Podcast appearances and mentions of robert mandel

"Rollie Tyler is the movies' best special effects man. Now somebody wants him to do it for real. But is he the weapon or the victim, Is it murder or is it... F/X" In this week's episode, we are discussing the 1986 action thriller 'F/X' starring Bryan Brown, Brian Dennehy and Diane Venora. Directed by Robert Mandel. F/X - IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089118/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_5_tt_5_nm_3_q_fx F/X - Rotten Tomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/fx Filming Location for F/X: https://nycinfilm.com/2024/01/16/f-x-1986/ Bill's Letterboxd Ratings: https://letterboxd.com/bill_b/list/bills-all-80s-movies-podcast-ratings/ Jason's Letterboxd Ratings: https://letterboxd.com/jasonmasek/list/jasons-all-80s-movies-podcast-ratings/ Website: http://www.all80smoviespodcast.com X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/podcastAll80s Facebook (META): https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100030791216864 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@all80smoviespodcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

For this week's episode of the podcast, we watched the 1996 action thriller slash high school drama The Substitute, directed by Robert Mandel — a prolific television director — and starring Tom Berenger, Ernie Hudson, Diane Venora, Marc Anthony, Luis Guzmàn and William Forsythe.In The Substitute, Berenger plays Jonathan Shale, a Vietnam veteran and mercenary who takes a break from the business of wet work after a botched operation in Cuba where several of his men were killed. He returns home to Miami to stay with his girlfriend, Jane Hetzko played by Venora, who is a teacher at a local, troubled high school.Jane becomes a target of the largest and most dangerous gang at the school, Kings of Destruction, and its leader Juan, played by Anthony, directs his men to attack her. She is seriously injured and while in the hospital, Shale maneuvers to become her substitute. His plan? To take down the gang, which is using the school as essentially an open air drug market.As he moves to confront Juan, Jonathan discovers that the gang is working with the school's ambitious and corrupt principal, played by Ernie Hudson, to move and distribute ever larger shipments of drugs from foreign supplies. Eager for revenge after a friendly teacher is killed by Juan, Jonathan gathers his men to make an assault on the gang, its suppliers and their allies.The tagline for The Substitute is “The most dangerous thing about school used to be the students.” You can watch The Substitute for free on Amazon Prime or on Tubi or Pluto or one of those services.Our next episode will on Brian DePalma's 1996 espionage thriller, Mission: Impossible.Connor Lynch produced this episode. Artwork by Rachel Eck.Contact us!Follow us on Twitter!John GanzJamelle BouieUnclearPodAnd join the Unclear and Present Patreon! For just $5 a month, patrons get access to a bonus show on the films of the Cold War, and much, much more.

Seth Carpenter, Morgan Stanley Chief Global Economist, and Mark Cabana, Bank of America Head of US Rates Strategy, break down the US Treasury's refunding announcement. Dom Konstam, Mizuho Securities Head of Macro Strategy, previews the Federal Reserve's rate decision. Win Thin, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Global Head of Currency Strategy, expects Japanese yields to continue to rise after the BOJ's decision. Jennifer Flitton, Invesco Head of US Government Affairs, discusses the latest in Washington on US aid to Israel.Get the Bloomberg Surveillance newsletter, delivered every weekday. Sign up now: https://www.bloomberg.com/account/newsletters/surveillance      FULL TRANSCRIPT:     This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene, along with Jonathan Farrow and Lisa Abramowitz. Join us each day for insight from the best an economics, geopolitics, finance and investment. Subscribe to Bloomberg Surveillance on demand on Apple, Spotify and anywhere you get your podcasts, and always on Bloomberg dot Com, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app. Where this seth Carpenter at, the chief global economist at Morgan Stanley. Is this just about in our start? Are we all John Williams this morning and we're readjusting? I clared it with me last week at a Bloomberg event. At two point zero percent is not two point six percent? I mean, are we really talking, as Mike aludes tou there about a new inflation regime? I think you want to separate out a couple of things. One is the new inflation regime, and there if you're comparing it to where we were from the financial crisis through COVID to say, yes, right, the FED was consistently missing it's inflation target to the downside. I call it a quarter percentage point. We're above, clearly above target now and over the next several years they want to bring it down, but I'm not sure they want to go back to the old days of you know, being below two percent on a regular basis. So if they're going to be averaging a little higher during expansions, call it a tenth or two above. You know, you're talking about twenty five to fifty basis points high inflation, so that's got to be there. I don't think we're talking about the difference between two percent inflation and three percent of I want to tell you on radio on television where we're heading here, what half are we have. We have Dark Carpenter with this on the broader economics of this moment. Ira Jersey schedule to join us just exquisite here on fixed income dynamics, and then we do even better. Mark Cabana is going to darken the door. Who's just expert on your world about you know, the different tranches of the auctions. I want to dig into what the implications are of this announcement sas and to me, I'm looking at the idea that they're really going to force the front end to a lot of the heavy lifting here. Does that pose a greater risk than people realize. So my view is no, the way I would think about it. There was a speculation that back and forth a little bit earlier, did the Treasury just react to the market. And I think you want to remember that the folks there at Treasury, Josh Frost, the assistant secretary, the career staff in debt management, they have a structure now, they have a framework for how to think about what to issue, and they're looking at what is the market saying about where the market wants to pay up and where the market's demanding a discount, and at the margin, they'll lean a little bit more to where the market wants the paper and lean a little bit away from the place where the market's pulling back. And we've seen over the past several months a big sell off in the long end. It showed up, you know, in models speak and the term premium, and they're paying attention to that. It's not that one week to the next, or one month to the next, or even one quar to the next, is it sustained. What we are seeing is very much a strong move on the long end in that thirty year yield plunging back below five percent. As we were talking about do you think I think that this indicates that really what we're seeing in yields is entirely a supply driven story more than anything in terms of an economic read on strength and inflation in the US. So no, it's so hard depending on any single thing. When I talk to our clients here in New York, in London, around the world who are trading in treasuries, there are a whole set of different narratives, one of which has been supplied. People have been worrying about the deficit, which is exactly why Secretary Yellen came out and said it's not the deficit. People are worrying about stronger growth. Q three GDP data was very strong, There's no two ways about it, and so that contributed to it. Other people are worrying about is there going to be a pullback from risk by global investors. Other people are looking at the back of Japan. We just had that meeting right where they effectively de facto got rid of yield crop control. So it's not just one single thing, it's everything coming together. So what's your compass at a time where we're expecting the FED to come out today too in varying shades of we have no idea and we will see just along with you, what is your guiding loadstar. So we're trying to figure out, along with the Fed, sort of what's going on with the economy. The strong Q three data and notwithstanding there are some signs of the economy slowing down. The last jobs report super strong, but if you look at the trend over the past eighteen month, clear downward trend. If you look at the GDP data, consumption spending holding in, but a lot of the strength was in inventories. Capex was not very strong at all, and so we are seeing that slowing. And so what we think is the Feds look in the same data we are. They're driving by feel a little bit and they're not going to hike today. We don't think they're going to hike in December because inflation just keeps undershooting their own forecast for where they thought inflation was going to be this year. What does the job dynamic look like with an ellen Zetner's sub one percent Q four GDP, Well, I think there This is where we want to keep in mind that there's so many swings from one quarter the next to some of the spending data. Like I said, the inventory, the numbers, that was never going to be the primary driver. So she starts giving you gloom on the job economy. Not at all. I will say that we have a Morgan Stanley Ellen and I and the rest of the team have been consistent from the beginning of this hiking cycle to say, the Fed's gonna hike, They're going to bring down inflation, but we are not going into recession. It is not doing gloom. Well, she's expert on the American consumer. What is Zenner when she gets fired up? You know she does. When Zender gets fired up about the American consumer, what is she saying? Lots of things, but in particular, one of the key risks that maybe people are overlooking for why there should be a slowdown in the fourth quarter is student loans. Right, there is a moratorium on student loans that's been lifted. We're starting to see that payback starting to happen, and that has to crimp consumer disposable incomes. That matters durable goods. Right. Interest rates are high, credit card rates are high. People financing cars and other things, it's just costing more and so they'll pull back on the spending. It just extraorded her. Seth Carpenter, thank you so much, really really appreciate it. With Morgan's stay, he writes piercing notes for Bank of America. There's no other way to put it. Out of US rates strategy, He's aged in the last ten minutes. Mark Cabana joins us this morning. So I'm like refunding, so what, I don't care. Everybody's in a ladder. It comes out, and to me it was sort of I don't you know, I really don't care. Jenny Allen said, we're gonna do short paper. Yeah, we're gonna do long paper. But we're the United States. Our listeners are viewers who are not sophisticated. Do they need to fear the fiscal system of America? No, you shouldn't fear the fiscal system because the US economy is still going to be very robust. There will be buyers for treasury paper. It's just a matter of at what level will they step in, And we've had a relative lack of buying recently, but that's meant that yields have had to adjust, and as they've adjusted, that should incentivize more investors to think about owning bonds and we do think that rates are going to keep rising or they're going to stay elevated. Really, until you see one of two things. Number One, until you see the macro data slow, we don't think that you've really seen that yet. Or two until you see d risking, until you see investors who think, you know what rates are kind of high, really yields almost a two and a half percent at the tenure point. That's a decent own and maybe I should think about de risking in my portfolio. This is such a valuable conversation. Then I got to get to what we see on balance sheets right now, mark to market and the rest of it in bonds. But let's stay on this theme right now of our new higher yield regime. How far out are you in the longer? I mean, if take any given yield, any given spread, is there a cabana one year, is it a cabana three years? How do you see the regime of longer? Well, we just think that rates are going to have to stay higher for longer. Not to reiterate the Fed mantra, but we really believe it because we've seen an economy that's been so resilient in the face of relatively elevated interest rates. And as long as that happens, that just is going to mean that the f it doesn't have to cut for a while. Now, when I think about longer, I personally think about five years plus. Oh wow, okay, my attention, just because you know, most investors who really focus on liquidity and liquidity management, they think generally two years, three years. But when I think about intermediate to long end, I think about five years plus. Okay, And I'm going to invent this phrase right now. I haven't seen it anywhere else. I want to copyright on this if you use it. Is it normal for longer? Is that really what we're talking about, is we're back to a normal rate regime. Well, it's certainly we're back to a regime that looks a lot more similar to the pre financial crisis than the post financial crisis. You've got a five year window on that. So what maturity do you buy? I'm in cash, I'm really comfortable at Bank of America. What maturre do you buy given a five year normal for longer view? Well, it really depends upon what your overall investment horizon is and where your preferences are. We think that if you're focused at the front end, you probably we want to be neutral to slightly overweight your benchmark. And if you're a more long term investor, we think that you at best want to be neutral right now, and you want to stay neutral until you see those signs of feedback that tell you that higher interest rates are finally slowing the economy, not just one data point here or there, but in the tier one stuff in labor more clearly an inflation. You want to stay neutral until you see those signs, or until you believe that there's a clearer and more definitive negative feedback from risk assets, which I don't think that we have really seen sufficiently yet. I love to bust Brian moynihan's chops because he, like no other CEO, quotes his research staff and I'll go blah blah blah about Bonzi and his own Cabana says, So let's get the report from Cabana that you would give to Brian moynihan right now. I got balance sheets, nationwide, mark to market I get, and I got everything else with massive bond losses, priced down, yield up. Should our listeners and viewers be afraid of this non marked market garbage on balance sheets. Well, I think you're talking about bank balance sheets, and we do appreciate that. Brian reads our research. He's a staunch supporter, and we really do appreciate that. We think that what banks are doing right now is that they are really prizing liquidity. They really want to hold as much liquidity as possible. They're choosing to hold cash, they're keeping reserves with the FED, and they're not buying bonds, they're not buying treasuries or mortgages, and they're prizing liquidity because they know that they need to meet their outflow needs. They know that their securities book is not particularly liquid because it's so low in value. You don't want to sell and realize the loss. We saw what happened with some of the regional band. So what do you do? This is the key thing. So what do you do if you're a bank? What do you do if your bank? If you've got all this out there and you don't want to sell, just like you said, but things can happen, things can change. How do you process that reality? If you're a bank, what you're doing right now as you're holding that is the game. That's why the Fed shrunk their balance sheet through QT by a trillion dollars, and you've seen bank cash holdings not move down very much at all. They are bidding up on the liability side of the balance sheet. They're issuing CDs, time deposits, etc. To take in more money because they're seeing retail outflows. And then they're holding cash and they're going to continue to do that until they see signs that the economy is turning, until they know that their loan growth is really slowed down and maybe negative on a year over year six month average or whatnot. And they're gonna wait until the economy slows more meaningfully to extend out the curve and buy those bonds. Right now, banks are not buying duration. They've been shrinking their treasury and agency holdings, and they're going to wait to add duration until they see definitive signs that the economy is turned. And so again, what banks are doing right now, it's holding out liquidity because that is the most valuable thing that they seem to believe that what does holding out liquidity mean for mere mortals that can't hold out liquidity? Small business? Torsten Slocke at Apollo talks about ten percent small business loans as well. I saw a thirty one percent charge card the other day. It wasn't Bank of America, of course, thirty one percent charge card interest rate the other day. What does the public do given price down, yield up banks saying I'm scared stiff, I got a whole cash. Look, it's a tough time to be a borrower. I think we know that, right. It's tough time to move, it's a tough time to buy a home, it's a tough time to be a business if you need a loan. And that's exactly what monetary policy is trying to do, right, It's trying to slow down activity by reducing demand for loans and borrowing. And so if you're a small business and you do need a loan, well you need to think about, Okay, what other liquidity sources do I have? Can I draw on any other type of liquidity? And then you've got to ask yourself do I really need to expand? Do I need to make that next investment? And you got to make sure that you can clear a much higher hurdle rate in order to justify those costs. That's how monetary policy works. It should slow down activity through the lending channel, and to some extent we're seeing that, but it hasn't happened, I think to the extent of the FED, like Mark Commander, thank you so much. With the Bank of America joining us now to begin strong on this day of a Federal Reserve meeting is Dominic Constem. He's head of macro strategy at Mosile Americas. For years literally iconic Credit Suite were thrilled that doctor Constem could join us today. Dominica, I give you the phrase super restrictive. Is Jerome Powell's FED combined with market action a super restrictive FED. Well, yeah, in the context of the sustainability of the US consumer, and if you like the overhang of debts refinancing in the corporate sector really beginning in twenty twenty five, you know, clearing the front end is super restrictive, and it's going to have to get first quite aggressively. As some stage that the issue is a timing, and you know that timing has been pushed out because the consumer who's got great balance sheet, has decided that even as they spent all their fiscal excess that they were given after COVID, they're deciding to leverage up even with interest rates as high as they are, but they can do that because of the balance sheet, So that kind of delays the impact of this super restrictiveness, which is kind of a bit of a conungrum for the Fed. So that's the price for longer, not higher for longer, but just longer. What is the cost did your own power of a longer strategy at these levels? Well, I think what's happened in the last couple of months really has been that the Fed has decided that, you know, because effectively they are super restrictive, they didn't want to keep on pushing up short rates, you know, don't not quickly go to six percent. So they've emphasized this idea that they're just going to hold at a high level for that much longer. But ironically that directly feeds into a sell off in the back end, the idea that what we call term premium, this risk premium that's short rates you end up being higher than the equivalent tenor of a longer dated treasury. That's term premium that gets priced into the market, which is why you've had this enormous sort of bare steepening going on with the tens going up to close to five percent thirties, nifiing the corter, et cetera. And in a way that that's not a bad thing if you want to slow the economy, but because that will undermine and is undermining risk assets, and it will help to tighten financial conditions overall. So that's the impact of what the Fed is doing. There is a risk though, that they run because you get people concerned about the as you mentioned earlier, the refinancing of the Treasury. You know, when they decide to issue longer dated debts that now it is coming in at much higher interest rates, and you start worrying about a vicious circle where if you can't reduce a debt so through spending cuts, well you've got another problem because your interest service costs are going up at the same time. And that's kind of get people worried about this idea that Treasury isn't going to be able to sustainably fund itself down the road, particularly when you get those sort of you know, bigger issues coming up, the structural issues coming up that will mean higher deficits. There's always been a sort of uncomfortable tension, especially now between the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve, especially because the Treasury Department is helmed by the one and only Janet Yellen who used to head the FED. How much is a treasure you're going to try to game out the market and kind of give a helping hand to the Fed by not concentrating some of those debt sales in the longer end, sell tea bills and hold a pad and wait for things to normalize. Well, I mean, it's obviously a great question and issue. I mean, strictly speaking, I don't think Treasury really should gain things too much. You know, they're not really traders as such, and if they were, then you know, maybe God help us. I mean, the idea I think is is, you know, you do have rollover risk, so you know, no one really knows how quickly long term rates might might reverse, even if we go into some slowing you know, where is this sort of mutual rate It might you know, might be higher and maybe ten years trading around you know, five percent is the sort of new norm. So I think it wouldn't be appropriate for the Treasury to really try and game the markets or a near term and sort of second guests that short term rates are going to come crashing down and they'll be able to refinance themselves down the road by extending maturity later. So I think they'll they'll probably extend the duration. I think the estimates are kind of you know, you know, seem about right, this sort of one hundred and fourteen billion and putting it in coupons. And because of the announcement we had earlier in the week, they can cut bill supply bits. So that's our expectation and no gaining of it. Basically, a lot of people expect this to be a boring meeting, sibad or Jappa calling it a placeholder, Steven Linder saying, how many ways can you say we'll see? I mean, this is basically going to be a holding kind of pattern. And yet we see a dissonance growing where the market sees and escalating's chance of excelling, reaccelerating inflation. At the same time that the Feds kind of seeming to subtly agree with Janet Yella and saying that yields are going to go back down. Do you think they're going to bridge that gap today? Well, they could do. I mean they've always got the option to. I mean that there are a couple of interesting things going on. I mean, obviously this sell off in the long end is very interesting, and I think they can definitely address that in the conference call and basically say that's doing some of the work for them and be a bit more optimistic. They can also be actually, even though inflation has been a bit sticky on the very latest prints, they could be a bit more optimistic on that. We've done some background analysis on that, and the reason why inflation has been a bit stick is it's really been on the demand side, less on the supply side type thing. And I think that's encouraging because that's something a little bit more understandable and sort of indicative that, you know, the underlying trend lower is still in place for inflation, and obviously the global inflation picture has been looking a bit better, so I think they can basically, you know, I don't think it'll be an uninteresting meeting or press conference. It's just really a question of how far power wants to go down the road and try and sort of reassure markets. One interesting thing I always think is that you know, to what extent to the FED really anticipate or understand that their actions at the September meeting was going to lead to this sort of you know, near one hundred base on itseel off in the long end. I mean, it's been quite dramatic, And did they really expect that way? Yes, this is a question dominic and why this is outside your remit. But we've known each other for years, So I'm going to go from the macro of constant to commercial banking. Bernanky taught us at Princeton that financial structure and strength matters. I'm looking at the technical construct of the American banking system and I don't like what I see. Should the FED fold in what's happening to the banks right now? Should they today pay attention in their meetings to the weakness that we see in commercial banking equity prices? Absolutely? And I think the thing that so many people miss is they think that banks are kind of less important now than they were before because of alternative banking, you know, fintech, private equity, you know, other forms of leverage if you like, in the system that they people think seem to think, you know, credit is created elsewhere. Credit is that there's something called outside money, which is a central bank, and they start the credit creation process there's in something called inside money, which is the banking system, and they continue the credit creation process. And to be honest, that pretty much is where how credit is created. Money it can only be created by the FED and the banks to the bank multiplier. It cannot be created by private equity. They have to get their leverage from somewhere. And so I think you always have to go to the banking system, and you always have to focus on if the banks are kind of doing their job, even if the leverage overrule in the system is getting higher and higher, and the relatives of the banks, they're the ultimate ones who if they pull the plug, let alone the FED putting the plug, then the whole kind of system can start to implode. So I do think it's very important what's happening in the banks, and I think it's a big concern that obviously lending is slowing down. There is obviously regulation and there's some credit some cattle restrictions taking place, but that's all part of the cycle. And as long as the FED is there to pick up the pieces at the end of it, we're fine. But those pieces will need to be picked up. You sound like Alan Meltzer, the late Great Alan Meltzer, lender of letters. Who are dom I got thirty seconds? Are you concerned the massive shift from deposits to money market funds? Is that going to destabilize the system. Well, it's been a challenge, but to be fair, that TGA build up that the Treasury has done has actually come at the expense a lot of the money market funds and the repo there. So I think, you know, the Fed has actually managed this process relatively well with the help of the Treasury rebuilding TJA with all that bill issuance, so you know, you know, it's it's a relatively orderly process, but it's obviously something that you've got to keep watching. You don't want excess reserves to get too low in the banking system. Is that to Constant? Thank you so much, Dominic Constant with the Missouri Are they just a terrific brief Therey joining US doctor Wynn Thinn, global head of Currency Strategy around brothers Harriman win Thin. You were at the altar of Robert Mundel at Columbia who invented our international currency dynamics. Is there a theory to what Japan is doing? Are they making up original theory? Well, first of all, thanks, thanks, as always a pleasure to appear here with you guys. To me, it's an experiment, it's an ongoing experiment. You know, Japan has been fighting deflation for decades and they've thrown everything at the wall to see what sticks. The latest iteration was negative rates and he locor control and by hooker, by crooked, it's it's finally getting out of deflation. It's obviously the positive makers are very nervous there getting you know, starting these poses is the easy part. Getting out of them is always the hard part. We saw the FED struggle with getting out of q back after a great financial crisis. So what we've been seeing unfold over the last year is just a really haphazard so again throwing stuff at the wall to see what works. It's been again more out of fear and concern than anything else. They don't want to upset the opera card that the recovery is, by many measures, you know, quite modest and vulnerable, and so that's what we're seeing. I do think that that Japan will exit accommodations fully in early times, and by that I mean a ray hike. Why should our why should our viewers and listeners care in the Western world, it just seems to be removed and over there. For example, comparing the yuan the ren menbi in China to Japanese. Yeah, and even with we you want versus a dollar, it's studying how weak the Japanese yen is versus ren memby. Why do I care in America? Well, I think, as you guys pointed out just earlier in the segment, Japanese investors have been have been basically leaving Japan and chasing yield and returns elsewhere. And that's because of the zero rate interest policy and heal com control. Domestic eiels aren't attractive enough. So we've seen massive capital outflows of Japan over the last years, if not decades. If we get that infection point where things change and actually rates are allowed to go back to market based levels, I think the fear of at least in Japan and others, is that that wave of capital will come back from crashing back. And already seen announcements some of the Japanese life insurers that they planned the second half of this fiscal year to underweight foreign investments, foreign bonds and overweight jgb's in anticipation of normalization. So there's also the capital flow stories that I think, you know, coming in a time when we don't know what the Fed's doing, we don't know what's going on in Europe with the Middle East. It's just another sort of added uncertainty that Marcus had that jests and I think that's what I think investors in general are worried about. It's almost deliberate ambiguity. Is deliberate ambiguity by the Bank of Japan going to actually create some sort of soft gradual increase in yields and some sort of controlled departure from yaled curve control. Yeah, yeah, at least I think that's what we're seeing. In fact, in my opinion, Yeald curve control is dead. It's deader than Elvis right now, as far as I can tell, they've they've introduced this ambiguity where it's now one percent is now reference point. Who knows what that means. So the market will will prod and tested the Bank of Japan not just on heels but also on the dollary in and it's gonna be a cat and mouse game. But really, for all intents and purposes, jgbills are going up. They have been going up. They will continue go up. We'll go above that one percent sort of reference point within days, and you know the upside I think natural sort of target for the markets. Where we go from there well dependent what's going on in other global market, especially US treasuries. But again, this is normal. This is you know, we've been it's very what I would say, an abnormal period. And it's been going on for decades in Japan of zero rates, negative rates, year clear control and it's abnormal. And I think that they're trying to exit that, but are obviously very very scared of the ramification at least some moments ago, the d X y unraveling. Right now one oh six point ninety one, we're really buttressed up here against the one oh seven on DXY and is clearly yet led by en dynamics. And this goes like the banking stocks. I'm sorry, you just have to look at the Bloomberg screen and it's screaming a certain level of tension out there this morning without being you know, a toxic brew of gloom. I mean, it's just the markets are speaking before this FED meeting, and it's not all the managed message of the elites. When to that point. How disruptive is the fact that the dollar has continued to strengthen and not weaken as so many people thought this year. Well and for the for the US, it's good because the stronger currency helps to limit important inflation. What we were seeing particularly stress is with emerging markets, especially in Asia, that's being double whemmed by the yen, n by the dollar. But basically we've seen many many emerging market center banks intervene to help support their own currency. We've seen surprise rate hikes, we saw that from Indonesia last month, and we've also seen countries that are cutting weights slow. They're easy because the currencies are coming under pressure. So it's to me it's really a toxic root for emerging markets. That is a height height money conditions in the US, slowing global growth slow in China, and easing cycles in emerging markets, and that's all to be a very toxic row for emerging market currency. You should have seen Tom King's face when you said toxic brew. His ears perked up and he was fully into Robert Mondel used to say, Robert Mandel would be in a lecture and he say, look, you know the Mundell triangulation and in partically ununified currency. It's one big time. This is a difficult time because people have been throwing around people have it thrown around where it's like toxic brew for quite a while. And yet we have been in a sort of uneasy equilibrium all year that's really been tapped off by a US dynamism. You go, what do you mean? I don't think it's been an an easy equilibrium. I think the markets are talking here. You know, I'm going back and forth, Doug cass here on the banks, you can rationalize us all you want. Yen one Fifty's why we're talking to win thin so win way in on that. Are things breaking down in a more material way that'll lead to more traumatic moves in effects. Well, I think was the main driver that's really taking anyone by surprise. This is the continued strength of the US economy and by that extension the US dollar, the FED and all that. I'm of the opinion that the Fed will probably get us into a recession next year. But I don't look for anything quote unquote break by break, we mean like a financial crisis, banking crisis some sort. We had to scare back in March with SVB but we found that was, you know, to me, an idiosyncratic situation with SVB and signature. So to me, you know, all the stress tests suggest that that the global financials remains fairly resilient. Now look, that's like we all know that. That doesn't mean you know, a whole lot when when when push comes to show. But I do think that we are sorting this post gred financial crisis uh so situation where yes, the institutions and and overseers and regulators are all sort of on the same page and and hopefully uh willing and able to head off a crisis. Now, well we see pockets of stress. You know, we've had frontier markets blowing up, emerging markets or Canade remain in the stress look UK, uh Europe or into recession. But you know, nothing again, nothing sort of broken. This is sort of a normal thing. I used. I'll leave this, you know with the final thought is that, let's say, normal sort of situation terms of down town going too faster in the US, that's hiking, We're gonna slow, we maybe go into recession, but then the whole cycle starts over. It's not something to worry about. I've got to leave it there. Doctor, Thank you so much, he says Brown Brothers Harriman. There's been an issue in the US side of things, first of all how deeply the US troops will get involved, but also how much aid can actually get passed to go towards supporting both Israel and Ukraine, which no one is talking about. Jennifer Flytt and covering all of this fantastic guests to really analyze it for US head of US Government Affairs at INVESCO, Jennifer, what do you make of this split that we've seen with the House proposing a separate bill to fund Israel that yesterday President Biden said, Vito right, he issued a veto threat. That's correct. Yesterday. We're going to see what the House can do. I think it's still an open question if they have the support because they have paired the Israeli funding with an offset that directly sort of impacts that Inflation Reduction Act and of the irs, and so they will lose the vast majority of Democrats. Could they gain a couple while they lose a few of their own Republicans? I think that's the question, and we'll see that play out on Thursday. What does it tell you about the nature of funding agreements. If funding Israel comes at the expense of cutting the agency served with collecting taxes, well, first, I would say this is an opening salvo for the House because they will have to negotiate no matter what with the Senate. Schumer has the majority leader in the Senate, has already stated that this is dead on arrival, so there is an expectation that there will be further negotiation. But when it comes to offsets, this is a reflection of what is happening in America right now with regard to our own domestic debt our, own deficits that we're running right now. And that's what Republicans and their districts really feel a need to answer to. Jennifer. I believe it is November first. Count it down sixteen days to November seventeenth. It's been left in the debris. We've forgotten about November seventeenth. Give us a brief of the importance of November seventeenth inside the Beltleigh, it is coming upon us very quickly. That is an excellent point and it is not lost on most members. Also, most members that want to get Ukraine funding through the House, Republican and Democratic members and the Continuing Resolution, which is that stop gap that runs out on November seventeenth that has to be extended. The Ukraine funding may have to ride on that continuing resolution. However, they work it out and we'll see that over the next week. They're currently drafting another continuing resolution in the House. Jennifer, there's real dissonance and a headline Stiffe been reading and I am trying to square them. I'd love your help. Basically, on one side, you see the fight that's escalating in Congress, it's escalating with the White House over how to get financing to back these efforts. And then on the other hand, we're talking about US troops potentially being in Gaza indefinitely after the war to keep some sort of peace. What is the appetite in the United States to have a protracted role in some of these conflicts that seem pretty intractable right now? That's right. I think there are a number of steps though that we have to get to first, right because US troops are in the region, of course, they are in Iraq there in Yemen. This was discussed a little bit at the hearing yesterday with Secretary of Blincoln and Secretary of defense Austin. They have been attacked over the last week two weeks. They have had to retaliate in those attacks, and the expectation is to deter further escalation. That I think is the immediate issue before we get to the longer term issues in Gaza. Israel is able to contain that area. There's also a really short term kind of issue with respect to President Biden's approval rating in some of the swing states. And there was a poll that recently came out that more than fifty percent of Muslim Americans used to support President Biden and now a fewer than twenty percent currently do. How significantly is this going to color the entire debate next year? That's an excellent point. I think the tension there within the Democrat Democratic Party and seeing some of those polls, but even seeing the streets right, I mean, we've seen the protrust across America, not just among Arab and Muslim Americans, but also with young people, young progressives on college campuses, and they do see that as a threat. So how they're going to diplomatically work within their own party and their own voters. I think we're starting to see that play out. Jennifer Thank you so much. Jennifer flintne with this with Invesco there on Washington and the war in the Eastern Mediterranean. Subscribe to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live every weekday starting at seven am Eastern. I'm Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can watch us live on Bloomberg Television and always I'm the Bloomberg Terminal. Thanks for listening. I'm Tom Keen, and this is BloombergSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Get ready to be dazzled by the deadly art of illusion!No, wait. That was the sequel.Anyways, Andrew and Dave return this episode to discuss director Robert Mandel's 1986 cult film F/X, starring Bryan Brown and Brian Dennehey! How does this thriller of its era hold up? What beloved childhood figure turns up here? And why isn't this film what you think it is? Tune in and find out!Next Episode: Before Tom Cruise got into a habit of trying to kill himself on every film he makes, there was a time where all he had to do was learn how to mix drinks. All music by Andrew Kannegiesser. Editing by Dave Babbitt.

Jess and Dini travel back to September 10, 1993! We recap Season 1 - Episode 1, Pilot. “Do you believe in the existence of extraterrestrials?” This is where it all started for us and millions of fans around the world! FBI Agent Dana Scully is assigned to work with fellow agent, Fox “Spooky” Mulder on cases involving unexplained phenomena. On their first case together, the duo head to Oregon to investigate the mysterious deaths of four young people from the same graduating class. While Scully believes there's a logical explanation, Mulder suspects the victims were alien abductees. This episode was written by Chris Carter and directed by Robert Mandel. Do you have any X-Files related theories, stories,  key points or podcast feedback? Please email us at TheXFilesChatRoomPodcast@gmail.com We'd love to hear from you. Please tell us how we can improve!You can find us on:Twitter @TXFChatRoomPodInstagram @TXFChatRoomPodTraditional homeland acknowledgments are gathered from:https://native-land.ca/Resources: X-Files WikiIMDB

This week on Peanuts and Popcorn, we kick off our brand-new format, appropriately with Stanley Kubrick's classic, 2001: A Space Odyssey. Our 2nd film is Robert Mandel's F/X from 1986. Next up are Tar and The Banshees of Inisherin. We also have much to discuss on the pending MLB season, offseason grades and more on the season premiere of Peanuts and Popcorn.

In this week's episode, Daniel & Harry are joined by writer and podcast host Mark Oppenheimer to discuss Robert Mandel's 1992 film “School Ties,” starring Brendan Fraser and Matt Damon.They unpack how the film represents widespread antisemitism as it existed at the time, debate the accuracy of its depiction of Jewish practice, and discuss how screenwriter Dick Wolf infuses a Law and Order type intensity into the film.As always, they close out the episode by ranking the film's "Jewishness" in terms of its cast & crew, content, and themes.IMDB - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105327/Movie Trailer - https://youtu.be/bGYOP55A59cMark's LinksGatecrashers - https://www.tabletmag.com/podcasts/gatecrashersSquirrel Hill: The Tree of Life Synagogue Shooting and the Soul of a Neighborhood - https://www.amazon.com/Squirrel-Hill-Synagogue-Shooting-Neighborhood/dp/0525657193/Connect with Jews on Film online:Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/jewsonfilm/Twitter - https://twitter.com/jewsonfilmpodYouTube- https://www.youtube.com/@jewsonfilmTikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@jewsonfilmpod

What do, a solitary teenager who forms life-changing bonds with his High School friends, and a talented Jewish athlete attending a privileged private school, have in common? This week on THE MOVIE CONNECTION: KC Watched: "SCHOOL TIES" (7:01) (Directed by, Robert Mandel. Starring, Brendan Fraser, Matt Damon, Chris O'Donnell...) Jacob Watched: "THE PERKS OF BEING A WALLFLOWER" (38:37) (Directed by, Stephen Chbosky. Starring, Logan Lerman, Emma Watson, Ezra Miller...) Talking Points include: Where'd ya go, Logan Lerman? Tunnel Songs Before School Special and more!! Send us an email to let us know how we're doing: movieconnectionpodcast@gmail.com Follow us on Instagram Rate and Review on Apple Podcasts Check out more reviews from Jacob on Letterboxd Cover art by Austin Hillebrecht, Letters by KC Schwartz

Talk about school daze! These no good punk kids (who still go to school every day) are in dire need of some asshole authority figure to give them some tough love. Will they survive until graduation? THE PRINCIPAL (1987, Christopher Cain) 10:50 THE SUBSTITUTE (1996, Robert Mandel) 1:06:00 ONE EIGHT SEVEN (1997, Kevin Reynolds) 2:02:00

On our 200th episode we look back at the week of September 29th, 1992. We talk about the album, Dirt, from Alice In Chains and the movie, School Ties, from director Robert Mandel. With special guest, Phil Norris. Dirt School Ties

Benvenuti nella raccolta in formato Podcast delle puntate di #CloseUp, a cura di Matteo Righi, aka Houssy. #CloseUp è la rubrica di recensioni cinematografiche in onda su Radio Italia Anni 60 Emilia-Romagna.

This week on Hull on Estates, Jonathon Kappy and Nick Esterbauer discuss the recent decision of Robert Mandel et al. v. 1909975 Ontario Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 5343, and review the issue of rectification in the corporate context.  

Welcome to the Hurdy Gurdy Cafe. This is our very first podcast! In this episode I speak with Sergio Gonzalez about the Hurdy Gurdy, what it's all about, where to find one, and how to buy a hurdy gurdy.   If you'd like to watch the video, follow this link: https://youtu.be/QY0zYPC_Uic   The Hurdy Gurdy Cafe Podcast Season 1 Episode 1- Show Notes What does Sergio Gonzalez have to say about: What is the Hurdy Gurdy all about? (Where's the air?) What is the Organistrum? A very brief history of the Hurdy Gurdy. What is Avant Garde Hurdy Gurdy? What's going on with “Coil – La Loco, Paris, France (2004-05-23)”? Who is Marc Egea? Who is Efren Lopez? https://www.efrenlopez.net/me/ What does Jimmy Page have to do with the hurdy gurdy? Does Nigel Eaton like being considered a rock star? Why is the hurdy gurdy gaining so much popularity? What is “Easy Listening Gurdy”? What is the Cretan Lyra? Featured Music – Tobie Miller – Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major, track #8 from the Bach Solo Album Nigel Eaton – Three Sharks, Track #7 from the Pandaemonium Album With Andy Cutting, Paul James, Mark Davies, Julie Murphy, and Becky Price Cliff Stapleton – The Almond and the Olive – From the Bath Folk Festival in 2011. Questions Answered – What is the best approach to learning the Hurdy Gurdy? How do you make the most out of a mid to low range hurdy gurdy instrument? What is an HGSO? (It's not a hurdy gurdy.) What is a Nerdy Gurdy? – http://www.nerdygurdy.nl/ How about Gordiy Starukh or Robert Mandel as Hurdy Gurdy builders? https://robertmandel.at/shop/ https://www.facebook.com/hordijgurdy/ Do hurdy gurdy's use air to make sounds, or is that just a lyra organizzata? How does the hurdy gurdy actually make sounds? Is a Hurdy Gurdy and a wheel fiddle the same thing? What is an Infinite Violin Bow?!?! Why doesn't my hurdy gurdy sound very good? What should one expect when ordering or buying a new hurdy gurdy? What should I know about Marco Gammara or ELZ Guitars? https://www.facebook.com/people/Marco-Gamarra-Luthier/100010112567629 www.facebook.com/elzguitars/ — Thanks for being with us Sergio Gonzalez. Learn more about what Sergio is up to at: https://www.zanfoneando.com/hurdy-gurdy-online-lessons/

The Crazy Folks review F/X (1986), starring Bryan Brown, Brian Dennehy, Cliff DeYoung and Jerry Orbach. Directed by Robert Mandel. B-movie special effects guy gets hired by the Feds to stage the assassination of a mob informant but shenanigans ensue when things are not what they seem... go figure. We will also touch on how some actors today have taken the method way too far and Sir Lawrence Olivier's famous opinion about it.

Robert Mandel's F/X (1986) -- also sometimes known as FX: Murder by Illusion -- is the story of Rollie Taylor (Bryan Brown), a movie special effects man who is hired by two government agents (Cliff DeYoung & Mason Adams) to stage the public assassination of a mob boss (Jerry Orbach) who's turned state's evidence. What better way to keep the mob off the tail than by “killing him”? But things don't turn out as easy as that.Jedidiah Ayres and Adam Schartoff join Mike to discuss F/X, its sequel, and the spin-off TV series. Special guests include director Robert Mandel, writer Alan Ormsby, and actor Cliff DeYoung.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Robert Mandel's F/X (1986) -- also sometimes known as FX: Murder by Illusion -- is the story of Rollie Taylor (Bryan Brown), a movie special effects man who is hired by two government agents (Cliff DeYoung & Mason Adams) to stage the public assassination of a mob boss (Jerry Orbach) who’s turned state's evidence. What better way to keep the mob off the tail than by “killing him”? But things don’t turn out as easy as that.Jedidiah Ayres and Adam Schartoff join Mike to discuss F/X, its sequel, and the spin-off TV series. Special guests include director Robert Mandel, writer Alan Ormsby, and actor Cliff DeYoung.

Robert Mandel's F/X (1986) -- also sometimes known as FX: Murder by Illusion -- is the story of Rollie Taylor (Bryan Brown), a movie special effects man who is hired by two government agents (Cliff DeYoung & Mason Adams) to stage the public assassination of a mob boss (Jerry Orbach) who’s turned state's evidence. What better way to keep the mob off the tail than by “killing him”? But things don’t turn out as easy as that.Jedidiah Ayres and Adam Schartoff join Mike to discuss F/X, its sequel, and the spin-off TV series. Special guests include director Robert Mandel, writer Alan Ormsby, and actor Cliff DeYoung.

Every podcast thinks terrible thoughts and this week those terrible thoughts are about The Rage: Carrie 2. Analog Jones is joined by The Jersey Ghouls to review this over the top 90's horror film. The Rage: Carrie 2 was released into theaters on March 12, 1999. The budget was $21 million, and the movie made $17.8 million in the box office. Directed by Katt SheaProduced by Paul MonashWritten by Rafael MoreuBased on Carrie by Stephen King The Rage: Carrie 2 CastEmily Bergl as Rachel LangJason London as Jesse RyanDylan Bruno as Mark BingJ. Smith Cameron as Barbara LangAmy Irving as Sue SnellZachery Ty Bryan as Eric Stark The Rage: Carrie 2 TrailersThe World is Not Enough (James Bond)The James Bond 007 CollectionThe Mod Squad (1999)Blast From the PastRocky MarcianoThe Lesser EvilThe Corruptor The Rage: Carrie 2 PlotBarbara Lang has schizophrenia and is locked up in a mental institution called Arkham Asylum. Rachel has to live with foster parents. Years later, Rachel talks with her best friend Lisa, who has lost her virginity to Eric, a football player. The football players have a game where they sleep with girls and receive points. After Eric rejects her, Lisa commits suicide. Her death ignites Rachel's dormant telekinetic powers. Rachel discovers a photo of Lisa and Eric. She tells school guidance counselor Sue Snell and Sheriff Kelton that Lisa and Eric slept together. Kelton looks into charging Eric with statutory rape. Walter, Rachel's Basset Hound dog, is hit by a car, but Jesse drives by and takes the dog to an animal hospital. They have coffee while Walter is recovering. Eric, Mark and several other football players learn that Rachel had a photo of Eric and Lisa together and gave it to Sheriff Kelton. They pay Rachel a visit at her house to intimidate her into not talking, but her powers stop them. Sue Snell meets with Rachel and learns Rachel is telekinetic. Snell shows Rachel the original high school from Carrie (1976) that she survived, but 70 people died in the fire that Carrie White started. The Senior D.A. covers up the statutory rape because of the political influence of the wealthy families. Encouraged, Mark plots to humiliate Rachel for what she did to Eric. He apologizes to Jesse and offers his parents' cabin so Jesse can spend the night with Rachel. Rachel loses her virginity, both unaware that a hidden video camera is filming them. Rachel goes to a party, and the popular kids reveal their sex game that she is a part of, which triggers Rachel's telekinesis and unleashes the rage in her. Rachel closes the doors, kills most of the party goers, including Sue Snell in a horrific display of power. Rachel gets crushed by a piece of the house, Jesse says he loves her and she saves him. A year later, Jesse is at college, sharing his room with Rachel's dog, Walter. Jesse dreams Rachel approaches him in his dorm. When he walks towards her, she shatters into pieces in a very odd ending. Behind the Scenes of The Rage: Carrie 2Original the script was titled The Curse and was stalled for two years. When the film started to shoot in 1998 it was retitled to Carrie 2: Say You're Sorry. A few weeks into production the first director Robert Mandel quit over creative differences, and Katt Shea took over. Buy the double feature with the 2002 TV version of Carrie and The Rage: Carrie 2 by Scream Factory. Come back next week when we review Heart and Souls (1993). Discuss these movies and more on our Facebook page. You can also listen to us on iTunes, Podbean, and Youtube! Email us at analogjonestof@gmail.com with any comments or questions!

Robert Mandel is a Sonoma resident, successful vineyard owner and retired telecommunications, technology sales and management executive with more than 30 years of experience. As a record promoter with Epic Records in the 1970s, Mandel also promoted the single “Brandy (You’re A Fine Girl)” by Looking Glass to be a No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 and the Cash Box Top 100 charts. Two years later it served as the inspiration for Barry Manilow’s classic “Mandy.” Listen more at http://www.jayrooke.com/008 Check out my website: https://jayrooke.com/   Follow me on: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TribeCreator/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jayrooke/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/JayRooke

Warning: all episodes usually contain a high amount of strong language, drug/alcohol references, adult jokes, and other material that may be concerning to some listeners.Be sure to check out Jon Young’s Bombs Away podcast: http://www.bombsawayshow.com/Jon’s FB https://www.facebook.com/bombsawayshowThe crew talks about the production of their movie Hookman 2Jon returns in the Tale of Old Man CorcoranThe series is currently available in the United States on Amazon, YouTube, and several other sites.Intro theme is by glassdevaney: https://soundcloud.com/glassdevaney/are-you-afraid-of-the-darkOutro song is by Maddtown: https://soundcloud.com/maddtown/are-you-afraid-of-the-darkProduced by Modulation Studios. Contact: werenotafraidofthedark@gmail.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/werenotafraidofthedark/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/werenotafraidofthedark/Are You Afraid Of The Dark? “The Tale of the Magician’s Assistant” (TV Episode 1993)”. IMDB. Accessed January 20, 2018. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0514428/Are You Afraid of the Dark? “The Tale of the Magician’s Assistant” Season 2, episode 11. Directed by Ron Oliver. Written by Cassandra Schafhausen. Originally aired September 11, 1993 on Nickelodeon. https://youtu.be/yYR439GX7NABrad Silberling, dir. Casper (1995). Universal Pictures, Amblin Entertainment, The Harvey Entertainment Company. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112642/Durham, Adam & Young, Jonathan, dirs. Hookman 2 (2013). Modulation Studios. Tri-B Productions. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1828200glassdevaney. Are You Afraid of the Dark? Instrumental cover. 2012. https://soundcloud.com/glassdevaney/are-you-afraid-of-the-darkJohn Fawcett, dir. Ginger Snaps (2000). Copperheart Entertainment, Water Pictures, Motion International. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0210070/Katt Shea, Robert Mandel, dirs. Carrie 2: The Rage (1999). United Artists, Red Bank Films. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0144814/McRobb, Will, Mittenthal, Robert, & Viscardi, Chris. KaBlam! (1996-2000) Flying Mallet Productions, Nickelodeon Production. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0122353/Mel Brooks, dir. Young Frankenstein (1974). Gruskoff/Venture Films, Crossbow Productions, Jouer Limited. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072431/Michael Lindsay-Hogg, dir. Ivana Trump’s For Love Alone (1996). RHI Entertainment. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0164029/Mike Judge, creator. Beavis and Butthead (1993-2011). Film Roman Productions, J.J. Sedelmaier Productions, Judgemental Films Inc. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105950/Mr. Skin. "Karen Elkin Nude - Naked Pics and Sex Scenes at Mr. Skin." Mrskin. Accessed January 19, 2018. https://www.mrskin.com/karen-elkin-nude-c7322.Raimi, Sam, dir. The Evil Dead (1981). Renaissance Pictures. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083907/Riversa, Jose & Schaefer, Karl, creators. Eerie, Indiana (1991-1992). Cosgrove/Meurer Productions, Hearsts Entertainment Productions, Unreality. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0101088/Ron Oliver, dir. Are You Afraid Of The Dark? Season 2, episode 11, “The Tale of the Magician’s Assistant.” Aired on September 11, 1993, on Nickelodeon. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0514428/Robert Kurtzman, dir. Wishmaster (1997). Image Organization, Pierre David. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120524/Robert Zemeckis, dir. The Polar Express (2004). Castle Rock Entertainment, Shangri-La Entertainment, Playtone. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338348/Spielberg, Steven, dir. Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981). Paramount Pictures, Lucasfilm. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082971/

Warning: all episodes usually contain a high amount of strong language, drug/alcohol references, adult jokes, and other material that may be concerning to some listeners.Be sure to check out Jon Young’s Bombs Away podcast: http://www.bombsawayshow.com/Jon’s FB https://www.facebook.com/bombsawayshowThe crew talks about the production of their movie Hookman 2Jon returns in the Tale of Old Man CorcoranThe series is currently available in the United States on Amazon, YouTube, and several other sites.Intro theme is by glassdevaney: https://soundcloud.com/glassdevaney/are-you-afraid-of-the-darkOutro song is by Maddtown: https://soundcloud.com/maddtown/are-you-afraid-of-the-darkProduced by Modulation Studios. Contact: werenotafraidofthedark@gmail.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/werenotafraidofthedark/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/werenotafraidofthedark/Are You Afraid Of The Dark? “The Tale of the Magician’s Assistant” (TV Episode 1993)”. IMDB. Accessed January 20, 2018. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0514428/Are You Afraid of the Dark? “The Tale of the Magician’s Assistant” Season 2, episode 11. Directed by Ron Oliver. Written by Cassandra Schafhausen. Originally aired September 11, 1993 on Nickelodeon. https://youtu.be/yYR439GX7NABrad Silberling, dir. Casper (1995). Universal Pictures, Amblin Entertainment, The Harvey Entertainment Company. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112642/Durham, Adam & Young, Jonathan, dirs. Hookman 2 (2013). Modulation Studios. Tri-B Productions. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1828200glassdevaney. Are You Afraid of the Dark? Instrumental cover. 2012. https://soundcloud.com/glassdevaney/are-you-afraid-of-the-darkJohn Fawcett, dir. Ginger Snaps (2000). Copperheart Entertainment, Water Pictures, Motion International. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0210070/Katt Shea, Robert Mandel, dirs. Carrie 2: The Rage (1999). United Artists, Red Bank Films. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0144814/McRobb, Will, Mittenthal, Robert, & Viscardi, Chris. KaBlam! (1996-2000) Flying Mallet Productions, Nickelodeon Production. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0122353/Mel Brooks, dir. Young Frankenstein (1974). Gruskoff/Venture Films, Crossbow Productions, Jouer Limited. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072431/Michael Lindsay-Hogg, dir. Ivana Trump’s For Love Alone (1996). RHI Entertainment. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0164029/Mike Judge, creator. Beavis and Butthead (1993-2011). Film Roman Productions, J.J. Sedelmaier Productions, Judgemental Films Inc. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105950/Mr. Skin. "Karen Elkin Nude - Naked Pics and Sex Scenes at Mr. Skin." Mrskin. Accessed January 19, 2018. https://www.mrskin.com/karen-elkin-nude-c7322.Raimi, Sam, dir. The Evil Dead (1981). Renaissance Pictures. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083907/Riversa, Jose & Schaefer, Karl, creators. Eerie, Indiana (1991-1992). Cosgrove/Meurer Productions, Hearsts Entertainment Productions, Unreality. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0101088/Ron Oliver, dir. Are You Afraid Of The Dark? Season 2, episode 11, “The Tale of the Magician’s Assistant.” Aired on September 11, 1993, on Nickelodeon. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0514428/Robert Kurtzman, dir. Wishmaster (1997). Image Organization, Pierre David. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120524/Robert Zemeckis, dir. The Polar Express (2004). Castle Rock Entertainment, Shangri-La Entertainment, Playtone. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338348/Spielberg, Steven, dir. Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981). Paramount Pictures, Lucasfilm. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082971/

(Attention on spoile) Neïla, jouée par Camélia Jordana, est une jeune femme qui rêve de devenir avocate. En arrivant à l’université d’Assas, elle se confronte au très misanthrope Pierre Mazard, professeur de droit joué par Daniel Auteuil. Après un dérapage raciste en plein amphi dès le premier jour, il entreprend de coacher Neïla pour un concours d’éloquence pour faire amende honorable, et se sert de la jeune femme comme caution morale. Comme tous les films d’Yvan Attal, “Le Brio” est un film à message, en l’occurrence sur le thème de la bien pensance avec une chute très prévisible et une pseudo morale mignonne mais peu réaliste. Le personnage de Daniel Auteuil ne change pas particulièrement au cours du film, on lui pardonne même presque d’être aussi débectable, son racisme n’est pas remis en question, et la jeune femme répond peu à ses provocations. On a pas détesté, même presque passé un bon moment, en grande partie grâce à la performance de Camélia Jordana. Animé par Daniel Andreyev avec Virginie Adane et Vincent Manilève. RECOMMANDATIONS Vincent Manilève : le documentaire “A voix haute” diffusé sur France 2 puis en version longue au cinéma, sur un concours d’éloquence à l’Université de Seine Saint Denis. On y trouve la finesse qui manque au film d’Yvan Attal, et des personnages passionnants que l’on suit dans leur quotidien. Virginie Adane : le film “The we and the i” de Michel Gondry, projet de fin d’année d’une classe dans le Bronx. Daniel Andreyev : “The Substitute” de Robert Mandel, un “schoolxploitation” à l’américaine. RETROUVEZ MDR - sur Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/MDR-100-com%C3%A9dies-fran%C3%A7aises-249107848855674/ - sur iTunes : itunes.apple.com/fr/podcast/mdr/id1192391840?mt=2 CRÉDITS MDR est un podcast de Séance radio, produit par Goom. Enregistré à l’Antenne Paris (10, rue la Vacquerie 11ème) le vendredi 24 novembre 2017. Production exécutive : Binge Audio. Direction de production : Joël Ronez. Réalisation : Jules Krot. Chargée de production et d’édition : Camille Regache. Générique : Corentin Kerdraon. Voir Acast.com/privacy pour les informations sur la vie privée et l'opt-out.

C'est la rentrée de PODSAC ! Vous retrouvez Jérôme et Anthony qui est là sans être là… Autour de Jérôme donc, Thibault Turcas le réalisateur des Vilains qu'on ne présente plus, Anthony Darche (donc pas Anthony mais c'est quand même un Anthony) notre comédien de cœur et aussi acteur dans les Vilains et prochainement dans une production Anje Mécanique et notre ami, réalisateur lui aussi, Vincent Lecrocq, qui participe pour la première fois à un Podsac. Cet épisode est un EPLA et tout ce beau petit monde se retrouve, en bonne compagnie canine, pour parler des films suivants : 1 - BRIDE OF REANIMATOR de Brian Yuzna (1990) 2 – ROGUE (aka Solitaire) de Greg McLean (2008) 3 - MEURTRES A LA SAINT VALENTIN de Patrick Lussier (2009) 4 - F/X EFFETS DE CHOC de Robert Mandel (1986) 5 - 31 de Rob Zombie (2016) Bonne écoute et STAY SACED !

C’est la rentrée de PODSAC ! Vous retrouvez Jérôme et Anthony qui est là sans être là… Autour de Jérôme donc, Thibault Turcas le réalisateur des Vilains qu’on ne présente plus, Anthony Darche (donc pas Anthony mais c’est quand même un Anthony) notre comédien de cœur et aussi acteur dans les Vilains et prochainement dans une production Anje Mécanique et notre ami, réalisateur lui aussi, Vincent Lecrocq, qui participe pour la première fois à un Podsac. Cet épisode est un EPLA et tout ce beau petit monde se retrouve, en bonne compagnie canine, pour parler des films suivants : 1 - BRIDE OF REANIMATOR de Brian Yuzna (1990) 2 – ROGUE (aka Solitaire) de Greg McLean (2008) 3 - MEURTRES A LA SAINT VALENTIN de Patrick Lussier (2009) 4 - F/X EFFETS DE CHOC de Robert Mandel (1986) 5 - 31 de Rob Zombie (2016) Bonne écoute et STAY SACED !

On the season premiere of We Hate Movies, the gang heads back to school with Tom Berenger and Marc Anthony in The Substitute! Why does this movie spend so much time on the botched Cuba mission? Why did Berenger's resume need to be that padded? And what on Earth is up with that bathing suit? PLUS: I'mgonnakillherI'mgonnakillherI'mgonnakillher! The Substitute stars Tom Berenger, Ernie Hudson, Raymond Cruz, William Forsythe, Luis Guzmán and Diane Venora; directed by Robert Mandel.