Podcasts about voided

Today we discuss the voided Maxx Crosby trade with the Ravens and other free agent targets for the Raiders

My friend Ace Parlier came on to talk about his latest sci-fi adventure, Voided. It's a fast paced space venture that is sure to be one of your newest favorites. And if you tune in, you may get some hints of what the sequel will be like....

Does faith in Jesus cancel the Law of God? Or does it actually confirm it? Many wrestle with this question. Some believe grace replaces the Law entirely. Others cling to the Law without understanding its purpose. But Scripture shows us something deeper: the Law was never the means of salvation — it was the mirror that revealed our need for one. In this episode, we walk through Romans and the words of Jesus to understand the purpose of the Law, the power of faith, and how the gospel does not abolish God's standard — it fulfills it. Faith does not make the Law void. It establishes it.

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdf

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Non Prosecution Agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein stands as one of the most controversial prosecutorial decisions in modern American legal history. Despite extensive, corroborated allegations that Epstein sexually abused dozens of underage girls over many years, federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida declined to pursue federal charges and instead entered into a sweeping agreement that limited his exposure and shielded potential co-conspirators. At the time, officials justified the deal by citing evidentiary challenges and concerns about witness credibility, explanations that later appeared increasingly thin when contemporaneous emails revealed careful negotiation and strategic calculation rather than uncertainty. The agreement required Epstein to comply with specific conditions, including sex-offender registration and restrictions on contact with minors, yet records show he violated those terms repeatedly. Under normal circumstances, such breaches would have triggered revocation. In Epstein's case, they did not.The failure to revisit or void the agreement has remained a point of intense scrutiny for years, particularly as additional reporting and government reviews documented prosecutorial misconduct and violations of victims' rights. An Inspector General investigation found that prosecutors concealed the agreement from victims and coordinated closely with Epstein's legal team, undermining statutory protections meant to ensure transparency and participation. Despite those findings, the Department of Justice has largely treated the agreement as a closed chapter, framing it as a historical error rather than an active legal issue. Critics argue that this posture has allowed the agreement's immunity provisions to continue casting a shadow over unresolved questions about accountability for others involved. With the factual record well established and the legal authority to act undisputed, the central issue has shifted. It is no longer whether the deal was flawed, but whether federal authorities are willing to confront the consequences of leaving it intact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

0:00 — Welcome! Braxton is quarantined, Peter's son got head lice… Merry Christmas 12:15 — Peter's nightmare white elephant gift exchange 24:20 — How do you fix the College Football Playoff?30:40 — CFP First Round recap: Oregon doesn't look championship ready, CFP committee validated in picking Alabama to be in, Miami-TA&M was intense 46:20 — Peter's bad fantasy football beat50:30 — NFL News & Notes — DK Metcalf swings at a Lions fan, fumbles a $45M bag; Cowboys eliminated, won't be a conference championship for 30th year; playoff scenarios + eliminations 1:00:10 — Bets of the Week 

A local board election has been voided, and voters will have to go back to the polls, after a judge ruled fraudulent voting had "permeated or infected" the election. Simon Mitchell, KC spoke to Ingrid Hipkiss.

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdf

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdf

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdf

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein's subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Friday edition of Circle Back dives into the biggest drama from gambling Twitter this week. We break down the controversy around NoVig, which drew backlash after voiding winning NFL SGPs over the weekend, and revisit the heated debate between Steve Fezzik and CLARS24 over the math behind the Circa Survivor Pool. On top of that, we cover the latest developments on the U.S. gambling tax, including Dina Titus' efforts to repeal the 2026 cap on gambling loss deductions. Jacob Gramegna hosts alongside Mike (aka Mr. PeanutBettor) and Joey Knish, with special guest Porter from BAanalytics joining as the fourth voice. Together, they unpack these controversies, debates, and updates, giving viewers insight into the stories and arguments dominating gambling Twitter. This is Circle Back, your weekly deep dive into betting drama, analysis, and hot takes.

It's a busy time in the world of lawfare, thanks to communist judges on the bench. Jesse Kelly opens the show discussing the impact of communist judges on America. He is then joined by House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan to discuss a new subpoena against Jack Smith. Senator Ron Johnson also joins the show to discuss what he's learned about Operation Arctic Frost. It all wraps up with a conversation about the Supreme Court and Joe Biden's autopen orders with Alex Swoyer. I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TVChoq: Visit https://choq.com/jessetv for a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life Vandy Crisps: Ready to give MASA or Vandy a try? Get 25% off your first order by going to http://masachips.com/JESSETV and using code JESSETV. Cowboy Colostrum: Get 25% Off Cowboy Colostrum with code JESSETV at https://www.cowboycolostrum.com/JESSETVFollow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The United States is ending migration from third-world countries, said President Donald Trump, who issued an announcement on Thanksgiving and said that the kindness of Americans has been exploited by people from other countries who are draining the nation's resources and making it less safe.Trump also announced that he is declaring all orders and documents signed by the autopen under former President Joe Biden null and void. Trump said that if Biden contests this, he will be investigated for perjury.We'll discuss these topics and others in this episode of Crossroads.Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and guests, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Mike Silver of The Athletic joins the Gregs to revisit Friday's breaking news of Brandon Aiyuk and the 49ers preparing to part ways after the season, and why he hasn't fought back on the voided guarantees for 2026See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In hour 1, Spadoni and Shasky discuss the stunning news from Friday that the 49ers have voided his guarantees, WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON!?

Mike Silver of The Athletic joins the Gregs to revisit Friday's breaking news of Brandon Aiyuk and the 49ers preparing to part ways after the season, and why he hasn't fought back on the voided guarantees for 2026See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Biden is cooked, Democrats testified and lied, charge them with perjury if they were under oath. Become A Member http://youtube.com/timcastnews/join The Green Room - https://rumble.com/playlists/aa56qw_g-j0 BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Join The Discord Server - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL

SPONSORS: Go to https://allfamilypharmacy.com/DA and use code “DA10” for a discount!  Ivermectin Hydroxychloroquine Mebendazole Go to https://www.PatriotMobile.com/GRAHAM or call 972-PATRIOT. Use promo code GRAHAM and get a FREE MONTH of service. ✉️Subscribe to the Newsletter!! https://newsletter.grahamallen.com/

WORLD: $92-B damages ruling vs Tepco ex-bosses voided | June 7, 2025Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.netFollow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotionSubscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digitalSign up to our newsletters: https://tmt.ph/newslettersCheck out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Today we're talking about President Trump's tariffs being voided, then reinstated; the State Department revoking Chinese student visas; Israel announcing it killed Hamas's acting leader; and other top news for Friday, May 30th. Stay informed while remaining focused on Christ with The Pour Over Today. Want to support The Pour Over? Choose to pay at tpopod.com  Please support our TPO sponsors! Upside: https://links.thepourover.org/Upside Cru: give.cru.org/pour LMNT: https://links.thepourover.org/LMNT_Podcast Student Life Application Study Bible: https://links.thepourover.org/SLASB_Pod Stress Less: https://links.thepourover.org/StressLess Platforms to Pillars: https://links.thepourover.org/PlatformstoPillars Subsplash: subsplash.com/tpo CSB: https://links.thepourover.org/CSB_podcast Field of Greens: FieldofGreens.com The Table Podcast: https://links.thepourover.org/TheTablePodcast

Want more MTM Vegas? Check out our Patreon for access to our exclusive weekly aftershow! patreon.com/mtmvegas Episode Description: As a reminder you can watch this show as well at: http://www.YouTube.com/milestomemories This week more details were released about the new massive Midtown Las Vegas project which sits in between the Arts District and Fremont Street. This new development will feature hotels, residences and tons of shopping/dining, but is it Vegas enough? In other news Caesars lost a big lawsuit this week about slot sidebets as they made the news for voiding tons of sports bets for a player who circumvented the rules. We also discuss: more behind the showgirl "mafia", 10X points at Resorts World, Guy Fieri expands again, Penn & Teller street, Downtown fireworks and the end of the crazy Ivanpah mirror array. 0:00 Plaza's Downtown Fireworks begin 0:30 Genting Rewards (Resorts World) 10X 2:05 Caesars refuses to pay sports bets 3:04 Circumventing rules - Is it okay to void bets? 5:29 Piero's family drama - Historic venue in jeapordy? 6:41 Chicken Guy! opens at Harrah's + Pin Up Pizza special update 7:34 Caesars loses slot sidebet lawsuit 9:45 Penn & Teller street coming? 11:04 Cadence Crossing (newest Vegas casino) is moving forward 11:40 Ivanpah's mirror array shutting down? 13:43 Behind the Showgirl “mafia” 15:38 Midtown Vegas coming soon 16:46 Is Midtown Las Vegas too generic? Each week tens of thousands of people tune into our MtM Vegas news shows at http://www.YouTube.com/milestomemories. We do two news shows weekly on YouTube with this being the audio version. Never miss out on the latest happenings in and around Las Vegas! Enjoying the podcast? Please consider leaving us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform! You can also connect with us anytime at podcast@milestomemories.com.  You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify or by searching "MtM Vegas" or "Miles to Memories" in your favorite podcast app. Don't forget to check out our travel/miles/points podcast as well!

Joe Ostrowski & Sam Panayotovich begin the show by discussing how sports books voided bettors' wagers in the Crown Tournament and share their takes on the situation. They also get into the women's tournament and recap the games from yesterday. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Unleashed: The Political News Hour with Chris Cordani – President Biden issued controversial pre-emptive pardons to figures like Hunter Biden and Dr. Fauci, but revelations that they were autopen-signed raise serious legal questions. With Trump voiding the pardons and the courts now involved, scrutiny deepens over who truly held power during Biden's term—and why key political figures received protection before any charges were filed.

Tim, Phil, Raymond, & Elaad are joined by Eleazar Perez to discuss Trump voiding Joe Biden's pardons amid 'auto pen' scandal, Trump ending Secret Service protection for Hunter & Ashley Biden, Trump administration deporting over 200 gang members to El Salvador, and Democrat approval collapsing. Hosts: Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Raymond @raymondgstanley (X) Elaad @elaadeliahu (X) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: Eleazar Perez @Officialeleazarperez (YouTube) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Green Room - https://rumble.com/playlists/aa56qw_g-j0 BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Join The Discord Server - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - https://www.youtube.com/TimcastIRL Trump JUST VOIDED Biden's Pardons Of Fauci & Biden Family, Dan Bongino Can PROSECUTE Them Now Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

I still run into vendor teams that collect vendor banking information on voided checks or letterhead.  Is that still a best practice and if not, what else should be done?Keep listening.  Check out my website www.debrarrichardson.com if you need help implementing authentication techniques, internal controls, and best practices to prevent fraudulent payments, regulatory fines or bad vendor data. Check out the Vendor Process Training Center for 116+ hours of weekly live and on-demand training for the Vendor team.  Links mentioned in the podcast + other helpful resources:   Vendor Master File Tip of the Week > Bad Practices When Changing Vendor's Banking:  https://youtu.be/0tNFDyvOhzg Vendor Process Training Center - https://training.debrarrichardson.comCustomized Fraud Training:  https://training.debrarrichardson.com/customized-fraud-training Free Live and On-Demand Webinars: https://training.debrarrichardson.com/webinarsVendor Master File Clean-Up:  https://www.debrarrichardson.com/cleanupYouTube Channel:  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqeoffeQu3pSXMV8fUIGNiw More Podcasts/Blogs/Webinars www.debrarrichardson.comMore ideas?  Email me at debra@debrarrichardson.com Music Credit:  www.purple-planet.com

Seth and Sean discuss the Texans voiding Stefon Diggs' contract, officially making him a free agent, and who they may be able to bring in to bolster the WR position.

Seth and Sean discuss the Texans letting Stefon Diggs' contract void, if they should want him back next year, and which of the top free agents they should take a look at.

HOUR 1 - Seth and Sean discuss Stefon Diggs' contract being voided and what the Texans might do to bolster the WR position, dive into the drama the Alex Bregman signing is causing with Rafael Devers in Boston, and go through the day's Headlines.

#PANAMA:: BELT ROAD TO BE VOIDED. STEVE YATES, HERITAGE @GORDONGCHANG, GATESTONE, NEWSWEEK, THE HILL 1945 THE  INTERAMERICAN UNIVERSITY

https://www.myheraldreview.com/news/cochise_county/cochise-county-staff-voided-tallies-for-16k-early-ballots-before-election-day-but-never-advised/article_9bf12aac-a055-11ef-8c04-1b99a039246f.html  Today - we're diving into what happened with the early ballot tallies in Cochise County.  Support the show: https://www.myheraldreview.com/site/forms/subscription_services/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Biden's UN swan song: Says there is hope amid geopolitical hellfire (00:00) Media freaks out over Nebraska trying to secure Trump win 7 weeks ahead of election (12:17) Scandals galore!! Aides resign and investigations of NYC mayor mount (21:08) Josh Shapiro signs missile in photo op with Zelensky: Election interference?!' (30:29) Telegram privacy voided by European authorities, data no longer safe (41:16) GOP Senator skewers head of Arab NGO asking if supports Hamas (51:13) 'Creepy Joe' returns? Biden says staff doesn't let him have girls on stage (01:02:35) Trump vows to end Russia-Ukraine War, says Biden is not helping (01:08:39) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, A.B. Ridgeway addresses a critical scam targeting individuals through fake Social Security emails and calls. He shares the story of Joyce House, who received a suspicious notice claiming her Social Security number was being revoked. Fortunately, she trusted her instincts and didn't fall victim to the scam. A.B. emphasizes the importance of vigilance, especially during tax season, and provides actionable advice for avoiding such fraudulent schemes.3 Key Takeaways:Beware of Suspicious Emails and Calls: Fraudsters may send emails that look official, such as using SSA logos and similar website domains like "SSA.US.gov." Always verify the source, especially when receiving unsolicited communications.Trust Your Instincts: If something feels off, like Joyce's experience when a scammer asked for personal information, don't hesitate to hang up or stop responding. Always double-check details such as email addresses or phone numbers before taking action.Build Your 'Power of Five': To protect yourself financially, A.B. recommends having a solid team of five key people: a financial advisor, an accountant, a lawyer, a power of attorney, and an executor. This team will guide and protect you through financial decisions and prevent potential scams.3 Memorable Quotes:"Your Social Security number might be the most valuable piece of information you have." — A.B. Ridgeway"It said SSA.US.gov—sounds official, looks official, but we all know the official website is SSA.gov." — A.B. Ridgeway"You need to have a team that's going to guide you, or you're going to be at a greater risk of falling for these scams." — A.B. Ridgeway

In this episode, A.B. Ridgeway addresses a critical scam targeting individuals through fake Social Security emails and calls. He shares the story of Joyce House, who received a suspicious notice claiming her Social Security number was being revoked. Fortunately, she trusted her instincts and didn't fall victim to the scam. A.B. emphasizes the importance of vigilance, especially during tax season, and provides actionable advice for avoiding such fraudulent schemes.3 Key Takeaways:Beware of Suspicious Emails and Calls: Fraudsters may send emails that look official, such as using SSA logos and similar website domains like "SSA.US.gov." Always verify the source, especially when receiving unsolicited communications.Trust Your Instincts: If something feels off, like Joyce's experience when a scammer asked for personal information, don't hesitate to hang up or stop responding. Always double-check details such as email addresses or phone numbers before taking action.Build Your 'Power of Five': To protect yourself financially, A.B. recommends having a solid team of five key people: a financial advisor, an accountant, a lawyer, a power of attorney, and an executor. This team will guide and protect you through financial decisions and prevent potential scams.3 Memorable Quotes:"Your Social Security number might be the most valuable piece of information you have." — A.B. Ridgeway"It said SSA.US.gov—sounds official, looks official, but we all know the official website is SSA.gov." — A.B. Ridgeway"You need to have a team that's going to guide you, or you're going to be at a greater risk of falling for these scams." — A.B. Ridgeway

Joe Ostrowski and Sam Panayotovich discuss sportsbooks deciding to void Jordan Mason prop and anytime touchdown bets from last night, after Christian McCaffrey was a surprise inactive and what the precedent should be in these situations going forward. Plus an early look at Week #2 line movement, with a look at handful of injuries and notable news around the league. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Scott shares his thoughts on Byron Allen's $14.3 billion offer to buy Paramount, and identifies who would be a better acquirer. He also breaks down the latest earnings from luxury powerhouse LVMH, explains why its stock has underperformed, and discusses the problems with family businesses. Finally, he takes a look at the outcome of the shareholder lawsuit against Elon Musk. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tonight on group chat news we catch you up on everything you need to know from this last week including the latest from J Powell and how it's not looking good for a rate cut in March, The latest jobs report, the release of the new Apple vision pro, Meta shares surge 20%, insider story on how FTX can give everyone their money back, Amazon earnings up 14%, Joe Rogans new deal with Spotify worth $250 million that is NOT exclusive, New York was selected for the world cup 2026, and Elon Musks $56 billion payback was VOIDED by a Delaware judge, and the latest update with Neuralink.     Connect with Group Chat! Watch The Pod #1 Newsletter In The World For The Gram Tweet With Us Exclusive Facebook Content We're @groupchatpod on Snapchat     

(0:00) Bestie intros! The guys try the Apple Vision Pro (8:24) Zuckerberg apologizes to parents in hearing, Section 230 under fire from child safety reforms (36:19) Delaware judge voids Elon's comp package, understanding Fortune 500 country club compensation (1:08:26) Reddit reportedly targeting $5B valuation in potential March IPO (1:16:17) Drone attack, risks of greater Middle East conflict, failures of the military industrial complex Follow the besties: https://twitter.com/chamath https://twitter.com/Jason https://twitter.com/DavidSacks https://twitter.com/friedberg Follow the pod: https://twitter.com/theallinpod https://linktr.ee/allinpodcast Intro Music Credit: https://rb.gy/tppkzl https://twitter.com/yung_spielburg Intro Video Credit: https://twitter.com/TheZachEffect Referenced in the show: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/tim-cook-apple-vision-pro https://twitter.com/MKBHD/status/1752706894874202256 https://twitter.com/Box/status/1753085804115861766 https://twitter.com/briantong/status/1752645464204493147 https://www.meta.com/smart-glasses/shop-all https://www.instagram.com/p/C0w4Agjvq5_/?img_index=1 https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1752749485070156025 https://www.nbcnews.com/video/zuckerberg-apologizes-to-parents-at-senate-child-safety-hearing-203338309674 https://ultimateclassicrock.com/judas-priest-suicide https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1GX0C0 https://www.google.com/finance/quote/TSLA:NASDAQ https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/30/tesla-shares-slide-after-judge-voids-elon-musks-56-billion-compensation.html https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=359340 https://www.google.com/finance/quote/GM:NYSE https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/mary-barra-spent-a-decade-transforming-gm-it-hasnt-been-enough-d82f4c5a https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/what-the-uaw-and-everyone-else-needs-to-know-about-ceo-pay https://buffett.cnbc.com/video/2004/05/01/munger-i-would-rather-throw-a-viper-down-my-shirtfront-than-hire-a-compensation-consultant.html https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-28/reddit-advised-to-target-at-least-5-billion-valuation-in-ipo https://twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/1639459879546150913 https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iraq-seeks-quick-exit-us-forces-no-deadline-set-pm-says-2024-01-10 https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/19/missile-drone-pentagon-houthi-attacks-iran-00132480 https://weapons.substack.com/p/biden-dod-and-the-army-are-not-protecting https://twitter.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/1752786864900108547 https://inside.com/vc/posts/u-s-vc-funding-for-defense-tech-startups-continues-upward-trajectory-in-q1-2023-376404 https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahemerson/2024/01/23/eric-schmidts-secret-white-stork-project-aims-to-build-ai-combat-drones https://www.saildrone.com