Podcast appearances and mentions of Roland Barthes

Roland Barthes' «Mythen des Alltags» beschreibt, wie alltägliche Phänomene und Medienbotschaften als Mythen wirken. Sie lassen menschengemachte, historisch gewachsene Bedeutungen als natürliche, unveränderliche Tatsachen erscheinen. So werden gesellschaftliche Ideologien verschleiert und legitimiert. Das Buch versammelt 53 Analysen von Mythen, die Barthes charakteristisch für das alltägliche Leben in Frankreich hält: Wrestling, Tour de France, Wein, Kochen, Reiseführer, Werbung, Arbeiterklasse in den Filmen Charlie Chaplins, Hochzeitsfeiern, das Design von Autos. Barthes versteht sich als Mythologe. Er liest die Mythen als Teil eines umfassenden Zeichensystems und schlägt vor, den Mythos als eine Sprache, eine Rede zu begreifen. Sie kann alles in Mythos verwandeln: die Mathematik ebenso wie das Gehirn Albert Einsteins. Die Mythen sind eine Praxis der Bourgeoisie, die gesellschaftlichen Verhältnisse zu ent-nennen und sie in vermeintliche Natur zu verkehren. Barthes will seine Analyse der «Alltagsmythen» als eine semiologische Demontage der Massenkultur verstanden wissen und als Ideologiekritik. Dabei reicht ihm ein bloßes Anprangern der Ideologie jedoch nicht, die Mythen verhüllen nicht, sie sagen alles und sie reden zu viel. Barthes will mit den Mitteln der Zeichentheorie erfassen, wie Mythen und Ideologeme konstruiert werden, wie also die Klassenkultur des Bürgertums in die universelle Kultur eines «ewigen Menschen» verwandelt wird. Barthes‘ Analysen zielen auf eine Semioklastik überzugehen, also ein Sturm auf die herrschende Produktion von Sinn und Bedeutung und deren Zerstörung. Den Mythen stellt er eine Form von Diskursen entgegen, die nah an der gesellschaftlichen Arbeit die Bedeutung des Realen erzeugen können. Zu Gast bei Alex Demirović ist in dieser Folge die Literaturwissenschaftlerin und Direktorin des Leibniz-Zentrums für Literatur- und Kulturforschung Eva Geulen.

Nous sommes le 15 juin 1955. Si vous vous êtes procuré le journal « Le Monde », voici ce que allez pouvoir lire à propos de la publication du « Voyeur », le deuxième roman d'un jeune auteur appelé Alain Robbe-Grillet. L'article est signé Emile Henriot qui écrit : « J'ai lu deux fois ce diable de bouquin ; non par plaisir, mais pour essayer de comprendre ce qu'il signifie et ce qu'il recèle, ce que l'auteur, mené par son goût du mystère et de la contremarche, a voulu montrer ; et à ma grande honte, je n'y suis point parvenu. Non plus qu'à m'intéresser à cet imbroglio sans signification humaine, véritable casse-tête chinois. Qui ? Où ? Quand ? Comment et pourquoi ?... Les questions classiques de tout enquêteur sont ici sans prise possible, et vous ne pouvez faire fond sur aucun élément désassemblés de cette histoire en elle-même très simple, avant l'arrivée du premier gendarme : la petite fille mangée aux crabes est-elle morte toute seule et par accident ; sinon, qui l'a tuée ? Le marchand de montres, vous ou moi, ou bien quelqu'un d'autre ? Personne n'en sait rien et n'en saura rien. » Heureusement, « Le voyeur » rencontre aussi des soutiens comme celui de Roland Barthes, et sera, finalement, récompensé par le prix des Critiques. Nous sommes au début d'une des aventures littéraires les plus passionnantes du vingtième siècle, elle va se confondre avec celle du Nouveau Roman, une expérience humaine hors du commun aussi, celle d'Alain Robbe-Grillet. Invité : Benoît Peeters, écrivain, critique, scénariste de BD. « Alain Robbe-Grillet – L'Aventure du Nouveau Roman » ; Flammarion + « Réinventer le roman », entretiens inédits avec ARG. Sujets traités : Alain Robbe-Grillet, romancier, cinéaste, littérature, Roland Barthes, Merci pour votre écoute Un Jour dans l'Histoire, c'est également en direct tous les jours de la semaine de 13h15 à 14h30 sur www.rtbf.be/lapremiere Retrouvez tous les épisodes d'Un Jour dans l'Histoire sur notre plateforme Auvio.be :https://auvio.rtbf.be/emission/5936 Intéressés par l'histoire ? Vous pourriez également aimer nos autres podcasts : L'Histoire Continue: https://audmns.com/kSbpELwL'heure H : https://audmns.com/YagLLiKEt sa version à écouter en famille : La Mini Heure H https://audmns.com/YagLLiKAinsi que nos séries historiques :Chili, le Pays de mes Histoires : https://audmns.com/XHbnevhD-Day : https://audmns.com/JWRdPYIJoséphine Baker : https://audmns.com/wCfhoEwLa folle histoire de l'aviation : https://audmns.com/xAWjyWCLes Jeux Olympiques, l'étonnant miroir de notre Histoire : https://audmns.com/ZEIihzZMarguerite, la Voix d'une Résistante : https://audmns.com/zFDehnENapoléon, le crépuscule de l'Aigle : https://audmns.com/DcdnIUnUn Jour dans le Sport : https://audmns.com/xXlkHMHSous le sable des Pyramides : https://audmns.com/rXfVppvN'oubliez pas de vous y abonner pour ne rien manquer.Et si vous avez apprécié ce podcast, n'hésitez pas à nous donner des étoiles ou des commentaires, cela nous aide à le faire connaître plus largement. Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Playlist de Philippe Poirier pour webSYNradio avec trois de ses compositions entremêlés des sons de David Garland, Christopher Hobbs, Carlos Gardel, Philip Glass, Elvis Presley, Isidore Isou, Eric Satie, kristin Oppenheim, Sonic Youth, David Toop, Morton Feldman, Brooks Williams, Dariush Dolat-Shahi, Marcel Broodthaers. Les morceaux choisis (pas tous) suivent un certain sentiment de la voix. Celle-ci s'exprime ici parfois de façon affirmée, parfois à peine incarnée, chantant ou parlant, d'un lieu où tous les mots ont été dits. Ces voix évoquent, à leur manière, le fameux texte où Roland Barthes rapporte les propos de Panzera, son maître de chant, faisant la distinction entre l'articulation et la prononciation. Avec l'articulation, dit Barthes, « la langue se met en avant, elle est le fâcheux, le casse-pieds de la musique ; dans l'art de la prononciation au contraire (celui de Panzera), c'est la musique qui vient dans la langue et retrouve ce qu'il y a en elle de musical, d'amoureux.

durée : 00:19:14 - Lectures du soir - "Gide lisait du Bossuet en descendant le Congo, cette posture résume assez bien l'idéal de nos écrivains en vacances photographiés par Le Figaro. Joindre aux loisirs banals, le prestige d'une vocation que rien ne peut arrêter, ni dégrader."

durée : 00:20:04 - Lectures du soir - "La justice est ce corps d'une transgression possible. C'est parce qu'il y a une loi que le spectacle des passions qui la débordent a tout son prix."

durée : 00:17:35 - Lectures du soir - " Paris Match nous a raconté une histoire qui en dit long sur le mythe petit-bourgeois du nègre. La science va vite et droit en son chemin mais les représentations collectives ne suivent pas, maintenues stagnantes dans l'erreur par le pouvoir, la grande presse et les valeurs d'ordre. "

durée : 00:20:33 - Lectures du soir - "Le strip-tease est fondé sur une contradiction : désexualiser la femme dans le moment même où on la dénude. Comme si l'érotisme restait ici une sorte de terreur délicieuse dont il suffit d'annoncer les signes rituels pour provoquer à la fois l'idée de sexe et sa conjuration."

durée : 00:19:38 - Lectures du soir - "Le mystère des soucoupes volantes a d'abord été tout terrestre, on supposait que la soucoupe venait de l'inconnu soviétique, de ce monde aussi privé d'intentions claires qu'une autre planète… "

Hello Interactors,This week, the European Space Agency launched a satellite to "weigh" Earth's 1.5 trillion trees. It will give scientists deeper insight into forests and their role in the climate — far beyond surface readings. Pretty cool. And it's coming from Europe.Meanwhile, I learned that the U.S. Secretary of Defense — under Trump — had a makeup room installed in the Pentagon to look better on TV. Also pretty cool, I guess. And very American.The contrast was hard to miss. Even with better data, the U.S. shows little appetite for using geographic insight to actually address climate change. Information is growing. Willpower, not so much.So it was oddly clarifying to read a passage Christopher Hobson posted on Imperfect Notes from a book titled America by a French author — a travelogue of softs. Last week I offered new lenses through which to see the world, I figured I'd try this French pair on — to see America, and the world it effects, as he did.PAPER, POWER, AND PROJECTIONI still have a folded paper map of Seattle in the door of my car. It's a remnant of a time when physical maps reflected the reality before us. You unfolded a map and it innocently offered the physical world on a page. The rest was left to you — including knowing how to fold it up again.But even then, not all maps were neutral or necessarily innocent. Sure, they crowned capitals and trimmed borders, but they could also leave things out or would make certain claims. From empire to colony, from mission to market, maps often arrived not to reflect place, but to declare control of it. Still, we trusted it…even if was an illusion.I learned how to interrogate maps in my undergraduate history of cartography class — taught by the legendary cartographer Waldo Tobler. But even with that knowledge, when I was then taught how to make maps, that interrogation was more absent. I confidently believed I was mediating truth. The lines and symbols I used pointed to substance; they signaled a thing. I traced rivers from existing base maps with a pen on vellum and trusted they existed in the world as sure as the ink on the page. I cut out shading for a choropleth map and believed it told a stable story about population, vegetation, or economics. That trust was embodied in representation — the idea that a sign meant something enduring. That we could believe what maps told us.This is the world of semiotics — the study of how signs create meaning. American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce offered a sturdy model: a sign (like a map line) refers to an object (the river), and its meaning emerges in interpretation. Meaning, in this view, is relational — but grounded. A stop sign, a national anthem, a border — they meant something because they pointed beyond themselves, to a world we shared.But there are cracks in this seemingly sturdy model.These cracks pose this question: why do we trust signs in the first place? That trust — in maps, in categories, in data — didn't emerge from neutrality. It was built atop agendas.Take the first U.S. census in 1790. It didn't just count — it defined. Categories like “free white persons,” “all other free persons,” and “slaves” weren't neutral. They were political tools, shaping who mattered and by how much. People became variables. Representation became abstraction.Or Carl Linnaeus, the 18th-century Swedish botanist who built the taxonomies we still use: genus, species, kingdom. His system claimed objectivity but was shaped by distance and empire. Linnaeus never left Sweden. He named what he hadn't seen, classified people he'd never met — sorting humans into racial types based on colonial stereotypes. These weren't observations. They were projections based on stereotypes gathered from travelers, missionaries, and imperial officials.Naming replaced knowing. Life was turned into labels. Biology became filing. And once abstracted, it all became governable, measurable, comparable, and, ultimately, manageable.Maps followed suit.What once lived as a symbolic invitation — a drawing of place — became a system of location. I was studying geography at a time (and place) when Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and GIScience was transforming cartography. Maps weren't just about visual representations; they were spatial databases. Rows, columns, attributes, and calculations took the place of lines and shapes on map. Drawing what we saw turned to abstracting what could then be computed so that it could then be visualized, yes, but also managed.Chris Perkins, writing on the philosophy of mapping, argued that digital cartographies didn't just depict the world — they constituted it. The map was no longer a surface to interpret, but a script to execute. As critical geographers Sam Hind and Alex Gekker argue, the modern “mapping impulse” isn't about understanding space — it's about optimizing behavior through it; in a world of GPS and vehicle automation, the map no longer describes the territory, it becomes it. Laura Roberts, writing on film and geography, showed how maps had fused with cinematic logic — where places aren't shown, but performed. Place and navigation became narrative. New York in cinema isn't a place — it's a performance of ambition, alienation, or energy. Geography as mise-en-scène.In other words, the map's loss of innocence wasn't just technical. It was ontological — a shift in the very nature of what maps are and what kind of reality they claim to represent. Geography itself had entered the domain of simulation — not representing space but staging it. You can simulate traveling anywhere in the world, all staged on Google maps. Last summer my son stepped off the train in Edinburgh, Scotland for the first time in his life but knew exactly where he was. He'd learned it driving on simulated streets in a simulated car on XBox. He walked us straight to our lodging.These shifts in reality over centuries weren't necessarily mistakes. They unfolded, emerged, or evolved through the rational tools of modernity — and for a time, they worked. For many, anyway. Especially for those in power, seeking power, or benefitting from it. They enabled trade, governance, development, and especially warfare. But with every shift came this question: at what cost?FROM SIGNS TO SPECTACLEAs early as the early 1900s, Max Weber warned of a world disenchanted by bureaucracy — a society where rationalization would trap the human spirit in what he called an iron cage. By mid-century, thinkers pushed this further.Michel Foucault revealed how systems of knowledge — from medicine to criminal justice — were entangled with systems of power. To classify was to control. To represent was to discipline. Roland Barthes dissected the semiotics of everyday life — showing how ads, recipes, clothing, even professional wrestling were soaked in signs pretending to be natural.Guy Debord, in the 1967 The Society of the Spectacle, argued that late capitalism had fully replaced lived experience with imagery. “The spectacle,” he wrote, “is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images.”Then came Jean Baudrillard — a French sociologist, media theorist, and provocateur — who pushed the critique of representation to its limit. In the 1980s, where others saw distortion, he saw substitution: signs that no longer referred to anything real. Most vividly, in his surreal, gleaming 1986 travelogue America, he described the U.S. not as a place, but as a performance — a projection without depth, still somehow running.Where Foucault showed that knowledge was power, and Debord showed that images replaced life, Baudrillard argued that signs had broken free altogether. A map might once distort or simplify — but it still referred to something real. By the late 20th century, he argued, signs no longer pointed to anything. They pointed only to each other.You didn't just visit Disneyland. You visited the idea of America — manufactured, rehearsed, rendered. You didn't just use money. You used confidence by handing over a credit card — a symbol of wealth that is lighter and moves faster than any gold.In some ways, he was updating a much older insight by another Frenchman. When Alexis de Tocqueville visited America in the 1830s, he wasn't just studying law or government — he was studying performance. He saw how Americans staged democracy, how rituals of voting and speech created the image of a free society even as inequality and exclusion thrived beneath it. Tocqueville wasn't cynical. He simply understood that America believed in its own image — and that belief gave it a kind of sovereign feedback loop.Baudrillard called this condition simulation — when representation becomes self-contained. When the distinction between real and fake no longer matters because everything is performance. Not deception — orchestration.He mapped four stages of this logic:* Faithful representation – A sign reflects a basic reality. A map mirrors the terrain.* Perversion of reality – The sign begins to distort. Think colonial maps as logos or exclusionary zoning.* Pretending to represent – The sign no longer refers to anything but performs as if it does. Disneyland isn't America — it's the fantasy of America. (ironically, a car-free America)* Pure simulation – The sign has no origin or anchor. It floats. Zillow heatmaps, Uber surge zones — maps that don't reflect the world, but determine how you move through it.We don't follow maps as they were once known anymore. We follow interfaces.And not just in apps. Cities themselves are in various stages of simulation. New York still sells itself as a global center. But in a distributed globalized and digitized economy, there is no center — only the perversion of an old reality. Paris subsidizes quaint storefronts not to nourish citizens, but to preserve the perceived image of Paris. Paris pretending to be Paris. Every city has its own marketing campaign. They don't manage infrastructure — they manage perception. The skyline is a product shot. The streetscape is marketing collateral and neighborhoods are optimized for search.Even money plays this game.The U.S. dollar wasn't always king. That title once belonged to the British pound — backed by empire, gold, and industry. After World War II, the dollar took over, pegged to gold under the Bretton Woods convention — a symbol of American postwar power stability…and perversion. It was forged in an opulent, exclusive, hotel in the mountains of New Hampshire. But designed in the style of Spanish Renaissance Revival, it was pretending to be in Spain. Then in 1971, Nixon snapped the dollar's gold tether. The ‘Nixon Shock' allowed the dollar to float — its value now based not on metal, but on trust. It became less a store of value than a vessel of belief. A belief that is being challenged today in ways that recall the instability and fragmentation of the pre-WWII era.And this dollar lives in servers, not Industrial Age iron vaults. It circulates as code, not coin. It underwrites markets, wars, and global finance through momentum alone. And when the pandemic hit, there was no digging into reserves.The Federal Reserve expanded its balance sheet with keystrokes — injecting trillions into the economy through bond purchases, emergency loans, and direct payments. But at the same time, Trump 1.0 showed printing presses rolling, stacks of fresh bills bundled and boxed — a spectacle of liquidity. It was monetary policy as theater. A simulation of control, staged in spreadsheets by the Fed and photo ops by the Executive Branch. Not to reflect value, but to project it. To keep liquidity flowing and to keep the belief intact.This is what Baudrillard meant by simulation. The sign doesn't lie — nor does it tell the truth. It just works — as long as we accept it.MOOD OVER MEANINGReality is getting harder to discern. We believe it to be solid — that it imposes friction. A law has consequences. A price reflects value. A city has limits. These things made sense because they resist us. Because they are real.But maybe that was just the story we told. Maybe it was always more mirage than mirror.Now, the signs don't just point to reality — they also replace it. We live in a world where the image outpaces the institution. Where the copy is smoother than the original. Where AI does the typing. Where meaning doesn't emerge — it arrives prepackaged and pre-viral. It's a kind of seductive deception. It's hyperreality where performance supersedes substance. Presence and posture become authority structured in style.Politics is not immune to this — it's become the main attraction.Trump's first 100 days didn't aim to stabilize or legislate but to signal. Deportation as UFC cage match — staged, brutal, and televised. Tariff wars as a way of branding power — chaos with a catchphrase. Climate retreat cast as perverse theater. Gender redefined and confined by executive memo. Birthright citizenship challenged while sedition pardoned. Even the Gulf of Mexico got renamed. These aren't policies, they're productions.Power isn't passing through law. It's passing through the affect of spectacle and a feed refresh.Baudrillard once wrote that America doesn't govern — it narrates. Trump doesn't manage policy, he manages mood. Like an actor. When America's Secretary of Defense, a former TV personality, has a makeup studio installed inside the Pentagon it's not satire. It's just the simulation, doing what it does best: shining under the lights.But this logic runs deeper than any single figure.Culture no longer unfolds. It reloads. We don't listen to the full album — we lift 10 seconds for TikTok. Music is made for algorithms. Fashion is filtered before it's worn. Selfhood is a brand channel. Identity is something to monetize, signal, or defend — often all at once.The economy floats too. Meme stocks. NFTs. Speculative tokens. These aren't based in value — they're based in velocity. Attention becomes the currency.What matters isn't what's true, but what trends. In hyperreality, reference gives way to rhythm. The point isn't to be accurate. The point is to circulate. We're not being lied to.We're being engaged. And this isn't a bug, it's a feature.Which through a Baudrillard lens is why America — the simulation — persists.He saw it early. Describing strip malls, highways, slogans, themed diners he saw an America that wasn't deep. That was its genius he saw. It was light, fast paced, and projected. Like the movies it so famously exports. It didn't need justification — it just needed repetition.And it's still repeating.Las Vegas is the cathedral of the logic of simulation — a city that no longer bothers pretending. But it's not alone. Every city performs, every nation tries to brand itself. Every policy rollout is scored like a product launch. Reality isn't navigated — it's streamed.And yet since his writing, the mood has shifted. The performance continues, but the music underneath it has changed. The techno-optimism of Baudrillard's ‘80s an ‘90s have curdled. What once felt expansive now feels recursive and worn. It's like a show running long after the audience has gone home. The rager has ended, but Spotify is still loudly streaming through the speakers.“The Kids' Guide to the Internet” (1997), produced by Diamond Entertainment and starring the unnervingly wholesome Jamison family. It captures a moment of pure techno-optimism — when the Internet was new, clean, and family-approved. It's not just a tutorial; it's a time capsule of belief, staged before the dream turned into something else. Before the feed began to feed on us.Trumpism thrives on this terrain. And yet the world is changing around it. Climate shocks, mass displacement, spiraling inequality — the polycrisis has a body count. Countries once anchored to American leadership are squinting hard now, trying to see if there's anything left behind the screen. Adjusting the antenna in hopes of getting a clearer signal. From Latin America to Southeast Asia to Europe, the question grows louder: Can you trust a power that no longer refers to anything outside itself?Maybe Baudrillard and Tocqueville are right — America doesn't point to a deeper truth. It points to itself. Again and again and again. It is the loop. And even now, knowing this, we can't quite stop watching. There's a reason we keep refreshing. Keep scrolling. Keep reacting. The performance persists — not necessarily because we believe in it, but because it's the only script still running.And whether we're horrified or entertained, complicit or exhausted, engaged or ghosted, hired or fired, immigrated or deported, one thing remains strangely true: we keep feeding it. That's the strange power of simulation in an attention economy. It doesn't need conviction. It doesn't need conscience. It just needs attention — enough to keep the momentum alive. The simulation doesn't care if the real breaks down. It just keeps rendering — soft, seamless, and impossible to look away from. Like a dream you didn't choose but can't wake up from.REFERENCESBarthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1957)Baudrillard, J. (1986). America (C. Turner, Trans.). Verso.Debord, G. (1994). The Society of the Spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Zone Books. (Original work published 1967)Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.Hind, S., & Gekker, A. (2019). On autopilot: Towards a flat ontology of vehicular navigation. In C. Lukinbeal et al. (Eds.), Media's Mapping Impulse. Franz Steiner Verlag.Linnaeus, C. (1735). Systema Naturae (1st ed.). Lugduni Batavorum.Perkins, C. (2009). Philosophy and mapping. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier.Raaphorst, K., Duchhart, I., & van der Knaap, W. (2017). The semiotics of landscape design communication. Landscape Research.Roberts, L. (2008). Cinematic cartography: Movies, maps and the consumption of place. In R. Koeck & L. Roberts (Eds.), Cities in Film: Architecture, Urban Space and the Moving Image. University of Liverpool.Tocqueville, A. de. (2003). Democracy in America (G. Lawrence, Trans., H. Mansfield & D. Winthrop, Eds.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1835)Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Charles Scribner's Sons. (Original work published 1905) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit interplace.io

La balado accueille une nouvelle collaboratrice: Marie-Elaine Guay qui réfléchit au concept de militantisme et de la dangerosité de la neutralité. Godefroy Laurendeau nous offre pour sa part une chronique en roue libre où il se permet même une intrusion en économie! En 2ème portion d'épisode,  on discute de l'importance des librairies (qui sont au coeur du dernier # de Lettres Québécoises) avec la co-rédactrice en chef de la revue Mégane Desrosiers ainsi que Léa, membre de la coop de solidarité  l'Euguélionne.

durée : 00:19:50 - Lectures du soir - "L'affaire Minou Drouet s'est présentée pendant longtemps comme une énigme policière. Est-ce elle ou n'est-ce pas elle ? On a appliqué à ce mystère les techniques habituelles de la police, moins la torture, et encore "

durée : 00:19:46 - Lectures du soir - "Le bifteck participe de la même mythologie sanguine que le vin, c'est le cœur de la viande, c'est la viande à l'état pur, et quiconque en prend s'assimile la force taurine. De toute évidence, le prestige du bifteck tient à sa quasi crudité."

durée : 00:16:22 - Lectures du soir - "Le photographe surconstruit presque toujours l'horreur qu'il nous propose, ajoutant aux faits, par des contrastes ou des rapprochements, le langage intentionnel de l'horreur. "

durée : 00:19:00 - Lectures du soir - "Garbo appartient encore à ce moment du cinéma où la saisie du visage humain jetait les foules dans le plus grand trouble, où l'on se perdait littéralement dans une image humaine comme dans un filtre où le visage constituait une sorte d'état absolu de la chair."

durée : 00:20:21 - Lectures du soir - " Le Tour dispose d'une véritable géographie homérique. Comme dans l'Odyssée, la course est ici à la fois périple d'épreuves et exploration totale des limites terrestres. "

Varför försonas med en våldsverkare som rånar oss? När det gäller döden står Elisabeth Hjorth står inte på samma sida som historiens vise mäns. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna.När jag studerade teologi cirkulerade ett skämt mellan de blivande prästerna, om en begravningsannons för någon som blivit åttiofem år. Efter de sörjandes namn i annonsen stod ett enda ord: Varför? Åttiofem år och vad hände med devisen good enough? Sedan länge förskonat från krig, svält och hög barnadödlighet överskrider medellivslängden i Sverige vissa andra länders med mer än trettio år. Samtidigt finns det många som vill förlänga livet ytterligare. Inom gerovetenskapen, eller åldersforskningen, studeras olika sätt att genom levnadsvanor och på medicinteknisk väg skjuta fram såväl åldrande som död. Att acceptera sin utmätta tid på jorden förespråkade redan Lucretius. I dikten ”Dödsfruktan är dårskap” listar han ett antal argument till dödens favör som 2000 år senare känns igen. Inklusive att det blir tråkigt att leva för länge och att jorden riskerar att bli överbefolkad om ingen dör. Myter och berättelser, från Gilgamesh till Harry Potter, understryker budskapet. Memento mori, kom ihåg att du ska dö. Godta det, annars riskerar du att förvandlas till en eländig Gollum på botten av världen. En som inte hade skrattat åt de anhörigas ”varför?” är filosofen Patrick Linden, som diskuterar den filosofiska frågan om döden som sådan. Är döden en meningsfull del av livet eller ett ont som ska bekämpas? Lindens bok Mot döden är en vidräkning med dödens alla försvarare, dit de flesta av historiens stora tänkare räknas. Sokrates, Buddha, Marcus Aurelius, alla förespråkade de att acceptera och bejaka slutet. Lindens samtida kollega Martin Hägglund hävdar att vi endast genom att erkänna döden kan känna att livet står på spel. Utan risken att förlora skulle vi inte riktigt bry oss, varken om oss själva eller dem vi älskar. Men det är precis tvärtom, menar Linden, så länge vi har något vackert att förlora har vi all anledning att frukta och motarbeta döden. Till skillnad från Linden kan jag inte föreställa mig ett globalt samförstånd kring visionen om evig ungdom. Mer realistiskt är ett cyniskt krig om resurser som redan är orättvist fördelade. Däremot sympatiserar jag med passionen, den frenesi med vilken Linden attackerar sin ärkefiende. Han vägrar försonas med döden. Trots att han vet att det betraktas som barnsligt, egoistiskt och ofilosofiskt. Jag misstänker att han tillhör dem av oss som tänker på döden varje dag och sannerligen inte behöver påminnas en extra gång. För det är något med döden som snarare får det att brinna bakom ögonen än att klokt nicka i takt med historiens vise män. Döden är ju en våldsverkare. Döden är ett rån och en skymf mot allt levande. Varför all denna kärlek, spirande omsorg, innerliga närhet till det som ändå ska ryckas bort? Det verkar inte riktigt klokt. Stjärnhimlen eller havet eller linjerna i den älskades ansikte blir väl inte vackrare för att döden finns? Min väns far är mycket sjuk. Jag möter henne under striderna om vårdbehoven, i sorgearbetet som redan pågår. Frustrationen över att alla insatser riktas mot kroppens behov fast själen fortfarande har sin längtan. Döendets brutalitet och skuggan av det förestående. Sedan kommer döden och med den sorgen som ingen egentligen kan förbereda sig på. En utomstående måste träda mycket försiktigt runt detta tomrum, av respekt för kärleken och för det oersättliga ljus som försvunnit. Att citera någon av dödens alla försvarare vore hemskt. Om inte ett enda av de stora tänkarnas råd fungerar i situationen, vad har de då för legitimitet? Författarna har ibland en mer antagonistisk relation till döden än filosoferna. Sara Lidman, till exempel, ville inte höra talas om dödens hemlighetsfulla mening eller något inneboende gott i smärtan. Det är livet samman med en levande älskad som är det goda, skriver hon. Mot alternativet måste man protestera. ”Jag har inte kunnat ta mig an något annat än döden och försvaret mot döden”, sa författaren Birgitta Trotzig i ett tal och sällade sig till dödens fiender. Ibland påstås att det finns en utbredd ”beröringsskräck inför döden” i samtiden. Det är en märklig anklagelse. Vem blir inte skräckslagen när döden snuddar vid en? Enligt Linden är de som känner sig längst från döden också de som har lättast att acceptera den. Det är naturligt att känna sig odödlig, skrev Roland Barthes, tills man en dag inte gör det. Tills man, som han själv, en dag kliver ut i gatan och blir överraskad av en tvättbil som på ett ögonblick förvandlar livet till ett farväl.Det finns författare som inte är så upproriska mot döden. Niklas Rådström skriver vackert i dödens absoluta närhet, om döden som en försynt men nitisk bibliotekarie. Också inför en sådan erfarenhet går det bara att böja sig, förundrat. En mjuk tilltro som bebor en människa som slutit fred med döden. Min väns far levde sitt hela liv i kyrkan, han var politiskt engagerad, filosofiskt bevandrad. Ändå ansåg han att döden var fullkomligt värdelös, ett oskick. Det är logiskt, säger jag till min vän. Hatet mot döden är en stor poäng med kristendomen. ”Du död, var är din seger, var är din udd?” som det försmädligt står i första Korinthierbrevet. Denna fiendskap riskerar att förlora sin radikalitet om religionen blott syftar till att terapeutiskt hantera och acceptera dödens faktum. I en tid då de svåraste erfarenheterna ska bemästras så att livet kan fortlöpa smidigt för alla har det inte blivit mindre angeläget att bespotta döden sedan den tidiga kristendomen. Tvärtom. Uppståndelse och återförening är för den som inte kan acceptera livets slutliga nederlag. Som finner tanken att bottenlöst lidande skulle uppvägas av stunder av nåd eller hela decennier av oförtjänt välmåga alltför bisarr. För döden är djupt orättvis; den slår hårdast mot den fattiga, osynliggjorda och tystade. Att tro på ett liv före döden måste innebära att bekämpa dödens orättvisa utfall. Att också tro på ett liv efter är väl inget annat än att vid maktlöshetens gräns hoppas på det oerhörda, att döden till sist blir plundrad på sitt byte. Säkert kan livet bli lättare för någon som kontemplerar dödens nödvändighet. Men att acceptera existentiell ensamhet, sin otillräcklighet eller sårbarhet är något annat än att böja sig för döden själv. Viktigare än att lära sig dö rätt är kanske att lära sig varsamhet kring förlustens erfarenhet, att inte dra sig undan eller förminska de sår som döden orsakar de levande. Min väns far godtog aldrig döden och det tröstar mig på något sätt att han höll ut i denna oförsonlighet. När vi, om Gud vill, ses på den andra sidan ska jag säga det till honom. Elisabeth Hjorthförfattare och professor i litterär gestaltningLitteraturPatrick Linden: Mot döden. En radikalt livsbejakande filosofi. Volante, 2024.

durée : 00:26:47 - Les saveurs du Pays Basque - Le Carreau des Halles et l'Esplanade Roland Barthes à Bayonne accueillent la Foire au Jambon. Entre concours fermier, salaisonniers passionnés et traditions basques, ces lieux vibrent au rythme d'un patrimoine gourmand transmis avec ferveur.

¿Que retos tiene el lenguaje para nuestros procesos y creaciones artísticas?Retomamos la vieja discusión de la forma y el fondo, esta vez desde la perspectiva del ensayo De la obra al texto de Roland Barthes. ¿Quieres una asesoría para tu proyecto? https://www.pensarlaimagen.com/asesoria-para-artistas-visuales Únete al PATRONATO de Pensar la imagen https://www.patreon.com/pensarlaimagen/membership Curso de PROFESIONALIZACIÓN PARA ARTISTAS PRO https://www.pensarlaimagen.com/curso-de-artista-profesional-integral También estamos en Instagram.com/podcastpensarlaimagen twitter.com/pensarlaimagen Tiktok.com/podcastpensarlaimagen #artecontemporáneo #arte #autor #Contemporaryart #podcastpensarlaimagen #artistas

Ihanteellinen sivistys on pelkkää lempeää kaunopuheista vuodatusta, sanataidetta, joka osoittaa sielun hetkellisesti liikuttuneen. Näin ironisoi esseisti Roland Barthes ajattelua, joka tyytyy tunteellisuuteen. Päivän mietelause on poiminta Barthesin teoksesta Mytologioita. Sen on suomentanut Panu Minkkinen. Mietelauseen on valinnut Jakke Holvas. Lukijana Maaria Holma.

We're talking resistance, joy, and queer communities with Brenda Shaughnessy!Please Support Breaking Form!Review the show on Apple Podcasts here.Aaron's STOP LYING is available from the Pitt Poetry Series.James's ROMANTIC COMEDY is available from Four Way Books.NOTES:Click here for Brenda's Queer Resistance Playlist 2025 (Spotify).Check out Brenda's poem "Panopticon" from Interior with Sudden Joy.Visit Brenda Shaughnessy's website . And hear her read from her newest book, Tanya here. Read more about UC Santa Cruz closing the Feminist Studies Dept here. Read more about Maria RessaFor more about Roland Barthes's contribution to literary criticism, read here.While dated, here's a list of creative writing programs that are LGBTQ+ friendly. Read more about Bettina ApthekerRead more about Donna J. HarawayRead on for more about the clubs Brenda mentions: Meow Mix, Clit Club, Henrietta Hudson (still open!), Pandora's Box, and more.Read more about Angela Davis's work here.For more about Wendy Brown, read her Guggenheim citation here.You can learn more about Allan Bérubé here. Learn more about the incredible Urvashi Vaid here.Watch/listen to Cécile McLorin Salvant's "Until" here. Read more about Kate Clinton on her website here.For more about Teresa de Lauretis, click here. 

En este podcast nos adentramos en los fascinantes orígenes y la evolución de la teoría fotográfica, un viaje que ha transformado la manera en que capturamos y entendemos la luz, la imagen y la realidad misma. Desde los primeros experimentos con la cámara oscura hasta el desarrollo de la fotografía digital, exploramos cómo los grandes pensadores y científicos como Nicéphore Niépce, George Eastman y Roland Barthes han influido en las ideas y conceptos que hoy definen nuestra comprensión de la imagen fotográfica. Analizaremos cómo la teoría fotográfica ha ido de la mano con los avances técnicos, así como las implicaciones filosóficas y culturales de la fotografía a lo largo del tiempo. Si eres un amante de la fotografía o simplemente te intriga cómo se ha desarrollado el pensamiento sobre esta poderosa herramienta visual, este podcast es para ti.

Relationen mellan Marguerite Duras och den nästan fyrtio år yngre Yann Andréa var inte okomplicerad. Men stark. Elisabeth Hjorth skildrar deras möte. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna. Essän sändes för första gången den 4 maj 2017.En bar. Ganska elegant, trevlig. En man och en kvinna sitter vid ett av borden. Han är vacker, olycksbådande. Kvinnan har åldrats, hon måste fortfarande älskas. Någon betraktar paret, det finns alltid en betraktare. Betraktaren är jag.När Marguerite Duras och hennes följeslagare Yann Andréa möts första gången är hon en erfaren författare och han en bedrövad ung man. Det är i alla fall så mötet gestaltas i hennes sena roman ”Yann Andréa Steiner”.1980 börjar järnridån ska i sina grundvalar av de strejkande arbetarna i Gdansk. Duras placerar mötet med Yann i denna politiska kontext, i ett Europa sargat av minnen och förtryck. Hon har ännu inte skrivit ”Älskaren” som ska ge henne läsare över hela världen och som hon själv kallar en flygplatsroman hon skrev när hon var full. Hon har haft framgångar med sina filmer men skrivandet har gått i stå. Ensamheten i det stora huset vid Atlanten är stor som Europas ensamhet. Det är nu som hon möter en 38 år yngre man och de inleder ett beroende av varandra lika starkt som beroendet av alkoholen och skrivandet.Marguerite Duras film ”India Song” visas på en liten biograf i staden där Yann bor. Efteråt går de till en bar. Det är Yann, hans filosofistuderande kompisar och så Marguerite. Hon dricker två whisky och han följer henne till parkeringen där hennes Renault 16 står. Han frågar om hon har några älskare. Hon säger: ”Inte nu längre”. Han frågar hur snabbt hon kör. Hon svarar: ”I 140, liksom alla som har en R16”.Yann börjar skriva till Marguerite. Han älskar henne redan, så som man älskar en författare för böckerna hon skrivit, för att de handlar om en själv. Det är korta brev, små biljetter nästan. Marguerite svarar inte, men hon sparar Yanns rader. Sedan ska hon säga att de är det bästa han har åstadkommit i textväg. Sedan ska hon säga att hon tyckte om rösten i breven, den som skulle bli rösten i hennes liv.När breven slutar komma blir Marguerite nervös. Hon är redan beroende av dem. Varför har han tystnat? Hon kan inte tro att han förlorat intresset, kanske har han dött? Hon skriver tillbaka och kontakten återupptas. En dag ringer Yann för att tala om att han kommer på besök. ”När kommer ni?”, frågar hon. ”Imorgon klockan elva”, svarar han.Det är så det går till när Duras gör Yann till litteratur. Det är inte första gången, och han är inte den ende. I Duras böcker rör sig människorna i hennes liv ständigt. De blir mytiska och främmande, antar nya former, byter namn och historier med varandra.En ny bar, den liknar den första. Bara en annan stad, de har kört hela dagen. Mest av allt älskar mannen och kvinnan att åka i bilen tillsammans. Att stanna på en bar eller ett café och hitta på historier om människorna de ser.När Yann väl anlänt med bussen den där dagen stannade han kvar till Marguerite Duras död sexton år senare. Han blev hennes musa, hennes assistent, hennes beskyddare. Han renskrev hennes bilder av deras gemensamma tillvaro, han räddade kanske hennes liv. Hon var ensam, hon drack. Hon behövde en vän, men hävdar envist att Yann var hennes älskare.Den kärlek till Yann som går att spåra i Duras böcker, starkast i ”Emily L”, inverterad i ”Älskaren”, närvarande i bok efter bok, blir en litterär gåta. En kvinna som har levt med krig och förlorat ett barn, som är besatt av att skriva och vars författarskap dignar under nittonhundratalets blodiga historia. Hur ska hon älska en man som är så ung? En pojke vars begär driver honom till barerna på nätterna, i jakt på vackra män från Buenos Aires och Santiago. Detta är inte den tonåriga Marguerite Duras kärlek till en kinesisk miljardär, inte heller den uppoffrande smärtsamma kärleken till maken Robert L, som återvände från koncentrationsläger och tillfrisknade under hennes vård. Kärleken mellan Marguerite och Yann är märkt av litteratur, av den förödande och fruktbara sammanblandningen av liv och skrivande.Yann älskar Marguerites böcker. Hon älskar honom för hans röst, hans kropp, hans tankar. Denna åldrade kvinnas kärlek är luttrad och hjärtskärande, på en gång illusionsfri och påstridig. Det är en skyddslös kärlek, galen, den vet för mycket, den vet allt, men den förstår inte. Åldern, erfarenheten, visdomen kan inte hjälpa hjärtat.Och han? Mannen är för ung. Han är för intelligent. Han är för upptagen med att undersöka om livet är värt att leva.När Yann kommer till Marguerite är hans pengar slut. Hon betalar för vinet och maten. De talar i timmar, om att skriva, om att läsa. Marguerite säger att hon lätt skulle byta alla Roland Barthes böcker mot platserna i Indokina där hon växte upp. Barthes rådde henne en gång att återvända till stilen i hennes första ”så enkla och så förtjusande” romaner. Hon förlåter honom aldrig för hans nedlåtenhet. Hon vägrar vara nyanserad och tolerant. Så länge hon levde och efter sin död karaktäriseras detta raseri som pinsamt, ovärdigt, kvinnligt. Hon ger generationer kvinnor hopp genom att vara så genant som ingen kvinna får vara.Är det pinsamheten som får Yann att vända sig bort? Som får honom att säga: ”Ni kommer att överges av alla, för ni är galen, omöjlig att stå ut med”. Är det galenskapen som får honom att återvända, ständigt? Som får honom att gå tillbaka till henne när gryningen reser sig ur havet, lämna sina älskare och återvända till huset och kontrollera att manuskriptet hon arbetar med ligger kvar på bordet?Yann Andréa älskar Marguerite Duras böcker, men böckerna är hon. Hans liv blir hennes. Han låter sig förvandlas till en litterär karaktär, och beskriver det själv så. När hon är död fortsätter han författa brev till henne.Hon för sin del kan inte motstå någon som är så barnslig, som vill ha allt och allt på en gång. Hon vill ha denna nya kropp, lång och mager. Hon vill höra denna otroligt mjuka röst som är kunglig och återhållen. För att behålla honom måste hon hota med att kasta manuskriptet i havet.Marguerite Duras vet att kärleken till Yann Andreá blir acceptabel om hon utelämnar det pinsamma, om hon låter det vara en historia om två intellektuella som är besatta av litteratur. Hon vägrar. Yann är hennes älskare. Hon tvekar att skriva ner det, men gör det ändå: ”Efteråt sa ni att jag hade en osannolikt ung kropp” Yann kommer att förneka att han någonsin sagt något så löjligt, att det någonsin funnits en sådan historia.Den är en hård historia. Marguerite skriver: ”Ibland är jag rädd från det att ni vaknat. Liksom alla män förvandlas ni till kvinnomördare varje dag, om så bara för några sekunder”. Yann får vredesutbrott och de skrattar tillsammans när det är över. Hon skriver: ”Det händer att jag grips av ömhet för den sortens människor som vi är”.Lika centralt som raseriet är för Duras författarskap är förmågan till ömhet. I hennes sista bok ”Det är allt”, delvis en dialog med Yann, ligger denna ömhet i öppen dager tillsammans med hotet av den nära förestående separationen.Det är ingen bar längre, det är en dödsbädd. Den vackre mannen frågar: ”Hur skulle ni beskriva mig? Den döende kvinnan svarar: ”Outgrundlig. Den mest förtrollande människa jag mött. Ett gammalt svin.” Hon svarar: ”Jag älskar er. Adjö.”Elisabeth Hjorthförfattare, etiker och professor i litterär gestaltning LitteraturMarguerite Duras:Yann Andréa Steiner. Översättning Kennet Klemets, Ellerströms förlag, 2017.Horan på den normandiska kusten. Översättning Kennet Klemets, Ellerströms 2015.Det är allt. Översättning Kennet Klemets, Ellerströms, 2013.Emily L. Översättning Britt Arenander, Modernista, 2011.Dödssjukdomen. Översättning Marie Werup, Modernista, 2007Blå ögon svart hår. Översättning Kerstin Hallén, Albert Bonniers förlag, 1988. FaktaMarguerite Duras föddes 1914 och växte upp franska Indokina. Hon betraktas som en av 1900-talets framträdande och säregna författare och filmare. Bland hennes rika produktion kan nämnas ”Älskaren”, ”Smärtan”, ”En fördämning mot stilla havet”, ”Hiroshima, mon amour” och ”Att skriva”. Under 2000-talet har svenska översättningar av hennes böcker utgivits på hela sex olika förlag. Duras dog 1996.Yann Andréa (1952-2014) hette egentligen Yann Lemée

Invité de la rédaction : Laurence Goldmann reçoit Dror Mishani pour son dernier livre "Au ras du sol - Journal d'un écrivain en temps de guerre" aux éditions Gallimard À propos du livre : « Au ras du sol - Journal d'un écrivain en temps de guerre » paru aux éditions Gallimard Le matin du 7 octobre 2023, à Toulouse, Dror Mishani découvre le message de sa femme : "Bonjour, ici, c'est un sacré bordel." Il envisage tout, sauf cette attaque du Hamas... Dans l'avion qui le ramène à Tel-Aviv, il commence à rédiger un article : "Peut-être faut-il reconnaître la puissance du coup porté et la profondeur de notre douleur, reconnaître la défaite, ne pas essayer de l'escamoter sous ce qui aura l'air, à court terme, d'une victoire, mais qui ne sera qu'un engrenage de souffrances." Ces lignes sont au coeur d'un journal intime qui décrit, pendant six mois, la vie quotidienne en temps de guerre et expose les sentiments complexes d'un père de famille israélien marié à une Polonaise catholique ; un intellectuel pacifiste passant, aux yeux de certains proches, pour un traître ; un romancier écrasé par la politique qui craint de ne plus jamais pouvoir écrire et qui, pour ne pas sombrer, "cherche refuge dans la lecture des catastrophes des autres" - Natalia Ginzburg, Italo Calvino, Stefan Zweig, Emmanuel Carrère... Traducteur de Roland Barthes en hébreu, Dror Mishani, quarante-neuf ans, enseigne l'histoire du roman policier et la littérature à l'université de Tel-Aviv. Auteur de cinq romans publiés aux Editions Gallimard, il compte parmi les auteurs israéliens contemporains de premier plan. Francophile et francophone, il est chevalier de l'ordre des Arts et des Lettres.

durée : 00:02:08 - L'Humeur du matin par Guillaume Erner - par : Guillaume Erner - Pour la Saint-Valentin, Guillaume Erner vous invite à rester au lit et — inspiré par Roland Barthes — parler d'amour parce que, dans l'amour, tout est discours, tout est poésie et devrait l'être. - réalisation : Félicie Faugère

Avec Mathias Roux, philosophe. Anders Breivik, le terroriste d'extrême droite norvégien qui a assassiné 77 jeunes en 2011 reçoit 800 lettres d’amour par mois. Il existe un joli mot pour désigner cette passion pour les criminels : “hybristophilie”. Bien sûr, on pourrait considérer ce genre d’héroïsation des tueurs comme un trouble pathologique, mais on peut aussi le voir comme la manifestation extrême d’une fascination largement partagée pour le crime.  Cette attraction repose certes en grande partie sur nos pulsions voyeuristes, mais pour le philosophe Mathias Roux, les vraies affaires criminelles représentent plus que de simples faits divers. Dans “Le goût du crime” (Actes Sud, 2023), l’essai qu’il a coécrit avec son frère Emmanuel Roux, il montre que non seulement ces affaires donnent matière à penser notre époque, mais elles soulèvent de grandes questions philosophiques. Pourquoi les affaires criminelles nous fascinent-elles ? Que nous enseigne l’événement criminel sur la question de la vérité et du mal ? Quelle est la raison du crime ? Un épisode des Idées Larges avec Mathias Roux, philosophe, et Matthieu Béra, sociologue.  Références : - Marcel Proust, "Contre Sainte-Beuve", Gallimard, 1954- Pierre Bourdieu, "Sur la télévision", Liber Éditions, 1996- Roland Barthes, "Essais critiques", Seuil, 1964- Émile Durkheim, "Les règles de la méthode sociologique", la Revue philosophique, 1894- Émile Durkheim, "Leçons de sociologie criminelle", éd. par Matthieu Béra, Flammarion, 2022 (1892-1893)- Michel Foucault, "Du gouvernement des vivants – Cours au Collège de France". 1979-1980, Gallimard, Seuil, 2012 Archives sonores : - RTL INFO - Landru, Fourniret, Dutroux, Abdeslam… ils ont tous reçus des lettres d'amour: comment expliquer cette attirance pour les criminels? - 2022- La Voix du Nord - Il y a cinquante ans éclatait l’affaire de Bruay-en-Artois - 2022- Office national de radiodiffusion télévision française (ORTF) - Meurtre de Brigitte Dewèvre à Bruay-en-Artois - 1972- Global Entertainment Productions GmbH & Company Medien KG - Kevin Bacon, Elisabeth Shue, Josh Brolin - HOLLOW MAN - 2000- AXIS TV - Colloque GYPSY XXII - Pierre-Olivier SUR : Je jure de dire la vérité... - 2022- Federation Entertainment France Télévisions Versus Production What's Up Films - Sambre - Episode 6 - Jean-Xavier de Lestrade - 2023 Musique Générique :« TRAHISON » Musique de Pascal Arbez-Nicolas © Delabel Editions, Artiste : VITALIC,(P) 2005 Citizen Records under Different Recording licence ISRC : BEP010400190,Avec l’aimable autorisation de [PIAS] et Delabel Editions.  Episode vidéo publié le 24 mai 2024 sur arte.tv Autrice Laura Raim Réalisateur Jean Baptiste Mihout Son Alban Lejeune Montage Antoine Dubois Mixage et sound design Jean-Marc Thurier Une co-production UPIAN Margaux Missika, Alexandre Brachet, Auriane Meilhon, Emma Le Jeune, Karolina Mikos avec l'aide de Nancy-Wangue Moussissa ARTE France Unité société et culture

What are the mysterious objects seen flying over Santopolis? Can Falk stop them with the help of a new paramilitary force made up of old familiar faces? How do you feel about cilantro? Listen to find out!Uniquely Heroic Americans, episode 121 of This Gun in My Hand, was seasoned and lorded over by Rob Northrup. This episode and all others are available on Youtube with automatically-generated closed captions of dialog. Visit http://ThisGuninMyHand.blogspot.com for credits, show notes, archives, and to buy my books, such as Sisyphus, Eat Your Heart Out, available in paperback and ebook from Amazon. What makes my chili taste uniquely American? This Gun in My Hand!Show Notes:1. Is this the first episode to quote Dead Kennedys lyrics? Maybe.2. Darn, I should have started the ad with “speaking of motherships…”3. Robert Thomas Northrup's mother did not rewrite the ad text in this episode. Some unnamed fictional character who wrote the ad might have solicited notes and rewrites from their mother, or might have been lying. Many statements made by characters in This Gun in My Hand are lies or mistakes. That's for you to determine because your interpretation is more important than the actual author's intent. See “The Death of the Author,” an essay by Roland Barthes.https://web.archive.org/web/20200419132326/http://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/threeEssays.html#barthes4. “In the Western world, Persia (or its cognates) was historically the common name for Iran. In 1935, Reza Shah asked foreign delegates and League of Nations to use the term Iran (‘Land of the Aryans'), the endonym of the country, used by its native people, in formal correspondence.” - “Reza Shah,” Wikipedia, 2 January 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reza_Shah#Replacement_of_Persia_with_IranCredits:The opening music was from The Sun Sets at Dawn (1950), and the closing music was from Killer Bait (1949), both films in the public domain. Transitional music around the commercial was from the June 9, 1946 episode of the public domain radio show US Steel Hour of Mystery. Most of the music and sound effects used in the episode are modified or incomplete versions of the originals.Sound Effect Title: tug boat horn - sound effect.wavBy komal22moizLicense: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0https://freesound.org/people/komal22moiz/sounds/380825/Sound Effect Title: R11-19-Army Marching Steadily.wav License: Public Domainhttps://freesound.org/s/480434/ (another marching sound to layer with above)Sound Effect Title: Chân LínhLicense: Public Domainhttps://freesound.org/s/546791/ Sound Effect Title: Stomach RumbleLicense: Public Domainhttps://freesound.org/people/yrdn/sounds/473989/Sound Effect Title: groaning1.flacLicense: Public Domainhttps://freesound.org/people/borygmi/sounds/414975/Sound Effect Title: 38 Caliber Gun Shot 5xRecorded by Mike KoenigLicense: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0http://soundbible.com/375-38-Caliber-Gun-Shot-5x.htmlSound Effect Title: Kimmokkeita / RicochetsBy YleArkistoLicense: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0https://freesound.org/people/YleArkisto/sounds/401921/Sound Effect Title: A slap or smack in the face License: Public Domainhttps://freesound.org/s/522596/ The image accompanying this episode is a modified detail of the cover of the public domain comic book Fightin' Marines Number 14 (May 1955), artist unknown.https://digitalcomicmuseum.com/index.php?dlid=21270

Warten, sagt Roland Barthes, ist im Grunde das Warten auf die Geliebte. Tatsächlich hat sich die Kunst gerade am liebenden Warten abgearbeitet: Proust, Schnitzler, Schönberg, Beckett. Die Kunst misst aus, was an Erregung den scheinbar so ruhigen Vorgang des Wartens durchzieht, seine innere Erfahrung. Unruhe, Angst, Panik, Schock regieren, wo das Warten sich zieht oder der Geliebte ausbleibt. Wer wartet, ist nicht mehr bei sich selbst, aber er ist auch nicht anderswo. Aber wo ist er? Und welche Kunst kann dem beikommen? Von Reiner Niehoff und Sven Rücker (SWR 2018)

Trevor and Paul are back with the fourth annual best of the year extravaganza! In Part I, we count down the first half of our en favorite reads of 2024—and we are once again joined by a cast of friends and listeners who share some of their top books and best reading experiences of the year! Another great chance to grow your TBR pile for 2025!ShownotesBooks* The Postcard, by Anne Berest, translated by Tina Kover* Gabriëlle, by Anne Berest and Claire Berest, translated by Tina Kover* Two Hours, by Alba Arikha* Crooked Seeds, by Karen Jennings* Fathers and Fugitives, by S.J. Naudé, translated by Michiel Heyns* Not Even the Dead, by Juan Gómez Bárcena, translated by Katie Whittemore* Not a River, by Selva Almada, translated by Annie McDermott* The Wind That Lays Waste, by Selva Almada, translated by Chris Andrews* Dead Girls, by Selva Almada, translated by Annie McDermott* Brickmakers, by Selva Almada, translated by Annie McDermott* Any Person Is the Only Self, by Elisa Gabbert* The Unreality of Memory, by Elisa Gabbert* Ex Libris, by Anne Fadiman* Rhine Journey, by Anne Schlee* About Looking, by John Berger* The Inkal, by Alejandro Jodorowsky and Moebius* Pedro Páramo, by Juan Rulfo, translated by Douglas J. Weatherford* The Man Who Liked Slow Tomatoes, by K.C. Constantine* The Premier, by Georges Simenon* Two Thousand Million Man-Power, by Gertrude Trevelyan* Horror Movie, by Paul Tremblay* A County Doctor, by Franz Kafka* Kalpa Imperial: The Greatest Empire That Never Was, by Angélica Gorodischer, translated by Ursula K. Le Guin* Sons, by Robert De Maria* Brothers, by Robert De Maria* Fletch, by Gregory McDonald* Bedlam, by Charlene Elsby* Quarry, by Max Allan Collins* A Tiler's Afternoon, by Lars Gustfsson, translated by Tom Geddes* One Hundred Years of Solitude, by Gabriel Garcia Márquez, translated by * Lonesome Dove, by Larry McMurtry* The Carrying, by Ada Limón* Picnic, Lighting, by Billy Collins* The Peregrine, by J.A. Baker* Bright Dead Things, by Ada Limón* The Hurting King, by Ada Limón* You Are Here: Poetry in the Natural World, compiled by Ada Limón* Black Lamb and Grey Falcon, by Rebecca West* Clear, by Carys Davies* Malena, by Ingeborg Bachmann, translated by Philip Boehm* It Lasts Forever and Then It's Over, by Anne de Marcken* Last Words from Montmartre, by Qin Miaojin, translated by Ari Larissa Heinrich* The Preparation of the Novel, by Roland Barthes, translated by Kate Briggs* Earthly Signs: Moscow Diaries, 1917 - 1922, by Marina Tsvetaeva, translated by Jamey Gambrell* The Power of Gentleness: Meditation on the Risk of Living, by Anne Dufourmantelle, translated by Katherine Payne and Vincent Sallé* Matrescence: On Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Motherhood, by Lucy Jones* Question 7, by Richard Flanagan* The Narrow Road to the Deep North, by Richard Flanagan* Thunderclap: A Memoir of Art and Life and Sudden Death, by Laura Cumming* H Is for Hawk, by Helen Macdonald* The Goshawk, by T.H. White* The Vanishing Velázquez: A 19th Century Bookseller's Obsession with a Lost Masterpiece, by Laura Cumming* The Ice Palace, by Tarjei Vesaas, translated by Elizabeth Rokkan* The Birds, by Tarjei Vesaas, translated by Michael Barnes and Torbjørn Støverud* James, by Percival Everett* The Trees, by Percival EverettThe Mookse and the Gripes Podcast is a book chat podcast. Every other week Paul and Trevor get together to talk about some bookish topic or another. We hope you'll continue to join us!Many thanks to those who helped make this possible! If you'd like to donate as well, you can do so on Substack or on our Patreon page. These subscribers get periodic bonus episode and early access to all episodes! Every supporter has their own feed that he or she can use in their podcast app of choice to download our episodes a few days early. Please go check it out! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit mookse.substack.com/subscribe

durée : 00:59:15 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - De son enfance politisée à la création du Mouvement de libération des femmes, Antoinette Fouque revient sur son parcours et ses engagements dans ce "Jeux d'archives". Avec elle, écoutons Léon Blum, Louise Weiss, Nathalie Sarraute, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes et un groupe de militantes du MLF. - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé - invités : Antoinette Fouque

durée : 01:00:02 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - De son enfance politisée à la création du Mouvement de libération des femmes, Antoinette Fouque revient sur son parcours et ses engagements dans ce "Jeux d'archives". Avec elle, écoutons Léon Blum, Louise Weiss, Nathalie Sarraute, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes et un groupe de militantes du MLF. - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé - invités : Antoinette Fouque

durée : 00:58:10 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann, Antoine Ravon - Né en 1931, Guy Debord a quinze ans de moins que Roland Barthes. En 1967, le philosophe publie "La Société du spectacle", critique du capitalisme, tandis que Barthes s'éloigne des tonalités marxistes de ses "Mythologies". Pourtant, leurs œuvres convergent, dénonçant mythes et spectacle. - réalisation : Nicolas Berger - invités : Eric Marty Écrivain et universitaire; Vincent Kaufmann Professeur émérite de littérature et d'histoire des médias à l'université de St. Gall en Suisse

durée : 00:39:59 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Mathilde Wagman - "Je ne sais pas qui je suis, je ne le saurai jamais". En 1976, seul dans un studio obscur, l'intellectuel Roland Barthes, 61 ans, se dévoile sans certitude. Entre enfance pauvre, absence de père, il explore les contours flous de sa propre identité. Une introspection radiophonique inédite. - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé - invités : Roland Barthes Ecrivain et critique littéraire français

Eine Mischung aus Freude, Aufregung , Erregung, Unwohlsein? Was kann das sein?In dieser Folge erzählt uns Franziska Singer, Schauspielerin und preisgekrönte Podcasterin u.a. des True Crime Podcasts “Darfs ein bissl Mord sein” und des Sexpodcasts “Liebesgeschichte” über Tentakelpornos und Sex-positive-parties. Außerdem stelle ich dir ein Buch vor, das mich seit meinem Studium begleitet: “Fragmente einer Sprache der Liebe” von Roland Barthes, und ich sag dir, welche Aphrodisiaka in den letzten Jahrhunderten verwendet wurden. Und weißt du, was “la petite mort” bedeutet?Wie gefällt dir Jeannes Varieté? Was ist dein Lieblings-Liebes-Wort?Schreib mir per E-Mail an jeanne@ohwow.eu oder auf Instagram an @jeanne_drach! Abonniere den Jeannes Varieté Newsletter: ohwow.eu/newsletter.Links zur FolgeFranziska Singers Podcast LiebesGeschichtenFranziska Singer auf InstagramFragmente einer Sprache der Liebe von Roland Barthes bei SuhrkampAphrodisiakum im Spektrum der WissenschaftenAphrodisiaka: Wirksam bis gefährlich - Artikel in der PresseLe Mepris von Luc Godard, 1963, auf YoutubeKoi No YokanLa petite mortNazIn dieser Folge haben mitgewirkt: Jeanne Drach, Catharina Ballan, Anna Muhr, Hanna Bergmayr; Trompete: Almut Schäfer-Kubelka. Foto: Christian Zagler. Grafik: Catharina Ballan. Strategische Beratung: Milo Tesselaar.Dieser Podcast wird präsentiert von OH WOW.Diese Folge wurde gesponsert von Sonnentor.Lasse deine fe:male Power wachsen! Natürlich hat Weiblichkeit viele Facetten. Hör auf deinen Körper und seine wechselnden Bedürfnisse. Entdecke mit SONNENTOR die Kraft der Kräuter und wachse über dich hinaus. Denn die Natur hat die besten Rezepte für deinen selbstbestimmten Lebensweg. Entdecke Rezepte, Wissen und inspirierende Geschichten unter: www.sonnentor.com/femalepower Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This conversation delves into the representation of Gotham City as a text, exploring its origins, meanings, and the semiotic analysis of its imagery. Dan, Richard, and John discuss the historical context of the term 'Gotham', its connections to urban design, and the dualities present in its narrative, particularly through the lens of Batman. They examine the architectural symbolism of Gotham, the role of myths and archetypes, and how these elements reflect societal fears and cultural codes. This conversation delves into the semiotic analysis of Gotham and the character of Batman, exploring how narratives reflect and critique capitalism and ideology. The discussion highlights the evolution of Batman's character from a simplistic hero to a complex figure grappling with moral ambiguity and psychological struggles. We also examine the cultural significance of urban environments and the authenticity of narratives within them, ultimately connecting these themes to broader societal reflections and the role of pop culture in shaping our understanding of the world. Gotham's name originates from a folk tale about fools. Semiotics helps decode the meanings behind signs. The imagery of Gotham is dark and layered. Binaries of good and evil are central to Gotham's narrative. Myths and archetypes play a significant role in storytelling. Gotham reflects societal fears and corruption. The architecture of Gotham symbolizes its dual nature. Light and dark imagery are crucial in Gotham's representation. Cultural codes shape our understanding of symbols. Gothic elements in Gotham connect to historical narratives. Roland Barthes' levels of signification help us understand meaning. Gotham's narrative naturalizes capitalism through Batman's wealth. The ideological critique of capitalism is often masked in narratives. Batman evolves from a simplistic hero to a morally ambiguous figure. Cultural reflections in media reveal societal anxieties and psychopathy. Authenticity in urban narratives is tied to historical context. Semiotics allows us to decode the meanings behind cultural symbols. Pop culture serves as a mirror reflecting contemporary issues. Understanding the language of semiotics enhances cultural analysis. Decoding the world can become an engaging intellectual pursuit.

Entretien mené par Pauline Le Gall En se remémorant les moments vécus avec un ancien amant, le narrateur tente de percer le mystère de Jérémie. Qui était cet homme qu'il ne connaissait pas vraiment, et qu'il a aimé, peut-être ? Ce portrait, composé de 1000 fragments, aboutit à un grand roman sur la passion, dans la belle lignée de Roland Barthes et Hervé Guibert. À lire – Clément Ribes, Mille images de Jérémie, Verticales, 2024.

Listenings (Spuyten Duyvil, 2023) is a collection of meditations on the art of experiencing sound. The writings reflect Jason Weiss's passion for illuminating details, momentary experiences, and the most subtle and brief of auditory stimulations to consider their role in thought and emotion. The chapter-sections, each on a particular subtheme, invite us to visit concerts, to analyze music, to interpret sounds far and near, from friends, parents, relatives, and strangers, and to appreciate and esteem them as a key part of the human condition. Listenings summons readers to reflect but also to consider listening as an artform, a dialogue, and a locus of experiences – to make music by listening. Jason Weiss adroitly argues that to listen is not merely to perceive sound as a stimulus but to interpret, to participate, to reflect, to engage in an activity that can shift from a passive one toward a new creative beginning. This conversation includes Jason Weiss, Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera and Jorge Rodríguez Acevedo of the Departamento de Humanidades at the Universidad de Puerto Rico-Mayagüez (UPR-M). They discuss listening as a creative resource; the importance of listening in memory; Weiss's precise and harmonious approach to linking language, sound and listening; the role of technology how we interpret sound; and the role of listening in the author's life, experiences and creative process. This interview, our podcast, and the Instituto Nuevos Horizontes were made possible by generous support from the Mellon Foundation. This is our second episode on Listenings - the first, on New Books Network en español, is available here. Topics discussed in the interview: Listening in translingual environments. Music, performance, concerts. Travel, distance, and new language contexts. Technology and sound. When Jason Weiss met Jorge Luis Borges in Paris. The circumstances surrounding Roland Barthes's death. Jason Weiss's book The Lights of Home: A Century of Latin American Literature in Paris and our podcast episode on that title. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Listenings (Spuyten Duyvil, 2023) is a collection of meditations on the art of experiencing sound. The writings reflect Jason Weiss's passion for illuminating details, momentary experiences, and the most subtle and brief of auditory stimulations to consider their role in thought and emotion. The chapter-sections, each on a particular subtheme, invite us to visit concerts, to analyze music, to interpret sounds far and near, from friends, parents, relatives, and strangers, and to appreciate and esteem them as a key part of the human condition. Listenings summons readers to reflect but also to consider listening as an artform, a dialogue, and a locus of experiences – to make music by listening. Jason Weiss adroitly argues that to listen is not merely to perceive sound as a stimulus but to interpret, to participate, to reflect, to engage in an activity that can shift from a passive one toward a new creative beginning. This conversation includes Jason Weiss, Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera and Jorge Rodríguez Acevedo of the Departamento de Humanidades at the Universidad de Puerto Rico-Mayagüez (UPR-M). They discuss listening as a creative resource; the importance of listening in memory; Weiss's precise and harmonious approach to linking language, sound and listening; the role of technology how we interpret sound; and the role of listening in the author's life, experiences and creative process. This interview, our podcast, and the Instituto Nuevos Horizontes were made possible by generous support from the Mellon Foundation. This is our second episode on Listenings - the first, on New Books Network en español, is available here. Topics discussed in the interview: Listening in translingual environments. Music, performance, concerts. Travel, distance, and new language contexts. Technology and sound. When Jason Weiss met Jorge Luis Borges in Paris. The circumstances surrounding Roland Barthes's death. Jason Weiss's book The Lights of Home: A Century of Latin American Literature in Paris and our podcast episode on that title. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/music

Listenings (Spuyten Duyvil, 2023) is a collection of meditations on the art of experiencing sound. The writings reflect Jason Weiss's passion for illuminating details, momentary experiences, and the most subtle and brief of auditory stimulations to consider their role in thought and emotion. The chapter-sections, each on a particular subtheme, invite us to visit concerts, to analyze music, to interpret sounds far and near, from friends, parents, relatives, and strangers, and to appreciate and esteem them as a key part of the human condition. Listenings summons readers to reflect but also to consider listening as an artform, a dialogue, and a locus of experiences – to make music by listening. Jason Weiss adroitly argues that to listen is not merely to perceive sound as a stimulus but to interpret, to participate, to reflect, to engage in an activity that can shift from a passive one toward a new creative beginning. This conversation includes Jason Weiss, Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera and Jorge Rodríguez Acevedo of the Departamento de Humanidades at the Universidad de Puerto Rico-Mayagüez (UPR-M). They discuss listening as a creative resource; the importance of listening in memory; Weiss's precise and harmonious approach to linking language, sound and listening; the role of technology how we interpret sound; and the role of listening in the author's life, experiences and creative process. This interview, our podcast, and the Instituto Nuevos Horizontes were made possible by generous support from the Mellon Foundation. This is our second episode on Listenings - the first, on New Books Network en español, is available here. Topics discussed in the interview: Listening in translingual environments. Music, performance, concerts. Travel, distance, and new language contexts. Technology and sound. When Jason Weiss met Jorge Luis Borges in Paris. The circumstances surrounding Roland Barthes's death. Jason Weiss's book The Lights of Home: A Century of Latin American Literature in Paris and our podcast episode on that title. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/art

Listenings (Spuyten Duyvil, 2023) is a collection of meditations on the art of experiencing sound. The writings reflect Jason Weiss's passion for illuminating details, momentary experiences, and the most subtle and brief of auditory stimulations to consider their role in thought and emotion. The chapter-sections, each on a particular subtheme, invite us to visit concerts, to analyze music, to interpret sounds far and near, from friends, parents, relatives, and strangers, and to appreciate and esteem them as a key part of the human condition. Listenings summons readers to reflect but also to consider listening as an artform, a dialogue, and a locus of experiences – to make music by listening. Jason Weiss adroitly argues that to listen is not merely to perceive sound as a stimulus but to interpret, to participate, to reflect, to engage in an activity that can shift from a passive one toward a new creative beginning. This conversation includes Jason Weiss, Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera and Jorge Rodríguez Acevedo of the Departamento de Humanidades at the Universidad de Puerto Rico-Mayagüez (UPR-M). They discuss listening as a creative resource; the importance of listening in memory; Weiss's precise and harmonious approach to linking language, sound and listening; the role of technology how we interpret sound; and the role of listening in the author's life, experiences and creative process. This interview, our podcast, and the Instituto Nuevos Horizontes were made possible by generous support from the Mellon Foundation. This is our second episode on Listenings - the first, on New Books Network en español, is available here. Topics discussed in the interview: Listening in translingual environments. Music, performance, concerts. Travel, distance, and new language contexts. Technology and sound. When Jason Weiss met Jorge Luis Borges in Paris. The circumstances surrounding Roland Barthes's death. Jason Weiss's book The Lights of Home: A Century of Latin American Literature in Paris and our podcast episode on that title. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

Listenings (Spuyten Duyvil, 2023) is a collection of meditations on the art of experiencing sound. The writings reflect Jason Weiss's passion for illuminating details, momentary experiences, and the most subtle and brief of auditory stimulations to consider their role in thought and emotion. The chapter-sections, each on a particular subtheme, invite us to visit concerts, to analyze music, to interpret sounds far and near, from friends, parents, relatives, and strangers, and to appreciate and esteem them as a key part of the human condition. Listenings summons readers to reflect but also to consider listening as an artform, a dialogue, and a locus of experiences – to make music by listening. Jason Weiss adroitly argues that to listen is not merely to perceive sound as a stimulus but to interpret, to participate, to reflect, to engage in an activity that can shift from a passive one toward a new creative beginning. This conversation includes Jason Weiss, Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera and Jorge Rodríguez Acevedo of the Departamento de Humanidades at the Universidad de Puerto Rico-Mayagüez (UPR-M). They discuss listening as a creative resource; the importance of listening in memory; Weiss's precise and harmonious approach to linking language, sound and listening; the role of technology how we interpret sound; and the role of listening in the author's life, experiences and creative process. This interview, our podcast, and the Instituto Nuevos Horizontes were made possible by generous support from the Mellon Foundation. This is our second episode on Listenings - the first, on New Books Network en español, is available here. Topics discussed in the interview: Listening in translingual environments. Music, performance, concerts. Travel, distance, and new language contexts. Technology and sound. When Jason Weiss met Jorge Luis Borges in Paris. The circumstances surrounding Roland Barthes's death. Jason Weiss's book The Lights of Home: A Century of Latin American Literature in Paris and our podcast episode on that title. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sound-studies

As fans of literature, we all know how powerful and effective storytelling can be. But can we harness that power to help us communicate in our daily lives? In this episode, Jacke talks to Matt Abrahams (Think Faster, Talk Smarter: How to Speak Successfully When You're Put on the Spot) about the lessons we can learn from literature - and how we can leverage an understanding of storytelling structure to help us succeed both personally and professionally. PLUS Mike Palindrome joins Jacke for a discussion of his longtime passion for the essays of French cultural critic and literary theorist Roland Barthes. Help support the show at patreon.com/literature or historyofliterature.com/donate. The History of Literature Podcast is a member of Lit Hub Radio and the Podglomerate Network. Learn more at www.thepodglomerate.com/historyofliterature. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

durée : 00:52:58 - LSD, la série documentaire - par : Perrine Kervran - Au XXe siècle, les romanciers français ont dû faire face à deux écueils : d'un côté Marcel Proust et la Recherche du temps perdu, horizon difficilement dépassable, et de l'autre Roland Barthes, qui signe en 68, la mort de l'auteur.

Explore the evolution of structuralism and post-structuralism in philosophy with a detailed look into structuralist theory and post-structuralist theory. Understand Ferdinand de Saussure linguistics and its impact on modern thought. Delve into Claude Lévi-Strauss anthropology and Roland Barthes semiotics. Analyze Louis Althusser ideology and Jacques Derrida deconstruction. Discover Michel Foucault power and knowledge and Julia Kristeva intertextuality. Learn about Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari rhizome, binary oppositions in structuralism, and synchrony vs diachrony. Examine structuralism in literary criticism and post-structuralism in literary criticism. See how these theories apply to structuralism in social sciences and post-structuralism in social sciences. Uncover the principles of structural Marxism and governmentality in post-structuralism.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/philosophy-acquired--5939304/support.

durée : 00:35:59 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - L'émission "Arcanes 70" recevait Roland Barthes en 1970, il venait de publier son essai "S/Z", une émission diffusée la première fois le 16 avril 1970 sur France Culture. - invités : Roland Barthes Ecrivain et critique littéraire français

durée : 00:36:59 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - Marguerite Duras, Roland Barthes, Henri Lefebvre et Vladimir Jankélévitch analysaient la question des loisirs en France en 1962. Une série de la collection "Recherche de la France" en huit volets, le huitième traitait du monde touristique et de ses coutumes, comme la photographie de vacances. - invités : Roland Barthes Ecrivain et critique littéraire français; Marguerite Duras Écrivaine, dramaturge et cinéaste (1914-1996); Vladimir Jankélévitch Philosophe (1903-1985)

La serie de mitos y leyendas en nuestro podcast comienza con una explicación de porqué creamos narraciones míticas y la relación que ellas tienen con nuestra vida. Este episodio es un recuento sobre el poder de la palabra y sobre cómo ella todavía rige los destinos de nuestra vida cotidiana, aún en contextos donde pareciese que el “mito” es un elemento de otros tiempos. Notas del episodio  La importancia de los mitos en cualquier tiempo y contexto La palabra y la creación del mundo Scherezada« Contar para vivir» Los griots de África: el patrimonio de la palabra Roland Barthes y la función social del mito La relación entre los rituales y los mitos ¡Síguenos en nuestras Redes Sociales! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DianaUribe.fm/  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dianauribe.fm/?hl=es Twitter: https://twitter.com/dianauribefm?lang=es Pagina web: https://www.dianauribe.fm

For our penultimate episode in this series David talks to Kathleen Stock about Roland Barthes's idea of the Death of the Author (1967). Once very fashionable, the notion that readers not writers are the arbiters of what a text means has had a long and sometimes painful afterlife. As well as exploring its curious appeal and its persistent blindspots, Kathleen discusses her personal experience of how it can go wrong.Two bonus Bad Ideas episodes for PPF+ subscribers – on Email and VAR – will be available very soon. Sign up now and get ad-free listening too! www.ppfideas.comComing Next: Helen Lewis on MesmerismComing Soon: The Great Political Fictions Part 2, starting with Middlemarch Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

All Fours by Miranda July is a funny and unflinching look at one woman's existence as she faces changes in her life and relationships. July joined us to talk about aging as a woman, societal pressures on identity and motherhood, her writing process and more with guest host, Jenna Seery.  This episode of Poured Over was hosted by Jenna Seery and mixed by Harry Liang.                      New episodes land Tuesdays and Thursdays (with occasional Saturdays) here and on your favorite podcast app.            Featured Books (Episode):  All Fours by Miranda July  The First Bad Man by Miranda July   No One Belongs Here More Than You by Miranda July  Cleanness by Garth Greenwell  Acts of Infidelity by Lena Andersson  A Lover's Discourse by Roland Barthes 

durée : 00:59:06 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann - Élève de Roland Barthes et grande lectrice de Jacques Lacan, Julia Kristeva impose des concepts nouveaux pour penser le geste littéraire. Comment tous ces outils de réflexion, sémiologiques, psychanalytiques, s'articulent-ils pour penser le « ça parle » qui est à l'œuvre dans l'usage du langage ? - invités : Julia Kristeva Écrivaine, psychanalyste, professeure émérite à l'Université de Paris et membre titulaire et formateur de la Société Psychanalytique de Paris; Isabelle Alfandary Professeure de littérature américaine et de théorie critique à l'université Sorbonne-Nouvelle, philosophe et psychanalyste; Dominique Ducard Sociologue et linguiste, professeur émérite en sciences du langage à l'université Paris-Est Créteil, membre du laboratoire Céditec

Seriah is joined by Chris Ernst and author and researcher Adam Gorightly to discuss Discordionism, its origins, and its influences on society. Topics include the Illuminati, Kerry Thornley, Greg Hill, Lee Harvey Oswald, D.A. Jim Garrison, the goddess Discordia, order and chaos, Principia Discordia, public-domain publishing, Jonathan Vankin, U.S. Marine Corps, socialism, communism, the book “The Idle Warriors”, the Warren Commission, Wittier CA, New Orleans LA, Grace Zabriskie, Gary Kirstein, Slim Brooks, 1950's/early 60's Beatnik milieu, JFK assassination, counter-culture, groovy packs, Robert Anton Wilson, Playboy magazine, anarchism, “jakes”, the book “Oswald”, Operation Mindfuck, John Birch Society, Alan Chapman, Clay Shaw, anti-LGBTQ conspiracy witch hunt, the three tramps in Dallas, E. Howard Hunt, paranoid schizophrenia, the Inside Edition TV interview, Barbara Reid, Thornley/Oswald cloning theory, the books “The Illuminatus! Trilogy”, Loompanics publishing, esoteric Nazism, the Necronomicon, Ann Marjory Camron, the book “Wormwood Star the Magickal Life of Marjorie Cameron”, Greg Hill and computer programming, Bank of America, hacking and Easter eggs, Bavarian Illuminati, Nesta Webster, John Robison, anti-communism, anti-Semitism, theories that the CIA introduced LSD to the counter-culture, Atsugi U.S. Navy base, “Behind the Bastards” podcast, “Who Killed JFK?” podcast, U-2 pilot Gary Powers, Oswald as intelligence agent, two-Oswald theories, the book “Harvey and Lee” by John Armstrong, Rob Reiner and Soledad O'Brien, the book “Family of Secrets” by Russ Baker, George H.W. Bush and the JFK assassination, “The Devil's Hour” TV series, Church of the Subgenius, Adam's book “The Prankster and the Conspiracy”, Ivan Stang's book “High Weirdness By Mail”, slack, the J.R. “Bob” Dobbs avatar, the alternative music group Negativland, audio sampling, the Burning Man festival, Roland Barthes' theory of semiotics, the commodification of Che Guevara's image, Sondra London, culture jamming, AI and future chaos, Adam's books, and much more! This is an absolutely fascinating discussion that goes all sorts of places! - Recap by Vincent Treewell of The Weird Part Podcast Outro Music is Sickhoose with SJR.The song can be found on Spotify under Diablo Sickhoose) Download