Podcasts about rulings

Host Mike Shields and ad consultant Emily Riley return to break down the major developments in media and advertising, from the Google antitrust trial to the latest on Google's cookie changes.

Rulings in Kouri Richins delays her trial indefinitely Donna Adleson's trial could be delayed Rulings on the death penalty, 911 call, and text messages in the Bryan Kohberger case Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

Documents and Responsa from across the Jewish world reveal that for centuries Jews discussed, debated and disagreed over the Shabbos Eruv Walled cities, canals, telegraph poles, Kabbala, fires and powerful secular rulers all played their role and affected entire communities. And from the 19th century onwards, strong personalities would influence and colour the narrative.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Erevin and Halacha 03:04 Understanding the Concept of Erevin 05:53 Historical Context of Erevin 08:54 Disputes and Rulings on Erevin 11:48 Erevin in Different Regions 14:55 The Role of Authority in Erevin 17:53 Contemporary Applications of Erevin 21:05 The Historical Context of Eruvin in Jewish Communities 24:41 Challenges and Innovations in Eruvin Construction 28:03 The Evolution of Eruvin in Krakow 36:00 Eruvin in the New World: St. Louis Case Study

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf

Hans and Robby are back again this week with a brand new episode! This week, they discuss the top IRA rulings of 2024.  Don't forget to get your copy of “The Complete Cardinal Guide to Planning for and Living in Retirement” on Amazon or on CardinalGuide.com for free! You can contact Hans and Cardinal by emailing hans@cardinalguide.com or calling 919-535-8261. Learn more at CardinalGuide.com. Find us on YouTube: Cardinal Advisors.

Ten Game-Changing Rulings in the Bryan Kohberger Trial You Need to Know In a pivotal moment for the State of Idaho vs. Bryan Kohberger, the court has officially ruled on a wave of major motions that will shape the upcoming trial over the brutal University of Idaho student murders. In this deep-dive video, we break down exactly what evidence the jury will hear, including explosive expert testimony, digital forensic analysis, and never-before-heard communications from the surviving roommates inside the King Road house on the night of the killings. One of the biggest developments? Bryan Kohberger's defense team attempted to remove the death penalty, arguing that his diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) made capital punishment unconstitutional in his case. The judge denied that motion, making it clear that ASD does not qualify for the same legal protections as intellectual disability under Atkins v. Virginia—a precedent-setting move in Idaho. Meanwhile, the court approved a wide range of expert witnesses for the prosecution, despite objections from the defense. The jury is now expected to hear testimony from: FBI CAST Agent Nicholas Ballance, who analyzed Kohberger's cell phone tower data and drive testing results to place him near the scene before and after the crime. Cellebrite forensic specialists Heather and Jared Barnhart, who uncovered abnormal gaps in Kohberger's digital activity, potentially suggesting deleted data or anti-forensic behavior. FBI forensic accountant Michael Douglass, who tracked shifts in Kohberger's financial behavior, including his sudden switch from debit card usage to cash withdrawals. ISP detective Darren Gilbertson, who conducted physical timed walkthroughs of 1122 King Road, proving one person could allegedly carry out the crimes in under four minutes. Toxicology expert Dr. Gary Dawson, who challenges the multiple-attacker theory by analyzing the victims' level of intoxication during the homicides. But perhaps the most emotionally impactful ruling relates to what the jury will now hear from D.M. and B.F., the two surviving roommates. The court ruled that text messages sent between 4:22 a.m. and 4:26 a.m.—in which D.M. described a man in a ski mask and her intense fear—are admissible under hearsay exceptions. These messages, sent in real time during the murders, offer a raw glimpse into the trauma unfolding inside the house before the bodies were discovered. We also cover the 911 call made nearly 8 hours later, which has been under intense public scrutiny. The court has ruled that most of the call is admissible, and the transcript will be shown alongside the audio in court—but with a few redactions, pending further evidentiary foundation. This detailed breakdown offers everything you need to know about the latest legal developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, including how forensic science, digital evidence, psychological defenses, and real-time trauma responses are converging to form the core of this historic and chilling true crime trial. If you're following the University of Idaho murder trial, the Kohberger defense strategy, or how courts weigh psychological disorders in capital cases, this video provides the clearest and most comprehensive analysis available. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KohbergerTrial #UniversityOfIdaho #KohbergerEvidence #ForensicAnalysis #ExpertWitnesses #911Call #RoommateTestimony #TrueCrime    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Ten Game-Changing Rulings in the Bryan Kohberger Trial You Need to Know In a pivotal moment for the State of Idaho vs. Bryan Kohberger, the court has officially ruled on a wave of major motions that will shape the upcoming trial over the brutal University of Idaho student murders. In this deep-dive video, we break down exactly what evidence the jury will hear, including explosive expert testimony, digital forensic analysis, and never-before-heard communications from the surviving roommates inside the King Road house on the night of the killings. One of the biggest developments? Bryan Kohberger's defense team attempted to remove the death penalty, arguing that his diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) made capital punishment unconstitutional in his case. The judge denied that motion, making it clear that ASD does not qualify for the same legal protections as intellectual disability under Atkins v. Virginia—a precedent-setting move in Idaho. Meanwhile, the court approved a wide range of expert witnesses for the prosecution, despite objections from the defense. The jury is now expected to hear testimony from: FBI CAST Agent Nicholas Ballance, who analyzed Kohberger's cell phone tower data and drive testing results to place him near the scene before and after the crime. Cellebrite forensic specialists Heather and Jared Barnhart, who uncovered abnormal gaps in Kohberger's digital activity, potentially suggesting deleted data or anti-forensic behavior. FBI forensic accountant Michael Douglass, who tracked shifts in Kohberger's financial behavior, including his sudden switch from debit card usage to cash withdrawals. ISP detective Darren Gilbertson, who conducted physical timed walkthroughs of 1122 King Road, proving one person could allegedly carry out the crimes in under four minutes. Toxicology expert Dr. Gary Dawson, who challenges the multiple-attacker theory by analyzing the victims' level of intoxication during the homicides. But perhaps the most emotionally impactful ruling relates to what the jury will now hear from D.M. and B.F., the two surviving roommates. The court ruled that text messages sent between 4:22 a.m. and 4:26 a.m.—in which D.M. described a man in a ski mask and her intense fear—are admissible under hearsay exceptions. These messages, sent in real time during the murders, offer a raw glimpse into the trauma unfolding inside the house before the bodies were discovered. We also cover the 911 call made nearly 8 hours later, which has been under intense public scrutiny. The court has ruled that most of the call is admissible, and the transcript will be shown alongside the audio in court—but with a few redactions, pending further evidentiary foundation. This detailed breakdown offers everything you need to know about the latest legal developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, including how forensic science, digital evidence, psychological defenses, and real-time trauma responses are converging to form the core of this historic and chilling true crime trial. If you're following the University of Idaho murder trial, the Kohberger defense strategy, or how courts weigh psychological disorders in capital cases, this video provides the clearest and most comprehensive analysis available. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KohbergerTrial #UniversityOfIdaho #KohbergerEvidence #ForensicAnalysis #ExpertWitnesses #911Call #RoommateTestimony #TrueCrime    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf

​On April 24, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler issued a ruling on the admissibility of key evidence in the trial of Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The judge determined that the majority of the 911 call made by one of the surviving roommates could be presented to the jury, as it falls under exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as present sense impression and excited utterance. However, certain portions of the call, including statements made by an unidentified woman relaying secondhand information, were deemed inadmissible due to lack of firsthand knowledge and contemporaneity. Additionally, the judge allowed the use of a transcript of the 911 call as a demonstrative aid during the trial, provided it is properly authenticated and accompanied by appropriate jury instructions. ​Regarding text messages exchanged between the two surviving roommates, D.M. and B.F., the court found that many of these messages are admissible under the same hearsay exceptions. These texts, sent in the early hours of November 13, 2022, include descriptions of a masked intruder and expressions of fear and confusion, which the court considered to be spontaneous reactions to a startling event. The judge emphasized that the admissibility of these messages is contingent upon the prosecution establishing the necessary foundation at trial. The defense had objected to the inclusion of these messages, arguing that they lacked context and could be misleading; however, the court concluded that, when properly contextualized, they are relevant and admissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge deals more defeats to Bryan Kohberger's defense | Idaho Statesman

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On April 24, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler issued a ruling on the admissibility of key evidence in the trial of Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The judge determined that the majority of the 911 call made by one of the surviving roommates could be presented to the jury, as it falls under exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as present sense impression and excited utterance. However, certain portions of the call, including statements made by an unidentified woman relaying secondhand information, were deemed inadmissible due to lack of firsthand knowledge and contemporaneity. Additionally, the judge allowed the use of a transcript of the 911 call as a demonstrative aid during the trial, provided it is properly authenticated and accompanied by appropriate jury instructions. ​Regarding text messages exchanged between the two surviving roommates, D.M. and B.F., the court found that many of these messages are admissible under the same hearsay exceptions. These texts, sent in the early hours of November 13, 2022, include descriptions of a masked intruder and expressions of fear and confusion, which the court considered to be spontaneous reactions to a startling event. The judge emphasized that the admissibility of these messages is contingent upon the prosecution establishing the necessary foundation at trial. The defense had objected to the inclusion of these messages, arguing that they lacked context and could be misleading; however, the court concluded that, when properly contextualized, they are relevant and admissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge deals more defeats to Bryan Kohberger's defense | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ten Game-Changing Rulings in the Bryan Kohberger Trial You Need to Know In a pivotal moment for the State of Idaho vs. Bryan Kohberger, the court has officially ruled on a wave of major motions that will shape the upcoming trial over the brutal University of Idaho student murders. In this deep-dive video, we break down exactly what evidence the jury will hear, including explosive expert testimony, digital forensic analysis, and never-before-heard communications from the surviving roommates inside the King Road house on the night of the killings. One of the biggest developments? Bryan Kohberger's defense team attempted to remove the death penalty, arguing that his diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) made capital punishment unconstitutional in his case. The judge denied that motion, making it clear that ASD does not qualify for the same legal protections as intellectual disability under Atkins v. Virginia—a precedent-setting move in Idaho. Meanwhile, the court approved a wide range of expert witnesses for the prosecution, despite objections from the defense. The jury is now expected to hear testimony from: FBI CAST Agent Nicholas Ballance, who analyzed Kohberger's cell phone tower data and drive testing results to place him near the scene before and after the crime. Cellebrite forensic specialists Heather and Jared Barnhart, who uncovered abnormal gaps in Kohberger's digital activity, potentially suggesting deleted data or anti-forensic behavior. FBI forensic accountant Michael Douglass, who tracked shifts in Kohberger's financial behavior, including his sudden switch from debit card usage to cash withdrawals. ISP detective Darren Gilbertson, who conducted physical timed walkthroughs of 1122 King Road, proving one person could allegedly carry out the crimes in under four minutes. Toxicology expert Dr. Gary Dawson, who challenges the multiple-attacker theory by analyzing the victims' level of intoxication during the homicides. But perhaps the most emotionally impactful ruling relates to what the jury will now hear from D.M. and B.F., the two surviving roommates. The court ruled that text messages sent between 4:22 a.m. and 4:26 a.m.—in which D.M. described a man in a ski mask and her intense fear—are admissible under hearsay exceptions. These messages, sent in real time during the murders, offer a raw glimpse into the trauma unfolding inside the house before the bodies were discovered. We also cover the 911 call made nearly 8 hours later, which has been under intense public scrutiny. The court has ruled that most of the call is admissible, and the transcript will be shown alongside the audio in court—but with a few redactions, pending further evidentiary foundation. This detailed breakdown offers everything you need to know about the latest legal developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, including how forensic science, digital evidence, psychological defenses, and real-time trauma responses are converging to form the core of this historic and chilling true crime trial. If you're following the University of Idaho murder trial, the Kohberger defense strategy, or how courts weigh psychological disorders in capital cases, this video provides the clearest and most comprehensive analysis available. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KohbergerTrial #UniversityOfIdaho #KohbergerEvidence #ForensicAnalysis #ExpertWitnesses #911Call #RoommateTestimony #TrueCrime    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

​On April 24, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler issued a ruling on the admissibility of key evidence in the trial of Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The judge determined that the majority of the 911 call made by one of the surviving roommates could be presented to the jury, as it falls under exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as present sense impression and excited utterance. However, certain portions of the call, including statements made by an unidentified woman relaying secondhand information, were deemed inadmissible due to lack of firsthand knowledge and contemporaneity. Additionally, the judge allowed the use of a transcript of the 911 call as a demonstrative aid during the trial, provided it is properly authenticated and accompanied by appropriate jury instructions. ​Regarding text messages exchanged between the two surviving roommates, D.M. and B.F., the court found that many of these messages are admissible under the same hearsay exceptions. These texts, sent in the early hours of November 13, 2022, include descriptions of a masked intruder and expressions of fear and confusion, which the court considered to be spontaneous reactions to a startling event. The judge emphasized that the admissibility of these messages is contingent upon the prosecution establishing the necessary foundation at trial. The defense had objected to the inclusion of these messages, arguing that they lacked context and could be misleading; however, the court concluded that, when properly contextualized, they are relevant and admissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge deals more defeats to Bryan Kohberger's defense | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On this Episode of Ford News, Johnathan is BACK! After suffering a horrific car accident, Johnathan is on the mend and ready to fight MAGA once again. We start by discussing the absolute disaster that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has been. He's leaked operational details in Signal chats, all while saying repeatedly that he can't stand leakers. LOOK IN THE MIRROR! Then it's on to another cabinet member, Kristi Noem, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.  She took her family to dinner, and had her purse stolen, with cash, her passport, and her DHS ID Badge inside! This was while her Secret Service detail was "protecting" her. Congresswoman Nancy Mace got feisty with a constituent who simply wanted to know when her next town hall would be. Then, in the "Ford Fact Check," Johnathan talks about the Supreme Court Ruling that requires the government to bring back Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador. Somehow, MAGA thought this was a win. They didn't seem to read the court's opinion. LINKSPete HegsethHegseth Crisis Communication After Signalgate Was Horrible: Ex-Spokesperson - Business InsiderPete Hegseth had a meltdown: Signal gate: Pete Hegseth reportedly has a meltdown at White House Easter Egg Roll in front of his own children in a desperate plea to save his job - The Economic TimesThe Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans - The AtlanticKristi NeomHomeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's bag, including $3,000 in cash, is stolen from DC restaurant | CNN PoliticsNancy MaceNancy Mace Says ‘F*ck You' During Heated Exchange With ConstituentFord Fact CheckFacilitate vs. Effectuate: The 10-Letter Words at the Center of a Growing Constitutional Crisis - NewsweekNOEM v. ABREGO GARCIA | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteJudge skeptical that Trump's Venezuela deportation notices comply with Supreme Court rulingReplyForwardAdd reaction

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Catching up on the latest rulings in the Bryan Kohberger caseLori Daybell live stream - https://www.youtube.com/live/M1NDQWgG36I?si=oE8XvJ6pWieoCCzaDonate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

Idaho Murders Judge Sets Stage For August Trial WITH Key Rulings #hippler #kohberger #idaho4update The Idaho Murders trial is set to begin in August, following a series of legal rulings by the judge that have left many stunned. In this video, we dive into the latest developments in the case, exploring the implications of the judge's decisions and what they mean for the trial ahead. From the prosecution's strategy to the defense's next moves, we break down everything you need to know about the Idaho Murders trial.

In this episode, we take a clear and practical look at vaginal health—covering important topics like yeast infections, urinary tract infections, bacterial vaginosis, discharge, and spotting. We also explore how these common experiences relate to Islamic rulings on cleanliness, ritual purity, and worship.With expert insight on both medical and religious aspects, we aim to provide clarity on what to look out for, how to manage symptoms, and how to confidently care for your body. Whether you're seeking answers about what's medically normal or how these issues affect your spiritual practices, this conversation is designed to inform and empower.Text to get in touch!Support the showIf you enjoyed this episode, subscribe and share! To help us continue this important work, become a sustainer at www.empowherhealth.org

Progressive judges continue their lawfare against Trump but they will lose in the end.  

Send us a textAssalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh,Today we cover 4 subjectsAfter Ramadan Iman booster tafseer of Surat NurRulings on travel prayersTeachings of Muhammad (SAW)Duas for safety  Click here to join our facebook community of MuslimsIt's essential as part of our Deen that we keep increasing our knowledge of Islam and I make this promise to you that all our blog topics have carefully been written only to add beneficial Islamic knowledge to your life inshallahLearn and share with your family and friends inshallah as full reward is given for thosewho share beneficial knowledge of our beautiful Deen

In this powerful and deeply personal episode of "A Load of BS on Sport," we sit down with the legendary Nigel Owens. From his humble beginnings in a small Welsh village, where English was a second language, to becoming one of rugby's most respected referees, Nigel's journey is one of resilience and raw honesty. He opens up about the challenges of officiating high-stakes matches, his candid views on the TMO's impact on the game, and the importance of earned respect on the field.Beyond the rugby pitch, Nigel shares his deeply personal struggles with his sexuality, the isolating experience of growing up in a time of prejudice, and his battle with bulimia and depression. In a moment of profound vulnerability, he recounts his near-fatal attempt to take his own life, a stark reminder of the internal conflicts he faced.Nigel's story is a testament to the power of self-acceptance and the importance of being true to oneself. He offers invaluable advice to young people facing similar challenges, emphasising the importance of happiness and self-pride. This episode is a must-listen for anyone seeking inspiration, honesty, and a deeper understanding of the man behind the whistle. Join us as we explore the rural roots, rugby rulings, and raw honesty of Nigel Owens.If you found Nigel's story as moving and insightful as we did, please subscribe to "A Load of BS on Sport" on your favorite podcast platform. Your subscription helps us bring you more compelling conversations like this one. Don't forget to share this episode with your friends and family – Nigel's message of resilience and self-acceptance is one that everyone needs to hear. Thank you for listening!We understand that Nigel's candid discussion of mental health challenges, including depression and suicidal thoughts, may resonate with some of our listeners. If you or someone you know is struggling, please remember that you're not alone and help is available. We encourage you to reach out to the following organisations for support:UK & Ireland Support Resources:Samaritans (UK & Ireland):Provides confidential emotional support for people experiencing feelings of distress or despair.Phone: 116 123 (free, 24/7)Website: www.samaritans.orgMind (UK):Offers information and support for anyone experiencing a mental health problem.Phone: 0300 123 3393 (Monday to Friday, 9 am to 6 pm)Website: www.mind.org.ukCALM (Campaign Against Living Miserably) (UK):Specifically targets men who are struggling with their mental health.Phone: 0800 58 58 58 (daily, 5 pm to midnight)Website: www.thecalmzone.netPieta (Ireland):Provides free therapy to those engaging in self-harm, those with suicidal ideation, or those bereaved by suicide.Phone: 01 628 2111Website: www.pieta.ieAware (Ireland):provides support and information for people who experience depression and bipolar disorder.Website: www.aware.ieLGBT Foundation (UK):Provides support and information for the LGBTQ+ community.Phone: 0345 3 30 30 30Website: lgbt.foundationRemember, seeking help is a sign of strength, and there are people who care and want to support you. Please reach out if you need it. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Zachary Woodman, Alex McHugh, and Nathan Goodman join Cory Massimino for a panel on Trump's authoritarian actions on immigration, the history of immigration control and regulation, and what you can do to resist the administration's authoritarian xenophobia.   Show notes and Sources: Zachary Woodman's Segment on the Trump Administration's Actions on Immigration So Far Trump's Executive Order on the Alien Enemies Act Venezuelan Couple in Virginia Case Thrown out of Civil Court ICE disappears 48 Undocumented Migrants DC Circuit Court Judge: Nazis got more Due Process under Alien Enemies Act Legal History of Migrant's Constitutional Rights Migrants Deported for Non-Gang-Related Tattoos 90% of Migrants Deported to El Salvador Have No Criminal Record Trump's Appeal up to the Supreme Court, Supreme Court's Rulings on the matter So Far Trump Defying Court Orders Mike Johnson Floats Dissolving District Courts that Rule Against Trump on Administration House passes bill restricting district court judges from issuing nationwide injunctions MAGA Supporters Send Death Threats to Judges Trump Administration's Letter Intimidating Northwestern Law Clinic The Trump Administration's Populist Arguments in Courts Thom Homan: “What was Laken Riley's Due Process?” Trump Admin Executive Order Revoking Citizenship for Thousands of Migrants Trump Administration Pausing Green Card Applications Filipino Woman from Washington Disappeared by Border Patrol Canadian Woman Held in Custody by CBP Canada, Germany, UK Issuing Travel Warnings against United States Legal Migrant from Tampa Being Extradited to El Salvador  Columbia Student Hunted by ICE for Her Palestinian Disagreement Tufts Student Abducted by Unmarked Immigration Officials Trump Admin Revokes Legal Status for Hundreds of Student Visa Holders Three Deaths in ICE Custody at Krome Detention Center in Miami Texas Migrants Being Deported to Guantanamo Bay Luis Alberto Castillo Rivera's Legal Deposition Kristi Noem's Propaganda Video in El Salvador, which Violates National Law Opening of Migrant Detention Center in Michigan CBP's 100-Mile Border Zone ICE Targeting US Citizens Mahmoud Khalil's Public Statement of His Detention Louisiana Judge Rules Against Mouhamad Khalil, Citing Foreign Policy Authority Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order and Why it's Unconstitutional Nathan's Segment on the History of US Border Policy: Coyne and Hall: Tyranny Comes Home Border Militarization and Domestic Institutions Federal Officers Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab People In Portland, DHS Confirms Drones on the Border: Efficacy and Privacy Implications  Reece Jones, Nobody is Protected: How the Border Patrol Became the Most Dangerous Police Force in the United States US Citizens Deported on Accident Pre-Trump Kenyon Zimmer: Faces of the First Red Scare: Documenting Red Scare Deportees Alex McHugh's Segment on Resisting ICE: Tool to Find ICE Contractors Meet the ICE Contractors We Have Rights: Document and Witness ICE/CBP Abuse of Power Borderlands Relief Collective Border Kindness Al Otro Lado Woomera Quaker Meeting Raided in UK Nathan Goodman, et al: Collective Action in the Sanctuary Movement: Polycentric Protection of Central American Asylum Seekers Immigrant Legal Justice Center-Know Your Rights National Immigrant Justice Center-Know Your Rights ACLU-Know Your Rights, Immigrant Rights  

In the past week, U.S. courts have issued a pair of significant rulings on the deportation actions of the Trump administration. On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled without dissent to uphold a federal judge's order that the government must facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S. after he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador. Separately, on Friday, an immigration judge in Louisiana ruled that the government could deport Khalil, a legal U.S. resident and recent Columbia University graduate student, on national security grounds. Ad-free podcasts are here!Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story ⁠here and today's “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.Take the survey: What do you think of the recent court decisions? Let us know!You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.This podcast was written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Hunter Casperson, Kendall White, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. Our logo was created by Magdalena Bokowa, Head of Partnerships and Socials. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

WMAL GUEST: 7:05 AM - INTERVIEW - JOE DIGENOVA - legal analyst and former U.S. Attorney to the District of Columbia NO ROGUE RULINGS ACT: Mike Johnson says No Rogue Rulings Act will fix ‘real abuse’ in judicial system Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil can be deported, immigration judge rules AP: US still won’t say whether it will return mistakenly deported man, despite Supreme Court decision Where to find more about WMAL's morning show: Follow the Show Podcasts on Apple podcasts, Audible and Spotify. Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @Jgunlock, @patricepinkfile, and @heatherhunterdc. Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Show Website: https://www.wmal.com/oconnor-company/ How to listen live weekdays from 5 to 9 AM: https://www.wmal.com/listenlive/ Episode: Monday, April 14, 2025 / 7 AM Hour See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

America is sliding off the edge. Trade wars, Supreme court Rulings, I.C.E, and more. Michael Regilio and Travis Clyburn break it all down.  More at dogmadebate.com

This wild and wide-ranging episode of The Liberty Den brings together a rotating cast of Badlands Media hosts for a conversation that starts with heartfelt tribute and quickly spirals into signature late-night madness. The crew opens with a tribute to longtime Badlander Beth, reflecting on her impact in the community and the driving force behind their continued fight against the corruption that took her too soon. From there, the team dives into the latest developments in election integrity, including Tulsi Gabbard's viral comments as DNI, the growing mainstream acknowledgment of rigged machines, and the overdue need for accountability, not just more investigations. The conversation heats up around the No Rogue Rulings Act, the strategy to rein in activist judges, and the unlikely prospects of it passing the Senate. What starts as political analysis quickly snowballs into full-blown conspiracy comedy, with deep dives into FDA food allowances (yes, maggots are allowed), Denver Airport occult lore, and glowing red-eyed horse statues named “Blucifer.” The crew also debates whether Jordan Sather was on Comedy Central, dreams up haunted hotel GART destinations, and even plans to buy a plane while joking about underground bunkers, Space Force bases, and lizard people. Equal parts serious and unhinged, this episode is a perfect slice of Liberty Den, where the rabbit holes are real, the jokes are brutal, and the friendships are bulletproof.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled the Trump administration must "facilitate" the return of a man it mistakenly deported to El Salvador. How is the White House responding, and what happens next? Then, is the entity known as DOGE using Social Security information it isn't meant to be able to access? This episode: White House correspondent Asma Khalid, political reporter Stephen Fowler, and senior White House correspondent Tamara Keith.The podcast is produced by Bria Suggs & Kelli Wessinger and edited by Casey Morell. Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Financial markets aren't buying President Donald Trump's 90-day tariff pause. We have updates on two high-profile deportation cases. A judge is deciding whether to proceed with the Menendez brothers' resentencing hearings. We're hearing from the National Transportation Safety Board about the deadly helicopter crash in New York. Plus, weather and climate research are on the chopping block. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A daily non-partisan, conversational breakdown of today's top news and breaking news stories Headlines: – Welcome to Mo News (00:00) – Trump Announces 90-Day Tariff Pause (02:00) – Dow and S&P Post Biggest Gains Since 2008 (02:50) – Behind The Decision To Pause Tariffs, Increase China Pressure (04:25) – Rulings in New York and Texas Curb Deportations of Venezuelans to El Salvador (15:00) – Trump Administration Freezes $1 Billion for Cornell and $790 Million for Northwestern (18:00) – Death Toll Grows In Dominican Club Collapse (20:10) – Trump Targets ‘Weak' Shower Heads He's Long Complained About (21:20)  – LA Olympics to Include New Mixed-Gender Team Events In Gold And Gymnastics (24:45) – On This Day In History (27:15) Thanks To Our Sponsors: – Vanta – Get $1,000 off – Shopify – $1 per-month trial Code: monews – Industrious - Coworking office. 30% off day pass – LMNT - Free Sample Pack with any LMNT drink mix purchase – Athletic Greens – AG1 Powder + 1 year of free Vitamin D & 5 free travel packs – BetterHelp – 10% off your first month

Hosts: Erin Rider and Andy Cupp  SCOTUS rules in favor of Pres. Trump over Alien Enemies Act  President Trump may move forward with the deportation of Tren de Aragua gang members. That's according to a narrowly split ruling from the United States Supreme Court. But those who are set to be deported must receive due process -- they must receive notice of their deportation under the Alien Enemies Act and must also get their day in court to plead their case as to why they shouldn't be deported. The Inside Sources hosts go in-depth on the ruling.    SCOTUS blocks order requiring Trump administration to reinstate fired federal workers  More confusion today for thousands of federal probationary workers recently fired by the Trump administration. A federal judge had ordered the administration to reinstate those employees, saying the process for the firings was a problem. But this morning, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed that lower court's decision. Now, the Trump Administration has the green light to move ahead with the firings and not worry about reinstating those workers.    Dozens of countries looking to negotiate new tariffs  Will the massive tariffs placed on foreign countries trigger negotiations and improve the trade imbalance? It's what President Trump said would happen, but economists still aren't convinced. However, there are reports now of dozens of countries already reaching out to the administration asking to renegotiate trade and tariffs. That news sent stocks hirer today. Inside Sources discusses the possible negotiations and Congress’ role in all of it.    Cabinet members visit Utah – a sign of the state’s growing political influence?  During their visits to Utah yesterday, three members of President Trump's Cabinet praised the state for its work along the lines of health, food, and transportation. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke of wanting to implement a similar ban on fluoride in drinking water – something Utah passed during the legislative session – and make it nationwide. Erin and Andy talk about the growing status of Utah in national politics.    Opinion: Utah will continue trend of cutting taxes  During this last legislative session, the Utah state legislature prioritized giving Utahns yet another tax cut -- for the fifth year in a row. And even though the budget was looking tight, they still found a way to eliminate some taxes, including some taxes on social security benefits. Deseret News Opinion Editor Jay Evensen thinks this tax-cutting trend will continue. He joins the show to talk more about that.    Utah pursuing mining partnership with Canada  Governor Spencer Cox -- joined by state, business, and energy leaders -- continues to tour Canada this week on a mission to strengthen trade ties between the state and Canada. One thing that's been a focus of the visit so far is energy and natural resources. In fact, Canada's Fraser Institute has identified Utah as not one of the most -- but as THE MOST -- attractive location for mining investment. Brian Somers, President of the Utah Mining Association is there on the trade mission and joins us to share some insights.    Dire wolves coming back from extinction  It may sound a little Jurassic Park, and it sort of is. Scientists, using DNA from teeth and bones, say they’ve been able to bring back the extinct dire wolf. Erin and Andy finish the show discussing the potential ethical implications of such a move.   

The Supreme Court lifts an order preventing swift removal of alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Yet the majority of the Justices take no position on the merits of using that law, while they also emphasize the requirement of due process. Meantime, an appeals court says the White House must seek the return of a man mistakenly sent to a prison in El Salvador. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Two Supreme Court rulings will impact critical Trump Administration deportation cases. First, the court allowed the White House to continue using the Alien Enemies Act, which gives them sweeping wartime authority to rapidly deport alleged gang members. In a second case, the Court extended a deadline for returning Maryland father Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Venezuelan prison back to the US.  Gregg Nunziata, a veteran of the conservative legal movement, joins the show to discuss the implications of these rulings.  Also on today's show: Jan Egeland, Secretary General, Norwegian Refugee Council; Dr. Tom Frieden, Former Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

But a book: https://amzn.to/4ll9Ni3

We had half an hour to kill so the podcast gang decided to sum up their Best and Worst Reboots/Sequels/Remakes.   Sounds simple enough? We wish it was but no arguments took place, just simple observations at the roundtable.                     MAIN LINKS:  LinkTree: https://linktr.ee/JURSPodcast Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/JackedUpReviewShow/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2452329545040913 Twitter: https://twitter.com/JackedUpReview  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jacked_up_podcast/        SHOW LINKS: YouTube: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCIyMawFPgvOpOUhKcQo4eQQ   iHeartRadio: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-the-jacked-up-review-show-59422651/   Podbean: https://jackedupreviewshow.podbean.com   Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Eg8w0DNympD6SQXSj1X3M   Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-jacked-up-review-show-podcast/id1494236218   RadioPublic: https://radiopublic.com/the-jacked-up-review-show-We4VjE   Overcast: https://overcast.fm/itunes1494236218/the-jacked-up-review-show-podcast   Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy9hNDYyOTdjL3BvZGNhc3QvcnNz   Anchor:  https://anchor.fm/s/a46297c/podcast/rss   PocketCasts: https://pca.st/0ncd5qp4   CastBox:  https://castbox.fm/channel/The-Jacked-Up-Review-Show-Podcast-id2591222   Discord:  https://discord.com/channels/796154005914779678/796154006358851586         #MovieReview #FilmTwitter #PodFamily #PodcastersOfInstagram #Movies #Film #Cinema #Music #Reviews #Retrospect #Podcasts #MutantFam #MutantFamily #actionmystery #bmovies #scifihorror #truecrime #historydramas #warmovies #podcastcollabs #hottakes #edgy #cultmovies #nsfw #HorrorFam #badass 

Senator Chuck Grassley discusses his efforts to rein in activist federal judges who issue national injunctions, affecting the entire country rather than just their district. He highlighted the issue of judges taking free junkets, which can influence their decisions. Grassley also addresses the Biden administration's mishandling of unaccompanied minors at the border, noting that 200,000 children were lost track of, and some were sent to families connected to MS-13. He emphasizes the need for bipartisan support to address these issues and praised the new FBI director for addressing unanswered oversight letters. Grassley also advocates for the reinstatement of whistleblowers who lost their jobs for exposing wrongdoing. Additionally, Congressman Marlon Stutzman discusses the impact of President Trump's tariffs on global trade, particularly on American farmers and producers. Stutzman highlights the historical disadvantages faced by American beef farmers due to Mad Cow Disease restrictions, which allowed Australia to build its beef industry. He emphasizes the need for fair trade rather than free trade, noting that the U.S. has been disadvantaged in defending its allies. Stutzman also mentions the positive economic impact of Trump's policies, including tax reforms, energy policies, and deregulation, which have attracted significant investments from companies like Oracle and Nvidia. He believes these policies will sustain economic growth and maintain America's global economic leadership. Finally, West Virginia has banned seven artificial food dyes due to their harmful effects, setting a precedent for other states. Senator Chris Rose talks about the legislation, highlighting the state's reputation as the least healthy and the need to address attention disorders and carcinogens linked to these dyes. Despite industry resistance, Rose notes that healthier alternatives are available and cheaper, citing examples like Aldi. The state is also considering a SNAP program waiver to remove sugary drinks. Governor Morrisey's "Mountaineer Mile" initiative aims to promote health. Rose emphasizes the need for a coalition of states, including Texas and Florida, to push for federal action on food safety.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Judge Cannone denied Karen Read's motion to bring in an expert on police procedure to support their "Bowden Defense" (claiming law enforcement didn't properly investigate). The judge stated she hadn't seen this type of expert used in Massachusetts cases. The defense can still use the Bowden Defense, but through questioning witnesses.The court denied the defense's motion regarding a third-party culprit defense for Colin Albert but allowed it for Brian Albert and Brian Higgins. The judge expressed strong reservations about the Third-Party Culprit Defense, requiring more than "mere or rank speculation." I breakdown the threshold of evidence needed.Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/An_t-g5WueoThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

The Federal Election Commission is continuing to issue rulings, functioning with just four remaining members, despite a dispute over President Donald Trump's unprecedented firing of longtime Democratic member Ellen Weintraub that Democratic senators say is illegal. Forbes staff writer Zach Everson joined "Forbes Newsroom" to discuss.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Today, we're talking about a deadly earthquake in Myanmar; a number of rulings on challenges to recent White House activity; reactions to VP Vance's trip to Greenland; and other top news for Monday, March 31st. Stay informed while remaining focused on Christ with The Pour Over Today. Please support our TPO sponsors! Parenting with Ginger Hubbard: https://links.thepourover.org/ParentingwithGingerHubbard The Bulletin: MoreCT.com/BulletinPodcast Upside: https://links.thepourover.org/Upside Cru: give.cru.org/pour LMNT: https://links.thepourover.org/LMNT_Podcast HelloFresh: hellofresh.com/hellofreshpodcast One Year Bible: https://links.thepourover.org/OneYearBible_Pod World Relief: https://links.thepourover.org/WorldRelief_Pod The Chronological Life Application Study Bible: https://links.thepourover.org/LASB_0215 Student Life Application Study Bible: https://links.thepourover.org/SLASB_Pod CSB Easter Gift Guide: https://links.thepourover.org/CSB_EasterGiftGuide

A.M. Edition for Mar. 19. A federal judge in Maryland ruled that the Department of Government Efficiency's dismantling of USAID was likely unconstitutional, while a judge in Washington D.C. has blocked President Trump's executive order which excludes transgender individuals from serving openly in the military. Plus, WSJ autos reporter Stephen Wilmot explains what a decades-old chicken tax has to do with the barrage of new tariffs being pursued by the Trump administration. Kate Bullivant hosts. Sign up for the WSJ's free What's News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Day 18, Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan extracts and uncovers the profound benefits and rulings derived from Surah Al-Fatihah. He explores its legal, theological, and spiritual dimensions, highlighting how this foundational Surah shapes our understanding of worship, faith, and daily practice. Through this session, we gain deeper insight into the practical applications of Al-Fatihah's verses, reinforcing its significance as the most recited chapter in our lives. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amauofficial/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/AMAU Telegram: https://t.me/amauofficial YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/amauofficial/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/amauofficial/ iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/al-madrasatu-al-umariyyah/id1524526782 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/08NJC1pIA0maaF6aKqZL4N #Tafseer #SurahAlFatihah #Quran #IslamicKnowledge #UstadhAbdulrahmanHassan #QuranicTafseer #IslamicStudies #SpiritualGrowth #IslamicLectures #Day1 #Faith #MuslimEducation

Fasting in Ramadan is a pillar of Islam, but do we truly understand its rulings? From determining the start of Ramadan to moon sighting for Eid, and the rulings on menstruation and postpartum bleeding—these are essential matters every Muslim must know.   In this session of Al-Manāhil al-Ḥisān fī Durūs Ramaḍān, Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan explores key fiqh issues related to fasting, backed by authentic ahadith and scholarly discussions.   Don't let ignorance affect your worship—fast with knowledge and follow the Sunnah. Watch now! Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amauofficial/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/AMAU Telegram: https://t.me/amauofficial YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/amauofficial/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/amauofficial/ iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/al-madrasatu-al-umariyyah/id1524526782 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/08NJC1pIA0maaF6aKqZL4N #ramadanspecial #ramadan2025 #fasting #IslamicKnowledge #UstadhAbdulrahmanHassan #moonsighting #IslamicStudies #righteousness  #IslamicLectures #Day9 #Imaan #MuslimEducation