Podcasts about deliberations

In the fast-paced world of work, the simple act of observation is often overlooked—yet it offers a real and measurable edge. Research shows that the ability to “read the room,” such as recognizing emotions in others' faces and voices, provides valuable insight into unspoken dynamics like mood shifts, alliances, or resistance.  Observation creates the feeling of being seen and heard—for both the observer and those around them. Observation requires not focusing cognitively, but noticing yourself, others, and the environment in real time, with awareness and intention. Writer David Brooks refers to particularly attentive individuals as “illuminators”—those who are persistently curious about others and help people feel truly understood. In contrast, “diminishers” are too self-absorbed to notice what's happening around them. Despite our good intentions, there are forces that work against our ability to observe. Power, for instance, has been shown to reduce perspective-taking and awareness of others. To combat this, leaders and people in power should deliberately switch into “observer mode,” especially in rooms where power dynamics are unequal. Other barriers include our negativity bias (we over-focusing on flaws), inattentional blindness (we miss what's routine or familiar), and our psychological state (stress and urgency diminish our ability to notice others' needs). There are practical, field-tested strategies to restore and strengthen observational power. Techniques include strategies listing “three good things” noticed during the day, using two-column notes (content vs. process), timeboxed round-robins to ensure equal airtime, and asking diagnostic questions like “What are we not seeing?” or “How could this fail?” Silent writing before group discussions helps quieter observers contribute, while brief reflective summaries during meetings—e.g., “Here's what I'm hearing; what did I miss?”—can flush out hidden disagreement and signal active listening. Finally, leaders should watch out for “power fog.” When those in charge speak with certainty, it's critical to double-check assumptions and seek out dissenting or overlooked perspectives.  Observation is a particularly crucial leadership tool—but it is important for all of us - and as Kirsten says, observation is surprisingly entertaining, often revealing, and always worth slowing down for. Good Reads: PubMedMoodle@UnitsPMC The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions Are Women the Silent Sex? Power and Perspectives Not Taken What Great Listeners Actually Do

The jury has reached its verdict in the trial of croc wrangler Matt Wright — but not without a twist.In this episode, reporters Olivana Lathouris and Matt Garrick join Stephen Stockwell to take you inside the courtroom as the decision was handed down and discuss what comes next for Matt Wright.If you have any questions you'd like Oli and Stocky to answer in future episodes, please email thecaseof@abc.net.au.The Case Of is the follow-up to the hit podcast Mushroom Case Daily, and all episodes of that show will remain available in the back catalogue of The Case Of.--It's the trial everyone in Darwin is talking about. In February 2022 a helicopter on a crocodile egg collection mission crashed in remote Arnhem Land, killing the egg collector and paralysing the pilot.NT Croc Wrangler Matt Wright isn't on trial for the crash, but for what allegedly he did after. Charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice, prosecutors say he tried to interfere with the investigation.Matt Wright has pled not guilty and denies all the allegations.To hear the background of this story, listen to our episode introducing the case of the croc wrangler.The Case Of is the follow-up to the hit ABC podcast Mushroom Case Daily. The response to Mushroom Case Daily was overwhelming, with more than 8000 emails from listeners, many of them noting how the coverage had given them unprecedented insight into Australia's criminal judicial system. We decided to convert the podcast into an ongoing trial coverage feed to continue delivering on this front, following cases that capture the public's attention.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Waupaca County Sheriff’s Office is conducting a death investigation in Waushara County.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

If we had the power to design our own political system, what would it look like? Stanford Professor James Fishkin talks with Steve about deliberative democracy, a method that brings together diverse, representative groups to weigh policy trade-offs in a fact-based, civil environment. He maintains that when people get the chance to discuss issues in depth, they often move away from extremes, suggesting that polarization isn't as unbreakable as pundits claim. James presents some examples, like how deliberative polling in Texas led to a massive shift toward wind energy. Steve acknowledges his skepticism and asks whether James believes this could translate into real power, like shaping a federal job guarantee or breaking the corporate stranglehold on policy. James argues that while deliberative democracy isn't a magic fix, it's a tool to cut through misinformation and empower ordinary people, offering a glimpse of what democracy could be. (When we wrest control from the hands of the ruling class.) James S. Fishkin holds the Janet M. Peck Chair in International Communication at Stanford University where he is Professor of Communication, Professor of Political Science (by courtesy) and Director of the Deliberative Democracy Lab.He is the author of Democracy When the People Are Thinking (Oxford 2018), When the People Speak (Oxford 2009), Deliberation Day (Yale 2004 with Bruce Ackerman) and Democracy and Deliberation (Yale 1991).He is best known for developing Deliberative Polling® – a practice of public consultation that employs random samples of the citizenry to explore how opinions would change if they were more informed. His work on deliberative democracy has stimulated more than 100 Deliberative Polls in 28 countries around the world. It has been used to help governments and policy makers make important decisions in Texas, China, Mongolia, Japan, Macau, South Korea, Bulgaria, Brazil, Uganda and other countries around the world.

Michael Smerconish speaks with Stanford political scientist Dr. James Fishkin about his groundbreaking book "Can Deliberation Cure the Ills of Democracy?" They explore how bringing diverse Americans together for civil, informed discussion—through experiments like America in One Room—can reduce polarization and lead to surprising consensus. A hopeful look at democratic reform in a divided age. Original air date 15 July 2025. The book was published on 3 July 2025.

The guys rounded out the final 2 spots of the QB symposium in this final hour.

Join WRESTLING LEGEND LuFisto and Jeff Lippman in the third edition of 'LFG, BOIL EM, FRY EM, PUT EM IN A STEW!' The duo dives deep into recent episode of LFG, including: wrestling matches, discussing key aspects and performances. With extensive notes and analysis, they evaluate the contestants' strategies and moves, while also debating the effectiveness of different coaching styles. Special highlights include Serena's transformation and Elijah Holyfield's impactful performance. The episode also delves into wrestling dynamics, discusses the evolution of women's wrestling, and previews future events.00:00 Introduction and Hosts' Weekly Recap00:35 Analyzing the Matches and Coaching Insights03:50 Heel vs. Babyface Dynamics08:22 Character Development and Match Strategies11:36 Match Reviews and Critiques19:26 Main Event and Final Thoughts35:08 Elijah Holyfield's Performance and Potential36:09 Harlem's Style and Potential Changes36:53 Serena's Standout Performance38:32 Judges' Deliberations and Voting39:31 Discussion on Wrestling Styles and Characters47:38 Evolution 2: Lack of Build-Up and Anticipation50:54 Excitement for Upcoming Matches and Events57:59 Final Thoughts and Podcast PromotionsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wrestling-soup--1425249/support.

The D'artagnans are faced with a moral dilemma and try to come to the best conclusion. They parlay with the previous general of the Tenebris and discuss their options at length. While the rest of the group reaches an accord, Athena hesitates. She communes with Archimedes for guidance. Río and Athena have very different points of view. Athena goes back to Hesto alone.

All of us here are conscious. If you notice, when you look around, you can see somebody, and you feel that somebody's looking back at you. There's a conscious being there. You look at the wall; you don't get the same experience, because there's no consciousness in the wall, but there is within each one of our bodies. And as Krishna describes in the Bhagavad Gītā, we are conscious beings—a person. A person is a conscious entity, and we inhabit a body. It's not that we are the body; we inhabit the body. And the superior energy, Krishna describes in the Bhagavad Gītā, is all of the conscious beings in this world who are inside a material body, which is an apparatus through which we can engage with the lower energies in the world. For instance, I have eyes, and I can touch the objects of my eyes, the light, and it comes back to me in different forms and shapes, and it gets interpreted by my brain. I can be aware of the shapes and colors of the world, and that goes for all the different senses. However, the difference is important because when we're taking conscious control of our life, The Bhagavad Gītā describes how we must be deliberate in what we do. To do that, we have to deliberate. Deliberation is one of the processes that leads to spiritual enlightenment. If you think of the word "deliberate," everyone say it, please. I should say, I don't mean to be so demanding. You might notice a word within the word "deliberate," which is "Libra." Have you ever heard "Libra"? I was born on September twenty- seventh, so I am a Libra according to the Sun calendar. And what is the sign of Libra? Any Libras in here? Alright, it's a pan scale. There are two sides. You put something on one side or the other, and then you can, for instance, put a cauliflower on one side, if you go to the Green Market, and you put a weight on the other side. When it balances out, you can tell how much it weighs. So, "deliberate"—there's a way in which one should weigh out the consequences of what we do. That's one of the teachings of the Bhagavad Gītā. It sounds rather simple, but how do we do that? One of the ways we start is by understanding the different categories of energy. So, let me give you an example of how this applies or can apply in our lives. We're taking conscious control of our life. In the Bhagavad Gītā, Krishna mentions that.. ------------------------------------------------------------ To connect with His Grace Vaiśeṣika Dāsa, please visit https://www.fanthespark.com/next-steps/ask-vaisesika-dasa/ ------------------------------------------------------------ Add to your wisdom literature collection: https://iskconsv.com/book-store/ https://www.bbtacademic.com/books/ https://thefourquestionsbook.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------ Join us live on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FanTheSpark/ Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/sound-bhakti/id1132423868 For the latest videos, subscribe https://www.youtube.com/@FanTheSpark For the latest in SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/fan-the-spark ------------------------------------------------------------ #spiritualawakening #soul #spiritualexperience #spiritualpurposeoflife #spiritualgrowthlessons #secretsofspirituality #vaisesikaprabhu #vaisesikadasa #vaisesikaprabhulectures #spirituality #bhaktiyoga #krishna #spiritualpurposeoflife #krishnaspirituality #spiritualusachannel #whybhaktiisimportant #whyspiritualityisimportant #vaisesika #spiritualconnection #thepowerofspiritualstudy #selfrealization #spirituallectures #spiritualstudy #spiritualquestions #spiritualquestionsanswered #trendingspiritualtopics #fanthespark #spiritualpowerofmeditation #spiritualteachersonyoutube #spiritualhabits #spiritualclarity #bhagavadgita #srimadbhagavatam #spiritualbeings #kttvg #keepthetranscendentalvibrationgoing #spiritualpurpose

Kevin Sheehan has the knowledge on all things Commanders fan are worried abut right now...the uniform and RFK Stadium 2.0 actually happening. Craig has a great conversation with him and follows up the remainder of the hour on it.

ICYMI: Hour One of ‘Later, with Mo'Kelly' Presents – Thoughts on the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs sex trafficking trial deliberations AND the tragic attack at a Hollywood 7-Eleven that left an employee ‘clinically dead'…PLUS – A look at the revitalization of SeaWorld San Diego with the Ying Yang Twins and more - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app & YouTube @MrMoKelly

This is the All Local morning update for July 2, 2025.

Greg Bishop provides the latest in the case challenging Illinois' prohibition of carrying concealed carry on mass transit and shares a conversation with Illinois State Rifle Association Executive Director Richard Pearson about an appeals court setting Sept. 22 for oral arguments in the case challenging the state's gun and magazine ban.

To reduce the chasm of polarization in American Politics, Professor Fishkin has developed a successful process of Deliberative Polling that he has employed in 160 cases in the US and overseas to great success.

Increased Gas Tax Hits California Drivers Please Subscribe + Rate & Review Philip Teresi on KMJ wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Philip Teresi is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi, Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs are set to begin deliberations on Monday, June 30, marking the final and most consequential phase of a case that has gripped both the entertainment world and the legal community. After seven weeks of testimony—including 34 prosecution witnesses, graphic accounts of abuse from women like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” and surveillance footage showing Combs assaulting Cassie in 2016—the case now shifts entirely to the jury's interpretation of the facts. The 12 jurors, made up of eight men and four women, will return to court to receive final legal instructions before beginning deliberations behind closed doors. No witnesses were called by the defense, and Combs himself did not testify. Instead, his team focused on cross-examining the accusers and portraying the case as one built on exaggeration, greed, and consensual behavior taken out of context.The jury now faces the task of evaluating five serious federal charges: racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, and two counts of transporting individuals across state lines for the purpose of prostitution under the Mann Act. Legal analysts note that while the Mann Act charges are more straightforward, the racketeering and trafficking counts involve far more complex determinations—requiring the jury to weigh consent versus coercion, patterns of control, and the credibility of the women who testified. The deliberations could last days or even longer, depending on how sharply divided the panel is on interpreting the law and the evidence. At stake is the question of whether one of the most powerful figures in modern music will face decades—if not life—in prison, or walk away vindicated after one of the most sensational celebrity trials in years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:At the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Trial, Jurors Are Ready to Deliberate - The New York Times

Diddy Deliberations Begin, Big Beautiful Bill In Trouble, Epstein Associate Loses Case | AOA Podcast#diddy #epstein #bigbeautifulbillDonate to the Star Legacy Foundationhttps://secure.qgiv.com/event/letsnotbestillnewyork-2024/team/972576/?fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAaZO5QCURjbxvugyb7pLMRrq4qLmAQvz7O8TuvysHZODRNWdRj2mvJiF0As_aem_qN3SWRpBooECG60-TiXPughttps://secure.qgiv.com/event/letsnotbestillnewyork-2024/team/972576/Get more AoA and become a member to get exclusive access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOfx0OFE-uMTmJXGPpP7elQ/joinGet Erin C's book here: https://amzn.to/3ITDoO7Get Merch here - https://bit.ly/AnthonyMerchSubscribe to the Anthony On Air Podcast here:Facebook - https://bit.ly/AntOnAirFBYouTube - https://bit.ly/AntOnAirYTApple Podcast - https://bit.ly/AntOnAirAppleSpotify - https://bit.ly/AntOnAirSpotTwitter - https://bit.ly/AntOnAirTwitterInstagram - https://bit.ly/AntOnAirInstaTikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@anthonyradioDiscord - https://discord.gg/78V469aV22Get more at https://www.AnthonyOnAir.com

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports it's day 2 of jury deliberations in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking trial.

 A gunman ambushes Idaho firefighters, Democrats in the Senate try to slow the President's Big Beautiful Bill, and the jury in the Diddy trial begins deliberations. Get the facts first on Evening Wire. 

After nearly 7 weeks of jaw dropping and complicated testimony, Diddy’s fate is now in the hands of 8 men and 4 women. Amy and T.J. go over the final instructions the judge gave the jury this morning and all the latest color coming from the Manhattan courthouse!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After nearly 7 weeks of jaw dropping and complicated testimony, Diddy’s fate is now in the hands of 8 men and 4 women. Amy and T.J. go over the final instructions the judge gave the jury this morning and all the latest color coming from the Manhattan courthouse!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After nearly 7 weeks of jaw dropping and complicated testimony, Diddy’s fate is now in the hands of 8 men and 4 women. Amy and T.J. go over the final instructions the judge gave the jury this morning and all the latest color coming from the Manhattan courthouse!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We start with new information on the suspect in the deadly firefighter ambush in northern Idaho. The Trump administration's fight against Harvard University has intensified. The Supreme Court tossed a handful of lower court rulings that sided with transgender Americans. We'll tell you about the latest round of Israeli military strikes in Gaza. And, Sean “Diddy” Combs' federal criminal trial is in a jury's hands. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

After nearly 7 weeks of jaw dropping and complicated testimony, Diddy’s fate is now in the hands of 8 men and 4 women. Amy and T.J. go over the final instructions the judge gave the jury this morning and all the latest color coming from the Manhattan courthouse!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs are set to begin deliberations on Monday, June 30, marking the final and most consequential phase of a case that has gripped both the entertainment world and the legal community. After seven weeks of testimony—including 34 prosecution witnesses, graphic accounts of abuse from women like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” and surveillance footage showing Combs assaulting Cassie in 2016—the case now shifts entirely to the jury's interpretation of the facts. The 12 jurors, made up of eight men and four women, will return to court to receive final legal instructions before beginning deliberations behind closed doors. No witnesses were called by the defense, and Combs himself did not testify. Instead, his team focused on cross-examining the accusers and portraying the case as one built on exaggeration, greed, and consensual behavior taken out of context.The jury now faces the task of evaluating five serious federal charges: racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, and two counts of transporting individuals across state lines for the purpose of prostitution under the Mann Act. Legal analysts note that while the Mann Act charges are more straightforward, the racketeering and trafficking counts involve far more complex determinations—requiring the jury to weigh consent versus coercion, patterns of control, and the credibility of the women who testified. The deliberations could last days or even longer, depending on how sharply divided the panel is on interpreting the law and the evidence. At stake is the question of whether one of the most powerful figures in modern music will face decades—if not life—in prison, or walk away vindicated after one of the most sensational celebrity trials in years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:At the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Trial, Jurors Are Ready to Deliberate - The New York TimesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports jury deliberations begin and quickly hit a snag at Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial.

Mike Marza and Bernarda Villalona ABC News Legal Contributor, recap the jury's first day of deliberations in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial. The jury has concluded their deliberations for the day, the foreperson said in a note. “We will end at 5 p.m. and resume at 9 a.m. tomorrow,” the note said. The jury also sent a separate note regarding how to understand the narcotics distribution allegations Combs faces. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

VLOG June 30 US v Sean Combs Day 33, jury charge and deliberations, Week 7 book: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=fBppEQAAQBAJInner City Press covers https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-combs-trial-agnifilo-saysDocs https://www.patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-as-132654556"Big Beautiful Bill," Tillis. Do Kwon 7/15. UN @AntonioGuterres censor in Spain

VLOG June 30 US v Sean Combs Day 33, jury charge and deliberations, Week 7 book: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=fBppEQAAQBAJ…Inner City Press covers https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-combs-trial-agnifilo-says…Docs https://patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-as-132654556…"Big Beautiful Bill," Tillis. Do Kwon 7/15. UN @AntonioGuterres censor in Spain

The jury in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial has officially begun deliberations — but day one brought unexpected drama inside the jury room. One juror is already being called out for allegedly not following the judge's instructions, raising questions about a possible mistrial. We break down what this could mean for the case, the stakes moving forward, and how soon a verdict could drop. Hosts: Derek Kaufman & Jason Beckerman Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Jurors in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs are set to begin deliberations on Monday, June 30, marking the final and most consequential phase of a case that has gripped both the entertainment world and the legal community. After seven weeks of testimony—including 34 prosecution witnesses, graphic accounts of abuse from women like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” and surveillance footage showing Combs assaulting Cassie in 2016—the case now shifts entirely to the jury's interpretation of the facts. The 12 jurors, made up of eight men and four women, will return to court to receive final legal instructions before beginning deliberations behind closed doors. No witnesses were called by the defense, and Combs himself did not testify. Instead, his team focused on cross-examining the accusers and portraying the case as one built on exaggeration, greed, and consensual behavior taken out of context.The jury now faces the task of evaluating five serious federal charges: racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, and two counts of transporting individuals across state lines for the purpose of prostitution under the Mann Act. Legal analysts note that while the Mann Act charges are more straightforward, the racketeering and trafficking counts involve far more complex determinations—requiring the jury to weigh consent versus coercion, patterns of control, and the credibility of the women who testified. The deliberations could last days or even longer, depending on how sharply divided the panel is on interpreting the law and the evidence. At stake is the question of whether one of the most powerful figures in modern music will face decades—if not life—in prison, or walk away vindicated after one of the most sensational celebrity trials in years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:At the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Trial, Jurors Are Ready to Deliberate - The New York TimesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Welcome back to Crime Time Inc.! In episode 28 of our Charles Manson series, we dive deep into the final, chilling days of what was once the longest murder trial in American history. Host Alex takes you inside the packed courtroom on March 18, 1971, as prosecutor Vincent Buliosi delivers his notorious closing argument against Charles Manson and his three female followers. Discover how Buliosi faced the ultimate challenge: convincing a jury to sentence these criminals to death. Delve into the heated exchanges, the defense's desperate appeals, and the shocking jury verdicts. We explore the emotional weight carried by the victims' families and hear from the jurors themselves. Don't miss the gripping analysis by our crime experts, Simon and Tom, as they unpack the psychological manipulation Manson exerted over his followers. This episode promises a riveting look at one of history's most shocking crimes and the relentless pursuit of justice. Tune in and unravel the mystery with us!00:00 Introduction to the Charles Manson Series00:38 The Guilt Phase and the Ultimate Question01:11 The Courtroom Drama Unfolds01:43 Buliosi's Chilling Opening Argument03:27 Defense Strategies and Counterarguments09:49 Manson's Manipulations and Threats25:41 The Jury's Deliberation and Verdict27:38 Aftermath and Reflections32:17 The Verdict and Sentencing of Charles Manson33:45 The Aftermath: Manson's Continued Influence35:03 The Trial of Charles 'Tex' Watson39:03 Manson's Followers and Their Reckonings40:25 The Manson Family's Escape Plan42:10 Expert Analysis and ReflectionsTom Wood is a former murder squad detective and Deputy Chief Constable of Lothian and Borders Police in Scotland. Tom worked on many high profile murder cases including Robert Black, Peter Tobin and was part of the team investigating The World's End Murders from day one until 37 years later when the culprit, Angus Sinclair was finally convicted. Tom was latterly the detective in overall charge of The World's End murder investigation. Tom is now retired from the Police and is a successful author.Tom Wood's Books Ruxton: The First Modern Murder https://amzn.eu/d/25k8KqGThe World's End Murders: The Inside Story https://amzn.eu/d/5U9nLoPSimon is a retired Police Officer and the best selling author of The Ten Percent, https://amzn.eu/d/5trz6bs a memoir consisting ofstories from the first part of his career as a police officer. From joining in 1978,being posted in Campbeltown in Argylll, becoming a detective on the Isle ofBute, Scotland, through to the Serious Crime Squad and working in the busy Glasgowstation in Govan.#CharlesManson,#MansonMurders,#truecrimepodcast,#helterskelter,#CrimeHistory,Further reading on Charles Manson which helped influence this podcast:Manson: The Life and Times of Charles Manson by Jeff GuinnHelter Skelter: The True Story of the Manson Murders by Vincent Bugliosi and Curt GentryCharles Manson, the CIA and the Secret History of the Sixties by Tom O'NeillAbout Crime Time Inc.Crime Time Inc. is hosted by Tom and Simon—two ex-cops with decades of frontline experience and zero tolerance for fluff. Tom, a by-the-book former Deputy Chief Constable from Edinburgh, and Simon, a rule-bending ex-undercover cop from Glasgow, bring sharp insight, dark humour, and plenty of East vs. West banter to every episode.Whether they're revisiting cases they worked on, grilling fellow former officers, or picking apart narrated true crime stories, Tom and Simon don't just talk about crime—they've lived it. Real cases. Real cops. Real talk.Our Website: https://crimetimeinc.com/If you like this show please leave a review. It really helps us.Please help us improve our Podcast by completing this survey.http://bit.ly/crimetimeinc-survey Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The government rebuttal concluded with prosecutor Maurene Comey imploring jurors to find Sean Combs guilty and lauding his alleged victims for coming forward with “overwhelming evidence.” “The defendant never thought the women he abused would have the courage to speak out loud what he had done with him,” Comey argued. “For 20 years, the defendant got away with his crimes. That ends in this courtroom.” Comey told the jury the violence between Combs and "Jane" at her home in June 2024 represented the most “clear cut” example of sex trafficking in the entire case. The defense suggested "Jane" instigated it to use it later against Combs, knowing he was under criminal investigation. Comey said there was no evidence of that. Court is adjourned, the jury was sent home with instructions not to discuss the case. The jury returns 9 a.m. ET Monday for the judge's charge and deliberations. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode of True Crime News The Sidebar Podcast: Marie Pereira joins host Joshua Ritter to break down the biggest cases making headlines across the nation. They discuss jury deliberations in Karen Read's retrial, Gavin Smith's overturned conviction after a jury found him guilty of murder for killing his entire family as a teenager, and jurors being shown explicit videos of Sean “Diddy” Combs' alleged “freak offs” as the mogul faces federal sex-trafficking charges. Tweet your questions for future episodes to Joshua Ritter using the hashtag #TCNSidebar. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Mike Crawford from the Young Jurks joins the show to discuss Verdict watch in the Karen Read trial. Plus, the Supreme Court has a big ruling in Tennessee.  Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

The Billy & Lisa Show cover a whole bunch of topics during today's show, including Brad Marchand winning the Stanley Cup, and Katherine Loftus coming to break down the end of the Karen Read case. Listen to Billy & Lisa weekdays from 6-10AM on Kiss 108!   

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The jurors, alongside Judge Cannone, entered the Norfolk Superior courtroom shortly before 9 a.m. They were queried about any prior discussions or exposure to the case before being released to deliberate for the day.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

President Donald Trump's much anticipated ‘Liberation Day' sent global markets into a tizzy in April, but how did private credit firms react?During what we have termed the ‘Deliberation Days' of Q1, private credit investors were scrambling to mitigate potential tariff risks as best they could but they were also on the offensive.Elijah Jackson's latest quarterly report on the state of the market, ‘Good Deal Hunting', is aptly titled as direct lenders did not shy away from stealing BSL marketshare during the period. And PC firms were also able to pick up an extra 25bps of spread on average — how d'ya like them apples?David Brooke, 9fin's private credit editor, sat down with Elijah on this week's episode of Cloud 9fin to unpack some of the wicked smart moves that lenders made.Have any feedback on the podcast? Send us a note at podcast@9fin.com — thanks for listening!

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/4wSJeNZph94Day 33 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on June 13, 2025. The Defense's closing argument, delivered by Jackson, focused on the lack of collision and the integrity of the investigation. The Prosecution's closing argument, delivered by Hank Brennan, focused on Karen Read's actions and the data.After lunch, the court read the jury instructions. The court did not include the defense's requested instruction regarding John O'Keefe's hoodie but did include a straight DUI as a lesser included charge.The jury began deliberations just after 2:39 PM local time and deliberated for a little under two hours before asking to go home for the weekend. They were instructed not to discuss the case with anyone, conduct independent research, or follow news about the case over the weekend. Deliberations will resume on Monday morning.RESOURCESKaren Read Retrial Day 32 - https://youtube.com/live/N1az5x1PEkMWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

In this episode of True Crime News The Sidebar Podcast: Neama Rahmani joins host Joshua Ritter to break down the biggest cases making headlines across the nation. They discuss contentious jury deliberations in Harvey Weinstein's retrial, Karen Read's defense resting their case, and shocking testimony in Sean “Diddy” Combs' federal sex-trafficking trial. Tweet your questions for future episodes to Joshua Ritter using the hashtag #TCNSidebar. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Melissa joins Stephanie and Spoiler Steve to break down this year's nominees for the 2025 Scene-It Cast Awards Show!

Teen, Joseph Koenig, Convicted of Murder For Dropping Boulders Off Busy Overpass Jurors in Jefferson County needed barely two hours Friday morning to convict Joseph Koenig of first-degree murder for hurling a landscaping rock through the windshield of Alexa Bartell's moving car, killing the 20-year-old as she drove near Arvada in April 2023. Deliberations began late Thursday and resumed at 9 a.m.; by 10:45, the panel had returned guilty verdicts on every one of the 19 counts Koenig faced. Koenig, now 19, stood accused not only of Bartell's murder but of unleashing a late-night rock-throwing spree that terrorized motorists across northwest metro Denver. Prosecutors charged him with nine counts of attempted first-degree murder for the other cars struck, three counts of second-degree assault, and six counts of attempted second-degree assault. While the jury found Koenig guilty on each allegation, several counts were reduced under Colorado law. Last week jurors heard from nearly two dozen witnesses, including victims who recalled the sudden shatter of glass and the panic of losing control at highway speed. The most damning testimony came from Koenig's two friends—Nicholas “Mitch” Karol-Chik and Zachary Kwak—who took plea deals and told the jury Koenig threw the fatal rock. The defense pounced on Karol-Chik's earlier statement to police suggesting Kwak hurled the final stone, but both men insisted on the stand that Koenig was responsible for Bartell's death. Koenig himself never testified. Instead, defense lawyers called Laurence Steinberg, a Temple University adolescent-brain researcher, to argue that impulsivity and Koenig's ADHD lessened his culpability. Deputy District Attorney Katharine Decker countered in a pointed cross-examination, pressing Steinberg to acknowledge that teenagers can still foresee lethal consequences. Koenig was a high school senior at the time of the incident. Originally scheduled for trial last summer, the case was postponed for a court-ordered mental-health evaluation after Koenig's attorneys cited an ADHD diagnosis and borderline personality disorder. Closing arguments Thursday distilled the stakes: prosecutors said Koenig acted “knowingly and intentionally,” while defense attorney Martin Stuart asked jurors to convict only of reckless manslaughter—calling his client “guilty of a crime, but not murder.” Evidence showed that Koenig, Karol-Chik, and Kwak circled back to the crash scene on April 19, 2023, photographing Bartell's disabled Chevy Spark instead of checking on her or dialing 911. That callous post-attack behavior, prosecutors argued, underscored Koenig's indifference to human life. After the verdict, Bartell's mother, Kelly, stood outside the courthouse clutching a framed photo of her daughter. “These have been the hardest two years of our lives, but we got justice today,” she said through tears. “It doesn't bring Alexa back, and that's horrible. But we hope no family ever has to live this nightmare again.” District Court Judge Mark Randall set Koenig's sentencing for June 3 at 8:30 a.m. Victims and relatives will be allowed to address the court before penalties are imposed; a first-degree murder conviction in Colorado carries an automatic life sentence with the possibility of parole after 40 years. Karol-Chik and Kwak, who pleaded guilty last year to lesser charges—including second-degree murder and multiple counts of attempted assault—are scheduled to learn their fates on May 1 and May 2, respectively Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Teen, Joseph Koenig, Convicted of Murder For Dropping Boulders Off Busy Overpass Jurors in Jefferson County needed barely two hours Friday morning to convict Joseph Koenig of first-degree murder for hurling a landscaping rock through the windshield of Alexa Bartell's moving car, killing the 20-year-old as she drove near Arvada in April 2023. Deliberations began late Thursday and resumed at 9 a.m.; by 10:45, the panel had returned guilty verdicts on every one of the 19 counts Koenig faced. Koenig, now 19, stood accused not only of Bartell's murder but of unleashing a late-night rock-throwing spree that terrorized motorists across northwest metro Denver. Prosecutors charged him with nine counts of attempted first-degree murder for the other cars struck, three counts of second-degree assault, and six counts of attempted second-degree assault. While the jury found Koenig guilty on each allegation, several counts were reduced under Colorado law. Last week jurors heard from nearly two dozen witnesses, including victims who recalled the sudden shatter of glass and the panic of losing control at highway speed. The most damning testimony came from Koenig's two friends—Nicholas “Mitch” Karol-Chik and Zachary Kwak—who took plea deals and told the jury Koenig threw the fatal rock. The defense pounced on Karol-Chik's earlier statement to police suggesting Kwak hurled the final stone, but both men insisted on the stand that Koenig was responsible for Bartell's death. Koenig himself never testified. Instead, defense lawyers called Laurence Steinberg, a Temple University adolescent-brain researcher, to argue that impulsivity and Koenig's ADHD lessened his culpability. Deputy District Attorney Katharine Decker countered in a pointed cross-examination, pressing Steinberg to acknowledge that teenagers can still foresee lethal consequences. Koenig was a high school senior at the time of the incident. Originally scheduled for trial last summer, the case was postponed for a court-ordered mental-health evaluation after Koenig's attorneys cited an ADHD diagnosis and borderline personality disorder. Closing arguments Thursday distilled the stakes: prosecutors said Koenig acted “knowingly and intentionally,” while defense attorney Martin Stuart asked jurors to convict only of reckless manslaughter—calling his client “guilty of a crime, but not murder.” Evidence showed that Koenig, Karol-Chik, and Kwak circled back to the crash scene on April 19, 2023, photographing Bartell's disabled Chevy Spark instead of checking on her or dialing 911. That callous post-attack behavior, prosecutors argued, underscored Koenig's indifference to human life. After the verdict, Bartell's mother, Kelly, stood outside the courthouse clutching a framed photo of her daughter. “These have been the hardest two years of our lives, but we got justice today,” she said through tears. “It doesn't bring Alexa back, and that's horrible. But we hope no family ever has to live this nightmare again.” District Court Judge Mark Randall set Koenig's sentencing for June 3 at 8:30 a.m. Victims and relatives will be allowed to address the court before penalties are imposed; a first-degree murder conviction in Colorado carries an automatic life sentence with the possibility of parole after 40 years. Karol-Chik and Kwak, who pleaded guilty last year to lesser charges—including second-degree murder and multiple counts of attempted assault—are scheduled to learn their fates on May 1 and May 2, respectively Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872