Podcasts about banned

America's best documentary filmmaker spent nearly five years making a nine-hour masterpiece for Netflix. Which you'll never see. Edelman sits down with Pablo in search of catharsis — if not closure — in the battle for truth and control over the life story of one of the biggest control freaks ever. (This episode originally aired March 4, 2025.) • Previously on PTFO: When Docs Cry  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Qi6x3QF-v8 • Subscribe to Pablo's Substack for exclusive access, documents and invites https://pablo.show/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Dr. Steven Greer, founder of The Disclosure Project, shares his perspective on being excluded from major podcast platforms and discusses the challenges facing UFO disclosure advocates in mainstream media. What You'll Discover: Why Dr. Greer was banned from Joe Rogan's show (and the $100M Spotify connection) Secret government technologies "thousands of years more advanced" than public tech How reverse-engineered ET spacecraft power classified military operations The truth about false flag UFO operations designed to deceive the public Evidence of government cover-ups including the Buga Sphere artifact Why mainstream media won't touch real UFO disclosure Key Revelations: Dr. Greer exposes how handlers control major podcasts, why whistleblowers face death threats, and the specific technologies being hidden from humanity. From anti-gravity craft to free energy systems, this interview reveals what the secret government doesn't want you to know. Guest Bio: Dr. Steven Greer is a retired emergency physician, founder of The Disclosure Project, and director of the Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence (CSETI). He has briefed presidents, CIA directors, and world leaders on UFO/ET evidence and leads the global CE5 contact protocols. Resources Mentioned: Dr. Greer's website: https://www.drstevengreer.com/ Support his next film: https://ultimatedisclosure.com/ CE5 Contact Conference (Sept 19-21, 2025): https://drstevengreer.ticketspice.com/ce5-contact-and-consciousness Connect with Inspire Nation: School of Mystics Summer Sale: https://inspirenation.mykajabi.com/offers/8gADUKEZ/checkout (Code: FREEMONTH20) Daily Energy Transmission: https://dailywoohoo.com YouTube Membership: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVoOM-cCEPbJ1vzlQAFQu1A/join Automatic Writing Class (Sept 23): https://inspirenation.mykajabi.com/offers/4rZzztvj/checkout?coupon_code=GETGUIDANCE50 This episode was originally broadcast as a YouTube premiere on August 28, 2025 and contains sensitive information that has been censored on other platforms.  

Punt & Pass is back with @PuntandPass @DrewButler & @FrommJake! Presented by PrizePicks & brought to you by Humberto Injury Law. This week: Ohio State bans Barstool's Dave Portnoy ahead of Texas showdown Best throwback CFB logos fans want back Dawgs return Between the Hedges + season vibes PrizePicks plays & Week 1 breakdown: Texas–OSU, LSU–Clemson, UGA–Marshall, Bama–FSU, ND–Miamipuntandpass.com To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The far more censored version of the award-winning and unparalleled "A Mediocre Time with Tom and Dan." - "A Corporate Time" is a daily companion and terrestrial radio show heard nationally on iHeartRadio. It's silly.

Rich and Doug discuss what the scripture states about getting inked in this epic podcast.    What do you think about the episode?  Comment below or email us: http://waw.fm/hello

College Football week 1 predictions are here as Josh Pate breaks down LSU vs Clemson. Can Brian Kelly and Garrett Mussmeier get the win in Clemson over Dabo Swinney and the Tigers? What will Alabama vs FSU have in store as Kalen DeBoer hopes for a better year for the Tide while Mike Norvell needs to salvage his program? Notre Dame vs Miami is a huge Sunday night game. Will Marcus Freeman and the Irish be able to break in a new QB vs Mario Cristobal and the Canes? What do we make of reports Ohio State has moved to BAN Dave Portnoy from their stadium for their week 1 game against Texas? The JP Poll is back with the week 1 edition. Where are teams like Texas, Ohio State, and Florida? Could we see surprise G5 teams? What about sleepers like Utah or prime contenders like UGA? We get one of our last batches of Bold Predictions on the show tonight as the season is upon us.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ready to shake up the tactical training world? MDFI just made waves by banning the SIG P320 from their classes due to safety concerns, and their bold move is *changing the game*! In this no-holds-barred conversation, Tim Nelson of MDFI keeps it real about the risks, the backlash, and how they're focusing on firearms safety over everything else. From the rise of "responsible armed citizens" to the latest hot takes on industry shifts, this video dives into the culture, the challenges, and the ultimate experience of leveling up your safety game. ⚡ Whether you're a pop culture enthusiast or a tactical gear enthusiast, this isn't just a video—it's a lifestyle. MDFI is setting the standard, showing that safety and innovation can go hand in hand. Learn how the SIG P320 controversy is reshaping training practices, why instructors nationwide are taking notice, and what it means for YOU as a shooter looking to upgrade your skills.

Who should be banned from Michigan Stadium in response to OSUSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, I sit down with Dr. Andrew Wakefield, physician-turned-filmmaker and one of the most controversial voices in modern medicine. From his early days as a gastroenterologist in the UK to becoming an outspoken critic of vaccine policy, Andy shares the story of how listening to parents and pursuing uncomfortable questions about children's health ultimately cost him his profession, country, and medical license. Andy and I discuss the rise in autism diagnoses, the explosion of the vaccine schedule, and the erosion of public trust in health authorities—alongside the role of media, censorship, and film in shaping public awareness.Whether you agree with him or not, Andy's perspective challenges us to confront uncomfortable questions about integrity, power, and responsibility in medicine. It's a conversation about courage, conviction, and what it takes to speak out when the stakes are at their highest. Visit protocol7.movie and use code LUKE10 to save 10% on merch.DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for educational purposes only and not intended for diagnosing or treating illnesses. The hosts disclaim responsibility for any adverse effects from using the information presented. Consult your healthcare provider before using referenced products. This podcast may include paid endorsements.THIS SHOW IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY:BON CHARGE | Use the code LIFESTYLIST for 15% off at boncharge.com/lifestylist.LEELA QUANTUM TECH | Go to lukestorey.com/leelaq and use the code LUKE10 for 10% off their product line.MAGNESIUM BREAKTHROUGH | You can use the code LUKE15 for 15% off at bioptimizers.com/luke.SUNLIGHTEN | Save up to $600 when you go to lukestorey.com/sunlighten and use code LUKESTOREY in the pricing form.MORE ABOUT THIS EPISODE:(00:00:00) From London to Texas: The Turning Point in Andy's Career(00:11:16) Autism Rates, Whistleblowers, & Becoming a Filmmaker(00:26:42) Protocol 7, Corporate Fraud, & the Future of Vaccines(00:42:58) Vaccine Hesitancy, Censorship, & the Psychology of Compliance(00:56:41) Polio, Politics, & the Future of Vaccine Awareness(01:17:54) Autism, Communication, & Hidden Human Potential(01:39:13) Censorship, Resilience, & Lessons from the StarsResources:• Website: wakefieldmediagroup.com • Instagram: instagram.com/andyjwakefield • X: x.com/DrAndyWakefield • Shop all our merch designs at lukestoreymerch.com• Check out Gilded By Luke Storey: gildedbylukestorey.com• Join me on Telegram:

NEW SHIRTS ARE LIVE: https://store.barstoolsports.com/collections/mostly-sports Sign the petition: https://www.change.org/p/give-mister-ed-his-rightful-spot-on-the-hollywood-walk-of-fame?source_location=psf_petitions Mark Titus and Brandon Walker talking sports... mostly. Thanks to our sponsors: Jägermeister: Check Jägermeister out at https://us.jagermeister.com/. Drink Responsibly, Jägermeister Liqueur 35% alcohol by volume. Imported by Mast Jägermeister US, White Plains. NY. DraftKings: Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Help is available for problem gambling. Call (888) 789-7777 or visit ccpg.org (CT). 18+ (19+ AL/NE, 21+ AZ/MA/VA). Valid only where Pick6 operates, see dkng.co/pick6states. Void in NY, ONT, and where prohibited. Eligibility restrictions apply. Must click link to claim Bag Builder Token. Token must be selected BEFORE placing free entry in Bag Builder contest. Entry must have 6/6 correct Picks to earn equal share of cash prize pool. Tokens are single use and expire 9/8 @ 8:15 PM ET. Max. 6 Tokens per customer. Earn addt'l Tokens via linkshare w/ new Bag Builder entrants and linking Discord account w/ DraftKings. Ends 9/8/25 at 8:15 PM ET. Terms: pick6.draftkings.com/promos. Sponsored by DK. Mountain Dew: THE MOUNTAIN IS CALLING, EXPERIENCE THE REFRESHING CITRUS KICK OF MOUNTAIN DEW. GRAB ONE TODAY! https://www.mountaindew.com/find-dew T. Marzetti Company: Find Marzetti ranch at your local grocery store, refrigerated by the fruits & veggies or visit https://Marzetti.com to learn more Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@MostlySportsTitusandWalker?sub_confirmation=1. Follow Mostly Sports on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MostlySports Follow Mark on Twitter: https://twitter.com/clubtrillion Follow Brandon on Twitter: https://twitter.com/bfw Follow Mostly Sports on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mostlysportsshow/ Follow Mark on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/marktheshark34/ Follow Brandon on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bwalkersec/ Follow Mostly Sports on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mostlysportsshow?lang=en Follow Brandon on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@brandonfwalker?lang=en Follow Mark on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@marktituspod?lang=en

Dave Portnoy NOT banned from Ohio Stadium + No idea what to expect from OSU-Texas opener full 517 Tue, 26 Aug 2025 12:56:30 +0000 q3NPdk1YxISivXqmMKDx3DLh09f9o3jo ncaa,college football,ohio state buckeyes,sports The Ken Carman Show with Anthony Lima ncaa,college football,ohio state buckeyes,sports Dave Portnoy NOT banned from Ohio Stadium + No idea what to expect from OSU-Texas opener The only place to talk about the Cleveland sports scene is with Ken Carman and Anthony Lima. The two guide listeners through the ups and downs of being a fan of the Browns, Cavaliers, Guardians and Ohio State Buckeyes in Northeast Ohio. They'll help you stay informed with breaking news, game coverage, and interviews with top personalities.Catch The Ken Carman Show with Anthony Lima live Monday through Friday (6 a.m. - 10 a.m ET) on 92.3 The Fan, the exclusive audio home of the Browns, or on the Audacy app. For more, follow the show on X @KenCarmanShow. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False http

Hour 3: John Greco + Kenny Pickett was a "miss" + Dave Portnoy NOT banned from Ohio State game full 2293 Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:33:31 +0000 bZvQRvbdlXQDt85B3jYVXS3FtplVNNGf sports The Ken Carman Show with Anthony Lima sports Hour 3: John Greco + Kenny Pickett was a "miss" + Dave Portnoy NOT banned from Ohio State game The only place to talk about the Cleveland sports scene is with Ken Carman and Anthony Lima. The two guide listeners through the ups and downs of being a fan of the Browns, Cavaliers, Guardians and Ohio State Buckeyes in Northeast Ohio. They'll help you stay informed with breaking news, game coverage, and interviews with top personalities.Catch The Ken Carman Show with Anthony Lima live Monday through Friday (6 a.m. - 10 a.m ET) on 92.3 The Fan, the exclusive audio home of the Browns, or on the Audacy app. For more, follow the show on X @KenCarmanShow. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False

What happens when a family legacy meets a bold mission for change? Rochelle Jacobs, co-founder of Naturally Serious, joins us to share how her journey, from watching her Persian grandmother blend skincare from tea leaves to launching a patented antioxidant-rich brand, has been decades in the making. In this inspiring episode, Rochelle shares how her confidence, entrepreneurial roots, and commitment to clean, effective beauty helped shape Naturally Serious into a lifestyle brand women can trust. Rochelle reminds us that confidence is a tool, self-care is non-negotiable, and that skin is more than surface—it's the story we tell the world.

Two children are in the hospital after E-bike crashes in San Marcos. Plus, the plea in court from the man accused of murdering a National City woman in her home. And, the new TSA rules that ban certain hair care products on flights. NBC 7's Steven Luke has these stories and more, including meteorologist Sheena Parveen's forecast for this Tuesday, August 26, 2025. 

Seattle Mariners catcher Cal Raleigh smacked his 50th HR of the season joining Mickey Mantle as the only switch-hitters with 50 home runs in a season, NFL rosters make final cuts to 53 man limit, Browns send QB Pickett to The Raiders, Bengals give star DE Hendrickson $14 million raise

The Democratic party has created a list of banned words so party members can sound more like real people. Cracker barrel CEO goes nuts and costs the company millions of dollars. Omar Fateh has no business in politics much less running as a mayoral candidate. Johnny Heidt with guitar news. Heard On The Show:Minneapolis police investigating pedestrian-involved hit-and-run, 2 seriously hurtMinneapolis woman recovering after being shot Sunday morningUkraine-Russia war latest: Zelensky says US and Ukrainian officials will meet to prepare for possible Putin summitSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Introducing the All Def SquADD Cast show “Versus". It's a podcast with the OG SquADD! Each week, the SquADD will debate topics and vote at the end to see what wins. Versus airs every Monday and you can download and listen wherever podcasts are found. Special Guest Dion Lack Roxxy Haze Rodney Perry This Week We Discuss Banned From Uber/Lyft vs Every Fast Food Restaurant Have A Partner With A Weird Sexual Kink vs Weird Smell S/o To Our Sponsors Ava Download Ava Promo: SQUADD Blue Chew Bluechew.com/SQUADD Prizepicks Download Prizepicks Promo: SQUADD

The World Darts Federation has struck out with a new policy, banning trans women from competing in women's darts. This move, exemplified by the ban on rising star Dasha Dolan Van Leuven, isn't about fair play; it's a blatant display of prejudice disguised as policy. Despite darts being a game of precision and skill, not brute physical strength, the federation's decision smacks of scientific denial and an insidious blend of transphobia and misogyny. It's yet another disheartening instance where fear and cultural bias override logic and inclusivity, reminiscent of 'separate but equal' policies. Thankfully, Dasha is refusing to quit, continuing to compete and highlighting how easily bigotry can infiltrate any arena, no matter how absurd the justification.News Source:Trans darts player vows not to let new anti-trans ban ruin her love of the sportBy John Russell for LGBTQ NationJuly 30, 2025

Are property taxes actually illegal theft from homeowners? This episode dives deep into the growing chorus of Americans claiming property taxes violate constitutional property rights, examining two main legal arguments: the "no true ownership" theory, and possible Fifth Amendment violations. These arguments are gaining steam in several states, but are they legally valid? On The Market host Dave Meyer explores that question, plus how rising home prices are driving property tax reform movements across states like Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, potentially reshaping the housing market by reducing ownership costs and affecting home prices, mortgage affordability, and regional migration patterns. Links from the Show Join the Future of Real Estate Investing with Fundrise Join BiggerPockets for FREE Find an Investor-Friendly Agent in Your Area Find Investor-Friendly Lenders Property Manager Finder Dave's BiggerPockets Profile Check out more resources from this show on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠BiggerPockets.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/on-the-market-350⁠ Interested in learning more about today's sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠advertise@biggerpockets.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Food and Drug Administration or FDA regulates roughly 78% of the US food supply. This includes packaged products, food additives, infant formula, ultra-processed foods, and lots more. However, an analysis by the Environmental Working Group found that 99% of new food ingredients enter our food supply through a legal loophole that skirts FDA oversight and seems, to me at least, to be incredibly risky. Today we're speaking with two authors of a recent legal and policy analysis published in the Journal Health Affairs. They explain what this loophole is and its risks and suggest a new user fee program to both strengthen the FDA's ability to regulate food ingredients and address growing concerns about food safety. Our guests are Jennifer Pomeranz Associate Professor of Public Health Policy and Management at New York University School of Global Public Health and Emily Broad, director of Harvard Law School Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation. Interview Summary So Jennifer, let's start with you, help our listeners understand the current situation with food ingredient oversight. And what is this legal loophole that allows food companies to add new ingredients without safety reviews. Sure. So, Congress passed the Food Additives Amendment in 1958, and the idea was to divide food additives and generally recognized as safe ingredients into two different categories. That's where the GRAS term comes from generally recognized as safe? ‘Generally Recognized As Safe' is GRAS. But it circularly defines food additives as something that's not GRAS. So, there's not actually a definition of these two different types of substances. But the idea was that the food industry would be required to submit a pre-market, that means before it puts the ingredient into the marketplace, a pre-market petition to the FDA to review the safety. And then the FDA promulgates a regulation for safe use of a food additive. GRAS ingredients on the other hand, initially thought of as salt, pepper, vinegar, are things like that would just be allowed to enter the food supply without that pre-market petition. The problem is the food industry is the entity that decides which category to place each ingredient. There's no FDA guidance on which category they're supposed to ascribe to these ingredients. What has happened is that the food industry has now entered into the food supply an enormous amount of ingredients under what we call the GRAS loophole, which is allowing it to just bring it to the market without any FDA oversight or even knowledge of the ingredient. So, in essence, what we're having now is that the food industry polices itself on whether to submit this pre-market petition for a food additive or just include it in its products without any FDA knowledge. When you said ‘enormous number of such things,' are we talking dozens, hundreds, thousands? Nobody knows, but the environmental working group did find that 99% of new ingredients are added through this loophole. And that's the concerning part. Well, you can look at some ultra-processed foods and they can have 30 or 40 ingredients on them. That's just one food. You can imagine that at across the food supply, how many things there are. And there are these chemicals that nobody can pronounce. You don't know what's going on, what they are, what they're all about. So, what you're saying is that the food industry decides to put these things in foods. There's some processing reason for putting them in. It's important that the public be protected against harmful ingredients. But the food industry decides what's okay to put in and what's not. Are they required to do any testing? Are there criteria for that kind of testing? Is there any sense that letting the industry police itself amounts to anything that protects the public good? Well, the criteria are supposed to be the same for GRAS or food additives. They're supposed to be meeting certain scientific criteria. But the problem with this is that for GRAS ingredients, they don't have to use published data and they can hold that scientific data to themselves. And you mentioned food labels, the ingredient list, right? That doesn't necessarily capture these ingredients. They use generic terms, corn oil, color additive, food additive whatever. And so, the actual ingredient itself is not necessarily listed on the ingredient list. There is no way to identify them and it's unknown whether they're actually doing the studies. They can engage in these, what are called GRAS panels, which are supposed to be experts that evaluate the science. But the problem is other studies have found that 100% of the people on these GRAS panels have financial conflicts of interest. Okay, so let me see if I have this right. I'm a food company. I develop a new additive to provide color or flavor or fragrance, or it's an emulsifier or something like that. I develop a chemical concoction that hasn't really been tested for human safety. I declare it safe. And the criteria I use for declaring it set safe is putting together a panel of people that I pay, who then in a hundred percent of cases say things are. That's how it works? I can't say that in a hundred percent of cases they say it's safe, but a hundred percent of the people have financial conflicts of interest. That's one of the major concerns there. Well, one can't imagine they would continue to be paid... Exactly. This sounds like a pretty shaky system to be sure. Emily: I wanted to add a couple other really quick things on the last discussion. You were saying, Kelly, like they're using a panel of experts, which indeed are paid by them. That would be best case in some cases. They're just having their own staff say, we think this is generally recognized as safe. And I think there's some examples we can give where there isn't even evidence that they went to even any outside people, even within industry. I think that the takeaway from all of that is that there's really the ability for companies to call all the shots. Make all the rules. Not tell FDA what they're doing. And then as we talked about, not even have anything on the label because it's not a required ingredient if it's, used as part of a processing agent that's not a substance on there. So I was feeling pretty bad when Jennifer is talking about these panels and the heavy conflict... Even worse. Of interest, now I feel worse because that's the best case. Totally. And one other thing too is just you kind of warmed this up by talking about this loophole. When we put an earlier article out that we wrote that was about just this generally recognized as safe, the feedback we got from FDA was this isn't a loophole. Why are you calling this a loophole? And it's pretty clear that it's a loophole, you know? It's big enough to drive thousands of ingredients through. Yes, totally. Emily, you've written about things like partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, trans fats, and red dye number three in particular. Both of which FDA has now prohibited in food. Can you walk us through those cases? You asked about partially hydrogenated oils or trans-fat, and then red dye three, which are two examples that we talk about a little bit in our piece. Actually, one of those, the partially hydrogenated oils was allowed in food through the generally recognized as safe definition. And the other was not. But they are both really good examples of another real issue that FDA has, which is that not only are they not doing a good job of policing substances going into food on the front end, but they do an even worse job of getting things out of food on the backend, post-market once they know that those substances are really raising red flags. And you raised two of the prime examples we've been talking about. With partially hydrogenated oils these are now banned in foods, but it took an extremely long time. Like the first evidence of harm was in the mid-nineties. By 2005, the Institute of Medicine, which is now the National Academies, said that intake of trans fat, of partially hydrogenated oils, should be as low as possible. And there was data from right around that time that found that 72,000 to 228,000 heart attacks in the US each year were caused by these partially hydrogenated oils. And on FDA's end, they started in early 2000s to require labeling. But it wasn't until 2015 that they passed a final rule saying that these substances were not generally recognized as safe. And then they kept delaying implementation until 2023. It was basically more than 20 years from when there was really clear evidence of harm including from respected national agencies to when FDA actually fully removed them from food. And red dye number three is another good example where there were studies from the 1980s that raised concerns about this red dye. And it was banned from cosmetics in 1990. But they still allowed it to be added to food. And didn't ban it from food until early this year. So early 2025. In large part because one of the other things happening is states are now taking action on some of these substances where they feel like we really need to protect consumers in our states. And FDA has been doing a really poor job. California banned red dye about 18 months before that and really spurred FDA to action. So that 20-year delay with between 72,000 and 228,000 heart attack deaths attributable to the trans fats is the cost of delay and inaction and I don't know, conflicts of interest, and all kinds of other stuff that happened in FDA. So we're not talking about something trivial by any means. These are life and death things are occurring. Yes. Give us another example, if you would, about something that entered the food supply and caused harm but made it through that GRAS loophole. The example that I've talked about both in some of the work we've done together and also in a perspective piece in the New England Journal of Medicine that really focused on why this is an issue. There was this substance added to food called tara flour. It came on the scene in 2022. It was in food prepared by Daily Harvest as like a protein alternative. And they were using it from a manufacturer in South America who said we have deemed this generally recognized as safe. Everything about that is completely legal. They deemed it generally recognized as safe. A company put it into food, and they sold that. Up until that point, that's all legal. What happened was very quickly people started getting really sick from this. And so there were, I think, about 400 people across 39 states got sick. Nearly 200 people ended up in the hospital, some of them with liver failure because of this toxicity of tara flour. And so FDA followed the thread they did help work with the company to do a voluntary recall, but it then took them two years, until May, 2024, to declare tara flour not generally recognized as safe. So I think, in some ways, this is a great example because it shows how it's so immediate, the impact of this substance that, again, was legally added to food with no oversight. In some ways it's a misleading example because I think so many of the substances in food, it's not going to be so clear and so immediate. It's going to be year over year, decade over decade as part of a full diet that these are causing cardiovascular risk, thyroid disease, cancer risk, those kinds of things. I'd love to hear from either of you about this. Why is FDA falling down on the job so badly? Is it that they don't have the money to do the necessary testing? Do they not have the authority? Is there not the political will to do this? Is there complete caving into the food industry? Just let them do what they want and we're going let it go? Jennifer: All of the above? Everything you just said? It's all of the above. Emily: Jen, do you wanna talk about the money side? Because that sort of gets to the genesis of the article we worked on, which was like maybe there's a creative solution to that piece. Yes, I'd love to hear about that because I thought that was a very creative thing that you guys wrote about in your paper. That there would be an industry user fee to help produce this oversight. Tell us what you had in mind with that. And then then convince me that FDA would appropriately use this oversight and do its job. So, the idea in the paper was proposing a comprehensive user fee program for the food branch of the FDA. The FDA currently collects user fees for all of human drugs, animal drugs, medical devices, etc. With Tobacco, it's a hundred percent funded by user fees. But food, it only gets 1% of its funding through user fees. And it's important to note user fees fund processes. They don't fund outcomes. It's not like a bribe. And the idea behind user fees and why industry sometimes supports them is actually to bring predictability to the regulatory state. It brings efficiency to reviews. And then this all allows the industry to anticipate timelines so they can bring products to market and know when they're going be able to do it. In the food context, for example, the FDA is required to respond to those food additives petitions that we talked about within 180 days. But they can't respond in time. And they have a lot of timelines that are required of them in the food context that they can't meet. They can't meet their timelines because they're so underfunded. So, we proposed a comprehensive user fee. But one of the main reasons that we think a user fee is important is to address the pre-market issues that I talked about and the post-market issues that Emily talked about. In order to close that GRAS loophole, first of all, FDA needs to either reevaluate its authorities or Congress needs to change its authorities. But it would need resources to be able to do something pre-market. Some of the ideas we had was that the user fee would fund some type of either pre-market review, pre-market notification, or even just a pre-market system where the FDA determines whether a proposed ingredient should go through the GRAS avenue, or through food additive petition. So at least that there will be some type of pre-market oversight over all the ingredients in the food supply. And then also the FDA is so severely lacking in any type of comprehensive post-market into play, they would have the resources to engage in a more comprehensive post-market review for all the ingredients. Could you see a time, and I bring this up because of lawsuits against the food industry for some of these additives that are going on now. The state attorney's generals are starting to get involved, and as you said, Emily, the some states are taking legislative action to ban certain things in the food supply. Do you think there could come a time when the industry will come to government pleading to have a user fee like this? To provide some standardization across jurisdictions, let's say? So, there's two things. The first is Congress has to pass the user fee, and historically, actually, industry has done exactly what you said. They have gone to Congress and said, you know what? We want user fees because we want a streamlined system, and we want to be able to know when we're bringing products to market. The problem in the context of food for the issues we're talking about is that right now they can use the GRAS loophole. So, they have very little incentive to ask for user fees if they can bring all their ingredients into the market through the GRAS loophole. There are other areas where a user fee is very relevant, such as the infant formula 90 day pre-market notification, or for different claims like health claims. They might want user fees to speed those things up, but in terms of the ingredients, unless we close the GRAS loophole, they'd have little incentive to actually come to the table. But wouldn't legal liability change that? Let's say that some of these lawsuits are successful and they start having to pay large settlements or have the State Attorneys General, for example, come down on them for these kinds of things. If they're legally liable for harm, they're causing, they need cover. And wouldn't this be worth the user fee to provide them cover for what they put in the food supply? Yes, it's great to have the flexibility to have all these things get through the loophole, but it'd be great as well to have some cover so you wouldn't have so much legal exposure. But you guys are the lawyers, so I'm not sure it makes sense. I think you're right that there are forces combining out in the world that are pushing for change here. And I think it's hard to disentangle how much is it that industry's pushing for user fees versus right now I think more willing to consider federal regulatory changes by either FDA or by Congress. At the state level this is huge. There's now becoming a patchwork across states, and I think that is really difficult for industry. We were tracking this year 93 bills in 35 states that either banned an additive in the general public, banned it in schools. Banned ultra-processed foods, which most of the states, interestingly, have all defined differently. But where they have had a definition, it's been tied to various different combinations of additives. So that's going on. And then I think you're right, that the legal cases moving along will push industry to really want clear and better standards. I think there's a good question right now around like how successful will some of these efforts be? But  what we are seeing is real movement, both in FDA and in Congress, in taking action on this. So interestingly, the Health Affairs piece that we worked on was out this spring. But we had this other piece that came out last fall and felt like we were screaming into the void about this is a problem generally recognized as safe as a really big issue. And suddenly that has really changed. And so, you know, in March FDA said they were directed by RFK (Robert F. Kennedy), by HHS (Health and Human Services) to really look into changing their rule on generally recognized as safe. So, I know that's underway. And then in Congress, multiple bills have been introduced. And I know there are several in the works that would address additives and specifically, generally recognized as safe. There's this one piece going on, which is there's forces coalescing around some better method of regulation. I think the question's really going to also be like, will Congress give adequate resources? Because there is also another scenario that I'm worried about that even if FDA said we're going now require at least notification for every substance that's generally recognized as safe. It's a flood of substances. And they just, without more resources, without more staff devoted to this, there's no way that they're going to be able to wade through that. So, I think that either the resources need to come from user fees, or at least partially from user fees, from more appropriations and I think, In my opinion, they are able to do that on their own. Even given where current administrative law stands. Because I think it's very clear that the gist of the statute is that FDA should be overseeing additives. And I think a court would say this is allowing everything to instead go through this alternative pathway. But I really think FDA's going to need resources to manage this. And perhaps more of a push from Congress to make sure that they really do it to the best of their ability. I was going to say there's also an alternative world where we don't end up spending any of these resources, and they require the industry just to disclose all the ingredients they've added to food and put it on a database. This is like low hanging fruit, not very expensive, doesn't require funding. And then the NGOs, I hope, would go to work and say, look at this. There is no safety data for these ingredients. You know, because right now we just can't rely on FDA to do anything unless they get more funding to do something. So, if FDA doesn't get funding, then maybe this database where houses every ingredient that's in the food supply as a requirement could be a low resource solution. Jennifer, I'll come back to you in a minute because I'd like to ask how worried should we be about all this stuff that's going into food. But Emily, let me ask you first, does FDA have the authority to do what it needs to do? Let's say all of a sudden that your wish was granted and there were user fees would it then be able to do what needs to be done? I think certainly to be able to charge these user fees in almost all areas, it right now doesn't have that authority, and Congress would need to act. There's one small area which is within the Food Safety Modernization Act for certain types of like repeat inspections or recalls or there's a couple other. FDA isn't charging fees right now because they haven't taken this one step that they need to take. But they do have the authority if they just take those steps. But for everything else, Congress has to act. I think the real question to me is because we now know so many of these substances are going through this GRAS pathway, the question is really can they do everything they need to do on their own to close that loophole? And again, my opinion is Congress could make it clear and if Congress were to act, it would be better. Like they could redefine it in a way that was much more clear that we are drawing a real line. And most things actually should be on the additive side of the line rather than the generally recognized as safe side of the line. But even with their current authority, with the current definition, I think FDA could at least require notification because they're still drawing a line between what's required for additives, which is a very lengthy pre-market process with, you know, a notice and comment procedure and all of these things. My take is FDA do what you can do now. Let's get the show on the road. Let's take steps here to close up the loophole. And then Congress takes time. But they definitely can even strengthen this and give a little more, I think, directives to FDA as to how to make sure that this loophole doesn't recur down the line. In talks that I've given recently, I've shown an ingredient list from a food that people will recognize. And I ask people to try to guess what that food is from its ingredient list. This particular food has 35 ingredients. You know, a bunch of them that are very hard to pronounce. Very few people would even have any idea at all what those ingredients do. There's no sense at all about how ingredient number 17 would interact with ingredient 31, etc. And it just seems like it's complete chaos. And I don't want to take you guys outside your comfort zone because your backgrounds are law. But Jennifer, let me ask you this. You have a background in public health as well. There are all kinds of reasons to be worried about this, aren't there? There are the concerns about the safety of these things, but then there's a concern about what these ultra-processed ingredients do to your metabolism, your ability to control your weight, to regulate your hunger and things like that. It sounds this is a really important thing. And it's affecting almost everybody in the country. The percentage of calories that are now coming from ultra-processed foods is over 50% in both children and adults. So it sounds like there's really reason to worry. Would you agree? Yes. And also, the FDA is supposed to be overseeing the cumulative effects of the ingredients and it doesn't actually enforce that regulation. Its own regulation that it's supposed to evaluate the cumulative effects. It doesn't actually enforce this. So by cumulative effects do you mean the chronic effects of long term use? And, having these ingredients across multiple products within one person's consumption. Also, the FDA doesn't look at things like the effect on the gut microbiome, neurotoxicity, even cancer risk, even though they're supposed to, they say that if something is GRAS, they don't need to look at it because cancer risk is relegated only to food additives. So here we're at a real issue, right? Because if everything's entering through the GRAS loophole, then they're not looking at carcinogen effects. So, I think there is a big risk and as Emily had said earlier, that these are sometimes long-term risks versus that acute example of tara flour that we don't know. And we do know from the science, both older and emerging science, that ultra-processed food has definite impact on not only consumption, increased consumption, but also on diet related diseases and other health effects. And by definition what we're talking about here are ultra-processed foods. These ingredients are only found in ultra-processed foods. So, we do know that there is cause for concern. It's interesting that you mentioned the microbiome because we've recorded a cluster of podcasts on the microbiome and another cluster of podcasts on artificial sweeteners. Those two universes overlap a good bit because the impact of the artificial sweeteners on some of them, at least on the microbiome, is really pretty negative. And that's just one thing that goes into these foods. It really is pretty important. By the way, that food with 35 ingredients that I mentioned is a strawberry poptart. Jennifer: I know that answer! Emily: How do you know that? Jennifer: Because I've seen Kelly give a million talks. Yes, she has. Emily: I was wondering, I was like, are we never going to find out? So the suspense is lifted. Let me end with this. This has been highly instructive, and I really appreciate you both weighing in on this. So let me ask each of you, is there reason to be optimistic that things could improve. Emily, I'll start with you. So, I've been giving this talk the past few months that's called basically like Chronic Disease, Food Additives and MAHA, like What Could Go Right and What Could Go Wrong. And so, I'm going give you a very lawyerly answer, which is, I feel optimistic because there's attention on the issue. I think states are taking action and there's more attention to this across the political spectrum, which both means things are happening and means that the narrative changing, like people are getting more aware and calling for change in a way that we weren't seeing. On the flip side, I think there's a lot that could go wrong. You know, I think some of the state bills are great and some of them are maybe not so great. And then I think this administration, you have an HHS and FDA saying, they're going to take action on this in the midst of an administration that's otherwise very deregulatory. In particular, they're not supposed to put out new regulations if they can get rid of 10 existing ones. There are some things you can do through guidance and signaling, but I don't think you can really fix these issues without like real durable legislative change. So, I'm sorry to be one of the lawyers here. I think the signals are going in the right direction, but jury is out a little bit on how well we'll actually do. And I hope we can do well given the momentum. What do you think, Jennifer? I agree that the national attention is very promising to these issues. The states are passing laws that are shocking to me. That Texas passing a warning label law, I would never have thought in the history of the world, that Texas would be the one to pass a warning label law. They're doing great things and I actually have hope that something can come of this. But I am concerned at the federal level of the focus on deregulation may make it impossible. User fees is an example of where they won't have to regulate, but they could provide funding to the FDA to actually act in areas that it has the authority to act. That is one solution that could actually work under this administration if they were amenable to it. But I also think in some ways the states could save us. I worry, you know, Emily brought up the patchwork, which is the key term the industry uses to try to get preemption. I do worry about federal preemption of state actions. But the states right now are the ones saving us. California is the first to save the whole nation. The food industry isn't going to create new food supply for California and then the rest of the country. And then it's the same with other states. So, the states might be the ones that actually can make some real meaningful changes and get some of the most unsafe ingredients out of the food supply, which some of the states have now successfully done. Bios Emily Broad Leib is a Clinical Professor of Law, Director of Harvard Law School Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, and Founding Director of the Harvard Law School Food Law and Policy Clinic, the nation's first law school clinic devoted to providing legal and policy solutions to the health, economic, and environmental challenges facing our food system. Working directly with clients and communities, Broad Leib champions community-led food system change, reduction in food waste, food access and food is medicine interventions, and equity and sustainability in food production. Her scholarly work has been published in the California Law Review, Wisconsin Law Review, Harvard Law & Policy Review, Food & Drug Law Journal, and Journal of Food Law & Policy, among others. Professor Jennifer Pomeranz is a public health lawyer who researches policy and legal options to address the food environment, obesity, products that cause public harm, and social injustice that lead to health disparities. Prior to joining the NYU faculty, Professor Pomeranz was an Assistant Professor at the School of Public Health at Temple University and in the Center for Obesity Research and Education at Temple. She was previously the Director of Legal Initiatives at the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University. She has also authored numerous peer-reviewed and law review journal articles and a book, Food Law for Public Health, published by Oxford University Press in 2016. Professor Pomeranz leads the Public Health Policy Research Lab and regularly teaches Public Health Law and Food Policy for Public Health.

On Aug. 26, in 2023 and 2024, Amy co-led Women's Equality forums that were well attended and enjoyed, (and filmed by affiliates of 1623 Studios). On Amy's 1st podcast she shares what she's been up to and suggests ways to celebrate Women's Equality Day in 2025, in light of recent roll-backs in women's rights. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is what dreams are made of--Trisha is finally starring in a fast food commercial! After stanning Arby's for years, she is officially the face of their new shake. Plus, is Tana Mongeau's Just Bieber lookalike ex responsible for scamming a Las Vegas hotel? And we need YOU to spread the word that MrBeast can't read.

The Sound Chaser Progressive Rock Podcast is on the air. On the show this time I have the new single from Massimo Pieretti, a wide variety of progressive music styles, the Symphonic Zone, and more. All that, plus news of tours and releases on Sound Chaser. Playlist1. Magenta - Speechless, from We Are Seven2. Phil Manzanera / 801 - Listen Now, from Listen Now!3. Phil Manzanera / 801 - Flight 19, from Listen Now!4. Shakti - Lotus Feet, from Shakti, with John McLaughlin5. Arti + Mestieri - Terminal, from Giro di Valzer per Domani6. Kotebel - The Flight of the Hippogriff Part 2, from Live at Prog-Résiste 20137. Carlo Celuque - Gravity Force, from Berlin Walk8. Quarkspace - Where Galaxies Collide, from The Hidden Moon9. Massimo Pieretti - Alone, from The Next Dream10. Kristian Schultze - Total Recall, from Metronomics11. Dream Theater - Voices, from Once in a LIVEtimeTHE SYMPHONIC ZONE12. Colin Masson - South Australia, from The Southern Cross13. Qango - The Last One Home, from Live in the Hood14. Vangelis - Chariots of Fire, from Chariots of Fire15. Synergy - Legacy, from Electronic Realizations for Rock Orchestra16. Tomita - Debussy: Arabesque No. 1, from Snowflakes Are Dancing17. IZZ - Deafening Silence, from My River FlowsLEAVING THE SYMPHONIC ZONE18. Eduard Artemiev - Expectation, from Warmth of Earth19. Eduard Artemiev - Rekkens, from Warmth of Earth20. Michael Garrison - Dimensions, from Eclipse21. Patrick Moraz - Eastern Sundays, from Future Memories I & II Live on TV22. Steve Morse Band - Live to Ride, from StressFest23. Frank Zappa - Can't Afford No Shoes, from One Size Fits All24. Banned from Utopia - So Yuh Don't Like Modern Art, from So Yuh Don't Like Modern Art25. King Crimson - Moon Child (Take 1), from In the Court of the Crimson King 40th Anniversary Edition26. Träd Gräs och Stenar - Tegenborgsvalsen, from Gärdet 12.6.197027. Gentle Giant - Funny Ways, from Live Rome 197428. Nicolas Meier World Group - Stories from the Garden, from Magnificent

Attorney Audriana Anderson joins Jon Hansen to discuss the Illinois ban on ticketing students in school. Audrey explains how students would get ticketed before, and she talks about what the ban could mean for schools and students. For more information, visit andersonaa.com or call 630-877-5800.

The Mustache Man gets raided, TSA bans more stuff from planes, please watch my suitcase, the Celtics logo drama, This Week in Florida, Shawn describes a disturbing new viral video, Moe hammers some questions, a CEO knocked out by an Uber driver and so much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Mustache Man gets raided, TSA bans more stuff from planes, please watch my suitcase, the Celtics logo drama, This Week in Florida, Shawn describes a disturbing new viral video, Moe hammers some questions, a CEO knocked out by an Uber driver and so much more!

8:05 - Joel Larsgaard talks money8:20 - More with Joel Larsgaard8:35 - Newly banned TSA items8:50 - There's no such thing as a "Coolcation."

The conversation begins, continues, but rarely ends, on Discourse! As mentioned, you can become a member of our VIP community by donating a small monthly amount to show your support, and dive into sports science and opinion. We are also on YouTube now, for those who want to watch.Show notesIn today's spotlight, our Discourse Digest looks back at some remarkable track & field performances and how they set up enthralling races in the upcoming Tokyo World Championships. We talk Kipyegon, Tsegay, Chebet, Hodgkinson and Lyles. Tensions between the UCI and cycling teams boiled over with a standoff around rider tracking the latest in the ongoing rider-safety struggles. We discuss how the failure of both sides to compromise and communicate is impacting rider risk.Risk conversations continue with news that World Boxing will follow athletics' example by screening for sex to protect the integrity of the women's boxing category and the safety of its fighters. Finally, instrumented mouthguards now have an LED light, and we discuss how many are only now becoming aware of this innovation and system for head impact management in Rugby Union.In Centre Stage (48:17) we turn our attention to doping. Gabby Thomas has called for lifetime bans for coaches whose athletes dope. We explain why it's not quite that simple, legally and philosophically. It's all part of the complexity of the anti-doping landscape, which we explore further with examples of recent doping cases and claims about who bears fault, when bans begin and which performances are tainted.Listener Lens (1:01:58) involves discussion about heart rate as a guide to training intensity on hot days. Ross explains that we can measure, but not manage our training while our physiology does the necessary in the heat. That becomes a conversation about Zone 2 training in Ross Replies (1:09:47), as listener Niall shares questions about how to incorporate this training intensity into his journey towards fitness and performance.And finally (1:13:16), Josh asks who you'd put on your Mount Rushmore of athletes? An impossible question, but Gareth and Ross share their thoughts, raising some eyebrows with picks and how they value sporting icons and their legacies.LinksVaughters interview about safety in cycling and the UCI standoffWorld Boxing sex screening articleListener Lens on HR in the heat - Discourse members onlyZone 2 thoughts - the mega thread from our listeners - Discourse onlyMount Rushmore of sport Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We're joined by Damonteal Harris, vocalist of the hardest slam/death metal/hardcore hybrid band on earth right now: PEELINGFLESH from Oklahoma. Damonteal walks us through how growing up in the the Tulsa hardcore scene led him eventually joining forces with the rest of the band to their unexpected (to them) rise as the absolute kings of modern brutal slam.With their unique integrations of hip hop samples throughout their entire discography, an undeniably charismatic frontman, flawless live performances from the entire band, and tireless songwriting output, you can't help but root for PF. Thanks to Damonteal for joining us, PF RADIO 2 OUT SOON!!!________________________________________HardLore: A Knotfest SeriesJoin the HARDLORE PATREON to watch every single weekly episode early and ad-free, alongside exclusive monthly episodes: https://patreon.com/hardlorepodJoin the HARDLORE DISCORD: https://discord.gg/jA9rppggef________________________________________Cool links:HardLore Official Website/HardLore Records store: https://hardlorepod.comTry AG1 at DrinkAG1.com/HARDLORE to receive a free 1-year supply of vitamin D and 5 travel packs of AG1.Get 15% off MADD VINTAGE with code HARDLORE15! https://maddvintage.com/________________________________________FOLLOW PEELINGFLESH:INSTAGRAM | https://www.instagram.com/peelingfleshok/TWITTER | https://www.twitter.com/peelingfleshok FOLLOW HARDLORE:INSTAGRAM | https://www.instagram.com/hardlorepod/TWITTER | https://twitter.com/hardlorepodSPOTIFY | https://spoti.fi/3J1GIrpAPPLE | https://apple.co/3IKBss2 FOLLOW COLIN:INSTAGRAM | https://www.instagram.com/colinyovng/TWITTER | https://www.twitter.com/ColinYovng FOLLOW BO:INSTAGRAM | https://www.instagram.com/bosxe/TWITTER | https://www.twitter.com/bosxe________________________________________00:00:00 - Start00:02:28 - Finding Extreme Music in Tulsa / Oklahoma00:04:22 - Banned in OKC00:05:52 - Early Bands00:07:31 - Slam Or Hardcore?00:08:15 - Miss May I Cut Your Leg Off?00:09:44 - Origin of PeelingFlesh00:13:14 - Early PeelingFlesh Tours00:16:28 - Human Pudding/Funny Titles00:19:36 - PeelingFlesh "Lyrics"00:21:02 - Mush Mouthing00:22:27 - Falling Off A Bridge Trying To Save A White Baby00:25:13 - The G Code00:30:23 - The Mini Bus00:35:29 - The G Code Tour00:40:09 - Tour & Family Rituals00:46:49 - Pardon This Interruption00:49:27 - Being Called Buddy00:50:38 - Martial Arts00:52:14 - PF Radio Vol. 200:55:02 - Writing Schedule00:55:57 - Eating On Tour01:02:21 - Top 4 HC records01:04:20 - Top 4 Hip Hop Records01:06:45 - Sample Clearance01:08:38 - Ghosts01:11:53 - Growing Up In Oklahoma01:13:43 - Tours and Standout Tales From the Road01:16:54 - Patreon Q&A01:30:41 - Closing Remarks

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On today's episode of The Sporting Tribune Today, hosts Arash Markazi, Grant Mona, and Josh Tariff break down all the latest sports news. They'll react to Kelsey Plum's incredible buzzer-beater to lift the Sparks to a win over the Wings. The trio will also discuss the Dodgers' 8-3 loss to the Rockies, which saw Shohei Ohtani hit a rough patch, and the positive news that Matthew Stafford was back on the practice field for the third straight day. Finally, they'll touch on the reports of UCLA's recent issues with the media and the WWE shifting to ESPN. Produced by: Grant Mona

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Big old ZERO being thrown out at the top of the ep this week folks! Tom is back state side and he's coming in hot, meanwhile Timmy is about to take off for his galavanting around Europe with his new bride. We talk Ireland, being banned from Wembley Stadium, and more on this hot hot steamy ep. Just a dang good time. Tell a friend, send us a note, we love ya! Email: roommatesinlawcomedy@gmail.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/roommates_in_law Tommy Brennan: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/somekidtommy Tour dates: https://punchup.live/tommybrennan Tim Smith: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oletimmysmith Tour dates: https://linktr.ee/oletimmysmith 

There's a cop in Nashville who looks like Morgan Wallen. Luke Combs and the "Nashville No". The celebrity impersonator who got BANNED for life and moreSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Justin Bieber BioSnap a weekly updated Biography.The past week has put Justin Bieber's name back in the headlines for reasons both serious and surreal. The most significant biographical development is a major legal and financial resolution. According to reporting by IMDb, People, and Just Jared, Justin Bieber has agreed to pay $31.5 million to his former manager Scooter Braun and Hybe to settle a high-profile financial dispute. The bulk of this sum stems from Bieber's canceled Justice Tour in 2022, which led to financial obligations after the singer pulled the plug for health reasons. TMZ and AOL note that Bieber agreed to repay $26 million from the tour advance plus roughly half of $11 million in back commissions. People magazine further explains Braun and Hybe had covered costs initially, but Bieber only made one payment before this settlement finalized the matter. This puts closure to a lingering financial story that has dogged his business life for the past two years and is likely to be seen as an inflection point reflecting both personal and professional consequences.On a more personal note, Elle Magazine has featured new public moments between Justin and his son, Jack Blues Bieber, whose first birthday is coming up on August 22. Justin shared intimate photos on Instagram showing him playing with Jack, while Hailey Bieber has been candid in Vogue about motherhood being her top priority and the couple working through relationship challenges to emerge together. Entertainment Tonight sources maintained that while there were rough patches recently, including rumors of marital strife, the Biebers are currently in a good place, with divorce never seriously on the table.Amusement and confusion enveloped the entertainment world this week after a stunning episode in Las Vegas, as reported by The Tribune, Economic Times, and Consequence. Over the weekend, a French impersonator named Dylan Desclos duped the XS Nightclub into believing Bieber himself was in the building. With a lookalike entourage and even performing Sorry on stage, Desclos fooled staff and the crowd before being exposed and permanently banned by the Wynn. The real Bieber has made no public comment on the incident, although social media buzzed with speculation and video clips, sparking fresh debates on celebrity culture and the risks of impersonation.Finally, according to Instagram fan accounts, Bieber was recently seen celebrating with friends at Gunna's album release party in Los Angeles, appearing relaxed and engaged in the music scene. No new music or upcoming major projects have been officially announced since the release of his latest album, Swag, last month. No extended interviews or public statements from Justin on personal controversies have emerged, and no credible sources confirm any rumors about further relationship or career changes at this time. The dominant public headlines for Bieber this week: major legal closure, viral impersonation confusion in Las Vegas, and warm father-son moments as he prepares to mark Jack's first birthday.Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode OverviewTikTok banned my anatomy quiz. The reason? I showed an anatomically correct clitoris model and asked people to guess what it was. No explicit words. No graphic content. Just science.This is exactly why Saundra Pelletier, CEO of Evofem Biosciences, launched #SayVaginaMonth —a movement to fight censorship, challenge stigma, and normalize medically accurate conversations about women's bodies.What You'll Hear in This EpisodeWhy female anatomy gets censored while male terms don'tHow stigma in language leads to silence in the exam roomWhy even doctors avoid sexual health—and how to change thatWhy naming body parts correctly is critical for safety, consent & careWhat you can do to join #SayVaginaMonth and push back against bansWhy This MattersIf we can't say vagina or clitoris without fear of being banned, how can we expect healthcare, policy, or research to serve women properly? Words shape awareness. Awareness shapes care. Silence keeps us in the shadows.Resources & LinksConnect with Saundra Pelletier on LinkedIn, Instagram and TikTok

Guest: Coach Joe Kennedy

AI and automation tools can help B2B marketers scale their content or get their LinkedIn accounts shut down! LinkedIn expert Michelle J Raymond breaks down how to use AI responsibly, what LinkedIn's user agreement actually says, and how to stay compliant while increasing productivity.Key moments in this episode - 00:00 AI and Automation on LinkedIn00:32 The Rise and Fall of AI Hype02:52 Understanding LinkedIn's User Agreement06:41 The Dangers of Automation Abuse10:59 Safe Tools for LinkedIn Marketing17:16 Creating an AI Social Media PolicyLinkedIn User Agreement CONNECT WITH MICHELLE J RAYMOND Michelle J Raymond on LinkedIn Book a free intro call https://socialmediaforb2bgrowthpodcast.com/ B2B Growth Co newsletterToday's episode is sponsored by Metricool. Make sure to register for a FREE Metricool account today. Use Code MICHELLE30 to try any Premium Plan FREE for 30 days. https://metricool.com/michellejraymond/?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=influencer&utm_campaign=20250819_michelle-raymond_august-li-analytics-tagging_en&utm_content=audio&utm_term=q2

In today's episode of Reddit Podcast, a wild Karen completely loses it. You won't believe how this one ends! Sit back, relax, and enjoy this binge-worthy Reddit podcast, featuring Karen freakouts, entitled people stories, and pro revenge tales.

They're making it illegal to have fun. Chicago’s best morning radio show now has a podcast! Don’t forget to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts and remember that the conversation always lives on the Q101 Facebook page. Brian & Kenzie are live every morning from 6a-10a on Q101. Subscribe to our channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/@Q101 Like Q101 on Facebook HERE: https://www.facebook.com/q101chicago Follow Q101 on Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/Q101Chicago Follow Q101 on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/q101chicago/?hl=en Follow Q101 on TikTok HERE: https://www.tiktok.com/@q101chicago?lang=enSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

GIGANTIC Transgender Male Handball player PANICS! Fears he will be BANNED from Women's Olympic Team!

UK Cuts Own Throat! Illegals Get Homes & Flags Banned UK Cuts Own Throat! Illegals Get Homes & Flags Banned  #UKPolitics #IllegalMigrants #FlagsBanned #RickyJones #JonGaunt #TwoTierJustice #Labour #Birmingham #Starmer  Meanwhile, Labour councillor Ricky Jones was found not guilty after branding protestors as “Nazi Fascists” and even urging, “We need to cut their throats.”  Birmingham City Council goes bankrupt — and bans the Union Flag from lampposts, while spending thousands lighting up the city library in Pakistan colours for Pakistan Day. But did they do the same on St George's Day?  As predicted, illegal migrants are being moved from hotels into Homes of Multiple Occupation (HMOs) — a con trick where even local councils are kept in the dark.  The UK is being invaded and fundamentally changed at alarming speed, while Keir Starmer plays "world statesman." So the big question: Are we cutting our own throat as a sovereign nation?  

In 1875, the United States passed the Page Act: the first federal law to restrict immigration. The Page Act marked a turning point in American immigration policy, introducing the use of moral and racial criteria to determine who could enter the country.Join me as I examine the origins, language, and enforcement of the Page Act, how the law impacted immigration from China, and how it shaped future U.S. policies, including the Chinese Exclusion Act.The Page Act is often overlooked in discussions of American immigration history, but it offers important insight into how race, gender, and morality became central to border control in the late 19th century.Support the show

In 1969, Indonesian writer Pramoedya Ananta Toer was imprisoned without trial in the notorious labour camp on Buru Island. He spent 10 years there.He is best known for his novels about the rise of Indonesian nationalism. He wrote much of his work in captivity. As he was denied pen and paper on the island, his most famous work, the Buru Quartet, began as oral storytelling. He narrated the stories to fellow prisoners until he was eventually allowed to write them down himself. His powerful story is told through archive interviews. Produced and presented by Gill Kearsley.Eye-witness accounts brought to life by archive. Witness History is for those fascinated by the past. We take you to the events that have shaped our world through the eyes of the people who were there. For nine minutes every day, we take you back in time and all over the world, to examine wars, coups, scientific discoveries, cultural moments and much more. Recent episodes explore everything from the death of Adolf Hitler, the first spacewalk and the making of the movie Jaws, to celebrity tortoise Lonesome George, the Kobe earthquake and the invention of superglue. We look at the lives of some of the most famous leaders, artists, scientists and personalities in history, including: Eva Peron – Argentina's Evita; President Ronald Reagan and his famous ‘tear down this wall' speech; Thomas Keneally on why he wrote Schindler's List; and Jacques Derrida, France's ‘rock star' philosopher. You can learn all about fascinating and surprising stories, such as the civil rights swimming protest; the disastrous D-Day rehearsal; and the death of one of the world's oldest languages.