Podcasts about Nassar

Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nassar announced Egypt was taking control of the British and French owned Suez Canal Company in July 1956.  He took this action to fund the Aswan Dam he wanted built.  In response to Nassar seizing the canal, Britain, France, and Israel secretly planned a joint invasion.  Israel would advance towards the canal through the Sinai Peninsula while Britain and France would intervene and regain control of the canal under the guise of being peacekeepers.  Barry Turner explains why the plan did not work in, “Suez 1956: The Inside Story of the First Oil War.” 

The note's contents are brief and striking, referencing 16-year-old charges, a choice to say goodbye, and the phrase "no fun" underlined. Hawk compares the alleged suicide note to a second handwritten note also found in Epstein's cell, noting consistent handwriting, similar phrasing, and that same underlined phrase appearing in both. Also examined is a letter allegedly sent from Epstein to convicted sex offender Larry Nassar, which many on social media have pointed to as proof the suicide note is fake. Hawk compares available examples of Jeffrey Epstein's actual signature from legal documents to the signature on the Nassar letter and finds they do not match, leading him to conclude the Nassar letter is likely fraudulent. Nicholas Tartaglione, Epstein's cellmate, a former NYPD officer convicted of four murders for hire on behalf of a drug cartel, found the note after Epstein's death and gave it to his attorneys rather than prison officials. A judge then ordered it sealed in a courthouse safe, where it remained until last week. Hawk walks through the evidence carefully and shares his honest assessment of what the handwriting comparison reveals about the authenticity of the suicide note. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB

Vier uitzendingen in de maand mei in het teken van onze Mariathon! Steeds kunnen we elk jaar rekenen op jullie gebed en jullie gulle giften voor de projecten welke de Wereldfamilie van Radio Maria elk jaar uitkiest tot steun van deze radio's in de wereld die er het meeste behoefte aan hebben. Maar jullie hebben ook het recht te vernemen en wij de plicht jullie in te lichten hoe het staat met de projecten die jullie hebben ondersteund.

Fe hecha canción es el programa de EWTN Radio Católica Mundial que promociona la música de los grupos y cantantes católicos del mundo hispano. Desde el Estudio 3 de Radio Católica Mundial, Douglas Archer comparte con ustedes una hora cargada de canciones, incluyendo las últimas novedades y estrenos, y de vez en cuando con algún invitado que canta o toca en directo.

Despite efforts to extend the cease-fire in Lebanon and disarm Iranian proxy Hizballah, fighting continues between the militant group and Israeli forces. Hosts Alistair Taylor and Matthew Czekaj are joined by MEI Senior Fellow Fadi Nicholas Nassar to examine what the renewed fighting means for attempts to counter Iranian influence in Lebanon and what could lie ahead. They discuss the prospects for a lasting agreement, Iran's broader proxy strategy, and how Washington can help strengthen the sovereignty of the Lebanese state.   To read Nassar's latest commentary piece in The National Interest, please click here.   Recorded on May 5, 2026.

Vier uitzendingen in de maand mei in het teken van onze Mariathon! Steeds kunnen we elk jaar rekenen op jullie gebed en jullie gulle giften voor de projecten welke de Wereldfamilie van Radio Maria elk jaar uitkiest tot steun van deze radio's in de wereld die er het meeste behoefte aan hebben. Maar jullie hebben ook het recht te vernemen en wij de plicht jullie in te lichten hoe het staat met de projecten die jullie hebben ondersteund.

EZ back Monday, May 4Segments include:*EZ tries solving a mystery about an alleged local pedo.*Alleged pedo has same name and looks exactly like this guy!*Hot chick in Louisiana likes porking kids.  Oddly, she's not a teacher.*EZ makes a silly cold call inquiring about a job opening. Hint: it has to do with previous story.*Larry Nassar is going to be killed in prison.  Inmate says Nassar is sucking dick to stay alive.*In between podcasts, EZ spoke with neighbor / cat owner.*Simone Biles is fed up with certain questions.*Don't celebrate a win too early in the olympics.*Olympic swimmer asked to leave Olympic Village early for being a skank.*Local kook goes on a joy ride.*Power outage causes trouble for EZ*We look back on the 1 year anniversary of something spectacular*Locals having a tizzy over an alligator*RFK Jr tells Roseanne a horrific story of something he did.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

O Brasil Que Faz traz mais uma história incrível, e você é o nosso convidado especial para acompanhar uma conversa sobre vendas, experiência do cliente e visão de mercado.Uma trajetória construída desde a infância no varejo e no atacado, com aprendizados reais de quem vive o mercado no dia a dia.“Ouvir o cliente é estar atento a tudo o que acontece na área de vendas, identificar o que não está bom e corrigir rapidamente.”Vamos receber André Nassar, profissional com ampla experiência no varejo e atacado, para um bate-papo sobre atendimento, gestão comercial e crescimento sustentável.

In the news today- At Democratic convention, Nassar scandal a recurring theme in trustee race, ELPD identifies man killed in officer-involved shooting, and MSU men's tennis claims title, women finish season with rivalry finale. 

Hay cosas que hacemos todos los días que le están enviando la señal equivocada a las personas a nuestro alrededor. Y lo peor es que no lo sabemos. En este episodio de Pietro Habla Con, Nani Nassar , comunicadora y experta en inteligencia social me explicó cuáles son los errores más comunes de lenguaje corporal y comunicación que hacen que la gentenos perciba como inseguros, fríos o poco confiables, aunque no lo seamos. - Hablamos del Gen Z Stare y qué dice de una generación que tiene todas las herramientas para comunicarse pero cada vez conecta menos en persona. De por qué hay personas que entran a una sala y todos les prestan atención antes de decir una sola palabra. Del error de voz que hace que suenes a que estás pidiendo permiso. Y de los hábitos pequeños que hacen que alguien te quiera desde el primer minuto — o que decida ignorarte. Si alguna vez saliste de una entrevista, una cita o una reunión pensando no quedé como quería, este episodio es para vos.

Hay cosas que hacemos todos los días que le están enviando la señal equivocada a las personas a nuestro alrededor. Y lo peor es que no lo sabemos. En este episodio de Pietro Habla Con, Nani Nassar , comunicadora y experta en inteligencia social me explicó cuáles son los errores más comunes de lenguaje corporal y comunicación que hacen que la gentenos perciba como inseguros, fríos o poco confiables, aunque no lo seamos. - Hablamos del Gen Z Stare y qué dice de una generación que tiene todas las herramientas para comunicarse pero cada vez conecta menos en persona. De por qué hay personas que entran a una sala y todos les prestan atención antes de decir una sola palabra. Del error de voz que hace que suenes a que estás pidiendo permiso. Y de los hábitos pequeños que hacen que alguien te quiera desde el primer minuto — o que decida ignorarte. Si alguna vez saliste de una entrevista, una cita o una reunión pensando no quedé como quería, este episodio es para vos.

The recent news linking Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein stems from a document that appeared in a large federal release of Epstein-related records, described as a handwritten letter from Epstein to Nassar. Almost immediately, officials said the letter was not authentic, citing technical issues with handwriting, mailing details, and dates. On paper, that explanation is straightforward. But given the long history of mishandled evidence, delayed disclosures, and shifting narratives in the Epstein case, it is not unreasonable that the appearance of such a document—however brief—triggered questions before being dismissed.The government's position is that there is no verified connection between Epstein and Nassar beyond this disputed item, and no evidence the two ever corresponded. Still, the episode highlights a recurring problem with how Epstein material has been released: documents surface without context, provenance, or explanation, leaving the public to parse authenticity after the fact. Even if the letter is exactly what authorities say it is, the way it entered the public record reinforces skepticism—not about any specific claim, but about a process that repeatedly introduces confusion into a case where clarity and credibility have already been in short supply.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Letter to Larry Nassar, signed by ‘J. Epstein,' cites “our president” | CNN Politics

15 minutos a cada 15 dias.No episódio de hoje, Edmara Galvão comenta sobre a situação da Fundação Nacional do Livro Infantil e Juvenil, trata dos centenários de Carlos Heitor Cony e do personagem de Ursinho Pooh, fala sobre uma curiosidade envolvendo o poeta Paulo Leminski, apresenta uma nova categoria de premiação literária da Biblioteca Nacional, fala sobre o fim do contrato de publicação de Raduan Nassar com a Companhia das Letras e chama o Arthur Marchetto para falar sobre a adaptação de "Devoradores de Estrelas", de Andy Weir.O episódio também traz uma Resenha Relâmpago da ouvinte Valéria Olsson sobre "Obra Completa", de Murilo Rubião.---RecebidosErva Brava, de Paulliny Tort - Editora FósforoOs Imortais, de Paulliny Tort - Editora FósforoUm hino à vida, de Gisèle Pelicot - Editora Companhia das Letras (trad. Julia da Rosa Simões)Coisa de gente branca, de Langston Hughes - Clássicos Zahar (trad. José Roberto O'Shea)O livro do despertar, de Mark Nepo - Editora Goya (trad. Renato Marques)Saída Estratégica, de Martha Wells - Editora Aleph (trad. Laura Pohl)A segunda-feira começa no sábado, de Arkádi Strugástky & Boris Strugátski - Editora Aleph (trad. Yuri Martins de Oliveira)Uma lembrança chamada império, de Arkady Martine - Editora Aleph (trad. Beatriz D'Oliveira)Periféricos, de William Gibson - Editora Aleph (trad. Ludimila Hashimoto)Agência, de William Gibson - Editora Aleph (trad. Leonardo Alves)---Links citadosJurados deixam FNLIJ e indicam inviabilidade do prêmio em 2026Anotações perdidas por Leminski dentro de avião há 40 anos voltam a sua família

The recent news linking Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein stems from a document that appeared in a large federal release of Epstein-related records, described as a handwritten letter from Epstein to Nassar. Almost immediately, officials said the letter was not authentic, citing technical issues with handwriting, mailing details, and dates. On paper, that explanation is straightforward. But given the long history of mishandled evidence, delayed disclosures, and shifting narratives in the Epstein case, it is not unreasonable that the appearance of such a document—however brief—triggered questions before being dismissed.The government's position is that there is no verified connection between Epstein and Nassar beyond this disputed item, and no evidence the two ever corresponded. Still, the episode highlights a recurring problem with how Epstein material has been released: documents surface without context, provenance, or explanation, leaving the public to parse authenticity after the fact. Even if the letter is exactly what authorities say it is, the way it entered the public record reinforces skepticism—not about any specific claim, but about a process that repeatedly introduces confusion into a case where clarity and credibility have already been in short supply.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Letter to Larry Nassar, signed by ‘J. Epstein,' cites “our president” | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

After the crimes of former USA Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar came to light, dozens of survivors filed lawsuits against the Federal Bureau of Investigation, arguing that the bureau's failures allowed the abuse to continue for far longer than it should have. The lawsuits centered on the FBI's handling of the initial complaints brought forward by Olympic gymnast Simone Biles and other athletes in 2015. According to later findings by the Department of Justice Inspector General, agents received credible allegations against Nassar but failed to act quickly, did not properly document interviews, and allowed months to pass without notifying state authorities who could have intervened. During that delay, Nassar continued abusing young gymnasts. Survivors argued that the FBI's negligence and failure to follow basic investigative procedures enabled additional assaults that could have been prevented. The cases ultimately resulted in a substantial settlement from the federal government, acknowledging the role that investigative failures played in prolonging the abuse.That legal outcome has been viewed by many observers as a potential roadmap for survivors of Jeffrey Epstein seeking accountability beyond the trafficker himself. Epstein's crimes also unfolded over many years despite repeated warnings to authorities, and critics have long argued that federal investigators and prosecutors missed opportunities to intervene earlier. The Nassar litigation demonstrated that victims can pursue claims against the government when investigative failures allow abuse to continue after authorities were put on notice. For Epstein survivors, that framework raises the possibility of similar legal arguments—particularly surrounding law enforcement's handling of earlier complaints, the controversial non-prosecution agreement in Florida, and other moments when authorities were aware of allegations but failed to stop the exploitation. While the circumstances differ, the Nassar cases showed that institutional failures by investigators can carry legal consequences, creating a model that Epstein survivors and their attorneys may look to as they pursue broader accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

After the crimes of former USA Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar came to light, dozens of survivors filed lawsuits against the Federal Bureau of Investigation, arguing that the bureau's failures allowed the abuse to continue for far longer than it should have. The lawsuits centered on the FBI's handling of the initial complaints brought forward by Olympic gymnast Simone Biles and other athletes in 2015. According to later findings by the Department of Justice Inspector General, agents received credible allegations against Nassar but failed to act quickly, did not properly document interviews, and allowed months to pass without notifying state authorities who could have intervened. During that delay, Nassar continued abusing young gymnasts. Survivors argued that the FBI's negligence and failure to follow basic investigative procedures enabled additional assaults that could have been prevented. The cases ultimately resulted in a substantial settlement from the federal government, acknowledging the role that investigative failures played in prolonging the abuse.That legal outcome has been viewed by many observers as a potential roadmap for survivors of Jeffrey Epstein seeking accountability beyond the trafficker himself. Epstein's crimes also unfolded over many years despite repeated warnings to authorities, and critics have long argued that federal investigators and prosecutors missed opportunities to intervene earlier. The Nassar litigation demonstrated that victims can pursue claims against the government when investigative failures allow abuse to continue after authorities were put on notice. For Epstein survivors, that framework raises the possibility of similar legal arguments—particularly surrounding law enforcement's handling of earlier complaints, the controversial non-prosecution agreement in Florida, and other moments when authorities were aware of allegations but failed to stop the exploitation. While the circumstances differ, the Nassar cases showed that institutional failures by investigators can carry legal consequences, creating a model that Epstein survivors and their attorneys may look to as they pursue broader accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

At the 2026 CONEXPO trade show, Fluid Power Forum guest host Ben Brown interviews Elie Nasr of Famic Technologies about show highlights and Famic's Automation Studio software for system design, modeling, and simulation across hydraulics, pneumatics, electrical, automation, robotics, and P&ID. Nassar notes the growing impact of electronics on components such as valves, pumps, and transmission systems. He explains that Automation Studio enables engineers to build models using real manufacturer components and reuse the same design for simulation, system validation, maintenance, troubleshooting, training, and full documentation, with OEM feedback citing 80–90% reductions in design time. Listeners can find updates on LinkedIn and videos on YouTube. #FluidPowerForum #CONEXPO #ModelingAndSimulation #SystemDesign Subscribe to the Fluid Power Forum today to never miss an episode. The podcast is available on all of your favorite podcast platforms, including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and iHeart Radio. Additionally, we're launching Fluid Power Forum Plus, offering premium, members-only content designed just for our listeners. When you sign up on the NFPA website, you'll unlock a host of rewards, ranging from exclusive content to live panels and networking receptions. Connect with our guest host, Ben Brown, at bbrown@nfpa.com. Connect with our guest, Elie Nasr, at enasr@famictech.com. Find and share more interesting fluid power technologies and unique applications using #onlyfluidpowercan and follow podcast and other fluid power industry-related updates at @TheNFPA.

The US-Israel war on Iran is expanding, and regional leaders and aid agencies are warning that a humanitarian disaster is looming. In Lebanon, Israel is pounding southern Beirut, going after what it is describing as Hezbollah targets. It's a resounding message from Iran that, in this asymmetrical war, attacks will not go unanswered. Adel Nassar is Lebanon's justice minister and he joins the show from Beirut.  Also on today's show: Mostafa Daneshgar, Iranian political analyst & Maryam Alemzadeh, associate professor in history & politics of Iran university of Oxford; Vivian Salama, staff writer, the Atlantic    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Department of Justice has displayed a clear inconsistency in how it has handled two allegedly fabricated Epstein-related documents. When the letter purportedly sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar surfaced, the Department of Justice responded swiftly and decisively. Officials publicly and unequivocally denied the letter's authenticity, leaving no room for ambiguity or extended review. That response demonstrated the DOJ's willingness to intervene forcefully when it believes a document is false and can confidently support that conclusion. The speed and certainty of that denial set a clear institutional benchmark for how the department handles dubious materials tied to Epstein.By contrast, the DOJ has remained conspicuously silent regarding the alleged Epstein birthday card reportedly sent by Donald Trump. Despite the availability of the same investigative tools and expertise used in the Nassar letter assessment, the department has not issued a similar categorical denial. This silence is notable given the far greater political and reputational implications of the birthday card. The uneven response suggests uncertainty rather than neutrality, implying that the DOJ may be unable to definitively disprove the card's authenticity. In the context of Epstein's broader history—marked by selective transparency and delayed accountability—the DOJ's inconsistent behavior has fueled skepticism and reinforced perceptions that politically sensitive material is treated with greater caution, even when public clarity would otherwise be expected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Hosts Alistair Taylor and Matthew Czekaj are joined by MEI Senior Fellow Fadi Nicholas Nassar to discuss Hizballah's role in the escalating conflict in the Middle East and the implications for Lebanon. A day after the United States and Israel launched a joint military campaign against Iran, Tehran's Lebanese proxy fired missiles at northern Israeli territory. Israel responded swiftly and forcefully, and Lebanon's government and population now fear the Iranian-backed militia is dragging the country back into war. The conversation explores the broader repercussions of Hizballah's actions against the backdrop of a widening war in Iran and Lebanon's quickly evolving political climate. Nassar also outlines recommendations for how Lebanon can move forward as a sovereign and effective state.   Find Nick's recent article assessing the Lebanese authorities' actions to disarm Hizballah here.   Recorded on March 4, 2026.

The Department of Justice has displayed a clear inconsistency in how it has handled two allegedly fabricated Epstein-related documents. When the letter purportedly sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar surfaced, the Department of Justice responded swiftly and decisively. Officials publicly and unequivocally denied the letter's authenticity, leaving no room for ambiguity or extended review. That response demonstrated the DOJ's willingness to intervene forcefully when it believes a document is false and can confidently support that conclusion. The speed and certainty of that denial set a clear institutional benchmark for how the department handles dubious materials tied to Epstein.By contrast, the DOJ has remained conspicuously silent regarding the alleged Epstein birthday card reportedly sent by Donald Trump. Despite the availability of the same investigative tools and expertise used in the Nassar letter assessment, the department has not issued a similar categorical denial. This silence is notable given the far greater political and reputational implications of the birthday card. The uneven response suggests uncertainty rather than neutrality, implying that the DOJ may be unable to definitively disprove the card's authenticity. In the context of Epstein's broader history—marked by selective transparency and delayed accountability—the DOJ's inconsistent behavior has fueled skepticism and reinforced perceptions that politically sensitive material is treated with greater caution, even when public clarity would otherwise be expected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

El próximo domingo 8 de marzo el país vivirá una jornada importante para la democracia, las elecciones de Congreso de la República.  Y son cruciales porque se define un poco el mapa político colombiano frente a las elecciones presidenciales de primera vuelta el 31 de mayo y si es necesario segunda vuelta el 21 de junio.  Para analizar este panorama quiero saludar a Hassan Nassar, un periodista que desde esa orilla tuvo la oportunidad de informar, analizar y opinar sobre el acontecer político del país..Hoy está en la otra orilla, aspira a la Cámara de Representantes por Bogotá por el Centro Democrático con el número 106.   Con Hassan Nassar hablamos de fraude electoral, lo que se juega el país en las próximas elecciones y los principales temas que se deben abordar a partir del 20 de julio desde el Congreso de la República.  Los invitamos a seguir el canal de SinCandado en WhatsApp. Activen la campanita.   Visite nuestras cuentas en X (Twitter), Instagram, Youtube y Youtube Music y el podcast de SinCandadoRadio en Spotify y demás plataformas 

In this JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights episode, host Dr. Carolyn Lineen summaries the article, "Concordance of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Assay Results Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Excision Specimens in Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer," by Nassar et al. TRANSCRIPT Carolyn Lineen: Hello and welcome to JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights. I'm your host, Carolyn Lineen, from St. James's Hospital, Dublin, and today we will be discussing the JCO Precision Oncology article titled "Concordance of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Assay Results Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Excision Specimens in Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer" by Dr. Aziza Nassar and colleagues. The Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score assay is a 21-gene expression test that provides both prognostic information regarding distant recurrence risk and predictive information regarding the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. The recurrence score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of recurrence and a potentially higher likelihood of benefit from chemotherapy. Traditionally, genomic testing is performed on surgical excision specimens following tumor resection. However, this approach can potentially delay access to biological risk stratification, which may be important when early treatment planning or neoadjuvant therapy is being considered. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the level of concordance between recurrence scores derived from paired core needle biopsy specimens and surgical excision specimens obtained from the same untreated primary breast tumors. Investigators specifically evaluated both continuous recurrence score agreement and categorical risk classification concordance. The study included 134 patients with paired biopsy and surgical specimens. The median patient age was 62 years, with a wide age range from 33 to 99 years. Approximately 17% of patients were aged 50 years or younger, while 83% were older than 50 years. All patients had hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer and had not received prior systemic treatment before either specimen collection. Each patient contributed two tumor samples: a core needle biopsy specimen obtained at initial diagnosis and a surgical excision specimen obtained during definitive tumor resection. Both samples underwent Oncotype DX testing, allowing direct within-patient comparison. The investigators reported mean recurrence scores of 15.6 for core needle biopsy specimens and 16.6 for surgical excision specimens. Although this absolute mean difference between specimen types did reach statistical significance with a P value of 0.003, the authors note that this numerical difference was small at one recurrence score unit and may not therefore be clinically meaningful. Additionally, categorical recurrence score results did not differ significantly. The primary measure of agreement between recurrence scores was the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. The study demonstrated a Lin concordance correlation coefficient of 0.86 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.80 to 0.90, indicating strong agreement between biopsy and surgical specimens. Additionally, categorical agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic. The study reported a kappa value of 0.64 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.44 to 0.83, indicating substantial agreement between specimen types. Comparing this study to previously published evidence, the authors referenced prior smaller studies examining concordance between paired tissue samples. For example, earlier research evaluating 50 patients demonstrated correlation coefficients of approximately 0.8 and categorical concordance rates ranging from 72% to 78%, depending on the classification cut points used. Compared with earlier studies, the present study provides stronger evidence supporting consistency between biopsy and surgical testing. These findings have several important implications for clinical practice. First, early availability of recurrence score results may enhance multidisciplinary care planning. Obtaining genomic risk data at the time of diagnosis allows tumor boards to integrate molecular risk stratification into initial treatment discussions rather than waiting for postoperative results. Second, biopsy-based testing may support decision making regarding treatment sequencing. Earlier genomic information may help guide selection of neoadjuvant therapy or inform early decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy necessity. Third, early testing may reduce delays in treatment initiation. Separate research evaluating presurgical Oncotype DX testing has demonstrated potential reductions in time to initiation of adjuvant therapy by approximately 8 days, suggesting potential improvements in care efficiency. Additionally, biopsy-based testing demonstrates strong technical feasibility. Studies examining real-world implementation have reported test success rates as high as 99.1% when performed on core biopsy specimens. Despite the encouraging results, certain limitations must be considered. Core needle biopsy samples evaluate only a portion of the tumor, and intratumoral heterogeneity could theoretically influence recurrence score results in selected cases. Preanalytical factors, including tissue fixation and sample handling, may also affect RNA integrity and assay performance. Standardization of specimen processing protocols will be essential if biopsy-based testing becomes routine. Furthermore, although analytical concordance is strong, prospective outcome studies demonstrating equivalent long-term clinical outcomes based on biopsy-directed treatment decisions would further strengthen the evidence base. In conclusion, this study demonstrates strong concordance between Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Scores derived from core needle biopsy specimens and surgical excision specimens in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. With a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.86 and overall categorical agreement exceeding 90%, the findings support the clinical feasibility of performing genomic testing at the time of diagnostic biopsy. If validated through additional prospective studies, this approach may enable earlier risk stratification and improve multidisciplinary treatment planning. Thank you for tuning in to JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights. Don't forget to subscribe and join us next time as we explore more groundbreaking research shaping the future of oncology. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.

Fe hecha canción es el programa de EWTN Radio Católica Mundial que promociona la música de los grupos y cantantes católicos del mundo hispano. Desde el Estudio 3 de Radio Católica Mundial, Douglas Archer comparte con ustedes una hora cargada de canciones, incluyendo las últimas novedades y estrenos, y de vez en cuando con algún invitado que canta o toca en directo.

The Department of Justice has displayed a clear inconsistency in how it has handled two allegedly fabricated Epstein-related documents. When the letter purportedly sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar surfaced, the Department of Justice responded swiftly and decisively. Officials publicly and unequivocally denied the letter's authenticity, leaving no room for ambiguity or extended review. That response demonstrated the DOJ's willingness to intervene forcefully when it believes a document is false and can confidently support that conclusion. The speed and certainty of that denial set a clear institutional benchmark for how the department handles dubious materials tied to Epstein.By contrast, the DOJ has remained conspicuously silent regarding the alleged Epstein birthday card reportedly sent by Donald Trump. Despite the availability of the same investigative tools and expertise used in the Nassar letter assessment, the department has not issued a similar categorical denial. This silence is notable given the far greater political and reputational implications of the birthday card. The uneven response suggests uncertainty rather than neutrality, implying that the DOJ may be unable to definitively disprove the card's authenticity. In the context of Epstein's broader history—marked by selective transparency and delayed accountability—the DOJ's inconsistent behavior has fueled skepticism and reinforced perceptions that politically sensitive material is treated with greater caution, even when public clarity would otherwise be expected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Department of Justice has displayed a clear inconsistency in how it has handled two allegedly fabricated Epstein-related documents. When the letter purportedly sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar surfaced, the Department of Justice responded swiftly and decisively. Officials publicly and unequivocally denied the letter's authenticity, leaving no room for ambiguity or extended review. That response demonstrated the DOJ's willingness to intervene forcefully when it believes a document is false and can confidently support that conclusion. The speed and certainty of that denial set a clear institutional benchmark for how the department handles dubious materials tied to Epstein.By contrast, the DOJ has remained conspicuously silent regarding the alleged Epstein birthday card reportedly sent by Donald Trump. Despite the availability of the same investigative tools and expertise used in the Nassar letter assessment, the department has not issued a similar categorical denial. This silence is notable given the far greater political and reputational implications of the birthday card. The uneven response suggests uncertainty rather than neutrality, implying that the DOJ may be unable to definitively disprove the card's authenticity. In the context of Epstein's broader history—marked by selective transparency and delayed accountability—the DOJ's inconsistent behavior has fueled skepticism and reinforced perceptions that politically sensitive material is treated with greater caution, even when public clarity would otherwise be expected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Department of Justice has displayed a clear inconsistency in how it has handled two allegedly fabricated Epstein-related documents. When the letter purportedly sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar surfaced, the Department of Justice responded swiftly and decisively. Officials publicly and unequivocally denied the letter's authenticity, leaving no room for ambiguity or extended review. That response demonstrated the DOJ's willingness to intervene forcefully when it believes a document is false and can confidently support that conclusion. The speed and certainty of that denial set a clear institutional benchmark for how the department handles dubious materials tied to Epstein.By contrast, the DOJ has remained conspicuously silent regarding the alleged Epstein birthday card reportedly sent by Donald Trump. Despite the availability of the same investigative tools and expertise used in the Nassar letter assessment, the department has not issued a similar categorical denial. This silence is notable given the far greater political and reputational implications of the birthday card. The uneven response suggests uncertainty rather than neutrality, implying that the DOJ may be unable to definitively disprove the card's authenticity. In the context of Epstein's broader history—marked by selective transparency and delayed accountability—the DOJ's inconsistent behavior has fueled skepticism and reinforced perceptions that politically sensitive material is treated with greater caution, even when public clarity would otherwise be expected.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The recent news linking Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein stems from a document that appeared in a large federal release of Epstein-related records, described as a handwritten letter from Epstein to Nassar. Almost immediately, officials said the letter was not authentic, citing technical issues with handwriting, mailing details, and dates. On paper, that explanation is straightforward. But given the long history of mishandled evidence, delayed disclosures, and shifting narratives in the Epstein case, it is not unreasonable that the appearance of such a document—however brief—triggered questions before being dismissed.The government's position is that there is no verified connection between Epstein and Nassar beyond this disputed item, and no evidence the two ever corresponded. Still, the episode highlights a recurring problem with how Epstein material has been released: documents surface without context, provenance, or explanation, leaving the public to parse authenticity after the fact. Even if the letter is exactly what authorities say it is, the way it entered the public record reinforces skepticism—not about any specific claim, but about a process that repeatedly introduces confusion into a case where clarity and credibility have already been in short supply.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Letter to Larry Nassar, signed by ‘J. Epstein,' cites “our president” | CNN Politics

The recent news linking Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein stems from a document that appeared in a large federal release of Epstein-related records, described as a handwritten letter from Epstein to Nassar. Almost immediately, officials said the letter was not authentic, citing technical issues with handwriting, mailing details, and dates. On paper, that explanation is straightforward. But given the long history of mishandled evidence, delayed disclosures, and shifting narratives in the Epstein case, it is not unreasonable that the appearance of such a document—however brief—triggered questions before being dismissed.The government's position is that there is no verified connection between Epstein and Nassar beyond this disputed item, and no evidence the two ever corresponded. Still, the episode highlights a recurring problem with how Epstein material has been released: documents surface without context, provenance, or explanation, leaving the public to parse authenticity after the fact. Even if the letter is exactly what authorities say it is, the way it entered the public record reinforces skepticism—not about any specific claim, but about a process that repeatedly introduces confusion into a case where clarity and credibility have already been in short supply.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Letter to Larry Nassar, signed by ‘J. Epstein,' cites “our president” | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The recent news linking Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein stems from a document that appeared in a large federal release of Epstein-related records, described as a handwritten letter from Epstein to Nassar. Almost immediately, officials said the letter was not authentic, citing technical issues with handwriting, mailing details, and dates. On paper, that explanation is straightforward. But given the long history of mishandled evidence, delayed disclosures, and shifting narratives in the Epstein case, it is not unreasonable that the appearance of such a document—however brief—triggered questions before being dismissed.The government's position is that there is no verified connection between Epstein and Nassar beyond this disputed item, and no evidence the two ever corresponded. Still, the episode highlights a recurring problem with how Epstein material has been released: documents surface without context, provenance, or explanation, leaving the public to parse authenticity after the fact. Even if the letter is exactly what authorities say it is, the way it entered the public record reinforces skepticism—not about any specific claim, but about a process that repeatedly introduces confusion into a case where clarity and credibility have already been in short supply.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Letter to Larry Nassar, signed by ‘J. Epstein,' cites “our president” | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice sent out a tweet before releasing more than 30,000 new documents from the Epstein files, saying some of the documents contain “untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump.” The documents in fact, do contain damning documents from an apparent suicide note from Epstein to Nassar along with flight logs that show Trump on Epstein’s private plane more times than previously known, apparently with alleged Epstein victims. While the President is NOT accused of doing anything criminal, it is certainly raising a number of questions. Also, in today’s document dump, a jaw dropping email reportedly from former Prince Andrew to Ghislane Maxwell.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Department of Justice sent out a tweet before releasing more than 30,000 new documents from the Epstein files, saying some of the documents contain “untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump.” The documents in fact, do contain damning documents from an apparent suicide note from Epstein to Nassar along with flight logs that show Trump on Epstein’s private plane more times than previously known, apparently with alleged Epstein victims. While the President is NOT accused of doing anything criminal, it is certainly raising a number of questions. Also, in today’s document dump, a jaw dropping email reportedly from former Prince Andrew to Ghislane Maxwell.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Department of Justice sent out a tweet before releasing more than 30,000 new documents from the Epstein files, saying some of the documents contain “untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump.” The documents in fact, do contain damning documents from an apparent suicide note from Epstein to Nassar along with flight logs that show Trump on Epstein’s private plane more times than previously known, apparently with alleged Epstein victims. While the President is NOT accused of doing anything criminal, it is certainly raising a number of questions. Also, in today’s document dump, a jaw dropping email reportedly from former Prince Andrew to Ghislane Maxwell.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Department of Justice sent out a tweet before releasing more than 30,000 new documents from the Epstein files, saying some of the documents contain “untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump.” The documents in fact, do contain damning documents from an apparent suicide note from Epstein to Nassar along with flight logs that show Trump on Epstein’s private plane more times than previously known, apparently with alleged Epstein victims. While the President is NOT accused of doing anything criminal, it is certainly raising a number of questions. Also, in today’s document dump, a jaw dropping email reportedly from former Prince Andrew to Ghislane Maxwell.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The FBI has faced sustained and bipartisan criticism for its handling of major sexual abuse cases, most notably those involving Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein, where clear warning signs were missed, complaints were mishandled, and opportunities to stop ongoing abuse were squandered. In the Nassar case, the Justice Department's own inspector general found that FBI agents in the Indianapolis field office failed to properly document victims' allegations, delayed action for more than a year, and made false statements about their handling of the case—during which time Nassar continued abusing young gymnasts. Survivors later testified that the FBI's inaction directly enabled further assaults, turning what should have been a law-enforcement intervention into a catastrophic institutional failure marked by negligence, indifference, and self-protection.Similar patterns have been identified in the Epstein case, where the FBI possessed credible intelligence about Epstein's sexual exploitation of minors as early as the mid-2000s yet failed to act decisively. Despite evidence of interstate trafficking, multiple victims, and powerful co-conspirators, federal authorities deferred to a deeply flawed Florida investigation that culminated in a secret non-prosecution agreement, effectively neutralizing federal enforcement. Critics argue that the FBI's passivity, combined with its willingness to accept prosecutorial hand-offs and jurisdictional excuses, allowed Epstein to continue abusing girls for years after he should have been stopped. Together, the Nassar and Epstein cases have become emblematic of a broader critique: that when sexual abuse allegations collide with institutional risk, reputational concerns, or powerful defendants, the FBI has too often failed the very victims it is charged to protect.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The FBI has faced sustained and bipartisan criticism for its handling of major sexual abuse cases, most notably those involving Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein, where clear warning signs were missed, complaints were mishandled, and opportunities to stop ongoing abuse were squandered. In the Nassar case, the Justice Department's own inspector general found that FBI agents in the Indianapolis field office failed to properly document victims' allegations, delayed action for more than a year, and made false statements about their handling of the case—during which time Nassar continued abusing young gymnasts. Survivors later testified that the FBI's inaction directly enabled further assaults, turning what should have been a law-enforcement intervention into a catastrophic institutional failure marked by negligence, indifference, and self-protection.Similar patterns have been identified in the Epstein case, where the FBI possessed credible intelligence about Epstein's sexual exploitation of minors as early as the mid-2000s yet failed to act decisively. Despite evidence of interstate trafficking, multiple victims, and powerful co-conspirators, federal authorities deferred to a deeply flawed Florida investigation that culminated in a secret non-prosecution agreement, effectively neutralizing federal enforcement. Critics argue that the FBI's passivity, combined with its willingness to accept prosecutorial hand-offs and jurisdictional excuses, allowed Epstein to continue abusing girls for years after he should have been stopped. Together, the Nassar and Epstein cases have become emblematic of a broader critique: that when sexual abuse allegations collide with institutional risk, reputational concerns, or powerful defendants, the FBI has too often failed the very victims it is charged to protect.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The FBI has faced sustained and bipartisan criticism for its handling of major sexual abuse cases, most notably those involving Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein, where clear warning signs were missed, complaints were mishandled, and opportunities to stop ongoing abuse were squandered. In the Nassar case, the Justice Department's own inspector general found that FBI agents in the Indianapolis field office failed to properly document victims' allegations, delayed action for more than a year, and made false statements about their handling of the case—during which time Nassar continued abusing young gymnasts. Survivors later testified that the FBI's inaction directly enabled further assaults, turning what should have been a law-enforcement intervention into a catastrophic institutional failure marked by negligence, indifference, and self-protection.Similar patterns have been identified in the Epstein case, where the FBI possessed credible intelligence about Epstein's sexual exploitation of minors as early as the mid-2000s yet failed to act decisively. Despite evidence of interstate trafficking, multiple victims, and powerful co-conspirators, federal authorities deferred to a deeply flawed Florida investigation that culminated in a secret non-prosecution agreement, effectively neutralizing federal enforcement. Critics argue that the FBI's passivity, combined with its willingness to accept prosecutorial hand-offs and jurisdictional excuses, allowed Epstein to continue abusing girls for years after he should have been stopped. Together, the Nassar and Epstein cases have become emblematic of a broader critique: that when sexual abuse allegations collide with institutional risk, reputational concerns, or powerful defendants, the FBI has too often failed the very victims it is charged to protect.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode, Dave and Dharm welcome back Ziad Nassar, Deputy CEO of Huspy, one year after his first appearance on the show. And what a difference a year makes. Ziad shares how Huspy has evolved from a UAE-based mortgage innovator into one of the fastest-scaling proptechs in EMEA, now active across the UAE and Spain with expansion under way in Saudi Arabia. Backed by a US $59 million Series B round led by Balderton Capital, Huspy is pursuing an ambitious mission: empowering the people who serve homebuyers and sellers. The conversation explores: Why Huspy focuses on enabling agents and mortgage brokers—the professionals closest to homebuyers and sellers—through technology, training, and fairer rewards. The logic behind expanding to Spain, and the company's disciplined playbook for entering new markets. How AI is transforming property discovery and agent productivity—from natural-language search (“find me a Georgian-style home near London with a vet nearby”) to smart tools that augment rather than replace human expertise. The importance of focus and discipline in scaling a startup, and the lessons Huspy has learned from trial, error, and relentless iteration. Why PropTech remains one of the least-disrupted global industries, and how human experience, data, and automation can finally start to change that. Ziad's candour and passion make this a compelling listen—an honest look at what it takes to modernise real estate, balance technology with trust, and build for the people who make the housing market work.

MEI Senior Fellow Fadi Nicholas Nassar joins host Matthew Czekaj to share expert insights and personal reflections on Pope Leo XIV's trip to Lebanon from November 30 to December 2. Nassar unpacks the significance of the visit, part of the pontiff's first overseas tour since assuming office, and its potential impact on Lebanon's untenable status quo. The conversation explores key questions, including the ability of spiritual and moral authority to compensate for the shortcomings of political leadership as well as whether Lebanon's government will be able to capitalize on the momentum generated by this visit as the possible return of conflict looms on the horizon.   Find Fadi Nicholas Nassar's recent book on the challenges and responsibilities of conflict resolution here.   Recorded on December 3, 2025.

Send us a textKathy, Burk and Mark  react to the trailer for Baahubali: The Epic,  the larger-than-life saga that redefined Indian cinema directed and co-edited by S. S. Rajamouli. It is a re-edited and remastered single-film version of Rajamouli's earlier two-part saga, Baahubali: The Beginning (2015) and Baahubali 2: The Conclusion (2017), combining footage from both films with technical enhancements and previously unseen scenes. Produced by Shobu Yarlagadda and Prasad Devineni under Arka Media Works, the film stars Prabhas in a triple role, alongside Rana Daggubati, Anushka Shetty, Tamannaah Bhatia, Ramya Krishna, Sathyaraj, Nassar and Subbaraju.Support the show

***This programme contains references to sexual abuse which some listeners may find upsetting*** For decades, Larry Nassar was the doctor for the women's Olympic Gymnastics team and also treated athletes at Michigan State University. He was the go-to practitioner for sports related injuries but saw many women and girls outside of the sport as well. Rachael Denhollander was a teenager when she went to see Larry Nassar for treatment. She had been a gymnast as a child, and she and her mother believed Nassar would be giving her pelvic floor therapy for an injury. They soon realised this was not the case, but felt unable to challenge someone who was so revered by the sports establishment. Mike Wooldridge hears how Rachael's decision to do the right thing and publicly tell her story, at great personal cost, led to over 200 women revealing abuse by Larry Nassar. He finds out how her Christian faith was challenged as the story and trial became international news, how she decided to forgive her abuser and how she now works with survivors of sexual abuse in churches in the USA.If you are affected by anything you hear in this programme, it is important to talk to someone about it and get support. Talking can help to see a way through things, whether this is with a family member, friends, a doctor, or a support organisation. You can find help by visiting the Befrienders Worldwide website: befrienders.org.

Full conversation with Melissa Davis, MS, CCC-SLP and Jenna Nassar, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-S, for "Intraprofessional Practice: Strategies for Effective Collaboration Between SLPs" an episode of the First Bite podcast.Hosted by: Michelle Dawson MS, CCC-SLP, CLC, BCS-SEarn 0.1 ASHA CEU for this episode with Speech Therapy PD: https://www.speechtherapypd.com/courses/intraprofessional-practice-strategiesIn this episode of First Bite, we're exploring what effective intraprofessional practice really looks like for SLPs in pediatrics. When colleagues collaborate well, everyone benefits—especially the little ones we serve.Join Michelle Dawson, MS, CCC-SLP, CLC, BCS-S, as she interviews Melissa Davis, MS, CCC-SLP, owner of Speech Therapy for Kids and co-owner of Kids Therapy Spot in Starkville and Columbus, MS, and Jenna Nassar, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-S, clinician and instructor in the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Together, they share how they make intraprofessional collaboration work for optimal continuity of care.Tune in to learn what a typical day looks like for a pediatric medical SLP in different settings, discover strategies to strengthen your clinical skills across those settings, and gain practical ideas for communicating effectively—even across hundreds of miles—so that the little ones on both your caseloads thrive.About the Guest(s): Melissa Davis, MS CCC-SLP, is the owner of Speech Therapy for Kids and co-owner of Kids Therapy Spot located in Starkville and Columbus, MS. Melissa received her bachelor's degree in Speech-Language Pathology from Middle Tennessee State University in May of 2000 and her master's degree in Speech-Language Pathology from Mississippi University for Women in May of 2002. Melissa worked for two rehabilitation companies from 2002 to 2009, providing speech therapy services in homes and daycare centers for children in the early intervention program. In January 2010, Melissa went into private practice. She now has two outpatient clinics in Starkville and Columbus, MS, in addition to contracting speech therapy services at three Prescribed Pediatric Extended Care Facilities and the private schools in Starkville, MS. In addition to owning a private practice, Melissa continues to be a treating SLP primarily focusing on treating children with pediatric feeding disorders at her two outpatient clinics, in addition to the PPEC in Starkville, MS. She also consults on patients with PFD at the PPECs located in Meridian and Columbus, MS. Melissa is an active volunteer with Feeding Matters and was on the 2023 and 2024 ASHA PFD topic committee. She consistently speaks to undergraduate and graduate students at various universities about PFD and has also had numerous speaking engagements, presenting information on opening and operating a private practice.Jenna Nassar, MS CCC-SLP, BCS-S, is a pediatric speech pathologist and an instructor in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Cancer at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. In addition to these roles, she also serves as the pediatric outpatient team leader, clinical Internship coordinator for the Department of Speech Pathology, and as a member of the cleft and craniofacial team. She specializes in pediatric swallowing and feeding disorders and serves patients both inpatient and outpatient at Batson Children's Hospital. She holds Board Certification in swallow and swallowing disorders through the ABSSD. She is trained in a variety of treatment approaches for feeding and swallowing disorders. She is a member of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, the Mississippi Speech-Language-Hearing Association, SIG 13, and Feeding Matters. She was awarded the 2023 Clinical Achievement Award from the Mississippi Speech-Language-Hearing Association and the Association's Honors in 2025. In 20024, she served on the Pediatric Feeding...

Al Nassar, Sr. Manager, Special Events at The Walt Disney Company, joins Amanda Ma, CEO and Founder of Innovate Marketing Group, to explore how Disney crafts emotional connections, handles thousand-person hiccups, and stages before-dawn ceremonies at the castle. Learn practical tips on leadership, vendor collaboration, and protecting your reputation in the industry.About the guest: In 1991, Al was asked to start a new team at the Disneyland Resort called Operations Special Events. The role focused on managing event logistics while protecting the guest experience—a position that quickly became one of the greatest blessings of his life. Over the years, Al has created countless memorable experiences and built lasting relationships that bring joy to every event he touches.Married for 25 years to his wife Gina, who works on the Communications Events team at Disneyland, Al values family and balance above all. When he's not enjoying time with loved ones at the Colorado River, he can often be found supporting friends' events or speaking to professionals and students about his decades of experience in the industry.Al is also the author of Keeping It Special, a book filled with heartfelt stories and lessons from his 35 years of creating magic behind the scenes at Disney. The book is available at KeepingItSpecial.comFollow Al on LinkedIn!EventUp is brought to you by Innovate Marketing Group. An award-winning Corporate Event and Experiential Marketing Agency based in Los Angeles, California. Creating Nationwide Immersive Event Experiences to help brands connect with people. Learn more here!At Innovate Marketing Group, we've curated a collection of free resources designed to help you elevate your events and marketing efforts. Whether you're planning a company retreat or navigating the latest event trends, our tools, reports, and checklists are here to support your success and keep you at the forefront of innovation. Access them here!Follow us!Find us on ⁠⁠LinkedIn and Instagram and catch our latest episodes on the EventUp Podcast!

The conversation today centers around the culinary journey of Chef Andy Nassar from Keel Farm, as he shares his insights on the art of cooking, mentorship, and the evolution of the restaurant industry. A particular highlight of our discussion is Chef Nassar's creative approach to traditional dishes, exemplified by his innovative take on bibimbap, which harmoniously blends Korean flavors with Southern barbecue influences. Additionally, we delve into the intricacies of another dish, moqueca, as he reflects on the cultural influences that shape his culinary style. Chef Nassar emphasizes the importance of passion and authenticity in cooking, advocating for a balance between creativity and the fundamental essence of food. Join us as we explore the passion that drives Chef Nassar and the future of dining at Keel Farm.Takeaways: Chef Andy Nassar's culinary journey exemplifies the importance of passion and creativity in the kitchen. The integration of local ingredients and cultural influences is pivotal in Chef Andy's approach to menu development. Chef Andy emphasizes the significance of mentorship within the culinary industry to inspire the next generation of chefs. The podcast discusses how Chef Andy blends traditional dishes like bibimbap with local flavors to create unique culinary experiences. In the conversation, Chef Andy reflects on the balance of maintaining authenticity while pushing creative boundaries in cooking. The episode highlights the role of media and social platforms in shaping contemporary dining experiences and restaurant visibility. Mentioned in this episode:Aussie Select - Fully cooked, premium Australian lambFully cooked, premium Australian lamb—ready to serve and packed with clean flavor.RAK Porcelain USA -Tableware We use RAK for all in-studio tableware—clean, durable, and designed for chefs.Citrus America Citrus America – Commercial-grade juicing systems built for speed and yield.

Fe hecha canción es el programa de EWTN Radio Católica Mundial que promociona la música de los grupos y cantantes católicos del mundo hispano. Desde el Estudio 3 de Radio Católica Mundial, Douglas Archer comparte con ustedes una hora cargada de canciones, incluyendo las últimas novedades y estrenos, y de vez en cuando con algún invitado que canta o toca en directo.

SummaryIn this conversation, Dr. Jenn Gates-Nassar shares her journey as a pediatric resident, balancing the demands of her medical training with motherhood. She discusses her motivations for pursuing medicine, the challenges of being a resident with young children, and the emotional toll of caring for sick kids. Dr. Gates-Nassar also highlights the importance of advocacy in public health, the impact of adverse childhood experiences on long-term health, and the challenges posed by misinformation in healthcare. Throughout the discussion, she reflects on her aspirations for the future and the ongoing learning process in medicine.TakeawaysDr. Gates-Nassar is a second-year pediatric resident at Mount Sinai.She balances her demanding residency with being a mother to two young girls.Her journey into medicine was influenced by her family's public health background.She emphasizes the importance of reliable childcare for working parents.Guilt when away from her children but recognizes the need for stable caregivers.She discusses the emotional challenges of being a pediatric resident.Advocacy and public health are significant aspects of her career aspirations.Adverse childhood experiences can have lasting impacts on health outcomes.Misinformation in healthcare is a growing concern for pediatricians.Time stamps00:00Introduction and Background03:01Journey into Medicine05:57Balancing Family and Residency09:00Navigating Parenthood and Guilt11:58Career Aspirations in Pediatrics15:12Challenges in Pediatric Care17:53Addressing Systemic Barriers21:05Misinformation and Public Health Advocacy27:29Balancing Clinical Work and Personal Life31:03Navigating Parenthood and Medical Training34:14Advice for Future Parents in Medicine38:06Influences and Inspirations in Medicine43:24Experiences and Challenges in Residency48:45The Ongoing Journey of Learning in Medicinekeywordspediatrics, residency, motherhood, public health, advocacy, work-life balance, adverse childhood experiences, healthcare challenges, physician insights, medical trainingSupport the show

With France, the UK, Australia and Canada expected to recognise an independent Palestinian state at UN General Assembly in New York, what are the origins of the state they plan to recognise? In this episode, Palestinian-American historian Maha Nassar from the University of Arizona describes the events leading up to the original declaration of Palestinian independence in 1988, including the compromises made within the Palestinian liberation movement. Nassar then traces how  we've got to the point where more than 150 countries will recognise an independent Palestinian state – a move that she believes is more of a symbolic gesture than a meaningful route to Palestinian sovereignty.This episode was written and produced by Mend Mariwany and Gemma Ware with assistance from Katie Flood. Sound design and mixing by Eloise Stevens and theme music by Neeta Sarl. Read the full credits for this episode and sign up here for a free daily newsletter from The Conversation.If you like the show, please consider donating to The Conversation, an independent, not-for-profit news organisation.

Should your church livestream? Josh Nassar joins us on the ChurchGear podcast this week to discuss livestreaming, budgeting for livestreaming and Toby gives a conversion story you can't miss! In this episode you'll hear: 1:00 – How to Meet Your Spouse While Serving in Church Production5:00 – Church Production Pro Josh Nassar Joins the Podcast7:45 – Josh Nassar's Journey Into Church AVL & Tech Ministry11:15 – Getting Started in Church Live Streaming: Tips for Beginners20:45 – The Cheapest Way to Live Stream a Church Service29:00 – “Baffle Blake” Segment with HouseRight (Church Tech Challenge)35:45 – Best Practices for Church Setup and Teardown Teams43:45 – Church Live Stream Disaster Story: No Internet on Sunday46:45 – Tech Takeaway: Why You Don't Always Have to Follow the “Right Way” in Church ProductionCheckout HouseRight's solutions for your church and open jobs here. Resources for your Church Tech Ministry Sell Us Gear: Does your church have used gear that you need to convert into new ministry dollars? We can make you an offer here. Buy Our Gear: Do you need some production gear but lack the budget to buy new gear? You can shop our gear store here. Connect with us: Sales Bulletin: Get better deals than the public and get them earlier too here! Early Service: Get our best gear before it goes live on our site here. Instagram: Hangout with us on the gram here! Reviews: Leaving us a review on the podcast player you're listening to us on really helps the show. If you enjoyed this episode, you can say thank you with a review!

Can you name the top four struggles today’s moms feel? Overwhelmed. Uncared for Mom-guilt Wonder, what’s my purpose? Am I significant? If you, or a mom you know, can relate to any of these struggles, you’ll love this week’s conversation. In this powerful episode, Bible teacher and MomQ founder Candace Nassar shares how God redeemed her dysfunctional childhood, broke the generational chains, and how a life-changing Bible study ignited a personal relationship with Jesus—forever altering the course of her story. You’ll learn how God can–and likely is–in the process of healing and redeeming you and your story, too. Leaving a corporate career behind, Candice followed God’s nudge to create MomQ, a faith-based community that helps moms grow spiritually, find purpose, and overcome the pressure of perfection. We talk about the gift of community, how Jesus reaches out to us even when we feel unlovable, and how God’s truth brings freedom from guilt. This is your reminder that motherhood wasn’t meant to be walked alone—and grace is more than enough. And remember, I'd love to connect more on Instagram, where you'll find me at @donnaajones. Xo, Donna PS. Don’t forget to subscribe so you don’t miss a single episode! Donna’s Resources: Order a copy of my new book - Healthy Conflict, Peaceful Life: A Biblical Guide to Communicating Thoughts, Feelings, and Opinions with Grace, Truth, and Zero Regret. It is available anywhere books are sold– here is the link on Amazon. If you need a helpful resource for someone exploring faith and Christianity or simply want to strengthen your own knowledge, you’ll want a copy of my book, Seek: A Woman’s Guide to Meeting God. It’s a must for seekers, new believers, and those who want to be more confident in their faith! Connect with Candace Nassar Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/candacenassar/ Website: https://momq.org/ Connect with Donna Instagram: @donnaajones Website: www.donnajones.org Donna’s speaking schedule: https://donnajones.org/events/ Discover more Christian podcasts at lifeaudio.com and inquire about advertising opportunities at lifeaudio.com/contact-us.