POPULARITY
8 episodes with geragos
3 episodes with geragos
4 episodes with geragos
3 episodes with geragos
2 episodes with geragos
2 episodes with geragos
2 episodes with geragos
2 episodes with geragos
During a closed-door meeting on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian sternly reprimanded attorney Mark Geragos for comments made on his podcast, "2 Angry Men," regarding the prosecution team in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial. Geragos, who represents Combs' mother and has been observed consulting with the defense team, referred to the all-female group of federal prosecutors as "a six-pack of white women." Judge Subramanian condemned the remark as "outrageous" and emphasized that such language would not be tolerated in any courtroom. He further warned Geragos that he would be monitoring future episodes of the podcast to ensure compliance with court decorum and to prevent any potential influence on the jury pool .Geragos attempted to justify his comments by suggesting that Combs feels targeted due to his race, stating that his observation was rooted in the client's perspective. However, the judge dismissed this rationale, reiterating the importance of maintaining professionalism and impartiality in legal proceedings. Prosecutors expressed concern over Geragos' public commentary, highlighting the podcast's substantial audience and the risk of prejudicing the jury. They also noted that Geragos discussed key evidence, including a surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, and criticized the prosecution's strategy. In response, the judge underscored the necessity for all legal representatives to refrain from extrajudicial statements that could compromise the fairness of the trialto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy Trial Judge Snaps at Lawyer Who Discussed Prosecutors on TMZ - Business Insider
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), attorney Teny Geragos submitted a declaration supporting a motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged government misconduct. The declaration outlines instances where federal agents purportedly leaked confidential information to the media, including details about search warrants and witness interviews. Geragos contends that these actions have compromised Sean Combs' right to a fair trial by influencing public perception and potentially tainting the jury pool.Additionally, the declaration highlights the release of a 2016 hotel surveillance video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Geragos argues that the video's leak to the media was orchestrated by government agents, violating grand jury secrecy rules. The defense asserts that such leaks are part of a broader pattern of misconduct aimed at prejudicing the case against Combs. Consequently, they request an evidentiary hearing to investigate these allegations and seek appropriate remedies to ensure a fair judicial process.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.81.0_1.pdf
In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears. Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN
In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears. Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears. Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears. Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
VLOG June 12 US v Combs, Jane to end, analysis of Teny Geragos' cross, upcoming witnesses. Inner City Press is covering https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-sean-combs-lawyer-has-jane Week 4 book: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=8uFjEQAAQBAJ 2d Cir denies Gold Bar Bob bail so jail June 17; UN censors https://www.cjr.org/the_profile/reporter-expelled-un.php
This week, Mark and Gary dive into the fast-escalating feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, breaking down how a spat over spending turned into a full-blown political and personal clash involving Jeffrey Epstein allegations and deleted tweets. Plus, the hosts weigh short-term wins vs. long-term influence, with insight from Geragos's other podcast '2 Angry Men' with Harvey Levin.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're there.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
We're continuing the our amateur coverage of the Diddy trial! Today we're going to break down the testimony from Kid Cudi, THE PUNISHER (and his book about limp dicks) and Jonathan Oddi's conspiracies: Trump is Illuminati, Geragos stuff, which rappers are gay (Rick Ross and DJ Khaled), private jets for running drugs and more! Today we're catching up on Week Two of the Diddy Trial! LINKS: Emilie Hagen's Substack for more Diddy coverage: https://substack.com/@emilieknowseverything?r=br4gm&utm_campaign=profile&utm_medium=profile-pageBONUS: Diddy 3 Hour Deep Dive- Gangsters, Illuminati Wealth, Blood Sacrifices, Satanism & Synchromysticism https://illuminatiwatcher.com/bonus-diddy-3-hour-deep-dive-gangsters-illuminati-wealth-blood-sacrifices-satanism-synchromysticism/You can now sign up for our commercial-free version of the show with a Patreon exclusive bonus show called “Morning Coffee w/ the Weishaupts” at Patreon.com/BreakingSocialNorms OR subscribe on the Apple Podcasts app to get all the same bonus “Morning Coffee” episodes AD-FREE with early access! (*Patreon is also NOW enabled to connect with Spotify! https://rb.gy/r34zj)Want more?…Index of all previous episodes on free feed: https://breakingsocialnorms.com/2021/03/22/index-of-archived-episodes/Leave a review or rating wherever you listen and we'll see what you've got to say!Follow us on the socials:instagram.com/theweishaupts2/Amazon Affiliate shop (*still under construction) with our favorite hair, skin care and horny books: https://breakingsocialnorms.com/2024/08/24/amazon-shopping-list-josie-and-isaacs-list/Check out Isaac's conspiracy podcasts, merch, etc:AllMyLinks.com/IsaacWOccult Symbolism and Pop Culture (on all podcast platforms or IlluminatiWatcher.com)Isaac Weishaupt's book are all on Amazon and Audible; *author narrated audiobooks*STATEMENT: This show is full of Isaac's and Josie's useless opinions and presented for entertainment purposes. Audio clips used in Fair Use and taken from YouTube videos.
News Whip: Dick's Sporting Goods buys Foot Locker. Handel's Ice Cream opens in Burbank. #DicksSportingGoods #FootLocker #HandelsIceCream #Food #Foodie // Man, fatally shot by Fountain Valley police after stealing officer's gun, bodycam video shows // How did Geragos get paid to defend the Menendez brothers for resentencing hearin // Fire in Long Beach Eliana Moreno NBCLA
News Whip: Air BNB offering new features. San Clemente looking for “just right” sand. IN-N-OUT to eliminate bad dyes in their food. // Disneyland makes some changes to “It's a Small World”. Breaking news: Menendez Brothers resentenced 50 years to life, eligible for parole. #Menene // BREAKING: Menendez brothers resentencing; 50 years to life, eligible for parole // Adam Carolla's connection to Menendez brother's lawyer Mark Geragos. Carolla was the impetus for Geragos taking the Menendez case. #MarkGeragos #MenendezFree The Stand-Up Comedy Club of Bellflower 2nd show tickets available Saturday, May 24th –10pm show. #AdamCarolla #standup #Comedy
Megyn Kelly is joined by Buck Sexton, co-host of The Clay and Buck Show, to discuss new reporting that former President Biden might need a wheelchair if he won the election, top Dems and the corporate press working overtime to cover-up his physical and cognitive decline, the truth about Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson's new book, the press getting major stories wrong on purpose, how they will never apologize for what they screw up because it serves an agenda, the leftist media fixating on Trump bringing white Afrikaners into America who are seeking refuge, the insane double standard by the left and their racist comments, and more. Then attorneys Mark Eiglarsh and Mark Geragos join to discuss the disturbing new details coming out at the Diddy trial, inside story about the lawyers and judge, recent details surrounding the Menendez brothers case, Geragos' and Megyn and Justin Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman's efforts to get the brothers out of prison, bombshell new reporting about Bryan Kohberger's disturbing phone searches after the Idaho murders, his association with serial killer Ted Bundy, the timeline of the crimes and what the defense could be planning, and more. Sexton- https://www.youtube.com/@BuckSextonEiglarsh- https://www.eiglarshlaw.com/Geragos- https://www.youtube.com/@reasonabledoubtpodcast Riverbend Ranch: Visit https://riverbendranch.com/ | Use promo code MEGYN for $20 off your first order.Grand Canyon University: https://GCU.eduDailyLook: https://dailylook.com to take your style quiz and use code MEGYN for 50% off your first order.Done with Debt: https://www.DoneWithDebt.comFollow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow
The Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNN
The Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Mark Geragos and Harvey Levin debate what really happened behind closed doors in the Diddy trial, after Geragos faced backlash for calling prosecutors a “six-pack of white women” on last week's episode. With the judge now monitoring the podcast for potential misconduct, tensions rise as Geragos evades Harvey's questions and defends his remarks. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
During a closed-door meeting on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian sternly reprimanded attorney Mark Geragos for comments made on his podcast, "2 Angry Men," regarding the prosecution team in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial. Geragos, who represents Combs' mother and has been observed consulting with the defense team, referred to the all-female group of federal prosecutors as "a six-pack of white women." Judge Subramanian condemned the remark as "outrageous" and emphasized that such language would not be tolerated in any courtroom. He further warned Geragos that he would be monitoring future episodes of the podcast to ensure compliance with court decorum and to prevent any potential influence on the jury pool .Geragos attempted to justify his comments by suggesting that Combs feels targeted due to his race, stating that his observation was rooted in the client's perspective. However, the judge dismissed this rationale, reiterating the importance of maintaining professionalism and impartiality in legal proceedings. Prosecutors expressed concern over Geragos' public commentary, highlighting the podcast's substantial audience and the risk of prejudicing the jury. They also noted that Geragos discussed key evidence, including a surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, and criticized the prosecution's strategy. In response, the judge underscored the necessity for all legal representatives to refrain from extrajudicial statements that could compromise the fairness of the trialto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy Trial Judge Snaps at Lawyer Who Discussed Prosecutors on TMZ - Business InsiderBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
During a closed-door meeting on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian sternly reprimanded attorney Mark Geragos for comments made on his podcast, "2 Angry Men," regarding the prosecution team in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial. Geragos, who represents Combs' mother and has been observed consulting with the defense team, referred to the all-female group of federal prosecutors as "a six-pack of white women." Judge Subramanian condemned the remark as "outrageous" and emphasized that such language would not be tolerated in any courtroom. He further warned Geragos that he would be monitoring future episodes of the podcast to ensure compliance with court decorum and to prevent any potential influence on the jury pool .Geragos attempted to justify his comments by suggesting that Combs feels targeted due to his race, stating that his observation was rooted in the client's perspective. However, the judge dismissed this rationale, reiterating the importance of maintaining professionalism and impartiality in legal proceedings. Prosecutors expressed concern over Geragos' public commentary, highlighting the podcast's substantial audience and the risk of prejudicing the jury. They also noted that Geragos discussed key evidence, including a surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, and criticized the prosecution's strategy. In response, the judge underscored the necessity for all legal representatives to refrain from extrajudicial statements that could compromise the fairness of the trialto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy Trial Judge Snaps at Lawyer Who Discussed Prosecutors on TMZ - Business Insider
During a closed-door meeting on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian sternly reprimanded attorney Mark Geragos for comments made on his podcast, "2 Angry Men," regarding the prosecution team in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial. Geragos, who represents Combs' mother and has been observed consulting with the defense team, referred to the all-female group of federal prosecutors as "a six-pack of white women." Judge Subramanian condemned the remark as "outrageous" and emphasized that such language would not be tolerated in any courtroom. He further warned Geragos that he would be monitoring future episodes of the podcast to ensure compliance with court decorum and to prevent any potential influence on the jury pool .Geragos attempted to justify his comments by suggesting that Combs feels targeted due to his race, stating that his observation was rooted in the client's perspective. However, the judge dismissed this rationale, reiterating the importance of maintaining professionalism and impartiality in legal proceedings. Prosecutors expressed concern over Geragos' public commentary, highlighting the podcast's substantial audience and the risk of prejudicing the jury. They also noted that Geragos discussed key evidence, including a surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, and criticized the prosecution's strategy. In response, the judge underscored the necessity for all legal representatives to refrain from extrajudicial statements that could compromise the fairness of the trialto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy Trial Judge Snaps at Lawyer Who Discussed Prosecutors on TMZ - Business InsiderBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The Menendez Brothers' Freedom Fight Hits Another Wall—And This One's Personal New Twist in the Menendez Case: Inside the Fight Over Resentencing The judge called it “stupid.” And honestly, that might be the most accurate legal description anyone's used in this decades-long saga. Erik and Lyle Menendez, who've been in prison for the past 29 years for killing their parents, just had their shot at a new sentencing delayed yet again—this time because no one could agree on whether they're allowed to look at a report they already have. Let's rewind. In 1989, the Menendez brothers walked into their parents' Beverly Hills mansion and shot Jose and Kitty Menendez to death. It was brutal. No question. But what came next split the country. The prosecution said it was a cold-blooded, calculated murder for inheritance. The defense said it was self-defense after a lifetime of sexual abuse at the hands of their father. The jury went with the prosecution, and in 1996, both brothers were sentenced to life without parole. Now, decades later, the conversation shifted. The state of California, under Governor Gavin Newsom's guidance, has been looking more closely at long-term sentences, rehabilitation, and second chances. That's where the Menendez brothers come back into focus. Former LA DA George Gascón—before getting pushed out—had asked for their sentences to be reconsidered, recommending they get 50 years with the possibility of parole. But Mark Geragos, the brothers' longtime attorney, is swinging for the fences. He's now asking for a reduction to manslaughter. If the judge agrees, that would mean Erik and Lyle walk out of prison immediately. But first, everyone needs to agree on how to handle a risk assessment report ordered by the governor's office. You'd think that would be straightforward. It is not. The prosecution claims they need more time because only part of the report has been released. The defense hasn't seen the full thing either. The judge, Michael Jesic, hadn't seen it either. And he was clearly done with the nonsense. "I need clarification from the governor's office,” Jesic said in court Thursday. “This is stupid.” Still, prosecutors insisted that the parts they have seen are enough to put the whole thing on pause. They filed a motion to delay so everyone could review what they call a crucial piece of the puzzle: how dangerous the brothers might be if released. According to Deputy DA Habib Balian, if a report exists that evaluates their potential for violence, it has to be considered. On the other side, Geragos went scorched earth. He slammed DA Nathan Hochman for holding a press conference where he referenced the report. Geragos now wants Hochman off the case altogether, saying he's compromised the process. Hochman, for what it's worth, has made it clear he does not support resentencing. So yeah—tensions are high. The governor's office later clarified that the risk assessment wasn't meant to stand alone—it's part of a broader review ahead of a June parole hearing. They also said that both the defense and prosecution already had access to what's been shared. And, they noted, they're happy to send it to the judge if he wants it. In the meantime, the brothers sat quietly, watching the hearing on a video feed from their prison near San Diego. Dressed in blue, emotionless, probably wondering what fresh bureaucratic hell they were now trapped in. This whole thing has been a stop-and-start process. The original resentencing hearing was set for January, but got postponed because of wildfires in LA and a last-minute attempt by prosecutors to pull back on their own request. This latest delay pushes things again, with the next court date now scheduled for May 9. Outside the courtroom, interest in the case hasn't faded. Netflix's “Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story” and a follow-up docuseries reignited public fascination. Journalists flooded the courthouse. Reporters elbowed for spots inside. It's the same media frenzy that's followed this case for decades. Inside, things got messy—again. Geragos and Bryan Freedman, an attorney representing Menendez relatives, blasted prosecutors for showing graphic crime scene photos in a prior hearing without warning the family. Freedman called it “harassment.” Balian apologized, but added that Erik and Lyle were the ones who caused the scene in those photos—not him. Another point of contention? The DA's office now controls the victims' services branch of the court. Geragos and Freedman say they've heard crickets from them. No contact. No coordination. Not even a heads-up. It's worth noting that nearly all surviving members of the Menendez family have publicly forgiven the brothers. They want them released. They believe in their rehabilitation. Prosecutors, however, say the brothers have never come clean. They point to lies told at trial—about the abuse, about what really happened that night—and say the Menendez brothers haven't taken full responsibility. Hochman's office has openly said they don't believe the abuse happened at all. So where does this leave everything? On pause. Again. The next hearing's set for May 9, assuming someone can get the right version of the report to the judge and everyone decides to read the same set of pages this time. #MenendezBrothers #ResentencingDrama #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeSystemChaos Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Menendez Brothers' Freedom Fight Hits Another Wall—And This One's Personal New Twist in the Menendez Case: Inside the Fight Over Resentencing The judge called it “stupid.” And honestly, that might be the most accurate legal description anyone's used in this decades-long saga. Erik and Lyle Menendez, who've been in prison for the past 29 years for killing their parents, just had their shot at a new sentencing delayed yet again—this time because no one could agree on whether they're allowed to look at a report they already have. Let's rewind. In 1989, the Menendez brothers walked into their parents' Beverly Hills mansion and shot Jose and Kitty Menendez to death. It was brutal. No question. But what came next split the country. The prosecution said it was a cold-blooded, calculated murder for inheritance. The defense said it was self-defense after a lifetime of sexual abuse at the hands of their father. The jury went with the prosecution, and in 1996, both brothers were sentenced to life without parole. Now, decades later, the conversation shifted. The state of California, under Governor Gavin Newsom's guidance, has been looking more closely at long-term sentences, rehabilitation, and second chances. That's where the Menendez brothers come back into focus. Former LA DA George Gascón—before getting pushed out—had asked for their sentences to be reconsidered, recommending they get 50 years with the possibility of parole. But Mark Geragos, the brothers' longtime attorney, is swinging for the fences. He's now asking for a reduction to manslaughter. If the judge agrees, that would mean Erik and Lyle walk out of prison immediately. But first, everyone needs to agree on how to handle a risk assessment report ordered by the governor's office. You'd think that would be straightforward. It is not. The prosecution claims they need more time because only part of the report has been released. The defense hasn't seen the full thing either. The judge, Michael Jesic, hadn't seen it either. And he was clearly done with the nonsense. "I need clarification from the governor's office,” Jesic said in court Thursday. “This is stupid.” Still, prosecutors insisted that the parts they have seen are enough to put the whole thing on pause. They filed a motion to delay so everyone could review what they call a crucial piece of the puzzle: how dangerous the brothers might be if released. According to Deputy DA Habib Balian, if a report exists that evaluates their potential for violence, it has to be considered. On the other side, Geragos went scorched earth. He slammed DA Nathan Hochman for holding a press conference where he referenced the report. Geragos now wants Hochman off the case altogether, saying he's compromised the process. Hochman, for what it's worth, has made it clear he does not support resentencing. So yeah—tensions are high. The governor's office later clarified that the risk assessment wasn't meant to stand alone—it's part of a broader review ahead of a June parole hearing. They also said that both the defense and prosecution already had access to what's been shared. And, they noted, they're happy to send it to the judge if he wants it. In the meantime, the brothers sat quietly, watching the hearing on a video feed from their prison near San Diego. Dressed in blue, emotionless, probably wondering what fresh bureaucratic hell they were now trapped in. This whole thing has been a stop-and-start process. The original resentencing hearing was set for January, but got postponed because of wildfires in LA and a last-minute attempt by prosecutors to pull back on their own request. This latest delay pushes things again, with the next court date now scheduled for May 9. Outside the courtroom, interest in the case hasn't faded. Netflix's “Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story” and a follow-up docuseries reignited public fascination. Journalists flooded the courthouse. Reporters elbowed for spots inside. It's the same media frenzy that's followed this case for decades. Inside, things got messy—again. Geragos and Bryan Freedman, an attorney representing Menendez relatives, blasted prosecutors for showing graphic crime scene photos in a prior hearing without warning the family. Freedman called it “harassment.” Balian apologized, but added that Erik and Lyle were the ones who caused the scene in those photos—not him. Another point of contention? The DA's office now controls the victims' services branch of the court. Geragos and Freedman say they've heard crickets from them. No contact. No coordination. Not even a heads-up. It's worth noting that nearly all surviving members of the Menendez family have publicly forgiven the brothers. They want them released. They believe in their rehabilitation. Prosecutors, however, say the brothers have never come clean. They point to lies told at trial—about the abuse, about what really happened that night—and say the Menendez brothers haven't taken full responsibility. Hochman's office has openly said they don't believe the abuse happened at all. So where does this leave everything? On pause. Again. The next hearing's set for May 9, assuming someone can get the right version of the report to the judge and everyone decides to read the same set of pages this time. #MenendezBrothers #ResentencingDrama #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeSystemChaos Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
The Menendez Brothers' Freedom Fight Hits Another Wall—And This One's Personal New Twist in the Menendez Case: Inside the Fight Over Resentencing The judge called it “stupid.” And honestly, that might be the most accurate legal description anyone's used in this decades-long saga. Erik and Lyle Menendez, who've been in prison for the past 29 years for killing their parents, just had their shot at a new sentencing delayed yet again—this time because no one could agree on whether they're allowed to look at a report they already have. Let's rewind. In 1989, the Menendez brothers walked into their parents' Beverly Hills mansion and shot Jose and Kitty Menendez to death. It was brutal. No question. But what came next split the country. The prosecution said it was a cold-blooded, calculated murder for inheritance. The defense said it was self-defense after a lifetime of sexual abuse at the hands of their father. The jury went with the prosecution, and in 1996, both brothers were sentenced to life without parole. Now, decades later, the conversation shifted. The state of California, under Governor Gavin Newsom's guidance, has been looking more closely at long-term sentences, rehabilitation, and second chances. That's where the Menendez brothers come back into focus. Former LA DA George Gascón—before getting pushed out—had asked for their sentences to be reconsidered, recommending they get 50 years with the possibility of parole. But Mark Geragos, the brothers' longtime attorney, is swinging for the fences. He's now asking for a reduction to manslaughter. If the judge agrees, that would mean Erik and Lyle walk out of prison immediately. But first, everyone needs to agree on how to handle a risk assessment report ordered by the governor's office. You'd think that would be straightforward. It is not. The prosecution claims they need more time because only part of the report has been released. The defense hasn't seen the full thing either. The judge, Michael Jesic, hadn't seen it either. And he was clearly done with the nonsense. "I need clarification from the governor's office,” Jesic said in court Thursday. “This is stupid.” Still, prosecutors insisted that the parts they have seen are enough to put the whole thing on pause. They filed a motion to delay so everyone could review what they call a crucial piece of the puzzle: how dangerous the brothers might be if released. According to Deputy DA Habib Balian, if a report exists that evaluates their potential for violence, it has to be considered. On the other side, Geragos went scorched earth. He slammed DA Nathan Hochman for holding a press conference where he referenced the report. Geragos now wants Hochman off the case altogether, saying he's compromised the process. Hochman, for what it's worth, has made it clear he does not support resentencing. So yeah—tensions are high. The governor's office later clarified that the risk assessment wasn't meant to stand alone—it's part of a broader review ahead of a June parole hearing. They also said that both the defense and prosecution already had access to what's been shared. And, they noted, they're happy to send it to the judge if he wants it. In the meantime, the brothers sat quietly, watching the hearing on a video feed from their prison near San Diego. Dressed in blue, emotionless, probably wondering what fresh bureaucratic hell they were now trapped in. This whole thing has been a stop-and-start process. The original resentencing hearing was set for January, but got postponed because of wildfires in LA and a last-minute attempt by prosecutors to pull back on their own request. This latest delay pushes things again, with the next court date now scheduled for May 9. Outside the courtroom, interest in the case hasn't faded. Netflix's “Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story” and a follow-up docuseries reignited public fascination. Journalists flooded the courthouse. Reporters elbowed for spots inside. It's the same media frenzy that's followed this case for decades. Inside, things got messy—again. Geragos and Bryan Freedman, an attorney representing Menendez relatives, blasted prosecutors for showing graphic crime scene photos in a prior hearing without warning the family. Freedman called it “harassment.” Balian apologized, but added that Erik and Lyle were the ones who caused the scene in those photos—not him. Another point of contention? The DA's office now controls the victims' services branch of the court. Geragos and Freedman say they've heard crickets from them. No contact. No coordination. Not even a heads-up. It's worth noting that nearly all surviving members of the Menendez family have publicly forgiven the brothers. They want them released. They believe in their rehabilitation. Prosecutors, however, say the brothers have never come clean. They point to lies told at trial—about the abuse, about what really happened that night—and say the Menendez brothers haven't taken full responsibility. Hochman's office has openly said they don't believe the abuse happened at all. So where does this leave everything? On pause. Again. The next hearing's set for May 9, assuming someone can get the right version of the report to the judge and everyone decides to read the same set of pages this time. #MenendezBrothers #ResentencingDrama #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeSystemChaos Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos delve into the latest developments in the Menendez brothers' case following their resentencing hearing. Geragos addresses the prosecution's tactics and the emotional toll on the Menendez family. Hosts: Harvey Levin & Mark Geragos Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Sean "Diddy" Combs has made a significant change to his legal team by bringing in renowned defense attorney Mark Geragos to take a leading role in his upcoming trial. Geragos, known for representing high-profile clients such as Michael Jackson, Chris Brown, and Hunter Biden, joins his daughter Teny Geragos, who is already part of Combs' defense team. This move comes after the resignation of attorney Anthony Ricco in March, leaving Marc Agnifilo as the primary counsel. The addition of Geragos suggests a strategic shift in Combs' defense as he prepares to face serious charges, including racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with the trial set to begin on May 5, 2025.In a separate legal maneuver, Combs' attorneys have filed a subpoena seeking access to unaired footage and related materials from Warner Bros.' documentary series "The Fall of Diddy." The defense aims to obtain raw interviews, notes, and any compensation records involving two accusers featured in the series, identified as a former personal chef and an ex-girlfriend alleging misconduct. Warner Bros. has filed a motion to quash the subpoena, invoking journalist's privilege to protect unpublished materials and arguing that the request is overly broad and constitutes a "fishing expedition." The studio contends that the materials sought are likely inadmissible as hearsay and that Combs' legal team has not met the necessary burden to override these protections. The court has given Combs' attorneys until Thursday to respond to Warner Bros.' motion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Exclusive | Diddy to shake-up defense, star lawyer Mark Geragos poised for leading roleDiddy's Legal Team Blocked From Accessing Raw 'Fall of Diddy' Footage, Warner Bros. Cites 'Reporter's Privilege'
Sean "Diddy" Combs has made a significant change to his legal team by bringing in renowned defense attorney Mark Geragos to take a leading role in his upcoming trial. Geragos, known for representing high-profile clients such as Michael Jackson, Chris Brown, and Hunter Biden, joins his daughter Teny Geragos, who is already part of Combs' defense team. This move comes after the resignation of attorney Anthony Ricco in March, leaving Marc Agnifilo as the primary counsel. The addition of Geragos suggests a strategic shift in Combs' defense as he prepares to face serious charges, including racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with the trial set to begin on May 5, 2025.In a separate legal maneuver, Combs' attorneys have filed a subpoena seeking access to unaired footage and related materials from Warner Bros.' documentary series "The Fall of Diddy." The defense aims to obtain raw interviews, notes, and any compensation records involving two accusers featured in the series, identified as a former personal chef and an ex-girlfriend alleging misconduct. Warner Bros. has filed a motion to quash the subpoena, invoking journalist's privilege to protect unpublished materials and arguing that the request is overly broad and constitutes a "fishing expedition." The studio contends that the materials sought are likely inadmissible as hearsay and that Combs' legal team has not met the necessary burden to override these protections. The court has given Combs' attorneys until Thursday to respond to Warner Bros.' motion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Exclusive | Diddy to shake-up defense, star lawyer Mark Geragos poised for leading roleDiddy's Legal Team Blocked From Accessing Raw 'Fall of Diddy' Footage, Warner Bros. Cites 'Reporter's Privilege'Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Sean "Diddy" Combs has made a significant change to his legal team by bringing in renowned defense attorney Mark Geragos to take a leading role in his upcoming trial. Geragos, known for representing high-profile clients such as Michael Jackson, Chris Brown, and Hunter Biden, joins his daughter Teny Geragos, who is already part of Combs' defense team. This move comes after the resignation of attorney Anthony Ricco in March, leaving Marc Agnifilo as the primary counsel. The addition of Geragos suggests a strategic shift in Combs' defense as he prepares to face serious charges, including racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with the trial set to begin on May 5, 2025.In a separate legal maneuver, Combs' attorneys have filed a subpoena seeking access to unaired footage and related materials from Warner Bros.' documentary series "The Fall of Diddy." The defense aims to obtain raw interviews, notes, and any compensation records involving two accusers featured in the series, identified as a former personal chef and an ex-girlfriend alleging misconduct. Warner Bros. has filed a motion to quash the subpoena, invoking journalist's privilege to protect unpublished materials and arguing that the request is overly broad and constitutes a "fishing expedition." The studio contends that the materials sought are likely inadmissible as hearsay and that Combs' legal team has not met the necessary burden to override these protections. The court has given Combs' attorneys until Thursday to respond to Warner Bros.' motion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Exclusive | Diddy to shake-up defense, star lawyer Mark Geragos poised for leading roleDiddy's Legal Team Blocked From Accessing Raw 'Fall of Diddy' Footage, Warner Bros. Cites 'Reporter's Privilege'Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs' ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper's infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy's wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?'” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don't know anything about the freak-off.' Then they asked why I wasn't invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I'm ugly.'” Chappelle continued, “It's just no fun being famous anymore. It's like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff's exploding, and I'm like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I'll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.'” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle's sharp humor didn't stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I'm glad they didn't call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy's legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn't mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What's notable is they never once said that these women didn't consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs' ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper's infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy's wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?'” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don't know anything about the freak-off.' Then they asked why I wasn't invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I'm ugly.'” Chappelle continued, “It's just no fun being famous anymore. It's like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff's exploding, and I'm like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I'll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.'” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle's sharp humor didn't stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I'm glad they didn't call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy's legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn't mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What's notable is they never once said that these women didn't consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs' ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper's infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy's wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?'” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don't know anything about the freak-off.' Then they asked why I wasn't invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I'm ugly.'” Chappelle continued, “It's just no fun being famous anymore. It's like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff's exploding, and I'm like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I'll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.'” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle's sharp humor didn't stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I'm glad they didn't call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy's legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn't mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What's notable is they never once said that these women didn't consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs
Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs' ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper's infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy's wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?'” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don't know anything about the freak-off.' Then they asked why I wasn't invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I'm ugly.'” Chappelle continued, “It's just no fun being famous anymore. It's like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff's exploding, and I'm like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I'll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.'” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle's sharp humor didn't stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I'm glad they didn't call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy's legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn't mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What's notable is they never once said that these women didn't consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Dave Chappelle Jokes About Diddy's Legal Troubles and Parties on SNL Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs' ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper's infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy's wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?'” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don't know anything about the freak-off.' Then they asked why I wasn't invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I'm ugly.'” Chappelle continued, “It's just no fun being famous anymore. It's like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff's exploding, and I'm like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I'll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.'” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle's sharp humor didn't stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I'm glad they didn't call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy's legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn't mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What's notable is they never once said that these women didn't consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs' ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper's infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy's wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?'” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don't know anything about the freak-off.' Then they asked why I wasn't invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I'm ugly.'” Chappelle continued, “It's just no fun being famous anymore. It's like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff's exploding, and I'm like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I'll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.'” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle's sharp humor didn't stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I'm glad they didn't call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy's legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn't mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What's notable is they never once said that these women didn't consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs' ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper's infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy's wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?'” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don't know anything about the freak-off.' Then they asked why I wasn't invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I'm ugly.'” Chappelle continued, “It's just no fun being famous anymore. It's like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff's exploding, and I'm like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I'll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.'” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle's sharp humor didn't stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I'm glad they didn't call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy's legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn't mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What's notable is they never once said that these women didn't consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs
Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs' ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper's infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy's wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?'” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don't know anything about the freak-off.' Then they asked why I wasn't invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I'm ugly.'” Chappelle continued, “It's just no fun being famous anymore. It's like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff's exploding, and I'm like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I'll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.'” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle's sharp humor didn't stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I'm glad they didn't call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy's legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn't mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What's notable is they never once said that these women didn't consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), attorney Teny Geragos submitted a declaration supporting a motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged government misconduct. The declaration outlines instances where federal agents purportedly leaked confidential information to the media, including details about search warrants and witness interviews. Geragos contends that these actions have compromised Sean Combs' right to a fair trial by influencing public perception and potentially tainting the jury pool.Additionally, the declaration highlights the release of a 2016 hotel surveillance video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Geragos argues that the video's leak to the media was orchestrated by government agents, violating grand jury secrecy rules. The defense asserts that such leaks are part of a broader pattern of misconduct aimed at prejudicing the case against Combs. Consequently, they request an evidentiary hearing to investigate these allegations and seek appropriate remedies to ensure a fair judicial process.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.81.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs are pushing back against serious allegations of sexual assault made by a woman who claims the two attacked her when she was 13 at an after-party for the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. The woman, whose identity has not been revealed, admitted to inconsistencies in her story, though she stands by her allegations. The woman alleged she was driven from Rochester, New York, to New York City for the VMAs and later attended an after-party. According to her, she was offered a ride by Combs' limousine driver and arrived at the party, where she spoke with musicians Benji Madden and his brother. She claimed she was drugged at the party and later sexually assaulted by Jay-Z, Combs, and an unnamed celebrity. The story has drawn skepticism after representatives for the Madden brothers confirmed they were on tour in the Midwest during the VMAs. Additionally, the woman's father said he doesn't recall the more than five-hour drive home from New York City, casting further doubt on her account. Jay-Z, whose legal name is Shawn Carter, responded firmly in a statement, criticizing Tony Buzbee, the woman's attorney. “This incident didn't happen and yet he filed it in court and doubled down in the press,” he said. “True Justice is coming. We fight FROM victory, not FOR victory. This was over before it began. This 1-800 lawyer doesn't realize it yet, but, soon.” Buzbee, a Houston-based personal injury lawyer representing 120 alleged victims of sexual misconduct against Combs, defended his actions, stating that it is his team's responsibility to investigate any new claims as they arise. He previously denied accusations of blackmail by Jay-Z, calling such claims “stupid and laughable.” Combs, currently awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, also denied the allegations through his attorney, Teny R. Geragos. “Yesterday, a lawyer admitted that over 50 people falsely claimed to be victims. Today, for the second time this week, a Buzbee plaintiff has been exposed. This is the beginning of the end of this shameful money grab,” Geragos said. The woman's original lawsuit accused Combs of sexual assault, but she amended it last week to include Jay-Z. She admitted to making “some mistakes” in recalling events but insisted the core of her story remains true. According to her lawsuit, she was made to sign a nondisclosure agreement while in the limousine before being drugged at the party. She claims the assault occurred in a bedroom where she had gone to rest. Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, has filed a motion to dismiss the case, calling it “stunning” that such a serious complaint would be filed without proper vetting. “It is stunning that a lawyer would not only file such a serious complaint without proper vetting but would make things worse by further peddling this false story in the press,” Spiro said. Both Jay-Z and Combs are icons of the hip-hop world, credited with building vast empires that extend far beyond music. Jay-Z, with an estimated net worth of $2.5 billion, has been a major figure in the industry, collaborating with Combs on music and business ventures over the years. The legal challenges come as Combs faces mounting accusations, with Buzbee's firm filing numerous lawsuits and establishing a toll-free hotline for alleged victims. Combs, who has pleaded not guilty to federal charges, was denied bail for the third time and is set to face trial in May. As the legal battles unfold, the allegations raise questions about the legitimacy of the claims and the broader wave of lawsuits filed against high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. #JayZ #Diddy #SexualAssault #MTVVMAs #TonyBuzbee #HipHopNews #LegalBattles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs are pushing back against serious allegations of sexual assault made by a woman who claims the two attacked her when she was 13 at an after-party for the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. The woman, whose identity has not been revealed, admitted to inconsistencies in her story, though she stands by her allegations. The woman alleged she was driven from Rochester, New York, to New York City for the VMAs and later attended an after-party. According to her, she was offered a ride by Combs' limousine driver and arrived at the party, where she spoke with musicians Benji Madden and his brother. She claimed she was drugged at the party and later sexually assaulted by Jay-Z, Combs, and an unnamed celebrity. The story has drawn skepticism after representatives for the Madden brothers confirmed they were on tour in the Midwest during the VMAs. Additionally, the woman's father said he doesn't recall the more than five-hour drive home from New York City, casting further doubt on her account. Jay-Z, whose legal name is Shawn Carter, responded firmly in a statement, criticizing Tony Buzbee, the woman's attorney. “This incident didn't happen and yet he filed it in court and doubled down in the press,” he said. “True Justice is coming. We fight FROM victory, not FOR victory. This was over before it began. This 1-800 lawyer doesn't realize it yet, but, soon.” Buzbee, a Houston-based personal injury lawyer representing 120 alleged victims of sexual misconduct against Combs, defended his actions, stating that it is his team's responsibility to investigate any new claims as they arise. He previously denied accusations of blackmail by Jay-Z, calling such claims “stupid and laughable.” Combs, currently awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, also denied the allegations through his attorney, Teny R. Geragos. “Yesterday, a lawyer admitted that over 50 people falsely claimed to be victims. Today, for the second time this week, a Buzbee plaintiff has been exposed. This is the beginning of the end of this shameful money grab,” Geragos said. The woman's original lawsuit accused Combs of sexual assault, but she amended it last week to include Jay-Z. She admitted to making “some mistakes” in recalling events but insisted the core of her story remains true. According to her lawsuit, she was made to sign a nondisclosure agreement while in the limousine before being drugged at the party. She claims the assault occurred in a bedroom where she had gone to rest. Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, has filed a motion to dismiss the case, calling it “stunning” that such a serious complaint would be filed without proper vetting. “It is stunning that a lawyer would not only file such a serious complaint without proper vetting but would make things worse by further peddling this false story in the press,” Spiro said. Both Jay-Z and Combs are icons of the hip-hop world, credited with building vast empires that extend far beyond music. Jay-Z, with an estimated net worth of $2.5 billion, has been a major figure in the industry, collaborating with Combs on music and business ventures over the years. The legal challenges come as Combs faces mounting accusations, with Buzbee's firm filing numerous lawsuits and establishing a toll-free hotline for alleged victims. Combs, who has pleaded not guilty to federal charges, was denied bail for the third time and is set to face trial in May. As the legal battles unfold, the allegations raise questions about the legitimacy of the claims and the broader wave of lawsuits filed against high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. #JayZ #Diddy #SexualAssault #MTVVMAs #TonyBuzbee #HipHopNews #LegalBattles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs are pushing back against serious allegations of sexual assault made by a woman who claims the two attacked her when she was 13 at an after-party for the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. The woman, whose identity has not been revealed, admitted to inconsistencies in her story, though she stands by her allegations. The woman alleged she was driven from Rochester, New York, to New York City for the VMAs and later attended an after-party. According to her, she was offered a ride by Combs' limousine driver and arrived at the party, where she spoke with musicians Benji Madden and his brother. She claimed she was drugged at the party and later sexually assaulted by Jay-Z, Combs, and an unnamed celebrity. The story has drawn skepticism after representatives for the Madden brothers confirmed they were on tour in the Midwest during the VMAs. Additionally, the woman's father said he doesn't recall the more than five-hour drive home from New York City, casting further doubt on her account. Jay-Z, whose legal name is Shawn Carter, responded firmly in a statement, criticizing Tony Buzbee, the woman's attorney. “This incident didn't happen and yet he filed it in court and doubled down in the press,” he said. “True Justice is coming. We fight FROM victory, not FOR victory. This was over before it began. This 1-800 lawyer doesn't realize it yet, but, soon.” Buzbee, a Houston-based personal injury lawyer representing 120 alleged victims of sexual misconduct against Combs, defended his actions, stating that it is his team's responsibility to investigate any new claims as they arise. He previously denied accusations of blackmail by Jay-Z, calling such claims “stupid and laughable.” Combs, currently awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, also denied the allegations through his attorney, Teny R. Geragos. “Yesterday, a lawyer admitted that over 50 people falsely claimed to be victims. Today, for the second time this week, a Buzbee plaintiff has been exposed. This is the beginning of the end of this shameful money grab,” Geragos said. The woman's original lawsuit accused Combs of sexual assault, but she amended it last week to include Jay-Z. She admitted to making “some mistakes” in recalling events but insisted the core of her story remains true. According to her lawsuit, she was made to sign a nondisclosure agreement while in the limousine before being drugged at the party. She claims the assault occurred in a bedroom where she had gone to rest. Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, has filed a motion to dismiss the case, calling it “stunning” that such a serious complaint would be filed without proper vetting. “It is stunning that a lawyer would not only file such a serious complaint without proper vetting but would make things worse by further peddling this false story in the press,” Spiro said. Both Jay-Z and Combs are icons of the hip-hop world, credited with building vast empires that extend far beyond music. Jay-Z, with an estimated net worth of $2.5 billion, has been a major figure in the industry, collaborating with Combs on music and business ventures over the years. The legal challenges come as Combs faces mounting accusations, with Buzbee's firm filing numerous lawsuits and establishing a toll-free hotline for alleged victims. Combs, who has pleaded not guilty to federal charges, was denied bail for the third time and is set to face trial in May. As the legal battles unfold, the allegations raise questions about the legitimacy of the claims and the broader wave of lawsuits filed against high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. #JayZ #Diddy #SexualAssault #MTVVMAs #TonyBuzbee #HipHopNews #LegalBattles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs
Jay-Z, Diddy Deny Sexual Assault Allegations as Accuser Admits Inconsistencies Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs are pushing back against serious allegations of sexual assault made by a woman who claims the two attacked her when she was 13 at an after-party for the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. The woman, whose identity has not been revealed, admitted to inconsistencies in her story, though she stands by her allegations. The woman alleged she was driven from Rochester, New York, to New York City for the VMAs and later attended an after-party. According to her, she was offered a ride by Combs' limousine driver and arrived at the party, where she spoke with musicians Benji Madden and his brother. She claimed she was drugged at the party and later sexually assaulted by Jay-Z, Combs, and an unnamed celebrity. The story has drawn skepticism after representatives for the Madden brothers confirmed they were on tour in the Midwest during the VMAs. Additionally, the woman's father said he doesn't recall the more than five-hour drive home from New York City, casting further doubt on her account. Jay-Z, whose legal name is Shawn Carter, responded firmly in a statement, criticizing Tony Buzbee, the woman's attorney. “This incident didn't happen and yet he filed it in court and doubled down in the press,” he said. “True Justice is coming. We fight FROM victory, not FOR victory. This was over before it began. This 1-800 lawyer doesn't realize it yet, but, soon.” Buzbee, a Houston-based personal injury lawyer representing 120 alleged victims of sexual misconduct against Combs, defended his actions, stating that it is his team's responsibility to investigate any new claims as they arise. He previously denied accusations of blackmail by Jay-Z, calling such claims “stupid and laughable.” Combs, currently awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, also denied the allegations through his attorney, Teny R. Geragos. “Yesterday, a lawyer admitted that over 50 people falsely claimed to be victims. Today, for the second time this week, a Buzbee plaintiff has been exposed. This is the beginning of the end of this shameful money grab,” Geragos said. The woman's original lawsuit accused Combs of sexual assault, but she amended it last week to include Jay-Z. She admitted to making “some mistakes” in recalling events but insisted the core of her story remains true. According to her lawsuit, she was made to sign a nondisclosure agreement while in the limousine before being drugged at the party. She claims the assault occurred in a bedroom where she had gone to rest. Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, has filed a motion to dismiss the case, calling it “stunning” that such a serious complaint would be filed without proper vetting. “It is stunning that a lawyer would not only file such a serious complaint without proper vetting but would make things worse by further peddling this false story in the press,” Spiro said. Both Jay-Z and Combs are icons of the hip-hop world, credited with building vast empires that extend far beyond music. Jay-Z, with an estimated net worth of $2.5 billion, has been a major figure in the industry, collaborating with Combs on music and business ventures over the years. The legal challenges come as Combs faces mounting accusations, with Buzbee's firm filing numerous lawsuits and establishing a toll-free hotline for alleged victims. Combs, who has pleaded not guilty to federal charges, was denied bail for the third time and is set to face trial in May. As the legal battles unfold, the allegations raise questions about the legitimacy of the claims and the broader wave of lawsuits filed against high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. #JayZ #Diddy #SexualAssault #MTVVMAs #TonyBuzbee #HipHopNews #LegalBattles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Nathan Hochman had barely unpacked his office when his tenure as Los Angeles County District Attorney began with a seismic jolt. In his first major act, he dismissed two high-ranking deputies, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had become central figures in the simmering controversy surrounding Lyle and Erik Menendez. The Menendez brothers, infamous for the brutal 1989 murders of their parents, were the focus of a contentious resentencing appeal that had ignited public and legal debate alike. Hochman's decisive move sent shockwaves through the legal community, marking a clear departure from the policies of his predecessor, George Gascon. Theberge and Lunsford had been instrumental in a 57-page appeal filed just weeks earlier, advocating for a reduction in the brothers' life sentences without the possibility of parole. Their argument rested on evidence of rehabilitation. The proposed revision—50 years to life—would have made the Menendez brothers immediately eligible for parole after 34 years of incarceration. Critics lambasted the move as a slap in the face to justice, reigniting the fierce divide that had characterized public opinion since the sensational trial in the mid-1990s. Hochman's stance was unequivocal. He publicly criticized Gascon's approach to the Menendez case, accusing him of leveraging high-profile cases for political gain. By removing Theberge and Lunsford from their positions, Hochman made it clear that his administration would be taking a different path. Theberge, who had led the resentencing unit under Gascon, was transferred to the office of the Alternate Public Defender, while Lunsford was reassigned within the DA's office. These personnel shifts signaled a stark policy pivot—one that appeared to prioritize retribution over rehabilitation. Yet the personnel changes only deepened the intrigue. Shortly after Hochman's announcement, the DA's office declared that Antonio Aguilar would take over as head of the resentencing unit and the post-conviction and discovery division. However, Aguilar denied the appointment, despite his name being listed on the official roster of new appointments. The office, tight-lipped as ever, declined to clarify the discrepancy, leaving Observers speculated about the true state of affairs within the DA's administration. This lack of transparency only added fuel to the growing skepticism about Hochman's intentions and the broader direction of his administration. The Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing, initially scheduled for mid-December, became another casualty of the administrative upheaval. Judge Michael Jesic postponed the hearing to late January, citing the need to give Hochman's team sufficient time to familiarize themselves with the voluminous case file. This delay added another layer of uncertainty to an already convoluted saga. Hochman now faced a critical decision: whether to proceed with the original recommendation for resentencing or to withdraw it, provided he could present a legitimate reason for doing so. Either choice carried significant risks, not only for the Menendez brothers but also for the credibility of the DA's office under its new leadership. With public scrutiny intensifying, Hochman's next move could set a precedent for how his tenure would be judged. Meanwhile, Mark Geragos, the brothers' high-profile attorney, had been busy mounting a parallel offensive. Geragos filed a habeas corpus petition that introduced new evidence allegedly corroborating the brothers' claims of sexual abuse by their father. This revelation, Geragos argued, warranted a new trial. The petition awaited a response from the DA's office, which had initially been due in late November but requested an extension until December 20. The delay only heightened the tension, as all parties braced for a showdown in the courtroom. Geragos's strategy was clear: keep the focus on the alleged abuse and its potential impact on the original trial's outcome. This approach not only put pressure on Hochman but also revived public interest in the case, ensuring that every development was scrutinized by the media. Complicating matters further was the Menendez brothers' clemency appeal to Governor Gavin Newsom. The governor deferred any action, citing respect for Hochman's review of the case. The clemency request represented a long-shot bid for freedom, but it also underscored the high stakes involved. Clemency, a rarely granted relief, would require compelling evidence of miscarriage of justice, rehabilitation, or extenuating circumstances. Newsom's decision to defer highlighted the gravity of the situation and the potential political ramifications of any action he might take. For the brothers, it was a sliver of hope in an otherwise daunting legal landscape. The January 30–31 hearing loomed large on the horizon, poised to become a pivotal moment not just for the Menendez brothers but for the broader conversation about justice, rehabilitation, and the legacy of one of the most notorious cases in American legal history. The outcome of this hearing could redefine the narrative surrounding the Menendez brothers, shifting it from one of cold-blooded killers to victims of a deeply dysfunctional family dynamic. However, such a shift would not come easily. The prosecution's team was expected to vigorously oppose any motion that might appear to lessen the severity of the brothers' crimes. What began as a family tragedy has evolved into a multifaceted legal drama, replete with power struggles, moral quandaries, and the ever-present specter of public scrutiny. Hochman's early moves have set the stage for a high-stakes confrontation, one that promises to test the limits of justice and redemption in a system often criticized for its rigidity. As the Menendez brothers await their day in court, the question remains: will this new chapter bring closure to a case that has haunted the public imagination for decades, or will it only deepen the mystery? Adding to the drama is the renewed cultural fascination with the case, spurred in part by the Netflix series "Monsters," which revisited the Menendez brothers' story in a broader context of sensationalized family crimes. The series has reignited debates over the fairness of the original trial, the admissibility of abuse claims, and the role of public opinion in shaping legal outcomes. For many, the Menendez case serves as a litmus test for how society balances the scales of justice against the backdrop of human complexity. This renewed attention has amplified the stakes for all involved, from the DA's office to the defense team, and even the public officials who might be drawn into the fray. As the clock ticks down to the January hearing, one thing is certain: the Menendez brothers' story is far from over. With new evidence, shifting legal strategies, and a public hungry for resolution, the next chapter promises to be as riveting and consequential as the events that have already unfolded. The question of justice—what it means, who deserves it, and how it should be administered—looms large, casting a shadow over the proceedings and ensuring that this case will remain etched in the annals of American legal history. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Nathan Hochman had barely unpacked his office when his tenure as Los Angeles County District Attorney began with a seismic jolt. In his first major act, he dismissed two high-ranking deputies, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had become central figures in the simmering controversy surrounding Lyle and Erik Menendez. The Menendez brothers, infamous for the brutal 1989 murders of their parents, were the focus of a contentious resentencing appeal that had ignited public and legal debate alike. Hochman's decisive move sent shockwaves through the legal community, marking a clear departure from the policies of his predecessor, George Gascon. Theberge and Lunsford had been instrumental in a 57-page appeal filed just weeks earlier, advocating for a reduction in the brothers' life sentences without the possibility of parole. Their argument rested on evidence of rehabilitation. The proposed revision—50 years to life—would have made the Menendez brothers immediately eligible for parole after 34 years of incarceration. Critics lambasted the move as a slap in the face to justice, reigniting the fierce divide that had characterized public opinion since the sensational trial in the mid-1990s. Hochman's stance was unequivocal. He publicly criticized Gascon's approach to the Menendez case, accusing him of leveraging high-profile cases for political gain. By removing Theberge and Lunsford from their positions, Hochman made it clear that his administration would be taking a different path. Theberge, who had led the resentencing unit under Gascon, was transferred to the office of the Alternate Public Defender, while Lunsford was reassigned within the DA's office. These personnel shifts signaled a stark policy pivot—one that appeared to prioritize retribution over rehabilitation. Yet the personnel changes only deepened the intrigue. Shortly after Hochman's announcement, the DA's office declared that Antonio Aguilar would take over as head of the resentencing unit and the post-conviction and discovery division. However, Aguilar denied the appointment, despite his name being listed on the official roster of new appointments. The office, tight-lipped as ever, declined to clarify the discrepancy, leaving Observers speculated about the true state of affairs within the DA's administration. This lack of transparency only added fuel to the growing skepticism about Hochman's intentions and the broader direction of his administration. The Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing, initially scheduled for mid-December, became another casualty of the administrative upheaval. Judge Michael Jesic postponed the hearing to late January, citing the need to give Hochman's team sufficient time to familiarize themselves with the voluminous case file. This delay added another layer of uncertainty to an already convoluted saga. Hochman now faced a critical decision: whether to proceed with the original recommendation for resentencing or to withdraw it, provided he could present a legitimate reason for doing so. Either choice carried significant risks, not only for the Menendez brothers but also for the credibility of the DA's office under its new leadership. With public scrutiny intensifying, Hochman's next move could set a precedent for how his tenure would be judged. Meanwhile, Mark Geragos, the brothers' high-profile attorney, had been busy mounting a parallel offensive. Geragos filed a habeas corpus petition that introduced new evidence allegedly corroborating the brothers' claims of sexual abuse by their father. This revelation, Geragos argued, warranted a new trial. The petition awaited a response from the DA's office, which had initially been due in late November but requested an extension until December 20. The delay only heightened the tension, as all parties braced for a showdown in the courtroom. Geragos's strategy was clear: keep the focus on the alleged abuse and its potential impact on the original trial's outcome. This approach not only put pressure on Hochman but also revived public interest in the case, ensuring that every development was scrutinized by the media. Complicating matters further was the Menendez brothers' clemency appeal to Governor Gavin Newsom. The governor deferred any action, citing respect for Hochman's review of the case. The clemency request represented a long-shot bid for freedom, but it also underscored the high stakes involved. Clemency, a rarely granted relief, would require compelling evidence of miscarriage of justice, rehabilitation, or extenuating circumstances. Newsom's decision to defer highlighted the gravity of the situation and the potential political ramifications of any action he might take. For the brothers, it was a sliver of hope in an otherwise daunting legal landscape. The January 30–31 hearing loomed large on the horizon, poised to become a pivotal moment not just for the Menendez brothers but for the broader conversation about justice, rehabilitation, and the legacy of one of the most notorious cases in American legal history. The outcome of this hearing could redefine the narrative surrounding the Menendez brothers, shifting it from one of cold-blooded killers to victims of a deeply dysfunctional family dynamic. However, such a shift would not come easily. The prosecution's team was expected to vigorously oppose any motion that might appear to lessen the severity of the brothers' crimes. What began as a family tragedy has evolved into a multifaceted legal drama, replete with power struggles, moral quandaries, and the ever-present specter of public scrutiny. Hochman's early moves have set the stage for a high-stakes confrontation, one that promises to test the limits of justice and redemption in a system often criticized for its rigidity. As the Menendez brothers await their day in court, the question remains: will this new chapter bring closure to a case that has haunted the public imagination for decades, or will it only deepen the mystery? Adding to the drama is the renewed cultural fascination with the case, spurred in part by the Netflix series "Monsters," which revisited the Menendez brothers' story in a broader context of sensationalized family crimes. The series has reignited debates over the fairness of the original trial, the admissibility of abuse claims, and the role of public opinion in shaping legal outcomes. For many, the Menendez case serves as a litmus test for how society balances the scales of justice against the backdrop of human complexity. This renewed attention has amplified the stakes for all involved, from the DA's office to the defense team, and even the public officials who might be drawn into the fray. As the clock ticks down to the January hearing, one thing is certain: the Menendez brothers' story is far from over. With new evidence, shifting legal strategies, and a public hungry for resolution, the next chapter promises to be as riveting and consequential as the events that have already unfolded. The question of justice—what it means, who deserves it, and how it should be administered—looms large, casting a shadow over the proceedings and ensuring that this case will remain etched in the annals of American legal history. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), attorney Teny Geragos submitted a declaration supporting a motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged government misconduct. The declaration outlines instances where federal agents purportedly leaked confidential information to the media, including details about search warrants and witness interviews. Geragos contends that these actions have compromised Sean Combs' right to a fair trial by influencing public perception and potentially tainting the jury pool.Additionally, the declaration highlights the release of a 2016 hotel surveillance video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Geragos argues that the video's leak to the media was orchestrated by government agents, violating grand jury secrecy rules. The defense asserts that such leaks are part of a broader pattern of misconduct aimed at prejudicing the case against Combs. Consequently, they request an evidentiary hearing to investigate these allegations and seek appropriate remedies to ensure a fair judicial process.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.81.0_1.pdf
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), attorney Teny Geragos submitted a declaration supporting a motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged government misconduct. The declaration outlines instances where federal agents purportedly leaked confidential information to the media, including details about search warrants and witness interviews. Geragos contends that these actions have compromised Sean Combs' right to a fair trial by influencing public perception and potentially tainting the jury pool.Additionally, the declaration highlights the release of a 2016 hotel surveillance video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Geragos argues that the video's leak to the media was orchestrated by government agents, violating grand jury secrecy rules. The defense asserts that such leaks are part of a broader pattern of misconduct aimed at prejudicing the case against Combs. Consequently, they request an evidentiary hearing to investigate these allegations and seek appropriate remedies to ensure a fair judicial process.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.81.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), attorney Teny Geragos submitted a declaration supporting a motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged government misconduct. The declaration outlines instances where federal agents purportedly leaked confidential information to the media, including details about search warrants and witness interviews. Geragos contends that these actions have compromised Sean Combs' right to a fair trial by influencing public perception and potentially tainting the jury pool.Additionally, the declaration highlights the release of a 2016 hotel surveillance video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Geragos argues that the video's leak to the media was orchestrated by government agents, violating grand jury secrecy rules. The defense asserts that such leaks are part of a broader pattern of misconduct aimed at prejudicing the case against Combs. Consequently, they request an evidentiary hearing to investigate these allegations and seek appropriate remedies to ensure a fair judicial process.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.81.0_1.pdf
In the latest in the Scandoval Saga, Tom Sandoval tells Page Six that Geragos and Freedman offered to drop a damning lawsuit against him if he were willing to “point the finger at NBCUniversal”.Watch the full coverage: https://www.youtube.com/live/kSivDmZOnes?t=350sThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacyChartable - https://chartable.com/privacy
Megyn Kelly is joined by attorney Mark Geragos to discuss the details about the Menendez brother's trials, why some of those facts may lead the brothers to soon go free, the reason Geragos took up the case and the cause, the evidence that could have the Menendez brothers released from prison, what the media is saying about the case, the likelihood they could be released before Thanksgiving, and more. Then Megyn answers viewer and listener questions about what happens if Jimmy Carter dies after he voted and how she unwinds, and "You Can't Say That" about seasonal bias.Have a question for Megyn? Megyn@MegynKelly.comGeragos- https://www.youtube.com/@reasonabledoubtpodcast Electronic Payments Coalition: https://ElectronicPaymentsCoalition.orgDone with Debt: https://www.DoneWithDebt.com/ Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow
Megyn Kelly is joined by all-star legal experts to break down the Trump conviction and guilty verdict, with Arthur Aidala, Mark Eiglarsh, Alan Dershowitz, Mark Geragos, Dave Aronberg, Mike Davis, and Phil Holloway, to discuss what Trump's sentence might be now that he's found guilty, Judge Merchan's history of sentencing, whether Trump will get jail time or "community service," what probation would look like, Trump speaking out and unloading on the biased Judge Merchan, Elie Honig's fair coverage of the case, comparing the Trump case to the Harvey Weinstein verdict that was overturned on appeal, what Trump's appeal strategy should be, how the case could end up at the Supreme Court, whether Republicans should fight fire with fire and go after political opponents too, Judge Merchan's small donation earmarked for "resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trump's radical right-wing legacy," whether he should have recused himself, President Biden's comments about the Trump verdict, whether Biden should have weighed in on a criminal case, his campaign out in the media calling Trump a "convicted felon" over and over again, Michael Cohen's media tour, and more.Aidala- https://omny.fm/shows/the-arthur-aidala-power-hourEiglarsh- https://www.eiglarshlaw.com/Dershowitz- https://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Jews-Hamas-Barbarism/dp/1510780548Geragos- https://www.youtube.com/@reasonabledoubtpodcastAronberg- https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeMTNDavis- https://article3project.org/Holloway- https://www.youtube.com/@PhilipHolloway
Megyn Kelly is joined by legal experts Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos to discuss the failures of Judge Merchan in the Trump business records trial, why his rulings have made clear how biased he is, the way he's a "prosecutor in a robe," what Dersh witnessed when Merchan thought the media had been removed from the courtroom, the pressures jurors could face to convict Trump for fear of backlash, the pressure lawyers face if this goes to appeal, the connection to politics and the 2024 election, MSNBC declaring the prosecutor "Shakespeare" despite the possible lied during closing argument, why this trial should have been televised, and more. Geragos- https://www.youtube.com/@reasonabledoubtpodcastDershowitz- https://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Jews-Hamas-Barbarism/dp/1510780548 Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow
Megyn Kelly begins the show by detailing the breaking news that President Joe Biden has finally agreed to two debates with former President Donald Trump, the shocking news that the first one is expected in June on CNN without any audience, and more. Then attorneys Marcia Clark and Mark Geragos join to discuss the logistics of what might happen if Trump is found guilty, the possibility of actual jail time awaiting sentencing or a suspended jail sentence, whether he might have to wear an ankle monitor, the details of the fiery Michael Cohen's cross-examination by Trump's defense team, his glaring credibility issues, whether his obvious and public hatred of Trump will affect how the jury sees him, what happens next in the Trump trial, the real life woman portrayed in the Netflix series “Baby Reindeer," whether she has a case against Netflix and the show creator, her viral interview with Piers Morgan and whether she'll sue him now, and more. Clark- https://marciaclarkbooks.com/Geragos- https://www.youtube.com/@reasonabledoubtpodcastFollow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow
Megyn Kelly is joined by Judge Joe Brown, former TV host and lawyer, to discuss the relevance of when Fani Willis' affair with Nathan Wade began, her paying Nathan Wade more than his peers, her lack of important disclosures to the court, her attitude while testifying last week, whether her comments about money could open her up to IRS violation issues, whether Willis lied while on the stand during her testimony, the key element of how she kept cash, and more. Then National Review's Charles C.W. Cooke joins to discuss President Biden finding a new way to move forward with his "student loan forgiveness" plan, his desire to override Congress and the courts, why this shows the Biden campaign and the Democrats are panicking, Biden's age as a major election issue, the death of Alexei Navalny, the Washington Post attacking Nikki Haley's high school, a biological male injuring girls in high school basketball, and more. Then it's Kelly's Court with Marcia Clark and Mark Geragos to talk about whether Gabby Petito's parents have a case against the parents of their daughter's killer Brian Laundrie, whether his parents were obligated to share what they knew, the Alec Baldwin movie set shooting case and how it will be affected by the "Rust" armorer on trial now, whose negligence will be found at fault, the orgasm cult criminal case, and more.Brown- https://jjbbbq.com/Cooke- https://twitter.com/charlescwcookeClark- https://www.instagram.com/thatmarciaclark/Geragos-https://twitter.com/markgeragos Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
