Podcasts about la innocence project

Comedian and friend of the podcast Greg Fitzsimmons joins the show to talk about how people age into comedy, Adam talks about his new dry bar special available on Angel.com this Wednesday. They then both talk about catholicism, celebrities leaving the country, and how Ellen looks like Nosferatu.Rudy and Adam then go over the top news stories of the day including the LA Innocence Project claiming to have evidence that exonerates Scott Peterson, Gene Simmons talking smack on bands like Santana, and two Australian twins speaking in unison. Sasha Stone zooms in to close out the show. She talks about her substack newsletter Free Thinking Through the Fourth Turning, her personal political shift, and how Hollywood Cancel Culture lines up almost perfectly with Fascist Regimes. Get it on. FOR MORE WITH RUDY PAVICH:INSTAGRAM: @rudy_pavichFOR MORE WITH GREG FITZSIMMONS:INSTAGRAM: @gregfitzsimmonsTWITTER: @gregfitzshowWEBSITE: GREG FITZSIMMONS.comFOR MORE WITH SASHA STONE:SUBSTACK NEWSLETTER: Free Thinking Through the Fourth TurningINSTAGRAM: @sashastone TWITTER: @realsashastone + @AwardsDailyThank you for supporting our sponsors:chime.com/ADAMhomechef.com/ADAMhomes.comhydrow.com Use code “ADAM”oreillyauto.com/ADAMpluto.tvrosettastone.com/ADAMLIVE SHOWS: May 2 - Port Charlotte, FL (2 shows)May 3 - Port Charlotte, FL (2 shows)May 4 - Melbourne, FLMay 30 - Tacoma, WA (2 shows)May 31 - Tacoma, WA (2 shows)See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Is there any evidence that he did it? LA innocence project moves forward on Scott Peterson case. Hour 3 4/23/2025 full 2025 Wed, 23 Apr 2025 21:00:00 +0000 TGn2PHouV6X0efTTKMrykR0pFmP8fpM1 news The Dana & Parks Podcast news Is there any evidence that he did it? LA innocence project moves forward on Scott Peterson case. Hour 3 4/23/2025 You wanted it... Now here it is! Listen to each hour of the Dana & Parks Show whenever and wherever you want! 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. News False

The White House is looking to replace Pete Hegseth as defense secretary. Pope latest. Scott Peterson murder case: LA Innocence Project files petition to overturn conviction. Food dyes phased out.

A Miami teen is behind bars awaiting trial for butchering his mom 40 times with a large kitchen knife...as she lay next to her newborn daughter. But now, the 14yo's defense team us urging the judge to give them access to a relative's Facebook chats saying they could point to another killer. Is Scott Petersen gaining ground in his bid for freedom? The LA Innocence Project has filed a petition saying the convicted killer is actually innocent and they can prove it. Plus, a Utah robber's sticky situation leads to a foiled heist. Jennifer Gould reports. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Convicted killer Scott Peterson appeared before a San Mateo County judge via Zoom as his legal team, led by the Los Angeles Innocence Project, sought approval for DNA testing on key evidence they argue could lead to a new trial. Peterson, convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson and their unborn son Connor in 2002, has consistently maintained his innocence. Paula Mitchell, director of the LA Innocence Project, is urging Judge Elizabeth Hill to authorize the testing of several items, including a blood-stained mattress found in a burned-out van near the Modesto airport. Mitchell emphasized that Modesto police failed to investigate whether the van fire was connected to Laci Peterson's case. Authorities, however, have dismissed any link between the blaze and the murder. The defense also seeks to test evidence recovered near the bodies of Laci and Connor, whose remains surfaced along the Richmond shoreline in 2003, as well as items tied to a burglary across the street from the Petersons' Modesto home. Peterson's legal team insists that all requested evidence is available, well-preserved, and maintains an unbroken chain of custody suitable for DNA testing. “This case has always been about getting to the truth, and DNA testing can provide answers that weren't available during the original trial,” Mitchell stated. Prosecutors oppose the motion, arguing that existing evidence already proved Peterson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. They point to the jury's 2004 conviction, which resulted in Peterson being sentenced to life in prison without parole. The trial, relocated from Modesto to San Mateo County due to extensive pretrial publicity, included testimony that Peterson took Laci's body aboard his boat and dumped it in San Francisco Bay on Christmas Eve 2002. Peterson, who has attended recent hearings from Mule Creek State Prison via Zoom, maintains that he was fishing in the bay on the day of Laci's disappearance. His defense team asserts that DNA testing could uncover evidence implicating other suspects or provide critical context about items near the crime scene. The case, which gripped national attention from the moment Laci disappeared, continues to polarize public opinion. During the initial investigation, Peterson gave interviews, including a now-famous sit-down with Court TV anchor Ted Rowlands, to plead his innocence. Despite his efforts, mounting evidence led to his arrest and subsequent conviction. Mitchell and the LA Innocence Project remain hopeful that Judge Hill will grant their motion, emphasizing the importance of utilizing modern forensic techniques to ensure justice. “We're asking for the chance to use tools that weren't available two decades ago. This isn't about revisiting old arguments; it's about finding the truth through science,” Mitchell said. The hearing represents a pivotal moment for Peterson, whose life sentence leaves him few remaining avenues for appeal. As the courtroom battle continues, the legacy of the high-profile case remains a stark reminder of its profound impact on the justice system and public consciousness. #ScottPeterson #InnocenceProject #DNATesting #LaciPeterson #TrueCrime #JusticeForLaci #CrimeNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Convicted killer Scott Peterson appeared before a San Mateo County judge via Zoom as his legal team, led by the Los Angeles Innocence Project, sought approval for DNA testing on key evidence they argue could lead to a new trial. Peterson, convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson and their unborn son Connor in 2002, has consistently maintained his innocence. Paula Mitchell, director of the LA Innocence Project, is urging Judge Elizabeth Hill to authorize the testing of several items, including a blood-stained mattress found in a burned-out van near the Modesto airport. Mitchell emphasized that Modesto police failed to investigate whether the van fire was connected to Laci Peterson's case. Authorities, however, have dismissed any link between the blaze and the murder. The defense also seeks to test evidence recovered near the bodies of Laci and Connor, whose remains surfaced along the Richmond shoreline in 2003, as well as items tied to a burglary across the street from the Petersons' Modesto home. Peterson's legal team insists that all requested evidence is available, well-preserved, and maintains an unbroken chain of custody suitable for DNA testing. “This case has always been about getting to the truth, and DNA testing can provide answers that weren't available during the original trial,” Mitchell stated. Prosecutors oppose the motion, arguing that existing evidence already proved Peterson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. They point to the jury's 2004 conviction, which resulted in Peterson being sentenced to life in prison without parole. The trial, relocated from Modesto to San Mateo County due to extensive pretrial publicity, included testimony that Peterson took Laci's body aboard his boat and dumped it in San Francisco Bay on Christmas Eve 2002. Peterson, who has attended recent hearings from Mule Creek State Prison via Zoom, maintains that he was fishing in the bay on the day of Laci's disappearance. His defense team asserts that DNA testing could uncover evidence implicating other suspects or provide critical context about items near the crime scene. The case, which gripped national attention from the moment Laci disappeared, continues to polarize public opinion. During the initial investigation, Peterson gave interviews, including a now-famous sit-down with Court TV anchor Ted Rowlands, to plead his innocence. Despite his efforts, mounting evidence led to his arrest and subsequent conviction. Mitchell and the LA Innocence Project remain hopeful that Judge Hill will grant their motion, emphasizing the importance of utilizing modern forensic techniques to ensure justice. “We're asking for the chance to use tools that weren't available two decades ago. This isn't about revisiting old arguments; it's about finding the truth through science,” Mitchell said. The hearing represents a pivotal moment for Peterson, whose life sentence leaves him few remaining avenues for appeal. As the courtroom battle continues, the legacy of the high-profile case remains a stark reminder of its profound impact on the justice system and public consciousness. #ScottPeterson #InnocenceProject #DNATesting #LaciPeterson #TrueCrime #JusticeForLaci #CrimeNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Convicted killer Scott Peterson appeared before a San Mateo County judge via Zoom as his legal team, led by the Los Angeles Innocence Project, sought approval for DNA testing on key evidence they argue could lead to a new trial. Peterson, convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson and their unborn son Connor in 2002, has consistently maintained his innocence. Paula Mitchell, director of the LA Innocence Project, is urging Judge Elizabeth Hill to authorize the testing of several items, including a blood-stained mattress found in a burned-out van near the Modesto airport. Mitchell emphasized that Modesto police failed to investigate whether the van fire was connected to Laci Peterson's case. Authorities, however, have dismissed any link between the blaze and the murder. The defense also seeks to test evidence recovered near the bodies of Laci and Connor, whose remains surfaced along the Richmond shoreline in 2003, as well as items tied to a burglary across the street from the Petersons' Modesto home. Peterson's legal team insists that all requested evidence is available, well-preserved, and maintains an unbroken chain of custody suitable for DNA testing. “This case has always been about getting to the truth, and DNA testing can provide answers that weren't available during the original trial,” Mitchell stated. Prosecutors oppose the motion, arguing that existing evidence already proved Peterson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. They point to the jury's 2004 conviction, which resulted in Peterson being sentenced to life in prison without parole. The trial, relocated from Modesto to San Mateo County due to extensive pretrial publicity, included testimony that Peterson took Laci's body aboard his boat and dumped it in San Francisco Bay on Christmas Eve 2002. Peterson, who has attended recent hearings from Mule Creek State Prison via Zoom, maintains that he was fishing in the bay on the day of Laci's disappearance. His defense team asserts that DNA testing could uncover evidence implicating other suspects or provide critical context about items near the crime scene. The case, which gripped national attention from the moment Laci disappeared, continues to polarize public opinion. During the initial investigation, Peterson gave interviews, including a now-famous sit-down with Court TV anchor Ted Rowlands, to plead his innocence. Despite his efforts, mounting evidence led to his arrest and subsequent conviction. Mitchell and the LA Innocence Project remain hopeful that Judge Hill will grant their motion, emphasizing the importance of utilizing modern forensic techniques to ensure justice. “We're asking for the chance to use tools that weren't available two decades ago. This isn't about revisiting old arguments; it's about finding the truth through science,” Mitchell said. The hearing represents a pivotal moment for Peterson, whose life sentence leaves him few remaining avenues for appeal. As the courtroom battle continues, the legacy of the high-profile case remains a stark reminder of its profound impact on the justice system and public consciousness. #ScottPeterson #InnocenceProject #DNATesting #LaciPeterson #TrueCrime #JusticeForLaci #CrimeNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

 This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

TIMESTAMPS (7:45) - Updates - Matthew Perry (16:55) - Laci Peterson In 2002, Laci Peterson and her husband Scott found out that they were expecting their first child, a son they planned to name Conner. From the outside, the couple appeared to have a picture-perfect life.  Under the surface though, cracks were forming. From early on in their marriage, Scott had a number of affairs with other women.  In November 2002, he began an affair with a woman named Amber Frey.  He told Amber at one point that he had ‘lost his wife' and the upcoming Christmas would be his first without her. On Christmas Eve 2002, Laci was around 8 months pregnant.  Scott said he left her at home watching Martha Stewart and that she was gone when he returned. The search for Laci and her unborn son was one of the most extensive and high-profile ever seen.  Laci and Conner's remains would be found months after they vanished. Scott was arrested near the Mexican border and was charged in relation to the deaths of his wife and son.   22 years later, there is still movement in this case.  An organization called the LA Innocence Project is spearheading a new appeal to prove Scott's alleged innocence. Read our blog for this case If you'd like to listen to this episode ad-free, please visit us on Patreon This week's episode is sponsored by: Save time and money and shop Thrive Market today. Go to ThriveMarket.com/tcs for 30% off your first order, plus a FREE $60 gift! 

Send us a textScott and Laci Peterson Case The Fairness of the Trial and Efforts for a New TrialIn this episode, the hosts discuss the Scott and Laci Peterson case. They provide an overview of the case and share their personal experiences and perspectives. They also explore the involvement of the Innocence Project and the LA Innocence Project in seeking a new trial for Scott Peterson. The conversation covers topics such as Scott and Laci's background, their relationship, the day Laci went missing, and the evidence presented in the trial. The hosts highlight the discrepancies and unanswered questions in the case and discuss the potential for a new trial. The conversation explores various theories and inconsistencies surrounding the Scott Peterson case. Key points include the existence of a missing tape, glitches in the courthouse scanner, the behavior of the Peterson's dog, the involvement of burglars, Scott's affair with Amber Frey, and his narcissistic personality. The conversation raises questions about the fairness of the trial and the lack of thorough investigation. The California Supreme Court overturned the death penalty due to improper screening of jurors, and there are ongoing efforts to secure a new trial. The conversation explores the possibility of Scott Peterson receiving a fair trial and the need for DNA testing and evidence discovery. The discussion also delves into the books written by Scott's stepsister and another author, which present alternative theories and suspects. The missing watch and the van that was burned are discussed as potential pieces of evidence. The conversation concludes with the hosts expressing their differing opinions on Scott's guilt and the need for a new trial.TakeawaysThe hosts provide an overview of the Scott and Laci Peterson case and share their personal experiences and perspectives.They discuss the involvement of the Innocence Project and the LA Innocence Project in seeking a new trial for Scott Peterson.The conversation covers topics such as Scott and Laci's background, their relationship, the day Lacey went missing, and the evidence presented in the trial.The hosts highlight the discrepancies and unanswered questions in the case and discuss the potential for a new trial. The conversation highlights various inconsistencies and unanswered questions in the Scott Peterson case.The existence of a missing tape and glitches in the courthouse scanner raise concerns about the integrity of the evidence.The behavior of the Peterson's dog and the involvement of burglars add complexity to the case.Scott's affair with Amber Frey and his narcissistic personality are discussed as possible motives.The fairness of the trial is questioned, and efforts are being made to secure a new trial. The need for a fair trial and the importance of DNA testing and evidence discoveryThe existence of books that present alternative theories and suspectsThe significance of the missing watch and the burned van as potential evidenceDiffering opinions on Scott Peterson's guilt and the need for a new trialSupport the show

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Control Body Odor ANYWHERE with @lumedeodorant and get 15% off with promo code EDBQB at https://LumeDeodorant.com! #lumepod #adActor Matthew Perry died unexpectedly on October 28th, 2023, after being found unresponsive in his hot tub. The cause of death was the acute effects of ketamine including contributing factors of drowning. Five people have been charged by the Feds in connection with his death, including 2 doctors and his live-in personal assistant.Disney is trying to have a widower's wrongful death lawsuit dismissed and sent to arbitration. Disney stated that the couple had signed up for a Disney+ trial in the past and the terms of service state that the consumer's right to a jury trial in any dispute would forever be barred. Disney lawyers also claim there is an arbitration clause when you get a Disney park ticket as well.In the Alex Murdaugh case, the Supreme Court granted a direct hearing of his appeal about his motion for a New Trial, which Justice Toal had previously denied. They will also take up if South Carolina will keep the standard that requires a defendant to show that the jurors were impacted and in any way prejudiced.The Tom Girardi trial should end this week and jurors might make a decision depending on when they get the case goes to deliberation.The LA Innocence Project took on the Scott Peterson Case this year. DNA testing on a piece of duct tape found on Laci was granted. We are waiting for the results and if something comes out of that, then a bid for a new trial can be made.This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacyChartable - https://chartable.com/privacy

In the podcast episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delves into the ongoing controversy surrounding Scott Peterson's potential new trial. The conversation begins with a discussion of recent Netflix and Peacock documentaries that revisit the case, raising questions about Peterson's guilt. Central to the debate is a piece of duct tape with DNA from someone other than Scott, which has prompted the Los Angeles Innocence Project to take up the case. Dreeke acknowledges the importance of projects that ensure justice is served, but he expresses skepticism about the duct tape's relevance, pointing out that DNA on such common items could easily come from multiple sources. He highlights the overwhelming evidence against Peterson, including his wife's body being found where he was fishing, and his suspicious behavior. Dreeke also compares Peterson's manipulative nature to that of other notorious criminals like Alex Murdaugh, suggesting that Peterson's conviction was justified. The conversation also touches on the tendency of the legal system to protect the guilty, often at the expense of the victims and their families, which Dreeke finds troubling. He concludes by emphasizing that reopening this case could cause undue suffering for the victims' families without new compelling evidence. **Main Points:** - Discussion of Scott Peterson's case, including new documentaries and the potential for a new trial. - The Los Angeles Innocence Project's involvement due to DNA found on duct tape. - Skepticism about the duct tape's significance and the overall evidence against Peterson. - Comparison of Scott Peterson's manipulative behavior to other criminals like Alex Murdaugh. - Critique of the legal system's focus on protecting the guilty rather than victims. - Concerns about the impact of retrying the case on the victims' families. - Mention of Robin Dreeke's upcoming book "Unbreakable Alliances." #ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #DNAEvidence #LosAngelesInnocenceProject #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #LegalSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delves into the ongoing controversy surrounding Scott Peterson's potential new trial. The conversation begins with a discussion of recent Netflix and Peacock documentaries that revisit the case, raising questions about Peterson's guilt. Central to the debate is a piece of duct tape with DNA from someone other than Scott, which has prompted the Los Angeles Innocence Project to take up the case. Dreeke acknowledges the importance of projects that ensure justice is served, but he expresses skepticism about the duct tape's relevance, pointing out that DNA on such common items could easily come from multiple sources. He highlights the overwhelming evidence against Peterson, including his wife's body being found where he was fishing, and his suspicious behavior. Dreeke also compares Peterson's manipulative nature to that of other notorious criminals like Alex Murdaugh, suggesting that Peterson's conviction was justified. The conversation also touches on the tendency of the legal system to protect the guilty, often at the expense of the victims and their families, which Dreeke finds troubling. He concludes by emphasizing that reopening this case could cause undue suffering for the victims' families without new compelling evidence. **Main Points:** - Discussion of Scott Peterson's case, including new documentaries and the potential for a new trial. - The Los Angeles Innocence Project's involvement due to DNA found on duct tape. - Skepticism about the duct tape's significance and the overall evidence against Peterson. - Comparison of Scott Peterson's manipulative behavior to other criminals like Alex Murdaugh. - Critique of the legal system's focus on protecting the guilty rather than victims. - Concerns about the impact of retrying the case on the victims' families. - Mention of Robin Dreeke's upcoming book "Unbreakable Alliances." #ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #DNAEvidence #LosAngelesInnocenceProject #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #LegalSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delves into the ongoing controversy surrounding Scott Peterson's potential new trial. The conversation begins with a discussion of recent Netflix and Peacock documentaries that revisit the case, raising questions about Peterson's guilt. Central to the debate is a piece of duct tape with DNA from someone other than Scott, which has prompted the Los Angeles Innocence Project to take up the case. Dreeke acknowledges the importance of projects that ensure justice is served, but he expresses skepticism about the duct tape's relevance, pointing out that DNA on such common items could easily come from multiple sources. He highlights the overwhelming evidence against Peterson, including his wife's body being found where he was fishing, and his suspicious behavior. Dreeke also compares Peterson's manipulative nature to that of other notorious criminals like Alex Murdaugh, suggesting that Peterson's conviction was justified. The conversation also touches on the tendency of the legal system to protect the guilty, often at the expense of the victims and their families, which Dreeke finds troubling. He concludes by emphasizing that reopening this case could cause undue suffering for the victims' families without new compelling evidence. **Main Points:** - Discussion of Scott Peterson's case, including new documentaries and the potential for a new trial. - The Los Angeles Innocence Project's involvement due to DNA found on duct tape. - Skepticism about the duct tape's significance and the overall evidence against Peterson. - Comparison of Scott Peterson's manipulative behavior to other criminals like Alex Murdaugh. - Critique of the legal system's focus on protecting the guilty rather than victims. - Concerns about the impact of retrying the case on the victims' families. - Mention of Robin Dreeke's upcoming book "Unbreakable Alliances." #ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #DNAEvidence #LosAngelesInnocenceProject #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #LegalSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Scott Peterson, 51, is set to feature in an upcoming documentary that will mark his first interview in over 20 years. The documentary, titled "Face to Face with Scott Peterson," is scheduled to premiere on August 20 on NBC's streaming platform, Peacock. The trailer for the show was unveiled on YouTube on Monday, sparking renewed interest in Peterson's controversial case. “The world's media hung on every moment of the trial, and Scott was convicted and sentenced to death,” reads the show's synopsis. “Case closed. Or is it?” This statement encapsulates the premise of the series, which aims to reexamine the case that captivated the nation when Laci Peterson went missing in 2002. Peterson was convicted in 2004 for the murder of his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. He was initially sentenced to death, but his sentence was changed to life in prison in 2020. Despite the conviction, theories of Peterson's innocence have persisted, and this documentary aims to explore these in depth. The series will feature on-camera interviews with Peterson himself, as well as detectives from the Modesto Police Department and Janey Peterson, Scott Peterson's sister-in-law.  The documentary will also highlight the efforts of Peterson's new defense team, the Los Angeles Innocence Project, which has been actively seeking a new trial for him. “Most think justice was served, but some don't,” a title card in the trailer states, cutting to a shot of Janey Peterson, who has been a vocal advocate for Peterson's innocence. The documentary will delve into various theories purported by Janey Peterson and the LA Innocence Project, including the controversial "orange van theory." The "orange van theory" posits that Laci was abducted by being pushed into a van at La Loma Park while walking her dog. A van with a bloodstained mattress inside was found, but DNA testing during the initial investigation did not link the evidence to Laci. A response from the Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office stated that a male profile was developed and that “there is no legitimate DNA test that will turn the male profile into a match for Laci.” Peterson's defense team has recently filed a motion requesting prosecutors to release over 600 items of material, extending his long-running bid for a new trial. This motion followed a decision by San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Elizabeth Hill, who rejected DNA testing for 13 items requested by Peterson's defense, allowing only one item to be tested. Prosecutors have consistently argued that the evidence and aspects the LA Innocence Project aims to reexamine were thoroughly scrutinized during Peterson's 2004 trial, subsequent appeals, and when his sentence was reduced. Given the extensive timeline and prominence of the case, along with Peterson's multiple appeals and court appearances, there are thousands of pages of discovery items available for examination. The documentary's exploration of these new theories and the legal maneuvers of Peterson's defense team promises to provide a comprehensive look at one of the most infamous cases in recent history. "Face to Face with Scott Peterson" is expected to reignite debates about Peterson's guilt and the justice system's handling of his case. "Face to Face with Scott Peterson" premieres on August 20 on Peacock. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Scott Peterson, 51, is set to feature in an upcoming documentary that will mark his first interview in over 20 years. The documentary, titled "Face to Face with Scott Peterson," is scheduled to premiere on August 20 on NBC's streaming platform, Peacock. The trailer for the show was unveiled on YouTube on Monday, sparking renewed interest in Peterson's controversial case. “The world's media hung on every moment of the trial, and Scott was convicted and sentenced to death,” reads the show's synopsis. “Case closed. Or is it?” This statement encapsulates the premise of the series, which aims to reexamine the case that captivated the nation when Laci Peterson went missing in 2002. Peterson was convicted in 2004 for the murder of his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. He was initially sentenced to death, but his sentence was changed to life in prison in 2020. Despite the conviction, theories of Peterson's innocence have persisted, and this documentary aims to explore these in depth. The series will feature on-camera interviews with Peterson himself, as well as detectives from the Modesto Police Department and Janey Peterson, Scott Peterson's sister-in-law.  The documentary will also highlight the efforts of Peterson's new defense team, the Los Angeles Innocence Project, which has been actively seeking a new trial for him. “Most think justice was served, but some don't,” a title card in the trailer states, cutting to a shot of Janey Peterson, who has been a vocal advocate for Peterson's innocence. The documentary will delve into various theories purported by Janey Peterson and the LA Innocence Project, including the controversial "orange van theory." The "orange van theory" posits that Laci was abducted by being pushed into a van at La Loma Park while walking her dog. A van with a bloodstained mattress inside was found, but DNA testing during the initial investigation did not link the evidence to Laci. A response from the Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office stated that a male profile was developed and that “there is no legitimate DNA test that will turn the male profile into a match for Laci.” Peterson's defense team has recently filed a motion requesting prosecutors to release over 600 items of material, extending his long-running bid for a new trial. This motion followed a decision by San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Elizabeth Hill, who rejected DNA testing for 13 items requested by Peterson's defense, allowing only one item to be tested. Prosecutors have consistently argued that the evidence and aspects the LA Innocence Project aims to reexamine were thoroughly scrutinized during Peterson's 2004 trial, subsequent appeals, and when his sentence was reduced. Given the extensive timeline and prominence of the case, along with Peterson's multiple appeals and court appearances, there are thousands of pages of discovery items available for examination. The documentary's exploration of these new theories and the legal maneuvers of Peterson's defense team promises to provide a comprehensive look at one of the most infamous cases in recent history. "Face to Face with Scott Peterson" is expected to reignite debates about Peterson's guilt and the justice system's handling of his case. "Face to Face with Scott Peterson" premieres on August 20 on Peacock. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Scott Peterson, 51, is set to feature in an upcoming documentary that will mark his first interview in over 20 years. The documentary, titled "Face to Face with Scott Peterson," is scheduled to premiere on August 20 on NBC's streaming platform, Peacock. The trailer for the show was unveiled on YouTube on Monday, sparking renewed interest in Peterson's controversial case. “The world's media hung on every moment of the trial, and Scott was convicted and sentenced to death,” reads the show's synopsis. “Case closed. Or is it?” This statement encapsulates the premise of the series, which aims to reexamine the case that captivated the nation when Laci Peterson went missing in 2002. Peterson was convicted in 2004 for the murder of his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. He was initially sentenced to death, but his sentence was changed to life in prison in 2020. Despite the conviction, theories of Peterson's innocence have persisted, and this documentary aims to explore these in depth. The series will feature on-camera interviews with Peterson himself, as well as detectives from the Modesto Police Department and Janey Peterson, Scott Peterson's sister-in-law.  The documentary will also highlight the efforts of Peterson's new defense team, the Los Angeles Innocence Project, which has been actively seeking a new trial for him. “Most think justice was served, but some don't,” a title card in the trailer states, cutting to a shot of Janey Peterson, who has been a vocal advocate for Peterson's innocence. The documentary will delve into various theories purported by Janey Peterson and the LA Innocence Project, including the controversial "orange van theory." The "orange van theory" posits that Laci was abducted by being pushed into a van at La Loma Park while walking her dog. A van with a bloodstained mattress inside was found, but DNA testing during the initial investigation did not link the evidence to Laci. A response from the Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office stated that a male profile was developed and that “there is no legitimate DNA test that will turn the male profile into a match for Laci.” Peterson's defense team has recently filed a motion requesting prosecutors to release over 600 items of material, extending his long-running bid for a new trial. This motion followed a decision by San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Elizabeth Hill, who rejected DNA testing for 13 items requested by Peterson's defense, allowing only one item to be tested. Prosecutors have consistently argued that the evidence and aspects the LA Innocence Project aims to reexamine were thoroughly scrutinized during Peterson's 2004 trial, subsequent appeals, and when his sentence was reduced. Given the extensive timeline and prominence of the case, along with Peterson's multiple appeals and court appearances, there are thousands of pages of discovery items available for examination. The documentary's exploration of these new theories and the legal maneuvers of Peterson's defense team promises to provide a comprehensive look at one of the most infamous cases in recent history. "Face to Face with Scott Peterson" is expected to reignite debates about Peterson's guilt and the justice system's handling of his case. "Face to Face with Scott Peterson" premieres on August 20 on Peacock. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com  

Scott Peterson may be set free and face another trial if any of the new evidence that has recently surfaced exonerates him as the perpetrator. The LA Innocence Project is assisting Scott Peterson with these new findings. We discuss his previous conviction and what may be presented in his future hearings. Learn things that you thought you knew that you may not know on this episode---especially as it relates to Scott Peterson and his conviction for murder. This and more on this episode of Charlie Crimebuster. Contact me: charliecrimebuster@gmail.com Support: www.peacemakernetwork.com Website: www.charliecrimebuster.com YouTube: www.youtube.com/@CharlieCrimebuster META/Facebook: www.facebook.com/charliecrimebuster X (formerly Twitter.com): www.x.com/C_Crimebuster  

Scott Peterson is a convicted murderer who gained notoriety for the killing of his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, Conner, in 2002. Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time, disappeared from their Modesto, California home on December 24, 2002. Her disappearance prompted a massive search effort and garnered widespread media attention.Initially, Scott Peterson appeared to be a grieving husband, pleading for his wife's safe return and participating in media interviews. However, suspicion soon turned towards him, especially after it was revealed that he had been having an extramarital affair with a woman named Amber Frey.Despite maintaining his innocence, Scott Peterson was arrested on April 18, 2003, in San Diego, where he had fled to, and was later charged with the murder of his wife and unborn son. The case against him relied heavily on circumstantial evidence, including his affair, inconsistent statements to the police, and behavior deemed suspicious.The trial began in 2004 and captivated the nation with its intense media coverage. The prosecution argued that Scott Peterson murdered his wife to escape the responsibilities of marriage and impending fatherhood, while the defense claimed that he was innocent and had been wrongly accused.In November 2004, Scott Peterson was found guilty of first-degree murder for Laci's death and second-degree murder for Conner's death. He was subsequently sentenced to death by lethal injection.Now, after 20 years, the Innocence Project has taken up his cause and they say he's innocent.   In our second article we spin back down to Delphi for another update as we get more clarifcation from Judge Gull about the location of the trial, while other issues remain in limbo.  (commercial at 9:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge denies motions to move trial back in Delphi double murders case, hears arguments during contempt hearing (21alivenews.com)source:Scott Peterson returns to court as LA Innocence Project takes up case 20 years after pregnant wife's murder | The Independent (the-independent.com)

Scott Peterson is a convicted murderer who gained notoriety for the killing of his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, Conner, in 2002. Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time, disappeared from their Modesto, California home on December 24, 2002. Her disappearance prompted a massive search effort and garnered widespread media attention.Initially, Scott Peterson appeared to be a grieving husband, pleading for his wife's safe return and participating in media interviews. However, suspicion soon turned towards him, especially after it was revealed that he had been having an extramarital affair with a woman named Amber Frey.Despite maintaining his innocence, Scott Peterson was arrested on April 18, 2003, in San Diego, where he had fled to, and was later charged with the murder of his wife and unborn son. The case against him relied heavily on circumstantial evidence, including his affair, inconsistent statements to the police, and behavior deemed suspicious.The trial began in 2004 and captivated the nation with its intense media coverage. The prosecution argued that Scott Peterson murdered his wife to escape the responsibilities of marriage and impending fatherhood, while the defense claimed that he was innocent and had been wrongly accused.In November 2004, Scott Peterson was found guilty of first-degree murder for Laci's death and second-degree murder for Conner's death. He was subsequently sentenced to death by lethal injection.Now, after 20 years, the Innocence Project has taken up his cause and they say he's innocent.   In our second article we spin back down to Delphi for another update as we get more clarifcation from Judge Gull about the location of the trial, while other issues remain in limbo.  (commercial at 9:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge denies motions to move trial back in Delphi double murders case, hears arguments during contempt hearing (21alivenews.com)source:Scott Peterson returns to court as LA Innocence Project takes up case 20 years after pregnant wife's murder | The Independent (the-independent.com)

Derricke Dennis comes on the show with the latest on Trump's "Hush Money" trial as the jury continues to deliberate in NYC.  John rehashes the fight for a new trial for Scott Peterson, led by the LA Innocence Project. KFI's Blake Troli joins John to discuss the woman who was arrested again for attempted kidnapping in Koreatown. Attorney Lou Shapiro comes on the show to talk about what he thinks the verdict on the Trump "Hush Money" trial will be as we await the jury's verdict. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The LA Innocence Project has taken on Peterson's case, arguing in a filing he may be innocent of the 2004 murders of his wife and unborn son. Dateline producer Susan Leibowitz breaks down their arguments to run new DNA tests on old evidence. In Jacksonville, prosecutors lay out their case against Shanna Gardner, accused of plotting to kill her ex. And KHQ Anchor Hayley Guenthner reports back from a sentencing in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, where a judge called a former state trooper a "remorseless killer."More reporting by KHQ's Hayley Guenthner

Mario Felix joins the show to talk about his French Bulldog (Jennifer) that was stolen as part of a scary ongoing wave of crime in the LA area pertaining to expensive dog breeds. If you have any information, please contact Mario at 213-565-3131. Murder charges were filed after one of the victims of Venice Canals attacks died after being in a coma. Also, Scott Peterson was in court today as the LA Innocence Project is looking to get a new trial for Scott. John discusses the plastic bag ban and highlights the inefficacy of the law. Burglars using hidden cameras to break into homes.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Scott Peterson's name is synonymous with a horrific crime: the murder of his wife and unborn child. But when the LA Innocence Project stepped in, claiming new evidence, doubts arose. Could Scott Peterson be innocent after all?What do you think about Scott's chances for a new verdict?Get all the crime in half the time! Watch True Crime Recaps on Facebook, TikTok, YouTube or Snapchat! Follow us on Instagram and Twitter. New episodes weekly!

Tensions between Iran and Israel ramp up amid protests in cities across the US. Also, the latest on Donald Trump's criminal trial as jury selection continues.  Plus, Scott Peterson is back in court today for the first of three hearings as the LA Innocence Project takes up his murder case. And, In-Depth TODAY: What you need to know about airline credit cards and loyalty programs as the Government calls a hearing to see if you're really getting all the perks you're promised. 

20 years ago Scott Peterson was convicted of murder for the deaths of his wife Laci and unborn son Connor. The Los Angeles Innocence Project has taken him on as a client seeking discovery of evidence and DNA testing from the Modesto California police department and district attorney that they believe could result in proving that Peterson is factually innocent. In this episode we discuss what this means and discuss whether Peterson was presumed innocent until proven guilty and given a fair trial 20 years ago. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Judy Baca's collaborative effort to create “The Great Wall of LA” is the subject of a new LA Times short documentary. The mural is being extended to another half mile.  Four men accused in Friday's terrorist attack at a Russian concert hall appeared in court bruised and bandaged — an example of Putin's regime using violence to exert political control. The LA Innocence Project is pushing for new evidence and DNA testing in Scott Peterson's quest for a retrial. Peterson was convicted of murdering his wife and their unborn son two decades ago.  Beyoncé topped Billboard's Hot Country Songs chart with a single from “Cowboy Carter,” but the album has drawn backlash over who's qualified to make country music.

This week we discuss the disappearance and murder of Laci Peterson. Her husband, Scott Peterson,  was convicted of killing Laci, and their unborn child, Conner. Laci was 8 months pregnant when she was reported missing on Christmas Eve, 2002. Her stepfather reported her missing after Scott Peterson called the family after 4 PM on Christmas Eve. Four months later, Laci and Conner's bodies wash up on the shores of San Francisco Bay. The LA Innocence Project has picked up Scott's case and wants new evidence tested. He has always maintained his innocence. It will be interesting to see what comes out of these hearings, and what new evidence will be revealed. www.texaswineandtruecrime.com

Scott Peterson is a convicted murderer who gained notoriety for the killing of his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, Conner, in 2002. Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time, disappeared from their Modesto, California home on December 24, 2002. Her disappearance prompted a massive search effort and garnered widespread media attention.Initially, Scott Peterson appeared to be a grieving husband, pleading for his wife's safe return and participating in media interviews. However, suspicion soon turned towards him, especially after it was revealed that he had been having an extramarital affair with a woman named Amber Frey.Despite maintaining his innocence, Scott Peterson was arrested on April 18, 2003, in San Diego, where he had fled to, and was later charged with the murder of his wife and unborn son. The case against him relied heavily on circumstantial evidence, including his affair, inconsistent statements to the police, and behavior deemed suspicious.The trial began in 2004 and captivated the nation with its intense media coverage. The prosecution argued that Scott Peterson murdered his wife to escape the responsibilities of marriage and impending fatherhood, while the defense claimed that he was innocent and had been wrongly accused.In November 2004, Scott Peterson was found guilty of first-degree murder for Laci's death and second-degree murder for Conner's death. He was subsequently sentenced to death by lethal injection.Now, after 20 years, the Innocence Project has taken up his cause and they say he's innocent.   In our second article we spin back down to Delphi for another update as we get more clarifcation from Judge Gull about the location of the trial, while other issues remain in limbo.  (commercial at 9:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge denies motions to move trial back in Delphi double murders case, hears arguments during contempt hearing (21alivenews.com)source:Scott Peterson returns to court as LA Innocence Project takes up case 20 years after pregnant wife's murder | The Independent (the-independent.com)

Scott Peterson is a convicted murderer who gained notoriety for the killing of his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, Conner, in 2002. Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time, disappeared from their Modesto, California home on December 24, 2002. Her disappearance prompted a massive search effort and garnered widespread media attention.Initially, Scott Peterson appeared to be a grieving husband, pleading for his wife's safe return and participating in media interviews. However, suspicion soon turned towards him, especially after it was revealed that he had been having an extramarital affair with a woman named Amber Frey.Despite maintaining his innocence, Scott Peterson was arrested on April 18, 2003, in San Diego, where he had fled to, and was later charged with the murder of his wife and unborn son. The case against him relied heavily on circumstantial evidence, including his affair, inconsistent statements to the police, and behavior deemed suspicious.The trial began in 2004 and captivated the nation with its intense media coverage. The prosecution argued that Scott Peterson murdered his wife to escape the responsibilities of marriage and impending fatherhood, while the defense claimed that he was innocent and had been wrongly accused.In November 2004, Scott Peterson was found guilty of first-degree murder for Laci's death and second-degree murder for Conner's death. He was subsequently sentenced to death by lethal injection.Now, after 20 years, the Innocence Project has taken up his cause and they say he's innocent.   In our second article we spin back down to Delphi for another update as we get more clarifcation from Judge Gull about the location of the trial, while other issues remain in limbo.  (commercial at 9:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge denies motions to move trial back in Delphi double murders case, hears arguments during contempt hearing (21alivenews.com)source:Scott Peterson returns to court as LA Innocence Project takes up case 20 years after pregnant wife's murder | The Independent (the-independent.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a thought-provoking episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis discusses the ongoing efforts to investigate Scott Peterson's claim of wrongful conviction, spearheaded by the LA Innocence Project. The conversation sheds light on the potential impact of newly surfaced evidence, including a blood-stained mattress and a burnt-out van, as well as the challenges ahead in seeking a new trial. Key discussion points include: The LA Innocence Project's involvement has brought attention to the case, yet Faddis cautions against premature conclusions without thorough testing of the new evidence. The significance of the new evidence, including a mattress and a van potentially linked to Lacey Peterson's murder, hinges on forensic testing to establish any direct connection. Technological advancements in DNA testing could play a crucial role in reevaluating the evidence, offering tools not available during the original trial. The criteria for a new trial require presenting new evidence that could reasonably lead to a different verdict, a high bar for the defense to meet. Speculation on defense strategies, including challenging the alleged confession and exploiting procedural irregularities, to cast doubt on Peterson's guilt. #ScottPetersonCase #WrongfulConviction #NewTrialEvidence #InnocenceProject #LegalInsights #DNAAdvancements #JusticeSystemReform Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a thought-provoking episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis discusses the ongoing efforts to investigate Scott Peterson's claim of wrongful conviction, spearheaded by the LA Innocence Project. The conversation sheds light on the potential impact of newly surfaced evidence, including a blood-stained mattress and a burnt-out van, as well as the challenges ahead in seeking a new trial. Key discussion points include: The LA Innocence Project's involvement has brought attention to the case, yet Faddis cautions against premature conclusions without thorough testing of the new evidence. The significance of the new evidence, including a mattress and a van potentially linked to Lacey Peterson's murder, hinges on forensic testing to establish any direct connection. Technological advancements in DNA testing could play a crucial role in reevaluating the evidence, offering tools not available during the original trial. The criteria for a new trial require presenting new evidence that could reasonably lead to a different verdict, a high bar for the defense to meet. Speculation on defense strategies, including challenging the alleged confession and exploiting procedural irregularities, to cast doubt on Peterson's guilt. #ScottPetersonCase #WrongfulConviction #NewTrialEvidence #InnocenceProject #LegalInsights #DNAAdvancements #JusticeSystemReform Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Rabia and Ellyn are back on About Damn Crime's main feed, ready to discuss the top true crime stories of the week. Following their impactful first episode of “Solve the Case” where they shed light on the Scott Peterson Case, the LA Innocence Project has renewed the controversial investigation 20 years later. After viewing the emotionally charged Wendy Williams documentary, the duo ponders whether it crosses ethical boundaries into exploitation. Then they explore the heartbreaking murder of a Las Vegas teenager and the aftermath for the affected families. Rabia delves into the case of Laken Hope Riley, a University of Georgia student whose death has become a focal point in the national immigration debate. And some good news! Ellyn shares an uplifting story of bravery and heroism from a firefighter, among other captivating tales. Please give Rabia and Ellyn a follow on Instagram at @rabiaandellyn or on their personal pages, @rabiasquared2 and @ellynmarsh. Check out their Patreon page for exclusive bonus content for Rabia and Ellyn Solve the Case at https://www.patreon.com/rabiaandellyn! And do not forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel for more Solve the Case, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA8XyM5mAldu9zswyj5zcLQ Thanks to our sponsors: Seekers Notes = Solve puzzles, search for hidden objects & complete game quests! Seekers Notes has enchanted millions of fans of the hidden objects genre. Download Seekers Notes today. Shopify = Go to SHOPIFY.COM/solvethecase now to grow your busine ss–no matter what stage you're...

Scott Peterson is setting his sights on a new trial through the LA Innocence Project. They have taken his case and are asking to do DNA testing on items with more modern technology than was available at the time of his trial. I have decided to deep dive the entire case from day one up to now as a refresher for all of us. All links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibisDonate: PayPal - prettyliesandalibis@gmail.com Venmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- Prettyliesandalibis

20 years ago Scott Peterson was convicted of killing his wife Laci and their unborn son. He has always proclaimed his innocence and now he has a powerful ally. The LA Innocence Project has taken up his case and is calling for a new trial. As Les Trent reports, today Peterson was back in court. And more than 19 million people tuned in for Sunday night's Oscars…the highest in four years. As Jim Moret reports, we're learning more about the drama that went on behind-the-scenes. Plus, a man was hiking in Hawaii when he came upon an emaciated dog, stuck near a 1,000 foot peak. The dog was too weak to make it down on its own...so the hiker carried her. Les Trent on saving a pup named Stevie. And the man who was attacked by a crocodile and lived to tell the tale.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Scott Peterson, convicted of first-degree murder in 2004 for the deaths of his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, has been granted a status hearing by a California judge, following the involvement of the Los Angeles Innocence Project (LAIP) in his case. Peterson's case, which garnered national attention, is set for a hearing on Mar. 12, where he is expected to appear via Zoom, while LAIP representatives will be present in person before Judge Elizabeth Hill. Now 51 years old, Peterson has served over two decades in prison after initially being sentenced to death, later commuted to life without parole. The involvement of the LA Innocence Project signals a significant development. The organization, known for taking on cases with potential DNA evidence to prove innocence, believes that Peterson's state and federal constitutional rights were violated. During a recent appearance on Court TV's “Opening Statements with Julie Grant,” criminal defense attorney Kaysia Earley highlighted the importance of the LAIP's involvement, stating, “Ultimately, his constitutional rights were violated so if there was any exculpatory evidence that can exonerate him that they see, then it's worth going after; and in this case, that exculpatory evidence is DNA evidence.” The LAIP seeks to conduct DNA testing on specific items related to the case, including a hammer believed to have been present at a burglary scene across the street from the Petersons' home around the time of Laci's disappearance. Additionally, they aim to test a blood-stained mattress found in a burned-out van in the Petersons' neighborhood on Christmas Day 2002. According to court filings from the LAIP, new evidence supports Peterson's claim of innocence and raises questions about who abducted and killed Laci and Conner Peterson. The documents assert violations of Peterson's constitutional rights and claim of actual innocence backed by newly discovered evidence. While a new trial may be ordered if Peterson's due process is found to be violated, it remains an uphill battle. Despite public scrutiny over Peterson's behavior, including infidelity, the focus lies on the potential new evidence and constitutional violations. Cameras will be permitted in the courtroom for what could be a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Scott Peterson's conviction. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Scott Peterson, convicted of first-degree murder in 2004 for the deaths of his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, has been granted a status hearing by a California judge, following the involvement of the Los Angeles Innocence Project (LAIP) in his case. Peterson's case, which garnered national attention, is set for a hearing on Mar. 12, where he is expected to appear via Zoom, while LAIP representatives will be present in person before Judge Elizabeth Hill. Now 51 years old, Peterson has served over two decades in prison after initially being sentenced to death, later commuted to life without parole. The involvement of the LA Innocence Project signals a significant development. The organization, known for taking on cases with potential DNA evidence to prove innocence, believes that Peterson's state and federal constitutional rights were violated. During a recent appearance on Court TV's “Opening Statements with Julie Grant,” criminal defense attorney Kaysia Earley highlighted the importance of the LAIP's involvement, stating, “Ultimately, his constitutional rights were violated so if there was any exculpatory evidence that can exonerate him that they see, then it's worth going after; and in this case, that exculpatory evidence is DNA evidence.” The LAIP seeks to conduct DNA testing on specific items related to the case, including a hammer believed to have been present at a burglary scene across the street from the Petersons' home around the time of Laci's disappearance. Additionally, they aim to test a blood-stained mattress found in a burned-out van in the Petersons' neighborhood on Christmas Day 2002. According to court filings from the LAIP, new evidence supports Peterson's claim of innocence and raises questions about who abducted and killed Laci and Conner Peterson. The documents assert violations of Peterson's constitutional rights and claim of actual innocence backed by newly discovered evidence. While a new trial may be ordered if Peterson's due process is found to be violated, it remains an uphill battle. Despite public scrutiny over Peterson's behavior, including infidelity, the focus lies on the potential new evidence and constitutional violations. Cameras will be permitted in the courtroom for what could be a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Scott Peterson's conviction. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Haitian Prime Minister Ariel Henry announced early Tuesday that he would resign amid violence throughout the country. Also, a former Boeing employee known for raising concerns about the firm's production standards was found dead. Plus, the latest on the digitally altered photo of Princess Kate and her kids that has caused speculation with the Royal Family. And, the LA Innocence Project is set to represent convicted murderer Scott Peterson at a new hearing in California. 

Scott Peterson, convicted of first-degree murder in 2004 for the deaths of his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, has been granted a status hearing by a California judge, following the involvement of the Los Angeles Innocence Project (LAIP) in his case. Peterson's case, which garnered national attention, is set for a hearing on Mar. 12, where he is expected to appear via Zoom, while LAIP representatives will be present in person before Judge Elizabeth Hill. Now 51 years old, Peterson has served over two decades in prison after initially being sentenced to death, later commuted to life without parole. The involvement of the LA Innocence Project signals a significant development. The organization, known for taking on cases with potential DNA evidence to prove innocence, believes that Peterson's state and federal constitutional rights were violated. During a recent appearance on Court TV's “Opening Statements with Julie Grant,” criminal defense attorney Kaysia Earley highlighted the importance of the LAIP's involvement, stating, “Ultimately, his constitutional rights were violated so if there was any exculpatory evidence that can exonerate him that they see, then it's worth going after; and in this case, that exculpatory evidence is DNA evidence.” The LAIP seeks to conduct DNA testing on specific items related to the case, including a hammer believed to have been present at a burglary scene across the street from the Petersons' home around the time of Laci's disappearance. Additionally, they aim to test a blood-stained mattress found in a burned-out van in the Petersons' neighborhood on Christmas Day 2002. According to court filings from the LAIP, new evidence supports Peterson's claim of innocence and raises questions about who abducted and killed Laci and Conner Peterson. The documents assert violations of Peterson's constitutional rights and claim of actual innocence backed by newly discovered evidence. While a new trial may be ordered if Peterson's due process is found to be violated, it remains an uphill battle. Despite public scrutiny over Peterson's behavior, including infidelity, the focus lies on the potential new evidence and constitutional violations. Cameras will be permitted in the courtroom for what could be a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Scott Peterson's conviction. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Alex Stone comes on the show to talk about a judge granting a status hearing for Scott Peterson after the LA Innocence Project took on Peterson's case. More on the no bail situation. What country has the most fat people. AOC was heckled outside of a Brooklyn movie theater. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In 2004, in one of the most high-profile trials of the past two decades, Scott Peterson was convicted of murdering his wife, Laci Peterson, 27, and their unborn son, Conner, with whom Laci was eight months pregnant. Laci disappeared from their home in Modesto, California, on Christmas Eve in 2002. Laura Ingle is an investigative reporter who has covered the Peterson case from the beginning. She reports for Fox News and NewsNation. Ingle received an Edward R. Murrow award in 2005 for her 2004 Scott Peterson trial coverage and was awarded four Golden Mikes from the Southern California Association of Television and Radio News Directors. Listeners can learn more about Laura on X @lauraingle and IG @lauraingletv Resources:   In this episode of Zone 7, Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum, sits down with investigative reporter Laura Ingle to re-examine the Scott Peterson case 20 years later. They discuss details like Peterson's suspicious behavior, the discovery of Laci's body, and new evidence from the LA Innocence Project questioning his guilt. Laura provides an on-the-ground perspective from visiting the crime scene recently. They also analyze Peterson's odd actions, new claims about a burned-out van containing possible blood evidence, and re-evaluate eyewitness testimony. Show Notes: [0:00] Welcome back to Zone 7 with Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum.  [1:20] Background of The Scott Peterson case [2:00] Sheryl introduces Laura Ingle to the listeners  [4:00] Investigating the burnt-out orange van [11:30] Peterson's lack of urgent response raises huge suspicion  [17:00] Sheryl gives her opinion on the Peterson case [21:40] The infamous picture of Laci is discussed  [28:35] Question: What do you see today unfolding with the Innocence Project and with the families? [30:30] Blood evidence found in a van should be retested  [34:30] The amount of gasoline indicates intentional arson of the van to hide evidence [37:50] “Every test, on every case, every time.” [40:00] Police declined to collect key pieces of physical evidence from the crime scene [43:45] “I have always been bothered by the lack of investigation of the burglary of our home and the possible connection to Laci's disappearance and murder.” -S.M [49:50] Laura describes Sharon Rocha's raw visible grief [51:00] Question: Will you describe the Christmas Eve photo comparison of Laci Peterson for us? [52:39] “I would have liked to personally have prosecuted Scott Peterson.” -N.G Thanks for listening to another episode! If you love the show and want to help grow the show, please head over to iTunes and leave a rating and review!  --- Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook., Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Sheryl is also the founder and director of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute, a collaboration between universities and colleges that brings researchers, practitioners, students and the criminal justice community together to advance techniques in solving cold cases and assist families and law enforcement with solvability factors for unsolved homicides, missing persons, and kidnapping cases.   You can connect and learn more about Sheryl's work by visiting the CCIRI website https://coldcasecrimes.org Social Links: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com Twitter: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollum See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Head to https://policygenius.com/LAWNERD to get your free life insurance quotes and see how much you could save.Turn your food waste into dirt with the press of a button with Lomi. Use the code LAWNERD to save $50 at https://lomi.com/LAWNERDOver 3 million butts love TUSHY. Get 10% off Tushy with the code LAWNERD at https://hellotushy.com/LAWNERD #tushypodScott Peterson was convicted of killing his wife, Laci, and his unborn child, Conner in 2004. The Jury rendered a death sentence. He appealed the case, and the California Supreme Court overturned the death sentence but was still deemed guilty of murder and was to remain in custody without parole for life. The LA Innocence Project has picked up his case, claiming new evidence that could lead to a new trial needs to be examined. I break down the new motions filed and an overview of the case.Connect With Me. Get the App! Looking for my YouTube videos? This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Podsights - https://podsights.com/privacyPodscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacyChartable - https://chartable.com/privacy

The involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the infamous Scott Peterson case, convicted for the murder of his wife Lacey Peterson, has reignited a debate that seemed long settled. The question arises: Can new evidence unearthed by this organization challenge the verdict that has stood for over two decades?    In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into this complex issue with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a former FBI Special Agent. The conversation highlighted a critical distinction – the LA Innocence Project, the group now championing Peterson's case, is distinct from the renowned Innocence Project. This revelation itself raises eyebrows about the credibility and motivations of the LA-based group.    Coffindaffer shared insights into the new evidence brought forward by the LA Innocence Project – a van with a red stain, discovered on Christmas morning, a mile and a half from the crime scene. The nature of this stain, whether it's blood, paint, or something else, remains unknown. Coffindaffer noted, "I think it's really important to get it tested. The issue, of course, is, has it even been preserved?"    The former FBI agent raised questions about the relevance and preservation of this evidence. Given the passage of time, the integrity of any DNA that might be present is uncertain. Moreover, the sudden emergence of this evidence after two decades is perplexing. "Where has it been over the last 20 years that suddenly today we're talking about it?" Coffindaffer questioned.    Brueski and Coffindaffer also revisited the burglary across the street from the Peterson home, which occurred around the time of Lacey's disappearance. The defense initially posited that this burglary could be linked to Lacey's murder, suggesting she might have been killed by burglars to silence her as a witness. However, this theory was largely discredited when it was established that the burglary happened after Lacey's disappearance.    The conversation also touched upon the role of Mark Geragos, Peterson's defense attorney, who has consistently maintained his client's innocence. Coffindaffer, while acknowledging Geragos' expertise, expressed skepticism about his stance, given his role as a defense attorney.    A significant point of contention discussed was the handling of the jury in Peterson's trial. The vacating of Peterson's death sentence due to a juror-related issue raises questions about the fairness and integrity of the trial process. "Either the conviction's good and was worth the death penalty, or the conviction wasn't good, and he shouldn't be in jail for life," Coffindaffer stated, highlighting the dilemma faced by the justice system in such scenarios.    The involvement of the LA Innocence Project, according to Coffindaffer, seems more like a bid for attention than a genuine quest for justice. "They need to bark up another tree, but boy, has this gotten them so much recognition," she remarked, indicating skepticism about their choice of case and the quality of the new evidence.    In conclusion, the renewed interest in the Scott Peterson case, spurred by the LA Innocence Project, brings forth a mixture of skepticism and curiosity. While new evidence always holds the potential to alter the course of justice, the credibility of the evidence and the motives of those presenting it remain under scrutiny. As the saga continues, one question lingers: Can this new evidence truly unravel the truth in a case as complex and emotionally charged as that of Scott Peterson, or will it simply add another layer of mystery to an already convoluted narrative? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the infamous Scott Peterson case, convicted for the murder of his wife Lacey Peterson, has reignited a debate that seemed long settled. The question arises: Can new evidence unearthed by this organization challenge the verdict that has stood for over two decades?    In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into this complex issue with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a former FBI Special Agent. The conversation highlighted a critical distinction – the LA Innocence Project, the group now championing Peterson's case, is distinct from the renowned Innocence Project. This revelation itself raises eyebrows about the credibility and motivations of the LA-based group.    Coffindaffer shared insights into the new evidence brought forward by the LA Innocence Project – a van with a red stain, discovered on Christmas morning, a mile and a half from the crime scene. The nature of this stain, whether it's blood, paint, or something else, remains unknown. Coffindaffer noted, "I think it's really important to get it tested. The issue, of course, is, has it even been preserved?"    The former FBI agent raised questions about the relevance and preservation of this evidence. Given the passage of time, the integrity of any DNA that might be present is uncertain. Moreover, the sudden emergence of this evidence after two decades is perplexing. "Where has it been over the last 20 years that suddenly today we're talking about it?" Coffindaffer questioned.    Brueski and Coffindaffer also revisited the burglary across the street from the Peterson home, which occurred around the time of Lacey's disappearance. The defense initially posited that this burglary could be linked to Lacey's murder, suggesting she might have been killed by burglars to silence her as a witness. However, this theory was largely discredited when it was established that the burglary happened after Lacey's disappearance.    The conversation also touched upon the role of Mark Geragos, Peterson's defense attorney, who has consistently maintained his client's innocence. Coffindaffer, while acknowledging Geragos' expertise, expressed skepticism about his stance, given his role as a defense attorney.    A significant point of contention discussed was the handling of the jury in Peterson's trial. The vacating of Peterson's death sentence due to a juror-related issue raises questions about the fairness and integrity of the trial process. "Either the conviction's good and was worth the death penalty, or the conviction wasn't good, and he shouldn't be in jail for life," Coffindaffer stated, highlighting the dilemma faced by the justice system in such scenarios.    The involvement of the LA Innocence Project, according to Coffindaffer, seems more like a bid for attention than a genuine quest for justice. "They need to bark up another tree, but boy, has this gotten them so much recognition," she remarked, indicating skepticism about their choice of case and the quality of the new evidence.    In conclusion, the renewed interest in the Scott Peterson case, spurred by the LA Innocence Project, brings forth a mixture of skepticism and curiosity. While new evidence always holds the potential to alter the course of justice, the credibility of the evidence and the motives of those presenting it remain under scrutiny. As the saga continues, one question lingers: Can this new evidence truly unravel the truth in a case as complex and emotionally charged as that of Scott Peterson, or will it simply add another layer of mystery to an already convoluted narrative? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the infamous Scott Peterson case, convicted for the murder of his wife Lacey Peterson, has reignited a debate that seemed long settled. The question arises: Can new evidence unearthed by this organization challenge the verdict that has stood for over two decades?    In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into this complex issue with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a former FBI Special Agent. The conversation highlighted a critical distinction – the LA Innocence Project, the group now championing Peterson's case, is distinct from the renowned Innocence Project. This revelation itself raises eyebrows about the credibility and motivations of the LA-based group.    Coffindaffer shared insights into the new evidence brought forward by the LA Innocence Project – a van with a red stain, discovered on Christmas morning, a mile and a half from the crime scene. The nature of this stain, whether it's blood, paint, or something else, remains unknown. Coffindaffer noted, "I think it's really important to get it tested. The issue, of course, is, has it even been preserved?"    The former FBI agent raised questions about the relevance and preservation of this evidence. Given the passage of time, the integrity of any DNA that might be present is uncertain. Moreover, the sudden emergence of this evidence after two decades is perplexing. "Where has it been over the last 20 years that suddenly today we're talking about it?" Coffindaffer questioned.    Brueski and Coffindaffer also revisited the burglary across the street from the Peterson home, which occurred around the time of Lacey's disappearance. The defense initially posited that this burglary could be linked to Lacey's murder, suggesting she might have been killed by burglars to silence her as a witness. However, this theory was largely discredited when it was established that the burglary happened after Lacey's disappearance.    The conversation also touched upon the role of Mark Geragos, Peterson's defense attorney, who has consistently maintained his client's innocence. Coffindaffer, while acknowledging Geragos' expertise, expressed skepticism about his stance, given his role as a defense attorney.    A significant point of contention discussed was the handling of the jury in Peterson's trial. The vacating of Peterson's death sentence due to a juror-related issue raises questions about the fairness and integrity of the trial process. "Either the conviction's good and was worth the death penalty, or the conviction wasn't good, and he shouldn't be in jail for life," Coffindaffer stated, highlighting the dilemma faced by the justice system in such scenarios.    The involvement of the LA Innocence Project, according to Coffindaffer, seems more like a bid for attention than a genuine quest for justice. "They need to bark up another tree, but boy, has this gotten them so much recognition," she remarked, indicating skepticism about their choice of case and the quality of the new evidence.    In conclusion, the renewed interest in the Scott Peterson case, spurred by the LA Innocence Project, brings forth a mixture of skepticism and curiosity. While new evidence always holds the potential to alter the course of justice, the credibility of the evidence and the motives of those presenting it remain under scrutiny. As the saga continues, one question lingers: Can this new evidence truly unravel the truth in a case as complex and emotionally charged as that of Scott Peterson, or will it simply add another layer of mystery to an already convoluted narrative? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The case of Scott Peterson, convicted for the murder of his pregnant wife Lacey Peterson, remains a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. Recently, the LA Innocence Project announced its decision to take up Peterson's case, claiming to possess new evidence that could potentially exonerate him or secure a new trial. This development raises a pivotal question: are we witnessing a genuine pursuit of justice or a strategic move to garner attention?    In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski engaged in a revealing conversation with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent. Coffindaffer dropped a significant revelation: the LA Innocence Project is not affiliated with the renowned, original Innocence Project, known for its rigorous selection of cases and success in proving wrongful convictions.    Coffindaffer expressed skepticism about the motives of the LA Innocence Project. "I think that the reason this has happened, of course, is to more make a name for this LA Innocence project than anything," she stated, highlighting the difference in stature and credibility between the two organizations.    The purported new evidence in question revolves around a van found on Christmas morning, a mile and a half from the crime scene, with traces of what might be blood. Coffindaffer, with her extensive investigative experience, voiced doubts about the relevance of this evidence to Peterson's case. "For me as an investigator, this is a real big stretch to connect my dots," she said, casting doubt on the strength of this new lead.    Coffindaffer also revisited the original evidence that led to Peterson's conviction, underscoring its damning nature. She pointed to the blood found on the bedspread, the truck door, and the construction of five anchors, four of which were likely used to weigh down Lacey's body in the ocean. She also mentioned the discovery of Lacey's hair on pliers used on Peterson's boat, and the numerous lies Peterson told to his mistress, Amber Fry, as further proof of his guilt.    The conversation with Coffindaffer raises critical questions about the integrity and effectiveness of secondary organizations like the LA Innocence Project. While the pursuit of justice for the wrongfully convicted is a noble cause, the involvement of such entities in high-profile cases like Peterson's can be clouded by suspicions of ulterior motives, such as gaining publicity or notoriety.    As the case progresses, observers and legal experts alike will be watching closely to see whether the new evidence brought forth by the LA Innocence Project holds any water. The skepticism expressed by seasoned investigators like Coffindaffer serves as a reminder of the importance of critical evaluation and due diligence in the justice system.    In conclusion, the LA Innocence Project's involvement in the Scott Peterson case has stirred the pot once more, bringing the infamous case back into the limelight. Whether this move will lead to a groundbreaking revelation of truth or end up as a mere footnote in the ongoing saga of Scott Peterson remains to be seen. As we ponder the implications of this development, one question lingers: Is the pursuit of truth always the driving force behind such legal interventions, or do other motivations sometimes enter the fray? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The name Scott Peterson often evokes a chilling response. It's a name that resurfaces in the media every few years, sparking renewed debate and intrigue. This time, the spotlight returns as the LA Innocence Project takes up his case, stirring a whirlwind of questions and theories about the truth behind the conviction of Scott Peterson in the murder of his wife, Lacey Peterson.    The case, predominantly built on circumstantial evidence, continues to baffle and divide public opinion. As Tony Brueski, host of the podcast "Hidden Killers," puts it, "The case is filled with circumstantial evidence, but circumstantial evidence doesn't mean it's not valid evidence by any stretch of the imagination."    Retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, joined the discussion, offering expert insights into the complex dynamics of the case. Dreeke highlighted the significance of behavioral patterns and their role in assessing Peterson's guilt. He underscored that while circumstantial evidence is powerful, it must be weighed against the probability and statistics of such scenarios.    The LA Innocence Project's involvement has raised eyebrows, not least because of the case's high profile. Their decision to reexamine the case, particularly focusing on alternative theories like the nearby burglary, has been met with skepticism by experts like Dreeke. He pointed out that the likelihood of Lacey Peterson being murdered as a witness to a burglary is exceedingly low, challenging the plausibility of this alternative narrative.    Brueski and Dreeke delved deeper into Scott Peterson's behavioral arc during and after the crime, examining his actions and emotional responses. Peterson's conduct, particularly his affair with Amber Frey and his apparent emotional detachment following Lacey's death, paints a disturbing picture. Dreeke explained, "It's almost like he, whether or not he killed her or not, seemed to be completely mentally checked out of that relationship to have the ability to just swing right into this next one and have zero emotion."    The discussion also touched upon the possibility of new evidence being brought forward by the LA Innocence Project. However, the details of this evidence remain undisclosed, adding to the mystery and complexity of the case. The experts expressed curiosity and caution, noting the project's silence on the specifics of their findings.    Dreeke compared Peterson's behavior to that of politicians, highlighting how individuals can mask their true nature for a time before their genuine personality emerges. He speculated that if Peterson was indeed feigning his emotional responses, it could only be sustained for a limited period before his true nature would reveal itself.    The conversation also brought up the parallels between Peterson's case and other notorious cases, like that of Chad and Lori Daybell, who displayed a similar emotional detachment in the face of heinous crimes. This comparison further cements the chilling nature of Peterson's behavior and raises questions about his psychological profile.    In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in Scott Peterson's case opens a Pandora's box of questions, theories, and speculations. While some, like Dreeke, remain skeptical of Peterson's innocence, the reexamination of the case underlines the continuous quest for truth and justice in the American legal system. As the case unfolds, one can't help but wonder: Will this new investigation shed light on overlooked aspects of the case, or will it reaffirm Scott Peterson's guilt? Only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The name Scott Peterson has resurfaced in the headlines, stirring up a case that has long been considered closed. The LA Innocence Project has taken up Peterson's cause, citing new potential evidence that could suggest his innocence in the murder of his wife, Lacey Peterson. This development begs the question: Could this be a breakthrough in a case many thought was resolved, or is it merely a distraction from the truth?    Tony Brueski, host of "Hidden Killers," sought answers from Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries. Motta, with his expertise in legal defense, weighed in on the potential impact of the LA Innocence Project's involvement. "Anytime you get like any of the innocence projects... they're not going to jump into a case if they feel it's completely fruitless," Motta stated, acknowledging the seriousness with which these organizations approach such cases.    The discussion centered around a burnt-out van found a mile away from the Peterson home, containing what appears to be blood, and discovered a day after Lacey Peterson's disappearance. This van, previously unconnected to the case, now becomes a focal point of the LA Innocence Project's investigation. Motta expressed initial skepticism but also acknowledged the potential significance of this finding: "I was more... I thought it may have had a better chance of succeeding when I thought that it was related to the van that the burglars that Lacey is supposedly to have happened upon while she was walking the dog."    The conversation also touched on the public perception of Scott Peterson, shaped by his infidelity and the media's portrayal. Motta pointed out the danger of conflating personal character flaws with criminal guilt: "Him being a bad husband, a terrible husband... does not necessarily make him a murderer." This distinction is crucial in re-examining the case, where public opinion may have been swayed by Peterson's character rather than hard evidence.    Motta also delved into the legal intricacies of introducing new evidence through a post-conviction relief act petition. "It's got to be legitimate, you know, and it's got to be compelling," he explained, emphasizing the high bar for such evidence to be considered by the court. The question remains whether the van and its contents can meet these criteria.    The case's complexity is further highlighted by the challenges of proving that this new evidence was truly undiscovered during the original trial. "If it was there and existed, and [Mark Geragos] just missed it, it's not newly discovered," Motta clarified, underlining the importance of this evidence being genuinely new to have any legal impact.    Brueski and Motta's discussion shed light on the fine line between proving innocence and creating reasonable doubt. The presence of blood in the van, if connected to the Petersons, could open up new avenues for the defense. However, Motta remained cautious, suggesting that even if the blood is linked to the case, it does not automatically exonerate Scott Peterson.    In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the Scott Peterson case has reignited interest and debate around a case that many thought was firmly resolved. While the prospect of new evidence is tantalizing, its actual impact remains uncertain. As the legal process unfolds, one critical question persists: Will this new evidence unearthed by the LA Innocence Project lead to a dramatic reversal in Scott Peterson's fate, or will it simply reaffirm the verdict that has defined this case for over two decades? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Two decades after the conviction of Scott Peterson for the murder of his wife Lacey Peterson, the case has resurfaced with the involvement of the LA Innocence Project. This development raises a crucial question: Could new evidence possibly exonerate Peterson, or does it simply add another layer of intrigue to an already complex case?    Tony Brueski, host of "Hidden Killers," discussed this unexpected twist with Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author. Scott offered her insights into the psychological aspects of the case, particularly focusing on Scott Peterson's personality and behavior.    The conversation highlighted the significance of the LA Innocence Project's interest in the case. "Anytime there is potential new evidence, it's a good thing to take a look at it," Scott said, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the right person is behind bars. However, she was quick to point out that being a "slimy husband" does not necessarily equate to being a murderer.    Scott dissected the complex character of Scott Peterson, particularly his interactions with Amber Frye, his mistress. "It was really appalling to listen to... it just he looks so psychopathic," she commented, referring to Peterson's ability to lie and manipulate without apparent remorse or empathy. This ability to deceive and his apparent lack of moral compass raise profound questions about his psychological makeup.    The discussion also delved into what constitutes psychopathy and its potential origins. According to Scott, recent research suggests that psychopathy is not necessarily a result of trauma or abuse but rather may have biological roots. "We think that there are people who are born different," she explained, pointing to brain differences in areas like the amygdala and the ventral medial prefrontal cortex, which are linked to fear response and empathy.    Despite these insights, the conversation recognized that not all psychopaths engage in criminal behavior. "Everyone who's psychopathic is not a murderer," Scott said, acknowledging the complexity of the condition. She explained that many individuals with psychopathic traits may lead lives without ever engaging in physical violence, although they might still engage in manipulative or financially predatory behaviors.    Regarding the potential for change in individuals diagnosed with psychopathy, Scott was cautious. "We really can't change the brain," she stated, indicating that while managing behavior is possible, fundamentally altering a psychopath's nature is not. This perspective sheds light on the challenges faced by the criminal justice system in dealing with individuals exhibiting these traits.    As the conversation drew to a close, the focus shifted back to the Scott Peterson case and the role of the LA Innocence Project. The new evidence, centered around a van found near the Peterson home with a blood-stained mattress, could potentially shift the narrative of the case. However, as Scott pointed out, "If it was available to the defense and [Mark Geragos] just missed it, it's not newly discovered."    In conclusion, the re-emergence of the Scott Peterson case poses as many questions as it does answers. While the potential for new evidence offers a glimmer of hope for a different outcome, the complexities of Peterson's personality and the challenges in understanding psychopathy add layers of doubt and speculation. As this case unfolds again, the lingering question remains: Is Scott Peterson a misunderstood individual caught in a tragic set of circumstances, or is he a master manipulator whose true nature led to unthinkable crimes? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The recent decision by the LA Innocence Project to take up Scott Peterson's case, a man serving a life sentence for the murder of his wife Lacey Peterson, has raised many eyebrows and sparked a flurry of questions. What could this mean for a case that seemed closed, with Peterson presumably behind bars for life?    In an episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski discussed this intriguing development with Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor and attorney. Faddis shared his insights into the potential implications of the LA Innocence Project's involvement, questioning whether there might be significant new evidence, or if this is merely a strategy for garnering attention.    The conversation highlighted the reputation of the Innocence Project and the impact of its support for Peterson. "This announcement grabbed the attention of the nation, in part because of the reputation of the Innocence Project... most folks would say the Innocence Project is pretty reputable and incredible," Faddis noted. The involvement of such a respected organization suggests that there could be more to Peterson's story than what was presented in his trial.    Faddis and Brueski discussed key aspects of the case that the LA Innocence Project might be focusing on, including a controversial burglary that took place across the street from the Peterson home on the day Lacey disappeared. Faddis elaborated, "There's a dispute as to exactly when it took place, but according to Scott Peterson's team, it took place on the day that Lacey Peterson disappeared." The theory suggests that Lacey could have been murdered because she witnessed the burglary.    A significant point of interest is a blood-soaked mattress found in a van near the crime scene, which the Innocence Project wants to test for DNA. The question arises: why was this evidence not explored during the original investigation? Faddis explained, "2004 was a different time... DNA was still kind of in its infancy." This new angle could potentially introduce fresh evidence that was not available or considered two decades ago.    The discussion also touched on the nature of circumstantial evidence and its role in Peterson's conviction. Faddis pointed out that Peterson's actions and behavior, including his affair and inconsistencies in his statements, were damning, albeit circumstantial. "This is someone who was painted in a horrible light, but not necessarily I think with much effort... there were so many things that just never really truly added up," he stated.    However, the conversation took a critical turn when considering the nature of the Innocence Project's involvement. Faddis expressed doubt about the likelihood of finding evidence that could exonerate Peterson entirely, suggesting that the goal might be to create reasonable doubt for a new trial. "I don't think any of the possible new evidence... would result in a complete reversal of the conviction and no new trial," he said.    Brueski and Faddis debated the motivations behind the LA Innocence Project's decision to take up such a high-profile and contentious case. Faddis highlighted a crucial legal distinction: "Usually the Innocence Project goes for the former, people who are factually innocent." The implication is that the LA Innocence Project might be stretching this definition, possibly to gain publicity or challenge the conviction on weaker grounds.    In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the Scott Peterson case opens up a realm of possibilities and uncertainties. While the prospect of new evidence is intriguing, the true nature and impact of this evidence remain to be seen. As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one question lingers: Is the LA Innocence Project pursuing a path of true justice for Scott Peterson, or are they navigating a more complex and ambiguous route that blurs the lines between innocence and reasonable doubt? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The name Scott Peterson often evokes a chilling response. It's a name that resurfaces in the media every few years, sparking renewed debate and intrigue. This time, the spotlight returns as the LA Innocence Project takes up his case, stirring a whirlwind of questions and theories about the truth behind the conviction of Scott Peterson in the murder of his wife, Lacey Peterson.    The case, predominantly built on circumstantial evidence, continues to baffle and divide public opinion. As Tony Brueski, host of the podcast "Hidden Killers," puts it, "The case is filled with circumstantial evidence, but circumstantial evidence doesn't mean it's not valid evidence by any stretch of the imagination."    Retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, joined the discussion, offering expert insights into the complex dynamics of the case. Dreeke highlighted the significance of behavioral patterns and their role in assessing Peterson's guilt. He underscored that while circumstantial evidence is powerful, it must be weighed against the probability and statistics of such scenarios.    The LA Innocence Project's involvement has raised eyebrows, not least because of the case's high profile. Their decision to reexamine the case, particularly focusing on alternative theories like the nearby burglary, has been met with skepticism by experts like Dreeke. He pointed out that the likelihood of Lacey Peterson being murdered as a witness to a burglary is exceedingly low, challenging the plausibility of this alternative narrative.    Brueski and Dreeke delved deeper into Scott Peterson's behavioral arc during and after the crime, examining his actions and emotional responses. Peterson's conduct, particularly his affair with Amber Frey and his apparent emotional detachment following Lacey's death, paints a disturbing picture. Dreeke explained, "It's almost like he, whether or not he killed her or not, seemed to be completely mentally checked out of that relationship to have the ability to just swing right into this next one and have zero emotion."    The discussion also touched upon the possibility of new evidence being brought forward by the LA Innocence Project. However, the details of this evidence remain undisclosed, adding to the mystery and complexity of the case. The experts expressed curiosity and caution, noting the project's silence on the specifics of their findings.    Dreeke compared Peterson's behavior to that of politicians, highlighting how individuals can mask their true nature for a time before their genuine personality emerges. He speculated that if Peterson was indeed feigning his emotional responses, it could only be sustained for a limited period before his true nature would reveal itself.    The conversation also brought up the parallels between Peterson's case and other notorious cases, like that of Chad and Lori Daybell, who displayed a similar emotional detachment in the face of heinous crimes. This comparison further cements the chilling nature of Peterson's behavior and raises questions about his psychological profile.    In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in Scott Peterson's case opens a Pandora's box of questions, theories, and speculations. While some, like Dreeke, remain skeptical of Peterson's innocence, the reexamination of the case underlines the continuous quest for truth and justice in the American legal system. As the case unfolds, one can't help but wonder: Will this new investigation shed light on overlooked aspects of the case, or will it reaffirm Scott Peterson's guilt? Only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The name Scott Peterson has resurfaced in the headlines, stirring up a case that has long been considered closed. The LA Innocence Project has taken up Peterson's cause, citing new potential evidence that could suggest his innocence in the murder of his wife, Lacey Peterson. This development begs the question: Could this be a breakthrough in a case many thought was resolved, or is it merely a distraction from the truth?    Tony Brueski, host of "Hidden Killers," sought answers from Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries. Motta, with his expertise in legal defense, weighed in on the potential impact of the LA Innocence Project's involvement. "Anytime you get like any of the innocence projects... they're not going to jump into a case if they feel it's completely fruitless," Motta stated, acknowledging the seriousness with which these organizations approach such cases.    The discussion centered around a burnt-out van found a mile away from the Peterson home, containing what appears to be blood, and discovered a day after Lacey Peterson's disappearance. This van, previously unconnected to the case, now becomes a focal point of the LA Innocence Project's investigation. Motta expressed initial skepticism but also acknowledged the potential significance of this finding: "I was more... I thought it may have had a better chance of succeeding when I thought that it was related to the van that the burglars that Lacey is supposedly to have happened upon while she was walking the dog."    The conversation also touched on the public perception of Scott Peterson, shaped by his infidelity and the media's portrayal. Motta pointed out the danger of conflating personal character flaws with criminal guilt: "Him being a bad husband, a terrible husband... does not necessarily make him a murderer." This distinction is crucial in re-examining the case, where public opinion may have been swayed by Peterson's character rather than hard evidence.    Motta also delved into the legal intricacies of introducing new evidence through a post-conviction relief act petition. "It's got to be legitimate, you know, and it's got to be compelling," he explained, emphasizing the high bar for such evidence to be considered by the court. The question remains whether the van and its contents can meet these criteria.    The case's complexity is further highlighted by the challenges of proving that this new evidence was truly undiscovered during the original trial. "If it was there and existed, and [Mark Geragos] just missed it, it's not newly discovered," Motta clarified, underlining the importance of this evidence being genuinely new to have any legal impact.    Brueski and Motta's discussion shed light on the fine line between proving innocence and creating reasonable doubt. The presence of blood in the van, if connected to the Petersons, could open up new avenues for the defense. However, Motta remained cautious, suggesting that even if the blood is linked to the case, it does not automatically exonerate Scott Peterson.    In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the Scott Peterson case has reignited interest and debate around a case that many thought was firmly resolved. While the prospect of new evidence is tantalizing, its actual impact remains uncertain. As the legal process unfolds, one critical question persists: Will this new evidence unearthed by the LA Innocence Project lead to a dramatic reversal in Scott Peterson's fate, or will it simply reaffirm the verdict that has defined this case for over two decades? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Two decades after the conviction of Scott Peterson for the murder of his wife Lacey Peterson, the case has resurfaced with the involvement of the LA Innocence Project. This development raises a crucial question: Could new evidence possibly exonerate Peterson, or does it simply add another layer of intrigue to an already complex case?    Tony Brueski, host of "Hidden Killers," discussed this unexpected twist with Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author. Scott offered her insights into the psychological aspects of the case, particularly focusing on Scott Peterson's personality and behavior.    The conversation highlighted the significance of the LA Innocence Project's interest in the case. "Anytime there is potential new evidence, it's a good thing to take a look at it," Scott said, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the right person is behind bars. However, she was quick to point out that being a "slimy husband" does not necessarily equate to being a murderer.    Scott dissected the complex character of Scott Peterson, particularly his interactions with Amber Frye, his mistress. "It was really appalling to listen to... it just he looks so psychopathic," she commented, referring to Peterson's ability to lie and manipulate without apparent remorse or empathy. This ability to deceive and his apparent lack of moral compass raise profound questions about his psychological makeup.    The discussion also delved into what constitutes psychopathy and its potential origins. According to Scott, recent research suggests that psychopathy is not necessarily a result of trauma or abuse but rather may have biological roots. "We think that there are people who are born different," she explained, pointing to brain differences in areas like the amygdala and the ventral medial prefrontal cortex, which are linked to fear response and empathy.    Despite these insights, the conversation recognized that not all psychopaths engage in criminal behavior. "Everyone who's psychopathic is not a murderer," Scott said, acknowledging the complexity of the condition. She explained that many individuals with psychopathic traits may lead lives without ever engaging in physical violence, although they might still engage in manipulative or financially predatory behaviors.    Regarding the potential for change in individuals diagnosed with psychopathy, Scott was cautious. "We really can't change the brain," she stated, indicating that while managing behavior is possible, fundamentally altering a psychopath's nature is not. This perspective sheds light on the challenges faced by the criminal justice system in dealing with individuals exhibiting these traits.    As the conversation drew to a close, the focus shifted back to the Scott Peterson case and the role of the LA Innocence Project. The new evidence, centered around a van found near the Peterson home with a blood-stained mattress, could potentially shift the narrative of the case. However, as Scott pointed out, "If it was available to the defense and [Mark Geragos] just missed it, it's not newly discovered."    In conclusion, the re-emergence of the Scott Peterson case poses as many questions as it does answers. While the potential for new evidence offers a glimmer of hope for a different outcome, the complexities of Peterson's personality and the challenges in understanding psychopathy add layers of doubt and speculation. As this case unfolds again, the lingering question remains: Is Scott Peterson a misunderstood individual caught in a tragic set of circumstances, or is he a master manipulator whose true nature led to unthinkable crimes? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The case of Scott Peterson, convicted for the murder of his pregnant wife Lacey Peterson, remains a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. Recently, the LA Innocence Project announced its decision to take up Peterson's case, claiming to possess new evidence that could potentially exonerate him or secure a new trial. This development raises a pivotal question: are we witnessing a genuine pursuit of justice or a strategic move to garner attention?    In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski engaged in a revealing conversation with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent. Coffindaffer dropped a significant revelation: the LA Innocence Project is not affiliated with the renowned, original Innocence Project, known for its rigorous selection of cases and success in proving wrongful convictions.    Coffindaffer expressed skepticism about the motives of the LA Innocence Project. "I think that the reason this has happened, of course, is to more make a name for this LA Innocence project than anything," she stated, highlighting the difference in stature and credibility between the two organizations.    The purported new evidence in question revolves around a van found on Christmas morning, a mile and a half from the crime scene, with traces of what might be blood. Coffindaffer, with her extensive investigative experience, voiced doubts about the relevance of this evidence to Peterson's case. "For me as an investigator, this is a real big stretch to connect my dots," she said, casting doubt on the strength of this new lead.    Coffindaffer also revisited the original evidence that led to Peterson's conviction, underscoring its damning nature. She pointed to the blood found on the bedspread, the truck door, and the construction of five anchors, four of which were likely used to weigh down Lacey's body in the ocean. She also mentioned the discovery of Lacey's hair on pliers used on Peterson's boat, and the numerous lies Peterson told to his mistress, Amber Fry, as further proof of his guilt.    The conversation with Coffindaffer raises critical questions about the integrity and effectiveness of secondary organizations like the LA Innocence Project. While the pursuit of justice for the wrongfully convicted is a noble cause, the involvement of such entities in high-profile cases like Peterson's can be clouded by suspicions of ulterior motives, such as gaining publicity or notoriety.    As the case progresses, observers and legal experts alike will be watching closely to see whether the new evidence brought forth by the LA Innocence Project holds any water. The skepticism expressed by seasoned investigators like Coffindaffer serves as a reminder of the importance of critical evaluation and due diligence in the justice system.    In conclusion, the LA Innocence Project's involvement in the Scott Peterson case has stirred the pot once more, bringing the infamous case back into the limelight. Whether this move will lead to a groundbreaking revelation of truth or end up as a mere footnote in the ongoing saga of Scott Peterson remains to be seen. As we ponder the implications of this development, one question lingers: Is the pursuit of truth always the driving force behind such legal interventions, or do other motivations sometimes enter the fray? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The recent decision by the LA Innocence Project to take up Scott Peterson's case, a man serving a life sentence for the murder of his wife Lacey Peterson, has raised many eyebrows and sparked a flurry of questions. What could this mean for a case that seemed closed, with Peterson presumably behind bars for life?    In an episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski discussed this intriguing development with Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor and attorney. Faddis shared his insights into the potential implications of the LA Innocence Project's involvement, questioning whether there might be significant new evidence, or if this is merely a strategy for garnering attention.    The conversation highlighted the reputation of the Innocence Project and the impact of its support for Peterson. "This announcement grabbed the attention of the nation, in part because of the reputation of the Innocence Project... most folks would say the Innocence Project is pretty reputable and incredible," Faddis noted. The involvement of such a respected organization suggests that there could be more to Peterson's story than what was presented in his trial.    Faddis and Brueski discussed key aspects of the case that the LA Innocence Project might be focusing on, including a controversial burglary that took place across the street from the Peterson home on the day Lacey disappeared. Faddis elaborated, "There's a dispute as to exactly when it took place, but according to Scott Peterson's team, it took place on the day that Lacey Peterson disappeared." The theory suggests that Lacey could have been murdered because she witnessed the burglary.    A significant point of interest is a blood-soaked mattress found in a van near the crime scene, which the Innocence Project wants to test for DNA. The question arises: why was this evidence not explored during the original investigation? Faddis explained, "2004 was a different time... DNA was still kind of in its infancy." This new angle could potentially introduce fresh evidence that was not available or considered two decades ago.    The discussion also touched on the nature of circumstantial evidence and its role in Peterson's conviction. Faddis pointed out that Peterson's actions and behavior, including his affair and inconsistencies in his statements, were damning, albeit circumstantial. "This is someone who was painted in a horrible light, but not necessarily I think with much effort... there were so many things that just never really truly added up," he stated.    However, the conversation took a critical turn when considering the nature of the Innocence Project's involvement. Faddis expressed doubt about the likelihood of finding evidence that could exonerate Peterson entirely, suggesting that the goal might be to create reasonable doubt for a new trial. "I don't think any of the possible new evidence... would result in a complete reversal of the conviction and no new trial," he said.    Brueski and Faddis debated the motivations behind the LA Innocence Project's decision to take up such a high-profile and contentious case. Faddis highlighted a crucial legal distinction: "Usually the Innocence Project goes for the former, people who are factually innocent." The implication is that the LA Innocence Project might be stretching this definition, possibly to gain publicity or challenge the conviction on weaker grounds.    In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the Scott Peterson case opens up a realm of possibilities and uncertainties. While the prospect of new evidence is intriguing, the true nature and impact of this evidence remain to be seen. As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one question lingers: Is the LA Innocence Project pursuing a path of true justice for Scott Peterson, or are they navigating a more complex and ambiguous route that blurs the lines between innocence and reasonable doubt? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The case of Scott Peterson, convicted for the murder of his pregnant wife Lacey Peterson, remains a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. Recently, the LA Innocence Project announced its decision to take up Peterson's case, claiming to possess new evidence that could potentially exonerate him or secure a new trial. This development raises a pivotal question: are we witnessing a genuine pursuit of justice or a strategic move to garner attention?    In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski engaged in a revealing conversation with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent. Coffindaffer dropped a significant revelation: the LA Innocence Project is not affiliated with the renowned, original Innocence Project, known for its rigorous selection of cases and success in proving wrongful convictions.    Coffindaffer expressed skepticism about the motives of the LA Innocence Project. "I think that the reason this has happened, of course, is to more make a name for this LA Innocence project than anything," she stated, highlighting the difference in stature and credibility between the two organizations.    The purported new evidence in question revolves around a van found on Christmas morning, a mile and a half from the crime scene, with traces of what might be blood. Coffindaffer, with her extensive investigative experience, voiced doubts about the relevance of this evidence to Peterson's case. "For me as an investigator, this is a real big stretch to connect my dots," she said, casting doubt on the strength of this new lead.    Coffindaffer also revisited the original evidence that led to Peterson's conviction, underscoring its damning nature. She pointed to the blood found on the bedspread, the truck door, and the construction of five anchors, four of which were likely used to weigh down Lacey's body in the ocean. She also mentioned the discovery of Lacey's hair on pliers used on Peterson's boat, and the numerous lies Peterson told to his mistress, Amber Fry, as further proof of his guilt.    The conversation with Coffindaffer raises critical questions about the integrity and effectiveness of secondary organizations like the LA Innocence Project. While the pursuit of justice for the wrongfully convicted is a noble cause, the involvement of such entities in high-profile cases like Peterson's can be clouded by suspicions of ulterior motives, such as gaining publicity or notoriety.    As the case progresses, observers and legal experts alike will be watching closely to see whether the new evidence brought forth by the LA Innocence Project holds any water. The skepticism expressed by seasoned investigators like Coffindaffer serves as a reminder of the importance of critical evaluation and due diligence in the justice system.    In conclusion, the LA Innocence Project's involvement in the Scott Peterson case has stirred the pot once more, bringing the infamous case back into the limelight. Whether this move will lead to a groundbreaking revelation of truth or end up as a mere footnote in the ongoing saga of Scott Peterson remains to be seen. As we ponder the implications of this development, one question lingers: Is the pursuit of truth always the driving force behind such legal interventions, or do other motivations sometimes enter the fray? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The name Scott Peterson often evokes a chilling response. It's a name that resurfaces in the media every few years, sparking renewed debate and intrigue. This time, the spotlight returns as the LA Innocence Project takes up his case, stirring a whirlwind of questions and theories about the truth behind the conviction of Scott Peterson in the murder of his wife, Lacey Peterson.    The case, predominantly built on circumstantial evidence, continues to baffle and divide public opinion. As Tony Brueski, host of the podcast "Hidden Killers," puts it, "The case is filled with circumstantial evidence, but circumstantial evidence doesn't mean it's not valid evidence by any stretch of the imagination."    Retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, joined the discussion, offering expert insights into the complex dynamics of the case. Dreeke highlighted the significance of behavioral patterns and their role in assessing Peterson's guilt. He underscored that while circumstantial evidence is powerful, it must be weighed against the probability and statistics of such scenarios.    The LA Innocence Project's involvement has raised eyebrows, not least because of the case's high profile. Their decision to reexamine the case, particularly focusing on alternative theories like the nearby burglary, has been met with skepticism by experts like Dreeke. He pointed out that the likelihood of Lacey Peterson being murdered as a witness to a burglary is exceedingly low, challenging the plausibility of this alternative narrative.    Brueski and Dreeke delved deeper into Scott Peterson's behavioral arc during and after the crime, examining his actions and emotional responses. Peterson's conduct, particularly his affair with Amber Frey and his apparent emotional detachment following Lacey's death, paints a disturbing picture. Dreeke explained, "It's almost like he, whether or not he killed her or not, seemed to be completely mentally checked out of that relationship to have the ability to just swing right into this next one and have zero emotion."    The discussion also touched upon the possibility of new evidence being brought forward by the LA Innocence Project. However, the details of this evidence remain undisclosed, adding to the mystery and complexity of the case. The experts expressed curiosity and caution, noting the project's silence on the specifics of their findings.    Dreeke compared Peterson's behavior to that of politicians, highlighting how individuals can mask their true nature for a time before their genuine personality emerges. He speculated that if Peterson was indeed feigning his emotional responses, it could only be sustained for a limited period before his true nature would reveal itself.    The conversation also brought up the parallels between Peterson's case and other notorious cases, like that of Chad and Lori Daybell, who displayed a similar emotional detachment in the face of heinous crimes. This comparison further cements the chilling nature of Peterson's behavior and raises questions about his psychological profile.    In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in Scott Peterson's case opens a Pandora's box of questions, theories, and speculations. While some, like Dreeke, remain skeptical of Peterson's innocence, the reexamination of the case underlines the continuous quest for truth and justice in the American legal system. As the case unfolds, one can't help but wonder: Will this new investigation shed light on overlooked aspects of the case, or will it reaffirm Scott Peterson's guilt? Only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Two decades after the conviction of Scott Peterson for the murder of his wife Lacey Peterson, the case has resurfaced with the involvement of the LA Innocence Project. This development raises a crucial question: Could new evidence possibly exonerate Peterson, or does it simply add another layer of intrigue to an already complex case?    Tony Brueski, host of "Hidden Killers," discussed this unexpected twist with Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author. Scott offered her insights into the psychological aspects of the case, particularly focusing on Scott Peterson's personality and behavior.    The conversation highlighted the significance of the LA Innocence Project's interest in the case. "Anytime there is potential new evidence, it's a good thing to take a look at it," Scott said, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the right person is behind bars. However, she was quick to point out that being a "slimy husband" does not necessarily equate to being a murderer.    Scott dissected the complex character of Scott Peterson, particularly his interactions with Amber Frye, his mistress. "It was really appalling to listen to... it just he looks so psychopathic," she commented, referring to Peterson's ability to lie and manipulate without apparent remorse or empathy. This ability to deceive and his apparent lack of moral compass raise profound questions about his psychological makeup.    The discussion also delved into what constitutes psychopathy and its potential origins. According to Scott, recent research suggests that psychopathy is not necessarily a result of trauma or abuse but rather may have biological roots. "We think that there are people who are born different," she explained, pointing to brain differences in areas like the amygdala and the ventral medial prefrontal cortex, which are linked to fear response and empathy.    Despite these insights, the conversation recognized that not all psychopaths engage in criminal behavior. "Everyone who's psychopathic is not a murderer," Scott said, acknowledging the complexity of the condition. She explained that many individuals with psychopathic traits may lead lives without ever engaging in physical violence, although they might still engage in manipulative or financially predatory behaviors.    Regarding the potential for change in individuals diagnosed with psychopathy, Scott was cautious. "We really can't change the brain," she stated, indicating that while managing behavior is possible, fundamentally altering a psychopath's nature is not. This perspective sheds light on the challenges faced by the criminal justice system in dealing with individuals exhibiting these traits.    As the conversation drew to a close, the focus shifted back to the Scott Peterson case and the role of the LA Innocence Project. The new evidence, centered around a van found near the Peterson home with a blood-stained mattress, could potentially shift the narrative of the case. However, as Scott pointed out, "If it was available to the defense and [Mark Geragos] just missed it, it's not newly discovered."    In conclusion, the re-emergence of the Scott Peterson case poses as many questions as it does answers. While the potential for new evidence offers a glimmer of hope for a different outcome, the complexities of Peterson's personality and the challenges in understanding psychopathy add layers of doubt and speculation. As this case unfolds again, the lingering question remains: Is Scott Peterson a misunderstood individual caught in a tragic set of circumstances, or is he a master manipulator whose true nature led to unthinkable crimes? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

 The Los Angeles Innocence Project has recently decided to take up the case of Scott Peterson, who was convicted in 2004 for the murder of his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son, Conner. Scott Peterson has maintained that he is innocent for the past two decades, and the LAIP argues that there may be new evidence to explore. The Murder of Laci Peterson: Tainted Love (Part1): https://audioboom.com/posts/7939547-the-murder-of-laci-peterson-tainted-love-part-1 Try our coffee!! - www.CriminalCoffeeCo.com Become a Patreon member -- > https://www.patreon.com/CrimeWeekly Shop for your Crime Weekly gear here --> https://crimeweeklypodcast.com/shop Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CrimeWeeklyPodcast Website: CrimeWeeklyPodcast.com Instagram: @CrimeWeeklyPod Twitter: @CrimeWeeklyPod Facebook: @CrimeWeeklyPod ADS: 1. StitchFix.com/CrimeWeekly - Get 25% off when you keep everything in your Fix!

Alec Baldwin indicted on charge of involuntary manslaughter; LA Innocence Project takes up Scott Peterson case; Ava DuVernay talks about exploring America's 'caste' in new film Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

He's known as one of the nation's most notorious killers. 19 years ago, Scott Peterson was convicted of murdering his eight-months pregnant wife Laci. Now a group called the LA Innocence Project, known for exonerating wrongly convicted inmates, is demanding a new review of the case. And the first Arctic blast of the year has led to almost 50 deaths. As blizzard conditions and freezing temperatures continue across the country...we are seeing amazing rescues. Including a mom and her four-year old daughter who ended up dangling from a wall in their SUV. Plus, is he a faker? In court he appears to be a frail old man - but prosecutors say it's all an act. They say he's a 36-year-old sexual predator who tried to fake his own death to avoid capture. And last time we told you how reclusive exercise guru Richard Simmons is furious over a planned bio-pic about his life, starring comedian Pauly Shore. Now Shore is coming to Inside Edition with a message for Simmons.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Jeff Vaugh and Tiffany Hobbs fill in for Gary and Shannon on this Flashback Friday! Jeff and Tiffany start off the show with an update of the Soctt Peterson's trial being picked up by LA Innocence Project. #TerrorInTheSkies.

Uvalde massacre response failed at every point. Republicans move forward with Mayorkas impeachment amid emotional testimony. LA Innocence Project to take up Scott Peterson murder case. Friday Funnies. Movies opening this weekend. Wages are up but so is inflation. Zach Abraham, Bulwark Capital, talks about the outlook for the 2024 investment market. Congress passes bill to fund the government through March.

The LA Innocence Project has taken on the Scott Peterson.  Could he be innocent?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Los Angeles Innocence Project has taken up the case of Scott Peterson, claiming new evidence now supports his longstanding claim that he is not guilty.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Heard Studio and Strangest Fruit Podcast present the Compton Innocence Initiative live at Cal State State University Los Angeles. Thank you to the LA Innocence Project and Project Rebound for making this happen! Everyone who was supposed to be there was there. This is our first live podcast and we're gearing up to do many more. We appreciate the support and we're locked and loaded for 2024.    This project will explore and expose the wrongful convictions of Christopher Stone and Lamont Kellum Jr. Both of these men are innocent and currently in prison. Both out of Compton Court. #wrongfulconviction #compton

Today on Change Agents, Andy sits down with Andy Wilson and Paula Mitchell from the Los Angeles Innocence Project. In 1986, Andy was wrongfully convicted of murder. At the age of 31, he was sentenced to life in prison without parole, leaving behind his wife and young daughter. However, thanks to the help of Paula Mitchell, he was later exonerated and became the founding donor for the LA Innocence Project. The organization works with law enforcement to prevent wrongful convictions in the future and to help free innocent people currently behind bars. Paula Mitchell serves as their director. Change Agents is an IRONCLAD original. Subscribe to the podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/change-agents-with-andy-stumpf/id1677415740 Shop IRONCLAD Apparel: https://shop.thisisironclad.com/ Change Agents is an IRONCLAD original. Visit https://www.thisisironclad.com to learn more. Be sure to subscribe to @thisisironclad on YouTube and major social platforms. Follow us on Social - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thisisironclad Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/ThisIsIRONCLAD Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thisisironclad TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thisisironclad Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://thisisironclad.com/newsletter