Podcasts about endfragment

La jornada 10 termina hoy y el Valencia lo hará en zona de descenso. Es merecido. Hace varios partidos que es de los 3 peores equipos de Primera. El presente es preocupante y el futuro, más. Esta es la situación, como yo la veo. Corberán no da con la tecla y no está teniendo reflejos ni recursos para cambiar. El equipo no conecta con su idea este año y creo sinceramente que le ayudan muy poco dentro del vestuario decisiones como el cambio de Gayà el sábado faltando media hora. Mestalla ha dicho basta después de muchos años de sufrimiento. Ayudan poco a la imagen de los jugadores acciones como la del 0-2 ante el Villarreal, en la que Pepelu y Guerra miran y andan mientras Comesaña recoge el rechace de Copete y marca a placer. El club no ha hecho ni hace nada para suturar esa brecha Mestalla-equipo que puede ser el golpe de gracia después de muchos años de una gestión infame, miserable e indigna. Llevo semanas diciéndolo y clamando en el desierto. ¿Quién lidera la petición de paz aquí? ¿Quién abandera la búsqueda de unión? ¿Quién sale a pedir perdón y ayuda a la afición? Más vale tarde que nunca.

Hasta 1900 las ejecuciones en España eran públicas y se celebraban como un espectáculo más para el ciudadano. Hasta se instalaban puestos de comida y bebida, y los cocheros voceaban sus ofertas para trasladar a los morbosos hasta el lugar de la ejecución. La última fiesta fue el garrote que dieron en público en 1899 a Rafael González Gancedo por asesinar a su mujer y a su bebé para largarse con su amante. Nuevo episodio con Nieves Concostrina, Ana Valtierra, Emma Vallespinós, Pepe Rubio, Jesús Pozo y María Jesús Rodríguez.

Hasta 1900 las ejecuciones en España eran públicas y se celebraban como un espectáculo más para el ciudadano. Hasta se instalaban puestos de comida y bebida, y los cocheros voceaban sus ofertas para trasladar a los morbosos hasta el lugar de la ejecución. La última fiesta fue el garrote que dieron en público en 1899 a Rafael González Gancedo por asesinar a su mujer y a su bebé para largarse con su amante. Nuevo episodio con Nieves Concostrina, Ana Valtierra, Emma Vallespinós, Pepe Rubio, Jesús Pozo y María Jesús Rodríguez.

Espacio sobre cine y series con María Castejón, crítica de cine y especializada en feminismo

Con el catedrático en Microbiología y director del Museo de Ciencias de la UNAV, Ignacio López Goñi

Espacio de reflexión con Ricardo Piñero, filósofo y profesor universitario

En 'Del 40 al 1 Coca Cola': El Número 1 repite por segunda semana no consecutiva. Cartel completo de LOS40 Music Awards Santander 2025. La última contradicción de Estados Unidos contra la Super Bowl de Bad Bunny.Aitana y su Cuarto Azul World Tour: ¿cuántos estadios Bernabéu caben en la gira más ambiciosa del año? En LOS40 Classic, Cyndi Lauper: La “artista perfecta” para el himno LGTBIQ+ ‘True colours'.

Corberán se explica sobre la involución de su equipo y Calero se queja del horario del derbi; previas y Valencia Basket. En nuestro SER Deportivos de este viernes hemos escuchado con detenimiento a Carlos Corberán explicando qué le pasa a su equipo y por qué muestra una imagen tan diferente a la temporada pasada. Última hora del Valencia y del Levante, escuchando a Calero quejarse del horario del derbi, con noticias de última hora sobre la renovación de Carlos Álvarez como granota. Las victorias del Valencia Basket masculino y femenino.

En las carreras de caballos, cada gramo cuenta. Para un jockey el "sobrepeso" tiene un significado diferente: implica una sanción o incluso quedarse fuera de la competición. Jaime Gelabert vive intentando un lograr un equilibro perfecto entre la potencia y la ligereza, con un control estricto de lo que come y bebe para no superar los 50 kg de peso.

Ana Mena inaugura la segunda temporada del video-pódcast musical de LOS40. ¡Nueva confirmada! Emilia se une a LOS40 Music Awards Santander 2025. Ruslana prepara el que será su debut en el cine, con 'A fuego'. Shakira reversiona ‘Hips Don't Lie', con Beéle y Ed Sheeran: la colaboración que no vimos venir.  ‘Morning Box' cumple 1.500 programas tirando la casa por la ventana.

Así que esta es su primera colonoscopía.

Nos preguntamos cómo sería el político perfecto. Rubén Rodríguez nos trae su perfil a través de las virtudes de ciertos políticos que ya no están y que ha seleccionado entre todos los colores del espectro político. La vocación de Anguita, el compromiso de Zerolo, la cercanía de Iñaki Azkuna y la entereza de Gutiérrez Mellado durante el 23F.

El argentino y el colombiano se suman al cartel de actuaciones del 7 de noviembre en el Roig Arena. ‘La Bicicleta': Carlos Vives desvela la historia real detrás del título de su colaboración con Shakira. Ana Mena habla del éxito de 'Quiero decirte' por el estreno de 'Culpa Nuestra'. De Aitana a La Oreja de Van Gogh: Todo sobre los conciertos que te interesan. En LOS40 Classic: Bee Gees y el “pequeño secreto” de ‘You win again'.

En 'Del 40 al 1 Coca Cola': Huntr/X vuelve a ser Nº1 por tercera semana consecutiva. Rosalía habla de su nuevo disco y da la noticia que todos esperábamos. Crónica del concierto de Guitarricadelafuente en Madrid. Eric Clapton regresa a España con dos únicos conciertos en Madrid y Barcelona en 2026. En LOS40 Classic: 45 años de ‘The river', el caudal más humano de Bruce Springsteen.

Con el historiador Jaime Aznar

La actividad de las ONGs de Navarra

Con las divulgadoras en nutrición Yolanda Vélaz y María Marqués

Aitana, Dani Fernández, Feid y Lola Índigo parten como máximos nominados. Las novedades musicales del viernes, con Myke Towers, Tame Impala, Nathy Peluso, Charlie Puth y más. La importancia de la actuación de Karol G en el Victoria Secret Fashion Show 2025. La elegante respuesta de Leire Martínez a la reunión de LOVG. En LOS40 Classic: Keith Richards, el desenfrenado verano de un exiliado fiscal que acabó con una sentencia de culpabilidad y una “obra maestra”.

Ha vuelto La Oreja de Van Gogh y Edgar Hita tiene mucho que contarnos sobre vueltas con los ex. Luismi Pérez nos explica lo dos tipos de tormentas que se pueden formar: las dinámicas y las térmicas. Repasamos la prensa, la actualidad deportiva y nos detenemos en la contraportada. Cerramos la hora con el segundo grabófono de Adriana Mourelos, como no, marcado por la política y la actualidad nacional.

La Oreja de Van Gogh comienza nueva etapa con su vocalista original y una importante ausencia. Sigue en directo el programa especial de nominados de LOS40 Music Awards Santander 2025. Las pistas del universo dual del nuevo disco de Rosalía. Saiko y Quevedo reaccionan a la misteriosa carta de Tainy. En LOS40 Classic: ‘Red red wine', el enorme ‘hit' de UB40 que llenó los bolsillos de Neil Diamond.

Aitana anuncia los conciertos de 'Cuarto Azul World Tour'. Feid anuncia que se retira de los escenarios temporalmente. Katy Perry vuelve a España en 2026 como cabeza de cartel de O Son do Camiño. Ed Sheeran se alía con Lamine Yamal y Aitana Bonmatí en la presentación de su camiseta para el Barça. 

¿Se viene colaboración entre Aitana y Ana Mena? Taylor Swift anuncia docuserie y concierto final en Disney+. Quiero decirte' de Ana Mena y Abraham Mateo revive gracias a ‘Culpa Nuestra'. Eva Amaral vuelve a los escenarios tras superar sus problemas de salud. Alejandro Sanz reúne a Bisbal y Vanesa Martín en México. 

La banda colombiana actuará en el Roig Arena de Valencia el 7 de noviembre. Crónica del concierto de Belén Aguilera en Madrid. Entrevista a De La Rose en LOS40 Urban, con Ramsés López 'El Faraón'. En LOS40 Classic: Annie Lennox criticó la imagen sexualizada de los vídeos pop tras la carta de Sinead O'Connor a Miley Cyrus. Una psicóloga responde a la pregunta que todos nos hacemos: ¿Es bueno escuchar música triste cuando estamos tristes?

En 'Del 40 al 1 Coca Cola': La banda sonora de K-pop Demon Hunters es Nº1 por segunda semana consecutiva. Rauw Alejandro se pone la bata de profe para enseñar salsa a los niños en Nueva York. Entrevista a Corina Smith en LOS40 Urban. Todo sobre LOS40 Hispanidad Pop 2025. En LOS40 Classic: Treinta años de ‘Insomniac': el rugido punk de Green Day tras el éxito de ‘Dookie'.

Rebbi and Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon disagree about whether the sanctification of a kohen’s hands and feet, performed before Temple service, is nullified each night, requiring repetition the next morning. According to Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon, the sanctification remains valid overnight, and there is no need to repeat it. Ilfa raises a question based on this view: If the sanctification remains valid overnight, is the water in the Temple’s basin also unaffected and not disqualified by nightfall? Rabbi Ami quotes Rabbi Yochanan, who reports that Ilfa later answered that the water is indeed not disqualified overnight. However, Rabbi Yitzchak bar Bisna challenges this conclusion. A Mishna in Yoma describes a device used in the Temple—the muchni—which lowered the water into a well each night to prevent it from becoming disqualified by remaining overnight. The Gemara attempts to use this source to support the possibility that Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon holds the water is disqualified overnight. This is based on an earlier Mishna in the same chapter that discusses the location of the bull’s slaughter on Yom Kippur, which aligns with Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon’s opinion: the area between the altar and the ulam (entrance hall), designated for slaughtering kodashei kodashim (most holy offerings). If the earlier Mishna accords with his opinion, it stands to reason that the later Mishna accords with his opinion as well. However, since the passage can also be interpreted in accordance with Rebbi’s view, no definitive conclusion is reached. A Mishna in Yoma describes a device used in the Temple, the muchni, to lower the water into a well each night to prevent it from becoming disqualified overnight. The Gemara attempts to prove that this source aligns with Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon’s view, proving that he holds the water is disqualified overnight, as an earlier Mishna in the chapter that describes the location of the slaughtering of the bull on Yom Kippur accords with his opinion. This location, between the altar and the ulam, matches Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon’s opinion regarding the designated area for slaughtering kodashei kodashim (most holy offerings). However, the passage can also be interpreted according to Rebbi’s view, so no definitive conclusion is reached. Rabbi Yochanan rules that a kohen who removes ashes from the altar during the final part of the night sanctifies his hands and feet for the day, despite it still being nighttime. Abaye explains this ruling according to Rebbi, while Rava explains it according to Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon. A challenge is raised against Rava’s interpretation, but it is ultimately resolved. Two additional questions are discussed: Does leaving the Temple cancel the sanctification of one’s hands and feet? Four sources are brought to address this, but each is rejected, and the question remains unresolved. Does becoming impure cancel the sanctification? Two of the sources cited in the previous discussion are brought in an attempt to answer this question as well.

Rebbi and Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon disagree about whether the sanctification of a kohen’s hands and feet, performed before Temple service, is nullified each night, requiring repetition the next morning. According to Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon, the sanctification remains valid overnight, and there is no need to repeat it. Ilfa raises a question based on this view: If the sanctification remains valid overnight, is the water in the Temple’s basin also unaffected and not disqualified by nightfall? Rabbi Ami quotes Rabbi Yochanan, who reports that Ilfa later answered that the water is indeed not disqualified overnight. However, Rabbi Yitzchak bar Bisna challenges this conclusion. A Mishna in Yoma describes a device used in the Temple—the muchni—which lowered the water into a well each night to prevent it from becoming disqualified by remaining overnight. The Gemara attempts to use this source to support the possibility that Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon holds the water is disqualified overnight. This is based on an earlier Mishna in the same chapter that discusses the location of the bull’s slaughter on Yom Kippur, which aligns with Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon’s opinion: the area between the altar and the ulam (entrance hall), designated for slaughtering kodashei kodashim (most holy offerings). If the earlier Mishna accords with his opinion, it stands to reason that the later Mishna accords with his opinion as well. However, since the passage can also be interpreted in accordance with Rebbi’s view, no definitive conclusion is reached. A Mishna in Yoma describes a device used in the Temple, the muchni, to lower the water into a well each night to prevent it from becoming disqualified overnight. The Gemara attempts to prove that this source aligns with Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon’s view, proving that he holds the water is disqualified overnight, as an earlier Mishna in the chapter that describes the location of the slaughtering of the bull on Yom Kippur accords with his opinion. This location, between the altar and the ulam, matches Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon’s opinion regarding the designated area for slaughtering kodashei kodashim (most holy offerings). However, the passage can also be interpreted according to Rebbi’s view, so no definitive conclusion is reached. Rabbi Yochanan rules that a kohen who removes ashes from the altar during the final part of the night sanctifies his hands and feet for the day, despite it still being nighttime. Abaye explains this ruling according to Rebbi, while Rava explains it according to Rabbi Elazar b’Rabbi Shimon. A challenge is raised against Rava’s interpretation, but it is ultimately resolved. Two additional questions are discussed: Does leaving the Temple cancel the sanctification of one’s hands and feet? Four sources are brought to address this, but each is rejected, and the question remains unresolved. Does becoming impure cancel the sanctification? Two of the sources cited in the previous discussion are brought in an attempt to answer this question as well.

Uy ahora sí metieron la casa por la ventana.

Todavía nos dura el cabreo después de una derrota indignante y vergonzosa, tanto como el 6-0 de Barcelona hace unas semanas. El Valencia hizo el ridículo ante el Oviedo. Al nivel del Johan Cruyff. Pero con una diferencia, a peor. Lo de anoche en Mestalla puede ser más dañino. Porque Gayà se equivocó con un desplante evitable a la grada. Y, sobre todo, porque Corberán no da con la tecla y ayer además se dedicó a señalar jugadores en sala de prensa tras la derrota. Que suele ser el principio del fin de un entrenador. Si hablamos de fútbol, el Valencia sigue sin jugar a nada y sin hacer 45 minutos potables. Y los jugadores sin ninguna personalidad ni amor propio para ganar por encima de pizarras. 1 de octubre y ya volvemos estar cansados de aguantarnos.

¡Mucho ojo con el Valencia! Bisturí en el Valencia tras la derrota ante el Oviedo: Corberán y jugadores. En nuestro SER Deportivos de este miércoles hemos sacado el bisturí para analizar la delicada situación que deja en el Valencia la derrota ante el Oviedo, parándonos en Corberán, Gayà, Javi Guerra, Danjuma, Almeida... Y un adelanto de nuestro nuevo programa: Mano a Mano, con el primer entrevistado, Fernando Gómez. 

Almeida apunta a titular ante el Oviedo: hoy sí hay fútbol. Los cambios que medita Calero. Y el supercalendario del Valencia Basket. En nuestro SER Deportivos de este martes hemos abierto con última hora deportiva del Valencia antes de jugar frente al Oviedo, con un nombre propio: André Almeida. Y después, un apunte editorial sobre Netflix, Vinicius y el Valencia. Después, el Levante, con lo que está planeando Calero. Y terminamos con el supercalendario del Valencia Basket, a las puertas de su primer partido de Euroliga.

Tienes de especial lo que yo tengo de princesa de Mónaco.

Última hora sobre Corberán, Julen y el Valencia; Calero y su renovación; y entrevista a Sergio de Larrea. En nuestro SER Deportivos de este viernes hemos abierto con información de última hora de Corberán, Agirrezabala y el Valencia de cara al partido del lunes. Última hora del Levante antes de viajar a Getafe, escuchando a Calero hablar de su rival y de su renovación. Y, a las puertas de las Supercopas de baloncesto masculino y femenino, nos marchamos al Roig Arena para hablar largo y tendido con un joven brillante al que da gusto escuchar: Sergio de Larrea, llamado a ser líder de este Valencia Basket que se marcha a jugar a Málaga este sábado.

Entrevista a Raquel Carrera en la víspera de la Supercopa de España; Aguirrezabala, Calero, Bordalás y De Larrea. En nuestro Off The Record de este viernes hemos abierto con última hora sobre el estado del portero del Valencia, el equipo que medita poner Calero en Getafe, las voces del entrenador granota y de Bordalás. Y tras escuchar un resumen de la entrevista a Sergio de Larrea, nos marchamos al Roig Arena para entrevistar a la jugadora franquicia del Valencia Basket femenino, Raquel Carrera, antes de la Supercopa.

¡No te quites la máscara, no te quites la máscara!

Mi mecánico de confianza, pa que me cheque el aceite seguido.

Tomarte selfies mandando besos.

Sin caldo que no traigo cucharaaaaaaa.

Hola, nos conocimos ayer en el antro. Tienes que ir al doctor.

Aaaaaaah con razón dice pastel glande.

Doctor, vengo a que me ponga el DIU… el diusted.

Solo 5 años más y los mando al carajo.

¿Entonces no es un documental? ¡Que indignación, quiero mi dinero de vuelta!

Today's daf is sponsored by Lisa Elon in honor of her steadfast chevruta, Rhondda Ma Today's daf is sponsored by Lisa Elon in honor of her steadfast chevruta, Rhondda May, "May G-d grant us many more years of great learning together. " Today's daf is sponsored by Rachel Alexander Levy in memory of Jack Schuster, father of my chevruta, Rabbi Jordi Schuster. May his memory be for a blessing. Today's daf is sponsored by Adam Dicker in honor of Carolyn Hochstadter Dicker on her birthday. There is a debate between Rav and Shmuel regarding the kashering process known as niguv. In one version of the debate, Rav requires that ashes be used once during the process, while Shmuel requires them to be used twice. In another version, there is no actual disagreement—Rav simply omits the final step of rinsing with water, since its sole purpose is to remove the ashes. Shmuel, however, includes it as part of the process. How are wicker nets in a winepress kashered? Rabbi Avahu derives from the laws of purifying wicker nets that they require niguv. If the nets are made of reeds, which are more absorbent, they must be left unused for twelve months—or, according to Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, until the next wine-making season. What is the practical difference between these two opinions? Rabbi Yossi offers an alternative to waiting a year: pouring boiling water over them. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel cites Rabbi Yossi, suggesting instead that the nets be placed under running water for an onah. What is an onah? Some define it as either a day or a night, while others say it means twelve hours. Rav Shmuel bar Yitzchak explains that both interpretations ultimately mean the same thing. How? The strainer and baskets used in the winepress are kashered differently depending on the material they are made from, since the level of absorption varies. If grape clusters are placed in the winepress and surrounded by the juice from the grapes, are they considered a single unit for the purposes of impurity? This has practical implications: if an am haaretz—someone who may not be trusted regarding purity laws—touches one cluster, does that render all the surrounding clusters impure? If one purchases utensils from a non-Jew, how are they to be kashered? The method depends on how the utensil was used: if used with cold food, rinse with water; if used with hot water, perform hagala (boiling); and if exposed to direct fire, apply libun (burning with fire). A knife must be polished. All these utensils also require tevila—immersion in a mikveh. Two different phrases in Bamidbar 31:23, following the battle with Midian, are cited to derive the requirement for tevila. Why are both phrases needed? Rav Nachman explains that even new utensils purchased from a non-Jew require tevila, since kashered old utensils are considered equivalent to new ones. Borrowed utensils from a non-Jew do not require tevila, but a question arises regarding utensils given to a Jew as collateral. Metal and glass utensils require tevila, but earthenware does not. If an earthenware vessel is coated with a lead glaze, should it be treated as earthenware or as metal? If utensils were used without being kashered, is food prepared in them forbidden? The answer depends on when the vessel was last used and whether one holds that a substance imparting a bad flavor is permitted or prohibited.   y, "May G-d grant us many more years of great learning together. " Today's daf is sponsored by Rachel Alexander Levy in memory of Jack Schuster, father of my chevruta, Rabbi Jordi Schuster. May his memory be for a blessing. Today's daf is sponsored by Adam Dicker in honor of Carolyn Hochstadter Dicker on her birthday. There is a debate between Rav and Shmuel regarding the kashering process known as niguv. In one version of the debate, Rav requires that ashes be used once during the process, while Shmuel requires them to be used twice. In another version, there is no actual disagreement—Rav simply omits the final step of rinsing with water, since its sole purpose is to remove the ashes. Shmuel, however, includes it as part of the process. How are wicker nets in a winepress kashered? Rabbi Avahu derives from the laws of purifying wicker nets that they require niguv. If the nets are made of reeds, which are more absorbent, they must be left unused for twelve months—or, according to Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, until the next wine-making season. What is the practical difference between these two opinions? Rabbi Yossi offers an alternative to waiting a year: pouring boiling water over them. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel cites Rabbi Yossi, suggesting instead that the nets be placed under running water for an onah. What is an onah? Some define it as either a day or a night, while others say it means twelve hours. Rav Shmuel bar Yitzchak explains that both interpretations ultimately mean the same thing. How? The strainer and baskets used in the winepress are kashered differently depending on the material they are made from, since the level of absorption varies. If grape clusters are placed in the winepress and surrounded by the juice from the grapes, are they considered a single unit for the purposes of impurity? This has practical implications: if an am haaretz—someone who may not be trusted regarding purity laws—touches one cluster, does that render all the surrounding clusters impure? If one purchases utensils from a non-Jew, how are they to be kashered? The method depends on how the utensil was used: if used with cold food, rinse with water; if used with hot water, perform hagala (boiling); and if exposed to direct fire, apply libun (burning with fire). A knife must be polished. All these utensils also require tevila—immersion in a mikveh. Two different phrases in Bamidbar 31:23, following the battle with Midian, are cited to derive the requirement for tevila. Why are both phrases needed? Rav Nachman explains that even new utensils purchased from a non-Jew require tevila, since kashered old utensils are considered equivalent to new ones. Borrowed utensils from a non-Jew do not require tevila, but a question arises regarding utensils given to a Jew as collateral. Metal and glass utensils require tevila, but earthenware does not. If an earthenware vessel is coated with a lead glaze, should it be treated as earthenware or as metal? If utensils were used without being kashered, is food prepared in them forbidden? The answer depends on when the vessel was last used and whether one holds that a substance imparting a bad flavor is permitted or prohibited.

This week's learning is dedicated by Carolyn Hochstadter, Adam Dicker and family on the 17th yahrzeit of Fred Hochstadter, Ephraim ben Kayla v'Baruch this Monday, 8 Elul. "'Dad' was a holocaust survivor who was saved via the Kindertransport, came to Canada and met 'Ma' in Montreal. Together, they built a family, business, community, and legacy of support and love for Medinat Yisrael. We miss you and are managing to catch up on some of your reading material, including Menachem Elon's Mishpat Ivri — to which Hadran's Daf Yomi has given so much background and context. We continue to laugh at your jokes and follow your wise guidance. And also in honor of today's pidyon haben of our first Sabra grandchild, Zecharia Ami - Zach. Saba and Savta would be proud." Today's daf is sponsored by Rochel Cheifetz in commemoration of her husband’s, Aryeh Leib ben Yehuda, Lenny Cheifetz's,  33rd yahrzeit. "You were taken much too soon. But I thank HKB"H for the time we were blessed with your smile, goodness, sense of humor, and love. Yehi zichro baruch."  Today's daf is sponsored by Emma Rinberg for a refuah shlemah for her son Joseph, Yosef Yitzchak Nisan Ben Nechama Leah Esther, who is having surgery today to repair a broken femur after a bike accident. The Mishna lists various items that are forbidden to derive benefit from and remain prohibited even in the smallest amount when mixed with permitted substances. The Gemara asks and explains why certain items are not included in the Mishna’s list. If yayin nesech falls into a pit, the entire quantity of wine becomes forbidden. However, Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel ruled that the mixture may be sold, provided the value of the yayin nesech is deducted from the sale price. There is a debate among the amoraim about whether we rule like Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel in all cases, or only in specific situations—such as when a barrel of yayin nesech is mixed with a barrel of permitted wine, as opposed to a smaller quantity of forbidden wine that is mixed into a jug or barrel of permitted wine. To kasher a winepress that was used by or prepared by a non-Jew, the process depends on the material from which the winepress is made and whether it was lined with pitch.

¿Podría traerme un cuchillo con más filo?

Today's daf is sponsored by David and Mitzi Geffen in loving memory of Mitzi's brother Dr. Dennis Lock on his yahrtzeit. He was a loving husband, father, uncle, and grandfather, a devoted physician; and had a love of learning Talmud. He is sorely missed. Today's daf is sponsored by Rachel Bayefsky and Michael Francus in honor of their baby daughter Avital Temima, born 12 Av/August 6. "She is already listening to Rabbanit Farber’s podcast during feedings! May she grow up to love learning." If a fleet enters a city during peacetime, any open wine barrels are deemed forbidden due to the concern that the soldiers may have drunk from them. In contrast, during wartime, it is assumed they would not have had time to drink, and therefore the wine is not considered to have been used for libations. However, a conflicting source suggests that even in times of war, the women of the city may have been raped. Rav Meri resolves this contradiction by distinguishing between the concern of rape and the concern of wine consumption. The Mishna discusses how a Jewish laborer who is paid in wine by a non-Jew can request monetary compensation in a manner that avoids the prohibition of benefiting from yayin nesech (wine used for idolatrous purposes). It raises the question: can a non-Jew pay a wine tax to the king on behalf of a Jew, or would that be prohibited due to the Jew deriving benefit from yayin nesech? The Mishna further rules that when a Jew sells wine to a non-Jew, the price must be agreed upon before the wine is poured into the non-Jew’s container. If not, the wine is considered to be in the non-Jew’s possession before the sale is finalized, and the Jew would be benefiting from yayin nesech. Ameimar and Rav Ashi debate whether the act of pulling an item (meshicha) constitutes a valid acquisition (kinyan) for non-Jews. Rav Ashi, who holds that it does not, cites Rav’s instruction to wine sellers to ensure they receive payment before measuring out the wine. However, the Gemara offers an alternative explanation for Rav’s directive. A challenge is raised against Ameimar’s view, and two difficulties are posed against Rav Ashi—one stemming from our Mishna. Ultimately, all objections are resolved.

El índice puede ser de gran ayuda para encontrar lo que buscas.

Ojalá el Kevin no se entere que su hijo es del Brandon y que sucedio cuando todavía salía con el Dylan

This week's learning is sponsored by Danielle & Jason Friedman in honor of Anabelle Friedman on her siyum of Mashechet Rosh Hashana on the occasion of her Bat Mitzvah, and in honor and appreciation of Rabbanit Michelle for inspiring and enabling multiple generations of women, in our family and around the world, to engage in Talmud study. Today's daf is sponsored by the Hadran Women of Long Island in memory of Myer Senders a”h, beloved father of our friend and co-learner Tina Lamm. "May the Torah learned today by all of us be a zechut for his neshama ותהא נשמתו צרורה בצרור החיים." What is the law regarding a mouse that falls into vinegar? Is the mouse nullified, and if so, at what ratio? The Mishna presents three distinct scenarios involving a Jew and a non-Jew, where wine is left in a location accessible to the non-Jew, raising concerns about potential libation (נסך) and thus rendering the wine prohibited. In each case, the Mishna outlines whether there is reason to suspect that the non-Jew offered the wine as a libation. The determining factor is whether the Jew stated they would be gone for a while or whether the Jew is considered to be supervising. The Gemara defines supervision as a situation in which the Jew could return at any moment, even if they are not physically present. The amount of time that must elapse to prohibit the wine (in a case where the Jew leaves for a while) is debated between the Rabbis and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel. The Rabbis hold that the wine becomes prohibited if enough time passes to pierce the stopper, reseal it, and allow it to dry. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel maintains that the required time is that needed to break the stopper entirely, fashion a new one, and let it dry. A fourth case involves a non-Jew dining in a Jew’s home, with wine left either on the table or on a side table. If the Jew leaves the room, there is concern that the non-Jew may touch the wine on the table, but not the wine on the side table—unless the Jew instructed the non-Jew to dilute the wine. If the bottle is sealed and enough time has passed for the stopper to be broken, replaced, and dried, the wine is prohibited. Why are all three cases necessary? What is unique about each, and why did the Mishna include them all? Rabbi Yochanan limits the scope of the debate between the Rabbis and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel to stoppers made of lime plaster, excluding those made of clay. If a non-Jew were to pierce a clay stopper and reseal it, the tampering would be visibly noticeable. A difficulty is raised against Rabbi Yochanan’s explanation from a braita, but it is ultimately resolved. Rava rules in accordance with Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, as the final case in the Mishna reflects his opinion exclusively, without presenting the view of the Rabbis. The sugya concludes with a practical question: If the halakha follows Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel—requiring a longer time to prohibit the wine—and also follows Rabbi Eliezer (Avodah Zarah 31a), who permits leaving a barrel with a single seal in the possession of a non-Jew without concern for tampering, why is the current practice to avoid leaving wine in a non-Jew’s possession? The Gemara answers that the concern lies with the bunghole, which was used to smell the wine. The worry is that the non-Jew might widen the hole to drink from it and offer the wine as a libation. Bungholes were apparently not present in barrels during the time of the Mishna but were commonly used at a later time in Babylonia when the question was asked.

Ella: "Este Idiota Seguro Está Pensando En Otra"Él: "¿Los transformes tendrán seguro de vida o de auto?"