Podcasts about deliberations

Joan Blades helped launch MoveOn. Jacob Hess grew up a conservative kid in Utah. Their friendship is the argument.Joan Blades, co-founder of MoveOn and Living Room Conversations, and Jacob Hess of the Deseret News join Corey to talk about what happens when political opposites actually sit down together. They cover MoveOn's 1998 start as a one-sentence petition, why these conversations feel scary before they feel fun, and how local pride could rebuild trust in our elections.Calls to Action✅ Leave a rating and review: lovethepodcast.com/politicsandreligion✅ Subscribe on Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com✅ Watch and subscribe on YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion✅ Invite one friend who votes differently to a Living Room Conversation: livingroomconversations.orgKey takeawaysHess traces his turn to a graduate school computer lab, where a classmate held him after he learned his brother was being sent home to die. After that, the culture war rhetoric about "dangerous" people stopped making sense.Hess argues dialogue shouldn't ban persuasion, because people with conviction end up feeling they must leave it at the door. Blades says curiosity and listening build the relationship that makes honest grappling possible.Hess frames this work as public health, since chronic anger is chronic stress. Blades adds that if we're in a loneliness epidemic, human relationships are the obvious remedy.Blades is organizing locally around a principle from Braver Angels' cross-partisan work: voting should be easy, cheating should be hard. Local pride in how elections work, she says, is the path to national trust.About Joan BladesJoan Blades is a co-founder of Living Room Conversations, MoveOn, and MomsRising. A mediator and attorney by training, she co-authored The Custom-Fit Workplace and The Motherhood Manifesto.About Jacob HessJacob Hess writes for the Deseret News and co-authored You're Not as Crazy as I Thought (But You're Still Wrong) with Phil Neisser. A former board member of the National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation, he teaches mindfulness and researches long-term healing from depression. His upcoming book is Recovering Hope.LinksLiving Room Conversations: livingroomconversations.orgTrustworthy Elections Initiative: ncdd.org/trustworthy-elections.htmlBraver Angels Trustworthy Elections report: braverangels.org/trustworthy-electionsJacob Hess, Deseret News: www.deseret.com/authors/jacob-hessJacob Hess on Substack: publishpeace.netConnect with usSubstack: coreysnathan.substack.comYouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligionInstagram, Threads, Bluesky, X, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn: @coreysnathanPartnersProud to be part of The Democracy Group, a network of podcasts examining what's broken in our democracy and how we can work together to fix it.Scary in line. Worth the ride.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Welcome to Mysteries to Die For.I am TG Wolff and am here with Jack, my piano player and producer. This is a podcast where we combine storytelling with original music to put you in the heart of a mystery. All stories are structured to challenge you to beat the detective to the solution. Jack and I perform these live, front to back, no breaks, no fakes, no retakes.In the world's most dangerous working environments it can seem like everything is out to kill you. The equipment you use. The materials you work with. The very air you breathe. Stored energy is a coiled viper waiting for the right moment to lash out. Owners, manufacturers, contractors, and beyond have developed safety protocols to combat STCKY, that is, Stuff That Can Kill You. Gravity, Motion, Mechanical, Electrical, Pressure, Sound, Radiation, Biological, Chemical, Temperature. This season is all about the means of murder as authors put our STCKY detective skills to the test. This is Season 9, Stuff That Can Kill You.This is Episode 19, where drowning is our STCKY means of death. This is Ping by Robert J. BinneyDELIBERATIONIt's another conundrum and Henri suspects everyone. Let's see if we can help him bring this case to a close and get him that macchiato he's been Jonesing for. Here's Henri's “do not trust” list, in the order we met them:• Mayor Tom Vaughn, Politian, ‘nuff said• Assistant Chief Rorschach, the man uses spit to fix his hair• Janet from IT, crushing on the ink stain• Judith the Comptroller, the money lady• John Smith, almost forgot himMembershipsAlright, before we dive back into the Henri's craziness, we gotta talk memberships. We've got three tiers now — the Grave Digger's Union, which is free because apparently we're philanthropists… or bad at business.Then there's the Cadaver Collective — four bucks a month. That's literally the price of a gas station coffee that tastes like sadness and burnt hopes.And if you're feeling fancy, we've got the Preservationist Society at eight bucks. That's the tier for people who want to say, ‘Yes, I support delusion storytellers who got their hands on a pair of microphone.Your membership keeps our real human authors fed, our software from becoming self aware, and the ads from clawing their way into the show.If you're not ready for commitment, you can still drop us a tip and leave a pun so bad it legally counts as a haunting. It's all on our website www.m2d4podcast.comAnthologyHey, before we answer the real question bothering Henri … who ruined Maxine's dye job with chlorine?— quick save the date. Our Season 9 companion anthology drops this October 13. Yes, an actual book. Words. Pages. Deliberation.So mark your calendars, carve it into a pumpkin, tattoo it on your soul — October 13. Season 9 anthology – Stuff That Can Kill You.WRAP UPThat wraps this episode of Mysteries to Die For. Support our show by subscribing, telling a mystery lover about us, and signing up for a membership. Check out our website m2d4podcast.com for links to this season's authors.Mysteries to Die For is hosted by TG Wolff and Jack Wolff. Ping was written by Robert J. Binney. Music and production are by Jack Wolff. Episode art is by TG Wolff. Join us next week for a Toe Tag, which is the first chapter from a fresh release in the mystery, crime, or thriller genre. Then come back in two weeks. Instead of an original story, we are going to do something a little different – we are going to play one minute mysteries where Jack and I will go up again H. A. Ripley and his 1932 DetectogramsWRAP UPThat wraps this episode of Mysteries to Die For. Support our show by subscribing, telling a mystery lover about us, and signing up for a membership. Check out our website m2d4podcast.com for links to this season's authors.Mysteries to Die For is hosted by TG Wolff and Jack Wolff. Ping was written by Robert J. Binney. Music and production are by Jack Wolff. Episode art is by TG Wolff. Join us next week for a Toe Tag, which is the first chapter from a fresh release in the mystery, crime, or thriller genre. Then come back in two weeks. Instead of an original story, we are going to do something a little different – we are going to play one minute mysteries where Jack and I will go up again H. A. Ripley and his 1932 Detectograms

In this episode, Malik & Tyler discuss the elimination of Chris vs. Justin, and Justin's victory, when will we get the introduction of mercenaries, We talk about Wes' critique of Chris, gender bias in challenge fans, and TV opportunities for challengers from Bananas bitter clip that's been going around. Tension between Cara and Tori, CT not getting respect put on his name and of Course Tyler tells us his Top 5.TakeawaysJustin's unexpected victory in the elimination challenge was a significant upset.The conversation highlights the gender bias and double standards in the perception of male and female challengers. Realism in TV showsEvaluation of daily challengeChapters01:22 Chris vs. Justin02:10 Justin's Performance and Perception03:29 Elimination Challenge: Chain Reaction04:43 Justin's Victory and Upset06:27 Team Games and Mercenaries07:06 Deliberation and Team Dynamics11:07 Team Nominations and Captains12:27 Wes' Critique of Chris13:52 Gender Bias in Challenge Fans16:12 TV Opportunities for Challengers20:06 Realism in TV Shows20:35 Daily Challenge: Devil's in the Details21:01 Adrienne as Captain22:06 Team Dynamics: Orange vs. Gray23:02 Discussion on Daily Challenge24:13 Evaluation of the Daily Challenge25:20 Tension Between Cara and Tori26:11 Recovery and Performance of Challengers27:25 CT's Role and Performance28:09 Tori's Leadership and Team Dynamics29:28 Pigeonholing and Team Game Strategy30:11 Season's Performance and Production31:01 CT's Track Record and Performance32:08 CT's Scapegoating and Performance33:05 Team Strategy and CT's Role34:25 Evaluation of Challengers: Izzy and Michelle35:39 Power Rankings and Team Evaluation39:22 Adrienne's Safety and Game Dynamics

The lone holdout in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial is now part of a legal inquiry the defense is asking the court to authorize. Michael Desronvil voted to hold Clancy criminally responsible while the other 11 jurors favored a verdict of not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. After the September 4 mistrial, public records revealed legal problems in Desronvil's background that were not part of the public trial record when he was seated. Those records include a dismissed domestic assault case, a civil restraining order involving his teenage nephew that was active when jury selection took place, and eviction proceedings. Kevin Reddington wants the court to inspect Desronvil's sealed questionnaire and determine whether he accurately answered questions about prior arrests, charges, and court orders. The defense also wants information about alleged cellphone use during deliberations. Desronvil denies the central criticism of his deliberations and says he had no doubt about his position. The courtroom fight follows Patrick Clancy's 60 Minutes interview, where he described the months before the killings from inside the family home. Patrick said mental illness can be 'tragically deceptive.' He recalled Lindsay's lack of sleep, deep depression, intrusive thoughts, repeated treatment, and a psychiatric hospitalization that ended days before the family celebrated Cora's birthday. He also said Lindsay later described January 24 as something she remembered like a dream. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke put the two developments side by side without turning either into more than the record supports. Patrick can describe what he saw, but he cannot retroactively diagnose what everyone missed. The defense can identify troubling juror history, but it still has to show why it matters legally. On September 29, Judge Sullivan is expected to confront motions aimed at both the juror controversy and whether a second prosecution would violate double-jeopardy protections. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HoldoutJuror #DoubleJeopardy #MichaelDesronvil #MentalHealth #TrueCrime #Massachusetts 

On this historic Prime Time Episode 386, Jonathan Carney returns to the Prime Time Show. Jonathan has been putting his footprint at Hooten Young, developing many innovative and collaborative projects. Tonight we will catch up on some of this projects, including the recently announced collaboration with Ruger Firearms. Plus we will we tap into Jon's pulse of the industry with an extended Deliberation segment.

On this historic Prime Time Episode 386, Jonathan Carney returns to the Prime Time Show. Jonathan has been putting his footprint at Hooten Young, developing many innovative and collaborative projects. Tonight we will catch up on some of this projects, including the recently announced collaboration with Ruger Firearms. Plus we will we tap into Jon's pulse of the industry with an extended Deliberation segment.

Kohberger's latest motion & jurors going onlineOn Breaking the Case with Jen Coffindaffer FBI, Jen is joined by veteran attorney Lawyer Schiff to break down two fascinating issues involving the criminal justice system.First, they examine Bryan Kohberger's latest motion challenging his guilty plea, focusing on newly unsealed information about concerns raised by his defense team regarding his competency and mental health before the plea.They discuss Boykin rights, competency, appellate review, and whether the plea could ultimately be challenged.Then the conversation turns to a major modern-day jury problem: jurors using their phones and accessing information online during high-profile trials. The discussion explores how the internet can undermine jury instructions and whether the traditional jury system is equipped for today's digital world.Could technology force major changes to the way juries operate?#BreakTheCase #BryanKohberger #Kohberger #IdahoMurders #KohbergerCase #JuryDuty #Jurors #JuryDeliberations #CriminalJustice #LegalAnalysis #Courtroom #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #JenCoffindaffer #LawyerSchiff #CoffindafferFBI

Jordan Cash is Associate Professor in the James Madison College at Michigan State University.Faculty web page: https://jmc.msu.edu/directory/c/jordan-cashHis books include:- Adding the Lone Star: John Tyler, Sam Houston, and the Annexation of Texas. University Press of Kansas, 2024- The Isolated Presidency. Oxford University Press, 2024- (with Kevin Burns) eds., Congressional Deliberation: Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023. 2024- (with Tony Bartl) eds., Constitutionalism and Liberty: Essays in Honor of David K. Nichols. Lexington Books, 2025Other works referenced:- David K. Nichols, "Gouveneur Morris and the Creation of American Constitutionalism," in Natural Right and Political Philosophy, Ward and Ward eds., University of Notre Dame Press.- Ewing, Kleinerman, and Zug eds., Beyond Checks and Balances: The Political Purpose of Separation of Powers, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2026

As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, our lives are increasingly influenced by decisions made outside our national constituencies. Today, government actionsare likely to affect many people who never participated in elections in which the government in question ran for office. This applies to various policy areas but seems especially true in the financial sphere. As the financial crisis in the late 2000's has shown, the absence of governmental oversight regardingfinancial activities in a country can have consequences far beyond its borders.One mechanism to address this is transnational peer review of financial regulators. Such peer review aims to enable supervisory convergence and dissemination of best practices. Yet, mechanisms of transnational governance themselves are often claimed to undermine democracy by giving decision-making power to experts and thereby taking it out of the hands of publicly elected officials. In this conversation, Yane Svetiev analyzes processes of peer review of financial regulators – both their peril and their promise.

Seven days. Twelve jurors. Seven weeks of testimony. Psychiatric experts on both sides. And the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court came down to one man who admitted he had reasonable doubt and still refused to vote for acquittal.The jurors are speaking publicly for the first time. Foreperson Roni Carlson said the holdout told the room he had reasonable doubt about Clancy's guilt after watching a recorded interview played in evidence. Carlson began signing the verdict forms. Then the holdout reversed and said he would not change his position.Other jurors said the holdout disregarded testimony explanations from nurses serving on the jury. Juror Paula Devlin called him arrogant and said he refused to engage with information that contradicted his position. The jury sent a formal note to Judge William Sullivan stating one member was not following the court's reasonable doubt instructions.The psychological toll on the jury was severe. Jurors described being physically sick leaving the courthouse. The 911 call Patrick Clancy made after discovering what happened on January 24, 2023 left jurors in tears every night.Lindsay Clancy was charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington conceded the killings and argued postpartum psychosis.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke breaks down the behavioral dynamics of a holdout juror under group pressure, how trauma from evidence affects deliberation, and whether the system can call any jury fair when the evidence itself causes lasting psychological harm.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #HungJury #RobinDreeke #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

Tony Dokoupil speaks with Port Authority police officer Will Jimeno and the Rev. Michael Bird, two people who stepped up after the 9/11 attacks.Retired detective Phil Alvarez, whose brother Luis died of cancer linked to the toxins at Ground Zero, talks about marking 25 years since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and how his organization is working to extend the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund.Ron Fazio Sr. was last seen holding the door for others escaping the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. Now his son honors his memory with Hold the Door for Others, a nonprofit that helps people grow and grieve after trauma, crisis and loss.On Sept. 11, 2001, Vanessa Minter, an American Airlines reservations agent, answered Betty Ong's call from one of the hijacked planes during the terror attacks. In an exclusive interview with Jonah Kaplan, Minter recalls the flight attendant's bravery and finally meets Ong's family 25 years later.Lindsay Clancy trial juror reveals new details about holdout juror and jury deliberationsSome tech insiders are sounding the alarm on the dangers of artificial intelligence, which could be used to disable critical infrastructure or create biological weapons. Dr. Céline Gounder weighs in.

Shannon's 8:30 Dirty 9-10-2026See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The music world and legal analysts are watching closely as the high-profile federal case reaches its most critical juncture. In this episode, we break down everything you need to know now that Lil Durk's fate is in the jury's hands. Following intense closing arguments from both the prosecution and the defense in Los Angeles, a 12-member federal jury has begun deliberations in the murder-for-hire conspiracy trial. We examine the core arguments presented in court, including the government's claims tying the rapper to a 2022 shooting, and the defense team's aggressive pushback against cooperating witnesses. We also look ahead at what a guilty verdict or an acquittal means for the Chicago hip-hop star, including potential sentencing outcomes and looming separate legal challenges. In this episode, you will learn:The precise charges Lil Durk faces and the evidence introduced during the federal trial. Key takeaways from the prosecution's narrative and the defense's strategy led by attorneys like Brian Steel and Drew Findling. How jury deliberations work and what factors could influence a unanimous decision. Potential outcomes for Lil Durk, including ongoing legal hurdles regardless of the verdict. Who this episode is for:This breakdown is essential for hip-hop culture enthusiasts, true crime followers, and legal junkies wanting a factual, clear-eyed look at one of the biggest celebrity trials of the decade.Stay ahead of the breaking legal updates. Subscribe and follow our show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred platform. If this episode helped you make sense of the headlines, please leave a 5-star review and share this episode with friends and fellow fans.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/chaos-culture-radio--3078307/support.Follow Chaos Culture Radio for real conversations that move culture forward.New episodes every week.Share this episode with someone who needs to hear it.

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial has left major questions about what happened inside the jury room. Now, jurors are speaking out about their deliberations, disagreements, and why they could not reach a unanimous verdict. In this episode, STS breaks down what jurors revealed, the key issues that divided them, and what the Lindsay Clancy mistrial could mean moving forward.Key Points:Lindsay Clancy jurors speak out after mistrialWhat happened during jury deliberationsWhy jurors could not reach a unanimous verdictKey disagreements inside the jury roomProsecution and defense argumentsQuestions surrounding Lindsay Clancy's mental stateCriminal responsibility versus legal insanityWhat jurors focused on during deliberationsWhat the mistrial means for the caseWhat could happen nextThe Lindsay Clancy mistrial has opened the door to new insight into one of the most closely watched criminal cases. Jurors are now sharing details about their deliberations, giving a rare look at the disagreements and questions that prevented them from reaching a verdict. STS examines what the jurors revealed, which evidence created the biggest challenges, and how the prosecution and defense arguments shaped the debate. The Lindsay Clancy mistrial also raises important questions about her mental state, criminal responsibility, and the possibility of another trial. What really happened during deliberations, and what can the jurors' comments tell us about where the case broke down? STS breaks down the latest developments and what may come next. Follow the STS Podcast for survivor stories, true crime news, cold cases, and real crime stories.Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial are speaking out after the mistrial, revealing new details about jury deliberations, the holdout juror and what happened behind closed doors. After weeks of testimony in the Duxbury, Massachusetts murder trial, the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the deaths of Clancy's three children, Cora, Dawson and Callan.Surviving the Survivor (STS) breaks down the jurors' new interviews and what their revelations could mean for Lindsay Clancy and the possibility of another trial. Our #BestGuests analyze the mistrial, the divided jury, the insanity defense, postpartum psychosis and what prosecutors and the defense may do next.Subscribe, Like & Set Alerts to "ALL" for show times & breaking news. https://www.youtube.com/@SurvivingThe...Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-yr...Support the show & be a part of #STSNation:Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorEmail: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.comSurviving The Survivor is a leading destination for true crime analysis, breaking crime news, murder trial coverage, criminal investigations, courtroom breakdowns, and live case discussions.Hosted by Emmy Award-winning journalist Joel Waldman and his mother Karm, a child Holocaust survivor, STS brings together top FBI profilers, homicide detectives, criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, forensic experts, journalists, victims' advocates, and survivors to analyze the biggest true crime stories.From high-profile murder cases and missing persons investigations to serial killers, criminal psychology, police procedures, and major court trials, STS delivers fact-based reporting and expert insight from those who have worked some of the nation's most notorious cases.Known for having the best guest in true crime, STS gives viewers direct access to the experts behind the headlines. Join #STSNation for live shows, breaking updates, audience Q&As, and in-depth case analysis. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In the midst of a fierce trade war, Ottawa wants to reduce its reliance on the U.S. But Canada's former defence minister says pivoting away from American military hardware is a challenge the government hasn't quite figured out. A former UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories praises Canada for joining a ban on imports from Israeli settlements. But Michael Lynk says that move is just a start. Deliberations are about to begin over designs for a revitalized prime minister's residence. The head of the jury, celebrated architect Moshe Safdie, tells us what the future could hold for 24 Sussex.A fungus leaves corn kernels an unappetizing grey-black colour, but those unsightly cobs are a beautiful Mexican delicacy that's now being embraced by foodies north of the Rio Grande. It was in the Smithsonian for more than 150 years, but now, the last known pelt of an extinct woolly dog has finally been returned to its former Pacific habitat. A Sami reindeer herder in Sweden worries about the survival of his culture — as politicians debate whether a desire to mine rare earth minerals trumps his people's land rights. Enter, if you dare, the corn maze of one New Brunswick farm, which celebrates the corn-sistent corn-tributions of PWHL great Marie-Philippe Poulin, by being shaped like her face. As It Happens, the Tuesday Edition. Radio that's always looking at the broader corn-text.

As jurors struggle to reach a verdict in the Lindsay Clancy trial, "48 Hours" correspondent Natalie Morales and WBZ-TV reporter and anchor Kristina Rex unpack escalating jury-room tensions, the impact of the closing arguments on jurors, and discussions on postpartum mental health at the heart of the case.

Before jurors began deliberating again this morning, things got heated once again between Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington and Judge Sullivan. Reddington wanted the holdout juror to be questioned in open court, but the judge ultimately denied his request, saying there was no indication the juror has refused to deliberate or follow the law. Reddington then accused the judge of softly, glossing over his instructions to the jury, and that’s when Sullivan fired back, defending himself. The judge ultimately gave new, slightly more forceful instructions to jurors before sending them back to deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It’s anyone’s guess what may happen when court resumes at 9am in the triple murder trial of Lindsay Clancy. We heard from Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, that the judge will first hold an inquiry into the juror identified for refusing to follow the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Depending on how that goes, jurors are then expected to resume deliberations for the seventh day, up against the timeline of a holiday weekend.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stunning new developments in what began as a profound human tragedy, and has become a riveting courtroom drama that could come down to one single juror. A deadlocked jury has been sent home after a sixth day of deliberations in the Lindsay Clancy trial, the Massachusetts mother accused of murder after strangling her three young children in 2023. Plus, Vice President Vance tells reporters “I wouldn't call Iran a war right now.” Anderson talks about that with Republican Rep. Pat Harrigan, a retired Army special forces officer who served in Afghanistan and earned two bronze stars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Before jurors began deliberating again this morning, things got heated once again between Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington and Judge Sullivan. Reddington wanted the holdout juror to be questioned in open court, but the judge ultimately denied his request, saying there was no indication the juror has refused to deliberate or follow the law. Reddington then accused the judge of softly, glossing over his instructions to the jury, and that’s when Sullivan fired back, defending himself. The judge ultimately gave new, slightly more forceful instructions to jurors before sending them back to deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It’s anyone’s guess what may happen when court resumes at 9am in the triple murder trial of Lindsay Clancy. We heard from Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, that the judge will first hold an inquiry into the juror identified for refusing to follow the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Depending on how that goes, jurors are then expected to resume deliberations for the seventh day, up against the timeline of a holiday weekend.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It’s anyone’s guess what may happen when court resumes at 9am in the triple murder trial of Lindsay Clancy. We heard from Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, that the judge will first hold an inquiry into the juror identified for refusing to follow the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Depending on how that goes, jurors are then expected to resume deliberations for the seventh day, up against the timeline of a holiday weekend.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Before jurors began deliberating again this morning, things got heated once again between Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington and Judge Sullivan. Reddington wanted the holdout juror to be questioned in open court, but the judge ultimately denied his request, saying there was no indication the juror has refused to deliberate or follow the law. Reddington then accused the judge of softly, glossing over his instructions to the jury, and that’s when Sullivan fired back, defending himself. The judge ultimately gave new, slightly more forceful instructions to jurors before sending them back to deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

HOUR 1: After 6 weeks of a trial, 1 week of deliberations. Lindsay Clancy trial declared mistrial. full 2481 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 19:00:00 +0000 U33qgPrZktJEUF0dYz7499lvDHGTSdSk news The Dana & Parks Podcast news HOUR 1: After 6 weeks of a trial, 1 week of deliberations. Lindsay Clancy trial declared mistrial. You wanted it... Now here it is! Listen to each hour of the Dana & Parks Show whenever and wherever you want! © 2025 Audacy, Inc. News

Lindsay Clancy trial: nine women, three men, a dynamite charge, and a reprobate mind. She does not deny killing Cora, Dawson, and Callan. On January 24, 2023, Lindsay Clancy sent Patrick Clancy out for takeout, then strangled her three children in the Duxbury basement. Prosecutors say she acted intentionally. The defense says postpartum psychosis erases criminal responsibility. After five days, the Lindsay Clancy jury told the judge it could not agree. He gave jurors the dynamite charge, a harsh push intended to break the deadlock and avoid a mistrial. Jason Whitlock argues she made herself her own idol, that God handed her over to a reprobate mind, and that feminism relocated the victim from the children to the mother who can still speak. ➢ Show Outline 0:00 - Lindsay Clancy Case and the Deadlocked Jury 1:05 - Idolatry, Covetousness and a Reprobate Mind 2:45 - Abortion Culture and How We View Motherhood 7:17 - Panel Reacts to the Verdict Struggle 11:09 - Sin, Systems and the Cliff of Morality 14:52 - Nihilism, Feminism and the Sin Problem 23:10 - Explaining vs Excusing Behavior 24:51 - Biblical Accountability and Finding Purpose in Prison ➢ Follow Our GUESTS https://www.youtube.com/@AnthonyWalker1 https://www.youtube.com/@TheShemekaMichelle  https://www.youtube.com/@DreAllDay ➢ Subscribe to Jason's other channel https://www.youtube.com/JasonWhitlock?sub_confirmation=1 https://www.youtube.com/@JasonWhitlockHarmony?sub_confirmation=1 https://www.youtube.com/@JasonWhitlockBYOG?sub_confirmation=1 https://www.youtube.com/@JasonWhitlockClips?sub_confirmation=1 ➢ Connect with Jason on Social Media:  https://x.com/JasonWhitlock  https://www.instagram.com/realjasonwhitlock/ https://www.facebook.com/jasonwhitlock ➢ Send Jason an Email FearlessBlazeShow@gmail.com ➢ Support The Blaze Visit https://TheBlaze.com. Explore the all-new ad-free experience and see for yourself how we're standing up against suppression and prioritizing independent journalism. Support Conservative Voices! Subscribe to BlazeTV at https://www.fearlessmission.com and get $20 off your yearly subscription. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The 12 jurors for the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial are headed back to deliberations this morning, after trying to reach a verdict for nearly 30 hours over the past five days. The. Jury began deliberating LAST Thursday, and now, a full week later they continue after the judge issued a “Tuey Rodriguez” charge Wednesday afternoon, urging the group to reconsider their positions to try and find consensus. Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington says he’s ready to retry the case as soon as next week if a mistrial is declared, but acknowledged that regardless of the outcome, this case is a tragedy, reminding eporters that jurors have been through a very traumatic event.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After 36 hours of trying to reach a verdict, the jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial will return on Friday for their seventh day of deliberations. But we just heard from defense attorney Kevin Reddington who told reporters there will first be an inquiry into the juror who reportedly refused to follow the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Reddington hope that inquiry will be in open court, after his motion to remove the juror was denied this afternoon.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After 36 hours of trying to reach a verdict, the jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial will return on Friday for their seventh day of deliberations. But we just heard from defense attorney Kevin Reddington who told reporters there will first be an inquiry into the juror who reportedly refused to follow the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Reddington hope that inquiry will be in open court, after his motion to remove the juror was denied this afternoon.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The 12 jurors for the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial are headed back to deliberations this morning, after trying to reach a verdict for nearly 30 hours over the past five days. The jury began deliberating LAST Thursday, and now, a full week later they continue after the judge issued a “Tuey Rodriguez” charge Wednesday afternoon, urging the group to reconsider their positions to try and find consensus. Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington says he’s ready to retry the case as soon as next week if a mistrial is declared, but acknowledged that regardless of the outcome, this case is a tragedy, reminding reporters that jurors have been through a very traumatic event.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Redo from an earlier episode - the jury foreperson said there's 1 juror who will not follow the law regarding reaosnable doubt. WHat happened next is something I have never seen before. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)

After 36 hours of trying to reach a verdict, the jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial will return on Friday for their seventh day of deliberations. But we just heard from defense attorney Kevin Reddington who told reporters there will first be an inquiry into the juror who reportedly refused to follow the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Reddington hope that inquiry will be in open court, after his motion to remove the juror was denied this afternoon.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The 12 jurors for the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial are headed back to deliberations this morning, after trying to reach a verdict for nearly 30 hours over the past five days. The jury began deliberating LAST Thursday, and now, a full week later they continue after the judge issued a “Tuey Rodriguez” charge Wednesday afternoon, urging the group to reconsider their positions to try and find consensus. Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington says he’s ready to retry the case as soon as next week if a mistrial is declared, but acknowledged that regardless of the outcome, this case is a tragedy, reminding reporters that jurors have been through a very traumatic event.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial remains deadlocked after five days of deliberations, twice telling the judge they cannot reach a unanimous verdict. Now, after Judge William Sullivan delivered a formal instruction urging jurors to keep trying, could the next note from the jury bring the trial to an end? Veteran true-crime journalist Ted Rowlands joins Chanley to discuss how close the case may be to a hung jury, what happens if a mistrial is declared, and whether prosecutors could try Clancy again. Plus, they examine the growing tension outside the courthouse after a woman was accused of filming jurors, and whether outside influences could become an issue for the defense. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Jurors are expected back in court at 9am this morning to begin their 5th day of deliberations after telling the judge on Tuesday they were deadlocked. The jury of 12 will begin their 23rd hour of deliberations, trying to determine whether or not Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for the strangling deaths of her three young children. As jurors left the courthouse on Tuesday, a 56-year-old woman was arrested and charged after reportedly filming members of the jury. Meantime, Clancy’s defense attorney still has hope that jurors will be able to reach a consensus, telling reporters he is heartened they are working hard, and have not said yet, that they’re done.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Judge in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial began the morning with a veiled, yet stern announcement, reminding everyone in the courtroom the statutes governing conduct within the proceedings. Without getting specific, it appears the judge was referring to the arrest of a woman photographing jurors outside the courthouse yesterday. Reporters in the courtroom then witnessed the judge asking each juror a question one by one with attorneys from both sides present, before dismissing them to begin their deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors are expected back in court at 9am this morning to begin their 5th day of deliberations after telling the judge on Tuesday they were deadlocked. The jury of 12 will begin their 23rd hour of deliberations, trying to determine whether or not Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for the strangling deaths of her three young children. As jurors left the courthouse on Tuesday, a 56-year-old woman was arrested and charged after reportedly filming members of the jury. Meantime, Clancy’s defense attorney still has hope that jurors will be able to reach a consensus, telling reporters he is heartened they are working hard, and have not said yet, that they’re done.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Judge in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial began the morning with a veiled, yet stern announcement, reminding everyone in the courtroom the statutes governing conduct within the proceedings. Without getting specific, it appears the judge was referring to the arrest of a woman photographing jurors outside the courthouse yesterday. Reporters in the courtroom then witnessed the judge asking each juror a question one by one with attorneys from both sides present, before dismissing them to begin their deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)

The Judge in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial began the morning with a veiled, yet stern announcement, reminding everyone in the courtroom the statutes governing conduct within the proceedings. Without getting specific, it appears the judge was referring to the arrest of a woman photographing jurors outside the courthouse yesterday. Reporters in the courtroom then witnessed the judge asking each juror a question one by one with attorneys from both sides present, before dismissing them to begin their deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors are expected back in court at 9am this morning to begin their 5th day of deliberations after telling the judge on Tuesday they were deadlocked. The jury of 12 will begin their 23rd hour of deliberations, trying to determine whether or not Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for the strangling deaths of her three young children. As jurors left the courthouse on Tuesday, a 56-year-old woman was arrested and charged after reportedly filming members of the jury. Meantime, Clancy’s defense attorney still has hope that jurors will be able to reach a consensus, telling reporters he is heartened they are working hard, and have not said yet, that they’re done.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial is back at it, beginning their 4th day of deliberations. As of this morning, the jury has already deliberated for 17 hours, which makes this verdict watch one of the longest in recent high profile murder trials. We go over what the judge’s options are if the jury says they’re deadlocked. While the state of Massachusetts does not allow an Allen charge, they do have another type of charge, called the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction. It’s certainly controversial and considered a last ditch effort to encourage jurors into a compromise. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ep 376: Join Amy and Meghan in a live recording, as they discuss the Lindsay Clancy trial as the jury heads into deliberation. We'll be discussing the case, Trial strategy, criminological theories and our opinions on the case. Sponsors: (using our promo codes, supports the show!) Hungryroot - You're going to love Hungryroot as much as we do. For a limited time get 40% off your first order PLUS get a free item in every box for life. Go to Hungryroot.com/WAC, code WAC . Credits: Written and Hosted by Amy Shlosberg and Meghan Sacks Produced by James Varga Audio Editor, Music by Dessert Media Get Even More Women&Crime Episodes: Patreon - Ad-free shows starting at $2 a month, or upgrade for $5 a month to get a new extra episode every month, as well as exclusive virtual HappyHours with Meg & Amy. Check-out other tiers for perks such as lectures, true crime book club, and more! Visit our Patreon page for more info: https://www.patreon.com/womenandcrime/ Apple Subscriptions - Exclusive episodes and ad-free regular stories are now available through Apple's podcast app for only $4.99 a month, or save with an annual membership. YouTube Memberships - Exclusive episode available on YouTube for only $4.99 a month. https://www.youtube.com/@WomenandCrime/membership/ Help is Available: If you or someone you know is in a crisis situation, or a victim of domestic, or other violence, there are many organizations that can offer support or help you in your specific situation. For direct links to these organizations please visit https://womenandcrimepodcast.com/resources/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial is back at it, beginning their 4th day of deliberations. As of this morning, the jury has already deliberated for 17 hours, which makes this verdict watch one of the longest in recent high profile murder trials. We go over what the judge’s options are if the jury says they’re deadlocked. While the state of Massachusetts does not allow an Allen charge, they do have another type of charge, called the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction. It’s certainly controversial and considered a last ditch effort to encourage jurors into a compromise. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Day 4 of deliberations begins in the Lindsay Clancy trial, however, the jury has already told the judge they cannot reach a unanimous decision. Potential staffers exposed "rude" Meghan Markle's interview process. Plus, Rob Reiner's son Jake Reiner gets married 8 months after tragic deaths. See if you could save when you switch to Progressive. You'll feel good about making a savvy choice. Visit https://www.progressive.com/ and see if you can enjoy a little extra cash back.Become a Member of No Filter: ALL ACCESS: https://allaccess.supercast.com/ Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb Disclaimer: The views expressed in this video, on this YouTube Channel, and on No Filter with Zack Peter are for entertainment purposes only. All content is protected under Fair Use Rights.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial is back at it, beginning their 4th day of deliberations. As of this morning, the jury has already deliberated for 17 hours, which makes this verdict watch one of the longest in recent high profile murder trials. We go over what the judge’s options are if the jury says they’re deadlocked. While the state of Massachusetts does not allow an Allen charge, they do have another type of charge, called the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction. It’s certainly controversial and considered a last ditch effort to encourage jurors into a compromise. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The jury continues deliberating in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial. RHOA alum Kim Zolciak is speaking out in defense of her 15 year old son who was arrested on SA charges. D4vd is back in court. And Dolly Parton is laid to rest at age 80. See if you could save when you switch to Progressive. You'll feel good about making a savvy choice. Visit https://www.progressive.com/ and see if you can enjoy a little extra cash back.Become a Member of No Filter: ALL ACCESS: https://allaccess.supercast.com/ Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb Disclaimer: The views expressed in this video, on this YouTube Channel, and on No Filter with Zack Peter are for entertainment purposes only. All content is protected under Fair Use Rights.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Lindsay Clancy jury will continue deliberations Monday, but they've already deliberated longer than the juries in the trials of OJ, Dahmer, Scott Peterson, Alex Murdaugh, and Susan Smith. But they've got a long way to go if they're going to deliberate as long as the Charles Manson jury. Amy and T.J. go through the deliberation times in some famous cases (MJ, Chauvin, Cosby, Yates, Zimmerman, etc) and see what it tells us the Clancy jury. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Lindsay Clancy jury will continue deliberations Monday, but they've already deliberated longer than the juries in the trials of OJ, Dahmer, Scott Peterson, Alex Murdaugh, and Susan Smith. But they've got a long way to go if they're going to deliberate as long as the Charles Manson jury. Amy and T.J. go through the deliberation times in some famous cases (MJ, Chauvin, Cosby, Yates, Zimmerman, etc) and see what it tells us the Clancy jury. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors begin deliberating Lindsay Clancy's fate after closing arguments clash over whether she was psychotic or deliberately killed her three children - The MK True Crime Show co-host Phil Holloway weighs in. A military judge sets a tentative June 2028 trial date for alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and three accused accomplices. A Rutgers University dean is arrested and barred from campus after investigators allegedly discover “upskirt” videos on one of his devices. Thieves steal nearly all of a priceless 3,000-year-old gold collection from a Spanish museum in less than four minutes. Subscribe now to Emily's "After Party": Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/after-party-with-emily-jashinsky/id1821493726 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0szVa30NjGYsyIzzBoBCtJ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@AfterPartyEmily?sub_confirmation=1 Byrna: Go to https://Byrna.com or your local Sportsman's Warehouse today. Lean: Discover why LEAN is becoming the choice for real weight‑loss results—shop now at https://TAKELEAN.com use code MK. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

We continue to be on verdict watch as 9 women and 3 men continue a second day of deliberations, with no verdict as of yet. Earlier today, Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, told reporters the jurors asked to see the bag of empty pill bottles found in Clancy’s nightstand, as well as the bloody knife she used in her suicide attempt. Reddington also let the press know how Clancy was holding up, as the rest of us wait to hear word from the jury.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.