obscures important historical realities, especially during the Reformation – The relationship between science and theology as well as between God's two books: the book of creation and the book of Scripture. – How we think about scientific investigation given the tension between suspicion (because of human sin) and confidence (because of the divine image and the reliability of human faculties) – “Epistemic trespassing” and how pastors can live with the burden of being expected to weigh in on scientific issues, and how they build bridges between science and theology. Books mentioned in this podcast: History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science by John William Draper (1874) A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology by Andrew Dickson White (1896) Science and Theology in the Reformation by Charlotte Methuen (2008) Since the Beginning: Interpreting Genesis 1 and 2 through the Ages ed. Kyle Greenwood (2018) Follow Jennifer Powell McNutt on Twitter: https://twitter.com/jpowellmcnutt Here is a link to Dr. McNutt's First Mondays talk at Dordt University: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-NTB-m2BQM  

Recorded Monday, Oct. 18, 2021 The arrival of thousands of Haitians at the southern U.S. border – driven from their homes by political chaos, economic desperation, and natural disasters – is filled with sad and horrific media coverage and political hyperbole about American immigration policy. This First Mondays program examines and explores the actual American and international laws regarding legal entry issues generally and refugee law specifically. The event was hosted by Professors Ted De Barbieri and Patricia Reyhan and they spoke with expert guests Professor Sarah Rogerson, Staff Attorney Lauren DesRosiers, and Professor Alexandra Harrington. First Mondays is a special discussion program focusing on current business and political events through a legal lens. This program is an opportunity to meet Albany Law School faculty and to participate in a stimulating discussion on world events.

On today's show, Dr. Ben visits with Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. You can find more about Morley at rcp123.org. You can get more information about the wellness classes offered by Veritas at veritaswellness.health or find more about Veritas Medical (and find archived shows) at veritasmedical.com. Dr. Ben begins by sharing some information […]

On today’s show, Dr. Ben visits with Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. You can find more about Morley at rcp123.org. You can get more information about the wellness classes offered by Veritas at veritaswellness.health or find more about Veritas Medical (and find archived shows) at veritasmedical.com. Dr. Ben begins by sharing some information […]

There's something about the start of a fresh month it gets me so excited for all the possibilities. In today's episode, I walk you through how you can set simple, yet impactful intentions to get your month going in the right direction, as well as a few helpful Affirmations to help increase your audacity to get it all done. If you're loving this episode, please share it! Tag me in your stories or follow me for more encouragement @yiemajohn on FB and IG or shoot me an email at hello@yiemajohn.com

Join this “First Mondays” Series program with Professors Ted De Barbieri and Patricia Reyhan to explore presidential powers, how those powers have expanded under both major political parties in recent years, and the consequences of the expansion of executive power. They welcome expert guest Prof. David M. Driesen, University Professor, from the Syracuse University College of Law, who will draw on his findings from his upcoming book, “The Specter of Dictatorship and Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power.” First Mondays is a special discussion program about current business and political events through a legal lens. This program is an opportunity to meet Albany Law School faculty and to participate in a stimulating discussion on world events.

Join us to discuss how federal law limits the liability of online platforms, effects online speech, the recent calls to limit protections, and other aspects of online speech. This “First Mondays” Series program will be hosted by Professors Ted De Barbieri and Patricia Reyhan and they will speak with expert guest Professor Rob Heverly '92, Associate Professor of Law here at Albany Law School. First Mondays is a special discussion program about current business and political events through a legal lens. This program is an opportunity to meet Albany Law School faculty and to participate in a stimulating discussion on world events.

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. You can find more about Morley at rcp123.org. You can get more information about the wellness classes offered by Veritas at veritaswellness.health or find more about Veritas Medical (and find archived shows) at veritasmedical.com. Dr. Ben begins by sharing the sad statistics […]

First Mondays is a special discussion program about current business and political events through a legal lens. This program is an opportunity to meet Albany Law School faculty and to participate in a stimulating discussion on world events. -- Hosts: Prof. Patricia Reyhan - Distinguished Professor of Law; Prof. Ted De Barbieri - Associate Professor of Law; Director, Community Economic Development Clinic Expert Guests: Prof. Rose Mary Bailly - Advisor to the GLC and Pro Bono Programs, Adjunct Professor; Jennifer J. Monthie '03 - Legal Director, Disability Rights New York --- American pop music icon Britney Spears is 39 years old. For the past thirteen years, her career, all of her considerable financial wealth, and many aspects of her well-being have been held in a conservatorship under the significant or exclusive control of her father. In a much-publicized case, Ms. Spears asked a court to remove her father from this role, threatening to cease performances were he not to be removed. The circumstances surrounding the conservatorship were recently brought to wide public attention through a New York Times documentary "Framing Britney Spears" and through #FreeBritney. Conservatorships are familiar legal responses to scenarios where individuals, either because of age or cognitive impairment, are unable to act responsibly for themselves. In that sense, they perform an important legal and familial role. But the Spears case illustrates the problems embedded in stripping a large swatch of personal autonomy from an individual. This month's “First Monday” explores these issues with the guidance of professors and practitioners who have explored the tension between personal autonomy and societal/familial concern for the individual. -- Attend First Mondays events: alumni@albanylaw.edu

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. You can find more about Morley at rcp123.org. You can get more information about the wellness classes offered by Veritas at veritaswellness.health or find more about Veritas Medical (and find archived shows) at veritasmedical.com. Dr. Ben begins by sharing the sad statistics […]

Want to understand just what the heck is going on with this whole GameStop thing? In this special edition of the podcast, join Profs. Patricia Reyhan, Ted De Barbieri, and Christine Chung to talk about Reddit's WallStreetBets, GameStop, and Market Regulation as part of the First Monday series. Recorded on February 1, 2021. “First Mondays” is a special discussion program about current business and political events through a legal lens. This program is an opportunity to meet Albany Law School faculty and to participate in a stimulating discussion on world events. Watch the talk: https://vimeo.com/507721776 More about Prof. Chung: https://www.albanylaw.edu/faculty/directory/profiles?ind=Chung,+Christine+Sgarlata Albany Law School Institute for Financial Market Regulation: https://www.albanylaw.edu/centers/institute-for-financial-market-regulation

On today's show, Dr. Ben visits with Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Dr. Ben begins the show by sharing some various headlines from the media over the last few weeks. These headlines, although hopeful for rescue medicine, highlight just that – rescue medicine. Our goal at Veritas is to highlight the truth. Focus […]

On today’s show, Dr. Ben visits with Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Dr. Ben begins the show by sharing some various headlines from the media over the last few weeks. These headlines, although hopeful for rescue medicine, highlight just that – rescue medicine. Our goal at Veritas is to highlight the truth. Focus […]

A First Mondays program recorded on November 2, 2020. Join this discussion on some of the country's hottest topics involving Big Tech and Big Pharma focused on the United States Justice Department's efforts to block or punish allegedly wrongful acts by major players, notably Google, Purdue Pharma, and TikTok. First Mondays is a special discussion program about current business and political events through a legal lens. This program is an opportunity to meet Albany Law School faculty and to participate in a stimulating discussion on world events. Hosts Prof. Patricia Reyhan - Distinguished Professor of Law Prof. Ted De Barbieri - Associate Professor of Law; Director, Community Economic Development Clinic Panelists David M. Horn - Special Counsel, WilmerHale (Washington, D.C.) Carl J. Kempf III '98 - Rensselaer County Attorney Prof. Robert Heverly '92 - Associate Professor of Law, Albany Law School Prof. Alexandra Harrington '05 - Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Albany Law School

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Dr. Ben begins by sharing evidence from the past on how doctors and scientists sometimes get it wrong. Sometimes, when you give the body something for immediate relief, like vitamin D (which is actually a hormone), the long-term consequences just aren't worth […]

NOTE: First Mondays is a special discussion program about current business and political events through a legal lens. This program is an opportunity to meet Albany Law School faculty and to participate in a stimulating discussion on world events. As America prepares for the 2020 Election, we present a First Mondays program around voting rights. We will discuss the history of the struggle for voting rights including the Voting Rights Act of 1965 with our special guest, Professor Gilda R. Daniels. Professor Daniels is a voting rights expert and former Deputy Chief in the U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division, Voting Section, where she served in both the Clinton and Bush administrations. She is currently a professor of law at the University of Baltimore Law School and the Director of Litigation for Advancement Project's National Office, a multi-racial civil rights organization. She is also the author of UNCOUNTED: The Crisis of Voter Suppression in America, her first book. Published in January by New York University Press, it has already been called “required reading” by Ms. Magazine. Hosts Prof. Patricia Reyhan - Distinguished Professor of Law Prof. Ted De Barbieri - Associate Professor of Law; Director, Community Economic Development Clinic Special Guest Prof. Gilda R. Daniels - Associate Professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law; Author: UNCOUNTED: The Crisis of Voter Suppression in America

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Dr. Ben begins by sharing evidence from the past on how doctors and scientists sometimes get it wrong. Sometimes, when you give the body something for immediate relief, like vitamin D (which is actually a hormone), the long-term consequences just aren’t worth […]

This week's episode focuses on building community in your actual neighborhood! We talk about the importance of community all the time. But it's easier to build community at work, or at church, maybe in a foster support group, or sports' team. But how about where you actually live? Do you know your neighbors' names?  All of us want to help out people in need - like if your neighbor was going through cancer treatments, you would want to help them, right? But how would you know they have cancer if you don't even know their names?? Lindsay Watson, our sister-in-law and next-door neighbor, shares how she started our neighborhood's monthly meetings and Group Me text thread. Our neighborhood is THE best. And maybe yours is too, you just don't know it yet! First Mondays This is a thing that Lindsay started where the neighborhood ladies gather on someone's driveway around 8pm. Kids are usually in bed. No one has to clean their house. You bring your own folding chair and beverage of choice (no judgement), and an open heart to meet your neighbors! There's a question of the night so that everyone can get to know one another, and so that no one person dominates all the talking time. It's GREAT! We have gotten to know so much about our neighbors through First Mondays. Our neighbor, Tia, was on our podcast cause we got to hear about her story at a First Monday. She is incredible, and you should listen to her journey here. She has adopted her 3 nieces, and cares for her husband who has ALS. She is a vision of strength and servant leadership. The Good Word of the Day "We have different gifts, according to the grace given to each of us. If your gift is prophesying, then prophesy in accordance with your faith; 7 if it is serving, then serve; if it is teaching, then teach; 8 if it is to encourage, then give encouragement; if it is giving, then give generously; if it is to lead, do it diligently; if it is to show mercy, do it cheerfully. " -Romans 12:6-8 We all have different gifts and talents. Maybe you aren't very extroverted, but you are yearning for community in your neighborhood. You may have to be the brave one who starts a First Monday. But once you get to know your neighbors, you can pass the 'leading' baton off to another neighbor who would enjoy leading it.  Podcasts we are listening to. Lindsay listens to The Bible Binge, which is a fun podcast about looking at the Bible through a pop culture lens. It's pretty amazing.  Chris listens to The Financial Samurai, cause he loves financial podcasts! This episode talked about how your cars should value 10% of your income. Very interesting! And Jihae listens to The Storybrand Podcast. This episode with Dan Heath was INCREDIBLE. They talked about looking at problems from an Upstream perspective, and we will definitely be reading, and discussing that book in a future episode! If you would like to connect: Fostering Voices on Instagram Jihae on Instagram and Chris on Facebook You can also email us at hello@fosteringvoices.com AND we would LOVE it if you would SUBSCRIBE and leave us a review on iTunes! This helps others to find our podcast so we can share these voices from the foster care and adoption community with more people!  

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. After talking about fats and heart health, they talk about nitric oxide. Morley explains how nitric oxide relates to oxidative stress and disease. He shares how closely this oxidative process is related to the lack of bioavailable copper in the body. During […]

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. After talking about fats and heart health, they talk about nitric oxide. Morley explains how nitric oxide relates to oxidative stress and disease. He shares how closely this oxidative process is related to the lack of bioavailable copper in the body. During […]

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Morley uses the first half of the show to explain the immune system function through the relationship between copper, iron, and oxygen. During the second half of the show, they discuss how agriculture has changed and the various mineral levels present in […]

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Morley uses the first half of the show to explain the immune system function through the relationship between copper, iron, and oxygen. During the second half of the show, they discuss how agriculture has changed and the various mineral levels present in […]

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Dr. Ben begins the show by giving some encouraging headlines related to covid 19 and how this isn't the real pandemic. The real pandemic is childhood disease, autoimmune disease, heart disease, cancer, etc. that are increasing exponentially. However, no one seems to […]

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Dr. Ben begins the show by giving some encouraging headlines related to covid 19 and how this isn’t the real pandemic. The real pandemic is childhood disease, autoimmune disease, heart disease, cancer, etc. that are increasing exponentially. However, no one seems to […]

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Together, they discuss bio-identical hormones.

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Dr. Ben starts by shedding some light on the current statistics relating to coronavirus. Morley shares how iron overload relates to the virus, and how that impacts the severity of a person’s case. They finish the first half of the show by […]

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Together, they talk about women's health, pregnancy, infant and maternal mortality rates, etc. in regards to iron and anemia.

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Together, they talk about women’s health, pregnancy, infant and maternal mortality rates, etc. in regards to iron and anemia.

On today’s show, Dr. Ben has Morley Robbins on for First Mondays with Morley. They discuss several topics, including – •Bioavailable copper and ceruloplasmin in relation to disease •Ability to make energy, which requires copper and magnesium •Pathogens being attracted to low-energy environments •Excess iron •Labile iron pool and energy loss •Unresolved emotional conflicts in […]

Today’s show was the “First Mondays with Morley” for November.  In this episode Morley and Dr. Ben reinforce the idea that the very, very root cause of “disease” is metabolic chaos at the cellular level.  They stress how American’s have lost their resiliency and resistance to disease because the mitochondria get stuck in a low energy, […]

Today's show was the “First Mondays with Morley” for November.  In this episode Morley and Dr. Ben reinforce the idea that the very, very root cause of “disease” is metabolic chaos at the cellular level.  They stress how American's have lost their resiliency and resistance to disease because the mitochondria get stuck in a low energy, […]

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. They discussed things, including: unintended consequences of man-made prevention techniques, iron fortified foods that create low energy cells and allow disease to exist, bioavailable copper regulating iron, inaccurate measuring of iron present in the body, the vitamin D myth, structured water in […]

On today’s show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. They discussed things, including: unintended consequences of man-made prevention techniques, iron fortified foods that create low energy cells and allow disease to exist, bioavailable copper regulating iron, inaccurate measuring of iron present in the body, the vitamin D myth, structured water in […]

It is a privilege for me to meet someone as interested in politics as I am; it's a rare find to meet another teen even more fascinated than me by politics, and who knows way more about government. So it was a real honor to have a conversation with Anna Salvatore, a junior in high school and creator of the High School SCOTUS blog, which has had tens of thousands of visitors, including influential promoters such as the "New York Times's" Supreme Court correspondent Adam Liptak. She has been interviewed by NPR and by Ben Wittes, of Brookings and founder of the Lawfare blog (and where I first heard of her on the Lawfare podcast). In this episode, Anna and I discuss how her blog High School SCOTUS took off, what the process has taught her, looking at the Court's new decisions and what they can tell us about its direction, and the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing's broader effects. High School SCOTUS: https://highschoolscotus.wordpress.com Favorite: Podcast--"First Mondays" Person to follow on Social Media--Adam Liptak/Robert Barnes, both SCOTUS reporters Book--John Updike's stories/George Orwell's "Can Socialists be Happy"

It’s anybody’s guess whether or not President Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, DC Circuit Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh, will replace retired Justice Anthony Kennedy on the High Court. The FBI is reported to be finishing up its supplemental background check on Mr. Kavanaugh, looking into multiple allegations of past sexual assault and misconduct made in recent weeks against the nominee.Former college classmates and current friends of the Judge have weighed in on his fitness for the Supreme Court, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has promised a vote this week. Today on Midday, perspectives on the Kavanaugh nomination from Cleta Mitchell, a former counsel to the National Republican Senatorial and Congressional Committees; Ian Samuel, associate professor at Indiana University's Maurer School of Law and co-host of First Mondays, the weekly podcast about the Supreme Court; and Thiru Vignarajah, a former federal prosecutor, former Deputy Attorney General of Maryland and currently a litigator with DLA Piper in Baltimore.The Kavanaugh confirmation process and the future of the Supreme Court, today on Midday.

It’s the Midday Newswrap: The Labor Department released the monthly job numbers this morning, and, as has been the case for the last seven or eight years, the numbers continue to be good. The unemployment rate has stayed steady at 3.9%. The economy added 201 thousand jobs in August, and wages grew by .4 percent , up nearly three percent for the year. Analysts have observed that wages are growing at a faster rate than inflation for the first time in a long time.In a now infamous op-ed in the NY Times from a person identified by the Times as a Senior Administration Official, someone claims that she or he is one of many people working behind the scenes to, in this person’s words, “frustrate parts of the Trump agenda, and the President’s “worst inclinations.” Just what parts, just how many people, and who is making this claim are not yet known. Plus, NFL opened its season last night in a broadcast that featured a new Nike commercial narrated by Colin Kaepernick. We’ll talk about Nike’s decision to place Kaepernick front and center in its 30th anniversary ad campaign.Tom is joined in studio by Michael Fletcher, a senior writer with ESPN’s The Undefeated, the online platform that explores the intersection of race, culture and sports; and Ian Samuel, an associate professor of law at Indiana University, and the co-host of a podcast about the Supreme Court, called First Mondays.

In episode 93, Dean Shanahan interviews Maurer School of Law professors Ian Samuel and Steve Sanders. They talk about Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel's time as Antonin Scalia's counter-clerk, judicial politics, and Samuel's podcast First Mondays. #politicsandtheworld

An excerpt from today's bonus episode, available in full to our Patreon patrons, in which Current Affairs legal editor Oren Nimni and social media editor Vanessa A. Bee interview Indiana Law professor, First Mondays host, and rising legal star Ian Samuel about being a lefty in the law. Discussed: the three's lefty origin stories, the consequences of a Kavanaugh nomination, why the law is a conservatizing profession, and more. To listen to this episode — and gain access to our patrons' "Bird Feed" — consider becoming a monthly patron at our Patreon page. Call into Current Affairs anytime at (504) 867-8851.

It's our annual Supreme Court term roundup, with special guest Ian Samuel. We discuss, natch, one case, Carpenter v. United States, which concerns the need for a warrant to get records from cell phone companies concerning the location of your phone. But there's much more, including: hard drive upgrades, the sum total of human writing, audio vs. text for messaging, emojis, AI and grunts, Supreme Court-packing / balancing / restructuring (16:37), what rules of procedure an enlarged Court should set for itself and what rules should be imposed on it (29:00), podcast lengths and listening habits (51:04), Carpenter v. United States(01:02:06), Batman movies, and Hold-Up. This show’s links: First Mondays (http://www.firstmondays.fm) Ian Samuel’s writing (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=936551) Ian Samuel, The New Writs of Assistance (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3075587) Snopes, Did Facebook Shut Down an AI Experiment Because Chatbots Developed Their Own Language? (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/facebook-ai-developed-own-language/) (no, but interesting) Oral Argument 134: Crossover (http://oralargument.org/134) Christian Turner, Amendment XXVIII: A First Draft (https://www.hydratext.com/blog/2018/7/12/amendment-xxviii) Ian Ayres and John Witt, Democrats Need a Plan B for the Supreme Court. Here’s One Option. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/democrats-need-a-plan-b-for-the-supreme-court-heres-one-option/2018/07/27/4c77fd4e-91a6-11e8-b769-e3fff17f0689_story.html) Oral Argument 37: Hammer Blow (http://oralargument.org/37) (with Michael Dorf); Oral Argument 38: You're Going to Hate this Answer_ (http://oralargument.org/38) (with Steve Vladeck); Christian Turner, Bound by Federal Law (http://www.hydratext.com/blog/2014/10/29/bound-by-federal-law) (including links to posts by Michael and Steve on the issue of state courts' not being bound by federal circuit courts) Carpenter v. United States (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-402_new_o75q.pdf) Radiolab, Eye in the Sky (https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/update-eye-sky/) Ian Samuel, Warrantless Location Tracking (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1092293) Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=659168721517750079) Florida v. Jardines (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2570635442757547915) Justice Souter’s discussion of Plessy and the role of history in judging (http://www.c-span.org/video/?284498-2/america-courts) (watch from minute one until about minute fourteen) and his Harvard Commencement speech (http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2010/05/text-of-justice-david-souters-speech/) on Plessy Hold Up! (http://www.hydratext.com/blog/2015/7/24/hold-up) Special Guest: Ian Samuel.

On this week’s episode of Versus Trump, Jason and Charlie discuss a new lawsuit that forces courts to answer the question of whether the federal government needs a warrant to search people's cell phones and other electronic devices at the border, and they also [at 32:30] respond to a discussion on the Supreme Court podcast First Mondays regarding the government's recent filing in the Hargan v. Garza abortion case.First, Jason and Charlie tackle border searches of cell phones and laptops by discussing a new case filed by the ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation called Alasaad v. Duke. The case was recently filed in Boston on behalf of several individuals who had their electronic devices searched when they returned to the U.S. from oversees. As Jason and Charlie note, the policies authorizing border searches without a warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion of a crime were put in place in 2009 under President Obama—but the number of people whose electronic devices have been searched at the border has risen dramatically since President Trump took office. Jason and Charlie analyze whether the policy is constitutional and try to predict what rule a court might adopt to put some limits on these searches.After that [at 32:30], Jason and Charlie return to the noteworthy case of Hargan v. Garza. The federal government recently filed a much-discussed Supreme Court petition that accused the ACLU of misconduct in a case that ultimately resulted in an undocumented immigrant obtaining the abortion she sought. Jason and Charlie disagree with the view articulated in the most recent episode of First Mondays, in which the hosts said that the government's petition presented a potentially close case on the misconduct issue, and also argued that the lawyers who signed the petition must subjectively have thought there was serious attorney misconduct. If you've been following the debate over this filing, you'll definitely want to tune in for Jason and Charlie's views.Please share or provide feedback, and rate us in iTunes. You can find us at @VersusTrumpPod on twitter, or send us an email at versustrumppodcast@gmail.com. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

More than the usual nonsense and sniffles as we try to empty the mailbag. Note: Because of a massive gap between time available and time required to edit out the gak, this episode contains many more than the average number of sniffles and echoes. We tried to fire the editor responsible but learned he was one of us, unpaid, and would either be able to release this episode as is or not at all. Religion and American policy (6:19), a chrono-completist suggests a show topic (10:51), on sex discrimination (14:08), incentives for creation (22:16), boilerplate and terms of service (27:04), antitrust and big data (28:50), boilerplate and the FyreFestival (36:59), boilerplate and arbitration and class actions and airline passengers (38:43), ye ole 1x vs. 2x debate and binge-watching/listening (45:35), Asher Steinberg on the major question exception to Chevron (51:21), self-promotion (52:30), “research” not equal to “to search again”(54:03), Grimmelman’s Property Course and IP and the bar exam (57:14), ethicists and the morality of expedited review (1:03:34), return to the place of the constitutional law course (1:06:22), the limited role of books on the web (1:11:47), cosplay (1:13:40), Joel’s article (1:14:22), the politicization of the U.S. Supreme Court and its appointments compared to other countries and more on the Crossover episode (1:15:01), argument in the monkey selfie case (1:23:15), Wonder Woman and Star Trek vs. Star Wars (1:25:06). This show’s links: Oral Argument 101: Tug of War (https://oralargument.org/101) (on gun violence) Oral Argument 131: Because of Sex (https://oralargument.org/131) (guest Anthony Kreis on sex discrimination) Oral Argument 28: A Wonderful Catastrophe (https://oralargument.org/28) (on Joe’s favorite case(s)) Oral Argument 132: The Soul of Music (https://oralargument.org/132) (guest Joe Fishman on copyright in music) Nicholas Georgakopoulos, The Logic of Securities Law (https://www.amazon.com/Logic-Securities-Law-Nicholas-Georgakopoulos/dp/1107158508/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1491051115&sr=1-1&keywords=georgakopoulos%2C+logic+of+securities+law) Oral Argument 133: Too Many Darn Radio Buttons (https://oralargument.org/133) (guest Jim Gibson on boilerplate in contracts) HBO, Silicon Valley: Terms of Service (http://www.hbo.com/silicon-valley/episodes/4/30-terms-of-service/index.html); see also Nick Statt, HBO’s Silicon Valley Wades into a Heated Debate about Privacy Policies (https://www.theverge.com/2017/5/1/15504692/hbo-silicon-valley-season-4-episode-2-terms-of-service-recap) From The Economist, no byline: The World’s Most Valuable Resource Is No Longer Oil, but Data (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21721656-data-economy-demands-new-approach-antitrust-rules-worlds-most-valuable-resource) Oral Argument 139: It’s All the Stacey Show (https://oralargument.org/139) (guest Stacey Dogan on competition law and IP) About the Fyre Festival (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fyre_Festival) Jens David Ohlin, United Airlines’ Own Contract Denied It Any Right to Remove Passenger (http://www.dorfonlaw.org/2017/04/united-airlines-own-contract-denied-it.html) Asher Steinberg, Another Addition to the Chevron Anticanon: Judge Kavanaugh on the “Major Rules” Doctrine (http://narrowestgrounds.blogspot.com/2017/05/another-addition-to-chevron-anticanon.html) Oral Argument 135: Alexandria (https://oralargument.org/135) (guest James Grimmelman on the Google Books settlement and other things) Crabbe's English Synonymes [sic], Centennial Edition (1917), at p. 228 (https://books.google.com/books?id=4UBAAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA228&dq=%22the+particle+re%22+intensive+french&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwickeCZ5O_TAhXi6YMKHUG1BPAQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=%22the%20particle%20re%22%20intensive%20french&f=false) (“re” as intensive) Oral Argument 61: Minimum Competence (https://oralargument.org/61) (guest Derek Muller on the bar exam) Oral Argument 96: Students as Means (https://oralargument.org/96) George Bodarky, How New York’s Roosevelt Island Sucks Away Summer Trash Stink (http://www.npr.org/2017/07/26/539304811/how-new-york-s-roosevelt-island-sucks-away-summer-trash-stink) Joel Townsend, Adequacy of Risk Assessment in the Exercise of the Character Cancellation Power under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/2017/06/11/public-law-review-update-vol-28-pt-2/) (abstract public, paper behind a paywall) Oral Argument 134: Crossover (https://oralargument.org/134) (with the hosts of First Mondays (http://www.firstmondays.fm)) The oral argument in Naruto v. Slater (https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000011851) (the monkey selfie case at 1:46:00 in the video) Oral Argument 141: The Picard Meltdown Principle (https://oralargument.org/141) (guest Leah Litman) Oral Argument 142: Normativity (https://oralargument.org/142) (guest Jeffrey Kaplan)

Jeffrey Kaplan joins us to discuss his work in philosophy on the nature of law, law’s connection to morality, and the way law gives us reasons to follow it. We discuss the connection with Christian’s work and also succeed (wildly but sporadically) in providing the usual nonsense. This show’s links: Jeffrey Kaplan’s webpage (https://www.jeffreykaplan.org) First Mondays (http://www.firstmondays.fm) Summary Judgment (https://www.summaryjudgmentpod.com) Jeffrey Kaplan, Attitude and the Normativity of Law (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2991878) Christian Turner, Models of Law (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2835112) Christian Turner, Legal Theory 101 (https://www.hydratext.com/legal-theory-101/) (note the links and episodes on Hart, Dworkin, Fuller, Shapiro, and Hershovitz Scott Hershovitz, The End of Jurisprudence (http://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/f.1160.Hershovitz.1204_96n1tozj.pdf) Stephen Perry, Hart on Social Rules and the Foundations of Law: Liberating the Internal Point of View (http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1107/) Scott Shapiro, The Planning Theory of Law (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2937990) David Plunkett and Scott Shapiro, Law, Morality and Everything Else: General Jurisprudence as a Branch of Meta-Normative Inquiry (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2964089) Brian Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (https://www.amazon.com/Social-Legal-Theory-Modern-Transformation/dp/1316638510) Brian Tamanaha, Necessary and Universal Truths About Law? (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2799935) Anil Seth, Your Brain Hallucinates Your Conscious Reality (https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_how_your_brain_hallucinates_your_conscious_reality/up-next) (TED Talk)

Leah Litman joins us to discuss the problematic argument that a law’s novelty is a reason to believe it is unconstitutional. In particular, she focuses on arguments that statutes that affect the separation of powers or the federalism balance are suspect if they are somehow unprecedented. Also, brief updates on: a wasp, Joe’s living situation, Christian’s health, Leah’s bee-related flight delay. This show’s links: Leah Litman’s faculty profile (http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/litman/) and writing (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2361860) Leah Litman, Debunking Antinovelty (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2843763) First Mondays (http://www.firstmondays.fm/) United States v. Windsor (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6241888197107641609); Romer v. Evans (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17758055891258118781) Printz v. United States (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10894716839911389166); Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12800232869146089406); NFIB v. Sibelius (Obamacare I) (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11973730494168859869) Cass Sunstein, Incompletely Theorized Agreements (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2995488) PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=668509147734540905) Karl Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study (https://books.google.com/books?id=rxqSEU7y6lkC&q=%22orthodox+view%22#v=snippet&q=%22orthodox%20view%22&f=false) Special Guest: Leah Litman.

It’s finally here, the one where we talk with the hosts of the world-famous First Mondays podcast, Ian Samuel and Dan Epps. Topics include physics conundrums, podcasts (05:13), the politics of Supreme Court nominations (27:08), and radically changing the rules governing the Supreme Court’s docket (54:54). This show’s links: First Mondays (http://www.firstmondays.fm) Dan Epps’ faculty profile (http://law.wustl.edu/faculty_profiles/profiles.aspx?id=10752) and writing (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=462731) Ian Samuel’s faculty profile (http://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/11599/Samuel/) and writing (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=936551) Feynman on mirrors (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msN87y-iEx0) Randall Munroe, The Goddamn Airplane on the Goddamn Treadmill (https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/09/09/the-goddamn-airplane-on-the-goddamn-treadmill/) Randall Munroe, xkcd: 28-Hour Day (https://xkcd.com/320/) Christian Turner, Podcasts (https://www.hydratext.com/blog/2014/1/11/podcasts) (and somehow this post about Streamers (https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/14575/streamers) is still online) The Bernie Sanders Show (https://www.sanders.senate.gov/bernies-podcast) Chris Guthrie and Tracey George, Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts' of Appeals Image (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1374449) Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12719084930434459940); Planned Parenthood v. Casey (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6298856056242550994) Nina Martin, The Supreme Court Decision That Made a Mess of Abortion Rights (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/02/supreme-court-decision-mess-abortion-rights) Barry Friedman, The Will of the People (https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Will_of_the_People.html?id=V004NCn4Vm8C) Daniel Epps and William Ortman, The Lottery Docket (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2928275) John Duffy, The Federal Circuit in the Shadow of the Solicitor General (http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/78-3-Duffy.pdf) Washington Energy Co. v. United States (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=297528725569885130) Oral Argument 28: A Wonderful Catastrophe (http://oralargument.org/28) (background for Joe’s Erie question) Expression Hair Design v. Schneiderman (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1391_g31i.pdf); Guido Calabresi, Federal and State Courts: Restoring a Workable Balance (http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2123/) The First Mondays Patreon page (https://www.patreon.com/firstmondays) Special Guests: Dan Epps and Ian Samuel.

Welcome back to POTD! Only on Anchor ⚓️ • First Mondays, the podcast of the day! • First Mondays - Talking Supreme Court things • First Mondays - A controversial case • They have a few side shows as well! • First Mondays - 101 1st St. (The Basics of SCOTUS) • Talking with Ian and Dan, of First Mondays! • Dan and Ian of First Mondays! • The conception of First Mondays • What's the story behind the name of the show? • The backgrounds of Dan and Ian • Some of the experiences of working in the syste

In an alternate studio, with alternate equipment and chairs, striving to get back in the groove, blowing out the rust, we make our return to the interweb-waves. (Please forgive some of the audio dips and quiet portions.) No particular agenda, but we wind up responding to some long-ago feedback about the stagecraft of judicial proceedings. This show’s links: First Mondays (http://www.firstmondays.fm) Oral Argument 79: He Said It Peabody Well (http://oralargument.org/79) The Supreme Court of the UK (https://www.supremecourt.uk/index.html) Jay Wexler’s SCOTUS Humor (http://jaywex.com/wordpress/scotus-humor/) Oral Argument 31: Knee Defender (http://oralargument.org/31) Plato, The Republic (http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.html) and, yep, r/plato (https://www.reddit.com/r/Plato/) Texas v. Johnson (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2084618710761560217)

Laura Weinrib, Assistant ​Professor ​of ​Law ​and ​Herbert ​and ​Marjorie ​Fried ​Teaching ​Scholar, is a 2003 graduate of Harvard Law School. She completed her PhD in history at Princeton University in 2011. In 2000, she received an AB in literature and an AM in comparative literature from Harvard University. After law school, Weinrib clerked for Judge Thomas L. Ambro of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. From 2009 to 2010, she was a Samuel I. Golieb Fellow in Legal History at the New York University School of Law. Recorded October 5, 2015, as part of the Law School's First Mondays luncheon series.

Laura Weinrib, Assistant ​Professor ​of ​Law ​and ​Herbert ​and ​Marjorie ​Fried ​Teaching ​Scholar, is a 2003 graduate of Harvard Law School. She completed her PhD in history at Princeton University in 2011. In 2000, she received an AB in literature and an AM in comparative literature from Harvard University. After law school, Weinrib clerked for Judge Thomas L. Ambro of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. From 2009 to 2010, she was a Samuel I. Golieb Fellow in Legal History at the New York University School of Law. Recorded October 5, 2015, as part of the Law School's First Mondays luncheon series.

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Together, they discuss bio-identical hormones.

On today's show, Dr. Ben interviews Morley Robbins for First Mondays with Morley. Dr. Ben starts by shedding some light on the current statistics relating to coronavirus. Morley shares how iron overload relates to the virus, and how that impacts the severity of a person's case. They finish the first half of the show by […]

On today's show, Dr. Ben has Morley Robbins on for First Mondays with Morley. They discuss several topics, including – •Bioavailable copper and ceruloplasmin in relation to disease •Ability to make energy, which requires copper and magnesium •Pathogens being attracted to low-energy environments •Excess iron •Labile iron pool and energy loss •Unresolved emotional conflicts in […]

First Mondays with Morley – Today we talk about osteoporosis and how taking calcium isn't the answer. We explain how calcium is leached out of the bone but it is still present in the body and just needs to be escorted back into the bone. Calcium supplementation can lead to further inflammation in the body […]

On today's show, we continued our series, “First Mondays with Morley” to find out what interesting tidbits Morley Robbins discovered in his research over the past month.  Today we discuss the root cause of heart disease. Morley shares his new theory about how the mitochondria actually produce structured water inside our cell.  Dr. Edwards also […]