Podcasts about Utah Valley University

The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk's death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson's immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson's violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk's death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson's immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson's violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk's death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson's immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson's violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk's death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson's immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson's violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

A huge share of the internet has decided the answer is no — that Tyler Robinson didn't kill Charlie Kirk, that he was set up, that the real shooter got away. The theory has serious reach and serious money behind it. This episode takes it seriously too, and holds it up against everything that came out under oath.Tony works through the two theories that matter. First, the patsy claim: that Robinson was framed and wasn't even at Utah Valley University that day. He answers it with the confession note under Robinson's keyboard, the DNA on the rifle, the engraved casings tied to a tool in Robinson's home, and the surveillance footage that tracked him onto campus and into the woods where the weapon was found. Second, the second-shooter claim, and the three anomalies that fuel it — the missing casings, the second bullet on another roof, the bullet that couldn't be matched.Every anomaly gets one clean answer, delivered straight. And Tony is honest about the single loose end in this case that still hasn't been explained — while making clear it points at sloppy police work, not a second gunman.The fact that should settle the whole argument isn't forensic at all. It's what Robinson's own defense attorney did, and refused to do, across five days of testimony with her client facing execution.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CharlieKirk #TylerRobinson #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheories #CandaceOwens #Patsy #SecondShooter #UVU #Justice

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk's death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson's immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson's violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk's death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson's immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson's violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Copious evidence was presented last week during the preliminary hearing of Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk, and yet conspiracy theories still abound about what happened last September on the campus of Utah Valley University.

A man allegedly confessed to a crime in three formats. He turned himself in to the sheriff. His DNA is on the weapon. And somehow the prosecution is the one on the defensive. The Charlie Kirk death-penalty case should be the definition of open-and-shut. Tyler Robinson is charged with aggravated murder for the September 2025 shooting at Utah Valley University that killed Kirk, one of the most prominent political figures in the country and a father of two young children.The problems started before Robinson was ever identified. Kirk's private security team warned the university about exposed rooftops overlooking the event venue. Nobody was assigned to secure them. Robinson allegedly set up a shooting position on an unsecured roof and waited at least seven minutes before firing. UVU deployed six campus police officers for a crowd that exceeded 3,000. No drones, no bag checks, no metal detectors, no coordination with local law enforcement agencies that had the resources the university lacked.After the shooting, a 71-year-old man falsely claimed responsibility and was arrested on the spot. The FBI director publicly named the wrong suspect. Robinson was identified only after his own parents recognized him in surveillance photos and persuaded him to surrender. The investigation's first 33 hours produced zero correct arrests.Then the prosecution created its own crisis. The county attorney's spokesperson violated a pretrial publicity order by telling TMZ the state had "ample evidence" against Robinson. A judge held him in contempt. The bullet that killed Kirk can't be forensically matched to the rifle. And the key witness testified by video, not in person. Tony breaks down how every checkpoint in this case — prevention, investigation, prosecution — failed in sequence.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CharlieKirk #TylerRobinson #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #UVU #DeathPenalty #Prosecution #Contempt #PreliminaryHearing #Justice

The death-penalty prosecutor in the Charlie Kirk case got himself held in contempt of court — and the trial hasn't even started. Tyler Robinson faces aggravated murder charges for the September 2025 shooting that killed Kirk at Utah Valley University. By every measure, the prosecution's case should be overwhelming. Alleged confessions in a handwritten note, text messages, and a Discord post. DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle. Surveillance footage placing him on the rooftop. A voluntary surrender facilitated by his own parents.But the prosecution couldn't leave the evidence alone. After the defense highlighted an inconclusive ballistics report — the bullet fragmented and couldn't be matched to the rifle — the county attorney's spokesperson went on a media tour. TMZ. USA Today. Fox News. He corrected misinformation about the ballistics, which was permitted. Then he told TMZ prosecutors had "ample evidence" to overcome the presumption of innocence. That was not permitted. The judge held him in civil contempt and ordered the prosecution to pay the defense's legal costs.The prosecutor's misstep is just one failure in a case defined by them. Kirk's security team warned the university about rooftop exposure two weeks before the event. Six campus officers covered a crowd of more than 3,000. The first person arrested was a false confessor whose phone contained illegal material unrelated to the case. The FBI director announced the wrong suspect. And Robinson was ultimately identified not by the investigation but by his mother and father, who recognized their son in publicly released surveillance photos.Tony traces the path from a preventable tragedy to a prosecution that keeps handing ammunition to the defense.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CharlieKirk #TylerRobinson #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #UVU #DeathPenalty #Prosecution #PreliminaryHearing #UtahValleyUniversity #Justice

On the Flyover Conservatives Show, David and Stacy Whited sit down with Ben Kjar, the inspiring subject of Angel Studios' new film STAND OUT. Born with Crouzon syndrome, Ben endured major surgeries, painful bullying, and moments that could have destroyed his confidence—but with faith, family, and determination, he became a three-time Utah state wrestling champion, an NCAA Division I All-American, and a world champion. Ben shares how the words of his mother transformed his identity, why the thing that makes you different may be the very thing God uses to make a difference, and how families can help children build genuine confidence. He also reveals his “3XSC” formula for achieving goals by calling your shot, surrounding yourself with the right people, and setting a clear deadline. This powerful conversation will challenge you to confront fear, stop settling for average, and step into the extraordinary purpose God has placed inside you.TO WATCH ALL FLYOVER CONTENT: www.theflyoverapp.com Follow and Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheFlyoverConservativesShow To Schedule A Time To Talk To Dr. Dr. Kirk Elliott Go To ▶ https://flyovergold.comOr Call 720-605-3900 ► Receive your FREE 52 Date Night Ideas Playbook to make date night more exciting, go to www.prosperousmarriage.comBen KjarANGEL: https://www.angel.com/watch/standoutPRIME: https://www.amazon.com/Standout-Kjar-Story-Tanner-Christensen/dp/B0GX19RGH1WEBSITE: https://benkjar.comCALL YOUR SHOT: https://3xsc.comBen Kjar is an international motivational speaker, world champion wrestler, entrepreneur, and the inspiring subject of Angel Studios' film STAND OUT. Born with Crouzon syndrome, Ben endured numerous surgeries, bullying, and emotional challenges before turning the difference that once made him feel isolated into a source of purpose and strength. He became a three-time Utah state wrestling champion and Utah Valley University's first NCAA Division I wrestling All-American. At age 40, Ben represented the United States at the Veterans World Championships, earning gold in Greco-Roman wrestling and silver in freestyle. Today, he travels the world teaching individuals, athletes, families, and organizations how to overcome fear, build confidence, “disobey average,” and achieve extraordinary goals.-------------------------------------------

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Since Charlie Kirk's murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk's political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution's case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson's vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson's former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson's lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs's immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson's guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson's vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson's former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson's lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs's immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson's guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

It's only the middle of July, but back-to-school season is just around the corner. Before you know it, your kids will be out of the house for most of the day. Before they head out, we're taking some time to talk about the tough conversations you should have with your kids. Today, we kick things off with a chat about technology... AI, chatbots, and sextortion. With so much changing technology, how do you talk with your kids about the dangers of this kind of tech and how they can best be protected? Brandon Amacher, Director of the Emerging Tech Policy Lab at Utah Valley University, joins to share his expertise.

The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson's vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson's former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson's lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs's immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson's guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson's vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson's former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson's lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs's immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson's guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson's vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson's former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson's lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs's immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson's guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson's vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson's former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson's lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs's immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson's guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Charlie Kirk Murder Case: New Evidence Reveals Overwhelming Proof of Guilt This episode of the Carl Jackson Show is a must-listen for anyone following the Charlie Kirk murder case. The latest developments in the investigation have brought forth a wealth of new evidence that's leaving conspiracy theorists scrambling to explain the overwhelming proof of guilt. From surveillance footage to DNA analysis, the case against Tyler Robinson is looking increasingly airtight. The speaker delves into the details of the case, discussing the timeline of events leading up to the assassination, including Robinson's visits to the Utah Valley University campus on the day of the shooting. The evidence presented includes surveillance footage showing Robinson's car entering the campus parking garage, as well as his own DNA found on a rifle and shell casings. The prosecution's case is built on a foundation of concrete evidence, including text messages and a confession note left behind by Robinson. As the investigation unfolds, the speaker highlights the inconsistencies in the conspiracy theories surrounding the case. From the "exploding microphone" to the "second shooter," these theories are being debunked by the sheer weight of the evidence. The speaker also discusses the role of social media in perpetuating these conspiracy theories, and the ways in which they can be used to manipulate and deceive. If you're following the Charlie Kirk murder case, you won't want to miss this episode of the Carl Jackson Show. Tune in to hear the latest developments and the speaker's analysis of the evidence. Listen now to get the truth behind the Charlie Kirk murder case. Follow Carl Jackson:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradioX/Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshowInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshowWebsite: http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.comStore: https://CarlJacksonStore.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Breaking new surveillance footage shown in the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing is giving the public one of the most detailed timelines yet in the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Prosecutors say the footage shows Robinson's alleged movements on campus before the shooting, including visits to UVU, rooftop access, and his alleged escape after the fatal shot.In this video, we break down what the footage reportedly shows, why the timeline matters, what prosecutors are arguing in court, and how this new evidence could shape the case moving forward. Robinson is charged with aggravated murder and other counts, prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, and he has not yet entered a plea. This is a developing story, and the legal process is still ongoing. We'll separate verified court reporting from speculation and show why this newly revealed footage has become a major turning point in the Charlie Kirk case.For free and unbiased Medicare help, dial (656) 218-0931 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter, or go to https://askchapter.org/nez✅ Reach out to me: https://bio.site/professornez✅ ORIGINAL MADE IN U.S.A 250TH AMERICA DESIGNS: https://professornez.myspreadshop.com/✅ Check out our Official Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@professornezclips▶ Support the Channel and Buy us a Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/professornezEducational Commentary & Original AnalysisThis channel presents educational, lecture-style analysis created by a university professor and educator. Content focuses on contextual examination, historical background, legal frameworks, and evidence-based analysis of widely reported events, public records, and institutional processes.The approach emphasizes academic methodology, media literacy, and source-driven interpretation rather than advocacy, persuasion, or real-time news reporting. Viewers are encouraged to consult primary sources and form independent conclusions.All content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, medical, or professional advice. Views expressed are solely those of the creator.This channel may include references or links to third-party websites or products for informational purposes. Some links may be affiliate links, which may generate a commission at no additional cost to the viewer.In this video expert Professor Nez analyzes and educates on what happened and why with fact based, data based, verified and researched expertise reporting.All original content is protected by copyright. Fair use applies where permitted by law.Category: News Analysis & Educational CommentaryMethodology: This report utilizes primary source verification and comparative analysis of public records.Subject Matter Expertise: Political Strategy, Regulatory Policy, and Media Literacy.

It's Friday, July 10th, A.D. 2026. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes heard on 140 radio stations and at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Adam McManus Finnish MP, convicted for quoting Bible, denied transit through London airport Finnish Member of Parliament Päivi Räsänen, who was recently convicted by Finland's Supreme Court for quoting the Bible, has been told that she cannot go through London's Heathrow Airport due to her alleged “hate crime” conviction, reports LifeSiteNews.com. Writer Rod Dreher broke the news on his Substack on Wednesday. The incident has not yet been detailed by any other outlets, but Dreher's report was reposted on X by the senior counsel of Alliance Defending Freedom, which has defended Räsänen in court over the years. War Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly prayed to King Jesus on July 4th On Independence Day, War Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered this extraordinary prayer at the White House. Listen. HEGSETH: “King Jesus, we come humbly before Your throne, praising You for all the providence You've bestowed upon this nation. For over 250 years, from George Washington to President Trump, we have dedicated this nation to one nation under God, and certainly, in God we trust. “And as we think 250 years ago to George Washington on bended knee in Valley Forge, appealing to Heaven on behalf of his troops in this young nation. We've appealed to You from the beginning, and may we continue to appeal to You. And tonight, we pray for our President, President Trump. Give him safety, give him wisdom. “Lord, we pray for our Vice President, our First Lady, our Second Lady, the cabinet members here, all the governors assembled here as well, our civil magistrates, Lord God. I ask that You give them the wisdom to see what is right and the courage to do it; wisdom defined as fear of the Lord, ear of the Lord being the source of all knowledge and wisdom, Lord God, Your eternal truths may they rule. “So, this evening, also, I would be remiss if I did not pray for our great troops, our men and women all around the globe, defending our great nation, as they have for 250 years. Lord God, watch over them and protect them. “It is in Your holy name, the Lord Jesus Christ, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, that we pray, and we bless this food, too. Amen.” I bet you didn't hear that prayer on any secular news outlet. In Psalm 35:18, King David offers this prayer to God: “I will give You thanks in the great assembly; among the throngs I will praise You.” Students for Life gives Congress an ‘F' after Planned Parenthood's funding resumes Pro-lifers across America are reeling over the Republican-controlled Congress's failure to keep Planned Parenthood defunded. Now, Students for Life has taken the dramatic step of notifying every member of Congress that they have received a failing pro-life grade as a result, reports LifeSiteNews.com. Last July, President Donald Trump signed into law his “One Big Beautiful Bill”, a wide-ranging policy package that included a one-year ban on federal tax dollars going through Medicaid to entities that commit abortions for reasons other than rape, incest, or supposed threats to the mother's life.  While it denied millions to Planned Parenthood, pro-lifers warned from the start that it was only a temporary solution and urged Congress to enact a more permanent measure ahead of the provision's July 4, 2026 expiration date. Maine's Democratic Senatorial candidate suspends campaign Democratic Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner ended his campaign on July 8th after facing a detailed allegation of sexual assault, an astounding and rapid fall for the leftist oysterman whose dramatic rise and grassroots support helped him overcome establishment opposition to secure his party's nomination, reports Politico.com. But a persistent accumulation of controversies weighed on Platner's campaign for months. Monday marked a turning point: Democratic leadership, many of Platner's staunchest leftist backers, and key groups who had been helping fund his bid withdrew their support and pressured Platner to drop out after POLITICO reported a new allegation of sexual assault. Since his withdrawal from the race, several Democrats have expressed interest in running against Republican incumbent Senator Susan Collins. Appearing on Fox News, Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania did not pull any punches and spoke directly to Graham Platner on national television. FETTERMAN: “A woman credibly accused you of raping her. He will be remembered as an accused rapist. He's always been a dead man walking.” FOX NEWS HOST: “He choked up a couple of times during that announcement. Do you think he thinks he's the victim here?” FETTERMAN: “Oh, yeah, definitely. Bro, you will only be remembered as the accused rapist that got pushed out of your election. That's your legacy, bro. You are a guy that cheats on your wife. You're the guy that roughs up your ex-girlfriends. That's your legacy, bro.” Trial of Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter reveals testimony from trans roommate In the trial involving Charlie Kirk's September 10, 2025 assassination, suspected shooter, Tyler Robinson, faces several charges including aggravated murder, a capital offense, reports the New York Post. On July 9th, Robinson's preliminary hearing entered Day 4 in Provo, Utah, as prosecutors played redacted video testimony from his ex-lover, Lance Twiggs, a man who pretends to be a woman named Luna. Twiggs was Robinson's former roommate and romantic partner, who was granted "use immunity" for his statements to investigators. Twiggs revealed Robinson's alleged tearful confession after returning home from killing Charlie Kirk — hours before turning himself in. In never-before-seen footage, Twiggs told prosecutors on July 9th that Robinson was walking around their apartment before breaking down and declaring he “wishes he hadn't done it.” The video showed prosecutor Ryan McBride interviewing Robinson's partner, who described Robinson's alleged regret when they spoke in person on September 11 — one day after Kirk was killed. McBRIDE: “Did he talk about what he had done?” TWIGGS: “Didn't go into detail. I just asked him, in person, if what he said was true the night before, and he said it was. He started crying a little bit, and said he wishes he hadn't done it.” Proverbs 12:17 says, “An honest witness tells the truth, but a false witness tells lies.” As related texts were read aloud, Kirk's widow, Erika Kirk, was heard crying in court, according to the Daily Mail. The video and accompanying texts — shown for the first time in court during a preliminary hearing — offered the strongest picture yet of how the accused lone gunman allegedly confessed to the assassination. 31-year-old Charlie Kirk was fatally shot in the neck during a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University. Worldview listeners weigh in from Wisconsin and Florida Wyatt Dennison, age 10, in DeForest, Wisconsin, wrote me and said, “I really like to listen to your newscast during lunchtime every day. I enjoy hearing how the Church throughout the world is doing. I also appreciate your sharing Scripture related to the news stories. My mom homeschools my four siblings and me. We are grateful to hear current events from a Christian worldview.” And Samuel Card in Fellsmere, Florida, wrote, “I enjoy the brief, yet various topics that The Worldview team compiles. Sometimes I go back and delve deeper into a subject that catches my attention. My favorite part is how Scripture is given throughout, showing just how much it applies to every part of life. An added benefit: I have just enough time to listen during my morning walk to work!” 12 Worldview listeners gave $3,345 on Thursday And finally, on Thursday by 5:45pm Central, 12 Worldview listeners stepped up to the plate and invested their treasure to fund the six-member team behind The Worldview for another 365 days. Our thanks to Karen in Muskego, Wisconsin who gave $25 as well as Paul in Cypress, Texas, Gilbert in Kodiak, Alaska, Susan in Oak Grove, Missouri, and Lara in Streetman, Texas – each of whom gave $50. We were touched by the generosity of Wendy in Ventura, California, Kelly in Loving, Texas, Steve in Loveland, Colorado, and George in Leesburg, Virginia – each of whom gave $100. And we're grateful to God for an anonymous donor in Cranston, Rhode Island who gave $120, David and Kathy in Crestview, Florida who renewed their pledge for $50/month for another 12 months for a total gift of $600, and Justin in Bozeman, Montana who gave $2,000. Those 12 gifts add up to $3,345. Ready for our new grand total? Drum roll please. (drum roll sound effect) $21,043 (sound effect of people cheering) That means we need to raise $9,832 to hit our $30,875 goal by tonight at 12 midnight. We need to find 4 Worldview listeners who will pledge $100/month for 12 months or give a one-time gift of $1,200, 4 folks who will pledge $50/month or give a one-time gift of $600 and 8 listeners who will pledge $25/month or give a one-time gift of $300. Go to TheWorldview.com, click on Give, select the dollar amount, and make sure to click on the “recurring” button if that's your wish.  This Christian newscast champions the truth and a Biblical worldview. Invest in it today to fund its future. Again, go to TheWorldview.com, and click on Give. What has the Lord placed on your heart to give? Close And that's The Worldview on this Friday, July 10th, in the year of our Lord 2026. Subscribe for free by Spotify, Amazon Music, or by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com.  Plus, you can get the Generations app through Google Play or The App Store. I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

The Charlie Kirk Murder Case: New Evidence Reveals Overwhelming Proof of Guilt This episode of the Carl Jackson Show is a must-listen for anyone following the Charlie Kirk murder case. The latest developments in the investigation have brought forth a wealth of new evidence that's leaving conspiracy theorists scrambling to explain the overwhelming proof of guilt. From surveillance footage to DNA analysis, the case against Tyler Robinson is looking increasingly airtight. The speaker delves into the details of the case, discussing the timeline of events leading up to the assassination, including Robinson's visits to the Utah Valley University campus on the day of the shooting. The evidence presented includes surveillance footage showing Robinson's car entering the campus parking garage, as well as his own DNA found on a rifle and shell casings. The prosecution's case is built on a foundation of concrete evidence, including text messages and a confession note left behind by Robinson. As the investigation unfolds, the speaker highlights the inconsistencies in the conspiracy theories surrounding the case. From the "exploding microphone" to the "second shooter," these theories are being debunked by the sheer weight of the evidence. The speaker also discusses the role of social media in perpetuating these conspiracy theories, and the ways in which they can be used to manipulate and deceive. If you're following the Charlie Kirk murder case, you won't want to miss this episode of the Carl Jackson Show. Tune in to hear the latest developments and the speaker's analysis of the evidence. Listen now to get the truth behind the Charlie Kirk murder case. Follow Carl Jackson:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradioX/Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshowInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshowWebsite: http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.comStore: https://CarlJacksonStore.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A high-profile preliminary hearing is underway to determine if 23-year-old Tyler Robinson will stand trial for the shocking sniper-style assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. As prosecutors present chilling evidence, questions loom about courtroom transparency and the looming threat of the death penalty. Law&Crime's Jesse Weber is joined by litigator Rich Schoenstein to break down the most explosive moments from the courtroom and analyze what lies ahead for the defense.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW: Take your business to the next level with a free 14-day trial at https://odoo.com/sidebar. HOST:Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweberLAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokeVideo Editing - Michael Deininger, Christina O'Shea, Alex Ciccarone, & Jay CruzScript Writing & Producing - Savannah Williamson & Juliana BattagliaGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrimeTwitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Donate (no account necessary) | Subscribe (account required) Join Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA Operations Officer, as he dives into today's top stories shaping America and the world. In this Listener Q&A episode of The Wright Report, Bryan tackles listener questions on the Charlie Kirk assassination trial, breaking down new evidence placing Tyler Robinson on campus and the forensic mystery behind the bullet that killed Charlie. Bryan also explores what it means to be an American through the words of Charlie Kirk, Teddy Roosevelt, and St. Thomas Aquinas, then digs into listener mail on Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's push for radical Supreme Court reforms, more fallout from the Graham Platner rape allegation in Maine, and a candid update on why there will be no Part Two to Bryan's July 4th video. Plus, Hamas dissolves its Gaza government but refuses to disarm, and Iran and the US trade escalating strikes near the Strait of Hormuz as Trump revokes Iranian oil sanction waivers. "And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." - John 8:32   Keywords: Charlie Kirk trial, Tyler Robinson evidence, Utah Valley University, Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk American identity, Teddy Roosevelt hyphenated Americanism, St Thomas Aquinas citizenship, JD Vance Pope Leo, Josh Shapiro Supreme Court, Katanji Brown Jackson, Graham Platner Maine Senate, Bukele Path, immigration debate, Hamas Gaza dissolution, UN Gaza transition, Iran strikes Strait of Hormuz, IRGC Ayatollah funeral, Iran oil sanctions, Trump Iran strikes, Bahrain Kuwait missiles, Wright Report Q&A

Agent Hull's testimony in the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing gave us a much better look at how prosecutors are trying to move this case forward. The judge is not deciding guilt at this stage, instead he's trying to determine if there is reasonable cause to bind Tyler Robinson over for trial in the shooting death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Pay attention to the way investigators place Robinson on the UVU campus multiple times on the morning of the shooting, first in shorts and a red shirt, later with a blue backpack, and then later again in different clothing while walking with what Agent Hull described as “a gait or a limp.” Prosecutors used the video evidence to track the person they identify as Robinson moving toward the rooftop where he allegedly laid prone at the corner of the roof before the shot was fired. Then, he ran with something in his hands to the corner of the rooftop where he scaled down the building and ran into a nearby wooded area. He didn't take the stairs, and the video supports the claim that the clothing matched that worn by Tyler Robinson when he was seen going to the rooftop. The important question for today is not whether every issue has been proven for trial. It's whether the state showed enough reasonable cause to move this case forward to a trial. This powerful testimony may also support the prosecution's larger argument about planning, preparation, premeditation, flight, and eventually a possible death penalty case. Until a decision is made by a jury, Tyler Robinson is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.#ProfilingEvil #MikeKing #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #CharlieKirkCase #CharlieKirkMurder #UtahValleyUniversity #UVU #PreliminaryHearing #AgentHull #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #CourtroomCoverage #LegalAnalysis #DeathPenaltyCase #CriminalJustice #SurveillanceVideo #BehavioralAnalysis #UtahNews #CrimeNews #BreakingNews #AggravatedMurder #CourtCase #TrialWatch========================================20% OFF Newspapers.comhttps://www.newspapers.com/go/podcast/?ref=profilingevil?xid=8877&utm_source=ProfilingEvilPodcast&utm_medium=podcst&utm_campaign=ProfilingEvil26========================================Discounts on eBikes: https://aipasbike.com/?ref=PROFILINGEVILReferral Coupon Code: PROFILINGEVIL========================================Email your questions to: ProfilingEvil@gmail.com========================================

Tyler Robinson's preliminary hearing, Karoline Leavitt's viral Gen Z gaffe, Trump Accounts, and Aaronalysis headline today's A.M. Update. The preliminary hearing for Tyler Robinson kicks off in Utah with surveillance footage showing Robinson on the Utah Valley University campus four times before, during, and after the shooting, while Blake Neff reports that TPUSA's Terrell Farnsworth, who faced months of harassment from the Candace Owens crowd, was actually helping prosecutors all along. Karoline Leavitt tells Jesse Watters that Gen Z has been raised with silver spoons in their mouths, and Aaron says even with the out-of-context caveat that is a let-them-eat-cake moment the White House cannot afford. Trump rings the NYSE and Nasdaq opening bells from the Oval Office to mark the live launch of Trump Accounts, joined by Ted Cruz, Scott Bessent, and Michael and Susan Dell whose $6.25 billion pledge seeds $250 accounts for up to 25 million children under 10, and Aaron calls it a potential test run for eventually replacing Social Security.

Day one of the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing in Utah was exactly what I expected it to be, slow, procedural, and at times rather painful. This was not opening statements in a trial. This was the prosecution beginning the process of showing the judge that there is enough probable cause to send the aggravated murder case against Tyler Robinson forward to trial in the shooting death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Let's examine the first day of testimony that included the presence of Charlie Kirk's widow and family. We heard from the officer who discovered the shooters “sniper pad” and saw and heard from video, graphic evidence and parts of the autopsy report. The defense scored a win when the judge refused to admit a prosecution-created video compilation because it had been altered with zooms, red circles, and other edits.We'll also look at what the prosecution seems to value the most right now in the form of video, geography, line of sight analysis and a careful chain from the shooting scene to the suspected escape route. I also want to discuss what the state seemed to avoid on day one, including deeper motive evidence, DNA, ballistics, etched rounds, and any full discussion of alleged admissions. You'll be surprised with the number of defense objections in this first day of testimony when they argued repeatedly against photos, videos and even written statements. I'm left wondering if this foretells of motions and appeals down the road.#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #CharlieKirkMurder #ProfilingEvil #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #CourtroomCoverage #PreliminaryHearing #UtahCrime #UtahValleyUniversity #CriminalJustice #DeathPenaltyCase #BreakingCrimeNews #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #LawAndCrime #CrimeAnalysis #CriminalBehavior #JusticeForCharlie #MurderTrial #Esri #GIS #ArcGIS #crime #crimemapping========================================20% OFF Newspapers.comhttps://www.newspapers.com/go/podcast/?ref=profilingevil?xid=8877&utm_source=ProfilingEvilPodcast&utm_medium=podcst&utm_campaign=ProfilingEvil26========================================Discounts on eBikes: https://aipasbike.com/?ref=PROFILINGEVILReferral Coupon Code: PROFILINGEVIL========================================Email your questions to: ProfilingEvil@gmail.com========================================

What makes a photography experience unforgettable? It's not just beautiful images. It's how your clients feel from the very first inquiry to the final gallery delivery.In this episode, I sit down with photographer Maegan Grendall to talk about the client workflow that has helped her create a seamless, personalized experience while building a business fueled by referrals and repeat clients.We dive into the systems, communication, and intentional touch points that make clients feel cared for every step of the way, while also creating a workflow that's sustainable for photographers.Whether you're just starting out or refining your client experience, you'll walk away with practical ideas you can implement right away.In This Episode:Why your client experience starts long before the session.The workflow steps that help clients feel confident and cared for.Simple ways to stand out in a competitive photography market.How clear communication creates happier clients and fewer headaches.The small details that lead to more referrals and repeat bookings.Creating systems that save time without sacrificing a personal touch.Why she feels contracts are one of the most important parts of the workflow (Here are the ones I use CODE: RACHELTR10 for 10% off) If you're ready to elevate your client experience and build a photography business that feels both professional and personal, this episode is for you.About the guest:Maegan Grendell is a portrait and wedding photographer based in northern Utah, serving clients wherever their stories take her. After studying art and design at Utah Valley University, she followed her passion for photography full time, turning a lifelong love of creativity into a career.With a camera in her hands since the age of three, Maegan is passionate about creating an experience that goes far beyond beautiful photos. She believes photography is about helping people feel confident, seen, and genuinely cared for from the first inquiry to the final gallery. Her thoughtful client workflow and intentional approach have helped her build a business rooted in connection, storytelling, and unforgettable experiences.When she's not behind the camera, you'll find her traveling, spending time with family and friends, listening to music, working out, searching for the perfect drink, or attempting to learn guitar.Connect with Rachel:

The preliminary hearing for Tyler Robinson continues for another day. Remember, he's the man charged with shooting and killing political influencer Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University last year. The prosecution is trying to convince the judge to move this ahead to trial. But the defense is taking every opportunity it can to object to the prosecution's moves. KSL NewsRadio reporter Heather Peterson was at the courthouse in Provo all day yesterday; she joins Greg and Holly with updates.

Today is day one of a preliminary hearing expected to last all week for 23-year-old Tyler Robinson. Robinson is facing the death penalty for the September 10th murder of Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed while speaking to a crowd of 3 thousand people at Utah Valley University. Prosecutors will be laying out its evidence against Robinson, which will include a video taped statement from Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, to convince a judge there is enough proof to go to trial. The hearing, which will resemble a mini-trial, will be live-streamed and will mark the first time Charlie Kirk’s widow Erica and his parents will be face-to-face with Robinson.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today is day one of a preliminary hearing expected to last all week for 23-year-old Tyler Robinson. Robinson is facing the death penalty for the September 10th murder of Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed while speaking to a crowd of 3 thousand people at Utah Valley University. Prosecutors will be laying out its evidence against Robinson, which will include a video taped statement from Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, to convince a judge there is enough proof to go to trial. The hearing, which will resemble a mini-trial, will be live-streamed and will mark the first time Charlie Kirk’s widow Erica and his parents will be face-to-face with Robinson.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today is day one of a preliminary hearing expected to last all week for 23-year-old Tyler Robinson. Robinson is facing the death penalty for the September 10th murder of Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed while speaking to a crowd of 3 thousand people at Utah Valley University. Prosecutors will be laying out its evidence against Robinson, which will include a video taped statement from Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, to convince a judge there is enough proof to go to trial. The hearing, which will resemble a mini-trial, will be live-streamed and will mark the first time Charlie Kirk’s widow Erica and his parents will be face-to-face with Robinson.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing is underway in Provo, Utah, and this could give the public its first real look at the evidence in the Charlie Kirk murder case. Robinson is charged with aggravated murder in the shooting death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University, and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty if he is convicted. This is a preliminary hearing, where the judge decides whether there is enough evidence to move the case forward. The hearing will show us how the state plans to prove identification, intent, motive and aggravating factors as they actively pursue the death penalty. It can also show us how the defense may counter the case, challenge the evidence, object to testimony, and begin laying the groundwork for trial. #ProfilingEvil #MikeKing #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #CharlieKirkCase #UtahCrime #UtahNews #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #CrimeNews #CourtroomCoverage #PreliminaryHearing #DeathPenaltyCase #CriminalJustice #BreakingNews #LegalAnalysis #CourtCase #ForensicEvidence #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrimeDiscussion========================================20% OFF Newspapers.comhttps://www.newspapers.com/go/podcast/?ref=profilingevil?xid=8877&utm_source=ProfilingEvilPodcast&utm_medium=podcst&utm_campaign=ProfilingEvil26========================================Discounts on eBikes: https://aipasbike.com/?ref=PROFILINGEVILReferral Coupon Code: PROFILINGEVIL========================================Email your questions to: ProfilingEvil@gmail.com========================================

Today is day one of a preliminary hearing expected to last all week for 23-year-old Tyler Robinson. Robinson is facing the death penalty for the September 10th murder of Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed while speaking to a crowd of 3 thousand people at Utah Valley University. Prosecutors will be laying out its evidence against Robinson, which will include a video taped statement from Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, to convince a judge there is enough proof to go to trial. The hearing, which will resemble a mini-trial, will be live-streamed and will mark the first time Charlie Kirk’s widow Erica and his parents will be face-to-face with Robinson.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Unashamed Unafraid, Austin shares how keeping a small journal of unfiltered “Dear God” letters for six months became a record of his recovery, transformed his relationship with God, improved communication with his wife, and supported about four months of sobriety. He describes feeling prompted to write “I'm a porn addict in recovery. Ask me anything.” on a poster board and sit at Utah Valley University; after three hours, one student approached, discussed shame and feeling unlovable, and later asked to keep talking. Sam connects this to his own prayer for guidance to expand the platform, then joins Austin in Salt Lake City near City Creek Mall to hold the sign with Austin, where several strangers engage in meaningful conversations. They discuss de-shaming addiction, the most common question they received, and invite listeners to try writing letters to God and email Sam to get involved.Make a donation and become an Outsider!Follow us on social media! Instagram, Facebook & TikTokSubscribe to our YouTubeCheck out our recommended resourcesWant to rep the message? Shop our MERCH!  For more inspiration, read our blogDo you have a story you are willing to share? Send us an email! contact@unashamedunafraid.com01:17 Letters to God04:00 Sobriety Breakthrough04:36 Share About Your Porn Addiction07:30 Finding The One08:40 Why Vulnerability Matters11:04 Taking It to Salt Lake12:06 De-Shaming Porn Addiction14:50 Hard Questions Real Answers16:30 Hope Without Pressure

As we approach America's 250th birthday, we're reminded that every generation inherits the responsibility of shaping the nation's future. At a moment marked by fear, division, and distrust, the invitation to become peacemakers has never felt more urgent.Today, we're sharing a powerful message from Patrick Mason, that he shared at our Restore Gathering at Utah Valley University last year, just two weeks after the tragic shooting of Charlie Kirk on the same campus. Speaking only a few hundred yards from the memorial, Patrick reminds us that violence is never the end of the story. The gospel invites us to answer fear with courage, suspicion with curiosity, and enmity with love.We love Patrick's conviction that peacemaking is the work of discipleship. It is the work of Zion. And as we prepare to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, he invites us to declare our own independence—from the politics of fear, from contempt, from tribalism, and from the habits that keep us divided. Instead, he calls on all of us to join "a revolution of friendship and civility."When he finished speaking at Restore, the room erupted. There was a palpable sense of hope and energy— that ordinary people really can help heal a divided world. As you celebrate this Independence Day, we hope you'll be filled with that same conviction.Tickets for Restore 2026 are now available, and we have a new format we think you're going to love. Get details here!

The Rod and Greg Show Daily Rundown – Thursday, June 25, 20264:20 pm: Sam Dorman, Editor of the Epoch Times, joins Rod and Greg for a conversation about the decisions handed down this week by the U.S. Supreme Court.4:38 pm: Clark Aposhian, Chairman of the Utah Shooting Sports Council and host of Gun Radio Utah on KNRS, joins the program to discuss the Supreme Court decision today that struck down a Hawaii law requiring gun owners to get permission to carry into a store or private property.5:05 pm: Utah State Forester and Division Director of Utah Forestry, Fire and State Lands Jamie Barnes will join Rod and Greg to discuss today's executive order from Governor Spencer Cox to give her the ability to ban fireworks via a state of emergency.5:38 pm: Draper City Mayor Troy Walker joins Rod and Greg for a conversation about the statewide fireworks ban issued today in Utah, and why the ban has the support of the state's mayors.6:38 pm: Dave McEntire, Professor in the Department of Emergency Services at Utah Valley University, who formerly lived in Venezuela, joins the show to discuss the devastating impacts of yesterday's twin earthquakes.

How did a rebel nation establish a federal court system? Utah Valley University professor Matthew Brogdon shows how the U.S. court system formed during the Revolutionary War. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Political ads dominate the airwaves and our social media pages during election season -- that's nothing new. What is new, however, is the growing prevalence of AI deepfake ads. New research from Utah Valley University finds that voters aren't very good at distinguishing fake ads from real ones. And that's causing some real issues as we move towards election day. In fact, deepfake videos received equal or even higher credibility scores than their real counterparts... meaning voters often think a deepfake AI video is legitimate, while the real one is not. Director of the Emerging Tech Policy Lab at UVU, Brandon Amacher, joins the show to explain the study.

Justin Jones, executive director of Utah Valley University's Gary Herbert Public Policy Institute discusses Utah's vote-by-mail system and voter security measures, University of Utah Professor Paul Reeve shares the history of Juneteenth and discusses the history of enslaved persons in the Utah territory from the 1840s to the 1860s and Timpanogos Valley Theatre board member Gary Harter previews the "1776 The Musical," which chronicles the struggles of the Founding Fathers in the days before the Declaration of Independence was signed.

MAGA politicians, pastors, and influencers gathered on the National Mall this weekend to rededicate America to God. Unlike biblical ceremonies of rededication, however, this one included no repentance or lament. Elon Musk is upset that a black woman was cast as Helen of Troy in Christopher Nolan's upcoming film "The Odyssey." Sharon McMahon is back to explain how political backlash and violent threats canceled her commencement speech at Utah Valley University, and why the message she planned to deliver is more relevant than ever. Also this week—religious skeptics used to ask, "Why do bad things happen to good people?" So, why is Gen Z asking a different question, "Why don't bad things happen to bad people?" Holy Post Plus: Ad-Free Version of this Episode: https://www.patreon.com/posts/721-easy-vs-hope-158706698/   Bonus Interview with Sharon McMahon: https://www.patreon.com/posts/158708712/   0:00 - Theme Song 3:14 -  Sponsor - PolicyGenius - Secure your family's tomorrow so you have peace of mind today. Go to https://www.policygenius.com/HOLYPOST to find the right life insurance for you 4:13 - Sponsor - BetterHelp - This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at https://www.betterhelp.com/HOLYPOST and get 10% off your first month! 5:58 - Rededication of America 21:06 -  Sponsor - Rocket Money - Find and cancel your old subscriptions with Rocket Money at https://www.rocketmoney.com/HOLYPOST 22:06 - Sponsor - Feeding America - Feeding America, led by neighbors! Give now to end hunger at https://www.feedingamerica.org 22:40 - Sponsor - Garrett Theological Seminary - Garrett has a program for you! Apply by July 15 to start a master's degree this fall! https://www.garrett.edu/holypost 50:06 - Interview 52:11 - Commencement Speech Cancellation 1:12:14 - Durable Hope 1:25:14 - End Credit   Links Mentioned in News Segment: Gen Z Asks Why Bad Things Don't Happen to Bad People: https://www.christianitytoday.com/2026/05/gen-z-why-bad-things-happen-to-good-people-theodicy-evil-suffering/ Other Resources: Holy Post website: https://www.holypost.com/   Holy Post Plus: www.holypost.com/plus   Holy Post Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/holypost   Holy Post Merch Store: https://www.holypost.com/shop   The Holy Post is supported by our listeners. We may earn affiliate commissions through links listed here. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.