Podcasts about ratajkowski

Emily Ratajkowski is doing a balancing act many famously beautiful women have to perform. In her 2021 book “My Body,” she reflects on what it's been like to build a career based on her public image, and her struggle to control that image in an industry largely run by men. Since getting divorced a few years ago, she's been thinking a lot about gender dynamics and the type of agency she wants to have in dating, too.Today, Ratajkowski reads “Why I Fell for an ‘I'm the Man' Man,” by Susan Forray. Forray is also a successful, self-sufficient woman, dating after divorce. She's surprised to find herself falling for a man with old-fashioned ideas about who does what in a relationship. (He pays for dinner, handles the finances and initiates sex). As a single mom who handles everything, Ratajkowski says, she can relate to the desire to be cared for once in a while. And that doesn't have to mean playing into a sexist stereotype.

The Victoria's Secret Icon burst onto the acting and modeling scene while injecting a carefree cool that has contributed to her stardom. Ten years into her storied career, she is raising a son with her best friend, running a prolific podcast, and letting go of what doesn't serve her. In this insightful interview, Ratajkowski describes living without fear and maintaining control in an industry of complicated power dynamics, letting go of perfectionism, and getting to wear her first set of VS wings.   Watch the full-length special of The Tour '23 on Prime Video and follow @amandadecadenet and @victoriassecret to never miss a moment.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hi Outlouders! Jumping your feed to give you a laugh and re-introduce you to Cancelled the show hosted by our very own Clare and Jessie Stephens.  This episode is all about Emily Ratajkowski, aka Em Rata and judging her crimes which include: saying hair is feminine, her controversial book and her feud with Celeste Barber.  And we assign charges and sentences accordingly. If you love this episode, there is plenty more where that came from and you can listen to them here! THE END BITSSubscribe to Mamamia GET IN TOUCH: Feedback? We're listening! Call the pod phone on 02 8999 9386 or email us at podcast@mamamia.com.au CREDITS:Hosts: Clare and Jessie Stephens Executive Producer: Talissa Bazaz Audio Producers: Thom Lion Mamamia acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the Land we have recorded this podcast on, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present, and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures.  Just by reading our articles or listening to our podcasts, you're helping to fund girls in schools in some of the most disadvantaged countries in the world - through our partnership with Room to Read. We're currently funding 300 girls in school every day and our aim is to get to 1,000. Find out more about Mamamia at mamamia.com.auBecome a Mamamia subscriber: https://www.mamamia.com.au/subscribeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to the Cancelled courtroom, the woman who stole another podcasts name** Em Rata. While it isn't illegal to be that beautiful (we should know), this episode we look a her real 'crimes' and assign charges and sentences.  Like the time she got cancelled for saying hair is feminine, a controversial book and a feud with one of our favourite Aussie comedians.  Plus, more of your lazy gewl stories.  ** in our defence (legal term) we didn't know the other Cancelled existed, sorry to them. THE END BITSSubscribe to Mamamia GET IN TOUCH: Feedback? We're listening! Call the pod phone on 02 8999 9386 or email us at podcast@mamamia.com.au CREDITS:Hosts: Clare and Jessie Stephens Producer: Talissa Bazaz Audio Producers: Thom Lion Mamamia acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the Land we have recorded this podcast on, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present, and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures.  Just by reading our articles or listening to our podcasts, you're helping to fund girls in schools in some of the most disadvantaged countries in the world - through our partnership with Room to Read. We're currently funding 300 girls in school every day and our aim is to get to 1,000. Find out more about Mamamia at mamamia.com.au Support the show: https://www.mamamia.com.au/subscribeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This podcast was recorded about a week before its subject, Andrea Long Chu, was awarded the 2023 Pulitzer Prize for criticism, so it doesn't come up in the conversation with Blake Smith, but it's interesting to keep in mind as he and I analyze Chu and try to understand the particular role she plays in the broader intellectual and journalistic ecosystem.Our story begins in early 2018, when the hipster intellectual magazine N+1 published a long essay titled “On Liking Women.” The essay, which went rather viral, was about the author's transition to being a woman, her fascination with the 1967 radical tract the SCUM Manifesto, the dynamics of sissy porn, and her complicated feelings about wanting to be a woman, wanting women, and the universal fear of being feminized.Its author, Andrea Long Chu, was at the time a doctoral student in comparative literature at NYU, and in all respects unfamous. The essay would change that, rather dramatically. In the way that Ta-Nehisi Coates was, for a time, the black intellectual, and Wesley Yang was the Asian intellectual, Chu became, and perhaps remains, the trans intellectual of the moment. Later that year she wrote another splashy piece,“My New Vagina Won't Make Me Happy,” for the New York Times. Her 2019 book, Females, got an immense amount of attention. In 2021 she was hired as a staff critic for New York magazine, and in that role has written a series of buzzed about reviews. She's not famous, exactly, but she's almost as close to it as journalists get it. She is now friends, for instance, with the genuinely famous Emily Ratajkowski, whom she profiled in The New York Times Magazine, and who later interviewed Chu for her own podcast, High Low with Emrata.As she says to Ratajkowski, some of this success was a matter of timing. There was a space waiting to be filled. Trans issues had gotten big in the culture, and while there were a lot of good trans memoirs out there, and an increasing number of trans people making a name for themselves in the “influencer” space, there was neither an intellectual nor a magazine feature writer who had yet made a name for him or herself reliably and stylishly explaining the trans thing to the world. Chu has been able to step into this space so successfully because she is a stylish writer, because she has a command of the relevant theory, and also because she has that thing that so many it boys and girls of journalism have had: she's a tease. She comes close and dances away. She reveals and withholds, issues grand pronouncements, and then implies that she's just kidding … maybe.Here she is at the end of her breakout essay, I am being tendentious, dear reader, because I am trying to tell you something that few of us dare to talk about, especially in public, especially when we are trying to feel political: not the fact, boringly obvious to those of us living it, that many trans women wish they were cis women, but the darker, more difficult fact that many trans women wish they were women, period. This is most emphatically not something trans women are supposed to want. The grammar of contemporary trans activism does not brook the subjunctive. Trans women are women, we are chided with silky condescension, as if we have all confused ourselves with Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, as if we were all simply trapped in the wrong politics, as if the cure for dysphoria were wokeness. How can you want to be something you already are? Desire implies deficiency; want implies want. To admit that what makes women like me transsexual is not identity but desire is to admit just how much of transition takes place in the waiting rooms of wanting things, to admit that your breasts may never come in, your voice may never pass, your parents may never call back.…This is not to garner pity for sad trannies like me. We have enough roses by our beds. It is rather to say, minimally, that trans women want things too. The deposits of our desire run as deep and fine as any. The richness of our want is staggering. Perhaps this is why coming out can feel like crushing, why a first dress can feel like a first kiss, why dysphoria can feel like heartbreak. The other name for disappointment, after all, is love.I've been reading and listening to Chu recently, and I find myself atypically confused. I honestly don't know what she's trying to say, about gender and sexuality and sex and politics, nor whether she actually believes whatever it is she's trying to say. I don't know if she's the real deal or, like so many it boys and girls of the past, she's performing a role that is ultimately too disconnected from a genuinely grounded self to write things that are meaningful.To help me process my confusion, I reached out to Blake Smith, who recently wrote a highly critical piece on Chu. Officially, Blake is an historian of modern France coming off a Fulbright in North Macedonia, and before that a PhD from Northwestern University. Unofficially, but more relevantly for our purposes, he's been writing up a storm of intellectual but accessible essays over the past few years, for a variety of publications, most often Tablet, where the Chu piece was published. These fall into a few different buckets. One is what I'd call his ongoing project to identify potential intellectual and creative resources for the revivification of liberalism. This has manifested in critical essays on various eminent and obscure European and American intellectuals, including folks like Michel Foucault, Philip Rieff, Judith Shklar, Leo Strauss, Jacob Taubes, Richard Howard, and Roland Barthes. Another bucket is criticism of woke thinking and writing, and a third is his interest in queer theory. His Chu piece falls into both of the latter buckets, although Chu has a complicated relationship to woke. It may overlap with the first too, though that's not as obvious a connection.His Chu piece begins not with Chu herself, but with the archetypal conversion (or transition) story of western civilization, that of Saul of Tarsus, who had a vision of Jesus while on the road to Damascus. He abandoned his Judaism, changed his name to Paul, and dedicated his life to evangelizing for the new faith. Or, in Smith's tart description, he just changed his stripes, remaining “what he had been before—an antagonizing, persecutory self-promoter,” but with a new lexicon of values and a new set of targets. Smith writes:In his letters to churches throughout the Roman Empire, Paul gave an account of himself as being uniquely guilty and abject—the “chief of sinners”—and especially favored by God. In doing so, he created a powerful and enduring model for the way people seek attention and influence in Western culture, from the Confessions of Augustine to the ubiquitous self-narrations of our own moment. Flamboyant rejection of a former life, a lurid picture of its depravity and danger, the wrenching rapture of being overtaken and undone by an outward power, a new self to be declared and recognized by others, new enemies (shadows of the old self) to be exposed and attacked, and a continual staggering back and forth between declarations of one's utter unworthiness and ethical exaltation.One of the most successful contemporary practitioners of this mode of confession, in which a conversion is narrated in a mode of self-abasement and self-aggrandizement, is the essayist Andrea Long Chu. In 2018, Chu, who transitioned from male to female, established her reputation with essays for N+1 and The New York Times on her desire for femininity and her feelings about her new vagina. “Few of us” trans women, she argued, “dare to talk about” the truths she purportedly exposed in these essays—that transition is motivated by fetishistic investment in the most external, sexualized aspects of traditional femininity (“Daisy Dukes, bikini tops, and all the dresses, and, my god, for the breasts”)—and that transitioning had made her more dysphoric and “suicidal.”Chu positioned herself in national publications as declaring hidden truths that other people like herself had been too cowardly to avow. Publications from The Point to The Nation to Vogue interviewed her, and New York magazine has more recently hired her, while scholars devote articles and even special issues of journals to her contributions to gender theory. The most notorious of the latter was her 2019 pamphlet-length book, Females, published with Verso, a press that once had something to do with the left. In Females, Chu worked on two different double registers. She played at once comic and serious, giving herself the right to backtrack her most radical claims as ironic “bits.” She gave, moreover, a reading of Valerie Solanas' SCUM Manifesto (1967) as a statement about the nature of desire as such, for everyone, and as a kind of prefiguring of her own transition. It was as if Chu became the protagonist of Nabokov's novel Pale Fire, who is convinced that a local writer's autobiographical poem is in fact the elaborately allegorized story of his own life. Where Solanas had called for the extermination of men, she took her plan only as far as a failed attempt to murder Andy Warhol. Females ends with Solanas, at a distance of half-a-century, killing another “Andy”—Chu's former, male self. Get full access to Eminent Americans at danieloppenheimer.substack.com/subscribe

Easter Sundays of yore...Emily Ratajkowski has quit acting because men make her feel like a "piece of meat"...Worst weekend of John Leguizamo's life...Crazy nights with 1980's supermodel Janice Dickenson...When men were men and women were men and there was no room for phonies.

President Trump indicted...Biden jokes about chocolate chip ice cream in the face of a school shooting...Creed III actor Jonathan Majors' girlfriend takes the blame for his abusive behavior...Emily Ratajkowski's ex-husband, Sebastian McClard, now has three women accusing him of sexual abuse.

Ryan Seacrest is leaving Live with and Mark Consuelos will be working with his wife, Kelly Ripa.  We asked you if you have or do work with your partner and what it was like?  We'll let you know what's open in this Family Day weekend, tell you what new in theatres, and share new music with you.  Plus Instagram has a new feature, learn how to say Ratajkowski properly, and the Watchlist.

My weird crush on Judge Jeanine Pirro...Open season on Emily Ratajkowski...A synopsis on the Netflix series "Don't Pick Up The Phone."...Tim Robbins comes to his sense regarding Covid mandates...Sean Penn wants all unvaxxed folks to be in prison.

Abonnez-vous

Mia Khalifa on the Emrata podcast: "Any guy who goes after a girl significantly younger than them is severely lacking in their life and I mean that confidence-wise I mean like they are falling short in so many places that that is the only place they can turn to feel like they have they have something on the scale of power" Emily calls the behavior predatory.Mia Khalifa slams men who choose to date women much younger than themhttps://www.ladbible.com/news/mia-khalifa-slams-men-who-choose-to-date-women-much-younger-than-them-20221129 Emily Ratajkowski and Mia Khalifa Dragged for Views on Age Gap Dating https://hypebae.com/2022/11/emily-ratajkowksi-high-low-with-emrata-mia-khalifa-control-age-gap-dating-billie-eilishOlder Men Dating Younger Women: What Does It Mean?Consenting adults come together for many reasons and age isn't always a factor. Older men may fall for younger women and younger women may sometimes prefer to date older men. https://psychcentral.com/relationships/older-men-dating-younger-womenContact KOP for professional podcast production, imaging, and web design services at http://www.kingofpodcasts.comFollow KOP on Twitter, Instagram, TikTok or Facebook @kingofpodcastsSend a question, comment or topic to KOP to kingofpodcasts@yahoo.com and I will talk about it on a future segment of Depraved and Debaucherous.

TESTO DELL'ARTICOLO ➜ www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=7214LA SUPERMODELLA COMPRA LA BAMBOLA AL FIGLIO PER EVITARE CHE GIOCHI CON LE MACCHININE di Giuliano GuzzoIl Natale si avvicina, nelle città fervono i preparativi per addobbi e luminarie e nelle case si inizia a respirare un clima d'attesa. Purtroppo, però, non c'è solo questo. L'Avvento infatti da alcuni anni coincide con una polemica che ciclicamente si ripresenta: quella contro i regali sessualmente tipizzati ai bambini. Bambole rosa alle bimbe e camioncini ai maschietti, assicurano i corifei del pensiero dominante, sarebbero diseducativi, perfino pericolosi; e ormai c'è purtroppo chi ci crede.Una testimonianza al riguardo viene in questi giorni dalle cronache, a proposito della scelta di Emily Ratajkowski, 31 anni, supermodella e attrice statunitense che ha recentemente condiviso una preoccupazione quanto meno originale: il figlioletto Sylvester Apollo, nato nel marzo, gioca molto con i camion, pare gli piacciano proprio. E dove sta il problema, uno si chiederà? In effetti, ciò non costituisce affatto un problema. Eppure, Ratajkowski - che dopo la separazione con il marito, Sebastian Bear-McClard, è una mamma single - lo è.È PAZZESCO, ADORA I CAMIONLo ha detto lei stessa, mentre dialogava nel corso di una recente intervista: «È pazzesco, Sly adora i camion. Si entusiasma così tanto, ama giocare con qualsiasi cosa con le ruote». Di qui la preoccupazione materna, verso quello che evidentemente considera qualcosa di anomalo: «Questa mattina gli ho ordinato una bambola e un servizio da tè perché mi sono detta: "Tutto questo va bilanciato"». «Mi piace l'idea», ha aggiunto la super top model, «di imporre il minor numero possibile di stereotipi di genere su mio figlio».Ora, le contraddizioni delle parole di Emily Ratajkowski sono varie e di massima evidenza. Anzitutto perché se il figlioletto adora i camion - senza che nessuno, tanto meno la madre, lo abbia spinto in tal senso, è evidente come di mezzo non ci sia alcuno stereotipo, bensì una preferenza naturale; in secondo luogo, va rilevato come se una imposizione ci sia è proprio quella della bella modella e attrice nel momento in cui si è messa in tesa di rifilare una bambola e un servizio da tè al piccolo Sylvester Apollo senza che questi ne avesse fatto, a quanto è dato capire, alcuna richiesta.Detto ciò, vale la pena ricordare un aspetto sul tema che evidentemente non solo Ratajkowski ma anche tantissimi altri sembrano ignorare, e cioè che le differenti preferenze, tra maschi e femmine, verso i giocattoli sessualmente tipizzati, ecco, sembrano avere una base biologica. Vanno in questa direzione numerosi elementi, a partire dal fatto che siffatte differenze preferenze insorgono - e si osservano - già nei primi mesi di vita dei piccoli, quando cioè non solo i vituperati stereotipi di genere, ma neppure le conoscenze più elementari sull'esistenza sono state trasmesse ai neonati.I PICCOLI VANNO LASCIATI LIBERINon solo: analoghe differenze sia nelle preferenze dei giocattoli sia, cosa ancora più importante, nello stile di gioco, sono state osservate anche nei primati, animali molto vicini all'uomo ma che, per ovvie ragioni, è difficile immaginare condizionati dagli stereotipi di genere. Ancora, si può aggiungere che se il figlioletto di Emily Ratajkowski avesse avuto - ma non l'ha avuta - una preferenza per le bambole anziché verso «qualsiasi cosa con le ruote», come ha, non ci sarebbe dovuto essere nessun motivo di allarme. Non bisogna infatti confondere le preferenze ludiche, non di rado transitorie, dell'infanzia con l'identità di genere o altro.Ciò che infatti i paladini del pensiero gender si ostinano a non capire, infatti, non è solo che - come si diceva poc'anzi - bambini e bambine spesso e volentieri hanno preferenze diverse nei giochi (senza ciò, letteratura alla mano, abbia chissà quali ricadute negative nell'età adulta), ma anche che, molto semplicemente, i piccoli vanno lasciati liberi. Sì, liberi di divertirsi e di giocare come e con cosa meglio credono, senza imposizioni ideologiche di sorta. L'infanzia, almeno quella, resti libera dalla politica!

"Kim Kardashian strips down as rumors swirl ex Pete Davidson is dating Emily Ratajkowski Kim Kardashian and Pete Davidson split in August after a nine-month relationship Kim Kardashian is leaving little to the imagination amid rumors Pete Davidson and Emily Ratajkowski are dating. Kardashian, 42, t" "--START AD- #TheMummichogblogOfMalta Amazon Top and Flash Deals(Affiliate Link - You will support our translations if you purchase through the following link) - https://amzn.to/3CqsdJH Compare all the top travel sites in just one search to find the best hotel deals at HotelsCombined - awarded world's best hotel price comparison site. (Affiliate Link - You will support our translations if you purchase through the following link) - https://www.hotelscombined.com/?a_aid=20558 “So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets."" #Jesus #Catholic. Smooth Radio Malta is Malta's number one digital radio station, playing Your Relaxing Favourites - Smooth provides a ‘clutter free' mix, appealing to a core 35-59 audience offering soft adult contemporary classics. We operate a playlist of popular tracks which is updated on a regular basis. https://smooth.com.mt/listen/ END AD---" "ook to Instagram Wednesday to promote her new Skims holiday collection. In the images, the reality television star showed some skin in a black rhinestone thong with a matching bralette. She also shared shots wearing the same rhinestone set in the color nude. On Thursday morning, news of Davidson and Ratajkowski's relationship picked up. Wednesday was the ""Saturday Night Live"" star's 29th birthday, and he reportedly spent it with the model. Fans on social media were quick to associate Kim's recent Instagram posts to the news of Davidson moving on. Thursday morning, Kardashian shared throwback images of herself posing in front of a large bouquet of flowers that many are suspecting were gifted to her around her birthday at the end of October. KIM KARDASHIAN, PETE DAVIDSON CALL IT QUITS AFTER NINE MONTHS ""When your ex-boyfriend moves on and you want people to think you did too… stars, they're just like us!"" one user commented. ""Even celebs use social media for sly digs,"" another added. In August, Kim and Pete went their separate ways after a nine-month relationship. Davidson and Kardashian first sparked romance rumors in October last year after they were spotted enjoying time with friends at Knott's Scary Farm Halloween weekend. The outing happened just weeks after Kardashian hosted ""Saturday Night Live."" KIM KARDASHIAN SHARES HER THEORY ON WHY ‘HOT' GIRLS DATE PETE DAVIDSON Earlier this year, Kardashian confirmed Davidson had gotten her name branded on his chest. Davidson sent fans into a tizzy in March when a selfie he sent to Kardashian's estranged husband, Kanye West, appeared to show the name ""Kim"" inked on his chest. Kim Kardashian posed in lingerie on Instagram as rumors swirl Pete Davidson and Emily Ratajkowski are dating. Kim Kardashian posed in lingerie on Instagram as rumors swirl Pete Davidson and Emily Ratajkowski are dating. (Getty Images) ""He has a few tattoos, a few cute ones that he got [for me],"" Kardashian told Ellen DeGeneres at the time. ""But the ‘Kim' one is not actually a tattoo. It's a branding."" CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER In addition to the branding, the comedian also had a tattoo that said ""My girl is a lawyer,"" which Kardashian revealed was her favorite. Davidson has been linked to several A-list stars in Hollywood throughout the years. The comedian made headlines in 2018 for his brief yet highly public engagement to pop singing sensation Ariana Grande after a few weeks of dating. Pete Davidson and Kim Kardashian, pictured here at the White House Correspondents Association gala, broke up after dating nine months. Pete Davidson and Kim Kardashian, pictured here at the White House Correspondents Association gala, broke

Content warning for this episode: we talk about domestic violence, abuse, and harm to children. We will give verbal warnings in the episode before those segments.  Brad Pitt and Emily Ratajkowski have been in the headlines recently for their brief romantic outings, however the narrative Page Six and other tabloids report may not be the whole story. Violence and abuse allegation about Pitt recently revealed in court documents directly oppose Ratajkowski's reputation as a feminist author and content creator. Links:  Emily Ratajkowski, Brad Pitt, 11/16/2022 Emrata latest video [TikTok] Brad Pitt and Emily Ratajkowski 'Have Had a Few Dates': 'There Is an Attraction' (Source) [October 3] [People] Emily Ratajkowski, Sebastian Bear-McClard planning to divorce amid cheating claims [July 15, 2022] [Page Six] Emily Ratajkowski and Sebastian Bear-McClard Split After 4 Years of Marriage: Source [July 18, 2022] [People] Brad Pitt allegedly ‘choked,' hit ‘frightened' kids in Angelina Jolie plane fight [October 4, 2022] [Page Six] Brad Pitt calls Angelina Jolie's latest plane allegations ‘completely untrue' [October 5, 2022] [Page Six] Emily Ratajkowski, Freer Now Than Ever, Gets Candid on TikTok, Britney Spears and What Her New Podcast Has in Common With Joe Rogan's [Variety] Emily Ratajkowski kisses mystery man on NYC date night amid Brad Pitt rumors [Page Six] Emily Ratajkowski Spotted Passionately Kissing New Man After Being Linked to Brad Pitt [People] Here's Where Brad Pitt and Emily Ratajkowski Stand After Her Date Night With Orazio Rispo [E!] cursed Twitter link [Twitter]  About: Hosted by journalists Joan Summers and Matthew Lawson, Eating For Free is a weekly podcast that explores gossip and power in the pop culture landscape: Where it comes from, who wields it, and who suffers at the hands of it. Find out the stories behind the stories, as together they look beyond the headlines of troublesome YouTubers or scandal-ridden A-Listers, and delve deep into the inner workings of Hollywood's favorite pastime. The truth, they've found, is definitely stranger than any gossip. You can also find us on our website, Twitter, and Instagram. Or buy our merch! Any personal, business, or general inquires can be sent to eatingforfreepodcast@gmail.com  Joan Summers: Twitter: @laracroftbarbie Matthew Lawson: Twitter: @_matthewlawson

Casey Anthony blames her father in the death of her daughter. The Grammy nominations are out and PEOPLE's Jeff Nelson shares his favorite snubs and surprises. HGTV's Celebrity IOU season 3 premiere honors the late Leslie Jordan. PEOPLE's Dory Jackson for this week's Heart Monitor to discuss Gisele Bündchen's dating rumors, Pete Davidson and Ratajkowski hitting things off, and why Bachelorette alum Gabby Windey called it quits. For these stories and more, head to PEOPLE.com.Follow on Instagram: Janine Rubenstein - @janinerube Jeff Nelson - @nelson_jeff Dory Jackson - @dory_jackson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

La modelo y actriz Emily Ratajkowski aprovechó el Día internacional para salir del clóset

Jordan Peterson is on drugs...My dinner with Coolio...Chloe Grace Moretz and her Body Dismorphic Disease...Brad Pitt will put a baby in Emily Ratajkowski.

This week the girls chat about a few new fun celebrity updates including our beloved jersey shore cast, family Ratajkowski, and the forever hot Brad Pitt. PS. Praise the Lord Andrew Tate is no longer on Facebook and Instagram

The model, actor and writer views her body as a ‘tool' to make a living – but ever since 2013's Blurred Lines video, it has also been treated as public property. In this interview, Ratajkowski explains why she has written a book about her experiences, from an allegation of assault by Robin Thicke to how motherhood has changed her. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

Emily Ratajkowski has established herself as a multifaceted talent. As a model, she has appeared on the covers of major fashion magazines and is currently the face of L'Oréal's hair care line Kerastase. As an actress, she has appeared in films including David Fincher's Gone Girl and alongside Amy Schumer in I Feel Pretty. Ratajkowski is also outspoken politically, continually using her platform to advocate for her political beliefs, having campaigned for Bernie Sanders in both 2016 and 2020. She joined How To Academy live on stage in London to explore the themes of her essay collection My Body in conversation with journalist and broadcaster Pandora Sykes. Investigating the culture's fetishization fo female beauty and its obsession and contempt for women's sexuality, this is an must-hear discussion for everyone concerned with the dynamics of gender and power in the modern world. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In her book, “My Body,” Emily Ratajkowski reflects on her fraught relationship with the huge number of photographs of her body that have come to define her life and career.Some essays recount the author's hustle as a young model who often found herself in troubling situations with powerful men; another is written as a long, venomous reply to an email from a photographer who has bragged of discovering her. Throughout, Ratajkowski is hoping to set the record straight: She is neither victim nor stooge, neither a cynical collaborator in the male agenda, as her critics have argued, nor some pop-feminist empoweree, as she herself once supposed.To hear more audio stories from publications like The New York Times, download Audm for iPhone or Android.

Emily Ratajkowski is winning in the Instagram era: She has 28.6 million followers and has spent more than half her life making a living as a model. But even at her level of success, she still wonders: When you make a living off your desirability, is the power of your body ever just yours?It's one of the questions she explores in her debut book of essays, “My Body.” Because even now, she's still working to keep her followers' attention. “I want them to see me and look at me and also click the link to read the article that I care about,” she says. She calls Instagram an empowering tool for curating and controlling her narrative. But she also sees how the platform is a “validation machine” that can quickly turn toxic, especially for teenage girls navigating a world shaped by the male gaze.In this conversation, Kara Swisher asks Ratajkowski about why she's chosen to stay in modeling for now, despite the ambivalence she expresses about both the profession and the double-edged sword of beauty. They also discuss how she wishes she could be angrier and why she doesn't regret her appearance in Robin Thicke's “Blurred Lines” music video.This episode contains strong language.You can find more information for all episodes at nytimes.com/sway, and you can find Kara on Twitter @karaswisher.

Emily Ratajkowski is winning in the Instagram era: She has 28.6 million followers and has spent more than half her life making a living as a model. But even at her level of success, she still wonders: When you make a living off your desirability, is the power of your body ever just yours?It's one of the questions she explores in her debut book of essays, “My Body.” Because even now, she's still working to keep her followers' attention. “I want them to see me and look at me and also click the link to read the article that I care about,” she says. She calls Instagram an empowering tool for curating and controlling her narrative. But she also sees how the platform is a “validation machine” that can quickly turn toxic, especially for teenage girls navigating a world shaped by the male gaze.In this conversation, Kara Swisher asks Ratajkowski about why she's chosen to stay in modeling for now, despite the ambivalence she expresses about both the profession and the double-edged sword of beauty. They also discuss how she wishes she could be angrier and why she doesn't regret her appearance in Robin Thicke's “Blurred Lines” music video.This episode contains strong language.You can find more information for all episodes at nytimes.com/sway, and you can find Kara on Twitter @karaswisher.

Emily Ratajkowski is famous in part because she's beautiful — and she's the first to admit that. The model and actor has made a successful career off of her looks, but she's also had to contend with losing ownership and control of her image. Ratajkowski spoke with Tom Power about her first book of essays, My Body, which examines feminism, artistry and the commodification of sexuality.

Hello, my guest today is Emily Ratajkowski, a model, actress, entrepreneur, and writer. She has starred in David Fincher's Gone Girl, among other films and has appeared on the covers of multiple magazines and walked the runway for numerous high fashion brands. Her 2020 essay for New York magazine, "Buying Myself Back," garnered over one million views within twenty-four hours and was the magazine's most-read piece of the year. My Body is her first book, and it's out now, which we discuss the book in this episode. If you enjoyed her piece for New York magazine, you will absolutely love the book. It explores feminism, sexuality, power, men's treatment of women and women's rationalisations. These essays chronicle moments from Ratajkowski's life while investigating the culture we live in and its obsession with and contempt for women's sexuality and the dynamics of the fashion and film industries, and the grey areas when it comes to discussing such topics. Hope you enjoy this conversation!Get your copy of My Body here: https://uk.bookshop.org/a/153/9781529415896Say hello!- My books: https://uk.bookshop.org/lists/my-books-90e08b32-dafc-4517-843a-a7c0cecde865- Twitter: Twitter.com/emmagannon- Instagram: Instagram.com/emmagannonuk See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Model and actress Emily Ratajkowski joins Jess and Zerlina on the show to talk about her new book 'My Body.'My Body is a profoundly personal exploration of feminism, sexuality, and power, of men's treatment of women and women's rationalizations for accepting that treatment. These essays chronicle moments from Ratajkowski's life while investigating the culture's fetishization of girls and female beauty, its obsession with and contempt for women's sexuality, the perverse dynamics of the fashion and film industries, and the grey area between consent and abuse.

Stanno facendo molto discutere negli ultimi giorni le dichiarazioni della modella Emily Ratajkowski: "Quando ci chiedono se speriamo sia maschio o femmina, io e mio marito diciamo che non sapremo il suo genere finché non avrà compiuto 18 anni. Poi ce lo farà sapere".

Mariana Rollman - L'Instagram d'Emily Ratajkowski (2017) Pour ne pas manquer les prochains épisodes de Montreux Comedy Edition Audio, abonnez-vous sur vos lecteurs de podcast favoris. Suivez-nous sur les réseaux sociaux - YouTube : http://bit.ly/YoutubeMCF - Facebook : https://bit.ly/FacebookMCF - Instagram : https://bit.ly/InstagramMCF - Twitter : https://bit.ly/TwitterMCF - TikTok : https://bit.ly/TikTokMCF Plus d'infos et la programmation du Montreux Comedy Festival : http://www.montreuxcomedy.com/fr/

I september publicerede den verdenskendte model Emily Ratajkowski essayet “Buying Myself Back - When does a model own her own image?” i New York Magazine. Hendes skriv tændte debatten på Instagram og Twitter, og modeverdenen var på den anden ende. Emily Ratajkowski beskriver i detaljer, hvordan hun oplevede, at en fotograf udnyttede hende som ung, og langsomt, men sikkert, skubbede hendes grænser. Det er en taktik, den dansk-israelske model Julie Pallesen godt kan genkende. Som helt ung model forsøgte en fransk 40-årig fotograf i en skummel, lille lejlighed uden for Paris at presse Julies grænser til det yderste.

Emily Ratajkowski is a model. In her line of work, her image is not always treated as her own. Ratajkowski wrote an essay for The Cut about the ways her likeness has been bought and sold and separated from her. Now she talks with the Cut host Avery Trufelman about what it’s like to try and take back her own power. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In questo nuovo episodio parliamo della grande questione che da anni divide il mondo del fantasy (in realtà no ma facciamo finta che sia così): quanto conta il fattore culo rispetto alla pura competenza? Vi diamo le nostre opinioni insieme allo sprizzino fortino e concludiamo con le risposte alle vostre domande dal canale Telegram. Let’s Go!

Alabama passes anti-abortion law. Left goes ballistic. Model Emily Ratajkowski poses nude to protest law. Adds some nonsensical rhetoric that sounds straight out of the liberal college classroom. "Our bodies, our choice." "Industrial prison complex." "Patriarchy." But yet this junk resonates with some. You probably knew this, but many apparently don't: Alabama's governor is a woman. No word from Ratajkowski as to why a female governor is trying to further a political patriarchy. Mischaracterizations of legislation by AOC & Left. Attorney General William Barr looking into whether the government tried to "put its thumb on the scale" in 2016 by launching the Russian probe. Comey & Brennan both downplay their role in pushing Russian dossier, point finger at the other. An update on why I've been out. 

Alabama passes anti-abortion law. Left goes ballistic. Model Emily Ratajkowski poses nude to protest law. Adds some nonsensical rhetoric that sounds straight out of the liberal college classroom. "Our bodies, our choice." "Industrial prison complex." "Patriarchy." But yet this junk resonates with some. You probably knew this, but many apparently don't: Alabama's governor is a woman. No word from Ratajkowski as to why a female governor is trying to further a political patriarchy. Mischaracterizations of legislation by AOC & Left. Attorney General William Barr looking into whether the government tried to "put its thumb on the scale" in 2016 by launching the Russian probe. Comey & Brennan both downplay their role in pushing Russian dossier, point finger at the other. An update on why I've been out. 

Alabama passes anti-abortion law. Left goes ballistic. Model Emily Ratajkowski poses nude to protest law. Adds some nonsensical rhetoric that sounds straight out of the liberal college classroom. "Our bodies, our choice." "Industrial prison complex." "Patriarchy." But yet this junk resonates with some. You probably knew this, but many apparently don't: Alabama's governor is a woman. No word from Ratajkowski as to why a female governor is trying to further a political patriarchy. Mischaracterizations of legislation by AOC & Left. Attorney General William Barr looking into whether the government tried to "put its thumb on the scale" in 2016 by launching the Russian probe. Comey & Brennan both downplay their role in pushing Russian dossier, point finger at the other. An update on why I've been out. 

The ladies are joined by special guest Dan Allegretto live in scenic Gowanus.

Set your new blu ray/DVD/Digital HD combo sets up and prepare for the Entourage commentary they didn't want you to hear! Nick and Andrew settle in for 105 minutes of Hollywood glitz and glamour, and the pronunciation of Ratajkowski. We have the details on how scenes came into existence, the celebrity cameos you never knew were involved, the secrets behind Hollywood and Doug Ellin's background performer focus. This is the be-all end-all of info-tainment commentary tracks. If you've enjoyed the 30 episodes of Yellin' 'Bout Ellin, don't forget to tell the hosts on twitter via @EthanRunt so that they can feel good about wasting the last year of their lives.