Podcasts about bankruptcy court

Per BioXcel's press release:BioXcel Therapeutics Enters Into Asset Sale Agreement with Teva PharmaceuticalsAug 28, 2026 PDF VersionBioXcel Therapeutics intends to complete a court-supervised sale transaction, in an effort to maximize value for all stakeholdersTeva Pharmaceuticals to serve as “stalking horse” bidder in a court-supervised 363 auction processBioXcel Therapeutics has secured a commitment for debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing to support ongoing operationsNEW HAVEN, Conn., Aug. 28, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: BTAI) (“BioXcel Therapeutics” or the “Company”), a biopharmaceutical company built on artificial intelligence (“AI”) to develop transformative medicines in neuroscience, today announced that it has entered into an asset sale agreement with Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH (“Teva”), a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., for substantially all of the Company's assets. This includes IGALMI® (dexmedetomidine) sublingual film and the related pending supplemental New Drug Application of BXCL501 for potential at-home (outpatient) use for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder in adults. Concurrent with the execution of the asset sale agreement, BioXcel Therapeutics and its subsidiaries, OnkosXcel Therapeutics, LLC and OnkosXcel Employee Holdings, LLC, have commenced voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”) to facilitate a court-supervised sale process, which is expected to include the auction of substantially all of the Company's assets.To anchor the sale process, Teva will serve as the sole “stalking horse bidder” for the sale of the assets contemplated by the asset sale agreement. A stalking horse asset sale agreement establishes a strong baseline offer and is intended to help maximize value for all stakeholders through the Chapter 11 auction process.“Following a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives, we believe this option provides a clear framework to pursue a value-maximizing transaction” said Vimal Mehta, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of BioXcel Therapeutics. “Our priority is to execute a disciplined and efficient sale process while supporting all of our stakeholders and continuing to support the sNDA with a PDUFA date of November 14, 2026. We are pleased to have a signed agreement with a leading pharmaceutical company to serve as stalking horse bidder in the process, underscoring the strategic interest in our assets and in IGALMI®....”For the rest of the BioXcel press release see: https://ir.bioxceltherapeutics.com/news-releases/news-release-details/bioxcel-therapeutics-enters-asset-sale-agreement-tevaFor more information about the BioXcel bankruptcy/sale including the bankruptcy petitions and information about company assets and liabilities see: https://cases.stretto.com/bioxcel/ Typically, in situations such as these, there is a proposed buyer referred to as a stalking horse, and there is also an opportunity for other parties to come forward and bid on the assets.

A Question of Ethics: A Conversation on Courts and Ethics September 1st, 2026, EpisodeCourt professionals are committed to fairness, impartiality, and equal access, principles reflected in the NACM Model Code of Conduct. Yet many Americans believe the legal system operates on two tracks, one for those with financial resources and another for those without. This perception extends from landlord-tenant cases to family law, debt collection, consumer disputes, and other civil matters. Wealthier parties can afford attorneys, expert witnesses, and other resources, while lower-income individuals must often navigate complicated legal procedures alone. Does thispublic perception of a “two-tiered” system of justice have merit? If so, can courts do more to counter this perception? Courts cannot eliminate economic inequality; they canimprove how people experience the justice system. Many courts have created self-service areas where self-represented litigants can come to learn about court procedures and become more familiar with how the court operates.  On the other hand, self-service centers cannotadvise litigants on how to present a case to a judge. Are self-service centers enough to “balance the scales”?Frontline court staff play a particularly critical role because they are often the first, and sometimes only, court employees with whom litigants interact. Well-trained, empathetic staff can explain court procedures, provide legal information without giving legal advice, and help individuals feel heard and respected. These interactions significantly influence public trust and confidence in the courts. Procedural fairness is of vital importance. Even when legal outcomes cannot be changed, litigants are more likely to view the process as fair if they understand what is happening, are treated respectfully, and have an opportunity to tell their story. Meeting the litigant's "human need" to be seen and heard is just as important as meeting the "business need" of processing court paperwork efficiently. What more can courts do to address this serious need? Should courts reach beyond courthouse walls? Rather thanwaiting for people to seek assistance, can courts partner with legal aid organizations, bar associations, libraries, schools, and community organizations to provide legal information where people live? Examples include legal clinics held in community centers, outreach at neighborhood events, informational booths at public festivals, and educational campaigns using local media and social media. These efforts can help reduce fear of the courts and increase awareness of available legal resources.Technology offers additional opportunities but also raisesconcerns. Can artificial intelligence help self-represented litigants understand legal procedures and identify possible legal issues? However,  current AI systems can also produceinaccurate information and may not recognize the nuances of individual cases.While many self-represented litigants are already using AI tools, courts are reluctant to recommend them until issues involving accuracy, unauthorized practice of law, and disclosure requirements are better resolved.Today's PanelCreadell Webb Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Officer, 1st Judicial District of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaRick Pierce Retired Judicial Programs Administrator, Administrative Office of the Courts,Mechanicsburg, PennsylvaniaTJ BeMent Court Administrator, 10th Judicial Administrative District, Athens, GeorgiaNorman Meyer Retired Clerk of Court, Bankruptcy Court, District of New MexicoKaylee Jensen Political Science Student & Government Ethics Fellow at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, CaliforniaErica Payne-Santiago Deputy Court Administrator for the Circuit Court for Prince George's County, MarylandDevin Kuntz District Court Administrator 11th Judicial District in Kalispell, Montana   

Silver Bow Mining signed a definitive agreement to acquire the Jefferson County Metallurgical Complex in Montana through a Chapter 11 bankruptcy process, committing roughly $28.6 million in cash at initial closing plus contingent value rights, royalties, and profit interests tied to future milestones. Mining Stock Daily spoke to president Doug Stiles and CFO Wade Black about the transaction. The complex includes two processing circuits, the Montana Tunnels M-Pit, and related infrastructure that the company believes could eventually help process ore from its nearby Rainbow Block deposit, pending a feasibility study, shareholder approval, and Bankruptcy Court sign-off.

According to the bankruptcy court's ruling in this podcast, which was docketed by the bankruptcy court on the record of the FTX bankruptcy case, an FTX customer/claimant brought a motion seeking reconsideration of the disallowance of his claim. His claim had been disallowed by the bankruptcy court because of complications with his submission of documents to satisfy Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements. These requirements typically require submission of documentation in order for claims to be allowed, in other words eligible for payout. Sometimes customers/claimants need to also submit signed Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax forms.This can be burdensome for U.S. based customers/claimants, and especially burdensome for customers/claimants of foreign companies that file for bankruptcy in the United States that did not go through a KYC process or fill out tax forms when they opened accounts.People tend to think that, if their deposits and investments fail then they will be paid out in the ordinary course based on the information on file on apps through which they manage their accounts. Unfortunately this is not usually the case now typically. I am not sure but I think we would be pretty screwed if a bank or other institution holding deposit accounts failed - and I have applied to work for the FDIC because the government anticipates bank failure the FDIC will handle and I think I can help based on my bankruptcy experience.But perhaps in the future, in bankruptcy cases and in bank failure cases outside of bankruptcy, there will be technological and other improvements such that depositors and other claimants need not go through a process at all to prove up their claims and be paid out.For now, in bankruptcy cases, customers/claimants often find themselves either not submitting the KYC paperwork or trying to sell their claims to parties that are better able to cope with U.S. bankruptcy claims allowance/disallowance processes, including passing KYC requirements.From the FTX ruling it's not clear what the alleged defect was with the KYC documentation submitted by the customer/claimant, but the ruling explains that the customer/claimant was concerned to receive a request for more information than he had submitted, through the mechanism for submitting the documentation. The claimant expressed to the court that he thought the request for information was possibly part of a PHISHing attempt (a cybersecurity data breach that can result in identity theft).I am not clear what beyond a drivers license or other form of identification is needed to satisfy KYC in the FTX cases and whether the FTX customers/claimants had been KYC'd when opening accounts or thereafter.And I think I heard the court explain in the ruling, but I am not sure, that 47,000 - forty seven thousand - customer claims have been disallowed on the same basis as the claim at issue before the court in the ruling. In other words the claims will not be paid out.Can this possibly be correct? And how many FTX claims in total have been disallowed?This is not a perfect analogy but practically speaking - Imagine a scenario where, instead of plaintiffs bringing class actions for fraud perpetrated on them leading up to a bankruptcy filing such as FTX's, the defendant companies that committed the fraud against the customers, whose CEO is jailed for fraud, are protected from prosecution/litigation for fraud and are bringing class actions defensively to avoid paying out customers on claims that would not exist but for the fraud and collapse of FTX.For some context on claims allowance/disallowance processes in other bankruptcy cases, before FTX filed for bankruptcy relief in 2022... Twenty years ago or so, it became a practice in large bankruptcy cases that were not cases that followed frauds/fiascos like FTX, for the bankrupt companies' lawyers, to bring so called omnibus claims objections. The omnibus claims objection procedure is part of the claims allowance process, for large bankruptcy cases and enables bankrupt companies to more efficiently challenge claims on a common basis when there is a legitimate basis for a challenge affecting many claims.Generally speaking, even outside of bankruptcies following frauds, the claims allowance process reverses the bankruptcy rules that creditor claims (including customer claims) are presumptively valid and allowable. So the process is backwards substantively.And bankrupt companies can challenge claims on the basis of vague objections such as books and records objections, in other words challenging that the claim as filed by the customer/creditor is valid, on the basis the claim doesn't match the bankrupt companies' records. This can also be done with investor claims, which are a type of customer/creditor claim asserted in U.S. bankruptcy cases.Typically, If the creditor does nothing in response to an omnibus claims objection concerning the creditor claim (and that of many other customers) then the claim will be disallowed, by default. The bankruptcy court will treat the objection to the claim as unopposed and enter an order disallowing/expunging/excluding the claims from payment in the bankruptcy. The claims may be listed on a schedule with many other claims in the same situation - claims that will not be paid out.This is the default scenario, where a creditor who has timely notice of a claims objection, might reasonably assume creditors with larger claims will come forward. But the creditor doesn't consider those larger claimants may be dealing with the bankrupt company via arriving at one off deals reflected in stipulations and orders presented to the court, concerning the extent to which claims will be allowed and paid out.If the creditor does not default - and timely or untimely responds to the omnibus claims objection - which will typically necessitate hiring counsel, then the hearings on the customer claim are likely to be adjourned because the bankrupt company controls the agenda for hearings presented to the court. In other words, the claimant is not going to win and have a claim eligible for payout, even if the claimant responds to the claim objection.If the bankrupt company doesn't want to confront an issue that can be raised by other customers, which is a recurring scenario in bankruptcy cases, then the bankrupt company can adjourn hearings on a claim for months.In the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy case in the United States, filed in 2018, I represented foreign nationals who entrusted Lehman Brothers investment vehicles with funds before Lehman Brothers collapsed, then these individuals had to deal with the claims allowance process for customers/creditors/investors trying to collect on Lehman Brothers guarantees in the U.S.Few if any people would have invested in the Lehman Brothers feeder funds soliciting money overseas, without the Lehman Brothers guarantee probably, but when it came time to pay out on the Lehman Brothers guarantees - Lehman Brothers did not pay out in its chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, filed in New York. Lehman Brothers brought waves of omnibus claims objections challenging claims, hundreds of them.The bankruptcy judge presiding over the Lehman Brothers case at the time, who was the judge who had dealt with the nightmare of the case since the case filing in 2008, ruled that objections of one claimant would apply to all claimants, in effect giving us class action type status, recognizing the common issues (being defrauded into investing into a Lehman Brothers feeder fund with specious documentation causing it to be unclear what level of priority the claims should receive in an unthinkable bankruptcy scenario where Lehman Brothers, which had guaranteed payout to investors itself bankrupted then challenged the payout obligations).After the bankruptcy judge presiding over the Lehman Brothers case helped the parties procedurally and substantively with instructions for how the trial/hearing on the claims would proceed, the lawyers for the bankrupt company caused an adjournment of the hearing on our claims "sine die" - which means an adjournment of the trial on the claims without date/indefinitely.The bankrupt companies kept the claims off the bankruptcy court's agenda while the judge who wanted a trial on the merits was the bankruptcy judge presiding over the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy.After the judge retired from the bench and another judge took over the case, Lehman Brothers found a way to avoid trial on the claims again and make sure they wouldn't be paid. I remember the substitute judge, who has since retired, telling the Lehman Brothers' lawyers, who she saw in court repeatedly over the course of the year, how great it was to work with them and she wished happy holidays as it was year end. I have the transcript somewhere and look at it every few years, missing appearing before the judge who initially presided over the Lehman Brothers case then retired into private practice where he does great dispute resolution work including mediation.The omnibus claims objection process for disallowing claims was extraordinary in the Lehman Brothers case which was in New York, but the case was abnormally large with a lot of foreign investment and resulting bankruptcy claims.Over time, the disallowance process via omnibus claims objections has become normal in some cases in Delaware like FTX and, in that context, perpetuates bankrupt companies' representations their bankruptcy plans are paying creditors decently high percentages on their claims, when really the percentages would be low if the claims in the claims pool were allowed and paid out.I do not know the circumstances of the claimant in FTX whose rights were impacted by the FTX ruling in this episode of the podcast, or how much crypto or money he lost, or how much he stands to gain if his claim is allowed, or whether he transferred his claim or continues to hold. I commend him on coming forward to a court of justice to defend his rights. He can proceed further and appeal if he thinks it worthwhile or do what the other claimants do and deal with the loss, unfair as it seems to be following the fraudulent collapse of FTX and good faith customer attempts to comply with the claims process including KYC requirements.An interesting question is can the many other FTX claimants whose claims have been disallowed due to alleged failure to satisfy KYC requirements appeal join in an appeal or will they too hear that their objections are untimely and will not be paid out?Thoughts on how FTX claimants can be helped are welcome on the YouTube channel accompanying this audio stream, when I post the FTX hearing there later today.www.youtube.com/@the-comi

hearsay tale presented to the US bankruptcy court in Delaware of alleged happenings in Mexico, in support of proposed retention of Mexican counsel over objections

Question of Ethics: A Conversation of Courts and Ethics:June 2nd Court ManagerThis episode of the Question of Ethics Conversation examines a fundamental ethical challenge facing court professionals today: how are their ethical responsibilities evolving inan age of social media with an increasingly politicization? Canon Four of the Model Code focuses on conduct that is unmistakably political: attending campaign rallies, canvassing for judges running for election, or advocating for ballot initiatives within the courthouse. We now operate in a landscape where nearly every issue is viewed through a political lens. Statements that once would have been considered civic, educational, or banal are now often interpreted as partisan. Today, they can trigger assumptions of perceived bias.At its core, Canon Four rests on a critical assumption: that court professionals can maintain a private sphere in which they exercise their First Amendment rights, separate from their official role. Nearly 40 years later, that assumption is severely strained.In an era defined by social media and the always-on visibility of the digital world, personal expression is no longer private. Opinions, political or otherwise, are broadcast instantly, permanently, and often without context. Anonymity isfragile at best. Even attempts to separate identities through pseudonyms or multiple accounts are increasingly common and increasingly ineffective. This episode does not claim to offer definitive answers. Instead, it confronts the complexity of the moment and frames questions that court professionals and the professionitself, must now grapple with:        Can we, as court professionals, realistically be held accountable for navigating an ever-expanding universe of “political” issues, even down to opinions aboutcultural events or entertainment? ·              To what extent can we express our personal views without creating a perception of bias that undermines public trust? ·                                       How do we reconcile widely differing ethical standards across jurisdictions, roles, and court systems?   What emerges is not just an ethics question, but a question of professional survival and institutional trust. One possible path forward is not to attempt an ever-expanding list of prohibitions, but to shift toward practical, principle-based guidance. This could include developing best practices, strengthening commentary within the Code, and emphasizing leadership judgment, mentorship, and open dialogue. Above all, the goal remains constant: to ensure that court professionals, regardless of personal beliefs, are perceived as fair, impartial, and worthy of the public's trust. In a world where neutrality is harder to demonstrate, that responsibility has never been more important.On the CallToday:Creadell Webb, Chief Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Officer for the 1st Judicial District Court in Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaKarl Thoennes, Court Administrator, 2nd Judicial Circuit Court in Sioux Falls, South DakotaTeshrie Kalisharan, Alternative Dispute Resolution  Coordinator for the 9th Judicial Circuit Court in Orlando, Florida Norman Meyer, Retired Clerk of Court for the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New MexicoRoger Rand, IT Manager for the Multnomah County Court in Portland, OregonNathaniel Mingo, Director of Court Services for the Municipal Court in Riverdale, GeorgiaKelly Hutton, Deputy State Court Administrator for the North Dakota State Court System in Bismarck, North DakotaAccess the episode by going to the NACM website podcast link: ⁠⁠https://www.nacmnet.org/podcasts⁠⁠Become part of the Conversation. Submit your comments and questions to: ⁠⁠ethics@nacmnet.org⁠Join the Question of Ethics Conversation held after the Subcommittee meetings every fourth Thursday of the month at 4:00 pm ET.

In Episode 5 of Business Bankruptcy Basics, hosts Ella Vincent and Andrew Still are joined by Judge Daniel P. Collins of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to break down one of the most fundamental topics in bankruptcy: creditor claims. Judge Collins walks listeners through the surprisingly broad definition of a "claim" under the Bankruptcy Code and the key categories of secured, unsecured, and priority claims. The episode also covers the payment waterfall, the treatment of undersecured claims, and the strategic importance of administrative expense priority. This episode also covers how creditors file a proof of claim, how claims become allowed, and common grounds for objections. This episode offers a clear and practical guide to understanding who gets paid and why. The content of the "Business Bankruptcy Basics" podcast, including any statements made by its hosts or guests, is provided for educational purposes only. This podcast is not intended to be, nor should it be relied upon as, legal advice. Listening to this podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are solely those of the hosts and guests and do not reflect the positions or opinions of their employers or any organizations with which they may be affiliated. For legal guidance, please consult a qualified attorney.

hearing on approval of sealed proposed settlement agreement between Saks and its largest landlord Simon Property Group to resolve litigation

emergency motion

This is a peculiar hearing. Based on the explanation to the court on the record, this brief hearing was on approval of the revised disclosure statement submitted to the court for review within hours of the court hearing, with further party input and more changes anticipated. This is towards approval of the disclosure statement so Saks et al can solicit votes in support of a bankruptcy plan. I'm in the corporate restructuring space and found the presentation incomprehensible for the most part. I don't understand why people who didn't receive notice can be considered to have had a chance to review this disclosure statement and react to it in time to come forward to the bankruptcy court.

Judge Elizabeth Stong calls bankruptcy court a "second chance court," a forum where companies in financial distress and individuals buried in debt can find a path forward, even if it's rarely the one they hoped for. She serves on the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting in Brooklyn. Becoming a judge was never on Judge Stong's radar — she was a happy litigation partner with no bankruptcy background when a job announcement caught her eye. In this episode, Judge Stong describes managing more than 300 active Chapter 11 cases alongside individual filings, the rhythm of case management conferences, and how she works with law clerks to prepare for hundreds of orders each week. She unpacks the structure of Article I bankruptcy judgeships and the Second Circuit's appointment process, and reflects on the weight of decisions that shape whether a family keeps its home or thousands of employees keep their jobs. The Honorable Elizabeth Stong is a graduate of Harvard Law School. This episode is hosted by Kyle McEntee.Mentioned in this episode:Learn more about Juno and private student loansAccess LawHub today!Learn more about Juno and private student loansHaynes Boone LLPLearn more about Haynes Boone LLP

The podcast skips a couple of hearings held in the Saks bankruptcy proceedings earlier in April. The 4/24/2026 hearing is a helpful one to review because it includes an update on the restructuring support agreement and also an update on the anticipated timing of the chapter 11 disclosure statement. Additionally the hearing includes a summary of the proposed chapter 11 exit financing, with the business justification for the terms. At the conclusion of the hearing, the bankruptcy court approved the proposed exit financing, and the court noted another hearing is on for next Friday.

This is the second hearing in the case, streamed in this podcast. You can (1) review the first hearing among the earlier episodes of the podcast by scrolling through the various published episodes or (2) access the prior hearing through this link: https://www.justcast.com/shows/center-of-main-interests-international-bankruptcy-and-restructuring-podcast-including-crypto/audioposts/755247

This audio recording is docketed in the Power Block Coin bankruptcy proceedings as docket number 471.

This is the official court audio of the hearing held April 2, and is docketed on the court's docket.There have been some hearings in the Saks bankruptcy proceedings since the last Saks hearing posted to this podcast. The hearings concerned, for the most part, a dispute with a particular party as opposed to macro developments in the cases. The hearings were somewhat lengthy and broken up over a few recordings, and not available on the podcast but are available on the court's docket and the case administration site. https://cases.stretto.com/Saks/court-docket/ (Search the docket for the files named audio).This latest hearing being streamed here was held on April 2, 2026 and concerns an emergency request to lift the automatic stay. The automatic stay is a protection that goes into effect by operation of law under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, when a bankruptcy petition is filed. In this case as it typical the Saks chapter 11 debtors are protected by the stay, not only from contractual obligations, but also from continuing to defend personal injury litigation arising from injuries sustained before Saks Global went into bankruptcy. In this case it sounds like an individual plaintiff wanted to proceed with personal injury litigation in Massachusetts and sought bankruptcy court approval via counsel. The bankruptcy court was responsive, held a hearing, and continued the hearing to a final hearing on May 7. The court encouraged the parties to work things out, in other words to at least agree to a date the automatic stay will lift. This is after the judge suggested a 60 day time frame at the outset of the hearing.The court noted that the court will not allow the stay to stop the case from going to trial indefinitely. I think it would be interesting for the lawyer who argued against the automatic stay being lifted to listen to what he is saying to the court, and ask himself why he would try to deprive a personal injury claimant of continuing litigation when it doesn't make a difference in terms of the future of Saks Global. Also the law is pretty clear, even with outlier cases like Purdue Pharma, which some people estimated pays just $40k for wrongful death claims - that personal injury claims can't be liquidated in bankruptcy court.As the court noted, at some point bankruptcy courts allow personal injury claims to be liquidated, in other words to continue on their path to jury trial or other payout under applicable non bankruptcy law.

This is the official audio of the court hearing held 3/31 and is docketed in the bankruptcy proceedings as docket number 51. For more information about the bankruptcy proceedings see the case administration site at https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/ultinon/Home-Index

Listen to the hearing held in Saks's chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings on February 20, 2026, to catch up on the Saks bankruptcy.The audio streaming on this platform is available on the bankruptcy court's docket. If you'd like to download it directly, see docket number 926, which is a PDF with an embedded MP3 file:https://cases.stretto.com/public/x503/14494/PLEADINGS/1449402202680000000212.pdfThanks to streaming technology and my podcasting initiatives, publicly available court hearings are more readily accessible to people who are hearing impaired, people who prefer to hear content while reading along with subtitles, and the many people who cannot be present in person or send someone to take notes, or for who it does not make sense to hire counsel given the typical costs and delays.Also, some streaming platforms enable use of subtitles in languages other than English, which expands the accessibility of information about developments in the Saks bankruptcy proceedings internationally. Given the international nature of the business and how many people are affected by the bankruptcy, I believe international streaming is essential.There is an important development in the case ahead. The Saks Meeting of Creditors is coming up. The Meeting of Creditors is scheduled to be held telephonically on February 23, 2026, 1:00 p.m. Central Standard Time. Below is the dial-in provided for the call, on the case administration site, which also includes more information about the Saks cases - https://cases.stretto.com/saks/---Meeting of CreditorsPursuant to section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Meeting of Creditors has been scheduled for February 23, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. CT and will be held telephonically:(888) 330-1716; passcode 7125797#---Meetings of Creditors can be informative and provide an opportunity to ask questions of the representative of the bankrupt company presented at the Meeting of Creditors.Thanks for listening to my podcast! Please Subscribe to support my work.

--

What drives someone to become a bankruptcy judge? And what does it take to lead one of the nation's busiest bankruptcy districts while maintaining warmth, wisdom… and a sense of humor? In this episode, TMA NYC's NOW leaders Fran Falchook and Rita Ginzburg sit down with the Honorable Chief Judge Christine M. Gravelle of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey for an intimate conversation that explores the person behind the robe. Judge Gravelle shares her journey from growing up in the Berkshires to navigating law school at night as a new working mother. Her path led her to a career in bankruptcy law and eventually the bench, where she oversees some of the nation's most complex restructuring cases. This episode offers rare insight into the judicial perspective on bankruptcy and restructuring through the lens of lived experience, personal growth and the networks that support us all. To learn more about turnaround management, news, and experts, visit turnaround.org. Episode LinksOur episode is sponsored by Archer & Greiner. Learn more about Fran Falchook. Learn more about Rita Y. Ginzburg. Learn more about Judge Christine M. Gravelle. Learn more about the Turnaround Management Association here. Our music is by Kit and the Calltones.

It's In the News.. a look at the top headlines and stories in the diabetes community. This week's top stories: big FDA recall around Freestyle Libre (see more below to find out if you're affected), Dexcom launches their 15.5 day sensor, Omnipod announces enhancements, Tandem tests a fully closed loop (with high fat, high carb meals) and lots more! Find out how to submit your Community Commercial Find out more about Moms' Night Out  Please visit our Sponsors & Partners - they help make the show possible! Learn more about Gvoke Glucagon Gvoke HypoPen® (glucagon injection): Glucagon Injection For Very Low Blood Sugar (gvokeglucagon.com) Omnipod - Simplify Life Learn about Dexcom   Check out VIVI Cap to protect your insulin from extreme temperatures The best way to keep up with Stacey and the show is by signing up for our weekly newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter here Here's where to find us: Facebook (Group) Facebook (Page) Instagram Twitter Check out Stacey's books! Learn more about everything at our home page www.diabetes-connections.com  Reach out with questions or comments: info@diabetes-connections.com Episode transcription with links: Hello and welcome to Diabetes Connections In the News! I'm Stacey Simms and every other Friday I bring you a short episode with the top diabetes stories and headlines happening now. Our top story this week: XX Certain glucose monitors from Abbott Diabetes Care are providing users with incorrect glucose readings, an error that has been linked with the deaths of at least seven people and more than 700 serious injuries worldwide, according to an alert from the US Food and Drug Administration.   Incorrect glucose readings can lead to improper treatment. Abbott warned that about 3 million FreeStyle Libre 3 and FreeStyle Libre 3 Plus sensors are affected, but no other Libre products. Patients can visit FreeStyleCheck.com to see if their sensors are affected and to get a replacement for free.   The FDA has also published specific information about the affected products in its alert. The agency considers this to be a "potentially high-risk issue" and will continue to update its website as information becomes available.   "Patients should verify if their sensors are impacted and immediately discontinue use and dispose of the affected sensor(s)," the FDA said.   https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/02/health/abbott-diabetes-glucose-monitors https://www.freestylecheck.com/us-en/home.html XX Omnipod 5 is getting some enhancements.. and Omnipod 6 is announced. The FDA cleared updates including  a lower, 100 mg/dL target glucose option and what they call a more seamless automated experience. "This is the most significant algorithm advancement to our Omnipod 5 System since its launch in 2022," said Eric Benjamin, Insulet EVP and COO. Insulet said the new 100 mg/dL target glucose expands Omnipod 5's customization range. It now features six settings between 100 mg/dL and 150 mg/dL in 10 mg/dL increments. The company said this flexibility allows healthcare providers to tailor insulin delivery more precisely. It supports individuals seeking tighter glucose management or aiming to meet specific glucose goals. Omnipod 5's latest upgrades also help users stay in "Automated Mode" with fewer interruptions, even during prolonged high glucose events. Insulet plans to launch the updates to the algorithm in the first half of 2026. The company announced plans for an Omnipod 6 – without a lot of detail - at the company's Investor Day event in November. They also talked about a new, fully closed-loop pump for the type 2 diabetes population. https://www.drugdeliverybusiness.com/insulet-fda-clearance-omnipod-5-algorithm-enhancements/ XX Dexcom, the global leader in glucose biosensing, announced today that the Dexcom G7 15 Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System will launch in the United States on Dec. 1, making it the longest-lasting CGM system with 15.5 days of wear.   Dexcom G7 15 Day will first be available through durable medical equipment (DME) providers on Dec. 1 with full retail launch in the coming weeks. Dexcom G7 15 Day will also be covered for Medicare beneficiaries.   Dexcom G7 15 Day's industry-leading wear-time will provide fewer sensor changes, less disruption and more time for people with diabetes to benefit from life-changing CGM technology.   New with Dexcom G7 15 Day:  Longest lasting CGM system with 15.5 days of wear. Best-in-class accuracy1 with an overall MARD of 8.0%. Easier glucose management with fewer monthly sensor changes and reduced monthly waste. This follows yesterday's announcement – the FDA has cleared Dexcom Smart Basal, the first and only CGM-integrated basal insulin dosing optimizer designed for adults 18 and older with Type 2 diabetes using long-acting insulin. Dexcom Smart Basal will use Dexcom G7 15 Day sensor data and logged doses to calculate personalized daily recommendations to guide users towards a more effective long-acting insulin dose, as directed by their healthcare provider. At launch, Dexcom G7 15 Day will connect with the iLet Bionic Pancreas and Omnipod® 5§§. We are working closely with Tandem and look forward to extending the launch to their customers shortly as they finalize integration. For specific information on pump compatibility and availability with the Dexcom G7 15 Day system, visit Dexcom.com/connectedpumps https://investors.dexcom.com/news/news-details/2025/Dexcom-G7-15-Day-Continuous-Glucose-Monitoring-System-to-Launch-on-Dec--1-in-the-United-States/default.aspx   XX A small study of ten adults with type 1 diabetes tested Tandem's new fully closed-loop "Freedom" insulin system — and the participants put it through a real-world stress test. For 72 hours in a hotel setting, they ate heavy carb-and-fat meals, skipped all meal announcements, and didn't give any mealtime insulin boluses. The system handled almost everything automatically. Researchers said the device stayed in closed-loop mode 97% of the time and there were no incidents of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia reported. While using the Freedom system, participants spent a median 61% of the day in the glucose target range — slightly higher than the 56% achieved with their usual pump at home. But the biggest improvement came overnight: time in range jumped to 96% with the closed-loop system compared to just under 70% during their home-pump week. With almost zero time spent below 70 mg/dL, researchers concluded that the fully automated Tandem system was both safe and effective even with unannounced, high-impact meals — hinting at a future of diabetes management that demands less effort from users.   XX Novo Nordisk reported promising mid-stage results for its experimental drug amycretin (AM-ee-creht-in) in diabetes patients on Tuesday. Amycretin, targets both GLP-1 and amylin hormones. In this study, it helped patients with type 2 diabetes lose up to 14.5% of their body weight over 36 weeks with weekly injections, far outperforming a placebo. The oral version delivered weight loss of up to 10.1%. Rival Eli Lilly  is surging ahead with its own amylin-based drug, eloralintide, which is advancing to late-stage testing after helping patients shed as much as 20% of their weight in a mid-stage trial. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/25/novos-next-gen-obesity-drug-shows-positive-results-heads-to-late-stage-testing.html XX The U.S. Medicare health plan said on Tuesday that newly negotiated prices for 15 of its costliest drugs will save 36% on those medications compared with recent annual spending, or about $8.5 billion in net covered prescription costs. The prices go into effect in 2027, including a monthly price of $274 for Novo Nordisk's popular GLP-1 drug semaglutide, sold as Wegovy for weight loss and Ozempic for diabetes. medicare's recent net price for Ozempic, opens new tab was $428 a month, according to an analysis published in the Journal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy. Medicare put the drug's list price, before confidential rebates and discounts, at $959 a month. Based on such nondiscounted list prices, Medicare said savings on the 15 drugs ranged from 38% to 85%. The annual price negotiations were established under President Joe Biden's signature Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022. Previously, Medicare was barred by law from negotiating with drugmakers. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-negotiated-medicare-prices-15-more-drugs-test-cost-savings-promise-2025-11-25/   XX LifeScan announced its Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization plan received U.S. Bankruptcy Court approval. LifeScan said it's positioned to emerge from its financial restructuring process by the end of the year. The CEO says, "This balance sheet restructuring provides a stronger foundation for LifeScan to support our base business, advance new growth strategies, and commence our journey to become one of the most comprehensive players in the glucose management space." https://www.drugdeliverybusiness.com/glucose-monitor-lifescan-emerge-from-bankruptcy/ XX An artificial intelligence (AI)-led Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) was as effective as a traditional human-led program in achieving recommended goals for weight loss, A1c reduction, and physical activity, according to a randomized trial of adults with prediabetes and overweight or obesity. One example of a push notification: "Looks like you're at the grocery store, Rita! Want a quick list of high-fiber snacks or smart swaps to stay on track this week?" The app also provided location- and goal-based education, with gamification elements to promote engagement. Approximately one third of participants in both the AI and human-led groups achieved the primary outcome (31.7% and 31.9%, respectively). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses and individual components of the composite endpoint. "As more AI-based programs emerge, head-to-head comparisons among different AI-DPPs will be informative. An AI-led approach will not suit everyone; some individuals benefit more from human interaction and accountability," said Mathioudakis, adding that future research should focus on best matching patients to the modalities they prefer. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/ai-directed-diabetes-prevention-program-effective-human-2025a1000xam XX A new study suggets metformin could help people with type 1, reducing the need for insulin.  The researchers were surprised to find that metformin did not improve insulin resistance or change blood sugar levels. This suggests that, unlike in type 2 diabetes, metformin doesn't combat insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes.   However, metformin did reduce the amount of insulin people needed to keep their blood sugar levels stable.   https://www.the-express.com/news/health/192157/diabetes-medicine-insulin-type-1 XX Beyond Type 1 launches #TheBeyondType campaign in India to combat type 1 diabetes stigma. Nick Jonas is one of the founders of Beyond Type 1, his wife, Priyanka Chopra Jonas is his partner in this new non profit. The initiative highlights inspiring individuals living with T1D and partners with local organisations to improve awareness, medical support, and community networks for affected families across the nation. India has more young people living with T1D than any other nation, yet understanding of the condition remains limited. Beyond Type 1 is partnering with grassroots organisations across high-need regions. These include HRIDAY in Delhi–NCR, Nityaasha Foundation in Pune, Gram Jyoti in Jharkhand, and SAMATVAM Trust in Bangalore—each group focusing on improving awareness, providing medical support and building stronger community networks for young people with T1D.

CISA staff may see pay cuts in 2026. Threat actors advertise a full chain zero-day exploit for iOS. A US-led international coalition releases joint guidance on integrating AI into operational technology. Microsoft lowers sales growth targets for its agentic AI products. A major fintech provider suffers a ransomware-linked breach. Arizona's Attorney General sues Temo over data collection practices. Lessons learned from Capita's handling of Black Basta. The UK sanctions Russia's GRU. My guest is Dave Baggett, co-founder and CEO of INKY (recently acquired by Kaseya), about the challenges of email security. A U.S. Bankruptcy Court insists on AI transparency. Remember to leave us a 5-star rating and review in your favorite podcast app. Miss an episode? Sign-up for our daily intelligence roundup, Daily Briefing, and you'll never miss a beat. And be sure to follow CyberWire Daily on LinkedIn. CyberWire Guest Today, Dave Bittner speaks with Dave Baggett, co-founder and CEO of INKY (recently acquired by Kaseya), about the need to update email security that was built on a 1971 design. Selected Reading US Slashes Pay Incentives at Already Weakened Cyber Agency (Bloomberg) Zero-Day Alert: Alleged iOS 26 Full Chain Exploit for Sale (Dataminr) Principles for the Secure Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Operational Technology (CISA) Microsoft drops AI sales targets in half after salespeople miss their quotas (Ars Technica) Marketing and Compliance Software Vendor to Banks Breached (Data Breach Today) Arizona attorney general sues Chinese online retailer Temu over data theft claims (AP News) What organisations can learn from the record breaking fine over Capita's ransomware incident (DoublePulsar) UK cracks down on Russian intelligence agency authorised by Putin to target Skripals (GOV.UK) General Order 210: Filings Using Generative Artificial Intelligence (Southern District of California, United States Bankruptcy Court) Share your feedback. What do you think about CyberWire Daily? Please take a few minutes to share your thoughts with us by completing our brief listener survey. Thank you for helping us continue to improve our show. Want to hear your company in the show? N2K CyberWire helps you reach the industry's most influential leaders and operators, while building visibility, authority, and connectivity across the cybersecurity community. Learn more at sponsor.thecyberwire.com. The CyberWire is a production of N2K Networks, your source for strategic workforce intelligence. © N2K Networks, Inc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In our news wrap Friday, a federal bankruptcy judge will approve Purdue Pharma’s latest deal to settle lawsuits over the damage of opioids, Charlotte is bracing for an expected surge of federal agents as President Trump looks to expand his immigration crackdown and the Trump administration is dropping plans to make airlines compensate passengers for flight delays caused by carriers. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

Sorry the volume is low. (This is the official court audio.)

The subject matter of the hearing is sale of the company in the US bankruptcy.Sorry the volume is low. This is the court recording that was docketed on November 10 as docket number 725. https://veritaglobal.net/dolphinco/document/list/6300

--

Sorry the volume is low. (This is the official court audio.)

For other docket entries on the BlockFi chapter 11 bankruptcy docket, see https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/blockfi/Home-DocketInfo

Debtwire's global head of legal, Sarah Foss, joins Retail Dive Senior Reporter Daphne Howland for a discussion of retailer bankruptcies – in 2025 and beyond.

The bankruptcy court presiding over the chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings of Del Monte held a second hearing on August 18. This is the official court audio recording of the August 18 hearing. The audio is docketed with the bankruptcy court as docket number 407. For this and other filings docketed with the bankruptcy court, see https://cases.stretto.com/delmontefoods/

In the long and winding court battle between John Dehlin and Jenn Kamp, the trail may be finally coming to a close after three years. RFM has covered this story from the start, and leads you through the final resolution of the matter in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Tacoma. Additionally, we take a somewhat lighthearted… Read More »John Dehlin v. Jenn Kamp [RFM 383]

In the long and winding court battle between John Dehlin and Jenn Kamp, the trail may be finally coming to a close after three years. RFM has covered this story from the start, and leads you through the final resolution of the matter in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Tacoma. Additionally, we take a somewhat lighthearted… Read More »John Dehlin v. Jenn Kamp [RFM 383] The post John Dehlin v. Jenn Kamp [RFM 383] appeared first on Mormon Discussions Podcasts - Full Lineup.

A new $7.4 billion settlement with states has been reached with Purdue Pharma and its Sackler family owners to settle lawsuits alleging that their drug OxyContin helped fuel the opioid crisis — but it still has to be approved by a U.S. Bankruptcy Court. We’ll learn more about all the deal entails. Then, we’ll discuss mortgage rates, job creation and immigration. And after, as Congress struggles with tech legislation, states aim to regulate online privacy

A new $7.4 billion settlement with states has been reached with Purdue Pharma and its Sackler family owners to settle lawsuits alleging that their drug OxyContin helped fuel the opioid crisis — but it still has to be approved by a U.S. Bankruptcy Court. We’ll learn more about all the deal entails. Then, we’ll discuss mortgage rates, job creation and immigration. And after, as Congress struggles with tech legislation, states aim to regulate online privacy

A new $7.4 billion settlement with states has been reached with Purdue Pharma and its Sackler family owners to settle lawsuits alleging that their drug OxyContin helped fuel the opioid crisis — but it still has to be approved by a U.S. Bankruptcy Court. We’ll learn more about all the deal entails. Then, we’ll discuss mortgage rates, job creation and immigration. And after, as Congress struggles with tech legislation, states aim to regulate online privacy