Podcast appearances and mentions of susan constantine

Karen Read LAUGHING Outside Court While O'Keefe's Family Cries | 5 Moments That Disgust America DESCRIPTION: SHOCKING FOOTAGE REVEALS TRUE CHARACTER: While John O'Keefe's mother sobbed in court reliving her son's death, Karen Read was caught on camera laughing with her PR team just outside. This disturbing compilation shows the five moments that turned public opinion against the woman who claims to be a grieving girlfriend. The footage that exposed Karen Read: LAUGHING and posing for selfies while O'Keefe's mother testified about identifying her son's body SMIRKING and rolling her eyes as prosecutors showed autopsy photos HIGH-FIVING her defense team after a witness broke down crying SHOPPING for designer clothes the day after emotional victim impact statements JOKING with reporters about being "too pretty for prison" while family members wept nearby Body language expert Susan Constantine analyzes Read's inappropriate emotional responses, revealing classic signs of antisocial personality disorder. The lack of empathy, the narcissistic need for attention, the inability to read the room - all point to someone incapable of genuine remorse. We contrast Read's behavior with other high-profile defendants who at least pretended to show respect for their victims. Even Scott Peterson kept his smirks off camera. Read's brazen disregard for O'Keefe's grieving family has shocked even seasoned court watchers. Most disturbing: Read's own supporters have abandoned her after seeing this footage. Social media erupted with former "Free Karen Read" accounts admitting they were wrong. When you lose the people who believed in your innocence, you've revealed your true self. John O'Keefe's family deserves respect, not mockery. This video ensures everyone sees who Karen Read really is. #KarenReadLaughing #DisrespectfulDefendant #NoRemorse #CourtroomDisgrace #TrueCharacter #JohnOKeefesFamily #ShockingFootage #BodyLanguageReveals #NarcissistExposed #JusticeForJohn Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read LAUGHING Outside Court While O'Keefe's Family Cries | 5 Moments That Disgust America DESCRIPTION: SHOCKING FOOTAGE REVEALS TRUE CHARACTER: While John O'Keefe's mother sobbed in court reliving her son's death, Karen Read was caught on camera laughing with her PR team just outside. This disturbing compilation shows the five moments that turned public opinion against the woman who claims to be a grieving girlfriend. The footage that exposed Karen Read: LAUGHING and posing for selfies while O'Keefe's mother testified about identifying her son's body SMIRKING and rolling her eyes as prosecutors showed autopsy photos HIGH-FIVING her defense team after a witness broke down crying SHOPPING for designer clothes the day after emotional victim impact statements JOKING with reporters about being "too pretty for prison" while family members wept nearby Body language expert Susan Constantine analyzes Read's inappropriate emotional responses, revealing classic signs of antisocial personality disorder. The lack of empathy, the narcissistic need for attention, the inability to read the room - all point to someone incapable of genuine remorse. We contrast Read's behavior with other high-profile defendants who at least pretended to show respect for their victims. Even Scott Peterson kept his smirks off camera. Read's brazen disregard for O'Keefe's grieving family has shocked even seasoned court watchers. Most disturbing: Read's own supporters have abandoned her after seeing this footage. Social media erupted with former "Free Karen Read" accounts admitting they were wrong. When you lose the people who believed in your innocence, you've revealed your true self. John O'Keefe's family deserves respect, not mockery. This video ensures everyone sees who Karen Read really is. #KarenReadLaughing #DisrespectfulDefendant #NoRemorse #CourtroomDisgrace #TrueCharacter #JohnOKeefesFamily #ShockingFootage #BodyLanguageReveals #NarcissistExposed #JusticeForJohn Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read LAUGHING Outside Court While O'Keefe's Family Cries | 5 Moments That Disgust America DESCRIPTION: SHOCKING FOOTAGE REVEALS TRUE CHARACTER: While John O'Keefe's mother sobbed in court reliving her son's death, Karen Read was caught on camera laughing with her PR team just outside. This disturbing compilation shows the five moments that turned public opinion against the woman who claims to be a grieving girlfriend. The footage that exposed Karen Read: LAUGHING and posing for selfies while O'Keefe's mother testified about identifying her son's body SMIRKING and rolling her eyes as prosecutors showed autopsy photos HIGH-FIVING her defense team after a witness broke down crying SHOPPING for designer clothes the day after emotional victim impact statements JOKING with reporters about being "too pretty for prison" while family members wept nearby Body language expert Susan Constantine analyzes Read's inappropriate emotional responses, revealing classic signs of antisocial personality disorder. The lack of empathy, the narcissistic need for attention, the inability to read the room - all point to someone incapable of genuine remorse. We contrast Read's behavior with other high-profile defendants who at least pretended to show respect for their victims. Even Scott Peterson kept his smirks off camera. Read's brazen disregard for O'Keefe's grieving family has shocked even seasoned court watchers. Most disturbing: Read's own supporters have abandoned her after seeing this footage. Social media erupted with former "Free Karen Read" accounts admitting they were wrong. When you lose the people who believed in your innocence, you've revealed your true self. John O'Keefe's family deserves respect, not mockery. This video ensures everyone sees who Karen Read really is. #KarenReadLaughing #DisrespectfulDefendant #NoRemorse #CourtroomDisgrace #TrueCharacter #JohnOKeefesFamily #ShockingFootage #BodyLanguageReveals #NarcissistExposed #JusticeForJohn Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorks Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: Politics, Slider Phenomenon, Neo Beta Robot, Beta Male Societal Value, Repetition Persuasion, Economic Consumer Polling, Nicole Shanahan, DNC Power Move, Defective Kamala Harris, Defective Joe Biden, President Trump Labeling Genius, Kamala Body Language Analysis, Susan Constantine, Bill Maher, Reid Hoffman, Mike Benz, Brazilian X Ban, Elon Musk, US Censorship Push, Laura Loomer, Jeff Walz, Tim Walz, Censorship Brainwashing, Scott Adams ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support

STS Book on Amazon: Https://www.amazon.com/shop/surviving...STS Merch Store: https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/STS Patreon: Https://patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorSTS Website: https://survivingthesurvivor.com/#STSNation, Welcome to another episode of Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of True Crime… Ashley Benefield, 32, is accused of shooting and killing her estranged husband, Doug Benefield, in September 2020. She was arrested a little more than a month after the shooting in November and charged with second-degree murder with a firearm. In a case that has captured national attention, the former ballerina and Lakewood Ranch mother is claiming that she fired her gun in self-defense against Doug Benefield, whom she had married in 2016 following a whirlwind 13-day romance after the two met at a political event. Ashley Benefield alleges her estranged husband was a domestic violence abuser. #BestGuests: Martin E. Radner is an attorney licensed in Michigan and New Jersey. His practice is focused on personal injury, civil rights and criminal defense. He has handled and tried cases in both the state and federal court systems. Mr. Radner is well known and respected by the legal community as a fierce advocate and skilled trial attorney. His youtube channel is called brother counsel where he breaks down and analyzes high profile trials.Susan Constantine is one of the nation's leading jury consultants. She's also a body language + communication expert … As owner of The Human Behavior Lab, Susan's subjective analysis of potential jurors body language, voice, and statements during vior dire assist attorneys to spot potentially dangerous jurors who may render an unfavorable verdict. She's appeared on Dateline, Today, Fox & Friends and many other big time shows. Dr. Garrison earned a Psy.D. in clinical psychology from the Georgia School of Professional Psychology (GSPP). He has been cited for his expertise in psychology in numerous media outlets including Business Insider, Forbes, Vice, Huffington Post, Yahoo News, Real Simple, Fatherly, and others. Dr. Garrison has extensively studied the language and culture of South Korea for over a decade. He also hosts his own YouTube channel Dr. G Explains. #AshleyBenefield #DougBenefield #BlackSwan #Ballerina #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity

Send us a Text Message.Please consider becoming a supporter to help us continue to produce podcasts.https://www.buzzsprout.com/881932/supporters/newUnlock the darkest secrets of a criminal mind as we, Joshua Diaz, forensic psychologist Dr. Gary Brucato, and detective Chris McDonough, unravel the Stephen Stearns case alongside language expert Susan Constantine. Our latest episode is a deep dive into the tragic murder of Madeline Soto, where we dissect a chilling police recording that exposes the stark contrast between Stearns' story and the heartbreaking evidence left behind – revealing the sinister strategies used by predators to deceive.From the peculiarities of a missing child investigation to the psychological dance between detectives and suspects, our conversation is a riveting journey through the nuances of criminal behavior. We scrutinize every inconsistency, debate potential accomplice involvement, and offer expert insights into the art of interrogation. You'll learn how suspects use language patterns to distance themselves from the truth and the key signs that signal deception, adding layers of depth to your understanding of true crime investigations.As we guide you through this complex case, the Witness Box becomes more than a podcast – it's an experience that probes the underbelly of human nature and the lengths to which individuals will go to mask their deeds. This episode isn't just about the grim facts; it's an exploration of the impact these crimes have on families and communities, and a masterclass in the meticulous work that goes into solving them. Tune in for a compelling look at the psychological maze that law enforcement navigates to bring justice to light.Dr. Gary Brucato Bio-https://www.coldcasefoundation.org/dr-gary-brucato.htmlChris McDonough's Bio- https://www.coldcasefoundation.org/chris-mcdonough---law-enforcement-relations.htmlSupport the Show.

In the "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski" podcast, body language expert Susan Constantine dissects the interviews and public appearances of a mother and her partner following the mysterious disappearance of their daughter. The conversation uncovers a myriad of deceptive cues and emotional incongruences that suggest a deeper involvement in the crime. Key insights include: Misplaced Comforting: The unnatural dynamic of the mother comforting the partner, rather than vice versa, raises suspicions about their genuine emotional states and unity in deception. Deceptive Emotional Displays: Both the mother and the partner exhibit fake emotional distress, characterized by the absence of genuine tears and appropriate facial expressions of sadness. Manipulation of Narrative: Their accounts contain strategic omissions and manipulative word choices aimed at misleading the investigation and controlling public perception. Partial Truths as Stress Relief: The partner's admission of feeling responsible and his description of the daughter as "sleeping" during the drive are analyzed as partial truths, potentially revealing their guilt and cognitive strategies to alleviate the stress of lying. Discrepancies in Body Language and Verbal Statements: Inconsistent gestures, lack of appropriate facial expressions, and mismatched story details suggest a concerted effort to appear grieving without the genuine emotional underpinning. Warning to Single Parents: Constantine concludes with a cautionary message about the dangers of introducing new partners to children's lives without thorough vetting, highlighting the risks posed by predatory individuals. #HiddenKillersPodcast #BodyLanguageExpert #SusanConstantine #TruthBehindTears #FamilyDeception #UnveilingLies #ChildSafetyAwareness Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski" podcast, body language expert Susan Constantine dissects the interviews and public appearances of a mother and her partner following the mysterious disappearance of their daughter. The conversation uncovers a myriad of deceptive cues and emotional incongruences that suggest a deeper involvement in the crime. Key insights include: Misplaced Comforting: The unnatural dynamic of the mother comforting the partner, rather than vice versa, raises suspicions about their genuine emotional states and unity in deception. Deceptive Emotional Displays: Both the mother and the partner exhibit fake emotional distress, characterized by the absence of genuine tears and appropriate facial expressions of sadness. Manipulation of Narrative: Their accounts contain strategic omissions and manipulative word choices aimed at misleading the investigation and controlling public perception. Partial Truths as Stress Relief: The partner's admission of feeling responsible and his description of the daughter as "sleeping" during the drive are analyzed as partial truths, potentially revealing their guilt and cognitive strategies to alleviate the stress of lying. Discrepancies in Body Language and Verbal Statements: Inconsistent gestures, lack of appropriate facial expressions, and mismatched story details suggest a concerted effort to appear grieving without the genuine emotional underpinning. Warning to Single Parents: Constantine concludes with a cautionary message about the dangers of introducing new partners to children's lives without thorough vetting, highlighting the risks posed by predatory individuals. #HiddenKillersPodcast #BodyLanguageExpert #SusanConstantine #TruthBehindTears #FamilyDeception #UnveilingLies #ChildSafetyAwareness Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," body language expert Susan Constantine examines interviews related to the disappearance and subsequent murder of a young girl, Madeline. The conversation reveals significant insights into the deceptive behaviors and emotional detachment displayed by Madeline's mother, Jen Soto, and her partner, highlighting their potential involvement and knowledge of the events leading to Madeline's tragic end. Key points include: Deceptive Narratives: Constantine points out the constructed narratives by Jen Soto and her partner, suggesting their knowledge of the crime before Madeline's body was discovered. Significance of the Birthday Party: The discussion about Madeline's birthday party, particularly the mother's absence and statements, is analyzed as a potential trigger event leading to the tragedy. Lack of Emotional Consistency: The absence of genuine emotional distress in Jen Soto's demeanor, coupled with specific word choices and statement structures, signals deception. Physical Cues of Deception: Observable behaviors such as gulping, shoulder shrugging, and inconsistent pronoun usage are highlighted as indicators of lying and emotional detachment. Disturbing Implications: Constantine speculates on the deeper involvement of Madeline's mother in the abuse, questioning her unawareness of her partner's actions and her possible role in a larger scheme of abuse. #HiddenKillersPodcast #BodyLanguageExpert #JusticeForMadeline #DetectingDeception #FamilySecretsUnveiled #AnalyzingLies #UncoveringTruth Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," body language expert Susan Constantine examines interviews related to the disappearance and subsequent murder of a young girl, Madeline. The conversation reveals significant insights into the deceptive behaviors and emotional detachment displayed by Madeline's mother, Jen Soto, and her partner, highlighting their potential involvement and knowledge of the events leading to Madeline's tragic end. Key points include: Deceptive Narratives: Constantine points out the constructed narratives by Jen Soto and her partner, suggesting their knowledge of the crime before Madeline's body was discovered. Significance of the Birthday Party: The discussion about Madeline's birthday party, particularly the mother's absence and statements, is analyzed as a potential trigger event leading to the tragedy. Lack of Emotional Consistency: The absence of genuine emotional distress in Jen Soto's demeanor, coupled with specific word choices and statement structures, signals deception. Physical Cues of Deception: Observable behaviors such as gulping, shoulder shrugging, and inconsistent pronoun usage are highlighted as indicators of lying and emotional detachment. Disturbing Implications: Constantine speculates on the deeper involvement of Madeline's mother in the abuse, questioning her unawareness of her partner's actions and her possible role in a larger scheme of abuse. #HiddenKillersPodcast #BodyLanguageExpert #JusticeForMadeline #DetectingDeception #FamilySecretsUnveiled #AnalyzingLies #UncoveringTruth Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Susan Constantine, a body language expert, delves into interviews concerning the case of a missing girl, scrutinizing the mother, Jen Soto's, verbal and non-verbal communication for signs of potential deception and emotional detachment regarding her daughter's disappearance. The discussion highlights several critical aspects: Camera Footage Discrepancy: Contrary to earlier statements about existing camera footage showing the girl near her school, it is later clarified that no such evidence was found. Constantine critiques the justifications given for the absence of conclusive footage. Hearsay and Repetition: Jen Soto's tendency to repeat hearsay as if it were fact is noted, a method that facilitates seamless deception because it is based on memory rather than invention. Physical Signs of Deception: Observable signs of deceit, such as gulping and shoulder shrugging, along with a lack of visible distress in Jen's facial expressions, are identified as deception indicators. Emotional Detachment: The lack of expected emotional distress, including tears or expressions of sadness, points to a disconnection from the grave situation. The absence of personal references to her missing daughter further underscores this detachment. Absence of a Call to Action: The unusual absence of a direct plea for assistance in finding her daughter is highlighted as abnormal behavior for a parent in crisis. Analysis of Story Structure: The structure of Jen Soto's narrative is analyzed, revealing an imbalance between the lead-up, body, and conclusion, which deviates from typical storytelling patterns. #HiddenKillersPodcast #BodyLanguageAnalysis #TruthInDeception #SusanConstantine #MissingCaseInsight  #EmotionalDetachment #DetectingLies Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Susan Constantine, a body language expert, delves into interviews concerning the case of a missing girl, scrutinizing the mother, Jen Soto's, verbal and non-verbal communication for signs of potential deception and emotional detachment regarding her daughter's disappearance. The discussion highlights several critical aspects: Camera Footage Discrepancy: Contrary to earlier statements about existing camera footage showing the girl near her school, it is later clarified that no such evidence was found. Constantine critiques the justifications given for the absence of conclusive footage. Hearsay and Repetition: Jen Soto's tendency to repeat hearsay as if it were fact is noted, a method that facilitates seamless deception because it is based on memory rather than invention. Physical Signs of Deception: Observable signs of deceit, such as gulping and shoulder shrugging, along with a lack of visible distress in Jen's facial expressions, are identified as deception indicators. Emotional Detachment: The lack of expected emotional distress, including tears or expressions of sadness, points to a disconnection from the grave situation. The absence of personal references to her missing daughter further underscores this detachment. Absence of a Call to Action: The unusual absence of a direct plea for assistance in finding her daughter is highlighted as abnormal behavior for a parent in crisis. Analysis of Story Structure: The structure of Jen Soto's narrative is analyzed, revealing an imbalance between the lead-up, body, and conclusion, which deviates from typical storytelling patterns. #HiddenKillersPodcast #BodyLanguageAnalysis #TruthInDeception #SusanConstantine #MissingCaseInsight  #EmotionalDetachment #DetectingLies Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," body language expert Susan Constantine discusses the nuances of Jen Soto's behavior in interviews regarding her daughter's disappearance. The conversation focuses on dissecting visual and verbal cues that may indicate deceit or withholding of information. Here are the main points: Disjointed Narration: Constantine points out the disjointed and depersonalized manner in which Jen narrates the events of her daughter's disappearance, particularly noting the absence of personalization, such as not using her daughter's name. Search for Answers: The expert highlights how Jen appears to be searching for answers, indicating rehearsed responses and a lack of genuine emotion. Depersonalization: The lack of personal reference to her daughter by name is marked as a significant indicator of depersonalization and potential deception. Cognitive Disruption: Jen's loss of thought and the deer-in-headlights look suggest a cognitive disruption common in individuals trying to maintain a fabricated story. Fearful Behavior: Constantine interprets signs of fear and seeking approval, suggesting Jen might be under pressure or fearful of someone, possibly pointing to coercion in her narrative. Control Over Narrative: The timing and nature of distractions during the interview are discussed as potential attempts to control or influence the narrative. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," body language expert Susan Constantine discusses the nuances of Jen Soto's behavior in interviews regarding her daughter's disappearance. The conversation focuses on dissecting visual and verbal cues that may indicate deceit or withholding of information. Here are the main points: Disjointed Narration: Constantine points out the disjointed and depersonalized manner in which Jen narrates the events of her daughter's disappearance, particularly noting the absence of personalization, such as not using her daughter's name. Search for Answers: The expert highlights how Jen appears to be searching for answers, indicating rehearsed responses and a lack of genuine emotion. Depersonalization: The lack of personal reference to her daughter by name is marked as a significant indicator of depersonalization and potential deception. Cognitive Disruption: Jen's loss of thought and the deer-in-headlights look suggest a cognitive disruption common in individuals trying to maintain a fabricated story. Fearful Behavior: Constantine interprets signs of fear and seeking approval, suggesting Jen might be under pressure or fearful of someone, possibly pointing to coercion in her narrative. Control Over Narrative: The timing and nature of distractions during the interview are discussed as potential attempts to control or influence the narrative. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," the discussion revolves around the troubling case involving the Soto family, with particular focus on the mysterious circumstances surrounding the murder of Maddie Soto. The guest expert, Susan Constantine, a renowned body language expert, shares her insights derived from analyzing interviews related to the case. Key points from the conversation include: Deceptive Behavior: Susan Constantine identifies deceptive indicators in the body language of Steven Stearns, the boyfriend considered a stepfather figure to Maddie, and Jen Soto, Maddie's mother. She emphasizes the importance of analyzing their behavior in interviews for hidden clues. Fight or Flight Response: Constantine notes the physical signs of stress and fear, such as fidgeting and the "deer in headlights" look, which could suggest a fear of getting caught or the stress of having to maintain a fabricated story. Analysis Techniques: The conversation delves into the methodology of body language analysis, including the use of the SCAN (Scientific Content Analysis) technique, voice stress analysis, and statement analysis, which together can provide a high degree of accuracy in detecting deception. Emotional and Behavioral Cues: Constantine points out the discrepancy between the expressed emotions and actual behavior, highlighting inconsistencies that suggest deceit. Comprehensive Evaluation: She explains how combining different modes of analysis (body language, voice, and verbal statements) leads to a more reliable assessment of someone's truthfulness. #HiddenKillersPodcast #BodyLanguageExpert #JusticeForMaddie #DetectingDeception #TrueCrimeAnalysis #SusanConstantine #SotoFamilyMystery    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," the discussion revolves around the troubling case involving the Soto family, with particular focus on the mysterious circumstances surrounding the murder of Maddie Soto. The guest expert, Susan Constantine, a renowned body language expert, shares her insights derived from analyzing interviews related to the case. Key points from the conversation include: Deceptive Behavior: Susan Constantine identifies deceptive indicators in the body language of Steven Stearns, the boyfriend considered a stepfather figure to Maddie, and Jen Soto, Maddie's mother. She emphasizes the importance of analyzing their behavior in interviews for hidden clues. Fight or Flight Response: Constantine notes the physical signs of stress and fear, such as fidgeting and the "deer in headlights" look, which could suggest a fear of getting caught or the stress of having to maintain a fabricated story. Analysis Techniques: The conversation delves into the methodology of body language analysis, including the use of the SCAN (Scientific Content Analysis) technique, voice stress analysis, and statement analysis, which together can provide a high degree of accuracy in detecting deception. Emotional and Behavioral Cues: Constantine points out the discrepancy between the expressed emotions and actual behavior, highlighting inconsistencies that suggest deceit. Comprehensive Evaluation: She explains how combining different modes of analysis (body language, voice, and verbal statements) leads to a more reliable assessment of someone's truthfulness. #HiddenKillersPodcast #BodyLanguageExpert #JusticeForMaddie #DetectingDeception #TrueCrimeAnalysis #SusanConstantine #SotoFamilyMystery    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

IT'S HERE: STS HARDCOVER BOOK SIGNED COPIES FROM JOEL AND KARM: https://premierecollectibles.com/waldman Pre-Order Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLx 

Refute the Top 5 Gay Myths with this free eBook: https://ruthinstitute.org/top-5-myths Get the full interview by joining us for exclusive, uncensored content on Locals:  https://theruthinstitute.locals.com Hello friends! Beginning this week, we will be making the full Dr. J Show available for our Locals subscribers only. For the price of a small coffee at Starbucks, you get exclusive access to the entirety our Dr. J Shows every month. This includes the parts Big Tech won't permit to see the light of day. And best of all, your support allows us to keep bringing you this important content.  Dr. Carolyn Pela is Assistant Dean, Head of the School of Arts, Sciences & Humanities, and Chair of Human Development and Family Studies of Arizona Christian University, having been a part of the University almost 21 years.  She is the author of “Sexual Attraction Fluidity and Well-being: A Longitudinal Outcome Study,” and “Narrative Therapy and Unwanted Same-sex Attractions: Claiming Lost Stories”, and “Sexual Attraction Fluidity Exploration in Therapy.”  Dr. Pela is an advocate of S.A.F.E.T.Y., Sexual Attraction Fluidity Exploration Therapy.  She has appeared in the films Voices of the Silenced (2017), Censored (2020) and Joseph Nicolosi: A True Friend (2019).   Dr. Pela's paper, “Sexual Attraction Fluidity and Well-being: A Longitudinal Outcome Study”: https://www.journalofhumansexuality.com/copy-of-new-page-2 full article: https://www.journalofhumansexuality.com/_files/ugd/ec16e9_d0708a0dc82e4da78e0258eb96dc1467.pdf   Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity: https://www.therapeuticchoice.com/   International Foundation for Therapy and Counseling Choice: https://iftcc.org/   Susan Constantine previously on The Dr J Show, explaining Sam Brinton's deceptions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz5--f7GW5I   Focus on the Family therapist database: https://www.focusonthefamily.com/get-help/counseling-services-and-referrals/   Focus' Christian Counselors Network: https://www.christiancounselorsnetwork.com/   Dr. Pela on Vimeo:  https://vimeo.com/22368116   This episode of The Dr J Show may also be seen on the following platforms:   TheRuthInstitute.Locals.com   https://rumble.com/c/TheRuthInstitute   https://www.bitchute.com/channel/MXkWgTk4Brwr/   https://odysee.com/@TheRuthInstitute:7   Sign up for our weekly newsletter here: https://ruthinstitute.org/newsletter/   +

Dr. Phil McGraw and his guests unravel the art of detecting lies and their moral implications, examining how dishonesty weaves its way into the fabric of our lives. Our guests, Pamela Meyer, Scott Rouse, Mark Bowden, Chase Hughes, Greg Hartley, and Susan Constantine, shed light on the application of behavioral insights for societal improvement. Learn how understanding body language and deception can be transformative in diverse contexts, offering valuable tools for navigating the complex landscape of human interactions. Whether you're intrigued by the psychology behind deception or seeking practical insights for a more truthful existence, this episode provides a thought-provoking exploration into the intricate world of lies and the profound impact they have on our daily lives. Join us on this journey of discovery as we uncover the truth about deception and its role in shaping our shared human experience. More information: https://drphilintheblanks.com Thank You To Our Sponsor: Factor Meals- https://factormeals.com/philintheblanks50 and use code philintheblanks50 to get 50% off! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In a verdict that has captured national attention, the Kowalski family was awarded over $250 million in their lawsuit against Johns Hopkins Children's Hospital. The case, laden with emotional turmoil and legal complexities, was recently dissected on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring insights from trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine.    The crux of the case revolved around the treatment of Maya Kowalski and the subsequent suicide of her mother, Beata. The family's painful journey, marked by medical negligence and questionable practices at the hospital, culminated in a staggering financial judgment.    Constantine, renowned for her expertise in deciphering body language, offered a unique perspective on key testimonies during the trial. She was particularly struck by the demeanor of Sally Smith, whose body language she described as exhibiting a "bulldog" attitude. Constantine noted, "She had a lot of scowling that was around her mouth... and her arrogance... screamed loudly from that witness box."    Another pivotal figure in the trial was Catherine Betty, a social worker with a checkered past. Constantine analyzed her deposition, observing, "She looked like Joan Cleaver next door... but her overall appearance seemed to be soft and likable, but then that's where you kind of tie in the evidence." This contrast between appearance and actions was a recurring theme in Constantine's analysis.    The heart-wrenching testimony of Maya and her family was another focal point. Constantine, having met the family, conveyed the depth of their pain and the authenticity of their accounts. "The eyes are windows of their soul. So much sadness and brokenness... They were the most humble family," she reflected.    Constantine further discussed the impact of Beata Kowalski's suicide on the verdict. She emphasized the emotional charge the incident brought to the trial, stating, "That's a wound that never heals and it affects people for their lives."    The podcast also delved into the broader implications of such a substantial verdict on the medical community. Constantine speculated about the potential for class action lawsuits, highlighting the systemic issues the case has unearthed. "This is going to open up to be a massive class action lawsuit. You wait, it's coming," she predicted.    The verdict in the Take Care of Maya case represents more than just a financial penalty; it's a clarion call for systemic changes in hospital practices and accountability. The substantial sum awarded to the Kowalski family signifies a societal acknowledgment of the profound damages wrought by medical negligence and the need for more stringent oversight in healthcare institutions.    As the dust settles on this landmark case, one question lingers: Will the Take Care of Maya verdict be the catalyst for a new era of medical accountability and patient advocacy? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a verdict that has captured national attention, the Kowalski family was awarded over $250 million in their lawsuit against Johns Hopkins Children's Hospital. The case, laden with emotional turmoil and legal complexities, was recently dissected on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring insights from trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine.    The crux of the case revolved around the treatment of Maya Kowalski and the subsequent suicide of her mother, Beata. The family's painful journey, marked by medical negligence and questionable practices at the hospital, culminated in a staggering financial judgment.    Constantine, renowned for her expertise in deciphering body language, offered a unique perspective on key testimonies during the trial. She was particularly struck by the demeanor of Sally Smith, whose body language she described as exhibiting a "bulldog" attitude. Constantine noted, "She had a lot of scowling that was around her mouth... and her arrogance... screamed loudly from that witness box."    Another pivotal figure in the trial was Catherine Betty, a social worker with a checkered past. Constantine analyzed her deposition, observing, "She looked like Joan Cleaver next door... but her overall appearance seemed to be soft and likable, but then that's where you kind of tie in the evidence." This contrast between appearance and actions was a recurring theme in Constantine's analysis.    The heart-wrenching testimony of Maya and her family was another focal point. Constantine, having met the family, conveyed the depth of their pain and the authenticity of their accounts. "The eyes are windows of their soul. So much sadness and brokenness... They were the most humble family," she reflected.    Constantine further discussed the impact of Beata Kowalski's suicide on the verdict. She emphasized the emotional charge the incident brought to the trial, stating, "That's a wound that never heals and it affects people for their lives."    The podcast also delved into the broader implications of such a substantial verdict on the medical community. Constantine speculated about the potential for class action lawsuits, highlighting the systemic issues the case has unearthed. "This is going to open up to be a massive class action lawsuit. You wait, it's coming," she predicted.    The verdict in the Take Care of Maya case represents more than just a financial penalty; it's a clarion call for systemic changes in hospital practices and accountability. The substantial sum awarded to the Kowalski family signifies a societal acknowledgment of the profound damages wrought by medical negligence and the need for more stringent oversight in healthcare institutions.    As the dust settles on this landmark case, one question lingers: Will the Take Care of Maya verdict be the catalyst for a new era of medical accountability and patient advocacy? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the case against Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer and Gilgo Beach murderer, unfolds, attention turns to his estranged wife, Asa Ellerup. In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski is joined by Susan Constantine, a body language expert, to discuss the latest developments and the psychological underpinnings of Asa's actions.    The question looming over this case is: What drives Asa Ellerup's behavior and decisions in the wake of her husband's horrific accusations? Brueski and Constantine explore this complex psychological terrain, considering Asa's recent visit to Rex in jail and her desire to see the evidence for herself.    Constantine suggests that Asa's actions may stem from a deep need to reconcile the image of the man she was married to with the heinous crimes he is accused of. "There's a part of every human being that just wants to know why," Constantine explains. "They've been so completely bamboozled, they just have to have some form of closure for themselves."    The conversation delves into the possibilities of Asa being used as an informant to extract confessions or information from Rex, a hypothesis that adds another layer to the already complex case. Constantine also discusses the psychological aspects of denial and self-deception, drawing parallels to other high-profile cases like that of Cindy Anthony.    "Could it be a matter of pride, ego, disbelief, shame, guilt, or even a bruised ego that Asa didn't see the signs?" Brueski asks, highlighting the emotional turmoil Asa must be grappling with. Constantine agrees, noting that in such situations, individuals often struggle with embarrassment and shame, leading to denial and a reluctance to accept the truth.    The discussion also touches upon the broader implications of belief and trust in relationships, particularly in situations involving deceit or criminal behavior. "Why do people believe a liar?" Constantine ponders, emphasizing the need for emotional intelligence and objectivity in assessing situations and evidence.    Brueski raises the point of public perception, considering how Asa's actions and decisions are viewed by the world at large. "With every move she makes, Asa Ellerup is under the microscope, her decisions scrutinized for clues to her knowledge or involvement in her husband's alleged crimes," he observes.    As the case against Rex Heuermann progresses, Asa Ellerup's role and actions continue to intrigue and puzzle observers. With her recent jail visit and ongoing divorce proceedings, questions about her knowledge, beliefs, and motives remain at the forefront of this complex and tragic story.    The conversation between Brueski and Constantine sheds light on the human aspects of this case, exploring the psychological dynamics at play and the challenges of grappling with betrayal and deception on such a profound level. As the case moves forward, the world watches, seeking answers and understanding in a story that continues to shock and perplex. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the case against Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer and Gilgo Beach murderer, unfolds, attention turns to his estranged wife, Asa Ellerup. In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski is joined by Susan Constantine, a body language expert, to discuss the latest developments and the psychological underpinnings of Asa's actions.    The question looming over this case is: What drives Asa Ellerup's behavior and decisions in the wake of her husband's horrific accusations? Brueski and Constantine explore this complex psychological terrain, considering Asa's recent visit to Rex in jail and her desire to see the evidence for herself.    Constantine suggests that Asa's actions may stem from a deep need to reconcile the image of the man she was married to with the heinous crimes he is accused of. "There's a part of every human being that just wants to know why," Constantine explains. "They've been so completely bamboozled, they just have to have some form of closure for themselves."    The conversation delves into the possibilities of Asa being used as an informant to extract confessions or information from Rex, a hypothesis that adds another layer to the already complex case. Constantine also discusses the psychological aspects of denial and self-deception, drawing parallels to other high-profile cases like that of Cindy Anthony.    "Could it be a matter of pride, ego, disbelief, shame, guilt, or even a bruised ego that Asa didn't see the signs?" Brueski asks, highlighting the emotional turmoil Asa must be grappling with. Constantine agrees, noting that in such situations, individuals often struggle with embarrassment and shame, leading to denial and a reluctance to accept the truth.    The discussion also touches upon the broader implications of belief and trust in relationships, particularly in situations involving deceit or criminal behavior. "Why do people believe a liar?" Constantine ponders, emphasizing the need for emotional intelligence and objectivity in assessing situations and evidence.    Brueski raises the point of public perception, considering how Asa's actions and decisions are viewed by the world at large. "With every move she makes, Asa Ellerup is under the microscope, her decisions scrutinized for clues to her knowledge or involvement in her husband's alleged crimes," he observes.    As the case against Rex Heuermann progresses, Asa Ellerup's role and actions continue to intrigue and puzzle observers. With her recent jail visit and ongoing divorce proceedings, questions about her knowledge, beliefs, and motives remain at the forefront of this complex and tragic story.    The conversation between Brueski and Constantine sheds light on the human aspects of this case, exploring the psychological dynamics at play and the challenges of grappling with betrayal and deception on such a profound level. As the case moves forward, the world watches, seeking answers and understanding in a story that continues to shock and perplex. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

How does a family become entangled in a web of conspiracy and murder, driven by motives that defy understanding? This question lies at the heart of the shocking case surrounding Charles Adelson and Donna Adelson, recently discussed on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine.   Charles Adelson, recently convicted of murder, faces a life sentence. But the story doesn't end there. The focus has shifted to his mother, Donna Adelson, who was apprehended while trying to flee the country. She's now charged with murder, unraveling further layers of this complex family drama. Constantine, renowned for her expertise in decoding non-verbal cues, weighed in on this evolving narrative with Brueski, sharing her insights into the Adelson family dynamics.   The case, riddled with intricacies, left even seasoned experts like Brueski and Constantine reaching for crime scene boards to make sense of the convoluted relationships and events. "I was getting a string out because it was like, who did what, did who, did he, what?" Brueski remarked, echoing the sentiments of many following the case.   The motive behind the murder of Dan Markle, Charles Adelson's brother-in-law, remains baffling. “There was really no abuse, no physical abuse, no sexual abuse. There's nothing that would have warranted to have this guy dead,” Constantine noted, highlighting the seemingly baseless hatred driving the plot. The trial revealed incriminating phone calls and emails, suggesting a deep-seated animosity and a desire for control.   Donna Adelson's role, particularly her attempt to flee to a non-extradition country, raised red flags for Constantine. “She escapes and goes to another country, tries to get out of the country because why wouldn't she, if you're guilty, you would run. If you're innocent, you would stay and fight it out,” she observed, implying guilt through actions.   A pivotal piece of evidence was an email from Donna to her daughter, the ex-wife of the victim. Constantine's analysis of this communication is telling: “It's like, I'm putting you, you know, right now you've got five weeks to figure it out.” This email, Constantine argues, suggests Donna's influential role in orchestrating the murder.   The Adelson family dynamics, particularly the mother-son relationship between Donna and Charles, drew Constantine's attention. “He's obviously a very smart guy. What is going on with that mother-son dynamic?” she questioned. This dynamic, along with the strength in numbers theory, paints a picture of a family driven by collective disgruntlement, ultimately culminating in a tragic outcome.   Constantine sees Donna Adelson as the ringleader, a figure exerting power and control over her family. “Mom or your dad are big influencers,” she said, highlighting the potential for a parent's influence to lead children down dark paths. The level of narcissism and vindictiveness displayed, according to Constantine, is not something that evolves overnight but is a trait developed over a lifetime.   The Adelson case, with its layers of family intrigue, deceit, and now murder, poses a fundamental question about the nature of familial bonds and their potential to drive individuals to extreme actions. As Constantine pointedly notes, “No one wakes up being a narcissist.” This case, then, is not just about the murder of Dan Markle; it's a deep dive into the psychology of a family capable of conspiring to such chilling ends.   As the legal saga continues to unfold, the question remains: How far can the roots of familial influence extend in shaping decisions, and in this instance, could they have been the driving force behind a plot as heinous as murder? The answers, as the trial progresses, may offer a rare glimpse into the depths of human psychology and the dark corners of familial manipulation. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

How does a family become entangled in a web of conspiracy and murder, driven by motives that defy understanding? This question lies at the heart of the shocking case surrounding Charles Adelson and Donna Adelson, recently discussed on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine.   Charles Adelson, recently convicted of murder, faces a life sentence. But the story doesn't end there. The focus has shifted to his mother, Donna Adelson, apprehended while trying to flee the country. She's now charged with murder, unraveling further layers of this complex family drama. Constantine, renowned for her expertise in decoding non-verbal cues, weighed in on this evolving narrative with Brueski, sharing her insights into the Adelson family dynamics.   The case, riddled with intricacies, left even seasoned experts like Brueski and Constantine reaching for crime scene boards to make sense of the convoluted relationships and events. "I was getting a string out because it was like, who did what, did who, did he, what?" Brueski remarked, echoing the sentiments of many following the case.   The motive behind the murder of Dan Markle, Charles Adelson's brother-in-law, remains baffling. “There was really no abuse, no physical abuse, no sexual abuse. There's nothing that would have warranted to have this guy dead,” Constantine noted, highlighting the seemingly baseless hatred driving the plot. The trial revealed incriminating phone calls and emails, suggesting a deep-seated animosity and a desire for control.   Donna Adelson's role, particularly her attempt to flee to a non-extradition country, raised red flags for Constantine. “She escapes and goes to another country, tries to get out of the country because why wouldn't she, if you're guilty, you would run. If you're innocent, you would stay and fight it out,” she observed, implying guilt through actions.   A pivotal piece of evidence was an email from Donna to her daughter, the ex-wife of the victim. Constantine's analysis of this communication is telling: “It's like, I'm putting you, you know, right now you've got five weeks to figure it out.” This email, Constantine argues, suggests Donna's influential role in orchestrating the murder.   The Adelson family dynamics, particularly the mother-son relationship between Donna and Charles, drew Constantine's attention. “He's obviously a very smart guy. What is going on with that mother-son dynamic?” she questioned. This dynamic, along with the strength in numbers theory, paints a picture of a family driven by collective disgruntlement, ultimately culminating in a tragic outcome.   Constantine sees Donna Adelson as the ringleader, a figure exerting power and control over her family. “Mom or your dad are big influencers,” she said, highlighting the potential for a parent's influence to lead children down dark paths. The level of narcissism and vindictiveness displayed, according to Constantine, is not something that evolves overnight but is a trait developed over a lifetime.   The Adelson case, with its layers of family intrigue, deceit, and now murder, poses a fundamental question about the nature of familial bonds and their potential to drive individuals to extreme actions. As Constantine pointedly notes, “No one wakes up being a narcissist.” This case, then, is not just about the murder of Dan Markle; it's a deep dive into the psychology of a family capable of conspiring to such chilling ends.   As the legal saga continues to unfold, the question remains: How far can the roots of familial influence extend in shaping decisions, and in this instance, could they have been the driving force behind a plot as heinous as murder? The answers, as the trial progresses, may offer a rare glimpse into the depths of human psychology and the dark corners of familial manipulation. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

It's every parent's nightmare: a medical institution diagnosing their child, and then a subsequent loss of custody based on questionable claims. But when the institutions you trust begin to make unverifiable assumptions about parents, what remains of justice? On a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski, a concerning pattern emerged during a conversation with Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine.     Brueski broached a concerning topic regarding Dr. Smith, whose role at Johns Hopkins Children's Hospital appeared to be absent of the checks and balances we often associate with justice. This lack of oversight led Constantine to reveal a startling connection. "Okay. So there is a route to all of this," she began. In Orlando, a psychological firm wrote a book on Munchausen's by proxy disorder. Constantine noted that despite it being a rare condition, there's been a significant influx of women diagnosed in that area.     Contrary to the conventional understanding of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, where a guardian may fake a child's illness, these mothers are accused of the opposite – trying to help their children recover from genuine health issues.     Constantine goes on to claim, "Here is the person that wrote this book that literally removed the children from my dear friend of 40 years." Though she is able to read people well, being a body language expert, she has seen no signs of Munchausen's by proxy disorder in her friend. Instead, she describes an alarming pattern in which women, primarily mothers, are being wrongly diagnosed by a forensic psychologist, now colloquially termed as "Dr. XYZ moms".     This chain of diagnosis and removal of children has extensive implications, particularly in child custody battles. "The courts say you have to go through counseling for co-parenting... and whoever it is that has the biggest, widest pockets," Constantine explains. Those with more financial means, typically fathers, can exploit this diagnosis to gain full custody of their children. With the false diagnosis of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, mothers are effectively removed from their children's lives, permanently.     Complicating the matter further is the monetization of this system. This Orlando-based firm, according to Constantine, charges large sums for evaluations, leaving countless families grappling with not only the loss of their children but significant financial burdens as well.     Brueski's probing question about the motive behind such actions illuminates a larger issue. "Is this something where overall there needs to be reform in the entire system?" he asks. Indeed, Constantine points to the formation of collaborative law groups that control a significant portion of these processes. These groups, comprised of forensic psychologists and arbitrators for custody battles, form a tightly-knit community. The implication is clear: expose one, and the whole system might collapse.     It's a sobering realization when those tasked with justice seem entwined in questionable practices. Constantine's revelations, interwoven with personal experiences and ties to those affected, paint a disturbing picture. One where justice isn't just blind; it might also be compromised.     At the heart of this narrative is the issue of training, or rather the lack of it. Constantine describes her experience with training workers in the department of children and families. Their lack of expertise and inadequate training leaves them ill-equipped to handle sensitive family matters, leading to decisions that often rip families apart.     In concluding the interview, Brueski and Constantine shed light on an urgent need for reform and proper training. With families being torn apart based on unverified and often false diagnoses, the question becomes: How many more lives will be shattered before the system rights its wrongs?Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

It's every parent's nightmare: a medical institution diagnosing their child, and then a subsequent loss of custody based on questionable claims. But when the institutions you trust begin to make unverifiable assumptions about parents, what remains of justice? On a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski, a concerning pattern emerged during a conversation with Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine.     Brueski broached a concerning topic regarding Dr. Smith, whose role at Johns Hopkins Children's Hospital appeared to be absent of the checks and balances we often associate with justice. This lack of oversight led Constantine to reveal a startling connection. "Okay. So there is a route to all of this," she began. In Orlando, a psychological firm wrote a book on Munchausen's by proxy disorder. Constantine noted that despite it being a rare condition, there's been a significant influx of women diagnosed in that area.     Contrary to the conventional understanding of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, where a guardian may fake a child's illness, these mothers are accused of the opposite – trying to help their children recover from genuine health issues.     Constantine goes on to claim, "Here is the person that wrote this book that literally removed the children from my dear friend of 40 years." Though she is able to read people well, being a body language expert, she has seen no signs of Munchausen's by proxy disorder in her friend. Instead, she describes an alarming pattern in which women, primarily mothers, are being wrongly diagnosed by a forensic psychologist, now colloquially termed as "Dr. XYZ moms".     This chain of diagnosis and removal of children has extensive implications, particularly in child custody battles. "The courts say you have to go through counseling for co-parenting... and whoever it is that has the biggest, widest pockets," Constantine explains. Those with more financial means, typically fathers, can exploit this diagnosis to gain full custody of their children. With the false diagnosis of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, mothers are effectively removed from their children's lives, permanently.     Complicating the matter further is the monetization of this system. This Orlando-based firm, according to Constantine, charges large sums for evaluations, leaving countless families grappling with not only the loss of their children but significant financial burdens as well.     Brueski's probing question about the motive behind such actions illuminates a larger issue. "Is this something where overall there needs to be reform in the entire system?" he asks. Indeed, Constantine points to the formation of collaborative law groups that control a significant portion of these processes. These groups, comprised of forensic psychologists and arbitrators for custody battles, form a tightly-knit community. The implication is clear: expose one, and the whole system might collapse.     It's a sobering realization when those tasked with justice seem entwined in questionable practices. Constantine's revelations, interwoven with personal experiences and ties to those affected, paint a disturbing picture. One where justice isn't just blind; it might also be compromised.     At the heart of this narrative is the issue of training, or rather the lack of it. Constantine describes her experience with training workers in the department of children and families. Their lack of expertise and inadequate training leaves them ill-equipped to handle sensitive family matters, leading to decisions that often rip families apart.     In concluding the interview, Brueski and Constantine shed light on an urgent need for reform and proper training. With families being torn apart based on unverified and often false diagnoses, the question becomes: How many more lives will be shattered before the system rights its wrongs?Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can a deeper dive into DNA evidence and body language foretell the fate of a murder suspect? This is the question that unfolded in the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delve into the complexities surrounding the Bryan Kohberger case.    In a significant ruling, the judge in the Kohberger case rejected the defense's motion to dismiss charges due to minor errors in jury instructions. Yet, what the defense succeeded in obtaining could alter the course of the trial: a thorough examination of the genetic genealogy evidence against Kohberger during discovery. This move prompts Brueski to question, "Is there anything in this that they can take a look at and say, 'yeah, this doesn't really add up the way that you gathered it,' and could it affect the case?"    Constantine's expertise sheds light on the implications of such a strategy. "This genetic genealogy stuff is powerful," she acknowledges, referencing a personal anecdote about the unexpected discovery of a friend's grandson to illustrate its impact. However, she warns of the potential backfire, emphasizing the "slippery slope" Kohberger's defense might find themselves on if they uncover evidence that reinforces the prosecution's case.    Indeed, the defense's approach is audacious, as Constantine credits Kohberger's attorney with leaving "no stone unturned." But this begs the question, at what risk? "It seems like maybe a place you don't want to go shining your flashlight around if you're the defense," Brueski interjects, highlighting the dangers of bringing unwanted evidence to light.    Constantine's insights extend beyond the DNA evidence. Her analysis of Kohberger's body language in recent court appearances reveals a shift in his demeanor. "He's feeling a little more comfortable, isn't he? Seems like it," she observes. Notably, she points out Kohberger's "steeple" gesture—a sign of confidence—which is a departure from his previous courtroom behavior. She interjects, "The higher the steeple, the higher the confidence."    The expert further decodes Kohberger's nonverbal cues, noting a suspicious look "off to the corner of his eye" during the proceedings. This synchronization of physical gestures with the timing of statements can be telling of an individual's internal processes, according to Constantine.    As the conversation progresses, the topic shifts to the ethical boundaries of coaching a defendant on body language. Constantine firmly opposes such practices, stating, "I've never coached... I've done witness prep... but never to the point where [I instruct them], 'when she says this, I want you to do that.'"    The discussion circles back to Kohberger's evolving courtroom presence. Constantine contrasts his initial interactions—avoiding eye contact, a sign of his antisocial tendencies—with his now more assured stance, attributing it to a sense of "getting some wins," which may be boosting his confidence.    While Kohberger's defense might interpret these developments as positive, Brueski remains skeptical, implying that any so-called victories are pyrrhic at best, given the gravity of the accusations.    The episode closes with a poignant reflection by Brueski and Constantine on the weight of evidence and the human element within the justice system. Constantine's years of experience have taught her to be selective about the cases she involves herself in, particularly steering clear of "horrible heinous murder cases" and "child molestation" unless unequivocal evidence of innocence is presented.    So, what does Kohberger's newfound courtroom confidence truly signify? And as the defense peers into the genetic genealogy that led to his arrest, might they uncover their own Pandora's box of irrefutable evidence? These are the questions that "Hidden Killers" leaves its audience contemplating, as the legal battle over Bryan Kohberger's fate continues to unfold. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can a deeper dive into DNA evidence and body language foretell the fate of a murder suspect? This is the question that unfolded in the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delve into the complexities surrounding the Bryan Kohberger case.    In a significant ruling, the judge in the Kohberger case rejected the defense's motion to dismiss charges due to minor errors in jury instructions. Yet, what the defense succeeded in obtaining could alter the course of the trial: a thorough examination of the genetic genealogy evidence against Kohberger during discovery. This move prompts Brueski to question, "Is there anything in this that they can take a look at and say, 'yeah, this doesn't really add up the way that you gathered it,' and could it affect the case?"    Constantine's expertise sheds light on the implications of such a strategy. "This genetic genealogy stuff is powerful," she acknowledges, referencing a personal anecdote about the unexpected discovery of a friend's grandson to illustrate its impact. However, she warns of the potential backfire, emphasizing the "slippery slope" Kohberger's defense might find themselves on if they uncover evidence that reinforces the prosecution's case.    Indeed, the defense's approach is audacious, as Constantine credits Kohberger's attorney with leaving "no stone unturned." But this begs the question, at what risk? "It seems like maybe a place you don't want to go shining your flashlight around if you're the defense," Brueski interjects, highlighting the dangers of bringing unwanted evidence to light.    Constantine's insights extend beyond the DNA evidence. Her analysis of Kohberger's body language in recent court appearances reveals a shift in his demeanor. "He's feeling a little more comfortable, isn't he? Seems like it," she observes. Notably, she points out Kohberger's "steeple" gesture—a sign of confidence—which is a departure from his previous courtroom behavior. She interjects, "The higher the steeple, the higher the confidence."    The expert further decodes Kohberger's nonverbal cues, noting a suspicious look "off to the corner of his eye" during the proceedings. This synchronization of physical gestures with the timing of statements can be telling of an individual's internal processes, according to Constantine.    As the conversation progresses, the topic shifts to the ethical boundaries of coaching a defendant on body language. Constantine firmly opposes such practices, stating, "I've never coached... I've done witness prep... but never to the point where [I instruct them], 'when she says this, I want you to do that.'"    The discussion circles back to Kohberger's evolving courtroom presence. Constantine contrasts his initial interactions—avoiding eye contact, a sign of his antisocial tendencies—with his now more assured stance, attributing it to a sense of "getting some wins," which may be boosting his confidence.    While Kohberger's defense might interpret these developments as positive, Brueski remains skeptical, implying that any so-called victories are pyrrhic at best, given the gravity of the accusations.    The episode closes with a poignant reflection by Brueski and Constantine on the weight of evidence and the human element within the justice system. Constantine's years of experience have taught her to be selective about the cases she involves herself in, particularly steering clear of "horrible heinous murder cases" and "child molestation" unless unequivocal evidence of innocence is presented.    So, what does Kohberger's newfound courtroom confidence truly signify? And as the defense peers into the genetic genealogy that led to his arrest, might they uncover their own Pandora's box of irrefutable evidence? These are the questions that "Hidden Killers" leaves its audience contemplating, as the legal battle over Bryan Kohberger's fate continues to unfold. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can one alleged act of jury tampering unravel the verdict in a high-profile murder case? This is the pivotal question that has emerged following Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. The once-prominent South Carolina lawyer, convicted in a saga that gripped the nation, is seeking another chance in court, claiming jury tampering by a court official. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delves into the murky waters of this claim with host Tony Brueski.    During the podcast, Constantine articulated skepticism about the jury tampering allegations involving Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill. "The four jurors unequivocally say...she never told us that," Constantine stated, referencing the jurors' dismissal of any improper influence. Despite these claims, the notion of Hill potentially being too personable with jurors sparked debate about courtroom boundaries and the implications for Murdaugh's conviction.    "If there was prejudicial influence, then, of course, a new trial is warranted," Constantine asserted. Yet the crux of the matter remains proving such influence occurred, a challenge that looms large over the case. The jurors, according to Constantine, have no incentive to protect Hill: "There's no skin in the game."    The discussion took a turn when Brueski asked about Murdaugh's previous courtroom demeanor. Constantine did not mince words: "He's a horrible witness." Her blunt assessment of Murdaugh's testimony painted a picture of a man who was not just unconvincing but appeared to be outright deceptive. "He lied, continued to lie, and then admitted he lied," she said, concluding that if Murdaugh were to take the stand in a potential new trial, his lawyers would face an uphill battle to manage his presentation.    The conversation went deeper into the psyche of Murdaugh as Constantine dissected his patterns of lying and manipulation. "When you listen to a person long enough, you start to figure out how they lie," she explained. Her analysis of Murdaugh was unyielding: "He is the textbook liar."    Moreover, the potential for a new trial raised questions about what Murdaugh's defense could present differently. Constantine speculated that new evidence or witnesses would be the likely route. "Had we had this information, this would have come out," she posited, hypothetically speaking from the defense's perspective.    In an environment where the credibility of the justice system is often under scrutiny, the Murdaugh case stands out as a complex amalgam of legal drama, personal tragedy, and a deep dive into human behavior. With experts like Constantine providing insights, the public gets a glimpse into the intricate processes that determine the fate of those who stand trial.    The episode of "Hidden Killers" wrapped up, leaving listeners with a profound question that encapsulates the entire saga: If Alex Murdaugh is granted a new trial, what new narratives, evidence, or strategies will come into play, and will they be enough to navigate the "maze" of the legal system for a different outcome? Or will the same patterns that led to his initial conviction simply re-emerge, solidifying the case against him?    As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one thing is clear—Alex Murdaugh's story is far from over, and the world is watching. Will justice be served, or will it be reframed? What do you think? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can one alleged act of jury tampering unravel the verdict in a high-profile murder case? This is the pivotal question that has emerged following Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. The once-prominent South Carolina lawyer, convicted in a saga that gripped the nation, is seeking another chance in court, claiming jury tampering by a court official. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delves into the murky waters of this claim with host Tony Brueski.    During the podcast, Constantine articulated skepticism about the jury tampering allegations involving Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill. "The four jurors unequivocally say...she never told us that," Constantine stated, referencing the jurors' dismissal of any improper influence. Despite these claims, the notion of Hill potentially being too personable with jurors sparked debate about courtroom boundaries and the implications for Murdaugh's conviction.    "If there was prejudicial influence, then, of course, a new trial is warranted," Constantine asserted. Yet the crux of the matter remains proving such influence occurred, a challenge that looms large over the case. The jurors, according to Constantine, have no incentive to protect Hill: "There's no skin in the game."    The discussion took a turn when Brueski asked about Murdaugh's previous courtroom demeanor. Constantine did not mince words: "He's a horrible witness." Her blunt assessment of Murdaugh's testimony painted a picture of a man who was not just unconvincing but appeared to be outright deceptive. "He lied, continued to lie, and then admitted he lied," she said, concluding that if Murdaugh were to take the stand in a potential new trial, his lawyers would face an uphill battle to manage his presentation.    The conversation went deeper into the psyche of Murdaugh as Constantine dissected his patterns of lying and manipulation. "When you listen to a person long enough, you start to figure out how they lie," she explained. Her analysis of Murdaugh was unyielding: "He is the textbook liar."    Moreover, the potential for a new trial raised questions about what Murdaugh's defense could present differently. Constantine speculated that new evidence or witnesses would be the likely route. "Had we had this information, this would have come out," she posited, hypothetically speaking from the defense's perspective.    In an environment where the credibility of the justice system is often under scrutiny, the Murdaugh case stands out as a complex amalgam of legal drama, personal tragedy, and a deep dive into human behavior. With experts like Constantine providing insights, the public gets a glimpse into the intricate processes that determine the fate of those who stand trial.    The episode of "Hidden Killers" wrapped up, leaving listeners with a profound question that encapsulates the entire saga: If Alex Murdaugh is granted a new trial, what new narratives, evidence, or strategies will come into play, and will they be enough to navigate the "maze" of the legal system for a different outcome? Or will the same patterns that led to his initial conviction simply re-emerge, solidifying the case against him?    As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one thing is clear—Alex Murdaugh's story is far from over, and the world is watching. Will justice be served, or will it be reframed? What do you think? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can one alleged act of jury tampering unravel the verdict in a high-profile murder case? This is the pivotal question that has emerged following Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. The once-prominent South Carolina lawyer, convicted in a saga that gripped the nation, is seeking another chance in court, claiming jury tampering by a court official. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delves into the murky waters of this claim with host Tony Brueski.    During the podcast, Constantine articulated skepticism about the jury tampering allegations involving Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill. "The four jurors unequivocally say...she never told us that," Constantine stated, referencing the jurors' dismissal of any improper influence. Despite these claims, the notion of Hill potentially being too personable with jurors sparked debate about courtroom boundaries and the implications for Murdaugh's conviction.    "If there was prejudicial influence, then, of course, a new trial is warranted," Constantine asserted. Yet the crux of the matter remains proving such influence occurred, a challenge that looms large over the case. The jurors, according to Constantine, have no incentive to protect Hill: "There's no skin in the game."    The discussion took a turn when Brueski asked about Murdaugh's previous courtroom demeanor. Constantine did not mince words: "He's a horrible witness." Her blunt assessment of Murdaugh's testimony painted a picture of a man who was not just unconvincing but appeared to be outright deceptive. "He lied, continued to lie, and then admitted he lied," she said, concluding that if Murdaugh were to take the stand in a potential new trial, his lawyers would face an uphill battle to manage his presentation.    The conversation went deeper into the psyche of Murdaugh as Constantine dissected his patterns of lying and manipulation. "When you listen to a person long enough, you start to figure out how they lie," she explained. Her analysis of Murdaugh was unyielding: "He is the textbook liar."    Moreover, the potential for a new trial raised questions about what Murdaugh's defense could present differently. Constantine speculated that new evidence or witnesses would be the likely route. "Had we had this information, this would have come out," she posited, hypothetically speaking from the defense's perspective.    In an environment where the credibility of the justice system is often under scrutiny, the Murdaugh case stands out as a complex amalgam of legal drama, personal tragedy, and a deep dive into human behavior. With experts like Constantine providing insights, the public gets a glimpse into the intricate processes that determine the fate of those who stand trial.    The episode of "Hidden Killers" wrapped up, leaving listeners with a profound question that encapsulates the entire saga: If Alex Murdaugh is granted a new trial, what new narratives, evidence, or strategies will come into play, and will they be enough to navigate the "maze" of the legal system for a different outcome? Or will the same patterns that led to his initial conviction simply re-emerge, solidifying the case against him?    As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one thing is clear—Alex Murdaugh's story is far from over, and the world is watching. Will justice be served, or will it be reframed? What do you think? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can a man visibly deteriorate before the public eye and yet maintain his innocence amidst overwhelming suspicion and the weight of accusation? This pressing question encapsulates the essence of a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring guest Susan Constantine, a trial consultant and body language expert. They discuss the case of Richard Allen, accused of a double murder in Delphi, Indiana—a case riddled with controversy, not least because of Allen's apparent physical and mental unraveling during his time in solitary confinement.    Richard Allen is set to stand trial on October 24th, yet the evidence against him, as discussed by Brueski and Constantine, seems tenuous, forming what could only be described as a "fairly weak case." Allen, who lacks a criminal history, raised his hand during a call for witnesses who were on the hiking trail the day of the crime, an act that, according to Constantine, could be seen as either an innocent man's plea or a strategic half-confession to ease cognitive dissonance.    As Brueski and Constantine note, the physical transformation of Allen is stark and troubling. His latest mugshot reveals a man with deep-set furrows, sunken cheeks, and a pallor that speaks volumes of his prison ordeal. "He looks unhealthy. He truly looks like he's right on the edge of not being here any longer," Constantine remarked, her words painting a vivid picture of a man broken by the justice system's slow grind.    The crux of their discussion lies in the power of circumstantial evidence and the analysis of body language, particularly in the context of a photograph that captured a figure on the railroad tracks near the crime scene, potentially implicating Allen. While the photograph's subject remains officially unidentified, Constantine emphasizes the uniqueness of individuals' gait and posture—elements that could potentially match Allen to the figure in the photo, should comparative analysis prove conclusive.    Constantine shared her professional experience with similar analysis leading to the identification of a serial killer in Tampa, highlighting the potential significance such evidence could have in court. However, she also laments the fact that body language experts like herself are rarely allowed to testify in court unless to counter testimony from law enforcement.    The debate extends to the court of public opinion, where the "CSI effect" and the surge in true-crime aficionados create an expectation for irrefutable evidence. Constantine suggests that the jury, regardless of their instructions to stick to the facts, will inevitably make personal judgments based on the behavior and appearance of the accused.    The podcast reveals that the defense's strategy may involve odinism, which has been brought to the attention of the public and the court. As the conversation unfolds, the complexities of the legal process are laid bare, along with the human cost of the criminal justice system. The impending trial, the podcast suggests, will be as much about interpreting the nuances of human behavior as it is about weighing the hard evidence.    But what happens when the courtroom becomes an arena where jurors are expected to be part-time body language experts, and where the potential for bias is as significant as the evidence itself? As "Hidden Killers" leaves us pondering, we are reminded that the outcome of the trial could hinge not just on what is proven, but also on what is perceived. Can the legal system rise above the fray of human intuition, or is the court of public opinion an inescapable shadow over the scales of justice? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can a man visibly deteriorate before the public eye and yet maintain his innocence amidst overwhelming suspicion and the weight of accusation? This pressing question encapsulates the essence of a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring guest Susan Constantine, a trial consultant and body language expert. They discuss the case of Richard Allen, accused of a double murder in Delphi, Indiana—a case riddled with controversy, not least because of Allen's apparent physical and mental unraveling during his time in solitary confinement.    Richard Allen is set to stand trial on October 24th, yet the evidence against him, as discussed by Brueski and Constantine, seems tenuous, forming what could only be described as a "fairly weak case." Allen, who lacks a criminal history, raised his hand during a call for witnesses who were on the hiking trail the day of the crime, an act that, according to Constantine, could be seen as either an innocent man's plea or a strategic half-confession to ease cognitive dissonance.    As Brueski and Constantine note, the physical transformation of Allen is stark and troubling. His latest mugshot reveals a man with deep-set furrows, sunken cheeks, and a pallor that speaks volumes of his prison ordeal. "He looks unhealthy. He truly looks like he's right on the edge of not being here any longer," Constantine remarked, her words painting a vivid picture of a man broken by the justice system's slow grind.    The crux of their discussion lies in the power of circumstantial evidence and the analysis of body language, particularly in the context of a photograph that captured a figure on the railroad tracks near the crime scene, potentially implicating Allen. While the photograph's subject remains officially unidentified, Constantine emphasizes the uniqueness of individuals' gait and posture—elements that could potentially match Allen to the figure in the photo, should comparative analysis prove conclusive.    Constantine shared her professional experience with similar analysis leading to the identification of a serial killer in Tampa, highlighting the potential significance such evidence could have in court. However, she also laments the fact that body language experts like herself are rarely allowed to testify in court unless to counter testimony from law enforcement.    The debate extends to the court of public opinion, where the "CSI effect" and the surge in true-crime aficionados create an expectation for irrefutable evidence. Constantine suggests that the jury, regardless of their instructions to stick to the facts, will inevitably make personal judgments based on the behavior and appearance of the accused.    The podcast reveals that the defense's strategy may involve odinism, which has been brought to the attention of the public and the court. As the conversation unfolds, the complexities of the legal process are laid bare, along with the human cost of the criminal justice system. The impending trial, the podcast suggests, will be as much about interpreting the nuances of human behavior as it is about weighing the hard evidence.    But what happens when the courtroom becomes an arena where jurors are expected to be part-time body language experts, and where the potential for bias is as significant as the evidence itself? As "Hidden Killers" leaves us pondering, we are reminded that the outcome of the trial could hinge not just on what is proven, but also on what is perceived. Can the legal system rise above the fray of human intuition, or is the court of public opinion an inescapable shadow over the scales of justice? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a heart-wrenching episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and guest, Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine, dove deep into a haunting tale of misdiagnosis, systemic failures, and profound loss. Their discussion prompts a disturbing question: Are some children being taken away from their loving homes based on misunderstandings and flawed assessments?    Brueski paints a grim picture of the situation, noting, “We have so many issues, it seems with CPS. And things not being taken action on, and children being left in horrific situations. What is going on here where we have kids that literally have good homes...ripped out of their parents arms when they need the most?”    Constantine's connection to this issue is deeply personal. She recounts the story of a close friend whose children were forcibly removed because of a misdiagnosis: Munchausen's by proxy disorder. The disorder, in its essence, is when a caregiver or parent fabricates, exaggerates, or induces illness in a person under their care for attention or other gains. However, as Constantine points out, it was “debunked almost five years ago” and is now referred to as a "fictitious disorder."    This leads to the harrowing account of Maya Kowalski, a child experiencing excruciating pain that baffled medical professionals. As her mother sought answers and treatments both within the United States and beyond, she was met with skepticism and mistrust. Despite the mother's attempts to articulate her daughter's journey and the treatments she'd discovered, it was misconstrued as over-medicalization. Ultimately, it led to a tragic end with Maya's mother succumbing to despair and taking her own life.    One of the most chilling aspects discussed is the potential for a financial incentive in removing children from their homes. Vinnie Politan, as mentioned by Constantine, explored this on Court TV. But beyond financial motives lies the broader issue of trust in so-called "expert" assessments. Constantine expressed her frustration, saying, “it's mind-blowing to me that we are getting to a place where these authorities that are so-called experts are trained...and diagnosing or to see the symptoms of abuse and how wrong they can be.”    Dr. Chopra, a pain medical doctor who testified in a related trial, painted a picture of the severity of Maya's pain, emphasizing that it surpassed that of childbirth, cancer, or even amputation. How could a parent, desperate for relief for their child, be so grossly misunderstood?    One figure repeatedly mentioned in the podcast is Dr. Sally Smith, who diagnosed several cases as Munchausen's by proxy, including Maya's and a runner-up from American Idol. This, as Constantine states, represents a "real problem" with officials "taking matters into their own hands, causing so much distress, anxiety, endangerment, mental and physical, to these children."    Towards the end of the episode, listeners are reminded of the profound humanity at the heart of this issue. Constantine recounts a moving encounter outside a courtroom with Maya's grieving family. The group, united by shared pain, found solace in praying together, a moment that underscored the very real emotional toll of these systemic issues.    In light of this conversation, we are left to grapple with the complex interplay of medical, societal, and bureaucratic factors that can have devastating impacts on families. Yet, as Brueski and Constantine demonstrate, there is also space for empathy, understanding, and a collective call to action.    As we reflect on the issues discussed, we are left with a haunting question: How many more families must suffer before systemic changes are implemented? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a heart-wrenching episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and guest, Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine, dove deep into a haunting tale of misdiagnosis, systemic failures, and profound loss. Their discussion prompts a disturbing question: Are some children being taken away from their loving homes based on misunderstandings and flawed assessments?    Brueski paints a grim picture of the situation, noting, “We have so many issues, it seems with CPS. And things not being taken action on, and children being left in horrific situations. What is going on here where we have kids that literally have good homes...ripped out of their parents arms when they need the most?”    Constantine's connection to this issue is deeply personal. She recounts the story of a close friend whose children were forcibly removed because of a misdiagnosis: Munchausen's by proxy disorder. The disorder, in its essence, is when a caregiver or parent fabricates, exaggerates, or induces illness in a person under their care for attention or other gains. However, as Constantine points out, it was “debunked almost five years ago” and is now referred to as a "fictitious disorder."    This leads to the harrowing account of Maya Kowalski, a child experiencing excruciating pain that baffled medical professionals. As her mother sought answers and treatments both within the United States and beyond, she was met with skepticism and mistrust. Despite the mother's attempts to articulate her daughter's journey and the treatments she'd discovered, it was misconstrued as over-medicalization. Ultimately, it led to a tragic end with Maya's mother succumbing to despair and taking her own life.    One of the most chilling aspects discussed is the potential for a financial incentive in removing children from their homes. Vinnie Politan, as mentioned by Constantine, explored this on Court TV. But beyond financial motives lies the broader issue of trust in so-called "expert" assessments. Constantine expressed her frustration, saying, “it's mind-blowing to me that we are getting to a place where these authorities that are so-called experts are trained...and diagnosing or to see the symptoms of abuse and how wrong they can be.”    Dr. Chopra, a pain medical doctor who testified in a related trial, painted a picture of the severity of Maya's pain, emphasizing that it surpassed that of childbirth, cancer, or even amputation. How could a parent, desperate for relief for their child, be so grossly misunderstood?    One figure repeatedly mentioned in the podcast is Dr. Sally Smith, who diagnosed several cases as Munchausen's by proxy, including Maya's and a runner-up from American Idol. This, as Constantine states, represents a "real problem" with officials "taking matters into their own hands, causing so much distress, anxiety, endangerment, mental and physical, to these children."    Towards the end of the episode, listeners are reminded of the profound humanity at the heart of this issue. Constantine recounts a moving encounter outside a courtroom with Maya's grieving family. The group, united by shared pain, found solace in praying together, a moment that underscored the very real emotional toll of these systemic issues.    In light of this conversation, we are left to grapple with the complex interplay of medical, societal, and bureaucratic factors that can have devastating impacts on families. Yet, as Brueski and Constantine demonstrate, there is also space for empathy, understanding, and a collective call to action.    As we reflect on the issues discussed, we are left with a haunting question: How many more families must suffer before systemic changes are implemented? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

It's every parent's nightmare: a medical institution diagnosing their child, and then a subsequent loss of custody based on questionable claims. But when the institutions you trust begin to make unverifiable assumptions about parents, what remains of justice? On a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski, a concerning pattern emerged during a conversation with Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine.    Brueski broached a concerning topic regarding Dr. Smith, whose role at Johns Hopkins Children's Hospital appeared to be absent of the checks and balances we often associate with justice. This lack of oversight led Constantine to reveal a startling connection. "Okay. So there is a route to all of this," she began. In Orlando, a psychological firm wrote a book on Munchausen's by proxy disorder. Constantine noted that despite it being a rare condition, there's been a significant influx of women diagnosed in that area.    Contrary to the conventional understanding of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, where a guardian may fake a child's illness, these mothers are accused of the opposite – trying to help their children recover from genuine health issues.    Constantine goes on to claim, "Here is the person that wrote this book that literally removed the children from my dear friend of 40 years." Though she is able to read people well, being a body language expert, she has seen no signs of Munchausen's by proxy disorder in her friend. Instead, she describes an alarming pattern in which women, primarily mothers, are being wrongly diagnosed by a forensic psychologist, now colloquially termed as "Dr. XYZ moms".    This chain of diagnosis and removal of children has extensive implications, particularly in child custody battles. "The courts say you have to go through counseling for co-parenting... and whoever it is that has the biggest, widest pockets," Constantine explains. Those with more financial means, typically fathers, can exploit this diagnosis to gain full custody of their children. With the false diagnosis of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, mothers are effectively removed from their children's lives, permanently.    Complicating the matter further is the monetization of this system. This Orlando-based firm, according to Constantine, charges large sums for evaluations, leaving countless families grappling with not only the loss of their children but significant financial burdens as well.    Brueski's probing question about the motive behind such actions illuminates a larger issue. "Is this something where overall there needs to be reform in the entire system?" he asks. Indeed, Constantine points to the formation of collaborative law groups that control a significant portion of these processes. These groups, comprised of forensic psychologists and arbitrators for custody battles, form a tightly-knit community. The implication is clear: expose one, and the whole system might collapse.    It's a sobering realization when those tasked with justice seem entwined in questionable practices. Constantine's revelations, interwoven with personal experiences and ties to those affected, paint a disturbing picture. One where justice isn't just blind; it might also be compromised.    At the heart of this narrative is the issue of training, or rather the lack of it. Constantine describes her experience with training workers in the department of children and families. Their lack of expertise and inadequate training leaves them ill-equipped to handle sensitive family matters, leading to decisions that often rip families apart.    In concluding the interview, Brueski and Constantine shed light on an urgent need for reform and proper training. With families being torn apart based on unverified and often false diagnoses, the question becomes: How many more lives will be shattered before the system rights its wrongs? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

It's every parent's nightmare: a medical institution diagnosing their child, and then a subsequent loss of custody based on questionable claims. But when the institutions you trust begin to make unverifiable assumptions about parents, what remains of justice? On a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski, a concerning pattern emerged during a conversation with Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine.    Brueski broached a concerning topic regarding Dr. Smith, whose role at Johns Hopkins Children's Hospital appeared to be absent of the checks and balances we often associate with justice. This lack of oversight led Constantine to reveal a startling connection. "Okay. So there is a route to all of this," she began. In Orlando, a psychological firm wrote a book on Munchausen's by proxy disorder. Constantine noted that despite it being a rare condition, there's been a significant influx of women diagnosed in that area.    Contrary to the conventional understanding of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, where a guardian may fake a child's illness, these mothers are accused of the opposite – trying to help their children recover from genuine health issues.    Constantine goes on to claim, "Here is the person that wrote this book that literally removed the children from my dear friend of 40 years." Though she is able to read people well, being a body language expert, she has seen no signs of Munchausen's by proxy disorder in her friend. Instead, she describes an alarming pattern in which women, primarily mothers, are being wrongly diagnosed by a forensic psychologist, now colloquially termed as "Dr. XYZ moms".    This chain of diagnosis and removal of children has extensive implications, particularly in child custody battles. "The courts say you have to go through counseling for co-parenting... and whoever it is that has the biggest, widest pockets," Constantine explains. Those with more financial means, typically fathers, can exploit this diagnosis to gain full custody of their children. With the false diagnosis of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, mothers are effectively removed from their children's lives, permanently.    Complicating the matter further is the monetization of this system. This Orlando-based firm, according to Constantine, charges large sums for evaluations, leaving countless families grappling with not only the loss of their children but significant financial burdens as well.    Brueski's probing question about the motive behind such actions illuminates a larger issue. "Is this something where overall there needs to be reform in the entire system?" he asks. Indeed, Constantine points to the formation of collaborative law groups that control a significant portion of these processes. These groups, comprised of forensic psychologists and arbitrators for custody battles, form a tightly-knit community. The implication is clear: expose one, and the whole system might collapse.    It's a sobering realization when those tasked with justice seem entwined in questionable practices. Constantine's revelations, interwoven with personal experiences and ties to those affected, paint a disturbing picture. One where justice isn't just blind; it might also be compromised.    At the heart of this narrative is the issue of training, or rather the lack of it. Constantine describes her experience with training workers in the department of children and families. Their lack of expertise and inadequate training leaves them ill-equipped to handle sensitive family matters, leading to decisions that often rip families apart.    In concluding the interview, Brueski and Constantine shed light on an urgent need for reform and proper training. With families being torn apart based on unverified and often false diagnoses, the question becomes: How many more lives will be shattered before the system rights its wrongs? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the medical community misusing the Munchausen by proxy diagnosis and causing more harm than good?    In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski delves into the controversial and distressing topic of the misuse of the Munchausen by proxy diagnosis with guest Susan Constantine, a Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert.    Munchausen by proxy is a mental health disorder where a caregiver, often a parent, either makes up fake symptoms or causes real symptoms to make it look like the child is sick. The diagnosis, while legitimate in some cases, can be used improperly, leading to devastating consequences for families.    Central to the discussion was the disturbing case surrounding a doctor named Sally Smith. Although Dr. Smith recently retired and settled with the family involved, the ramifications of her actions linger. "Look at the damage this person did," Brueski points out, emphasizing the need for systemic changes in the medical community to prevent such misuse in the future.    The alarming revelation from the podcast was the advice given to Brueski and Constantine from an expert in the field: "You need to go after the hospitals, you need to go after the doctors, you need to go after the departments." This insight suggests that the broader medical community may be inadvertently complicit in these tragic cases.    Constantine emphasized the upcoming MAYA trial, which she believes will set a precedent. If Maya's case results in a win, it could pave the way for more lawsuits against medical professionals and institutions. "These guys are going to start hiding, and they're going to start stopping," predicts Constantine. "You got to hit them where it hurts, and that's right in the pocketbook."    The complexities of the Munchausen by proxy diagnosis also came under scrutiny. How does one conclusively diagnose someone with such a disorder? While Constantine acknowledges she isn't a medical professional, she raises valid concerns. She notes signs such as a child repeatedly reported as sick every time they're under their mother's care or excessive protectiveness of the child. However, she suggests a more rigorous approach to diagnosis involving external, unassociated doctors for a balanced opinion.    Drawing parallels to other distressing cases like the Didi Blanchard case in Springfield, Missouri, Constantine highlights the challenges in diagnosing psychological disorders. The reliance on "opinion" rather than fact, coupled with a lack of objective analysis, creates a slippery slope that can lead to incorrect and potentially damaging diagnoses.    The conversation also touched on the possible motivations behind misdiagnoses, pointing to potential ulterior motives like research opportunities. In one anecdote, Constantine speaks of how a child was subjected to manipulative "games" to determine if she was "faking it." Such practices raise significant ethical concerns.    Perhaps most heart-wrenching is the real-world consequences of these misdiagnoses. Constantine recounts how a mother, misdiagnosed with Munchausen by proxy, faced societal judgment and ostracization, despite multiple other doctors asserting she didn't have the disorder. In another case, a misdiagnosis had tragic consequences, with the mother, overwhelmed by the accusations, taking her own life.    Given the gravity of the implications of such diagnoses, both Brueski and Constantine conclude that there needs to be a shift in how these cases are approached. Constantine states, "We're relying on people's opinion. There is no fact to it." This lack of objective evidence combined with potential biases, whether from personal egos or institutional pressures, is a recipe for disaster.    While the conversation raises more questions than it answers, it is evident that there is a need for reform in how the medical community approaches such sensitive cases. Trust in the medical profession is paramount, and when that trust is undermined, it has profound consequences on society.    As the article concludes, it's worth pondering: How many more families need to be torn apart before there is a systemic change in diagnosing Munchausen by proxy? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the medical community misusing the Munchausen by proxy diagnosis and causing more harm than good? In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski delves into the controversial and distressing topic of the misuse of the Munchausen by proxy diagnosis with guest Susan Constantine, a Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert.    Munchausen by proxy is a mental health disorder where a caregiver, often a parent, either makes up fake symptoms or causes real symptoms to make it look like the child is sick. The diagnosis, while legitimate in some cases, can be used improperly, leading to devastating consequences for families.    Central to the discussion was the disturbing case surrounding a doctor named Sally Smith. Although Dr. Smith recently retired and settled with the family involved, the ramifications of her actions linger. "Look at the damage this person did," Brueski points out, emphasizing the need for systemic changes in the medical community to prevent such misuse in the future.    The alarming revelation from the podcast was the advice given to Brueski and Constantine from an expert in the field: "You need to go after the hospitals, you need to go after the doctors, you need to go after the departments." This insight suggests that the broader medical community may be inadvertently complicit in these tragic cases.    Constantine emphasized the upcoming MAYA trial, which she believes will set a precedent. If Maya's case results in a win, it could pave the way for more lawsuits against medical professionals and institutions. "These guys are going to start hiding, and they're going to start stopping," predicts Constantine. "You got to hit them where it hurts, and that's right in the pocketbook."    The complexities of the Munchausen by proxy diagnosis also came under scrutiny. How does one conclusively diagnose someone with such a disorder? While Constantine acknowledges she isn't a medical professional, she raises valid concerns. She notes signs such as a child repeatedly reported as sick every time they're under their mother's care or excessive protectiveness of the child. However, she suggests a more rigorous approach to diagnosis involving external, unassociated doctors for a balanced opinion.    Drawing parallels to other distressing cases like the Didi Blanchard case in Springfield, Missouri, Constantine highlights the challenges in diagnosing psychological disorders. The reliance on "opinion" rather than fact, coupled with a lack of objective analysis, creates a slippery slope that can lead to incorrect and potentially damaging diagnoses.    The conversation also touched on the possible motivations behind misdiagnoses, pointing to potential ulterior motives like research opportunities. In one anecdote, Constantine speaks of how a child was subjected to manipulative "games" to determine if she was "faking it." Such practices raise significant ethical concerns.    Perhaps most heart-wrenching is the real-world consequences of these misdiagnoses. Constantine recounts how a mother, misdiagnosed with Munchausen by proxy, faced societal judgment and ostracization, despite multiple other doctors asserting she didn't have the disorder. In another case, a misdiagnosis had tragic consequences, with the mother, overwhelmed by the accusations, taking her own life.    Given the gravity of the implications of such diagnoses, both Brueski and Constantine conclude that there needs to be a shift in how these cases are approached. Constantine states, "We're relying on people's opinion. There is no fact to it." This lack of objective evidence combined with potential biases, whether from personal egos or institutional pressures, is a recipe for disaster.    While the conversation raises more questions than it answers, it is evident that there is a need for reform in how the medical community approaches such sensitive cases. Trust in the medical profession is paramount, and when that trust is undermined, it has profound consequences on society.    As the article concludes, it's worth pondering: How many more families need to be torn apart before there is a systemic change in diagnosing Munchausen by proxy? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of Zone 7, Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum sits down with Susan Constantine, a leading expert in deception detection and body language. The conversation explores a range of topics, from the importance of objectivity in investigations to the nuances of voice pitch and tone. Susan covers how deception detection is a skill not just a gut feeling and how to understand human behaviors. Show Notes: [0:00] Welcome back to Zone 7 with Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum.   [2:40] Sheryl introduces Susan Constantine to the listeners [6:20] Susan unpacks how deception detection is a skill that can be learned, not just a gut feeling [8:30] Question: How did you get into this field of deception detection? [9:14] Susan recounts a haunting experience from her childhood that took place in a racially tense neighborhood [15:18] Susan talks about her career in jury selection [17:00] Susan discusses her role in the high-profile Casey Anthony trial, analyzing Anthony's body language [18:10] Sheryl and Susan dissect Casey Anthony's body language during her trial [21:34] Question: Can you tell us some of the facial expressions you try your best to look for and hone in on, depending on who you're working for? [22:20] The concept of cognitive load and how it can be a revealing factor when individuals are trying to lie [30:55] Susan discusses how she worked through the Michael Jackson case [39:55] “The more I've ranked up, the smaller my circle becomes.” [43:32] Susan discusses how she analyzes video footage to detect deception [45:00] Question: Could you talk a little bit about the Holmes case? [49:53] “Men are liars. We'll lie about lying if we have to. I'm an algebra liar. I figure two good lies makes a positive.” -T.A Thanks for listening to another episode! If you're loving the show and want to help grow the show, please head over to Itunes and leave a rating and review! How to Leave an Apple Podcast Review: First, Open the podcast app on your iPhone, Mac, or iPad. Then, hit the “Search” tab at the bottom right-hand corner of the page and search for Zone 7. Select the podcast, scroll down to find the subheading “Ratings & Reviews”. and select “Write a Review.” Next, select the number of stars you'd like to leave. Please choose 5 stars! Using the text box which says “Title,” write a title for your review. Then in the text box, write the review itself. The review can be up to 300 words long, but doesn't need to be much more than: “Love the show! Thanks!” or Once you're done select “Send” in the upper right-hand corner. --- Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook., Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Sheryl is also the founder and director of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute, a collaboration between universities and colleges that brings researchers, practitioners, students and the criminal justice community together to advance techniques in solving cold cases and assist families and law enforcement with solvability factors for unsolved homicides, missing persons, and kidnapping cases.   You can connect and learn more about Sheryl's work by visiting the CCIRI website https://coldcasecrimes.org Social Links: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com Twitter: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollum See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved deep into the murky waters of police corruption and unsolved crimes, specifically focusing on former Suffolk County Police Chief James Burke. Brueski's special guest was Susan Constantine, a recognized body language expert and trial consultant. Their discussion centered on the halted progress in the case against Rex Heuermann and the involvement of James Burke.    Burke, who was already incarcerated for unrelated crimes and corruption, is now facing allegations of engaging with sex workers. Brueski raised an alarming concern, questioning the extent to which Burke's tenure as the chief may have hindered investigations, particularly the Gilgo Beach killer case. Commenting on the hidden layers of crime networks, Constantine remarked, “You kind of wonder what is underground that we're not aware of. There's something bigger than what sometimes we see on the surface and there is police corruption."    Delving further into the clandestine nature of such cases, Constantine drew parallels with her experience as an expert consultant in the Jeffrey Epstein case. “When you think about just that whole underground thing there... there's a lot going on that I don't know that we all know everything," she shared, emphasizing that such cover-ups often have connections that extend beyond what meets the eye. The question that looms large is whether Burke's alleged involvement with sex workers was a mere personal vice, or if it masked deeper connections and potential cover-ups, potentially involving Heuermann and other suspects linked to a spree of unsolved murders.    Drawing a parallel with the convoluted intricacies of the Jeffrey Epstein case, Brueski expressed the challenge of accepting the potential involvement of high-profile individuals in such clandestine affairs. "I think the same thing kind of goes for something like this where you have faith in your police chief, you have faith in the people who are supposed to be protecting and serving," he said, emphasizing the trust deficit that incidents like these create in the community.    Constantine emphasized the hidden layers of corruption that often go unnoticed. She stressed that certain individuals often position themselves strategically in high offices to exert control and influence. “The individuals that are in charge of those investigating... have strategically put themselves in high positions. So they can block it," she revealed.    One of the more unsettling revelations from Constantine alluded to a local case she's privy to. “I have knowledge of a psychologist... that becomes the head of the department of Children and Families being the psychologist where everybody goes to for the courts approved as being the court-appointed," she disclosed. Such strategic placements allow these individuals to control narratives, evidence, and outcomes, ensuring their secrets remain buried.    Brueski and Constantine further theorized how individuals, like Rex in this situation, might strategize their moves. If one wanted to suppress information or control what comes out, they would likely position themselves in influential places, form connections with decision-makers, and ensure that every step taken by investigators or opponents has to go through them. It's a haunting game of chess, with real lives at stake.    Towards the end of their conversation, both Brueski and Constantine expressed apprehension about the future findings in the case against Burke and his potential connections. The discussion painted a grim picture of the depths of corruption and how deep-seated networks can influence and control criminal investigations. With the lines between protectors and perpetrators increasingly blurred, one can only wonder: how many more hidden killers are lurking in the shadows? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski sat down with Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine, to unpack the courtroom behavior of Brian Kohberger. Last week, the court witnessed Kohberger waiving his right to a speedy trial, sparking a myriad of questions about his overall strategy and intentions.   During the interview, Constantine remarked on Kohberger's demeanor when answering the judge's questions. "When I'm watching his behavior, he was very convincing," she observed. "He answered the questions, he listened, his voice tone was confident." Kohberger's assertive responses and the manner he communicated seemed strategic, prompting Constantine to wonder about his overarching legal game plan, especially given the decision to extend the trial.   Constantine further discussed the courtroom dynamics, particularly the vigilant role of Kohberger's attorney, who was described as indefatigable in her efforts. "You see his attorney constantly standing up over and over again...she is a real bulldog. For a defendant, you definitely would want to have her as your attorney," commented Constantine. Brueski agreed, noting, "She certainly is spacing this out and making the arguments on his behalf fairly well."   However, it's not just Kohberger's behavior that's drawing attention. The defense's strategy seems to be throwing a wide net, planning to bring forth a motion to dismiss based on various reasons, from biased grand juror accusations and alleged inadmissible evidence to claims of prosecutorial misconduct. When asked about this approach, Constantine was straightforward: "I think they're grasping at straws and slinging mud every which way they can."   Kohberger's defense, notably his claimed penchant for nighttime driving, was highlighted as being particularly weak. "That seems to be quite his norm, but that is a horrible defense," Constantine asserted. Given this, the defense's varied tactics could be seen as an attempt to defend their client vigorously, even if their foundations appear shaky.   While it might appear that the defense is trying everything to get the trial dismissed, it's worth noting that even a dismissal based on one of the reasons doesn't necessarily mean Kohberger would walk free. Brueski explained, "Essentially, if they have an issue with the grand jurors, they would just essentially reconvene another grand jury." This would in effect reset the trial clock.   A central point of discussion was the defense's approach to time. Earlier, there was a sense that the defense attorney, Ann Taylor, was trying to move things along swiftly. Now, there appears to be a strategic slowing down. Constantine believes this might be a tactic to buy time, suggesting, "Buying time to restrategize. That's what she's doing."   The conversation rounded out with a focus on the upcoming motion to dismiss and whether Kohberger's alibi would remain central to the defense. Constantine expressed that the judge might be providing Kohberger every possible chance, ensuring all bases are covered. "I think that the judge is giving a lot of leeway in Kohberger's case," she concluded.   Kohberger's trial continues to be a riveting spectacle. As it unfolds, many will watch closely, parsing every move, every gesture, and every strategy for a deeper understanding of the case's direction. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Tony Brueski, along with Susan Constantine and Fil Waters, discusses the infamous case of the Menendez brothers in a recent episode. They deliberate over the brothers' potential eligibility for a new trial, drawing from their respective areas of expertise to offer unique perspectives on the subject. The conversation invites listeners to consider the original verdict, the legal arguments surrounding the case, and whether justice was served. The discourse also sheds light on the complexities of the legal system and its evolving attitudes toward crime and punishment. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) -https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In a recent dialogue, Tony Brueski, joined by Susan Constantine and Fil Waters, delves into the baffling case of Harmony Montgomery, a young girl who was missing for two years before anyone noticed. They scrutinize the systemic and social failures that allowed such a significant delay in recognizing her disappearance. This in-depth conversation explores the implications of the case, shedding light on societal responsibility and the mechanisms in place to protect our children. The episode offers a sobering look at this tragic case and an urgent call for vigilant community involvement in safeguarding children's welfare. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) -https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In their latest discussion, Tony Brueski Fil Waters, and Susan Constantine tackle the controversial issue surrounding Scot Peterson, the school officer at Parkland who came under fire for failing to protect children during a tragic school shooting. They ponder upon the possible repercussions that Peterson should face for his inaction during this critical moment, when lives of innocent students were at stake. This discussion aims to dissect the responsibilities of those entrusted with the safety of students and the penalties they should face when they fail in their duties. The episode is a thoughtful debate on the accountability of law enforcement officers within school environments, an issue that has far-reaching implications for school safety nationwide. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) -https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this compelling episode, body language expert Susan Constantine turns her attention to potential solutions for curbing sociopathic behavior in society. Constantine, known for her insights on non-verbal cues and behavioral patterns, discusses strategies and interventions to reduce the perceived increase in such behaviors. She delves into the role of education, mental health resources, and societal changes in mitigating the impact of sociopathy. Tune in as we explore this complex issue from the perspective of a seasoned body language expert and delve into potential societal responses to sociopathy. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this thought-provoking episode, renowned body language expert Susan Constantine offers her unique insights into what she perceives as a rising tide of sociopathic behavior in modern society. Drawing from her extensive experience and knowledge, Constantine discusses the non-verbal cues and behavioral patterns associated with sociopathy, and how they seem to be increasingly prevalent. She explores potential societal factors contributing to this perceived increase, as well as the implications it holds for interpersonal relationships and community dynamics. Join us for this compelling discussion that traverses the intersection of psychology, sociology, and body language interpretation. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

Join us in this intriguing episode as we delve into the case of Kouri Richins, exploring the possible clues her body language may reveal about her potential guilt. Body language expert Susan Constantine shares her analysis, decoding Richins' non-verbal cues and gestures for possible signs of deception. With her extensive experience in the field, Constantine provides an insightful perspective on how Richins' body language might align with or contradict her verbal statements. Tune in to gain a new understanding of this complex case through the lens of body language interpretation. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story

In this episode, we analyze the controversial case of Lori Vallow Daybell, who stood trial without her defense calling any witnesses. We question whether her defense team failed to see through her lies and deceit, thereby influencing their courtroom strategy. Noted body language expert Susan Constantine offers her unique insight into the matter, evaluating Vallow Daybell's nonverbal cues for signs of deception. Listen in as we dissect this complex case, exploring the pivotal role of perception and interpretation in the justice system. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj  Follow Our Other Cases:    Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story