Podcasts about Nautilus

Send us a textIn this episode, Joe sits down with Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett, a leading neuroscientist and author of How Emotions Are Made, to explore groundbreaking insights on how emotions are formed and how we can better understand and regulate them. Together, they dive deep into the science behind emotions, how the brain predicts our feelings, and how we can gain more emotional agency in our personal and professional lives. Joe and Dr. Barrett cover:The theory of constructed emotions and how emotions are predictions, not reactionsThe role of the brain in regulating the body and how it shapes emotional experiencesWhy uncertainty feels like anxiety—and how to reframe itHow emotional granularity can help us build better emotional vocabulary and controlPractical steps to improve emotional regulation and decision-makingThe impact of body budgeting on mood, stress, and overall healthWhether you're leading a team, navigating personal relationships, or simply trying to better understand your emotional life, this conversation will give you powerful tools to enhance your emotional intelligence and well-being.Lisa Feldman Barrett, PhD, is among the top 0.1% most cited scientists in the world for her revolutionary research in psychology and neuroscience. She is a University Distinguished Professor of Psychology at Northeastern University. She also holds appointments at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, where she is Chief Science Officer for the Center for Law, Brain & Behavior.In addition to the books Seven and a Half Lessons About the Brain and How Emotions are Made, Dr. Barrett has published over 275 peer-reviewed, scientific papers appearing in Science, Nature Neuroscience, and other top journals in psychology and cognitive neuroscience, as well as six academic volumes published by Guilford Press. She writes regularly about science in the popular press, including The New York Times, The Guardian, Scientific American, BBC Science Focus, Popular Science, Nautilus, BigThink, Cosmopolitan,  Time magazine, MIT Technology Review, and more (see full list). Her popular TED talk has been viewed over 7 million times.A Special Thanks to Our Sponsors!Veteran-founded Adyton. Step into the next generation of equipment management with Log-E by Adyton. Whether you are doing monthly inventories or preparing for deployment, Log-E is your pocket property book, giving real-time visibility into equipment status and mission readiness. Learn more about how Log-E can revolutionize your property tracking process here!Meet ROGER Bank—a modern, digital bank built for military members, by military members. With early payday, no fees, high-yield accounts, and real support, it's banking that gets you. Funds are FDIC insured through Citizens Bank of Edmond, so you can bank with confidence and peace of mind. Visit

This week while Evan has handcuffed himself to the Nautilus at Tokyo Disney, we welcomed host of iamgeek podcast and Living with the Landspeeder podcast...Ryan Street!  Hear about the kyber crystals he creates and sells, which are absolutely amazing! We played a mini game where we were randomly given a Disney World attraction and Star Wars theme we had to reimagine the ride to.  It was a lot of fun!  @jeditalkpodcast on IG YouTube.com/JediTalk @iamgeekshow on IG

On this special episode of Translating Proteomics, Parag and Andreas break down the basics of proteomics — perfect for anyone with a background in molecular biology looking to get started in the field.Seasoned experts: We hope you can share this episode as a teaching tool or to inspire others to explore proteomics.Parag and Andreas cover the following questions in the episode, and links to additional Nautilus resources can be found below each question.What is proteomics?Blog post – What is proteomics? Techniques, applications, and methodsWhat are key questions proteomics can answer?Blog category – Applications of proteomicsWhy is it important to measure the proteome?FAQ on the Nautilus Resources pageBlog post – Genomics vs. proteomics: Two complementary perspectives on lifeWhat can and can't you do with proteomics?Translating Proteomics episode – Plasma Proteomics: The Dream and the NightmareLearn how the Nautilus Platform is designed to enable comprehensive broadscale proteomics and targeted proteoform studiesWhat are key proteomics methods and techniques?Blog series – Traditional protein analysis methodsBlog series – Next-generation proteomics technologiesWhat are the major pitfalls when doing proteomics?What are the challenges in proteomic data analysis?Translating Proteomics episode – Biology in Space and TimeBlog post – What is multiomics?What are people excited about in proteomics?Translating Proteomics episode – Poised for a Proteomics BreakthroughTranslating Proteomics episode - US HUPO 2025 – Key Takeaways, Trends, and Future Directions for ProteomicsTranslating Proteomics episode –

Went back to the "Jazz 45s" box and pulled a few things out that I hadn't played in awhile. Spring is here and it felt right. A short set of selections, new and old - enjoy! Tracklist: Sam Hankins, Eric Kloss, Nautilus, Quincy Jones, Charles Mingus, Takumi Moriya, Phi-Psonics, Unknown artist, Eddie Harris, Jukka Eskola Trio, Mary Lou Williams

Dr. Ko Un “Clara” Park and Dr. Mylin Torres present the latest evidence-based changes to the SLNB in early-stage breast cancer guideline. They discuss the practice-changing trials that led to the updated recommendations and topics such as when SLNB can be omitted, when ALND is indicated, radiation and systemic treatment decisions after SLNB omission, and the role of SLNB in special circumstances. We discuss the importance of shared decision-making and other ongoing and future de-escalation trials that will expand knowledge in this space. Read the full guideline update, “Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update” at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines. TRANSCRIPT This guideline, clinical tools, and resources are available at http://www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines. Read the full text of the guideline and review authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO-25-00099       Brittany Harvey: Hello and welcome to the ASCO Guidelines podcast, one of ASCO's podcasts delivering timely information to keep you up to date on the latest changes, challenges and advances in oncology. You can find all the shows, including this one at asco.org/podcasts. My name is Brittany Harvey and today I'm interviewing Dr. Ko Un "Clara" Park from Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Dr. Mylin Torres from Glenn Family Breast Center at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, co-chairs on “Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.” Thank you for being here today, Dr. Park and Dr. Torres. Dr. Mylin Torres: Thank you, it's a pleasure to be here. Brittany Harvey: And before we discuss this guideline, I'd like to note that ASCO takes great care in the development of its guidelines and ensuring that the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy is followed for each guideline. The disclosures of potential conflicts of interest for the guideline panel, including Dr. Torres and Dr. Park, who have joined us here today, are available online with the publication of the guideline in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, which is linked in the show notes. To start us off, Dr. Torres, what is the scope and purpose of this guideline update on the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer? Dr. Mylin Torres: The update includes recommendations incorporating findings from trials released since our last published guideline in 2017. It includes data from nine randomized trials comparing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone versus sentinel lymph node biopsy with a completion axillary lymph node dissection. And notably, and probably the primary reason for motivating this update, are two trials comparing sentinel lymph node biopsy with no axillary surgery, all of which were published from 2016 to 2024. We believe these latter two trials are practice changing and are important for our community to know about so that it can be implemented and essentially represent a change in treatment paradigms. Brittany Harvey: It's great to hear about these practice changing trials and how that will impact these recommendation updates. So Dr. Park, I'd like to start by reviewing the key recommendations across all of these six overarching clinical questions that the guideline addressed. So first, are there patients where sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted? Dr. Ko Un "Clara" Park: Yes. The key change in the current management of early-stage breast cancer is the inclusion of omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with small, less than 2 cm breast cancer and a negative finding on preoperative axillary ultrasound. The patients who are eligible for omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy according to the SOUND and INSEMA trial are patients with invasive ductal carcinoma that is size smaller than 2 cm, Nottingham grades 1 and 2, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative in patients intending to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy, and no suspicious lymph nodes on axillary ultrasound or if they have only one suspicious lymph node, then the biopsy of that lymph node is benign and concordant according to the axillary ultrasound findings. The patients who are eligible for sentinel lymph node biopsy omission according to the SOUND and INSEMA trials were patients who are undergoing lumpectomy followed by whole breast radiation, especially in patients who are younger than 65 years of age. For patients who are 65 years or older, they also qualify for omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in addition to consideration for radiation therapy omission according to the PRIME II and CALGB 9343 clinical trials. And so in those patients, a more shared decision-making approach with the radiation oncologist is encouraged. Brittany Harvey: Understood. I appreciate you outlining that criteria for when sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted and when shared decision making is appropriate as well. So then, Dr. Torres, in those patients where sentinel lymph node biopsy is omitted, how are radiation and systemic treatment decisions impacted? Dr. Mylin Torres: Thank you for that question. I think there will be a lot of consternation brought up as far as sentinel lymph node biopsy and the value it could provide in terms of knowing whether that lymph node is involved or not. But as stated, sentinel lymph node biopsy actually can be safely omitted in patients with low risk disease and therefore the reason we state this is that in both SOUND and INSEMA trial, 85% of patients who had a preoperative axillary ultrasound that did not show any signs of a suspicious lymph node also had no lymph nodes involved at the time of sentinel node biopsy. So 85% of the time the preoperative ultrasound is correct. So given the number of patients where preoperative ultrasound predicts for no sentinel node involvement, we have stated within the guideline that radiation and systemic treatment decisions should not be altered in the select patients with low risk disease where sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted. Those are the patients who are postmenopausal and age 50 or older who have negative findings on preoperative ultrasound with grade 1 or 2 disease, small tumors less than or equal to 2 cm, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who undergo breast conserving therapy. Now, it's important to note in both the INSEMA and SOUND trials, the vast majority of patients received whole breast radiation. In fact, within the INSEMA trial, partial breast irradiation was not allowed. The SOUND trial did allow partial breast irradiation, but in that study, 80% of patients still received whole breast treatment. Therefore, the preponderance of data does support whole breast irradiation when you go strictly by the way the SOUND and INSEMA trials were conducted. Notably, however, most of the patients in these studies had node-negative disease and had low risk features to their primary tumors and would have been eligible for partial breast irradiation by the ASTRO Guidelines for partial breast treatment. So, given the fact that 85% of patients will have node-negative disease after a preoperative ultrasound, essentially what we're saying is that partial breast irradiation may be offered in these patients where omission of sentinel node biopsy is felt to be safe, which is in these low risk patients. Additionally, regional nodal irradiation is something that is not indicated in the vast majority of patients where omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy is prescribed and recommended, and that is because very few of these patients will actually end up having pathologic N2 disease, which is four or more positive lymph nodes. If you look at the numbers from both the INSEMA and the SOUND trial, the number of patients with pathologic N2 disease who did have their axilla surgically staged, it was less than 1% in both trials. So, in these patients, regional nodal irradiation, there would be no clear indication for that more aggressive and more extensive radiation treatment. The same principles apply to systemic therapy. As the vast majority of these patients are going to have node-negative disease with a low risk primary tumor, we know that postmenopausal women, even if they're found to have one to three positive lymph nodes, a lot of the systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy decisions are driven by genomic assay score which is taken from the primary tumor. And therefore nodal information in patients who have N1 disease may not be gained in patients where omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy is indicated in these low risk patients. 14% of patients have 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes in the SOUND trial and that number is about 15% in the INSEMA trial. Really only the clinically actionable information to be gained is if a patient has four or more lymph nodes or N2 disease in this low risk patient population. So, essentially when that occurs it's less than 1% of the time in these patients with very favorable primary tumors. And therefore we thought it was acceptable to stand by a recommendation of not altering systemic therapy or radiation recommendations based on omission of sentinel nodes because the likelihood of having four more lymph nodes is so low. Dr. Ko Un "Clara" Park: I think one thing to add is the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors to that and when we look at the NATALEE criteria for ribociclib in particular, where node-negative patients were included, the bulk majority of the patients who were actually represented in the NATALEE study were stage III disease. And for stage I disease to upstage into anatomic stage III, that patient would need to have pathologic N2 disease. And as Dr. Torres stated, the rate of having pathologic N2 disease in both SOUND and INSEMA studies were less than 1%. And therefore it would be highly unlikely that these patients would be eligible just based on tumor size and characteristics for ribociclib. So we think that it is still safe to omit sentinel lymph node biopsy and they would not miss out, if you will, on the opportunity for CDK4/6 inhibitors. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. I appreciate you describing those recommendations and then also the nuances of the evidence that's underpinning those recommendations, I think that's important for listeners. So Dr. Park, the next clinical question addresses patients with clinically node negative early stage breast cancer who have 1 or 2 sentinel lymph node metastases and who will receive breast conserving surgery with whole breast radiation therapy. For these patients, is axillary lymph node dissection needed? Dr. Ko Un "Clara" Park: No. And this is confirmed based on the ACOSOG Z0011 study that demonstrated in patients with 1 to 3 positive sentinel lymph node biopsy when the study compared completion axillary lymph node dissection to no completion axillary lymph node dissection, there was no difference. And actually, the 10-year overall survival as reported out in 2017 and at a median follow up of 9.3 years, the overall survival again for patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy alone versus those who were treated with axillary lymph node dissection was no different. It was 86.3% in sentinel lymph node biopsy versus 83.6% and the p-value was non-inferior at 0.02. And so we believe that it is safe for the select patients who are early stage with 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes on sentinel lymph node biopsy, undergoing whole breast radiation therapy to omit completion of axillary lymph node dissection. Brittany Harvey: Great, I appreciate you detailing what's recommended there as well. So then, to continue our discussion of axillary lymph node dissection, Dr. Torres, for patients with nodal metastases who will undergo mastectomy, is axillary lymph node dissection indicated? Dr. Mylin Torres: It's actually not and this is confirmed by two trials, the AMAROS study as well as the SENOMAC trial. And in both studies, they compared a full lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy alone in patients who are found to have 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes and confirmed that there was no difference in axillary recurrence rates, overall survival or disease-free survival. What was shown is that with more aggressive surgery completion axillary lymph node dissection, there were higher rates of morbidity including lymphedema, shoulder pain and paresthesias and arm numbness, decreased functioning of the arm and so there was only downside to doing a full lymph node dissection. Importantly, in both trials, if a full lymph node dissection was not done in the arm that where sentinel lymph node biopsy was done alone, all patients were prescribed post mastectomy radiation and regional nodal treatment and therefore both studies currently support the use of post mastectomy radiation and regional nodal treatment when a full lymph node dissection is not performed in these patients who are found to have N1 disease after a sentinel node biopsy. Brittany Harvey: Thank you. And then Dr. Park, for patients with early-stage breast cancer who do not have nodal metastases, can completion axillary lymph node dissection be omitted? Dr. Ko Un "Clara" Park: Yes, and this is an unchanged recommendation from the earlier ASCO Guidelines from 2017 as well as the 2021 joint guideline with Ontario Health, wherein patients with clinically node-negative early stage breast cancer, the staging of the axilla can be performed through sentinel lymph nodal biopsy and not completion axillary lymph node dissection. Brittany Harvey: Understood. So then, to wrap us up on the clinical questions here, Dr. Park, what is recommended regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy in special circumstances in populations? Dr. Ko Un "Clara" Park: One key highlight of the special populations is the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation of the axilla in clinically node negative multicentric tumors. While there are no randomized clinical trials evaluating specifically the role of sentinel lymph nodal biopsy in multicentric tumors, in the guideline, we highlight this as one of the safe options for staging of the axilla and also for pregnant patients, these special circumstances, it is safe to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy in pregnant patients with the use of technetium - blue dye should be avoided in this population. In particular, I want to highlight where sentinel lymph node biopsy should not be used for staging of the axilla and that is in the population with inflammatory breast cancer. There are currently no studies demonstrating that sentinel lymph node biopsy is oncologically safe or accurate in patients with inflammatory breast cancer. And so, unfortunately, in this population, even after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, if they have a great response, the current guideline recommends mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. I appreciate your viewing both where sentinel lymph node can be offered in these special circumstances in populations and where it really should not be used. So then, Dr. Torres, you talked at the beginning about how there's been these new practice changing trials that really impacted these recommendations. So in your view, what is the importance of this guideline update and how does it impact both clinicians and patients? Dr. Mylin Torres: Thank you for that question. This update and these trials that inform the update represent a significant shift in the treatment paradigm and standard of care for breast cancer patients with early-stage breast cancer. When you think about it, it seems almost counterintuitive that physicians and patients would not want to know if a lymph node is involved with cancer or not through sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure. But what these studies show is that preoperative axillary ultrasound, 85% of the time when it's negative, will correctly predict whether a sentinel lymph node is involved with cancer or not and will also be negative. So if you have imaging that's negative, your surgery is likely going to be negative. Some people might ask, what's the harm in doing a sentinel lymph node biopsy? It's important to recognize that upwards of 10% of patients, even after sentinel lymph node biopsy will develop lymphedema, chronic arm pain, shoulder immobility and arm immobility. And these can have a profound impact on quality of life. And if there is not a significant benefit to assessing lymph nodes, particularly in someone who has a preoperative axillary ultrasound that's negative, then why put a patient at risk for these morbidities that can impact them lifelong? Ideally, the adoption of omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy will lead to more multidisciplinary discussion and collaboration in the preoperative setting especially with our diagnostic physicians, radiology to assure that these patients are getting an axillary ultrasound and determine how omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy may impact the downstream treatments after surgery, particularly radiation and systemic therapy decisions, and will be adopted in real world patients, and how clinically we can develop a workflow where together we can make the best decisions for our patients in collaboration with them through shared decision making. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. It's great to have these evidence-based updates for clinicians and patients to review and refer back to. So then finally, Dr. Park, looking to the future, what are the outstanding questions and ongoing trials regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer? Dr. Ko Un "Clara" Park: I think to toggle on Dr. Torres's comment about shared decision making, the emphasis on that I think will become even more evident in the future as we incorporate different types of de-escalation clinical studies. In particular, because as you saw in the SOUND and INSEMA studies, when we de-escalate one modality of the multimodality therapy, i.e., surgery, the other modalities such as radiation therapy and systemic therapy were “controlled” where we were not de-escalating multiple different modalities. However, as the audience may be familiar with, there are other types of de-escalation studies in particular radiation therapy, partial breast irradiation or omission of radiation therapy, and in those studies, the surgery is now controlled where oftentimes the patients are undergoing surgical axillary staging. And conversely when we're looking at endocrine therapy versus radiation therapy clinical trials, in those studies also the majority of the patients are undergoing surgical axillary staging. And so now as those studies demonstrate the oncologic safety of omission of a particular therapy, we will be in a position of more balancing of the data of trying to select which patients are the safe patients for omission of certain types of modality, and how do we balance whether it's surgery, radiation therapy, systemic therapy, endocrine therapy. And that's where as Dr. Torres stated, the shared decision making will become critically important. I'm a surgeon and so as a surgeon, I get to see the patients oftentimes first, especially when they have early-stage breast cancer. And so I could I guess be “selfish” and just do whatever I think is correct. But whatever the surgeon does, the decision does have consequences in the downstream decision making. And so the field really needs to, as Dr. Torres stated earlier, rethink the workflow of how early-stage breast cancer patients are brought forth and managed as a multidisciplinary team. I also think in future studies the expansion of the data to larger tumors, T3, in particular,reater than 5 cm and also how do we incorporate omission in that population will become more evident as we learn more about the oncologic safety of omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy. Dr. Mylin Torres: In addition, there are other outstanding ongoing clinical trials that are accruing patients right now. They include the BOOG 2013-08 study, SOAPET, NAUTILUS and the VENUS trials, all looking at patients with clinical T1, T2N0 disease and whether omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy is safe with various endpoints including regional recurrence, invasive disease-free survival and distant disease-free survival. I expect in addition to these studies there will be more studies ongoing even looking at the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting. And as our imaging improves in the future, there will be more studies improving other imaging modalities, probably in addition to axillary ultrasound in an attempt to accurately characterize whether lymph nodes within axilla contain cancer or not, and in that context whether omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy even in patients with larger tumors post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be done safely and could eventually become another shift in our treatment paradigm. Brittany Harvey: Yes. The shared decision making is key as we think about these updates to improve quality of life and we'll await data from these ongoing trials to inform future updates to this guideline. So I want to thank you both so much for your extensive work to update this guideline and thank you for your time today. Dr. Park and Dr. Torres. Dr. Mylin Torres: Thank you. Dr. Ko Un "Clara" Park: Thank you. Brittany Harvey: And thank you to all of our listeners for tuning in to the ASCO Guidelines podcast. To read the full guideline, go to www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines. You can also find many of our guidelines and interactive resources in the free ASCO Guidelines app available in the Apple App Store or the Google Play Store. If you have enjoyed what you've heard today, please rate and review the podcast and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode.   The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.  

And we're back! The We Watch Disney Podcast returns with a little Nautilus adventure. It's the 1954 classic, 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea. A whale of a tale about the mysterious ship, The Nautilus, and it's fascinating Captain Nemo.   Next episode: Davy Crocket: King of the Wild Frontier   Follow on Bluesky @WeWatchDisney.bsky.social We Watch Disney Podcast on YouTube We Went To Disney Youtube We Watch Disney Podcast on Spotify We Watch Disney Podcast on Apple Podcasts We Watch Disney Podcast on Patreon

Just as 7-Eleven offers too much good stuff, that's what we have in this week's episode of America on the Road. We've been driving a lot of interesting vehicles lately, and so today we thought we'd bring you not two road tests but four — 2025 Toyota Tundra, 2025 Lincoln Nautilus, 2025 Mazda CX-50, 2025 Hyundai Elantra N Line. It's a fascinating quartet of vehicles each with something special to bring to the table. Our Toyota Tundra test vehicle was a 4x4 SRS CrewMax 5.5 that blends rugged capability with modern features, offering a spacious cabin for five and a 5.5-foot composite bed equipped with a power outlet, LED lighting, and an integrated deck rail system. Powered by a 389-horsepower 3.4-liter twin-turbo V6 paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission, it features part-time four-wheel drive and off-road-ready suspension. This model is equipped with the optional TRD Rally Package, adding 18-inch TRD alloy wheels, Bilstein shocks, skid plates, Crawl Control, Multi-Terrain Select, and unique TRD interior and exterior styling. Additional accessories like a TRD performance air filter, bed mat, and wheel locks further boost its practicality and rugged appeal. The big question is whether the turbo V6 matches the ability of a V8. And is the pricey TRD Rally Package worth the added price? And how does the new hybrid version of the Mazda CX-50 stack up? It pairs a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, an EV battery, and an electronically controlled CVT to deliver 219 horsepower and 163 lb-ft of torque, along with standard electric all-wheel drive. It features Mazda's Mi-Drive modes for power and trail driving, hill launch assist, and a 1,500-pound towing capacity. The exterior is sharp with LED headlights, a panoramic moonroof, roof rails, and a power rear liftgate. Inside, the CX-50 Hybrid seats five and offers leather-trimmed seats, heated front seats, a heated leather-wrapped steering wheel, a power driver's seat with memory, and a wireless phone charger. Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, rain-sensing wipers, a wiper de-icer, keyless entry, and an electric parking brake round out the vehicle's feature list. Host Jack Nerad took this one to the desert and back, and we'll have his full report. Meanwhile, co-host Chris Teague took the wheel of the 2025 Lincoln Nautilus and the 2025 Hyundai Elantra N Line. He found the Nautilus offers a refined interior with a standard 48-inch panoramic display, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and Lincoln's new Digital Scent system for a personalized cabin experience. Two powertrain choices are available: a 250-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder and a 310-horsepower hybrid, both paired with standard all-wheel drive. Additional features include available BlueCruise 1.2 hands-free driving technology, premium leather seating, and an optional Revel Ultima 3D audio system. The 2025 Elantra N Line features a sport-tuned chassis, a 201-horsepower turbocharged 1.6-liter engine, and a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission for sharper performance than its siblings. It comes with 18-inch alloy wheels, unique N Line exterior styling, a black mesh grille, and a sports interior with leather-trimmed seats and alloy pedals. Technology highlights include a 10.25-inch touchscreen with navigation, wireless charging, and Hyundai's Bluelink+ connected services. So how does it match up with its most direct competitor, the Honda Civic Si? Chris and Jack will have the answers for you. In the news this week, we have a crisis on our hands, and it's not tariffs; it's uninsured motorists. They are costing each of us who has car insurance billions of dollars each year. We'll tell you what we learned about it a little later in the show. Of course, there is a lot of buzz right now about tariffs in the auto industry. We'll tell you what is real and what is hype and give you thoughts on how you should proceed if you're planning to buy a car this year.

Hauntings & Healing Nightmares During Crisis About the Show : Have you ever wondered aloud, “Was that just a ghost I heard and saw?” During any crisis, it is not unusual for our deceased loved ones, spirit guides, and guardian angels to come to our aid and offer guidance. Because many in the Western World were not raised to believe in such help, we may misinterpret these signs of caring for Hauntings. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Our loved ones often go to great lengths to let us know we are not alone in our hour of need and use anything and everything at their disposal, from moving objects to make noise to appearing in nightmares to let us know we are not alone. Helen Keller said, “When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but which has opened? Often, we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one for us.” Join Kat Kanavos aka Kat-The Queen of Dreams, as she shares deeply personal experiences from her first Nautilus award-winning book, Surviving Cancerland, filled with “hauntings and nightmares” during her health crisis. These experiences helped save her life, all three times.   About the Guest: Kathleen O'Keefe-Kanavos aka, Kat-The Queen of Dreams, is a three-time breast Cancer Survivor whose dreams and nightmares diagnosed her illness missed by the medical community and the tests on which they relied. She listened to the guidance in her dreams returned to her doctors for more tests, which found the cancer. Her doctors and dreams worked to save her life, three times. Kat turned her life crisis into award-winning books translated into foreign languages. Kat now teaches people how to understand and use their dream power to improve their life and writing, too, as a Dreamy Writers Conference Cruise Facilitator on the Holland American Cruise Line. https://www.kathleenokeefekanavos.com/ Show Take Away- Nice things go more unnoticed and are less remembered than scary ones. Sometimes scary things are the Universe saying, “Change…or else!” Remember when an authority figure said that to you? “Or else” can scare the be-jabbers out of us because our imagination can create scenarios much worse than reality. When we feel we have been painted into a scary corner by Death, what if…it is the only way Life can get our attention so we will make a change…for the better!  Video Version: https://www.youtube.com/live/9iHULFhQdS4?si=KShIuPRf4DKjThfE Chat with Kat during Live Show with Video Stream:  write a question on YouTube Have a Question for the Show? Go to Facebook– Dreams that Can Save Your Life Facebook Professional–Kathleen O'Keefe-Kanavos http://kathleenokeefekanavos.com/

O Direct do Nintendo Switch 2 aconteceu, as informações do console foram divulgadas… e não é bem o que a gente esperava. Ao lado do Lucas Eduard, do Nautilus, a gente comenta um pouco do que foi esse Direct e os detalhes compartilhados posteriormente. Além disso, também temos The First Berzerker Khazan, impressões do R36S e mais.Participantes:Lucas EduardHeitor De PaolaAssuntos abordados:03:00 - Um pouco sobre o Switch 253:00 - The First Berzerker Khazan1:04:00 - Impressões R36S1:24:00 - R.E.P.O.1:33:00 - Look OutsideVai comprar jogos na Nuuvem? Use o link de afiliado do Overloadr!Use nosso link de filiado ao fazer compras na Amazon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

O Direct do Nintendo Switch 2 aconteceu, as informações do console foram divulgadas… e não é bem o que a gente esperava. Ao lado do Lucas Eduard, do Nautilus, a gente comenta um pouco do que foi esse Direct e os detalhes compartilhados posteriormente. Além disso, também temos The First Berzerker Khazan, impressões do R36S e mais.Participantes:Lucas EduardHeitor De PaolaAssuntos abordados:03:00 - Um pouco sobre o Switch 253:00 - The First Berzerker Khazan1:04:00 - Impressões R36S1:24:00 - R.E.P.O.1:33:00 - Look OutsideVai comprar jogos na Nuuvem? Use o link de afiliado do Overloadr!Use nosso link de filiado ao fazer compras na Amazon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Park your astrocoupé and discover the incredible stories of the retro-futuristic world of Discoveryland at Disneyland Paris. Set off on incredible intergalactic journey in Star Tours: The Adventures Continue, explore Captain Nemo's submarine in Les Mystères du Nautilus and enter Café Hyperion and Vidéopolis where many secrets await you. Discover a place where the boundless imagination of the visionaries of the time comes to life, the journey to tomorrow starts here!

Garez votre astrocoupé et découvrez les histoires incroyables de l'univers rétro-futuriste de Discoveryland à Disneyland Paris. Partez pour d'incroyables voyages intergalactiques dans Star Tours : L'aventure Continue, explorez l'antre du Capitaine Nemo dans Les Mystères du Nautilus, entrez le Café Hyperion et Vidéopolis où de nombreux secrets vous attendent. Découvrez un lieu où l'imagination débordante des visionnaires de l'époque prend vie, le voyage vers demain commence ici !

Viaja al fondo del mar con Nemo, el capitán más borde y brillante de la literatura. En este Extra de 20.000 leguas de viaje submarino, David Botello (@DavidBotello4), Esther Sánchez (@estesan1969) y Ainara Ariztoy rinden tributo a Julio Verne explorando los secretos más locos de los océanos junto al legendario capitán Nemo. Súbete al Nautilus para navegar entre calamares gigantes, tesoros hundidos y fake news submarinas. Ponte el neopreno para descubrir el lado más friki, épico y surrealista de esta novela (antes de que te pille Nemo). ¡Cuidado con los tentáculos! Y, si quieres acompañarlos, ¡súbete a la Historia!

Y Bordeline, Nautilus, Un Hombre Decente, The Last Breath, Watson y Lupin: Zero. Una semana de muchos estrenos en salas y plataformas y con un montón de contendido, un programa mas cargado que los carajillos del bar de al lado de tu casa, sea cual sea, siempre hay un bar que los carga un morntón, bueno, que me lio, que programón nos ha quedado oiga.

Analizamos sin spoilers Nautilus, la ambiciosa adaptación del universo de 20.000 leguas de viaje submarino, que rescata el espíritu de la novela de Jules Verne con una visión más moderna y antiimperialista. Estreno 20 de marzo en AMC+. ‘Nautilus' se inspira directamente en los personajes y las historias de las dos novelas de Julio Verne en las que aparece el Capitán Nemo: ‘Veinte mil leguas de viaje submarino' y ‘La isla misteriosa'. La serie sigue a Nemo y su heterogénea tripulación a bordo del impresionante Nautilus mientras descubren mundos submarinos mágicos y evaden ser capturados por la despiadada Compañía Mercantil de las Indias Orientales. En su viaje descubrirán territorios inexplorados mientras se enfrentan a situaciones peligrosas y fantásticas, desde trampas en la profundidad de la jungla, hasta un tenso juego de cricket en el Ártico, pasando por el posible descubrimiento de la ciudad perdida de Atlántida. Únete a nuestro chat de telegram en el que miles de personas hablamos cada dia de series: Telegram – Grupo de debate: https://telegram.me/fueradeseries Telegram – Canal de noticias: https://t.me/noticiasfds Twitter: https://twitter.com/fueradeseries Facebook: https://twitter.com/fueradeseries Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fueradeseries/ Youtube: youtube.com/fueradeseries Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Science journalist and author Brandon Keim joins me to discuss the origins and evolution of H5N1—popularly known as bird flu—explored in his excellent article for Nautilus, The Unnatural History of Bird Flu. Brandon Keim deftly covers the recent evolutionary history and trajectory of avian influenza, with a focus on H5N1 and its subvariants as it has become more virulent and has evolved into an emergent public health threat for the human species. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenzas (HPAI) emerge under specific environmental pressures and contexts, and the highly consequential influenza strain, H5N1, is no different, with the main culprit for its troubling evolution being intensive animal production. / Episode notes: https://www.lastborninthewilderness.com/episodes/brandon-keim // Sustain + support: https://www.patreon.com/lastborninthewilderness // Donate: https://www.paypal.me/lastbornpodcast

Science journalist and author Brandon Keim joins me to discuss the origins and evolution of H5N1—also known as bird flu—explored in his excellent article for Nautilus, The Unnatural History of Bird Flu. // Support the work + listen to the full interview: https://www.patreon.com/lastborninthewilderness

El capitán Nemo sumergiéndose en los fondos marinos a bordo de su Nautilus; Phileas Fogg y su fiel Passepartout recorriendo el mundo; Miguel Strogoff atravesando la estepa siberiana; el profesor Lidenbrock descubriéndonos el centro de la Tierra… Millones de lectores de diferentes generaciones han sido cautivados por los inolvidables personajes de los relatos de Julio Verne (Nantes, 1828 – Amiens, 1905).En el 120 aniversario de su fallecimiento, Documentos RNE dedica un espacio al creador de la novela científica. Julio Verne, el futuro ya está aquí, con guion de Alfredo Laín y realización de Mayca Aguilera, es una propuesta singular que une el documental a la Ficción Sonora de RNE. Junto a fragmentos de sus obras, el documental se vertebra mediante una ficción original, con la participación de los actores Víctor Clavijo y Biel Montoro y otras voces habituales de Ficción Sonora.Ariel Pérez Rodríguez, presidente de la Sociedad Hispánica Jules Verne y autor de Jules Verne. Un viaje extraordinario, nos ayuda a entender la vida del autor francés. El joven Verne estuvo muy influenciado por el ambiente portuario de Nantes, donde soñó con vivir grandes aventuras en la mar; el influjo de su padre, Pierre Verne, quien trató de que siguiera sus pasos como abogado enviándole a estudiar a París, donde hará realidad su sueño de hacerse escritor cuando conoce al editor Pierre–Jules Hetzel, que convertirá sus novelas en best sellers.El documental también cuenta con el testimonio de un descendiente directo de Verne, su tataranieto, el periodista Jean Michel Verne, que recibió a Documentos RNE en su casa de Marsella. Sus palabras arrojan una visión íntima de su compleja personalidad y desliza la idea de que, quizás haya una zona de sombra en Julio Verne que no hemos sabido captar.La entrevista completa con Jean Michel Verne podrá escucharse en RNE Audio como contenido extra al documental sonoro.Escuchar audio

In this episode, I talk to Eliot Schrefer about his book Queer Ducks (and Other Animals): The Natural World of Animal Sexuality (Katherine Tegen Books, 2022). A quiet revolution has been underway in recent years, with study after study revealing substantial same-sex sexual behavior in animals. Join celebrated author Eliot Schrefer on an exploration of queer behavior in the animal world—from albatrosses to bonobos to clownfish to doodlebugs. In sharp and witty prose—aided by humorous comics from artist Jules Zuckerberg—Schrefer uses science, history, anthropology, and sociology to illustrate the diversity of sexual behavior in the animal world. Interviews with researchers in the field offer additional insights for readers and aspiring scientists. Queer behavior in animals is as diverse and complex—and as natural—as it is in our own species. It doesn't set us apart from animals—it bonds us even closer to our animal selves. Eliot Schrefer is a New York Times-bestselling author, has twice been a finalist for the National Book Award for Young People's Literature, received the Stonewall Honor for best LGBTQIA+ teen book, and received the Printz Honor for best young adult book from the ALA. His science writing has appeared in Discover, Sierra, USA Today, Nautilus, and The Washington Post Magazine. He has an M.A. in Animal Studies from NYU, is on the faculty of the Hamline MFA for writing for young people, and lives with his husband in New York City. Kyle Johannsen is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering (Routledge, 2021). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In this episode, I talk to Eliot Schrefer about his book Queer Ducks (and Other Animals): The Natural World of Animal Sexuality (Katherine Tegen Books, 2022). A quiet revolution has been underway in recent years, with study after study revealing substantial same-sex sexual behavior in animals. Join celebrated author Eliot Schrefer on an exploration of queer behavior in the animal world—from albatrosses to bonobos to clownfish to doodlebugs. In sharp and witty prose—aided by humorous comics from artist Jules Zuckerberg—Schrefer uses science, history, anthropology, and sociology to illustrate the diversity of sexual behavior in the animal world. Interviews with researchers in the field offer additional insights for readers and aspiring scientists. Queer behavior in animals is as diverse and complex—and as natural—as it is in our own species. It doesn't set us apart from animals—it bonds us even closer to our animal selves. Eliot Schrefer is a New York Times-bestselling author, has twice been a finalist for the National Book Award for Young People's Literature, received the Stonewall Honor for best LGBTQIA+ teen book, and received the Printz Honor for best young adult book from the ALA. His science writing has appeared in Discover, Sierra, USA Today, Nautilus, and The Washington Post Magazine. He has an M.A. in Animal Studies from NYU, is on the faculty of the Hamline MFA for writing for young people, and lives with his husband in New York City. Kyle Johannsen is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering (Routledge, 2021). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science

In this episode, I talk to Eliot Schrefer about his book Queer Ducks (and Other Animals): The Natural World of Animal Sexuality (Katherine Tegen Books, 2022). A quiet revolution has been underway in recent years, with study after study revealing substantial same-sex sexual behavior in animals. Join celebrated author Eliot Schrefer on an exploration of queer behavior in the animal world—from albatrosses to bonobos to clownfish to doodlebugs. In sharp and witty prose—aided by humorous comics from artist Jules Zuckerberg—Schrefer uses science, history, anthropology, and sociology to illustrate the diversity of sexual behavior in the animal world. Interviews with researchers in the field offer additional insights for readers and aspiring scientists. Queer behavior in animals is as diverse and complex—and as natural—as it is in our own species. It doesn't set us apart from animals—it bonds us even closer to our animal selves. Eliot Schrefer is a New York Times-bestselling author, has twice been a finalist for the National Book Award for Young People's Literature, received the Stonewall Honor for best LGBTQIA+ teen book, and received the Printz Honor for best young adult book from the ALA. His science writing has appeared in Discover, Sierra, USA Today, Nautilus, and The Washington Post Magazine. He has an M.A. in Animal Studies from NYU, is on the faculty of the Hamline MFA for writing for young people, and lives with his husband in New York City. Kyle Johannsen is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering (Routledge, 2021). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, I talk to Eliot Schrefer about his book Queer Ducks (and Other Animals): The Natural World of Animal Sexuality (Katherine Tegen Books, 2022). A quiet revolution has been underway in recent years, with study after study revealing substantial same-sex sexual behavior in animals. Join celebrated author Eliot Schrefer on an exploration of queer behavior in the animal world—from albatrosses to bonobos to clownfish to doodlebugs. In sharp and witty prose—aided by humorous comics from artist Jules Zuckerberg—Schrefer uses science, history, anthropology, and sociology to illustrate the diversity of sexual behavior in the animal world. Interviews with researchers in the field offer additional insights for readers and aspiring scientists. Queer behavior in animals is as diverse and complex—and as natural—as it is in our own species. It doesn't set us apart from animals—it bonds us even closer to our animal selves. Eliot Schrefer is a New York Times-bestselling author, has twice been a finalist for the National Book Award for Young People's Literature, received the Stonewall Honor for best LGBTQIA+ teen book, and received the Printz Honor for best young adult book from the ALA. His science writing has appeared in Discover, Sierra, USA Today, Nautilus, and The Washington Post Magazine. He has an M.A. in Animal Studies from NYU, is on the faculty of the Hamline MFA for writing for young people, and lives with his husband in New York City. Kyle Johannsen is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering (Routledge, 2021). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Apoie o UP no Orelo:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠clique aqui!⁠⁠⁠O tempo passou, as coisas mudaram e agora temos jogos, antes exclusivos, aparecendo em consoles da concorrência. Isso é um sinal do fim de uma era? Ou a guerra continua em outros campos de batalha, lutada pelas mesmas figuras? Neste episódio, Dan Schettini e Marcellus Vinícius recebem Henrique Antero, do Nautilus, para um papo sobre as camadas por trás do que define uma “guerra”, tanto pela ótica do consumidor quanto das grandes empresas da indústria.O nosso muito obrigado a: Marcus Vinicius Freitas, André Felipe, Henrique Fernandes Veri Marques, Vitor Ludwig, Alice Brites, Tatiana Macedo, Lucas Calixto, Marquinhos Maia, Rodrigo, Thiagoo Castilho, Caio Barcelos, Luan Germano, Guilherme Magalhães, Paulo Felisbino, Marcelo Bonato, Filipovisky De La Fuente, Agmar, Samuel Ribeiro de Oliveira, Pedro C., Matheus, Felipe Veloso, Arthur Luiz, Marcus Buzette, Giancarlo, Rafael Ramalli da Silva, Lucas Brum, Rafael Silva, Bruno Giordano Paiva Lima, Regis Fernando Gonçalves de Freitas, Anne Verrino, Rafael Yabiku, Guilherme Shuto, Fabricio Reis, Gustavo Furlanetto, andre juck, Venigma, Demétrius, Arthur Valladão, Daniel Baumgratz, Bruno Hatto, João Henrique, Bruno Anken, Akemi Nakamura, Helio Cannone, Andre Benia, Davi, Jonathan, Vitor Araujo e Breno Bezerra Bluhm, Rafael Ranulfo!Siga o UP:Orelo |Twitter |Twitch |Instagram |DiscordContato comercial: contato@somosup.com

Tom Does Disney: It's time to do a deep dive into theme park vlogger Tom Does Disney, but we must set the scene with the proper back story between him and his girlfriend Jenna and their toxic relationship. The Tale Of The Smoke Show: Tom regales us with the tale of the smoke show with a Lambo that ended up being a psycho. Arrest: Everything comes to a head as Tom tries to explain to the cops why he shouldn't have to let Jenna back into the house. They both get arrested. FUCK YOU WATCH THIS!, THE BEAR!, WAITING!, THE RENTALS!, MAYA RUDOLPH!, HALFTIME SHOW!, DRAKE!, KENDRICK!, HISTORICAL BEEF!, THEME PARKS!, IT'S JIM AND THEM JINGLE!, VLOGGERS!, ORLANDO!, FLORIDA!, LIVESTREAM!, ANIMAL KINGDOM!, FACETIME!, ARGUMENT!, PUBLIC SCENE!, IRL STREAMING!, ALMOST FAMOUS!, PURPLE AURA!, ABUSE!, CRAZY!, THE BOY BLUE!, ADAM THE WOO!, GUTTERMOUTH!, PIZZAFARI!, HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS!, CHRISTMAS!, ARGUING!, NAUTILUS!, RISE OF THE RESISTANCE!, AURA!, LAMBO!, SMOKE SHOW!, TATTOOS!, POKEMON CARDS!, TRUE CRIME!, LET THE DOG OUT!, RENT!, BILLS!< KIM POSSIBLE!, EVICT!, SQUATTER'S RIGHTS!, ESTABLISH RESIDENCE!, DISNEY STREAM!, MAGIC KINGDOM!, CUSTODY!, BRAZILIAN BABY!, OFFICER!, POLICE!, ZEN FELDMAN!, GREEDY!, OFF TOPIC!, BOOM!, FREESTYLE!, SONG!, LEGO!, GUARDIANS!, VIRTUAL QUEUE!, REMY'S!, JOBLESS FELON!, DOG!  You can find the videos from this episode at our Discord RIGHT HERE!

En este especial de nuestro podcast repasamos algunas de las novedades discográficas más destacadas de la música Smooth Jazz que hemos presentado en Febrero de 2025. Entre ellas, los nuevos trabajos de Gino Vannelli, Nautilus, Ryan La Valette, Vladimir Cetkar, Peter White y Johnny Britt.

let's hang out

lets hang out

Tout un Art ! est une série inédite à l'occasion de la Journée mondiale de la Baleine, le 19 février.Pendant longtemps, les baleines ont été représentées comme des animaux dangereux, perfides.Mais dans la 2e moitié du 19e siècle le discours change. Et les voix de deux Jules célèbres s'élèvent pour s'insurger contre la violence des hommes, qui pillent les océans : Jules Michelet dans La Mer et Jules Verne dans Vingt mille lieues sous les mers.Dans ce roman de 1870, Jules Verne le visionnaire nous plonge dans les profondeurs abyssales à bord du sous-marin Nautilus. Le premier sous-marin tout électrique, le Gymnote, sera inventé en 1888.Jules Verne, auteur de science-fiction ? Oui mais pas que… C'est d'abord de la science. Ainsi, l'auteur utilise un vocabulaire riche et précis pour parler de la faune et de la flore marines. Un vrai manuel de SVT ! Et pour cause : l'éditeur de Jules Verne, Hetzel, veut que ses romans soient pédagogiques. Ensemble ils inventent la littérature de vulgarisation scientifique.Si Jules Verne est en avance sur son temps sur le plan technologique, il l'est aussi sur le plan des idées, notamment écologiques. Quand le Nautilus croise un groupe de baleines, les instincts du chasseur canadien Ned Land se réveillent et il irait bien les titiller du harpon. Mais le capitaine Némo l'en empêche : on ne doit pêcher que pour se nourrir, au risque de faire disparaître les animaux marins. Si Jules Verne fait la distinction entre le bon et le mauvais pêcheur, il ne met pas pour autant les animaux sur un pied ou plutôt une nageoire d'égalité. Lorsqu'un combat s'engage entre des baleines et des cachalots, l'équipage du Nautilus défend les baleines et tue les cachalots considérés comme des animaux cruels.On ne compte plus les adaptations de Vingt mille lieues sous les mers. Deux exemples marquants. En 1907, Méliès, à la naissance du cinéma, réalise un film muet bourré d'effets spéciaux. En 2015, Christian Hecq et Valérie Lesort accomplissent la prouesse de faire apparaître les abysses sur une scène théâtrale, celle de la Comédie-Française, et utilisent … des marionnettes comme créatures marines ! ______  La série "Tout un Art !" 12x10') raconte le Vivant dans la (pop) culture, l'Art et l'Histoire, au-delà des aspects biologiques et comportementaux. Et aussi de connecter deux mondes qui se nourrissent l'un l'autre. _______Cette émission a été conçue et préparée par deux grands curieux. Sylvia Roustant est professeure, agrégée de lettres et créatrice du site Le secret derrière le tableau.Marc Mortelmans est créateur de podcasts, conférencier et auteur d'En finir avec les idées fausses sur le monde Vivant (Éditions de l'atelier 2024) et de Nomen, l'origine des noms des espèces (Ulmer 2024). contact@baleinesousgravillon.com.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

We are going live. Let's hang out, chat and give some knives away!

Forester Dr. Lauren Oakes joins in today to talk about the urgent need for effective reforestation efforts and the complexities of understanding the state of the world's forests. Plus, we talk about the dual narrative of loss and growth in forest ecosystems, emphasizing the importance of preserving existing forests while also working on reforestation efforts. About our guest:Dr. Lauren Oakes makes environmental science accessible to non-scientists. She writes about forests, climate, and our complex relationships with nature. Her craft blends science communications and reporting through narrative.She earned her Ph.D. from the Emmett Interdisciplinary Program for Environment and Resources at Stanford University. By training, she is an ecologist and land change scientist, committed to facilitating more sustainable land use practices in communities across the world. She has always been intrigued by our human footprint on the natural world and concerned about the ways environmental degradation affects the lives of people and other species.Her writing has appeared in The New York Times, Scientific American, Emergence Magazine, Nautilus and other media outlets. Her first book, In Search of the Canary Tree, was selected as one of Science Friday's Best Science Books of 2018. In 2019, it won second place for the Rachel Carson Environment Book Award and was a finalist for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Communication Award. The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation supported research and reporting for Treekeepers, her most recent book about the global reforestation movement.

En esta edición de nuestro podcast estrenamos 'Fresh', el nuevo trabajo del multiinstrumentista neozelandés Ryan LaValette, una de las estrellas emergentes de la música Smooth Jazz de los últimos años. En el repaso a otras novedades discográficas de este género reseñamos los álbumes de Papik & The Soultrend Orchestra, Nautilus, Soulstance y Ultrablue. En el bloque central recordamos algunos temas de la discografía de la vocalista Alyson Williams.

#OzWatch: Nemo's Nautilus as a Tiger Snake attacks Tasmanian fisherman. Jeremy Zakis, New South Wales. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety https://au.news.yahoo.com/aussie-fishermen-scramble-as-determined-tiger-snake-climbs-into-boat-dont-touch-it-000217395.html 1890

En este episodio, les cuento la historia de la periodista Kim Wall y el submarino Nautilos, construido por el inventor Peter Madsen. https://terrorcercadeti.com/ Facebook -https://www.facebook.com/terrorcerca/ Instagram -https://www.instagram.com/terrorcerca/ GoodReads -https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/130049089-terror-cerca-de-ti 

En esta edición de nuestro podcast presentamos 'Sunrise', nuevo trabajo discográfico del trío japonés Nautilus. En el repaso a novedades de la música Smooth Jazz reseñamos los álbumes de Ultrablue, Soulstance, Jessie Laine Powell, Boy Katindig y Gino Vannelli. En el bloque del recuerdo escuchamos al vocalista Elliott Yamin colaborando en discos de Euge Groove, Rick Braun, The Lao Tizer Band y Nicholas Cole.

Send us a textThe first ever Nautilus Gym Equipment collection to hit the Australian shores was in Adelaide in the 1970's. Now, Adelaide once again is home to the entire first generation collection, but completely renewed for a whole new generation at the LPZ Method in Melrose Park. This interview is a must listen for fans of Nautilus and a fascinating insight into what was with Dr Grant & Sue Pavia and what will be a legacy for the brand and those who now get to enjoy the passionate project Lachlan & Paula Zrim have brought back to life.We hope you enjoy this interview! Highly recommend watching the full video on Summon your Superhuman's Podcast channel on YouTube.Let us know what you love about Nautilus equipment and if you want to visit LPZ Method, you're welcome to get in touch to find out more.

Jeje está de volta de Las Vegas e, apesar de não poder nos contar o que ela foi fazer lá, ela ainda tem relatos de como a cidade do pecado a recebeu. Ela também pôde falar com a gente de Assassin's Creed Shadows que ela jogou em uma sessão de prévia, mas que estava anteriormente sob embargo. Além disso, tivemos Lucas Zavadil, do Nautilus, como convidado, que nos falou de Eternal Strands (e a gente acabou falando um pouco mais de Dynasty Warriors: Origins).Participantes:Lucas ZavadilJessica PinheiroHeitor De PaolaAssuntos abordados:04:00 - Jeje em Las Vegas12:00 - Prévia: Assassin's Creed Shadows49:00 - Dynasty Warriors: Origins1:01:00 - Eternal Strands1:23:00 - Blood Bar TycoonVai comprar jogos na Nuuvem? Use o link de afiliado do Overloadr!Use nosso link de filiado ao fazer compras na Amazon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

During the Dark Curse, Captain Nemo abducts Hook and invites him to join the crew “family” of his submarine, Nautilus, In the past, fugitive Snow and shepherd David separately travel to Longbourn; she to flee the kingdom and he to sell his struggling farm. Without ever seeing each other’s faces, David saves Snow from a […]

You really think this guy gets a job 40 days before the assassination, moving to Dallas from New Orleans and just happens to work in a high rise building right at the end of the motorcade rout that had an empty (meaning no people) room on the top floor?You'd have to say one of 3 things. Either he was part of a plan, was extremely well handled, or was a super rare coincidence.Think about it, a covert asset of ONI and CIA who could speak Russian and was certainly not lacking intelligence, moves to a new city to get a minimum wage job moving books. And then as testified by Roselli, he was shot so as to silence him.Remember what Hoover wrote Nov 24th 1963Why say the Real Assassin?”It is nteresting because Nick Katzenbach who Hoover is referring to, himself wrote the next day in a memo to Bill Moyer “THE PUBLIC MUST BE SATISFIED THAT OSWALD WAS THE ASSASSIN; THAT HE HAD NO CONFEDERATES WHO ARE STILL AT LARGE; AND THAT EVIDENCE WAS SUCH THAT HE WOULD HAVE BEEN CONVICTED AT TRIAL.””Jack Ruby, also a Jew, even told the warren commission he had to do it “because of his Jewish faith”and what was he talking about when he told Earl Warren“Unfortunately, Chief Earl Warren, had you been around 5 or 6 months ago, and I know your hands were tied, you couldn't do it, and immediately the President would have gotten a hold of my true story, or whatever would have been said about me, a certain organization wouldn't have so completely formed now, so powerfully, to use me because I am of the Jewish extraction, Jewish faith, to commit the most dastardly crime that has ever been committed. Can you understand now in visualizing what happened, what powers, what momentum has been carried on to create this feeling of mass feeling against my people, against certain people that were against them prior to their power?” That goes over your head doesn't it.…I want to say this to you. The Jewish people are being exterminated at this moment. Consequently, a whole new form of government is going to take over our country, and I know I won't live to see you another time. Do I sound sort of screwy–in telling you these things?… All I know is maybe something can be saved. Because right now, I want to tell you this, I am used as a scapegoat, and there is no greater weapon that you can use to create some falsehood about some of the Jewish faith, especially at the terrible heinous crime such as the killing of President Kennedy….Now maybe something can be saved. It may not be too late, whatever happens, if our President, Lyndon Johnson, knew the truth from me. But if I am eliminated, there won't be any way of knowing. Right now, when I leave your presence now, I am the only one that can bring out the truth to our President, who believes in righteousness and justice.”Note that later while talking to the press that Jack Ruby says the Truth may never come above board and that it goes all the way to the top. If LBJ isn't in the loop and at the top as it were, then who is he talking about?“But he has been told, I am certain, that I was part of a plot to assassinate the President…. I am sorry, Chief Justice Warren, I thought I would be very effective in telling you what I have said here. But in all fairness to everyone, maybe all I want to do is beg that if they found out I was telling the truth, maybe they can succeed in what their motives are, but maybe my people won't be tortured and mutilated. ….No; the only way you can do it is if he knows the truth, that I am telling the truth, and why I was down in that basement Sunday morning, and maybe some sense of decency will come out and they can still fulfill their plan, as I stated before, without my people going through torture and mutilation. …But I won't be around, Chief Justice. I won't be around to verify these things you are going to tell the President. … I have been used for a purpose, and there will be a certain tragic occurrence happening if you don't take my testimony and somehow vindicate me so my people don't suffer because of what I have done. …All I want is a lie detector test, and you refuse to give it to me. Because as it stands now—and the truth serum, and any other–Pentothal–how do you pronounce it, whatever it is. And they will not give it to me, because I want to tell the truth. And then I want to leave this world. But I don't want my people to be blamed for something that is untrue, that they claim has happened. “It seems that Jack Ruby is paranoid that the president has been told already that he was party of a plot to kill the president that that “his people” meaning Jewish people or the Israeli state was behind it. Israel had several motives to want both JFK and RFK dead. It was in their eye a matter of survival.1 The Kennedys want Israel inspected for nuclear weapons. RFK also had information and testing done around Dimona showing the Uranium there had come from the US's Nautilus project, since it was the only uranium in the world enriched to that high a % at that point in time. It was all over the area.2 The Kennedys supported Palestinians right of Return.3 They wanted Israel's foreign lobbies to register as foreign agents4 JFK along with France's Charles de Gaulle who also survived an assassination attempt, supported Algeria independence.The John Birch Society, who Ruby tries to paint a picture of as all powerful, didn't kill the President. As much as big oil was tied to LBJ, and Texas oil man David Harold Byrd owning the building where Lee Harvey Oswald worked, they didn't control Jack Ruby nor did they gain anything worth the risk when RFK was assassinated in California. Guys like David Ferrie and Jacob Rubenstein were working for the Mafia. And the Mafia lost a billion dollars in revenue when Castro shut down the casinos. They had every reason to work with the CIA when they came knocking and they did, and the CIA had every reason to seek plausible deniability that the mafia provided for a variety of illegal activities, from narcotic and gun running to assassination. The CIA's Victor Marchetti testified that Ferrie worked for the CIA.Jack Ruby was a central mafia figure and knew almost every cop in Dallas. He also went the Cuba and even rode with FBN agents to the airport. So was Oswald's childhood friend and fellow closet f****t Efraim Sullivan, who became a chief of police in Louisiana and got 4 cops killed as well as 5 civilians all in one shooting. According to his son he work for the Mossad. These southern mafia heads guys were bragging about JFK AND Robert getting killed before both happened. The Kennedys demanded the ZAC/ZOA/AIPAC register as a foreign agent. RFK issued them a moratorium with 72 hrs to comply in November of 63. The PM resigned over it to stall for time and Kennedy was killed the same month.The mafia was the CIA's plausible deniability and ground distribution network for narcotics which is how they were covertly financing anti communist resistance in Cuba, China, and USSR. Vietnam's opium was a natural market move as Europe was recovered from WWII. RFK was prosecuting the same mob leaders who the CIA was secretly working with to sell drugs and even attempt to assassinate Castro. Think back to the CIA's earliest operations in the Middle East, operation Ajax and the Suez Crisis, which was itself the product of a botched 1956 Israel false flag operation, Operation Suzanna, now commonly called the Lavon Affair. As a Senator, Johnson blocked the Eisenhower administration's attempts to apply sanctions against Israel following the 1956 Sinai Campaign. Who did these CIA operation in Iran and Egypt really benefit? Not the United States. But of course both Dulles brothers were hardcore Zionists. Bobby was killed on the first anniversary of the six day war and set up a Palestinian. Now who would want to do that?The plan was to replace him with Katzenbach, which LBJ did. And none of it could move until JFK was out of the way. The mob lost a billion dollars a year in gambling revenue when Castro shut down casinos. Hoffa using teamster pension funds to create Las Vegas as the new Cuba was in reaction to this. These are the guys who end up in a series of murders for or before finishing testimony to the House Committee on assassination. Giancana had been Ruby's boss. Trafficante had him killed.The Jewish finger prints are all over both assassinations. Johnson's domestic and foreign policies on Cuba on Russia on Vietnam didn't really change. Kennedy was not getting out of Vietnam. This is wishful thinking on par with the fools who thought Obama was going to be an antiwar president. JFK had already procured 6 billion dollars, most of it left over from Eisenhower who had had enough of the MIC, to spent on the F111 fighter jet. Oh it is interesting that the Crown family benefited when Johnson lobbied to have the contract go to General Dynamics. They also married into the family who owned the hotel where Bobby was shot and allowed Jewish mobsters to use it for gambling operations. It was Henry Crown's personal lawyer Albert E Jenner, who was appointed by Johnson and to be part of the Warren Commission whitewash, was hired to look into the backgrounds of the two most important individuals, Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby. Of course he found no intelligence ties or mob ties. Jenner was also a director for general Dynamics. Reading the biographies given for these men by the WC and comparing them to the mountains of information we have now is enough to make even the most crooked lawyer blush. Jack Ruby's first jail visitor was the mob boss of Dallas.The only dramatic changes under LBJ were on his Middle East policy. He had Americans killed! About the USS Liberty which the Israelis attacked in the Six Day War, LBJ told Admiral Lawrence Geis “I dont care if that ship sinks to the bottom of the ocean.” LBJ stacked his admin with Zionists and the US has never recovered. Israel kept it nukes, Palestinians never got right of return, (it was never even brought up again) the lobbies never registered as foreign agents, and America as subsidized the racist apartheid state with billions every year from then to now. Of Course Johnson didn't want the ZOA (Zionist Organization of America) to be registered as a foreign lobby. His aunt, Jessie Johnson was on it! Few people know that according to Jewish law, LBJ was himself Jewish. His mother was Rebekah Baines, thus Johnson's middle name. She was Jewish. Her mother was Ruth Ament Huffman, and her mother was Mary Elizabeth Perrin all of whom were Jewish. Perrin's husband was John S. Huffman whose mother was Suzanne Ament, thus Ruth's Middle name. Ament was a German Jew. The Huffman's settled in Fredrick Maryland and from there went to Kentucky and finally Texas. The Jewish times brags ” The line of Jewish mothers can be traced back three generations in Lyndon Johnson's family tree. There is little doubt that he was Jewish.” Regardless there is no doubt that LBJ was a Zionist and put Israel's needs first. Writing that list would take a long time.On November 21, 1963, a government informant named Thomas Mosley was negotiating the sale of machine guns to a Cuban exile named Echevarria. In the course of the transaction, Echevarria said that “we now have plenty of money – our new backers are Jews” and would close the arms deal “as soon as we [or they] take care of Kennedy.” The next day, Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas.You wont see that in Oliver Stone's film on JFK of course the Executive producer of that film was Arnon Milchan, Israel's largest arms dealer. It is unfortunate but many laymen JFK researcher use that film as their initiation.Echevarria's words are often associated with the Mocone -Rowley memo. CD 498 [Rowley memorandum| which does reference it. It goes on to explain how the conversation was interrupted by other bus drivers. The follow up interview with the informant is of course classified.Furthermore this adds. “I further told Mr Johnson that the informant had worked with us in a recent counterfeiting Case and had proved to be reliable.”However the primary source is a Secret Service ReportSpecial Agent Joseph E Noonan.What is the Jewish (mafia/state) doing mixed up with anti-Castro Cuban exiles who were illegally buying arms? And why isn't this pre Kennedy assassination foreknowledge more well known? Oh but you see it is, only the Jews part is usually removed. I don't think researchers should omit this just to be Politically Correct. The international angle and Johnson's deep ties with Israel and Israel's motives to kill not only JFK but RFK as well, is seldom explored. Stone's movie doesn't even mention middle eastern policy or Israel and instead focuses on the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam. I think enough eyeballs have been over every inch of those theories for over 5 decades. I have a working theory that cleanly ties both assassinations together. But I am censored on everything.How Israel stole the bomb and killed JFKI need you to subscribe, it is just $6 a month less if you sign up for a year. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.ryandawson.org/subscribe

I love records. But I love records because I love music. And sometimes, in fact often, great music doesn't get pressed on vinyl. And that's ok! That's why Bandcamp is so great. It's endless in how much great stuff is available there. Here's just a small sampling of the beautiful music I've found that as far as I know, has not been pressed onto vinyl, but is available digitally if you seek it out. Tracklist: Jazzbois, Nautilus, Raffy Bushman, Okonski, Soil Pimp Sessions, Chicago Soul Jazz Collective, Sunstrider

Original text by Darin Adler. An overview of the Motorola MEK6800D2 single board computer/development kit. Roger Heinen “engineers are a dime a dozen” story from episode 40 of the Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs Podcast. The General Magic documentary is a good hard look at how General Magic fizzled out, though it somehow managed to survive long enough to power the General Motors OnStar service. Darin Adler later joined the Nautilus (a.k.a. the GNOME desktop file manager) development team with Andy Hertzfeld at Eazel. Demonstration. Bryan Cantrill recounts the object-oriented operating system craze of the 1990s and counts the corpses: Spring, Taligent, Copland, and JavaOS. Lisa Melton recounts crisis management at Eazel and the history of the Safari and WebKit project on episode 11 of the Debug podcast. Waldemar Horwat went on to head JavaScript development at Netscape. Like many other eerily smart math and programming language types, he now works at Google.

In this special episode of Dave Does History, host Dave Bowman dives into the revolutionary impact of the USS Nautilus, launched on January 21, 1954, as the world's first nuclear-powered submarine. From its groundbreaking design and Admiral Hyman Rickover's visionary leadership to its operational challenges and Cold War-era accomplishments, this episode explores how the Nautilus redefined submarine warfare and naval strategy.

In this episode of Professional Carwashing & Detailing's Wash Talk, host Brian Ankney welcomed Amayr Babar and Ali Sareini, co-founders of Nautilus, to discuss how selling carwashes online increase ticket sales as well as facilitate upselling, such as single washes converting to bundled wash books with just one click.

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell and attorney Eric Bland talk about the horrors of the Los Angeles wildfires and how Big Insurance, as well as systemic failures in government preparation have made a catastrophic situation even worse.  Closer to home, the three talk about the success of Luna Shark's billboard blitz in the hopes of seeking answers in the Stephen Smith case (not to mention Sandy Smith's decision to increase the reward to $50,000 for information leading to arrests in her son's murder case).  Also on the show, a federal jury found Cory Fleming liable for his part in Alex Murdaugh's scheme to steal millions from Gloria Satterfield's family, but is HE the biggest loser to emerge from the Nautilus trial? Or did the insurance company waste untold amounts of time and money in launching an easily predictable losing battle over something that may ultimately be their own fault?  Plus, the latest in the Mica Francis case: Emails and texts show that JP MIller — and his right hand woman Tricia Ross — accused an Horry County Police Department officer of being at fault for Mica's death. AND Wayne Miller's odd real estate connection to Mica's divorce attorney Regina Ward — who also represented Mica's family in the fight over who would be personal representative for Mica. 

Today's poem is The Paper Nautilus by Marianne Moore. The Slowdown is your daily poetry ritual. In this episode, Major writes… “Treat poetry like a rollercoaster. You may not know the laws of physics, but it does not prevent you from enjoying the ride. Poetry values ambiguity and it is okay not to know all of its layers.” Celebrate the power of poems with a gift to The Slowdown today. Every donation makes a difference: https://tinyurl.com/rjm4synp

Investigative journalists — and proud “podcasters” — Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell reveal the latest in the Mica Francis story, starting with emails from JP Miller and his sidekick Tricia Ross that were sent to police days after Mica's death, urging the police to investigate one of their own in connection to Mica's death.  Yes, seriously. Turns out May 2 was a very bad day for JP Miller. Not only did he have to explain himself to his partners at the Myrtle Beach bar he had a stake in, he seemed to be on a war path as he pointed his finger at Heather Wilson, his alleged former ally at Horry County Police Department. JP — demonstrating once again that he thinks the police work directly for him — wanted the department to investigate Heather for Mica's death because she is the mother of the man Mica was hanging out with on March 11 and the man who JP later called and berated.  Mandy and Liz share the first installment of the texts and emails that came back from reporter Beth Braden's FOIA for communications between JP and the police. Also on the show, how did the waterfront home in Myrtle Beach that Wayne Miller tried to get the courts to force an octogenarian widow who was thought to have dementia to sell end up getting sold to attorney Regina Ward … the attorney who represented Mica in her pending divorce and later Mica's family in their quest to hold JP and his church accountable? We have the scoop — including an interview between Beth and Regina.  Plus, the latest in the Nautilus trial, which had Cory Fleming back up on the stand this week in federal court... and ultimately the jury came back with a verdict in Nautilus' favor, declaring that Cory Fleming owes them $1.25 Million in compensatory damages plus $50.00 in punitive damages.  Stay Tuned, Stay Pesky and Stay in the Sunlight...☀️ Episode Resources Jury decides Cory Fleming is liable for role in Murdaugh insurance scheme, owes $1.25M “Trial begins for Fleming in insurance accusation civil case” - Live5, Jan 6, 2025 “‘In my mind, that was deception': insurance expert testifies in Fleming case” - Live5, Jan 7, 2025 Alex Murdaugh's $14.8 Million Nautilus Judgement - Jan 2, 2025 911 Calls after Mica Francis' Death Timeline Exposing Dirty Southern Money Facebook Page If you are in crisis, please call, text or chat with the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988, or contact the Crisis Text Line by texting TALK to 741741. Premium Members also get access to ad-free listening, searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. If you are in crisis, please call, text or chat with the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988, or contact the Crisis Text Line by texting TALK to 741741. What We're Buying... Eric Bland's New Book!!! - Mandy's Book in Paperback!! - Marcia Clark's New Book - Amanda Knox's New Book - Tamron Hall's New Book - Erin Lee Carr's Book Peloton - onepeloton.com Find your push. Find your power with Peloton at onepeloton.com. Here's a link to some of our favorite things: https://amzn.to/4cJ0eVn And a special thank you to our other amazing sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, and VUORI. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! *** ALERT: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send fun merch to the first listener that finds something that needs to be adjusted! This episode was edited thanks to Ashlynn R. near 42:00 *** For current & accurate updates: bsky.app/profile/mandy-matney.com | bsky.app/profile/elizfarrell.com TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/TrueSunlightPod Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia tiktok.com/@lunasharkmedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell — and attorney Eric Bland — are BACK and ready to take on the New Year.  This 112th episode of COJ covers a range of topics, starting with a look back at the holidays. Premium members get a special discussion on Liz's snow day adventures, Mandy's aversion to winter, and Eric's past commuting woes in Philadelphia…and we'll touch on the dangers of public transportation in New York. This week Alex Murdaugh's best friend and co-conspirator Cory Fleming is back in federal court for the Nautilus case … but why? What defense could he possibly offer the insurance company that says Alex and Cory swindled them out of $3.8 million in the Satterfield scheme? Last week, Alex ended Nautilus' claim against him with a confession of judgment worth $14.8 million … meaning, things could get really bad for Cory. And yet he's still going for it. We also delve into the confusing aspects of the case, such as the role of the insurance companies and their handling of the initial claim and the potential for other co-conspirators to be revealed, especially if Cory Fleming or Alex Murdaugh provides testimony. Finally, the hosts shift gears to discuss the controversy surrounding Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, including Lively's initial complaint and Baldoni's defamation lawsuit. We'll dive into where the three land on who “the bad guy” is here.  Plus, Sandy Smith plans to increase the reward in the search for her son's killers as more people take notice of the Stephen Smith billboards that LUNASHARK has funded throughout South Carolina. More to come on that and a new event planned for July soon so stay tuned!

Alex Murdaugh, a once-powerful attorney whose life unraveled into a whirlwind of scandal, deceit, and tragedy, has been ordered to pay $14.8 million to Nautilus Insurance Company. This federal court judgment underscores the far-reaching consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent schemes, including one involving the tragic death of his family's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. For many, this marks a critical chapter in the ongoing saga of a man whose actions have left a trail of financial ruin, broken trust, and unanswered questions. The judgment, issued by a federal court, followed Murdaugh's decision not to contest the lawsuit filed by Nautilus. His admission that he could not pay the judgment and that mounting a defense would be a waste of the court's time speaks volumes about his current state—a sharp fall from grace for a man once revered in South Carolina's legal circles. This latest development centers on an insurance claim Murdaugh orchestrated after Satterfield's death in 2018. According to court records, Satterfield died following a fall at the Murdaugh residence, an incident that Murdaugh falsely attributed to the family's dogs to secure a hefty insurance payout. The funds, however, never reached Satterfield's heirs; instead, they were funneled into Murdaugh's personal accounts. Fraudulent Claim and Legal Fallout The circumstances surrounding Gloria Satterfield's death and the subsequent insurance claim reveal the depth of Murdaugh's deceit. Satterfield, a longtime housekeeper for the Murdaugh family, reportedly tripped over the family's dogs and suffered fatal injuries. Murdaugh, presenting himself as a grieving employer, encouraged Satterfield's sons to sue him for insurance money, claiming it would provide them financial support. Behind the scenes, Murdaugh had already devised a plan to pocket the settlement funds. Nautilus Insurance Company, which issued the $4.3 million policy payout, later discovered Murdaugh's fraudulent activities and filed a lawsuit to recover the funds. The lawsuit accused Murdaugh of “entering a complex web of deceit” to enrich himself at the expense of the Satterfield family and the insurer. With the federal court's default judgment, Nautilus secured not only the repayment of the original settlement but also additional damages and legal fees, bringing the total to $14.8 million. Murdaugh's Response In court, Murdaugh's response was strikingly subdued. He acknowledged his inability to pay the judgment and refrained from contesting the claims, suggesting that doing so would only prolong the inevitable. His legal strategy, or lack thereof, highlights the precarious position he now finds himself in—a stark contrast to the powerful and well-connected lawyer he once was. Murdaugh's decision not to mount a defense could also be seen as a tacit admission of guilt, further solidifying the damning narrative that has emerged over the past few years. A History of Scandal and Deception The Nautilus judgment is only the latest chapter in Murdaugh's long and sordid history of legal and financial troubles. Once a respected figure in South Carolina's Lowcountry, Murdaugh's reputation began to crumble in 2021 when he was implicated in a series of financial crimes. These included embezzling millions of dollars from his law firm, clients, and even family members. The revelations came to light following the shocking murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at the family's hunting estate. Initially presenting himself as a grieving husband and father, Murdaugh's involvement in their deaths led to his eventual conviction and life sentence for murder. Murdaugh's financial crimes came to light in part because of the Satterfield case. Her sons—believing they were due the insurance settlement—questioned why they had never received the money. Their inquiries prompted legal scrutiny, ultimately unraveling the intricate web of fraud Murdaugh had woven. In addition to the Nautilus lawsuit, Murdaugh faces numerous other civil and criminal cases, ranging from embezzlement to conspiracy. Implications of the Judgment The $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh carries significant implications, not just for him but also for ongoing investigations and related legal proceedings. Financially, the judgment adds another layer of debt to Murdaugh's already crumbling estate. With his assets frozen and his once-lucrative career in ruins, the likelihood of Nautilus recovering the full amount seems slim. However, the judgment sends a clear message about the consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent actions and serves as a vindication for Satterfield's family, who have long sought justice. Legally, the judgment could influence other cases involving Murdaugh. It establishes a precedent for holding him accountable for his financial misdeeds, potentially strengthening the positions of other plaintiffs seeking restitution. Moreover, it underscores the broader impact of Murdaugh's actions, which have left a lasting scar on South Carolina's legal and financial landscape. Broader Context: The Murdaugh Legacy To fully grasp the significance of the Nautilus judgment, one must understand the broader context of the Murdaugh family's legacy. For decades, the Murdaughs wielded considerable influence in South Carolina's Lowcountry, with generations of family members serving as solicitors, the region's equivalent of district attorneys. Their name was synonymous with power, wealth, and legal expertise. Alex Murdaugh, the scion of this dynasty, inherited not only the family's legal acumen but also its darker tendencies—a penchant for bending the rules and exploiting their privileged position. The unraveling of the Murdaugh legacy began with the death of Paul Murdaugh's friend Mallory Beach in a 2019 boating accident. Paul, who was allegedly intoxicated at the time, faced criminal charges, but the family's influence initially shielded him from accountability. The incident set off a chain of events that would ultimately expose Alex Murdaugh's criminal activities and lead to his downfall. From the Satterfield case to the financial crimes and the double homicide, the Murdaugh story is one of a family brought low by its own hubris and greed. Psychological and Social Ramifications Beyond the legal and financial consequences, the Murdaugh saga raises profound psychological and social questions. What drives a man like Alex Murdaugh—a product of privilege and power—to engage in such destructive behavior? Was it a sense of entitlement, a desperate attempt to maintain his lifestyle, or something darker? The case also sheds light on the vulnerabilities in legal and financial systems that allowed Murdaugh to perpetrate his schemes for so long. It is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the human cost of corruption. Looking Ahead As the legal proceedings against Alex Murdaugh continue, the $14.8 million judgment serves as a stark reminder of the far-reaching impact of his actions. For the Satterfield family, it is a step toward closure, though the financial and emotional toll remains immeasurable. For South Carolina's legal community, it is an opportunity to reflect on the systemic failures that enabled Murdaugh's crimes and to implement safeguards against future abuses of power. The story of Alex Murdaugh is far from over. With each new revelation, the complex web of deceit and betrayal grows more tangled, leaving a legacy that will be studied and debated for years to come. In the end, the judgment against Murdaugh is not just about money; it is about accountability, justice, and the hope that even in the darkest of times, the truth will prevail. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Alex Murdaugh, a once-powerful attorney whose life unraveled into a whirlwind of scandal, deceit, and tragedy, has been ordered to pay $14.8 million to Nautilus Insurance Company. This federal court judgment underscores the far-reaching consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent schemes, including one involving the tragic death of his family's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. For many, this marks a critical chapter in the ongoing saga of a man whose actions have left a trail of financial ruin, broken trust, and unanswered questions. The judgment, issued by a federal court, followed Murdaugh's decision not to contest the lawsuit filed by Nautilus. His admission that he could not pay the judgment and that mounting a defense would be a waste of the court's time speaks volumes about his current state—a sharp fall from grace for a man once revered in South Carolina's legal circles. This latest development centers on an insurance claim Murdaugh orchestrated after Satterfield's death in 2018. According to court records, Satterfield died following a fall at the Murdaugh residence, an incident that Murdaugh falsely attributed to the family's dogs to secure a hefty insurance payout. The funds, however, never reached Satterfield's heirs; instead, they were funneled into Murdaugh's personal accounts. Fraudulent Claim and Legal Fallout The circumstances surrounding Gloria Satterfield's death and the subsequent insurance claim reveal the depth of Murdaugh's deceit. Satterfield, a longtime housekeeper for the Murdaugh family, reportedly tripped over the family's dogs and suffered fatal injuries. Murdaugh, presenting himself as a grieving employer, encouraged Satterfield's sons to sue him for insurance money, claiming it would provide them financial support. Behind the scenes, Murdaugh had already devised a plan to pocket the settlement funds. Nautilus Insurance Company, which issued the $4.3 million policy payout, later discovered Murdaugh's fraudulent activities and filed a lawsuit to recover the funds. The lawsuit accused Murdaugh of “entering a complex web of deceit” to enrich himself at the expense of the Satterfield family and the insurer. With the federal court's default judgment, Nautilus secured not only the repayment of the original settlement but also additional damages and legal fees, bringing the total to $14.8 million. Murdaugh's Response In court, Murdaugh's response was strikingly subdued. He acknowledged his inability to pay the judgment and refrained from contesting the claims, suggesting that doing so would only prolong the inevitable. His legal strategy, or lack thereof, highlights the precarious position he now finds himself in—a stark contrast to the powerful and well-connected lawyer he once was. Murdaugh's decision not to mount a defense could also be seen as a tacit admission of guilt, further solidifying the damning narrative that has emerged over the past few years. A History of Scandal and Deception The Nautilus judgment is only the latest chapter in Murdaugh's long and sordid history of legal and financial troubles. Once a respected figure in South Carolina's Lowcountry, Murdaugh's reputation began to crumble in 2021 when he was implicated in a series of financial crimes. These included embezzling millions of dollars from his law firm, clients, and even family members. The revelations came to light following the shocking murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at the family's hunting estate. Initially presenting himself as a grieving husband and father, Murdaugh's involvement in their deaths led to his eventual conviction and life sentence for murder. Murdaugh's financial crimes came to light in part because of the Satterfield case. Her sons—believing they were due the insurance settlement—questioned why they had never received the money. Their inquiries prompted legal scrutiny, ultimately unraveling the intricate web of fraud Murdaugh had woven. In addition to the Nautilus lawsuit, Murdaugh faces numerous other civil and criminal cases, ranging from embezzlement to conspiracy. Implications of the Judgment The $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh carries significant implications, not just for him but also for ongoing investigations and related legal proceedings. Financially, the judgment adds another layer of debt to Murdaugh's already crumbling estate. With his assets frozen and his once-lucrative career in ruins, the likelihood of Nautilus recovering the full amount seems slim. However, the judgment sends a clear message about the consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent actions and serves as a vindication for Satterfield's family, who have long sought justice. Legally, the judgment could influence other cases involving Murdaugh. It establishes a precedent for holding him accountable for his financial misdeeds, potentially strengthening the positions of other plaintiffs seeking restitution. Moreover, it underscores the broader impact of Murdaugh's actions, which have left a lasting scar on South Carolina's legal and financial landscape. Broader Context: The Murdaugh Legacy To fully grasp the significance of the Nautilus judgment, one must understand the broader context of the Murdaugh family's legacy. For decades, the Murdaughs wielded considerable influence in South Carolina's Lowcountry, with generations of family members serving as solicitors, the region's equivalent of district attorneys. Their name was synonymous with power, wealth, and legal expertise. Alex Murdaugh, the scion of this dynasty, inherited not only the family's legal acumen but also its darker tendencies—a penchant for bending the rules and exploiting their privileged position. The unraveling of the Murdaugh legacy began with the death of Paul Murdaugh's friend Mallory Beach in a 2019 boating accident. Paul, who was allegedly intoxicated at the time, faced criminal charges, but the family's influence initially shielded him from accountability. The incident set off a chain of events that would ultimately expose Alex Murdaugh's criminal activities and lead to his downfall. From the Satterfield case to the financial crimes and the double homicide, the Murdaugh story is one of a family brought low by its own hubris and greed. Psychological and Social Ramifications Beyond the legal and financial consequences, the Murdaugh saga raises profound psychological and social questions. What drives a man like Alex Murdaugh—a product of privilege and power—to engage in such destructive behavior? Was it a sense of entitlement, a desperate attempt to maintain his lifestyle, or something darker? The case also sheds light on the vulnerabilities in legal and financial systems that allowed Murdaugh to perpetrate his schemes for so long. It is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the human cost of corruption. Looking Ahead As the legal proceedings against Alex Murdaugh continue, the $14.8 million judgment serves as a stark reminder of the far-reaching impact of his actions. For the Satterfield family, it is a step toward closure, though the financial and emotional toll remains immeasurable. For South Carolina's legal community, it is an opportunity to reflect on the systemic failures that enabled Murdaugh's crimes and to implement safeguards against future abuses of power. The story of Alex Murdaugh is far from over. With each new revelation, the complex web of deceit and betrayal grows more tangled, leaving a legacy that will be studied and debated for years to come. In the end, the judgment against Murdaugh is not just about money; it is about accountability, justice, and the hope that even in the darkest of times, the truth will prevail.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Alex Murdaugh, a once-powerful attorney whose life unraveled into a whirlwind of scandal, deceit, and tragedy, has been ordered to pay $14.8 million to Nautilus Insurance Company. This federal court judgment underscores the far-reaching consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent schemes, including one involving the tragic death of his family's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. For many, this marks a critical chapter in the ongoing saga of a man whose actions have left a trail of financial ruin, broken trust, and unanswered questions. The judgment, issued by a federal court, followed Murdaugh's decision not to contest the lawsuit filed by Nautilus. His admission that he could not pay the judgment and that mounting a defense would be a waste of the court's time speaks volumes about his current state—a sharp fall from grace for a man once revered in South Carolina's legal circles. This latest development centers on an insurance claim Murdaugh orchestrated after Satterfield's death in 2018. According to court records, Satterfield died following a fall at the Murdaugh residence, an incident that Murdaugh falsely attributed to the family's dogs to secure a hefty insurance payout. The funds, however, never reached Satterfield's heirs; instead, they were funneled into Murdaugh's personal accounts. Fraudulent Claim and Legal Fallout The circumstances surrounding Gloria Satterfield's death and the subsequent insurance claim reveal the depth of Murdaugh's deceit. Satterfield, a longtime housekeeper for the Murdaugh family, reportedly tripped over the family's dogs and suffered fatal injuries. Murdaugh, presenting himself as a grieving employer, encouraged Satterfield's sons to sue him for insurance money, claiming it would provide them financial support. Behind the scenes, Murdaugh had already devised a plan to pocket the settlement funds. Nautilus Insurance Company, which issued the $4.3 million policy payout, later discovered Murdaugh's fraudulent activities and filed a lawsuit to recover the funds. The lawsuit accused Murdaugh of “entering a complex web of deceit” to enrich himself at the expense of the Satterfield family and the insurer. With the federal court's default judgment, Nautilus secured not only the repayment of the original settlement but also additional damages and legal fees, bringing the total to $14.8 million. Murdaugh's Response In court, Murdaugh's response was strikingly subdued. He acknowledged his inability to pay the judgment and refrained from contesting the claims, suggesting that doing so would only prolong the inevitable. His legal strategy, or lack thereof, highlights the precarious position he now finds himself in—a stark contrast to the powerful and well-connected lawyer he once was. Murdaugh's decision not to mount a defense could also be seen as a tacit admission of guilt, further solidifying the damning narrative that has emerged over the past few years. A History of Scandal and Deception The Nautilus judgment is only the latest chapter in Murdaugh's long and sordid history of legal and financial troubles. Once a respected figure in South Carolina's Lowcountry, Murdaugh's reputation began to crumble in 2021 when he was implicated in a series of financial crimes. These included embezzling millions of dollars from his law firm, clients, and even family members. The revelations came to light following the shocking murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at the family's hunting estate. Initially presenting himself as a grieving husband and father, Murdaugh's involvement in their deaths led to his eventual conviction and life sentence for murder. Murdaugh's financial crimes came to light in part because of the Satterfield case. Her sons—believing they were due the insurance settlement—questioned why they had never received the money. Their inquiries prompted legal scrutiny, ultimately unraveling the intricate web of fraud Murdaugh had woven. In addition to the Nautilus lawsuit, Murdaugh faces numerous other civil and criminal cases, ranging from embezzlement to conspiracy. Implications of the Judgment The $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh carries significant implications, not just for him but also for ongoing investigations and related legal proceedings. Financially, the judgment adds another layer of debt to Murdaugh's already crumbling estate. With his assets frozen and his once-lucrative career in ruins, the likelihood of Nautilus recovering the full amount seems slim. However, the judgment sends a clear message about the consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent actions and serves as a vindication for Satterfield's family, who have long sought justice. Legally, the judgment could influence other cases involving Murdaugh. It establishes a precedent for holding him accountable for his financial misdeeds, potentially strengthening the positions of other plaintiffs seeking restitution. Moreover, it underscores the broader impact of Murdaugh's actions, which have left a lasting scar on South Carolina's legal and financial landscape. Broader Context: The Murdaugh Legacy To fully grasp the significance of the Nautilus judgment, one must understand the broader context of the Murdaugh family's legacy. For decades, the Murdaughs wielded considerable influence in South Carolina's Lowcountry, with generations of family members serving as solicitors, the region's equivalent of district attorneys. Their name was synonymous with power, wealth, and legal expertise. Alex Murdaugh, the scion of this dynasty, inherited not only the family's legal acumen but also its darker tendencies—a penchant for bending the rules and exploiting their privileged position. The unraveling of the Murdaugh legacy began with the death of Paul Murdaugh's friend Mallory Beach in a 2019 boating accident. Paul, who was allegedly intoxicated at the time, faced criminal charges, but the family's influence initially shielded him from accountability. The incident set off a chain of events that would ultimately expose Alex Murdaugh's criminal activities and lead to his downfall. From the Satterfield case to the financial crimes and the double homicide, the Murdaugh story is one of a family brought low by its own hubris and greed. Psychological and Social Ramifications Beyond the legal and financial consequences, the Murdaugh saga raises profound psychological and social questions. What drives a man like Alex Murdaugh—a product of privilege and power—to engage in such destructive behavior? Was it a sense of entitlement, a desperate attempt to maintain his lifestyle, or something darker? The case also sheds light on the vulnerabilities in legal and financial systems that allowed Murdaugh to perpetrate his schemes for so long. It is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the human cost of corruption. Looking Ahead As the legal proceedings against Alex Murdaugh continue, the $14.8 million judgment serves as a stark reminder of the far-reaching impact of his actions. For the Satterfield family, it is a step toward closure, though the financial and emotional toll remains immeasurable. For South Carolina's legal community, it is an opportunity to reflect on the systemic failures that enabled Murdaugh's crimes and to implement safeguards against future abuses of power. The story of Alex Murdaugh is far from over. With each new revelation, the complex web of deceit and betrayal grows more tangled, leaving a legacy that will be studied and debated for years to come. In the end, the judgment against Murdaugh is not just about money; it is about accountability, justice, and the hope that even in the darkest of times, the truth will prevail. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

The Mica Francis case takes another turn as Solid Rock moves to "The Rate Hole". Questions continue to be raised about what Myrtle Beach Pastor JP Miller knew about his estranged wife's death on the night her body was found in a North Carolina swamp … and when he knew it. Are those questions fair? Are they warranted? Are they just the beginning to figuring out what happened to Mica Francis in April 2024? Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell take a second look at old pieces of the puzzle and put them together with new information and offer their perspective on how investigators regarded JP Miller from the very beginning and why it seemed to rattle him. Also on the show, an update on Russell Laffitte's federal retrial and his attorney's infamous delay tactics, as well as the possibility of South Carolina Attorney General's Office prosecutor Creighton Waters getting his turn at putting Russell behind bars sooner rather than later.  Plus, Cory Fleming prepares for his restitution hearing, Nautilus insurance asks a federal judge to make Cory and his former law firm pay them millions for the Satterfield heist. And why it's time for an investigation to be opened into Chris Skinner's death. Also! Our cup of justice co-host Eric Bland is having a Book Signing This Saturday 12/7 at noon In Beaufort, SC Click for Details! Premium Episode Resources Jason Clarke casting article in Deadline Russell Laffitte's Nov 14, 2024 Order for New Federal Trial - Premium File EB's book “Anything but Bland” The Rat Hole in Myrtle Beach Why is Mica Miller's Church Hiding This Sermon? John Paul Millers Lost Sermon Robbie Harvey YouTube Channel Russell Laffitte's Dec 4, 2024 Joint Status Report - Premium File Cory Fleming's Dec 2, 2024 Preliminary Evidence List - Premium File Chris Skinner Drowning Investigation - Premium File NewsNation Interview with JP Miller True Sunlight Episode 60  JP Miller on Flodaddyflo's TikTok Mica Francis Death Investigation Release - May 7, 2024 - Premium File Stay Tuned, Stay Pesky and Stay in the Sunlight...☀️ Luna Shark Premium today at Lunashark.Supercast.com. Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. If you are in crisis, please call, text or chat with the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988, or contact the Crisis Text Line by texting TALK to 741741. What We're Buying... Eric Bland's New Book!!! - Mandy's Book in Paperback!! - Marcia Clark's New Book - Amanda Knox's New Book - Tamron Hall's New Book - Erin Lee Carr's Book Peloton - onepeloton.com Find your push. Find your power with Peloton at onepeloton.com. Here's a link to some of our favorite things: https://amzn.to/4cJ0eVn And a special thank you to our other amazing sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, and VUORI. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! *** ALERT: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send fun merch to the first listener that finds something that needs to be adjusted! *** For current & accurate updates: TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/TrueSunlightPod Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia tiktok.com/@lunasharkmedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices