Podcasts about Feasibility

Setting up a new factory is a major strategic decision. It is not just about finding cheaper land, moving away from China, or following other companies into Vietnam, Mexico, or another popular manufacturing location. In this episode, Renaud speaks with David Collins, CEO of Manufacturing Transformation Group, about what companies need to think through before relocating production or building their own factory. They discuss why more companies are considering factory relocation or ownership again, especially after COVID, tariff changes, supplier dependency, and IP concerns. But David explains why the first question should not be “where should we move?” It should be “what are we actually trying to accomplish?” The conversation covers the real trade-offs between China, Vietnam, Mexico, and other locations; why labour cost should not be the only driver; how supplier location, workforce skills, logistics, and infrastructure affect the decision; and why companies need a proper BOM, cost model, and feasibility study before making a move. They also get into greenfield vs brownfield factory projects, equipment selection, factory layout, commissioning, factory acceptance testing, and why automation can be a waste of money if it does not fit the real production process. The key message: moving to a new factory is a rare chance to redesign your manufacturing system properly. But if you simply copy the same poor layout, weak supply chain, bad inventory habits, and unsuitable equipment into a new building, you may just move the mess.   Show Sections 00:00 – Introduction: setting up a new factory 01:43 – Who David Collins and Manufacturing Transformation Group are 05:04 – Why more companies are considering factory relocation 05:50 – China, Vietnam, Mexico, and the real trade-offs between locations 08:10 – Why some companies want to own manufacturing again 09:32 – Don't just move the mess to a new factory 11:45 – The first question: what are you trying to accomplish? 12:02 – Supplier location, workforce skills, logistics, and infrastructure 14:18 – Why a real BOM and cost model are essential 15:27 – Feasibility studies and idealised factory planning 16:07 – Why automation is not always the right answer 17:34 – Comparing factory setup scenarios and locations 18:16 – Why labour cost should not be the only driver 20:48 – IP risks and supplier dependency 22:15 – Learning from the problems in your current factory 23:46 – Project management during a factory move 24:03 – Greenfield vs brownfield factory projects 26:09 – Layout planning, implementation, and local specialists 27:13 – On-the-ground project management and construction risks 28:33 – Equipment commissioning and factory acceptance testing 29:50 – Choosing equipment that fits your real needs 31:41 – Equipment maintenance, spare parts, and supplier risks 32:40 – Why factory setup is a once-in-a-decade decision 34:12 – Disciplined planning and avoiding old mistakes 36:45 – Closing thoughts   Related content How To Plan for Transferring Production To a New Factory: 45 Point Checklist Transfer Manufacturing From One Chinese Factory To Another With Fewer Risks How To Diversify Manufacturing Sources Out of China and Cut Risk Sofeast can help you > Electronic Production Transfer from China to India OR Malaysia Supply Chain Risk Management, Part 5: Moving Manufacturing to Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, or India (Pros & Cons) Production Transfer: A Roadmap (Assembly Operations Only) Get in touch with us Connect with us on LinkedIn Contact us via Sofeast's contact page Subscribe to our YouTube channel Prefer Facebook? Check us out on FB

Veronique de Rugy critiques the feasibility of single-payer healthcare in America. Citing Vermont's failed experiment, she highlights the astronomical tax increases required to fund such systems. De Rugy argues that government-run healthcare leads to rationing and stifles the medical innovation currently driven by the American private market.1949

My Free tools for sites and researchers: https://coordinare.co/My substack FREE: https://substack.com/@dansfera1?r=27gh4e&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=profileInato: https://go.inato.com/3VnSro6CRIO: http://www.clinicalresearch.ioMy PatientACE recruitment company: https://patientace.com/Join me at my conference! http://www.saveoursites.comText Me: (949) 415-6256Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7JF6FNvoLnBpfIrLNCcg7aGET THE BOOK! https://www.amazon.com/Comprehensive-Guide-Clinical-Research-Practical/dp/1090349521/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Dan+Sfera&qid=1691974540&s=audible&sr=1-1-catcorrText "guru" to 855-942-5288 to join VIP list!My blog: http://www.TheClinicalTrialsGuru.comMy CRC Academy: http://www.TheCRCacademy.comMy TikTok: DanSfera

American Rare Earths CEO Mark Wall joined Steve Darling from Proactive to announce the start of the company's 2026 exploration drilling program at the Cowboy State Mine within the Halleck Creek Rare Earths Project in Wyoming. The new campaign represents the beginning of feasibility-level drilling designed to support advancement toward a Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) at what is believed to be the largest known rare earth deposit in the United States based on total rare earth oxide content. Wall explained that the program is intended to establish the geological, geotechnical, and engineering foundation necessary for future mine planning and reserve development. The company plans to complete approximately 3,050 metres of HQ core drilling across 19 drill holes focused on the Red Mountain area of the project. Drilling officially commenced on May 13, 2026, and is expected to continue through mid-July. According to the company, the program is anticipated to generate approximately 1,045 core samples for laboratory assay testing. Remaining core material will be preserved for additional technical work, including geotechnical, hydrological, environmental, and metallurgical studies that will contribute to the DFS process and future mine design considerations. American Rare Earths also noted that all drill holes will undergo detailed geophysical logging, including optical and acoustic televiewer surveys where appropriate. These studies are expected to support advanced geomechanical analysis and provide important data related to rock structure, stability, and engineering requirements for potential future mining operations. Nine of the planned core holes are positioned on the top of Red Mountain and are specifically targeting higher-grade mineralized zones expected to contribute to the first five years of planned production, as outlined in the Cowboy State Mine pre-feasibility study pit shells. The company said these holes are designed to support future ore reserve estimation and improve confidence in the early-stage mine plan as work progresses toward the DFS. An additional ten core holes will be drilled around the base of Red Mountain, where previous channel sampling and recent geological mapping identified areas of potentially higher-grade mineralization. Management believes these holes could help further define and expand mineralized zones while improving the company's understanding of the broader deposit geometry and continuity. #proactiveinvestors #americanrareearthslimited #asx #arr #otcqx #arrnf #adr #amrry #wyomingrareinc #HalleckCreek #RareEarths #RareEarths #CriticalMinerals #MiningNews #HalleckCreek #WyomingMining #RareEarthElements #EnergyTransition #ExplorationDrilling #USMining

In this Company Introduction, I chat with Meredith Eades, President and CEO of EraNova Metals (TSXV: NOVA | OTCQB: STXPF). Meredith joins me to discuss her new leadership role, the strategic rebrand from Stuhini Exploration, and the company's dual-track approach to unlocking value from the large Ruby Creek property in Atlin, British Columbia. Key discussion points include: Fast-Tracking the Adanac Molybdenum Project: An overview of how over $100 million in historical spending and extensive infrastructure are enabling the company to bypass the pre-feasibility stage and head straight from an upcoming Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) toward a full Feasibility Study. The Strategic Value of Molybdenum: A look at the global supply landscape for molybdenum, the 433-million-pound resource at Adanac, and why current market dynamics position this development-ready asset as a rare commodity in North America. High-Grade Discovery Potential at Atlin: Exploring the separate, highly prospective exploration arm of the property, which boasts surface samples of gold, silver, tungsten, and copper. Corporate Vision and Capital Allocation: Insights into the company's lean share structure, prominent backers like Eric Sprott, and how a recent $600,000 financing will fund immediate milestones and upcoming news flow.   Click here to visit the EraNova website to learn more about the Company - https://www.eranovametals.com/ -------------------- For more market commentary & interview summaries, subscribe to our Substacks:  The KE Report: https://kereport.substack.com/  Shad's resource market commentary: https://excelsiorprosperity.substack.com/ Investment disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Investing in equities, commodities, really everything involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Guests and hosts may own shares in companies mentioned.

Send us Fan MailNonprofit capital campaign strategy starts long before the ask — it begins with donor trust, board readiness, and a clear business case for growth. Kelly Hill of CASA Heart of Missouri shares how her organization turned a space challenge into a bold campaign to serve more children and strengthen the foster care ecosystem—and what it really takes to lead a capital campaign while still running the daily work of a nonprofit!CASA Heart of Missouri serves children in foster care through trained volunteer advocates, currently reaching about 60% of the children in need across Boone and Callaway Counties. But as the organization grew, rented space became both limiting and expensive. Kelly and her team asked a defining business question: “What if we did the hard thing now, raise the money to have our own permanent space?”That question became the foundation for the Building a Brighter Future campaign, a nearly $4.7 million effort to create a permanent home and launch The Clubhouse — a purpose-built space for supervised visits, family meetings, partner collaboration, and child-centered support.This discussion offers nonprofit leaders a grounded look at capital campaign planning for nonprofits, including feasibility studies, donor readiness, board leadership, case for support development, government funding, individual giving, and the patience required when major gifts move on donor timelines.Kelly also shares how outside coaching helped sharpen communication with investment-level donors and support long-term fundraising growth beyond the campaign itself. As she notes, “Donors give on their own schedule, they give on their own timeline.”This episode shows why capital campaigns are not just fundraising projects. They are business decisions that test strategy, culture, relationships, and capacity. 00:00:00 Capital Campaign Strategy for Nonprofits 00:01:04 Meet Kelly Hill of CASA Heart of Missouri 00:03:29 The Clubhouse Vision and Local Service Gaps 00:06:43 Turning a Space Problem Into a Growth Strategy 00:09:40 Building a Strong Case for Support 00:13:42 What a $4.6 Million Campaign Means for a Mid-Sized Nonprofit 00:16:09 Feasibility, Donor Strategy, and Government Funding 00:18:30 Using Outside Coaching to Strengthen Donor Conversations 00:21:59 Patience, Timing, and the Campaign Roller Coaster 00:23:50 Donor Relationships Before the Campaign Begins 00:25:32 Balancing Daily Operations With Capital Campaign Demands 00:28:57 Final Lessons for Nonprofit Leaders #TheNonprofitShow #NonprofitFundraising #CapitalCampaignFind us Live daily on YouTube!Find us  Live daily on LinkedIn!Find us Live daily on X: @Nonprofit_ShowOur national co-hosts and amazing guests discuss management, money and missions of nonprofits!  12:30pm ET   11:30am CT  10:30am MT  9:30am PTSend us your ideas for Show Guests or Topics: HelpDesk@AmericanNonprofitAcademy.comVisit us on the web:The Nonprofit Show

Welcome to the NeurologyLive® Mind Moments® podcast. Tune in to hear leaders in neurology sound off on topics that impact your clinical practice.In this Mind Moments episode, Scott Grossman, MD, assistant professor of neurology and ophthalmology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, discusses emerging research on inter-eye retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) asymmetry as a biomarker of prior optic neuritis in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS). Drawing from data presented at the 2026 American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting, Grossman explains how optical coherence tomography (OCT) may help improve diagnostic confidence in pediatric MS by identifying remote optic nerve injury, while also outlining how a 4-micron inter-eye RNFL difference emerged as the optimal threshold in this cohort. The conversation also explores the role of OCT within the updated 2024 McDonald Criteria, the feasibility of integrating OCT into routine neurology practice, challenges surrounding normative pediatric OCT data, and future research directions involving visible light OCT and broader population datasets. Looking for more Multiple Sclerosis discussion? Check out the NeurologyLive® Multiple Sclerosis clinical focus page.Episode Breakdown: 1:15 – Optic nerve involvement and updated MS diagnostic criteria  3:20 – Pediatric RNFL asymmetry thresholds and interpretation of study findings 5:15 – Clinical implications of OCT biomarkers in pediatric-onset MS  6:40 – Neurology News Network  8:40 – Feasibility of incorporating OCT into neurology and MS practice  10:15 – Future research directions, including normative data and visible light OCT The stories featured in this week's Neurology News Minute, which will give you quick updates on the following developments in neurology, are further detailed here: FDA Approves AXS-05 as New Treatment for Alzheimer Disease Agitation FDA Approves Ocrelizumab for Pediatric Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Efgartigimod Gains FDA Approval as First Treatment for Seronegative Forms of Myasthenia Gravis Thanks for listening to the NeurologyLive® Mind Moments® podcast. To support the show, be sure to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts. For more neurology news and expert-driven content, visit neurologylive.com.

What does truly culturally responsive autism support look like—and who should lead it? In this episode, Ben speaks with Dr. Davis Henderson, Dr. Candi Running Bear, and Dr. Olivia Lindly about their work adapting the Parents Taking Action program for Diné (Navajo) families. Together, they unpack how geography, language, family structure, and cultural values shape access to autism services—and how their team is working alongside communities to close those gaps. From telehealth delivery across vast rural regions to adapting AAC tools in Indigenous languages, this conversation highlights what it really takes to move beyond “one-size-fits-all” care. The team also shares their innovative next step: empowering parents to train educators—flipping the traditional model of expertise on its head. What You'll Learn Why autism awareness and services remain limited in many Indigenous communities How the Diné Parents Taking Action program was culturally adapted The role of community advisory boards in ethical, effective research How telehealth unexpectedly improved access and connection Why AAC must be culturally and linguistically responsive The importance of extended family systems in caregiving How parents are being empowered to train educators What culturally responsive autism assessment still gets wrong—and how to improve it Key Topics & Highlights Adapting evidence-based interventions for Indigenous communities Barriers: rural geography, transportation, internet, and systemic gaps Language access—including the need for autism terminology in Navajo Cultural values like Hózhó and their role in care AAC innovation: from iPads to paper-based systems in low-resource settings Community connection as an intervention outcome Expanding work to Hopi and other Indigenous communities Watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/XWkC-7l19is Continuing Education Credits (https://www.cbiconsultants.com/shop) BACB: 1.0 Ethics IBAO:  1.0 Cultural QABA: 1.0 Ethics CBA/CPD: 1.0 Cultural Diversity  Follow us! Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/behaviourspeak/ LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/in/behaviourspeak TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@behaviorspeak   About the Guests Dr. Davis Henderson – Associate Professor, Northern Arizona University. Navajo researcher focused on communication disorders and culturally responsive care. https://directory.nau.edu/?person=dh929 Dr. Candi Running Bear – Assistant Professor, University of New Mexico. Former special education teacher with deep experience in early childhood education on the Navajo Nation. https://coehs.unm.edu/faculty-staff/profiles/running-bear-candi.html Dr. Olivia Lindly – Associate Professor, Northern Arizona University. Public health researcher focused on maternal and child health and autism services. https://www.linkedin.com/in/olivia-lindly-phd-mph-3323306/ https://directory.nau.edu/?person=ojl28   Research Discussed: Lindly OJ, Running Bear CL, Henderson DE, Lopez K, Nozadi SS, Vining C, Bia S, Hill E and Leaf A (2023). Adaptation of the Parents Taking Action program for Diné (Navajo) parents of children with autism. Front. Educ. 8:1197197. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1197197 Lindly, O., Running Bear, C., Henderson, D. E., Kirby, B. R., Begay, V., Shui, A., Dababnah, S., & Magaña, S. M. (2025). Pilot study of a strengths-based education program for Diné (Navajo) families of autistic children: Feasibility, fidelity, acceptability, and initial outcomes. Research in Autism, 127, 202658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reia.2025.202658 Related Episodes: https://www.behaviourspeak.com/e/episode-37-the-realities-of-autism-in-first-nations-communities-in-canada-with-grant-bruno-phd-candidate/ https://www.behaviourspeak.com/e/episode-147-culturally-responsive-care-in-indigenous-communities-with-dr-jaxcy-turietta/ https://www.behaviourspeak.com/e/behavior-analysis-and-indigenous-ways-of-being-with-leslie-peters

"Pre-construction has become less efficient than construction itself."That is the claim Dustin Devan made on this week's Bricks, Bucks & Bytes after returning from Advancing Pre-Con. Martin, Patric Hellermann and Dustin also dug into the proposed California wealth tax, Bentley's Q1 earnings, and why VCs keep funding the 51st AI takeoff company.Tune in to find out about:✅ Why 80% of project cost is locked in before design is even 30% done✅ How the California wealth tax proposal would actually value private companies✅ Patric's case for indexing into "directionally right" early-stage bets✅ Why takeoff is a feature, not a companyListen now on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and YouTube.#aec #construction #constructiontech #bricksandbytes #bricksbucksandbytes #ai #vcOur Sponsors:BreadCrumb- 50,000+ projects globally. All running safer, faster, with Breadcrumb. - breadcrumb.coAphex is the multiplayer planning platform where construction teams plan together, stay aligned, and deliver projects faster – check out aphex.coArchdesk -  “The #1 Construction Management Software for Growing Companies - Manage your projects from Tender to Handover” check archdesk.comChapters00:00 Intro00:35 Introduction and Overview of Topics02:15 US Construction Spending Trends09:52 California Wealth Tax Proposal26:29 Advancing Pre-Construction Insights34:38 Building Cost Infrastructure and Pricing Engines40:30 The Role of Design in Construction Projects45:39 The Importance of Feasibility in Design50:46 The Impact of AI on Construction Estimation53:25 Navigating the Takeoff Tool Landscape57:02 Innovations in Construction Robotics 

Interview with Brian W. Penny, CEO and Director, Wallbridge MiningOur previous interview: https://www.cruxinvestor.com/posts/wallbridge-mining-tsxwm-advances-dual-gold-strategy-in-quebecs-abitibi-belt-8667Recording date: 12th May 2026Wallbridge Mining is advancing a significant gold resource base in Quebec's Abitibi region, one of the world's most established mining jurisdictions. The company controls approximately 4.25 million ounces of gold across two projects: the more advanced Fenelon deposit with 3.5 million ounces, and the earlier-stage Martiniere project with 750,000 ounces. Both assets remain open for expansion and are being evaluated independently to ensure disciplined capital allocation.A March 2025 preliminary economic assessment for Fenelon highlights strong project economics, including a net present value of $1.4 billion, a 34% internal rate of return, and a rapid 2.4-year payback period at a conservative gold price of $3,000 per ounce. The project is designed as a 15-year underground operation producing an average of 107,000 ounces annually, with higher-grade output of 127,000 ounces per year in the first five years to accelerate returns.Management has adopted a “right-sized” development strategy, opting for a 3,000 ton-per-day operation. This approach reduces capital intensity, simplifies permitting, and minimizes environmental impact while preserving upside from the broader resource base. Advancing the project to pre-feasibility will require $50–60 million and is expected to take approximately four years, including permitting and agreements with Indigenous communities.Near-term catalysts include metallurgical testing to confirm gold recovery rates and validate dry-stack tailings, as well as an active drilling program at Martiniere targeting exploration upside. Despite strong project fundamentals, Wallbridge's market capitalization remains around $100 million, creating a potential valuation gap.With improving gold market conditions and a clear pathway to development, Wallbridge is positioned to unlock value through continued de-risking, resource conversion, and strategic flexibility, including the possibility of future acquisition.Learn more: https://www.cruxinvestor.com/companies/wallbridge-miningSign up for Crux Investor: https://cruxinvestor.com

Iran has enough material stockpiled to create 10 nuclear bombs. They also have the missiles that could deliver those bombs to almost any city in Europe, built and ready to use. That comes from an assessment by the International Atomic Agency.   Meanwhile the Iranian economy is in a freefall, there is growing unrest in the ranks of the IRGC, and they are facing a massive potential disease crisis. Then Trump announces Iran could be close to signing a 14 point deal. Also Marco Rubio just issued a statement where he said the war is officially over. How does any of this make sense? Ben Hilton breaks it down for you here on today's show.  Sign up for The Israel Guys Show Notes: https://theisraelguys.com/subscribe/ Follow The Israel Guys on X: https://x.com/theisraelguys Join our Telegram channel: https://t.me/theisraelguys Source Links: Democratic lawmakers requesting details on Israel's Nuclear program https://www.timesofisrael.com/30-democratic-lawmakers-ask-rubio-to-reveal-details-of-israels-nuclear-program/ Timeline for Iran's Nuclear weapons program https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-895127 Feasibility of constructing nuclear weapon using 60% grade uranium https://scienceandglobalsecurity.org/archive/sgs33caplan.pdf How quickly can a bomb be built? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/22/what-is-uranium-enrichment-and-how-quickly-could-iran-build-a-nuclear-bomb Director-general of IAEA on what they know of Iran's current nuclear capability https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f96OlQdovg8 Detailed analysis of the effects of the 12-day war on the Iranian nuclear program https://www.inss.org.il/publication/iran-nuclear-program/   #Israelnews #Hezbollah #Iranwar #Trump #Bibi #Americannews #Ceasefire #Trump #Nuclear  

In this episode of the NCS Podcast Hot Topics series, host Richard Choi, DO, FNCS, is joined by Katharina Busl, MD, MS, to discuss the article "Infratentorial Pressure Monitoring in Cerebellar Stroke: Feasibility and Prognostic Utility," recently published in Neurocritical Care. Their conversation examines why pressure in the posterior fossa may differ from supratentorial measurements in patients with cerebellar stroke and why that distinction may matter clinically. They discuss the physiologic basis for compartmentalized intracranial pressure, the challenges of posterior fossa management and the potential implications for monitoring and treatment. Dr. Busl reviews the study's design and key findings, including evidence of a significant pressure gradient between infratentorial and supratentorial compartments and an early signal that higher infratentorial pressures may be associated with worse outcomes. She also discusses important limitations, including the study's small sample size, single-center nature and unanswered questions about surgical variables such as decompression size. The discussion further considers how this proof-of-concept work could inform future studies on monitoring, prognostication and treatment selection in cerebellar stroke. The views expressed on the NCS Podcast are solely those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official positions of the Neurocritical Care Society.

What if one of the most popular health trends in the world, fasting, is actually being done wrong by millions of people? In this powerful and deeply grounded conversation, Darin sits down with world-renowned longevity expert Dr. Valter Longo to cut through the noise surrounding fasting, dieting, and modern health trends. From the dangers of prolonged fasting and skipping breakfast to the science behind the Fasting Mimicking Diet, this episode delivers a reality check rooted in decades of clinical research, not social media hype. They explore the intersection of longevity, cancer, metabolism, and modern lifestyle, unpacking why extreme protocols fail, why simplicity wins, and why aligning with your biology is the true key to a long, disease-free life.     What You'll Learn Why most fasting trends are misapplied and potentially harmful The safest and most sustainable fasting window for longevity Why skipping breakfast is linked to increased mortality risk The science behind the Fasting Mimicking Diet (FMD) How fasting impacts cancer cells vs healthy cells The hidden risks of GLP-1 weight loss drugs Why "easy solutions" often lead to worse long-term outcomes The importance of circadian rhythm in metabolism The truth about protein intake and long-term health risks Why slow, consistent change beats every "quick fix"     Chapters 00:00:00 – Opening: SuperLife mission and framing the conversation 00:00:32 – Sponsor: Therasage infrared sauna and heat therapy benefits 00:03:16 – Introduction: Dr. Valter Longo and longevity research 00:03:40 – The fasting craze: what's misunderstood 00:04:05 – Documentary discussion: science vs entertainment 00:05:13 – Why education must outweigh entertainment 00:06:19 – The danger of social media health advice 00:07:00 – Food systems, pharma, and systemic health issues 00:07:58 – Why clinical trials matter more than anecdotes 00:08:15 – Framing fasting: trends vs real science 00:08:59 – The problem with DIY fasting 00:10:03 – The safest fast: 12-hour daily fasting explained 00:10:38 – Risks of long fasting: cholesterol, gallstones, mortality 00:11:09 – Why skipping breakfast increases health risks 00:11:49 – 12-hour fasting as the most sustainable protocol 00:12:13 – Modern eating habits: 15+ hour eating windows 00:12:34 – Why extreme diets fail long-term 00:13:37 – Feasibility: why most people won't sustain extremes 00:13:56 – Introducing the Fasting Mimicking Diet (FMD) 00:14:53 – Risks of fasting without personalization 00:15:20 – Why fasting can do more harm than good 00:15:45 – Sponsor: Alkemis Paint, indoor toxicity and non-toxic paint 00:18:42 – Clinical trials: meal timing and metabolic health 00:19:03 – Morning vs evening calorie intake study 00:19:56 – Why late eating disrupts metabolism and sleep 00:20:21 – Epidemiology: skipping breakfast increases mortality 00:21:18 – Circadian rhythm and digestion explained 00:22:11 – Evolutionary biology of eating patterns 00:22:41 – Circadian violations and long-term consequences 00:23:11 – Short-term benefits vs long-term risks 00:24:01 – Why slow progress leads to real results 00:24:49 – Realistic timelines: years, not weeks 00:25:19 – The modern system pushing unhealthy behaviors 00:25:48 – GLP-1 drugs: convenience vs consequences 00:26:13 – The danger of "effortless health" 00:27:13 – Exercise analogy: why effort still matters 00:28:06 – The "pill for everything" mentality 00:28:48 – Finding balance between extremes 00:29:25 – Sponsor: Our Place, non-toxic cookware and health 00:31:12 – Personalization vs one-size-fits-all health 00:31:51 – GLP-1 risks: depression, anxiety, muscle loss 00:32:36 – Natural vs drug-induced weight loss differences 00:33:29 – Rebound weight gain and hormonal suppression 00:34:14 – Supplements vs fixing root causes 00:34:37 – What is the Fasting Mimicking Diet 00:35:05 – Cancer research: fasting and treatment synergy 00:36:13 – How FMD mimics fasting while protecting the body 00:37:06 – Gut health and microbiome benefits 00:38:32 – FMD vs water-only fasting outcomes 00:39:26 – Clinical trials: Crohn's and colitis remission 00:40:03 – Importance of independent research 00:41:20 – Longevity through the lens of fatherhood 00:42:23 – Concerns about AI and children's development 00:43:25 – Social isolation vs digital addiction 00:44:25 – The need for balance in technology use 00:45:10 – AI overdependence and cognitive decline 00:46:18 – Mental health crisis and modern technology 00:47:10 – Reclaiming creativity and human agency 00:48:43 – Fasting and cancer: immune system activation 00:49:53 – Why cancer cells resist fasting signals 00:51:10 – The "desert analogy" for cancer vulnerability 00:52:54 – Combining fasting with therapies 00:54:07 – Future of treatment: precision targeting 00:55:14 – Early detection and personalized interventions 00:56:12 – Where fasting fits in cancer care today 00:57:31 – The protein debate: how much is too much 00:58:17 – Protein intake guidelines explained 00:59:07 – Quality vs quantity of protein 01:00:18 – SuperLife Patreon and accessing exclusive content 01:01:21 – The protein obsession problem 01:02:00 – Children consuming excessive protein 01:03:18 – Portion control and dietary awareness 01:04:07 – Risks of excessive protein intake 01:05:04 – Minimal benefits vs long-term risks 01:06:12 – Longevity populations and low protein intake 01:08:00 – The future of nutrition science 01:12:00 – Final reflections on longevity and health 01:15:00 – Closing thoughts: aligning with biology     Thank You to Our Sponsors Therasage: Go to www.therasage.com and use code DARIN20 at checkout for 20% off Alkemis: Go to alkemispaint.com and use code DARIN10 for 10% off your order. Our Place: Toxic-free, durable cookware that supports healthy cooking. Use code DARIN for 10% off at fromourplace.com.     Join the SuperLife Community Get Darin's deeper wellness breakdowns — beyond social media restrictions: Weekly voice notes Ingredient deep dives Wellness challenges Energy + consciousness tools Community accountability Extended episodes Join for $7.49/month → https://patreon.com/darinolien     Find More from Dr. Valter Longo Website: valterlongo.com Instagram: @prof_valterlongo Get His New Book: Fasting Cancer     Find More from Darin Olien: Instagram: @darinolien Podcast: SuperLife Podcast Website: superlife.com Book: Fatal Conveniences New Show: Roadmap to Happiness     Key Takeaway "The path to longevity isn't found in extreme protocols or quick fixes, it's found in consistency, alignment, and understanding your biology. When you stop chasing shortcuts and start working with your body instead of against it, that's when real transformation happens, not just in how long you live, but in how well you live."

ArticlesOncologic and Functional Outcomes of Active Surveillance and Ablative Therapy for Small Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Read)Transvenous Extrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts (TEPS): Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided Creation of Portocaval, Mesocaval, and Splenorenal Shunts (Read)Safety and Feasibility of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Cirrhosis-Induced Splenomegaly and Thrombocytopenia: Results from an Investigational Device Exemption Study (Read)HostSonya Choe, University of California Riverside School of MedicineAudio EditorMarie Hamel, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityAbstract ReadersMorgan Smeltzer, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker School of MedicineShobhit Chamoli, Armed Forces Medical CollegeTiffany Nakla, Touro University Nevada College of Osteopathic Medicine, NevadaSupport the show

Interview with Victor Cantore, President & CEO of Amex Exploration Inc.Our previous interview: https://www.cruxinvestor.com/posts/amex-exploration-tsxvamx-undervalued-investment-series-with-victor-cantore-9724Recording date: 14th April 2026Amex Exploration has released a feasibility study for its Perron Gold Mine in Quebec's Abitibi greenstone belt, delivering some of the most compelling economics in the junior mining sector. At a base case gold price of $3,500 per ounce, the project generates a post-tax net present value of $1.1 billion, rising to $1.7 billion at current spot prices near $4,750. The internal rate of return stands at 114%, with a post-tax payback period of just 0.5 years — meaning initial capital is recovered within months of first production.The project targets 774,000 ounces over five years from a 2.3 million ounce resource, mining at a high diluted grade of 12.1 grams per tonne — an improvement over the 10 g/t estimated in earlier assessments. Annual production is expected to average 147,000 ounces at all-in sustaining costs of $910 per ounce, generating $2.492 billion in pre-tax cash flow over the initial five-year period, or $3.7 billion at spot gold prices.A key feature of the project is its phased development strategy. Rather than constructing the full operation at once, Amex will begin with a $50 million bulk sample in mid-2027, which is expected to produce at least 23,000 ounces and generate approximately $68 million in pre-production revenue. This self-funding mechanism significantly reduces the need for equity financing. Phase one production is targeted for 2028 — three to four years ahead of a conventional development timeline.Initial capital expenditure of $193.9 million is kept lean through contract mining and toll milling arrangements, eliminating the need to build processing facilities or tailings infrastructure. This also simplifies permitting, as the early phases require only underground mining approvals. The bulk sample permit was secured within the expected six-month window, and community and First Nations support is well established.The property spans over 600 square kilometres in the historically prolific Abitibi greenstone belt, yet all current resources sit within just 6 square kilometres — leaving considerable room for future exploration and resource expansion beyond the initial mine plan.View Amex Exploration's company profile: https://www.cruxinvestor.com/companies/amex-explorationSign up for Crux Investor: https://cruxinvestor.com

Hello! This is Episode 396, and I want to talk about something that comes up at the very beginning of almost every project I hear about. It usually sounds like one of these questions. "Should I add a second storey, or extend out the back?" Or… "Is it worth renovating what we have, or should we just knock it down and build new?" Or… "We've got a blank block - do we go with a volume builder, or work with an architect or designer and do a custom project?" [For all resources mentioned in this podcast and a free, downloadable PDF transcript, head to www.undercoverarchitect.com/396] And what all of these questions have in common is this: they come from a place of genuinely not knowing which direction to go. There are multiple options on the table. Each of them could potentially work. They can vary in budget and timelines and team structure and approvals. But you don't yet have enough information to choose between them with confidence. And so what a lot of people do - and I completely understand the impulse - is to just pick one. Pick the option that seems most obvious, or most affordable, or the one that someone recommended, and start moving forward. Because forward feels like progress. And staying in that uncomfortable place of not knowing can feel like being stuck. But here's what I've seen happen, again and again. People who make that early decision without doing the groundwork first often find themselves... sometimes months in, sometimes with significant professional fees already spent... discovering that there was a better option they hadn't fully explored. Or a constraint they didn't know about. Or a cost they hadn't factored in. And by that point, going back feels devastating. But pushing forward doesn't feel right either. In this episode, I want to help you avoid that. I want to share a way of thinking about this phase of your project that can genuinely change your experience of it. And I want to give you a clear, practical process for how to navigate this decision-making period... so that when you do commit to a direction, you can do it with real confidence and strategy. As always, if you’d like to access a full transcript of this episode and links to the resources I mention, head to www.undercoverarchitect.com/396. Now, let’s dive in! RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THIS PODCAST: For links, images and resources mentioned in this podcast, head to >>> www.undercoverarchitect.com/396 Accessing my free '44 Ways' E-Book will simplify sustainability and help you create a healthy, low tox and sustainable home. You can download your free copy here >>> https://undercoverarchitect.com/ways Access the support and guidance you need to be confident and empowered when renovating and building your family home inside my flagship online program >>> https://undercoverarchitect.com/courses/the-home-method/ Just a reminder: All content on this podcast is provided by Undercover Architect for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in any circumstances, including but not limited to circumstances where loss or damage may result. The views and opinions of any guests on the podcast are solely their own. They may not reflect the views of Undercover Architect. Undercover Architect endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It's February 2026, welcome to MuseNews, the BCMA's monthly museum sector news podcast. Each month we recap some of the latest breaking news, happenings, and announcements from museums, galleries, and heritage organizations across BC and beyond. February 2026 Stories:  Find Just Desserts at Pitt Meadows Museum | Maple Ridge News Royal BC Museum faces mounting financial pressures Feasibility study looks at life after Selkirk at KSA : My Nelson Now Aviation Museum brings back Open Cockpit Day to North Saanich | Victoria News ‘Float the Boat' campaign aims to keep Maritime Museum of BC sailing through transition year

Show Highlights: Is M&A a strategic lever or a standalone strategy? [04:09] Motivations and processes in sell-side vs. buy-side M&A. [07:35] Key data a pre-deal internal evaluation should find. [12:10] Assessing feasibility and financing capacity before a deal. [13:10] Verdant Partners' role in mid-sized agribusiness M&A. [17:21] Cash vs. equity deals in co-op and corporation scenarios. [24:05] The complexity of merging co-ops and member benefits. [27:55] Why does early data-backed storytelling matter in M&A? [30:59] How M&A partners provide objectivity and stress-testing. [33:48] Overview of Verdant Partners and their industry impact. [35:45] Connect with Marijn Hendrickx on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/marijnhendrickx/. Explore Verdant Partners at https://www.verdantpartners.com/. Link to "Ep25: Future-Proofing your Agribusiness with Garrett Stoerger of Verdant Partners": https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep25-future-proofing-your-agribusiness-with-garrett/id1674259917?i=1000626158549 If you are interested in connecting with Joe, go to LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joemosher/, or schedule a call at www.moshercg.com.

"A side effect patients might experience is lymphedema. This is an increased buildup of lymphatic fluid in the tissues, either in the breast or in the arm and hand of the affected side. It's quite problematic for women. They might feel self-conscious. It might feel uncomfortable that the arm feels like it's throbbing or heavy. Clothing may not fit quite right. So we're always on the lookout for lymphedema," Maria Fenton-Kerimian, APRN, AOCNP®, nurse practitioner at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, told Jaime Weimer, MSN, RN, AGCNS-BS, AOCNS®, manager of oncology nursing practice at ONS, during a conversation about radiation site-specific side effects in breast cancer. Music Credit: "Fireflies and Stardust" by Kevin MacLeod Licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 3.0  Earn 0.5 contact hours of nursing continuing professional development (NCPD) by listening to the full recording and completing an evaluation at courses.ons.org by March 27, 2027. The planners and faculty for this episode have no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose. ONS is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. Learning outcome: Learners will report an increase in knowledge related to side effects experienced with radiation therapy to the breast. Episode Notes  Complete this evaluation for free NCPD.  ONS Podcast™ episodes: Episode 368: Best Practices for Challenging Patient Conversations in Metastatic Breast Cancer Episode 354: Breast Cancer Survivorship Considerations for Nurses Episode 301: Radiation Oncology: Side Effect and Care Coordination Best Practices Episode 298: Radiation Oncology: Nursing's Essential Roles Episode 194: Sex Is a Component of Patient-Centered Care ONS Voice articles: Could High-Dose Radiation Be the Missing Link in Breast Cancer Immunotherapy? Exercise Program Improves Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer—and Keeps Them Moving Daily Frank Conversations Enhance Sexual and Reproductive Health Support During Cancer How to Handle Even the Worst Radiation Therapy Side Effects Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing articles: Instruments to Evaluate Self-Management of Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer The Effects of a Clinical Care Model on Quality Process Outcomes in Radiation Oncology Oncology Nursing Forum articles: Feasibility of Breast Radiation Therapy Video Education Combined With Standard Radiation Therapy Education for Patients With Breast Cancer ONS Guidelines™ for Cancer Treatment–Related Radiodermatitis ONS books:  Guide to Breast Care for Oncology Nurses Manual for Radiation Oncology Nursing Practice and Education (fifth edition) ONS/ONCC® courses:  Radiation Oncology Conference Recordings Bundle™ Radiation Therapy Certificate™ ONS Huddle Cards: Altered Body Image Late Effects of Cancer Treatment Radiation Sexuality ONS Guidelines™: Cancer Treatment–Related Lymphedema Cancer Treatment–Related Radiodermatitis ONS Learning Libraries: Breast Cancer Radiation American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) National Comprehensive Cancer Network home page To discuss the information in this episode with other oncology nurses, visit the ONS Communities.  To find resources for creating an ONS Podcast club in your chapter or nursing community, visit the ONS Podcast Library. To provide feedback or otherwise reach ONS about the podcast, email pubONSVoice@ons.org. Highlights From This Episode "The goals of radiation to the breast are typically broken out into three different rationales. Either adjuvant treatment, where the tumor is removed surgically from the breast first and then radiation is delivered to lower the likelihood of return of the cancer. And then the second way it's given is with a curative intent. That may be for tumors that couldn't be fully resected, and the hope is to eradicate the tumor that is still present in the tissue. Lastly, it can be given in a palliative fashion where you're not expecting to completely cure the person of the cancer, but you hope to shrink the tumor enough to relieve symptoms." TS 1:46 "We really try to focus on patients managing fatigue by ensuring that they're having an appropriate, balanced diet with proper macro and micronutrients and that they're having adequate protein intake. We encourage patients to get adequate sleep. There is a culture of people pushing themselves and working into late hours of the night, and this would be quite difficult if you're experiencing radiation-induced fatigue. If someone is familiar and does regular exercise, we highly encourage them to continue that. If someone has not done much exercise and has slipped into a little bit of deconditioning or they're older or more frail, we might refer them for physical therapy or strength training to rebuild some of that stamina and energy." TS 7:56 "One of the key products to use for prevention of radiation dermatitis are silicone patches, and there are many on the market that are worn during the course of radiation or when the skin reaction begins. And they could stay on for several days during treatment, even if you're gently showering around the area. There are many homeopathic creams made from calendula flower, aloe vera, or some kind of combination of these types of products. The real issue with these products is that many of them aren't covered by insurance, so patients have to buy them out of pocket, over the counter. For some of our patients who are more financially challenged, it may be a problem. So I think [it's important] to be familiar with many different products so that patients have access to something that will minimize their skin reaction." TS 14:48 "After 90 days, it may be more common to see some of the cosmetic changes that can happen in the soft tissue of the breast. One of them is radiation fibrosis, which can be like a diffused scar tissue in the breast. It can sometimes cause hardening, retraction, or asymmetry. Sometimes it can cause a tight feeling where people can't stretch their arm to the full extent. We also know that there can be slower healing if surgery is done. For people that have tissue expanders or still want to have corrective plastic surgery, we really encourage them to wait at least six months or longer before approaching any of those plastic surgery procedures." TS 19:55 "Sexual health is such a big topic, but I think that nurses in radiation oncology are in a very good position to discuss that because we see patients for repeated period of time. So, there's maybe a quicker intimacy or familiarity that happens with the nurses in radiation. Personally, I always bring it up at a follow-up visit, which we do about a month after radiation ends. And it's kind of because the dust is settling and people are getting back to their lives." TS 23:53

The Trump Administration calls for sign changes at the Wichita Wildlife Refuge.A new report looks at the possibility of nuclear energy in the Sooner State.Improving the outcome of stroke-related complications on rural Oklahomans.You can find the KOSU Daily wherever you get your podcasts, you can also subscribe, rate us and leave a comment.You can keep up to date on all the latest news throughout the day at KOSU.org and make sure to follow us on Facebook, Tik Tok and Instagram at KOSU Radio.This is The KOSU Daily, Oklahoma news, every weekday.

Roger Whitney explores why retirement planning software—especially Monte Carlo simulations—can give a false sense of confidence if misunderstood. He explains what these tools actually measure, the hidden assumptions behind them, and why retirement is a complex problem that requires judgment, flexibility, and resilience—not just a high “success rate.” Roger shares how to properly interpret results, avoid common traps, and use software as a guide rather than a decision-maker so you can build a retirement plan that supports a great life.OUTLINE OF THIS EPISODE OF THE RETIREMENT ANSWER MAN(00:00) This show is dedicated to helping you not just survive retirement, but have the confidence to lean in and rock it.(00:30) Roger introduces the episode topic—why your retirement calculator's success rate can be misleading.PRACTICAL PLANNING SEGMENT(02:50) Roger explains his perspective as a long-time practitioner and outlines his experience using Monte Carlo-based retirement tools.(05:05) Complicated vs. complex problems: why retirement can't be “solved” like a math equation and must instead be managed over time.(09:30) Concerns about overreliance on software—from advisors scaling businesses to individuals misinterpreting results.(11:30) What retirement software actually measures.(13:25) What software does NOT measure.(14:18) Best uses of planning software.(17:40) What software should NOT be used for.(19:40) Key dangers of using retirement software.(23:00) Feasibility vs. resilience: why a plan that “works” on paper may still be fragile in real life.(24:20) The real risk:Overspending early and jeopardizing later yearsUnderspending and missing out on life(26:20) The massive number of assumptions behind every plan—and how small changes can dramatically alter outcomes over time.(38:20) How to interpret results properly.(40:55) Looking beyond the number: evaluating the distribution of outcomes and plan sensitivity.(44:43) Understanding failures:Timing (early vs. late failures)Severity (minor shortfall vs. major gap)(48:27) Best practices:Hold success rates lightlyKeep plans simpleRegularly review assumptionsAvoid over-planning and constant tweakingDefine what success actually means for your lifeSMART SPRINT(56:04) Schedule time to review the assumptions in your retirement planning software—focus on understanding the inputs rather than optimizing the output.CLOSING THOUGHTS(56:50) Roger shares an update on the merger of his firm with Tanya Nichols' firm and the creation of a new company, Retire Agile.REFERENCESlivewithroger.com — Register for Noodle Live on March 28!Submit a Question for RogerSign up for The Noodle

Interviewer info Lyssa Rome is a speech-language pathologist in the San Francisco Bay Area. She is on staff at the Aphasia Center of California, where she facilitates groups for people with aphasia and their care partners. She owns an LPAA-focused private practice and specializes in working with people with neurogenic communication disorders. She has worked in acute hospital, skilled nursing, and continuum of care settings. Prior to becoming an SLP, Lyssa was a public radio journalist, editor, and podcast producer. In this episode, Lyssa Rome interviews Jessica Obermeyer about group treatment for aphasia. Guest info Jessica Obermeyer, PhD, CCC-SLP, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Her area of specialization is acquired adult neurogenic language disorders. Dr. Obermeyer's research interests include discourse production in aphasia, treatment efficacy, and the cognitive requirements of language production. Prior to earning her doctorate, she worked in a variety of clinical settings where she specialized in assessment and treatment of adult neurogenic populations.     Listener Take-aways In today's episode you will: ● Recognize the role of written communication in clients' daily activities, including texting, email, and online tasks. ● Adapt ARCS-W treatment components to match each client's preferred writing modality (handwriting vs. typing). ● Identify candidates with aphasia who are well-suited for discourse-level writing treatment. Lyssa Rome Welcome to the Aphasia Access Aphasia Conversations Podcast. I'm Lyssa Rome. I'm a speech language pathologist on staff at the Aphasia Center of California, and I see clients with aphasia and other neurogenic communication disorders in my LPAA-focused private practice. I'm also a member of the Aphasia Access Podcast Working Group. Aphasia Access strives to provide members with information, inspiration, and ideas that support their aphasia care through a variety of educational materials and resources. I'm today's host for an episode that will feature Dr. Jessica Obermeyer, who was selected as a 2024 Tavistock Trust for Aphasia, Distinguished Scholar, USA and Canada. Dr. Obermeyer is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Her area of specialization is acquired adult neurogenic language disorders. Dr Obermeyer's research interests include discourse production and aphasia treatment efficacy and the cognitive requirements of language production. Prior to earning her doctorate, she worked in a variety of clinical settings, where she specialized in assessment and treatment of adult neurogenic populations. Jessica Obermeyer, welcome to the podcast, and thanks for being here. Jessica Obermeyer Thank you. It's a pleasure. Lyssa Rome So I wanted to get started with a question we often ask, which is: How did you get into this? Was there an aha moment for you and what led you to research aphasia? Jessica Obermeyer That's a great question. I think it was more of a slow awakening and journey to realizing that this is how I wanted to spend my days. When I started studying speech language pathology, I knew I wanted to work in adult rehab with people with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and aphasia. But as an undergraduate and a masters student, I worked on a lot of research related to traumatic brain injury and cognition. But then I had some exposure to aphasia research, and as a clinician, I just loved working with people that had aphasia. I loved running aphasia groups. I started aphasia groups, and when I decided to go back for my PhD, that is what I wanted to focus on. I also had the opportunity to work in adult outpatient, so I got to see a lot of people that had aphasia and were at different points in their rehabilitation journey. And those experiences just made me want to continue and especially do research that could develop and evaluate different treatment approaches for people that had aphasia. Lyssa Rome One of the sort of through lines in your research has been discourse. And I'm curious about how you landed on that as the focus of your work, why discourse? Jessica Obermeyer It's how we talk. It was always, you know, something I was interested in. I think, as a clinician, I felt really daunted by discourse, because it is laborious, you know, it takes a lot of time to think about how you're going to analyze it. But I was always so fascinated by all the linguistic components that make up discourse as a clinician. And then I think as a researcher, I really appreciate how important it is. Everything we do in our day to day lives is often at a discourse level, and that looks so different depending on the type of discourse. So your text exchange is discourse, your emails, your conversations, the interaction with a barista. You know, every kind of functional way that we communicate is often at a discourse level. But it's so different depending on what that interaction looks like, and that's just endlessly fascinating to me as a researcher… challenging but fascinating. Lyssa Rome Challenging both to evaluate and, I guess, to some extent, to treat. One of the things that I really appreciate is that it's how we communicate in our daily lives, and so if we're thinking about life participation and sort of functional approaches to treatment, to my mind, discourse is kind of where it's at. So I'm really excited to get to talk to you more about it. So speaking of discourse, I thought we could talk about your work on ARCS. Maybe we could start by telling us a little bit about the origins and how you became involved in researching. Jessica Obermeyer Yes, I'd be happy to. I started doing research with ARCS as a doctoral student. So it's been a long time, but the origin of ARCS, or Attentive Reading with Constrained Summarization, started with Yvonne Rogalski and Lisa Edmonds, and they published the first paper, I think, in 2009, but someone should go back to check that, and it was originally for someone that had primary progressive aphasia. And then there was another paper published for two people with Wernicke's aphasia. So in the original version, it's based on constrained summarization, and constrained only in that you're giving someone guidelines for how to summarize so they have to read through a segment of text. Usually it's a current event article, but clinically, you could use pretty much any written text. And I've actually done it with someone listening as well. Typically with ARCS, you would have someone read a segment of written text and then summarize it with the constraint or guideline to be specific. So avoid words like it, stuff, thing, he, she. So use that really intentional word retrieval. That's not what we typically do. We often use non-specific words, but it's that therapeutic, like try to go for the really precise and specific word exercise that retrieval and to also stay on topic, so try not to add a tangent, or, you know, additional information that's not related to what you're reading. And then in my work, I've added an additional guideline that's just based on what that person needs. So if they're repeating a lot, then that might be part of the guideline. Often, the guideline is to try to include the essential information that you've identified already. So that's the origin of ARCS. And as a doctoral student, I really wanted to do treatment research. I became really interested in cooperative learning theory, in how people can work together in their learning, collaborate to improve learning. And when I was doing that, reading and thinking about cooperative learning, writing seemed like such an excellent tool for that, because I think one of the hard things about spoken language is that it's just gone. You say it, it's gone. It's very hard to monitor, which I'm acutely aware of right now in this recording. But with written text, you have this wonderful record of what you've produced, and that can be really helpful for thinking about language and planning, especially in an approach like ARCS or ARCS-W that emphasizes this planning, process-driven component, where you're thinking about, "What do I need to include in this discourse? What's important? What's not important? And what have I actually produced? Does that meet, you know, the guidelines I've tried to meet?" So that's how writing actually got pulled into it. And I wanted to keep the spoken language because, I don't know that I've ever met someone with aphasia who told me they didn't want to continue exercising their spoken language, but the writing was just I think, an important addition, because there are so few written discourse treatment options. And it allowed for this emphasis on monitoring and planning and some of the cognitive components of discourse that can be hard to address. Lyssa Rome And maybe you could say a little bit about what you found when you've studied ARCS-W, so the Attentive Reading and Constrained Summarization-Written. Jessica Obermeyer Well, people have improved, which is great. So the one of the things about ARCS and ARCS-W that's maybe unique when we think about aphasia treatment as a whole, is that it's not a treatment with trained items, so no items are repeated. You're working on the process of discourse production, this process of monitoring and trying to be specific, be efficient, you know. In written discourse, people have made improvements in correct information units or CIUs. So at the word level in discourse, the amount of informative and correct information that they're producing, people have made improvements at the utterance level, where they're producing more relevant utterances and more utterances that have a basic sentence structure, and then this hasn't been looked at in all of the studies, but for some of the participants, where we've measured things like main concepts, the amount that the person is conveying the main ideas or concepts in the discourse has improved for some people as well. And then at this spoken discourse. So ARCS-W, it's half spoken, half written. Basically, people have also made similar improvements. So it's been encouraging so far, ARCS-W I would say, compared to ARCS is for people in the more mild aphasia end of the spectrum, especially with the writing component. Any clinician who's worked with people with aphasia will know that writing is often a stressful thing for people with aphasia. So it's for people that are writing at a phrase level already. It doesn't mean that their spelling is perfect, but if they're really struggling to get out a single word, this is probably not the ideal you know treatment for them, but for folks that are more on the mild end who want to work on spoken and written discourse, we have seen some positive results in their spoken and written discourse production. Another thing that I think is really important for this treatment is that it is so multi-modality. When we write normally, we're reading as well. You know, we're not just writing in a vacuum. A lot of the time. We're rereading our text, we are reading that text message and then responding to it. So I like that. I like multi-modality treatments. I like that this is a treatment that allows people to address multiple types of language goals, while, you know, keeping it pretty simple and low tech. Lyssa Rome I think that that really hits on one of the reasons that I like using ARCS-W in my work with people is that It can be used with so many different kinds of texts. So I've used both, you know, work emails, if their goal is to get back to work, newspaper articles that interest them, simplified newspaper articles that interest there's so many possibilities. And anyway, it's exciting to hear you talk about that. Jessica Obermeyer Yeah, I think that as a clinician, that's why I liked ARCS. It was so flexible, so easy to implement. And that's definitely one of the things I like about ARCS-W as well. Make treatment work hard for you. Lyssa Rome So that is interesting to people as well. Where are you going next with your ARCS research? Jessica Obermeyer Great question. I'm writing up results from about six people we ran over the last couple years, so that, I hope, gets submitted for publication soon. And I would really like to adapt this treatment a little further to use more assistive technology for folks that are really wanting to write, but aren't wedded to handwriting or typing in a traditional sense. So can we use speech-to-text? I always mix it up. And can we use methods to support people producing written language that are, you know, different than just typing it? Because people have really different needs in their life. So if that is a way to meet their writing needs, excellent, and I'd like to do that in the future. Lyssa Rome I think that gets back to this idea that it's so flexible, right? You could adapt it in so many different ways. I think that that's really exciting, because it sort of further underscores the flexibility of this approach. And we were talking earlier, before we started recording, about using the same ARCS framework, or ARCS-W framework for material that clients have listened to, things like podcasts or TED Talks. So it seems like it's so adaptable, which is part of what I think makes it really exciting. Jessica Obermeyer I think that's a great idea. We actually did use listening and then summarization for one of the participants in the first arc study, because that met their profile. That's how they wanted to interact with the treatment, and it worked out really well for them, and it's a great way to incorporate people's different interests. Not everyone wants to read, so being able to listen is a great option. And in the treatment for everybody, they always select their writing modality so they can either hand write or type, depending on what's relevant for them. In the population of people that have aphasia now, and I know that this will change over time, people have really different comfort levels with technology and with typing. So if someone says, "No, I never typed. I want to handwrite," then we can do that. And if, if it's the other, we can type. So I think listening is just another way to make it meet someone's needs better. Lyssa Rome I was hoping that you could talk a little bit more about the similarities and differences between different types of discourse. So spoken and written discourse, typed and versus handwritten discourse. Tell us a little bit more about that. Jessica Obermeyer Yeah, of course. Well, I should, I guess, start off by saying, working on the ARCS-W treatment research, I recognized just how little information is out there on written discourse and the majority of discourse measures that we use in aphasiology are based on spoken discourse production. But there are differences in how we speak versus how we write. So in spoken language, we've already talked a little bit about this, it's temporal, it's just gone. So writing is tangible. You have a record of your writing, and that can be really beneficial for people with aphasia. But of course, there's there's other things that can make writing more challenging as well. With spoken language, of course, we have the suprasegmental components of what we're saying. So we have our tone and our facial expression and things that allow us to impart meaning without actually saying it, and we don't have that in writing. Although things are shifting with text messaging technologies, we can add emojis and memes that help us communicate information. But I think when we're thinking about traditional writing, it doesn't have those additional components, and therefore people have to be more explicit with their word choice and a little more clear in what they're trying to say. People are often more efficient in writing. They use fewer words than they would in speaking. So those are some of the differences. We can't automatically correct our written output because we see that our partner doesn't understand. Because in writing, there's this distance between when we're writing versus when we think someone's reading it. Even in more instant platforms like text messaging, we don't know exactly when someone's reading something or how their face looks when they read it, in the way we know with speaking. So those differences do impact how we complete the task. And of course, the context of writing changes it dramatically. So you write notes to yourself really differently than you write a research paper or a work email. And that's not so different from speaking, right? The context is still going to impact how we speak or write, very much. So in my work, I've looked at how writing and typing are the same or different. And this is a pretty new area. There's a couple papers out there on it now, and I think it's gaining traction, which is great, because most people write through typing in their daily life now. What I found is that at a group level, it's pretty similar. Writing and typing look pretty similar for people that have aphasia. But individually it can be very different. So an individual person with aphasia might have a strength or weakness in handwriting versus typing for lots of different possible reasons, like their experience, or hemiparesis, their desire to do one or the other. But it's not, the patterns aren't completely clear. I think clinicians are probably really used to hearing that every individual with aphasia has the potential to be different. So I think that keeps with written and typed language output, handwritten and typed. Some of my recent work has been related to looking at different writing modalities for people with aphasia. So are there differences in their handwritten versus typed discourse production. There's a couple papers out on this now, and hopefully there'll be even more as it gains traction. And I think it's getting more attention in the research literature because of how important writing is in our daily lives now. I mean, most activities of daily living are now completed through, you know, the virtual world, so banking, shopping, lots of messaging are completed through reading and writing now. So that's kind of why I became interested in also working with ARCS-W and having people handwrite versus type, depending on their interest and comfort level. It was always interesting to me why certain people picked one or the other, and kind of what I was seeing. There is some research out there that shows that handwriting is advantageous for learning. So the specificity of how we're moving our fingers to create letters is helpful for retention and learning items, but when we're thinking at the discourse level, when we're not using the same items necessarily, things could potentially be a little different. So I was interested in just exploring some of those differences and patterns that might emerge, and if there was anything I could figure out that might be driving a pattern. So if someone's better at typing than handwriting, is there a reason that they're better? So what I have found so far, and it's it's pretty preliminary, is that at the group level, handwriting and typing look very similar for people with aphasia, so oftentimes, there's not a big difference in the total words that they produce, and that's been confirmed by a larger study as well from Jaime Lee and colleagues. But then when we look at the individual level, that's when you can start to see differences. And I don't think any clinician would be surprised to hear that people with Aphasia are variable or different. So we know that that is common, but it's been pretty interesting and striking in my own work to see how at the group level, these differences just totally even out. But then when we look at individuals, you do see that, you know, someone is more proficient with typing, someone else is more proficient with handwriting. So in a study I did, I think from 2024, we had people fill out this historical information about their typing experience and exposure, we knew about if they had a hemiparesis or not, and so were they able to use both hands or one hand for handwriting or typing? And like I said, we did find these individual differences for some people, but there wasn't a really clear pattern in what was driving those differences? Was it that they hadn't worked with a keyboard a lot? Was it that they only had the use of one hand? And we just didn't have enough data potentially to discern any specific patterns? Lyssa Rome We've talked a little bit about different types of discourse, written, spoken for written, typed versus handwritten. But I wanted to kind of come back to how we measure and analyze discourse, and wanted to ask about a more recent paper and have you describe a little bit about your work on discourse measurement and training clinicians to measure discourse? Jessica Obermeyer That paper is a perceptual rating paper. We've talked a lot about discourse in this chat, and I think probably one of the first things I might have mentioned was how daunting discourse analysis can be. So researchers are aware of that, and always kind of thinking that discourse is so rich, it provides us so much information about someone's linguistic ability, but also their success with communication in a way that other levels of language don't necessarily tell us. So how can we benefit from that rich information in a way that clinicians can do. Because with discourse analysis, you know, in the clinical session, it might not take that long. You're having someone participate in 10 minutes of conversation—that is not a lot of time in your session. The time is all backlogged. The time is after the session is over, and you're trying to transcribe what they've said and then identify discourse measures that you're interested in. And another thing that makes discourse just complex and dynamic is that there's not one measure, you know, there's not a measure of word retrieval and discourse. There are lots of measures that can give you insight into word retrieval and discourse. So this project I did with my collaborator, Marion Lehman, who also works on discourse, and especially conversation. We wanted to see if it was possible to train people to rate conversation samples from people with aphasia on linguistic measures, so measures of language ability. So there are other perceptual rating scales, but a lot of them might be looking at speech acts like initiation or presence or absence of errors. And we were really interested in if these, if perceptual ratings, could map on to the things we're doing in our labs, so you know, correct information units or the degree of informativeness, utterances that have basic structure, coherence, you know, these measures that we are spending many hours, you know, coding line by line, or even word by word, for some. So she and I developed this training and introduced—so the paper that's published, we used research assistants in our research labs, and we exposed them to the linguistic measures that we were interested in. Had them watch some practice videos, and then told them how we had coded them. So what was the value based on our lab coding? And then we did five test samples, so there were four linguistic measures. The training lasted about three hours, and I did five test samples. And we got some really good feedback from the RAs who did the training and rating samples. We had some promising results for especially two of the measures that we used in their training, and now we're really interested in extending that work with clinicians. So the people that were in the study before had very limited experience listening to people that had aphasia. They hadn't worked with people that had aphasia, they hadn't done extensive clinical training. We're hopeful that if we can use their feedback to fine tune the training and rating procedures and recruit some clinicians to participate, that hopefully we could get even better results and hopefully provide a tool to clinicians where they can be thinking about linguistic components of conversation in a way that's more feasible to their schedule and their workload, because we recognize how much time it takes. And I think it's, it's just a barrier to entry, even, because if someone is feeling like, "I can't do this, I don't have time to do this," then it's hard to even learn about or get started. Lyssa Rome Yeah, I'm so happy to hear that you're that you're focused on the feasibility for clinicians who have productivity requirements, who don't necessarily have a lot of time at the end of the day to do that kind of really in depth analysis. I think it's exciting. Jessica Obermeyer Oh, for sure, and clinicians, I think, work a lot of extra hours, but they have a whole caseload, you know, so balancing everybody's needs and being able to to provide excellent care to everybody is, is always a challenge, and hopefully, hopefully we'll, we'll be able to continue this work. We're trying to get some funding for the project because we want to be able to pay SLPs who participate in the research. Lyssa Rome As we start to wrap up, I'm wondering what you would like clinicians who are listening to this podcast to take away from what we've talked about today, from your work. Jessica Obermeyer I think one takeaway would be for clinicians to think about incorporating handwriting and typing into their existing treatment practice. So I've talked a lot about ARCS-W. ARCS-W is not for everybody. It is a very specific treatment approach for people that have mild aphasia who want to work on discourse-level writing. But there are so many ways to have people engage with handwriting and typing that will serve them in their daily life. So we've talked a lot about how literacy is just such a big—it's a bigger part of our lives than it was 20 years ago. People can achieve a lot of independence and autonomy if they're able to interact with reading and writing and complete it successfully. So I would really encourage clinicians to think about how they can incorporate reading and writing into their existing treatment. A study I was involved with— Liz Madden surveyed SLPs on their practices assessing and treating reading and writing, and one of the take-homes from that project was that clinicians evaluate writing more than treating it. And especially handwriting, versus typing. But I think that given the way society is moving, asking people like, "What's important for you, handwriting or typing?" and let's make that our practice. Lyssa Rome I appreciate how person centered and flexible that advice is right. We're trying to meet people where they're at and recognizing that our treatment can be tailored to the person who's sitting in front of us. I'm curious to hear what is coming next for you. What are you excited about in your work? Jessica Obermeyer That's actually a great segue about how we can tailor treatment, because that is one of the projects that I'm working on now, how we can think about treatment in terms of what are the things that make it work, versus things that maybe aren't essential components of the treatment? With the last study I did with ARCS-W of the things that we were really trying to understand better was: Did it matter if people hand wrote or typed? Did they have the same kind of level of generalization to the other writing modality? And in that study, it doesn't seem that they did. And I think there's really specific reasons for that, because we're working at this discourse level without repeated items. And so you might not see the same impact of that handwriting learning boost, because we're not repeating things as often. That's one of my real interests is thinking about how we work on treatment, how we deliver treatment, how clinicians can deliver treatment. Because I am very guilty of this. Working on writing takes a long time. It takes a long time for people with aphasia to produce written discourse level text. So in the ARCS W studies, it's an hour-and-a-half treatment session where we only work on ARCS-W. But I know I recognize that that's like not most clinicians' daily life, and it doesn't mirror what therapy many people with aphasia receive. So thinking about treatment in a more component-based and mechanistic way that makes it easier for clinicians to adapt to their their practice is is one of the things I would like to flesh out in the future. And then continuing to work on this training and perceptual rating protocol. One of the things my colleagues and I would like to do is create a training that can be shared freely, where clinicians can easily get access to it, and then collect more robust data. I mean, only if we get good results, of course. If we don't, we will not be sharing it. But those are the big things I'm thinking about in the next couple of years, and then beyond that, even more. Lyssa Rome Well, I look forward to reading more of your work and to seeing what comes next as well. Dr. Jessica Obermeyer, thanks so much for talking with us. I really appreciate it. Jessica Obermeyer It's been a pleasure. Thank you. Lyssa Rome And thanks also to our listeners for the references and resources mentioned in today's show. Please see our show notes. They're available on our website, www.aphasiaaccess.org. There, you can also become a member of our organization, browse our growing library of materials and find out about the Aphasia Access Academy. If you have an idea for a future podcast episode, email us at info@aphasiaaccess.org. Thanks again for your ongoing support of Aphasia Access. For Aphasia Access Conversations, I'm Lyssa Rome. Resources Obermeyer, J. (2024). Using and modifying standardized restorative treatments in aphasia: Clinician perspectives. American Journal of Speech‑Language Pathology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00349 Obermeyer, J., Leaman, M., & Oleson, J. (2025). Feasibility and preliminary data for a training protocol and perceptual rating scale of linguistic conversation measures in aphasia. American Journal of Speech‑Language Pathology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00420 Obermeyer, J. A., Rogalski, Y., & Edmonds, L. A. (2021). Attentive reading with constrained summarization-written, a multi-modality discourse-level treatment for mild aphasia. Aphasiology, 35(1), 100-125. Obermeyer, J. A., & Edmonds, L. A. (2018). Attentive reading with constrained summarization adapted to address written discourse in people with mild aphasia. American Journal of Speech‑Language Pathology, 27(1S), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0200 Obermeyer, J. A., Leaman, M. C., & Edmonds, L. A. (2020). Evaluating change in the conversation of a person with mild aphasia after Attentive Reading with Constrained Summarization–Written treatment. American Journal of Speech‑Language Pathology, 29(3), 1618–1628. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00078 Obermeyer, J., Edmonds, L., & Morgan, J. (2024). Handwritten and typed discourse in people with aphasia: Reference data for sequential picture description and comparison of performance across modality. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 33(6S), 3170-3185  

Fresh concern has been raised over the lack of visibility on a bridge near a popular Clare amenity. At this month's meeting of Ennis's local elected representatives, Mayor of Ennis and Fine Gael Councillor Mary Howard has highlighted her concern regarding the lack of lighting on the Droichead na Gabhair bridge located close to Lees Road. The proposed LIHAF project between the Claureen Roundabout and Drumcliffe Road would include the installation of new public lighting which would end approximately 70 metres west from the bridge. Ennis Municipal District will explore the possibility of lighting the bridge which Councillor Howard believes could prevent a future accident.

Enterprise Community Partners has been running a renter wealth-building program since 2022. How's it going? And what comes next?Show notes:Enterprise Community Partners' Renter Wealth Creation Fund website.The Renter Wealth Creation Fund term sheet.UCLA Housing Voice episode 108: Building Wealth by Renting with Shane Phillips and Bob Simpson.Phillips, S. (2025). Building Renter Wealth: An Evaluation of Shared Prosperity Rental (SPR) Housing Program Design and Feasibility. UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies.Executive summary for the SPR report.

Did you like the episode? Send me a text and let me know!! How to Validate Your Business Idea Without Building a Single ThingEver had a "billion-dollar idea" only to have it flop at launch? In this episode, we pull back the curtain on why most startups fail and—more importantly—how you can ensure yours doesn't. We're exploring the frameworks of Alberto Savoia, Strategizer, and Rob Fitzpatrick to help you find the truth before you spend a dime on engineering.Key Timestamps:[00:01:30] The FLOP Framework: Why failure is usually about the Premise, not the Launch or Operation.[00:03:30] The Mom Test: Why your friends are lying to you and how to fix it through Pathological Approval Seeking (PAOS) awareness.[00:04:45] Three Rules for Customer Discovery: How to talk about life, not ideas.[00:07:30] Feasibility vs. Desirability: Why the "Can we build it?" question should always come second.[00:10:45] Pretotyping with an "E": Defining YODA (Your Own Data) and skin in the game.[00:11:30] The Fake Door Method: Testing demand for $20 with a "Buy Now" button.[00:13:30] The Facade Method: Lessons from the Zappos origin story.[00:15:30] The Mechanical Turk: How "Josh Bot" saved $500k by using a human in a box.[00:17:30] Guerrilla Validation: The IKEA "Wall Hub" story and testing physical products.[00:22:30] The Ego Trap: Why we use complex engineering to hide from rejection.Featured Books & Resources:"The Mom Test" by Rob Fitzpatrick: The gold standard for customer conversations.Alberto Savoia (Stanford Seminars): The creator of Pretotyping and the Law of Market Failure.The Lean Startup Methodology: Foundational principles for validated learning.Strategizer (Alexander Osterwalder): Tools for testing business models and desirability.The Law of Market Failure: Most products fail because the market doesn't care (Premise failure).Pretotyping vs. Prototyping: A pretotype tests if you  Reclaim your "zone of genius" by letting Opus Clip automatically turn your long-form podcast into dozens of viral-ready shorts—start your free trial today at podnationopus.com For a 15% discount on your first purchase go RYZEsuoerfoods.com use code PODNA15 Thank you for being a Skoobeliever!! If you have questions about the show or you want to be a guest please contact me at one of these social mediasTwitter......... ..@djskoob2021 Facebook.........Facebook.com/skoobamiInstagram..... instagram.com/uepodcast2021tiktok....... @djskoob2021Email............... Uepodcast2021@gmail.com Skoob at Gettin' Basted Facebook PageAcross The Start Line Facebook Community Find out what one of the four hurdles of stop is affecting you the most!!Black Friday coaching Sale now!! 65% off original price! go to stan.store/skoob to book your appointment and take advantage of this limited time offer! On Twitter @doittodaycoachdoingittodaycoaching@gmailcom

Joined by a 20-year veteran of Fannie Mae, Shane shares findings from his work on a proposed new model for building renter wealth: shared prosperity rental housing.Show notes:Phillips, S. (2025). Building Renter Wealth: An Evaluation of Shared Prosperity Rental (SPR) Housing Program Design and Feasibility. UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies.Executive summary for the SPR report.Shane's 2021 article in The Atlantic, “Renting is Terrible, Owning is Worse.”Shane's blog posts preceding and following the article in The Atlantic.Monkkonen, P., Carlton, I., & Macfarlane, K. (2020). One to four: The market potential of fourplexes in California's single-family neighborhoods. UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies.The Multifamily Impact Council's Multifamily Impact Framework.Enterprise Community Partners' Renter Wealth Creation Fund website.Colorado Renter Rewards program website.

Are the American and Israeli war aims the same? Regime change may turn out to be an ambiguous definition. Mike and Gadi assess the different scenarios which may fall under that phrase, and consider which ones events – and Trump – may end up imposing.

Many investors see property development as the natural “next step” — a faster way to manufacture growth and build equity. The reality is far less straightforward: most development sites that can be built on simply don't make money.Rob Flux, founder of the Property Development Network, joins us to break down what really changes when you move from buy-and-hold to small-scale development. We explore why 90% of developable sites aren't profitable, how feasibility is often misunderstood, and why “profit on cost” — not hype — should drive your decisions. Rob explains the importance of site selection, overlays and constraints, demographic targeting, and why solving the right problems is what developers actually get paid for.We also dive into the practical realities: commercial vs residential funding, entity structuring mistakes, contingency planning, holding costs, and the psychological traps that come with early success. Is development just leveraged investing — or is it an entirely different career path? And in a market facing a 1.2 million home shortfall, does that make development easier… or just more competitive?If you've ever considered “graduating” into development, this episode is your reality check. Development can accelerate wealth — but only if you treat it with the seriousness it demands. Otherwise, it's just an expensive lesson.Episode Highlights01:15 – Meet Rob Flux: From Investor to Developer02:04 – Why Most Developers Fail (And Don't See It Coming)04:10 – The 10-Minute Site Test: Kill Bad Deals Fast05:00 – Overlays, Constraints & Building What Sells07:24 – The Development Sweet Spot (Before the Crowd)14:59 – Funding Models & Why Time Is Your Enemy21:14 – Market Cycles & Getting Product Fit Right27:15 – Luxury vs Volume: Two Paths to Profit28:47 – Where Population Growth Drives Real Demand32:05 – Who Actually Makes It in Development?33:44 – Feasibility 101: Profit on Cost Explained38:24 – Contingency Buffers: Protecting Your Margin39:31 – From Duplex to Six-Pack: Scaling Smart47:52 – Real-World Mistakes & Final TakeawaysAbout the GuestRob Flux is a property developer, mentor, and founder of the Property Development Network (PDN), Australia's largest community of active small-to-medium developers. With monthly meetups across Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, and Perth, PDN has become a leading education and mastermind platform for aspiring and experienced developers alike.Rob began investing at 18 and achieved financial independence by 38 — before a divorce forced him to rebuild from scratch. His first development deal delivered $1 million in profit, allowing him to leave his IT career and focus on development full time. Since then, he has refined his approach into a structured 7 Step Property Development Formula and continues to complete six- and seven-figure projects using creative acquisition and funding strategies.Beyond education, Rob serves on government advisory panels contributing to housing policy and planning reform across Australia. His mission is clear: to help 1,000 people achieve financial freedom by 2030 through smarter, more strategic property development.Connect with RobLinkedInWebsiteFacebookResourcesVisit our website: https://www.theelephantintheroom.com.auIf you have any questions or would like to be featured on our show, contact us at:The Elephant in the Room Property Podcast - questions@theelephantintheroom.com.auLooking for a Sydney Buyers Agent? https://www.gooddeeds.com.auWork with Veronica: https://www.veronicamorgan.com.auLooking for a Mortgage Broker? alcove.com.auWork with Chris: chrisbates@alcove.com.auEnjoyed the podcast? Don't miss out on what's yet to come! Hit that subscription button, spread the word, and join us for more insightful discussions in real estate. Your journey starts now!Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@theelephantintheroom-podcastSubscribe on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/the-elephant-in-the-room-property-podcast/id1384822719Subscribe on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3Ge1626dgnmK0RyKPcXRob0?si=26cde394fa854765If you enjoyed today's podcast, don't forget to subscribe, rate, and share the show! There's more to come, so we hope to have you along with us on this journey!See you on the inside,Veronica & Chris

This recording features audio versions of the February 2025 Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (JVIR) abstracts:ArticlesTransarterial Embolization for Refractory Adhesive Capsulitis and Related Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Read)Standardized Technique for Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Delphi Consensus Study on Optimized Methods and Emerging Concepts (Read)Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Combined with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 as a Prognostic Predictor for Patients with Liver Cirrhosis after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation (Read)Safety and Feasibility of Intra-Arterial Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Using an Emulsion of Ethiodized Oil plus Bumetanide in an Oncopig Model (Read)Lessons in IR: Coil Unraveling and Stretching during Retrieval of a Partially Deployed Embolization Coil (Read)JVIR and SIR thank all those who helped record this episode. To sign up to help with future episodes, please contact our outreach coordinator at millennie.chen.jvir@gmail.com.HostSonya Choe, University of California Riverside School of MedicineAudio EditorAndrew Sasser, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Outreach CoordinatorMillennie Chen, University of California Riverside School of MedicineAbstract Readers:Ahmed Alzubaidi, Wayne State University School of MedicineShobhit Chamoli, Armed Forces Medical CollegeAgnes Manish, Loma Linda University School of MedicineEmily Jagenberg,  Oakland University. William Beaumont School of Medicine Tiffany Nakla, Touro University Nevada College of Osteopathic Medicine, NevadaSupport the show

Most leads sound "good" until you start pulling on the threads. Nick and Tyler roleplay four common inquiry types and show how to spot risk early, protect your time, and decide whether it's pre-con, a small feasibility study, or a hard pass. Show Notes: 00:00 Cold open 00:31 Why decision makers matter 01:54 Sponsor: Anderson 05:30 Sponsor: Harness Workwear 09:13 Feasibility vs pre-con 09:35 Lead intake template & newsletter 22:36 Call 1: Referral lead 28:27 Call 2: Tight budget lead 39:47 Call 3: Facebook rush job 48:41 Call 4: Dream home lead 53:37 When the timeline is a deal-breaker 01:01:10 Wrap Video Version:https://youtu.be/aBTqwssCt80   Partners:  Andersen Windows Harnish Workwear  Use code H1025 and get 10% off their H-label gear   The Modern Craftsman: linktr.ee/moderncraftsmanpodcast Find Our Hosts:  Nick Schiffer  Tyler Grace  Podcast Produced By: Motif Media

Introducing the Demo Day YouTube/Podcast   Demo Day is a new series focused on one simple idea: showing, not telling, where AI is actually revolutionizing commercial real estate.   No theory. No slide decks. Not a clever ChatGPT prompt.   Just live, on-screen demonstrations of AI tools you can use today to get a significant edge against your competitors.   If you think ChatGPT is all AI has to offer, this episode will reset your mental model fast. In this Demo Day, I reveal the extraordinary AI platform, TestFit, a platform that applies AI directly to land underwriting and early development decisions by building super-detailed feasibility studies for you in minutes.   Best seen on YouTube, watch this episode to see how AI does what traditionally took weeks, consultants, and real pursuit capital: Instantly show what can be built on a site Kill weak deals early and surface better ones faster Update layouts and early-stage economics live on screen Run thousands of zoning and density scenarios in real time This is the real deal.   Beneath all the hype about AI, and the usual 'here's (yet) another great prompt' incremental benefits, there truly are companies revolutionizing the industry.   Testfit is one of them.   If you want to get REAL benefit from AI and give your company a real, immediately tangible competitive advantage in the new AI era – start here.   ***   At GowerCrowd, we are aggressively researching AI tools you can actually use and that bring real, immediate value to your business.    Subscribe to my newsletter and get access to this transformational intel before anyone else:  https://gowercrowd.com/subscribe Email: adam@gowercrowd.com Call: 213-761-1000

Guest Author: Paul GregoryHeadline: The Warren Commission: Testimony and ConspiracySummary: Paul Gregory visited Dealey Plaza to verify the feasibility of the shot before testifying to the Warren Commission. The hearings were marked by Margarite Oswald's disruptive demands for subpoena rights and her insistence on conspiracies, while Paul maintained that Lee acted alone despite Soviet suspicions.Article: Before testifying, Paul Gregory inspected Dealey Plaza and concluded that the shot from the depository was relatively easy, reinforcing his belief that Lee acted alone without a complex conspiracy, despite the Soviet Union's own fears of being implicated. The Warren Commission hearings were notably disrupted by Margarite Oswald, who demanded subpoena rights and insisted on her son's innocence, providing the Commission with a clear view of the chaotic psychological environment that shaped Lee.

Join Digital Education Committee Chair and podcast host Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS, and his guests Kelvin C. Chua, MBBS, MD, FHRS, CEPS-A, and Rahul N Doshi, MD, FHRS, for this week's Lead episode, which was recorded live at APHRS 2025 in Kyoto, Japan. This discussion will review recent evidence on the feasibility and safety of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for coronary sinus and left atrial appendage isolation, as well as mitral isthmus ablation, focusing on both acute and chronic outcomes. Panelists will examine procedural considerations, lesion durability, and safety signals highlighted in the study, and explore how these findings may inform evolving ablation strategies for complex atrial arrhythmias.   Learning Objectives Summarize the acute and chronic feasibility and safety outcomes of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for coronary sinus isolation, left atrial appendage isolation, and mitral isthmus ablation as reported in the study. Evaluate procedural techniques and lesion durability considerations associated with using PFA in anatomically complex atrial structures. Assess the potential clinical implications of these findings for incorporating PFA into ablation strategies for complex atrial arrhythmias, including patient selection and risk mitigation.   Podcast Contributors Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS Kelvin C. Chua, MBBS, MD, FHRS, CEPS-A Rahul N Doshi, MD, FHRS   Host and Contributor Disclosure(s): K.C. Chua•Nothing to disclose. R. N. Doshi•Speaking/Teaching/Consulting/Authoring: Boston Scientific, Kestra Inc., Abbott, Impulse Dynamics USA    M. S. Lloyd •Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting: Medtronic, Agra MedTech, Circa Scientific •Membership on Advisory Committees: Boston Scientific   Article for Discussion

Episode 42 - Erin Feldman - Prehabilitation in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease In this episode of Nutrition Pearls: the Podcast, co-hosts Jen Smith and Nikki Misner speak with dietitian Erin Feldman on the topic of prehabilitation in pediatric IBD. Erin Feldman, RD, is a registered dietitian at Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles with more than 25 years of experience supporting pediatric patients with complex gastrointestinal conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). She plays an integral role in Cedars-Sinai's IBD prehabilitation program for patients 13 and older, guiding patients through nutrition optimization before, during, and after surgery to help ensure the best possible outcomes. Over the past 2 years, Erin has served as faculty for Cedars-Sinai's six-month IBD Dietitian Apprenticeship Program, where she trains and mentors dietitians in pediatric IBD care. Her deep clinical expertise and passion for multidisciplinary collaboration make her a key voice in advancing nutrition for pediatric IBD patients.Nutrition Pearls is supported by an educational grant from Mead Johnson Nutrition.Resources:Banty A, et al. Feasibility of a nurse and dietitian-led IBD surgical prehabilitation program. Abstracts From the 2023 Crohn's & Colitis Congress. 2023;164(4)S21.Ladd MR et al. Malnutrition increases the risk of 30-day complications after surgery in pediatric patients with Crohn disease. J Ped Surg. 2018;53(11)2336-2345.Menchaca AD, et al. Preoperative nutrition status predicts hospital length of stay and unplanned reoperation risk in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Ped Surg. 2025;60(3)162147.Martins DS, Piper HG. Nutrition considerations in pediatric surgical patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2022;37:510–520.Produced by: Corey IrwinNASPGHAN - Council for Pediatric Nutrition Professionalscpnp@naspghan.org

Can recycled technical plastics meet quality, performance, and price requirements at the same time? In this episode, Isabelle Gola from Bosch Power Tools explains how Bosch developed a closed-loop pilot for power tools using recycled technical plastics while maintaining the same quality and performance standards, at the same price point for the end consumer. What you'll hear in this episode: • How recycled technical plastics were tested against existing quality and performance specifications. • How communication, certification, and transparency shaped internal alignment and customer response. • How Bosch defined success in the pilot, with feedback, learning, and data as central KPIs. The episode also looks at practical challenges behind the closed-loop approach, including reverse logistics considerations, sourcing sufficient volumes, and using disassembly data to inform eco-design and future product development. This episode is part of the “Recycled Plastics form Premium Brands” series, sponsored by HolyPoly.

Dry January often raises big questions: how much alcohol is actually safe, and do you need to stop drinking altogether to protect your health? In this episode, world-leading alcohol expert Professor David Nutt explains why alcohol ranks as one of the most harmful drugs to society, how even “normal” drinking can affect your health, and what the science really says about cutting back without giving it up completely. David, a neuropsychopharmacologist and former UK government drug adviser, explains why alcohol was ranked the most harmful drug overall in a landmark comparison of 20 drugs, how harm rises sharply as drinking increases, and unpacks common beliefs like red wine being “good for you”. The conversation also covers the social benefits of alcohol and why the goal isn't necessarily to stop drinking, but to drink with awareness. If you drink at all - whether it's a glass most nights or more on weekends - this episode helps you understand where the real risks begin, and how to make alcohol work for you, not against you. And for listeners using dry January as a reset, David shares practical, science-based advice on how to cut down safely and sustainably. If you're pausing and reflecting this dry January, what might change when you start drinking again? And which habits are worth leaving behind for good? Unwrap the truth about your food

We're here to wish you a very happy New Year! We hope you're ringing in the new year in good health and looking forward to what's ahead in 2026. As people are setting goals and making resolutions, we're re-running an episode today on the future of motivation. Last year, we sat down with Szu-chi Huang, an expert in motivation. She explained how science is changing our understanding of goal-setting and achievement, and offered a few tricks you can try when you feel stuck. We hope you'll tune in again today and pick up a few insights on how to sustain enthusiasm for your goals over time.Have a question for Russ? Send it our way in writing or via voice memo, and it might be featured on an upcoming episode. Please introduce yourself, let us know where you're listening from, and share your question. You can send questions to thefutureofeverything@stanford.edu.Episode Reference Links:Stanford Profile: ​​Szu-chi HuangConnect With Us:Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything WebsiteConnect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / MastodonConnect with School of Engineering >>> Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / FacebookChapters:(00:00:00) IntroductionRuss Altman introduces Szu-chi Huang, a professor of Marketing at Stanford GSB.(00:02:13) Studying MotivationSzu-chi shares what led her to study motivational science.(00:02:45) Defining MotivationMotivation as the drive to close the gap between current and ideal self.(00:03:39) The Science of MotivationStudying motivation through behavioral and neurological data.(00:04:30) Why It Matters in BusinessHow motivation science applies to leaders, teams, and customers.(00:05:21) The Motivation FrameworkThe strategies needed in order to stay motivated over time.(00:06:24) Journey vs. Destination MindsetThe different mindsets needed throughout the stages of motivation.(00:08:03) Motivating Kids to Choose HealthyCollaborating with UNICEF to study what motivates children.(00:09:37) Gamified Coupons in PanamaA study using gamified coupons to influence children's food choices.(00:13:08) Loyalty Programs as MotivationHow customer reward programs act as structured goal journeys.(00:15:29) Progress Versus PurposeThe different incentives needed in each stage of loyalty programs.(00:17:11) Retirement Saving LessonsHow financial institutions apply motivational science to long-term goals.(00:19:54) Motivation in Social ContextThe role of social connections in goal pursuit and sustaining motivation.(00:21:20) Support vs. Competition in Shared GoalsThe benefits and drawbacks of sharing goal journeys with others.(00:24:52) Designing Apps for MotivationHow redesigning user interfaces can help users stay motivated.(00:26:02) AI as a Motivation CoachUsing AI to personalize feedback across all stages of goal pursuit.(00:28:50) Starting and Sustaining a GoalPractical strategies for launching and sustaining a goal.(00:30:59) Conclusion Connect With Us:Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything WebsiteConnect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / MastodonConnect with School of Engineering >>>Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Twenty science stories from 2025 that you might have missed! The asteroid that's NOT going to hit earth. Exploring protein localization. Probing the sun. Pursuing nuclear fusion. ADHD and life expectancy. Sleeplessness and heart disease. Evolution of potatoes from tomatoes. New moons in our solar system. Exoplanet discoveries. The new human organelle. The Turing Test is passed. Feasibility of geoengineering. Influence of microbiome on infant brain development. Effect of COVID19 in male fathers on their offspring. A link between the common cold and COVID-19. Ocean acidification and environmental thresholds. Life on other planets. Pig organs successfully transplanted into people. Advances in synthesizing antimatter. Then hear about the planets, meteors, stars, nebulae, and constellations we can see in the night sky in January. ‘Bench Talk: The Week in Science' is a weekly program that airs on WFMP Louisville FORward Radio 106.5 FM (forwardradio.org) every Monday at 7:30 pm, Tuesday at 11:30 am, and Wednesday at 7:30 am. Visit our Facebook page for links to the articles discussed in this episode: https://www.facebook.com/BenchTalkRadio

In this conversation, Davidson, a Bitcoin developer, discusses his project Floresta, which aims to provide a lightweight Bitcoin node solution that balances privacy, security, and usability. He explains the technical aspects of Floresta, including its architecture, the use of compact block filters, and its relationship with Utreexo. Davidson emphasizes the importance of making Bitcoin more accessible to non-technical users while maintaining security and privacy. The discussion also touches on the challenges of running Bitcoin nodes, the potential integration of Floresta with existing applications, and the future of Bitcoin technology.Takeaways:

In this episode of the Real Estate Pros podcast, host Michelle Kesil interviews Eugene Gershman, a development management expert. Eugene discusses how he helps property owners develop their land into profitable ventures, emphasizing the importance of understanding zoning laws, conducting feasibility studies, and managing risks. He shares insights on client engagement, the role of technology in streamlining processes, and the investment opportunities available in real estate development. Eugene also highlights the significance of building a qualified team and maintaining open communication with clients throughout the development process.   Professional Real Estate Investors - How we can help you: Investor Fuel Mastermind:  Learn more about the Investor Fuel Mastermind, including 100% deal financing, massive discounts from vendors and sponsors you're already using, our world class community of over 150 members, and SO much more here: http://www.investorfuel.com/apply   Investor Machine Marketing Partnership:  Are you looking for consistent, high quality lead generation? Investor Machine is America's #1 lead generation service professional investors. Investor Machine provides true 'white glove' support to help you build the perfect marketing plan, then we'll execute it for you…talking and working together on an ongoing basis to help you hit YOUR goals! Learn more here: http://www.investormachine.com   Coaching with Mike Hambright:  Interested in 1 on 1 coaching with Mike Hambright? Mike coaches entrepreneurs looking to level up, build coaching or service based businesses (Mike runs multiple 7 and 8 figure a year businesses), building a coaching program and more. Learn more here: https://investorfuel.com/coachingwithmike   Attend a Vacation/Mastermind Retreat with Mike Hambright: Interested in joining a "mini-mastermind" with Mike and his private clients on an upcoming "Retreat", either at locations like Cabo San Lucas, Napa, Park City ski trip, Yellowstone, or even at Mike's East Texas "Big H Ranch"? Learn more here: http://www.investorfuel.com/retreat   Property Insurance: Join the largest and most investor friendly property insurance provider in 2 minutes. Free to join, and insure all your flips and rentals within minutes! There is NO easier insurance provider on the planet (turn insurance on or off in 1 minute without talking to anyone!), and there's no 15-30% agent mark up through this platform!  Register here: https://myinvestorinsurance.com/   New Real Estate Investors - How we can work together: Investor Fuel Club (Coaching and Deal Partner Community): Looking to kickstart your real estate investing career? Join our one of a kind Coaching Community, Investor Fuel Club, where you'll get trained by some of the best real estate investors in America, and partner with them on deals! You don't need $ for deals…we'll partner with you and hold your hand along the way! Learn More here: http://www.investorfuel.com/club   —--------------------

Marty, Dave, Eric, and Daniel sort the rumor of a black AVP, tools for creating spatial video, and maybe Netflix on AVP.VisionOS 26.2 RChttps://developer.apple.com/documentation/visionos-release-notes/visionos-26_2-release-notes New Immersive VideoThe World of Red Bullhttps://tv.apple.com/us/show/world-of-red-bull/umc.cmc.h96ns9ovu03p34i6bnodn3h6 Legs of Steel Crew video on the shoothttps://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=845919234692119 Winners of App and Game of the yearExplore POVhttps://apps.apple.com/ca/app/explore-pov/id6479555991Porta Nubahttps://apps.apple.com/ca/app/porta-nubi-immersive-puzzles/id6503628155 Back in BlackMore All-Black Vision Pro Prototype Parts Surface Onlinehttps://forums.macrumors.com/threads/more-all-black-vision-pro-prototype-parts-surface-online.2474341/ New startup competitionEx Apple Engineer's New Startup Claims to Beat Vision Pro in Speedhttps://www.macobserver.com/news/ex-apple-engineers-new-startup-claims-to-beat-vision-pro-in-speed/ Lakers in 3D!!!!Apple Immersive to stream select Lakers games on Vision Prohttps://www.thesportingtribune.com/2025/12/04/apple-immersive-to-broadcast-select-lakers-gamesSteam FrameConfirmed: Steam Frame will lack this Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest feature at launch — Valve says it's 'on our list'https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/vr-ar/confirmed-steam-frame-will-lack-this-apple-vision-pro-and-meta-quest-feature-at-launch-valve-says-its-on-our-list Bad Medicine Assessing the Feasibility of Using Apple Vision Pro While Performing Medical Precision Tasks: Controlled User Studyhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41340843/ Video creation trainingsApple Vision Pro Strategy For Immersive Video Production: Live Sports, Static Foveation, And Monetization Challengeshttps://www.cined.com/apple-vision-pro-strategy-for-immersive-video-production-live-sports-static-foveation-and-monetization-challenges/Create stories with immersive video and audio | Meet with Applehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jK58gKCyyBgAn introduction to capturing Apple Immersive Video | Meet with Applehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghpBTIbTZlg Day 1 | Create immersive media experiences for visionOS | Meet with Applehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leGqoF8HJxU Day 2 | Create immersive media experiences for visionOS | Meet with Applehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V_7-1bm4Rk Hidden workflow resourcesVision Pro Hidden Features and Workflows Many Users Haven't Discoveredhttps://applemagazine.com/vision-pro-hidden-features/Hyper-Specific Apple Vision Pro Use Cases Emerging Among Early Adoptershttps://applemagazine.com/vision-pro-hyper-specific-use-cases/ ReviewsI wish I waited for Galaxy XR instead of going broke on Vision Prohttps://www.androidauthority.com/i-wish-i-waited-samsung-galaxy-xr-3617651/Apple Vision Pro (M5) Review After 30 Days of Real Usehttps://www.geeky-gadgets.com/apple-vision-pro-m5-review-after-30-days-of-real-use/Drone for Spatial VideoThis 8K 360 Drone Is Not What I Expected - Antigravity A1 50-Min Reviewhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MipoNX7X0mA House of CommonsApple Vision Pro appears in front of House of Commons Select Committeehttps://www.reddit.com/r/VisionPro/comments/1pckcsp/apple_vision_pro_appears_in_front_of_house_of/ Netflix and chillA guide: How to watch Netflix in 4K on Safari or Supercut, with Spatial Audiohttps://www.reddit.com/r/VisionPro/comments/1pc2zm6/a_guide_how_to_watch_netflix_in_4k_on_safari_or/ Netflix Apphttps://www.reddit.com/r/VisionPro/comments/1pevsr6/netflix_app/ APPS Santa's Village: Holiday Magichttps://apps.apple.com/us/app/santas-village-holiday-magic/id6755688257 Posters 2.0https://apps.apple.com/us/app/posters-discover-media-home/id6478062053Email: ThePodTalkNetwork@gmail.comWebsite: ThePodTalk.netYouTube.com/@VisionProFiles

Freelance copywriting with AI? Is that smart? Not so savvy? And, where does strategy data and analysis fit in? We (re)define what strategy really is and how you see yourself. We talk about: AI (and its role in data analysis) Storytelling What you can promise clients (and what you should never)!   Take Kirsty's assessment to pinpoint your communication style, and get personalized insight on where you excel, where you could improve, and some strategies to try this week.   Join Amy's newsletter and get weekly insights on how to build and grow a sustainable business that fills your coffers and feeds your soul.  Got a question? Click here to ask us!

In this episode, Jason and Makenzie dive into the real purpose of ESOP feasibility and why it's far more than just another spreadsheet. They break down what “feasibility” truly means in an ESOP transaction and walk through the key factors companies should evaluate, from existing debt to entity structure (S-corp vs. C-corp) to long-term sustainability. They also dig into how feasibility helps determine whether an ESOP will genuinely benefit the company, the owners, and the employees.

Most people jump to what something looks like in practice (to assess viability and feasibility), but the first test to pass relates to desirability.Was this helpful? If so then you need to check out the 7 Fundamentals Of Self Improvement which features short summaries of the most popular and impactful episodes from the past 7 years.Takes only 5 minutes to read through them today but it'll help you avoid years of making things so much harder than they need to be. Plus, I bet you'll be surprised to learn what they are...

Vizsla Silver announced a strong Feasibility Study for its 100%-owned Panuco silver-gold project in Sinaloa, Mexico. Arizona Sonoran Copper has secured a C$75 million bought-deal financing led by Canaccord Genuity to advance early development work at its Cactus Copper Project near Casa Grande, Arizona. Dryden Gold reported final 2025 drill results from its Elora Gold System, where the company has more than tripled the length of the main Elora Shear Zone to over 800 metres. NexGen Energy released outstanding assays from its Patterson Corridor East discovery, located 3.5 kilometers east of the company's flagship Arrow deposit in Saskatchewan's Athabasca Basin. Osisko Metals reported strong new drilling from its Gaspé Copper Project in eastern Québec, including long intercepts that both confirm and extend mineralization beyond the 2024 resource model. Brixton Metals released additional strong assays from the Trapper Gold Target at its Thorn Project in British Columbia's Golden Triangle. Borealis Mining reported its second gold and silver doré pour from ongoing heap-leach operations at its Borealis mine in Nevada.This episode of Mining Stock Daily is brought to you by… EQUINOX GOLDEquinox has recently completed the business combination with Calibre Mining to create an Americas-focused diversified gold producer with a portfolio of mines in five countries, anchored by two high-profile, long-life Canadian gold mines, Greenstone and Valentine. Learn more about the business and its operations at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠equinoxgold.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Karim Harbott: From Requirements Documents to Customer Obsession—Redefining the PO Role Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes. The Great Product Owner: Strategic, Customer-Obsessed, and Vision-Driven   "The PO role in the team is strategic. These POs focus on the customer, outcomes, and strategy. They're customer-obsessed and focus on the purpose and the why of the product." - Karim Harbott   Karim believes the industry fundamentally misunderstands what a Product Owner should be. The great Product Owners he's seen are strategic thinkers who are obsessed with the customer. They don't just manage a backlog—they paint a vision for the product and help the entire team become customer-obsessed alongside them.  These POs focus relentlessly on outcomes rather than outputs, asking "why are we building this?" before diving into "what should we build?" They understand the purpose of the product and communicate it compellingly.  Karim references Amazon's "working backwards" approach, where Product Owners start with the customer experience they want to create and work backwards to figure out what needs to be built. Great POs also embrace the framework of Desirability (what customers want), Viability (what makes business sense), Feasibility (what's technically possible), and Usability (what's easy to use). While the PO owns desirability and viability, they collaborate closely with designers on usability and technical teams on feasibility.  This is critical: software is a team sport, and great POs recognize that multiple roles share responsibility for delivery. Like David Marquet teaches, they empower the team to own decisions rather than dictating every detail. The result? Teams that understand the "why" and can innovate toward it autonomously.   Self-reflection Question: Does your Product Owner paint a compelling vision that inspires the team, or do they primarily manage a list of tasks? The Bad Product Owner: The User Story Writer "The user story writer PO thinks it's their job to write full, long requirements documents, put it in JIRA, and assign it to the team. This is far away from what the PO role should be." - Karim Harbott   The anti-pattern Karim sees most often is the "User Story Writer" Product Owner. These POs believe their job is to write detailed requirements documents, load them into JIRA, and assign them to the team. It's essentially waterfall disguised as Agile—treating user stories like mini-specifications rather than conversation starters. This approach completely misses the collaborative nature of product development.  Instead of engaging the team in understanding customer needs and co-creating solutions, these POs hand down fully-formed requirements and expect the team to execute without question. The problem is that this removes the team's ownership and creativity. When POs act as the sole source of product knowledge, they become bottlenecks.  The team can't make smart tradeoffs or innovate because they don't understand the underlying customer problems or business context. Using the Desirability-Viability-Feasibility-Usability framework, bad POs try to own all four dimensions themselves instead of recognizing that designers, developers, and other roles bring essential perspectives. The result is disengaged teams, slow delivery, and products that miss the mark because they were built to specifications rather than shaped by collaborative discovery. Software is a team sport—but the User Story Writer PO forgets to put the team on the field.   Self-reflection Question: Is your Product Owner engaging the team in collaborative discovery, or just handing down requirements to be implemented?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Amanda and Ash interview Charlie Kao. Charlie shares how growing up as “free labor” on his dad's properties eventually led him back into commercial real estate, where he's now best known for self-storage. He explains why he's cautious on self-storage at a national level, how overbuilding and new alternatives are changing demand, and why he's leaning into highly localized markets where he has an unfair advantage. Charlie also walks through innovative ways he's turning basic storage into a true service business, from accepting and placing medical shipments to offering boat/RV add-ons, all while using feasibility studies and data-driven pricing to stay ahead of the competition. Charlie KaoCurrent role: Principal and Asset Manager, Twin Oaks CapitalBased in: Grand Rapids, Michigan Say hi to them at: https://www.twinoakscap.com/ | LinkedIn Alternative Fund IV is closing soon and SMK is giving Best Ever listeners exclusive access to their Founders' Shares, typically offered only to early investors. Visit smkcap.com/bec to learn more and download the full fund summary. Join the Best Ever Community  The Best Ever Community is live and growing - and we want serious commercial real estate investors like you inside. It's free to join, but you must apply and meet the criteria.  Connect with top operators, LPs, GPs, and more, get real insights, and be part of a curated network built to help you grow. Apply now at ⁠www.bestevercommunity.com⁠ Podcast production done by ⁠Outlier Audio⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a clinical crossroads in breast surgery—balancing the risks of over-treatment with the need to prevent invasive cancer. With new data from active monitoring trials, the pressure is on for surgeons to personalize care. Tune in to this essential episode to stay ahead of the curve on DCIS management and to hear expert insights from two leading breast surgical oncologists. Hosts: - Rashmi Kumar, MD, PhD Resident, University of Michigan General Surgery Residency Program Twitter/X: @RashmiJKumar - Melissa Pilewskie, MD Attending Breast Surgical Oncologist, Co-Director of the Weiser Family Center for Breast Cancer, Michigan Medicine Twitter/X: @MPilewskie -  Stephanie Downs-Canner, MD Attending Breast Surgical Oncologist & Physician-Scientist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Program Director of the Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Training Program Twitter/X: @SDownsCanner Learning Objectives: - Define DCIS and explain its significance as a precursor to invasive breast cancer. - Discuss challenges in diagnosing and risk-stratifying DCIS. - Review current standards for surgical and adjuvant management of DCIS. - Understand the implications of new research, including the COMET trial, for low-risk DCIS. - Evaluate patient-centered strategies for managing DCIS and preventing over-treatment. References: - Worni M, Akushevich I, Greenup R, et al. Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(12):djv263. PubMed - Francis A, Thomas J, Fallowfield L, et al. Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jan;51(16):2296-303. PubMed - Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L, et al. Feasibility of a non-surgical management strategy for low-grade DCIS: The LORD study. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(12):1497–1510. PubMed - Toss MS, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): current management and future directions. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;90:102091. PubMed - Comparative Effectiveness of Surgery versus Active Monitoring for Low-Risk DCIS (COMET) Trial Results. Early COMET Results: King TA, et al. Surgical excision versus active monitoring for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): 2-year results of the COMET randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024; e2400110. PubMed Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://behindtheknife.org/listen Behind the Knife Premium: General Surgery Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/general-surgery-oral-board-review Trauma Surgery Video Atlas: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/trauma-surgery-video-atlas Dominate Surgery: A High-Yield Guide to Your Surgery Clerkship: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/dominate-surgery-a-high-yield-guide-to-your-surgery-clerkship Dominate Surgery for APPs: A High-Yield Guide to Your Surgery Rotation: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/dominate-surgery-for-apps-a-high-yield-guide-to-your-surgery-rotation Vascular Surgery Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/vascular-surgery-oral-board-audio-review Colorectal Surgery Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/colorectal-surgery-oral-board-audio-review Surgical Oncology Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/surgical-oncology-oral-board-audio-review Cardiothoracic Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/cardiothoracic-surgery-oral-board-audio-review Download our App: Apple App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/behind-the-knife/id1672420049 Android/Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.btk.app&hl=en_US

Most people assume creatine is only for bodybuilders, but new research is challenging that belief. In this episode, Chalene dives into the surprising, science-backed benefits of creatine for women, particularly those in midlife. From brain health and bone density to hormonal support and cognitive function, this supplement might be one of the most underrated tools for aging powerfully. She also busts common myths like weight gain and bloating, and explains why some experts are calling it “the magnesium of 2025.” If you're curious about how to take it, which brands are trustworthy, and how to avoid getting scammed, this episode lays it all out. Watch this episode on YouTube this Sunday!!  https://www.youtube.com/@chalenejohnson/videos