Podcasts about CIPA

body pain thinking balance teacher pursuit root cause comfort crisis cipa

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 9, 2026 4:09

VLOG June 9 Najibullah sentencing for kidnapping NYT Rohde. Live Nation & Ohio, FOIA. Polymarket Maduro case, Geragos says no CIPA https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/for-soldier-indicted-for-polymarket Populist opposition to bank mergers, What Will Warsh Do? Volker Turk's RightsX waste as @USUN Waltz skydives

ohio waste nicholas maduro sentencing live nation foia populist polymarket warsh populists cipa geragos volker turk

Pain Is a Teacher: Root-Cause Thinking for Body and Life -Ep.43

Pursuit of Balance

Play Episode Listen Later May 18, 2026 34:47

Pain Is Your Best Teacher — The Comfort Crisis, Root-Cause Thinking & Emotional Regulation There's a genetic disorder called CIPA where people can't feel pain at all — and instead of a superpower, it's devastating. That's the entry point into this episode of Pursuit of Balance, where Corey breaks down why pain — physical, emotional, mental, and social — is one of the most valuable signals we have, and why our culture's relentless push toward comfort is quietly costing us. In this episode: Why physical pain is almost always a symptom, not the root cause (the "neighbor rule" explained) How to extract usable data from pain instead of just managing it Why there's no such thing as a "bad" exercise — only weak positions and tissues Training discomfort on purpose: sauna, cold plunge, and mental resilience The "avoidance tax" — how dodging hard conversations multiplies stress Why pain and suffering aren't the same thing Reframing nervousness as a signal that you care Micro-dosing hard things to build resilience in a comfort-saturated world A saying that anchors the whole episode: invite it, don't fight it. If you got value from this one, like, share, and subscribe.

Interview with Brian McGinnis – Data as a Strategic Asset, Not a Compliance Burden – AI Governance and the Acceptable Use Policy – Website Tracking Tools and the Wiretapping Litigation Wave – IP Fridays Podcast – Episode 174

IP Fridays - your intellectual property podcast about trademarks, patents, designs and much more

Play Episode Listen Later May 1, 2026 34:20

My co-host Ken Suzan and I are welcoming you to episode 174 of our podcast IP Fridays! In today's interview, Ken Suzan interviews Brian McGinnis, partner at Barnes & Thornburg and co-chair of the firm’s data security and privacy practice, about why companies need to stop treating data privacy as a compliance burden and start treating it as a core business asset. McGinnis argues that data is either a managed asset or an unmanaged liability, with no middle ground. But before we jump into this interview, I have news for you! The EPO saw a Record Year with 200,000+ Patent Applications in 2025: German filings dropped 2.2% while China grew 9.7%, overtaking Japan for the first time. Germany remains Europe’s top patent nation but loses ground globally. SMEs and universities now account for nearly half of all Unitary Patents granted to European innovators. News from the UPC Court of Appeal: Non-Technical Features Count for Inventive Step. An April 17 ruling clarifies that all claim features must be evaluated in their combined effect, including non-technical ones. Companies with software-related or mixed-technology inventions pending at the EPO or UPC should reassess recent inventive step objections at the UPC in light of this decision. Nokia Withdraws UPC and Munich Suits After Global FRAND Settlement; Following a global FRAND rate-setting decision by the UK High Court, Nokia withdrew parallel suits against Warner Bros. and Paramount at the UPC and in Munich. One UK ruling resolved litigation spanning Germany, the UPC, the US, and Brazil simultaneously. China Abandons Anti-Suit Injunctions in SEP Disputes: After a WTO arbitration ruling from July 2025, China withdrew its practice of blocking SEP holders from filing suits abroad. The EU Commission continues monitoring compliance, since the former policy was largely informal rather than codified in statute. The Trump Administration has put 100% Tariffs on Imported Patented Pharmaceuticals: Based on Section 232, the Trump administration imposed 100% tariffs on patented drugs and biologics effective April 2, 2026, with a 120-day transition period until July 31. EU member states face a reduced rate of 15%. Generics and biosimilars are explicitly excluded. China Rejects 1.27 Million Trademark Applications in Three-Year Crackdown: China’s CNIPA rejected over 1.27 million trademark applications and invalidated more than 3,300 marks, targeting so-called edge-ball marks designed to mislead consumers about product quality or origin. The announcement was made at an official press conference on April 23, 2026. Now let's jump into the interview with Brian McGinnis! Brian McGinnis is a partner at Barnes & Thornburg and co-chair of the firm’s data security and privacy practice. In this episode of IP Fridays, he argues that companies treating data privacy as a compliance burden are missing the point entirely and leaving significant value on the table. Data Is Either an Asset or a Liability Most companies still treat their data as invisible and costless. They do not manage it the way they would manage a patent portfolio or a trademark. That, McGinnis argues, is a fundamental strategic error. Data is either a managed asset or an unmanaged liability. There is no middle ground. When companies invest in understanding what data they collect, how it is used, and who has access to it, they unlock opportunities to drive real revenue and growth. Done right, a data governance program is not a cost center. It is a foundation for trust, operational efficiency, and competitive advantage. One Program, Not Twenty With more than 20 US state privacy laws now in effect, and major economies worldwide introducing their own frameworks, building separate compliance programs for each jurisdiction is neither practical nor smart. McGinnis recommends a single, comprehensive governance framework designed around the core purpose and intent of privacy law, flexible enough to absorb new requirements as they emerge. Companies that threw together a quick program when California’s CCPA came into force in 2020 are now overdue for an upgrade. The goal is to move from reactive compliance to a mature, proactive program that positions the company ahead of the regulatory curve rather than perpetually catching up. Website Tracking Tools: An Underestimated Risk One of the fastest-growing areas of privacy litigation involves tracking technologies built into company websites: pixels, session replay tools, analytics scripts, and chat widgets. Legal teams are often entirely unaware of what IT or marketing has deployed. That gap is expensive. Plaintiffs’ attorneys are applying 1970s-era telephone wiretapping statutes, including the California Invasion of Privacy Act, to argue that collecting any personal information, including IP addresses, before a user has consented constitutes illegal interception. Demand letters are being sent at industrial scale, with settlements typically running between $10,000 and $20,000 per case. What makes this particularly difficult is that a company can be fully compliant with statutory privacy law and still face these wiretapping claims, because the legal theory turns on the timing of data collection rather than the existence of a privacy notice. Vendor Contracts: The Hidden Exposure Marketing and technology agreements are another major source of unmanaged data risk. When a company deploys a third-party tool that handles personal data, the underlying contract needs to define precisely who owns that data, what the vendor is permitted to do with it, and what obligations flow down to any sub-processors involved. McGinnis draws a direct parallel to IP licensing: owning valuable data and then handing it to a vendor under a poorly drafted agreement is the equivalent of signing a bad IP license. Data processing agreements need to cover ownership, use restrictions, sub-processor obligations, breach notification timelines, audit rights, and deletion obligations. Many companies simply do not have these terms in place. Without them, a vendor who suffers a breach of non-personal business information has no contractual obligation to disclose it. Consumer Rights Requests: Process Matters Privacy laws give individuals the right to access, correct, delete, and opt out of the use of their personal data. Responding to these requests effectively requires pre-built processes, trained staff, and the technical ability to locate and act on individual data across all systems and sub-processors. Most companies, before engaging in formal data mapping, are not in a position to do this reliably. Staff failing to recognize a deletion request as a legal data subject request and routing it through a standard customer service queue instead is one of the most common failures McGinnis sees. The consequences can include regulatory complaints and class action lawsuits, particularly when a company continues to send emails to someone who has already requested deletion of their data. A newer risk involves Global Privacy Controls: browser-level opt-out signals that regulators and courts are now treating as legally binding deletion and non-collection requests. Companies receiving these signals daily without acting on them face growing exposure under several state laws. AI Governance: Policy Before Tools Generative AI tools are now embedded across business functions, from contract review and customer service to content creation and internal search. McGinnis is direct: every company needs an AI acceptable-use policy, and the absence of one is not a neutral position. Without clear rules, employees will use unapproved or publicly available tools regardless, feeding proprietary and sensitive information into open models with no control over how that data is used or retained. He draws a precise parallel to patent law. Posting proprietary information into an open AI system carries the same risk as publishing it publicly, potentially destroying patentability. The distinction between closed, organization-specific AI systems and open, publicly accessible ones is something employees need to understand explicitly. Making compliance easier than non-compliance is the practical goal. The Regulatory Outlook: More Laws, More Enforcement McGinnis expects the regulatory landscape to continue expanding. The EU AI Act is already setting the direction, and several US states have introduced or are developing AI-specific legislation. The pattern mirrors what happened with data privacy: Europe leads, US states follow in a patchwork, and federal legislation remains uncertain. Enforcement of existing privacy laws is also intensifying. GDPR has been in force since 2018, CCPA since 2020, and regulators are now past the period of extended tolerance for companies that are still catching up. Companies with immature compliance programs should expect less patience from regulators going forward. McGinnis closes with a clear point of view: if you have to comply anyway, get credit for it. A well-built governance program is a trust signal to customers, a sales asset, and a foundation for responsible AI use. Compliance done right is not a tax. It is a differentiator. The Full Transcript: Ken Suzan: Our guest today on the IP Fridays podcast is Brian McGinnis. Brian is a partner with Barnes and Thornburg and a founding member and co-chair of the firm’s data security and privacy law practice group. Brian serves as a member of the intellectual property department and the internet and technology practice. Brian is a Chambers Global and national ranked privacy and data security attorney, a certified information privacy professional, and the firm’s chief privacy officer. Brian brings nearly two decades of experience at the intersection of law and technology. Brian advises on a wide range of technology-driven legal matters, including privacy and data security, intellectual property, artificial intelligence, corporate transactions, software, and internet law. His deep understanding of privacy and technology law enables him to guide clients through rapidly evolving regulatory and operational challenges. Welcome Brian to the IP Fridays podcast. Brian McGinnis: Hey, thanks Ken. I appreciate it. Great to be here and thanks for having me. Ken Suzan: Excellent. Brian, the C-suite tends to treat data privacy as a compliance tax, something to hand off to legal and forget about. But when you see how companies actually get into serious trouble, what’s really going on? Brian McGinnis: Yeah, well, it’s a great place to start Ken and looking forward to the conversation today covering some of these privacy issues and AI issues, which I found in my own practice is really bled into the straight privacy stuff. Companies can’t really handle these things in a silo anymore. It’s really about managing and coming together as a coherent program for governance for the organization. I think if you do that right, the good news is we can become revenue generators and show growth for the company and not just compliance centers and a compliance tax. But I think the core problem that we face in working with most companies is that a lot of companies still treat their data as invisible, costless. They don’t treat it, in other words, like they would a patent portfolio or trademark or other IP portfolio. It’s just not managed as an asset in the ways that we’ve seen more sophistication around IP. And it really should be. Data is either a managed asset for the company or it’s an unmanaged liability. There’s really not an in between. And so for those companies that haven’t gotten their arms around all this data and what can be done with it, I think they’re really missing an opportunity. Having an understanding of what data the organization is collecting, how it’s being used, and having the proper governance around it really unlocks a lot of opportunity for use of that data in new ways — ways that can drive revenue and growth for the company. So I approach privacy not just about compliance, not just about avoiding penalties or doing it because some law out there says that we have to do it. It’s really about knowing and controlling one of the company’s core assets. And if you’re not doing that, you’ve got unmanaged data that you’re not getting value out of and that potentially could be a huge liability for the company. Managed well, it really supports trust, efficiency, and growth of the organization. Otherwise, I think it’s a missed opportunity. Ken Suzan: Yes, well said. Now let’s talk about state laws. With 20-plus state privacy laws now in effect, how should companies build a program that actually works across the board without starting over every time a new state law kicks in? Brian McGinnis: Yeah, so the first answer is don’t build 20 separate programs. This really goes back to having a comprehensive, sophisticated, well thought out program that really takes into account not only the 20 state laws, but obviously we’ve got international exposure with laws like GDPR and upcoming privacy laws internationally. Most of the larger economies in the world have some form of laws around privacy and AI. So you can’t really anymore build programs that account for the one, two, three, four, five different laws that in the past we had experience with — where you could just treat California as its own thing, treat New York as something else, and treat Europe as something else. The laws and the pace of these have really forced companies into having comprehensive programs. I don’t expect to see fewer laws. You’re only looking at potentially additional state laws, additional federal laws here in the US, and then certainly additional laws throughout the world. So a lot of the strategy these days is not only where are we today with these laws, but how do we set up our governance program in a way that really cuts to the core of the purpose and intent behind these laws so that we can be better prepared when new laws come about in the future. Historically, at least in the US, most companies just haven’t had laws that force them into compliance postures. As these laws have started to come along, a lot of companies have been playing from behind and saying, oh, the California Consumer Privacy Act, I just read about it and it goes into effect next week — let’s throw something together and call that our compliance program. We’ve now got years of these laws being in place, CCPA came into effect in 2020, and what we’re seeing much more of are companies looking to get more sophisticated in their programs and stop feeling like they’re always rushing to catch up. The goal is to level up their program, going from level one — constantly playing from behind — to level two and then level three, so that they really feel like they’re on top of it and have a sophisticated program that not only accounts for all the various privacy requirements that come at them, but also positions them to take advantage of the data and all the things that come along with having a good governance program. Ken Suzan: Brian, there’s an explosion of litigation targeting something most companies barely think about — the tracking tools baked into their own websites: pixels, session replay tools, analytics scripts, chat widgets, the list goes on and on. What’s happening, Brian, and what should companies do? Brian McGinnis: Yeah, and I think a lot of companies — the executives, the business teams — don’t even realize a lot of these tools are on their sites. IT deployed them years ago, the web team deployed them, marketing teams are constantly using them and certainly have a good understanding of it. But in a lot of cases, legal has never touched them and has no idea what’s happening on the website. We also see a lot of cases of companies who, even if they’re generally aware these tools are in use, aren’t aware what other teams are putting on the site or what those pieces of technology are tracking. And that gap can be really expensive. What we’re seeing right now — and this has been a trend for a number of months now and is really continuing to pick up steam — is a series of what I call gotcha lawsuits, where you have some enterprising plaintiffs’ counsel who have taken a look at some 1970s-era telephone wiretapping laws, including a law called CIPA, the California Invasion of Privacy Act, passed in the 70s with the idea that you shouldn’t be able to wiretap people’s telephone conversations. They’ve taken that and applied that theory to the internet. The way it works is: if a website has some sort of cookie, pixel, or other tracking technology on it that collects personal information about an individual — and that can be as simple as an IP address and device ID — and if that collection occurs as soon as the individual shows up at the website, prior to them being able to have notice provided to them or opt in and consent to that collection, then the theory under these lawsuits is that it constitutes wiretapping. We see a lot of this with the Meta pixel, with LinkedIn pixels, and the like. What they’re doing is effectively showing up and suing, threatening to sue, trying to take you to arbitration, depending upon what’s included in the company’s existing privacy notice. If you don’t have a cookie banner, if you don’t have a cookie notice, if you’re not getting opt-in on these things, they’re leaning on those failures and effectively trying to force you into a position where you are forced to make a settlement. Because the cost to litigate one of these to their conclusion would be expensive, whereas a lot of these cases will settle for $10,000 to $15,000 somewhere in that range. They’ve got technology crawling the internet looking for websites that don’t have these risks covered, sending demand letters and then collecting settlements, $10,000 to $20,000 at a time. It’s been very profitable for them and a very dangerous thing for our clients. And it’s a bit unusual because you can be fully compliant with the statutory privacy laws that require notification of the use of tracking technologies and cookies and banners — and still be subject to these lawsuits because of the wiretapping arguments being made. The timing wherein the data is collected from the individual could still subject you to these lawsuits. So it’s a tricky problem, one that I hate seeing companies get hit with and one that we spend a lot of time helping companies avoid. Ken Suzan: Yes, let’s talk about contracts, Brian, because I know you work with contracts probably on a daily basis. A lot of data risk lives inside vendor and technology agreements — the contracts companies sign with marketing platforms, analytics providers, cloud infrastructure, and SaaS tools. What should those agreements actually contain? Brian McGinnis: Yeah, so there’s quite a lot of things. You’ve got a world where marketing is constantly under pressure to learn more about their customers. The way they can do that is through any number of different tools and data gathering techniques, and we have all this technology available to help marketing and sales do better at their jobs. But we, at least in this country, got to a position where people really felt like they lost control of their information and their data. And so these privacy laws came along and really started to provide more rights to individuals — to have an understanding of what data exists within various companies that they do business with, who they’re sharing it with, trading it with, selling it to for advertising purposes; to have the right to opt out; the right to delete their information. Not checking through the agreements by which these teams are implementing these tools is a huge issue for companies. As part of an overall compliance program, having some kind of process where people who are aware of the growing numbers of privacy laws are reviewing these marketing contracts to make sure they are aligned with that program and aligned with those laws is absolutely critical. To talk about IP, given the IP Fridays audience: it’s kind of the equivalent of having really bad IP licenses. In other words, you own and control this information and data, and you need to control what the other side can do with one of your most valuable assets — or you’ve effectively given it away. So thinking about it in that way could be useful. In terms of more specifics: a big one is ownership of the data. The agreement itself may or may not have anything that addresses data. If there’s personal information involved, you probably need what we call a data processing agreement or addendum — a DPA — that specifically controls what that third party is able to do with that data, how they’re able to use it, whether they’re able to share it, whether they’re able to get value out of it on their own, or if they’re only allowed to be what we call a service provider, just providing services to the business that hired them. There needs to be explicit prohibition on retaining, using, and disclosing personal information for any purpose other than performing the exact services in the contract. Whether or not they’re permitted to sell or share data under CCPA terms is another key point. Certification that the provider will comply with any restrictions and security requirements you have on your data, and making sure those obligations flow down to any sub-processors they might use. You hire Company A, but Company A works with Company B and C to provide parts of their service. You’re effectively responsible for the protection of personal information throughout its lifecycle. A couple of other key provisions: breach notification triggers and timeline. It’s very possible under a lot of agreements that one of your vendors can suffer the world’s worst hacker breach and have no legal obligation to tell the company that hired them about it — unless there’s personal information involved. State data breach laws apply to personal information, not to other types of sensitive business information. Unless you have a contract that explicitly requires notification, there’s a good chance that vendor may not want to disclose it. And then other things like audit rights and deletion obligations go in there as well. Ken Suzan: Certainly a lot to cover. Let’s talk about privacy laws and consumer rights. Privacy laws give consumers real rights — to access their data, correct it, delete it, and opt out of how it’s being used. Most companies have a process for this on paper. What does it actually take to get it right, and what happens when it breaks down? Brian McGinnis: Yeah, it takes pre-planning. It takes a process. Some companies receive many more of these requests than others — some B2B companies receive none or a couple per year, while companies heavily involved in marketing to consumers might receive tens or hundreds a day. To be able to respond to these effectively and efficiently requires some forethought. It requires policy and procedure internally to be set up, and it requires the education of the team. Some of the common ways we see this go wrong: staff isn’t trained to know the difference between what we call a DSR — data subject request — versus a regular customer service inquiry. Maybe somebody submits what would be construed by law to be a deletion request and you just put it into your normal customer service response flow — and then you’re potentially missing timelines and the like. There also need to be systems in place to respond in accordance with the individual’s rights. Somebody submits a request saying, you have my information — what information do you have about me? Can your company determine that right now? Can you look through all your systems and down the line to all the processors and sub-processors you’ve worked with and hired, and identify what information you have about that individual? Most companies, until they engage in a governance program and data mapping, are at a real disadvantage to be able to do that. Why is that a problem? Because two weeks from now your company could be sending emails to the individual who just told you to delete their data, and they get really upset. That’s when they go and complain to regulators or start class action lawsuits. The lack of planning can be really, really expensive for a lot of companies. Making sure you’ve got some kind of process to understand what’s coming in, that the people receiving those requests know the difference between a regular customer service request and a data subject request, and that it gets to the appropriate parties for action — all of that is really, really key. Another one that we’re seeing pop up is what we call GPC, or Global Privacy Controls. It used to be that people would say “do not track” in their browser and most companies would ignore those signals. Now we’ve got advancements in law and browser technology where the browser you’re using to visit a company’s website sends a signal saying, opt me out of this. Regulators and courts are construing those as deletion requests, as opt-out requests that companies are now required to respond to. If your company hasn’t gone through an exercise to understand that, and is probably receiving GPC opt-out requests on a daily basis without acting on them, there’s some exposure there. At the end of the day, a lot of this really is about getting the appropriate people from across the organization — really each department — around a table, figuring out what data you collect, how you use it, who you share it with, where it comes from. That starts the process of your data map. Then you set about mapping that to the various legal requirements and figuring out how to respond, how to make it easy for people to exercise their rights so they’re not complaining, not suing, not going to regulators. Letting these squeaky wheels out of the process — the ones who don’t want you to be processing their information any longer — is really key. Ken Suzan: Let’s switch gears a bit and talk about AI. I know we’re hearing about it every day. Generative AI tools are now embedded in how companies work — contract review, customer service, content creation, internal search. Before employees start using these tools with customer data, confidential business information, or proprietary content, what has to be in place first? Brian McGinnis: Yeah. I think we’re long past the days when companies provided individuals access to corporate technology — computers, devices, and the like — without having some kind of acceptable use policy that governs that. We don’t want you downloading stuff that could harm our network or create security issues. We don’t want you using our technology in certain ways, whether that’s a BYOD policy or just general use of company internet or company devices. An AI acceptable use policy is really a continuation of those. Every company needs to have an AI acceptable use policy. Period. In my opinion, things like that are as important as the fire escape policy out in the hallways for these companies. I can tell you with absolute certainty: if your organization has not provided rules to your employees and personnel about the use of AI, what they can and can’t use — or if you’ve said you can’t use any AI — the personnel is still using AI. They’re just not using any approved tools. They’re probably using their own private tools that they subscribe to, or even worse, tools they don’t pay for, in which case they’re putting company information into a wide open public model. The more companies can do to think through this ahead of time, reduce it to policy, and then train and educate people on that company’s particular policy, the better. You need to make it easier for people to comply than not comply. An acceptable use policy should talk about: here’s how we can and can’t use it, here’s the data that should and should not go into the system, here’s some proper uses of AI, here’s some data that’s on the fringe that we need to keep out — more sensitive information, proprietary information, etc. Making sure you’re funneling and educating people about the difference between closed systems and open systems. In other words, this is a tool that only looks at our organization, only uses the data within a certain box, and is not publicly available — the AI system is not training on our data. You have more leeway to put more sensitive information into those types of systems than you do with open systems which potentially lose control of your data. It’s almost like a patent consideration in terms of keeping information secret. If something potentially has some patentability that you want to seek to file in the future, you can’t just go out and post it publicly and use public search engines and all this other stuff at the risk of exposing it. Similar concepts here — really getting a handle and control over what tools people can use and providing some education to them about how the company wants to think about what’s acceptable and what’s not in those uses is really the key starting point. Ken Suzan: Very useful information. Indeed, we’re coming towards the end of today’s episode. One final question for you, Brian. Where do you think we’ll be two years from now in this developing field, and how best for companies to stay ahead of the curve? Brian McGinnis: Yeah, this kind of takes us full circle, Ken. I think it’s kind of back to the beginning comments about the privacy space — and we’ve only got more of these laws coming. It’s still a developing field. We’re still really in the early days of enforcement. I mean, GDPR has been around since 2018, CCPA in the US really kicked us off in about 2020, and so there’s been a settling-in period as companies adjust and get used to having these laws and get compliance programs in place at various levels — from not at all prepared to highly sophisticated. We’re still pretty early on in terms of enforcement of these things. We’re already starting to see enforcement of more egregious violations of these various laws, and we’ll only continue to see more enforcement as the laws exist currently and as they continue to come along. The days of not having to pay attention to this are kind of over. And I always tell clients: if you’re going to have to do these things, you’re going to have to be compliant — you might as well get credit for it. By which I mean, let’s put all the policies in place, let’s do all the compliance activities, let’s have a sophisticated governance program, but then let’s also use that as a sales tool, as a way to help grow the company, as a way to sell new products and gain trust and earn trust with our customers — so that they know when they’re doing business with us, or when they’re giving us information, or when they’re using our AI tool, that we respect that and are going to take care of their information and have the structure in place internally to be able to do that. With respect to AI, what I’m seeing is very similar to what we have seen with the growth of privacy law — again led by Europe, with the EU AI Act in this case. Now you’ve got a handful of states in the US that already have AI laws, and others that are interested in continuing to roll those out. There’s friction with the federal government around whether there’s going to be a comprehensive law there. Like the privacy space, you’ve got varying factions — some of which want to develop really quickly with very little guardrails, others which say we’re threatening the future of humanity if we don’t get those guardrails in place. I think ultimately, at least in the US, we’re going to end up with another patchwork of AI laws for the foreseeable future that we’ll have to navigate. So really having a company position, a company philosophy of how do we handle all these various laws, how do we treat people’s data, how do we get our arms around it, how do we respond to whatever legal rights they currently have, and what principles do we put in place so that we can adapt for the future — and then, once we’ve done those things, how do we actually get value out of this and move the business forward. So it’s not a compliance tax, but a benefit to the business. That’s the end goal here, and I think the North Star for us. Ken Suzan: Fantastic, Brian. This has certainly been a very comprehensive interview. Really appreciate you taking the time to talk about it with us here on the IP Fridays podcast. Brian McGinnis: Happy to do it, Ken. Thanks for asking me and good to see you. Thank you.

Sony A7R VI: ¿80MP o 67MP? La verdad que nadie dice

John Vargas Fotografia

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 7, 2026 27:07

Sony A7R VI: ¿80MP o 67MP? La verdad que nadie dice es la gran pregunta que está sacudiendo la industria fotográfica en este momento. En este video analizamos a fondo qué está realmente en juego con la nueva generación de sensores y cómo esta decisión podría afectar directamente el valor de tu equipo actual.Además, exploramos el informe CIPA 2026 que confirma el fin de las cámaras DSLR y lo que esto significa para el mercado de segunda mano. También hablamos del polémico regreso de Kodak con nuevas películas y cómo la fotografía analógica sigue resistiendo.Pero eso no es todo: descubrirás la evolución de los sensores híbridos, el debate entre global y rolling shutter, y el papel de la fotografía en la misión Artemis II de la NASA.Este video no es solo noticia… es una guía estratégica para fotógrafos que quieren anticiparse al futuro y tomar mejores decisiones.#SonyA7RVI #FotografiaProfesional #CamarasSony #FotografiaDigital #FotografiaAnalogica #Kodak #DSLR #Fotografos #EquipoFotografico #NoticiasFotografia

nasa sony pero tambi adem dice nadie la verdad kodak artemis ii dslr cipa

Análisis Técnico 2026: ¿Joya Óptica o Trampa de Mercado?

John Vargas Fotografia

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 17, 2026 33:50

Bienvenidos a una nueva entrega de FotografoPro. En este episodio, el experto en moda y retrato John Vargas realiza una disección quirúrgica de las 7 noticias que están redefiniendo la industria este marzo de 2026.Analizamos a fondo si el nuevo soporte físico del Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S II justifica la reinversión de su capital o si la versión anterior sigue siendo la herramienta definitiva. Abordamos la polémica del nuevo Asistente de IA de Adobe Photoshop y cómo su interfaz de charla técnica podría comprometer la autoría del profesional senior.Además, cubrimos:La actualización crítica de soporte lógico (firmware) para los teleobjetivos de Sony.El resurgimiento de las cámaras compactas con un crecimiento del 36% según datos de CIPA.La pureza técnica del sensor monocromo de Ricoh y el futuro de los sensores de 1 pulgada en Fujifilm.Escuche este análisis para optimizar su flujo de trabajo y evitar caer en las redes del mercadotecnia vacío. Recuerde: proteger su dinero es nuestra prioridad técnica. "Nunca pero nunca dejes de hacer fotos"

sony adem nunca ia bienvenidos mercado analizamos abordamos escuche trampa fujifilm asistente adobe photoshop recuerde ricoh cipa nikon z

Phil Pearce: Google Consent Mode vs. ePrivacy, gaps in CIPA evidence and advanced audits

google consent gaps credit cards gdpr google analytics ppc pearce audits gtm google tag manager eprivacy cipa

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 8, 2026 43:56

How does Google Consent Mode affect ePrivacy compliance, opt-in signals, traffic sampling, marketing performance, and CIPA claims? What are the most common technical mistakes in the configuration of Tag Managers, tracking rules, and consent banners? Where is “do not train” (LLMs) going? Does agentic traffic ruin analytics or the premises of consent?We have gone through all of this with a true Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and website auditing expert.Phil Pearce is founder of MeasureMinds and creator of ConsentModeMonitor. He started in paid search for CreditCards.com managing a multi-million dollar PPC account, before shifting to Privacy & Analytics about 8 years ago, when he did a series of talks about Black Hat Analytics. More recently, he has been helping brands with technical defence against CIPA & ePrivacy/PECR and GDPR claims. Prior to building his business, Phil worked for ConversionWorks, Jellyfish & Sitemakers as a Google Analytics and Search Specialist. He is a top authority in Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and is the author of the GTM developer guide as well as host of the GA4ward, GTM4ward and Privacy4Marketers conferences.References:* Phil Pearce on LinkedIn* Consent Mode Monitor (Masters of Privacy Toolbox), free website scans for three months* Compliance Briefs (Masters of Privacy Toolbox), $500 discount for our listeners* Lineberry v. AddShopper, Inc. (3:23-cv-01996), May 29, 2025* MCP Manager by Usercentrics* Introducing DPO Central: AI-powered privacy program management* Sealmetrics: cookieless, consentless analytics This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mastersofprivacy.com/subscribe

Privacy Perspectives: Privacy Litigation Update - The Latest on Wiretap & CIPA Pixel Litigation

Ad Law Access Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 26, 2026 21:09

In this episode of Privacy Perspectives, Alex Schneider is joined by Whitney Smith, a partner in Kelley Drye's Litigation practice group. Together, they discuss a wave of new privacy litigation related to wiretapping claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, or CIPA. The speakers cover key takeaways from the cases that have been brought under CIPA, trends in the health privacy litigation space, and the potential effects of pending legislation.

perspectives privacy pixel litigation privacy act wiretap cipa kelley drye whitney smith alex schneider

Masters of Privacy LIVE NYC January 2026 (with Alan Chapell)

president new york city google masters european union privacy cpo adtech pandit us eu gpc privacy sandbox eprivacy cipa chapell

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 18, 2026 36:59

In this live recording (January 14th 2026), we have conducted a comparative law exercise (US/EU) regarding ePrivacy compliance through Universal Opt-Out signals.Alan Chapell is the President of Chapell & Associates, a law firm serving media and AdTech. He is outside counsel and CPO to several of the leading advertising and technology companies. He regularly publishes both The Chapell Report and The Monopoly Report.References:* Alan Chapell on LinkedIn* The Chapell Report* The Monopoly Report* IEEE P 7012 (MyTerms)* Alan Chapell: The many struggles of Google's Privacy Sandbox, and how to deploy it in compliance with EU and US privacy laws (Masters of Privacy, May 2024)* Can the GPC standard eliminate consent banners in the EU? (Sebastian Zimmeck, Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Cristiana Teixeira Santos, Konrad Kollnig, Robin Berjon)* The slippery slope of consent banners in preventing CIPA and VPPA claims: why effective Opt-Outs will prevail - also in the EU (Sergio Maldonado). This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mastersofprivacy.com/subscribe

Newsroom: Fall 2025

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 16, 2025 29:05

It is time for a seasonal update at the intersection of Marketing, Data, Privacy and Technology. We will stick to our usual five blocks: ePrivacy & regulatory updates; MarTech & AdTech; AI, Competition and Digital Markets; PETs, Zero-Party Data and Customer Centricity; Future of Media.This season's update includes:* CJEU Russmedia decision (“mere conduit” safe harbour overridden by a marketplace's role as a data controller)* EU/UK DPA fines (LastPass-ICO, Infobel-APDB, AMEX-CNIL, AENA-AEPD)* California: Public enforcement (by both the AG -JamCity, SlingTV- and the CPPA) and status of CIPA lawsuits* Texas' AG vs. TV manufacturers* New legislation: EU Digital Omnibus, California's spree, US Executive Order on AI* Most recent adventures and daring moves of Meta, OpenAI, Google, Apple and X in the face of MarTech/AdTech constraints, market dynamics, antitrust actions and other enforcement initiatives.(Our referenced monographic episode on CIPA/VPPA litigation is available here.)All references and links can be found in a separate blog post available to Masters of Privacy Connect subscribers on our website's Newsroom section (Newsroom Notes: Fall 2025).Our usual disclaimer: the voice that joins Sergio today is a text-to-speech output generated with Eleven Labs.Happy Holidays to all of you :) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mastersofprivacy.com/subscribe

US ePrivacy compliance, CIPA and VPPA claims for EU lawyers - and dummies

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 17, 2025 27:19

As promised last week, today's episode provides greater context on US ePrivacy audits, CIPA/VPPA claims, and EU-US comparative law as it affects the rollout or maintenance of MarTech solutions on websites and mobile applications.References:* “The slippery slope of consent banners in preventing CIPA and VPPA claims: why effective Opt-Outs will prevail - also in the EU” (Sergio Maldonado, November 2025 - you are listening to Part I of the more comprehensive analysis)* Jennifer Oliver: privacy litigation over pixels, trackers, and cookies (Masters of Privacy, August 2025)* From wiretapping and video rentals to website pixels, SDKs, and APIs. CIPA/VPPA litigation, risk management, and practical strategies (Nov 2025 update)* Toolbox: Fast CIPA/VPPA website auditing and case law matching for legal professionals (Alpha release). This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mastersofprivacy.com/subscribe

masters european union lawyers alpha privacy claims compliance dummies apis sdks martech eu us eprivacy cipa

Bonus | The Q & A

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 30, 2025 53:46

We've had so much news to cover that we haven't gotten to as many listener questions as we would like.So we have gathered some of your most frequent and most pertinent questions for this Q&A bonus episode.F.B.I. Plans to Lower Recruiting Standards, Alarming Agents - The New York TimesDo you have questions for the pod? Follow AG Substack|MuellershewroteBlueSky|@muellershewroteAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

terror plans trump administration national security justice department simplecast john bolton jack smith espionage act volume two government transparency classified information cipa fbi protects america

John Pavolotsky: California's privacy and AI legislative spree (October 2025)

head consent product development ketch cipa

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 19, 2025 37:17

California has enacted a sweeping wave of new privacy and AI laws in the past few days. From browsers finally reading opt-out signals to age verification, chatbot companions, data brokers and AI transparency, some of these laws will have a serious impact on the areas we mostly focus on (marketing, advertising, ecommerce, media).We have discussed AB 566, SB 361, SB 53, AB 1043, AB 656, AB 853, and SB 243 with John Pavolosky, joining us for a second time.Our guest is a partner at Stoel Rives in San Francisco. He is co-lead of the firm's Technology Industry Group. He has also been chair of the Intellectual Property Section of the California Lawyers Association.John has taught Technology Transactions Law at the UC Davis School of Law and Comparative Privacy Law at the Santa Clara University School of Law. John has also guest lectured on technology and privacy law topics at the University of California, Berkeley, Haas School of Business; the University of San Francisco School of Management; and Stanford University.References:* John Pavolotsky on LinkedIn* John Pavolotsky at Stoel Rives* John Pavolotsky: How successful can US privacy laws be at regulating AI models and systems? (Masters of Privacy, June 2025)* AB 566 (Opt-Out Preference Signal, October 8)* AB 1043 (Digital Age Assurance Act, October 13)* SB690, the law that could have done away with most CIPA lawsuits* SB 361 (Expanded Data Broker Transparency Requirements, October 8)* AB 56 (Social Media Warning Law, October 13)* AB 656 (Social Media Account “Delete” Button, October 8)* SB 243 (Companion Chatbots, October 13)* Her, a Spike Jonze movie (2013)* AB 853 (Amendment to the California AI Transparency Act, October 13)* SB 53 (Transparency in Frontier AI Act, September 29). This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mastersofprivacy.com/subscribe

Podcasting From the GR Space in Brisbane, Australia!

The PetaPixel Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 10, 2025 76:47

With a PetaPixel Membership, not only can you support original PetaPixel reporting and in-depth reviews, but you can also remove ads from the website and gain access to some seriously great perks, too. Members get $15 off the Moment Store, 25% off the PetaPixel Merch Store, 5% off certified pre-owned gear from KEH, and now can download full-resolution RAW files and JPEGs from the latest cameras and lenses. Join today! It costs just $3 per month or $30 per year. This week on The PetaPixel Podcast, Jordan Drake dials in remotely as Chris Niccolls and Jaron Schneider come to you from Brisbane, Australia. Ricoh has opened only its fourth-ever GR Space, and they were there to see the ribbon cut. Check out PetaPixel Merch: store.petapixel.com/ We use Riverside to record The PetaPixel Podcast in our online recording studio.We hope you enjoy the podcast and we look forward to hearing what you think. If you like what you hear, please support us by subscribing, liking, commenting, and reviewing! Every week, the trio go over comments on YouTube and here on PetaPixel, but if you'd like to send a message for them to hear, you can do so through SpeakPipe.In This Episode00:00 - Intro from the GR Space in Brisbane07:23 - Australia!10:50 - Tamron's G2 trinity on Z mount is complete15:28 - You can download and use other people's OM System recipes18:59 - Nikon says the ZR is good enough to fill two camera line segments by itself23:06 - Affinity stops selling software ahead of "big changes" coming in October24:56 - Nikon's original Z-mount 24-70mm f/2.8 is discontinued? 27:10 - CIPA data shows "summer slump" worse this year30:10 - Caira is an "AI-Native" Micro Four Thirds camera with Gen AI built in37:45 - Blackmagic RAW is coming to Sony39:27 - Fujifilm did make actual changes to the Eterna 55 sensor42:05 - Is Jaron right or is he wrong?52:17 - What have you been up to?56:40 - Tech support1:13:08 - Feel good story of the week

australia space tech podcasting raw brisbane riverside genai eterna affinity nikon g2 speakpipe fujifilm zr brisbane australia ricoh jpegs tamron cipa petapixel keh caira om system jordan drake chris niccolls

Blogging Tips to Increase Website Traffic with Susan U. Neal

Your Best Writing Life

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 7, 2025 39:54

What did you think of this episode?You've invested in a website and published a book. Now, how do you get people to visit your website? Today's blogging tips are the answer. Welcome to Your Best Writing Life, an extension of the Blue Ridge Mountains Christian Writers Conference held in the beautiful Blue Ridge Mountains of NC. I'm your host, Linda Goldfarb. Each week, I bring tips and strategies from writing and publishing industry experts to help you excel in your craft. I'm so glad you're listening in. During this episode, you'll learn Blogging Tips to Increase Website Traffic.My industry expert, Susan U. Neal, is the author of nine books on healthy living, and her most recent release is "How to Sell 1,000 Books a Month." She is the CEO of the Christian Indie Publishing Association, the Christian Authors Network, and the Christian Indie Awards, and she serves as the director of the Blue Lake Christian Writers Conference.Talk to us about blogging and search engine optimization (SEO)Google Keyword Planner at https://ads.google.com/home/#!/ (free), UberSuggest at https://neilpatel.com/ubersuggest/ (3 free uses/day or paid), and Publisher Rocket (paid). Christian Indie Publishing Association blog (https://christianpublishers.net/blog/), Healthy Living Series blog (https://susanuneal.com/healthy-living-blog). Create blog guidelines and post weekly.Rewrite the blog's meta description. Create an engaging blog title. Use https://convertcase.net/ Use the Advanced Marketing Institute's headline analyzerPixabay.com Unsplash.com Canva.com Pixlr.com Check out the blogging course at CIPA.Podia.com.Interested in writing for Susan's blogs? Email Susan at Visit Your Best Writing Life website.Join our Facebook group, Your Best Writing LifeYour host - Linda Goldfarb#1 Podcast in the "Top 50+ Must-Have Tools and Resources for Christian Writers in 2024". Awarded the Spark Media 2022 Most Binge-Worthy PodcastAwarded the Spark Media 2023 Fan Favorites Best Solo Podcast

ceo talk books canva rewrite awarded unsplash blue ridge mountains writing tips podia website traffic ubersuggest blogging tips must have tools cipa pixlr publisher rocket linda goldfarb susan u neal

Consent is broken | How do we fix it?

The Data Chronicles

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 17, 2025 47:29

Consent is one of the most misunderstood concepts in digital privacy. Every click, swipe, and scroll can trigger a data transaction, yet today's reliance on cookie banners and CMPs leaves companies exposed. As regulators grow more sophisticated and laws like CIPA and VPPA add new risks, it's clear consent needs a serious rethink. In this episode of The Data Chronicles, host Scott Loughlin is joined by Max Anderson, Co-founder and Head of Product Development at Ketch, a provider of consent and data privacy management solutions, to discuss why current mechanisms are failing, how opt-outs are evolving beyond a checkbox, and what it means to embed meaningful consent into the user journey while still enabling innovation.

Ep. 474: Yeah. No One Is Surprised – and more

PetaPixel Photography Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 24, 2025 44:27

Episode 474 of the Lens Shark Photography Podcast In This Episode If you subscribe to the Lens Shark Photography Podcast, please take a moment to rate and review us to help make it easier for others to discover the show. Sponsors: - Build Your Legacy with Fujifilm. Latest savings at FujfilmCameraSavings.com - Shop with the legends at RobertsCamera.com, and unload your gear with UsedPhotoPro.com - 20% OFF at KupoGrip.com. - 20% OFF at Tenba.com. - More mostly 20% OFF codes at LensShark.com/deals. Stories: This software seemed doomed from the start. (#) TTArtisan's fast new 40. (#) This camera company says it has the best AF. (#) Mitakon's new 55 macro. (#) CIPA's data tells an interesting tale. (#) This fast new portrait prime might be for you. (#) Connect With Us Thank you for listening to the Lens Shark Photography Podcast! Connect with me, Sharky James on Twitter, Instagram Vero, and Facebook (all @LensShark).

shop af surprised fujifilm cipa yeah no ttartisan mitakon sharky james

CIPA da Magia | Magickando 265

Magickando

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2025 66:48

Neste episódio, usando diretrizes da CIPA (Comissão interna de Prevenção a Acidentes), orgão interno das empresas cujo objetivo é prevenir acidentes e doenças, fizemos um mapeamento de riscos e manual de boas práticas ao magista.Entenda as artes ocultas de maneira objetiva e descompromissada, pelos olhos de Andrei Fernandes, Livia Andrade, Vinicius Ferreira e Ananda Mida que se encontram na mesa redonda da magia contemporânea.Comentado nos Recados:Curso Fundamentos da Bruxaria: Uma Jornada de Autodescoberta - Carolina Keller[PRÉ-VENDA] Omnia in Uno - Frater Achad - Vol. II

neste magia entenda preven acidentes comentado cipa andrei fernandes vinicius ferreira

Christine Desrosiers (Boltive): Privacy Tech spotlight V - understanding Manipulative Design and rolling out comprehensive client-side monitoring

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2025 32:41

What is “manipulative design”? How does this concept differ from “dark patterns”? How could we expand website and mobile app monitoring to a company's ad stack? Boltive's Christine Desrosiers has joined us for another Privacy Tech interview. She is an operations and product professional with 20 years of experience building best-in-class publisher ad stacks and ops teams, and integrating ad and site stacks with Privacy Tech. She is involved in a number of industry working groups and advisory boards, working to raise the bar on privacy, security and transparency. References: Christine Desrosiers on LinkedIn Boltive: monitor security and privacy compliance across the consumer front end (including publishing and AdTech) Jessica B. Lee, Chair of Loeb & Loeb LLP's Privacy, Security & Data Innovations practice Global Privacy Enforcement Network: 2024 “sweep” on deceptive design patterns FTC, ICPEN, GPEN Announce Results of Review of Use of Dark Patterns Affecting Subscription Services, Privacy (FTC, July 2024) Bringing Dark Patterns to Light (FTC, September 2022) Daniel Solove, A Taxonomy of Privacy (UPenn Law Review, January 2006) - see “decisional interference” Website Privacy Controls (New York State Attorney General) FTC study finds ‘dark patterns' used by a majority of subscription apps and websites (TechCrunch, July 2024) FTC vs. Amazon (“Roach Motel” pattern through the internally called “Illiad” process for consumers to cancel their Amazon Prime membership) California SB 690: A new hope for CIPA litigation overload? (Norton Rose Fulbright) Daniel Solove: On Privacy and Technology (Masters of Privacy, March 2025) Max Anderson (Ketch): Privacy Tech spotlight I – the future of CMPs, value vs. hype in privacy compliance SaaS (Masters of Privacy, April 2025) Daniel Barber (DataGrail): Privacy Tech spotlight II – widespread non-compliance, opt-out challenges, and shadow AI (Masters of Privacy, May 2025) Cillian Kieran (Ethyca): Privacy Tech spotlight III – compliance as an engineering challenge (Masters of Privacy, June 2025) Vaibhav Antil (Privado): Privacy Tech spotlight IV - from trust to evidence (Masters of Privacy, July 2025)

design tech masters clients amazon prime iv privacy rolling monitoring ftc comprehensive techcrunch taxonomy manipulative adtech dark patterns desrosiers client side illiad cipa california sb boltive

Vaibhav Antil (Privado): Privacy Tech spotlight IV - from trust to evidence

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 7, 2025 28:10

How do we move from mere words to actual baked-in privacy? Can built-in alerts, code scanning tools, or server-side auditing make life much easier for DPOs and legal teams? We are joined by Vaibhav Antil in a new installment of our Privacy Tech series. Vaibhav is founder & CEO of Privado.ai. Before starting Privado.ai, Vaibhav led product management at a tech company and worked with the legal team on GDPR compliance. Vaibhav started Privado.ai to solve the language gap between legal, privacy, and product engineering teams. References: Vaibhav Antil on LinkedIn Privado: Evidence-based Privacy Bridge: Technical Privacy Summit (by Privado) CNIL: Use analytics on your websites and applications (how analytical cookies can be exempt from consent) Max Anderson (Ketch): Privacy Tech spotlight I – the future of CMPs, value vs. hype in privacy compliance SaaS (Masters of Privacy, April 2025) Daniel Barber (DataGrail): Privacy Tech spotlight II – widespread non-compliance, opt-out challenges, and shadow AI (Masters of Privacy, May 2025) Cillian Kieran (Ethyca): Privacy Tech spotlight III – compliance as an engineering challenge (Masters of Privacy, June 2025)

ceo trust ai tech masters privacy gdpr privado ccpa vaibhav cipa dpos

Diana Bergano: uso de datos personales en FinTech - marco legal estadounidense y equilibrio entre el hambre de datos y su protección

Masters of Privacy (ES)

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 30, 2025 30:22

¿Cómo podemos encontrar un equilibrio entre el hambre de datos personales y su protección en el seno de una FinTech californiana? Diana Bergano lidera la práctica de protección de datos personales y la estrategia de data privacy en Earnin (Palo Alto, California). Como parte de su trabajo asesora a diferentes equipos sobre estrategias de privacidad desde el diseño, adecuación de actividades de marketing, uso de datos y desarrollo de soluciones de inteligencia artificial. Anteriormente ha sido Legal Counsel en Yapstone, Patelco y Blackhawk Network, y también ha pasado por Cisco Systems. Diana es Licenciada en Derecho por la Universidad de La Sabana (Colombia). Referencias: Diana Bergano en LinkedIn Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA - web de la FTC) CFPB: Oficina para la Protección Financiera del Consumidor de EE.UU California's Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA): A New Frontier for Website Tracking Litigation (ABA) Cookie cutter solution? Senate Bill 690's “commercial business purpose exemption” could crumble CIPA lawsuits (Lexology) FTC Issues Opinion Finding that TurboTax Maker Intuit Inc. Engaged in Deceptive Practices

california invasion engaged fintech universidad ftc ee derecho eeuu protecci equilibrio hambre consumidor financiera senate bills licenciada privacidad cisco systems ccpa legal counsel anteriormente estadounidense datos personales marco legal cipa deceptive practices glba blackhawk network

Newsroom: primavera 2025. IA desatada, fingerprinting en esteroides y publicidad sin anuncios

Masters of Privacy (ES)

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 11, 2025 28:32

Ha llegado la hora de ponernos al día en las cinco áreas de siempre: ePrivacy y marco regulatorio; MarTech y AdTech; IA, competencia y mercados digitales; PETs y Zero-Party Data; Futuro de los medios. Hemos añadido todas las referencias relevantes a la entrada de este episodio en nuestro blog: mastersofprivacy.com. Voces complementarias creadas por ElevenLabs.

Newsroom: Spring 2025. AI fines, fingerprinting on steroids, UOOM momentum, and the ad automation tsunami

amendment advances california senate cipa public safety committee

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 9, 2025 28:47

It is time for a seasonal update at the intersection of Marketing, Data, Privacy and Technology. We are today covering the first four of our usual five blocks: ePrivacy & regulatory updates; MarTech & AdTech; AI, Competition and Digital Markets; PETs and Zero-Party Data. All references and links can be found in this episode's blog post: Masters of Privacy. Allow us to thank two people in advance for their routine work in breaking down the news across some of the topics and jurisdictions covered here: Robert Bateman and his Privacy Corner and Federico Marengo with his Privacy and AI newsletter. Also, an important disclaimer: the voice that joins me today is a text-to-speech output generated with Eleven Labs.

california tiktok ai uk marketing technology spring masters data european union competition android momentum pets privacy automation tsunamis gdpr steroids fines newsrooms ccpa elevenlabs fingerprinting eprivacy cipa zero party data robert bateman global privacy control

California Senate Public Safety Committee Advances Pro-Business Amendment to CIPA

Ad Law Access Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later May 21, 2025 5:43

Alysa Z. Hutnik, Alexander I. Schneider, Meaghan M. Donahue On April 29, 2025, the Senate Public Safety Committee voted 6-0 to advance legislation that would exempt processing of personal information for a commercial business purpose from coverage by the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). Three years after extensive wiretapping litigation first emerged targeting the use of website pixels or similar technologies, the amendment could mark the end of the road for a large swath of wiretap litigation in the state and potentially nationwide.

Hinatea Penilla y Perella Marere : de Moorea à Nice, entre apnée et breakdance

Les Plongeurs Padawan

Play Episode Listen Later May 15, 2025 50:24

Championne de France d'apnée dynamique, détentrice de records nationaux et professeure de breakdance, Hinatea Penilla y Perella Marere mène une vie à contre-courant, entre rigueur sportive et expression artistique. Originaire de Moorea, en Polynésie française, elle incarne un parcours singulier où la passion de l'eau, ancrée depuis l'enfance, devient le fil conducteur d'une vie bien remplie.Dans cet épisode, Hinatea revient sur son enfance au bord du lagon, entre Tahiti et Moorea, et raconte comment cette proximité permanente avec l'océan a façonné son lien à l'eau, entre jeux d'apnée improvisés et exploration du récif. Partie étudier en métropole pour devenir professeure d'EPS, c'est finalement la danse qui s'impose dans sa vie : compétitrice de haut niveau, vice-championne de France de breakdance, puis professeure de danse à Nice.Mais c'est à Nice, en 2015, qu'elle redécouvre l'apnée de manière structurée, au sein du club CIPA. Elle se passionne pour l'apnée dynamique, discipline dans laquelle elle excelle, jusqu'à intégrer l'équipe de France. Hinatea partage ici les coulisses de ses entraînements, ses sensations sous l'eau, sa gestion mentale des efforts extrêmes, ses routines respiratoires, ainsi que sa préparation pour les grandes compétitions comme les Championnats du monde d'Athènes en mai 2025.On parle également de son attachement profond à la Polynésie, de ses retours annuels pour se ressourcer, de sa relation étonnante avec Honuiti, une tortue verte rencontrée derrière la barrière de corail, et de son regard sur les menaces environnementales qui pèsent sur les lagons.Enfin, elle nous raconte comment elle parvient à concilier deux disciplines exigeantes – l'apnée et la danse – en trouvant un équilibre entre relâchement et intensité, introspection et performance, dans l'eau comme sur scène.Un épisode inspirant pour tous les passionnés d'apnée, de sport de haut niveau et d'océan.

france dans acast enfin visitez emission mots laissez tahiti abonnez originaire breakdance championne polyn championnats moorea cipa ecrivez

Eric Adams unseal win; Sue Mi Terry next? Diddy jury Q redactions; Menendez delay, UN immunity case

She Said Privacy/He Said Security

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 28, 2025 4:26

VLOG April 28 Eric Adams defense theories ordered unsealed at Inner City Press' request: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25919757-as-eric-adams-runs-independent-inner-city-press-wins-cipa-unsealing-in-sdny-case-2d-order-unsealing-here/CIPA in US v Sue Mi Terry https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny110dschofieldterryicp042525.htmlRedactions in US v Sean Combs jury Qs https://www.patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-in-127482991UN immunity case, Press ban

press sean combs delay jury immunity eric adams menendez qs cipa redactions sue mi terry inner city press

Navigating CIPA Claims: Strategies for Protecting Your Business

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 6, 2025 29:27

Jessica Lee chairs Loeb & Loeb's Privacy, Security & Data Innovations practice and serves as Chief Privacy & Security Partner. She provides strategic legal counsel to companies navigating complex data governance issues, helping them turn compliance into a competitive advantage. Jessica advises on the full spectrum of privacy, security, and AI-related regulations, focusing on companies navigating the issues that arise from AdTech, the use of health data and other sensitive information, and other data monetization practices. In this episode… The California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) is putting many businesses under legal scrutiny. Modeled after federal wiretapping laws, CIPA requires two-party consent for recording or intercepting communications and has become a target for the plaintiffs' bar. The law has been used to challenge the use of session replay cookies, chatbots, and social media pixels, with claims that these technologies intercept data and communications without proper consent. As courts issue mixed rulings, businesses need to adapt their privacy frameworks and governance programs to reduce the risk of CIPA violations. Addressing CIPA-related risks requires a proactive and thorough approach. Managing website tracking technologies is no longer just about implementing cookie consent banners. Businesses also need to conduct comprehensive website audits to identify which cookies, pixels, and trackers are in use, ensuring these technologies comply with CIPA's consent requirements. Implementing a cookie governance program, securing thorough contractual agreements with third-party vendors, and disclosing data collection and consent practices in privacy notices are critical steps for mitigating CIPA-related risks. By adopting these strategies, companies can reduce their exposure to legal action and maintain trust with their users, even as courts continue to interpret CIPA's application to modern technologies. In this episode of She Said Privacy/He Said Security, Jodi and Justin Daniels speak with Jessica Lee, Chief Privacy & Security Partner and Chair of the Privacy, Security, and Data Innovations Practice at Loeb & Loeb, about managing CIPA compliance. Jessica provides a detailed overview of CIPA's requirements and breaks down why certain technologies are being targeted. She also discusses the importance of regular website audits and offers practical advice on mitigating risk by implementing a cookie governance program, reviewing consent management practices, and establishing contractual protections.

ai strategy navigating managing security businesses privacy claims implementing adtech modeled protecting your business jessica lee cipa

Stowaway Svetlana Dali cut off GPS; Mangione contrast. Shestakov, Bob Menendez files, UN Yemen scam

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 30, 2024 3:02

VLOG Dec 30 Stowaway Svetlana Dali delay on cutting off GPS monitor, Luigi Mangione contrasted incl on censorship https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/crimes-compared-luigi-mangione-nys McGonigal co-D Shestakov denied CIPA info, Gold Bar Bob Menendez timing, UN bans Press, Yemen scam https://www.innercitypress.com/ungate15tremblaynoanswersicp122724.html

press scams gps files yemen contrast cutoff dali mangione svetlana stowaway bob menendez mcgonigal cipa

Eric Adams won't waive CIPA, City of Maybe book Penny coverage? Diddy Detained to Patreon. UN Aleppo

new books sean combs coverage april fools day eric adams aleppo detained daniel penny waive your thoughts cipa

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 2, 2024 3:09

VLOG Dec 2 Eric Adams will not waive classified info, still wants April Fools Day trial. New Book, Adams City of Maybe: https://amazon.com/dp/B0DPCKZYSW Diddy Detained, now https://patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-1st-116788772… Daniel Penny for Your Thoughts, book: https://amazon.com/dp/B0DNXVK8JC UN & Aleppo

Diddy 5 new cases; FTX Wang, Archegos Hwang sentence; Trump 2029? Adams CIPA; UN sex abuse no SORNA

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 20, 2024 3:18

VLOG Nov 20 Diddy 5 new cases https://innercitypress.com/civil3combsfiveicp111924.html… FTX Wang & Archegos Hwang sentencings; Trump sentencing in 2029? Verdict book: https://amazon.com/dp/B0D5QW4RB9 Eric Adams CIPA; UN sex abuser Elkorany will no report under SORNA - ebook: https://amazon.com/dp/B0BKSJNL85

donald trump adams sean combs verdict sentence hwang sex abuse cipa sorna

Eric Adams, no trial date until CIPA? Combs gets new judge; Trump v obstruction. HND narco, UN caves

PetaPixel Photography Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 4, 2024 3:37

VLOG Oct 4 On Eric Adams, US says no trial schedule until Classified Info conference. Sean Combs gets a new judge; Trump v obstruction count. "Ladies of MDC" write in for inmate in from Cyprus cancer ward. Honduras narco Urbina Soto 18 years. UN caves

donald trump judge trial ladies caves sean combs honduras cyprus eric adams combs narco obstruction trump v mdc cipa

Ep. 444: This Is Your Sign – and more

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 7, 2024 47:16

Episode 444 of the Lens Shark Photography Podcast In This Episode If you subscribe to the Lens Shark Photography Podcast, please take a moment to rate and review us to help make it easier for others to discover the show. Sponsors: - Build Your Legacy with Fujifilm - Shop with the legends at RobertsCamera.com, and unload your gear with UsedPhotoPro.com - 20% OFF with code SHARKY2024 at BenroUSA.com - Calibrite's ColorChecker Passport Video 2 and Display 123 at Calibrite.com - More mostly 20% OFF codes at LensShark.com/deals. Stories: Scarcity is not a thing. (#) Get the Sony a9 II while you can. (#) CIPA data shows a recovering camera industry. (#) Instagram has a change of heart. (#) Panasonic finds more embarrassing problems. (#) Tamron patents a 50-200mm f/2.8. (#) Sepia Tone Bride puts her photographer on blast. (#) Yet another film simulation. (#) Photojournalists lament their demise in survey. (#) Connect With Us Thank you for listening to the Lens Shark Photography Podcast! Connect with me, Sharky James on Twitter, Instagram Vero, and Facebook (all @LensShark).

sony display panasonic tamron cipa sharky james

E546: The Most Common Lawsuit Claims in Ecommerce and How to Avoid Them

The Ecomcrew Ecommerce Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 15, 2024 29:53

John Di Giacomo joins us on the podcast today to talk about the most common lawsuit claims that he's personally seen in the past few years in the ecommerce industry, and how you can avoid them. John Di Giacomo is the founding partner of Revision Legal, a law firm with expertise in Internet law, copyright & trademark law, and related areas. Today, he's on the podcast to talk about the most common cases that have been on the rise recently. Specifically, we'll be talking about ADA Cases and CIPA claims, and how ecommerce sellers can protect themselves from these claims. The big takeaway here is to make sure that you're protected from these false claims. Because it's not a matter of if it happens, but a matter of when it happens. The best way to protect yourselves is to take preventive action before these claims ultimately kill your business, because it can definitely happen. John, thanks for coming on the podcast! It was nice having you back on after several years since your last episode and I hope to hear good news from you in the future. If any listeners would like to have a discussion about this, let me know by emailing us directly at support@ecomcrew.com. Also, if you have any questions or any topics you'd like us to discuss on the podcast, you can email us directly as well! We would really appreciate it if you would leave us a review on iTunes. Thanks for listening!

internet ecommerce claims lawsuit shopify lawsuits cipa fba amazon ecom crew

Last Call for Immunity

Prosecuting Donald Trump

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 13, 2024 37:04

In a last-ditch effort for total immunity, former President Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court to pause proceedings in the DC election subversion case while the high court decides whether to take up his appeal. MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord discuss the merits of Trump's arguments and how the court may proceed. They also weigh in on the latest out of Judge Cannon's Florida courtroom, as a flurry of activity is happening in the classified documents case.

Episode 63 | Clear Error; Manifest Injustice (feat. Brian Greer)

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 11, 2024 83:49

Brian Greer joins to discuss the CIPA process and Trump's latest attempts to derail the Mar-a-Lago case; DoJ's response to Trump's motion to compel, and their motion for Judge Cannon to reconsider her ruling; Just Security outlines some possible timelines for the DC case to proceed; plus listener questions.Brian Greerhttps://twitter.com/secretsandlaws Brian Greer's Quick Guide to CIPAhttps://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to know:Rule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Episode 54 - On a Scale of Durham to Smith

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 10, 2023 70:03

In DC, Jack Smith moves to admit evidence from before the DC conspiracy and files the opposition to Trump's motion to stay the entire proceeding. JPotential jurors are being pre-screened for the March 4 trial.In Mar-a-Lago, Judge Cannon is handed her first real test and the chance to make an appealable decision concerning CIPA Section 4 filings.Hunter Biden gets indicted on nine tax charges by Special Counsel David Weiss.We rank the recent Special Counsels.Plus, we have some great listener questions.Rule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_403Brian Greer's Quick Guide to CIPAhttps://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/ Some terms to remember:Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

donald trump dc conspiracies supreme court terror scale capitol appeal witnesses durham immunity lago hunter biden election fraud jack smith special counsel quick guide jury selection criminal case defraud judge cannon obstruct cipa dc circuit judge chutkan special counsel david weiss fbi protects america

Episode 50 - Going Through the Motions

donald trump dc procedures mcclanahan classified information cipa

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 12, 2023 53:19

This week: Trump's team tries to drown the proceedings in an ocean of motions; Jack Smith shows that the January 6th attack on the Capitol is integral to the government's case against Trump in DC.In Florida, Judge Cannon seems to be doing all she can to delay the trial, even by doing something potentially unprecedented with regard to CIPA.Plus, listener questions.A couple of terms to remember:Brady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod -Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG:Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

donald trump dc conspiracies terror capitol implications witnesses delays appeals motions jack smith in florida double jeopardy presidential immunity defraud judge cannon cipa fbi protects america

OA829: More on the Classified Information Procedures Act (feat. Kel McClanahan)

Opening Arguments

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 6, 2023 67:56

Today, Liz and Andrew welcome back Kel McClanahan to break down recent Classified Information Procedures Act ("CIPA") rulings in Donald Trump's cases in DC and Florida. What does it portend? Listen and find out! Notes Trump DC docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656595/united-states-v-trump/ Trump SDFL docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490069/united-states-v-trump/ -Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Episode 49 - Stay the Whole Enchilada (feat. Brian Greer)

donald trump zoom colorado minnesota judge trials acast lago politico tribulations fulton county lawfare trials and tribulations judge cannon cipa josh gerstein

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 5, 2023 79:47

In DC, we have updates on the limited gag order Judge Chutkan issued; and Trump's moves to stay the entire proceedings while awaiting a ruling on his motion to dismiss based on presidential immunity.In Florida, DoJ filed a notice to the court regarding Trump's attempts to delay other trials by playing one venue off the other. Brian Greer is here to go over CIPA filings and rulings in DC and Florida.A document comes up in the NYAG civil fraud trial that might be of interest to Jack Smith's team.John Eastman says that disbarment proceedings in California are strengthening his belief in the big lie.Plus, listener questions.Brian Greerhttps://twitter.com/secretsandlawsOn CIPAThe Quick Guide to CIPA (Classified Information Procedures Act)https://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/Motion from DoJ asking the court to require Trump to give notice of an advice-of-counsel defense:https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.98.0_1.pdfA couple of terms to remember:Brady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod -Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG:Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

california donald trump dc conspiracies discovery terror motion witnesses doj relevance national security jack smith election interference in florida gag order enchiladas john eastman ny ag defraud cipa attorney client privilege protective order judge chutkan whole enchilada pdfa fbi protects america

Trump's Trials and Tribulations: Judge Cannon, Section 3, and a Fulton County Update

The Lawfare Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 4, 2023 80:25

It's another episode of “Trump's Trials and Tribulations,” recorded live on Zoom before an audience of Lawfare Material Supporters. Lawfare Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes sat down with Lawfare Senior Editor Roger Parloff, Lawfare Legal Fellow Anna Bower, and Josh Gerstein of Politico to talk about Wednesday's hearing in the Mar-a-Lago case, Section 3 disqualification litigation in Minnesota and Colorado, the latest from Fulton County, what Judge Cannon is up to with her CIPA rulings, and the schedule for the Mar-a-Lago trial.This is a live conversation that happens online every Thursday at 4:00pm Eastern Time. If you would like to come join and ask a question, be sure to visit Lawfare's Patreon account and become a Material Supporter.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode 46 - The Fuzzy Math Cookie Jar

donald trump mcclanahan cipa

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 15, 2023 59:32

This week in Florida, Jack Smith's office files the government's response to Trump's motion for a revised CIPA schedule, claiming, in part, that it is a precursor to a motion to delay the entire trial, and we learn that Jack Smith may intend to prove Trump's motive in taking and retaining the documents, and Judge Cannon holds conflict of interest hearingsIn DC, DoJ filed a motion asking Judge Chutkan to require Trump to disclose whether he intends to employ an “advice of counsel” defense as that would affect discovery; Trump's defense team objects to something in the DoJ's motion to use “fair and protective jury procedures” but it is unclear what; Trump files a motion for “Select Committee Missing Materials” that may not even exist.In other Special Counsel news, Robert Hur interviewed President Biden for several hours; reporting says that Hur plans to wrap up his investigation soon.And we have a correction from last weekA couple of terms to remember:Brady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information InstituteJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law GlossaryBrian Greer on CIPAThe Quick Guide to CIPA (Classified Information Procedures Act)Questions for the pod -Submit questions for the pod here Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG:Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

donald trump joe biden terror doj jack smith special counsel conflict of interest robert hur cookie jar judge cannon cipa judge chutkan fuzzy math fbi protects america

OA817: CIPA Schmeepa (feat. Kel McClanahan)

Opening Arguments

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 9, 2023 56:59

Liz and Andrew welcome back friend of the show Kel McClanahan to break down all of the national security developments in the Trump indictments. Find out what might be coming next in the document retention case.... -Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Episode 45 - A Tale of Two Judges

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 8, 2023 58:20

This week in Florida, Judge Aileen Cannon stays the trial calendar pending Trump's motion for a delay due to CIPA section 4, and new reporting that Trump shared nuclear submarine capabilities with an Australian businessman. In DC, Donald files a motion to dismiss all charges based on absolute presidential immunity; an opposition to DOJ CIPA motions; Jack Smith files a motion in support of his original motion for a pre-trial don't-call-it-a-gag order based on Trump's posts about Mark Milley and an unrelated possible firearm purchase.SCOTUS declines to hear Eastman's attempt to block access to his emails; plus a listener question.A couple of terms to remember:Brady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information InstituteJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law GlossaryBrian Greer on CIPAThe Quick Guide to CIPA (Classified Information Procedures Act)Questions for the pod -Submit questions for the pod here Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG:Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

donald trump australian dc tale terror judges scotus eastman jack smith mark milley judge aileen cannon cipa fbi protects america

Trump's Trials and Tribulations: A Trip Through Four Courts

The Lawfare Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 30, 2023 69:40

It's another episode of Lawfare's live Thursday show, “Trump's Trials and Tribulations,” a tour around four courts. This week, Lawfare Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes sat down with Lawfare Legal Fellow Anna Bower and Lawfare Senior Editors Scott R. Anderson and Roger Parloff. They talked about what's going on in Fulton County, about that judgment against Donald Trump and the Trump Organization in the civil case in New York, about Tanya Chutkan's refusal to recuse herself, and about CIPA, CIPA, CIPA—classified materials in Mar-a-Lago. This is a live conversation that happens online every Thursday at 4:00pm Eastern Time. If you would like to come join and ask a question, be sure to visit Lawfare's Patreon account and become a Material Supporter.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

new york donald trump trip trials acast courts lago tribulations fulton county lawfare trials and tribulations trump organization cipa tanya chutkan roger parloff

Episode 44 - Scary Court Season

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 30, 2023 68:17

This week in the DC case: Judge Chutkan denies Donald's motion to recuse, Trump files motions to delay CIPA actions, and opposition to the don't-call-it-a gag order. In Florida, Judge Cannon grants, in part, Jack Smith's motion for conflict of interest hearings; Trump asks for a delay on section 4 of CIPA; and Judge Cannon will receive briefs from both sides on whether to allow Nauta to view classified evidence, and more; plus a listener question.A couple of terms to remember:Brady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information InstituteJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law GlossaryQuestions for the pod -Submit questions for the pod here Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG:Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

donald trump dc court terror scary jack smith in florida judge cannon nauta cipa judge chutkan fbi protects america

OA812: Classified Information and Judge Aileen "Loose" Cannon (feat. Kel McClanahan)

Opening Arguments

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 27, 2023 72:29

Today, Andrew and Liz welcome back to the show National Security Counselor Kel McClanahan to break down a bunch of filings pursuant to the Classified Information Procedures Act, and tell us how to keep our eyes on Judge Cannon! Notes Chris Geidner "Law Dork" on the Fifth Circuit https://www.lawdork.com/p/fifth-circuit-adf-training-book-ban-social-media CIPA - Appendix 13 to Title 18 of the US Code https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18a/compiledact-96-456 Trump's motion for CIPA Section 4 scheduling https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.160.0.pdf DOJ CIPA Section 3 Brief https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.162.0.pdf Nauta/DeOliveira CIPA Section 3 Brief https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654.163.0.pdf DOJ CIPA Motion Under Seal in DC ( cover page) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/59/1/united-states-v-trump/ -Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com

donald trump dc judge fifth circuit loose cannons mcclanahan judge cannon classified information cipa us code

Jack | Episode 43 | One of those Jumpsuits (feat. Brian Greer)

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 24, 2023 73:18

This week: Rolling Stone reports that Trump is privately fretting about possibly going to prison; DoJ filed their proposed don't-call-it-a-gag order in the DC case; CIPA expert Brian Greer joins Allison to discuss the implications of that and what's going on with a supplemental briefing Judge Cannon requested; plus a couple of very fine questions from some very smart and good-looking listeners.Our Guest:Brian GreerSecrets and Laws (@secretsandlaws) on TwitterQuestions for the pod:https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG:Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and Trump We would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

donald trump dc prison laws terror rolling stones doj secret service gag order judge cannon cipa jumpsuits fbi protects america

Episode 35 - Obstruction Inception (feat. Brian Greer)