Podcast appearances and mentions of austin bradford hill

Conversamos con el divulgador científico Gonzalo (DatosDeCiencia) sobre la aplicación del método científico. Especialmente, en el ámbito de la salud y la nutrición. Te adelanto dos cosas: - Gonzalo es de las personas más inteligentes con las que he conversado en el podcast. - Ha cambiado el paradigma de lo que consideraba correcto a nivel nutricional. [...] Si te gusta el podcast, sospecho que te gustarán también mis EMAILS. Te podría decir que son maravillosos y cargados de valor, pero mejor que lo descubras por ti mismo. Si los quieres recibir, te puedes apuntar aquí: https://pildorasdelconocimiento.com/ Descubrirás ideas, reflexiones y... también estarás al tanto de cuando hago nuevas clases, masterclasses y formaciones. No te confundo con más enlaces. Está todo ahí. :::::::::::::::: ÍNDICE :::::::::::::::: 00:00:00 Intro 00:01:01 Gonzalo de DatosDeCiencia 00:04:50 Ciencia vs Show 00:06:20 Ciencia en nutrición 00:08:25 Alimentación evolutiva (falacia narrativa) 00:09:50 Tipos de razonamiento 00:14:20 Integración del razonamiento en el método científico 00:19:05 GPT Consensus 00:21:40 Dieta Vegana con el máximo respaldo científico 00:27:20 Tipos de experimentos 00:35:40 Falacias narrativas 00:42:10 La nutrición es un circo 00:47:50 Comer huevos 00:48:30 ¿Tenemos intuición nutricional? Adipostato y estímulos supernormales 00:52:20 Inteligencia fluida vs inteligencia cristalizada 00:54:20 Radical científico 00:59:20 Criterio del marcación en ciencia 01:05:05 Modelos probabilísticos 01:08:50 Libros y Papers 01:13:14 Despedida ::::::::::::::::REFERENCIAS::::::::::::::::: [Libro] «Comer para no morir» de Michael Greger (https://amzn.to/3UduOz8) [Paper] "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" de Austin Bradford Hill (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1898525/) [Autor] Ronald Fisher – Padre del diseño experimental y la asignación aleatoria. - Obra destacada: "The Design of Experiments" (1935). (https://home.iitk.ac.in/~shalab/anova/DOE-RAF.pdf) [Autor] Thomas Kuhn – Autor que criticó la rigidez del método científico. - Obra destacada: "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (1962). (https://amzn.to/3U572Fp) [Autor] Paul Feyerabend – Filósofo de la ciencia que cuestionó la estructura rígida del método científico. - Obra destacada: "Against Method" (1975). (https://amzn.to/4h2K4IZ) [Referencia a Herramienta] GPT Consensus – Herramienta de inteligencia artificial que se basa en artículos científicos para generar respuestas en lenguaje natural. [Autor] Eric Rimm – Investigador mencionado en relación con las guías dietéticas y la nutrición, específicamente sobre productos animales. (https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=U7sQDw4AAAAJ&hl=en) [Autor] Philip Cole – Referenciado por su "Hypothesis Generating Machine", un artículo satírico que trata sobre la generación de hipótesis en ciencia. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/3702282) [Meta-análisis]: Título: "Dietary intake of total, animal, and plant proteins and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies". Conclusión: «Una mayor ingesta de proteínas totales se asoció con un menor riesgo de mortalidad por todas las causas, y la ingesta de proteínas vegetales se asoció con un menor riesgo de mortalidad por todas las causas y por enfermedades cardiovasculares. La sustitución de alimentos ricos en proteínas animales por fuentes de proteínas vegetales podría estar asociada con la longevidad.» (https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2412) * Cita de Gonzalo en el minuto 01:11:01 "Todo trabajo científico es incompleto, ya sea observacional o experimental. Todo trabajo científico es susceptible de ser alterado o modificado por el avance del conocimiento. Eso no nos otorga la libertad de ignorar el conocimiento que ya tenemos, o de posponer la acción que parece exigir en un momento dado. Quién sabe, preguntó Robert Browning, pero ¿el mundo puede terminar esta noche? Es cierto, pero según las pruebas disponibles, la mayoría de nosotros nos preparamos para viajar al trabajo el día siguiente a las 8.30." — "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" by Sir Austin Bradford Hill Puedes seguirme aquí: Website: https://pildorasdelconocimiento.com/ Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/Lualobus LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lualobus/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fernando_pdc/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/P%C3%ADldorasdelConocimiento Puedes seguir aquí a Gonzalo: Instragram: https://www.instagram.com/datosdeciencia Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@sciencedataoficial

Conversamos con el divulgador científico Gonzalo (DatosDeCiencia) sobre la aplicación del método científico. Especialmente, en el ámbito de la salud y la nutrición. Te adelanto dos cosas: - Gonzalo es de las personas más inteligentes con las que he conversado en el podcast. - Ha cambiado el paradigma de lo que consideraba correcto a nivel nutricional. [...] Si te gusta el podcast, sospecho que te gustarán también mis EMAILS. Te podría decir que son maravillosos y cargados de valor, pero mejor que lo descubras por ti mismo. Si los quieres recibir, te puedes apuntar aquí: https://pildorasdelconocimiento.com/ Descubrirás ideas, reflexiones y... también estarás al tanto de cuando hago nuevas clases, masterclasses y formaciones. No te confundo con más enlaces. Está todo ahí. :::::::::::::::: ÍNDICE :::::::::::::::: 00:00:00 Intro 00:01:01 Gonzalo de DatosDeCiencia 00:04:50 Ciencia vs Show 00:06:20 Ciencia en nutrición 00:08:25 Alimentación evolutiva (falacia narrativa) 00:09:50 Tipos de razonamiento 00:14:20 Integración del razonamiento en el método científico 00:19:05 GPT Consensus 00:21:40 Dieta Vegana con el máximo respaldo científico 00:27:20 Tipos de experimentos 00:35:40 Falacias narrativas 00:42:10 La nutrición es un circo 00:47:50 Comer huevos 00:48:30 ¿Tenemos intuición nutricional? Adipostato y estímulos supernormales 00:52:20 Inteligencia fluida vs inteligencia cristalizada 00:54:20 Radical científico 00:59:20 Criterio del marcación en ciencia 01:05:05 Modelos probabilísticos 01:08:50 Libros y Papers 01:13:14 Despedida ::::::::::::::::REFERENCIAS::::::::::::::::: [Libro] «Comer para no morir» de Michael Greger (https://amzn.to/3UduOz8) [Paper] "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" de Austin Bradford Hill (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1898525/) [Autor] Ronald Fisher – Padre del diseño experimental y la asignación aleatoria. - Obra destacada: "The Design of Experiments" (1935). (https://home.iitk.ac.in/~shalab/anova/DOE-RAF.pdf) [Autor] Thomas Kuhn – Autor que criticó la rigidez del método científico. - Obra destacada: "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (1962). (https://amzn.to/3U572Fp) [Autor] Paul Feyerabend – Filósofo de la ciencia que cuestionó la estructura rígida del método científico. - Obra destacada: "Against Method" (1975). (https://amzn.to/4h2K4IZ) [Referencia a Herramienta] GPT Consensus – Herramienta de inteligencia artificial que se basa en artículos científicos para generar respuestas en lenguaje natural. [Autor] Eric Rimm – Investigador mencionado en relación con las guías dietéticas y la nutrición, específicamente sobre productos animales. (https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=U7sQDw4AAAAJ&hl=en) [Autor] Philip Cole – Referenciado por su "Hypothesis Generating Machine", un artículo satírico que trata sobre la generación de hipótesis en ciencia. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/3702282) [Meta-análisis]: Título: "Dietary intake of total, animal, and plant proteins and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies". Conclusión: «Una mayor ingesta de proteínas totales se asoció con un menor riesgo de mortalidad por todas las causas, y la ingesta de proteínas vegetales se asoció con un menor riesgo de mortalidad por todas las causas y por enfermedades cardiovasculares. La sustitución de alimentos ricos en proteínas animales por fuentes de proteínas vegetales podría estar asociada con la longevidad.» (https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2412) * Cita de Gonzalo en el minuto 01:11:01 "Todo trabajo científico es incompleto, ya sea observacional o experimental. Todo trabajo científico es susceptible de ser alterado o modificado por el avance del conocimiento. Eso no nos otorga la libertad de ignorar el conocimiento que ya tenemos, o de posponer la acción que parece exigir en un momento dado. Quién sabe, preguntó Robert Browning, pero ¿el mundo puede terminar esta noche? Es cierto, pero según las pruebas disponibles, la mayoría de nosotros nos preparamos para viajar al trabajo el día siguiente a las 8.30." — "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" by Sir Austin Bradford Hill Puedes seguirme aquí: Website: https://pildorasdelconocimiento.com/ Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/Lualobus LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lualobus/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fernando_pdc/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/P%C3%ADldorasdelConocimiento Puedes seguir aquí a Gonzalo: Instragram: https://www.instagram.com/datosdeciencia Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@sciencedataoficial

Brought to you by Wealthfront high-yield savings account, Helix Sleep premium mattresses, and Shopify global commerce platform providing tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business. Peter Attia, MD (@PeterAttiaMD), is the founder of Early Medical, a medical practice that applies the principles of Medicine 3.0 to patients with the goal of lengthening their lifespan and simultaneously improving their healthspan. He is the host of The Drive, one of the most popular podcasts covering the topics of health and medicine. Dr. Attia received his medical degree from the Stanford University School of Medicine and trained for five years at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in general surgery, where he was the recipient of several prestigious awards, including Resident of the Year. He spent two years at the National Institutes of Health as a surgical oncology fellow at the National Cancer Institute, where his research focused on immune-based therapies for melanoma.His new book is Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity (3/28).Please enjoy!This episode is brought to you by Shopify! Shopify is one of my favorite platforms and one of my favorite companies. Shopify is designed for anyone to sell anywhere, giving entrepreneurs the resources once reserved for big business. In no time flat, you can have a great-looking online store that brings your ideas to life, and you can have the tools to manage your day-to-day and drive sales. No coding or design experience required.Go to shopify.com/Tim to sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period. It's a great deal for a great service, so I encourage you to check it out. Take your business to the next level today by visiting shopify.com/Tim.*This episode is also brought to you by Helix Sleep! Helix was selected as the #1 overall mattress of 2020 by GQ magazine, Wired, Apartment Therapy, and many others. With Helix, there's a specific mattress to meet each and every body's unique comfort needs. Just take their quiz—only two minutes to complete—that matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you. They have a 10-year warranty, and you get to try it out for a hundred nights, risk-free. They'll even pick it up from you if you don't love it. And now, Helix is offering 20% off all mattress orders plus two free pillows at HelixSleep.com/Tim.*This episode is also brought to you by Wealthfront! Wealthfront is an app that helps you save and invest your money. Right now, you can earn 4.05% APY—that's the Annual Percentage Yield—with the Wealthfront Cash Account. That's more than twelve times more interest than if you left your money in a savings account at the average bank, according to FDIC.gov. It takes just a few minutes to sign up, and then you'll immediately start earning 3.8% interest on your savings. And when you open an account today, you'll get an extra fifty-dollar bonus with a deposit of five hundred dollars or more. Visit Wealthfront.com/Tim to get started.*[07:00] How and why Peter's muscle mass has increased significantly.[18:48] Why the long wait for Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity?[23:19] Objective, strategy, and tactics.[28:50] From Medicine 1.0 to Medicine 3.0.[39:04] Randomized control trial results: guidelines, not gospel.[43:21] Revisiting why and how one should increase their medical literacy.[52:44] Avoiding scientific method misconceptions.[55:43] Austin Bradford Hill.[56:22] Observational study versus randomized control trial.[1:00:09] Are sleep trackers downgrading the quality of our sleep?[1:02:53] Under what conditions does Peter feel alcohol might be worth its downsides?[1:06:47] Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs).[1:18:24] Underutilized metrics and tools for expanding health and lifespan.[1:25:01] Strength.[1:33:11] Rucking around and finding out about VO2 max.[1:38:32] Finding the zone two sweet spot.[1:41:10] How skinning and rucking have upped my endurance.[1:42:24] Rucking vs. weighted vests.[1:46:39] Are neurodegenerative diseases preventable?[1:51:47] Helping your doctor understand and embrace Medicine 3.0.[1:53:47] How much is an ounce of prevention worth to you?[1:58:23] Early cancer screening.[2:06:33] Outlive chapters.[2:08:46] The chapter on emotional health that almost didn't make the book.[2:10:16] Peter's 47 affirmations.[2:14:18] Parting thoughts.*For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsorsSign up for Tim's email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim's books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissYouTube: youtube.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, Margaret Atwood, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Dr. Gabor Maté, Anne Lamott, Sarah Silverman, Dr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Does Estrogen Cause Breast Cancer? The "Change of Life" and the Quality of Life Matters of the Heart Breaking Bad Losing and Using Our Minds Can Breast Cancer Survivors Take Estrogen? Progesterone and the Pill Debates, Decisions, and Final Lessons in the Case for HRT That is a list of chapter titles in the book, Estrogen Matters: Why Taking Hormones in Menopause Can Improve Women's Well-Being and Lengthen Their Lives—Without Raising the Risk of Breast Cancer by medical oncologist Avrum Bluming, MD, and social psychologist, Carol Tavris, PhD.  I was introduced to the book by my former PCP, Dr. Melody Rodarte, DO. It reads like a thriller. The introduction is even called, "Who Killed HRT?" The authors tell a riveting story. Over 20 years ago, they indicate that a poorly conceived and misinformed study from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) swept through the medical community, indicating a causal connection of estrogen and breast cancer and demonizing the use of estrogen to treat menopausal women.  "... We will show in a close examination of the WHI studies, some of those claims were exaggerated, some were misleading, and some were just wrong—and several of the WHI investigators themselves eventually backed away from them." The book delivers the goods, names names, and provides more than 50 pages of referenced articles and studies to back up their claims that "estrogen matters."  "But wait, Jan! My oncologist has told me ... " Yes, I totally understand. Mine has told me the same things. You'll hear my story in the interview. Now that I've read the book, I'm sending my onc a copy and begging her to look into it. You might consider doing the same thing. This quote in the book says it all. "All scientific work is incomplete—whether it be observational or experimental. All scientific work is liable to be upset or modified by advancing knowledge. That does not confer upon us a freedom to ignore the knowledge we already have, or to postpone the action that it appears to demand at a given time." —Austin Bradford Hill, 1965 (Hill is the British biostatistician who pioneered the randomized clinical trial) Why should we even consider using estrogen as women who have gone through breast cancer treatment? Here are a few reasons from the book's back cover. "There is no current way to prevent or treat Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia—except estrogen." "Seven times as many women die of heart disease as die of breast cancer annually. In fact, heart disease, not cancer, is the leading cause of death among breast cancer survivors, and HRT can decrease that risk by 30 to 50 percent." "The same number of women die annually following osteoporotic hip fracture as die of breast cancer, and HRT can cut this risk in half." "There is no evidence to support the current medical advice to take HRT at the lowest dose for the shortest period of time." "HRT is the most effective treatment for all menopausal symptoms, not only the familiar hot flashes, night sweats, and insomnia—which can last seven years or longer—but also heart palpitations, joint and muscle aches, headaches, bladder problems, sexual discomforts, and depression, which many women do not realize are often signs of menopause as well." "Women taking HRT live, on average, several years longer than those not taking it." "Estrogen does not increase the risk of breast cancer. Breast cancer is not a disease, as some professionals believe, 'of having too much estrogen in your body.' Even breast cancer survivors may safely take HRT under a doctor's supervision, and it will not increase their risk of recurrence." Please read it yourself. Do your own research. Discuss it with your providers. Be your own advocate.  Find out more about the book on their website at Estrogen Matters. Shared with love by Jan James, Hope After Breast Cancer Find out more about our private Facebook support groups (Booby Buddies, Hope After Breast Cancer, Sex After Breast Cancer, Booby Buddies en español) here. Joining our Newsletter List will give you a monthly recap of our best content, as well as information about available training and support. If you're a woman who is tired of merely surviving breast cancer—If you want to heal deeper and faster in a safe community of like-minded women—THRIVER NATION is for you! Learn more on our website. Subscribe to our Hope After Breast Cancer Podcast on your favorite podcast platform! Watch original video here. This interview is provided as an educational and informational source for our community. As with everything we provide on our website, on our podcast, and inside our private support groups, the information provided is not intended to be a substitute for advice from a professional who is aware of the facts and circumstances of your individual situation.

Großbritannien 1947. Experten für Public Health treibt eine wichtige Frage um: Warum sind in den letzten Jahren so viel mehr Männer an Lungenkrebs gestorben als in den Jahrzehnten zuvor? Austin Bradford Hill und sein Assistent Richard Doll entwerfen eine Studie, die diese Frage beantworten soll. Dabei stoßen sie auf viele wichtige methodische Fragen zu kausalen Zusammenhängen und eine unpopuläre Wahrheit.

This week we take a short detour, to describe one application of Waksman and Schatz's work on streptomycin. Our hero this time is Austin Bradford Hill, a mathematician who, with innovative study design, is able to definitely prove that streptomycin can treat tuberculosis, a notoriously complicated disease. Website: http://thehistoryofmedicine.buzzsprout.com/E-mail: thehistoryofmedicinepodcast@gmail.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheHistoryOfMedicine/ Transcripts and Sources here! 

Does smoking cause lung cancer? How could you ever know? The second in a three-part series on causality, I’m joined by Dr. Shoshana Herzig to discuss how Austin Bradford Hill and Richard Doll set out to try and answer this question -- and along the way revolutionized the way we think about what causes disease. In this episode, we’ll talk about the first double-blinded randomized controlled trial, the long shadow of tuberculosis, and why epidemiology is beautiful. Plus, a brand new #AdamAnswers about chest compressions! Please support Bedside Rounds by filling out the listener demographic survey: https://survey.libsyn.com/bedsiderounds Sources: Bost TC. Cardiac arrest during anaesthesia and surgical operations. Am J Surg 1952;83: 135-4 Council, T. Tobacco Smoking and Lung Cancer. Brit Med J 1, 1523 (1957). Crofton J, The MRC randomized trial of streptomycin and its legacy: a view from the clinical front line. J R Soc Med. 2006 Oct; 99(10): 531–534. Daniels M and Bradford Hill A, Chemotherapy of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Young Adults, Br Med J. 1952 May 31; 1(4769): 1162–1168. Dangers of Cigarette-smoking. Brit Med J 1, 1518 (1957). Doll, R. & Hill, B. A. Lung Cancer and Other Causes of Death in Relation to Smoking. Brit Med J 2, 1071 (1956). Doll, R. & Hill, B. A. Smoking and Carcinoma of the Lung. Brit Med J 2, 739 (1950). Hill, A. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? J Roy Soc Med 58, 295–300 (1965). HOFFMAN, F. L. CANCER AND SMOKING HABITS. Ann Surg 93, 50–67 (1931). Hurt R, Modern cardiopulmonary resuscitation—not so new after all. J R Soc Med. 2005 Jul; 98(7): 327–331. Keating C, Smoking Kills: The Revolutionary Life of Richard Doll. 2009. Keith A, Three Hunterian Lectures ON THE MECHANISM UNDERLYING THE VARIOUS METHODS OF ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION PRACTISED SINCE THE FOUNDATION OF THE ROYAL HUMANE SOCIETY IN 1774. (1909). The Lancet, 173(4464), 825–828. Kouwenhoven WB et al, Closed-chest cardiac massage, JAMA, JAMA. 1960;173(10):1064-1067. Morabia, A. Quality, originality, and significance of the 1939 “Tobacco consumption and lung carcinoma” article by Mueller, including translation of a section of the paper. Prev Med 55, 171–177 (2012). Ochsner, A. & bakey. Primary pulmonary malignancy: treatment by total pneumonectomy; analysis of 79 collected cases and presentation of 7 personal cases. Ochsner J 1, 109–25 (1999). Ochsner, A. My first recognition of the relationship of smoking and lung cancer. Prev Med 2, 611–614 (1973). Parascandola, M. Two approaches to etiology: the debate over smoking and lung cancer in the 1950s. Endeavour 28, 81–86 (2004). Phillips, C. V. & Goodman, K. J. The missed lessons of Sir Austin Bradford Hill. Epidemiologic Perspectives Innovations 1, 1–5 (2004). Proctor, R. Angel H Roffo: the forgotten father of experimental tobacco carcinogenesis. B World Health Organ 84, 494–495 (2006). Wynder, E. RE: “WHEN GENIUS ERRS: R. A. FISHER AND THE LUNG CANCER CONTROVERSY”. Am J Epidemiol 134, 1467–9 (1991).

Ask a number of influential social scientists who in turn influenced them, and you’d likely get a blue-ribbon primer on the classics in social science. Wright Mills’ The Sociological Imagination. Ernest Becker’s The Denial of Death. Irving Goffman’s The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Emile Durkheim’s Suicide. Michel Foucault’s The Archaeology of Knowledge. During the recording of every Social Science Bites podcast, the guest has been asked the following: Which piece of social science research has most inspired or most influenced you? And now, in honor of the 50th Bites podcast to air, journalist and interviewer David Edmonds has compiled those responses into three collections. This last of the three appears here, with answers presented alphabetically from Toby Miller to Linda Woodhead. “I remember as a graduate student reading classics in epidemiology and sociology and feeling like a kid in the candy store,” recalls David Stuckler, now a University of Oxford sociologist, before namedropping? Durkheim. Several of the guests gently railed at the request to name just one influence. “There isn’t one,” starts Mirca Madianou, a communications expert at Goldsmiths, University of London. “There may have been different books at different times of my formation.” Social psychologist Steve Reicher said he instead liked the idea of desert Island books, which give multiple bites of this particular apple, and then named several influences, including E.P. Thompson’s The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century and Natalie Davis’s The Rites of Violence: Religious Riot in Sixteenth-Century France, which he describes as “beautiful and rich depictions of patterns of social behavior.” “I’m unprepared to answer this!” exclaims behavioral economist and Nobel laureate Robert Shiller before he cites Hersh Shefrin and Richard Thaler’s work that pioneered the connection between neuroscience and eEconomics. Sometimes, though, the answer comes instantly. “Not a day that I don’t think about him or talk about him to somebody,” said Lawrence Sherman of Austin Bradford Hill, an economist whose work evaluating the use of streptomycin in treating tuberculosis created the template for randomized controlled trials.

Wed, 05 Apr 2017 06:53:04 +0000 https://evidenzbasierte-pharmazie.podigee.io/40-sonderfolge-evidenz-geschichte-n-austin-bradford-hill-oder-warum-wir-randomisierung-brauchen c122ad2b74d60ae4046e0a4e4eafb15b Hier kommt die nächste Folge der Evidenzgeschichte(n): England nach dem 2. Weltkrieg: Tuberkulose gehört zu den wichtigsten Todesursachen bei jungen Menschen. Wie zuverlässig hilft Streptomycin? Das untersucht der Medizinstatistiker Austin Bradford Hill mit äußerst knappen Mitteln und einer neuen Methodik: einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie. **Unsere Quellen** Wikipedia-Einträge zu - [Austin Bradford Hill](https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Bradford_Hill) - [Tuberkulose](https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuberkulose) Wo ist der Beweis? [Unverzerrte prospektive Zuteilung zu verschiedenen Therapien](http://de.testingtreatments.org/tt-main-text/6-faire-tests-von-therapien/vergleiche-von-therapien-mit-maessigen-aber-wichtigen-effekten/) James Lind Library - [Die veröffentlichte Studie zum Streptomycin-Versuch und Erinnerungen von Bradford Hill und D'Arcy Hart](http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/medical-research-council-1948b/) - Bradford Hill, [Principles of medical statistics](http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/hill-ab-1937b/) - [Hintergrundinformationen zum Streptomycin-Versuch](http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/the-mrc-randomized-trial-of-streptomycin-and-its-legacy-a-view-from-the-clinical-front-line/) Weitere Quellen - [Die Randomisierung im Streptomycin-Versuch](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1114162/) Den Podcast Evidenz-Geschichte(n) kann man auch separat abonnieren - am schnellsten über unsere Seite bei Podigee. 40 full no