Podcasts about great debates

Wow, book number 15! It only feels like yesterday we were on book 5. Well, after The Great Debate that put presuppositionalism on the map - what's to be done after that? Well, you actually have to talk to people. Scary, yes, but how does one actually do that? Well, this book might be of help.

Our new Bits Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SideScrollersBitsThe best place to support: Direct Donations (TTS over $25): https://streamlabs.com/stutteringcraig/tipFind all our socials via LinkTree: https://linktr.ee/sidescrollersAttari: https://m.twitch.tv/attarifelarin/home https://www.youtube.com/@AttariFelarin Arch: https://www.youtube.com/@TheArchCast https://www.youtube.com/@ArchYouTube0:00 Intro03:48 REAL INTRO09:14 Meet Attari12:55 Today's Showdown26:02 Hard News26:15 Animal Talk!37:10 The Great Debate!42:46 Explosive Diarrhea!48:40 Stuck In A Bathtub For 9 Days52:48 AI Discussion01:14:56 Today's Sponsor01:16:22 Hollywood In The Dumps?01:40:14 Andy Serkis Defends White Casting01:53:40 Woman Attacks Minor For Patriotism01:57:53 Gaming History

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

American history is riddled with collisions between legally defensible rulings and morally costly outcomes. Still, "the purpose of law in any society is to embody a moral framework in practice," says Yuval Levin, who joins Mark Labberton to explore the moral architecture in the foundation of the American legal system, as they review the most recent rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court has just closed one of the most consequential terms in recent memory, articulating the tension between faithfulness to the Constitution and enacting justice and morality. Together they reflect on why and how a system founded on equality must be both majoritarian and counter-majoritarian at once; why a judge's job is to articulate their legal (rather than their moral) opinion; the rise of Constitutional originalism; why pre-Trump conservative arguments win at this Court while "Trumpy" ones lose; the contemporary relevance of the Federalist Papers; what recourse citizens have when they believe the Court has done wrong; and why the American legal system's worst failures still cluster around race. They explore several of the 2025-26 rulings of the Supreme Court, including imposition of tariffs, immigration enforcement, and birthright citizenship, and the Voting Rights Act. Episode Highlights "The purpose of law in any society is to embody a moral framework in practice." "This is a very good time to get to know The Federalist Papers." "The role of the judge in the American system is to apply the law, not to find the moral answer per se. We hope the law does that, though it doesn't always and we know it." "The American system of government, very much for moral reasons, is expected to be both majoritarian and counter-majoritarian." [Regarding Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh] "They grew up in the same place. They literally went to the same high school and had the same history teacher. Their mothers knew each other … They agreed with each other 52% of the time in this last term of the Supreme Court." [Courts to Trump] "You are in charge of the executive branch, but the executive branch is not in charge of the American government." "If you come to this court with a pre-Trump conservative legal argument, you're going to win. If you come to this court with a Trumpy legal argument, you're going to lose." "We experienced the high water mark of executive power about a year ago, and it is now receding." "The areas where it has failed most are concentrated around questions of race. That has been true from the beginning. It is thankfully less true than it used to be, but it is still true, and I think we have to be uniquely sensitive to those questions for that reason." About Yuval Levin Yuval Levin is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he holds the Beth and Ravenel Curry Chair in Public Policy and directs Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies. He founded and edits National Affairs, and he is a senior editor at The New Atlantis and a contributing editor at National Review. His books include "The Great Debate," "The Fractured Republic," "A Time to Build," and most recently, "American Covenant." He served on the White House domestic policy staff under George W. Bush and earned his PhD at the University of Chicago's Committee on Social Thought. Helpful Links and Resources Yuval Levin at the American Enterprise Institute: https://www.aei.org/profile/yuval-levin/ National Affairs, the publication Levin founded and edits: https://nationalaffairs.com/authors/detail/yuval-levin American Covenant, by Yuval Levin: https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/yuval-levin/american-covenant/9780465040742/?lens=basic-books A Time to Build, by Yuval Levin: https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/yuval-levin/a-time-to-build/9781541699281/?lens=basic-books The Federalist Papers, full text at the Library of Congress: https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers Trump v. Slaughter, the decision overturning Humphrey's Executor (June 29, 2026): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-332_qn12.pdf Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, the IEEPA tariffs decision (February 20, 2026): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf Louisiana v. Callais, the Voting Rights Act decision (April 29, 2026): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf Coverage of the birthright citizenship ruling in Trump v. Barbara, SCOTUSblog: https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-trumps-order-ending-birthright-citizenship/ Show Notes Yuval Levin's legal/constitutional frame: The law exists to put a society's moral convictions into workable practice. On "All men are created equal": If no one has natural authority over anyone else, we decide by majority vote—but equality also means the minority keeps its rights no matter who wins The Constitution assigns those two jobs to different institutions and lets them fight: Congress and the president answer to majorities, the courts deliberately do not Life tenure and fixed salaries exist so justices can protect minority rights without fear of majority reprisal A judge's job is to say what the law is, not to reach the most just result; therefore good judges regularly land where they might wish they didn't. What citizens can do when the Court rules wrongly: If it misread a statute, Congress can rewrite it. Constitutional rulings are harder to undo, but examples include the 16th Amendment (re: income tax) and the 14th Amendment (re: black citizenship, answering the Court directly) The pro-life movement's 50-year strategy to overturn Roe v. Wade Levin on the difficulty of simply being in the political minority, and why the system tries to make everyone a winner sometimes Originalism began as a limit on judicial power and judges' preferences Legal originalism looks for original public meaning, not the drafters' intent Parallel to biblical interpretation, where faithful readers reach wildly different conclusions The challenge of interpreting and applying the Constitution to matters of freedom and democracy today With Congress mostly absent, the Court is now deciding questions of executive power the Federalist Papers were written about Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch: Same age, same hometown, same high school history teacher, agreed only 52% of the time this term Trump v. Slaughter ends the independent agency: the Court overturned Humphrey's Executor, and the president can now fire FTC-style commissioners at will 2026 Court rulings also told the president no: on tariffs, on the National Guard in Illinois without the governor's consent, and on birthright citizenship Levin's rule of thumb: Pre-Trump conservative arguments win at this Court, Trumpy arguments lose Yuval Levin: Executive power peaked about a year ago and is now receding. Louisiana v. Callais guts Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by requiring proof of racial intent A legal bind: Black voters vote Democratic by 90% in the South, so a racist map and a purely partisan map look identical Levin defends the ruling as law and grieves it as outcome—several Black-held Southern seats will likely be redistricted away Why he opposes reauthorizing the VRA with race-based set-aside districts, and where he thinks change should come from instead Software now lets parties gerrymander voter by voter—in New England, Trump won 35% and Republicans hold zero House seats The deceptions of the human heart Does constitutional structure just launder self-interest? The system's deepest failures have always clustered around race Gratitude for the Constitution in America's 250th year #SupremeCourt #Constitution #VotingRights #Originalism #ExecutivePower #FaithAndPolitics #YuvalLevin #Conversing Production Credits Conversing is produced and distributed in partnership with Comment Magazine and Fuller Seminary.

Concluding our book, we ask, how must Christians respond to atheists with all these different accountings for science and logic? If we're unable to agree how we provide a basis for our knowledge, is there some sort of area above science and logic we could point to - something transcendental in nature that accounts for science and logic? Well, I'm glad you asked.

In this episode, the Fellowship has a Great Debate! Grab a drink and join us as we go back in time to the 1920s and things get feisty. *Always Drink Responsibly*Listen and Subscribe to us on:Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5vAQc9in2CnLploOMwXW4Q?si=C-ozbnLHRRuOz6R9xz999QApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2LhDrbZFollow Us!Twitter: @drinkingcosmosInstagram: @cosmoswithcosmos  Blue Sky: @cosmoswithcosmoshttps://cosmoswithcosmos.com/Credits:Eric Skiff - Resistor Anthems  http://EricSkiff.com/musicStars Background Vid Credit - Josu Relax http://relaxing-site.890m.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6dJEAs0-GkTheme Music Remixed by: Ron Proctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC__fjzKFm0X0BQWHjYX8Z_wCheck Out!Wildixiahttps://www.etsy.com/shop/Wildixia?ref=profile_headerRon Proctor@MrProctorShowRolling Bluff Planetariumhttps://www.rollingbluffsplanetarium.com/

The primary focus of this podcast episode revolves around the pressing question of whether the traditional college education is becoming obsolete as a necessary step for future success. We delve into the various factors contributing to this phenomenon, including the escalating costs of tuition and the changing perceptions of vocational training versus academic degrees. As we engage in a candid discussion, we share personal anecdotes that highlight the diverse pathways individuals have taken toward achieving their professional goals, often without the conventional college experience. Furthermore, we contemplate the implications of these shifts—considering whether the de-emphasis on college could ultimately benefit or detract from society's future. Ultimately, we advocate for a broader understanding of education, emphasizing that learning can occur in myriad forms beyond the confines of a college classroom.Takeaways:The podcast discusses the evolving perception of college education and its relevance to future success.Many individuals question whether college is the best path to achieving success in modern society.The speakers share personal experiences related to college and the societal pressures surrounding higher education.A significant point raised is the financial burden associated with college tuition and student debt.The conversation emphasizes the importance of trade skills and vocational training as valid alternatives to traditional college degrees.The speakers express concern about the current educational system and its ability to prepare students for real-world challenges.

Greg Bahnsen now starts to advance his main argument that because of the confusion within the basis for science and logic, one should attack the foundational worldview using one's own worldview and therefore Christians should do apologetics presuppoitionally. In this episode, we discuss why that's the case.

June 29, 2026COL. JOHN EIDSMOE,author of numerous books, ordainedminister in the Association of FreeLutheran Congregations, & Directorof the Executive Board of the PlymouthRock Foundation, who will address: “The INFLUENCE of JOHN CALVIN onthe BIRTH of AMERICA: A LUTHERANMINISTER's TRIBUTE” PLUS “The GREAT DEBATE BETWEENJOHN ADAMS & JOHN DICKINSONon INDEPENDENCE REVISITED” Subscribe: iTunes TuneIn Android RSS Feed Listen:

Before Bahnsen gives us the answer, he's going to give us a problem that can't find the answer within itself. There are two big philosophical camps that many, if not all, atheists hold to. The problem comes in when the two atheist worldviews come into disagreement, and you find both sides saying the other is wrong at this impasse; they can't get past each other. So, is there an answer? Find out the question first.

Jeff continued his 2026 Off-Season OSR Tour this week, but he checked in through the wonders of modern technology. Capt. Kevin and Capt. Kirk held down the fort in the studio – with BIG smiles on their faces. Why?  Because the fishing has been EPIC! OTHERWORLDLY! STUPENDOUS! TREMENDOUS! Yeah, it’s been pretty darn good. The guys – along with lots of callers – dropped all kinds of details, stories, tips and tricks. The show also meandered into tick territory. Find out everything you need – and don’t want – to know about Satan’s favorite bug. And we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t mention a conversation that rolled all show long. It’s one of the most important debates of our time: Ginger or Mary Ann? Here's your L.V. Hiers Inc gear tip of the week from Captain Chip Wingo: Tarpon fishing has been red hot this week, and Captain Chip relies on the Eagle Claw Tro-Kar 8/0 hooks. They’re $13-$14 a pack, Capt. Chip says they’re worth it…he won't tarpon fish without them! Here's your Ring Power Cat tip of the week: Always pick up trash you see floating on the water, but make sure you check it before you do! You never know what might be under there…this week Capt. Leon found a triple tail under a floating chip bag! Here’s your KirbyCo Builders’ Cooking Tip of the Week: Tera's Sourdough Discard Pancakes. Click HERE to get the recipe! Facebook

Tucker Carlson calls Trump 'weak' as conservative critics grow bolder. Tune in to hear more on this brewing GOP division from Abby Phillip's table of diverse voices. Let's talk about the future of American politics. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode, Jon Paramore and Alisa Paramore discuss what it really takes to build a business with your spouse. They share lessons on avoiding scorekeeping, setting clear priorities and planning your week together.

Matt Samet is the editor of the American Climbing Journal, and the oldest person to climb V10 on the TB2 (probably?).In this episode, Matt and Josh discuss the history of climbing, how its ethics developed into their current form, the state of climbing media, and lessons from a very long career in climbing.*Patreon Bonus Content (join https://www.patreon.com/testpiece for extended cut):*- The most common climbing accidents, and how to prevent them- The best piece in the American Climbing JournalJoin Patreon: HEREFollow us on Instagram: HEREVisit our podcast page: HERE

In the final part of the book, we cover Bahnsen's push to encourage all Christians to use the presuppositional apologetic approach. Bahnsen, true to form, pushes the antithesis between the supernatural Christian worldview and everything else. He starts with showing that all other worldviews have issues with change, unity, & diversity - a place where the Christian worldview can swoop in and provide the answer.

As Black History Month continues, Two Mics Up is going beyond the hashtags and digging into the real work of building Black futures.We're unpacking Black culinary reclaiming and health, the value of a degree in a creator economy, social media as connection or chaos, “get-rich-quick” culture, and whether creators or platforms really hold the power.

This week, Mark talks with renowned author and golf journalist Bob Harig

Gary Williams opens the show by previewing a massive week in golf, with the U.S. Women's Open making its Riviera debut and the Memorial Tournament celebrating its 50th edition. Gary discusses Nelly Korda's pursuit of another major championship, the significance of Riviera hosting the game's biggest women's event, and shares thoughts from Jack Nicklaus on the PGA TOUR schedule, course setup challenges, and the evolving state of professional golf.Bob Harig, longtime golf journalist and author of Tiger vs. Jack: Golf's Great Debate, joins Gary to discuss the enduring comparison between Tiger Woods and Jack Nicklaus. Harig explains why the debate remains compelling, breaks down how different eras shape the conversation, and shares insights from years of covering both legends. The discussion also touches on Jon Rahm, Bryson DeChambeau, LIV Golf's future, and Harig's thoughts following the recent changes at Sports Illustrated.Gene Wojciechowski, New York Times bestselling author and longtime sports storyteller, discusses his new golf-themed novel All Carry. Gene shares how his personal connection to golf and his relationship with his father inspired the story, why caddies remain some of the most fascinating figures in the game, and how years of covering golf helped shape the authenticity of the book's characters and setting.Keith Stewart, founder of Read The Line, returns for his betting analysis for both the Memorial Tournament and the U.S. Women's Open. Keith breaks down why Muirfield Village continues to challenge the world's best players, explains why Scottie Scheffler is the favorite to complete a Memorial three-peat, and shares his pick for the U.S. Women's Open at Riviera.The Show wraps with Dogs & Picks of the week.5 Clubs airs on Golf Channel and SiriusXM PGA TOUR Radio (Channel 92).0:00 US Women's Open Preview8:00 Jack Speaks to the Media12:30 Bob Harig26:26 Gene Wojciechowski38:33 Keith StewartFOLLOW 5 Clubs: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/5clubsgolf/X: https://x.com/5ClubsGolf Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/5ClubsGolf/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@5clubsgolfWant to wear Gary's Peter Millar fits from the show? Head to the link below and pick up the latest styles for on and off the course.https://www.petermillar.com/d/men

Today on The Daily Driver, I'm sharing the audio version of my latest National Dragster column, “The Great Debate.” This piece dives into one of the most talked-about discussions in sportsman drag racing history, the debate surrounding Scotty Richardson and Peter Biondo. Two of the most accomplished and influential racers the sport has ever seen. 

The previous three episodes leads up to Bahnsen's claim that presuppositional apologetics is the only way to do apologetics. It's the best tool to show the split between Christianity and every other viewpoint. And the best part, it's biblical and it is found in the Christian message itself.

 Jenna and Sheinelle chat with power couple Ciara and Russell Wilson. Also, they play a round of "The Great Debate". Plus, Hoda Kotb celebrates one year of her company, "Joy 101". And, Hoda tells the story of Peggy Moore, a staff member at Temple University who received her degree at 75 years old. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Join us to hear more about the preparations behind the Texas 4-Day Great Debates! In this episode, we interview Great Debate participants from NHI Houston, Great Debate Staff from NHI Austin, as well as Isabella Sada Nieto, Director of the Texas 4-Day Great Debates.Hosts: Isabella Matamoros and Avril CruzAudio Editing: Esteban RosasPodcast Art: Diego GarciaMusic: Zaiden WorleySocial Media Support: Avril Cruz

Bahnsen now moves to encouraging the Christian to engage in an apologetic method that attack worldview foundations first and foremost. There's nothing wrong in knowing the positive case for Christianity but when it comes to how one approaches proof and truth, why give up so much of your position to try and achieve a neutral starting point - it's not possible to have and it's not biblical to take.

Welcome to Dean's chat where we discuss all things podiatric medicine and surgery! In this episode, Drs. Jeffrey Jensen and Johanna Richey welcome back Dr. Christy King and Dr. Devon Glazer for an exciting preview of the upcoming Western Foot and Ankle Conference. The discussion highlights the evolution of the meeting into one of the premier live podiatric education experiences in the country, blending cutting-edge lectures, hands-on innovation, and the unique energy of Disneyland. Dr. King shares insights into the planning process behind building the scientific program, including this year's highly anticipated “Great Debate” featuring leading experts discussing complex flatfoot reconstruction topics. Dr. Glazer discusses the creative strategy behind the conference layout, sponsor hall, and Innovation Hub, emphasizing the importance of attendee engagement, tactile learning, and peer-to-peer collaboration.The conversation also explores the return and success of fully live conferences post-COVID, with attendance expectations continuing to grow after last year's sold-out event. Both guests stress the value of networking, mentorship, and providing students, residents, and fellows with opportunities to present research and connect with leaders in the profession. New additions this year include integrated poster presentations within the exhibit hall, expanded debate-style lecture formats, emerging technologies for chronic pain management, and sessions focused on artificial intelligence in podiatry. Throughout the episode, the group reflects on the collaborative spirit, innovation, and sense of community that make the Western Foot and Ankle Conference a standout educational experience for podiatric physicians at every stage of practice. We hope to see you there! https://www.thewestern.org/TheWestern/Register/TheWestern/Registration.aspx?EventKey=2026WFAC&hkey=c8f70f7a-2669-45f3-a9e9-8e954773b824

Dan Richards from Debunking and Neal Sendlak from GnosticInformant go head-to-head in a deep debate on ancient history, lost civilizations, the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, Göbekli Tepe, the Great Pyramid, Baalbek, ancient astronomy, and the evidence behind alternative vs mainstream archaeology.- Was Göbekli Tepe's Pillar 43 recording a realcatastrophic event?- How were the massive Baalbek stones actually moved? Who created them?- And were the pyramids truly built exactly how mainstream archaeology claims they were?This conversation explores the clash between mainstreamacademic perspectives and alternative historical theories - covering comet impacts, extinction events, megalithic construction, ancient navigation, elongated skulls, Pillar 43, the zodiac, pyramid construction theories, and the growing debate surrounding humanity's distant past.   Follow Matt Beall Podcast: https://x.com/MattBeallPodhttps://www.tiktok.com/@mattbeallpodhttps://www.instagram.com/mattbeallpodcast/https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61556879741320 Check out our Shorts & ClipsShorts Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@MattBeallShortsClip Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@MattBeallClips Listen Everywhere: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@MattBeallPodcastApple:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/matt-beall-limitless/id1712917413  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-6727221 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/MattBeallPodcast Check out Dan & Neal:https://x.com/DeDunkingPasthttps://x.com/Gnosisinformanthttps://www.youtube.com/@DeDunkinghttps://www.youtube.com/@GnosticInformant Timeline:00:00:00              Introductions00:00:38              Younger Dryas00:13:17              Astrological Symbolism00:41:51              Pyramid Dating01:41:38              Sphinx Dating02:05:16              Pillar 4302:29:40              Baalbek Stones02:51:03              Gunung Padang02:56:55              Is Archaeology a Science03:09:30              Closing #AncientHistory #YoungerDryas #GobekliTepe #Pyramids #Egypt #Baalbek #LostCivilization #AncientEgypt #Archaeology #GrahamHancock #Debate#History #AlternativeHistory #Mysteries #AncientMysteries #CometImpact #YoungerDryasImpact #GreatPyramid #Atlantis #NealSendlak #DanRichardsThe views and opinions expressed on this podcast are notnecessarily the views of the host or of any business related to the host.

Continuing Bahnsen's lecture on pushing the antithesis, we see Bahnsen make the case for a pushing the antithesis apologetics and provides the repercussions as seen in real, published literature on what happens if we give up that division between the Christian worldview and the non-Christian worldview.

JZ in for Bobby this morning! Today in history, we're two days away from the NFL schedule release, reasons for optimism for the Bengals, Browns, Quick Hitters: Milwaukee's open for business, Jamier Brown doubles down on OSU commitment, ND-USC might be back & LeBron's future, Ohio State unveils their new uniforms, the Oregon game could be a 3:30 kickoff, evaluating the Buckeyes transfer portal haul from last season, Bob Harig (Golf for Sports Illustrated) joined us to discuss his new book "Tiger v. Jack: Golf's Great Debate", and LaMelo welcomes LaOne into the world.

We now cover a lecture by Greg Bahnsen included in our book that encourages the Christian antithesis to be pushed when comparing our lives to those of the world and also in our apologetics. Here Bahnsen shows the Van Tillian origin of this idea in apologetics but shows the presence of it from Genesis all the way through the Old and New Testament.

Tune in as we talk the latest Falcons Hawks & NBA playoffs Oh and Wayne brought a guest on the show for a debate!

In this episode, Mandy Connell shares her thoughts on the recent Governor's forum and Victor Marx's Facebook live. She discusses how Marx's performance was more about self-aggrandizement than substantial policy discussions. Mandy highlights the lack of originality in Marx's talking points, which seemed to be a mix of what other candidates had already said. She also expresses frustration with Marx's approach to dealing with Democrats, which she believes is unrealistic. Additionally, Mandy touches on the recent bill proposed by lawmakers to provide special security and legal protections for elected officials, which she finds ironic and concerning.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this conversation, host Dr. Greg Gaski and guests Drs. Connor Kleweno and Joshua Parry focus on evaluation and management strategies for minimally displaced lateral compression pelvis fractures.  For additional educational resources visit OTA.org

Christian TAG Solves It All Finishing up the question, we see that a proper examination would have led Greg Bahnsen to present the transcendental argument that he was known for and how Christian TAG solves it all. TIMELINE: 00:00 – Introduction 00:15 – Question 7 – How Does The Christian Not Just Beg The Question As Well? 02:57 – Question 8 – Could This All Be An Illusion? 04:27 – Bahnsen’s Rebuttal With The Transcendental Rebuttal 13:33 – Conclusion BOOK LINKS: The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows Debate Transcript Video The Bahnsen Institute       All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com

What The Atheist Should Have Asked Here’s what Gordon Stein, the atheist, should have asked Greg Bahnsen in their debate instead of being caught off guard over what happened. Here, the editor steps into the role to pull out more context in the nature of the Christian worldview and why it provides the necessary basis for all knowledge. TIMELINE: 00:00 – Introduction 01:34 – Question 1 – Why Do We Need To Know The Laws Of Logic Before Coming To Our Theory? 03:52 – Question 2 – Why Can’t We Know Logic Is True Because It Works? 05:35 – Question 3 – Why Can’t Laws Of Logic Just Be Necessarily True? 08:17 – Question 4 – How Does The Christian Worldview Count As Proof? 09:57 – Question 5 – How Does That Show The Whole Bible Is True? 11:34 – Question 6 – How Do You Prove The Worldview Of The Christian Worldview? 13:55 – Conclusion BOOK LINKS: The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows Debate Transcript Video The Bahnsen Institute       All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com

Join dental entrepreneurs George Hariri, Matt Guarino, and Matt Ford as they break down the realities of running their national DSO, Shared Practices Group. They tackle the triumphs and tribulations of scaling a business, answer your burning questions (submit yours at bdppod.com), and delve into life's other adventures - from health and parenting to sports and politics. It's business, banter, and everything in between. Tune in and join the BDP community today!

Listen is as host Joe Patterson, MD debates the management of anemia after acute trauma with Danielle Peterson, MD and Brian Mullis, MD. For additional educational resources visit OTA.org

Recorded live at Money 20/20 in Las Vegas, Eyal is joined by two guests at the center of the great debate surrounding open banking in the United States: John Court, EVP & General Counsel at the Banking Policy Institute (BPI) and Penny Lee, President & CEO at the Financial Technology Association (FTA). In late 2024, after many years of deliberation, the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released the final version of their Personal Financial Data Rights rule, also known as Section 1033. On the day of its release, the rule was immediately challenged in court, marking the beginning of a drama unlike any other in the open banking space. John and Penny represent the two major players on either side of the court case itself, making them uniquely qualified to discuss where American open banking is headed. Specifically they discuss:How Section 1033 came to beWhat happened the day of its releaseMajor issues in the great debateThe validity of charging for data accessWhere 1033 currently stands

https://youtu.be/VXRRVnHb7ZA Christianity Provides The Only Justification For Knowledge Tony’s going to be out for a bit, so the next four episodes will be on the shorter end, but that’s ok. Here, the editor of the book, Joshua Pillows, structures the debate on what might have been the case if Stein had been prepared to deal with Bahnsen’s actual argument. So this is how it should have happened, and we start with Bahnsen’s opening statement. TIMELINE: 00:00 – Introduction 04:03 – The Embarrassing Dr. Stein 05:34 – Bahnsen’s Opening Statement Redux 07:13 – A Battle Of Worldviews 09:22 – The Issue With The Naturalistic Atheist Worldview 11:47 – Conclusion BOOK LINKS: The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows Debate Transcript Video The Bahnsen Institute       All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com

Hosts: Dr. Daniel Ennis, Dr. Janet PopeGuests: Dr. Marinka Twilt (Pediatric Rheumatologist, University of Calgary; ASM Program Committee Chair), Dr. Mo Osman (University of Alberta; Abstract Chair & ASM Planning Committee Co-Chair)We're coming to you almost live from Halifax for Day 2 of the Canadian Rheumatology Association ASM. The day featured diverse podium science, practical workshops, and a lively Great Debate on DMARD tapering.Podium sessions highlighted lupus research on cancer risk, rising costs and work disability in RA, and new biologic insights into flares, with B-cell changes supporting patient-reported disease activity in lupus.Workshops focused on practical tools, including capillaroscopy for early CTD detection, pediatric updates on neonatal lupus risk (anti-Ro vs anti-La), and a structured lab-based approach to unexplained lymphadenopathy.The Dunlop-Dottridge Lecture reviewed statin-associated myositis, emphasizing delayed onset, persistence after discontinuation of the statins, and early IVIG-based treatment.The Great Debate explored DMARD tapering, reinforcing that while guidelines are cautious, real-world care requires shared decision-making and a focus on the lowest effective dose rather than full discontinuation.Main TakeawaysRising costs and ongoing work disability remain significant in RAPatient-reported flares have a clear biological basisStatin-associated myositis can occur years after statin use and requires early IVIGDMARD tapering should be individualized, with focus on lowest effective doseWhat to Watch for on Day 3State-of-the-art lecture on Still's disease across the lifespanMore high-impact podium presentationsClinical workshops, including one on topical therapiesGala dinner and closing eventsMore highlights coming tomorrow—stay tuned!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCgZKgw9TtU Evil, Miracles, & Atheist Faith Tony’s going to be out for a bit, so the next four episodes will be on the shorter end, but that’s ok. Here, the editor of the book, Joshua Pillows, structures the debate on what might have been the case if Stein had been prepared to deal with Bahnsen’s actual argument. So this is how it should have happened, and we start with Bahnsen’s opening statement. TIMELINE: 00:00 – Introduction 04:03 – The Embarrassing Dr. Stein 05:34 – Bahnsen’s Opening Statement Redux 07:13 – A Battle Of Worldviews 09:22 – The Issue With The Naturalistic Atheist Worldview 11:47 – Conclusion BOOK LINKS: The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows Debate Transcript Video The Bahnsen Institute       All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com

RUNDOWN   Brady Farkas steps into the co-host chair and tells the story of how a Seattle childhood, journalism roots, and a winding radio career turned into one of the most thoughtful Mariners voices out there. Mariners No-Table discuss Mariners dropping back-to-back series and looking flat doing it, with the middle of the order still underperforming and the offense lacking any real consistency. Injuries and weak fill-ins expose how thin the lineup is, but the bigger issue is failure on the basics—defense, situational hitting, and execution. Bob Harig breaks down the impossible balance between empathy and accountability with Tiger Woods' latest incident, highlighting the toll of years of injuries and pain management. He also digs into the media's role, the public exposure of Tiger's lowest moments, and what this could mean for his future—both at Augusta and beyond. Mitch and Puck dive into the nostalgia and anticipation of Masters week, from iconic Jack Nicklaus moments to the quirks of broadcast tradition and coverage. But underneath it all, the conversation turns to Tiger Woods—less about golf now, more about a lifetime of pressure, pain, and a sense that something deeper has always been off. Verne Lundquist looks back on his final Masters with the same warmth and storytelling that defined his career—sharing behind-the-scenes moments, emotional goodbyes, and the iconic calls that made him a part of golf history. From Jack Nicklaus in '86 to one last birdie call at 16, it's a graceful exit from one of broadcasting's all-time greats.   GUESTS   Brady Farkas | Host, Refuse to Lose podcast Joe Doyle | MLB analyst, Over Slot Bob Harig | Golf writer and author of Tiger vs. Jack: Golf's Great Debate Jason Puckett | KJ-Aren'ts / Puck Drop Verne Lundquist | Legendary CBS broadcaster   TABLE OF CONTENTS   0:00 | From Seattle Kid to East Coast Voice: The Mariners Obsession That Never Left 16:40 | Mariners No-Table: Mariners' Sloppy Week Exposes Bigger Problems Than Just a Cold Start 43:02 | Bob Harig: Golf writer, longtime Tiger Woods insider, and author of Tiger vs. Jack: Golf's Great Debate; Tiger Trouble Again: Empathy vs. Accountability as Golf Faces Another Woods Crisis 1:07:52 | Jason "Puck" Puckett: Sports radio host and recurring Mitch Unfiltered contributor; Masters Week Magic—and the Lingering Sadness Around Tiger 1:24:02 | Verne Lundquist: Legendary CBS broadcaster and iconic voice of the Masters (40-year career at Augusta); "YES SIR" One Last Time: Verne Lundquist Reflects on His Final Masters 1:51:23 | Other Mariners Stuff: Brady Farkas, Host of the Refuse to Lose Podcast and Mariners analyst shares Bar Fights, Extraterrestrials, and Mariners Takes: Brady's Wild Seattle Trip

For more, check out The Profit Circle: patreon.com/theprofitcircle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B570UPGXmhg Evil, Miracles, & Atheist Faith We finish off with the debate with the final four questions including evil, agnosticism, the nature of logic, belief, and show that an atheist faith is present and the atheist in this debate stumbles over himself and accidentally admits it – twice. TIMELINE: 00:00 – Introduction 01:27 – Question 3 – Why Is There Evil? Rebellion 05:27 – Dr. Stein Rebuttal – God Needs To Force Us Not To Rebel To Be Good & Real 07:34 – Question 4 – Why Not Agnosticism? 08:54 – Ut Oh! Stein Contradicts Stein! 11:18 – Dr. Bahnsen’s Rebuttal – Stein Admits Atheists Have Blind Faith 16:31 – Question 5 – Why Is Do Laws Of Logic Need To Be Grounded In God? Because They Can’t Ground Themselves 23:19 – Dr. Stein’s Rebuttal – None, But Admits He Has Faith 24:51 – Question 6 – What Evidence Would An Atheist Need To Believe In God? Magic! 27:31 – Dr. Bahnsen’s Rebuttal – People Haven’t Believed When Shown Miracles 34:10 – Conclusion BOOK LINKS: The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows Debate Transcript Video The Bahnsen Institute       All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvdYRjGqNS4 The Christian God & The Guy From Germany With A Funny Mustache As we come down to the book’s debate proper section we are left with six questions from the audience. Here we cover two which involve asking why is the Christian God the answer out of all the other gods out there. Then we get to ask the question that takes all philosophers about 6 minutes to get to – how do we deal with ideas when it comes to that guy from Germany with a funny mustache. A really interesting response from both sides here. TIMELINE: 00:00 – Introduction 02:42 – Question 1 – Why The Christian God Out Of All The Other gods? 04:16 – An Important Question But Not Part Of The Debate Specifically 07:20 – A Consistent Worldview Different Than Something Like Hinduism 13:02 – Dr. Stein’s Response – Buddhism Is The Only Rational Religion 14:09 – Question 2 – Why That German With A Mustache Wrong? 15:01 – Western Tradition Says So! 21:17 – Dr. Bahnsen’s Response – Begging The Question 24:45 – Further Commentary 27:06 – Conclusion BOOK LINKS: The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows Debate Transcript Video The Bahnsen Institute       All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com

Christians Have The High Ground We all know what happens to those who have the high ground. Dr. Bahnsen ends his closing remarks with the key points being that atheist Gordon Stein doesn’t have a leg to stand on. In fact, he’s stealing the Christian’s leg to be able to claim all his worldview points on. So ends the Great Debate – but wait, there’s more! TIMELINE: 00:00 – Introduction 01:35 – The Christian Does What The Atheist Didn’t Do 01:59 – Bahnsen Shows That Stein Couldn’t Back Up His Worldview To Critique 05:07 – The Untouched Transcendental Christian Argument 07:07 – The Unaccountable Naturalistic Worldview Of The Atheist 10:43 – Atheists Can Still Do Good By The Grace Of God 12:04 – The Problem With Convention 13:13 – Matter Matters Because It’s Matter 14:53 – Greatest Happiness Is What Matters With Morality For Atheists 17:21 – Bahnsen Is Not Impressed & The Audience & Atheists Shouldn’t Be Either 19:55 – Conclusion BOOK LINKS: The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows Debate Transcript Video The Bahnsen Institute       All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com

Featured on WGN Radio's Home Sweet Home Chicago on 03/21/26: Chris Balke, Owner, All City Brick Staining, joins the show to talk about paint vs. stain and why stain is the better choice. Plus, Chris gives simple ways to boost curb appeal without major renovations and highlights the key questions homeowners should ask before hiring a […]

First, a brief discussion about plans for the Super Bowl. Next, Katie & her husband disagree about how to handle the big drinking hole! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Paul, Scott, and Lauren discuss the Statue of Liberty, Simlish, and the farmers’ market before playing The Great Debate. Send Threetures and emails to threedomusa@gmail.com.Leave us a voicemail asking us a question at hagclaims8.comFollow us on Instagram @ThreedomUSA.Unlock every episode of THREEDOM and THREEMIUM, ad-free, on cbbworld.comGrab some new Threedom merch at cbbworld.com/merchSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.