Podcasts about Undisputed

Meet Selene Mallone, the record-breaking ultra runner taking the Canadian scene by storm. Fresh off a course record at the Arizona Monster 300 and a win at the 2025 Divide 200, Selene discusses her ambitious "Project Double Double": tackling the Ribbon 200 and SOO 200 on this episode of the Athletics Ontario Running Podcast. She opens up about her evolution from powerlifting to elite trail running, detailing how she overcame disordered eating by fueling with high-density "real food" like pizza! Selene shares raw insights on mental grit, managing imposter syndrome, and her exciting new partnerships in the running community. Learn more about Selene at: https://www.instagram.com/small.onee Register to be an Athletics Ontario member: https://athleticsreg.ca/#!/memberships/athletics-canada-road-trail-membership Check out Hammer Nutrition Canada (and use our special discount code AORP15 at checkout): https://hammernutrition.ca/

Few artists have a career as unique and prolific as today's guest, Richmond Virginia's own, Nickelus F. Over multiple decades, F has dazzled listeners with his ridiculous technical skills as an MC, the authenticity and honesty in his subject matter, and his production chops that feature a degree of stylistic variety that was always impressively pulled off. With that said, he's recently taken aim at carving out what will eventually be known as the “Nickelus F sound”. And in this episode, he talks about this pursuit through the lens of his terrific new album, The Undisputed, dives into his artistic process as an MC and producer, and reflects on key lessons he's learnt from previous chapters in his career. You rarely hear such wisdom, honesty, and genuine excitement from one of rap's OGs. Don't miss this. The Plug (1:01). The Interview (2:34). Formative hip-hop connections (2:59). Current chapter of F's career and lasting legacy (7:03). Learning from earlier eras of F's career (14:42). Improving as an MC over time (22:00). Writing process (26:09). Richmond music scene (33:47). The Undisputed as Nickelus F's “North Star” (41:35). Honing in on the fundamentals of rap on The Undisputed (44:57). The “Nickelus F sound” (47:37). Upcoming projects / tour dates / merch (59:53). Support Trick Dice Records here: https://www.trickdice.co/  Buy/stream The Undisputed here: https://nickelusf.bandcamp.com/album/the-undisputed  Follow Nickelus F on Twitter here: https://x.com/NickelusF  Follow Nickelus F on Instagram here: https://www.instagram.com/nickelusf/?hl=en  Edited by: Alyssa Rodriguez Intro/Outro beat by: BLOODBLIXING -- Fiending for some more quality rap content? Visit the RMPP website: https://rmpp.squarespace.com/ Want to support and help us grow? Become a RMPP Patron, and gain access to exclusive content: https://www.patreon.com/therapmusicplugpodcast  Looking to connect? DM me @rapmusicplugpod on Twitter and Instagram, or shoot me an email at qlctv.podcast@gmail.com  

Mercedes Mone's returns to AEW and advances in the Owen Hart Foundation Women's Tournament. Plus Michael Oku becomes a 3-time Undisputed British Heavyweight Champion. Brian H. Waters discusses this, plus why Monetz Ford is ready to break out on his own, Je'Von Evans's opportunity to be King of the Ring, and more. Click here to support Maya World's family: https://gofund.me/3e19aea6a (1:45)Looking back at 15 years of the Wrestling Wrealm(2:59) Brother Azriel def JT Paradox(3:43) RC Daniels celebrates winning two titles(4:30) Jodi Aura wins the Remarkable Riot Championship(5:05) Ameera Roze becomes the inaugural North Carolina Wrestling Association women's champion(5:49)Jasmin Jones becomes the Kraken Pro-Wrestling Cash in Hand Champion!(6:42) Luxury Leah cosplays as “pregnant” Bianca Belair (7:24)Michael Oku becomes the NEW Undisputed Rev Pro British Heavyweight Champion(7:59) “Illustrious” Ace Jackson wins the new fatal wrestling federation YouTube Champion(9:17) Mercedes Mone' returns to AEW(10:21) Kevin Knight def. Speedball Mike Bailey and joins the Don Callis family(11:02)Jade Cargill & Michin def Charlotte Flair & Tiffany Stratton(12:01) Lash Legend (w/Nia Jax) defeats Chelsea Green(12:53)Ricky Saints def Carmelo Hayes(13:06)Je'Von Evans advances in King of the Ring tournament(14:01) Montez Ford's solo career(15:47) DarkState (Dion Lennox & Osiris Griffin) defeat Myles Borne & Tavion Heights (16:37) Kam Hendricks falls to tony D'Angelo (16:51) Nattie calls Jaida Parker's bluff

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Chris Broussard Declares Victor Wembanyama the Undisputed New Face of the NBA, and Shannon Sharpe Delivers Heavy Criticism of Wembanyama After the New York Knicks Stole Game 1 of the NBA Finals Visit https://prizepicks.onelink.me/LME0/CLNS and use code CLNS to get $50 in daily fantasy lineups when you play your first $5 lineup! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Recarga Activa, como todo lo que hacemos en AnaitGames, existe gracias al apoyo de la comunidad. ¿Te gusta lo que hacemos? Suscríbete en Patreon y te llevas todo lo que hacemos, sin anuncios, con acceso anticipado y formatos exclusivos. Más información en ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/anaitreload⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ * * * Bienvenidas y bienvenidos a Recarga Activa, el podcast diario de AnaitGames en el que filtramos lo más relevante de la actualidad del videojuego en pildorazos de 15 minutos. Estos son los titulares de hoy: poncle abre un nuevo estudio en Japón, liderado por Sawaki Takeyasu, creador de El Shaddai Prologue: Go Wayback pausa su desarrollo tras los despidos en PlayerUnknown Productions Herdling, Undisputed y Persona 5 Royal, entre los juegos de Game Pass de junio ♫ Sintonía del programa: Senseless, de Johny Grimes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegationsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell's version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre's response failed that test because, in Maxwell's view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre's claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre's earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell's behalf, the way Giuffre's allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell's denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell's Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre's ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell's aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Join us as we react to Brock Lesnar's shocking return on Monday Night Raw! What does that mean for his retirement, and how does this affect Oba Femi? Speaking of Oba Femi, we debate WWE's next big breakout: Trick Williams or Oba Femi—who truly deserves the title of WWE's undisputed future? We break down each contender's momentum, the potential impact on the roster, and what their rise could mean for the company's long-term plans. Then we dive into the official Cody Rhodes vs. Gunther matchup for Clash in Italy and question whether WWE has told the story the right way. Plus, a full Saturday Night's Main Event preview, a recap of WWE Monday Night Raw tonight and a retro look at This Week in Wrestling History with our “Shocking Wins” edition. Fresh takes, informed analysis, and plenty of debate.

Crimson Desert is the most talked about Game of 2026. It's insane scope, coupled with deep combat and incredible graphics surely make it a candidate as one of the highest scoring games of the year. Well, that is not the case, so we sent Adkins to find out what is really going on under the hood.From Knockout Kings, to Ready to Rumble to Fight Night, boxing games were once a staple of a gamers diet. However, as the sport spluttered and MMA rose to prominence, they seemed to fall by the wayside. In 2024, enter Undisputed and their attempt to bring back a Boxing video game. Biff decided to step into the ring and report back on what to expect.  Mixtape fired out the blocks as one of the highest rated games of the year. Critics cited its incredible soundtrack and emotional narrative as a potential new watermark. As time went on, the scores corrected themselves and Mixtape was snarled up in some controversy. Adkins cuts through all the noise to deliver the final verdict.With GTA VI closing in, Paper decided it was time to catch up on a gap in his Rockstar Games shame list. Paper rewarded himself with Red Dead Redemption 2. Seen as one of the greatest games of all time, this 2018 release is still being spoken about today. Paper continues that with his view on this classic. If you weren't into Mario Kart World, chances are you were looking at Donkey Kong Bananza as your most anticipated Switch 2 game of 2026. It took a bit of time but Adkins finally got time to blast through this ambitious platformer.Timestamps:00:00:00 Crimson Desert01:02:24 Undisputed01:45:36 Mixtape02:10:40 Red Dead Redemption 203:19:54 Donkey Kong Bananza

Nanny Faye is back on Unlocked and somehow manages to be even more unfiltered than last time.This week, Savannah and Nanny cover everything from dating apps and “situationships” to TikTok slang, viral moments, marriage advice, and the kind of brutally honest life wisdom only Nanny can deliver. One minute they're debating whether landlines should still exist, and the next Nanny is explaining why she'd never trust a dating app because “that's how people get killed.”They also dive into family stories nobody's heard before, including secrets Nanny kept for years, Savannah accidentally getting caught with company at her house, and why Papa told Nanny to never touch the lawn mower again. Along the way, Nanny opens up about love, loyalty, grief, aging, staying independent, and what she hopes people remember most about her one day.It's hilarious, heartfelt, chaotic, and somehow still full of really good advice.And yes… Nanny Faye is officially joining TikTok, and she's reacting to some of the hottest (and weirdest) trends on today's episode!Follow Nanny Faye on TikTok now! -- https://www.tiktok.com/@nanny.faye.chrisl?_r=1&_t=ZT-96HjM886NtGThank you to our sponsors for supporting our show!- Article: Our listeners are getting $50 OFF your first purchase of $100 or more when you visit https://www.article.com/unlocked and the discount will be automatically applied at checkout!- Progressive: Join the over 28 million drivers who trust Progressive. Visit us at https://www.progressive.com! Thank you to Progressive for sponsoring the show! (Restrictions apply. Not available in all states and situations.)- GoodGirlRX: Visit https://www.goodgirlrx.com and use code UNLOCKED15 to get 15% OFF at checkout!LET'S BE SOCIAL:Follow Savannah Chrisley:Insta: (https://www.instagram.com/SavannahChrisley)TikTok: (https://www.tiktok.com/@SavannahChrisley)X: (https://www.x.com/_itssavannah_)Nanny Faye Chrisley:Insta: (https://www.instagram.com/nannyfayechrisley/)Cameo: (https://www.cameo.com/fayechrisley) -- Get a personalized video from Nanny Faye today!Follow The Unlocked Podcast:Insta: (https://www.instagram.com/UnlockedWithSavannah)TikTok: (https://www.tiktok.com/@UnlockedWithSav)See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Linktree: ⁠https://linktr.ee/Analytic⁠Join The Normandy For Ad-Free NME, Additional Bonus Audio And Visual Content For All Things Nme+! Join Here:⁠ ⁠⁠https://ow.ly/msoH50WCu0K⁠Analytic Dreamz breaks down one of the biggest questions in gaming right now: Is Capcom truly dominating 2026? From record-breaking releases to industry-shifting moves, this episode examines why Capcom stands out as the potential MVP of the year.In this packed episode, Analytic Dreamz delivers the latest gaming updates including PRAGMATA, the Assassin's Creed Black Flag remaster (resynced), WINDROSE, MOUSE PI, Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream, and even Candy Crush developments. We also cover major industry news like the Xbox Game Pass price decrease and the removal of Call of Duty perks.On the music side, Analytic Dreamz discusses new tracks and moments from Noah Kahan, Usher & Chris Brown, Ella Langley, Coachella highlights, Michael Movie, and Drake. Plus, a look at the Music Industry with Sony's latest DRM controversy.Drama segment dives into FaZe vs Core and updates on d4vd.Tune in for unfiltered gaming analysis, music talk, and industry breakdowns you won't find anywhere else. New episodes of The Notorious Mass Effect drop weekly — hosted by Analytic Dreamz.Subscribe, rate, and follow so you never miss an episode. Turn on notifications and join the conversation in the comments.Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Linktree: ⁠https://linktr.ee/Analytic⁠Join The Normandy For Ad-Free NME, Additional Bonus Audio And Visual Content For All Things Nme+! Join Here:⁠ ⁠⁠https://ow.ly/msoH50WCu0K⁠Analytic Dreamz breaks down one of the biggest questions in gaming right now: Is Capcom truly dominating 2026? From record-breaking releases to industry-shifting moves, this episode examines why Capcom stands out as the potential MVP of the year.In this packed episode, Analytic Dreamz delivers the latest gaming updates including PRAGMATA, the Assassin's Creed Black Flag remaster (resynced), WINDROSE, MOUSE PI, Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream, and even Candy Crush developments. We also cover major industry news like the Xbox Game Pass price decrease and the removal of Call of Duty perks.On the music side, Analytic Dreamz discusses new tracks and moments from Noah Kahan, Usher & Chris Brown, Ella Langley, Coachella highlights, Michael Movie, and Drake. Plus, a look at the Music Industry with Sony's latest DRM controversy.Drama segment dives into FaZe vs Core and updates on d4vd.Tune in for unfiltered gaming analysis, music talk, and industry breakdowns you won't find anywhere else. New episodes of The Notorious Mass Effect drop weekly — hosted by Analytic Dreamz.Subscribe, rate, and follow so you never miss an episode. Turn on notifications and join the conversation in the comments.Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This week on the UKC Hunting Ops Podcast… We're revisiting the very first episode in the UNDISPUTED series, where Allen sits down with Steve Burkholder to count down his top 3 hounds and talk about the dogs that helped to establish him as a big name in the coon hunting world. You might also recognize Steve from the Tournament of Champions, where he's played an integral role in the past few years as an announcer. This is an all-time favorite episode you won't want to miss!   Follow Us on Social! www.facebook.com/UKCHuntingOpsPodcast www.instagram.com/ukchuntingops https://www.youtube.com/@ukcdogs   Check Out Our Sponsors: www.eukanubasportingdog.com

Support the show & get a link to our private discord channel: ko-fi.com/wedgeheadpodcastIn this episode Alex went into the lab and locked himself away to run the tests and to finally come up with the “Top Ten Games of All Time: No Opinions, Just Facts” list and that's what we're sharing with you on this episode.Everybody knows the pinside list is deeply flawed and skewed towards brand new games, but the real top ten list is right here… at least according to Alex.As always though, we are adults and we use adult language. This is the sensitive ears disclaimer. Support the show

Texas First Outdoors tips, tricks and news to be in the know. And knowing is half the battle! Stock media provided by Artmuns / Source

WBC interim World Super Bantamweight Champion Skye Nicolson talks Wednesday 29 April's fight down under against Mariah Turner. The southpaw Aussie admits the sole blemish on her career has helped shape Skye 2.0 as she looks to lock in a shot at Undisputed but first must come through Turner. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Mark Heath, Alex Jones and Ross Halls are back to reflect on Ipswich Town making history with their 2-0 win at oldest rivals Norwich City on Saturday. The boys chat about the surprise Town team selection and controversial penalty decision, plus hear from Kieran McKenna, Dara O'Shea and George Hirst.There's praise for Town's colossal defensive effort too, and debate around Marcelino Nunuez's memorable cameo appearance.We finish with a chat about what it means, and predictions for tomorrow night's trip to Pompey.Plus, Rossi explains how the Canaries tried to humiliate him at Carrow Road.Kings of Anglia is sponsored Molecular! Get 10% OFF with promo code KOA10 at https://www.molecular-uk.com/Subscribe on our website to watch the video version of the podcast - https://www.eadt.co.uk/subscribe/You can shop the KOA range here - (kings-of-anglia.myspreadshop.co.uk) 

Ger Gilroy, Michael McCarthy and Dara Smith-Naughton are on hand to bring you the Performance Rankings following a packed weekend of sport which saw Rory McIlroy claim his 2nd Green Jacket at the Masters with his conquering of Augusta National Golf Club coming in consecutive years. Viagra Connect 50mg film-coated tablets. Contains sildenafil. For adult men with erectile dysfunction. Subject to suitability. Maximum dosage one 50mg tablet per day. Always read the label. Catch The Off The Ball Breakfast show LIVE weekday mornings from 7:30am or just search for Off The Ball Breakfast and get the podcast on the Off The Ball app. SUBSCRIBE at OffTheBall.com/join

0:00 - In previous years, Jokic has always been the best player on the court for the Nuggets. Number 1 with a bullet. Undisputed. This year, that hasn't always been the case. And that's a good thing! 15:22 - We get it. It's a long season. The Avs looked disinterested last night. They couldn't get excited about playing the worst team in the league. But the job's not finished. They're not locked into a playoff seed yet. Seeding still matters. They HAVE to care about these last few games. They can't lose interest. Focus up, boys. Let's go.32:11 - Vic is interviewing Spencer Jones today. Aside from the obvious LinkedIn questions, what should Vic ask him?

In this episode we review the comments from Darren Mougey's press conference.  In addition, review the latest rumors surrounding the Jets draft selections. Be sure to follow Bubbs on Sports on YouTube! 

Because of our sin, we tend to stay blind to what God is doing. We wonder what God is doing or if he is really in control. We misunderstand that God is using the greatest suffering to bring about the greatest victory. Jesus willingly suffers, dies, and is buried to fulfill and porve everything that was ever written about him. The gospel shows how Jesus was using the greatest evil in the sinful hearts of man to bring about the good possible. The full redemption and salvation to every one who would put their faith and Trust in Jesus as their King.

On the 473rd edition of Wrestling With the Dawg Broadcast at FlairFlop.com, the Dirty Dawg Darsie grapples with the 2026 WrestleMania series with the first stop being on St. Patrick's Day 2002 where Chris Jericho defended the Undisputed WWF Championship against Triple H at WWF WrestleMania X8!  The Dawg dives into Ric Flair and Hollywood Hogan stealing the show at WrestleMania, the WWF Draft and the Dawg's memories of it, the WWF superstars making media rounds on Off the Record, and so much more! Please support WhenItWasCool.com! Patreon.com/WIWCool/ Patreon.com/DirtyDawgMES/ Shoutout to Innesx for Chris Jericho's WCW "All Of My Days" theme, Triple H's WWF "The Game" theme, and Chris Jericho's WWF "Break the Walls Down" theme.  Please check out his work on YouTube! https://www.youtube.com/@innesx_

On this episode of The Still Real to Us Show:-- Cody Rhodes regains the Undisputed WWE Championship from Drew McIntyre on SmackDown, setting up a massive showdown with Randy Orton at WrestleMania 42. Was this the right call by WWE, or would the originally rumored path for Cody at WM 42 have been the better story?-- Drew McIntyre's title reign comes to a controversial end, but did WWE completely miss the mark with his Undisputed WWE Championship run and booking along the way?-- A full WrestleMania 42 card roundup! Brock Lesnar's opponent appears to be locked in, Finn Bálor's shocking exit from The Judgment Day could reshape his WrestleMania plans, and is WWE quietly restarting a major storyline involving Sami Zayn?-- NXT Vengeance Day recap! We break down the biggest moments from the show and discuss the exciting news that wrestling legends are set to appear weekly on NXT television!-- AEW Revolution preview! Ciampa looks ready to “do it himself” against Mark Briscoe, Kevin Knight may be on the verge of a major turn, and Fletcher vs. Speedball on Dynamite may have been one of the best Dynamite matches we've ever seen!

Cody Rhodes vs Randy Orton one-on-one for the Undisputed Title was the best decision by WWE for a WrestleMania Main Event: AGREE or DISAGREE?The road to WrestleMania 42 just took a massive turn! On this episode, we break down a shocking championship change on WWE SmackDown as Cody Rhodes defeats Drew McIntyre to become the new WWE Undisputed Champion for a 3rd time. With the victory, it's now official: Cody Rhodes will defend the title against Randy Orton in the main event of WrestleMania 42. Can The American Nightmare hold on to the championship against The Viper on the biggest stage of them all?Meanwhile on WWE Raw, tensions escalate as CM Punk is confronted by Jey Uso and Jimmy Uso regarding his comments aimed at Roman Reigns the week before. Is Punk inserting himself into Bloodline business, and what could this mean as WrestleMania approaches?We also discuss the shocking shake-up within The Judgment Day as Finn Bálor is kicked out of the faction. What led to the split, and where does Balor go from here?Plus, we run through all the major notes and moments from Raw and Smackdown, including storyline developments, surprises, and what they could mean heading toward WrestleMania season.

"Boxing has never smelled this good." Alycia Baumgardner is down here in Miami to defend her super featherweight title and stops by the studio to share her story and answer Dan's most classic boxing questions. Also, the NBA Cup had a huge night, and TUA TAGOVAILOA HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN BENCHED BY THE MIAMI DOLPHINS. THE CREW REACTS. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices