Podcasts about lochner

One of labor's biggest wins in the just-ended Maryland General Assembly session was House Bill 2 (Union Dues Subtraction), reports Maryland State & DC AFL-CIO President Donna Edwards. Today's labor quote: A. Philip Randolph. Today's labor history: SCOTUS' most controversial ruling: Lochner v. New York.      @wpfwdc #1u #unions #LaborRadioPod @AFLCIO #1u @MDDCStateFed Proud founding member of the Labor Radio Podcast Network.

Stuttgart unterliegt Bremen, HSV und St. Pauli siegen - Remis zwischen FCM und KSC, Magdeburg gewinnt Viertelfinalkrimi, Friedrich holt WM-Gold im Viererbob - Blech für Lochner

Bayern wieder Tabellenführer - Hoffenheim trennt sich von Breitenreiter, HSV und St. Pauli siegen - Remis zwischen FCM und KSC, Magdeburg gewinnt Viertelfinalkrimi, Friedrich holt WM-Gold im Viererbob - Blech für Lochner

Tom Lochner, the founder of Quack Attack gloves joins us from Ohio. Tom discusses his waterfowl glove thats fairly new in terms of equipment. This product was developed from over 40 years of experience creating gloves for Firefighters. Quack Attack currently has two products out, a Waterfowl Glove and a Decoying glove. Tom takes pride in the fact that you can grab a shell from a shell box and load it into your shotgun while using the glove, this was a design of the full dexterity focus. On top of the product discussion we talk about Toms favourite hunts, changing times and more. Tom has been hunting waterfowl for more years than most! If you want to check out his gloves, goto https://www.quackattack.com/ Tune in this week to The Union 0430 Podcast! Looking for new product for the season: Visit Canadian Waterfowl Supplies: https://www.canadianwaterfowlsupplies.com/ Looking for some Punisher Swag? Visit www.punisherwaterfowl.com A huge thank you to our show sponsors: Real Geese Decoys : https://webfootdecoys.com/ Have ideas for a topic? Know someone who would be a good guest? Have questions about the show? Reach out on social media: Instagram : www.instagram.com/punisherwaterfowl                    @punisherwaterfowl Facebook : www.facebook.com/punisherwaterfowl #hunting #Podcast #waterfowl  

Landboukenners gee 'n samevatting van die uitdagings wat die bedryf in 2022 moes trotseer. Die akteur Lochner de Kock deel idees oor hoe om jou familie en vriende op Kersdag te onthaal.

Kurz bevor Corona kam, waren meine Auftragsbücher so voll wie noch nie. Mein Terminkalender platze fast vor Seminarterminen, die ich in ganz Süddeutschland halten sollte. Dazu ein halbes Dutzend bereits vereinbarter Pressereisen für Reisereportagen oder Interview-Termine in Zusammenhang mit Buchaufträgen. Auch meine wöchentlichen Kurse in München liefen gut. Nach über 30 Jahren hatte ich meine drei recht unterschiedlichen beruflichen Standbeine erfolgreich nebeneinander etabliert: Journalismus, Seminare halten und ein kleines Yoga- und Gymnastik-Boutique-Studio. Das Einzige, was ich dringend ändern hätte wollen, war, dass ich insgesamt bedeutend weniger arbeiten wollte. Aber wie? So hatte ich bereits vor Corona Buchaufträge abgelehnt und etliche Seminare an Kolleginnen weitergereicht und auch meine wöchentlichen Stunden Unterricht reduziert. Aber weniger zu arbeiten, bedeutete auch immer, weniger Einkünfte. Jeder Auftrag, den ich nicht annahm, machte sich direkt auf dem Konto bemerkbar. Mehr dazu erfährst du hier: https://www.meikehohenwarter.com/blog/okeg22

On this episode of THE CLASSIC METAL SHOW, Neeley and Chris talk with Jack Russell's Great White guitarist Robby Lochner. Lochner joined the show to talk about his new single with his band D.I.L.F., "Countdown To Christmas". They talk about the band, the wild video and more. Following, they talk a bit about Jack Russell's Great White, and all that is going on with that band going into 2023. All our links are available at https://www.linktr.ee/cmsrocks. Live Saturdays from 9pm to 3am Eastern at www.theclassicmetalshow.com or on Rumble, Odysee or YouTube. BECOME A VIP: https://bit.ly/cms-vip GET A FREE RUMBLE ACCOUNT: https://rumble.com/register/classicmetalshow/ GET A FREE ODYSEE ACCOUNT: https://odysee.com/$/invite/@ClassicMetalShow:a **NOTE: Everything said here, and on every episode of all of our shows are 100% the opinions of the hosts. Nothing is stated as fact. Do your own research to see if their opinions are true or not.** Please take a moment to subscribe, share and leave us a 5 Star Review for this episode! It helps us grow and do better episodes for YOU!! ROKU: Search "The Classic Metal Show" in the Roku Channels AMAZON: Search "The CMS Network" To Add Our Channel

On this episode of THE CLASSIC METAL SHOW, Neeley and Chris talk with Jack Russell's Great White guitarist Robby Lochner. Lochner joined the show to talk about his new single with his band D.I.L.F., "Countdown To Christmas". They talk about the band, the wild video and more. Following, they talk a bit about Jack Russell's Great White, and all that is going on with that band going into 2023. All our links are available at https://www.linktr.ee/cmsrocks. Live Saturdays from 9pm to 3am Eastern at www.theclassicmetalshow.com or on Rumble, Odysee or YouTube. BECOME A VIP: https://bit.ly/cms-vip GET A FREE RUMBLE ACCOUNT: https://rumble.com/register/classicmetalshow/ GET A FREE ODYSEE ACCOUNT: https://odysee.com/$/invite/@ClassicMetalShow:a **NOTE: Everything said here, and on every episode of all of our shows are 100% the opinions of the hosts. Nothing is stated as fact. Do your own research to see if their opinions are true or not.** Please take a moment to subscribe, share and leave us a 5 Star Review for this episode! It helps us grow and do better episodes for YOU!! ROKU: Search "The Classic Metal Show" in the Roku Channels AMAZON: Search "The CMS Network" To Add Our Channel --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/cmspn/message

Eigentlich sollte die Geheimrede Hitlers vor der Wehrmachtsführung am 22. August 1939 auf dem Obersalzberg zu einem zentralen Beweisstück des Nürnberger Prozesses 1945/46 werden. Denn in dieser Ansprache hatte der „Führer“ kurz vor dem Krieg all seinen wichtigen Generälen enthüllt, dass er für die Deutschen die „Erd-Herrschaft“ anstreben und über kurz oder lang alle „minderwertigen Rassen“ vernichten lassen werde. Die gesamte Wehrmachtsführung wurde somit zum Mitwisser. Allerdings gelang es in Nürnberg nicht, die Weitergabe dieser Geheimrede am 25. August 1939 an den Berlin-Korrespondenten der amerikanischen Nachrichtenagentur AP, Louis Lochner, durch den militärischen Widerstand unter Admiral Canaris zu rekonstruieren. Dabei war Lochner sogar beim Prozess als Berichterstatter anwesend. Die Hintergründe und Zusammenhänge, die einem Polit- und Geschichtsthriller ähneln, werden in dem Vortrag erstmals umfassend rekonstruiert. Den Originalbeitrag und mehr finden Sie bitte hier: https://lisa.gerda-henkel-stiftung.de/bfz_ns_weltherrschaft

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.12.02.518704v1?rss=1 Authors: Hill, E., Huang, X., Del Popolo, I., La Mache, C., Lochner, M., Ladds, G., Frenguelli, B. G., Wall, M. Abstract: We have previously reported that in rat hippocampal area CA1, the A1R-selective agonist, BnOCPA, potently inhibited excitatory synaptic transmission but did not cause membrane hyperpolarisation in CA1 pyramidal neurons, as would be expected of A1R agonists. This functional discrimination by BnOCPA may arise from its ability, in cAMP inhibition assays, to selectively activate only Gob out of the six Gi/o subtypes. This may explain why BnOCPA is a potent analgesic that does not cause sedation or cardiorespiratory depression in the rat. Since many preclinical studies are performed using mice, we have here investigated whether BnOCPA's functional discrimination extends to the mouse. While the potency of BnOCPA against the inhibition of hippocampal synaptic transmission was comparable between rats and mice, we discovered that low concentrations of BnOCPA hyperpolarised mouse CA1 neurons and reduced both their input resistance and firing rate in an A1R-dependent manner. In interleaved experiments we confirmed our previous observations in the rat that concentrations of BnOCPA equivalent to those tested in the mouse had little or no effect on membrane potential or input resistance. Using NanoBRET binding we established that BnOCPA had similar affinity at the mouse and rat A1Rs, and displayed little difference in G protein coupling, as determined using the TRUPATH assay. Thus, although the mechanism for the loss of BnOCPA functional selectivity between pre- and postsynaptic receptors in the mouse hippocampus is currently unclear, it may stem from differences in expression of the individual G proteins subunits or the coupling to murine K+ channels. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC

Executive Director of the Wisconsin State Cranberry Growers, Tom Lochner teaches us about cranberry harvesting.

We connect with Tim Lochner of the People Brothers Band, we talk about the formation and history of this energetic band, their connection to the Driftless Music Gardens, and what is on the horizon for this band which features some of the best vocalists and musicians in the region. https://www.peoplebrothers.comYou can find more conversations, food reviews, live music and events on our website https://lacrosselocal.com.

Den Originalbeitrag und mehr finden Sie bitte hier: https://lisa.gerda-henkel-stiftung.de/kunstgeschichten_stefanlochner

In this episode originally recorded in July 2021, Vox's Zack Beauchamp talks with Columbia law professor Jamal Greene about his book How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America Apart. They discuss how the US obsession with rights and their protections gives too much power to judges and the courts, makes it difficult for ordinary citizens to find reasonable solutions to legitimate problems, and has made this country's legal system not only nonsensical but dangerous. Vox Conversations will return on Thursday, Oct. 13th — but under a new name, and with a new look. Stay tuned for The Gray Area with Sean Illing: a philosophical take on culture, politics, and everything in between. Host: Zack Beauchamp (@zackbeauchamp), Senior Correspondent, Vox Guest: Jamal Greene (@jamalgreene), Dwight Professor of Law, Columbia Law School References:  How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America Apart by Jamal Greene (HMH Books; 2021) "From Guns to Gay Marriage, How Did Rights Take Over Politics?" by Kelefa Sanneh (New Yorker; May 24, 2021) Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45 (1905) Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 US __ (2018) District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US 570 (2008) "Texas's radical anti-abortion law, explained" by Ian Millhiser (Vox; Sept. 2, 2021) We want to hear from you! Take Vox's audience survey today: vox.com/feedback Enjoyed this episode? Rate Vox Conversations ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of Vox Conversations by subscribing in your favorite podcast app. Support Vox Conversations by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Erikk Geannikis Editor: Amy Drozdowska Engineer: Patrick Boyd Deputy Editorial Director, Vox Talk: A.M. Hall Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Sonshine School Director Cheryl Lochner shares with us her trials and tribulations raising her family.

We tend to react to the issue of the right to abortion according to moral, religious, or political convictions. But what we often tend to overlook is that the debate surrounding Roe v. Wade is primarily a legal one. So according to the US constitution, is the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade legally sound? Prof Jay Mootz (University of the Pacific) and Prof George Taylor (University of Pittsburgh) are legal philosophers who discuss key problems and questions relating to the recent decision.Living Philosophy is brought to you by Philosophy2u.com.Host:Dr Todd MeiSponsors:Philosophy2u.comHermeneutics in Real LifeLinks Related to this Episode:Jay Mootz (University of the Pacific)George Taylor (University of Pittsburgh)Hermeneutics (Philosophy2u Video)Rhetoric (Wikipedia)Paul Ricoeur (SEP)Hans-Georg Gadamer (SEP)Virtue Ethics (SEP)14th Amendment (1868)Alito on Abortion Rights (Reuters)Legal CasesCalder v. Bull (Wikipedia) [1798]Lochner v. New York (Wikipedia) [1905]Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (Wikipedia) [1954]Poe v. Ullman (Wikipedia) [1961]Griswold v. Connecticut (Wikipedia) [1965]Roe v. Wade (Wikipedia) [1973]Planned Parenthood v. Casey (Wikipedia) [1992]Obergefell v. Hodges (Wikipedia) [2015]Dobbs v. Jackson (Wikipedia) [2022]Music: Earth and the Moon, by KetsaLogo Art: Angela Silva, Dattura Studios

This episode addresses the June 24, 2022 bombshell decision from the U.S. Supreme Court - Dobbs v. Jackson - which overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.  We begin the show by exploring the core issue in Dobbs, which is the “fundamental right” to choose to have an abortion created by Roe. First up, we identify what fundamental rights are and where they're found in the Constitution. Then we take a deep dive into the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment since that is the source of the “privacy right” in Roe. This leads us to a discussion of the term “liberty” in the Due Process Clause … nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law … and how it was defined and expanded over the course of the 20th Century to includes rights of privacy under a doctrine called substantive due process. We then shift to the test, or standard, used to determine whether a right should be included in the expansive definition of liberty and discuss how Dobbs applied it. We round out the show by unpacking Justice Thomas' concurrence in Dobbs and what it really means. Finally, we wrap with a TL;DR about Dobbs, what happened, and where we go from here, now that abortion is back in the hands of the people. Links Mentioned Roe v. Wade - Supreme Court: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/#tab-opinion-1950137  Planned Parenthood v. Casey https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/505/833/  Lochner v. New York https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/198/45/  West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/300/379/  Griswold V. Connecticut https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/381/479/  Washington v. Glucksberg https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/521/702/  Moore v. City of East Cleveland https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/431/494/ Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/19-1392/  U.S. Constitution: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript  U.S. Const. Bill of Rights: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights  U.S. Const. 9th Amendment: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transcript#toc-amendment-ix  U.S. Const. 14th Amendment: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/amendments-11-27#xiv  Connect with Kelley Keller on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/kelleykeller/  

“So the basic claim is that, okay, there may have been this need, contingently, one time, for the court to act; but if you create a super weapon, it's something that whoever gets control of it, will find a tempting, non-democratic way of getting their policy done. That's what the Lochner era had been about. That's what the liberals used it for, instead of taking civil rights, gender equality to the country, and saying, ultimately, this is something on which we have to find a way to convince our fellow citizens, they relied on the super weapon. And of course, as you would predict, the Empire struck back. And really since the 1970s, the Supreme Court is a story in this last phase of the conservatives struggling and succeeding in getting control of that super weapon.”Today's podcast once again interrupts the retrospective gaze at the online culture war of the ROAD TO YEAR ZERO series and the pedagogical approach of the SYLLABUS and soon to be launched REMEDIAL READING series to catch up with current events, as we periodically will when current events both become pressing and can benefit from a longer run perspective.This week I spoke with Samuel Moyn, professor of history and law at Yale University, and author of the book Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War, about the recent Dobbs decision and what he regards as the misguided reliance on the Supreme Court as an instrument of progressive change. And finally, a reminder to become a paid subscriber and get a head start on the reading for the next episode of the Syllabus Series: Samuel Huntington, American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony (Harvard University Press, 1983), chs. 1-3. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit wesleyyang.substack.com/subscribe

In this episode of New Ideal Live, Onkar Ghate, Ben Bayer and Yaron Brook discuss the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturns Roe v. Wade and allows for immediate state-level bans on abortion. They cover the philosophic ideas that led to the decision, why defenses of abortion rights failed and the options now available for defenders of abortion rights. Among the topics covered: How the majority opinion empties the right to liberty of its content;Justice Clarence Thomas's opposition to substantive due process;Why the Ninth Amendment has not been used in Supreme Court rulings on abortion;The incrementalism behind Chief Justice John Roberts's concurrence;Why Roe v. Wade was a good decision despite its imperfect reasoning;The dissent's defense of individual liberty against majority will;The dissent's forceful protest against the unprincipled, anti-individualist majority opinion;Why the dissent is right that the majority is inconsistent with its own reasoning in claiming that abortion is different from other rights;Questions about whether the court typically tailors its reasoning to fit a predecided outcome;The problem with the viability standard and the idea of balancing rights with a “state interest” in the fetus;How the dissent undermines its own case by citing Lochner v. New York as a case that was rightly overturned;How the morality of self-sacrifice contributed to the Dobbs ruling and the dissent's failure to cite the right to the pursuit of happiness;Why the widespread acceptance of collectivist premises have contributed to the abridgement of abortion rights;Why the concept of “states' rights” is an expression of collectivism;How the fight over abortion rights will continue at the state and federal level. Mentioned in this podcast are the New Ideal Live episodes “Roe v Wade on the Brink” and “The Supreme Court Abortion Leak vs. the Rule of Law,” Bayer's book Why the Right to Abortion Is Sacrosanct, and Rand's lecture “Censorship: Local and Express,” also published in her book Philosophy: Who Needs It. The podcast was recorded on June 29, 2022. Listen to the discussion below. Listen and subscribe from your mobile device on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify or Stitcher. Watch archived podcasts here. https://youtu.be/jLMf6f1kJfU Podcast audio:

A somber Friday, as we wake to the news of the US Supreme Court overturning the Constitutional Right to an abortion. "This will go down in history with Dred Scott, Plessy v Ferguson, Lochner v NY, and Citizens United. But we will organize, just as anti-slavery, civil rights, and labor activists have done in the past. Solidarity is more important than ever." - Jon Shelton.On the show today, hear from Ashley All, Spokesperson for Kansans For Constitutional Freedom.KANSAS! On Aug 2nd, be the first in the nation to protect reproductive freedom by voting NO! Get registered to vote by July 12th!Link: https://kansansforfreedom.com/ A Good Day To Be A Kansas Citian. The struggle continues. We will win. xoxo - @hartzell965, @holeyhearts, @kcmorningshow

NOUVEAU: une question, un commentaire ou une suggestion ? Laissez-moi un message audio sur le

Die Inflation stagniert auf einem Rekordniveau. Finanz-Influencer Mario Lochner erklärt, auf welche Anlagemöglichkeiten Sie jetzt setzen sollten. Die Preise steigen rasant. Das bekommt derzeit jeder zu spüren – egal ob beim Kinobesuch oder Einkauf. Kopfsalat kostet 17 Prozent, Gurken 30 Prozent und Butter rund 44 Prozent mehr als im Vorjahr. Das liegt am anhaltenden Krieg in der Ukraine, an Lieferengpässen und dem gesunkenen Wert des Euros. Verstärkt wird der Trend durch die Inflation, die in der Euro-Zone auf dem Rekordniveau von 7,4 Prozent stagniert. Doch gibt es eine Möglichkeit die Inflation auszugleichen? Mario Lochner ist Finanzredakteur bei Mission Money und Finanz-Influencer. Normalerweise erklärt er komplexe Finanzthemen auf Tiktok in 60-Sekunden-Videos. In der heutigen Folge von Handelsblatt Today hat er aber ausführlicher dargelegt, ob Anleger beim Inflationsausgleich eher auf Aktien und Anleihen oder auf Kunst und Gold setzen sollten. Auf Tiktok bereitet Lochner die Themen meist für ein jüngeres Publikum auf. Denn vor allem in der Generation Z erfreuen sich Finfluencer immer größerer Beliebtheit. Die Möglichkeit seinen über 300.000 Followerinnen und Followern Finanztipps zu geben, sieht er jedoch als zweischneidiges Schwert an. Einerseits können Sachverhalte relativ anschaulich erklärt werden und junge Menschen dazu bringen, sich mit Themen aus der Finanzwelt zu beschäftigen. Andererseits ist die Gefahr groß, dass Follower den Tipps ohne Eigenrecherche folgen. „Ich sehe mich da als guter Freund in der Kneipe, der den Leuten mal in den Hintern tritt und animiert etwas zu tun“, sagt Lochner. Der Finanzredakteur findet, dass gerade der Fall von Fynn Kliemann Mahnung sein sollte: „Leider gibt es auch unter Finfluencern schwarze Schafe.“ Außerdem: Die Märkte sind so volatil wie lange nicht. Die hohe Inflation, die zu platzen drohende Immobilienblase und die angespannte Situation auf dem amerikanischen Arbeitsmarkt könnten jetzt Anzeichen für einen erneuten Finanzcrash sein. Ob eine Finanzkrise zu befürchten ist, erklärt Aktienanalyst und Wall-Street-Experte Markus Koch in einem US-Börsenausblick. *** Exklusives Angebot für Handelsblatt Today-Hörer: Testen Sie Handelsblatt Premium 4 Wochen für 1 € und bleiben Sie immer informiert, was die Finanzmärkte bewegt. Mehr Informationen: www.handelsblatt.com/mehrfinanzen

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ayn Rand once observed that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. “has had the worst philosophical influence on American law." In this New Ideal article from October 6, 2021 (read by Alex Wigger), Tom Bowden examines the influence of Holmes's iconic dissent in the case of Lochner v. New York. "Holmes believed that the Supreme Court presides over an empty Constitution—empty of purpose, of moral content, of enduring meaning—bereft of any embedded principles defining the relationship between man and the state," Bowden observes. "This distinctively Holmesian view, novel in 1905, is today's orthodoxy." Podcast audio:

So it started an era, apparently.

SCHÜTZ: Ich hebe meine augen auf, Salmo 121, SWV 31 (8.15). Ich bin die auferstehung SWV 464 (3.23). Wihl dem, der nocht wandelt, Salmo 1, SWV 28 (5.36). An der wassern zu Babel, Salmo 137, SWV 37 (5.07). Weib, was weinest du SWV 443 “Dialogo per la Pascua” (5.13). Coro de niños de Windsbach, G. Reith (vc.), W. Wagner (con.), D. Kirsch (laúd), M. Lochner (órg. positivo). Dir.: K.-F. Beringer. Meine seele erhebt den herren, Magnificat SWV 494 (7.07). Collegium Vocale de Gante, Concerto Palatino. Dir.: P. Herreweghe. Von aufgang der sonnen SWV 362 (5.09). T. Mathger (ten.), M. Schicketanz (baj.), Coro de Cámara de Dresde, Instrumentalisten. Dir.: H.-C. Rademann. Escuchar audio

Dr Char. is a consultant, trainer, educator, and psychotherapist with extensive professional experience - focusing on helping patients of diabetes (Type I, Type II). ---- Connect with Dr. Char Website: https://drchar.org/  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drchar57/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@drcharfrye --- With an Ed.D. in Counseling Psychology from Argosy University, she is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor (LMHC) and a qualified supervisor in the state of Florida for interns seeking licensure. Char is also a Licensed Professional Counselor - Mental Health Service Provider (LPC-MHSP) in the state of Tennessee and Approved Clinical Supervisor (ACS) with the National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC). Dr. Char holds a Master of Arts (MA) in Professional Counseling and a Bachelor of Religious Education (BRE) in Religious Studies. She has a primary certification in Rational Emotive Behavioral Therapy (REBT), certification as a trainer with Model Approach to Parenting Practices (MAPP), and held Florida Department of Education certifications in Guidance & Counseling and Exceptional Student Education (ESE).

Substantive due process. By the middle of the 19th century, "due process of law" was interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court to mean that "it was not left to the legislative power to enact any process which might be devised. The due process article is a restraint on the legislative as well as on the executive and judicial powers of the government, and cannot be so construed as to leave Congress free to make any process 'due process of law' by its mere will." The term "substantive due process" (SDP) is commonly used in two ways: first to identify a particular line of case law, and second to signify a particular attitude toward judicial review under the Due Process Clause. The term "substantive due process" began to take form in 1930s legal casebooks as a categorical distinction of selected due process cases, and by 1950 had been mentioned twice in Supreme Court opinions. SDP involves liberty-based due process challenges which seek certain outcomes instead of merely contesting procedures and their effects; in such cases, the Supreme Court recognizes a constitutionally-based "liberty" which then renders laws seeking to limit said "liberty" either unenforceable or limited in scope. Critics of SDP decisions typically assert that those liberties ought to be left to the more politically accountable branches of government. Courts have viewed the due process clause, and sometimes other clauses of the Constitution, as embracing those fundamental rights that are "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty". Just what those rights are is not always clear, nor is the Supreme Court's authority to enforce such unenumerated rights clear. Some of those rights have long histories or "are deeply rooted" in American society. The courts have largely abandoned the Lochner era approach (1897 thru 1937) when substantive due process was used to strike down minimum wage and labor laws in order to protect freedom of contract. Since then, the Supreme Court has decided that numerous other freedoms that do not appear in the plain text of the Constitution are nevertheless protected by the Constitution. If these rights were not protected by the federal courts' doctrine of substantive due process, they could nevertheless be protected in other ways; for example, it is possible that some of these rights could be protected by other provisions of the state or federal constitutions, and alternatively they could be protected by legislatures. The Court focuses on three types of rights under substantive due process in the Fourteenth Amendment, which originated in United States v Carolene Products Company (1938). Those three types of rights are: the first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights (for example, the Eighth Amendment); restrictions on the political process (for example, the rights of voting, association, and free speech); and, the rights of "discrete and insular minorities".

Heute nehme ich euch mal mit in eine Weinhandlung aus der Pfalz. Spannend mal aus Händlersicht zu erfahren, welche Weine zur Zeit angesagt sind, welche Preise gerechtfertigt sind oder auch nicht.Freut euch auf Johannes „Jojo“ Lochner von Rohstoff-Wein in Wachenheim. Hier geht's zu seinem Laden: https://www.rohstoff-wein.de/#!/Hier geht´s zum Gewinnspiel: https://podcast.kunze.tv See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On this week's EcoNews, the gang's nerdy lawyers — Tom, Matt and Scott — are joined by CalPoly Humboldt's own professor of environmental law, Jennifer Marlow, to talk about the recent oral argument in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency. Is the court going to jettison Chevron deference in favor of its newly constructed “major questions doctrine” or will we see a return to Lochner-era non-delegation doctrine? Learn what that all means and why it should terrify you on this week's episode!“In climate-change case, justices grapple with EPA's role, congressional intent, and their own jurisdiction,” SCOTUSBlog, Feb. 28, 2022.”The Supreme Court appears eager to gut the EPA, but can't figure out how to do it,” Vox, Feb. 28, 2022.Support the show (https://www.humboldtbaykeeper.org/get-involved/donate)

Do you like reboots? You're gonna love The Lochner Era 2: Return of the Robber Barons! Featuring all of the union-busting, labor-exploiting, children-working-in-a-coal-mine of the original Gilded Age, but now with 100 percent more campaign spending by corporations!The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Olympia: Deutsche Bob-Piloten rasen allen davon, keine Medaillen in der Abfahrt und im Biathlon / Bundesliga: Gladbach hat Eberl-Nachfolger gefunden

Olympia: Deutsche Bob-Piloten rasen allen davon, Walijewa trotzt Dopingdebatte / Champions League: Paris und Real torlos, City souverän in Lissabon / Bundesliga: Gladbach hat Eberl-Nachfolger gefunden

Die legendariese Tossie Lochner vertel weekliks een van haar vele stories waaroor sy vir baie jare vanuit Italië berig het, net hier op Nuuspod.

Die legendariese Tossie Lochner vertel weekliks een van haar vele stories waaroor sy vir baie jare vanuit Italië berig het, net hier op Nuuspod.

Die legendariese Tossie Lochner vertel weekliks een van haar vele stories waaroor sy vir baie jare vanuit Italië berig het, net hier op Nuuspod.

Die legendariese Tossie Lochner vertel weekliks een van haar vele stories waaroor sy vir baie jare vanuit Italië berig het, net hier op Nuuspod.

Die legendariese Tossie Lochner vertel weekliks een van haar vele stories waaroor sy vir baie jare vanuit Italië berig het, net hier op Nuuspod.

Johannes Lochner und Theresa Leitz sind Bobsportler:innen. Aber nicht seit kleinauf: Lochner war unter anderem im Tennis und Ski Alpin aktiv. Erst mit 21 Jahren hat er mit dem Bobfahren begonnen, mittlerweile ist er mehrfacher Welt- und Europameister. Theresa Leitz ist deutsche Juniorenmeisterin. In ihrer Jugend war sie Sprinterin gewesen, bevor sie sich im November 2019 im Bobsport versucht hat. Welche Schwierigkeiten zu Beginn herausfordernd waren und wie die beiden Sportler:innen Leistungssport und Beruf vereinen können, haben sie in der dritten Folge unserer Podcast-Reihe „Über Umwege in den Profisport“ erzählt. Redaktion & Moderation: David Schmidhuber Produktion: Annkathrin Stich Konzept: Antonia Engelhardt & Thomas Jensen ----------- **Die Sportgondel** ist ein M94.5-Podcast. © [M94.5 - ein Angebot der MEDIASCHOOL BAYERN.](https://www.m945.de/) Lust auf mehr junge & frische Formate?

Die legendariese Tossie Lochner vertel weekliks een van haar vele stories waaroor sy vir baie jare vanuit Italië berig het, net hier op Nuuspod.

It's Christmas time and we have a special podcast for you. We have asked the following to stop by and share their favorite Christmas/Holiday memories: Danny Vaughn, Doro Pesch, Eddie Trunk, Chris Hagar, Steve Brown, Paul Shortino, Wendy Dio and Perry Richardson. So grab a glass of eggnog, get comfy and enjoy the memories.   We have music for you by CJ Ramone, Lee Aaron, Psychostick, Lost in Static, Psychopunch. So turn it up and get ready to rock.  It's the last round of Five Questions and we close it out with Robby Lochner from Jack Russell's Great White.  What questions will Robby answer from the boys? Plus Robby shares two of his favorite memories as well.   Join Randy and Troy, for this and every episode of Ouch You're on my Hair and subscribe to the show on ApplePodcasts, Amazon Music, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Podomatic, Podbean and more. You can find them on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Ouch, You're on my Hair is brought to you by Dirt Bag Clothing.

Die legendariese Tossie Lochner vertel weekliks een van haar vele stories waaroor sy vir baie jare vanuit Italië berig het, net hier op Nuuspod.

In this episode of New Ideal Live, Onkar Ghate and Ben Bayer discuss the recent oral arguments in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case before the Supreme Court. They analyze what the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade would reveal about the Court's grasp of individual rights and the role of government. Among the topics covered: A brief history of abortion jurisprudence since Roe v. Wade;Ayn Rand's view of Roe and her support for abortion rights;Why abortion rights are not grounded in a right to privacy;Why activities don't need to be concretely enumerated to be protected by fundamental rights;Why we need abstract principles to state fundamental legal principles;Why conservative sympathy for the reversal of Lochner v. New York implies a presumption in favor of government power;Whether the potential to feel pain is the basis of rights;How Roe v. Wade tries to balance competing interests, not to protect rights;Why regarding life as sacred from conception is a baseless religious viewpoint;Why it's arbitrary to regard viability as the limit for justifiable abortion;Whether religion or judicial philosophy motivates Justice Thomas;Whether “individual responsibility” means a woman who chooses to have sex should carry a pregnancy to term;The Supreme Court Justices' unphilosophical approach. Mentioned in the discussion are Leonard Peikoff's essay “Abortion Rights Are Pro-Life,” Ben Bayer's essays “Ayn Rand's Radical Case for Abortion Rights” and “Science without Philosophy Can't Resolve Abortion Debate,” and Tom Bowden's “Justice Holmes and the Empty Constitution.” This podcast was recorded on December 9, 2021. Listen to the discussion below. Listen and subscribe from your mobile device on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify or Stitcher. Watch archived podcasts here. https://youtu.be/BGwS6CJ0UlE Podcast audio:

In 1905, the Supreme Court rendered two landmark decisions on the scope of individual liberty: Jacobson v. Massachusetts and Lochner v. New York. Jacobson's broad deference to public health authority lived side by side with Lochner's broader conception of economic liberty. While the restrictive precedent, Jacobson, now governs all pandemic response, Lochner is no longer available as a check, having been thrown in the dustbin of legal history. Judges follow a variant of Jacobson that's far removed from the actual decision to resolve disputes over religious freedom, abortion, gun rights, voting, and more. Over the course of a century, four prominent justices established the irrepressible myth of Jacobson v. Massachusetts.At a time when state police power has imposed unprecedented limits on individuals' ability to provide for themselves, Lochner should be brought out of lockdown. The rationales for Lochner's subsequent disavowal by the Court are largely inapplicable to the COVID-19 situation. Shutdown orders and the like have an economic effect but are not economic policy. They may be one of the broadest assertions of sovereign authority in peacetime, but we lack the constitutional language to deal with the potential danger to liberty implicated by such measures. Please join Josh Blackman and Eugene Kontorovich to discuss their recent work in this area, with commentary by Wendy Mariner. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Another stream of conscious solo episode. In this episode I cover:Taking stock of where I'm at in law school.What is jurisprudence?What is originalism?What is legal formalism?Why is Lochner v. New York so universally reviled by legal scholars?Am I starting to soften my stance on Critical Race Theory? --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/searchingforpoliticaliden/support

Brian tries to keep up with Kam Wright as they take a deep dive into political history, the Constitution, and current trends In this episode we cover: The real source of American freedom (hint...it's not the Bill of Rights). The reason many hesitate to embrace "politics by litigation" - the practice of granting nine judges in black robes the power to define/create new rights. History of the prohibition of alcohol in America. Brief history of the Progressive Era. Lochner v. New York. A brief explanation of Substantive Due Process and one of the most famous dissents in all of constitutional law. The New Deal, the Commerce Clause, the famous FDR threat to pack the Court, and the rise of the Bureaucracy. Why it matters so much more today who wins the Presidency than it used to. Gundy v. United States. A brief history of positive rights. The real danger of substantive due process. Is there anything wrong with changing the rules to the game if you're not winning? Why Kam thinks some NOT ALL progressive proposals will run into a "brick wall" when they get to the Constitution. A brief summary of modern political history. The creation of the Corporation and how it impacted American culture. A brief history of property rights. The REAL story behind the tale of Robin Hood. What the Founders thought was the proper role of government. Is Senator Elizabeth Warren's "wealth tax" constitutional? Briefly touching upon Critical Race Theory. Many people are searching for political identity. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/searchingforpoliticaliden/support

The case of Lochner v. New York (1905) is remembered as a paradigmatic example of economic substantive due process, where the Supreme Court asks whether state economic regulations are unreasonable deprivations of liberty or property in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. With the case of West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937), the Supreme Court had turned away from this approach to Due Process and signaled its future deference to legislative majorities in cases involving economic regulations.

In this episode, David makes a passionate defense of the majority ruling from Lochner v. New York, sparking a deep discussion with Stratty on the important legal, economic, political and cultural implications of SCOTUS's repudiation of Lochner. This episode was originally intended to be released as episode #11, but it took longer to edit than it should have. Follow us on Twitter, @LawofLibertyPod, @HoffFunk, and @StrattyD. Join our Discord - https://discord.gg/VMcjZxw

Rick Lochner is the President of RPC Leadership Associates, Inc. where he helps Business Owners Make Leadership a Way of Life. A Certified Veteran-Owned Business, he helps clients align their businesses to enjoy sustainable success on their terms. Rick is a graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point and has over 30 years of leadership experience across the Military, Corporate, Entrepreneurial, Academic and Non-Profit organizations. Rick is the author of several books including, "The Missing Piece for Entrepreneurs" and “I'm Still Sayin'…More Revelations for Making Leadership a Way of Life”. An accomplished public speaker, his popular leadership workshops and keynotes range from Understanding Generational Diversity, Effective Communications and Time Management to Effective Personal Leadership and Being Adaptable in a Dynamic Business Environment. Learn More About Rick & His Books - Click Here