Podcasts about alexandre koj

In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Trevor Wilson about his new book, Alexandre Kojève and the Specters of Russian Philosophy (Northwestern University Press, 2024). Their conversation delves into the intellectual currents of interwar Europe, placing the enigmatic figure of Alexandre Kojève into this unique cultural landscape. The conversation touches on how key philosophical concepts shift in translation, the influence of émigré culture, and the broader currents of Russian philosophy, including the philosophy of Sophia and Kojève's vision of the "end of history." Dr. Wilson also reflects on the challenges of translating philosophical texts written in multiple languages (and Kojève's notoriously illegible Russian handwriting). Beyond philosophy, the conversation explores writing routines and the often-overlooked infrastructures that make academic work possible. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Trevor Wilson about his new book, Alexandre Kojève and the Specters of Russian Philosophy (Northwestern University Press, 2024). Their conversation delves into the intellectual currents of interwar Europe, placing the enigmatic figure of Alexandre Kojève into this unique cultural landscape. The conversation touches on how key philosophical concepts shift in translation, the influence of émigré culture, and the broader currents of Russian philosophy, including the philosophy of Sophia and Kojève's vision of the "end of history." Dr. Wilson also reflects on the challenges of translating philosophical texts written in multiple languages (and Kojève's notoriously illegible Russian handwriting). Beyond philosophy, the conversation explores writing routines and the often-overlooked infrastructures that make academic work possible. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/russian-studies

In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Trevor Wilson about his new book, Alexandre Kojève and the Specters of Russian Philosophy (Northwestern University Press, 2024). Their conversation delves into the intellectual currents of interwar Europe, placing the enigmatic figure of Alexandre Kojève into this unique cultural landscape. The conversation touches on how key philosophical concepts shift in translation, the influence of émigré culture, and the broader currents of Russian philosophy, including the philosophy of Sophia and Kojève's vision of the "end of history." Dr. Wilson also reflects on the challenges of translating philosophical texts written in multiple languages (and Kojève's notoriously illegible Russian handwriting). Beyond philosophy, the conversation explores writing routines and the often-overlooked infrastructures that make academic work possible. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Trevor Wilson about his new book, Alexandre Kojève and the Specters of Russian Philosophy (Northwestern University Press, 2024). Their conversation delves into the intellectual currents of interwar Europe, placing the enigmatic figure of Alexandre Kojève into this unique cultural landscape. The conversation touches on how key philosophical concepts shift in translation, the influence of émigré culture, and the broader currents of Russian philosophy, including the philosophy of Sophia and Kojève's vision of the "end of history." Dr. Wilson also reflects on the challenges of translating philosophical texts written in multiple languages (and Kojève's notoriously illegible Russian handwriting). Beyond philosophy, the conversation explores writing routines and the often-overlooked infrastructures that make academic work possible. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Trevor Wilson about his new book, Alexandre Kojève and the Specters of Russian Philosophy (Northwestern University Press, 2024). Their conversation delves into the intellectual currents of interwar Europe, placing the enigmatic figure of Alexandre Kojève into this unique cultural landscape. The conversation touches on how key philosophical concepts shift in translation, the influence of émigré culture, and the broader currents of Russian philosophy, including the philosophy of Sophia and Kojève's vision of the "end of history." Dr. Wilson also reflects on the challenges of translating philosophical texts written in multiple languages (and Kojève's notoriously illegible Russian handwriting). Beyond philosophy, the conversation explores writing routines and the often-overlooked infrastructures that make academic work possible. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/french-studies

On this podcast I talk to Dr Hager Weslati about the philosopher Alexandre Kojève. Kojève is a hugely influential but not very well-known philosophers. Here Hager and I talk about his life, his philosophy, and his famous lectures on Hegel. Kojève was a philosopher,  entrepreneur, diplomat, architect of the European Union and possible spy! Hager Weslati is a lecturer in media philosophy and political PR at Kingston University. She translated Alexandre Kojève's Notion of Authority (2014) and his early 1950s manuscript on Kant (2024). Her current work is aligned with recent critical attempts, across a wide range of disciplinary areas, to engage Kojeve's mysterious system of knowledge and its strong resonances with contemporary thought and politics in a global context. You can find out more via Hager's university webpage. Also, Hager has made some  writings available via her academia.edu page. If you would like to study with me you can find more information about our online education MAs in Philosophy here at Staffordshire University. You can find out more information on our MA in Continental Philosophy via this link. Or, join our MA in Philosophy of Nature, Information and Technology via this link. Find out more about me here.  September intakes F/T or January intakes P/T. You can listen to more free back content from the Thales' Well podcast on TuneIn Radio, Player Fm, Stitcher and Podbean. You can also download their apps to your smart phone and listen via there. You can also subscribe for free on iTunes. Please leave a nice review.

Panelsamtal med Magnus Hörnqvist, Sara Edenheim & Evelina Johansson Wilén och Shabane Barot utifrån tidskriften Fronesis temanummer om erkännande. Begäret efter erkännande skiljer inte människor åt utan förenar dem. Att bli erkänd av andra är både en nödvändighet och en förbannelse. Dessutom dikterar erkännande politikens villkor på sätt som intensivt diskuterats under de senaste tre decennierna: håller konflikter om erkännande på att ersätta konflikter om resurser, är erkännandet förtryckande snarare än frigörande, och vad menar vi egentligen med erkännande? I detta panelsamtal återvänder till begreppets ursprung i 1800-talets Tyskland, gör ett nerslag i dess renässans på 1990-talet för att sedan ta sig an dagens diskussion om erkännandets ambivalens. Vi gör även nerslag hos några av de mest tongivande teoretikerna i denna diskussion, som J. G. Fichte, Alexandre Kojève, Judith Butler, Axel Honneth, Rahel Jaeggi, Nancy Fraser och Michèle Lamont. Magnus Hörnqvist är professor i kriminologi vid Stockholms Universitet Sara Edenheim är docent i historia och universitetslektor vid Umeå centrum för genusstudier, Umeå universitet. Evelina Johansson Wilén är genusvetare och biträdande lektor med inriktning mot social förändring och digitalisering vid Högskolan i Halmstad Moderator: Shabane Barot, medlem i Fronesis redaktionskommitté.

Chapitre 5 : Le triomphe du signifiant.À mesure que nous avançons dans l'histoire des idées de la psychanalyse, les grands noms se succèdent, apportant chacun leur touche à cette grande fresque dont les contours deviennent planétaires.De Carl Rogers à Françoise Dolto, nous abordons aujourd'hui l'étonnant double mouvement qu'a connu la diffusion de la psychanalyse dans la deuxième moitié du XXe siècle.Dans cette passionnante conversation Jacques Van Rillaer évoque les effets bénéfiques de la psychanalyse, mais aussi ce qui l'a mené à arrêter de la pratiquer.•• SOUTENIR ••Méta de Choc est gratuit, indépendant et sans publicité. Vous pouvez vous aussi le soutenir en faisant un don ponctuel ou mensuel : https://metadechoc.fr/tree/•• RESSOURCES ••Toutes les références en lien avec cette émission sont sur le site Méta de Choc : https://metadechoc.fr/podcast/que-vaut-la-psychanalyse/•• SUIVRE ••Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, PeerTube, YouTube.•• TIMECODES ••00:58 : Les facteurs non spécifiques des thérapies : Carl Rogers, psychologie humaniste, démarche scientifique, conditions fondamentales d'une bonne psychothérapie, empathie, sincérité du thérapeute, efficacité de la psychanalyse, déculpabilisation de la sexualité et des fantasmes.05:42 : Bruno Bettelheim : Psychanalyse des contes de fées, La forteresse vide, mensonges, libération des camps, Idriss Aberkane, autisme, culpabilisation de la mère, plagiat, abandon de la psychanalyse aux États-Unis, progrès de la pharmacologie, développement des thérapies cognitivo-comportementales.11:02 : L'avènement de Jacques Lacan : demande d'écoute du patient, concept de désir, jonction avec les sciences humaines, philosophie, Alexandre Kojève, Wilhelm Hegel, retour à Freud, complexe d'Œdipe, exclusion des affects, l'importance du signifiant, interprétations, langage, Noam Chomski, linguistique, forclusion du nom du père, aliénation de l'enfant par la mère, stade du miroir, Henri Wallon, narcissisme, assonances, il n'y a pas de rapport sexuel.26:36 : Les errements de Jacques Lacan : négation de la pathologie, traitement de la psychose par la conversation, effet de détérioration, effet nocebo, romantisation de la psychose, cas d'Aimée, séminaires de Lacan, didactique à durée variable, condamnation des didactiques de Lacan, Donald Winnicott, Marie Bonaparte, pénétration des médias, dévotion au lacanisme.35:49 : Françoise Dolto : place de l'enfant au sein de la famille, relais dans les médias, personnalisme, Emmanuel Mounier, respect de l'enfant, La cause des adolescents, réponses anxiogènes, la femme n'a pas de surmoi, psychologisation à outrance, culpabilisation de la mère.42:16 : La psychanalyse est-elle progressiste ? respect de l'ordre de la Nature, enfant roi, tribune appelant à l'abolition de la protection des enfants victimes d'inceste, l'enfant violé piège l'adulte, primat du phallus, la femme est complémentaire de l'homme, essentialisme, antiféminisme, orgasme vaginal.48:09 : L'attrait pour la psychanalyse dans les années 1960 : connaissance tabou, analyse didactique, Professeur Schotte, Université de Nimègue, test de Rorschach, test de Szondi, approche TCC, critique politique de la psychanalyse, capitalisme, critique sur l'efficacité de la psychanalyse, Lacan est un charlatan, agoraphobie, phobie des ascenseurs, phobie des pigeons, processus de déconversion, associations libres, thérapie rogérienne, formation aux TCC, démission de l'Association belge de psychanalyse. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Mitschnitt vom 30.5.22 Der Vortrag beginnt bei 4:32 Unsere Bildungsarbeit kann man unterstützen durch eine Spende via PayPal an: info@helle-panke.de. Spätestens seit dem «Ende der großen Erzählungen» (Lyotard) gilt Geschichtsphilosophie in weiten Teilen der Geistes- und Kulturwissenschaften als totalitarismusverdächtig. Dieser Verdacht scheint sich auch aktuell zu bestätigen, bedienen sich doch Autokraten und Diktatoren historischer Großerzählungen, mit denen sie Politik machen und rechtfertigen. Sie berufen sich ausdrücklich auf Geschichtsphixlosophien und umgeben sich mit Hofphilosophen als Stichwortgeber. Wird Geschichtsphilosophie notwendigerweise zur Komplizin von Politik, ja treibt sie diese sogar an? Und wie lässt sich die Frage nach der Geschichte seitens der Philosophie in kritischer Absicht behandeln? Der Vortrag stellt sich dem Problem mit der Geschichte, setzt sich mit Herangehensweisen von Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin und Siegfried Kracauer auseinander und erläutert, warum es wichtig ist, dass sich Philosophie gerade heute erneut mit der Frage nach der Geschichte befasst. Christine Blättler ist Professorin am Philosophischen Seminar der Universität Kiel. Zu ihren Büchern zählen: Theoretische Neugierde. Horizonte Hans Blumenbergs, Beiheft Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie, im Erscheinen (Hg. mit Angelika Messner und Ralf Köhne); Der Gesandte. Alexandre Kojèves europäische Missionen, Merve 2022 (Hg.); Benjamins Phantasmagorie. Wahrnehmung am Leitfaden der Technik, DEJAVU 2021; Walter Benjamin. Politisches Denken, Nomos 2016 (Hg. mit Christian Voller); In Gegenwart des Fetischs. Dingkonjunktur und Fetischbegriff in der Diskussion, Turia&Kant 2014 (Hg. mit Falko Schmieder).

FdB 3x37 | Finalizamos nuestro viaje fulgurante por la Fenomenología del espíritu: analizamos los últimos capítulos, dedicados a la "religión" y el "saber absoluto"; estudiamos cómo fue recibida la obra; el legado y las críticas a Hegel, con especial atención a su filosofía de la historia y su filosofía política, donde la historia universal es manifestación de la razón absoluta, y el sujeto irrumpe como creador de la historia. Escuchamos lo que Søren Kierkegaard tiene que decirle, por olvidar el individuo concreto. Después, leemos a Hegel junto a Ludwig Feuerbach y Karl Marx, y descubrimos el Hegel de Alexandre Kojève (1902-1968) en el París de entreguerras. En "Un libro en el bolsillo" leemos a Faustino Oncina, que coordina un volumen colectivo titulado ¿Tiene porvenir el futuro?. Un libro que se pregunta acerca de la posibilidad de pensar el futuro en la actualidad basándose en la historia conceptual de Reinhart Koselleck. Por último, decimos hasta siempre y gracias. Sobre todo, gracias. *Final: Víctor Gómez Pin. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/diego-civilotti/message

This episode is a re-publication of a seminar organised by the research project the End of Law, at CTR. Dr Mårten Björk will take the lead, and introduces the inaugural episode of the End of law podcast, and a lecture by professor Jeff Lo ve, with the title: "Between Kant and Hegel: Alexandre Kojève and the End of Law" It was recorded on 1 June 2021 as part of the Law, Theology and Culture seminar in Lund. Alexandre Kojève is best known for the influential lectures he gave on Hegel to an enthralled audience of French intellectuals including Raymond Aron, Henry Corbin, Jacques Lacan, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Aside from these lectures, published in 1947 as Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, Kojéve published relatively little before his death in 1968. Yet, he left over 26 boxes of unpublished material on a variety of topics, from quantum physics and the continuum hypothesis to a major treatise on law called Outline of a Phenomenology of Right (Esquisse d'une phénoménologie du droit). Kojève wrote this treatise (586 pages in the French book edition) in 1943 while living in Vichy France. He expounds in it a comprehensive theory of justice and the universal homogeneous state that promises to usher in the end of history and perhaps of law itself. In my talk, I shall examine some of the central legal features of Kojève's universal and homogeneous state and consider whether Kojève actually affirms that history can be brought to an end through a final legal regime or not. In this respect, Kojève reprises his end of history thesis from the Hegel lectures as well as putting it in question, opposing Hegelian finality to what Kojeve terms Kantian "skepticism" about final ends.  Jeff Love is Research Professor of German and Russian at Clemson University. He is the author of The Black Circle: A Life of Alexandre Kojève (Columbia University Press, 2018), Tolstoy: A Guide for the Perplexed (Continuum, 2008), and The Overcoming of History in War and Peace (Brill, 2004). He has also published a translation of Alexandre Kojève's Atheism (Columbia University Press, 2018), an annotated translation (with Johannes Schmidt) of F.W. J. Schelling's Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom (State University of New York Press, 2006), and recently a translation of António Lobo Antunes's novel Until Stones Become Lighter Than Water (Yale University Press, 2019). ---------------------------------------------- Religion and Theology is produced by Joel Kuhlin for the Center for Theology and Religious Studies. If you have comments or critique of this episode, or any other episodes of R&T, please contact us via the podcast's twitteraccount: @reloteol.

Kojève ist bekannter, als man vielleicht glaubt, wird doch viel auf seine Seminare Bezug genommen, wenn einige über Hegel zu sprechen glauben. Um den Hegel des 20. Jahrhunderts verständlich zu machen wird in diesem Video deshalb über die Dialektik und die Anerkennung gesprochen, um in Kojèves Denken einzuführen. Wenn euch diese Episode gefallen hat, dann könnten euch auch gefallen: • Was bedeutet Vernunft bei Hegel? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiDCcXc9_eI • Die politischen Implikationen des Identitätsgesetzes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C_hO1G91VA&t=1s • Young Baudrillard https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u47XoM--47M&t=1s Mich findet ihr hier: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/corvuscoraxpc Twitter: https://twitter.com/CorvusCoraxPC TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@corvuscoraxpodcast?lang=de-DE Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/corvuscoraxpodcast/ Schaut doch mal vorbei und lasst Grüße da :)

On this episode of Vox Conversations, Sean Illing talks with Chris Hayes, author, commentator, and host of All In With Chris Hayes on MSNBC. They discuss his recent essay in the New Yorker about fame and the internet, why we seek attention from strangers online, and how some German philosophers might offer guidance for our predicament. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), Interviews Writer, Vox Guest: Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes), host, All In With Chris Hayes on MSNBC References:  "On the Internet, We're Always Famous" by Chris Hayes (New Yorker; Sept. 24) “We Should All Know Less About Each Other” by Michelle Goldberg (New York Times; Nov. 1) Plato, Phaedrus (c. 370 BCE) Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business by Neil Postman (Penguin; 2005) G.W.F. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit (1807) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the "Phenomenology of Spirit" by Alexandre Kojève (1947; tr. 1969) The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads by Tim Wu (Vintage; 2017) Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment by Robert Wright (Simon & Schuster; 2018) Enjoyed this episode? Rate Vox Conversations ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to know when new episodes of Vox Conversations drop by following or subscribing in your favorite podcast app. Support Vox Conversations and Recode Daily by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode of Vox Conversations was made by:  Producer: Erikk Geannikis Editor: Amy Drozdowska Engineer: Paul Robert Mounsey Deputy Editorial Director, Vox Talk: Amber Hall Vox Audio Fellow: Victoria Dominguez Additional engineering by Melissa Pons from Hemlock Creek Productions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Sean Illing talks with Chris Hayes, author, commentator, and host of All In With Chris Hayes on MSNBC. They discuss his recent essay in the New Yorker about fame and the internet, why we seek attention from strangers online, and how some German philosophers might offer guidance for our predicament. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), Interviews Writer, Vox Guest: Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes), host, All In With Chris Hayes on MSNBC References:  "On the Internet, We're Always Famous" by Chris Hayes (New Yorker; Sept. 24) “We Should All Know Less About Each Other” by Michelle Goldberg (New York Times; Nov. 1) Plato, Phaedrus (c. 370 BCE) Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business by Neil Postman (Penguin; 2005) G.W.F. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit (1807) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the "Phenomenology of Spirit" by Alexandre Kojève (1947; tr. 1969) The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads by Tim Wu (Vintage; 2017) Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment by Robert Wright (Simon & Schuster; 2018) Enjoyed this episode? Rate Vox Conversations ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of Vox Conversations by subscribing in your favorite podcast app. Support Vox Conversations by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Erikk Geannikis Editor: Amy Drozdowska Engineer: Paul Robert Mounsey Deputy Editorial Director, Vox Talk: Amber Hall Vox Audio Fellow: Victoria Dominguez Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Marco Filoni"Festival Filosofia"https://www.festivalfilosofia.it/Festival Filosofia, CarpiVenerdì 17 settembre 2021, ore 17:30Marco FiloniTra paura e libertàUn'antinomia nelle cittàprenota il tuo posto: https://www.festivalfilosofia.it/In che modo è rappresentato l'uomo, tra paura e libertà, all'interno della città, con le mura che lo difendono dal nemico esterno ma non da quello interno, e con le porte o ponti, quali soglie e aperture all'altro?Marco Filoni"Il calcolo della paura"Einaudi Editorehttps://www.einaudi.it/Veniamo da mesi in cui la paura ha comprensibilmente dominato l'orizzonte di ogni emozione umana. Marco Filoni, ripercorrendone la storia da Hobbes ai Dpcm, tra moto dell'anima e controllo politico, disegna un inaspettato ritratto del «buon uso della paura».Perché non bisogna provare vergogna per l'aver paura: bisogna però averne rispetto, perché solo conoscendo ciò che ci incute timore possiamo comprendere le nostre inquietudini. Se deleghiamo la nostra paura ad altri in cambio dell'illusione di una sicurezza senza limiti, non faremo che rinunciare alla nostra libertà – fra le altre anche a quella di avere paura – in favore di una nuova paura, il terrore.Marco Filoni è professore di Filosofia politica alla Link Campus University di Roma. I suoi ambiti di ricerca vertono principalmente sull'hegelismo francese del Novecento, sul rapporto fra istituzioni e politica, sul nesso fra filosofia e città, sull'uso politico della paura e il paradigma di governo attraverso le emozioni. Consigliere scientifico di “Limes”, è inoltre membro del Consiglio Scientifico di diverse riviste e collane editoriali. È stato una delle voci dei programmi culturali di RadioTre Rai, per la quale ha condotto Pagina3, Pantagruel e i Gettoni di filosofia. Ha scritto per le pagine culturali di diverse testate (Domenica del “Il Sole 24 Ore”, “la Repubblica”, “Pagina99”) e attualmente scrive sul Venerdì di “la Repubblica” e su TuttoLibri de “La Stampa”. Tra i suoi ultimi libri, tradotti in varie lingue: Kojève mon ami (Torino 2013); Lo spazio inquieto (Palermo 2014); Inciampi. Storia di libri, parole e scaffali (Roma-Trieste 2019); Anatomia di un assedio. La paura nella città (Milano 2019); Politiche della città (con C. Del Bò, G.M. Labriola, Pisa 2021); Il calcolo della paura (Torino 2021); L'azione politica del filosofo. La vita e il pensiero di Alexandre Kojève (Torino 2021).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Massimiliano Valerii"Il contagio del desiderio"Statistiche e filosofia per capire il nuovo disordine mondialePonte alle Graziehttps://www.ponteallegrazie.it/Trent'anni di globalizzazione. Mai avevamo conosciuto tanti progressi in un periodo così breve. Ma adesso siamo proiettati in un nuovo disordine mondiale. Che cosa è andato storto? Per decifrare l'enigma del nostro futuro dobbiamo tornare ai furori eroici della filosofia. Negli anni Trenta un pugno di giovani, eretici e dissacranti, fanno le ore piccole nei caffè parigini, dove si agitano i demoni di Hegel. E danno forma a una riflessione sulla crisi dell'uomo contemporaneo che ha ancora molto da dirci. Alexandre Kojève, un personaggio avvolto nel mistero, pronuncia una parola magica: «desiderio». Ci costruisce sopra la teoria della «fine della storia». Spiega che le nostre inquietudini dipendono dalla lotta per il riconoscimento. E incanta tutti i protagonisti di quella avventura intellettuale. Lo stralunato Queneau gli giura devozione, Bataille è sulfureo e in nessun modo addomesticabile, Lacan si veste come un dandy ed è divorato dall'ambizione, Sartre diventa un divo e manda le donne in estasi. E Koyré, il patriarca geniale, ha un movimentato passato da spia nella Legione straniera da tenere nascosto. Su tutti si allunga l'ombra di Heidegger, che li spingerà sull'abisso angosciante ella finitezza per svelarne l'autentico significato. Quei profetici briganti della filosofia cambieranno per sempre il corso delle idee, perché avevano compreso che i problemi della metafisica non sono altro che i dilemmi della vita di ognuno di noi. E forse le risposte che oggi cerchiamo sono contenute in un manoscritto misteriosamente scomparso. Massimiliano Valerii ci conduce dentro un giallo filosofico, in cui i dossier più scottanti dell'attualità economica e sociale prendono una nuova luce.Massimiliano Valerii è direttore generale del Censis. Dopo gli studi in Filosofia a Roma, si è dedicato alla ricerca sociale, economica e territoriale. È il curatore dell'annuale Rapporto sulla situazione sociale del Paese, considerato uno dei più qualificati e completi strumenti di interpretazione della realtà socio-economica italiana. Con Ponte alle Grazie ha pubblicato nel 2019 La notte di un'epoca. Contro la società del rancore: i dati per capirla e le idee per curarla.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensare

Alexandre Kojève called Hegel’s take on historical and natural time a “basic error.” Kojève suggested three nested levels of time: historical, biological, and natural. Did Hegel get it wrong? The current episode explores this controversy in detail, including new evidence on whether the Big Bang was the actual start of natural time. The Jewish Star of David’s mystical relationship to the dimensions of spacetime is also discussed.

Part of Red Library's Revolutionary Politics in Central and South America and Real Philosophy Hourz Series We are joined by Comrade/Patron Brant of Houston Review of Books to tackle George Ciccarielo-Maher's Decolonizing Dialectics and get into some real theoretical ICY COLD TAKES in the library this week.  We discuss the relationship between dialectics and decolonization, postcolonialism and decolonial theory, Frantz Fanon, Enrique Dussel, try to recuperate Georges Sorel for today's Left a bit, universals, and the dialectic being mobile and armed in Venezuela under Chavez. This one is THICC, SPICY, and ICE COLD, comrades! Further Reading/References Houston Review of Books George Ciccariello-Maher GCM's Website Decolonizing Dialectics Bring the Ruckus Oakland Georges Sorel José Carlos Mariátegui Decoloniality Postcolonialism Jacobinism Teleology Communist International Hannah Arendt Négritude Alexandre Kojéve Afro-pessimism The Black Jacobins Enrique Dussel Emmanuel Levinas Can Dialectics Break Bricks Full Film Caracazo Jacobin Article on AFL-CIA in Venezuela The Revolution Will Not Be Televised Documentary about 2002 Attempted Coup of Chavez Ernesto Laclau Strike at the Helm Speech from Hugo Chavez ------------------------------------------------ Email us at redlibrarypodcast@gmail.com Follow us on Twitter at Red Library@red_library_pod Click here to subscribe to Red Library on iTunes  Click here to support Red Library on Patreon Click here to find Red Library on Facebook Click here to find the host's political theory blog, Capillaries: Theory at the Front

Columbia University press has just released a new translation of a work by philosopher Alexandre Kojève, simply titled Atheism, translated by Professor Jeff Love. Considered to be one of the twentieth century's most brilliant and unconventional thinkers, Kojève was a Russian émigré to France whose lectures on Hegel in the 1930s galvanized a generation of French intellectuals. Although Kojève wrote a great deal, he published very little in his lifetime, and so the ongoing rediscovery of his work continues to present new challenges to philosophy and political theory. Written in 1931 but left unfinished, Atheism is an erudite and open-ended exploration of profound questions of estrangement, death, suicide, and the infinite that demonstrates the range and the provocative power of Kojève's thought. Ranging across Heidegger, Buddhism, Christianity, German idealism, Russian literature, and mathematics, Kojève advances a novel argument about freedom and authority. He investigates the possibility that there is not any vantage point or source of authority—including philosophy, science, or God—that is outside or beyond politics and the world as we experience it. The question becomes whether atheism—or theism—is even a meaningful position since both affirmation and denial of God's existence imply a knowledge that seems clearly outside our capacities. Masterfully translated by Jeff Love, this book offers a striking new perspective on Kojève's work and its implications for theism, atheism, politics, and freedom. Jeff Love is Research Professor of German and Russian at Clemson University in South Carolina. His publications include books on Tolstoy, Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Dostoevsky, as well as a translation of Friedrich Schelling's Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom. Carrie Lynn Evans is a PhD student at Université Laval in Quebec City.

Columbia University press has just released a new translation of a work by philosopher Alexandre Kojève, simply titled Atheism, translated by Professor Jeff Love. Considered to be one of the twentieth century’s most brilliant and unconventional thinkers, Kojève was a Russian émigré to France whose lectures on Hegel in the 1930s galvanized a generation of French intellectuals. Although Kojève wrote a great deal, he published very little in his lifetime, and so the ongoing rediscovery of his work continues to present new challenges to philosophy and political theory. Written in 1931 but left unfinished, Atheism is an erudite and open-ended exploration of profound questions of estrangement, death, suicide, and the infinite that demonstrates the range and the provocative power of Kojève’s thought. Ranging across Heidegger, Buddhism, Christianity, German idealism, Russian literature, and mathematics, Kojève advances a novel argument about freedom and authority. He investigates the possibility that there is not any vantage point or source of authority—including philosophy, science, or God—that is outside or beyond politics and the world as we experience it. The question becomes whether atheism—or theism—is even a meaningful position since both affirmation and denial of God’s existence imply a knowledge that seems clearly outside our capacities. Masterfully translated by Jeff Love, this book offers a striking new perspective on Kojève’s work and its implications for theism, atheism, politics, and freedom. Jeff Love is Research Professor of German and Russian at Clemson University in South Carolina. His publications include books on Tolstoy, Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Dostoevsky, as well as a translation of Friedrich Schelling’s Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom. Carrie Lynn Evans is a PhD student at Université Laval in Quebec City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Columbia University press has just released a new translation of a work by philosopher Alexandre Kojève, simply titled Atheism, translated by Professor Jeff Love. Considered to be one of the twentieth century’s most brilliant and unconventional thinkers, Kojève was a Russian émigré to France whose lectures on Hegel in the 1930s galvanized a generation of French intellectuals. Although Kojève wrote a great deal, he published very little in his lifetime, and so the ongoing rediscovery of his work continues to present new challenges to philosophy and political theory. Written in 1931 but left unfinished, Atheism is an erudite and open-ended exploration of profound questions of estrangement, death, suicide, and the infinite that demonstrates the range and the provocative power of Kojève’s thought. Ranging across Heidegger, Buddhism, Christianity, German idealism, Russian literature, and mathematics, Kojève advances a novel argument about freedom and authority. He investigates the possibility that there is not any vantage point or source of authority—including philosophy, science, or God—that is outside or beyond politics and the world as we experience it. The question becomes whether atheism—or theism—is even a meaningful position since both affirmation and denial of God’s existence imply a knowledge that seems clearly outside our capacities. Masterfully translated by Jeff Love, this book offers a striking new perspective on Kojève’s work and its implications for theism, atheism, politics, and freedom. Jeff Love is Research Professor of German and Russian at Clemson University in South Carolina. His publications include books on Tolstoy, Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Dostoevsky, as well as a translation of Friedrich Schelling’s Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom. Carrie Lynn Evans is a PhD student at Université Laval in Quebec City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Columbia University press has just released a new translation of a work by philosopher Alexandre Kojève, simply titled Atheism, translated by Professor Jeff Love. Considered to be one of the twentieth century’s most brilliant and unconventional thinkers, Kojève was a Russian émigré to France whose lectures on Hegel in the 1930s galvanized a generation of French intellectuals. Although Kojève wrote a great deal, he published very little in his lifetime, and so the ongoing rediscovery of his work continues to present new challenges to philosophy and political theory. Written in 1931 but left unfinished, Atheism is an erudite and open-ended exploration of profound questions of estrangement, death, suicide, and the infinite that demonstrates the range and the provocative power of Kojève’s thought. Ranging across Heidegger, Buddhism, Christianity, German idealism, Russian literature, and mathematics, Kojève advances a novel argument about freedom and authority. He investigates the possibility that there is not any vantage point or source of authority—including philosophy, science, or God—that is outside or beyond politics and the world as we experience it. The question becomes whether atheism—or theism—is even a meaningful position since both affirmation and denial of God’s existence imply a knowledge that seems clearly outside our capacities. Masterfully translated by Jeff Love, this book offers a striking new perspective on Kojève’s work and its implications for theism, atheism, politics, and freedom. Jeff Love is Research Professor of German and Russian at Clemson University in South Carolina. His publications include books on Tolstoy, Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Dostoevsky, as well as a translation of Friedrich Schelling’s Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom. Carrie Lynn Evans is a PhD student at Université Laval in Quebec City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Columbia University press has just released a new translation of a work by philosopher Alexandre Kojève, simply titled Atheism, translated by Professor Jeff Love. Considered to be one of the twentieth century’s most brilliant and unconventional thinkers, Kojève was a Russian émigré to France whose lectures on Hegel in the 1930s galvanized a generation of French intellectuals. Although Kojève wrote a great deal, he published very little in his lifetime, and so the ongoing rediscovery of his work continues to present new challenges to philosophy and political theory. Written in 1931 but left unfinished, Atheism is an erudite and open-ended exploration of profound questions of estrangement, death, suicide, and the infinite that demonstrates the range and the provocative power of Kojève’s thought. Ranging across Heidegger, Buddhism, Christianity, German idealism, Russian literature, and mathematics, Kojève advances a novel argument about freedom and authority. He investigates the possibility that there is not any vantage point or source of authority—including philosophy, science, or God—that is outside or beyond politics and the world as we experience it. The question becomes whether atheism—or theism—is even a meaningful position since both affirmation and denial of God’s existence imply a knowledge that seems clearly outside our capacities. Masterfully translated by Jeff Love, this book offers a striking new perspective on Kojève’s work and its implications for theism, atheism, politics, and freedom. Jeff Love is Research Professor of German and Russian at Clemson University in South Carolina. His publications include books on Tolstoy, Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Dostoevsky, as well as a translation of Friedrich Schelling’s Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom. Carrie Lynn Evans is a PhD student at Université Laval in Quebec City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Columbia University press has just released a new translation of a work by philosopher Alexandre Kojève, simply titled Atheism, translated by Professor Jeff Love. Considered to be one of the twentieth century’s most brilliant and unconventional thinkers, Kojève was a Russian émigré to France whose lectures on Hegel in the 1930s galvanized a generation of French intellectuals. Although Kojève wrote a great deal, he published very little in his lifetime, and so the ongoing rediscovery of his work continues to present new challenges to philosophy and political theory. Written in 1931 but left unfinished, Atheism is an erudite and open-ended exploration of profound questions of estrangement, death, suicide, and the infinite that demonstrates the range and the provocative power of Kojève’s thought. Ranging across Heidegger, Buddhism, Christianity, German idealism, Russian literature, and mathematics, Kojève advances a novel argument about freedom and authority. He investigates the possibility that there is not any vantage point or source of authority—including philosophy, science, or God—that is outside or beyond politics and the world as we experience it. The question becomes whether atheism—or theism—is even a meaningful position since both affirmation and denial of God’s existence imply a knowledge that seems clearly outside our capacities. Masterfully translated by Jeff Love, this book offers a striking new perspective on Kojève’s work and its implications for theism, atheism, politics, and freedom. Jeff Love is Research Professor of German and Russian at Clemson University in South Carolina. His publications include books on Tolstoy, Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Dostoevsky, as well as a translation of Friedrich Schelling’s Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom. Carrie Lynn Evans is a PhD student at Université Laval in Quebec City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Columbia University press has just released a new translation of a work by philosopher Alexandre Kojève, simply titled Atheism, translated by Professor Jeff Love. Considered to be one of the twentieth century’s most brilliant and unconventional thinkers, Kojève was a Russian émigré to France whose lectures on Hegel in the 1930s galvanized a generation of French intellectuals. Although Kojève wrote a great deal, he published very little in his lifetime, and so the ongoing rediscovery of his work continues to present new challenges to philosophy and political theory. Written in 1931 but left unfinished, Atheism is an erudite and open-ended exploration of profound questions of estrangement, death, suicide, and the infinite that demonstrates the range and the provocative power of Kojève’s thought. Ranging across Heidegger, Buddhism, Christianity, German idealism, Russian literature, and mathematics, Kojève advances a novel argument about freedom and authority. He investigates the possibility that there is not any vantage point or source of authority—including philosophy, science, or God—that is outside or beyond politics and the world as we experience it. The question becomes whether atheism—or theism—is even a meaningful position since both affirmation and denial of God’s existence imply a knowledge that seems clearly outside our capacities. Masterfully translated by Jeff Love, this book offers a striking new perspective on Kojève’s work and its implications for theism, atheism, politics, and freedom. Jeff Love is Research Professor of German and Russian at Clemson University in South Carolina. His publications include books on Tolstoy, Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Dostoevsky, as well as a translation of Friedrich Schelling’s Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom. Carrie Lynn Evans is a PhD student at Université Laval in Quebec City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Alexandre Kojève, que Raymond Aron tenait pour l'homme le plus intelligent de sa génération, reste fort peu connu du public. Homme de pensée éminent, il fut un assoiffé de connaissances qui toute sa vie cultiva un goût prononcé pour le paradoxe. Philosophes, chercheurs et hommes politiques livrent ici de précieux éclairages sur ce penseur universel qui fut aussi « conseiller du prince ».