Podcasts about obama doctrine

6/26/2024 PODCAST Episodes #1436 - #1438 GUEST: Mike Lindell, Phill Kline, Chris Hoar, Dr. Peter McCullough, Rep. Morgan Griffith, Marsha Blackburn, Dr. Paul Alexander, Sheriff David Clarke + YOUR CALLS! at 1-888-480-JOHN (5646) and GETTR Live! @jfradioshow #GodzillaOfTruth #TruckingTheTruth   Want more of today's show? Episode #1436 Biden's America Manifests Obama Doctrine Episode #1437 Marsha Blackburn Goes Ballistic On Biden's Open Border Fiasco Episode #1438 Dr. Paul Alexander Calls For Full Covid-Vax Investigation   https://johnfredericksradio.libsyn.com/

[00:30] Pro-Hamas Insurrection at the Capitol (31 minutes) Pro-Hamas protesters took over the Cannon Rotunda at the Capitol yesterday, but the protests went largely unreported by the same media that still decries the “insurrectionists” from Jan. 6, 2021. The protest yesterday came after the media unquestioningly accepted and promoted Hamas's false declaration that Israel bombed a Gaza hospital. Joe Biden has announced $100 million will go to “humanitarian aid” for Gaza, but the Palestinian government plans to use international aid money to pay the families of terrorists who murdered Israelis two weeks ago. [31:30] Obama's Fingerprints (24 minutes) The world is looking to America for leadership, but Joe Biden is not providing it. Barack Obama's 2009 Cairo speech reflects the same pro-Islam foreign policy that the Biden administration actively carries out and promotes.

Photo:  An earlier president and vice-president:  Theo. Roosevelt & Wm. McKinley.CBS Eye on the World with John BatchelorCBS Audio Network@Batchelorshow"I think that Biden, the people around him, are reverting to that Obama doctrine." @VDHanson @HoooverInst https://amgreatness.com/2021/05/16/how-to-ensure-a-middle-east-war-in-five-easy-steps/

[00:30] The Obama Doctrine (13 minutes) Fake President Joe Biden has wasted little time in returning to Obama-era policies for the Middle East: random bombing campaigns, betraying friendly nations and, of course, empowering Iran. [13:00] Targeting Your Children (17 minutes) Public education today is little more than left-wing indoctrination. It is shocking to see what educators insist on teaching your children. [31:00] Preparation (24 minutes) Preparation is the key to success. In this segment, I talk about the preparation that went into a recent event at Armstrong College and the importance of doing our part in the conversion process.

This week, just in time for the inevitable arguments at Zoom Thanksgiving, Roqayah and Kumars go guest-less, spreading holiday cheer with a look at Trump’s foreign policy in review. They analyze the common conception of Trump as an anti-interventionist, taking stock of his legacy in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East before touching on some of what we can expect from the incoming Democratic administration.   If you want to support the show and receive access to tons of bonus content, subscribe on our Patreon for as little as $5 a month. Also, don't forget to subscribe, rate, and review the show on Apple Podcasts. We can't do this show without your support!!!

E4: A Decade of Peace? Wars in the 90sE4.1: Killing in the NameE4.2 Acts of GenocideE4.3 Problems from HellThe end of the Cold War did not mean global peace. In this episode, Emma and Chloe talk about the US’ foreign policy, and how its interventions in foreign wars in the 1990s continue to shape the US’ global outlook today. They discuss the origins of the ideas of humanitarian warfare and liberal interventionism, and the US’ long history of foreign interventions; disasters in Somalia, Rwanda, and the former Yugoslavia; and the US ongoing debates about how, if it all, it can promote democracy outside its own borders.ALSO – keep an eye out for a bonus episode, released Friday, where Chloe speaks to Dr Charlie Hunt from RMIT University about the UN’s role in peace and war in the 90s.LinksSamantha Power, A Problem From Hell: America in the Age of Genocide, Basic Books, 2002https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/samantha-power/a-problem-from-hell/9780465050895/Daniel Bessner, “The Fog of Intervention,” The New Republic, September 4, 2019https://newrepublic.com/article/154612/education-idealist-samantha-power-book-reviewJeffrey Goldberg, “The Obama Doctrine,” The Atlantic, April 2016https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/Dexter Filkins, “The Moral Logic of Humanitarian Intervention,” The New Yorker, September 2019.https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/09/16/the-moral-logic-of-humanitarian-intervention

E4: A Decade of Peace? Wars in the 90sE4.1: Killing in the NameE4.2 Acts of GenocideE4.3 Problems from HellThe end of the Cold War did not mean global peace. In this episode, Emma and Chloe talk about the US’ foreign policy, and how its interventions in foreign wars in the 1990s continue to shape the US’ global outlook today. They discuss the origins of the ideas of humanitarian warfare and liberal interventionism, and the US’ long history of foreign interventions; disasters in Somalia, Rwanda, and the former Yugoslavia; and the US ongoing debates about how, if it all, it can promote democracy outside its own borders.ALSO – keep an eye out for a bonus episode, released Friday, where Chloe speaks to Dr Charlie Hunt from RMIT University about the UN’s role in peace and war in the 90s.LinksSamantha Power, A Problem From Hell: America in the Age of Genocide, Basic Books, 2002https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/samantha-power/a-problem-from-hell/9780465050895/Daniel Bessner, “The Fog of Intervention,” The New Republic, September 4, 2019https://newrepublic.com/article/154612/education-idealist-samantha-power-book-reviewJeffrey Goldberg, “The Obama Doctrine,” The Atlantic, April 2016https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/Dexter Filkins, “The Moral Logic of Humanitarian Intervention,” The New Yorker, September 2019.https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/09/16/the-moral-logic-of-humanitarian-intervention

The end of the Cold War did not mean global peace. In this episode, Emma and Chloe talk about the US’ foreign policy, and how its interventions in foreign wars in the 1990s continue to shape the US’ global outlook today. They discuss the origins of the ideas of humanitarian warfare and liberal interventionism, and the US’ long history of foreign interventions; disasters in Somalia, Rwanda, and the former Yugoslavia; and the US ongoing debates about how, if it all, it can promote democracy outside its own borders.ALSO – keep an eye out for a bonus episode, released Friday, where Chloe speaks to Dr Charlie Hunt from RMIT University about the UN’s role in peace and war in the 90s.LinksSamantha Power, A Problem From Hell: America in the Age of Genocide, Basic Books, 2002https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/samantha-power/a-problem-from-hell/9780465050895/Daniel Bessner, “The Fog of Intervention,” The New Republic, September 4, 2019https://newrepublic.com/article/154612/education-idealist-samantha-power-book-reviewJeffrey Goldberg, “The Obama Doctrine,” The Atlantic, April 2016https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/Dexter Filkins, “The Moral Logic of Humanitarian Intervention,” The New Yorker, September 2019.https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/09/16/the-moral-logic-of-humanitarian-intervention

On Monday's Mark Levin Show, it’s unequivocal that the Democrat Party hates America as does the Democrat Party press because the voters did not give them the power they starve for. President Trump exercised his duty to protect and defend America and our interests after an Iranian-backed militia killed an American citizen and then attacked the U.S Embassy in Baghdad. Iran has been at war with America, chanting "Death to America" for nearly half a century, killing and maiming U.S soldiers since the days of President Carter. Yet the media is silent, not a single Gold-Star Family has been interviewed for their reaction to the killing of Qasem Soleimani, who is in large part, responsible for these atrocities. Then, the Trump Doctrine is similar to the Reagan Doctrine in that it relies on a strong military for American national security. Trump's Doctrine is unique in that it rejects the appeasement of the Obama Doctrine, as well as the interventionist and nation-building of the Bush Doctrine. Trump stood up and was guided by prudence as opposed to politics in making the decision to eliminate Soleimani. The Founders decided long ago that battlefield decisions would be made by the Commander-In-Chief, not by Congress. Afterward, Nancy Pelosi has failed to deliver the articles of impeachment and Mitch McConnell has the power to dismiss the articles. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Monday's Mark Levin Show, it’s unequivocal that the Democrat Party hates America as does the Democrat Party press because the voters did not give them the power they starve for. President Trump exercised his duty to protect and defend America and our interests after an Iranian-backed militia killed an American citizen and then attacked the U.S Embassy in Baghdad. Iran has been at war with America, chanting "Death to America" for nearly half a century, killing and maiming U.S soldiers since the days of President Carter. Yet the media is silent, not a single Gold-Star Family has been interviewed for their reaction to the killing of Qasem Soleimani, who is in large part, responsible for these atrocities. Then, the Trump Doctrine is similar to the Reagan Doctrine in that it relies on a strong military for American national security. Trump's Doctrine is unique in that it rejects the appeasement of the Obama Doctrine, as well as the interventionist and nation-building of the Bush Doctrine. Trump stood up and was guided by prudence as opposed to politics in making the decision to eliminate Soleimani. The Founders decided long ago that battlefield decisions would be made by the Commander-In-Chief, not by Congress. Afterward, Nancy Pelosi has failed to deliver the articles of impeachment and Mitch McConnell has the power to dismiss the articles. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today's podcast looks at President Trump's decision to withdraw American troops from Syria. While many people are upset at the president for doing so, especially because they feel he is abandoning the Kurds, I see him fulfilling a prediction I made more than two years ago.  Back then, I compared Trump's unstated foreign policy agenda to the Wilson Doctrine, which held America responsible for making the world safe for democracy, and the Obama Doctrine, which held Obama responsible for making the world safe from America. I concluded that Trump believes that his primary responsibility is to keep America safe, with a secondary responsibility to help our allies . . . but only up to a point. America's interests must always come first.

This week, Scott Morrison is going to Washington--or is it Mar-a-Lago? In anticipation of the Australian PM’s state dinner with Donald Trump, Emma and Chloe look back on the history of American-Australian relations. From the ANZUS treaty to Iraq (and detouring through conspiracy theories, Gough Whitlam, and the CIA), Australia has a track record of following the US everywhere it goes, including into war. With Trump ‘locked and loaded’, Emma and Chloe ask whether history repeating, and will Australia find itself at war in Iran?Reading ListOn Trump and Morrison/the US in the World:Dexter Filkins, “The Moral Logic of Humanitarian Intervention,” The New Yorker, 16 September 2019.https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/09/16/the-moral-logic-of-humanitarian-interventionElaine Pearson, “Trump’s Attack on Asylum-Seekers Was Made in Australia,” Foreign Policy, 24 July 2019https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/07/24/trumps-attack-on-asylum-seekers-was-made-in-australia-png-manus-island-nauru-new-zealand-refugees-offshore-detention/Tanya Levin, “What Scott Morrison’s faith means,” The Saturday Paper, Edition No. 261, July 13-19, 2019https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/opinion/topic/2019/07/13/what-scott-morrisons-faith-means/15629400008440Jeffrey Goldberg, “The Obama Doctrine,” The Atlantic, April 2016https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/“America’s ‘credibility’ is not the problem here,” Crikey, 31 October 2017.https://www.crikey.com.au/2017/10/31/yale-diaries-americas-credibility-is-not-the-problem-here/“The History of the USA and Australia’s Love In – and Turnbull’s Grovelling,” Daily Review, 6 May 2017.https://dailyreview.com.au/history-great-relationship-australia-us-love/59439/“Trump, Syria and the Irrelevance of History,” Daily Review, 15 April 2017.https://dailyreview.com.au/trump-syria-irrelevance-history/58522/“Teaching History in TrumpWorld,” Daily Review, 4 March 2017https://dailyreview.com.au/teaching-history-trumpworld/56534/On handshakes:Adam Boult and Chris Graham, “Justin Trudeau's handshake with Donald Trump the 'biggest display of dominance in the history of Canada',” The Telegraph, 14 February 2017.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/13/justin-trudeau-becomes-latest-world-leader-brave-trumps-awkward/On Whitlam:Christopher Knaus, “Whitlam dismissal 'palace letters' case wins right to be heard by high court,” The Guardian, 16 August 2019https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/aug/16/battle-over-whitlam-dismissal-palace-letters-heads-to-high-courtGuy Rundle, “All facts point to US involvement in the Dismissal,” Crikey, 13 November 2015 [$].https://www.crikey.com.au/2015/11/13/rundle-all-facts-point-to-us-involvement-in-the-dismissal/James Curran, “How Whitlam rattled the ANZUS alliance,” The Monthly, August 2012.https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2012/august/1348618116/james-curran/dear-mr-presidentOn the US and anti-Semitism in the UK:Owen Jones, “Fighting smears and the antisemitic minority in the Labour party,” 8 March 2019https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Qxk0hW0_EQ&feature=youtu.be

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sir Lawrence Freedman is Professor of War Studies at King’s College and the author of numerous books and publications to include Strategy: A History. In Episode 7 of the PME podcast, we talk about strategy. What is strategy and what it is not? We trace its historical roots, and discuss how traditional views of strategy still apply or do not apply to today’s conflicts and future conflicts. Additionally, Sir Lawrence Freedman was elected a Fellow of the British Academy in 1995 and awarded the CBE (Commander of the British Empire) in 1996. He was appointed Official Historian of the Falklands Campaign in 1997. He was awarded the KCMG (Knight Commander of St Michael and St George) in 2003. Finally, he was appointed in June 2009 to serve as a member of the official inquiry into Britain and the 2003 Iraq War.   Key Takeaways:  “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.” -Mike Tyson •What is strategy? Strategy involves making decisions when faced with “other people with their own plans and interests.” It requires flexibility. Planning is part of strategy, but having a plan is not a strategy. “Problem solving” is a critical component of strategy.  •In late nineteenth century Germany, Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke the elder was chief of staff of the Prussian Army. He was a student of Carl von Clausewitz. As a military strategist, Von Moltke emphasized the importance of flexibility. He said, “A plan breaks down on first contact.” Additionally, Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke saw military strategy as a “system of expedients.” •Sir Lawrence Freedman explains that American foreign policy doctrine (i.e. the Nixon Doctrine, Carter Doctrine, Bush Doctrine, Obama Doctrine) is a means of “signaling” to the world America’s priorities or intentions. It is part of strategy, but it is not itself a strategy. •Sun Tzu’s influence on strategy was based on the idea of “cunning and cleverness.” However, the flaw in strategy based on cunning is when both sides attempt to use cunning and cleverness against each other. We talk about whether countries like Russia and China use Sun Tzu’s methods to achieve their strategic aims. What are Russia’s interests? A conversation I had with Steven Lee Myers on his book The New Tsar is worth checking out to discover more on that topic. •Thucydides was the first “realist” historian. He wrote a book about the Peloponnesian War between Sparta and Athens in a book appropriately called The History of the Peloponnesian War. Sir Lawrence Freedman sites a book called Destined for War by Graham Allison. Destined for War describes a theory called the “Thucydides Trap” which is based on the idea that one power becomes fearful of the rise of another power and postulates that this might have ramifications for current and future relations between the United States and China. However, Sir Lawrence Freedman sees some flaws in this theory, and thinks that Thucydides had an interest in trying to preserve the reputation of Pericles. •We discuss whether there is something “elemental” to strategy. Sir Lawrence Freedman looked at chimpanzees and how they form coalitions and act in strategic ways. Winston Churchill (not a chimpanzee rather British Prime Minister) was good at applying the chimp-like principles of creating coalitions to achieve his strategic aims. Churchill sought to partner with President Roosevelt to get the U.S. on the allied side. When Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, Churchill sought to build a coalition with Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union to fight the Nazis.  •We talk about Napoleon and the development of strategy during the Enlightenment. Much like Thucydides rejection of the gods, the enlightenment rejected superstitious beliefs and emphasized what reason and human rationality could do to achieve strategic aims.    •Two critical 19th Century strategic thinkers include the Swiss officer, Antoine Henri Jomini, and the Prussian military theorist, Carl Von Clausewitz. Jomini emphasized the “decisive battle” strategy. Meanwhile, Clausewitz focused on the policy objectives of war. Clausewitz is also famous for developing the term “fog of war,” which refers to the uncertainty and the chaos of war when it involves two competing wills, each one trying to impose itself on the other. •The challenges of military strategy. How do wars end? We talk about “The Clausewitzian Challenge”, and I allude to my previous conversation with Gideon Rose, editor of Foreign Affairs, who wrote an excellent book called How Wars End. •Finally, we talk about the strategy of the Cold War and nuclear deterrence. Sir Lawrence Freedman mentions a strategist named Thomas Schelling, who is worth studying for his contributions to strategy based on Game Theory. We discuss the “rationality of irrationality,” which refers to the necessity to use caution based on a fear that one side might act out of irrationality. •Sir Lawrence Freedman has a new book coming out in the Fall of 2017 called, The Future of War: A History. The book focuses on how people in the past have tried to predict changes in warfare and predict the future of war.         For more information: Check out www.professionalmilitaryeducation.com Be sure to follow Sir Lawrence Freedman on Twitter @LawDavF and check out the book, Strategy: A History   Books and Resources mentioned in the podcast: Strategy: A History The New Tsar The History of the Peloponnesian War Destined for War On War The Art of War     HELP SPREAD THE WORD! If you like this interview and want to hear others, be sure to subscribe in iTunes. Support the show with written reviews, share on social media, and through word of mouth. For any requests for additional shows or guests, e-mail me: tim@professionalmilitaryeducation.com   Thanks for listening!

Providence Deputy Editor Mark Melton speaks with Matt Gobush about the Obama doctrine and a concept he calls “Moral Multilateralism". In the Spring 2016 issue of Providence’s print edition, Gobush wrote about this idea and what implications it would have for America’s foreign policy. A link to this article is provided on the podcast page, which can be found at ProvidenceMag.com/podcast. There is also a link to an article from the same issue by Providence’s managing editor Marc LiVecche, who is more critical of Obama’s foreign policy than Gobush.

Politico foreign correspondent Nahal Toosi examines the international record of President Obama's eight years in office and tries to discern the governing principles behind his foreign policy. The president sought to avoid costly overseas interventions - yet his critics allege that he has allowed rival powers like Russia and China to flex their muscles and threaten American interests. And he has been condemned for his signature foreign policy achievements, like rapprochements with Iran and Cuba. With interviews gathered in Europe, the Middle East and in Washington DC, Nahal examines the president's decisions to ask if there is such a thing as an "Obama Doctrine". Producer: Lucy Proctor.

Robert G. Kaufman is professor of public policy at Pepperdine University. He is the author of Henry M. Jackson: A Life in Politics (Washington) and In Defense of the Bush Doctrine (UPK). In Dangerous Doctrine, political scientist Robert G. Kaufman argues that the forty-fourth president has indeed articulated a clear, consistent national security policy. Drawing on international relations theory and American diplomatic history, Kaufman presents a robust critique of the Obama Doctrine. He situates Obama's exercise of power within American strategic traditions such as neorealism, classical realism, declinism, liberal internationalism, and moral democratic realism. Kaufman contends that President Obama has imprudently abandoned the venerable tradition of muscular internationalism employed by most of his predecessors since the end of World War II. Focusing on the pivotal regions of Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, Kaufman demonstrates how current executive branch leadership threatens the United States' role as superpower, weakening its ability to spread democracy and defeat threats to geopolitical order.

U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham gave remarks at a panel on the Middle East featuring Robert Satloff, Amb. Eric Edelman, Michele Dunne, and Michael Doran.

U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham gave remarks at a panel on the Middle East featuring Robert Satloff, Amb. Eric Edelman, Michele Dunne, and Michael Doran.

Flyover Politik Episode 20 3-14-2016 Today show we will cover 1- THE OBAMA DOCTRINE and insight to madame president 2- TOM IN TUCSON- Chicago "Riots" 3 News/Social Media Nuggets

When Obama first came to office there was a huge amount of global expectation riding on his foreign policy. He promised to heal the breach with the Islamic world, restore America’s good name, and fight fewer wars. But as his time in the White House draws to a close, how should we judge Obama’s record? Is the world a safer place now than when he took office? And behind all the policy making, is there an over-riding vision – what commentators have called “an Obama doctrine”? Join Owen Bennett-Jones and a panel of global experts, as they discuss President Obama’s foreign policy legacy and America’s place in the world today. (Photo: President Obama addresses US troops in Afghanistan, May 2014. Credit: Getty Images)

Soft and Big

Benjamin J. Rhodes, the deputy national security advisor to President Obama, was the chief US negotiator in the secret normalization talks with Cuba and has been a central player in the making of American foreign policy since 2009, both as a key advisor and as the president’s chief foreign policy speechwriter. Rhodes and Jeffrey Goldberg, national correspondent for The Atlantic, discuss the worldview of President Obama, focusing on Cuba, the Iran talks, and the continuing crisis across the broader Middle East.

By mid‐2015, the Obama presidency will be entering its final stages, and the race among the successors in both parties will be well underway. And while experts have already formed a provisional understanding of the Obama administration's foreign policy goals, the shape of the "Obama Doctrine" is finally coming into full view. In The Obama Doctrine, Colin Dueck analyzes and explains what the Obama Doctrine in foreign policy actually is, and maps out the competing visions on offer from the Republican Party. Dueck, a leading scholar of US foreign policy, contends it is now becoming clear that Obama's policy of international retrenchment is in large part a function of his emphasis on achieving domestic policy goals. There have been some successes in the approach, but there have also been costs. For instance, much of the world no longer trusts the US to exert its will in international politics, and America's adversaries overseas have asserted themselves with increasing frequency. The Republican Party will target these perceived weaknesses in the 2016 presidential campaign and develop competing counter‐doctrines in the process. The Obama Doctrine not only provides a sharp appraisal of foreign policy in the Obama era; it lays out an alternative approach to marshaling American power that will help shape the foreign policy debate in the run‐up to the 2016 elections. Colin DueckColin Dueck is an Associate Professor in George Mason University's School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs. He studied politics at Princeton University, and international relations at Oxford under a Rhodes scholarship. He has published three books on American foreign and national security policies, The Obama Doctrine: American Grand Strategy Today (Oxford 2015), Hard Line: The Republican Party and U.S. Foreign Policy since World War II (Princeton 2010), and Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy (Princeton 2006.) Dueck has provided congressional testimony and published articles on these same subjects in journals such as International Security, Orbis, Security Studies, Review of International Studies, Political Science Quarterly, and World Policy Journal, as well as online at RealClearPolitics, National Review, Foreign Affairs, The National Interest, and the New York Times. His current research focus is on the relationship between party politics, presidential leadership, American conservatism, and U.S. foreign policy strategies. He is the faculty adviser for the Alexander Hamilton Society at George Mason University, and a member of the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

Show NotesChris and Stephen note the launch of Tidal with some skepticism, then contrast the service with what could be considered Tidal’s polar opposite: YouTube. We look at the international aspects of music distribution, and think about how youth factor in to the ever-changing equation. And, good news, there’s a happy ending. I love happy endings. Before You Go Iran and the Obama Doctrine by Thomas Friedman Music “Number One” by The Sideshow Tragedy. Used by permission. “Winning Slowly Theme” by Chris Krycho. Now with more techno! Just kidding. Links Tidal Spotify Pono Bandcamp Beatport The Piano Guys’ YouTube Page Pentatonix’s Youtube Page By the Numbers: 80+ Amazing YouTube Statistics 33 Amazing YouTube Facts & Stats to Tweet & Share 13–24 Year Olds Watching More YouTube Than TV - To The Surprise of No-one by Andy Smith Lily Allen: “Tidal Will Make Fans Swarm Back to Piracy…” Neil Young’s PonoPlayer: The Emperor Has No Clothes Why Netflix needs to crack down on foreigners accessing its US site by Leo Mirani Bandcamp Hits $100 Million Payout Milestone, Plans Artist Subscriptions by Andrew Flanagan Further Reading Jay Z Launches TIDAL As “Artist Owned” Music Service: Big On Star Power, Short On Details by David Ulevitch Previously on the show 2.03: Impervious Scale—we talked about YouTube’s Music Key product and their problems with artists like Zoe Keating. 2.10: So You’ve Been Hacked—we talked about how all industries are affected by the Internet. Follow/Subscribe Twitter: @winningslowly @chriskrycho @scarradini App.net @winningslowly @chriskrycho Subscribe RSS iTunes

In a week that has featured an appalling display of the trailing edge of consciousness development -- the ISIS beheadings -- Jeff starts by highlighting a new, more encouraging emergent that is arising on humanity's leading edge. It's called being nice. Also, a good week for the Obama Doctrine?

Columnist Chris Harper discusses and debates with John Daly about the so-called Obama Doctrine.  Is there one?  And if so, is it just based on controlled chaos?

Welcome to the Seriouside of the jril show.  We will be discussing the following topics this morning: 1st SEGMENT:  MILITARY SEXUAL ASSAULT:  Sexual assault of female military servicemembers are on the rise.  What steps should the CINC to stop this disturbing trend? 2nd SEGMENT: THE OBAMA DOCTRINE:  Earlier this week the POTUS gave a speech earlier this week about the US's involvement in the war on terror. What does this all means? 3rd SEGMENT:  THE STATE OF BLACK AMERICA:  In this segment of our annual discussion, we are focusing our attention on the African American Family

The Obama Doctrine continues its failed U.S. foreign policy agenda of alienating the best friends of America, while embracing the mortal enemies of the United States, the democratic Free World and everything we stand for... On today's show: More about the bizarre foreign policy decisions of the Obama administration...Invitations to terrorist group members and their supporters...in spite of questionable legality under American law... Newly-elected Egyptian president Morsi is also on the guest list, in spite of his recently proclaimed goal of achieving the release of Islamic terrorist Omar Abdel Rahman from American prison...Remember him? He's the guy who engineered the first World Trade Center bombing...Welcome to the White House, my friend!... Plus...coverage of Hillary Clinton's visit to Egypt and Israel...Her pelting with tomatoes, shoes and epithets in Egypt....her snubbing by Egyptian Christians and lovers of secular democracy...and her resounding slap in the face to Israel with her statement about Jonathan Pollard... She compared him to imprisoned Arab terrorist and murderers, the only difference being that Clinton sees nothing wrong with American ally Pollard dying in U.S. prison, while she pleas for the release of the Arab murderers of Americans and Israelis from Israeli jail...The Obama Doctrine in action... All this and more on The Marty Roberts Show

The intervention in Libya shows President Obama pulled in a multitude of different directions. Is there now an "Obama Doctrine" in the Middle East? What are the implications for US policy toward the rest of the world?

Those of us who have been paying attention have a pretty good idea about the Obama doctrine. It is still alive and well. People need to be on the watch out for the deception of Obamaism. The Obama doctrine will destroy the very underlying fabric of our nation from within. Just what is the Obama Doctrine? Stay tune.

Tonight, the host revisit the radical socialist policies and executive orders of Obama first year in office. Open Mic.