Podcasts about rulings

On Legal Docket, the Supreme Court's unanimous decisions; on Moneybeat, the latest jobs report; and on History Book, an Arctic expedition. Plus, the Monday morning newsSupport The World and Everything in It today at wng.org/donate.Additional support comes from Ambassadors Impact Network. Unlocking the power of faith-based financing for your startup. More at ambassadorsimpact.comFrom Dordt University, where future teachers are shaped to love who, what, and how they teach—until all is made new. More at Dordt.edu.And from WatersEdge Kingdom Investments — personal investments that build churches. 5.05% APY on a three-month term. WatersEdge.com/invest.WatersEdge Kingdom Investments - WatersEdge securities are subject to certain risk factors as described in our Offering Circular and are not FDIC or SIPC insured. This is not an offer to sell or solicit securities. WatersEdge offers and sells securities only where authorized; this offering is made solely by our Offering Circular.

Today, we're talking about President Trump banning travel from 12 countries; the Congressional Budget Office's report on the Big Beautiful Bill; the Supreme Court issuing three unanimous rulings; and other top news for Friday, June 6th. Stay informed while remaining focused on Christ with The Pour Over Today. Want to support The Pour Over? Choose to pay at tpopod.com  Please support our TPO sponsors! Upside: https://links.thepourover.org/Upside Cru: give.cru.org/pour LMNT: https://links.thepourover.org/LMNT_Podcast CSB: https://links.thepourover.org/CSB_podcast The Table Podcast: https://links.thepourover.org/TheTablePodcast Heaven Meets Earth Podcast: https://links.thepourover.org/HeavenMeetsEarth World Relief: worldrelief.org/prayer MOSH: moshlife.com/TPO Stewardship Investments: stewardshipinv.com

The RUNDOWN S5 E84: SCOTUS Issues Two 9-0 Rulings on Same Day Dealing w/ Guns & DiscriminationPlease Support Our Sponsors:HITMAN INDUSTRIES - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.hitmanindustries.net/⁠⁠⁠⁠THE CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://cragop.org/⁠USCOMBATGEAR.COM⁠⁠⁠ - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.uscombatgear.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠HAWG HOLSTERS - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.hawgholsters.com/

The RUNDOWN S5 E84: SCOTUS Issues Two 9-0 Rulings on Same Day Dealing w/ Guns & DiscriminationPlease Support Our Sponsors:HITMAN INDUSTRIES - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.hitmanindustries.net/⁠⁠⁠⁠THE CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://cragop.org/⁠USCOMBATGEAR.COM⁠⁠⁠ - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.uscombatgear.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠HAWG HOLSTERS - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.hawgholsters.com/

ABC News Legal Analyst Royal Oakes discusses what may be next for Trump's tariffs following recent court rulings.

On Wednesday, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) blocked President Donald Trump's global tariffs from enforcement, ruling that the president lacked the authority to impose the duties unilaterally. However, the Trump administration appealed the decision to a federal appeals court, and on Thursday that court paused the CIT decision while it considers its ruling. The CIT's summary judgment was issued on two separate cases and is the first major legal challenge to President Trump's tariffs, which he announced on April 2. Ad-free podcasts are here!Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story ⁠here and today's “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.Take the survey: Do you think Trump's tariffs are constitutional? Let us know!Disagree? That's okay. My opinion is just one of many. Write in and let us know why, and we'll consider publishing your feedback.You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.This podcast was written by Isaac Saul and Ari Weitzman, and edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Hunter Casperson, Kendall White, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This Nightcap roundtable discusses a week of conflicting legal rulings on Trump's tariff policy and what it might mean for the administration's strategy. Then, Elon Musk exits the White House and faces questions as The New York Times reports that he used drugs during Trump's presidential campaign. Plus, POTUS continues to face off with Harvard, as a federal judge temporarily blocks the administration's attempts to prevent the enrollment of international students. And, see who made this week's MVP list. Sami Sage, John Della Volpe , Tim O'Brien, and Paul Rieckhoff join The 11th Hour this Friday.

As it currently stands... the tariffs that Trump already had in place are the ones that remain in place.

Yesterday's head-snapping court rulings on tariffs caused confusion, which could mean cautious markets. Meanwhile, investors await today's PCE prices and consumer sentiment data.Important DisclosuresThe information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness, or reliability cannot be guaranteed.Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.The Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.All names and market data shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.Past performance is no guarantee of future results, and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.Diversification strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes, please see ​schwab.com/indexdefinitions.The policy analysis provided by the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party.Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications, and other factors.(0131-0525)

After more than 24 hours of silence, President Trump just responded to a bombshell ruling against his tariffs. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Meera Chandan and Patrick Locke discuss the latest CIT ruling on tariffs, expectations for the upcoming payrolls report and the recent fiscal-driven rates moves  with implications for the broad dollar and FX markets.   Speakers: Meera Chandan, Global FX Strategy Patrick Locke, Global FX Strategy   This podcast was recorded on 30 May 2025. This communication is provided for information purposes only. Institutional clients can view the related report at https://www.jpmm.com/research/content/GPS-4994884-0  for more information; please visit www.jpmm.com/research/disclosures for important disclosures. © 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This material or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan. It is strictly prohibited to use or share without prior written consent from J.P. Morgan any research material received from J.P. Morgan or an authorized third-party (“J.P. Morgan Data”) in any third-party artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems or models when such J.P. Morgan Data is accessible by a third-party. It is permissible to use J.P. Morgan Data for internal business purposes only in an AI system or model that protects the confidentiality of J.P. Morgan Data so as to prevent any and all access to or use of such J.P. Morgan Data by any third-party.

The hosts discuss how desegregation under Brown was hampered in schools by a policy of “all deliberate speed” where the speed was often zero.  In contrast, and despite the fact that in large portions of the nation education is separate and unequal, the Trump administration has begun an “all speed ahead” policy of eliminating decrees which contained desegregation requirements'.   https://www.axios.com/2025/05/02/doj-decades-old-school-desegregation-louisiana   In this episode of Ellis Conversations, co-host Jamil Ellis and his father, retired federal magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis, reflect on the 71st anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education—not just the 1954 decision, but its overlooked 1955 follow-up. They explore the legal and societal impacts of desegregation mandates, the resistance that followed, and how today's rollback of civil rights enforcement—particularly around school desegregation—echoes familiar patterns. With real-life stories, including Ruby Bridges and Prince Edward County's school closures, the conversation traces decades of policy evolution—from Milliken v. Bradley to Roberts Court rulings that undermine systemic remedies for segregation. The episode also offers generational perspectives on optimism, protest, and the need for youth leadership in safeguarding educational equity.

We'll get the latest on what's happening with President Trump's tariffs and how things are going with China with UNO professor Walter “Dub” Lane, who just got back from a trip there.

May 30, 2025 ~ Dr. Tim Nash, director of the McNair Center for the Advancement of Free Enterprise at Northwood University, talks with Lloyd and Jamie about how the market is reacting to the uncertainty of tariffs as courts have begun questioning the presidential authority.

Confusion reigns after a US federal court suspended Donald Trump's worldwide tariffs and declared them unlawful, only for an appeal to temporarily allow them again. The White House is launching a full legal challenge - so the uncertainty will continue, especially for China, which faced the steepest tariffs. The Times' China correspondent Richard Spencer explains why Beijing can benefit, even without knowing what is coming next.The World in 10 is the Times' daily podcast dedicated to global security. Expert analysis of war, diplomatic relations and cyber security from The Times' foreign correspondents and military specialists. Watch more: www.youtube.com/@ListenToTimesRadio Read more: www.thetimes.com Picture: Getty Images Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A U.S. federal appeals court has overturned a trade court's ruling deeming U.S. President Trump's tariffs via emergency powers as unlawful; states of emergencies in two prairie provinces over wildfires has prompted Canada to request assistance from international partners.

The Trump administration is moving quickly to increase its deportation numbers and further expand its restrictions on immigration. But federal judges are continuing to rule against the president on immigration matters. White House correspondent Laura Barrón-López discussed the legal battles with Charles Kuck, an Atlanta-based immigration attorney and law professor at Emory University. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

In today's short clip, constitutional scholar Stephen Vladeck explains why the Supreme Court's use of unsigned, unexplained decisions—known as the “shadow docket”—is so dangerous. He shares why this judicial behavior, even when done in good faith, undermines public trust and the Court's ability to function in our constitutional system.

The Trump administration is moving quickly to increase its deportation numbers and further expand its restrictions on immigration. But federal judges are continuing to rule against the president on immigration matters. White House correspondent Laura Barrón-López discussed the legal battles with Charles Kuck, an Atlanta-based immigration attorney and law professor at Emory University. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

In this episode of The Marc Cox Morning Show, Hour 1 opens with the Missouri Supreme Court's decision that once again halts abortions statewide, effectively reinstating Missouri's trigger law. A viral confrontation involving a Tesla Cybertruck takes a legal turn as the vandal who placed an anti-Elon sticker on Christian Kirk's vehicle now faces felony charges. In “Kim on a Whim,” Kim St. Onge shares the emotional story of a woman told by her HOA to remove a Memorial Day tribute to her fallen soldier brother. Hour 2 delves into Donald Trump's proposed “Golden Dome” missile defense system, a $25 billion initiative inspired by Israel's Iron Dome. The Tesla vandalism case resurfaces as the suspect is formally charged with a felony. Nichole Murray shares business headlines, and Marc and Kim discuss the importance of remembering romantic moments with your partner. The hour ends with “In Other News.” In Hour 3, attorney Bevis Schock explains the legal implications of Missouri's abortion ruling. Genevieve Wood from The Heritage Foundation joins to discuss RFK Jr.'s move to remove CDC vaccine recommendations for kids and pregnant women, and critiques the Biden administration for allegedly hiding cardiovascular risks in young men. State Senator Adam Schnelting shares his opposition to the governor's special session for funding pro sports stadiums, citing the burden on Missouri taxpayers. Hour 4 features Mike O'Connell from the Missouri Department of Public Safety, who updates on tornado recovery efforts and the push for FEMA disaster aid. Taylor Riggs of Fox Business critiques the “Big Beautiful Bill” passed by House Republicans, warning of its impact on the deficit and highlighting Elon Musk's underappreciated efficiency push via DOGE. Elon Musk responds in a Sunday Morning Exclusive, voicing frustration with Trump's bill. The hour wraps with a discussion on whether U.S. presidents wield too much pardoning power.

Jonny and Heatherreflect on the true meaning of Memorial Day and why it is a somber holiday of remembrance. They offer a queer and trans infused contemplation of the military in contrast to the Trump Administration's approach, and link their focus to the real purpose of Pride. In the back half of the show they take a deeper look at the Big "Beautiful" Bill that narrowly passed the House and appears to have stalled in the Senate (for now). The review several victories in courts and legislatures where Trumps anti-LGBTQ agenda is being thwarted.

Let's look at a topic that's been making a lot of headlines lately: the use of the Alien Enemies Act for deportations, especially with talk around Trump's immigration policies. Now, don't worry—I promised to keep things non-political, and I plan to stick to that. Instead, I'm here to walk you through what's really going on behind the scenes: the legal procedures and how these cases play out in court.Recently, federal judges in different parts of the country have been coming to completely opposite conclusions about the government's power to use this act. So, how does that work? What happens when courts disagree this way? I'll break down the basics of appellate law, explain why we're probably headed straight for a Supreme Court decision, and talk about what that means for everyone watching this play out.If you're curious about how the legal system handles big, controversial cases like this—without all the political noise—you're in the right place. Stick around, and I'll walk you through exactly what's happening and what comes next.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Rulings pertaining to Wuḍuu' with Sheikh Muhammad Alwan

Gov. Ferguson is stoking fears about the “Big, Beautiful, Bill” saying it will cut Medicare and Medicaid. A sex offender in Seattle with a very bizarre nickname has been charged with more sex crimes. It was a day of mixed results for conservatives at the Supreme Court. // Big Local: Mail theft is rampant in the city of Sea-Tac. Kent has been plagued by internet outages. A man in Federal Way says his bearded dragon saved him from a fire. // You Pick the Topic: A woman brought a rotisserie chicken onto a flight.

5-21-2025: Wake Up Missouri with Randy Tobler, John Marsh, Peter Thiele, and Producer Drake

Hour 2 begins with a breakdown of the Supreme Court ruling on Venezuelan immigrants, sparking discussion on refugee status, legal versus illegal immigration, and the human side of the issue, including Pedro Pascal's personal story. The segment also highlights differences between Trump and Biden administration policies. Attention then shifts to the devastating tornadoes and storms that hit Missouri and Illinois, with Forest Park, Brentwood, Granite City, and Marion among the hardest-hit areas. Callers share emotional stories of destruction, funnel clouds, and survival. The hour wraps up with analysis of how media narratives shape public perception of immigration, and a look at available volunteer and support resources for storm recovery efforts.

I am Right episode 3 court rulings and tariffsA tariff is a tax imposed by a government on imported or exported goods. Here's a quick breakdown:Import tariff: A tax on goods brought into a country. It's the most common type and is used to: Protect domestic industries from foreign competitionRaise government revenueInfluence trade policiesExport tariff: A tax on goods leaving a country. These are less common but may be used to:Ensure domestic supply of a productGenerate revenueTypes of tariffs:Ad valorem: Charged as a percentage of the item's value (e.g., 10% of the product's price).Specific: Charged as a fixed amount per unit (e.g., $0.50 per kilogram).Compound: A combination of both ad valorem and specific tariffs.Let me know if you want examples or how tariffs affect global trade.#CongestionPricing #TrafficReduction#UrbanMobility #SustainableCities#CleanAir #NYCtraffic #NYCCommute#MTAFunding #ManhattanToll#FixTheSubway #Tariff #Tariffs #TradeTariffs #ImportTax #ExportTax#TradePolicy #CustomDuties #GlobalTrade#TradeWar

You decide

Host Mike Shields and ad consultant Emily Riley return to break down the major developments in media and advertising, from the Google antitrust trial to the latest on Google's cookie changes.

In this episode, we take a clear and practical look at vaginal health—covering important topics like yeast infections, urinary tract infections, bacterial vaginosis, discharge, and spotting. We also explore how these common experiences relate to Islamic rulings on cleanliness, ritual purity, and worship.With expert insight on both medical and religious aspects, we aim to provide clarity on what to look out for, how to manage symptoms, and how to confidently care for your body. Whether you're seeking answers about what's medically normal or how these issues affect your spiritual practices, this conversation is designed to inform and empower.Text to get in touch!Support the showIf you enjoyed this episode, subscribe and share! To help us continue this important work, become a sustainer at www.empowherhealth.org

Rulings in Kouri Richins delays her trial indefinitely Donna Adleson's trial could be delayed Rulings on the death penalty, 911 call, and text messages in the Bryan Kohberger case Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

Documents and Responsa from across the Jewish world reveal that for centuries Jews discussed, debated and disagreed over the Shabbos Eruv Walled cities, canals, telegraph poles, Kabbala, fires and powerful secular rulers all played their role and affected entire communities. And from the 19th century onwards, strong personalities would influence and colour the narrative.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Erevin and Halacha 03:04 Understanding the Concept of Erevin 05:53 Historical Context of Erevin 08:54 Disputes and Rulings on Erevin 11:48 Erevin in Different Regions 14:55 The Role of Authority in Erevin 17:53 Contemporary Applications of Erevin 21:05 The Historical Context of Eruvin in Jewish Communities 24:41 Challenges and Innovations in Eruvin Construction 28:03 The Evolution of Eruvin in Krakow 36:00 Eruvin in the New World: St. Louis Case Study

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf

Hans and Robby are back again this week with a brand new episode! This week, they discuss the top IRA rulings of 2024.  Don't forget to get your copy of “The Complete Cardinal Guide to Planning for and Living in Retirement” on Amazon or on CardinalGuide.com for free! You can contact Hans and Cardinal by emailing hans@cardinalguide.com or calling 919-535-8261. Learn more at CardinalGuide.com. Find us on YouTube: Cardinal Advisors.

Ten Game-Changing Rulings in the Bryan Kohberger Trial You Need to Know In a pivotal moment for the State of Idaho vs. Bryan Kohberger, the court has officially ruled on a wave of major motions that will shape the upcoming trial over the brutal University of Idaho student murders. In this deep-dive video, we break down exactly what evidence the jury will hear, including explosive expert testimony, digital forensic analysis, and never-before-heard communications from the surviving roommates inside the King Road house on the night of the killings. One of the biggest developments? Bryan Kohberger's defense team attempted to remove the death penalty, arguing that his diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) made capital punishment unconstitutional in his case. The judge denied that motion, making it clear that ASD does not qualify for the same legal protections as intellectual disability under Atkins v. Virginia—a precedent-setting move in Idaho. Meanwhile, the court approved a wide range of expert witnesses for the prosecution, despite objections from the defense. The jury is now expected to hear testimony from: FBI CAST Agent Nicholas Ballance, who analyzed Kohberger's cell phone tower data and drive testing results to place him near the scene before and after the crime. Cellebrite forensic specialists Heather and Jared Barnhart, who uncovered abnormal gaps in Kohberger's digital activity, potentially suggesting deleted data or anti-forensic behavior. FBI forensic accountant Michael Douglass, who tracked shifts in Kohberger's financial behavior, including his sudden switch from debit card usage to cash withdrawals. ISP detective Darren Gilbertson, who conducted physical timed walkthroughs of 1122 King Road, proving one person could allegedly carry out the crimes in under four minutes. Toxicology expert Dr. Gary Dawson, who challenges the multiple-attacker theory by analyzing the victims' level of intoxication during the homicides. But perhaps the most emotionally impactful ruling relates to what the jury will now hear from D.M. and B.F., the two surviving roommates. The court ruled that text messages sent between 4:22 a.m. and 4:26 a.m.—in which D.M. described a man in a ski mask and her intense fear—are admissible under hearsay exceptions. These messages, sent in real time during the murders, offer a raw glimpse into the trauma unfolding inside the house before the bodies were discovered. We also cover the 911 call made nearly 8 hours later, which has been under intense public scrutiny. The court has ruled that most of the call is admissible, and the transcript will be shown alongside the audio in court—but with a few redactions, pending further evidentiary foundation. This detailed breakdown offers everything you need to know about the latest legal developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, including how forensic science, digital evidence, psychological defenses, and real-time trauma responses are converging to form the core of this historic and chilling true crime trial. If you're following the University of Idaho murder trial, the Kohberger defense strategy, or how courts weigh psychological disorders in capital cases, this video provides the clearest and most comprehensive analysis available. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KohbergerTrial #UniversityOfIdaho #KohbergerEvidence #ForensicAnalysis #ExpertWitnesses #911Call #RoommateTestimony #TrueCrime    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Ten Game-Changing Rulings in the Bryan Kohberger Trial You Need to Know In a pivotal moment for the State of Idaho vs. Bryan Kohberger, the court has officially ruled on a wave of major motions that will shape the upcoming trial over the brutal University of Idaho student murders. In this deep-dive video, we break down exactly what evidence the jury will hear, including explosive expert testimony, digital forensic analysis, and never-before-heard communications from the surviving roommates inside the King Road house on the night of the killings. One of the biggest developments? Bryan Kohberger's defense team attempted to remove the death penalty, arguing that his diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) made capital punishment unconstitutional in his case. The judge denied that motion, making it clear that ASD does not qualify for the same legal protections as intellectual disability under Atkins v. Virginia—a precedent-setting move in Idaho. Meanwhile, the court approved a wide range of expert witnesses for the prosecution, despite objections from the defense. The jury is now expected to hear testimony from: FBI CAST Agent Nicholas Ballance, who analyzed Kohberger's cell phone tower data and drive testing results to place him near the scene before and after the crime. Cellebrite forensic specialists Heather and Jared Barnhart, who uncovered abnormal gaps in Kohberger's digital activity, potentially suggesting deleted data or anti-forensic behavior. FBI forensic accountant Michael Douglass, who tracked shifts in Kohberger's financial behavior, including his sudden switch from debit card usage to cash withdrawals. ISP detective Darren Gilbertson, who conducted physical timed walkthroughs of 1122 King Road, proving one person could allegedly carry out the crimes in under four minutes. Toxicology expert Dr. Gary Dawson, who challenges the multiple-attacker theory by analyzing the victims' level of intoxication during the homicides. But perhaps the most emotionally impactful ruling relates to what the jury will now hear from D.M. and B.F., the two surviving roommates. The court ruled that text messages sent between 4:22 a.m. and 4:26 a.m.—in which D.M. described a man in a ski mask and her intense fear—are admissible under hearsay exceptions. These messages, sent in real time during the murders, offer a raw glimpse into the trauma unfolding inside the house before the bodies were discovered. We also cover the 911 call made nearly 8 hours later, which has been under intense public scrutiny. The court has ruled that most of the call is admissible, and the transcript will be shown alongside the audio in court—but with a few redactions, pending further evidentiary foundation. This detailed breakdown offers everything you need to know about the latest legal developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, including how forensic science, digital evidence, psychological defenses, and real-time trauma responses are converging to form the core of this historic and chilling true crime trial. If you're following the University of Idaho murder trial, the Kohberger defense strategy, or how courts weigh psychological disorders in capital cases, this video provides the clearest and most comprehensive analysis available. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KohbergerTrial #UniversityOfIdaho #KohbergerEvidence #ForensicAnalysis #ExpertWitnesses #911Call #RoommateTestimony #TrueCrime    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

​On April 24, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler issued a ruling on the admissibility of key evidence in the trial of Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The judge determined that the majority of the 911 call made by one of the surviving roommates could be presented to the jury, as it falls under exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as present sense impression and excited utterance. However, certain portions of the call, including statements made by an unidentified woman relaying secondhand information, were deemed inadmissible due to lack of firsthand knowledge and contemporaneity. Additionally, the judge allowed the use of a transcript of the 911 call as a demonstrative aid during the trial, provided it is properly authenticated and accompanied by appropriate jury instructions. ​Regarding text messages exchanged between the two surviving roommates, D.M. and B.F., the court found that many of these messages are admissible under the same hearsay exceptions. These texts, sent in the early hours of November 13, 2022, include descriptions of a masked intruder and expressions of fear and confusion, which the court considered to be spontaneous reactions to a startling event. The judge emphasized that the admissibility of these messages is contingent upon the prosecution establishing the necessary foundation at trial. The defense had objected to the inclusion of these messages, arguing that they lacked context and could be misleading; however, the court concluded that, when properly contextualized, they are relevant and admissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge deals more defeats to Bryan Kohberger's defense | Idaho Statesman

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On April 24, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler issued a ruling on the admissibility of key evidence in the trial of Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The judge determined that the majority of the 911 call made by one of the surviving roommates could be presented to the jury, as it falls under exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as present sense impression and excited utterance. However, certain portions of the call, including statements made by an unidentified woman relaying secondhand information, were deemed inadmissible due to lack of firsthand knowledge and contemporaneity. Additionally, the judge allowed the use of a transcript of the 911 call as a demonstrative aid during the trial, provided it is properly authenticated and accompanied by appropriate jury instructions. ​Regarding text messages exchanged between the two surviving roommates, D.M. and B.F., the court found that many of these messages are admissible under the same hearsay exceptions. These texts, sent in the early hours of November 13, 2022, include descriptions of a masked intruder and expressions of fear and confusion, which the court considered to be spontaneous reactions to a startling event. The judge emphasized that the admissibility of these messages is contingent upon the prosecution establishing the necessary foundation at trial. The defense had objected to the inclusion of these messages, arguing that they lacked context and could be misleading; however, the court concluded that, when properly contextualized, they are relevant and admissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge deals more defeats to Bryan Kohberger's defense | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Catching up on the latest rulings in the Bryan Kohberger caseLori Daybell live stream - https://www.youtube.com/live/M1NDQWgG36I?si=oE8XvJ6pWieoCCzaDonate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

Idaho Murders Judge Sets Stage For August Trial WITH Key Rulings #hippler #kohberger #idaho4update The Idaho Murders trial is set to begin in August, following a series of legal rulings by the judge that have left many stunned. In this video, we dive into the latest developments in the case, exploring the implications of the judge's decisions and what they mean for the trial ahead. From the prosecution's strategy to the defense's next moves, we break down everything you need to know about the Idaho Murders trial.

In the past week, U.S. courts have issued a pair of significant rulings on the deportation actions of the Trump administration. On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled without dissent to uphold a federal judge's order that the government must facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S. after he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador. Separately, on Friday, an immigration judge in Louisiana ruled that the government could deport Khalil, a legal U.S. resident and recent Columbia University graduate student, on national security grounds. Ad-free podcasts are here!Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story ⁠here and today's “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.Take the survey: What do you think of the recent court decisions? Let us know!You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.This podcast was written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Hunter Casperson, Kendall White, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. Our logo was created by Magdalena Bokowa, Head of Partnerships and Socials. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

America is sliding off the edge. Trade wars, Supreme court Rulings, I.C.E, and more. Michael Regilio and Travis Clyburn break it all down.  More at dogmadebate.com

On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled the Trump administration must "facilitate" the return of a man it mistakenly deported to El Salvador. How is the White House responding, and what happens next? Then, is the entity known as DOGE using Social Security information it isn't meant to be able to access? This episode: White House correspondent Asma Khalid, political reporter Stephen Fowler, and senior White House correspondent Tamara Keith.The podcast is produced by Bria Suggs & Kelli Wessinger and edited by Casey Morell. Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

A daily non-partisan, conversational breakdown of today's top news and breaking news stories Headlines: – Welcome to Mo News (00:00) – Trump Announces 90-Day Tariff Pause (02:00) – Dow and S&P Post Biggest Gains Since 2008 (02:50) – Behind The Decision To Pause Tariffs, Increase China Pressure (04:25) – Rulings in New York and Texas Curb Deportations of Venezuelans to El Salvador (15:00) – Trump Administration Freezes $1 Billion for Cornell and $790 Million for Northwestern (18:00) – Death Toll Grows In Dominican Club Collapse (20:10) – Trump Targets ‘Weak' Shower Heads He's Long Complained About (21:20)  – LA Olympics to Include New Mixed-Gender Team Events In Gold And Gymnastics (24:45) – On This Day In History (27:15) Thanks To Our Sponsors: – Vanta – Get $1,000 off – Shopify – $1 per-month trial Code: monews – Industrious - Coworking office. 30% off day pass – LMNT - Free Sample Pack with any LMNT drink mix purchase – Athletic Greens – AG1 Powder + 1 year of free Vitamin D & 5 free travel packs – BetterHelp – 10% off your first month

The Supreme Court lifts an order preventing swift removal of alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Yet the majority of the Justices take no position on the merits of using that law, while they also emphasize the requirement of due process. Meantime, an appeals court says the White House must seek the return of a man mistakenly sent to a prison in El Salvador. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Senator Chuck Grassley discusses his efforts to rein in activist federal judges who issue national injunctions, affecting the entire country rather than just their district. He highlighted the issue of judges taking free junkets, which can influence their decisions. Grassley also addresses the Biden administration's mishandling of unaccompanied minors at the border, noting that 200,000 children were lost track of, and some were sent to families connected to MS-13. He emphasizes the need for bipartisan support to address these issues and praised the new FBI director for addressing unanswered oversight letters. Grassley also advocates for the reinstatement of whistleblowers who lost their jobs for exposing wrongdoing. Additionally, Congressman Marlon Stutzman discusses the impact of President Trump's tariffs on global trade, particularly on American farmers and producers. Stutzman highlights the historical disadvantages faced by American beef farmers due to Mad Cow Disease restrictions, which allowed Australia to build its beef industry. He emphasizes the need for fair trade rather than free trade, noting that the U.S. has been disadvantaged in defending its allies. Stutzman also mentions the positive economic impact of Trump's policies, including tax reforms, energy policies, and deregulation, which have attracted significant investments from companies like Oracle and Nvidia. He believes these policies will sustain economic growth and maintain America's global economic leadership. Finally, West Virginia has banned seven artificial food dyes due to their harmful effects, setting a precedent for other states. Senator Chris Rose talks about the legislation, highlighting the state's reputation as the least healthy and the need to address attention disorders and carcinogens linked to these dyes. Despite industry resistance, Rose notes that healthier alternatives are available and cheaper, citing examples like Aldi. The state is also considering a SNAP program waiver to remove sugary drinks. Governor Morrisey's "Mountaineer Mile" initiative aims to promote health. Rose emphasizes the need for a coalition of states, including Texas and Florida, to push for federal action on food safety.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.