Debates on SermonAudio

Taking a position on truth is pretty unpopular today, but there are still some who have the courage to do it in the public forum. Dr. James White is one of the nation's most active Christian apologists and debaters, having debated atheists, Muslims, etc. over the last twenty years. Here, Kevin Swanson interacts with James on how to engage the battle in the dangerous war of ideas—with meekness and fear.

This sermon examines the doctrine of the Trinity through specific passages in the book of Isaiah, identifying the distinct roles and relationships of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The analysis begins with Isaiah 42, where the Father is presented as the commissioner who delights in the Son, the Servant, who is empowered by the Holy Spirit to bring gentle justice to the Gentiles. The teaching continues with Isaiah 48, exploring the debate over whether the Father or the Son is the speaker, while emphasizing the unity of the divine persons in the sending of the Messiah. Finally, the sermon introduces Isaiah 61 alongside Luke 4, highlighting the anointing of Christ by the Spirit to preach good tidings and bind up the brokenhearted. Throughout the discussion, the preacher emphasizes that the three persons of the Trinity are united in purpose and authority, rather than operating in a hierarchy of subordination, providing a cohesive Old Testament foundation for understanding the triune nature of God.

Meet Christiana Faith Debate: Sunday, September 27th, 2026 (10/04/26 on 930 WFMD in Frederick, Maryland) Does history warn against Christian avoidance of "Artificial Intelligence"? In other words, are saints today repeating the strategic error of early 20th-Century fundamentalism? In the 1920s–1940s significant sectors of Christianity responded to cultural/intellectual hostility by withdrawing from universities, media, & public institutions; a posture that ceded enormous cultural influence for generations. The result wasn't the preservation of orthodoxy so much as the marginalization of orthodox Christianity from the formation of cultural institutions. Figures such as J Gresham Machen fought against this withdrawal, arguing that Christians must engage & reform institutions, rather than abandon them. The Faith Debate wondered if Christian avoidance of AI is the beginning of another decades-long strategic retreat that future generations will lament, asking if separation from culture has ever produced a more Christian culture. Can the church sanctify what it abandons? You're encouraged to go listen to these shows. In the meantime, this episode is part 2 of a 4-part conversation on the subject of spiritual visions/apparitions. The Faith Debate is found at wfmd.com, ChristianPodcastCommunity.org, & other podcast platforms like SermonAudio & Odysee. Videos are also posted, especially on Rumble. Find links for all this at householdoffaithinchrist.com. Panel: Troy Skinner. Founder, Household of Faith in Christ Daniel Razvi. Pastor, Conquered By Love Elijah Dirksen. Student, Whitfield Theological Seminary Kevin Schwartz. Gentleman with dramatic stories of visions/visitations

The sermon explores the dual approach Paul takes in Colossians to address false teaching: warning against deceptive persuasive arguments and affirming the believer's secure union with Christ. It emphasizes that the antidote to Gnostic error is not intellectual debate but a deep understanding of Christ's full deity and the believer's position in Him. The text highlights the progression of the Christian life, moving from being firmly rooted in Christ at salvation to being continuously built up and established in the faith through instruction. This stability is characterized by good discipline and steadfastness, contrasting with the lukewarmness of Laodicea. The message concludes by encouraging believers to respond to this truth with overflowing gratitude, recognizing that their security rests solely in the person and work of Jesus Christ.

The Matt Slick Live (Live Broadcast of 09-25-2026) is a production of the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry (CARM). Matt answers questions on topics such as: The Bible, Apologetics, Theology, World Religions, Atheism, and other issues! You can also email questions to Matt using: info@carm.org, Put "Radio Show Question" in the Subject line! Answers will be discussed in a future show. Topics Include: Matt Discusses a Debate from the Night Before with a Unitarian/Understanding "Properties" as Relates to God in Colossians 2:9/ Elohim in Genesis, also YaHWeH Elohim, The Name of God/ Can Those That Will Be in Heaven Rebel?/Were Angels Created Sinless?/ Could Judas have Been Compassionate When he Betrayed Jesus?/Matt Explains How the RCC Church Practices Idolatry/ What About the Ethiopian Bible?/Justification for Rejecting Extra Books of The Bible/ September 25, 2026

Two of biblical counseling's most influential leaders died within a year of each other (Adams and Powlison), and the movement has been fracturing ever since. In this series finale, Dr. Jared Poulton joins Jared and Dr. Alan Strange to bring the story into the present: the growing rift between "clinically informed" and "historic" biblical counseling, the theological debates over common grace and secular psychology no reformed denomination has ever weighed in on, and why so many Reformed Christians have kept biblical counseling at arm's length despite wanting exactly what it offers. Dr. Poulton makes the case for where the movement goes from here, and issues a direct challenge to pastors and elders who've sat this conversation out. Whether you've followed all four episodes or you're just catching up, this closing conversation will change how you think about the counsel happening in your own church.

3 John 1:2 — TV preachers quote this verse and stop. John didn't stop there — and the rest of the sentence wrecks the health-and-wealth gospel. This message unpacks the prosperity gospel debate hiding inside 3 John 1:2 — the verse health-and-wealth preachers love to quote, and love to stop reading. This expository preaching through the Apostle John's wish for a man named Gaius exposes what happens when "prosper and be in health" gets cut loose from the phrase that follows it: "even as thy soul prospereth." If you've ever wondered why the prosperity gospel doesn't add up biblically — or watched someone you love send their last dollars to a preacher promising healing and wealth — this sermon shows you exactly where that theology breaks, one piece of punctuation at a time. Soul prosperity, not bank account prosperity, is the measuring stick John actually gives. Preached from 3 John 1:1-2, this message traces the Apostle John's final years as the last living eyewitness of Christ, his love for a little-known believer named Gaius, and the wish he made for him. Drawing on Genesis 22, 2 Corinthians 11-12, and the record of Paul's own suffering and contentment, this verse-by-verse teaching calls believers back to a definition of prosperity measured by the soul first — everything else rides behind it. This sermon walks through 3 John 1:1-2, explaining: - Why John signed this letter only "the elder" — and why no one had to ask which elder - Who Gaius was, and why an old apostle loved a man history barely remembers - The difference between a formal prayer and a wish that "gets away from you" - How prosperity preachers stop reading at the comma in verse 2

The Matt Slick Live (Live Broadcast of 09-22-2026) is a production of the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry (CARM). Matt answers questions on topics such as: The Bible, Apologetics, Theology, World Religions, Atheism, and other issues! You can also email questions to Matt using: info@carm.org, Put "Radio Show Question" in the Subject line! Answers will be discussed in a future show. Topics Include: Rebuking False Teachers????/ Why Does Islam Not Use The Name YaHWeH?/ Tracts on the CARM Website?/Using Them for God's Glory/ The Contemporary "Baptist Movement" and Music/ Christian Versus Secular Counseling in ALL areas of Life?/A New Debate Forum and "Epoc Apologetics"/How Matt Dealt with Spousal Sufferings/ September 22, 2026

The Matt Slick Live (Live Broadcast of 09-21-2026) is a production of the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry (CARM). Matt answers questions on topics such as: The Bible, Apologetics, Theology, World Religions, Atheism, and other issues! You can also email questions to Matt using: info@carm.org, Put "Radio Show Question" in the Subject line! Answers will be discussed in a future show. Topics Include: Some RCC and EO adherents don't even know what The Gospel is/ Is there a commandment against debating?/ The Parable of The Unjust Steward/ Is Systematic Theology by Louis Berkhoff Good?/ Can a Christian be Friends with Unbelievers?/ Email Questions Answered/ How do we Align Ourselves with God, and How do we Know we are Doing It?/ 2 Peter 3—Not "Any" Should Perish?/ A Comment on Matt's Last Debate/ September 21, 2026

In 1 Corinthians 12:8–11, Paul identifies a variety of spiritual gifts given by the Holy Spirit for the building up of Christ's church. Among the most debated of these gifts is prophecy. What exactly was the New Testament gift of prophecy? Was it preaching, a spontaneous impression from the Spirit, a fallible revelation, or the authoritative Word of God? In this sermon, Pastor Robb Brunansky examines the biblical meaning of prophecy by tracing the prophetic ministry from the Old Testament through the Gospels, Acts, and the New Testament epistles. Scripture consistently presents true prophecy as direct revelation from God—authoritative, completely true, and produced by the Holy Spirit rather than the imagination or will of man. This study also considers several prominent views of New Testament prophecy and asks whether the Bible supports the idea that prophecy could contain a mixture of divine revelation and human error. From Moses and the Old Testament prophets to Agabus and the prophets of the early church, the biblical evidence points to continuity: when God truly speaks through a prophet, His Word is trustworthy and true. Understanding the nature of prophecy is essential not only for interpreting the spiritual gifts of 1 Corinthians 12, but also for understanding the sufficiency, authority, and reliability of God's revelation to His people.

This lesson examines the divisions within the Corinthian church as described in 1 Corinthians, focusing on the specific contention where members aligned themselves with one leader to the exclusion of accepting truth from others. The central message warns against the carnality and pride that fuel such strife, emphasizing that true unity requires identifying with the Lord Jesus and His Word as the sole authority for faith and practice. While following godly men is not inherently wrong, the lesson argues that elevating them to the status of ultimate authority leads to denominational fragmentation and imbalanced dependency. Believers are urged to trust in the inerrant Scripture over human fallibility to avoid the pitfalls of cult-like behavior and to maintain a balanced, Christ-centered perspective.

If Satan can't get the messengers to stop preaching, if he can't destroy or intimidate them, then Satan seeks to cause division about the truth of the gospel. We will study the special council at Jerusalem in Acts 15.

Meet Kevin Schwartz Faith Debate: Sunday, September 20th, 2026 (09/27/26 on 930 WFMD in Frederick, Maryland) For 5 straight shows The Faith Debate asked if AI's bringing the End Times? That makes for a total of 7 shows in '26 examining eschatological alarm about technology, wondering if it's from faithful Bible reading or an overreaction. This week shifts gears, but first here's some more about "Artificial Intelligence". Some point to The Book of Revelation's image of the beast, with economic control & widespread surveillance, as a framework thru which to interpret AI's trajectory. Others invoke Daniel ("many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase") as prophetic foreshadowing of the tech explosion. The panel distinguished between legitimate eschatological vigilance and date-setting sensationalism (the church has an embarrassing history of the latter). Postmillenial & Amillennial views frame the answers differently from Dispensational & Premillennial views. Those certain that AI is the mark-of-the-beast are undiscerning, but so too could be those saying AI is just a neutral tool. This episode is part 1 of a 4-part conversation on the subject of spiritual visions/apparitions. The Faith Debate can be found at wfmd.com, ChristianPodcastCommunity.org, & most podcast platforms - including SermonAudio & Odysee. Videos are found in many of these same places, plus on Rumble. Find links for all of these outlets at householdoffaithinchrist.com. Panel: Troy Skinner. Founder, Household of Faith in Christ Daniel Razvi. Pastor, Conquered By Love Elijah Dirksen. Student, Whitfield Theological Seminary Kevin Schwartz. Gentleman with dramatic stories of visions/visitations

This sermon examines the warnings in 2 Timothy 2:14-15 regarding the dangers of unprofitable word wrangling and the necessity of diligent study of Scripture. The teaching highlights that engaging in contentious debates over words leads to the spiritual ruin of hearers, likening the damage to a plow turning over settled soil. In contrast, believers are called to be diligent workmen who accurately handle the word of truth, seeking to be approved by God through examination and conformity to Christ. This diligence is not a fleshly effort but a response to the new life given by the Holy Spirit, who motivates believers to grow in their understanding and relationship with Jesus. The message concludes with a call to focus on the Word as the source of truth and the means by which believers are tested and found genuine.

Cultural controversies change constantly, but the worldview beneath them remains the same: humanity's rejection of God's authority to define reality. In this Weekly Watch episode, Dave Jenkins explains how Romans 1 equips Christians to recognize the lies beneath modern debates about identity, sexuality, human dignity, freedom, technology, justice, and truth. Christians are called to resist compromise and cruelty, renew their minds through God's Word, speak truth in love, and rest in the reign of Christ. For more from Contending for the Word, please visit: https://servantsofgrace.org/contending-for-the-word-podcast/

The sermon examines Romans 11:11-15 to explain how God uses the rejection of the gospel by ethnic Israel to bring salvation to the Gentiles, a strategy designed to provoke the Jews to jealousy. The sermon clarifies that Israel's stumbling is neither total nor permanent, as evidenced by the elect remnant and the future hope of their fullness. The preacher argues that this 'fullness' implies a future, massive conversion of Jews to Christ, distinct from dispensationalist views that separate Israel from the church. The sermon acknowledges the debated nature of the passage while offering a cohesive Reformed interpretation of God's sovereign plan for both Jews and Gentiles.

The sermon examines the doctrine of the baptism of the Holy Spirit, distinguishing it from the separate experience often taught in charismatic circles. It argues that the biblical baptism of the Spirit occurs at salvation, indwelling the believer and washing away sin, rather than serving as a subsequent empowerment for special gifts. The speaker critiques the blurring of doctrinal lines that leads to false assumptions, using examples from cultural debates to illustrate how confusion can be manipulated. By analyzing Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians 12-13, the text posits that the sign gifts of the Spirit, such as tongues and prophecy, were necessary for the validation of the infant church but have ceased as the church matured into the fullness of Scripture. The presentation concludes that while the Holy Spirit remains active, the specific miraculous signs associated with the early church are no longer required for believers today.

The sermon urges believers to remain steadfast in their faith amidst a darkening world by holding firmly to God's Word and rejecting political polarization. Drawing from Proverbs, the speaker emphasizes that spiritual integrity requires avoiding the paths of the wicked and focusing solely on vertical devotion to Christ rather than horizontal societal debates. The message highlights the promise that as global darkness increases, the light of the church will shine brighter, attracting those seeking truth during times of crisis. Believers are called to be lighthouse keepers who offer courage and hope through the power of the Holy Spirit, regardless of external threats or cultural pressure. Ultimately, the central appeal is for individuals to surrender their lives completely to God, asking Him to glorify His name through their faithful witness and transformed character.

This sermon explores how Christians can endure suffering without fear by anchoring their lives in the right fear of God, a firm hope in resurrection, and a gentle witness. Drawing from 1 Peter 3, the preacher explains that believers should expect hardship but remain unafraid because Christ has already faced the ultimate trial. The message emphasizes that honoring Christ in the heart produces a hope that sustains believers through loss and persecution. It further argues that apologetics is less about philosophical debate and more about living with a clear conscience and godly character. Ultimately, the sermon encourages the congregation to follow Jesus' example of self-sacrifice, finding courage in the assurance of eternal life.

The sermon warns believers against spiritual distractions that divert attention from Jesus Christ to unprofitable disputes, genealogies, and syncretistic philosophies. Drawing primarily from Titus 3:9-11, the message identifies these diversions as destructive because they fail to cultivate love for Christ or produce righteous living. The preacher emphasizes that true biblical teaching must always point to the centrality of Christ's work and result in obedience to His gospel. Believers are exhorted to reject divisive influences and maintain their focus on the transformative power of grace rather than empty theological debates. Ultimately, the core message calls for a steadfast commitment to the true gospel as the only path to salvation and spiritual vitality.

(1) Praying for the Spirit's inner strength; (2) Praying for Christ's indwelling love; (3) Praying for God's powerful glory.

Engaging With AI in Spiritual Matters Faith Debate: Sunday, September 13th, 2026 (09/20/26 on 930 WFMD in Frederick, Maryland) How serious are deepfakes? Can AI provide true spiritual counsel, as people replace true shepherding for algorithmic comfort? If used for sermons will AI bring bad preaching? Does tech erode understanding that human thought/creativity/relationships are unique/valuable because humans bear God's image? What's the case for/against engaging AI? Is it faithful, or failure, to disengage? If saints don't interact with AI, do they forfeit opportunity to shape it? Will Christian absence interacting mean the training data will skew further from a biblical framework? Is there a responsibility to engage AI development, prompt AI tools with theological content, & work in AI industries as a vocational calling? Or would this normalize a tech whose long-term effects are maybe corrosive? If only secular materialists are shaping AI's values, will the church one day complain about the fruit of a tree it refused to tend? This is part 5 of a 5-part series. For the full uninterrupted discussion, go to Theology Throwdown (04-11-26) on the Christian Podcast Community. The Faith Debate is found at wfmd.com, ChristianPodcastCommunity.org, & most podcast platforms - including SermonAudio & Odysee. Videos are found at many of these places, & on Rumble). Find links for it all at householdoffaithinchrist.com. Panel: Troy Skinner, Faith Debate Andrew Rappaport, Theology Throwdown Keith Heltsley, Quest For Truth Melissa Lex, Thoroughly Equipped Eve Franklin, Are You Just Watching Brandon Hollen, Rooted Reason George Binoka, Gospel Talks Anthony Russo, Grace and Peace Radio

Three major topics today, first, some more on the upcoming "debate" involving Dinesh D'Souza and his ever worsening diatribes against Calvinism. Then we responded to Joel Webbon's pious defense of having Alex Jones speak at a "Christ is King" Conference, and finished up doing in-depth in response to Leighton Flowers on Genesis 50 and motivations and actions.

What do Christians believe about the end times? As we begin Matthew 24 and the Olivet Discourse, Pastor Casey Lewis introduces the doctrine of eschatology and explains why Christians should study what Scripture teaches about the return of Christ. In this message, Pastor Casey surveys the major Christian end-times positions, including historic premillennialism, dispensational premillennialism, postmillennialism, amillennialism, and preterism. He also discusses how Christians should approach disagreements over eschatology with humility and charity, dangers such as date-setting and interpreting every news event as biblical prophecy, and why he currently holds to an amillennial view. Above all, the doctrine of the end times should lead Christians not merely to debate, but to remain faithful, active, and ready for the return of Jesus Christ. Scripture: Matthew 23:37-24:3 Sermon: The Doctrine of End Times Preacher: Pastor Casey Lewis Foundation Baptist Church http://foundationeuless.com/ Subscribe and follow along as we continue verse by verse through Matthew 24 and the Olivet Discourse.

The Bible says that the enemy roars around like a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour. Peter says do not think it strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you as though some strange thing happened to you but keep on rejoicing so that also the revelation of His glory you may rejoice in exultation. The New Testament teaches about the trying of one's faith as a fiery trial. But for Shadrach, Meshack, and Abendego it was a reality. The mysterious 4th Figure in this section of scripture is the Protector of God's people. The fire had no power over God's people. Not one stitch of clothing was singed. For that we rejoice. Whether Meshach, Shadrach, and Abendego saw this figure is up for debate. But we know one person who did and that 4th Figure would be etched in his mind forever Daniel 3:24-30 Luke 16:14 then 19-31

AI Ethical Considerations Faith Debate: Sunday, September 6th, 2026 (09/13/26 on 930 WFMD in Frederick, Maryland) People respond to AI with excitement/fear/everything between. Are the responses theologically sound, or driven by personality & culture? Some embrace "Artificial Intelligence" for productivity in sermon prep/evangelism/Bible study. Others are anxious over deception, loss of human connection, doctrinal dilution, & the erosion of pastoral care. Some treat AI as evidence the End Times are here. Is any of this based on Christian reasoning; or are saints importing secular anxieties/enthusiasms? Excitement/terror about AI can reveal more about a person's view of providence & human depravity than about AI itself. Are fears legit? Which concerns deserve weight? Which are technophobia dressed in piety? This episode is part 4 of a 5-part conversation (piggybacking on a 2-part AI discussion from earlier in 2026). To hear the 5 parts in uninterrupted fashion, go to the Christian Podcast Community & find the Theology Throwdown show dated 04-11-26. The Faith Debate podcasts can be found at wfmd.com, ChristianPodcastCommunity.org, & most podcast platforms - including SermonAudio & Odysee. Videos are made available in many of these same places, plus on Rumble. Find links for all of these outlets at householdoffaithinchrist.com. The Panel: Troy Skinner. Host, The Faith Debate Andrew Rappaport. Founder, Striving for Eternity Keith Heltsley. Co-host, Quest For Truth Melissa Lex. Host, Thoroughly Equipped Eve Franklin. Co-host, Are You Just Watching? Brandon Hollen. Host, Rooted Reason George Binoka. Co-host, Gospel Talks Podcast Anthony Russo. Host, Grace and Peace Radio

Romans 11:22 — "Otherwise thou also shalt be cut off." Does that mean you can lose your salvation? A verse-by-verse walk through Catholic, Arminian, and Reformed views on perseverance. This message addresses one of the most searched and debated questions in the Christian life: can a believer lose their salvation? This sermon walks through three major views — the Catholic view of ongoing justification through works, the Arminian view that a believer can choose to walk away and become apostate, and the Reformed conviction that the saints persevere not by their own strength, but because God preserves them to the end. Using real conversations, honest struggle with hard passages, and examples from David and Peter — two men who backslid badly and yet were never cast away — this sermon works through 2 Timothy 2 and 4, 1 John 1 and 5, Matthew 5 and 23, Galatians 2, Romans 9–11, Philippians 1 and 4, and Hebrews 7 to answer the question honestly and biblically: is your salvation dependent on your own perseverance, or on God's? This sermon walks through the doctrine of perseverance, explaining: - What perseverance actually means and why the Christian life is marked by it - The Catholic doctrine of ongoing justification, mortal sin, and venial sin — and why it misunderstands what justification means - The Arminian argument from Romans 11:22 that a believer can be "cut off" - Why Romans 9–11 is actually about the nation of Israel, not individual salvation - The olive tree, the grafted branches, and what they do (and don't) teach about losing salvation - David's adultery, conspiracy, and murder — and why he was still a man after God's own heart

SUNDAY SERMON - Nathan Swanson This Lord's Day, Pastor Nathan brings us a sermon from the book of Acts titled, "Grace Alone, Part 1." (Acts 15:1-22)

Reverend James Harden is president and CEO of CompassCare Pregnancy Services in New York. They are saving lives in places like Buffalo, Rochester, Bronx, Brooklyn and Staten Island, New York. He's a dedicated pro-life advocate that became a victim of an ANTIFA off-shoot's firebomb attack in 2022 in wake of the Dobbs decision. Last week, the U.S. State Department and the Treasury Department corroborated key findings that Rev. Harden has advanced since his pro-life center was firebombed in 2022. It was discovered that Jane's Revenge is basically a front-group for an international Marxist insurgency known as ANTIFA. This was learned only because CompassCare had to hire private investigators to do the job that the Biden era FBI and DOJ refused to do. According to Reverend Harden, ANTIFA stands for "anti-facism." However, the definition of facism that they employ is based on a Marxist one. In other words, they're anti-capitalist and anti-free market, but they're also atheistic with the ultimate goal of destroying the current nation-state system. So what does this have to do with abortion? Reverend Harden noted that ANTIFA doesn't actually care about left-wing causes, but they do like to "piggyback" off of them. One of those causes is abortion. They will use this debate to "gin up the grassroots base and then engage in what they call direct action targeting to destabilize society." The result of their efforts has been a "prairie fire of violence against pro-life Christian pregnancy centers and churches."

The sermon centers on Acts 1:8, urging believers to fulfill the Great Commission by making Christ known globally. It emphasizes that effective evangelism relies not on human strategy but on the supernatural power of the Holy Spirit. Believers are called to act as witnesses, sharing personal testimonies rather than engaging in debate. The message outlines a geographic scope for this mission, extending from one's immediate local community to the ends of the earth. Ultimately, it challenges the audience to live obediently and rely on God to accomplish what human effort cannot.

Put up a nicely done graphic against Calvinism and started there, walking through its common objections and providing the same responses we have provided for decades now. Then we looked at Leighton Flowers attempting to turn John 6 into a Provisionist Pretzel (applauded by Jenna Ellis) while ignoring the reality of what happened to him in the debate a few years ago. Enjoy!

This sermon examines the first eleven verses of 1 Corinthians 12 to explain the nature and purpose of spiritual gifts within the church. The preacher addresses the theological debate between cessationists and continuationists regarding the presence of miraculous gifts today while emphasizing that all believers possess some manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. Key themes include the sovereignty of the Triune God in distributing diverse abilities, the necessity of discerning true spiritual utterances from false ones, and the specific functions of gifts such as wisdom, knowledge, faith, healing, prophecy, and tongues. The text highlights that these manifestations are not for personal pride but are designed to benefit others and glorify Christ. Ultimately, the message affirms that every gift originates from the Holy Spirit who distributes them according to His sovereign will.

The sermon concludes a series on the reliability of Scripture by addressing the common misconception that the Bible is too difficult for ordinary believers to understand. It introduces the theological concept of perspicuity, arguing that God's revelation is sufficiently clear for salvation and daily obedience despite some complex passages. By examining the preface of the King James translators and biblical examples of translation refinement, the message affirms that multiple faithful translations serve to clarify rather than obscure God's truth. The preacher emphasizes that while not every verse is equally easy, the core doctrines are manifest, urging believers to study with humility and confidence. Ultimately, the goal of understanding Scripture is not intellectual debate but faithful obedience to God's commands.

A Faithful Plan For False Teachers reveals how to deal with false teachers biblically. Guard your heart with 2 Timothy 2. Faithfulness to God often meets fierce resistance from those who profess Christ while spreading false doctrine. In this expository preaching session from 2 Timothy 2, Pastor Richard Caldwell explains the danger of worldly chatter and ruinous speech. Believers must exercise biblical discernment to avoid the relational and demonic snare of empty arguments. To protect the church, spiritual leaders must accurately handle the word of truth. This requires direct, careful, and unashamed teaching of Scripture rather than engaging in meaningless debates. God provides a firm foundation for His people, offering absolute certainty even when false teachers upset the faith of others. Ultimately, the Lord knows those who are His. True Christians are characterized by a continuous repentance and a deliberate departure from unrighteousness. We can rest in the sovereignty of God as we stand firm in Reformed theology and biblical truth. Key Biblical Takeaways: - Believers must embrace the responsibility to warn others about the destructive nature of deceitful arguments and false doctrine. - Faithful Christians must diligently cut a straight path with Scripture, presenting God's Word accurately and avoiding worldly chatter. - False teaching spreads like a disease and ruins hearers, making strict biblical boundaries essential for the spiritual health of the church. - God's sovereign foundation remains secure, and His true people demonstrate their authentic faith by departing from evil and confessing sin.

This sermon explores the divided reactions to Jesus during the Feast of Tabernacles as recorded in John chapter seven, emphasizing the critical question of what individuals must do with Him. The preacher contrasts the misunderstanding of Jesus' family and the religious leaders with His divine authority and perfect adherence to God's timing for His mission. Central to the message is Jesus' invitation to all who thirst to come to Him for living water, symbolizing the Holy Spirit and eternal life available through faith. The text warns against superficial knowledge or mere intellectual agreement, urging a personal encounter with Christ that leads to genuine salvation and obedience. Ultimately, the sermon calls listeners to move beyond debate and judgment to make a decisive response to Jesus as Savior.

AI in Christian Thought Faith Debate: Sunday, August 30th, 2026 (09/06/26 on 930 WFMD in Frederick, Maryland) What's "Artificial Intelligence"? Before we respond to AI, we must understand it refers to computational systems trained on massive datasets to recognize patterns, generate outputs, & simulate reasoning. It doesn't possess consciousness, a soul, or genuine understanding in a meaningful sense. Large Language Models are trained on human-generated text. They reflect/amplify whatever values/assumptions/worldviews that dominate training data. The distinction between narrow AI & general AI is critical for calibrating a response appropriately. AI is a human artifact, not a rival to humanity. It's a tool made by image-bearers, not an image-bearer itself, so calling it "intelligent" is a category error. Let's define terms carefully. This episode is part 3 of a 5-part conversation (piggybacking on a 2-part AI discussion from earlier in 2026). To hear the 5 parts in uninterrupted fashion, go to the Christian Podcast Community & find the Theology Throwdown show from 04-11-26. The Faith Debate podcasts can be found at wfmd.com, ChristianPodcastCommunity.org, & most podcast platforms - including SermonAudio & Odysee. (Videos are made available in many of these same places, as well on Rumble). Find links for all of these outlets at householdoffaithinchrist.com. Panel: Troy Skinner. Host, The Faith Debate Andrew Rappaport. Host, Theology Throwdown Keith Heltsley. Host, Quest For Truth Melissa Lex. Host, Thoroughly Equipped Eve Franklin. Host, Are You Just Watching Brandon Hollen. Host, Rooted Reason George Binoka. Host, Gospel Talks Anthony Russo. Host, Grace & Peace Radio

William Lane Craig's rejection of the eternal generation of the Son has ignited controversy over the Nicene Creed. What exactly is Craig denying, what does eternal generation actually mean, and why does this debate matter? We begin our investigation.

For much of the 20th century, many academic theologians operated on the assumption that Calvin's successors (Beza, the Westminster Divines, the scholastic tradition) had in some ways betrayed him and traded a warm, Christ-centered theology for cold, rationalistic system-building. Then Richard Muller spent decades in the primary sources and found the picture was substantially wrong. In this final episode of What Did Calvin Actually Say?, Jared sits down with Dr. Cornelis Venema to untangle one of Reformed theology's most consequential scholarly debates and to ask what it means to stand at the end of a tradition rather than cherry-picking a moment from it.

This lesson provides an introductory overview of the New Testament, focusing on its contents and authorship within a broader series on Scripture. The speaker explains that the New Testament covers approximately one hundred years of history, culminating in the incarnation of Christ, and is divided into historical books, epistles, and apocalyptic literature. A significant portion addresses authorship, noting that while most books have clear attributions, Hebrews remains debated due to stylistic differences from Paul's other writings. The preacher emphasizes that apparent contradictions in the Gospels are resolvable through harmonization and contextual understanding of ancient literary conventions. Finally, the session concludes by affirming the divine inspiration and authority of the text as a defense against skeptical critiques.

The sermon explores the linguistic distinctions within the King James Bible regarding the various representations of God's name, specifically analyzing the Hebrew Tetragrammaton and its translation into LORD, God, or Jehovah. It examines how capitalization patterns reveal underlying Hebrew words like Yahweh, Elohim, and Adonai, emphasizing that these are not interchangeable but carry distinct theological weight. The preacher uses Genesis 22:14 to illustrate the complexity of translating compound names like Jehovah-Jireh, debating whether it signifies God who sees or God who provides based on contextual evidence. By highlighting marginal notes and translation choices, the message encourages readers to engage deeply with the text rather than relying solely on commentaries. Ultimately, the sermon invites believers to recognize God's personal involvement in their lives by adopting specific names for Him that reflect His actions in their own experiences.

Navigating AI's Role in Faith Faith Debate: Sunday, August 23rd, 2026 (08/30/26 on 930 WFMD in Frederick, Maryland) The Faith Debate digs into AI from a Christian vantage point. What is this technology at its root? Are fears about it due to faithful discernment, or cultural panic? If Christians disengage from "Artificial Intelligence", who fills the vacuum to train the machines, and shape the values baked into systems influencing billions of people? From the specter of end-times speculation to cultural withdrawal, can the church be let off the hook with easy answers? This isn't a conversation about gadgets, but rather about dominion, discipleship, and how the people of God can best show up where it counts. You're invited to listen, and then decide where you stand. This episode is part two of a five-part conversation (piggybacking on a two-part AI discussion from earlier in the year). To hear the five parts in uninterrupted fashion, go to the Christian Podcast Community and find the Theology Throwdown show dated April 11th, 2026. The Faith Debate podcasts can be found at wfmd.com, ChristianPodcastCommunity.org, and most podcast platforms - including SermonAudio and Odysee. (Videos are made available in many of these same places, as well on Rumble). Find links for all of these outlets at householdoffaithinchrist.com. Panel: Troy Skinner. Founder, Household of Faith in Christ Andrew Rappaport. Founder, Striving for Eternity Keith Heltsley. Co-host, Quest For Truth Melissa Lex. Host, Thoroughly Equipped Eve Franklin. Co-host, Are You Just Watching? Brandon Hollen. Host, Rooted Reason George Binoka. Co-host, Gospel Talks Podcast Anthony Russo. Host, Grace and Peace Radio

John 10:31-38 — The men who picked up stones to kill Jesus stated His claim to be God in full, word for word. His modern critics won't even do that. This expository preaching message walks verse by verse through John 10:31-38, the moment the Jews at Solomon's porch pick up stones to kill Jesus over His claim to be God. Rather than softening or reinterpreting what Jesus said, this teaching shows how His own accusers — men with every reason to minimize the claim — stated it in full. That's a stronger witness to the deity of Christ than anything offered by modern-day critics who insist Jesus never claimed to be God. Using Leviticus 24's blasphemy law and Psalm 82's rebuke of corrupt judges, this teaching shows how Jesus turns His accusers' own scripture against their charge — arguing from lesser to greater: if God once called sinful judges "gods" for merely holding an office, how much more is it not blasphemy for the One the Father sanctified and sent to say, "I am the Son of God"? This verse-by-verse exposition connects John 10:22-39 with Leviticus 24:16, Psalm 82, John 3:3, John 5:25, John 8:21-43, John 14:10-21, John 17:21, Micah 5:2, and 1 Corinthians 2:7-8, explaining: - Why debate doesn't reach for stones, but fear does - Why Jesus answers the blasphemy charge with a question, not a denial - What "the scripture cannot be broken" actually settles in this argument - How Psalm 82's rebuke of corrupt judges becomes Jesus's defense - Why His enemies are more reliable witnesses to His deity than modern skeptics - The difference between memorizing scripture and letting scripture read you - Why Jesus stands behind a record of works instead of hiding behind a claim

J.D. Vance believes Christian lifestyle suffices over verbal evangelism; Ex-Fauci adviser pleads guilty to concealing COVID-19 origins; Senator Darline Graham performed poorly in GOP Senatorial run-off debate

(1) Israel Watch 8/19/26: The Iran Ceasefire Ends, Israel expands her defensive war back into Syria, Turkey (Togarmah) injects itself, the Democrat Marxist Death Cult continues nominated anti-Israel, antisemites for the November Election even as the "Far Reich" on the right opposes Israel (video clip of P.M. Netanyahu)... We discuss the Mecca Defense Pact and why this does NOT negate the Gog Magog War (Offensive) prophecy. And we discuss the Bikers Across America rally in Dearborn, MI. While we do not endorse Jake Lang (who is anti-Israel), we do give credit where due regarding some of his remarks at the Dearborn City Council meeting Tuesday (the 18th). (2) All Actors Go To Heaven? We discuss the latest example of the Anti-Biblical practice of so many professing believers claiming that actors who gave no profession of faith and whose lives demonstrated a complete rejection of Biblical truth and morality somehow "Rest In Peace" and are "in Heaven" or "with the Angels", etc. This time it is bi-sexual, non-Christian actress Hayden Panettiere. (3) Meira K. Sums Things Up Quite Well regarding the Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson debate. (4) Funny Things... Or just Happy Things... Include Butch Wilmore's autographed photo and comments toward Steven Lee of Sermon Audio and an official, scientific report posted on the official U.S. government N.I.H. web site titled, "Testosterone Administration Induces Red Shift In Democrats". https://bbfohio.com

Well, it's two months to go till we have our debate in Gilbert, Arizona with Craig Truglia, and so...it's on my mind. So that's what we talked about today, getting into events at Nicea II, Patriarch Tarasios, etc. Don't tune it out! Vitally important material relevant to a lot of other things as well.

The sermon addresses the trustworthiness of biblical manuscripts by examining textual transmission and variant readings. It refutes skeptical claims, such as those by Bart Ehrman, by highlighting the abundance of ancient evidence and the minor nature of textual discrepancies. The speaker explains doctrines like verbal plenary inspiration and distinguishes between different Greek text families, including the Textus Receptus and eclectic texts. While acknowledging debates over specific translations like the King James Version, the message emphasizes that no essential doctrine depends on disputed readings. Ultimately, it affirms confidence in God's faithful preservation of His Word for believers today.

In this sermon from 1 Peter 3, Dylan Joyner explains how Christians should faithfully engage a world that is hostile toward Christ and His people. Scripture does not call believers to attack the culture with worldly weapons, nor does it call them to withdraw from the world entirely. Instead, Christians are called to stand confidently in the midst of opposition, trusting Christ and refusing to fear man. Peter gives two central commands: fear no one and honor Christ the Lord as holy. Although believers may experience persecution and suffering for righteousness' sake, nothing can ultimately harm those who are secure in Christ. Even suffering becomes an occasion for blessing, giving Christians every reason to live with confidence and joy rather than fear. The sermon also emphasizes Peter's command to always be prepared to give a defense for the hope within us. Biblical apologetics is not reserved for pastors, scholars, or professional debaters. Every Christian is called to know what he believes, understand why he believes it from Scripture, and be prepared to explain the gospel when opportunities arise. How Christians defend the faith matters as much as being prepared to defend it. Peter commands believers to speak with gentleness and respect, maintaining a good conscience even when they are slandered. Through the righteousness of Christ, believers can fear no man, endure suffering faithfully, proclaim the gospel boldly, and engage the unbelieving world with confidence and joy.

Proposition: Because by nature, we are enslaved to Satan, Jesus, our king, came to defeat him and to set us free so that we would be grateful and prepared for spiritual battle. 1. The Debate Over Jesus' Authority (vv. 14-20) 2. The Parable of the Victorious Plunderer (vv. 21-23) 3. The Parable of the Return of the Unclean Spirit (vv. 24-26) Lessons - See the great harm that the devil seeks to do and be prepared - Half-hearted conversion is very dangerous - Praise God for our Mighty Saviour

Theological Discourse on AI Faith Debate: Sunday, August 16th, 2026 (08/23/26 on 930 WFMD in Frederick, Maryland) "Artificial Intelligence" has real consequences; should Christians build it, boycott it, or redeem it? A.I. is no longer a science fiction premise; it's sadly writing sermons, answering theological questions, and shaping the worldview of millions. In light of these realities, is the church largely having the wrong conversations about it? Some Christians marvel at the possibilities, while others sound an apocalyptic alarm. The Faith Debate now helps ask and answer the question that matters most: What is our responsibility before God in this moment? This episode is part one of a five-part conversation (piggybacking on a two-part AI discussion from earlier in the year). To hear the five parts in uninterrupted fashion, go to the Christian Podcast Community and find the Theology Throwdown show dated April 11th, 2026. The Faith Debate podcasts can be found at wfmd.com, ChristianPodcastCommunity.org, and most podcast platforms - including SermonAudio and Odysee. (Videos are made available in many of these same places, as well on Rumble). Find links for all of these outlets at www.householdoffaithinchrist.com. The panel: Troy Skinner. Founder, Household of Faith in Christ Andrew Rappaport. Founder, Striving for Eternity Keith Heltsley. Co-host, Quest For Truth Melissa Lex. Host, Thoroughly Equipped Eve Franklin. Co-host, Are You Just Watching? Brandon Hollen. Host, Rooted Reason George Binoka. Co-host, Gospel Talks Podcast Anthony Russo. Host, Grace and Peace Radio

The sermon argues that true repentance must follow the revelation of God's glory rather than precede it, using Paul's address to the Athenians as the primary example. It contrasts modern cultural curiosity and philosophical arrogance with the biblical necessity of recognizing human dependence on the Creator. By examining Old Testament accounts of Job and Isaiah, the text demonstrates that encountering the holiness of God is what ultimately leads to genuine conviction and repentance. The message emphasizes that a correct understanding of God's sovereignty and majesty provides the necessary context for the gospel to have transformative power. Consequently, evangelism should prioritize exalting God's nature over immediate demands for moral reform or intellectual debate.