POPULARITY
3 episodes with los angeles county superior court
3 episodes with los angeles county superior court
4 episodes with los angeles county superior court
3 episodes with los angeles county superior court
2 episodes with los angeles county superior court
2 episodes with los angeles county superior court
2 episodes with los angeles county superior court
Recorded on March 28, 2025 at WonderCon: Yar, The Pirates of Star Wars Star Wars has had nearly 50 years of piracy, from child endangerment and property rights in Skeleton Crew, plundering Kyber Crystals in Clone Wars, smuggling puffer pigs in Star Wars Rebels, employment opportunities for the Bad Batch, and an open threat in Resistance. Join The Legal Geeks for an all-hands on deck adventure of the law of the high seas, as they search for lawful treasures of the Pirates of Star Wars in live action and animation. Featuring Judge Carol Najera, Los Angeles County Superior Court; Stephen Tollafield, Esq., Lieff, Cabraser, Heinmann, & Bernstein, LLP, Katrina Wraight, Esq., Best, Best & Krieger LLP, and moderated by Joshua Gilliland, Esq., Greenan, Peffer, Sallander & Lally LLP. Support the showNo part of this recording should be considered legal advice.Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok @TheLegalGeeks
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 6:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf
Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf
A ransomware attack hit the Los Angeles County Superior Court in July 2024, affecting e-filing services. Did you miss a filing deadline because of this? We discuss two Rules of Court that could help.We also cover:Are anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”?Court of Appeal to litigants: Your adverbs are unwelcome here. Ok to say “The order is erroneous.” But not “The order is transparently erroneous.”Appeal might be actually late, but constructively on time.Two anti-tax initiatives struck down: one too broad, the other too narrow.On HOA Christmas party ban, a split 9th Cir. panel with three opinions.If you are “seriously annoying” you can get hit with a restraining order, but not for being regular annoying.Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal's weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext's newest technology, CoCounsel, the world's first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.Other items discussed in the episode:Lawyer Toolkit: Untimely Appeals May Be Excused If There Was a Mishap with E-Filing, discussing Garg v. Garg (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 1036, 1041–1042Are Anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”? Wastexperts, Inc. v. Arakelian Enters. (D2d4 Jul. 11, 2024 No. B325299) [pub. opn.] (Tim's writeup)Late appeal deemed constructively filed on time, In re Santos (D5 Jun. 6, 2024 No. F087859) [nonpub. opn.] (Tim's writeup)Keeton v. Tesla, Inc.: arb-killer late-fee penalty NOT preempted by FAALegislature v. Weber: Tax initiative held invalid because too broadLoeber v. Lakeside Joint School District* Tax initiative held invalid because too narrowRead the full article at the
There was no order in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. For nine months, over 2,500 reporters from across the country congregated outside the courtroom to provide a glimpse into the murder trial of OJ Simpson. Coverage became "Must See TV," anchors became household names, and key figures within the trial turned into celebrities in their own right. FOX News Legal Analyst Gregg Jarrett reported on the trial as it was happening. He reflects on his coverage of the infamous case and discusses how it revolutionized the future of courtroom television. Follow Emily on Instagram: @realemilycompagno If you have a story or topic we should feature on the FOX True Crime Podcast, send us an email at: truecrimepodcast@fox.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Another lawsuit has been filed against Sean "Diddy" Combs, this time accusing his son, Christian Combs, of sexual assault on a chartered yacht trip. The lawsuit, filed by Grace O'Marcaigh, alleges disturbing events that unfolded during what was marketed as a family excursion but allegedly turned into a harrowing experience. According to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, O'Marcaigh claims she was sexually assaulted by Christian Combs, son of the music mogul, while working on a chartered yacht trip towards the end of 2022. The suit paints a grim picture of an environment that devolved into one of excess and debauchery, far removed from the wholesome outing it was purported to be. O'Marcaigh, who worked as a steward on the yacht, alleges that she witnessed a continuous cycle of partying and drug use involving a rotation of celebrities and suspected sex workers. She alleges that the atmosphere became increasingly concerning, with women exhibiting signs of distress after consuming what she believed to be spiked drinks. The lawsuit details the events leading up to the alleged assault, claiming that Christian Combs, heavily intoxicated, made unwelcome advances towards O'Marcaigh, pressuring her to consume alcohol. O'Marcaigh asserts that she felt the effects of the drink rapidly and suspected it had been tampered with. As the situation escalated, O'Marcaigh alleges that Christian Combs groped her and attempted to coerce her into performing sexual acts. The lawsuit includes audio recordings purportedly capturing the distressing encounter, with O'Marcaigh audibly declining Christian's advances. Following the alleged assault, O'Marcaigh asserts that she suffered severe mental and physical repercussions, including anxiety, panic attacks, and seizures. Despite her complaints to the yacht's captain, she claims her allegations were not taken seriously, leading to further mistreatment and eventual termination from her job. Attorneys representing O'Marcaigh emphasized her courage in coming forward and hoped that her story would encourage others to speak out against similar injustices. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for the harm inflicted upon O'Marcaigh. Sean Combs, who has faced a barrage of similar allegations in recent times, denies all accusations against him and his son. Representatives for Christian and Sean Combs did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the latest lawsuit. The filing of this lawsuit adds to the growing legal troubles surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs and his family, further underscoring the urgent need for accountability and justice in cases of alleged sexual assault and misconduct. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Another lawsuit has been filed against Sean "Diddy" Combs, this time accusing his son, Christian Combs, of sexual assault on a chartered yacht trip. The lawsuit, filed by Grace O'Marcaigh, alleges disturbing events that unfolded during what was marketed as a family excursion but allegedly turned into a harrowing experience. According to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, O'Marcaigh claims she was sexually assaulted by Christian Combs, son of the music mogul, while working on a chartered yacht trip towards the end of 2022. The suit paints a grim picture of an environment that devolved into one of excess and debauchery, far removed from the wholesome outing it was purported to be. O'Marcaigh, who worked as a steward on the yacht, alleges that she witnessed a continuous cycle of partying and drug use involving a rotation of celebrities and suspected sex workers. She alleges that the atmosphere became increasingly concerning, with women exhibiting signs of distress after consuming what she believed to be spiked drinks. The lawsuit details the events leading up to the alleged assault, claiming that Christian Combs, heavily intoxicated, made unwelcome advances towards O'Marcaigh, pressuring her to consume alcohol. O'Marcaigh asserts that she felt the effects of the drink rapidly and suspected it had been tampered with. As the situation escalated, O'Marcaigh alleges that Christian Combs groped her and attempted to coerce her into performing sexual acts. The lawsuit includes audio recordings purportedly capturing the distressing encounter, with O'Marcaigh audibly declining Christian's advances. Following the alleged assault, O'Marcaigh asserts that she suffered severe mental and physical repercussions, including anxiety, panic attacks, and seizures. Despite her complaints to the yacht's captain, she claims her allegations were not taken seriously, leading to further mistreatment and eventual termination from her job. Attorneys representing O'Marcaigh emphasized her courage in coming forward and hoped that her story would encourage others to speak out against similar injustices. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for the harm inflicted upon O'Marcaigh. Sean Combs, who has faced a barrage of similar allegations in recent times, denies all accusations against him and his son. Representatives for Christian and Sean Combs did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the latest lawsuit. The filing of this lawsuit adds to the growing legal troubles surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs and his family, further underscoring the urgent need for accountability and justice in cases of alleged sexual assault and misconduct. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Another lawsuit has been filed against Sean "Diddy" Combs, this time accusing his son, Christian Combs, of sexual assault on a chartered yacht trip. The lawsuit, filed by Grace O'Marcaigh, alleges disturbing events that unfolded during what was marketed as a family excursion but allegedly turned into a harrowing experience. According to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, O'Marcaigh claims she was sexually assaulted by Christian Combs, son of the music mogul, while working on a chartered yacht trip towards the end of 2022. The suit paints a grim picture of an environment that devolved into one of excess and debauchery, far removed from the wholesome outing it was purported to be. O'Marcaigh, who worked as a steward on the yacht, alleges that she witnessed a continuous cycle of partying and drug use involving a rotation of celebrities and suspected sex workers. She alleges that the atmosphere became increasingly concerning, with women exhibiting signs of distress after consuming what she believed to be spiked drinks. The lawsuit details the events leading up to the alleged assault, claiming that Christian Combs, heavily intoxicated, made unwelcome advances towards O'Marcaigh, pressuring her to consume alcohol. O'Marcaigh asserts that she felt the effects of the drink rapidly and suspected it had been tampered with. As the situation escalated, O'Marcaigh alleges that Christian Combs groped her and attempted to coerce her into performing sexual acts. The lawsuit includes audio recordings purportedly capturing the distressing encounter, with O'Marcaigh audibly declining Christian's advances. Following the alleged assault, O'Marcaigh asserts that she suffered severe mental and physical repercussions, including anxiety, panic attacks, and seizures. Despite her complaints to the yacht's captain, she claims her allegations were not taken seriously, leading to further mistreatment and eventual termination from her job. Attorneys representing O'Marcaigh emphasized her courage in coming forward and hoped that her story would encourage others to speak out against similar injustices. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for the harm inflicted upon O'Marcaigh. Sean Combs, who has faced a barrage of similar allegations in recent times, denies all accusations against him and his son. Representatives for Christian and Sean Combs did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the latest lawsuit. The filing of this lawsuit adds to the growing legal troubles surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs and his family, further underscoring the urgent need for accountability and justice in cases of alleged sexual assault and misconduct. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs
Another lawsuit has been filed against Sean "Diddy" Combs, this time accusing his son, Christian Combs, of sexual assault on a chartered yacht trip. The lawsuit, filed by Grace O'Marcaigh, alleges disturbing events that unfolded during what was marketed as a family excursion but allegedly turned into a harrowing experience. According to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, O'Marcaigh claims she was sexually assaulted by Christian Combs, son of the music mogul, while working on a chartered yacht trip towards the end of 2022. The suit paints a grim picture of an environment that devolved into one of excess and debauchery, far removed from the wholesome outing it was purported to be. O'Marcaigh, who worked as a steward on the yacht, alleges that she witnessed a continuous cycle of partying and drug use involving a rotation of celebrities and suspected sex workers. She alleges that the atmosphere became increasingly concerning, with women exhibiting signs of distress after consuming what she believed to be spiked drinks. The lawsuit details the events leading up to the alleged assault, claiming that Christian Combs, heavily intoxicated, made unwelcome advances towards O'Marcaigh, pressuring her to consume alcohol. O'Marcaigh asserts that she felt the effects of the drink rapidly and suspected it had been tampered with. As the situation escalated, O'Marcaigh alleges that Christian Combs groped her and attempted to coerce her into performing sexual acts. The lawsuit includes audio recordings purportedly capturing the distressing encounter, with O'Marcaigh audibly declining Christian's advances. Following the alleged assault, O'Marcaigh asserts that she suffered severe mental and physical repercussions, including anxiety, panic attacks, and seizures. Despite her complaints to the yacht's captain, she claims her allegations were not taken seriously, leading to further mistreatment and eventual termination from her job. Attorneys representing O'Marcaigh emphasized her courage in coming forward and hoped that her story would encourage others to speak out against similar injustices. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for the harm inflicted upon O'Marcaigh. Sean Combs, who has faced a barrage of similar allegations in recent times, denies all accusations against him and his son. Representatives for Christian and Sean Combs did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the latest lawsuit. The filing of this lawsuit adds to the growing legal troubles surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs and his family, further underscoring the urgent need for accountability and justice in cases of alleged sexual assault and misconduct. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Los Angeles County - Dates of Birth Removed?The Los Angeles County Superior court has announced that partial dates of birth will be removed from the public kiosks and from the court website.What does this mean? How does it impact you? The Los Angeles County Superior Court announced on February 20th that as of the close of business on Friday, February 23rd that partial dates of birth will no longer be available via KIOSKS or ONLINE.If you read this release carefully you will notice that the partial dates of birth will be removed from the court website and the publicly available KIOSKS. It doesn't say that they dates of birth wont' be available with clerk assisted searches.So, what does this mean? What is the true impact to background screeners, employers, and landlords?Connect with TIM SANTONIConnect with SANTONI BACKGROUNDS
In October 2022, a group of families who lost children to fentanyl sold over Snapchat filed a lawsuit against the company, in Los Angeles County Superior Court. According to the legal filings, several of the plaintiffs had met with Snapchat executives in April of 2021. During that meeting the plaintiffs allege Snapchat executives told them the company was immunized from civil liability by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. On January 2, 2024, in what may turn out to be one of the most significant legal decisions of the decade, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Lawrence Riff ruled the case would go forward. This is the first time in history a social media company is subject to claims it facilitated illegal and fatal drug sales. Join retired California Highway Patrol Chief Mark Garrett and retired DEA Special Agent in Charge Bill Bodner on Episode 6 of the Truth Nation Podcast as they discuss the ruling, the specific allegations in this case, how drugs are sold using the Snapchat platform, and how social media platforms use an outdated Section 230 as a shield to selectively censor and put profits before safety. If you're the parent of a child under the age 18, this is a must listen!
Twelve Los Angeles County cities filed a lawsuit Friday seeking to postpone the controversial new zero-bail policy that allows some nonviolent defendants charged with felonies or misdemeanors to be cited and released after being arrested.The cities of Whittier, Arcadia, Artesia, Covina, Downey, Glendora, Industry, Lakewood, La Verne, Palmdale, Santa Fe Springs and Vernon are seeking an injunction to postpone the implementation of the Los Angeles County Superior Court's zero-bail schedule, which went into effect Sunday, according to a news release from the city of Glendora.The new bail policy was imposed by court officials who argued that a defendant's ability to pay bail should not be the key factor in determining whether they stay in jail after an arrest. The so-called zero-bail schedule has been a controversial issue around the country, with criminal justice reform advocates arguing that pretrial releases should be based on an individual's criminal history not on an arbitrary dollar amount.Support the show
BlazeTV host Pat Gray and contributor Jaco Booyens join the show to discuss the historic vote that ousted Kevin McCarthy from the House speakership. The vote on the motion to vacate was 216-210, with eight Republicans voting to remove McCarthy from the speakership. The panel looks at who could possibly fill McCarthy's shoes as the new Republican speaker of the House. Former MLB pitcher Trevor Bauer finally speaks out after a long court battle with Lindsey Hill, who accused him of sexual assault. The Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled that Bauer "did not coerce her or threaten her into sexual activity." In a video, Bauer exposes his accuser and claims that he never assaulted her and that text messages Hill sent him revealed her intention to make false claims. Congressman Jamaal Bowman has apologized for accusing House Republicans of harboring "Nazi members." Bowman offered a bizarre excuse and apology after leaked talking points were sent to Democrats to help them stay on message pertaining to Bowman pulling a fire alarm during House hearings on Saturday. Hunter Biden pleaded not guilty today to three federal firearms charges. Today's Sponsors: Go to http://PrepareWithNews.com to get 25% on My Patriot Supply's THREE-MONTH EMERGENCY FOOD KITS. These meals will give you peace of mind when food shortages hit. But HURRY! This is a LIMITED-TIME OFFER that expires soon. In each kit, you'll get energy-boosting breakfasts, lunches, dinners, drinks, and snacks that will keep you going when the going gets tough. Right now, you can save $200 on an Eden Pure Thunderstorm 3-pack for whole home protection. You get 3 units for under $200. Put one in your basement, bedroom, family room, kitchen or anywhere you need clean, fresh air. Go to http://edenpuredeals.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Anti-SLAPP motions are sometimes called early summary judgment motions. But the fact that they are “early” is why they are so powerful: not only do they provide defendants a quick way to defend against claims that involve speech, they force the plaintiff to prove its case without any discovery.On this episode of the California Appellate Law Podcast, we discuss a recent 9th Circuit decision holding that denials of anti-SLAPP motions are immediately appealable as collateral orders. We also discuss:Judge Bress's criticism of the cases treating anti-SLAPP denials as collateral.Anti-SLAPP motions were designed for the powerless, but the City of Inglewood successful used it to strike an employee's retaliation complaint.How you can lose your arbitration if you don't pay the arbitrator fees in 30 days—and “the check is in the mail” doesn't cut it.A judgment issued in a sum not previously noticed is void and may be set aside at any time, but a sanctions order issued without notice is merely voidable, and may be set aside only within 6 months.Filing a notice of appeal in Los Angeles County Superior Court? Now you can pay your fees online. (Finally!)Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal's weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext's newest technology, CoCounsel, the world's first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.Other items discussed in the episode:Doe v. The Superior Court (D1d3 Sep. 8, 2023) No. A167105 (Tim's writeup).Martinez v. ZoomInfo Tech. Inc., No. 22-35305 (9th Cir. Sep. 21, 2023) (Tim's writeup).In re the Marriage of Jensen (D2d2 Sep. 5, 2023) No. B320565 (nonpub. opn.) (Tim's writeup).United States v. Sapalasan, No. 21-30251, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 23820 (9th Cir. Sep. 7, 2023) (Tim's writeup).New payment option for paying $775 appellate feeHow 'Purely Legal' Issues Ruling Applies To Rule 12 MotionsBrown v. City of Inglewood, No. B320658 (Cal. Ct. App. May 31, 2023)Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal's YouTube channel.
Rapper Tory Lanez was sentenced to 10 years in prison Tuesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court for assaulting fellow artist Megan Thee Stallion. Plus, Tao Thao, a former Minneapolis police officer who held back bystanders while his colleagues restrained George Floyd has been convicted of aiding and abetting manslaughter. And, the self-identified "Black supremacist" first grade teacher who went on a racist tirade about her sister dating a white man has reportedly been fired. Ep.206 - - - Click here to join the member exclusive portion of my show: https://bit.ly/3DzN2Uj Grab some “Yes We CANdace” merch here: https://bit.ly/3Amm13Y - - - Today's Sponsors: Birch Gold - Text "CANDACE" to 989898, or go to https://birchgold.com/candace, for your no-cost, no-obligation, FREE information kit. Hallow - Try Hallow for 3 months FREE: https://hallow.com/candace - - - Socials: Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3RNly1c Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3U5DF4a Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3Ug6Thd Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3d9dZ6k
Lizzo is bigger then all her dancer and she Fat Shaming! WTF. Seriously the entertainment industry always promoted the big black woman. They are considered MAMMIES! Lizzo is just part of what they wanted her to do, while she is a talented musician. She let them interject her big azz Twerking and all like that was cute. Where are all the BBW who need to cancel her fake azz. Lawsuit by former dancers accuses Lizzo of sexual harassment and creating a hostile work environment. LOS ANGELES (AP) — Lizzo has been sued by three former dancers who accuse the Grammy winner of sexual harassment and allege the singer and her production company created a hostile work environment. The civil lawsuit filed Tuesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court claims Lizzo pressured the dancers to engage with nude performers at a club in Amsterdam and shamed one of them for her weight gain before firing her. Plaintiffs Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams and Noelle Rodriguez make numerous charges including sexual, religious and racial harassment, disability discrimination, assault and false imprisonment. Representatives for Lizzo didn't immediately respond to emails seeking comment on the lawsuit. The court filing claims that after performing a concert in Amsterdam, Lizzo and her crew attended a sexually themed show at a club in the city's notorious Red Light District where “Lizzo began inviting cast members to take turns touching the nude performers.” During the show, Lizzo led a chant pressuring Davis to touch the breasts of one of the nude women performing at the club, the filing states. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/van-silk/support
Jason Middleton is in for Jennifer Jones Lee and, alongside Wayne Resnick, joins Bill for Handel on the News. Californians are slamming an 'unbelievable' proposal to pay unemployed migrants $300 each week. SAG-AFTRA is seeking strike authorization even before talks with studios begin. And a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has halted cash bail for low-level LA County cases.
A recent shooting at the home of GOP congressional candidate Pat Harrigan's parents and young children caused no injuries but has placed “tremendous stress” on the family in the final weeks of his campaign, Harrigan's mother said. The firearms manufacturer and U.S. Army Special Forces veteran is running against Democratic state Senator Jeff Jackson for an open U.S. House seat in North Carolina's new 14th District based in western Charlotte. READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/crime/nc-us-house-candidate-family-house-shot-at/83-03e1ac5a-cf0f-4588-933f-cea9c4930199 Miles Bridges will serve no jail time after pleading no contest to domestic violence charges after officials said he assaulted his then-girlfriend. Bridges, 24, appeared in Los Angeles County Superior Court on Thursday and pleaded no contest to one count of injuring a child's parent. The two felony counts of child abuse were dismissed. In response to his plea, the judge issued a three-year probation sentence for Bridges. READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/sports/miles-bridges-pleads-no-contest-receives-no-jail-time-in-domestic-violence-case-charlotte-hornets-nba-court-case-los-angeles-basketball/275-a6b7077d-59fc-4d27-ac27-3f72854047b5 Watch Wake Up Charlotte each weekday morning from 4:30 to 7 a.m. on WCNC Charlotte, and as always, join the conversation on social media using #WakeUpCLT!
A recent shooting at the home of GOP congressional candidate Pat Harrigan's parents and young children caused no injuries but has placed “tremendous stress” on the family in the final weeks of his campaign, Harrigan's mother said. The firearms manufacturer and U.S. Army Special Forces veteran is running against Democratic state Senator Jeff Jackson for an open U.S. House seat in North Carolina's new 14th District based in western Charlotte.READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/crime/nc-us-house-candidate-family-house-shot-at/83-03e1ac5a-cf0f-4588-933f-cea9c4930199Miles Bridges will serve no jail time after pleading no contest to domestic violence charges after officials said he assaulted his then-girlfriend.Bridges, 24, appeared in Los Angeles County Superior Court on Thursday and pleaded no contest to one count of injuring a child's parent. The two felony counts of child abuse were dismissed.In response to his plea, the judge issued a three-year probation sentence for Bridges.READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/sports/miles-bridges-pleads-no-contest-receives-no-jail-time-in-domestic-violence-case-charlotte-hornets-nba-court-case-los-angeles-basketball/275-a6b7077d-59fc-4d27-ac27-3f72854047b5Watch Wake Up Charlotte each weekday morning from 4:30 to 7 a.m. on WCNC Charlotte, and as always, join the conversation on social media using #WakeUpCLT!
Probate matters and general civil matters can sometimes be seen as operating in two separate worlds. However, in practice, these worlds often interact with one another. In this episode, we are covering probate and civil crossover issues. We discuss a lot of the basic concepts and considerations given when choosing to file either a probate or civil case and dealing with concurrent litigation. We also briefly address some new legislation as well as other practice tips that may prove helpful in tackling these issues.About Our GuestsBen Futernick is a research attorney in the Civil Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Ben has experience working on both the civil side and probate side, including the assignment of relating cases to one another. He recently coauthored two MCLE articles for the Daily Journal entitled “Introduction to Powers and Duties of Guardians Ad Litem” and “Minor's Compromises and Possible Changes to Guardian Ad Litem Statutes.”David Gibson is a probate attorney for the Los Angeles Superior Court. David previously worked as a research attorney in the probate department handling law and motion matters and, in private practice, advised and represented clients in family law proceedings.Erin Norcia is a partner at Temmerman, Cilley & Kohlmann, LLP. Erin's practice focuses on trust, probate, and conservatorship litigation. She is a member of the California Lawyer Association Trusts and Estates Section's Executive Committee. Erin is also a fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC) and is an Adjunct Professor of the Wills & Trusts Course at Santa Clara University School of Law.About Our HostRyka Farotte is a research attorney at the Los Angeles County Superior Court. He is currently a member of the Executive Committee of the California Lawyer Association's Trusts and Estates Section.Produced byFoley Marra Studios (thefoleymarrastudios.com)Thank you for listening to Trust Me!
Justice Lee Smalley Edmon is the Presiding Justice of the Second District, Division Three of the California Courts of Appeal. She previously served as a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court from 2000 to 2015, and was that court's first female presiding judge from 2011 to 2012. Before joining the bench, she practiced civil litigation at Adams, Duque & Hazeltine and Dewey Ballentine, and served in leadership positions in numerous bar associations and legal nonprofit boards, including as President of the Los Angeles County Bar Association.
Miley Cyrus was forced to cancel a performance Wednesday in Paraguay after the plane in which she was traveling was struck by lighting. Beyoncé, Billie Eilish and Finneas, Reba McEntire and Sebastián Yatra will perform their nominated songs on Sunday's 94th Academy Awards. Justin Bieber is dropping a defamation lawsuit he filed in 2020 against two women who accused him of sexual assault. Lawyers for the Canadian singer filed a request for dismissal in Los Angeles County Superior Court last Friday, according to Billboard. It was not clear if there a settlement was reached and Bieber's lawyer Evan Spiegel told NBC News only that the pop star “has decided to move on.” The case was tentatively set for trial in May. Original Articles by John R. Kennedy: Miley Cyrus Misses Festival After Plane Struck By Lightning Beyoncé, Billie Eilish To Perform At Oscars Justin Bieber Drops Lawsuit Against Sex Assault Accusers
A federal grand jury has indicted former Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon for contempt of Congress, the Justice Department announced today. Attorney General Merrick Garland has been under political pressure to indict Bannon since the House referred the Trump ally to the DOJ for contempt back in October. Each count carries a minimum of 30 days and a maximum of one year in jail, the Justice Department said. Britney Spears' 13-year conservatorship has ended. The Los Angeles County Superior Court terminated the court-ordered arrangement today. Spears' attorney Matthew Rosengart said a "safety net" is in place for the singer's finances and personal care. To learn more about how CNN protects listener privacy, visit cnn.com/privacy
In writing or performing, it is important to know your audience. In probate litigation, your audience is often the judicial officer presiding over the case. In this podcast, we sit down with Judge David J. Cowan to get his view on some key topics in handling contested probate proceedings.First, we explore the subject of pleadings and crafting a petition to tell a story. We next discuss bench trials and how Judge Cowan approaches them, including how he considers testimony on mental capacity and susceptibility to undue influence. Lastly, we discuss a bit narrower of a topic, relating civil cases to probate cases, which Judge Cowan currently oversees.This podcast should provide some insight on how a judicial officer may look at your case.About Our GuestJudge David J. Cowan is Supervising Judge of the Civil Division of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. He previously served as Supervising Judge of the Probate and Mental Health Division of the Superior Court. Judge Cowan is also a member of the Probate and Mental Health Advisory Committee to the Judicial Council of California as well as former vice-chair of the Probate Law Committee of the California Judges Association.About Our HostRyka Farotte is a research attorney at the Los Angeles County Superior Court. He is currently a member of the Executive Committee of the California Lawyer Association's Trusts and Estates Section.Thank you for listening to Trust Me!
In Part 61, Judge Mader reflects on the dynamics among the Los Angeles County Superior Court branches and explores a phenomenon called 'Black Robe Fever' where a judge's ego becomes inflated because of his or her position.
The Attorney Post - If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!
https://thelawcollaborative.com/ https://thelawcollaborative.com/learning-center/family-law-court-forms/ https://thelawcollaborative.com/learning-center/events/ Ronald M. Supancic has practiced Family Law exclusively since 1970. Ron was admitted to the Supreme Court of the United States on October 15, 1975. He has been certified by the California Bar Association Board of Legal Specialization as a Family Law Specialist since the inception of that certification program in 1980. Ron has handled hundreds of contested dissolutions, child custody cases, disputed post-marital proceedings, alimony cases, and prenuptial agreements. He has served as a Mediator and as a Judge Pro Tem with the Los Angeles County Superior Court since 1976. Ron holds an AV rating with the Martindale Hubbell Law Register. The ‘A' signifies the highest level of legal ability, while the ‘V' denotes ‘very high' adherence to the professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and diligence. Ron has been voted one of L.A.'s Super Lawyers by a jury of his peers in Los Angeles Magazine every year since 2006. At a special ceremony, Ron was honored by the California State Bar for 30 years of service as a Certified Family Law Specialist. Sponsors: https://InjuryAttorneyLeads.com http://hundredsofcustomers.com/rocket
In this episode, Dr. Brady Blevins and Daniel Ray discuss the controversy surrounding Bikram Yoga and its founder. Facing a warrant for his arrest from the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Bikram Choudhury, the guru who founded Bikram Yoga, has fled the United States refusing to pay a court-ordered judgement of about $7 million in damages. This judgement resulted from a wrongful termination and sexual harassment lawsuit filed by his former legal adviser, Minakshi Jafa-Boden. But as Daniel and Brady discovered, the legal, ethical and spiritual controversies surrounding Bikram Yoga go much deeper than this one lawsuit. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Our free 4-page Profile on Bikram Yoga by Brady Blevins: www.watchman.org/ProfileBikramYoga.pdf Our free 4-page Profile on Yoga by Robert Velarde: www.watchman.org/staff/jwalker/ProfileYoga.pdf "Yoga: Exercise or Religious Practice" by Brad Scott: www.watchman.org/articles/new-age/yoga--exercise-or-religious-practice/ Bikram: Yogi, Guru, Predator (Nov. 2019; Netflix Original Official Trailer on YouTube: www.bit.ly/BikramYouTube) FREE: We are also offering a free subscription to our 4-page bimonthly Profiles here: www.watchman.org/Free. SUPPORT: Help us create more content like this. Make a tax-deductible donation here: www.watchman.org/give. Apologetics Profile is a ministry of Watchman FellowshipFor more information, visit www.watchman.org © Watchman Fellowship, Inc.
Each year NSRLP "graduates" law student research assistants (RAs) who have worked with us over the previous three years. These prospective lawyers have had an "immersion program" in working with members of the public who are representing themselves, an experience that we hear year after year is formative in shaping their path into legal practice. This year's graduates are Ali Tejani (social media wizard, and our "In Other News" correspondent), Megan Campbell (manager of the SRL Case Law Database), Kaila Scarrow (co-investigator and co-author of our report on access to court transcripts, along with many other pieces), and Rebecca Flynn (researcher/editor of our latest A2J Annotated Bibliography, and Case Law Database researcher). Julie's conversation with them spans their hopes for the future of legal services, their thoughts about entering an evolving profession, and how COVID is going to change everything. (Make sure to listen to the end for “in other news” with guest host Jordan Furlong!) In other news, with Jordan Furlong (legal markets analyst and recent podcast guest): the State Bar of California has agreed to move ahead with a “regulatory sandbox” to try out innovative legal services; Los Angeles County Superior Court launching free online tool to help parents negotiate child custody disputes and visitation issues without having to come to court; and finally, a Globe & Mail op-ed from a graduating Osgoode Hall law student reflects on the benefits of online legal education. For related links and more on this episode visit our website: https://representingyourselfcanada.com/comfortable-being-uncomfortable/ Jumping Off the Ivory Tower is produced and hosted by Julie Macfarlane and Dayna Cornwall; production and editing by Brauntë Petric; Other News produced and hosted by Jordan Furlong; promotion by Moya McAlister and the NSRLP team.
How do you go from successful child actor to running for Superior Court judge? In this episode, I sit down with Troy Slaten, who starred in “Parker Lewis Can’t Lose” when he was a kid and is now running for Los Angeles County Superior Court judge in the March 3 election.
Edward Tabash is a constitutional and civil rights lawyer in Beverly Hills, California. He has chaired the National Legal Committee of Americans United for Separation of Church and State since 1995, and has argued and won before the California Supreme Court. He also sits as a part-time judge for the Los Angeles County Superior Court system. He has successfully represented the scientific outlook and secular humanism in public debates against the leading Christian philosophers around the world. In addition to serving on the Board of the Center for Inquiry and chairing the Council for Secular Humanism’s First Amendment Task Force, he chairs the Center for Inquiry's Los Angeles branch. In this conversation with D.J. Grothe, Edward Tabash explores issues valued by secularists and why they hang in the balance in this U.S. Presidential Election. He talks about gay marriage and abortion, and how both of these rights depend on a government neutrality in matters of religion. He details ways that pseudoscience and junk science are used to advance religiously derived public policy arguments against gay marriage and abortion. And he talks about global warming skepticism, and the need for scientific integrity in public policy. He emphasizes how the next U.S. President will reshape the Supreme Court, and what that portends for science and secular values. He also explains his role in gay rights victory with the Supreme Court of California earlier in 2008, and why he opposes Proposition 8, a proposed ballot measure in California that would amend the State Constitution to deny marriage rights to homosexuals.
Edward Tabash is a constitutional and civil rights lawyer in Beverly Hills, California. Graduating magna cum laude from UCLA in 1973, he graduated from Loyola Law School of Los Angeles three years later and was admitted to the California Bar that same year. He has chaired the National Legal Committee of Americans United for Separation of Church and State since 1995, and has argued and won before the California Supreme Court. He also sits as a part-time judge for the Los Angeles County Superior Court system. He has successfully represented the scientific outlook and secular humanism in public debates against the leading Christian philosophers around the world. In addition to serving on the Board of the Center for Inquiry and chairing the Council for Secular Humanism’s First Amendment Task Force, he chairs the Center for Inquiry's Los Angeles branch. In this discussion with D.J. Grothe, Edward Tabash explores issues of science and secularism relating to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. He surveys the stances of the candidates of both the Republican and Democratic parties as regards church-state separation, gay rights, abortion rights, global warming and other topics important to the pro-science secularist, regardless of his or her political leanings. Tabash also emphasizes the crucial importance of this election due to the Supreme Court appointments the next President will make. Also in this episode Toni Van Pelt, CFI's Director of Government Affairs, details ways listeners can get involved with CFI's activities on Capitol Hill through its Office of Public Policy.
Edward Tabash is a constitutional and civil rights lawyer in Beverly Hills, California. Graduating magna cum laude from UCLA in 1973, he graduated from Loyola Law School of Los Angeles three years later and was admitted to the California Bar that same year. He has chaired the National Legal Committee of Americans United for Separation of Church and State since 1995. He has been the most publicly-active man in the abortion rights movement in California since 1981. He has argued and won before the California Supreme Court and sits as a part-time judge for the Los Angeles County Superior Court system. Since 1990, he has been a member of the First Amendment Committee of the ACLU of Southern California. In this conversation with D.J Grothe, Eddie Tabash explains why he argues there really is no God. He discusses various scientific and philosophical arguments against god-belief, including arguments from divine hiddenness, the physical mind, the problem of evil, and morality. Tabash also addresses questions of meaning in a godless universe, and what atheists should do with their atheism.
Edward Tabash is a constitutional and civil rights lawyer in Beverly Hills, California. Graduating magna cum laude from UCLA in 1973, he graduated from Loyola Law School of Los Angeles three years later and was admitted to the California Bar that same year. He has chaired the National Legal Committee of Americans United for Separation of Church and State since 1995. He has been the most publicly-active man in the abortion rights movement in California since 1981. He has argued and won before the California Supreme Court and sits as a part-time judge for the Los Angeles County Superior Court system. Since 1990, he has been a member of the First Amendment Committee of the ACLU of Southern California. In election year 2000, he finished second out of four in a primary for the California State Assembly. He was the only open atheist to be a major contender for a state legislative seat in the United States during that election cycle. He has successfully represented the scientific outlook and secular humanism in public debates against the leading Christian philosophers around the world. In addition to serving on the Board of the Center for Inquiry and advising the Council for Secular Humanism's First Amendment Task Force, he chairs the Center for Inquiry West, in Hollywood, California. In this discussion with DJ Grothe, he explores the true meaning of separation of church and state, and defends secularism both for believer and unbeliever alike. Also in this episode, Lauren Becker announces Ten Amendments Day, as opposed to Ten Commandments Day, and explains ways listeners can personally get involved advancing public understanding of the Bill of Rights.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
