Podcast appearances and mentions of andrea graziosi

Due settimane di Donald Trump alla Casa Bianca e il mondo è già cambiato. Gli ordini esecutivi, la guerra delle tariffe, le dichiarazioni su Gaza, la promessa di mettere fine alla guerra in Ucraina, il cambiamento radicale della dottrina USA delle alleanze (non esistono più paesi amici di fronte agli interessi di Washington): la velocità data da Trump alle sue decisioni ha spiazzato la maggior parte dei governi mondiali. Se a casa, Trump sta installando una sorta di sistema populista dittatoriale a base di massa, all'estero, la sua politica è indirizzata solo ed esclusivamente ad accrescere il ruolo degli USA a discapito di chiunque possa essere un ostacolo al suo disegno. Ne abbiamo parlato con lo storico Andrea Graziosi e con l'Ambasciatore Stefano Stefanini. Nella seconda parte della trasmissione, invece il podcast della Fondazione del Giardino dei Giusti di Milano sui nuovi giusti. In questa puntata la storia di Antonio Maglio, il "papà delle Paralimpiadi". A cura di Michele Migone.

Il riconoscimento di identità diverse rischia di frantumare le nostre società, sostengono molti. D'altra parte riconoscere nuovi diritti e libertà è sacrosanto. Come evitare che questo progresso generi paure e rabbia con le conseguenze politico-elettorali che vediamo in giro per il mondo? Come tenere insieme uguaglianza e differenze? C'è qualcosa da imparare dalla lunga storia di chi ha cercato di conciliarle? Il ritorno della razza di Andrea Graziosi, il Mulino Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A cura di Michele Migone. Quale sarà il destino dell'Europa dopo la rielezione di Donald Trump e cosa accadrà all'Ucraina? Il presidente eletto USA ha già minacciato una sorta di guerra commerciale a suon di dazi nei confronti della UE, un conflitto che potrebbe essere molto oneroso per l'economia del Vecchio Continente. Così come ha già annunciato che metterà fine alla guerra in Ucraina. E tutti prevedono a discapito di Kiev. Ne abbiamo parlato con Eric Josef, corrispondente in Italia del quotidiano Liberation, con Tonia Mastrobuoni, corrispondente da Berlino de La Repubblica, con lo storico Andrea Graziosi, con Alessandro Marrone, esperto Nato dell'Istituto Affari Internazionali e con Lorenzo Cremonesi, inviato speciale del Corriere della Sera.

A cura di Michele Migone. Le prospettive della guerra in Ucraina e il racconto dalla zona della Russia occupata dagli ucraini, il conflitto in Medio Oriente, la ritorsione israeliana contro l'Iran, lo stato di salute del regime degli ayatollah e le speranze e la repressione contro il movimento Donna Vita Libertà. Sono questi i temi della puntata di Va Pensiero. Ne abbiamo parlato con lo storico Andrea Graziosi, Lorenzo Cremonesi, inviato speciale del Corriere della Sera, con l'analista di geopolitica Nima Bacheli e con Greta Privitera del Corriere della Sera

Protagonista di questo Laser è Volodymyr Sahaidak, direttore del Centro di riabilitazione sociale e psicologica di Kherson, in Ucraina. La struttura da anni accoglie bambini orfani, minori i cui genitori sono in carcere o comunque impossibilitati a garantirne il sostentamento. Kherson è rimasta sotto occupazione russa da febbraio a novembre del 2022: è stata una delle città più martoriate dalla guerra. Ai nostri microfoni, Sahaidak racconta come ha fatto a salvare dalla deportazione 52 bambini, e quali sono le prove che è riuscito a raccogliere. L'uomo oggi è sotto protezione, tutelato perché testimone del processo intentato dalla Corte penale internazionale contro il presidente russo, Vladimir Putin, e la responsabile delle politiche per l'infanzia, Maria Lvova Belova. L'intervista con Sahaidak è stata anche l'occasione per ragionare, insieme allo storico Andrea Graziosi, sul fenomeno storico della deportazione di persone, ma anche sulla possibilità che il processo contro Putin e Lvova Belova venga davvero celebrato e possa portare ad un'eventuale condanna

La morte, l'uccisione di Alexsei Navalny, la condanna di Oleg Orlov, Premio Nobel per la Pace con l'associazione Memorial, le minacce sull'utilizzo delle armi atomiche, i toni sempre più duri contro i Baltici. Perché Vladimir Putin ha fatto tutte queste mosse nelle ultime settimane, alla vigilia delle "elezioni" presidenziali? Segno di forza o di debolezza? Cosa sta progettando? Ne abbiamo parlato con la giornalista Anna Zafesova, Andrea Gullotta di Memorial Internazionale, Andrea Graziosi, storico e con Giulia De Florio, docente universitaria.

Se vince Donald Trump gli Usa non aiuteranno più l'Ucraina con l'invio delle armi. E'per questo che Vladimir Putin tifa per la sua vittoria contro il "comune nemico" Joe Biden. I destini della guerra in Ucraina si giocheranno soprattutto nelle urne americane, il prossimo anno, con le elezioni presidenziali. Difficile che prima l'equilibrio militare possa essere modificato sul terreno. Di questo abbiamo parlato con Andrea Graziosi, uno dei più più importanti storici italiani, esperto di storia della Russia e dell'Ucraina e con Giovanni Savino, docente universitario.

• Kultural Capsule: Vasyl features Ukrainian singer Zhennia Sakharova whose latest release honours heroes of Ukraine, past and present• Knyzhka Corner Book Review: Winterkill, by Marsha Skrypuch tells a gripping story of children who survived the Holodomor• Feature Interview: World-renowned scholar on Holodomor, Dr. Andrea Graziosi discusses the link between propaganda and genocide• Upcoming community events in the Vancouver listening area• Ukrainian Proverb of the Week• Other items of interest• Great Ukrainian Music in honour of HolodomorYour host: Pawlina.The Vancouver edition airs Saturdays at 6pm PST on air at AM1320 CHMB and streaming live at the CHMB website. www.am1320.com.The Nanaimo edition airs in Nanaimo on Wednesdays at 11am PST on CHLY 101.7FM, broadcasting to the north and central Vancouver Island, Gulf Islands, Sunshine Coast, northwest Washington State and Greater Vancouver listening areas. Support the show on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Protagonista di questo Laser è Volodymyr Sahaidak, direttore del “Centro di riabilitazione sociale e psicologica” di Kherson, in Ucraina. La struttura da anni accoglie bambini orfani, minori i cui genitori sono in carcere o comunque impossibilitati a garantirne il sostentamento. Kherson è rimasta sotto occupazione russa da febbraio a novembre del 2022: è stata una delle città più martoriate dalla guerra. Ai nostri microfoni, Sahaidak racconta come ha fatto a salvare dalla deportazione 52 bambini, e quali sono le prove che è riuscito a raccogliere. L'uomo oggi è sotto protezione, tutelato perché testimone del processo intentato dalla Corte penale internazionale contro il presidente russo, Vladimir Putin, e la responsabile delle politiche per l'infanzia, Maria Lvova Belova. L'intervista con Sahaidak è stata anche l'occasione per ragionare, insieme allo storico Andrea Graziosi, sul fenomeno storico della deportazione di persone, ma anche sulla possibilità che il processo contro Putin e Lvova Belova venga davvero celebrato e possa portare ad un'eventuale condannaKherson, 4 giugno 2022. Soldati russi perquisiscono il Centro per i minori vulnerabili

Fenomeni come la contrazione delle nascite e l'allungamento della speranza di vita hanno effetti enormi. Ma dipendono (anche) da scelte personali, ci dicono molto della cultura e i desideri del nostro tempo.Andrea Graziosi, "Occidenti e modernità", il MulinoTimbuctu è un podcast del Post condotto da Marino Sinibaldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Il giorno dopo la ribellione della Brigata Wagner contro il Cremlino si cerca di capire quale è la reale situazione del potere a Mosca. In questa puntata di Va pensiero le valutazioni di Anna Zafesova, giornalista e scrittrice, e Andrea Graziosi, storico, esperto di Ex Unione Sovietica

L'Occidente è ancora quello che conosciamo? E' in crisi, o semplicemente in trasformazione?Serena Sileoni lo chiede ad Andrea Graziosi, storico e docente presso l'Università Federico II di Napoli, in una nuova intervista Leonifiles________________Feelin Good by Kevin MacLeod Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3744-feelin-goodLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Uno degli effetti della guerra in Ucraina è di aver reso concreto un concetto abitualmente lontano come quello di Occidente. È dal 2014, dalla prima rivolta filoeuropeista, che il popolo ucraino combatte per cercare di avvicinarsi all'Europa e all'Occidente, e ora che con l'invasione della Russia la guerra è diventata una questione di vita o di morte, il concetto di Occidente non appare più così lontano e distante. Eppure l'Occidente è in crisi da tempo: la crisi demografica, la crisi politica e l'invecchiamento della popolazione stanno mettendo sempre più in difficoltà il suo modello. Per questo, possiamo dire che l'Occidente è davanti a un bivio: la guerra in Ucraina ha dimostrato la sua importanza, ma al tempo stesso non ha frenato le sue difficoltà e i suoi problemi.A Globo ne parliamo con Andrea Graziosi, che è professore di Storia Contemporanea all'Università Federico II di Napoli ed è uno dei massimi esperti europei dello spazio ex sovietico. Il suo ultimo libro, “Occidenti e Modernità”, parla proprio del mondo nuovo – e dell'Occidente nuovo – che dovremo costruire nei prossimi anni. I CONSIGLI DI ANDREA GRAZIOSI – Il film “The Fablemans” – Il film “RRR” – Il libro “Vita e destino” di Vasilij Grossman – Il libro “La cultura del narcisismo” di Christopher Lasch – Il libro “What is ‘Your' Race” di Kenneth Prewitt – Gli ultimi quattro lieder di Richard Strauss Globo è un podcast del Post condotto da Eugenio Cau. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Un anno fa l'invasione dell'Ucraina da parte della truppe di Mosca. Un anno dopo, la guerra voluta da Vladimir Putin ha provocato decine di migliaia di vittime tra soldati civili, città distrutte, territori occupati dai russi dove si registrano quotidiani arresti, torture e deportazioni. Il presidente russo pensava di chiudere la partita in 72 ore e invece, 12 mesi dopo, gli ucraini resistono, hanno riconquistato parti del loro territorio e puntano a una controffensiva che possa portare alla liberazione di altre porzioni del paese. Dietro l'avventura ucraina di Putin c'è una sua visione ideologica che va dall'imperialismo zarista allo stalinismo, dall'euroasiatismo all'avversione all'Occidente e alla democrazia liberale. Di questo abbiamo parlato con Andrea Graziosi, storico, autore del libro L'Ucraina e Putin tra storia e ideologia, edito da Laterza e con Paolo Valentino del Corriere della Sera.

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/military-history

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/world-affairs

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/genocide-studies

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

La guerra in Ucraina è arrivata a un punto cruciale. La controffensiva delle truppe di Kiev ha permesso la riconquista di significative porzioni dei territori occupati dai russi. Vladimir Putin ha minacciato l'uso dell'arma atomica; un modo per fare pressione sui governi occidentali per indurli a togliere il loro appoggio a Kiev. Mosca è in difficoltà e la chiave del futuro del conflitto potrebbe essere la riconquista della città di Kherson. Di tutto questo abbiamo parlato con lo storico Andrea Graziosi, autori del libro L'Ucraina e Putin, tra storia e ideologia, edito da Laterza

Vladimir Putin ha sbagliato tutto in Ucraina e sta perdendo la guerra. Cosa farà il presidente russo per evitare la sconfitta di una guerra che pensava di vincere in 72 ore e che invece vede le truppe russe in ritirata di fronte alla controffensiva ucraina ? Putin ha poche opzioni sul tavolo, una delle quali è la mobilitazione generale o parziale. Ma adottarla vuole dire smentire tutta la sua retorica sulla "operazione speciale" in Ucraina. Ne abbiamo parlato con lo storico Andrea Graziosi e con Maria Mikaleian dell'associazione Russi Liberi

Knyzhka Corner Book Review: Communism and Hunger – The Ukrainian, Chinese, Kazakh, and Soviet Famines in Comparative Perspective edited by Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn • Ukrainian Jewish Heritage: Book review of Our Fellow Countryman – Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson by Dr. Larysa Levchenko and Dr. Vladimir Shchukin. Join me - Pawlina - for the Vancouver edition of Nash Holos Ukrainian Roots Radio—every Saturday at 6pm PST on AM1320 CHMB and streaming at www.am1320.com.Reminder:If you're in the Vancouver listening area tune in to the Nanaimo edition on Wednesdays from 11am-1pm on air at 101.7FM or streaming online at CHLY Radio Malaspina with host Oksana Poberezhnyk. Podcast feed, transcipts, and links to reputable Ukrainian charities at our website. Support the show on Patreon See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Quali sono le radici del pensiero ideologico di Vladimir Putin ? Cosa è lo Spazio Russo di cui parla? Come si può definire il suo sistema di governo ? Una democrazia autoritaria? Un regime totalitario? Perché in un decennio il suo regime è diventato il modello di riferimento della destra radicale europea e statunitense sovranista e razzista? Cosa collega tutto questo con la guerra in Ucraina? A Va pensiero le riflessioni e le spiegazioni dello storico Andrea Graziosi e del giornalista del Manifesto Guido Caldiron.

Holodomor: la carestia sovietica in Ucraina Con Andrea Graziosi affrontiamo il tema dell'Holodomor, la disastrosa carestia sovietica in Ucraina del 1932-1933. Analizziamo le origini politiche e ideologiche di una tragedia che portò alla morte per fame di circa 4 milioni di ucraini nel tentativo di Stalin di piegare una nazione affamandone la popolazione ed eliminandone l'elite politica ed intellettuale. TESTI CONSIGLIATI . L'URSS di Lenin e Stalin. Storia dell'Unione Sovietica 1917-1945 di Andrea Graziosi https://amzn.to/36Q0y8b . L'URSS dal trionfo al degrado. Storia dell'Unione Sovietica. 1945-1991 di Andrea Graziosi https://amzn.to/3J8vxtm . The Harvest of Sorrow di Robert Conquest https://amzn.to/38bLUIy . La Guardia Bianca di Mikhail Bulgakov https://amzn.to/3DvmRMp . Lettere da Kharkiv di Andrea Graziosi https://amzn.to/3iVnFAq Andrea Graziosi è professore di Storia Contemporanea all'Università di Napoli Federico II. È uno specialista di storia dell'Unione Sovietica e dell'Ucraina e uno dei massimi esperti di Holodomor e delle carestie sovietiche. #storia #ucraina #russia #holodomor Sostieni Liberi Oltre le Illusioni diventando socio: vai su www.liberioltreleillusioni.it nella sezione "ASSOCIATI" e diventa socio. Ti aspettiamo ----------------------------

Due società post sovietiche, simili, ma non uguali: una che guarda verso l'Occidente e l'altra invece che rimane sul suo solco tradizionale. L'Ucraina di Zelensky e la Russia di Putin. Una società che si apre con difficoltà alle libertà civili e politiche e l'altra invece che rimane chiusa con un regime che la soffoca con la sua repressione. Il percorso di Zelensky da comico a leader internazionale e quello di Putin da leader internazionale a pericolo per la pace e la sicurezza Europea. Ne abbiamo parlato in questa puntata di Va pensiero con Andrea Graziosi che insegna Storia contemporanea all'Università di Napoli «Federico II» ed è il Presidente della Società Italiana per lo Studio della Storia Contemporanea. Graziosi ha insegnato storia sovietica negli Stati Uniti e in Francia. Di recente pubblicato L'Urss di Lenin e Stalin, 1914- 1945 e L'Urss dal trionfo al degrado, 1945-1991, il Mulino, Bologna 2007 e 2008.

Storia dell'Ucraina capire il contesto per capire la guerra. Facciamo un salto nella storia di Ucraina e Russa cercando di capire analogie e differenze dei due Paesi accomunati da uno stesso passato. La guerra in Ucraina continua e così continuano i nostri approfondimenti. In questa puntata di Serie Storiche, abbiamo l'occasione di ascoltare Andrea Graziosi, professore di storia ed esperto di Unione Sovietica che dialoga con il prof. Giovanni Federico. #storia #ucraina #guerra ---------------------------- Sostieni Liberi Oltre le Illusioni diventando socio: vai su www.liberioltreleillusioni.it nella sezione "ASSOCIATI" e diventa socio. Ti aspettiamo ----------------------------

Seconda parte dell'episodio comparativo sulle tre principali dittature totalitarie del XX secolo. L'argomento del giorno è la propaganda: come funzionava nel fascismo, nel nazionalsocialismo e nel comunismo? ---Fonti utilizzate per l'episodio:Un ringraziamento speciale all'aiuto di Paolo Arigotti, laureato in Storia Contemporanea, per l'ottimizzazione delle fonti, la stesura dello script e il fact checking. Per altre info su Paolo: Facebook.com/paoloarigottiIstagram paolo_arigotti_writerYoutube https://bit.ly/3adusljSimona Colarizi, L'opinione degli italiani sotto il regime, Laterza;Alberto Maria Banti, L'età contemporanea, Laterza;Enzo Collotti, La Germania nazista, Einaudi;Gianluca Magi, Goebbels: undici tattiche di manipolazione oscura, Piano B;Andrea Graziosi, L'Unione sovietica 1914-1991, Il Mulino;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VsP0Il49lk;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3cGNlrfh8o;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmYa4nWmpA.

Nel Ventennio in Italia si chiamava OVRA, in Germania Gestapo, in Unione Sovietica NKVD. Approfondiamo la storia e le strutture di polizia segreta dei tre principali regimi totalitari del Novecento. Fonti utilizzate per l'episodio:Un ringraziamento speciale all'aiuto di Paolo Arigotti, laureato in Storia Contemporanea, per l'ottimizzazione delle fonti e il fact checking. Per altre info su Paolo: Facebook.com/paoloarigottiIstagram paolo_arigotti_writerYoutube https://bit.ly/3adusljhttp://www.unife.it/giurisprudenza/giurisprudenza/studiare/storia-del-diritto-penale/materiale-didattico/art_bozza_qf;Ferrando Mantovani, Manuale di diritto penale, CEDAM;Mauro Canali, Le spie del regime, Il Mulino;Simona Colarizi, L'opinione degli italiani sotto il regime, Laterza;Indro Montanelli, Storia d'Italia, Volume 7, Corsera;William Shirer, Storia del Terzo Reich, Einaudi;Andrea Graziosi, L'Unione sovietica 1914-1991, Il Mulino;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CK76RVpuRtg;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyBpsaSEkqA; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IbG2m-1hgw.

Special edition commemorating Holodomor • Remarks by dignitaries on the passage of the BC Provincial Government's Bill M225, Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor) Memorial Day Act: BC Green Party leader Andrew Weaver who introduced the Private Member's Bill; Andriy Shevchenko, Ukraine's Ambassador to Canada; and Natalia Jatskevich, president of the BC Provincial Council of the Ukrainian Canadian Congress • Knyzhka Corner Book Review: Communism and Hunger by Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn (ed) • Ukrainian Proverb of the Week • Ukrainian Music on the theme of Holodomor and the current war of Russian aggression against Ukraine.Link to the formal speeches in the Legislature on the passage of Bill M225: Click here.Join me - Pawlina - for the VancThis presentation is in English. Your host: Pawlina.Nash Holos Ukrainian Roots Radio airs live in Nanaimo on Wednesdays from 11am-1pm PST on CHLY 101.7FM, broadcasting to the north and central Vancouver Island, Gulf Islands, Sunshine Coast, northwest Washington State and Greater Vancouver listening areas. In English: 11am-12pm with Pawlina. In Ukrainian 12-1pm with Oksana Poberezhnyk.You can also hear the Vancouver edition in the Nanaimo listening area on Saturdays from 6-7pm on air at AM1320 CHMB and streaming live at the CHMB website. www.am1320.com As well the International edition airs in over 20 countries on AM, FM, shortwave and satellite radio via PCJ Radio International. In between broadcasts, please follow @NashHolos on Twitter and Like the Nash Holos Facebook page. And check out our Patreon page if you'd like to help support the show.Please send us your suggestions, dedications and requests. Your comments are always welcome! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Special edition commemorating Holodomor • Remarks by dignitaries on the passage of the BC Provincial Government's Bill M225, Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor) Memorial Day Act: BC Green Party leader Andrew Weaver who introduced the Private Member's Bill; Andriy Shevchenko, Ukraine's Ambassador to Canada; and Natalia Jatskevich, president of the BC Provincial Council of the Ukrainian Canadian Congress • Knyzhka Corner Book Review: Communism and Hunger by Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn (ed) • Ukrainian Proverb of the Week • Ukrainian Music on the theme of Holodomor and the current war of Russian aggression against Ukraine.Link to the formal speeches in the Legislature on the passage of Bill M225: Click here.Join me - Pawlina - for the Vancouver edition of Nash Holos Ukrainian Roots Radio—every Saturday at 6pm PST on AM1320 CHMB Vancouver.Reminder: If you’re in the Vancouver listening area you can hear the Nanaimo edition on Wednesdays from 11am-1pm on air at 101.7FM or online at CHLY Radio Malaspina. Hour 1 is hosted by Pawlina, in English. Hour 2 is hosted by Oksana Poberezhnyk, in Ukrainian. Podcast feed at our website.In between broadcasts, please check out our Patreon site and consider supporting us. And do follow us there as well as on Facebook and Twitter! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this edition of Knyzhka Corner on Nash Holos: a review of Communism and Hunger – The Ukrainian, Chinese, Kazakh, and Soviet Famines in Comparative Perspective edited by Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn.Communism and Hunger is a collection of scholarly articles examining the similarities and differences of the 1931-1933 Ukrainian Holodomor, the Kazakh great hunger, and the famine in China in 1958-1962.The articles were written by scholars who presented their papers at a 2014 conference organized by the Holodomor Research and Education Consortium.“Whatever the economic motivations, the famines were also political events requiring political analysis of their causes and courses.” (p. vii)Full transcript here: See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Language is one of the complex systems facilitating communication; language is a system producing the inside and the outside of the individual's awareness of self and other. However, language is also a tool for and of ideological battles, shaping states and nations. A multifaceted nature of language is emphasized and explored in an interdisciplinary collection of articles The Battle for Ukrainian: A Comparative Perspective (Harvard University Press/Ukrainian Research Institute, 2017), edited by Michael S. Flier and Andrea Graziosi. This collection developed with the crucial contribution of Lubomyr Hajda, who highlighted the importance of the comparative aspect that goes beyond specific historical contexts. As the editors mention in their introduction, The Battle for Ukrainian presents the proceedings of the conference States, Peoples, Languages: A Comparative Political History of Ukrainian, 1863-2013. One of the starting points for the scholarly discussion was the history of the Ukrainian language, which happened to undergo a dramatic battle for its existence. Structured around the Valuev Circular (1863), which was followed by the Ems Decree (1876), the conference and the subsequent collection aimed to conceptualize the influences that the official documents would exercise on the formation and on the development of Ukrainian. Known for their oppressive and discriminatory effects, the two documents, as the current publication demonstrates, not only shaped the perception of Ukrainian but also produced a political and sociocultural framework for the languages functioning. The Battle for Ukrainian offers an insightful overview of the path that Ukrainian was, in fact, forced into: a persistent struggle against suppression and annihilation. Taking into consideration the influences exercised by the documents that restricted the usage of Ukrainian, the contributors investigate how Ukrainian was presented in the Russian Empire and under the Soviet Union. This conversation is put into a larger context, involving the issues of nation and identity formation. Additionally, the discussion creates a bridge between the past and the present: twenty-five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine seems to be still facing challenges that were first initiated by the language policies devised by Imperial Russia. Moreover, these challenges, as the recent events in the Donbas and Crimea, as well as new developments of language policies, demonstrate, are escalating. By analyzing the circumstances under which the Ukrainian language has been functioning, the contributors attempt to address the most urgent concerns, providing insights for the understanding of the past and the present. While emphasizing the language challenges, which Ukraine has been dealing with, The Battle for Ukrainian also draws comparative parallels that allow to search for frameworks and patterns that would emphasize the celebration of the existence of language. A language is a system that facilitates communication, but it is also an entity, fluid and changeable, that includes collaboration with other similar systems, entities. For this collection, the Ukrainian case provides material and territory for investigating linguistic areas, Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Language is one of the complex systems facilitating communication; language is a system producing the inside and the outside of the individual’s awareness of self and other. However, language is also a tool for and of ideological battles, shaping states and nations. A multifaceted nature of language is emphasized and explored in an interdisciplinary collection of articles The Battle for Ukrainian: A Comparative Perspective (Harvard University Press/Ukrainian Research Institute, 2017), edited by Michael S. Flier and Andrea Graziosi. This collection developed with the crucial contribution of Lubomyr Hajda, who highlighted the importance of the comparative aspect that goes beyond specific historical contexts. As the editors mention in their introduction, The Battle for Ukrainian presents the proceedings of the conference States, Peoples, Languages: A Comparative Political History of Ukrainian, 1863-2013. One of the starting points for the scholarly discussion was the history of the Ukrainian language, which happened to undergo a dramatic battle for its existence. Structured around the Valuev Circular (1863), which was followed by the Ems Decree (1876), the conference and the subsequent collection aimed to conceptualize the influences that the official documents would exercise on the formation and on the development of Ukrainian. Known for their oppressive and discriminatory effects, the two documents, as the current publication demonstrates, not only shaped the perception of Ukrainian but also produced a political and sociocultural framework for the languages functioning. The Battle for Ukrainian offers an insightful overview of the path that Ukrainian was, in fact, forced into: a persistent struggle against suppression and annihilation. Taking into consideration the influences exercised by the documents that restricted the usage of Ukrainian, the contributors investigate how Ukrainian was presented in the Russian Empire and under the Soviet Union. This conversation is put into a larger context, involving the issues of nation and identity formation. Additionally, the discussion creates a bridge between the past and the present: twenty-five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine seems to be still facing challenges that were first initiated by the language policies devised by Imperial Russia. Moreover, these challenges, as the recent events in the Donbas and Crimea, as well as new developments of language policies, demonstrate, are escalating. By analyzing the circumstances under which the Ukrainian language has been functioning, the contributors attempt to address the most urgent concerns, providing insights for the understanding of the past and the present. While emphasizing the language challenges, which Ukraine has been dealing with, The Battle for Ukrainian also draws comparative parallels that allow to search for frameworks and patterns that would emphasize the celebration of the existence of language. A language is a system that facilitates communication, but it is also an entity, fluid and changeable, that includes collaboration with other similar systems, entities. For this collection, the Ukrainian case provides material and territory for investigating linguistic areas, Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Language is one of the complex systems facilitating communication; language is a system producing the inside and the outside of the individual’s awareness of self and other. However, language is also a tool for and of ideological battles, shaping states and nations. A multifaceted nature of language is emphasized and explored in an interdisciplinary collection of articles The Battle for Ukrainian: A Comparative Perspective (Harvard University Press/Ukrainian Research Institute, 2017), edited by Michael S. Flier and Andrea Graziosi. This collection developed with the crucial contribution of Lubomyr Hajda, who highlighted the importance of the comparative aspect that goes beyond specific historical contexts. As the editors mention in their introduction, The Battle for Ukrainian presents the proceedings of the conference States, Peoples, Languages: A Comparative Political History of Ukrainian, 1863-2013. One of the starting points for the scholarly discussion was the history of the Ukrainian language, which happened to undergo a dramatic battle for its existence. Structured around the Valuev Circular (1863), which was followed by the Ems Decree (1876), the conference and the subsequent collection aimed to conceptualize the influences that the official documents would exercise on the formation and on the development of Ukrainian. Known for their oppressive and discriminatory effects, the two documents, as the current publication demonstrates, not only shaped the perception of Ukrainian but also produced a political and sociocultural framework for the languages functioning. The Battle for Ukrainian offers an insightful overview of the path that Ukrainian was, in fact, forced into: a persistent struggle against suppression and annihilation. Taking into consideration the influences exercised by the documents that restricted the usage of Ukrainian, the contributors investigate how Ukrainian was presented in the Russian Empire and under the Soviet Union. This conversation is put into a larger context, involving the issues of nation and identity formation. Additionally, the discussion creates a bridge between the past and the present: twenty-five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine seems to be still facing challenges that were first initiated by the language policies devised by Imperial Russia. Moreover, these challenges, as the recent events in the Donbas and Crimea, as well as new developments of language policies, demonstrate, are escalating. By analyzing the circumstances under which the Ukrainian language has been functioning, the contributors attempt to address the most urgent concerns, providing insights for the understanding of the past and the present. While emphasizing the language challenges, which Ukraine has been dealing with, The Battle for Ukrainian also draws comparative parallels that allow to search for frameworks and patterns that would emphasize the celebration of the existence of language. A language is a system that facilitates communication, but it is also an entity, fluid and changeable, that includes collaboration with other similar systems, entities. For this collection, the Ukrainian case provides material and territory for investigating linguistic areas, Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Language is one of the complex systems facilitating communication; language is a system producing the inside and the outside of the individual’s awareness of self and other. However, language is also a tool for and of ideological battles, shaping states and nations. A multifaceted nature of language is emphasized and explored in an interdisciplinary collection of articles The Battle for Ukrainian: A Comparative Perspective (Harvard University Press/Ukrainian Research Institute, 2017), edited by Michael S. Flier and Andrea Graziosi. This collection developed with the crucial contribution of Lubomyr Hajda, who highlighted the importance of the comparative aspect that goes beyond specific historical contexts. As the editors mention in their introduction, The Battle for Ukrainian presents the proceedings of the conference States, Peoples, Languages: A Comparative Political History of Ukrainian, 1863-2013. One of the starting points for the scholarly discussion was the history of the Ukrainian language, which happened to undergo a dramatic battle for its existence. Structured around the Valuev Circular (1863), which was followed by the Ems Decree (1876), the conference and the subsequent collection aimed to conceptualize the influences that the official documents would exercise on the formation and on the development of Ukrainian. Known for their oppressive and discriminatory effects, the two documents, as the current publication demonstrates, not only shaped the perception of Ukrainian but also produced a political and sociocultural framework for the languages functioning. The Battle for Ukrainian offers an insightful overview of the path that Ukrainian was, in fact, forced into: a persistent struggle against suppression and annihilation. Taking into consideration the influences exercised by the documents that restricted the usage of Ukrainian, the contributors investigate how Ukrainian was presented in the Russian Empire and under the Soviet Union. This conversation is put into a larger context, involving the issues of nation and identity formation. Additionally, the discussion creates a bridge between the past and the present: twenty-five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine seems to be still facing challenges that were first initiated by the language policies devised by Imperial Russia. Moreover, these challenges, as the recent events in the Donbas and Crimea, as well as new developments of language policies, demonstrate, are escalating. By analyzing the circumstances under which the Ukrainian language has been functioning, the contributors attempt to address the most urgent concerns, providing insights for the understanding of the past and the present. While emphasizing the language challenges, which Ukraine has been dealing with, The Battle for Ukrainian also draws comparative parallels that allow to search for frameworks and patterns that would emphasize the celebration of the existence of language. A language is a system that facilitates communication, but it is also an entity, fluid and changeable, that includes collaboration with other similar systems, entities. For this collection, the Ukrainian case provides material and territory for investigating linguistic areas, Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Language is one of the complex systems facilitating communication; language is a system producing the inside and the outside of the individual’s awareness of self and other. However, language is also a tool for and of ideological battles, shaping states and nations. A multifaceted nature of language is emphasized and explored in an interdisciplinary collection of articles The Battle for Ukrainian: A Comparative Perspective (Harvard University Press/Ukrainian Research Institute, 2017), edited by Michael S. Flier and Andrea Graziosi. This collection developed with the crucial contribution of Lubomyr Hajda, who highlighted the importance of the comparative aspect that goes beyond specific historical contexts. As the editors mention in their introduction, The Battle for Ukrainian presents the proceedings of the conference States, Peoples, Languages: A Comparative Political History of Ukrainian, 1863-2013. One of the starting points for the scholarly discussion was the history of the Ukrainian language, which happened to undergo a dramatic battle for its existence. Structured around the Valuev Circular (1863), which was followed by the Ems Decree (1876), the conference and the subsequent collection aimed to conceptualize the influences that the official documents would exercise on the formation and on the development of Ukrainian. Known for their oppressive and discriminatory effects, the two documents, as the current publication demonstrates, not only shaped the perception of Ukrainian but also produced a political and sociocultural framework for the languages functioning. The Battle for Ukrainian offers an insightful overview of the path that Ukrainian was, in fact, forced into: a persistent struggle against suppression and annihilation. Taking into consideration the influences exercised by the documents that restricted the usage of Ukrainian, the contributors investigate how Ukrainian was presented in the Russian Empire and under the Soviet Union. This conversation is put into a larger context, involving the issues of nation and identity formation. Additionally, the discussion creates a bridge between the past and the present: twenty-five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine seems to be still facing challenges that were first initiated by the language policies devised by Imperial Russia. Moreover, these challenges, as the recent events in the Donbas and Crimea, as well as new developments of language policies, demonstrate, are escalating. By analyzing the circumstances under which the Ukrainian language has been functioning, the contributors attempt to address the most urgent concerns, providing insights for the understanding of the past and the present. While emphasizing the language challenges, which Ukraine has been dealing with, The Battle for Ukrainian also draws comparative parallels that allow to search for frameworks and patterns that would emphasize the celebration of the existence of language. A language is a system that facilitates communication, but it is also an entity, fluid and changeable, that includes collaboration with other similar systems, entities. For this collection, the Ukrainian case provides material and territory for investigating linguistic areas, Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Language is one of the complex systems facilitating communication; language is a system producing the inside and the outside of the individual’s awareness of self and other. However, language is also a tool for and of ideological battles, shaping states and nations. A multifaceted nature of language is emphasized and... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Language is one of the complex systems facilitating communication; language is a system producing the inside and the outside of the individual’s awareness of self and other. However, language is also a tool for and of ideological battles, shaping states and nations. A multifaceted nature of language is emphasized and explored in an interdisciplinary collection of articles The Battle for Ukrainian: A Comparative Perspective (Harvard University Press/Ukrainian Research Institute, 2017), edited by Michael S. Flier and Andrea Graziosi. This collection developed with the crucial contribution of Lubomyr Hajda, who highlighted the importance of the comparative aspect that goes beyond specific historical contexts. As the editors mention in their introduction, The Battle for Ukrainian presents the proceedings of the conference States, Peoples, Languages: A Comparative Political History of Ukrainian, 1863-2013. One of the starting points for the scholarly discussion was the history of the Ukrainian language, which happened to undergo a dramatic battle for its existence. Structured around the Valuev Circular (1863), which was followed by the Ems Decree (1876), the conference and the subsequent collection aimed to conceptualize the influences that the official documents would exercise on the formation and on the development of Ukrainian. Known for their oppressive and discriminatory effects, the two documents, as the current publication demonstrates, not only shaped the perception of Ukrainian but also produced a political and sociocultural framework for the languages functioning. The Battle for Ukrainian offers an insightful overview of the path that Ukrainian was, in fact, forced into: a persistent struggle against suppression and annihilation. Taking into consideration the influences exercised by the documents that restricted the usage of Ukrainian, the contributors investigate how Ukrainian was presented in the Russian Empire and under the Soviet Union. This conversation is put into a larger context, involving the issues of nation and identity formation. Additionally, the discussion creates a bridge between the past and the present: twenty-five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine seems to be still facing challenges that were first initiated by the language policies devised by Imperial Russia. Moreover, these challenges, as the recent events in the Donbas and Crimea, as well as new developments of language policies, demonstrate, are escalating. By analyzing the circumstances under which the Ukrainian language has been functioning, the contributors attempt to address the most urgent concerns, providing insights for the understanding of the past and the present. While emphasizing the language challenges, which Ukraine has been dealing with, The Battle for Ukrainian also draws comparative parallels that allow to search for frameworks and patterns that would emphasize the celebration of the existence of language. A language is a system that facilitates communication, but it is also an entity, fluid and changeable, that includes collaboration with other similar systems, entities. For this collection, the Ukrainian case provides material and territory for investigating linguistic areas, Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Andrea Graziosi, presidente Anvur; Luciano Canfora, filologo classico e saggista, Sergio Della Sala, docente di neuroscienze all'Università di Edinburgo; Pietro Roversi, ricercatore Università di Oxford.