Podcasts about Reiner

The question Reiner raises is disclosure rather than diagnosis. What the White House releases about an 80 year old president does not match what is visible in daily footage, and the public has no reliable way to check. Hawk's comparison is to the last two years of Joe Biden's term, when people around him managed his schedule and limited his exposure, and to Ronald Reagan's final years in office. Those situations drew sustained coverage. This one has not, and Hawk's argument is that energy and volume are being mistaken for health. He closes by inviting viewers with medical training to weigh in, which is worth taking as an invitation to discuss what has been publicly reported rather than to diagnose anyone from a screen. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB

An LA grand jury’s indictment of 32-year-old Nick Reiner was unsealed on Wednesday, revealing new allegations against the son accused of killing his parents, Hollywood legends Rob and Michell Reiner. Reiner is now facing the added special circumstance of “lying in wait” which gives prosecutors the option of seeking the death penalty. Reiner pleaded not guilty to the charges and will be back in court in a matter of days fighting to free up at least $1.5 million from a trust set up for him by his parents to rehire high profile criminal defense attorney Alan Jackson.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

An LA grand jury’s indictment of 32-year-old Nick Reiner was unsealed on Wednesday, revealing new allegations against the son accused of killing his parents, Hollywood legends Rob and Michell Reiner. Reiner is now facing the added special circumstance of “lying in wait” which gives prosecutors the option of seeking the death penalty. Reiner pleaded not guilty to the charges and will be back in court in a matter of days fighting to free up at least $1.5 million from a trust set up for him by his parents to rehire high profile criminal defense attorney Alan Jackson.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

An LA grand jury’s indictment of 32-year-old Nick Reiner was unsealed on Wednesday, revealing new allegations against the son accused of killing his parents, Hollywood legends Rob and Michell Reiner. Reiner is now facing the added special circumstance of “lying in wait” which gives prosecutors the option of seeking the death penalty. Reiner pleaded not guilty to the charges and will be back in court in a matter of days fighting to free up at least $1.5 million from a trust set up for him by his parents to rehire high profile criminal defense attorney Alan Jackson.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

An LA grand jury’s indictment of 32-year-old Nick Reiner was unsealed on Wednesday, revealing new allegations against the son accused of killing his parents, Hollywood legends Rob and Michell Reiner. Reiner is now facing the added special circumstance of “lying in wait” which gives prosecutors the option of seeking the death penalty. Reiner pleaded not guilty to the charges and will be back in court in a matter of days fighting to free up at least $1.5 million from a trust set up for him by his parents to rehire high profile criminal defense attorney Alan Jackson.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this episode of The Movie Podcast, we sit down at SDCC with the team behind MARVEL'S WOLVERINE from Insomniac Games, including Marcus Smith, Mike Daly, Walt Williams, and Jess Reiner-Reed, alongside actors Liam McIntyre (Wolverine) and Krizia Bajos (Jean Grey), and Eric Monacelli from Marvel Games. Marvel's Wolverine is an action-packed adventure from Insomniac Games, the acclaimed studio behind the Marvel's Spider-Man series. Created in collaboration with Marvel Games, it delivers an all-new original story based on the legendary comic book character. Logan thought he was finished being Wolverine, but the past wasn't finished with him yet. Three years after walking out on his team, Wolverine rejoins the mutant task force, Team X, in their darkest hour. Marvel's Wolverine releases September 15th 2026 to PS5 consoles. Watch and listen to The Movie Podcast now on all podcast platforms, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TheMoviePodcast.ca⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.  ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out our new ⁠⁠⁠⁠The Movie Podcast Clips Channel!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Contact: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠hello@themoviepodcast.ca⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠FOLLOW US⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Daniel on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠X⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Letterboxd⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Shahbaz on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠X⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Letterboxd⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Anthony on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠X⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Letterboxd⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The Movie Podcast on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠X⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TikTok⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Discord⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Rotten Tomatoes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Send us Fan MailAnoka County Commissioner Jeff Reinert joined Liz Collin on her podcast to discuss some new information about elections and voting machines that he believes Anoka County residents and beyond need to be aware of after it came to light at a recent city council meeting. “When I first found out that our voting system is uncertified, I really didn't believe it. We are the fourth largest county in the state, and certainly we'd have certified voting equipment. But then I asked our elections team here at the county and was verified that it is not certified,” Reiner said. Support the show

Delta 10 gilt als die sichere Stillhalter-Strategie – 90 % Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit, weit aus dem Geld, wenig Aufregung. In dieser Folge spreche ich mit Reiner Hofmann darüber, warum genau diese vermeintliche Sicherheit trügt. Wir nehmen die Strategie auseinander: woher die 90 % eigentlich kommen, warum sie in die Irre führen, und was im Ernstfall wirklich passiert. Es geht um das unterschätzte Risiko hinter niedrigen Deltas, um Vanna und Gamma im Vola-Spike, um das schwache Chance-Risiko-Verhältnis gegenüber einem simplen Aktienkauf und um den psychologischen Trick, mit dem sich viele Trader systematisch selbst täuschen. Kein Streitgespräch, sondern eine ehrliche Einordnung von zwei Leuten, die den Optionshandel hauptberuflich betreiben. Unser Gast Reiner Hofmann: https://www.optionsmastery.rocks/ Unser Podcast wird unterstützt durch CapTrader: ⁠https://www.captrader.com/⁠   

Two people, two very different amounts of help, and one comparison the internet keeps making that doesn't actually hold up. Nick Reiner told reporters he went through somewhere around seventeen rehab stays between age fifteen and twenty-two, all arranged and paid for by his family, plus a yearlong conservatorship. He's now charged with killing his parents, Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner, and has pleaded not guilty. Lindsay Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General, sought care once, in December of 2022, and was discharged from a postpartum program after a single day. She's now on trial in Plymouth Superior Court for killing her three children, and this week's testimony didn't make the picture simpler. Patrick Clancy spent two days on the stand. Jurors heard his 911 call. First responders described the scene. Then prosecutors set nine prescription bottles in front of the jury — most of them still holding pills — directly undercutting a defense built around a woman overwhelmed by medication. Prosecutors also keep returning to a twenty-five-minute errand and a takeout order, asking jurors to weigh whether either one fits with a woman too sick to know what she was doing. Tony Brueski breaks down why stacking these two cases together as the same story is exactly how neither gets fixed — one person given nearly two decades of intervention, one given a single day, and both families now living with the same unanswerable question about who could have stopped it. Reiner has pleaded not guilty and no motive has been officially confirmed. Clancy's jury has not returned a verdict, and prosecutors argue she acted intentionally and should be held criminally responsible. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #NickReiner #TrueCrimeToday #PatrickClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #RobReiner Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Two families, two very different relationships with the help that was available to them — and this week both stories collided. Lindsay Clancy's murder trial in Plymouth Superior Court just wrapped three days of heavy testimony: Patrick Clancy on the stand for two of them, his 911 call played for a visibly shaken jury, and first responders walking the courtroom through the scene itself. Then prosecutors produced nine prescription bottles. Most still had pills in them. That single detail cuts against the defense's central argument — that Lindsay was overwhelmed by medications her providers kept adjusting. Her lawsuit says a postpartum program discharged her after one day in December of 2022, after providers noted her symptoms might be medication-related and told her to taper off an antipsychotic. She was a labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General. She knew exactly where to go for help — and got a single day of it. Compare that to Nick Reiner, who told reporters in 2015 he'd been through somewhere between seventeen and eighteen rehab stays since around age fifteen, all arranged and paid for by his family, including a yearlong conservatorship. He's now charged with two counts of murder in the deaths of Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner and has pleaded not guilty. Tony Brueski connects what jurors just heard about those pill bottles and that twenty-five-minute errand prosecutors won't stop mentioning, to the bigger question underneath both cases: whether endless access to treatment and almost none of it produce the same outcome, and what that says about the systems built to catch people before this happens. Reiner has pleaded not guilty and no motive has been officially confirmed. Clancy's jury has not returned a verdict, and prosecutors argue she acted intentionally and should be held criminally responsible. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #NickReiner #HiddenKillers #PatrickClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #RobReiner Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Here's the question that's been sitting underneath the Lindsay Clancy trial all week: did she know exactly what she was doing? Both sides agree she killed her three children. Plymouth Superior Court just spent three days trying to answer whether she understood it while it happened — Patrick Clancy on the stand for two of those days, his 911 call played for jurors who could barely sit through it, first responders describing the scene they walked into. Then prosecutors laid nine prescription bottles on the table. Most of them were still mostly full. If the defense rests on a woman drowning in medication her doctors kept switching, that's a hard detail to explain away. So is the twenty-five-minute errand prosecutors keep coming back to, and the takeout order they say she placed like nothing was wrong. Tony Brueski puts that against a case people keep comparing it to: Nick Reiner, who told reporters he cycled through roughly seventeen rehab stays his family arranged and paid for, including a yearlong conservatorship, and is now charged with killing Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner. Lindsay Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, sought help once in December of 2022 and was discharged in a day. Live, Tony breaks down what those pill bottles actually prove, what a jury is supposed to do with a father who spent two days defending the woman who killed his kids, and what happens to this family if the jury decides she isn't criminally responsible at all — and takes the hardest questions viewers have been sending in all week about who really failed those three children. Reiner has pleaded not guilty. Clancy's jury has not returned a verdict, and prosecutors argue she acted intentionally. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #NickReiner #HiddenKillersLive #PatrickClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #RobReiner Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Everybody comparing the Lindsay Clancy trial to the Nick Reiner case is comparing two people who spent years moving in opposite directions.Reiner's history, by his own public account, is one of leaving. Rehab from around age fifteen. Roughly seventeen stays by twenty-two per his 2015 People interview, some eighteen per The Hollywood Reporter. He told the LA Times he'd refuse to go or would walk out and live on the street.Clancy's history is one of asking. A postpartum program in late December of 2022 that, according to her lawsuit, noted her symptoms might be medication-driven, told her to taper the antipsychotic, and sent her home after a single day. A psychiatric hospital on New Year's Eve. A last appointment with her psychiatrist that ran seventeen minutes.And there's a piece of the Reiner story almost nobody has picked up. Records reported by Fox affiliates show a yearlong conservatorship that expired in 2021. Nobody revoked it and nobody litigated it. When it lapsed, a man whose records reportedly include a schizophrenia diagnosis went back to two people in their seventies.Tony Brueski lays out why these are two entirely different failures, why fixing one does nothing for the other, and why the phrase everybody uses for both is the reason neither gets addressed. Four years after that order lapsed, Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner were dead in their Brentwood home and their son was in custody by nine fifteen that night. On the other coast, Lindsay Clancy's last appointment with her psychiatrist ran seventeen minutes, on January 23, 2023, according to her lawsuit. The following day is when her lawyers say she heard a voice. Two failures, no overlap, and no single reform that touches both.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #NickReiner #TrueCrimeToday #RobReiner #Conservatorship #PostpartumPsychosis #Addiction #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MentalHealthSystem

Das Kornwestheimer Museum im Kleihues-Bau zeigt Arbeiten von Reiner Michelfelder (1906 - 1985). Der Avantgardist hat abstrakte Werke geschaffen. Wie sie entstanden? Sohn und Enkel meinen die Antwort zu kennen.

The Strange Case of Rob, Michele and Nick Reiner Episode 393 – It came as a shock when Rob and Michele Reiner were murdered late last year. Now, their son Nick, accused of the murders, is trying to fund his defense using money in a trust fund provided by his parents. More SML Planning Minute Podcast Episodes Transcript of Podcast Episode 393 Hello, this is Bill Rainaldi, with another edition of Security Mutual's SML Planning Minute. In today's episode: the strange case of Rob, Michele & Nick Reiner. World-famous movie director Rob Reiner and his wife Michele were both stabbed to death in their home in the early hours of December 14, 2025. Their son, Nick, was arrested soon afterward and charged with first-degree murder. No conviction has occurred, and Nick Reiner is entitled to the presumption of innocence while proceedings occur. Nick had gotten into a heated argument with his parents the previous evening, during a party at the home of Conan O’Brien, a well-known television talk show host.[1] Upon his arrest, Nick hired a well-known defense attorney named Alan Jackson, who had previously represented Kevin Spacey and Harvey Weinstein, but Jackson eventually withdrew from the case. Jackson at first refused to specifically state why he withdrew, but it is believed that money was a main issue.[2] Reiner is currently represented by Los Angeles County Public Defender Kimberly Greene, but according to a petition filed on his behalf, Jackson is willing to come back to assist with the case. Reiner would like to rehire Jackson, but he needs to find a way to pay him.[3] Nick apparently has no current source of income, but he does have a trust fund, set up by his parents, which is estimated to be at least $1.5 million. Through his attorney, Nick is petitioning the court for access to the trust fund to help finance his defense.[4] In other words, he would like to use some of the money his parents gave him to help defend himself against the murder charges. The terms of the trust are specific: half of the funds were supposed to be distributed when he reached age 30 in 2023, with the other half to be distributed when he turns 35. The 2023 distribution apparently did not happen.[5] As for the second payment, due in 2028, the outcome is in doubt. If convicted, Nick would likely be prohibited from collecting it due to California's “slayer statute.”[6] Most U.S. states have a slayer statute. This type of law first gained attention in 1989 when the Menendez brothers were accused of killing their parents in Beverly Hills, CA. The brothers were convicted of murder and prohibited from collecting their inheritance from their parents' estate. In California, the statute states that someone who murders someone else cannot inherit assets or gain any financial profit as a result. The burden of proof varies, with some states requiring a criminal conviction to void a disposition, and other states requiring only civil liability.[7] In Nick's case, if the statute is ruled applicable, it would result in Nick being treated as if he had predeceased his parents.[8] A big part of the issue is the unmade trust distribution from 2023, which was scheduled before the crime was committed. The trustee apparently denied the payment due to Nick's history of substance abuse, and his alleged inability to manage the trust assets on his own.[9] [10] For his part, Nick's attorney classifies this as a subjective opinion, which, in his view, is not a valid reason to hold back the money.[11] But things get even more complicated from there. Nick's side has also argued that the assets in question are not assets of his deceased parents' estate, but assets of a trust that had already been funded before the crimes occurred. The argument is that once the assets went into the trust, they were no longer part of Rob and Michele Reiner's estates. [12] Then there's the issue of legal competence. The counterargument offered by Nick's lawyer is that the trustee has the authorization to make payments to a fiduciary, so competency shouldn't be relevant.[13] Reiner asserted in a court filing that his two siblings, Jake and Romy Reiner, had agreed at first to pay legal fees to retain Alan Jackson, but later changed their minds.[14] Their role in any future trial or litigation remains to be seen. Of course, Nick Reiner is presumed innocent until proven guilty. For now, his trust attorneys claim that by blocking access to what they characterize as his own funds, the trustee is effectively punishing him before he is convicted.[15] There’s still a lot to be determined here. Stay tuned. [1] Comiter, Jordana. “Rob Reiner’s Death: A Timeline of the Investigation and Nick Reiner’s Arrest.” People Magazine. https://people.com/rob-reiner-death-investigation-timeline-11870197 (published December 19, 2025; accessed June 24, 2026). [2] Bagchi, Aysha. “Nick Reiner’s star lawyer stepped down. This could be why.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/01/07/nick-reiner-murder-charges-rob-michele-reiner-lawyer-withdraws/88069146007/ (published January 8, 2026; accessed June 24, 2026). [3] Sulkin Stern, Anna. “Nick Reiner Seeks Access to Trust Fund to Finance His Defense.” Wealthmanagement.com. https://www.wealthmanagement.com/estate-planning/nick-reiner-seeks-access-to-trust-fund-to-finance-his-defense (published June 17, 2026; accessed June 26, 2026). [4] Id. [5] Esquibias, Liza. “Nick Reiner wants his trust fund for his defense. Can he get it?.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/06/12/rob-reiner-son-nick-reiner-family-trust-dispute-inheritance-analysis/90497780007/ (published June 12, 2025; accessed June 25, 2026). [6] Sulkin Stern, Anna. “Nick Reiner Seeks Access to Trust Fund to Finance His Defense.” Wealthmanagement.com. https://www.wealthmanagement.com/estate-planning/nick-reiner-seeks-access-to-trust-fund-to-finance-his-defense (published June 17, 2025; accessed June 24, 2026). [7] Pehush, Tara L. (2005) “Comments: Maryland Is Dying for a Slayer Statute: The Ineffectiveness of the Common Law Slayer Rule in Maryland,” University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 35: Iss. 2, Article 7. http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol35/iss2/7 (published 2005; accessed July 17, 2026). [8] Esquibias, Liza. “Nick Reiner wants his trust fund for his defense. Can he get it?.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/06/12/rob-reiner-son-nick-reiner-family-trust-dispute-inheritance-analysis/90497780007/ (published June 12, 2025; accessed June 25, 2026). [9] Sulkin Stern, Anna. “Nick Reiner Seeks Access to Trust Fund to Finance His Defense.” Wealthmanagement.com. https://www.wealthmanagement.com/estate-planning/nick-reiner-seeks-access-to-trust-fund-to-finance-his-defense (published June 17, 2025; accessed June 24, 2026). [10] Esquibias, Liza. “Nick Reiner wants his trust fund for his defense. Can he get it?.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/06/12/rob-reiner-son-nick-reiner-family-trust-dispute-inheritance-analysis/90497780007/ (published June 12, 2025; accessed June 25, 2026). [11] Id. [12] Esquibias, Liza. “Nick Reiner wants his trust fund for his defense. Can he get it?.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/06/12/rob-reiner-son-nick-reiner-family-trust-dispute-inheritance-analysis/90497780007/ (published June 12, 2025; accessed June 25, 2026). [13] Sulkin Stern, Anna. “Nick Reiner Seeks Access to Trust Fund to Finance His Defense.” Wealthmanagement.com. https://www.wealthmanagement.com/estate-planning/nick-reiner-seeks-access-to-trust-fund-to-finance-his-defense (published June 17, 2025; accessed June 24, 2026). [14] Mandell, Sean.. “Nick Reiner Claims His Siblings ‘Reversed' Their ‘Commitment’ to Fund His Legal Defense.” People Magazine https://people.com/nick-reiner-claims-his-siblings-reversed-their-commitment-to-fund-his-legal-defense-11995526 (published June 11, 2025; accessed June 25, 2026). [15] Sulkin Stern, Anna. “Nick Reiner Seeks Access to Trust Fund to Finance His Defense.” Wealthmanagement.com. https://www.wealthmanagement.com/estate-planning/nick-reiner-seeks-access-to-trust-fund-to-finance-his-defense (published June 17, 2025; accessed June 24, 2026). More SML Planning Minute Podcast Episodes This podcast is brought to you by Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, The Company That Cares®. The content provided is intended for educational and informational purposes only. Information is provided in good faith. However, the Company makes no representation or warranty of any kind regarding the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information. The information presented is designed to provide general information regarding the subject matter covered. It is not to serve as legal, tax or other financial advice related to individual situations, because each individual's legal, tax and financial situation is different. Specific advice needs to be tailored to your situation. Therefore, please consult with your own attorney, tax professional and/or other advisors regarding your specific situation. To help reach your goals, you need a skilled professional by your side. Contact your local Security Mutual life insurance advisor today. As part of the planning process, he or she will coordinate with your other advisors as needed to help you achieve your financial goals and objectives. For more information, visit us at SMLNY.com/SMLPodcast. If you've enjoyed this podcast, tell your friends about it. And be sure to give us a five-star review. And check us out on LinkedIn, YouTube and Twitter. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk to you next time. Tax laws are complex and subject to change. The information presented is based on current interpretation of the laws. Neither Security Mutual nor its agents are permitted to provide tax or legal advice. The applicability of any strategy discussed is dependent upon the particular facts and circumstances. Results may vary, and products and services discussed may not be appropriate for all situations. Each person's needs, objectives and financial circumstances are different, and must be reviewed and analyzed independently. We encourage individuals to seek personalized advice from a qualified Security Mutual life insurance advisor regarding their personal needs, objectives, and financial circumstances. Insurance products are issued by Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Binghamton, New York. Product availability and features may vary by state.​ SubscribeApple PodcastsSpotifyAndroidPandoraby EmailTuneInDeezerRSSMore Subscribe Options https://smlny.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/SMLPM393-the-strange-case-of-rob-and-nick-reiner-16178.mp3

In the wake of Director Rob Reiner's tragic death, Film Generations examines The Princess Bride, a 1987 favorite with a magical cast, that came amid an astonishing string of hits that transformed Reiner's public image from sitcom star “Meathead” to one of Hollywood's most esteemed and beloved directors. Our young panelists were introduced to this film on video at early ages, making it a childhood memory formed long before they became film buffs. How does that affect their opinions of this comedy/fantasy/satire, and is their lens hopelessly different from the hosts, who saw the film when initially released in theaters as adult aspiring filmmakers? Find out as our swashbuckling panel weighs in, only on Film Generations.   Hosts: Mark Netter & David Tausik  Panelists:  Guy Lewis, Kylee LaRue & Jake Flowers  An ElectraCast Production   Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Princess_Bride IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/ Rotten Tomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/princess_bride Roger Ebert: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-princess-bride-1987 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In our last episode we looked at Grace Kelly, whose career was cut short by her own choice. She was given the option to be treated like a princess, or to go out and actually be an honest-to-god Princess. She chose both love and duty, since you can't really Princess and be a movie star at the same time. Fair. In today's episode, we look at a career that was cut short because the actor, who was otherwise very bright and talented, couldn't reel in his demons. River Phoenix died at the age of 23, of an overdose on Halloween night in 1993, collapsing outside a club he'd just left. The first film we'll be reviewing is the second film in his filmography, Stand By Me, directed by Rob Reiner. (Please note that Sean and I recorded this episode before Reiner's untimely death, which is why it's not addressed here.) Stand By Me is an adaptation of a Stephen King novella called The Body, and manages to improve on the original, possibly because King wasn't obviously writing for an eventual movie audience (a reason I mostly quit reading his stuff). The story follows four boys over a couple of days during the summer before they got to high school, on a journey to recover the body of someone who'd gone missing. They find the body, but they also find a lot of insights in each other. In Part 4 we'll look at Running on Empty, a film Phoenix made two years later.

Patrick, Mike, and Hector return to discuss Rob Reiner's 2025 mockumentary Spinal Tap 2: The End Continues. We share on thoughts on the movie, and conclude by selecting our favorite film from Reiner's legendary career. Support the show

Hour 3 - They Said it hears from Caleb Durbin, Grant Hill and another Lebron James update. Scheim gives us The News for the morning and Curtis's arch nemesis joins the show. Wiggy shares his thoughts on Brady wanting to wrestle.

Seidel, Änne; Reiner, Svenja www.deutschlandfunk.de, Kultur heute

Wat als we de wereldhandel helemaal opnieuw zouden kunnen uittekenen. Van nul, met een wit blad, heruitvinden? Want protectionisme, geopolitieke onrust en handelstarieven lijken een einde te maken aan decennia van steeds meer en vrij internationaal economisch verkeer. Het is het opzet van deze zomerreeks ‘Carte Blanche' van Trends Talk: we leggen experten de vraag voor hoe zij hun domein zouden heruitvinden. En als iets of iemand de goederenstromen sneller ziet veranderen dan officiële statistieken, dan is het wel de wereldwijde logistieke reus DHL. Reiner Wolfs is onze studiogast: hij heeft bijna 30 jaar internationale ervaring bij DHL, waarvan lang in de VS. Sinds begin dit jaar is hij weer in het thuisland, als managing directer van DHL Express België en Luxemburg. Hij geeft deze Trends Talk de primeur van het allereerste interview sinds zijn terugkeer. Trends is een podcastkanaal van de redactie van Trends. --- --- Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

True crime fans love spotting patterns, and this episode hands them three cases to compare at once: Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Rex Heuermann. Nancy Guthrie has been missing for six months, and the note her family received remains the detail investigators can't fully explain. Nick Reiner is accused of murdering his parents, Rob and Michele, hours after a fight at a holiday party that other guests noticed and walked away from. Rex Heuermann, already serving three life sentences plus a hundred years, is generating new headlines because of an unlicensed therapist who worked closely with his family without disclosing who she really was. Tony Brueski and the Hidden Killers team use these three very different cases to explore a single idea: how warning signs get missed, normalized, or actively hidden, no matter how different the circumstances look on the surface. The show compares how each case has been handled by law enforcement, families, and the people closest to the situation, and asks what it would actually take to catch a warning sign before it becomes a headline. There's also an honest conversation about why true crime audiences are drawn to cases like these in the first place, and what it means to sit with three unresolved, ongoing investigations at once instead of the neat, closed-case stories true crime often gets criticized for favoring. Three cases. Zero clean endings. One pattern that connects all three, whether anyone wants to admit it or not. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NancyGuthrie #NickReiner #RexHeuermann #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrimePodcast #GilgoBeach #Brentwood #MissingPersons #SerialKiller #ColdCase 

This episode moves through three cases in one sitting: Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Rex Heuermann, and by the end, a single pattern connects them all. Nancy Guthrie remains missing six months after vanishing from her Arizona home, and the note her family received continues to be the piece investigators can't fully explain away. Nick Reiner is accused of murdering his parents, Rob and Michele, hours after a fight at a holiday party that other guests noticed and walked away from anyway. Rex Heuermann, already serving three life sentences plus a hundred years, is back in the conversation because of an unlicensed therapist who worked closely with his family and wasn't who she claimed to be. Tony Brueski and the Hidden Killers team break down each case individually before drawing the thread between them: a warning that got missed, a behavior that got normalized, a professional who slipped through without anyone checking. The show also gives listeners an update on where each investigation stands, from the search for Nancy Guthrie, to Nick Reiner's not guilty plea and looming preliminary hearing, to the families still waiting on Rex Heuermann for answers about victims he hasn't been charged with. There's also a conversation about the concept of the "loving critic," someone close enough to say something before a situation goes too far, and why that person is so often missing at the exact moment they're needed most, whether it's a family, a friend group, or a professional relationship built on trust that wasn't earned. Three cases, three very different circumstances, and one uncomfortable question that ties them together. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NancyGuthrie #NickReiner #RexHeuermann #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #GilgoBeach #Brentwood #MissingPersons #ColdCase #TrueCrimeCommunity 

This episode of Hidden Killers Live does something a little different: instead of one deep dive, the team moves through three cases back to back, Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Rex Heuermann, and takes listener questions on all three. Robin Drake, Todd Michaels, and Lisa Hale start with Nancy Guthrie, six months missing from her Arizona home, and answer listener questions about the note her family received and what it might mean. From there, the conversation moves to Nick Reiner, accused of murdering his parents hours after a fight at a party that other guests noticed and did nothing about, including a personal story from Lisa about watching her own son go through a mental health crisis. The episode closes on Rex Heuermann, already sentenced to three life sentences plus a hundred years, and the unlicensed therapist who worked closely with his family while hiding who she really was. Across all three cases, the hosts keep landing on the same theme: someone had a piece of information, a gut feeling, or a front-row seat to a warning sign, and it didn't reach the people who needed it in time. The team also fields tough listener questions about law enforcement's role in cases like these, the real barriers to getting people help before a crisis, and what "closure" actually looks like for families years into an unresolved case. Three cases, one live conversation, and a lot of questions the team doesn't pretend to have easy answers for. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NancyGuthrie #NickReiner #RexHeuermann #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrimePodcast #ListenerQA #GilgoBeach #Brentwood #MissingPersons #ColdCase 

The surviving Reiner family occupies a legal and emotional position that few ever face simultaneously: primary mourners, next of kin with formal standing under victims'-rights statutes, and relatives of the accused. This look back examines that position and the difficult reality that awaits them regardless of how the case resolves.Jake, Romy, and Tracy Reiner lost both parents in a single day. Reporting indicates the siblings have severed contact with their brother and have expressed opposition to capital punishment — a preference that, as legal experts observe, carries weight but does not bind prosecutorial discretion. The proceedings ahead are likely to extend over a substantial period, with hearings, evidentiary disputes, and testimony concerning the defendant's mental state. We revisit where the matter stood at the time of our reporting.The segment then addresses a well-documented phenomenon among families of homicide victims: the expectation that a verdict will deliver emotional resolution, followed by the recognition that it does not. A conviction would not reverse the loss; a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity would not either. The analysis distinguishes between legal outcome and personal recovery, examines why comprehension of a defendant's clinical history does not compel forgiveness, and considers the established view among grief professionals that closure is constructed rather than conferred. It is a measured look at the gap between what the justice system can resolve and what it cannot.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#ReinerSiblings #JakeReiner #RomyReiner #TracyReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrime #VictimsRights #FamilyTragedy #JusticeVsPeace #HiddenKillers

The Reiner siblings are bracing for years of courtrooms — hearings, testimony, their brother's face across the room while lawyers argue over his mental state. This look back examines the position they've been forced into and the harder truth waiting at the end of it.Jake, Romy, and Tracy occupy three roles at the same time: primary mourners with no parents left above them, next of kin with legal standing under victims'-rights law, and family of the accused. All three, permanently. Sources say they've severed contact with Nick. Sources say they oppose the harshest penalty — but as experts note, a family's wishes are meaningful without being controlling, so they may state their position and still watch prosecutors choose otherwise. We revisit where things stood at the time of our reporting.Then the segment turns to the part almost no one prepares you for. So many families of victims spend years waiting for a guilty verdict, certain it will shift something inside them — and when it finally comes, they feel nothing, because the verdict only addresses what was done, not what it cost. If Nick is convicted, the Reiners' parents are still gone. If he's found not responsible by reason of mental illness, they're still gone. This is an unflinching look at the difference between justice and peace, why understanding someone's pathology doesn't obligate you to forgive it, and why closure, in the end, is something you build rather than something you're handed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#ReinerSiblings #JakeReiner #RomyReiner #TracyReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrime #JusticeVsPeace #FamilyTragedy #SiblingGrief #HiddenKillers

There's a trap waiting for the Reiner siblings, and it's the same one that catches almost every family of a victim: the belief that healing can't begin until the case is over. This look back examines why that belief is so powerful — and why, for Jake, Romy, and Tracy, it may be the very thing keeping their lives on pause.First, where things stood at the time of our reporting. The three siblings carry a role almost no family ever holds together: primary mourners, next of kin with legal standing, and family of the accused, all at once. Sources say they've cut their brother off entirely. Sources say they oppose the harshest penalty, though experts note a family's input is meaningful without being controlling. Years of hearings and testimony stretch ahead of them.Then the harder question. We walk through what the research and lived experience of victims' families actually show: that the verdict, when it finally lands, often changes far less than people expect. A conviction wouldn't bring their parents back. A finding of not responsible by reason of mental illness wouldn't either. Understanding the full clinical picture — the illness, the history, the pathology — doesn't obligate anyone to be okay with what was done. This segment makes a careful, compassionate case that peace isn't something the court hands down. It's something the people left behind have to build for themselves, with or without resolution.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#ReinerSiblings #JakeReiner #RomyReiner #TracyReiner #NickReiner #TrueCrime #HealingWithoutClosure #SurvivorRecovery #FamilyTragedy #HiddenKillers

Watch every episode ad-free & uncensored on Patreon: https://patreon.com/dannyjones Greg Carlwood is the creator and host of  @TheHighersideChats podcast where he interviews researchers, authors, and experts on a whole host of unusual, suppressed, alternative, paranormal, occult, and fringe subjects. https://www.thehighersidechats.com SPONSORS https://whiterabbitenergy.com/?ref=DJP - Use code DJP for 20% off. FOLLOW DANNY JONES https://www.instagram.com/dannyjones https://twitter.com/jonesdanny OUTLINE 00:00 - Why Greg is deaf in one ear 02:04 - Tracy Twyman 07:50 - The Brotherhoods of Secret Math 12:11 - Tracy Twyman was summoning Cain 16:45 - Masonic tracing boards 21:41 - Evidence magic is real 25:18 - Defining "magic" 26:22 - GATE Program & kids with psychic abilities 30:59 - The fruit conspiracy 36:45 - The Bilbo Baggins philosophy 41:35 - How to extract yourself out of the system 49:26 - Humans have been domesticated 56:33 - Florida's land & wildlife crisis 59:22 - CIA weather weapons active on 9/11 01:05:16 - Alcohol Prohibition conspiracy 01:13:22 - Henry Ford's book about the Jews 01:16:42 - "Free energy" inventors who died suspiciously 01:21:11 - Grass-fed beef & raw milk 01:28:29 - 6G & the next pandemic 01:29:20 - UFO disclosure isn't adding up 01:32:23 - The hypnagogic state 01:34:58 - Precognition & advanced sigil magic 01:42:43 - The pediatrician scam 01:49:46 - The Mountain Dew conspiracy 01:55:51 - Planned obsolescence & the light bulb conspiracy 02:01:44 - Presidents who tried to disclose aliens 02:05:21 - How to perform sigil magic 02:10:50 - "Astrology is real" 02:19:05 - The era of air control 02:22:56 - How the Elites are using magic 02:28:30 - Human cloning 02:35:16 - The Reiner family trauma 02:48:24 - Jean Michel Basquiat 02:57:28 - Tate murders 03:00:19 - Suspicious details about Oliver Tree's death 03:03:03 - Greg's interview method Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Reiner case reached a procedural standstill that surprised even seasoned observers: months after Rob and Michele Reiner died, the autopsy reports remained incomplete and under a law-enforcement security hold, and the preliminary hearing was continued to the fall. This look back examines the mechanics of that delay and what it indicates about the road to trial.Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins to assess the procedural posture. Prosecutors identified the pending autopsies as a final piece of discovery the defense required, with a substantial volume of additional material still being produced. Faddis addresses what such delays typically signal, how the defense may be positioning itself during the interval, and whether the defendant's documented schizoaffective diagnosis and prior conservatorship make a mental health defense effectively unavoidable. The segment also considers the toll on surviving family members who hold legal standing as next of kin while the determination of how their parents died remains formally unresolved.The episode then turns to widely circulated but unverified reporting that the defendant intends to publish an account from custody directed at his estranged siblings. Retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke analyzes the apparent inconsistency between accounts describing the defendant as cognitively diminished and those alleging a deliberate, retaliatory motive. Throughout, the analysis distinguishes court-confirmed facts from tabloid-sourced claims and treats the latter as unproven. We revisit where the matter stood at the time of our reporting.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #ReinerCase #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #CriminalProcedure #MentalHealth #HiddenKillers

— We live in a time of tremendous change, uncertainty, and division. Yet despite our differences, most of us share a common desire: to create a better future for ourselves, our communities, and the world around us. What if the greatest obstacles to positive change are not external circumstances, but the emotions that shape how we think, relate, communicate, and lead? What if understanding and working with these emotions could help us build trust, foster collaboration, navigate conflict, and inspire meaningful action? Today, we'll explore the powerful role emotions play in shaping our lives and our ability to influence positive change. We'll discuss how qualities such as optimism, trust, resilience, courage, and compassion can help us move beyond division, strengthen our leadership, relationships, and create lasting impact—whether in our families, workplaces, communities, or within ourselves. At its heart, this conversation is about discovering how each of us can become a more conscious, effective, and inspiring force for positive change, no matter where we are or what role we play. Valeria interviews Reiner Lomb — He is the author of  "ASPIRE: Seven Essential Emotions for Leading Positive Change, No Matter Where You Are" AND "The Boomerang Approach." Reiner Lomb is the founder of BoomerangCoach, an executive coaching firm specializing in leadership and career development, innovation, and transformational change. Reiner's mission is to mobilize and develop leaders to create a more sustainable and positive future for all. As an executive coach, he works with leaders and changemakers in a wide range of organizations, from start-ups and multinational companies to non-profits and local communities - all who aspire to create transformational change. Whether he's working with corporate executives, entrepreneurs, intrapreneurs, or indigenous tribal leaders, Reiner's clients appreciate his international business and cross-cultural leadership experience. Before becoming an executive coach, Reiner had a 30-plus year career in technology, started and developed software businesses, and led leadership development.  To learn more about Reiner Lomb and his work, please visit: https://reinerlomb.com/books/

Months after Rob and Michele Reiner were found stabbed in their own home, their son Nick's case still hadn't reached a preliminary hearing — and the reason is striking. The autopsy reports weren't finished, terabytes of discovery were still changing hands, and the whole proceeding got pushed to the fall. This look back unpacks what a delay like that actually tells you.Eric Faddis — criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor — joins to read the tea leaves. Is the holdup routine, or is the defense using the time to build something? Given Nick's documented history of schizoaffective disorder and a prior conservatorship, is a mental health defense effectively inevitable? And what does it do to a victim's family when the system can't even finish the paperwork on how their loved ones died? Jake, Romy, and Tracy have been watching this crawl forward one postponed date at a time.We revisit where things stood at the time of our reporting, then turn to the more disturbing thread running alongside it. According to tabloid reports carried across several outlets, Nick is allegedly planning a tell-all from his cell aimed at the siblings who cut him off. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke breaks down the contradiction: someone reportedly described as almost childlike behind bars, allegedly driven at the same time by something that looks a lot like a vendetta. We treat that reporting as the unverified tabloid sourcing it is — and ask what it would reveal if it's true.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #ReinerCase #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #MentalHealth #CriminalDefense #HiddenKillers

There's a contradiction sitting at the center of the Reiner case, and it's the kind retired FBI behavioral chief Robin Dreeke was built to take apart. Reports describe Nick Reiner as almost childlike in custody — unable to fully grasp where he is or why. Yet other reports claim he's simultaneously plotting a revenge tell-all aimed at the family who tried for years to save him. Both can't be the whole truth. So which is it?This look back brings two expert lenses to a case stalled in limbo. First, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis on the delay itself: a preliminary hearing pushed to the fall, autopsy reports still unfinished months after the deaths, terabytes of discovery in motion, and what all of it signals about the defense's strategy and the near-certainty of a mental health argument given Nick's documented diagnosis and prior conservatorship.Then Robin Dreeke walks through the behavioral profile. We treat the tell-all reporting carefully — it traces to tabloid sources, not the court record — but the contradiction it describes is worth examining: how someone can present as diminished and disconnected while reportedly nursing a calculated grievance. We go through the listener questions you've been sending: about the medication changes before that night, about whether an insanity defense can actually hold here, and about what it means when a family does everything right and still loses everything. We revisit where things stood at the time of our reporting.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #RobinDreeke #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #MentalHealth #InsanityDefense #ReinerCase #HiddenKillers

Nick Reiner pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder with special circumstances in the stabbing deaths of his parents. He's held without bail, the harshest penalty remains on the table — and his siblings, Jake and Romy, are done. Sources close to the family put it bluntly: Nick's defense is Nick's defense, and they're not part of it.This look back examines where the case stood at the time of our reporting, then turns to the harder human question underneath it. The high-profile attorney the family initially funded withdrew early on, leaving Nick with a public defender. Reports indicate his siblings won't attend the trial, and that in months of incarceration his only visitor has been his lawyer. After years of treatment programs, a conservatorship, repeated crises, and a lifetime of absorbing the fallout, two siblings reached the point where holding on was no longer possible.To understand that moment, this segment looks at three other families who arrived there before them: Peter Lanza, who stepped away from his son and later said he wished he'd never been born; the family who largely withdrew from public view after the Charleston church murders; and Kerri Rawson, who had to grieve her father, the man known as BTK, as two separate people — the dad she loved and the killer he hid.The question this segment asks isn't whether the Reiner siblings made the right call. It's what it cost them to stay as long as they did — and what the families who finally let go can teach the rest of us.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #JakeRomyReiner #TrueCrime #FamilyTragedy #Boundaries #PeterLanza #KerriRawson #HiddenKillers

 "If you really loved me, you wouldn't give up on me." It's the sentence that keeps people in burning buildings — the thing said right before one more chance is requested. This segment uses the Reiner tragedy to examine why love, presence, and devotion sometimes don't change a trajectory at all. They just keep you standing in its path.Rob and Michele Reiner never walked away from their son. Repeated treatment programs. Facilities reportedly costing tens of thousands a month. A guesthouse on their property. A film they made together about recovery. Seventeen years of trying, funding, and hoping. They never stopped — and they died anyway. Their love didn't fix him. Their proximity didn't protect them.This look back goes deep on the behavioral machinery underneath that outcome. We're taught that love means staying and that walking away is abandonment — but unconditional love isn't the same as unconditional proximity. Nick was reportedly told that refusing treatment meant losing the safety net. The boundary never held. Every line got redrawn.We break down the three traps that keep people in place: guilt weaponization, sunk cost, and the fantasy of the final save — the fear that you'll leave right before they were about to change. Rob reportedly brought his adult son to a party because he was afraid to leave him alone. This segment makes a hard, compassionate argument: you're allowed to step back, not because you don't love someone, but because you were never the thing that could save them.#RobReiner #NickReiner #MicheleSingerReiner #ReinerCase #TrueCrime #Boundaries #Enabling #AddictionFamily #LovingSomeoneDangerous #HiddenKillers

For years, the Reiner family publicly pushed back on the professionals treating their son — at one point even siding with Nick over the counselors who warned that he was lying and manipulating them. This segment makes the case that the experts may have been right, and that the tragedy wasn't a system that failed so much as a patient who allegedly wouldn't let it work.Nick Reiner had elite care: a facility reportedly costing tens of thousands a month, doctors managing his schizophrenia, and a family that never stopped trying. Sources say his medication was changed in the weeks before the killings — but medication only helps if it's taken, and sobriety only holds if it's maintained. Sources also describe his drug use worsening his condition to the point he was, in their words, not in his right mind.This look back examines where the case stood at the time of our reporting and weighs a difficult argument: that an insanity defense, which sources expect, doesn't erase the long chain of choices that came before. It's an opinion-driven segment about accountability and the limits of what love and money can buy. The Reiners gave their son everything the system had to offer. The question this segment puts on the table is whether the failure was the system's — or his.#RobReiner #NickReiner #MicheleReiner #TrueCrime #Accountability #MentalHealth #Addiction #InsanityDefense #ReinerCase #HiddenKillers

Multi-hyphenate Hollywood legend Rob Reiner had a run of films from 1984 to 1995 that are amongst the best that America has ever produced. Many are defining examples of their genre. All are imbued with the wit and heart of their director. Ranking these 9 movies could very well be a fool's errand, but if so, we have just the fools for the job: The Screen Drafts Legends! Join Clay Keller, Ryan Marker, Billy Ray Brewton, Bryan Cogman, Darren Franich, Graham Skipper, Drea Clark, and Oriana Nudo as they attempt to rank, via competitive collaboration, THE REINER RUN. The Legends will return in... MOVIES III: THE ROTTEN, only in the Screen Drafts Booster Club! Visit www.patreon.com/screendrafts to join The Booster Club

Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke take on listener questions across three of the biggest cases in true crime right now: the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping, the Nick Reiner murder charges, and the Alex Murdaugh retrial. One full-length panel discussion covering the details nobody's giving a straight answer on.The Guthrie sheriff told local radio he thinks the FBI arrested people for fake ransom notes — he's not sure. The Reiner case has two popular theories and both have fatal holes. The Murdaugh defense is betting on DNA evidence the state collected and never fully analyzed. In each case, the audience has already decided. In each case, they may have decided too fast.Robin brings decades of FBI behavioral analysis to the discussion. Tony brings the listener questions that cut to the bone. Together they challenge the lazy reads and push into the territory the comments are avoiding. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #NickReiner #NancyGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #MurdaughRetrial #HarveyLevin #TrustFund #TrueCrimePanel

Three cases the audience has been fighting about. Three details nobody's giving a straight answer on. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke cover them all in one full-length discussion — Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Alex Murdaugh — and challenge the conclusions the comments have already reached.The Guthrie sheriff only “thinks” the FBI arrested people for fake notes — he doesn't know. The Reiner case has split listeners between mental illness and money, and both explanations have holes. The Murdaugh defense is staking the retrial on unknown male DNA under Maggie's fingernails that SLED collected and shelved. Robin brings decades of behavioral analysis to each one.This is the full, uncut panel. Every listener question. Every competing theory. And the reason the easy answers aren't answers at all. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #NickReiner #NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #MurdaughRetrial #HarveyLevin #TrustFund #TrueCrimePanel

Techno fans, this one's for you. Reinier Zonneveld steps up for the latest GHR Exclusive Podcast Mix Series with a mix that keeps the energy moving. IG: @ghettohouseradio X: @ghettohouse

Episode Summary Business changes fast and people change slow. That gap, Steve Reiner argues, is where most change efforts quietly fail, and closing it is one of the few real competitive advantages a company has left. In this episode, host Justin Lake sits down with Steve, VP of Sales at Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits and author of Leaders Created and Business Changes Fast, People Change Slow, to unpack why adoption stalls on the frontline and what leaders can actually do about it. Steve walks through his Change Stamina Framework, a four-step approach that puts the work back on leaders rather than the frontline. Leaders learn the change first, well before launch. They bring in managers, then frontline champions, staying in the room the entire time. They host the training themselves instead of kicking off a meeting and slipping out the back. And they reinforce the change for far longer than anyone expects, because sustainment, not go-live, is where adoption is won or lost. Along the way, Steve explains why the small daily changes sting frontline teams more than the big platform launches, why people resist change for reasons rooted in how our brains conserve energy, and why nine and a half times out of ten people do not need pressure, they need more time and attention. He also ties it all back to the P&L: if a change is worth making, it is worth supporting all the way through, because every day a team spends stuck in the change curve is a day the business pays for it. Key Topics Shrinking the gap between business speed and people speed The Change Stamina Framework Leaders as participants, not just deciders Why people resist change Sustainment is longer than you think Connecting change to the P&L Episode Chapters 00:00  Introduction to leadership and change management 02:56  Connecting change to performance and profit 06:01  The role of leaders in change execution 09:14  The Change Stamina Framework 11:59  Building confidence in leaders 14:58  The importance of field engagement 18:11  Understanding resistance to change 21:00  The leader's responsibility in change 23:53  The impact of communication on change 27:02  The need for continuous engagement 30:01  Conclusion and call to action 32:04  Challenging routines and embracing change 34:44  Understanding the adoption curve 36:00  The importance of time and attention in leadership 39:46  Winning the game of chicken with resistors 43:45  The long road of change sustainment 49:12  Change as a continuous process 57:08  Engaging with leadership and resources   About Steve Reiner Steve Reiner is VP of Sales at Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, with more than two decades of experience rising from consultant to senior leadership across multiple markets. He focuses on building leaders who build engaged, high-performing frontline teams. Steve is the author of two books, Leaders Created and, most recently, Business Changes Fast, People Change Slow, which lays out his Change Stamina Framework for leading change faster than the competition. Resources Steve's website: Leaders Created "Business Changes Fast, People Change Slow" by Steve Reiner, available on Amazon "Leaders Created" by Steve Reiner, available on Amazon Steve Reiner on LinkedIn Skyllful

Join us for a new perspective on the art of dining out with Adam Reiner, a James Beard Award-winning journalist who spent over two decades working in some of New York City's most celebrated restaurants, including Babbo, Carbone, and The Grill. Adam joins the show to discuss his new book, The New Rules of Dining Out, a book that offers practical, step-by-step advice on everything from soliciting recommendations from your server and tactfully sending food back to navigating wine lists and tipping like a pro . Adam also makes a compelling case for why hospitality is a two-way street, encouraging diners to "lean forward" and become more active participants in their own dining experiences . The conversation explores the cultural significance of dining out in America and how better communication builds trust between guests and staff, leading to more joyful meals for everyone involved. Get Adam's Book: https://www.amazon.com/New-Rules-Dining-Out-Restaurants/dp/0807185043 ____________________________________ Join us every Monday as acclaimed bartender, Erick Castro, interviews some of the bar industry's top talents from around the world, including bartenders, distillers & authors. If you love cocktails & spirits then this award-winning podcast is just for you. SUPPORT US ON PATREON: Get early access to episodes, exclusive bonus episodes, special content and more: https://www.patreon.com/BartenderAtLarge WATCH OUR VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/bartenderatlarge FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM: Erick Castro: www.instagram.com/HungryBartender Bartender at Large: www.instagram.com/BartenderAtLarge FOLLOW US ON TIKTOK: Erick Castro: https://www.tiktok.com/@hungrybartender?_t=ZT-8uBekAKOGwU&_r=1 Bartender at Large: www.tiktok.com/BartenderAtLarge

The question at the center of the Reiner trust litigation is not whether Nick Reiner should receive his parents' money. It is whether the legal mechanism designed to prevent exactly that — California's slayer statute — can reach money the trust itself reportedly classified as due before anyone was killed. The 136-page probate petition filed on Nick Reiner's behalf argues that half of his trust distribution came due on September 14th, 2023, his thirtieth birthday, in a payout the trust describes as “mandatory and unconditional.” Rob and Michele Reiner were found dead in their Brentwood home twenty-seven months later. Nick has pleaded not guilty to both murder counts.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the slayer statute's actual mechanics against this timeline. Under California's probate code, a court can apply the statute on a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard — a civil threshold that does not require a criminal conviction. That standard stripped Scott Peterson of his claim to Laci's life insurance before his murder trial concluded. But the statute is built to prevent a killer from gaining through the killing. If the age-thirty distribution was already owed before the deaths, the legal question shifts: can a statute designed to block profit from a crime reach an obligation that predated the crime?Faddis addresses the procedural posture — an unopposed petition reportedly eligible for approval without a hearing — the trustee transition from Paul Kanin to Jodi Montgomery, the frozen family trusts, and whether Jake and Romy Reiner have standing to intervene. He also covers the Murdaugh retrial's newly appointed judge and the significance of her reported professional history with defense counsel.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #ReinerCase #SlayerStatute #TrustFund #EricFaddis #MicheleReiner #ScottPeterson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

The language in Nick Reiner's trust reportedly leaves no room for interpretation. Half of the fund was due on his thirtieth birthday. The trust itself calls it “mandatory and unconditional.” That birthday was September 14th, 2023 — more than two years before Rob and Michele Reiner were killed. Nick has pleaded not guilty to both counts of murder. And the money his parents' own trust document said he was owed has never been paid.Everyone citing California's slayer statute assumes it settles this. It doesn't — not the way most people think. Eric Faddis explains the two critical distinctions: a probate judge can strip a beneficiary on a “more likely than not” finding without waiting for a criminal conviction — the same mechanism that took Scott Peterson's claim to Laci's life insurance. But a rule designed to prevent someone from profiting through a killing may never reach money that allegedly belonged to Nick before anyone died. The age-thirty distribution is not an inheritance. It's an overdue obligation.Faddis maps every pot of money in play: the overdue age-thirty payout where the law reportedly leans somewhere most people won't like, the age-thirty-five money Nick wants released early, and the larger Reiner family trusts reportedly frozen until a verdict. He explains what the incoming trustee Jodi Montgomery — known for managing Britney Spears' conservatorship — can and cannot do, and gives his six-month prediction on where each dollar lands. The episode also covers Alex Murdaugh's retrial and the reported history between the newly assigned judge and the defense attorney.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #ReinerCase #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #EricFaddis #SlayerStatute #ScottPeterson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

A probate petition filed in Los Angeles County has brought the Nick Reiner murder case into a second courtroom — one where the rules are different and the stakes may be just as high. Nick Reiner, who has pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Rob and Michele Reiner, is petitioning for the release of more than $1.5 million held in an individual trust his parents established at his birth in 1993.The filing rests on the trust's own distribution terms, which the petition characterizes as “mandatory and unconditional”: half payable when the beneficiary turned thirty, the balance at thirty-five. Reiner reached the first distribution threshold more than two years prior to his parents' deaths. According to the petition, no funds were distributed. His legal team argues that the money has been owed since that birthday and that withholding it from someone who has not been convicted of any crime constitutes a violation of both the trust's terms and the presumption of innocence.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis conducts a full examination of both the petition's merits and the opposition's tools. On the merits: the enforceability of mandatory distribution language, the relevance of the two-year pre-existing withholding, and the reported procedural pathway in which an unopposed petition may be granted without hearing. On the opposition: the resignation of prior trustee Paul Kanin and his stated concerns about Reiner's capacity, the succession of Jodi Montgomery as fiduciary, the operation of California's slayer statute prior to conviction, the freeze reportedly applied to the larger Reiner family trusts, and the recoverability question that underpins the entire dispute — what happens to funds spent on a defense that ends in a guilty verdict.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #EricFaddis #SlayerStatute #TrueCrime #ProbateCourt #JakeReiner #ReinerCase

A 136-page petition now sitting in a Los Angeles probate court makes one of the most uncomfortable legal arguments in recent memory: Nick Reiner, charged with killing both his parents, says the trust they created for him when he was born owes him more than $1.5 million — and he wants it to mount his defense against their murders.The case turns on four words inside the trust itself: “mandatory and unconditional.” According to the filing, Rob and Michele Reiner locked in the distribution schedule with language that left no room for a trustee's discretion. Half at thirty. The rest at thirty-five. Nick turned thirty more than two years before the killings, and the petition says the money was never distributed. His lawyers argue it was owed regardless of what happened after — and that withholding it from a man who has pleaded not guilty amounts to punishment before a verdict.Eric Faddis has prosecuted and defended cases built on exactly this kind of intersection between trust law and criminal exposure. He traces the fight from the trust language through every available countermove: the departing trustee who cited doubts about Nick's “capacity to make sound decisions” before walking away, the role of California's slayer statute before any conviction is on the table, the freeze reportedly already imposed on the larger Reiner family trusts, and the formal opposition that Jake and Romy Reiner can file to block their brother's petition.Faddis also examines the new trustee stepping in: Jodi Montgomery, formerly Britney Spears' court-appointed conservator, whose team has reportedly requested a meeting with Nick in custody. And he closes on the question framing everything: if the money is released, spent on attorney Alan Jackson's defense, and a conviction follows — can the family recover a single dollar?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #MicheleReiner #ReinerTrust #TrueCrime #SlayerStatute #JodiMontgomery #ReinerCase

Nick Reiner trust payout — his trust reportedly had no clause to stop a distribution after a murder charge. Does your family's trust have one? Most don't.The probate petition filed in the Nick Reiner case exposes something that goes well beyond one family. The trust Rob and Michele Reiner established for their son in 1993 allegedly used the most common settings in estate planning — mandatory distributions at fixed ages, no behavioral conditions, no trustee discretion to withhold. Those default settings are the reason Nick Reiner's legal team can now argue that more than $1.5 million was his before anyone died, and that neither the trustee nor the slayer statute can take it back.According to reporting, the trustee is now preparing to ask a judge to release the funds. A hearing is reportedly on the calendar for August. High-profile defense attorney Alan Jackson has filed a declaration saying he stands ready to return to the case if the money comes through.This is not an episode about the Reiner case alone. It's about the document sitting in your filing cabinet right now. The trust your attorney drafted when your kids were small. The one you haven't opened since you signed it.Three provisions — an indictment freeze, a discretionary trust structure, and a behavioral trigger — are available to any family working with an estate attorney. They don't require predicting violence. They exist for the situations families actually deal with: addiction, instability, irresponsibility. The fact that they also protect against the unimaginable is the entire point.The Reiners reportedly had none of them. Most families don't. This episode walks through all three and explains exactly how each one would have changed the outcome in the Reiner case. Nick Reiner is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #EstatePlanning #SlayerStatute #FamilyTrust #NickReinerUpdate #TrueCrime

Everybody knows the slayer statute, even if they don't know the name — it's the law that kept the Menendez brothers from ever touching their parents' fortune. So when word broke about what happened to Nick Reiner's trust fund — a petition demanding more than a million and a half dollars from a trust his parents built — the internet ruled in one sentence: case closed, he gets nothing. This episode is about why California Probate Code 250 does not work the way most people think it does.Two surprises, and they cut in opposite directions. First, the statute can hit faster than you'd expect: a probate judge doesn't have to wait for a murder conviction. A civil court can strip a beneficiary on a preponderance of the evidence — more likely than not — the same machinery that took Scott Peterson's claim to Laci's life insurance while his criminal appeal was still alive. “Presumed innocent” doesn't bind a probate courtroom. Second, the statute may never reach the heart of this money at all. The slayer rule takes what you'd gain from a death — and according to the petition, half this trust came due on Nick's thirtieth birthday, twenty-seven months before his parents died. You can't lose to that rule what was already yours before anyone was killed.We map all three pots of Reiner money — the frozen family fortune, the age-35 half, the overdue age-30 distribution — and put a verdict on each. Then we sit with the question no statute will ever answer: Rob and Michele were alive for more than two years after that payout came due. Why didn't they make it? Hidden Killers follows the file wherever it leads — and this time, it leads somewhere uncomfortable.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillers #MenendezBrothers #SlayerStatute #MicheleReiner #ProbateCourt #TrueCrimeCommunity #CaliforniaLaw #TrustFund

Handel on the Law. Marginal Legal Advice.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this Nick Reiner case update, we follow the strangest thread in the entire trust fight: the man who was handed control of the money — and walked away months later.Paul Kanin took over Nick Reiner's trust after Rob and Michele Reiner were killed. According to the petition, his tenure was a wall of refusals, what Nick's lawyers call "a shifting series of excuses and justifications" — concerns about Nick's competence, questions about how the money would be used, and the looming possibility that California's slayer statute could bar the payout entirely if Nick is convicted of his parents' killings, charges he denies. Then Kanin reportedly told Nick's representatives something remarkable: he was resigning. A fiduciary named Jodi Montgomery — best known as Britney Spears' former conservator — is taking over.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis reads the resignation the way an investigator reads a crime scene: what does it tell you when the person holding the purse strings would rather hand off the fight than finish it? Faddis weighs Kanin's stated concern — Nick's "capacity to make sound decisions and adequately protect his own interests" — against the defense's counterpunch that no court has ever found Nick incompetent, and explains how much a trustee's personal judgment actually counts for in probate court.He also unpacks the apparent contradiction at the center of the episode: the much larger Reiner family trusts, where Nick is reportedly a full and equal beneficiary, were frozen until the criminal case ends. So why is this smaller trust even contestable? And if Jake and Romy Reiner formally oppose their brother, how ugly does the fight get — and who does ugly favor?The answer to that last one may surprise you.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillers #PaulKanin #JodiMontgomery #SlayerStatute #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #ReinerCase #ProbateFight

The newest Nick Reiner trial development is a 136-page probate petition filed from custody — naming both his outgoing and incoming trustees and demanding the release of more than $1.5 million held in the trust his parents established at his birth. In this extended episode, defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis conducts a complete legal examination of the dispute, from the filing's strongest claims to the family's most viable countermeasures.On the merits: the petition characterizes the trust's distributions as "mandatory and unconditional" — half payable at age thirty, a threshold Nick Reiner crossed more than two years before Rob and Michele Reiner were killed, with no payment made per the filing. Faddis evaluates that language under California trust law, the petition's invocation of the presumption of innocence — Nick has pleaded not guilty to both first-degree murder counts — the counsel-of-choice argument anchored to attorney Alan Jackson's declared readiness to resume the defense, and the reported procedural pathway by which an unopposed petition could be granted without hearing.On the opposition: trustee Paul Kanin's resignation following stated concerns about Nick's decision-making capacity, the appointment of successor Jodi Montgomery — formerly Britney Spears' conservator — and her requested custodial meeting, the operation of the slayer statute prior to any verdict, the reported freeze of the larger Reiner family trusts, the formal opposition available to Jake and Romy Reiner, and the recoverability of funds spent on defense should a conviction follow.The episode concludes with the Alex Murdaugh retrial's new presiding judge, Debra McCaslin: her reported professional history with lead defense counsel Dick Harpootlian, the disqualification standards that history implicates, and her authority over the financial-crimes evidentiary limits ordered by the South Carolina Supreme Court.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #ReinerCase #EricFaddis #ProbateCourt #TrueCrime #AlexMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #TrustLitigation

The question at the center of this Nick Reiner trial development is older than the case itself: can a person accused of killing benefit financially from the death? California's answer is the slayer statute — and in this episode, defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis explains how that law actually functions inside a live probate dispute, not how most people assume it does.The common understanding is that the slayer statute only operates after a conviction. The reality is more complicated, and it matters enormously here. Nick Reiner — who has pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Rob and Michele Reiner — has petitioned for the release of more than $1.5 million from his individual trust. The outgoing trustee reportedly cited the statute among his reasons for withholding the funds. Faddis walks through when the slayer bar can be invoked, who bears the burden, what standard of proof applies in a civil context, and whether a probate judge can simply freeze the assets until the criminal verdict resolves the question.Faddis then maps the family's procedural options with precision: formal opposition to the petition by Jake and Romy Reiner, who previously withdrew their agreement to fund their brother's defense; the implications of trustee Paul Kanin's resignation and his stated concerns about Nick's decision-making capacity; the arrival of successor trustee Jodi Montgomery, previously Britney Spears' conservator; and the reported freeze already imposed on the larger Reiner family trusts.He closes on the unresolved exposure: if funds are released, spent on defense counsel, and a conviction follows — is recovery possible, or is the money simply gone? The answer defines the stakes for everyone involved.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #SlayerStatute #EricFaddis #ProbateCourt #TrueCrime #JodiMontgomery #ReinerCase #TrustLitigation