Podcasts about lemkin

Hello Colorado Rapids fans. Welcome back to Holding The High Line. How about that rumored Stuv Lemkin signing? Rabbi and Red get together to discuss him and much more. We banter about the state of the world, our place in it, how to feel, and what to do about it. Classic HTHL amid an existential crisis. We recap the 0-2 loss to Austin FC. What went wrong and what does it say about the team. We discuss Jackson Travis, similarities to the Portland Timbers game, "upgrade the shot," and why it wasn't as bad as it seems. We then discuss news as Stuv Lemkin is close to signing for the Rapids. Also Zack Steffen is out so it's the Nico Hansen show for now. Then we preview Saturday's game against Orlando City. We have two Ask HTHLs. One is about Denver NWSL and the potential name of Colorado Black Diamonds. Also what's to blame for the Pids being meh half way through the season.

« Ce n'est pas à un responsable politique d'employer ces termes, c'est aux historiens, en temps voulu. » Questionné, sur le plateau de TF1, sur son refus de qualifier la situation à Gaza de génocide, Emmanuel Macron a botté en touche, le 13 mai. Depuis, le ton du président de la République à l'égard des responsables israéliens s'est fait plus menaçant, mais il n'a pour l'heure pas changé de vocabulaire pour caractériser la catastrophe humanitaire en cours dans la bande de Gaza.Une lourde charge historique pèse sur les responsables politiques lorsqu'ils invoquent cette notion, inventée après la seconde guerre mondiale par Raphaël Lemkin, juriste polonais d'origine juive réfugié aux Etats-Unis. En créant ce mot, Lemkin voulait empêcher la reproduction « de l'innommable » : la Shoah. L'interdiction du génocide a ensuite été adoptée par l'Organisation des Nations unies comme un « principe fondamental qui s'applique en tout et sans exception à toute l'humanité ».Les juges de la Cour internationale de justice (CIJ) ont estimé, dès le 26 janvier 2024, qu'il existait un risque « plausible » de génocide à Gaza. Alors, quels sont les critères juridiques d'un génocide ? Pourquoi une large partie de la communauté internationale refuse d'employer ce terme pour qualifier le sort des Gazaouis ? Que font les instances juridiques mondiales, telle que la CIJ, face à ce conflit ? Dans cet épisode du podcast « L'Heure du Monde », Stéphanie Maupas, journaliste spécialiste de la justice internationale au Monde, fait la lumière sur cette notion aussi sensible que complexe.Un épisode de Marion Bothorel et Claire Leys, réalisé par Quentin Bresson. Présentation et rédaction en chef : Claire Leys. Dans cet épisode : extraits de l'interview d'Emmanuel Macron sur TF1 le 13 mai 2025 ; d'une intervention de Raphaël Lemkin dans l'émission « Heure du Culture française » diffusée le 21 octobre 1948 ; d'une émission de l'Université Radiophonique internationale diffusée le 20 janvier 1949 ; des prises de parole du ministre israélien Bezalel Smotrich les 5 et 6 mai 2025 ; d'une vidéo du premier ministre israélien Benyamin Nétanyahou postée sur ses réseaux sociaux le 19 mai 2025 ; de la déclaration devant le Conseil de sécurité du responsable des affaires humanitaires de l'ONU, Tom Fletcher, le 13 mai 2025 et d'un discours d'Emmanuel Macron prononcé le 30 mai 2025.Cet épisode a été diffusé le 4 juin 2025. Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

This episode we are joined by awarding winning playwright, librettist and activist Catherine Filloux. Catherine's works have been performed nationally and internationally and her new play Third Person will be make its premier this fall at Culture Hub. Her other works include How to Eat and Orange, whatdies, Eyes of the Heart and Lemkin's House. We speak with Catherine about what got her into activism and how it relates to her works, working on operas and musicals, her new play Third Person and much more!

Roy L Hales/Cortes Currents - In a series of tweets between 2019 and 2021, the Conservative candidate for North Island Powell River, Aaron Gunn, argued against the the idea that residential schools were a form of genocide.  In the first of these he agreed that they were ‘truly horrific events,' but added that people should not refer to them with a loaded word like ‘genocide' that does not remotely reflect the reality of what happened.” He was wrong, residential schools are a perfect example of genocide. Mr Gunn's understanding of the term appears to be limited to ‘killing of a large number of people,' but when Raphael Lemkin coined the term he stated it wasn't necessary to kill people. There were also genocides of political and social institutions, culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups. Lemkin was a Jewish lawyer who fled from his native Poland after the Germans overran it in 1939. He was deeply concerned about NAZI Germany's extermination policy. In his book Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (1944), Lemkin wrote:  “By ‘genocide' we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin cide (killing), thus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homocide, infanticide, etc. Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.” He added that. “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain upon the territory …” Lemkin also coined the term cultural genocide, which is the systematic destruction of traditions, values, language, and other elements that make one group of people distinct from another.  How does this relate to Aaron Gunn's Tweets? These three appear to be misguided:  “There was no genocide. Stop lying to people and read a book …”;  “I understand that people have a misinformed view of history which they have reached following a steady and persistent attempt to discredit Canada's past in order to undermine its institutions and future.”  “Residential schools were asked for by Indigenous bands in Eastern Ontario when John A MacDonald was still a teenager.” This last remark refers to residential schools in eastern Ontario sometime between 1828 and 1835, when John A MacDonald was a teenager, but according to the Canadian Encyclopedia, the purpose of residential schools changed during the 1870s. “With the passage of the British North America Act in 1867, and the implementation of the Indian Act (1876), the government was required to provide Indigenous youth with an education and to assimilate them into Canadian society.” 

Sein Leben lang kämpfte Raphael Lemkin um Gerechtigkeit für die Opfer staatlicher Gewalt. Die Völkermord-Konvention, die vor 75 Jahren von den Vereinten Nationen angenommen wurde, gilt als sein Lebenswerk. Doch sie ist noch immer fragil. Paris am 9. Dezember 1948: Die Vollversammlung der Vereinten Nationen nimmt einstimmig ein Gesetz zur Verhütung und Bestrafung von Völkermord an. Im Mittelpunkt des internationalen Interesses steht an diesem Tag ein polnischer Jurist, der es sich zur Lebensaufgabe gemacht hat, dem Vernichtungswahn ein Ende zu bereiten. Sein Name: Raphael Lemkin. Die Völkermord-Konvention ist sein Lebenswerk – eine Art Epitaph für seine Eltern, die in Auschwitz umgebracht wurden. Einst wurde er als «Einstein des Völkerrechts» gefeiert; nach seinem Tod 1959 geriet Lemkin weitgehend in Vergessenheit. Erstsendung: 8.12.2023

SaaStr 780: From Outbound to Channel Partnerships: Your Burning Sales Questions Answered by SaaStr CEO and Founder Jason Lemkin At the closing AMA of SaaStr Annual, SaaStr CEO and Founder, Jason Lemkin shared candid insights about what's really happening in SaaS today. In this Ask Me Anything Part 1, Lemkin answers the questions:  What does SaaStr Annual attendee data tell us about the state of SaaS? Is outbound sales dead?  When sales slow how do you keep the team motivated and push through? How important are channel partnerships for sales and revenue? When should founders make their first executive hires? Let's find out the answers.  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SaaStr hosts the largest SaaS community events on the planet. Hey everybody - thanks to the 10,000 of you who came out to SaaStr Annual. We had a blast and big news -- we'll be back in MAY of 2025. That's right, the SaaStr Annual will be a bit earlier next year, May 13-15 2025. We'll still be back in the same venue, in the SF bay area at the 40+ acre sprawling san mateo county events center. Grab your tickets at saastrannual.com with code JASON50 for an extra discount on our very best pricing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   This episode is sponsored by: Anrok A question for SaaS finance leaders, do you know where your customers are? Anrok tracks where your sales are creating exposure, and automates tax calculation and filing worldwide. Built for high-growth software companies, Anrok protects your revenue and saves you time. Visit anrok.com/saastr to learn more.

Soykırım kavramı ilk defa 1943 yılında bir Yahudi olan Raphael Lemkin tarafından kullanıldı. Holokost'u kendi hayatında acı bir biçimde deneyimlemek zorunda kalan Lemkin, soykırım suçunun tanımlanması ve uluslararası hukuk tarafından kabul edilmesi için büyük çaba sarf etti. Nihayet 1948 yılının sonunda Birleşmiş Milletler Soykırım Konvansiyonu kabul edildi ve 1951 yılında yürürlüğe girdi. Bir ulusal, etnik, ırksal ya da dini grubu tamamıyla ya da kısmen yok etme amacı ile işlenen fiiller olarak tanımlanan soykırım kavramı zaman içerisinde muğlaklaştı ya da kapsamı ile ilgili tartışmalar yapıldı. Tıpkı terör kavramı gibi tanımlanması ve ispatında uluslararası ölçekte sorunlar yaşanması neyin soykırım olup olmadığı ile ilgili de öznel yorumlamaları beraberinde getirdi. Hiç kuşkusuz 20. yüzyıl soykırımlar tarihi açısından oldukça acı tecrübelere sahne olmuştur. Başta Nasyonel Sosyalizmin sebep olduğu Holokost olmak üzere 1990'larda Ruanda ve Bosna'da yaşananlar soykırımın ne denli tahrip edici olduğunu gözler önüne sermiştir. Bir tür uluslararası sistem krizine de işaret eden bu örnekler, Batı tarihi ve müdahalesi açısından da okunmalıdır. Nitekim her bir krizin yaşanması ve önlen(e)memesi aşamasında Batılı ülkelerin dolaylı ya da doğrudan sorumlu oldukları görülmektedir. 1994'te Hutu'ların sekiz yüz bin civarında Tutsi'yi öldürdükleri süreçte bütün yabancı misyonların ülkeyi terk etmeleri ve BM başta olmak üzere Batılı devletlerin herhangi bir müdahalede bulunmamaları bu açıdan önemli bir örnek. Benzer bir trajedinin yaşandığı Bosna'da da aşırılık yanlısı Sırp milliyetçilerinin Boşnaklara yönelik sistematik katliamlarına seyirci kalınmıştır. Binlerce insanın öldürüldüğü süreçte başta BM'ye bağlı barış gücü olarak görev yapan Hollanda askerleri olmak üzere Batılı ülkelerin tavrı, soykırımın yaşanmasında doğrudan etkili olmuştur. Hollandalı askerlerin Boşnakları Sırplara karşı korumasız bırakması sonucunda oluşan bu durum, Avrupa'nın göbeğinde bir “Avrupa medeniyeti” krizine de işaret etmektedir. Srebrenitsa'da yaşananların soykırım olarak tanımlanması aşamasında yaşananlara bakıldığında soykırım kavramına dair yapılan tartışmaların ne denli bulanıklaştırıldığı ve öznel yorumların yapıldığı da görülmektedir.

The Lemkin Institute on Genocide in ArtsakhConversations on GroongTopics:Background on the Lemkin InstituteGenocide in ArtsakhArmenian Government's Genocide DenialGaza and other GenocidesGuest:Elisa von Joeden-Forgey - TW/@LemkinInstituteHosts:Hovik Manucharyan - TW/@HovikYerevanAsbed Bedrossian - TW/@qubriqEpisode 341 | Recorded: June 25, 2024Subscribe and follow us everywhere you are: linktr.ee/groong

Speciální vlak jménem Lemkin zastaví do konce června na několika českých nádražích. V historických vagonech představuje Centrum studií genocid Terezín multimediální výstavu i další vzdělávací akce. Letošní cestu zahájil Vlak Lemkin v Teplicích, od pondělí 27. května zastaví na tři dny v Chomutově.

Der Student Raphael Lemkin hört vom Prozess und fragt sich: Wie ist es möglich, dass sich ein Massenmörder wie Talaat nicht vor Gericht verantworten muss, sein Mörder aber schon? Er kämpft sein Leben lang für ein internationales Gesetz, um die Verantwortlichen von Massenmorden wie an der armenischen Bevölkerung zu bestrafen. Aber wie beschreibt man ein Verbrechen, für das es noch kein Wort gibt? Lemkin erfindet ein Wort: Genozid. Dieser Begriff bekommt eine enorme Bedeutung, besonders für die Opfer, die für die Anerkennung des eigenen Leids kämpfen. Ein Projekt von Depart e. V. – Demokratie in Partnerschaft, gefördert durch die Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung Triggerwarnung: Der Podcast enthält Darstellungen von Gewalt, die möglicherweise retraumatisieren oder zu intensiven emotionalen Reaktionen führen können.

V Teplicích začíná jízda Vlaku Lemkin. V jeho upravených vagonech je výstava k tématu historie a prevence genocidního násilí.

Après avoir travaillé sur la Shoah, l'artiste et réalisatrice Natacha Nisic prépare une pièce sonore, trente ans après le génocide des tutsi du Rwanda. Elle a longuement travaillé sur la question des violences extrêmes notamment avec l'historienne Annette Becker. En 2018, elle a couvert le procès à Paris de deux génocidaires, déclarés coupables d'un massacre dans le village de Kabarondo, le 13 avril 1994 : Tito Barahira et Octavien Ngenzi, condamnés en appel à perpétuité, pour « crimes contre l'Humanité » et « génocide ». Il y aurait eu 2 000 morts à Kabarondo, selon l'ONU. Ses notes et ses croquis du procès, à l'état brut, sont devenus un livre : « Les fumées ». Bientôt adapté en projet sonore, avec des extraits du procès lus par deux jeunes femmes originaires du Rwanda, Lorie Rutagengwa Sugira et Cynthia Isaro.Daphné Gastaldi les a rencontrées dans le studio de la Friche de la Belle de Mai à Marseille, lors de la résidence de Natacha Nisic avec Alphabetville (Colette Tron) qui a permis l'enregistrement au Studio Euphonia. Au son de son reportage, l'historienne Annette Becker nous aide à penser le génocide.► À lire : - Natacha Nisic, artiste et réalisatrice : Les Fumées. Carnets d'un procès pour génocide. Rwanda 1994-France 2018. Hélène Dumas (texte) Extraits du livre.Le projet de Natacha Nisic « Les fumées » a le soutien de la fondation pour la mémoire de la Shoah et du Centre national des Arts plastiques. - Bibliographie sélective d'Annette Becker. Officier de la Légion d'Honneur. Professeur Émérite d'histoire contemporaine, Université Paris Nanterre - Le choc. Rwanda 1994 : le génocide de tutsi, Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, Annette Becker, Samuel Kuhn et Jean-Philippe Schreiber, éditions Gallimard- Des Juifs trahis par leur France, 1939-1944, éditions Gallimard Collection témoins, 2024- Messagers du désastre : Raphaël Lemkin, Jan Karski et les génocides, Fayard, 2018- L'Immontrable ? Des guerres et des violences extrêmes dans l'art et la littérature. Recueil d'articles avec une préface inédite. « Rendre visibles les extrêmes de la violence. De la Grande Guerre au génocide des Tutsi du Rwanda et aux terrorismes contemporains. », Créaphis, 2020.► À découvrir :- Association Ndiho « Je me souviens ».► Pour aller plus loin :- La marche du monde - Rwanda: face au génocide, dans les archives d'IbukaNous sommes à Kigali, au début de l'année 2022. En blouse blanche, gants et masques, des rescapés du génocide des Tutsi trient les documents administratifs accumulés, depuis 1995, par leur association…- La marche du monde - Les récits des enfants tutsiIls sont une centaine de jeunes tutsi à avoir raconté leur expérience de vie et de survie, avant, pendant et après l'extermination de leur famille. Rédigés sur des cahiers d'écoliers, la lecture de leurs…- La marche du monde - Rwanda : quand la parole répare les vivants25 ans après le génocide des Tutsis, nous vous proposons de découvrir l'itinéraire d'une rescapée, Émilienne Mukansoro, l'une des initiatrices des premiers groupes de parole dédiés aux femmes victimes…

Content warning for discussion of genocide. Welcome to the first spisode of Have a Day! w/ The History Wizard. This episode will discuss the early days of the field of genocide, the process by which it became a crime undernational law, the life of Raphael Lemkin, in brief, and the first time a country was charged with this crime above all crimes Intro and outro music linked here: https://uppbeat.io/track/paulo-kalazzi/heros-time Episode Transcript to Follow: Hey, Hi, Hello. This is The History Wizard and thank you for joining me for the flagship episode of “Have a Day w/ The History Wizard”. As we embark on this journey together we're going to be talking about History, Politics, Economics, Cartoons, Video Games, Comics, and the points at which all of these topics intersect. Anyone who has been following me one Tiktok or Instagram, @thehistorywizard on Tiktok and @the_history_wizard on Instagram, for any length of time. Literally any length of time at all, will probably be familiar with some, if not all, of the information we're going to learn today. However, I hope that you'll bear with me as it is important to, before we dive into the meat of the matter, make sure we've got some bones to wrap it around… Yes, that is the metaphor I'm going to go with. I wrote it down in my script, read it, decided I liked it, and now you all have to listen to it.  For our first episode we are going to be diving into one of my favorite parts of my field of expertise, meta knowledge concerning the field of genocide studies itself. Yes, that's right. We're going to start with the definition of genocide. The United Nations established the legal definition of genocide in the Convention for the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide, which was unanimously adopted by the 51 founding members of the UN in the third meeting of the General Assemble and came into full legal force in 1951 after the 20th nation ratified it. This, by the way, is why none of the Nazis in the Nuremberg Trial were charged with the crime of genocide. The crime didn't exist when they were on trial. But, to return to the matter at hand, the definition of genocide can be found in Article 2 of the Convention for the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide and reads as follows: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. It is important to note that definition of genocide that the UN adopted is not exactly the same as the definition that Lemkin first proposed to the UN. His definition included economic classes, as well as political parties. There was, significant, pushback against the inclusion of those two categories from the US and the USSR as both nations feared that their many of their own actions could be considered genocide. Lemkin didn't fight too hard for those categories to stay in the definition, he was more concerned with ethnicity, nationality, race, and religion for, what he called, their cultural carrying capacity. Now, despite Lemkin's concern over the destruction of cultures, there is no strict legal definition of cultural genocide. The inclusion of Article 2, subsection E: Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group, could be seen as a nod to this idea, but it's not nearly enough. There was some effort to rectify this oversight in 2007 with the passage of the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which states that indigenous peoples have a right against forcible assimilation. But even that is barely a step in the right direction as the UN DRIP is a legally non binding resolution making it little better than a suggestion. Now, where did the word genocide come from? Who made it and why? The term genocide was the brain child of a Polish-Jewish lawyer and Holocaust survivor named Raphael Lemkin. Now, despite Lemkin being a Holocaust survivor and term not gaining legal recognition until 1948, Lemkin actually based his work on the Armenian Genocide, what he originally called The Crime of Barbarity. Fun fact about Lemkin, he spoke 9 languages and could read 14. Anyway, after reading about the assassination of Talat Pasha in 1921. Talat was assassinated by Soghomon Telhirian as part of Operation Nemesis (he was put on trial for the assassination and was acquitted) After reading about the assassination Lemkin asked one of his professors at Jan Kazimierz University of Lwów (now the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv) why Talat was unable to be tried for his crimes before a court of law. The professor replied thusly: "Consider the case of a farmer who owns a flock of chickens. He kills them, and this is his business. If you interfere, you are trespassing." Lemkin replied, "But the Armenians are not chickens". His eventual conclusion was that "Sovereignty cannot be conceived as the right to kill millions of innocent people" In 1933 Lemkin made a presentation to the Legal Council of the League of Nations conference on international criminal law in Madrid, for which he prepared an essay on the Crime of Barbarity as a crime against international law. This is where the world would first encounter the word “genocide” a word that Lemkin had created by combining the Greek root ‘genos' meaning race or tribe, with the Latin root ‘cide' meaning killing.  Lemkin was as a private solicitor in Warsaw in 1939 and fled as soon as he could. He managed to escape through Lithuania to Sweden where he taught at the University of Stockholm until he was, with the help of a friend, a Duke University law professor named Malcolm McDermott Lemkin was able to flee to the US. Unfortunately for Lemkin he lost 49 member of his family to the Holocaust. The only family that survived was his brother, Elias and his wife who had both been sent to a Soviet forced labor camp. Lemkin was able to help them both relocate to Montreal in 1948. After publishing his iconic book “Axis Rule in Occupied Europe” with the help of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Lemkin became an advisor for chief prosecutor of the Nuremberg Trials, Robert H. Jackson. It was during these trials that he became convinced, more than ever before, that this crime above all crimes needed a name and laws to prevent and punish it. Even after the passage of the Convention for the Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Lemkin didn't consider his work to be over. The UN was brand new and had little in the way of real authority (something that hasn't changed over the past 70 years). So Lemkin traveled around to world trying to get national governments to adopt genocide laws into their own body of laws. He worked with a team of lawyers from Arabic delegations to try and get France tried for genocide for their conduct in Algeria and wrote an article in 1953 on the “Soviet Genocide in Ukraine” what we know as the Holodomor, though Lemkin never used that term in his article. Lemkin lived the last years of his life in poverty in New York city. He died in 1959 of a heart attack, and his funeral, which occurred at Riverside Church in Manhattan, was attended by only a small number of his close friends. Lemkin is buried in Mount Hebron Cemetery in Flushing, Queens. The last thing I want to discuss in our first episode is the first country to be charged with the crime of genocide before the United Nations. As we have already established, despite the Holocaust being the western world's premiere example of genocide, no one at the Nuremberg Trials was tried for the crime of genocide. So who, I can hear you asking from the future, who was the first country charged with genocide? Why, dear listener, it was none other than the U S of A in a 1951 paper titled “We Charge Genocide, which was presented before the United Nations in Paris in 1951. The document pointed out that the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide defined genocide as any acts committed with "intent to destroy" a group, "in whole or in part." To build its case for black genocide, the document cited many instances of lynching in the United States, as well as legal discrimination, disenfranchisement of blacks in the South, a series of incidents of police brutality dating to the present, and systematic inequalities in health and quality of life. The central argument: The U.S. government is both complicit with and responsible for a genocidal situation based on the UN's own definition of genocide. The paper was supported by the American Communist Party and was signed by many famous personages such as:  W. E. B. Du Bois, George W. Crockett, Jr., Benjamin J. Davis, Jr., Ferdinand Smith, Oakley C. Johnson, Aubrey Grossman, Claudia Jones, Rosalie McGee, Josephine Grayson, Amy and Doris Mallard, Paul Washington, Wesley R. Wells, Horace Wilson, James Thorpe, Collis English, Ralph Cooper, Leon Josephson, and William Patterson. It was Patterson who presented the paper and the signatures before the UN in 1951. The UN largely ignored Patterson and never deigned to hear his case against the US government. And upon his return journey Patterson was detained while passing through Britain and had his passport seized once he returned to the US. He was forbade to ever travel out of the country again. The history of the field of genocide studies is long, unfortunately, far longer than the existence of a word with a legal definition and laws to back it up. We'll be going through the history of genocide in future episode, interspersed with other historical events or pressing issues of great import as we take this educational journey together. I'm going to try and put an episode together once a week, and if that needs to change for any reason I will let you know. Next week, on March 26th, we'll be learning about the Gazan genocide and the vast amount of historical context that goes into this, currently occurring, genocide. I've been the History Wizard. You can find me on Tiktok @thehistorywizard. You can find me on Instagram @the_history_wizard. Have a Day w/ The History Wizard can be found anywhere pods are cast. If you cannot find it on your podcatcher or choice, let me know and I will try and do something about it. Tune in next week for more depressing, but very necessary information and remember… Have a Day!

In the two years since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine began, the fighting has caused widespread horror and devastation. Over 10,000 civilians have been killed and more than half a million people injured. Still millions of others are internally displaced, seeking refuge abroad, or are in dire need of humanitarian assistance. The idea of war – and how to prevent it – was a central concern when 51 nations came together to form the United Nations over seven decades ago. Russia's invasion of Ukraine poses deep challenges to the international rules-based order and raises complex questions of international law, not only for Ukraine, but for nations around the world.In partnership with the Ukrainian Association of International Law, which worked with other stakeholders such as the Ukrainian Bar Association, the American Society of International Law helped to convene a gathering of international lawyers in Lviv, Ukraine in December 2023. Lviv was home to three giants in the field of international law: Hersch Lauterpacht, Rafael Lemkin, and Louis Sohn. Lauterpacht developed the concept of crimes against humanity, Lemkin pioneered the term “genocide,” and pushed for the adoption of the U.N. Genocide Convention, and Sohn played a pivotal role in helping to conceptualize article 51 of the U.N. Charter on the right of self-defense. Many of those who gathered in Lviv are now sharing their reflections on the meeting in a Just Security symposium. Joining the show to discuss the symposium are four of its editors, Kateryna Busol, Olga Butkevych, Rebecca Hamilton, and Gregory Shaffer.  Kateryna is a Ukrainian lawyer and an Associate Professor at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. Olga is President of the Ukrainian Association of International Law and Chaired Professor of Law at Kyiv's National University of Taras Shevchenko. Rebecca is an Executive Editor at Just Security and a Professor of Law at American University, Washington College of Law. Greg is the Scott K Ginsburg Professor of International Law at Georgetown University Law Center and the President of the American Society of International Law. Show Notes:  Kateryna Busol (@KaterynaBusol)Olga ButkevychRebecca Hamilton (@bechamilton)Gregory Shaffer (@gregorycshaffer) Paras Shah (@pshah518) Just Security's symposium “International Law in the Face of Russia's Aggression in Ukraine: The View from Lviv” Patryk I. Labuda's (@PILabuda) Just Security article “Accountability for Russian Imperialism in the ‘Global East'”Just Security's International Law coverageJust Security's Russia-Ukraine War coverageMusic: “Broken” by David Bullard from Uppbeat: https://uppbe

Après avoir travaillé sur la Shoah, l'artiste et réalisatrice Natacha Nisic prépare une pièce sonore, trente ans après le génocide des tutsi du Rwanda. Elle a longuement travaillé sur la question des violences extrêmes notamment avec l'historienne Annette Becker.En 2018, elle a couvert le procès à Paris de deux génocidaires, déclarés coupables d'un massacre dans le village de Kabarondo, le 13 avril 1994 : Tito Barahira et Octavien Ngenzi, condamnés en appel à perpétuité, pour « crimes contre l'Humanité » et « génocide ». Il y aurait eu 2 000 morts à Kabarondo, selon l'ONU. Ses notes et ses croquis du procès, à l'état brut, sont devenus un livre : « Les fumées ». Bientôt adapté en projet sonore, avec des extraits du procès lus par deux jeunes femmes originaires du Rwanda, Lorie Rutagengwa Sugira et Cynthia Isaro.Daphné Gastaldi les a rencontrées dans le studio de la Friche de la Belle de Mai à Marseille, lors de la résidence de Natacha Nisic avec Alphabetville (Colette Tron) qui a permis l'enregistrement au Studio Euphonia. Au son de son reportage, l'historienne Annette Becker nous aide à penser le génocide.► À lire : - Natacha Nisic, artiste et réalisatrice : Les Fumées. Carnets d'un procès pour génocide. Rwanda 1994-France 2018. Hélène Dumas (texte) Extraits du livre.Le projet de Natacha Nisic « Les fumées » a le soutien de la fondation pour la mémoire de la Shoah et du Centre national des Arts plastiques. - Bibliographie sélective d'Annette Becker. Officier de la Légion d'Honneur. Professeur Émérite d'histoire contemporaine, Université Paris NanterreLe choc. Rwanda 1994 : le génocide de tutsi, Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, Annette Becker, Samuel Kuhn et Jean-Philippe Schreiber, éditions Gallimard- Des Juifs trahis par leur France, 1939-1944, éditions Gallimard Collection témoins, 2024- Messagers du désastre : Raphaël Lemkin, Jan Karski et les génocides, Fayard, 2018- L'Immontrable ? Des guerres et des violences extrêmes dans l'art et la littérature. Recueil d'articles avec une préface inédite. « Rendre visibles les extrêmes de la violence. De la Grande Guerre au génocide des Tutsi du Rwanda et aux terrorismes contemporains. », Créaphis, 2020.► À découvrir :- Association Ndiho « je me souviens ». ► Pour aller plus loin :- La marche du monde - Rwanda: face au génocide, dans les archives d'IbukaNous sommes à Kigali, au début de l'année 2022. En blouse blanche, gants et masques, des rescapés du génocide des Tutsi trient les documents administratifs accumulés, depuis 1995, par leur association…- La marche du monde - Les récits des enfants tutsiIls sont une centaine de jeunes tutsi à avoir raconté leur expérience de vie et de survie, avant, pendant et après l'extermination de leur famille. Rédigés sur des cahiers d'écoliers, la lecture de leurs…- La marche du monde - Rwanda : quand la parole répare les vivants25 ans après le génocide des Tutsis, nous vous proposons de découvrir l'itinéraire d'une rescapée, Émilienne Mukansoro, l'une des initiatrices des premiers groupes de parole dédiés aux femmes victimes…

In episode #160, I review growth rates that are considered VC fundable. I find growth rates to be very subjective based on the audience. Are we talking to VC or PE? Let's not get caught up in the hype. I cover the growth rates posted by Jason Lemkin in a SaaStr post and Benchmarkit.AI growth rates. - Lemkin's view of growth rates - Benchmarkit.ai growth rates - Bootstrappers, let's not get caught up in the hype SaaStr post: https://www.saastr.com/look-no-vc-wants-to-fund-a-startup-with-so-so-growth-except-maybe-your-existing-investors/ Subscribe to Ben's SaaS metrics newsletter: https://saasmetricsschool.beehiiv.com/subscribe Subscribe to Ben's SaaS monthly newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/df1db6bf8bca/the-saas-cfo-sign-up-landing-page SaaS Metrics courses here: https://www.thesaasacademy.com/ Join Ben's SaaS community here: https://www.thesaasacademy.com/offers/ivNjwYDx/checkout Follow Ben on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/benrmurray

In episode #154, I address the latest data points in revenue per FTE. ICONIQ Growth just published a great metrics report which times nicely with Jason Lemkin's thoughts on revenue per FTE and scaling your SaaS. - ARR per FTE - Scaling your SaaS ICONIQ's report: https://www.iconiqcapital.com/growth/insights/2023-growth-and-efficiency-series Subscribe to Ben's SaaS metrics newsletter: https://saasmetricsschool.beehiiv.com/subscribe Subscribe to Ben's SaaS monthly newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/df1db6bf8bca/the-saas-cfo-sign-up-landing-page SaaS Metrics courses here: https://www.thesaasacademy.com/ Join Ben's SaaS community here: https://www.thesaasacademy.com/offers/ivNjwYDx/checkout Follow Ben on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/benrmurray

Sein Leben lang kämpfte Raphael Lemkin dafür, dass den Opfern staatlicher Gewalt Gerechtigkeit widerfährt. Die seit 1951 gültige Völkermord-Konvention gilt als sein Lebenswerk. Doch sie ist noch immer fragil. Was können wir heute von Lemkin lernen? Von Beate Ziegswww.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Feature

Sein Leben lang kämpfte Raphael Lemkin dafür, dass den Opfern staatlicher Gewalt Gerechtigkeit widerfährt. Die seit 1951 gültige Völkermord-Konvention gilt als sein Lebenswerk. Doch sie ist noch immer fragil. Was können wir heute von Lemkin lernen? Von Beate Ziegswww.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Feature

Sein Leben lang kämpfte Raphael Lemkin dafür, dass den Opfern staatlicher Gewalt Gerechtigkeit widerfährt. Die seit 1951 gültige Völkermord-Konvention gilt als sein Lebenswerk. Doch sie ist noch immer fragil. Was können wir heute von Lemkin lernen? Von Beate Ziegswww.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Feature

Sein Leben lang kämpfte Raphael Lemkin um Gerechtigkeit für die Opfer staatlicher Gewalt. Die Völkermord-Konvention, die vor 75 Jahren von den Vereinten Nationen angenommen wurde, gilt als sein Lebenswerk. Doch sie ist noch immer fragil. Paris am 9. Dezember 1948: Die Vollversammlung der Vereinten Nationen nimmt einstimmig ein Gesetz zur Verhütung und Bestrafung von Völkermord an. Im Mittelpunkt des internationalen Interesses steht an diesem Tag ein polnischer Jurist, der es sich zur Lebensaufgabe gemacht hat, dem Vernichtungswahn ein Ende zu bereiten. Sein Name: Raphael Lemkin. Die Völkermord-Konvention ist sein Lebenswerk – eine Art Epitaph für seine Eltern, die in Auschwitz umgebracht wurden. Einst wurde er als «Einstein des Völkerrechts» gefeiert; nach seinem Tod 1959 geriet Lemkin weitgehend in Vergessenheit.

The award-winning French Algerian American playwright, librettist and activist, Catherine Filloux, has been, for the past 3 decades, traveling to conflict areas writing plays that address human rights and social justice.             Catherine's new play, “How to Eat an Orange,” will open at La MaMa Theatre in New York City, and her new musical “Welcome to the Big Dipper” (written with composer Jimmy Roberts of, “I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change” fame) will premiere Off-Broadway at the York Theatre in New York. It's a National Alliance for Musical Theatre finalist.             Catherine's play, “White Savior” is nominated for The Venturous Play List. Her many plays have been produced around the U.S. and internationally. I've read her play Lemkin's House and can tell you it's an intense and engaging exploration of the politics of genocide through the surreal landscape of the mind of Raphael Lemkin, the man who invented the word genocide.            Catherine's also the librettist for four produced operas, including New Arrivals, Where Elephants Weep, and The Floating Box. Her works have been played on Cambodian national TV, on Broadway on Demand, and chosen for Opera News Critic's Choice. And her opera, “Orlando,” is the winner of the 2022 Grawemeyer Award--the first opera by a woman composer and woman librettist in the history of the Vienna Staatsoper.             Catherine has traveled for her plays to countries including Bosnia, Cambodia, Guatemala, Haiti, Iraq, Morocco, Northern Ireland, and Sudan and South Sudan on an overseas reading tour with the University of Iowa's International Writing Program.             Catherine received her French Baccalaureate in Philosophy with Honors in Toulon, France, and is the co-founder/co-director of Theatre Without Borders. 

En esta ocasión tuve la fortuna de charlar con Iñigo Rumayor, Co-founder de Arcus, empresa que luego fue vendida a Mastercard. Comentamos los aprendizajes que nos dejó la lectura del libro From Impossible to Inevitable de Aaron Ross y Jason Lemkin.

Pierwsza Debata Lemkinowska zorganizowana przez Centrum im. prof. Bronisława Geremka, 27 stycznia 2011 r. "Pojęcie ludobójstwa we współczesnej polityce międzynarodowej. Przykłady Turcji i Rwandy" Udział wzięli: prof. Halil Berktay, Konstanty Gebert, prof. Marek Kornat, Assumpta Mugiraneza i  prof. Adam Daniel Rotfeld. https://wszechnica.org.pl/wyklad/pojecie-ludobojstwa-we-wspolczesnej-polityce-miedzynarodowej-przyklady-turcji-i-rwandy-cz-1/ Debatą „Pojęcie ludobójstwa w polityce międzynarodowej. Przykłady Turcji i Rwandy” Fundacja Geremka zainaugurowała cykl spotkań poświęconych pamięci Rafała Lemkina, wybitnego polskiego prawnika żydowskiego pochodzenia, twórcy terminu genocide w prawie międzynarodowym. Trzy debaty mają na celu przybliżenie oraz popularyzację dokonań Lemkina poprzez umieszczenie jego koncepcji w kontekście współczesnych debat dotyczących polityki międzynarodowej. – Jest to sytuacja co najmniej zawstydzająca, że taka postać nie jest obecna w encyklopediach i kompendiach na temat prawa międzynarodowego. Życzyłbym sobie, aby w Polsce powstała monografia na jego temat – mówił prof. Adam Daniel Rotfeld na otwarciu debaty. Rafał Lemkin zbudował pierwsze przekonanie o konieczności stworzenia odrębnego pojęcia na masową anihilację grup społecznych i narodów obserwując losy Ormian w Osmańskiej Turcji w 1915 roku. Ale jego koncepcja w postaci Konwencji ONZ w sprawie zapobiegania i karania zbrodni ludobójstwa została zaakceptowana i przyjęta dopiero po tragedii Holocaustu. – Lemkin miał poczucie porażki. Do czasu jego śmierci USA nie podpisały konwencji. Wyobrażał sobie, że za konwencją winna iść kolejna powołująca do życia międzynarodowy trybunał stanu, po to by nie stać się pustą deklaracją. W podzielonym świecie zimnej wojny było to niemożliwe. Może jednak osiągnął to, że zwrócił uwagę na konieczność otwarcia nowej perspektywy w nauce prawa: przezwyciężenia suwerenności, jako normy prawnej państwa – mówił prof. Marek Kornat, historyk i znawca Lemkina. – Nazistów nie sądzono za mord na Żydach, niemieckich obywatelach; uznano to za suwerenne prawo państwowe. W uzasadnieniu wyroku nie padło słowo ludobójstwo – zauważył Konstanty Gebert, moderator debaty. Prof. Rotfeld przywołując podstawowe zasady prawa międzynarodowego, w tym m.in. zasadę mówiącą o suwerenności państw i ich terytorium wskazał, że stoi ona w sprzeczności z koncepcją zwalczania ludobójstwa. Hitlerowcy odpowiadali przed sądem w Norymberdze wyłącznie za zbrodnie dokonane poza terytorium Niemiec. O ludobójstwie Ormian w 1915 roku opowiadał obszernie prof. Halil Berktay, jeden z pierwszych historyków tureckich, który zaczął o tym mówić w sposób otwarty. – Kiedy w latach 80-tych zaczynałem rozumieć co się stało z Ormianami, nic nie wiedziałem o Lemkinie i koncepcjach ludobójstwa w prawie międzynarodowym. Ale było dla mnie ważne, jako historyka, aby pojąć, co się naprawdę wydarzyło. Prof. Berktay poświęcił wiele uwagi kolektywnej pamięci narodu i wypieraniu z niej wydarzeń mogących zachwiać narodowotwórczą narrację historyczną. Przekonywał, że spór o kategorię prawną wydarzeń z 1915 roku jest tylko elementem rozliczenia z własną historią. Znajdź nas: https://www.youtube.com/c/WszechnicaFWW/ https://www.facebook.com/WszechnicaFWW1/ https://anchor.fm/wszechnicaorgpl---historia https://anchor.fm/wszechnica-fww-nauka https://wszechnica.org.pl/ #lemkin #ludobójstwo #rwanda #turcja

Why are things in SaaS so different in 2023 than in 2022? And extremely different than 2021? “I think for most of us during the crazy lockdown era, it was just nuts,” Lemkin explains. “And this is, I know this sounds obvious, or maybe it doesn't, but as someone's been doing SaaS since 2005, this is the first time in the last 10 years that SaaS has gotten harder.”   Watch the video: https://youtu.be/h1Hpag6gnOI   ****** Shipping projects doesn't have to be a mess. Notion combines project management with your docs, knowledge base, and AI. So you can stop jumping between tools, and stop paying too much for them too. Get Notion Projects for free at Notion.com/SAASTR.   Vention provides technology leaders with the top engineering talent they need to accelerate their roadmap, innovate faster and more efficiently, and ultimately catapult their operation to new heights. Vention developers sync with clients' in-house teams, helping them get to market 30 percent faster and saving them more than $600,000 on average. Looking for the edge to outpace your competition? Vention is your partner. Learn more at ventionteams.com.   *****   Want to join the SaaStr community? We're the

This week on DisrupTV, we interviewed Jason M. Lemkin, SaaS Founder, Enthusiast & VC, Dheeraj Pandey, CEO & Co-Founder of DevRev and Paulo Savaget, Author of The Four Workarounds. DisrupTV is a weekly Web series with hosts R “Ray” Wang and Vala Afshar. The show airs live at 11:00 a.m. PT/ 2:00 p.m. ET every Friday. Brought to you by Constellation Executive Network: constellationr.com/CEN.

La "Grande famine" du début des années 1930 a été baptisée "Holodomor" en Ukraine, littéralement "extermination par la faim". Elle est un enjeu mémoriel central depuis de nombreuses années et plus que jamais depuis le début de la guerre en Ukraine. Qualifiée de génocide par plus de 25 pays, cette famine aurait tué près de quatre millions de personnes. En cause, la collectivisation forcée des campagnes mise en place par le régime stalinien. Et en toile de fond, la volonté de briser la résistance des paysans ukrainiens. Au micro de Laurent Huguenin-Elie, Korine Amacher, professeur d'histoire russe et soviétique à l'Université de Genève mais également co-directrice du "Festival Histoire et Cité" (28 mars au 2 avril 2023 à Genève, Lausanne et Neuchâtel), sur le thème "Nourrir le monde". Une série en collaboration avec le Festival Histoire et Cité. Dimanche 2 avril à 20h55 sur RTSDeux, vous pourrez voir le documentaire "Moissons sanglantes - 1933, la famine en Ukraine", réalisé par Guillaume Ribot (France, 2022). Le film est disponible en ligne dès maintenant en cliquant ci-contre. Photo: commémoration de Holodomor à Kiev (Ukraine), en novembre 2022. Raphaël Lemkin, juriste juif polonais réfugié en 1941 aux États-Unis a inventé, en 1943, le terme et le concept de génocide. Dans ses différents écrits, il définit explicitement le Holodomor comme un génocide. Selon Lemkin, la condition d'un génocide n'est pas seulement l'expression d'une volonté affirmée de détruire un groupe mais surtout la mise en place d'une organisation pour ce faire. (© Andrew Kravchenko/AP/Keystone)

Sono poche le figure storiche che hanno ottenuto conquiste più importanti e ignorate di quelle di Raphael Lemkin. Se oggi siamo in grado di descrivere con un solo termine quello che è successo agli ebrei, agli armeni e ad altri popoli che hanno rischiato di scomparire per sempre, lo dobbiamo alla folle determinazione di questo profugo polacco che coniò la parola “genocidio” e ne fu anche vittima: 49 membri della sua famiglia, inclusi sua madre e suo padre, morirono durante la Shoah.Con una persistenza incredibile, Lemkin dedicò tutta la sua vita affinché le Nazioni unite approvassero la Convenzione sul genocidio. Una crociata ostinata e solitaria contro l'immobilismo dell'establishment internazionale affinché quanto accaduto ai suoi cari non si ripetesse più.Ospite della puntata: Gabriele Nissim

durée : 00:57:45 - Toute une vie - Le haut lieu de la mémoire de Raphael Lemkin est un tribunal et pas n'importe lequel : Au procès de Nuremberg, les dirigeants nazis de la guerre qui se termine sont jugés et Raphael Lemkin met toutes ses forces au service de son invention juridique : le crime de génocide. - invités : Annette Becker Historienne, professeur émérite des universités à l'université de Paris-Ouest Nanterre La Défense; Bernard Bruneteau Historien; Guillaume Mouralis Historien, Directeur de recherche au CNRS; Philippe Sands Avocat et écrivain

Al funerale dell'ebreo polacco Raphael Lemkin morto a New York il 28 agosto del 1959 ci furono solo sette persone, come capita per la maggior parte degli uomini giusti che vengono dimenticati per l'ingratitudine umana.Eppure Lemkin è stato uno dei grandi protagonisti della Storia, che ha allertato il mondo già nel 1933 contro le minacce di Hitler agli ebrei; che, fuggito dalla Polonia dove tutta la sua famiglia fu assassinata, cercò di convincere l'amministrazione americana a dare un nuovo indirizzo alla guerra per salvare gli ebrei; che dopo la guerra fu l'artefice della Convenzione per la prevenzione e la repressione del crimine di genocidio che venne approvata nel 1948 alle Nazioni Unite.A Lemkin dobbiamo la stessa creazione della parola genocidio che non esisteva nel lessico politico e che rappresenta un ibrido tra la parola greca “genos”, stirpe, usata da Platone nella Settima lettera e dal latino “cidio”, uccidere. Voleva che questa parola fosse sulla bocca di tutti come un marchio di un prodotto di largo consumo che tutti ricordassero a memoria e che avesse il valore di un nuovo comandamento: non commettere un genocidio. E che in nome di questo comandamento si unissero tutti gli Stati del mondo affinché non si ripetesse una nuova Shoah.Saggista e scrittore, Gabriele Nissim autore del podcast, è fondatore e presidente della fondazione Gariwo, la onlus che si occupa della ricerca delle figure esemplari dei Giusti. Nel 2003 ha promosso a Milano la costruzione del Giardino dei Giusti di tutto il mondo, e in seguito la campagna che ha portato alla proclamazione della Giornata europea dei Giusti, il 6 marzo, istituita dal Parlamento euro-peo nel 2012, e all'approvazione da parte del Parlamento italiano, nel dicembre del 2017, della legge che istituisce la Giornata dei Giusti dell'umanità. Nel 2018 è stato nominato dal presidente francese Macron Cavaliere dell'Ordine Nazionale al Merito «per il suo impegno al servizio della memoria e delle relazioni tra i nostri due Paesi» e nel 2021 commendatore della Repubblica dal presidente Mattarella. Has scritto per Rizzoli “Auschwitz non finisce mai”.A cura di Francesco De Leo. Montaggio di Silvio Farina.https://storiainpodcast.focus.it - Canale Le questioni della Storia------------Storia in Podcast di Focus si può ascoltare anche su Spotify http://bit.ly/VoceDellaStoria ed Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/it/podcast/la-voce-della-storia/id1511551427.Siamo in tutte le edicole... ma anche qui:- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FocusStoria/- Gruppo Facebook Focus Storia Wars: https://www.facebook.com/groups/FocuStoriaWars/ (per appassionati di storia militare)- YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/focusitvideo- Twitter: https://twitter.com/focusstoria- Sito: https://www.focus.it/cultura

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/military-history

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/world-affairs

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/genocide-studies

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Since the 1980s the study of genocide has exploded, both historically and geographically, to encompass earlier epochs, other continents, and new cases. The concept of genocide has proved its worth, but that expansion has also compounded the tensions between a rigid legal concept and the manifold realities researchers have discovered. The legal and political benefits that accompany genocide status have also reduced complex discussions of historical events to a simplistic binary - is it genocide or not? - a situation often influenced by powerful political pressures. Genocide addresses these tensions and tests the limits of the concept in cases ranging from the role of sexual violence during the Holocaust to state-induced mass starvation in Kazakh and Ukrainian history, while considering what the Armenian, Rwandan, and Burundi experiences reveal about the uses and pitfalls of reading history and conducting politics through the lens of genocide. Contributors examine the pressures that great powers have exerted in shaping the concept; the reaction Raphaël Lemkin, originator of the word “genocide,” had to the United Nations' final resolution on the subject; France's long-held choice not to use the concept of genocide in its courtrooms; the role of transformative social projects and use of genocide memory in politics; and the relation of genocide to mass violence targeting specific groups. Throughout, Andrea Graziosi and Frank E. Sysyn edited volume Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (McGill-Queen's UP, 2022) offers innovative solutions to address the limitations of the genocide concept, while preserving its usefulness as an analytical framework. Jeff Bachman is Senior Lecturer in Human Rights at American University's School of International Service in Washington, DC. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

Global Credit Strategy head Noel Hebert and BI distressed credit analyst Philip Brendel discuss September's rise in distressed supply amid a dearth of risk appetite. Included is an in-depth feature interview with Todd Lemkin, Chief Investment Officer of Canyon Partners (6:15). BI bankruptcy litigation analyst Negisa Balluku and Bloomberg distressed debt reporter Eliza Ronalds-Hannon join the panel to share thoughts on Endo International, Celsius Network, Voyager Digital, Cineworld, Bed, Bath & Beyond, JUUL, and Envision Healthcare (1:07:15).

The Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Polish Historians' Perspectives on the War Next Door! - WB 2nd April 2022 Welcome to Watching Brief. As the name implies, each week Marc (Mr Soup) & Andy Brockman of the Pipeline (Where history is tomorrow's news) cast an eye over news stories, topical media and entertainment and discuss and debate what they find. #archaeologynews #thepipeline #archaeosoup Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/archaeosoup 0:00 Introduction   4:05 Paul Barford Interview 28:44 Alina Nowobilska Interview 1:04:08 Closing Thoughts *** Link of the Week:   Disasters Emergency Committee: https://www.dec.org.uk/   *** Links: Pipeline April Fools' Article: CBA, CIfA & FAME LAUNCH JOINT MEDIA OPERATION: http://thepipeline.info/blog/2022/04/01/cba-cifa-fame-launch-joint-media-operation/ Paul Barford: @PortantIssues on Twitter Portable Antiquity Collecting and Heritage Issues: https://paul-barford.blogspot.com/ Alina Nowobilska: @WW2girl1944 on Twitter @hack_history on Twitter Refugees fleeing Ukraine (since 24 February 2022): https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine ‘Black Archaeology' in Eastern Europe: Metal Detecting, Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Objects, and ‘Legal Nihilism': https://www.counteringcrime.org/black-archaeology-in-eastern-europe Raphael Lemkin Center for Documenting Russian Crimes in Ukraine: https://instytutpileckiego.pl/en/instytut/aktualnosci/centrum-dokumentowania-zbrodni-rosyjskich-w-ukrainie-im The word “genocide” was first coined by Polish lawyer Raphäel Lemkin: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml At least 53 culturally important sites damaged in Ukraine – Unesco: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/01/at-least-53-culturally-important-sites-damaged-in-ukraine-unesco Inside the Efforts to Preserve Ukraine's Cultural Heritage: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/inside-the-efforts-to-preserve-ukraines-cultural-heritage-180979840/ News about the war from the official Ukrainian perspective: 135 war crimes against cultural heritage recorded in Ukraine: https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-society/3446115-135-war-crimes-against-cultural-heritage-recorded-in-ukraine.html

  Episode 235 Alexander is a Web Engineer and Architect focused on accessible and extensible solutions.   Links https://www.alemkin.com/ https://www.flapjacktech.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexander-lemkin-63663749/ https://github.com/alemkin   Resources https://www.ada.gov/ https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG2AA-Conformance https://www.a11yproject.com/ https://accessibilityinsights.io/   "Tempting Time" by Animals As Leaders used with permissions - All Rights Reserved × Subscribe now! Never miss a post, subscribe to The 6 Figure Developer Podcast! Are you interested in being a guest on The 6 Figure Developer Podcast? Click here to check availability!  

TESTO DELL'ARTICOLO ➜ http://www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=6561FINALMENTE GLI STATI UNITI RICONOSCONO IL GENOCIDIO ARMENO di Luca Della TorreLo scorso 24 aprile, il governo degli USA ha finalmente riconosciuto ufficialmente il genocidio del popolo armeno costato la vita a un milione e mezzo di cristiani sterminati con un piano normativo studiato a tavolino e realizzato con criminale determinazione dal governo ottomano musulmano turco tra il 1915 ed il 1917.Gli Stati Uniti si uniscono così ai 29 Paesi che nel mondo riconoscono che le efferate persecuzioni perpetrate con ferocia dalla Turchia durante la Prima Guerra Mondiale contro l'intero popolo di fede cristiana ed etnia armena rientrino a pieno titolo nella fattispecie di crimine penale internazionale di genocidio, come previsto dalla Convenzione ONU del 1948: 29 Stati sono ancora molto pochi in verità, rispetto ai 194 Stati membri dell'ONU.La decisione degli USA avrà ovviamente una ricaduta storica, politica e giuridica di portata internazionale nei confronti del tanto discusso alleato NATO, il regime islamico-nazionalista turco di Recep Taiyp Erdogan, che viene inchiodato alle sue precise responsabilità in tema di negazionismo sul genocidio armeno cristiano.Gli elementi storiografici che hanno portato a maturazione i processi per il riconoscimento di questo tragico capitolo nella storia della persecuzione alla fede cristiana sono dati dalla scoperta e pubblicazione nelle università USA del carteggio istituzionale di uno dei tre membri del Triumvirato che governò la Turchia ottomana durante la Prima Guerra Mondiale, il ministro Talat Pasha. In questi documenti si individuano le prove dei decreti, ordinanze, provvedimenti amministrativi finalizzati al massacro degli armeni.LA STRAGE DI UN MILIONE E MEZZO DI ARMENIA partire dall'aprile del 1915, il governo del Sultano turco in guerra contro le potenze alleate, pianifica a livello legale, militare un programma mirato alla eliminazione totale dal territorio ottomano della popolazione armena - cittadini turchi a tutti gli effetti ma di fede religiosa cristiana e non islamica e di gruppo etnico non turcomanno - attraverso arresti, massacri, stupri, deportazioni di massa, tra cui le celebri "marce della morte" verso i deserti della Mesopotamia. Le famiglie vengono smembrate, separando i genitori dai figli che vengono affidati in schiavitù a tribù curde dell'Impero ottomano; la legge di sicurezza per la deportazione ed espropriazione dispone la liquidazione dei beni dei cittadini armeni per miliardi di Euro attuali.Il frutto tragico di questa strategia porterà alla eliminazione fisica intenzionale di più di un milione e mezzo di armeni, alla luce dei più attendibili dati scientificamente assunti dalla comunità scientifica internazionale.La repressione dei cristiani armeni nell'Impero ottomano era cominciata in verità diversi anni prima. Già alla fine dell'Ottocento, nel momento in cui all'interno dell'Impero ottomano la vivace intraprendente minoranza cristiana si era organizzata per ribellarsi alle condizioni anacronistiche di "dimmithudine" (la sottomissione giuridica a discriminazioni dei diritti di libertà, politici, economici, praticate dai sistemi politici islamici verso le minoranze religiose cristiane in Medio Oriente da secoli) l'esercito turco si era già mobilitato.Gli storici armeni di quel periodo evidenziano che i militari di Costantinopoli uccisero con ferocia, nei quindici anni compresi fra il 1894 e il 1909, circa 200 mila persone. Uno sterminio, dunque, partito già dagli ultimi sultani, in particolare da Adbul Hamid II, che governò fino al 1909, e poi dal governo dei Giovani Turchi.Oggi la battaglia sul riconoscimento del genocidio riguarda più aspetti nell'ambito delle relazioni internazionali e della geopolitica: almeno tre.In primo luogo la legittimità della attribuzione del termine genocidio a questo stermino di massa, considerato come decisivo a livello di diritto internazionale: si consideri che il termine genocidio non nasce a seguito della Shoah ebraica della Seconda Guerra Mondiale, ma viene creato e introdotto nel diritto internazionale dal giurista accademico USA di origine polacca Raphael Lemkin, che studiò per primo negli anni ‘30 del XX secolo il dramma del popolo armeno nella Prima Guerra Mondiale.La nozione di genocidio introdotta grazie agli studi di Lemkin nella Convenzione ONU per la repressione del crimine di genocidio comprende tutte quelle condotte - uccisioni di massa, lesioni gravi, stupri, deportazioni, sottoposizione a condizioni di vita insostenibili fisicamente - miranti a distruggere in toto o in parte un gruppo nazionale, etnico, religioso, razziale.COPYRIGHT EBRAICO ESCLUSIVO SUL GENOCIDIOPer quanto paradossale possa apparire, si consideri che a livello di relazioni internazionali il termine genocidio è ancora oggetto di contesa sulla "proprietà esclusiva" del termine: un esempio è il discorso di memoria storica fortemente dibattuto in seno ad Israele - sia alla Knesset, il Parlamento, sia nelle accademie - sulla questione di esclusiva del genocidio ebraico e sulla unicità della Shoah. L'Armenia ha avuto parecchi contraddittori proprio con Israele al riguardo, contestando la pretesa israeliana al "copyright" esclusivo sulla tragedia del genocidio in forma di Olocausto nazista.Ciò vale pure per i criminali tragici misfatti compiuti dai regimi totalitari comunisti nel XX secolo: dall'Unione Sovietica alla Cambogia alla Cina, le responsabilità precise dei vertici politici, militari, di questi funesti leader - da Lenin a Stalin a Krushev, da Mao Ze Dong ai Khmer Rossi - tendono a non essere ricomprese nella qualifica di genocidio da parte dei governi che si sono succeduti agli stessi regimi.Così accade in Turchia: la reazione furibonda della Cancelleria turca a questo preciso atto d'accusa USA, tradisce l'impronta islamista-nazionalista che ancor oggi è la piattaforma giuridico-istituzionale che cementa le aspirazioni geopolitiche di questo scomodo alleato dell'Occidente: uno dei primi atti istituzionali che fondano la moderna Turchia in cui si incarna Erdogan è il Patto nazionale del 1920 dei Giovani Turchi, che afferma che il popolo turco ha una comune radice musulmana ed ottomana, che la rende unita per religione, razza e finalità.La Turchia vive oggi - con riferimento al mancato riconoscimento del genocidio armeno - la paradossale condizione dell'impianto costituzionale del proprio Stato, un mix di totalitarismo di evidente impronta islamista che confonde religione, Stato e società civile in un'unica definizione giuridica, e di esasperato nazionalismo panturanico che qualifica come nemico della nazione tutto ciò che proviene dall'Occidente: basti considerare che il Codice Penale turco prevede il reato di "offesa alla nazione turca" nei confronti di chiunque osi attribuire al governo turco di allora la responsabilità del presunto genocidio: le responsabilità giuridiche e politiche del milieu islamico ed islamista nei confronti dell'Occidente sono evidenti, il dialogo tra civiltà non è unilaterale se non esiste piattaforma identitaria condivisa su cui ragionare.Nota di BastaBugie: Leone Grotti nell'articolo seguente dal titolo "Genocidio armeno. Più Erdogan strepita, più si rivela debole" spiega perché Erdogan attacca Biden per il riconoscimento del genocidio armeno. Ma va detto anche che alle parole non seguono i fatti perché l'economia della Turchia è troppo fragile.Ecco l'articolo completo pubblicato su Tempi il 27 aprile 2021:Il riconoscimento ufficiale del genocidio armeno da parte di Joe Biden ha mandato su tutte le furie Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Il "sultano" ha intimato agli Stati Uniti di «rivedere immediatamente questo passo falso». Ha spiegato che il riconoscimento «avrà effetti devastanti sulle nostre relazioni bilaterali». Ha aggiunto che i rapporti con gli Usa «sono danneggiati come mai prima d'ora». E poi non ha fatto nulla di concreto, svelando l'estrema debolezza della Turchia.Il presidente turco sa di non potersi permettere sanzioni contro gli Stati Uniti per non indebolire ulteriormente un'economia già fragile e inimicarsi l'alleato Nato. Al contrario di quanto fatto in precedenza, non ha nemmeno ritirato l'ambasciatore, dimostrando ancora una volta l'inconsistenza delle minacce di Ankara. Al di là delle dichiarazioni di fuoco, infatti, più Erdogan urla più dimostra di essere debole.Quando nell'aprile 2019 la Camera dei deputati italiana riconobbe il genocidio armeno, Ankara si infuriò e ritirò il proprio ambasciatore. La stessa cosa fece nel 2015, quando fu papa Francesco a esprimersi sul genocidio. In entrambi i casi, gli ambasciatori tornarono al loro posto dopo pochi mesi.Erdogan sa che l'economia della Turchia è fragile. L'inflazione a marzo è cresciuta per il sesto mese consecutivo, aumentando il costo delle importazioni, a causa del continuo deprezzamento della lira. Nell'ultimo anno la lira turca ha perso più di un quinto del suo valore rispetto al dollaro americano. Ecco perché Ankara non può permettersi di protestare seriamente per il riconoscimento del genocidio armeno da parte di Biden.Parlare di genocidio armeno in Turchia è un reato punito dall'articolo 301 del codice penale. Ma lo sterminio di 1,5 milioni di armeni tra il 1915 e il 1917 è un fatto storico confermato da decine di migliaia di documenti ufficiali. Persino Hasan Cemal, nipote di quel Djemal Pasha che fu uno degli architetti del genocidio, ha scritto un libro intitolato 1915. Genocidio armeno, tradotto in Italia da Guerini. Nel libro si legge: «Finché noi turchi non prendiamo coscienza di ciò che è avvenuto, non potremo fare pace col nostro passato e considerarci una nazione con una storia».THE PROMISE (2016): IL MIGLIOR FILM SUL GENOCIDIO ARMENOPer sapere tutto sul film, che vede tra i protagonisti Christian Bale (ha interpretato Batman nella trilogia), visita il sito FilmGarantiti.ithttp://www.filmgarantiti.it/it/edizioni.php?id=72

This might be the first episode to get me death threats. The Turkish government does NOT like being accused of genocide, and neither do many of its citizens. But during WW1, genocide is exactly what the Young Turks orchestrated. Roughly 1.5 million Armenians were killed. And between 1900 - 1923, up to 4.3 million Armenian, Greek, Assyrian, and other smaller ethnic groups of Christian were massacred by the Ottoman Empire and their successors committed to the racist and xenophobic ideology of Pan-Turkism. Today's story is a crazy one. The craziest part about it is that it is not more well known. And it is not well known primarily because of Turkey's consistent and constant denial that it ever happened. It is literally illegal in Turkey to accuse the Turkish government of having committed genocide. They have cut off relations with other nations for accusing them of genocide. It's a topic that needs to be talked about more and I hope you are as fascinated by today's information as I am.  Thanks for helping Bad Magic Productions give $12,200 this month to No Kid Hungry https://www.nokidhungry.org/ Click the link to learn more. Watch the Suck on YouTube: https://youtu.be/Cj6OtU58AQg Merch  - https://badmagicmerch.com/   Discord! https://discord.gg/tqzH89v COTC private FB Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/cultofthecurious/ For all merch related questions/problems: store@badmagicproductions.com (copy and paste) Please rate and subscribe on iTunes and elsewhere and follow the suck on social media!! @timesuckpodcast on IG and http://www.facebook.com/timesuckpodcast Wanna become a Space Lizard? We're over 10,000 strong! Click here: https://www.patreon.com/timesuckpodcast  Sign up through Patreon and for $5 a month you get to listen to the Secret Suck, which will drop Thursdays at Noon, PST. You'll also get 20% off of all regular Timesuck merch PLUS access to exclusive Space Lizard merch. You get to vote on two Monday topics each month via the app. And you get the download link for my new comedy album, Feel the Heat. Check the Patreon posts to find out how to download the new album and take advantage of other benefits. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Lo más importante para crecer una empresa es entender qué tipo de negocio es. Dependiendo del tipo de negocio varían las métricas que nos importan (eCommerce vs. SaaS). Ningún negocio con suscripción puede sobrevivir haciendo simplemente marketing sin medirlo. Si estás pensando en hacer crecimiento de negocios con suscripción hay un arsenal de términos en growth que es importante aclarar y que deberían entender cualquiera de las personas de la empresa, no solo los profesionales de growth. En este episodio de SaaS Product Chat tuvimos de invitado a José Carlos Cortizo, CMO & Partner en Product Hackers, una consultora especializada en Growth, quien nos habló acerca de los retos y proyectos a los que se enfrentan cuando trabajan con clientes en Product Hackers y las habilidades necesarias para hacer growth efectivo en 2020. Además de esto, hablamos de la decisión de contratar una consultora o agencia externa vs. confiar en un equipo interno o qué acciones les han funcionado en el camino de promocionar Product Hackers. Cerramos con reflexiones sobre lo que es (y no es) una startup, qué significa darle la vuelta al funnel trabajando la captación lo justo para centrarse en aspectos más cercanos al producto o cómo cambiar la narrativa en el mundo startup a una que vea como cool alcanzar la rentabilidad.No olvides darle like, suscribirte al feed del podcast en cualquiera de las plataformas, y compartir nuestro show! Gracias por siempre estar con nosotros!Corti en internet:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jccortizo/Twitter: https://twitter.com/josek_netEn.Digital Podcast: https://en.digitalProduct Hackers: https://producthackers.com/es/author/corti/Estos son los enlaces a los temas de los que hemos hablado:BrainSINS: https://www.brainsins.com/es/Product Hackers: https://producthackers.com/es/Inteligencia Artificial aplicada al Marketing Digital: https://redcast.es/podcast/episodio-10-inteligencia-artificial-aplicada-al-marketing-digital-con-jose-carlos-cortizo/Luis Díaz del Dedo: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luisdiazdeldedo/Juanma Varo: https://www.linkedin.com/in/growth-marketing-juanma-varo/En.digital: https://redcast.es/podcasts/en-digital/Factorial: https://factorialhr.esStreamloots: https://www.streamloots.comHackeando el cerebro de tus compradores (cómo muchas compañías crean productos digitales o procesos de venta capaces de conectar con la psicología del comprador): https://www.amazon.es/Hackeando-cerebro-tus-compradores-PsychoGrowth/dp/B08NF1PKDC/ref=zg_bs_15246806031_1?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=XPMN92X60G9JRQGARSJAGrowth Hacking: Supera el reto de crear productos digitales exponenciales https://www.amazon.es/Growth-Hacking-productos-digitales-exponenciales/dp/8441541876Flip the Funnel: https://www.amazon.es/Flip-Funnel-Existing-Customers-Gain/dp/0470487852Dale la vuelta al funnel: https://en.digital/blog/funnel-conversion-dar-vuelta-al-funnel/1258Las 8 fases del cliente: https://en.digital/podcast/164-las-8-fases-del-clienteDoofinder: https://www.doofinder.com/en/Metricool: https://metricool.com/es/Juan Pablo Tejela: https://www.linkedin.com/in/juanpablotejela/?originalSubdomain=esJason M. Lemkin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonmlemkin/

On this shorter than normal episode of We Need To Talk About Movies Jim chats with director Rob Lemkin and activist Femi Nylander about their film African Apocalypse, which recently screened at the London Film Festival.Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/banterflix)

No site do Museu do Holocausto dos Estados Unidos, encontrei uma definição interessante. "O termo ‘genocídio’ não existia antes de 1944; ele foi criado como um conceito específico para designar crimes que têm como objetivo a eliminação da existência física de GRUPOS nacionais, étnicos, raciais, e/ou religiosos. Em contraste, ‘direitos humanos’, tais como definidos pela Declaração dos Direitos do Cidadão nos Estados Unidos ou pela Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos das Nações Unidas de 1948, dizem respeito a direitos individuais. Em 1944, Raphael Lemkin, um advogado judeu polonês, ao tentar encontrar palavras para descrever as políticas nazistas de assassinato sistemático, incluindo a destruição dos judeus europeus, criou a palavra ‘genocídio’ combinando a palavra grega geno-, que significa raça ou tribo, com a palavra latina -cídio, que quer dizer matar. Com este termo, Lemkin definiu o genocídio como ‘um plano coordenado, com ações de vários tipos, que objetiva à destruição dos alicerces fundamentais da vida de grupos nacionais com o objetivo de aniquilá-los’. No ano seguinte, o Tribunal Militar Internacional instituído em Nuremberg, Alemanha, acusou os líderes nazistas de haverem cometido ‘crimes contra a humanidade’, e a palavra ‘genocídio’ foi incluída no processo, embora de forma apenas descritiva, sem cunho jurídico." Muito bem. Agora que você aprendeu o que significa genocídio, pare de usar o termo feito um ignorante.   Este cafezinho chega a você com apoio do Cafebrasilpremium.com.br, conteúdo extra-forte para seu crescimento profissional www.cafebrasilpremium.com.br Versão do Youtube você encontra em bit.ly/lucianonoyoutube

No site do Museu do Holocausto dos Estados Unidos, encontrei uma definição interessante. "O termo ‘genocídio’ não existia antes de 1944; ele foi criado como um conceito específico para designar crimes que têm como objetivo a eliminação da existência física de GRUPOS nacionais, étnicos, raciais, e/ou religiosos. Em contraste, ‘direitos humanos’, tais como definidos pela Declaração dos Direitos do Cidadão nos Estados Unidos ou pela Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos das Nações Unidas de 1948, dizem respeito a direitos individuais. Em 1944, Raphael Lemkin, um advogado judeu polonês, ao tentar encontrar palavras para descrever as políticas nazistas de assassinato sistemático, incluindo a destruição dos judeus europeus, criou a palavra ‘genocídio’ combinando a palavra grega geno-, que significa raça ou tribo, com a palavra latina -cídio, que quer dizer matar. Com este termo, Lemkin definiu o genocídio como ‘um plano coordenado, com ações de vários tipos, que objetiva à destruição dos alicerces fundamentais da vida de grupos nacionais com o objetivo de aniquilá-los’. No ano seguinte, o Tribunal Militar Internacional instituído em Nuremberg, Alemanha, acusou os líderes nazistas de haverem cometido ‘crimes contra a humanidade’, e a palavra ‘genocídio’ foi incluída no processo, embora de forma apenas descritiva, sem cunho jurídico." Muito bem. Agora que você aprendeu o que significa genocídio, pare de usar o termo feito um ignorante.   Este cafezinho chega a você com apoio do Cafebrasilpremium.com.br, conteúdo extra-forte para seu crescimento profissional www.cafebrasilpremium.com.br Versão do Youtube você encontra em bit.ly/lucianonoyoutube

Join historian John Lestrange and his wife MJ Bradley as they tackle the issue of what, exactly, is genocide.  The two take a deep dive into the origin of the term, the beginnings of an international effort to prevent genocide, and the difficulties with actually getting the UN to do anything useful. Special thanks to the app Hatchful and MJ Bradley for designing and editing out logo. Show music is "Crusade - Heavy Industry by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License. Sources: UN Convention for the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide, UN General Assembly Resolution 260, Dec. 9, 1948. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crimeofgenocide.aspx   Coining a Term and Championing a Cause: The Story of Raphael Lemkin https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/coining-a-word-and-championing-a-cause-the-story-of-raphael-lemkin   Lemkin, Raphael. 1944. Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals for Redress. Washington [D.C.]: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Division of International Law.   Reassessing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals: Transitional Justice, Trial Narratives, and Historiography (War and Genocide) page 110 edited by Alexa Stiller and Kim C. Premiel Berghahn Books 2012   Robert Gellately & Ben Kiernan (2003). The Specter of Genocide: Mass Murder in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 267.   "The Prosecutor v. Limaj et al. – Decision on Prosecution's Motion to Amend the Amended Indictment – Trial Chamber – en IT-03-66 [2004] ICTY 7 (12 February 2004)“ http://www.worldlii.org/int/cases/ICTY/2004/7.html   European Court of Human Rights Judgement in Jorgic v. Germany (Application no. 74613/01) paragraphs 18, 36, 74   "Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court" International Criminal Court. July 1998.   Contributions by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to Development of the Definition of Genocide. Asoka De Z. Gunawaradana. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). Vol. 94 (APRIL 5-8, 2000), pp. 277-279   We Charge Genocide: The Historic Petition to the United Nations for Relief from a Crime of the United States Government Against the Negro People. Civil Rights Congress. 1952.   "The Genocide Trap", Chicago Daily Tribune, 22 December 1951, p. 8   John Docker, "Raphaël Lemkin, creator of the concept of genocide: a world history perspective", Humanities Research 16(2), 2010   "White Turns Down State Dept. Bid", Baltimore Afro-American, 8 December 1951 See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Click here to listen to the full interview with SasStr's Jason Lemkin https://tcrn.ch/2TPZ7vKWith the markets in turmoil and fear running rampant through the global economy, you might not think that it’s a great time to start a company. According to at least one well-known venture capitalist, however, it’s a great time to start up.TechCrunch recently caught up with former founder and active venture capitalist Jason Lemkin to chat about the world of software-as-service companies, better known by their acronym moniker “SaaS.” Lemkin swung by TC HQ in San Francisco to spend some time with the Equity crew to discuss all things SaaS, markets, and startups.Long-time Equity listeners will recall that this is not the first or even second time that we’ve had Lemkin on. He was, after all, our first guest, and a repeat for Episode 100. But as it’s Equity’s third birthday, and his SaaStr conference was just around the corner (now postponed), we had Lemkin back to dig deep into one of our favorite startup categories.So let’s get nerdy about SaaS.Is now a good time?After the jump you can listen to the full audio from our interview (it’s a little over 45 minutes, so feel free to download it and take it with you; there’s an excerpt in the main Equity feed as well). But I wanted to share my favorite portion of the chat with everyone, even if you’re not part of Extra Crunch.When we spoke to Lemkin the stock market had taken lumps, albeit nothing quite like we’ve seen in the last week. Still, when we asked about the potential for a cloud slowdown, Lemkin was not convinced that a secular cloud slowdown (as SaaS’s penetration into enterprise IT spend, it’s growth rate will slow) would be bad for startups operating as part of the modern, subscription software movement.Why? There’s so much spend left to build for that there’s lots to build. And, perhaps more importantly, incumbents SaaS firms are so large now that they can afford to let smaller companies get pretty damn big before they pay attention. “All the SaaS leaders,” according to Lemkin, “are at a billion, two billion, [...] in ARR. The Zendesks, the Shopifys, the Hubspots. And they don’t have time” to bother with small companies. Before, in his telling, a $5 million ARR SaaS company would have raised competitive eyebrows from market leaders. Today that bar has been raised to as high as $100 million.That’s good news for your local startup scene. Hit the clip if you’ve had a long, hard week and want some optimism:As you can see, I initially missed his point about market size, and what the growing cloud pie means for startups. But by the end I’d come around: Because the big SaaS companies need to add $100 million, $200 million, or even $300 million in revenue each year, small software startups just don’t scan. Think of it as temporary invisibility for all SaaS startups until you’re probably too big to stop.In the full interview we also went over Jason’s current venture fund, investing cadence, discussed vertical SaaS, his advice for the middle class of SaaS, how to think about venture debt, SaaS consolidation, software in India, and the Slack versus Microsoft scrap. It’s a lot of fun, so let’s get into it.

Click here to listen to the full interview with SasStr's Jason Lemkin https://tcrn.ch/2TPZ7vKWith the markets in turmoil and fear running rampant through the global economy, you might not think that it’s a great time to start a company. According to at least one well-known venture capitalist, however, it’s a great time to start up.TechCrunch recently caught up with former founder and active venture capitalist Jason Lemkin to chat about the world of software-as-service companies, better known by their acronym moniker “SaaS.” Lemkin swung by TC HQ in San Francisco to spend some time with the Equity crew to discuss all things SaaS, markets, and startups.Long-time Equity listeners will recall that this is not the first or even second time that we’ve had Lemkin on. He was, after all, our first guest, and a repeat for Episode 100. But as it’s Equity’s third birthday, and his SaaStr conference was just around the corner (now postponed), we had Lemkin back to dig deep into one of our favorite startup categories.So let’s get nerdy about SaaS.Is now a good time?After the jump you can listen to the full audio from our interview (it’s a little over 45 minutes, so feel free to download it and take it with you; there’s an excerpt in the main Equity feed as well). But I wanted to share my favorite portion of the chat with everyone, even if you’re not part of Extra Crunch.When we spoke to Lemkin the stock market had taken lumps, albeit nothing quite like we’ve seen in the last week. Still, when we asked about the potential for a cloud slowdown, Lemkin was not convinced that a secular cloud slowdown (as SaaS’s penetration into enterprise IT spend, it’s growth rate will slow) would be bad for startups operating as part of the modern, subscription software movement.Why? There’s so much spend left to build for that there’s lots to build. And, perhaps more importantly, incumbents SaaS firms are so large now that they can afford to let smaller companies get pretty damn big before they pay attention. “All the SaaS leaders,” according to Lemkin, “are at a billion, two billion, [...] in ARR. The Zendesks, the Shopifys, the Hubspots. And they don’t have time” to bother with small companies. Before, in his telling, a $5 million ARR SaaS company would have raised competitive eyebrows from market leaders. Today that bar has been raised to as high as $100 million.That’s good news for your local startup scene. Hit the clip if you’ve had a long, hard week and want some optimism:As you can see, I initially missed his point about market size, and what the growing cloud pie means for startups. But by the end I’d come around: Because the big SaaS companies need to add $100 million, $200 million, or even $300 million in revenue each year, small software startups just don’t scan. Think of it as temporary invisibility for all SaaS startups until you’re probably too big to stop.In the full interview we also went over Jason’s current venture fund, investing cadence, discussed vertical SaaS, his advice for the middle class of SaaS, how to think about venture debt, SaaS consolidation, software in India, and the Slack versus Microsoft scrap. It’s a lot of fun, so let’s get into it.