Podcasts about Magnitogorsk

Donate to Conversations with Tyler Give Crypto Other Ways to Give In his landmark multi-volume biography of Stalin, Stephen Kotkin shows how totalitarian power worked not just through terror from above, but through millions of everyday decisions from below. Currently a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution after 33 years at Princeton, Kotkin brings both deep archival work and personal experience to his understanding of Soviet life, having lived in Magnitogorsk during the 1980s and seen firsthand how power operates in closed societies. Tyler sat down with Stephen to discuss the state of Russian Buddhism today, how shamanism persists in modern Siberia, whether Siberia might ever break away from Russia, what happened to the science city Akademgorodok, why Soviet obsession with cybernetics wasn't just a mistake, what life was really like in 1980s Magnitogorsk, how modernist urban planning failed there, why Prokofiev returned to the USSR in 1936, what Stalin actually understood about artistic genius, how Stalin's Georgian background influenced him (or not), what Michel Foucault taught him about power, why he risked his tenure case to study Japanese, how his wife's work as a curator opened his eyes to Korean folk art, how he's progressing on the next Stalin volume, and much more. Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video. Recorded November 13th, 2024. Other ways to connect Follow us on X and Instagram Follow Tyler on X Sign up for our newsletter Join our Discord Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.

The Will To Win with Mike Keenan The Outer Limits of Inner Truth proudly presents an introspective interview with legendary NHL coach, Mike Keenan - author of the new book "Iron Mike: My Life Behind the Bench." In the NHL, Keenan took Philadelphia (twice) and Chicago to the Stanley Cup final before he led the New York Rangers to the title. Along the way, he led Team Canada to two Canada Cup victories, and later in his career won a Kontinental Hockey League championship in Magnitogorsk, Russia. Mike Keenan coached some of the greatest stars in hockey and is remembered as one of the game's most colorful personalities and greatest coaches. Book Link: Some questions we ask Mr. Keenan include: With the sense of urgency to win, how were you able to maximize your team's successes in the short term and yet, also give them the best chances for success in the long term? What was your most painful personal setback and what was your most painful professional set back? What did you learn from both experiences and how did both experiences permanently change your perception on life & coaching? Most people fail. Most people never fulfill their potential and even fewer people than that become legends in their own time. Do you think a champion mindset is actually mental disorder? Do you think that it is strange to believe & know that you can achieve the unachievable when so many are willing to embrace mediocrity? About Mike Keenan Mike Keenan is one of the most successful coaches ever. He began his hockey coaching career at Forest Hill Collegiate in Toronto, and his star ascended rapidly. He won an Ontario championship in junior with Peterborough, a Canadian university championship with the University of Toronto, and a Calder Cup in the AHL with Rochester. In the NHL, he took Philadelphia (twice) and Chicago to the Stanley Cup final before he led the New York Rangers to the title. Along the way, he led Team Canada to two Canada Cup victories, and later in his career won a Kontinental Hockey League championship in Magnitogorsk, Russia. Mike Keenan coached some of the greatest stars in hockey and is remembered as one of the game's most colorful personalities and greatest coaches.  

Taking a break from the thrilling world of statistics, today I zero in on the crown jewel of Soviet industrial expansion, the construction of the industrial city of Magnitogorsk. From an empty steppe there was built an entire city with the purpose of cranking out the steel and iron that would help fuel Soviet industry. It was no small task, and the eventual success of the project stands as a testament to the perseverance of the Soviet workers who made it happen.   Bibliography for this episode:    Kotkin, Stephen Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization University of California Press 1997 Allen, Robert C. Farm to Factory: A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution Princeton University Press 2003   Questions? Comments? Email me at peaceintheirtime@gmail.com

Adam Rutherford asks what ordinary life was like in the Soviet Union and how far its collapse helps to explain Russia today. Karl Schlögel is one of the world's leading historians of the Soviet Union. In his latest book, The Soviet Century: Archaeology of a Lost World (translated by Rodney Livingstone), he recreates an encyclopaedic and richly detailed history of daily life, both big and small. He examines the planned economy, the railway system and the steel city of Magnitogorsk as well as cookbooks, parades and the ubiquitous perfume Red Moscow. The historian Katja Hoyer presents a more nuanced picture of life in East Germany, far from the caricature often painted in the West. In Beyond the Wall: East Germany, 1949-1990 she acknowledges the oppression and hardship often faced by ordinary people, but argues that this now-vanished society was also home to its own distinctive and rich social and cultural landscape. But what did it feel like to live through the fall of communism and then democracy? These are the questions Adam Curtis looked to reveal in his 7-part television series, Russia 1985-1999 TraumaZone (available on BBC iPlayer). The archive footage from thousands of hours of tapes filmed by BBC crews across the country records the lives of Russians at every level of society as their world collapsed around them. Producer: Katy Hickman

Podcast Přepište dějiny vyjel zase po čase do regionů a přinášíme vám fascinující dějiny Žďáru nad Sázavou. Místo, které známe jako památku UNESCO na Zelené hoře je ale místem obrovské a strukturální změny mezi léty 1948 a 1960. Na zámku Kinských potkáme v roce 1938 lorda Runcimana na jeho misi, ale to zásadní se odehraje po druhé světové válce. Výstavba Žďárských strojíren a sléváren promění místo, které má v roce 1930 sotva čtyři tisíce obyvatel v centrum okresu, které má v 70. letech přes dvacet tisíc. Takový malý Magnitogorsk na Vysočině.    

In the second episode of our series on Stalinism, we try to get a better sense of what everyday life was like outside of repression.  In particular, we'll focus on Stalin's attempt to industrialize the Soviet Union, to transform it in the span of five to ten years from a backwards country to a futuristic society through central planning and collectivization.  The episode argues that it was this push for modernity that led ordinary citizens to justify/accept the extraordinary violence and repression of the 1930s.  Topics discussed include: the Moscow Metro (9:53), the Soviet Economy (17:15), the Five Year Plans (25:10), Alexei Stakhanov (30:13), Soviet work culture (32:02), Magnitogorsk (35:49), shortages (55:07),  and the (Soviet) civilizing mission (102:01).

Эфир от 10.09.2006 Долгие годы с вами встречался в эфире различных р/ст, но "Maximum" и "Electroshock", это однозначно венец моей карьеры на радио. 8 лет мы распечатывали уик-энд самыми горячими танцевальными релизами недели, а гостями становились звезды мировых танцполов. Шоу шагнуло далеко за границы сети вещания "Maximum" и транслировалось еще на 20-ти р/ст нашей страны, и не только! Грузия, Армения, Украина, Казахстан и даже США (русскоязычный вещатель). Гостями программы были мировые звезды, такие как: Dedmau5, Prodigy, Avicii и многие другие! Я был спокоен за записи шоу, ведь все они были в одном месте, на эксклюзиве и пользовались популярностью, но случалось так, как случилось…Архив был безвозвратно удален из-за сбоя в 2017г. Признаюсь, сильно переживал и практически смирился… Но! Весной 2022 один радиослушатель сообщил, что у него есть записи радио-шоу за 2,5 года (2011,2012 и часть 2013), а чуть позже случайно нашлись и ранние выпуски 2006,07 гг. Забрезжила надежда хотя бы частично восстановить "Electroshock"! Поэтому, если у вас завалялись записи моего радиошоу - обязательно отправляйте! А теперь, друзья, вы либо откроете для себя, либо вспомните то, как начинался EDM и то каким был тогда мир. Добро пожаловать на "Electroshock" и на мои страницы! Онлайн школа Руслана Севера ссылка (www.info-mymusicschool.ru/) Telegram: @abletonhello VK: djsever Instagram: musume_sever Promodj: promodj.com/ruslansever

Spatial Revolution: Architecture and Planning in the Early Soviet Union (Cornell UP, 2022) is the first comparative parallel study of Soviet architecture and planning to create a narrative arc across a vast geography. The narrative binds together three critical industrial-residential projects in Baku, Magnitogorsk, and Kharkiv, built during the first fifteen years of the Soviet project and followed attentively worldwide after the collapse of capitalist markets in 1929. Among the revelations provided by Christina E. Crawford is the degree to which outside experts participated in the construction of the Soviet industrial complex, while facing difficult topographies, near-impossible deadlines, and inchoate theories of socialist space-making. Crawford describes how early Soviet architecture and planning activities were kinetic and negotiated and how questions about the proper distribution of people and industry under socialism were posed and refined through the construction of brick and mortar, steel and concrete projects, living laboratories that tested alternative spatial models. As a result, Spatial Revolution answers important questions of how the first Soviet industrialization drive was a catalyst for construction of thousands of new enterprises on remote sites across the Eurasian continent, an effort that spread to far-flung sites in other socialist states—and capitalist welfare states—for decades to follow. Bryan Toepfer, AIA, NCARB, CAPM is the Principal Architect for TOEPFER Architecture, PLLC, an Architecture firm specializing in Residential Architecture and Virtual Reality. He has authored two books, “Contractors CANNOT Build Your House,” and “Six Months Now, ARCHITECT for Life.” He is an Assistant Professor at Alfred State College and has served as the Director of Government Affairs and as the Director of Education for the AIA Rochester Board of Directors. Always eager to help anyone understand the world of Architecture, he hosts the New Books Network – Architecture podcast, is an NCARB Licensing Advisor and helps coach candidates taking the Architectural Registration Exam. btoepfer@toepferarchitecture Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Spatial Revolution: Architecture and Planning in the Early Soviet Union (Cornell UP, 2022) is the first comparative parallel study of Soviet architecture and planning to create a narrative arc across a vast geography. The narrative binds together three critical industrial-residential projects in Baku, Magnitogorsk, and Kharkiv, built during the first fifteen years of the Soviet project and followed attentively worldwide after the collapse of capitalist markets in 1929. Among the revelations provided by Christina E. Crawford is the degree to which outside experts participated in the construction of the Soviet industrial complex, while facing difficult topographies, near-impossible deadlines, and inchoate theories of socialist space-making. Crawford describes how early Soviet architecture and planning activities were kinetic and negotiated and how questions about the proper distribution of people and industry under socialism were posed and refined through the construction of brick and mortar, steel and concrete projects, living laboratories that tested alternative spatial models. As a result, Spatial Revolution answers important questions of how the first Soviet industrialization drive was a catalyst for construction of thousands of new enterprises on remote sites across the Eurasian continent, an effort that spread to far-flung sites in other socialist states—and capitalist welfare states—for decades to follow. Bryan Toepfer, AIA, NCARB, CAPM is the Principal Architect for TOEPFER Architecture, PLLC, an Architecture firm specializing in Residential Architecture and Virtual Reality. He has authored two books, “Contractors CANNOT Build Your House,” and “Six Months Now, ARCHITECT for Life.” He is an Assistant Professor at Alfred State College and has served as the Director of Government Affairs and as the Director of Education for the AIA Rochester Board of Directors. Always eager to help anyone understand the world of Architecture, he hosts the New Books Network – Architecture podcast, is an NCARB Licensing Advisor and helps coach candidates taking the Architectural Registration Exam. btoepfer@toepferarchitecture Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Spatial Revolution: Architecture and Planning in the Early Soviet Union (Cornell UP, 2022) is the first comparative parallel study of Soviet architecture and planning to create a narrative arc across a vast geography. The narrative binds together three critical industrial-residential projects in Baku, Magnitogorsk, and Kharkiv, built during the first fifteen years of the Soviet project and followed attentively worldwide after the collapse of capitalist markets in 1929. Among the revelations provided by Christina E. Crawford is the degree to which outside experts participated in the construction of the Soviet industrial complex, while facing difficult topographies, near-impossible deadlines, and inchoate theories of socialist space-making. Crawford describes how early Soviet architecture and planning activities were kinetic and negotiated and how questions about the proper distribution of people and industry under socialism were posed and refined through the construction of brick and mortar, steel and concrete projects, living laboratories that tested alternative spatial models. As a result, Spatial Revolution answers important questions of how the first Soviet industrialization drive was a catalyst for construction of thousands of new enterprises on remote sites across the Eurasian continent, an effort that spread to far-flung sites in other socialist states—and capitalist welfare states—for decades to follow. Bryan Toepfer, AIA, NCARB, CAPM is the Principal Architect for TOEPFER Architecture, PLLC, an Architecture firm specializing in Residential Architecture and Virtual Reality. He has authored two books, “Contractors CANNOT Build Your House,” and “Six Months Now, ARCHITECT for Life.” He is an Assistant Professor at Alfred State College and has served as the Director of Government Affairs and as the Director of Education for the AIA Rochester Board of Directors. Always eager to help anyone understand the world of Architecture, he hosts the New Books Network – Architecture podcast, is an NCARB Licensing Advisor and helps coach candidates taking the Architectural Registration Exam. btoepfer@toepferarchitecture Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/russian-studies

Spatial Revolution: Architecture and Planning in the Early Soviet Union (Cornell UP, 2022) is the first comparative parallel study of Soviet architecture and planning to create a narrative arc across a vast geography. The narrative binds together three critical industrial-residential projects in Baku, Magnitogorsk, and Kharkiv, built during the first fifteen years of the Soviet project and followed attentively worldwide after the collapse of capitalist markets in 1929. Among the revelations provided by Christina E. Crawford is the degree to which outside experts participated in the construction of the Soviet industrial complex, while facing difficult topographies, near-impossible deadlines, and inchoate theories of socialist space-making. Crawford describes how early Soviet architecture and planning activities were kinetic and negotiated and how questions about the proper distribution of people and industry under socialism were posed and refined through the construction of brick and mortar, steel and concrete projects, living laboratories that tested alternative spatial models. As a result, Spatial Revolution answers important questions of how the first Soviet industrialization drive was a catalyst for construction of thousands of new enterprises on remote sites across the Eurasian continent, an effort that spread to far-flung sites in other socialist states—and capitalist welfare states—for decades to follow. Bryan Toepfer, AIA, NCARB, CAPM is the Principal Architect for TOEPFER Architecture, PLLC, an Architecture firm specializing in Residential Architecture and Virtual Reality. He has authored two books, “Contractors CANNOT Build Your House,” and “Six Months Now, ARCHITECT for Life.” He is an Assistant Professor at Alfred State College and has served as the Director of Government Affairs and as the Director of Education for the AIA Rochester Board of Directors. Always eager to help anyone understand the world of Architecture, he hosts the New Books Network – Architecture podcast, is an NCARB Licensing Advisor and helps coach candidates taking the Architectural Registration Exam. btoepfer@toepferarchitecture Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/architecture

Spatial Revolution: Architecture and Planning in the Early Soviet Union (Cornell UP, 2022) is the first comparative parallel study of Soviet architecture and planning to create a narrative arc across a vast geography. The narrative binds together three critical industrial-residential projects in Baku, Magnitogorsk, and Kharkiv, built during the first fifteen years of the Soviet project and followed attentively worldwide after the collapse of capitalist markets in 1929. Among the revelations provided by Christina E. Crawford is the degree to which outside experts participated in the construction of the Soviet industrial complex, while facing difficult topographies, near-impossible deadlines, and inchoate theories of socialist space-making. Crawford describes how early Soviet architecture and planning activities were kinetic and negotiated and how questions about the proper distribution of people and industry under socialism were posed and refined through the construction of brick and mortar, steel and concrete projects, living laboratories that tested alternative spatial models. As a result, Spatial Revolution answers important questions of how the first Soviet industrialization drive was a catalyst for construction of thousands of new enterprises on remote sites across the Eurasian continent, an effort that spread to far-flung sites in other socialist states—and capitalist welfare states—for decades to follow. Bryan Toepfer, AIA, NCARB, CAPM is the Principal Architect for TOEPFER Architecture, PLLC, an Architecture firm specializing in Residential Architecture and Virtual Reality. He has authored two books, “Contractors CANNOT Build Your House,” and “Six Months Now, ARCHITECT for Life.” He is an Assistant Professor at Alfred State College and has served as the Director of Government Affairs and as the Director of Education for the AIA Rochester Board of Directors. Always eager to help anyone understand the world of Architecture, he hosts the New Books Network – Architecture podcast, is an NCARB Licensing Advisor and helps coach candidates taking the Architectural Registration Exam. btoepfer@toepferarchitecture Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/eastern-european-studies

Spatial Revolution: Architecture and Planning in the Early Soviet Union (Cornell UP, 2022) is the first comparative parallel study of Soviet architecture and planning to create a narrative arc across a vast geography. The narrative binds together three critical industrial-residential projects in Baku, Magnitogorsk, and Kharkiv, built during the first fifteen years of the Soviet project and followed attentively worldwide after the collapse of capitalist markets in 1929. Among the revelations provided by Christina E. Crawford is the degree to which outside experts participated in the construction of the Soviet industrial complex, while facing difficult topographies, near-impossible deadlines, and inchoate theories of socialist space-making. Crawford describes how early Soviet architecture and planning activities were kinetic and negotiated and how questions about the proper distribution of people and industry under socialism were posed and refined through the construction of brick and mortar, steel and concrete projects, living laboratories that tested alternative spatial models. As a result, Spatial Revolution answers important questions of how the first Soviet industrialization drive was a catalyst for construction of thousands of new enterprises on remote sites across the Eurasian continent, an effort that spread to far-flung sites in other socialist states—and capitalist welfare states—for decades to follow. Bryan Toepfer, AIA, NCARB, CAPM is the Principal Architect for TOEPFER Architecture, PLLC, an Architecture firm specializing in Residential Architecture and Virtual Reality. He has authored two books, “Contractors CANNOT Build Your House,” and “Six Months Now, ARCHITECT for Life.” He is an Assistant Professor at Alfred State College and has served as the Director of Government Affairs and as the Director of Education for the AIA Rochester Board of Directors. Always eager to help anyone understand the world of Architecture, he hosts the New Books Network – Architecture podcast, is an NCARB Licensing Advisor and helps coach candidates taking the Architectural Registration Exam. btoepfer@toepferarchitecture Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Eine junge Frau reist in den Ural, nach Magnitogorsk, diese auf dem Reißbrett entstandene Stadt der Superlative, die auf zwei Erdteilen liegt. Sie besucht ihren Vater, der hier als Ingenieur tätig ist. Er hat sich verändert, seine Tochter spürt das sofort. Die Isolation der kleinen Gruppe deutscher Spezialisten, die Eintönigkeit und der stille Gigantismus der verschneiten Landschaft erzeugen ein permanentes Gefühl von Unwirklichkeit und Machtlosigkeit. Alte Wunden brechen auf: am Ort der ehemaligen Waffenproduktion des zweiten Weltkriegs kann die Vergangenheit nicht ruhen. Die einen betrinken sich oder lenken sich mit russischen Frauen ab, andere wiederum verschwinden spurlos. Auch die junge Frau fängt eine Beziehung an, zuerst flüchtig, fast bewusstlos. Sie spürt, dass ihr Leben in dieser feindlichen Umgebung eine neue Bedeutung erhält.(Quelle: Verlagstext)

Maria Shakhova graduated from Magnitogorsk State University in 2012 with a master's degree in Journalism. She got her first professional experience working as a correspondent in the frame at regional broadcasting in the city of Magnitogorsk. Then she moved to work as the head of an international Internet project. Since 2012 she has been living in Moscow. In 2013 she graduated from the University Business School at Moscow State University with a degree in PR and Marketing. Around the same time, she got a job in a large media holding, working first as a PR specialist, and then as a PR director. In 2014, she founded the communication agency PR agency of Maria Shakhova. The agency's projects have been awarded at the most prestigious contests, including: "Cannes Lions" (silver and bronze), "Event of the Year", Effie Awards Russia (Best cases), and others. Among the clients: SafMar, Sberbank, Otkritie broker, Moscow School of Management Skolkovo, and many others. Maria is a permanent expert in federal and industry media, regularly comments on events in Russia and the world. Since the beginning of 2020, Maria has been co-host of the "Let me Tell!" on the Life.ru channel, where are raised acute social and political topics. FIND MARIA ON SOCIAL MEDIA LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram ================================ SUPPORT & CONNECT: Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/denofrich Twitter: https://twitter.com/denofrich Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/denofrich YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/denofrich Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/den_of_rich/ Hashtag: #denofrich © Copyright 2022 Den of Rich. All rights reserved.

Maria Shakhova graduated from Magnitogorsk State University in 2012 with a master's degree in Journalism. She got her first professional experience working as a correspondent in the frame at regional broadcasting in the city of Magnitogorsk. Then she moved to work as the head of an international Internet project. Since 2012 she has been living in Moscow. In 2013 she graduated from the University Business School at Moscow State University with a degree in PR and Marketing. Around the same time, she got a job in a large media holding, working first as a PR specialist, and then as a PR director.In 2014, she founded the communication agency PR agency of Maria Shakhova. The agency's projects have been awarded at the most prestigious contests, including: "Cannes Lions" (silver and bronze), "Event of the Year", Effie Awards Russia (Best cases), and others. Among the clients: SafMar, Sberbank, Otkritie broker, Moscow School of Management Skolkovo, and many others.Maria is a permanent expert in federal and industry media, regularly comments on events in Russia and the world. Since the beginning of 2020, Maria has been co-host of the "Let me Tell!" on the Life.ru channel, where are raised acute social and political topics.FIND MARIA ON SOCIAL MEDIALinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram================================PODCAST INFO:Podcast website: https://www.uhnwidata.com/podcastApple podcast: https://apple.co/3kqOA7QSpotify: https://spoti.fi/2UOtE1AGoogle podcast: https://bit.ly/3jmA7ulSUPPORT & CONNECT:Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/denofrichTwitter: https://www.instagram.com/denofrich/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/denofrich/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/denofrich

Photo: .Sledging over the Tundras to Karoleon CBS Eyes on the World with John Batchelor CBS Audio Network @Batchelorshow 2/2: Magnitogorsk in the wildfires and pandemic.@Felix_Light @CBSNews @MoscowTimes https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/08/04/russia-sees-record-wildfire-spread-as-siberian-blazes-rage-on-a74695

Photo: The Rim Fire burned more than 250,000 acres (1,000 km2) of forest near Yosemite National Park, in 2013. CBS Eyes on the World with John Batchelor CBS Audio Network @Batchelorshow 1/2: Magnitogorsk in the wildfires and pandemic.@Felix_Light @CBSNews @MoscowTimes https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/08/04/russia-sees-record-wildfire-spread-as-siberian-blazes-rage-on-a74695

Pierpaolo Mittica, reporter, fotografo e regista internazionale, ci racconta i suoi viaggi in Cina, Russia, Kazakistan, Ucraina...per testimoniare come incidenti e sfruttamento possano portare a pericolosi disastri ambientali. ✅ Pierpaolo Mitticahttps://www.pierpaolomittica.com/✅ Wuhai, Cina - Carbone cinesehttps://www.pierpaolomittica.com/stories/china-coal-the-black-legacy/✅ Karabaš, Russia - Fusione del ramehttps://www.pierpaolomittica.com/stories/karabash/✅ Magnitogorsk, Russia - La città dell'acciaiohttps://www.pierpaolomittica.com/stories/magnitogorsk/✅ Semipalatinsk, Kazakistan - Test nuclearihttps://www.pierpaolomittica.com/stories/semipalatinsk-the-crime-of-nuclear-testing/✅ Chernobyl, Ucraina - La vita a Chernobylhttps://www.pierpaolomittica.com/projects/chernobyl-stories/life-in-chernobyl/

Maurizio Mottola (Radio Sircus) intervista Nazim Comunale di Iran - band (da Reggio Emilia), in occasione della pubblicazione dell'album Aemilia (Aagoo Records) dello scorso Dicembre 2020. Un trio strumentale (allargato) che “naviga” dalle piatte terre d'Emilia fino al deserto mediorientale, come un moderno Caboto, tra sperimentazione e improvvisazione. Un flusso di coscienza e suoni da ascoltare e guardare, non per piacere o mero intrattenimento, come nella traccia Magnitogorsk, qui proposta al termine dell'intervista, di cui è disponibile sul “tubo” il video ufficiale.

Lokomotiv Yaroslavl Director of Player Development Ted Suihkonen and Metallurg Magnitogorsk Assistant Coach Mike Pelino join the third episode of Icecast 2.0, hosted by Gillian Kemmerer. With a background in neuroscience and a hidden musical talent, Suihkonen has been a major factor in Loko's rebuild after tragedy struck the franchise in 2011. He discusses the success of his youngsters and approach to getting hockey players into the “flow state” to maximize their creativity and confidence. A two-time Gagarin Cup champion under Mike Keenan and Ilya Vorobyov, Mike Pelino has had a front row seat to the KHL's progress and development over time. In his eighth season, Pelino helped Metallurg to climb the Eastern Conference and finish the season in third place. He touches on the phenomenon that is Sergei Mozyakin, cultural differences in Russian locker rooms and some late-night karaoke sessions in Magnitogorsk.

How I became Russian. Daniel moved from England to Magnitogorsk, Russia. Hockey, lifestyle and Russian women. В этом выпуске: Присоединиться к сообществу и скачать транскрипции выпусков с ударениями и полезными фразами http://patreon.com/russiantwist 0:00 Привет! 0:44 Как Daniel оказался в Магнитогорске; 3:40 За что Daniel любит Магнитогорск, чем можно заняться в этом городе; 5:55 Как русские реагируют на англичанина, живущего в Магнитогорске; 7:45 Кем работает Daniel; 8:33 Скучает ли Daniel по Великобритании и английскому менталитету; 9:35 Есть ли гопники в Магнитогорске; 11:11 Культурный шок; 12:39 О русских девушках; 15:42 Чего не понимает Daniel; 16:50 Менталитет россиян; 17:50 Как Daniel стал русским; 19:34 Чем Daniel занимается в свободное время. Хоккей. 20:27 Пандемия в Магнитогорске; 21:35 Города, которые посетил Daniel, и что он о них думает; 24:11 Ещё немного о Магнитогорске; 25:02 Пожелание слушателям; 26:30 Русская душа англичанина. ____________________ Instagram @russiantwistpodcast Twitter @PodcastTwist YouTube youtube.com/TheRussianTwistPodcast russiantwistpodcast@gmail.com Dasha's YouTube channel: Russian with Dasha Tom's YouTube channel: TheDolphinPolyglot

L'Avangard a vaincu Magnitogorsk et va commencer sa demi-finale de la KHL ce samedi, contre Kazan. Bob nous parle de ça, de Cole Caufield, d'Eric Staal, des Blue Jackets, d'Aaron Ekblad et des Flames.

Bob s'inquiète que le début de saison 2020-2021 dans la LNH soit possiblement repoussé au mois de janvier. Il commente aussi la victoire du Lightning, le troisième match de la finale de l'Ouest et vous fait découvrir un peu la ville de Magnitogorsk.

A Magnitogorsk of a cross country trip.

Vålerenga-profilen om hvordan han elsket å hisse opp Tommy Kristiansen og Nathan Martz, karrieren, Storhamar-oppgjørene, sparken i Sparta etter bytur - og så byr vi på Santa Maria-taco med Mats Zuccarello i Magnitogorsk - fiesta, fiesta.

Cam Robinson from Dobber Prospects joins me this week to break down some of our favourite players from the 2019 NHL Draft.Here's the link to my Patreon if you want to help support my work ($5 a month gets you a bonus episode every week!) www.patreon.com/iantulloch3:15 – Jack Hughes (5'10 168lb C, USNDP, USHL) 5:21 – Kaapo Kakko (6'2 190lb RW, TPS, Liiga)7:34 – Vasili Podkolzin (6'1 190lb RW, SKA, VHL)11:34 – Philip Broberg (6'3 203lb LHD, AIK, Allsvenskan)14:45 – Trevor Zegras (6'0 168lb C, USNDP, USHL)16:48 – Cole Caufield (5'7 157lb RW, USNDP, USHL)19:35 – Bobby Brink (5'10 165lb RW, Sioux City, USHL)22:50 – Jakob Pelletier (5'9 161lb LW, Moncton, QMJHL)25:00 – Arthur Kaliyev (6'2 190lb LW, Hamilton, OHL) 27:41 – Anttoni Honka (5'10 176lb RHD, JYP, Liiga)31:25 – Mikko Kokkonen (5'11 190lb LHD, Jukurit, Liiga)33:37 – Ville Heinola (5'11 176lb LHD, Lukko, Liiga)35:22 – Lassi Thomson (6'0 187lb RHD, Kelowna, WHL)37:35 – Victor Soderstrom (5'11 176lb RHD, Brynas, SHL)40:23 – Nils Hoglander (5'9 185lb LW, Rogle, SHL)43:04 – Albin Grewe (6'0 176lb RW, Djugardens J20, SuperElit)46:14 – Moritz Seider (6'4 198lb RHD, Adler, DEL)48:49 – Alex Newhook (5'11 190lb C, Victoria, BCHL)53:17 – Spencer Knight (6'3 198lb G, USNDP, USHL)57:26 – Brett Leason (6'5 198lb C, Prince Albert, WHL)1:00:40 – Samuel Fagemo (6'0 194lb RW, Frolunda, SHL)1:02:38 – Some of Cam's favourites: John Beecher, Jamieson Rees, Ryan Johnson, Billy Constantinou, Nicholas Robertson, Sasha Mutala1:04:51 – Philip Tomasino (6'0 181lb C, Niagara, OHL)1:05:53 – Pavel Dorofeyev (6'0 163lb LW, Magnitogorsk, MHL)1:06:41 – Yegor Afanaseyev (6'3 203lb F, Muskegon, USHL)1:07:07 – Nolan Foote (6'3 187lb LW, Kelowna, WHL)1:07:46 – Thomas Harley (6'3 183lb LHD, Mississauga, OHL)1:08:49 – Antti Saarela (5'11 176lb LW, Lukko, Liiga)1:10:03 – Kirill Slepets & Nando EggenbergerMusic by Punch DeckLearn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Noisia Radio this week: We premiere ‘Marauder - Hades’ taken from Partial#5, out this week on Division and ‘Magnitogorsk’ by Abstract Elements, out now on Invisible. More new and exciting music by the likes of Shades, Urbandawn, Prolix & Black Sun Empire,

Denne gang taler Katrine og Marie om Det Magnetiske Bjerg, Magnitogorsk. Byen og stålværket skulle definere Ruslands styrke og fremgang, men var i høj grad præget af forfærdelige forhold for arbejderne og dårlig planlægning fra ledelsen. Vi opdager også, hvor længe Katrine kan tale om Stalin-tiden, hvis folk ikke stopper hende i tide...

By the time the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the Bolshevik Party had already amassed a considerable amount of expertise in moving masses of people around. Large population transfers (to put it mildly) were part and parcel of building socialism. Certain “elements” needed to be sent for re-education (the Kulaks), others to build new socialist cities (Magnitogorsk), and still others back to where–ethnically speaking–they “belonged” (Baltic Germans). Thus when the Germans attacked, the Bolsheviks were ready to move their “assets” out of the way. Sort of. In To the Tashkent Station. Evacuation and Survival in the Soviet Union at War (Cornell UP, 2009), Rebecca Manley does a fine job of telling the tale of how they evacuated millions of people as the Germans advanced in 1941 and 1942. Though the Party had plans (the Bolsheviks were great planners…), everything did not, as the Russians say, go po planu. As the enemy advance, threatened people did what threatened people always do–they ran off (or, as the Soviet authorities said, “self-evacuated.”). The Party was not really in a position to control this mass exodus as many members of the Party itself had hit the road. Of course some Soviet citizens stayed put, comforting themselves with the (false) hope that the Nazis were really only after the Jews and Communists. But most didn’t, particularly if they had sufficient blat (“pull”) to get a train ticket to a place like Tashkent. Under Communism, everyone is equal. In the real world, everyone isn’t, as many Soviet citizens found out. Some were allowed to leave, others weren’t. Some were given shelter, others weren’t. Some were fed, others weren’t. In this time of crisis, all of the dirty secrets of Communism were revealed. This is not to say, of course, that it wasn’t a heroic effort. It was, and a largely successful one. The Party managed to save much of its human and physical capital, and this fact contributed mightily to its eventual triumph in the war. Moreover, it saved millions of Jews from certain death, a fact that deserves to be acknowledged more often than it is. There are, then, many reasons to be thankful the Soviets bugged out as fast as they did. And there are also many reasons to be thankful Rebecca Manley has told us the story of how they did it. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

By the time the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the Bolshevik Party had already amassed a considerable amount of expertise in moving masses of people around. Large population transfers (to put it mildly) were part and parcel of building socialism. Certain “elements” needed to be sent for re-education (the Kulaks), others to build new socialist cities (Magnitogorsk), and still others back to where–ethnically speaking–they “belonged” (Baltic Germans). Thus when the Germans attacked, the Bolsheviks were ready to move their “assets” out of the way. Sort of. In To the Tashkent Station. Evacuation and Survival in the Soviet Union at War (Cornell UP, 2009), Rebecca Manley does a fine job of telling the tale of how they evacuated millions of people as the Germans advanced in 1941 and 1942. Though the Party had plans (the Bolsheviks were great planners…), everything did not, as the Russians say, go po planu. As the enemy advance, threatened people did what threatened people always do–they ran off (or, as the Soviet authorities said, “self-evacuated.”). The Party was not really in a position to control this mass exodus as many members of the Party itself had hit the road. Of course some Soviet citizens stayed put, comforting themselves with the (false) hope that the Nazis were really only after the Jews and Communists. But most didn’t, particularly if they had sufficient blat (“pull”) to get a train ticket to a place like Tashkent. Under Communism, everyone is equal. In the real world, everyone isn’t, as many Soviet citizens found out. Some were allowed to leave, others weren’t. Some were given shelter, others weren’t. Some were fed, others weren’t. In this time of crisis, all of the dirty secrets of Communism were revealed. This is not to say, of course, that it wasn’t a heroic effort. It was, and a largely successful one. The Party managed to save much of its human and physical capital, and this fact contributed mightily to its eventual triumph in the war. Moreover, it saved millions of Jews from certain death, a fact that deserves to be acknowledged more often than it is. There are, then, many reasons to be thankful the Soviets bugged out as fast as they did. And there are also many reasons to be thankful Rebecca Manley has told us the story of how they did it. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

By the time the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the Bolshevik Party had already amassed a considerable amount of expertise in moving masses of people around. Large population transfers (to put it mildly) were part and parcel of building socialism. Certain “elements” needed to be sent for re-education (the Kulaks), others to build new socialist cities (Magnitogorsk), and still others back to where–ethnically speaking–they “belonged” (Baltic Germans). Thus when the Germans attacked, the Bolsheviks were ready to move their “assets” out of the way. Sort of. In To the Tashkent Station. Evacuation and Survival in the Soviet Union at War (Cornell UP, 2009), Rebecca Manley does a fine job of telling the tale of how they evacuated millions of people as the Germans advanced in 1941 and 1942. Though the Party had plans (the Bolsheviks were great planners…), everything did not, as the Russians say, go po planu. As the enemy advance, threatened people did what threatened people always do–they ran off (or, as the Soviet authorities said, “self-evacuated.”). The Party was not really in a position to control this mass exodus as many members of the Party itself had hit the road. Of course some Soviet citizens stayed put, comforting themselves with the (false) hope that the Nazis were really only after the Jews and Communists. But most didn’t, particularly if they had sufficient blat (“pull”) to get a train ticket to a place like Tashkent. Under Communism, everyone is equal. In the real world, everyone isn’t, as many Soviet citizens found out. Some were allowed to leave, others weren’t. Some were given shelter, others weren’t. Some were fed, others weren’t. In this time of crisis, all of the dirty secrets of Communism were revealed. This is not to say, of course, that it wasn’t a heroic effort. It was, and a largely successful one. The Party managed to save much of its human and physical capital, and this fact contributed mightily to its eventual triumph in the war. Moreover, it saved millions of Jews from certain death, a fact that deserves to be acknowledged more often than it is. There are, then, many reasons to be thankful the Soviets bugged out as fast as they did. And there are also many reasons to be thankful Rebecca Manley has told us the story of how they did it. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

By the time the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the Bolshevik Party had already amassed a considerable amount of expertise in moving masses of people around. Large population transfers (to put it mildly) were part and parcel of building socialism. Certain “elements” needed to be sent for re-education (the Kulaks), others to build new socialist cities (Magnitogorsk), and still others back to where–ethnically speaking–they “belonged” (Baltic Germans). Thus when the Germans attacked, the Bolsheviks were ready to move their “assets” out of the way. Sort of. In To the Tashkent Station. Evacuation and Survival in the Soviet Union at War (Cornell UP, 2009), Rebecca Manley does a fine job of telling the tale of how they evacuated millions of people as the Germans advanced in 1941 and 1942. Though the Party had plans (the Bolsheviks were great planners…), everything did not, as the Russians say, go po planu. As the enemy advance, threatened people did what threatened people always do–they ran off (or, as the Soviet authorities said, “self-evacuated.”). The Party was not really in a position to control this mass exodus as many members of the Party itself had hit the road. Of course some Soviet citizens stayed put, comforting themselves with the (false) hope that the Nazis were really only after the Jews and Communists. But most didn’t, particularly if they had sufficient blat (“pull”) to get a train ticket to a place like Tashkent. Under Communism, everyone is equal. In the real world, everyone isn’t, as many Soviet citizens found out. Some were allowed to leave, others weren’t. Some were given shelter, others weren’t. Some were fed, others weren’t. In this time of crisis, all of the dirty secrets of Communism were revealed. This is not to say, of course, that it wasn’t a heroic effort. It was, and a largely successful one. The Party managed to save much of its human and physical capital, and this fact contributed mightily to its eventual triumph in the war. Moreover, it saved millions of Jews from certain death, a fact that deserves to be acknowledged more often than it is. There are, then, many reasons to be thankful the Soviets bugged out as fast as they did. And there are also many reasons to be thankful Rebecca Manley has told us the story of how they did it. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

By the time the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the Bolshevik Party had already amassed a considerable amount of expertise in moving masses of people around. Large population transfers (to put it mildly) were part and parcel of building socialism. Certain “elements” needed to be sent for re-education (the Kulaks), others to build new socialist cities (Magnitogorsk), and still others back to where–ethnically speaking–they “belonged” (Baltic Germans). Thus when the Germans attacked, the Bolsheviks were ready to move their “assets” out of the way. Sort of. In To the Tashkent Station. Evacuation and Survival in the Soviet Union at War (Cornell UP, 2009), Rebecca Manley does a fine job of telling the tale of how they evacuated millions of people as the Germans advanced in 1941 and 1942. Though the Party had plans (the Bolsheviks were great planners…), everything did not, as the Russians say, go po planu. As the enemy advance, threatened people did what threatened people always do–they ran off (or, as the Soviet authorities said, “self-evacuated.”). The Party was not really in a position to control this mass exodus as many members of the Party itself had hit the road. Of course some Soviet citizens stayed put, comforting themselves with the (false) hope that the Nazis were really only after the Jews and Communists. But most didn’t, particularly if they had sufficient blat (“pull”) to get a train ticket to a place like Tashkent. Under Communism, everyone is equal. In the real world, everyone isn’t, as many Soviet citizens found out. Some were allowed to leave, others weren’t. Some were given shelter, others weren’t. Some were fed, others weren’t. In this time of crisis, all of the dirty secrets of Communism were revealed. This is not to say, of course, that it wasn’t a heroic effort. It was, and a largely successful one. The Party managed to save much of its human and physical capital, and this fact contributed mightily to its eventual triumph in the war. Moreover, it saved millions of Jews from certain death, a fact that deserves to be acknowledged more often than it is. There are, then, many reasons to be thankful the Soviets bugged out as fast as they did. And there are also many reasons to be thankful Rebecca Manley has told us the story of how they did it. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices