Podcasts about heated debate

Flakko and his guests talk about faith and beliefs. ----- Promote Your Music with No Jumper - https://nojumper.com/pages/promo CHECK OUT OUR ONLINE STORE!!! https://nojumper.com NO JUMPER PATREON   / nojumper   CHECK OUT OUR NEW SPOTIFY PLAYLIST https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5te... Follow us on SNAPCHAT   / 4874336901   Follow us on SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/4z4yCTj... iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/n... Follow us on Social Media:   / 4874336901     / nojumper     / nojumper     / nojumper     / nojumper   JOIN THE DISCORD:   / discord   Follow Adam22:   / adam22     / adam22     / adam22   adam22bro on Snapchat Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dating Talk is LIVE on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠youtube.com/whatever

PREDICT who will be more persuasive in THIS debate here at Manifold: https://manifold.markets/ModernDayDebate/is-onlyfans-bad-for-society-jazmen This debate is sponsored by  @AtheistsforLiberty , an organization devoted to preserving debates & dialogues between groups! Atheists for Liberty can be found here: https://linktr.ee/atheistsforliberty LINKS TO GUESTS:  @jazmenjafarr  @AlexStein99  Interested in debating on Modern-Day Debate? Here's a list of things we ask for from potential debaters when they email to make things go faster: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kdwtQrA7QevNev9Mjm4xKvHnTkJ7FY-rMLjqUhtZKmI/edit?usp=sharing At Modern-Day Debate (MDD), our vision is to provide a neutral debate platform so everyone has their fair shot to make their case on a level playing field. Consider joining our Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/ModernDayDebate ) or our channel as a member. Our Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ModernDayDebate __________________________________________________________________ Modern Day Debate Discord: https://discord.gg/ModernDayDebate If James is hosting, the intro song will always be: MDD Theme [Featuring Brian & Travis] from Ye24: https://soundcloud.com/templecitystudios / @ThomCaliche If Ryan is hosting, you have to ask him what song is playing. _______________________________________________________________________________ RULES FOR CHAT -Chats flagrantly disrespectful toward speakers will receive a warning. *Attack the ideas instead of the person. -Chatters continuing the disrespect after a warning will be banned. -Chatters violating YouTube TOS are banned immediately. ______________________________________________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER The views shared by guests on Modern-Day Debate are not necessarily representative of the views of Modern-Day Debate, James, or any university he has or has had any affiliation with. I'm (James) a Christian. If you ever want prayer or just someone to talk to (specifically over voice chat on Zoom) after a horrible day, please reach out and let me know. moderndaydebate@gmail.comAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

HEATED DEBATE: Christianity or Secular Humanism, Which Is Best? Andrew Wilson Vs Craig/FTFEAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Stephen A Smith In Hot Water Over His Controversial Serena Williams Comments, Brian Windhort Almost Walks ESPN First Take, Rashad McCants And Gilbert Arenas Get Into A Heated Debate Over Lebron Influence On Luka Doncic. Download the PrizePicks app today and use code CLNS and get $50 instantly when you play $5! Join The Dreamerspro Community: https://www.patreon.com/Dreamersproofficial Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Virginia’s Republican governor is clashing with Democrats who run the General Assembly over the budget. And as Michael Pope reports, one of the flashpoints is immigration enforcement.

How Amorim Replaces Martínez & Why Garnacho MUST Be Sold (Heated Debate) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Dating Talk is LIVE on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠youtube.com/whatever

In this timely episode, The Health Advocates break down the recent Senate hearings for HHS nominee Robert Kennedy Jr.. They discuss the critical role of the HHS Secretary in shaping public health policy and managing key agencies like the FDA and CDC. The hearings exposed Kennedy’s controversial views on vaccines, concerns over scientific integrity, and notable missteps in understanding health policies. Tune in to hear what this means for patients and what happens next in the confirmation process. Contact Our Hosts Steven Newmark, Chief of Policy at GHLF: snewmark@ghlf.org Zoe Rothblatt, Director of Community Outreach at GHLF: zrothblatt@ghlf.org A podcast episode produced by Ben Blanc, Associate Director, Digital Production and Engagement at GHLF. We want to hear what you think. Send your comments in the form of an email, video, or audio clip of yourself to podcasts@ghlf.org Catch up on all our episodes on our website or on your favorite podcast channel.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dave Palumbo, John Romano and the WHACK PACK debate the age old question!

Dave Palumbo, John Romano and the WHACK PACK debate the age old question!

The high-profile case of Kouri Richins, charged with murdering her husband, Eric Richins, has entered a critical phase as attorneys contest the admissibility of key evidence ahead of her trial. Eric Richins died in March 2022 from a fentanyl overdose, and investigators took over a year to arrest his wife. The case is attracting attention due to conflicting narratives about the investigation process and the evidence gathered. Detective Jeff O'Driscoll, one of the lead investigators, testified about his early visits to Kouri Richins, emphasizing that she was not initially a primary suspect. "We knew Eric had died of a fentanyl overdose but did not know whether it was an accident, suicide, or homicide," O'Driscoll explained. He described Kouri Richins as “very cheery, very open” during his visit, though defense attorney Kathy Nestor criticized his approach. Nestor questioned why O'Driscoll stayed in the home for three hours and why Richins was not informed about an audio recording of their conversation. Nestor also raised issues about O'Driscoll obtaining phone records prior to the visit without notifying Richins or her attorney. "In order to be thorough, I was trying to investigate all of those possibilities," O'Driscoll replied, maintaining that his actions were standard procedure. Investigators executed multiple search warrants, but these operations have drawn scrutiny. During a traffic stop shortly after the first search, Eric Maynard of the Summit County Sheriff's Office obtained Richins' phone. A recording played in court revealed Richins crying during their conversation, but Maynard testified, "I did not see tears." He said she voluntarily gave her phone password but later admitted a mistake in his report, which stated she was in custody at the time. Another contentious piece of evidence is a letter titled "Walk the dog!!" discovered in Kouri Richins' jail cell. Prosecutors allege the letter outlines instructions for her mother and brother about testimony and financial issues, claiming it amounts to witness tampering. The letter also mentions a person referred to as "Lotto," described as an intimate acquaintance of Kouri Richins. Prosecutors argue this correspondence could link her to attempts at manipulating witnesses and avoiding suspicion. However, the defense has questioned whether the letter falls under attorney-client privilege due to references to legal advice. Deputy Summit County Attorney Brad Bloodworth defended the inclusion of the letter, asserting, "This is not trial preparation; it's about controlling testimony and publicity." Bloodworth also pointed to its significance in explaining potential motives, including financial pressures on Kouri Richins. The timeline of events leading to Richins' arrest also came under scrutiny. Less than three weeks after O'Driscoll's visit, he secured a warrant to search Richins' home for evidence, including copper cups and counterfeit pills. During the search, an orange notebook was seized, though its relevance is now contested. Additionally, Richins' arrest outside a Salt Lake County business involved another phone seizure, which her defense argues may have been mishandled. Eric Richins' death, initially called in as a medical emergency, has led to Kouri Richins facing charges of aggravated murder and attempted murder, alongside allegations of mortgage fraud and forgery. Her legal team is fighting to suppress evidence they believe was improperly obtained, while prosecutors argue the material is critical to proving her guilt. As the trial approaches, attorneys are tasked with submitting written briefs to address unresolved evidentiary disputes. The judge has indicated that decisions on contested items will follow a future hearing. In addition to the murder charges, Kouri Richins faces separate allegations of financial crimes, including mortgage fraud, which will be addressed in a subsequent trial. The case's complexity and high stakes underscore the challenges of balancing thorough investigation with legal safeguards. With the trial scheduled for April, it remains to be seen how the evidence battles will shape the jury's understanding of the events surrounding Eric Richins' tragic death. #KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylOverdose #TrueCrime #LegalNews #MurderTrial #UtahNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The high-profile case of Kouri Richins, charged with murdering her husband, Eric Richins, has entered a critical phase as attorneys contest the admissibility of key evidence ahead of her trial. Eric Richins died in March 2022 from a fentanyl overdose, and investigators took over a year to arrest his wife. The case is attracting attention due to conflicting narratives about the investigation process and the evidence gathered. Detective Jeff O'Driscoll, one of the lead investigators, testified about his early visits to Kouri Richins, emphasizing that she was not initially a primary suspect. "We knew Eric had died of a fentanyl overdose but did not know whether it was an accident, suicide, or homicide," O'Driscoll explained. He described Kouri Richins as “very cheery, very open” during his visit, though defense attorney Kathy Nestor criticized his approach. Nestor questioned why O'Driscoll stayed in the home for three hours and why Richins was not informed about an audio recording of their conversation. Nestor also raised issues about O'Driscoll obtaining phone records prior to the visit without notifying Richins or her attorney. "In order to be thorough, I was trying to investigate all of those possibilities," O'Driscoll replied, maintaining that his actions were standard procedure. Investigators executed multiple search warrants, but these operations have drawn scrutiny. During a traffic stop shortly after the first search, Eric Maynard of the Summit County Sheriff's Office obtained Richins' phone. A recording played in court revealed Richins crying during their conversation, but Maynard testified, "I did not see tears." He said she voluntarily gave her phone password but later admitted a mistake in his report, which stated she was in custody at the time. Another contentious piece of evidence is a letter titled "Walk the dog!!" discovered in Kouri Richins' jail cell. Prosecutors allege the letter outlines instructions for her mother and brother about testimony and financial issues, claiming it amounts to witness tampering. The letter also mentions a person referred to as "Lotto," described as an intimate acquaintance of Kouri Richins. Prosecutors argue this correspondence could link her to attempts at manipulating witnesses and avoiding suspicion. However, the defense has questioned whether the letter falls under attorney-client privilege due to references to legal advice. Deputy Summit County Attorney Brad Bloodworth defended the inclusion of the letter, asserting, "This is not trial preparation; it's about controlling testimony and publicity." Bloodworth also pointed to its significance in explaining potential motives, including financial pressures on Kouri Richins. The timeline of events leading to Richins' arrest also came under scrutiny. Less than three weeks after O'Driscoll's visit, he secured a warrant to search Richins' home for evidence, including copper cups and counterfeit pills. During the search, an orange notebook was seized, though its relevance is now contested. Additionally, Richins' arrest outside a Salt Lake County business involved another phone seizure, which her defense argues may have been mishandled. Eric Richins' death, initially called in as a medical emergency, has led to Kouri Richins facing charges of aggravated murder and attempted murder, alongside allegations of mortgage fraud and forgery. Her legal team is fighting to suppress evidence they believe was improperly obtained, while prosecutors argue the material is critical to proving her guilt. As the trial approaches, attorneys are tasked with submitting written briefs to address unresolved evidentiary disputes. The judge has indicated that decisions on contested items will follow a future hearing. In addition to the murder charges, Kouri Richins faces separate allegations of financial crimes, including mortgage fraud, which will be addressed in a subsequent trial. The case's complexity and high stakes underscore the challenges of balancing thorough investigation with legal safeguards. With the trial scheduled for April, it remains to be seen how the evidence battles will shape the jury's understanding of the events surrounding Eric Richins' tragic death. #KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylOverdose #TrueCrime #LegalNews #MurderTrial #UtahNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The high-profile case of Kouri Richins, charged with murdering her husband, Eric Richins, has entered a critical phase as attorneys contest the admissibility of key evidence ahead of her trial. Eric Richins died in March 2022 from a fentanyl overdose, and investigators took over a year to arrest his wife. The case is attracting attention due to conflicting narratives about the investigation process and the evidence gathered. Detective Jeff O'Driscoll, one of the lead investigators, testified about his early visits to Kouri Richins, emphasizing that she was not initially a primary suspect. "We knew Eric had died of a fentanyl overdose but did not know whether it was an accident, suicide, or homicide," O'Driscoll explained. He described Kouri Richins as “very cheery, very open” during his visit, though defense attorney Kathy Nestor criticized his approach. Nestor questioned why O'Driscoll stayed in the home for three hours and why Richins was not informed about an audio recording of their conversation. Nestor also raised issues about O'Driscoll obtaining phone records prior to the visit without notifying Richins or her attorney. "In order to be thorough, I was trying to investigate all of those possibilities," O'Driscoll replied, maintaining that his actions were standard procedure. Investigators executed multiple search warrants, but these operations have drawn scrutiny. During a traffic stop shortly after the first search, Eric Maynard of the Summit County Sheriff's Office obtained Richins' phone. A recording played in court revealed Richins crying during their conversation, but Maynard testified, "I did not see tears." He said she voluntarily gave her phone password but later admitted a mistake in his report, which stated she was in custody at the time. Another contentious piece of evidence is a letter titled "Walk the dog!!" discovered in Kouri Richins' jail cell. Prosecutors allege the letter outlines instructions for her mother and brother about testimony and financial issues, claiming it amounts to witness tampering. The letter also mentions a person referred to as "Lotto," described as an intimate acquaintance of Kouri Richins. Prosecutors argue this correspondence could link her to attempts at manipulating witnesses and avoiding suspicion. However, the defense has questioned whether the letter falls under attorney-client privilege due to references to legal advice. Deputy Summit County Attorney Brad Bloodworth defended the inclusion of the letter, asserting, "This is not trial preparation; it's about controlling testimony and publicity." Bloodworth also pointed to its significance in explaining potential motives, including financial pressures on Kouri Richins. The timeline of events leading to Richins' arrest also came under scrutiny. Less than three weeks after O'Driscoll's visit, he secured a warrant to search Richins' home for evidence, including copper cups and counterfeit pills. During the search, an orange notebook was seized, though its relevance is now contested. Additionally, Richins' arrest outside a Salt Lake County business involved another phone seizure, which her defense argues may have been mishandled. Eric Richins' death, initially called in as a medical emergency, has led to Kouri Richins facing charges of aggravated murder and attempted murder, alongside allegations of mortgage fraud and forgery. Her legal team is fighting to suppress evidence they believe was improperly obtained, while prosecutors argue the material is critical to proving her guilt. As the trial approaches, attorneys are tasked with submitting written briefs to address unresolved evidentiary disputes. The judge has indicated that decisions on contested items will follow a future hearing. In addition to the murder charges, Kouri Richins faces separate allegations of financial crimes, including mortgage fraud, which will be addressed in a subsequent trial. The case's complexity and high stakes underscore the challenges of balancing thorough investigation with legal safeguards. With the trial scheduled for April, it remains to be seen how the evidence battles will shape the jury's understanding of the events surrounding Eric Richins' tragic death. #KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylOverdose #TrueCrime #LegalNews #MurderTrial #UtahNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Shannon Sharpe Almost Brought To Tears On Live TV, Shannon Sharpe Gets Into A Heated Debate With Ryan Clark, Michael Jordan Teammate Reveals Why Lebron James Doesn't Motivate NBA Players Like Kobe Bryant. Download the PrizePicks app today and use code CLNS and get $50 instantly when you play $5! Join The Dreamerspro Community: https://www.patreon.com/Dreamersproofficial Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The high-profile case of Kouri Richins, charged with murdering her husband, Eric Richins, has entered a critical phase as attorneys contest the admissibility of key evidence ahead of her trial. Eric Richins died in March 2022 from a fentanyl overdose, and investigators took over a year to arrest his wife. The case is attracting attention due to conflicting narratives about the investigation process and the evidence gathered. Detective Jeff O'Driscoll, one of the lead investigators, testified about his early visits to Kouri Richins, emphasizing that she was not initially a primary suspect. "We knew Eric had died of a fentanyl overdose but did not know whether it was an accident, suicide, or homicide," O'Driscoll explained. He described Kouri Richins as “very cheery, very open” during his visit, though defense attorney Kathy Nestor criticized his approach. Nestor questioned why O'Driscoll stayed in the home for three hours and why Richins was not informed about an audio recording of their conversation. Nestor also raised issues about O'Driscoll obtaining phone records prior to the visit without notifying Richins or her attorney. "In order to be thorough, I was trying to investigate all of those possibilities," O'Driscoll replied, maintaining that his actions were standard procedure. Investigators executed multiple search warrants, but these operations have drawn scrutiny. During a traffic stop shortly after the first search, Eric Maynard of the Summit County Sheriff's Office obtained Richins' phone. A recording played in court revealed Richins crying during their conversation, but Maynard testified, "I did not see tears." He said she voluntarily gave her phone password but later admitted a mistake in his report, which stated she was in custody at the time. Another contentious piece of evidence is a letter titled "Walk the dog!!" discovered in Kouri Richins' jail cell. Prosecutors allege the letter outlines instructions for her mother and brother about testimony and financial issues, claiming it amounts to witness tampering. The letter also mentions a person referred to as "Lotto," described as an intimate acquaintance of Kouri Richins. Prosecutors argue this correspondence could link her to attempts at manipulating witnesses and avoiding suspicion. However, the defense has questioned whether the letter falls under attorney-client privilege due to references to legal advice. Deputy Summit County Attorney Brad Bloodworth defended the inclusion of the letter, asserting, "This is not trial preparation; it's about controlling testimony and publicity." Bloodworth also pointed to its significance in explaining potential motives, including financial pressures on Kouri Richins. The timeline of events leading to Richins' arrest also came under scrutiny. Less than three weeks after O'Driscoll's visit, he secured a warrant to search Richins' home for evidence, including copper cups and counterfeit pills. During the search, an orange notebook was seized, though its relevance is now contested. Additionally, Richins' arrest outside a Salt Lake County business involved another phone seizure, which her defense argues may have been mishandled. Eric Richins' death, initially called in as a medical emergency, has led to Kouri Richins facing charges of aggravated murder and attempted murder, alongside allegations of mortgage fraud and forgery. Her legal team is fighting to suppress evidence they believe was improperly obtained, while prosecutors argue the material is critical to proving her guilt. As the trial approaches, attorneys are tasked with submitting written briefs to address unresolved evidentiary disputes. The judge has indicated that decisions on contested items will follow a future hearing. In addition to the murder charges, Kouri Richins faces separate allegations of financial crimes, including mortgage fraud, which will be addressed in a subsequent trial. The case's complexity and high stakes underscore the challenges of balancing thorough investigation with legal safeguards. With the trial scheduled for April, it remains to be seen how the evidence battles will shape the jury's understanding of the events surrounding Eric Richins' tragic death. #KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylOverdose #TrueCrime #LegalNews #MurderTrial #UtahNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

With Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs in the AFC Championship again, Bobby says he thinks the flopping and penalties Mahomes draws from the refs is because Tom Brady started it years ago, and Kickoff Kevin gets heated when defending his Patriots. Plus, Eddie broke his arm over the weekend after conveniently finding out the guys would have to compete in a lifting competition for the last Super Bowl ticket. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook App today: https://dkng.co/bobbysports If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL/IN/MI/NJ/PA/WV/WY), 1-800-NEXT STEP (AZ), 1-800-522-4700 (CO/NH), 888-789-7777/visit http://ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA), 1-877-770-STOP (7867) (LA), 877-8-HOPENY/text HOPENY (467369) (NY), visit OPGR.org (OR), call/text TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN), or 1-888-532-3500 (VA). 21+ (18+ WY). Physically present in AZ/CO/CT/IL/IN/IA/LA/MI/NJ/ NY/PA/TN/VA/WV/WY only. N/A in NH/OR/ON. New customers only. Valid 1 per new customer. Min. $5 deposit. Min $5 wager. $200 issued as eight (8) $25 free bets. Ends 9/19/22. See http://draftkings.com/sportsbook for details. Follow the Show: @BobbyBonesSports Follow the Crew: @MrBobbyBones @ProducerEddie @KickoffKevin @MikeDeestro @ReidYarberry See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

With Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs in the AFC Championship again, Bobby says he thinks the flopping and penalties Mahomes draws from the refs is because Tom Brady started it years ago, and Kickoff Kevin gets heated when defending his Patriots. Plus, Eddie broke his arm over the weekend after conveniently finding out the guys would have to compete in a lifting competition for the last Super Bowl ticket. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook App today: https://dkng.co/bobbysports If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL/IN/MI/NJ/PA/WV/WY), 1-800-NEXT STEP (AZ), 1-800-522-4700 (CO/NH), 888-789-7777/visit http://ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA), 1-877-770-STOP (7867) (LA), 877-8-HOPENY/text HOPENY (467369) (NY), visit OPGR.org (OR), call/text TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN), or 1-888-532-3500 (VA). 21+ (18+ WY). Physically present in AZ/CO/CT/IL/IN/IA/LA/MI/NJ/ NY/PA/TN/VA/WV/WY only. N/A in NH/OR/ON. New customers only. Valid 1 per new customer. Min. $5 deposit. Min $5 wager. $200 issued as eight (8) $25 free bets. Ends 9/19/22. See http://draftkings.com/sportsbook for details. Follow the Show: @BobbyBonesSports Follow the Crew: @MrBobbyBones @ProducerEddie @KickoffKevin @MikeDeestro @ReidYarberry See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

WHO ELSE can I play right back? Arteta's HEATED debate over Arsenal's defensive options Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On today's episode of The Stretch, we are joined by Ohio's Tate to breakdown the match up of Ohio State vs Notre Dame, and the match up in the gambling cave. Tate believes OSU matches up perfectly to ND, however Chief Disagrees. We also get more into our expectations for the Bears head coaching search, the NFC north being a fraudulent juggernaut conference, Tom Ricketts quote of only breaking even, and more.You can find every episode of this show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or YouTube. Prime Members can listen ad-free on Amazon Music. For more, visit barstool.link/redlineradio

This conversation went all over the place. We got into a heated debate over whether companies should be held accountable for what they tell their travelers & whether or not all healthcare workers are know-it-all's - Type A - Questioners. We get into proving your point vs ego vs knowing when to let things go. We somehow got into an entire conversation about how I (Kim) am short with my tongue and how I turned Erran into a type A. This conversation got heated and basically turned into marriage counseling session lol!! Enjoy:)Let us know what you think on our IG: instagram.com/kimanderrang/For all things Travsessed: imtravsessed.com

In this tennis podcast we discuss all the highlights of Day 3 at the Australian Open 2025. Fonseca defeats Rublev in straight sets, Raducanu defeats Alexandrova, Medvedev goes to 5 with Samrej. ❤️ SUBSCRIBE TO GTL: https://bit.ly/35JyOhz ▶️ JOIN YOUTUBE MEMBERSHIP: https://bit.ly/3Fk9rSr

Are hyper-independent women redefining relationships?

A heated debate has erupted over H-1B visas, and now President-elect Donald Trump has chimed in. The debate was triggered by comments from Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, who will head the incoming Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Both came out in support of the visas, while many influencers with pro-Trump leanings came out strongly against the visa policies. The topic could become a key factor in the policies of the next Trump administration on immigration, domestic manufacturing, and American innovation.

It began with a statement that sent shockwaves through the world of music and celebrity—a woman, identified only as Jane Doe, stepping forward with accusations that two of the most powerful figures in hip-hop, Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs, raped her when she was just 13 years old. Twenty-four years after the alleged incident, she finally decided to speak out, taking her story to NBC News and launching a lawsuit that named both men as defendants. Yet, as with many high-profile allegations, the story quickly unraveled into a tangled web of claims, counterclaims, and inconsistencies that raised as many questions as it answered. The Alleged Incident: A Night at the VMAs According to Jane Doe, the assault took place on the night of the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. Sneaking out of her home in Rochester, New York, she made her way to New York City, determined to be part of the electric atmosphere surrounding the VMAs. Lacking a ticket, she watched the event from a jumbotron outside Radio City Music Hall and mingled with others hoping to catch a glimpse of the stars. A limo driver, claiming to work for Diddy, allegedly offered to take her to an after-party, suggesting that she “fit what Diddy was looking for.” The lawsuit describes her arrival at a “large white residence with a gated U-shaped driveway.” Inside, she said, she mingled with celebrities and accepted a drink from a waitress that soon made her feel woozy. She retreated to an empty bedroom, where she alleged Jay-Z and Diddy entered and raped her. The lawsuit paints a harrowing picture of what she described as a “catastrophic event” that upended her life. Emerging Discrepancies As Jane Doe's story gained attention, inconsistencies began to surface. For instance, she initially claimed her father had driven five hours to pick her up after the incident, but he later stated he did not recall such a trip. While her father acknowledged retrieving her late at night on one occasion, he stated it was a local drive and unrelated to the alleged assault. Another issue involved Jane Doe's claim of speaking with Benji Madden at the after-party. Representatives for Madden confirmed he was on tour in the Midwest at the time of the VMAs. Additionally, photos from that night show Jay-Z and Diddy at the Lotus nightclub, which does not match the description of the residence Jane Doe provided. While these images do not account for their entire evening, they cast doubt on parts of her account. Legal Reactions and Public Scrutiny Jay-Z and Diddy's legal teams responded swiftly and forcefully. Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, labeled the lawsuit as lacking merit, accusing Jane Doe's lawyer, Tony Buzbee, of failing to properly vet her claims. Diddy's attorneys echoed similar sentiments, describing the lawsuit as baseless. Both teams have filed motions for dismissal, asserting that the allegations lack sufficient evidence. Despite the criticism, Jane Doe remains adamant. She stated that while some details may have been inaccurate, the central events of her account were true. The Complexities of Trauma and Memory The case has sparked debate over the reliability of memory, particularly in survivors of trauma. Experts in psychology note that traumatic events can distort memory, with certain details becoming blurry over time while others remain vividly clear. Advocates for sexual assault survivors caution against dismissing claims based solely on inconsistencies, arguing that they are common and do not necessarily indicate falsehood. Jane Doe's personal struggles following the alleged assault add context to her delayed disclosure. She described years of depression, academic struggles, and homelessness. Despite these challenges, she eventually earned her high school diploma and certifications in Christian counseling and applied behavior analysis. Now a mother of two, she says her decision to come forward was driven by a desire to advocate for herself and others who have endured similar experiences. Broader Implications and Diddy's Legal Troubles This lawsuit arrives at a precarious time for Diddy, who is already facing federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges. The allegations against him in Jane Doe's case align with broader claims of predatory behavior that have surfaced in recent years. For Jay-Z, the accusations present a rare challenge to his otherwise carefully maintained public image as a business mogul and philanthropist. The legal implications are significant. The court's handling of this case could set a precedent for how similar claims are evaluated, particularly those involving powerful figures. Cultural Reflections on Power and Accountability The allegations have reignited discussions about the intersection of power, celebrity, and accountability. Movements like #MeToo have amplified the voices of survivors but have also drawn backlash from those who argue that the pendulum of public opinion can swing too far, sometimes undermining the principle of due process. Jane Doe's case embodies this tension, highlighting the difficulty of balancing empathy for survivors with the need for rigorous legal scrutiny. For the entertainment industry, the stakes are enormous. The outcome of this case could influence how future allegations against high-profile individuals are handled. It also underscores the growing demand for accountability in industries historically marked by unchecked power dynamics. The Road Ahead Jane Doe's journey has been fraught with personal and public challenges. Her decision to come forward, despite the scrutiny, reflects a broader shift in societal attitudes toward survivors of sexual assault. As the legal battle unfolds, the public will likely remain divided. Questions about memory, evidence, and the passage of time will loom large. For Jane Doe, Jay-Z, and Diddy, the stakes are personal and profound. For society, the case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in seeking justice in a world where power and influence often muddy the waters. This case will undoubtedly leave a lasting mark, not only on the individuals involved but on the broader cultural landscape. It challenges us to consider how we navigate the murky intersections of truth, memory, and accountability in the pursuit of justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

It began with a statement that sent shockwaves through the world of music and celebrity—a woman, identified only as Jane Doe, stepping forward with accusations that two of the most powerful figures in hip-hop, Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs, raped her when she was just 13 years old. Twenty-four years after the alleged incident, she finally decided to speak out, taking her story to NBC News and launching a lawsuit that named both men as defendants. Yet, as with many high-profile allegations, the story quickly unraveled into a tangled web of claims, counterclaims, and inconsistencies that raised as many questions as it answered. The Alleged Incident: A Night at the VMAs According to Jane Doe, the assault took place on the night of the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. Sneaking out of her home in Rochester, New York, she made her way to New York City, determined to be part of the electric atmosphere surrounding the VMAs. Lacking a ticket, she watched the event from a jumbotron outside Radio City Music Hall and mingled with others hoping to catch a glimpse of the stars. A limo driver, claiming to work for Diddy, allegedly offered to take her to an after-party, suggesting that she “fit what Diddy was looking for.” The lawsuit describes her arrival at a “large white residence with a gated U-shaped driveway.” Inside, she said, she mingled with celebrities and accepted a drink from a waitress that soon made her feel woozy. She retreated to an empty bedroom, where she alleged Jay-Z and Diddy entered and raped her. The lawsuit paints a harrowing picture of what she described as a “catastrophic event” that upended her life. Emerging Discrepancies As Jane Doe's story gained attention, inconsistencies began to surface. For instance, she initially claimed her father had driven five hours to pick her up after the incident, but he later stated he did not recall such a trip. While her father acknowledged retrieving her late at night on one occasion, he stated it was a local drive and unrelated to the alleged assault. Another issue involved Jane Doe's claim of speaking with Benji Madden at the after-party. Representatives for Madden confirmed he was on tour in the Midwest at the time of the VMAs. Additionally, photos from that night show Jay-Z and Diddy at the Lotus nightclub, which does not match the description of the residence Jane Doe provided. While these images do not account for their entire evening, they cast doubt on parts of her account. Legal Reactions and Public Scrutiny Jay-Z and Diddy's legal teams responded swiftly and forcefully. Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, labeled the lawsuit as lacking merit, accusing Jane Doe's lawyer, Tony Buzbee, of failing to properly vet her claims. Diddy's attorneys echoed similar sentiments, describing the lawsuit as baseless. Both teams have filed motions for dismissal, asserting that the allegations lack sufficient evidence. Despite the criticism, Jane Doe remains adamant. She stated that while some details may have been inaccurate, the central events of her account were true. The Complexities of Trauma and Memory The case has sparked debate over the reliability of memory, particularly in survivors of trauma. Experts in psychology note that traumatic events can distort memory, with certain details becoming blurry over time while others remain vividly clear. Advocates for sexual assault survivors caution against dismissing claims based solely on inconsistencies, arguing that they are common and do not necessarily indicate falsehood. Jane Doe's personal struggles following the alleged assault add context to her delayed disclosure. She described years of depression, academic struggles, and homelessness. Despite these challenges, she eventually earned her high school diploma and certifications in Christian counseling and applied behavior analysis. Now a mother of two, she says her decision to come forward was driven by a desire to advocate for herself and others who have endured similar experiences. Broader Implications and Diddy's Legal Troubles This lawsuit arrives at a precarious time for Diddy, who is already facing federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges. The allegations against him in Jane Doe's case align with broader claims of predatory behavior that have surfaced in recent years. For Jay-Z, the accusations present a rare challenge to his otherwise carefully maintained public image as a business mogul and philanthropist. The legal implications are significant. The court's handling of this case could set a precedent for how similar claims are evaluated, particularly those involving powerful figures. Cultural Reflections on Power and Accountability The allegations have reignited discussions about the intersection of power, celebrity, and accountability. Movements like #MeToo have amplified the voices of survivors but have also drawn backlash from those who argue that the pendulum of public opinion can swing too far, sometimes undermining the principle of due process. Jane Doe's case embodies this tension, highlighting the difficulty of balancing empathy for survivors with the need for rigorous legal scrutiny. For the entertainment industry, the stakes are enormous. The outcome of this case could influence how future allegations against high-profile individuals are handled. It also underscores the growing demand for accountability in industries historically marked by unchecked power dynamics. The Road Ahead Jane Doe's journey has been fraught with personal and public challenges. Her decision to come forward, despite the scrutiny, reflects a broader shift in societal attitudes toward survivors of sexual assault. As the legal battle unfolds, the public will likely remain divided. Questions about memory, evidence, and the passage of time will loom large. For Jane Doe, Jay-Z, and Diddy, the stakes are personal and profound. For society, the case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in seeking justice in a world where power and influence often muddy the waters. This case will undoubtedly leave a lasting mark, not only on the individuals involved but on the broader cultural landscape. It challenges us to consider how we navigate the murky intersections of truth, memory, and accountability in the pursuit of justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Today on "Don't@ME". Riley Gaines Debate On X, Mystics Owner Spews Nonsense and Kamala Harris Going For Governor?! Plus, Host, "The Ross Tucker Football Podcast", Ross Tucker with reaction to Jonathan Taylor's fumble out of the back of the end zone vs the Broncos and is Josh Allen in line to win his first ever NFL MVP award? ACC & ESPN College Football Analyst, Tom Luginbill on Notre Dame securing Marcus Freeman with a long term extension. And ESPN College Basketball Analyst, Fran Fraschilla shares his pick on the team to beat that he's seen so far in college basketball this season Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

It began with a statement that sent shockwaves through the world of music and celebrity—a woman, identified only as Jane Doe, stepping forward with accusations that two of the most powerful figures in hip-hop, Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs, raped her when she was just 13 years old. Twenty-four years after the alleged incident, she finally decided to speak out, taking her story to NBC News and launching a lawsuit that named both men as defendants. Yet, as with many high-profile allegations, the story quickly unraveled into a tangled web of claims, counterclaims, and inconsistencies that raised as many questions as it answered. The Alleged Incident: A Night at the VMAs According to Jane Doe, the assault took place on the night of the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. Sneaking out of her home in Rochester, New York, she made her way to New York City, determined to be part of the electric atmosphere surrounding the VMAs. Lacking a ticket, she watched the event from a jumbotron outside Radio City Music Hall and mingled with others hoping to catch a glimpse of the stars. A limo driver, claiming to work for Diddy, allegedly offered to take her to an after-party, suggesting that she “fit what Diddy was looking for.” The lawsuit describes her arrival at a “large white residence with a gated U-shaped driveway.” Inside, she said, she mingled with celebrities and accepted a drink from a waitress that soon made her feel woozy. She retreated to an empty bedroom, where she alleged Jay-Z and Diddy entered and raped her. The lawsuit paints a harrowing picture of what she described as a “catastrophic event” that upended her life. Emerging Discrepancies As Jane Doe's story gained attention, inconsistencies began to surface. For instance, she initially claimed her father had driven five hours to pick her up after the incident, but he later stated he did not recall such a trip. While her father acknowledged retrieving her late at night on one occasion, he stated it was a local drive and unrelated to the alleged assault. Another issue involved Jane Doe's claim of speaking with Benji Madden at the after-party. Representatives for Madden confirmed he was on tour in the Midwest at the time of the VMAs. Additionally, photos from that night show Jay-Z and Diddy at the Lotus nightclub, which does not match the description of the residence Jane Doe provided. While these images do not account for their entire evening, they cast doubt on parts of her account. Legal Reactions and Public Scrutiny Jay-Z and Diddy's legal teams responded swiftly and forcefully. Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, labeled the lawsuit as lacking merit, accusing Jane Doe's lawyer, Tony Buzbee, of failing to properly vet her claims. Diddy's attorneys echoed similar sentiments, describing the lawsuit as baseless. Both teams have filed motions for dismissal, asserting that the allegations lack sufficient evidence. Despite the criticism, Jane Doe remains adamant. She stated that while some details may have been inaccurate, the central events of her account were true. The Complexities of Trauma and Memory The case has sparked debate over the reliability of memory, particularly in survivors of trauma. Experts in psychology note that traumatic events can distort memory, with certain details becoming blurry over time while others remain vividly clear. Advocates for sexual assault survivors caution against dismissing claims based solely on inconsistencies, arguing that they are common and do not necessarily indicate falsehood. Jane Doe's personal struggles following the alleged assault add context to her delayed disclosure. She described years of depression, academic struggles, and homelessness. Despite these challenges, she eventually earned her high school diploma and certifications in Christian counseling and applied behavior analysis. Now a mother of two, she says her decision to come forward was driven by a desire to advocate for herself and others who have endured similar experiences. Broader Implications and Diddy's Legal Troubles This lawsuit arrives at a precarious time for Diddy, who is already facing federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges. The allegations against him in Jane Doe's case align with broader claims of predatory behavior that have surfaced in recent years. For Jay-Z, the accusations present a rare challenge to his otherwise carefully maintained public image as a business mogul and philanthropist. The legal implications are significant. The court's handling of this case could set a precedent for how similar claims are evaluated, particularly those involving powerful figures. Cultural Reflections on Power and Accountability The allegations have reignited discussions about the intersection of power, celebrity, and accountability. Movements like #MeToo have amplified the voices of survivors but have also drawn backlash from those who argue that the pendulum of public opinion can swing too far, sometimes undermining the principle of due process. Jane Doe's case embodies this tension, highlighting the difficulty of balancing empathy for survivors with the need for rigorous legal scrutiny. For the entertainment industry, the stakes are enormous. The outcome of this case could influence how future allegations against high-profile individuals are handled. It also underscores the growing demand for accountability in industries historically marked by unchecked power dynamics. The Road Ahead Jane Doe's journey has been fraught with personal and public challenges. Her decision to come forward, despite the scrutiny, reflects a broader shift in societal attitudes toward survivors of sexual assault. As the legal battle unfolds, the public will likely remain divided. Questions about memory, evidence, and the passage of time will loom large. For Jane Doe, Jay-Z, and Diddy, the stakes are personal and profound. For society, the case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in seeking justice in a world where power and influence often muddy the waters. This case will undoubtedly leave a lasting mark, not only on the individuals involved but on the broader cultural landscape. It challenges us to consider how we navigate the murky intersections of truth, memory, and accountability in the pursuit of justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpScWes_g_Z95ViTF5vdkiA/join Let us know if you agree in the comments below! Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. ----email us at----thepanicbuttonpodcast@gmail.com New REACTIONS Every Week! SUPPORT THE CHANNEL

Today Nancy Grace and Sheryl McCollum discuss the latest on the Luigi Mangione case. They explain the legal nuances of the charges against him, the premeditation and intent behind his actions, and the implications of his crimes on victims and society. Nancy and Sheryl also examine broader issues, such as the public's controversial support of Mangione, the legal distinctions between murder charges, and the growing concern over ghost guns. Show Notes: (0:00) Welcome! Nancy and Sheryl introduce this week’s crime roundup (0:10) Sheryl introduces the updates on the Luigi Mangione case (1:00) Public reaction and outrage (3:00) Legal breakdown of murder 1 vs. murder 2 (8:00) Human trafficking and poaching routes (9:30) Evidence and investigation details (14:00) Connection to past infamous cases (17:00) Family impact and emotional toll (23:30) Ghost guns and legal implications (30:00) Personal reflections and closing thoughts --- Nancy Grace is an outspoken, tireless advocate for victims’ rights and one of television's most respected legal analysts. Nancy Grace had a perfect conviction record during her decade as a prosecutor. She is the founder and publisher of CrimeOnline.com, a crime- fighting digital platform that investigates breaking crime news, spreads awareness of missing people and shines a light on cold cases. In addition, Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, a daily show hosted by Grace, airs on SIRIUS XM’s Triumph Channel 111 and is downloadable as a podcast on all audio platforms - https://www.crimeonline.com/ Connect with Nancy: X: @nancygrace Instagram: @thenancygrace Facebook: @nancygrace Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook., Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Connect with Sheryl: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com X: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollum See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We took a week off we back and it was a fun one! Things got a little testy through with a few debates but we got through lol. Take a look below to follow the topics in this week's pod! 00:00:00 Welcome 00:04:56 Pre-game Kai Cenat's Mafiathon 00:13:52 2024 Music Replays 00:25:42 Drafting our All NBA Teams Pt1 00:35:15 HEATED Lamelo vs Kyrie Debate 00:46:37 Drafting our All Rookie Teams Pt1 00:53:11 Is Caitlin Clarke more popular than the NBA's Stars Under 30? 00:58:35 Are the Rockets For Real? 01:05:27 HEATED Debate on Nets Potential Moves 01:27:39 Fast Topics Ja will stop dunking? Should players get guard dogs? Paul Millsap retires WNBA's new team Toronto Tempo Women's and Mens college basketball thoughts Still high on Cooper Flagg Paul Pierce Says He Broke LeBron's Will

In this intense episode, Eli and guests tackle heated topics on Black men, dating preferences, trauma, accountability, and stereotypes. Emotions run high as a guest storms off mid-debate. Join us as we dive deep into issues facing Black men and women in today's relationships, community accountability, and the challenges of healing past trauma. *Enhance Your Experience with #Dailyrapupcrew

It's back to business as Ryan and Christian return for a solo adventure in the Zip Cave. This week, the guys discuss Ridley Scott's new epic blockbuster Gladiator II as Ryan and Cush saw the film over the holiday weekend. The guys also discuss the PLE Survivor Series: War Games and the repercussions of the wins/losses from the event.  Also this week, a new in-depth interview with DCU head James Gunn on Creature Commandos, what's still DC canon and more. Plus, news on Michael Mann's Heat 2, a discussion on Ridley Scott's work ethic with his new Gladiator film, a rumored director for Avengers vs. X-Men, Robert Eggers' upcoming Nosferatu breaks a runtime record (previous also held by Eggers) and so much more! >>HAVE YOU VISITED OUR NEW WEBSITE??? Find past shows, current episodes, clips and more! Click Here to head to the site! Don't forget to follow the guys on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram. Contribute to the GeekZip Podcast through our official Patreon account, where as members, you'll receive exclusive content regularly! Email your questions and comments to geekzippodcast@gmail.com. Online news clips and stories by: comicbooknews.com, screenrant.com, ign.com, cosmicbook.news, fangoria.com, YouTube, Facebook, WWE, givemesport.com, wwfoldschool.com, wrestlezone.com, screencrush.com, variety.com, small-screen.co.uk, indiewire.com,  ihorror.com, comingsoon.net, cbr.com, rue-morgue.com, paramountartscenter.com, mountainhealtharena.com, chaswvccc.com, Time Warp-Ashland, KY, msn.com, eonline.com 

Dating Talk is LIVE on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠youtube.com/whatever --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/whatever/support

Andy Scott and Gary Logan are joined by former lightweight world champion Anthony Crolla and cruiserweight contender Viddal Riley to reflect on an eventful week in the boxing world.The panel breaks down Jake Paul's controversial victory over boxing legend Mike Tyson and analyses Chris Billam-Smith's unanimous decision defeat to Gilberto Ramirez.Viddal Riley also comments on an eagerly anticipated potential match-up against fellow British counterpart Isaac Chamberlain.

The sparks fly from the beginning this week!Christian and Ryan have a very spirited and NSFW conversation about Ryan's recent review of Todd Phillip's Joker: Folie A Deux. Ryan enjoyed the film, while Christian has the suspicion that Zip is biased in his love for comic books and comic book films. Did you see the 2nd Joker film? Give us your thoughts in the comments!Also, a new 'Kane' variant suggested by the guys after seeing the latest in-ring incarnation, 'CoKane', David Zaslav's hope in possible media mergers following Trump's win, discussing the new Captain America: New World Order trailer and our first look at the 'Red Hulk' transformation and much more!>>HAVE YOU VISITED OUR NEW WEBSITE??? Find past shows, current episodes, clips and more! Click Here to head to the site!Don't forget to follow the guys on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram. Contribute to the GeekZip Podcast through our official Patreon account, where as members, you'll receive exclusive content regularly! Email your questions and comments to geekzippodcast@gmail.com.Online news clips and stories by: comicbooknews.com, screenrant.com, ign.com, cosmicbook.news, fangoria.com, YouTube, Facebook, WWE, givemesport.com, wwfoldschool.com, wrestlezone.com, screencrush.com, variety.com, small-screen.co.uk, indiewire.com,  ihorror.com, comingsoon.net, cbr.com, rue-morgue.com, paramountartscenter.com, mountainhealtharena.com, chaswvccc.com, Time Warp-Ashland, KY, msn.com, eonline.com 

Dating Talk is LIVE on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠youtube.com/whatever --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/whatever/support

Have Arsenal and Man City bottled the title race? Is Haaland BORING? And are Newcastle back on their top 4 surge? Things get heated in this weeks epsiode!New episodes available to watch & listen EVERY DAY.Click HERE: https://linktr.ee/pitchsidepodcastIf you'd like to work with us, email the studio onpitchside@fellasstudios.comProduced by The Fellas Studios: https://fellasstudios.com/podcastsTheo:https://youtube.com/c/HiMalfoyhttps://youtube.com/c/TheoBakerVlogsReev:https://youtube.com/c/reevhttps://youtube.com/c/OllieFletcherTom Garratt:https://www.youtube.com/@TomGarratt10Ollie:https://x.com/TalkCPFC Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Today, JJ and Kait explore the rise of dating apps post-COVID and if they're now on their way out as well as delving into the impact of Christian nationalism.  Love Heart of Dating Podcast? Want to support us AND be a part of the fam? Join us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/heartofdating Subscribe to our YouTube channel here! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ1PswEXEyeSddMmOSiRKGw Crushing on a cutie? Download this FREE Resource on how to show interest: https://www.heartofdating.com/resource/how-to-show-interest  Want to further your dating knowledge? Check out our ultimate dating library! https://www.heartofdating.com/resource/ultimate-dating-library  Kait wrote a book! Snag Thank You For Rejecting Me on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3E59cLQ Want to meet some epic Christian Singles? Join our huge HOD Family on FB! https://www.facebook.com/groups/heartofdatingpodcast  Come hang with us on the gram: http://instagram.com/heartofdating http://instagram.com/kaitness https://www.instagram.com/jjtomlin/?hl=en Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Download the PrizePicks app today and use code CLNS and get $50 instantly when you play $5. Shocking Video Goes Viral Of Lakers Head Coach JJ Redick Screaming At Lebron James, Disturbing Trend Develops For Lebron James, NBA Legends Get Into Heated Debate While Arguing Over Michael Jordan Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Show off your Lone Star spirit with a free "Remember the Alamo" hat with an annual subscription to The Texan: https://thetexan.news/subscribe/ The Texan's Weekly Roundup brings you the latest news in Texas politics, breaking down the top stories of the week with our team of reporters who give you the facts so you can form your own opinion. Enjoy what you hear? Be sure to subscribe and leave a review! Got questions for the reporting team? Email editor@thetexan.news — they just might be answered on a future podcast.This week on The Texan's “Weekly Roundup,” the team discusses:Abbott's General Counsel Argues Texas Supreme Court Should Dismiss Roberson House Committee SubpoenaRobert Roberson House Committee Hearing Features Celebrities, Former Judge, Trial JurorEarly Voting Begins for 2024 General ElectionInitial GOP Early Vote Turnout in Texas Substantially Higher Than 2020 LevelsGonzalez, Flores Trade Blows in Heated Debate for South Texas Congressional SeatRepublican Harris-Davila Faces Democrat Birkholz in Competitive Williamson County House DistrictDemocratic Rep. Mihaela Plesa Faces Republican Steven Kinard in Collin County House RacePaxton Demands Federal Election Commission Issue New Rules on ActBlue's Payment MethodsSan Antonio Police Confirm Venezuelan 'Tren de Aragua' Gang Occupied Vacant ApartmentsCozen O'Connor Public Strategies - The Beltway BriefingListen for of-the-moment insider insights, framed by the rapidly changing social and...Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

This episode is sponsored by Miracle Made. Go to trymiracle.com/ELLIS and use the code ELLIS to claim your FREE 3 PIECE TOWEL SET and SAVE over 40% OFF. This episode is sponsored by HelloFresh. Get 10 FREE meals at HelloFresh.com/ellisfree. Applied across 7 boxes, new subscribers only, varies by plan. That's 10 free HelloFresh meals, just by going to HelloFresh.com/ellisfree. This episode is sponsored by BlueChew. Try BlueChew FREE when you use our promo code ELLIS at checkout--just pay $5 shipping. BlueChew.com, promo code ELLIS to receive your first month FREE. In this heated podcast episode, Ryan Sickler and Jason dive into a controversial and eye-opening debate about sexuality, attractiveness, and gender identity. They tackle the provocative question: Is it gay to sleep with an ugly woman or a trans woman? Their intense discussion explores societal perceptions, the complexities of sexual preference, and what defines attraction. With shocking quotes and unfiltered opinions, this episode pushes the boundaries of conversation around LGBT topics, trans identity, and traditional views of masculinity. Don't miss this explosive episode where no topic is off-limits! #PodcastDebate #RyanSickler #JasonEllis #LGBTQ #TransWomen #GenderIdentity #Sexuality #ControversialTopics #TransDebate #LGBTQDebate #PodcastDiscussion #HotTakes #Masculinity #LGBTQIssues #TrendingPodcast #Debate Subscribe to our Patreon to call/text/write in LIVE https://www.patreon.com/EllisMate Call/Text (424) 350-1721 or email submittoellis@gmail.com https://www.instagram.com/thejasonellisshow https://twitter.com/JasonEllisShow Jason Ellis: https://www.theJasonEllis.com https://instagram.com/wolfmate https://twitter.com/EllisMate Michael Tully: https://instagram.com/tullywood https://twitter.com/Tully #ryansickler #jasonellis #michaeltully #thejasonellisshow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to another episode of The Action and Ambition Podcast! Joining us today is Michael Lee, a California resident and author of "The Abortion Bible." This book tackles America's most heated debate: abortion. In four parts, Lee explores how the country became so divided on this issue. He discusses faith, law, and women's rights, highlighting the progress women have made over the past century. The book also calls for more support for children in difficult situations. Lee offers insights into this complex topic, touching on history, women's challenges, and the future of the abortion debate. "The Abortion Bible" aims to provide a comprehensive look at this controversial subject that continues to spark intense discussions across the nation. Don't miss a thing on this. Tune in to learn more!

Dean and Oscar debate the winner of Colorado's matchup this week with the hosts of Bleav in Kansas State.

This cracks are already showing in this year's President's Cup battle, with critics calling the format out for some of the team's choices, but is that the whole story?   Listen to This Week's Show Download on iTunes here Listen on Spotify here Thanks to this Week's Sponsors Titleist is committed to ensuring that every golf ball delivers superior quality and consistency.  From ball to ball, dozen to dozen we should expect our golf ball to perform exactly the same way, shot after shot. That's why Titleist owns the design, the technology and the manufacturing to make sure consistency spot on every time. They even conduct all the testing and quality checks to make sure nothing slips through the cracks.  Titleist is the #1 ball for every player and the #1 ball in golf.  Choose the best for your game and find out more at Titleist.com. Trust your golf game to FootJoy, the number one Shoe in Golf. Shop now at FootJoy.com. Thanks for tuning to The Golf Podcast! Cover Image via X

Dating Talk is LIVE on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠youtube.com/whatever --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/whatever/support

On today's episode of The Mid Show, we get into a recap of the 4th episode of Hard Knocks, and recap the show as a whole thus far. Later, a heated debate erupts as Eddie Claims Chief is too optimistic his takes lose value and Chief and White Sox Dave fire back saying Eddie doesn't have takes at all. We also get into the White Sox losing their 100th game and what it would take for White Sox Dave to buy in again.You can find every episode of this show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or YouTube. Prime Members can listen ad-free on Amazon Music. For more, visit barstool.link/redlineradio

Konstantin Kisin and Saifedean Ammous debate the Israel Palestine conflict in what quickly descends into a chaotic mishmash of Saifedean blaming Konstantin's views on his 'identity' without wanting to let up what exactly he means by this... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices