Podcast appearances and mentions of Axel Honneth

Die Organisation von Arbeit hat sich stark geändert. Für viele Menschen ist Arbeit längst mehr als nur das halbe Leben. Was das für die Demokratie bedeutet, fragt Philosoph Axel Honneth im Gespräch mit Jürgen Wiebicke. Wiederholung vom 28. August 2023. Von WDR 5.

Donnez-moi votre feedback par SMS (mobile uniquement)!Le concept de "quiet quitting" est apparu après la pandémie de COVID-19, où les employés se contentent de faire le strict minimum requis par leur poste, souvent en réponse à des cultures de travail exigeantes et à des préoccupations de santé mentale. Axel Honneth, sociologue et philosophe allemand, souligne l'importance de la reconnaissance dans différents contextes sociaux, notamment au travail, où il identifie trois formes distinctes de reconnaissance : l'amour, les droits et la réussite. La reconnaissance est essentielle pour l'estime de soi et le bien-être, et son absence peut conduire à des luttes pour la reconnaissance. Le modèle de travail entrepreneurial moderne valorise la flexibilité et l'autonomie, mais peut entraîner des pathologies psychologiques en brouillant les frontières entre vie professionnelle et personnelle. Stephan Voswinkel distingue deux formes de reconnaissance au travail : l'appréciation pour l'engagement à long terme et l'admiration pour des réalisations exceptionnelles. Le "quiet quitting" peut être vu comme une réponse au manque de reconnaissance et de valeur accordée au travail ordinaire, les travailleurs cherchant la reconnaissance dans d'autres sphères de leur vie. Honneth soutient que la perte de critères stables de performance pousse les individus à chercher la reconnaissance en dehors de la sphère professionnelle. En conclusion, l'autonomie au travail doit être découplée du système de valeurs qui rend les contributions ordinaires invisibles, et les entreprises doivent reconnaître la contribution de manière non triviale pour éviter le désengagement des travailleurs.Source: Corbin, T.A., Flenady, G. Quiet Quitting as Compensatory Respect: Meaningful Work, Recognition, and the Entrepreneurial Ethic. Philosophy of Management 23, 461–480 (2024). Accès gratuit à toutes nos ressources: www.coapta.ch/campusAccès aux archives du podcast: www.coapta.ch/podcast© COAPTA SàrlTous les épisodes disponibles sur www.coapta.ch/podcast ou sur votre plateforme préférée (Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts); cherchez "Leadershift" ou "Vincent Musolino" Faites partie de notre communauté sur le Discord officiel COAPTA!

Axel Honneth sorgt sich in seinem neuen Buch »Der arbeitende Souverän« um die Demokratiefähigkeit der Arbeiter. Dabei übersieht er den Demokratieverdruss der Kapitalisten. Artikel vom 22. März 2023: https://jacobin.de/artikel/souveraen-solange-der-chef-nichts-sagt-axel-honneth-der-arbeitende-souveraen-rezension-kritischer-theorie-frankfurter-schule-thomas-zimmermann Seit 2011 veröffentlicht JACOBIN täglich Kommentare und Analysen zu Politik und Gesellschaft, seit 2020 auch in deutscher Sprache. Ab sofort gibt es die besten Beiträge als Audioformat zum Nachhören. Nur dank der Unterstützung von Magazin-Abonnentinnen und Abonnenten können wir unsere Arbeit machen, mehr Menschen erreichen und kostenlose Audio-Inhalte wie diesen produzieren. Und wenn Du schon ein Abo hast und mehr tun möchtest, kannst Du gerne auch etwas regelmäßig an uns spenden via www.jacobin.de/podcast. Zu unseren anderen Kanälen: Instagram: www.instagram.com/jacobinmag_de X: www.twitter.com/jacobinmag_de YouTube: www.youtube.com/c/JacobinMagazin Webseite: www.jacobin.de

Poslušnost platila tradičně za ctnost, nejen náboženskou, ale i intelektuální. Být disciplinovaný se většina z nás učí tím, že nejprve poslouchá druhé, teprve poté se naučí poslouchat sebe sama. Ostatně i osobní autonomii, tuto nejvyšší moderní ctnost, chápe Immanuel Kant jako schopnost být poslušen mravnímu imperativu, svému lepšímu já, dát mu přednost před svým nejmilovanějším já, jinými slovy před sobectvím. Na poslušnosti stála i moderní idea univerzity: student se měl stávat vzdělaným tím, že následuje předobraz svého učitele. Ideoví otcové moderní univerzity, jejichž spisy zakládaly západní univerzity mnohdy hovoří o tom, že vzdělání stojí na „násilí“ či „omezování“.            V průběhu dvacátého století se poslušnost pro někoho stala ctností spornou, nezřídka kdy byla zahrnuta výsměchem i odsudky. Odkaz na poslušnost nacistům je snad laciný, ale ne neefektivní způsob, jak původní ctnost znemožnit. Je faktem, že se mnozí nacisté na poslušnost odvolávali. Proslul zvláště Adolf Eichmann. Pojem poslušnosti dále zpochybnily i tzv. testy lidskosti, které navazovaly na zděšení z konformismu moderních vzdělaných společností. Mezi tyto testy bývá řazen Milgramův i Zimbardův experiment. Philip Zimbardo, jeden z nejvlivnějších sociálních psychologů druhé poloviny dvacátého století, se poslušností zabývá i na pozadí druhé světové války. Spíše než že by poslušnost odmítl, nabízí novou interpretaci Kantova pojetí. Ve Stanfordském experimentu i svých studiích k vandalismu ukázal, jak snadno podléháme situačním podmínkám i autoritám a jak snadno se dopouštíme zlých činů.Vysmívat se poslušnosti přesto není cesta. Jedině díky ní si budujeme disciplínu, která je základem dobra i naplněného života. Nedisciplinovanost ústí v rozplizlost, která je nezřídka kdy souznačná se zoufalstvím. Zimbardo to zvláště ve svém pozdním díle sleduje na mladých lidech v tzv. post-disciplinární společnosti. Tradiční hierarchické vztahy dítěte a rodiče, žáka a učitele, studenta a profesora jsme redefinovaly na vztahy partnerské, ne-li „parťácké“. Tuto redefinici považujeme ne zřídkakdy za ctnost, za znamení vlastní velkorysosti. V tom se podle Zimbarda pleteme. Chápat hierarchické vztahy výlučně jako místa mocenského zneužívání je znamením infantilního nepochopení, které je jedním z důvodů, proč děti a mladí lide dnes neprospívají.  Kapitoly I. Jeden problém je zneužívat moc, druhý neumět ji unést [začátek až 19:20] II. Hanebná poslušnost? [19:20 až 32:18] III. Zimbardo: Chlapec z ulice i nejproslulejší psycholog své doby [32:18 až 45:20] IV. Zlo bývá banální. Ale možná existuje i banální dobro? [45:20 až 56:15] V. Nedisciplinovanost k uzoufání [56:15 až konec]  Bibliografie Hannah Arendtová, Eichmann v Jeruzalémě, přel. Martin Palouš, Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2019. Hannah Arendt, Vom Leben des Geistes, München: Piper Verlag, 2006. Axel Honneth, Právo svobody, přel. Břetislav Horyna, Praha: Filosofia, 2018.Philip Zimbardo, Rosemary K. M. Swordová, Lépe žít a milovat díky terapii časové perspektivy, Praha: Academia 2022. Philip Zimbardo, Luciferův efekt: Jak se z dobrých lidí stávají lidé zlí, přel. Radek Kašpar,  Marika Králíková, Praha: Academia, 2021. Philip Zimbardo, Nikita Coulombe, Man Disconnected: How the Digital Age Is Changing Young Men Forever, London: Rider Publishing 2016. Philip Zimbardo, Paměti psychologa. Rozhovor s Danielem Hartwigem, přel. Linda Bartošková, Praha: Portál, 2021.

Wer unsere Arbeit mit einer Spende unterstützen will, kann dies per PayPal tun: paypal.me/hellepanke Likes, Abos und ein Besuch auf www.helle-panke.de unterstützen uns ebenso. Den Newsletter mit unserem Wochenprogramm gibt es hier: www.helle-panke.de/de/topic/22.newsletter.html Aufzeichnung vom 18. Oktober 2023, aus der Kopenhagener Str. 9 in Berlin 1. Tag der Konferenz "1923 – Sattelzeit der Revolution. Umbrüche in Politik, Kultur und radikaler Gesellschaftskritik" (3 Panels) 3. Panel. 100 Jahre Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein. Zum Werk Begrüßung: Dimitra Alifieraki Diskussion: Dr. Karl Lauschke und Dr. Rüdiger Dannemann Vor hundert Jahren, 1923, veröffentlichte Georg Lukács sein epochales Werk "Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein". 2023 publizierte Karl Lauschke eine umfangreiche Monographie zu Georg Lukács, Titel: „Die Gegenwart als Werden erfassen“. Inhalt, politischer Kontext und Rezeption von Georg Lukács´ Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein“. Seine von der Sorgfalt des Historikers geprägte Studie verdient aus unterschiedlichen Gründen unsere Aufmerksamkeit. Zunächst: Manche glauben, die Geschichte von „Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein“ sei inzwischen auserzählt. Karl Lauschkes Studie beweist das Gegenteil. Im Gespräch mit dem Philosophen Rüdiger Dannemann, dem Vorsitzenden der Internationalen Georg Lukács Gesellschaft, soll in einem "Werkstattgespräch" ausgelotet werden, welche Engführungen und Irrtümer die bisherige Wirkungsgeschichte aufweist und welche neuen Wege die Lukács-Rezeption in Zukunft gehen sollte. Dr. Karl Lauschke, Privatdozent am Otto-Suhr-Institut der Freien Universität Berlin, Lehrstuhlvertretungen in Münster, Göttingen Dortmund, heute freiberuflicher Historiker. 2023 publizierte er die umfangreiche Monographie zu Georg Lukács „Die Gegenwart als Werden erfassen“. Inhalt, politischer Kontext und Rezeption von Georg Lukács´"Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein“. Dr. Rüdiger Dannemann, Vorsitzender der Internationalen Georg-Lukács-Gesellschaft und Herausgeber des Lukács-Jahrbuchs sowie der Lukács-Werkausgabe in Einzelbänden. Aktuelle Veröffentlichungen: (zusammen mit Axel Honneth), Ästhetik, Marxismus, Ontologie. Ausgewählte Texte, 2021; Georg Lukács, Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein. Faksimile des Arbeitsexemplars. Mit Transkriptionen und Erläuterungen der Lukács-Marginalien von Rüdiger Dannemann, 2023; Georg Lukács, Zur Ontologie des gesellschaftlichen Seins. Die Entfremdung, 2024. Moderation: Dimitra Alifieraki

Natürlich sind wir unersetzlich. Doch was wäre denn eine alternative Lösung, gäbe es uns jeweils einzeln nicht (mehr)? Wer könnte uns würdig vertreten im Duo? Wen würden wir dem anderen an die Seite wünschen als Podcast-Partner*in?

At the end of the day, I have faith in the wisdom of democracy: the idea that good political solutions only arise from widely dispersed discussion, debate and decision among the broadest group of those affected. This book is intended, then, not as a finalized blueprint or technical report delivered from on high but as a conversation opener for democratic debate among my fellow citizens. – Christopher F. Zurn, Splitsville USA (2023) Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States (Routledge, 2023) argues that it's time for us to break up to save representative democracy, proposing a mutually negotiated, peaceful dissolution of the current United States into several new nations. Zurn begins by examining the United States' democratic predicament, a road most likely headed for electoral authoritarianism, with distinct possibilities of ungovernability and violent civil strife. Unlike others who share this diagnosis, Zurn presents a realistic picture of how we can get to reform and what it would involve. It is argued that “Splitsville” represents the most plausible way for American citizens to continue living under a republican form of government. Despite recent talk of secession and civil war, this book offers the most extensive treatment yet of the issues we need to think through to enable a peacefully negotiated political divorce. The publisher's summary above of Professor Zurn's latest book is a worthy overview, even more are the insightful thoughts and comments he shares in this interview. There is something here for everyone, as he shares insights about two key influences on his work - Honneth and Habermas, as well as his gratitude for his Northwestern graduate school experience under Thomas McCarthy in heady times when Nancy Fraser was still there. Zurn explains his argument ‘that democracy minimally requires a widely shared precommitment to obeying and accepting the outcomes of free, fair and regular elections for political representatives' and contends ‘if we look frankly at our current situation, we—the United States ‘we'—no longer sufficiently share this democratic precommitment.'  The professor elaborates on ideas and concepts such as ‘conflict entrepreneurs' and their manipulation of an existential framing of our political struggles to gain and maintain power. However, he also makes clear that the American public agrees at a ‘high level on the basic values of American society' and he expands his argument to ‘think about the complex constellation of values we want to realize in our politics'. As you will hear, Splitsville USA was written by an articulate and passionate voice that is both supportive and highly committed to saving representative government. Some of Professor Zurn's other books and chapters in edited books mentioned in this interview: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social (2015) Chapter 12: ‘Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders' in  Axel Honneth: Critical Essays - With a Reply by Axel Honneth (2011) Introduction to The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (2009) Christopher Zurn is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

At the end of the day, I have faith in the wisdom of democracy: the idea that good political solutions only arise from widely dispersed discussion, debate and decision among the broadest group of those affected. This book is intended, then, not as a finalized blueprint or technical report delivered from on high but as a conversation opener for democratic debate among my fellow citizens. – Christopher F. Zurn, Splitsville USA (2023) Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States (Routledge, 2023) argues that it's time for us to break up to save representative democracy, proposing a mutually negotiated, peaceful dissolution of the current United States into several new nations. Zurn begins by examining the United States' democratic predicament, a road most likely headed for electoral authoritarianism, with distinct possibilities of ungovernability and violent civil strife. Unlike others who share this diagnosis, Zurn presents a realistic picture of how we can get to reform and what it would involve. It is argued that “Splitsville” represents the most plausible way for American citizens to continue living under a republican form of government. Despite recent talk of secession and civil war, this book offers the most extensive treatment yet of the issues we need to think through to enable a peacefully negotiated political divorce. The publisher's summary above of Professor Zurn's latest book is a worthy overview, even more are the insightful thoughts and comments he shares in this interview. There is something here for everyone, as he shares insights about two key influences on his work - Honneth and Habermas, as well as his gratitude for his Northwestern graduate school experience under Thomas McCarthy in heady times when Nancy Fraser was still there. Zurn explains his argument ‘that democracy minimally requires a widely shared precommitment to obeying and accepting the outcomes of free, fair and regular elections for political representatives' and contends ‘if we look frankly at our current situation, we—the United States ‘we'—no longer sufficiently share this democratic precommitment.'  The professor elaborates on ideas and concepts such as ‘conflict entrepreneurs' and their manipulation of an existential framing of our political struggles to gain and maintain power. However, he also makes clear that the American public agrees at a ‘high level on the basic values of American society' and he expands his argument to ‘think about the complex constellation of values we want to realize in our politics'. As you will hear, Splitsville USA was written by an articulate and passionate voice that is both supportive and highly committed to saving representative government. Some of Professor Zurn's other books and chapters in edited books mentioned in this interview: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social (2015) Chapter 12: ‘Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders' in  Axel Honneth: Critical Essays - With a Reply by Axel Honneth (2011) Introduction to The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (2009) Christopher Zurn is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

At the end of the day, I have faith in the wisdom of democracy: the idea that good political solutions only arise from widely dispersed discussion, debate and decision among the broadest group of those affected. This book is intended, then, not as a finalized blueprint or technical report delivered from on high but as a conversation opener for democratic debate among my fellow citizens. – Christopher F. Zurn, Splitsville USA (2023) Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States (Routledge, 2023) argues that it's time for us to break up to save representative democracy, proposing a mutually negotiated, peaceful dissolution of the current United States into several new nations. Zurn begins by examining the United States' democratic predicament, a road most likely headed for electoral authoritarianism, with distinct possibilities of ungovernability and violent civil strife. Unlike others who share this diagnosis, Zurn presents a realistic picture of how we can get to reform and what it would involve. It is argued that “Splitsville” represents the most plausible way for American citizens to continue living under a republican form of government. Despite recent talk of secession and civil war, this book offers the most extensive treatment yet of the issues we need to think through to enable a peacefully negotiated political divorce. The publisher's summary above of Professor Zurn's latest book is a worthy overview, even more are the insightful thoughts and comments he shares in this interview. There is something here for everyone, as he shares insights about two key influences on his work - Honneth and Habermas, as well as his gratitude for his Northwestern graduate school experience under Thomas McCarthy in heady times when Nancy Fraser was still there. Zurn explains his argument ‘that democracy minimally requires a widely shared precommitment to obeying and accepting the outcomes of free, fair and regular elections for political representatives' and contends ‘if we look frankly at our current situation, we—the United States ‘we'—no longer sufficiently share this democratic precommitment.'  The professor elaborates on ideas and concepts such as ‘conflict entrepreneurs' and their manipulation of an existential framing of our political struggles to gain and maintain power. However, he also makes clear that the American public agrees at a ‘high level on the basic values of American society' and he expands his argument to ‘think about the complex constellation of values we want to realize in our politics'. As you will hear, Splitsville USA was written by an articulate and passionate voice that is both supportive and highly committed to saving representative government. Some of Professor Zurn's other books and chapters in edited books mentioned in this interview: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social (2015) Chapter 12: ‘Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders' in  Axel Honneth: Critical Essays - With a Reply by Axel Honneth (2011) Introduction to The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (2009) Christopher Zurn is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

At the end of the day, I have faith in the wisdom of democracy: the idea that good political solutions only arise from widely dispersed discussion, debate and decision among the broadest group of those affected. This book is intended, then, not as a finalized blueprint or technical report delivered from on high but as a conversation opener for democratic debate among my fellow citizens. – Christopher F. Zurn, Splitsville USA (2023) Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States (Routledge, 2023) argues that it's time for us to break up to save representative democracy, proposing a mutually negotiated, peaceful dissolution of the current United States into several new nations. Zurn begins by examining the United States' democratic predicament, a road most likely headed for electoral authoritarianism, with distinct possibilities of ungovernability and violent civil strife. Unlike others who share this diagnosis, Zurn presents a realistic picture of how we can get to reform and what it would involve. It is argued that “Splitsville” represents the most plausible way for American citizens to continue living under a republican form of government. Despite recent talk of secession and civil war, this book offers the most extensive treatment yet of the issues we need to think through to enable a peacefully negotiated political divorce. The publisher's summary above of Professor Zurn's latest book is a worthy overview, even more are the insightful thoughts and comments he shares in this interview. There is something here for everyone, as he shares insights about two key influences on his work - Honneth and Habermas, as well as his gratitude for his Northwestern graduate school experience under Thomas McCarthy in heady times when Nancy Fraser was still there. Zurn explains his argument ‘that democracy minimally requires a widely shared precommitment to obeying and accepting the outcomes of free, fair and regular elections for political representatives' and contends ‘if we look frankly at our current situation, we—the United States ‘we'—no longer sufficiently share this democratic precommitment.'  The professor elaborates on ideas and concepts such as ‘conflict entrepreneurs' and their manipulation of an existential framing of our political struggles to gain and maintain power. However, he also makes clear that the American public agrees at a ‘high level on the basic values of American society' and he expands his argument to ‘think about the complex constellation of values we want to realize in our politics'. As you will hear, Splitsville USA was written by an articulate and passionate voice that is both supportive and highly committed to saving representative government. Some of Professor Zurn's other books and chapters in edited books mentioned in this interview: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social (2015) Chapter 12: ‘Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders' in  Axel Honneth: Critical Essays - With a Reply by Axel Honneth (2011) Introduction to The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (2009) Christopher Zurn is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-west

At the end of the day, I have faith in the wisdom of democracy: the idea that good political solutions only arise from widely dispersed discussion, debate and decision among the broadest group of those affected. This book is intended, then, not as a finalized blueprint or technical report delivered from on high but as a conversation opener for democratic debate among my fellow citizens. – Christopher F. Zurn, Splitsville USA (2023) Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States (Routledge, 2023) argues that it's time for us to break up to save representative democracy, proposing a mutually negotiated, peaceful dissolution of the current United States into several new nations. Zurn begins by examining the United States' democratic predicament, a road most likely headed for electoral authoritarianism, with distinct possibilities of ungovernability and violent civil strife. Unlike others who share this diagnosis, Zurn presents a realistic picture of how we can get to reform and what it would involve. It is argued that “Splitsville” represents the most plausible way for American citizens to continue living under a republican form of government. Despite recent talk of secession and civil war, this book offers the most extensive treatment yet of the issues we need to think through to enable a peacefully negotiated political divorce. The publisher's summary above of Professor Zurn's latest book is a worthy overview, even more are the insightful thoughts and comments he shares in this interview. There is something here for everyone, as he shares insights about two key influences on his work - Honneth and Habermas, as well as his gratitude for his Northwestern graduate school experience under Thomas McCarthy in heady times when Nancy Fraser was still there. Zurn explains his argument ‘that democracy minimally requires a widely shared precommitment to obeying and accepting the outcomes of free, fair and regular elections for political representatives' and contends ‘if we look frankly at our current situation, we—the United States ‘we'—no longer sufficiently share this democratic precommitment.'  The professor elaborates on ideas and concepts such as ‘conflict entrepreneurs' and their manipulation of an existential framing of our political struggles to gain and maintain power. However, he also makes clear that the American public agrees at a ‘high level on the basic values of American society' and he expands his argument to ‘think about the complex constellation of values we want to realize in our politics'. As you will hear, Splitsville USA was written by an articulate and passionate voice that is both supportive and highly committed to saving representative government. Some of Professor Zurn's other books and chapters in edited books mentioned in this interview: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social (2015) Chapter 12: ‘Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders' in  Axel Honneth: Critical Essays - With a Reply by Axel Honneth (2011) Introduction to The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (2009) Christopher Zurn is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/politics-and-polemics

At the end of the day, I have faith in the wisdom of democracy: the idea that good political solutions only arise from widely dispersed discussion, debate and decision among the broadest group of those affected. This book is intended, then, not as a finalized blueprint or technical report delivered from on high but as a conversation opener for democratic debate among my fellow citizens. – Christopher F. Zurn, Splitsville USA (2023) Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States (Routledge, 2023) argues that it's time for us to break up to save representative democracy, proposing a mutually negotiated, peaceful dissolution of the current United States into several new nations. Zurn begins by examining the United States' democratic predicament, a road most likely headed for electoral authoritarianism, with distinct possibilities of ungovernability and violent civil strife. Unlike others who share this diagnosis, Zurn presents a realistic picture of how we can get to reform and what it would involve. It is argued that “Splitsville” represents the most plausible way for American citizens to continue living under a republican form of government. Despite recent talk of secession and civil war, this book offers the most extensive treatment yet of the issues we need to think through to enable a peacefully negotiated political divorce. The publisher's summary above of Professor Zurn's latest book is a worthy overview, even more are the insightful thoughts and comments he shares in this interview. There is something here for everyone, as he shares insights about two key influences on his work - Honneth and Habermas, as well as his gratitude for his Northwestern graduate school experience under Thomas McCarthy in heady times when Nancy Fraser was still there. Zurn explains his argument ‘that democracy minimally requires a widely shared precommitment to obeying and accepting the outcomes of free, fair and regular elections for political representatives' and contends ‘if we look frankly at our current situation, we—the United States ‘we'—no longer sufficiently share this democratic precommitment.'  The professor elaborates on ideas and concepts such as ‘conflict entrepreneurs' and their manipulation of an existential framing of our political struggles to gain and maintain power. However, he also makes clear that the American public agrees at a ‘high level on the basic values of American society' and he expands his argument to ‘think about the complex constellation of values we want to realize in our politics'. As you will hear, Splitsville USA was written by an articulate and passionate voice that is both supportive and highly committed to saving representative government. Some of Professor Zurn's other books and chapters in edited books mentioned in this interview: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social (2015) Chapter 12: ‘Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders' in  Axel Honneth: Critical Essays - With a Reply by Axel Honneth (2011) Introduction to The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (2009) Christopher Zurn is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-south

At the end of the day, I have faith in the wisdom of democracy: the idea that good political solutions only arise from widely dispersed discussion, debate and decision among the broadest group of those affected. This book is intended, then, not as a finalized blueprint or technical report delivered from on high but as a conversation opener for democratic debate among my fellow citizens. – Christopher F. Zurn, Splitsville USA (2023) Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States (Routledge, 2023) argues that it's time for us to break up to save representative democracy, proposing a mutually negotiated, peaceful dissolution of the current United States into several new nations. Zurn begins by examining the United States' democratic predicament, a road most likely headed for electoral authoritarianism, with distinct possibilities of ungovernability and violent civil strife. Unlike others who share this diagnosis, Zurn presents a realistic picture of how we can get to reform and what it would involve. It is argued that “Splitsville” represents the most plausible way for American citizens to continue living under a republican form of government. Despite recent talk of secession and civil war, this book offers the most extensive treatment yet of the issues we need to think through to enable a peacefully negotiated political divorce. The publisher's summary above of Professor Zurn's latest book is a worthy overview, even more are the insightful thoughts and comments he shares in this interview. There is something here for everyone, as he shares insights about two key influences on his work - Honneth and Habermas, as well as his gratitude for his Northwestern graduate school experience under Thomas McCarthy in heady times when Nancy Fraser was still there. Zurn explains his argument ‘that democracy minimally requires a widely shared precommitment to obeying and accepting the outcomes of free, fair and regular elections for political representatives' and contends ‘if we look frankly at our current situation, we—the United States ‘we'—no longer sufficiently share this democratic precommitment.'  The professor elaborates on ideas and concepts such as ‘conflict entrepreneurs' and their manipulation of an existential framing of our political struggles to gain and maintain power. However, he also makes clear that the American public agrees at a ‘high level on the basic values of American society' and he expands his argument to ‘think about the complex constellation of values we want to realize in our politics'. As you will hear, Splitsville USA was written by an articulate and passionate voice that is both supportive and highly committed to saving representative government. Some of Professor Zurn's other books and chapters in edited books mentioned in this interview: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social (2015) Chapter 12: ‘Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders' in  Axel Honneth: Critical Essays - With a Reply by Axel Honneth (2011) Introduction to The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (2009) Christopher Zurn is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

At the end of the day, I have faith in the wisdom of democracy: the idea that good political solutions only arise from widely dispersed discussion, debate and decision among the broadest group of those affected. This book is intended, then, not as a finalized blueprint or technical report delivered from on high but as a conversation opener for democratic debate among my fellow citizens. – Christopher F. Zurn, Splitsville USA (2023) Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States (Routledge, 2023) argues that it's time for us to break up to save representative democracy, proposing a mutually negotiated, peaceful dissolution of the current United States into several new nations. Zurn begins by examining the United States' democratic predicament, a road most likely headed for electoral authoritarianism, with distinct possibilities of ungovernability and violent civil strife. Unlike others who share this diagnosis, Zurn presents a realistic picture of how we can get to reform and what it would involve. It is argued that “Splitsville” represents the most plausible way for American citizens to continue living under a republican form of government. Despite recent talk of secession and civil war, this book offers the most extensive treatment yet of the issues we need to think through to enable a peacefully negotiated political divorce. The publisher's summary above of Professor Zurn's latest book is a worthy overview, even more are the insightful thoughts and comments he shares in this interview. There is something here for everyone, as he shares insights about two key influences on his work - Honneth and Habermas, as well as his gratitude for his Northwestern graduate school experience under Thomas McCarthy in heady times when Nancy Fraser was still there. Zurn explains his argument ‘that democracy minimally requires a widely shared precommitment to obeying and accepting the outcomes of free, fair and regular elections for political representatives' and contends ‘if we look frankly at our current situation, we—the United States ‘we'—no longer sufficiently share this democratic precommitment.'  The professor elaborates on ideas and concepts such as ‘conflict entrepreneurs' and their manipulation of an existential framing of our political struggles to gain and maintain power. However, he also makes clear that the American public agrees at a ‘high level on the basic values of American society' and he expands his argument to ‘think about the complex constellation of values we want to realize in our politics'. As you will hear, Splitsville USA was written by an articulate and passionate voice that is both supportive and highly committed to saving representative government. Some of Professor Zurn's other books and chapters in edited books mentioned in this interview: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007) Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social (2015) Chapter 12: ‘Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders' in  Axel Honneth: Critical Essays - With a Reply by Axel Honneth (2011) Introduction to The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (2009) Christopher Zurn is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day

Die Organisation von Arbeit hat sich in den letzten Jahren stark geändert. Für viele Menschen ist die Arbeit längst mehr als nur das halbe Leben. Der Raum für Politik bleibt dabei möglicherweise auf der Strecke. Was bedeutet das für die Demokratie? Studiogast: Axel Honneth, Philosoph; Moderation: Jürgen Wiebicke Von WDR 5.

Robert Misik im Gespräch mit Axel Honneth DER ARBEITENDE SOUVERÄNEine normative Theorie der Arbeit  Welche Rolle spielt die Organisation von Arbeitsverhältnissen für die Bestandssicherung eines demokratischen Gemeinwesens? Das ist die Frage, der Axel Honneth in seiner neuen großen Monographie nachgeht, deren Schlüsselbegriffe »gesellschaftliche Arbeit« und »soziale Arbeitsteilung« sind. Seine zentrale These lautet, dass die Teilnahme an der demokratischen Willensbildung an die Voraussetzung einer transparent und fair geregelten Arbeitsteilung gebunden ist. An welchen Scharnierstellen hätte heute eine Politik der Arbeit anzusetzen, um den sich abzeichnenden Missständen entgegenzuwirken und u einer dringend benötigten Neubelebung demokratischer Partizipation beizutragen? Axel Honneth, SozialphilosophRobert Misik, Autor und Journalist Axel Honneth, geboren 1949, ist Jack C. Weinstein Professor of the Humanities an der Columbia University in New York. 2015 wurde er mit dem Ernst-Bloch-Preis, 2016 für Die Idee des Sozialismus mit dem Bruno-Kreisky-Preis für das politische Buch ausgezeichnet. 2021 hielt er in Berlin seine vielbeachteten Benjamin-Lectures zum Thema dieses Buches.  Axel Honneth:Der arbeitende Souverän. Eine normative Theorie der ArbeitSuhrkamp Verlag, März 2023, ISBN 978-3-518-58797-3, € 30,-

Über die Frage, wie Demokratie für alle erfahrbar werden kann.In dieser Folge von Dichtung & Wahrheit ist Axel Honneth zu Gast bei Laura de Weck. Im Gespräch mit dem Sozialphilosophen geht es darum, wie Arbeitsverhältnisse und soziale Anerkennung unsere politische Willensbildung beeinflussen – und was sich ändern müsste, damit Demokratie für alle erfahrbar werden kann. Honneth spricht außerdem über die persönlichen Hintergründe, die ihn zu den in seinen Arbeiten zentralen Themen »Anerkennung« und »Scham« führten und darüber, welche Rolle die Rockmusik bei seiner eigenen Politisierung spielte.Axel Honneth gehört zu den wichtigsten Mitgliedern der dritten Generation der Frankfurter Schule. Von 2001 bis 2018 war Honneth Direktor des Instituts für Sozialforschung (IfS) an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. Derzeit ist er Jack C. Weinstein Professor of the Humanities an der Columbia University in New York.Wer errät, ob die persönliche Anekdote von Axel Honneth am Ende der Folge wahr oder erfunden ist, hat die Chance, eins von drei signierten Exemplaren seines Buchs Der arbeitende Souverän zu gewinnen. Die Auflösung gibt es dann am 29.06.2023 auf www.suhrkamp.de/podcast.Die Bücher zur Folge»Der arbeitende Souverän«»Anerkennung oder Unvernehmen?« Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Das neue Buch des Sozialphilosophen Axel Honneth ist ein emphatisches Plädoyer für den sinnstiftenden Wert der Erwerbsarbeit. Rezension von Konstantin Sakkas. Suhrkamp Verlag, 400 Seiten, 30 Euro ISBN 978-3-518-58797-3

Das Institut für Sozialforschung hat in 100 Jahren renommierte Philosophen hervorgebracht und globale Debatten angestoßen. Ob die "Kritische Theorie" der Frankfurter Schule noch zeitgemäß ist, diskutieren Axel Honneth und Alexandra Schauer. Honneth, Axel; Schauer, Alexandrawww.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Sein und StreitDirekter Link zur Audiodatei

Filosoffen Axel Honneth fortæller i denne uges Langsomme Samtaler med Rune Lykkeberg om sin intellektuelle dannelse, arven fra kritisk teori, kampen for anerkendelse og ambitionen om at knytte de store ideer til progressive bevægelser. I samtalen fortæller Honneth også om sin nye bog Der arbeitende Souverän, hvor den tyske filosof sætter forbindelsen mellem arbejdsforholdene og demokratisk deltagelse i centrum af samtalen. For Honneth skal man indrette arbejdsmarkedet, så folk ikke bare er lønmodtagere, men får mulighed for at udfolde sig som frie borgere. 

durée : 00:58:37 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann - En soulignant le potentiel de transformation de tout un chacun, la philosophie hégélienne est-elle un contrepoids à la fixité des identités ? L'œuvre de Hegel oblige à penser le non-identique, une question dont s'empare la Théorie critique, portée par Theodor W. Adorno et Axel Honneth. - invités : Katia Genel maître de conférences en philosophie à l'université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, actuellement en délégation au Centre Marc Bloch à Berlin; Elodie Djordjevic maîtresse de conférences en philosophie du droit à l'université Paris Panthéon-Assas, directrice adjointe de Droit et Philosophie ; Daniel Payot professeur émérite de l'Université de Strasbourg

Prekäre Beschäftigung hindert viele Menschen daran, an der demokratischen Willensbildung teilzunehmen, sagt Axel Honneth. In seinem Buch "Der arbeitende Souverän" untersucht der Soziologe den Widerspruch zwischen Arbeitsalltag und demokratischem Anspruch. Ein Gespräch über Plackerei, Post-Demokratie und den Kampf für eine bessere Arbeitswelt.

Wer unsere Arbeit mit einer Spende unterstützen will, kann dies per PayPal tun: paypal.me/hellepanke Likes, Abos und ein Besuch auf www.helle-panke.de helfen uns ebenso. Vielen Dank! Aufzeichnung vom 23. Februar 2023 100 Jahre "Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein" Georg Lukács‘ schwieriges Verhältnis zu seinem philosophischen Meisterwerk. Rüdiger Dannemann im Gespräch mit Patrick Eiden-Offe Gleich nach seinem Erscheinen im Frühjahr 1923 sorgt Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein für reichlich Unruhe und Debatte, es wird Inspirationsquelle im Umfeld kritisch-revolutionärer Theorie, zum Hassobjekt dogmatischer Orthodoxie. Heute ist es unbestritten ein Klassiker des 20. Jahrhunderts. Bis zu seinem Lebensende ringt der Autor um eine angemessene Positionierung zu seinem wirkungsmächtigsten Werk. Die jetzt erstmals in einer Faksimileausgabe des Originals publizierten Marginalien und Notizen sind Lukács‘ letzter Versuch einer Standortbestimmung, nicht aber das letzte Wort in der durch Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein angestoßenen Debatte. Rüdiger Dannemann wird Lukács Anmerkungen und Notizen, seine verschiedenen Selbstkritiken und sein lebenslanges Ringen mit dem Werk vorstellen, anschließend gibt es ein Gespräch mit Patrick Eiden-Offe, der an einer Lukács Biographie arbeitet. Dr. Rüdiger Dannemann ist Mitbegründer und Vorsitzender der Internationalen Georg Lukács-Gesellschaft sowie Herausgeber des Lukács-Jahrbuchs und der Georg Lukács Werkauswahl in Einzelbänden, Georg Lukács, Ästhetik, Marxismus, Ontologie. Ausgewählte Texte. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp 2021 (mit Axel Honneth). Im Februar 2023 gibt er Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein als Faksimile des Hand- und Arbeitsexemplars von Georg Lukács heraus. PD. Dr. Patrick Eiden-Offe arbeitet am Leibniz Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung, hat 2017 Poesie der Klasse. Romantischer Antikapitalismus und die Erfindung des Proletariats und 2021 Hegels „Logik“ lesen: ein Selbstversuch veröffentlicht und arbeitet zurzeit an einer großen Lukács Biographie. Moderation: Dr. Frank Engster

Panelsamtal med Magnus Hörnqvist, Sara Edenheim & Evelina Johansson Wilén och Shabane Barot utifrån tidskriften Fronesis temanummer om erkännande. Begäret efter erkännande skiljer inte människor åt utan förenar dem. Att bli erkänd av andra är både en nödvändighet och en förbannelse. Dessutom dikterar erkännande politikens villkor på sätt som intensivt diskuterats under de senaste tre decennierna: håller konflikter om erkännande på att ersätta konflikter om resurser, är erkännandet förtryckande snarare än frigörande, och vad menar vi egentligen med erkännande? I detta panelsamtal återvänder till begreppets ursprung i 1800-talets Tyskland, gör ett nerslag i dess renässans på 1990-talet för att sedan ta sig an dagens diskussion om erkännandets ambivalens. Vi gör även nerslag hos några av de mest tongivande teoretikerna i denna diskussion, som J. G. Fichte, Alexandre Kojève, Judith Butler, Axel Honneth, Rahel Jaeggi, Nancy Fraser och Michèle Lamont. Magnus Hörnqvist är professor i kriminologi vid Stockholms Universitet Sara Edenheim är docent i historia och universitetslektor vid Umeå centrum för genusstudier, Umeå universitet. Evelina Johansson Wilén är genusvetare och biträdande lektor med inriktning mot social förändring och digitalisering vid Högskolan i Halmstad Moderator: Shabane Barot, medlem i Fronesis redaktionskommitté.

The notion of freedom and how to ensure it for all has occupied the minds of many modern thinkers. In his text Elements of the Philosophy of Right, German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel explored the nature of individual freedom and how society and the government can guarantee it for all citizens. Hegel argued that protecting basic rights wasn't enough. Governments needed to support a more robust conception of individual freedom. He also believed we need other people in order to help us fully realize our individual freedom. Axel Honneth is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and Director of the Institute for Social Research at Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. He's the author of The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel's Social Theory and Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory, among other books. See more information on our website, WritLarge.fm. Follow us on Twitter @WritLargePod. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

The notion of freedom and how to ensure it for all has occupied the minds of many modern thinkers. In his text Elements of the Philosophy of Right, German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel explored the nature of individual freedom and how society and the government can guarantee it for all citizens. Hegel argued that protecting basic rights wasn't enough. Governments needed to support a more robust conception of individual freedom. He also believed we need other people in order to help us fully realize our individual freedom. Axel Honneth is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and Director of the Institute for Social Research at Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. He's the author of The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel's Social Theory and Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory, among other books. See more information on our website, WritLarge.fm. Follow us on Twitter @WritLargePod. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/german-studies

The notion of freedom and how to ensure it for all has occupied the minds of many modern thinkers. In his text Elements of the Philosophy of Right, German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel explored the nature of individual freedom and how society and the government can guarantee it for all citizens. Hegel argued that protecting basic rights wasn't enough. Governments needed to support a more robust conception of individual freedom. He also believed we need other people in order to help us fully realize our individual freedom. Axel Honneth is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and Director of the Institute for Social Research at Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. He's the author of The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel's Social Theory and Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory, among other books. See more information on our website, WritLarge.fm. Follow us on Twitter @WritLargePod. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

The notion of freedom and how to ensure it for all has occupied the minds of many modern thinkers. In his text Elements of the Philosophy of Right, German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel explored the nature of individual freedom and how society and the government can guarantee it for all citizens. Hegel argued that protecting basic rights wasn't enough. Governments needed to support a more robust conception of individual freedom. He also believed we need other people in order to help us fully realize our individual freedom. Axel Honneth is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and Director of the Institute for Social Research at Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. He's the author of The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel's Social Theory and Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory, among other books. See more information on our website, WritLarge.fm. Follow us on Twitter @WritLargePod. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

Was ist eigentlich Anerkennung und was macht sie mit uns und anderen? Und ja, Macht ist hier durchaus auch als Substantiv enthalten. Denn das Vorenthalten von Anerkennung ist ein Herrschaftsinstrument. Das zu wissen und entsprechend zu berücksichtigen, kann in Konfliktsituationen hilfreich sein. Aber auch uns selbst gegenüber brauchen wir Anerkennung als Werkzeug.

Axel Honneth's 2021 Royal Institute of Philosophy Dublin Lecture seeks briefly to reconstruct the history of conceptual disputes about the meaning of work from the beginning of capitalist industrialisation. Initially, the only kind of activity that counted as work in the proper sense was the industrialised manufacture of goods. Subsequently, this extremely narrow view of work was challenged by a succession of social actors who attempt to expand the definition by interpreting additional kinds of activity as work. At the present juncture, there is widespread acceptance of the view that caring and curative activities, be they in private households or in public facilities, should also count as work in the strict sense. However, this new, broader notion of work poses the problem of how to distinguish socially important work from activities performed for merely private ends. Honneth concludes with a proposal for resolving this conceptual difficulty.Axel Honneth holds professorships at both Columbia University and the Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. His work focuses on social-political and moral philosophy, especially relations of power, recognition, and respect. One of his core arguments is for the priority of intersubjective relationships of recognition in understanding social relations. He has been awarded the Ernst Bloch-Preis from the City of Ludwigshafen, the Bruno-Kreisky Prize from the Karl-Renner Stiftung in Vienna and the Ulysses Medal, University College Dublin's highest honour. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Willkommen im Sprawl. Und willkommen in Gilead. Zeitungen und Fernsehen sind zwar verboten, doch Bruder Alex und Bruder Stephan haben natürlich trotzdem die heißesten News für euch. Das Sprawl Radio kennt keine Grenzen, das Sprawl Radio ist in euch. Macht euch bereit für unseren Report über Atwood's "Der Report der Magd". Hirundo maleficis evoltat.In dieser Folge besprechen wir Kapitel 1-9 aus "Der Report der Magd".In der nächsten Folge besprechen wir Kapitel 10-18 aus "Der Report der Magd".Schreibt uns eine E-Mail an sprawlradio@gmx.deTwitter @sprawlradioLetterboxd: Kim_chi und gamurgaIhr mögt unseren Podcast und möchtet uns finanziell unterstützen? Wir freuen uns über kleine oder große Beträge über Paypal: paypal.me/sprawlradio oder an sprawlradio@gmx.deLiteratur:Margaret Atwood, Der Report der Magd, 1985 (dt. Übersetzung 1985)Axel Honeth, Die Idee des Sozialismus, 2015Podcast:Axel Honneth im Dissens PodcastVerwendete Musik:Dee Yan-Key - Sloshed

No episódio de hoje conversamos com Nathalie Bressiani (UFABC) sobre a Filosofia Social de Nancy Fraser, filósofa feminista americana e pensadora da Teoria Crítica. Na entrevista, tratamos de sua compreensão sobre Feminismo e Teoria Crítica, a influência de Habermas em seus trabalhos, o debate travado com Axel Honneth, sua teoria da justiça democrática e potenciais emancipatórios. Ademais, falamos da importância da redistribuição e do reconhecimento para a filósofa, sua relação teórica com Marx e Weber, sua crítica ao capitalismo e sua base ideológica neoliberal. Nathalie oferece um panorama privilegiado da filosofia de Nancy Fraser tanto para quem ainda não conhece seu trabalho quanto para os já iniciados em suas análises e crítica social.

Judith und Franz sind neu in der Frankfurter Schule und widmen diese Folge dem großen Erik Spiekermann und der Hausschrift der Deutschen Bahn. Zwischen fischelnden Hunden und Angelutensilien aus dem Rammstein-Repertoire erörtern die beiden die Irrungen und Wirrungen des Anerkennungsbegriffs. Was bleibt? Zweifelsohne ein herzhafter Rant gegen die toxische Positivität, so schön wie ein Oberarmtattoo: „Ich mag keine glücklich dreinschauenden Chemo-Patientinnen.“ Da sind doch locker mal fünf Euro für die Phrasen-Ente fällig. Rausschmeißer-Empfehlungen: Inside Austria https://open.spotify.com/show/7bKkc7yt7C6GRPABEW8Og4 Wilde Schafsjagd https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilde_Schafsjagd

This episode of Season 5 of the BSP Podcast features Adriano Lotito, Milano-Bicocca University. The presentation is taken from our 2020 annual conference: ‘Engaged Phenomenology' Online.   ABSTRACT: This contribution focuses on the Tran Duc Thao's work, Phenomenology and Dialectical Materialism, that is fundamental to post-war French thought, having influenced thinkers as Lyotard and Derrida amongst others and representing the first systematic attempt to synthesize Marxism and phenomenology. Firstly I examine the Tran's reconstruction of Husserlian phenomenology. Originally there is an objective idealism theorizing the independence of the object; then there is its reversal in a subjective idealism highlighting the constituting consciousness; finally there is the switch from static to genetic phenomenology with the thematization of the life-world as historical-empirical ground (I). Secondly I explore the contradiction indicated by Tran between the Husserl's idealistic frame, implicating the reproduction of an abstract dualism, and the results of the concrete analysis, bound to the original claim of going back to the things themselves. This tension is particularly detectable in The Origin of Geometry (II). Thirdly I discuss the Tran's solution to this riddle, namely the radicalisation of the materialistic stance discovered in the Husserl's late writings towards a Marxist horizon. The genesis of the a priori forms of the antepredicative experience is derived from the evolution of species and from the development of human work. The dialectic of behaviour as practical interaction between organism and nature determines the emergence of meanings structuring the experience. The notion of intentionality is interpreted as result of an immanent negation, the aufhebung of any immediate determinations through the work of an emerging  bodily-social intersubjectivity that in this way reaches the self-consciousness. The real movement, insofar as is sketched out and repressed at once, is sublated as intentional content. Transcendental subjectivity becomes an immanent subjectivisation of the object through praxis. This could lead to an alternative antireductionist ontologization of phenomenology despite a teleologism that risks to cage the dialectic in a too narrow path (III).   BIO: Adriano Lotito graduated in Philosophy (B.A) at the University of Bologna with a thesis entitled Phenomenology and Marxism in Tran Duc Thao (Supervisor Prof. Manlio Iofrida) and in Philosophy of the Contemporary World (M.A) at the Vita-Salute San Raffaele University with a thesis entitled Criteria of Normativity in the Axel Honneth's Critical Theory (Supervisor Prof. Roberto Mordacci). He is currently attending the Advanced Course in Critical Theory of Society at the Milano-Bicocca University. He is focusing, with the view to a future Ph.D., on the rethinking of the immanent critique specifically in connection with the work transformations.   This recording is taken from the BSP Annual Conference 2020 Online: 'Engaged Phenomenology'. Organised with the University of Exeter and sponsored by Egenis and the Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health. BSP2020AC was held online this year due to global concerns about the Coronavirus pandemic. For the conference our speakers recorded videos, our keynotes presented live over Zoom, and we also recorded some interviews online as well. Podcast episodes from BSP2020AC are soundtracks of those videos where we and the presenters feel the audio works as a standalone: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/bsp-annual-conference-2020/   You can check out our forthcoming events here: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/events/   The British Society for Phenomenology is a not-for-profit organisation set up with the intention of promoting research and awareness in the field of Phenomenology and other cognate arms of philosophical thought. Currently, the society accomplishes these aims through its journal, events, and podcast. Why not find out more, join the society, and subscribe to our journal the JBSP? https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/  

Cosa si intende per un modello sociale o intersoggettivo di libertà? Perché non si può concepire una libertà che sia realizzata a livello individuale, senza un'azione collettiva regolata con altri? Axel Honneth Libertà sociale. Cooperazione e azione collettiva Domenica 19 settembre 2021 Modena

Nesse episódio conversamos com Filipe Campello (UFPE) sobre Teoria Crítica. Sua definição, principais questões e autores, pensando também em Hegel a partir da Teoria Crítica. Tratamos das sucessões de gerações nesse campo, a virada afetiva de Axel Honneth, as críticas de Nancy Fraser e sua aproximação ao Pragmatismo, as contribuições de Rainer Forst e também sobre a atual pesquisa de Campello acerca da relação entre afetos e instituições na Democracia.

In Round 4 of the Pill Pod's Fight Night, we feature a theoretical battle over the foundation of politics: is politics founded on the struggle for recognition? Or is it the aesthetic creation of a future? French Insurrectionist Jacques Ranciere pits himself against the chief of the Frankfurt School's third generation, Axel Honneth.   If you're partial to the format, you can find Round 1: (Baudrillard vs. Foucault) and Round 3: (Foucault vs. Derrida) over at www.patreon.com/plasticpills  

The notion of freedom and how to ensure it for all has occupied the minds of many modern thinkers. In his text Elements of the Philosophy of Right, German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel explored the nature of individual freedom and how society and the government can guarantee it for all citizens. Hegel argued that protecting basic rights wasn’t enough. Governments needed to support a more robust conception of individual freedom. He also believed we need other people in order to help us fully realize our individual freedom. Axel Honneth is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and Director of the Institute for Social Research at Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. He’s the author of The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel's Social Theory and Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory, among other books. See more information on our website, WritLarge.fm. Follow us on Twitter @WritLargePod.

Neste episódio acompanharemos um bate-papo com a psicanalista Stephanie Soares Brum sobre a questão do reconhecimento, a partir dos autores Donald W. Winnicot, Jéssica Benjamin, Axel Honneth e Daniel Stern. Live realizada pelo canal do Instituto (youtube.com/NebulosaMarginal) no dia 28 de Abril de 2021. Mais informações: NebulosaMarginal.com.br Siga o Instituto através das nossas redes sociais: Facebook.com/NebulosaMarginal Instagram.com/NebulosaMarginal YouTube.com/NebulosaMarginal

Material indicado Hegel e a liberdade dos modernos de Domenico Losurdo Em nome da liberdade! Hegel hoje e o gesto em direção à emancipação: https://lavrapalavra.com/2020/08/03/e...​ Luta por reconhecimento e a centralidade do sofrimento em Axel Honneth: potencial emancipatório e constituição de vínculos políticos: https://lavrapalavra.com/2019/02/13/l...​ O coronavírus e a propaganda anti-China: https://revistaopera.com.br/2020/03/2...

Dimitra Vulcana recebe Heribaldo Maia para falar sobre Hegel.Heribaldo é colunista do blog LavraPalavra, Curador @Projeto Mímesis , membro do Grupo de Estudos Adorno (UFPE), estudioso da obra de Axel Honneth e Hegel e Formado em História pela UFPE.#hqacessível: fotos minhas e do Heribaldo com sombras verdes e laranja. Um Marx Verde e um Hegel laranja. Na lateral direita tem um triângulo nas cores do arco-íris e está escrito na imagem "Hegel em Marx?"Apoie nosso projeto no https://apoia.se/horaqueer, mais informações e links, acesse nosso site www.horaqueer.com

Der Sozialphilosoph Axel Honneth denkt in dreizehn Aufsätzen über die gegenwärtige Lage der Freiheit nach. Rezension von Konstantin Sakkas. Suhrkamp Verlag 2020, 350 Seiten, 22 Euro ISBN 978-3-518-29913-5

Klimakrise und Europas Desintegration: Für Axel Honneth sind das Folgen einer Ego-Freiheit. In "Die Armut unserer Freiheit" plädiert der Philosoph für ein soziales Verständnis von Freiheit. Ein Gespräch über die Grenzen des Individualismus, die Kunst der Solidarität und Freundschaft.

Complaining about our pains is often viewed as weak or soft. Kant and Aristotle went so far as to say that it should never be done. And they say it's something a real man would never do. But could complaining actually be a virtue, even when you can't fix the thing that makes you sad or mad? When done well, complaining can expose our vulnerabilities, invite others to commiserate over share pains, affirm and validate experiences, and just maybe--help us all feel a little less alone. Links and Resources Kathryn Norlock (https://www.kathrynnorlock.com/) The paper (https://philpapers.org/archive/NORCC-2.pdf) Self-respect and protest by Bernard Boxill (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265062) Whining, griping, and complaining: Positivity in the negativity by Robin M. Kowalski (http://people.uncw.edu/hakanr/documents/whining.pdf) Complaint: From Minor Moans to Principled Protests by Julian Baggini (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4884398-complaint) Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics at 1171b10 (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0054:book=7:chapter=7&highlight=men%2Ceffeminate) Kant's Lectures on Ethics (https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=5kCTORPawb4C&pg=PA186&dq=sooner+suffer+myself+than+burden&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwinid32k-jpAhXeSxUIHUnIBukQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=sooner%20suffer%20myself%20than%20burden&f=false) Recognition by Axel Honneth and Avishai Margalit (https://www.jstor.org/stable/4107035?seq=1) Companions in Misery by Mariana Alessandri (https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/companions-in-misery/) Paper Quotes Complaining offers important personal and interpersonal benefits, to oneself when one may otherwise feel isolated or wonder if one’s perceptions are correct, and to others when complaining fulfills social expectations to be a certain kind of cooperative and discursive companion. In short, minor complaints can fulfill the functions of affirmation of one’s own presence and perceptions, or affirmation of others’ perceptions, or both. The whinge can communicate one’s insistence on acknowledgement (“I am not alone”) and/or the interest in acknowledging others (“You are not alone”). Most pressing to me are those occasions when one’s complaint is a plea for validation that one’s pains are not insignificant, and one’s complaint further seeks company to attenuate isolation in suffering, because denial of recognition frustrates basic goods of self-knowledge and autonomy. The recognition of others provides us with options, sources of control, and assistance in integrating our self-narratives; the denial of recognition can leave us trapped within ourselves. Special Guest: Kathryn Norlock.

Aquele em que os odiados, em sintonia com o final de semana de coronamanifestações conservadoras e obtusas (desprovidas de inteligência - 15/03/20), proseiam sobre movimentos socias. Indo do clássico movimento operário do século XIX aos movimentos contemporâneos agrário, gênero, antiglobalização, etnia e congêneres, Bruno, Cássio e Osvaldo debatem sobre consciência de classe, transformação, coletivos literários, lugar de fala, individualidade, literatura marginal, representação, ideologia e cenário político atual, tateando autores como Hanna Arendt, Axel Honneth, Maria da Glória Gohn, Ilse Scherer-Warren, Lillian Schwartz, Paulo Leminsk, Karl Marx, Alain Touraine, Peter Singer, dentre outros. Em diálogos eivados de reflexões sobre os fatos políticos atuais absolutamente patéticos, como uma secretária da cultura que despreza em seu discurso produção cultural do que é considerado ideologicamente minoria ou de um presidente que utiliza um comediante para falar com a impressa, só para citar algumas das inúmeras desventuras em série de um governo grosseiro/autoritário com o cidadão, os odiados mesclam nesse episódio reflexões teóricas, conceituais com a análises lúcidas da história do Brasil, passando pela abolição da escravatura, era Vargas, tropicália, “diretas já”, até fatos mais recentes como as manifestações de junho de 2013 e o avanço da ideologia de extrema-direita em solo nacional. Destarte, questionamentos como "reivindico, logo exsito?"; "escrevo, logo transformo/aglutino?"; se o estado brasileiro foi construído com o silenciamento dos movimentos sociais?; quanto pior, melhor ou pior?; levaram nossos queridos odiados a produzir um episódio equilibrado e incômodo. Quer conferir o resultado? Aperte o play e se enforque na corda da liberdade! CofeComMilque é Bruno Malavolta, Cássio Rodrigues e Osvaldo Machado; Fale conosco: cofecommilque@gmail.com; Siga-nos no Instagram: @cofecommilque Este programa é produzido e editado pela Élis Estúdios.

Sie ist eine der führenden Intellektuellen, 2016 ausgezeichnet mit dem Friedenspreis des deutschen Buchhandels: die Philosophin, Journalistin und Autorin Carolin Emcke. Nach ihrem Studium bei Jürgen Habermas und Axel Honneth in Frankfurt, London und Harvard wurde sie Kriegsreporterin beim "Spiegel" und schrieb später einen Bestseller über ihre Erlebnisse in den Krisenregionen der Welt („Von den Kriegen – Briefe an Freunde“). Heute ist sie Essayistin, Kolumnistin und Autorin vieler weiterer Bücher, wie etwa von "Stumme Gewalt – Nachdenken über die RAF", von "Wie wir begehren", in dem sie auch ihr eigenes Coming-out thematisiert, und des internationalen Bestsellers "Gegen den Hass". Seit 2004 ist sie Gastgeberin der politischen Gesprächsreihe Streitraum an der Berliner Schaubühne. Carolin Emcke ist leidenschaftliche Anhängerin des Fußballvereins Borussia Dortmund, liebt Bircher Müsli und trinkt immer und überall Tee – und, wenn das Gespräch so richtig interessant wird, lieber Bier als Wein. In "Alles Gesagt?" spricht sie über die großen Fragen der Menschheit und über die kleinen Momente persönlichen Glücks – das Carolin Emcke beispielsweise im Dschungel findet. Nach fünf Stunden und XX Minuten beendet sie das Gespräch mit den Gastgebern, ZEIT-ONLINE-Chefredakteur Jochen Wegner und ZEITmagazin-Chefredakteur Christoph Amend. Denn das darf bei "Alles Gesagt?" nur der Gast. Shownotes 00:10:00 Klimaproteste und Gewaltverzicht 00:13:00 Darf man Gesetze brechen? 00:14:00 "Wann ist der Moment, an dem mir Tee angeboten wird?" 00:18:00 "Ich kann in jedem Zustand Borussia-Dortmund-Spiele gucken." 00:24:00 Bircher Müsli für Carolin Emcke 00:26:00 Darf man eine Ökodiktatur errichten? 00:34:00 "Mir machen Massenveranstaltungen auf der Straße Angst." 00:44:00 Die Geschichte der Rosa Parks 00:55:00 Carolin Emckes Zeit als Handballerin 01:01:00 "Ich war ein irrsinniges Heimwehkind." 01:05:00 "Bei der Sexualität war ich ein bisschen langsam." 01:32:00 "Darum geht es in der Demokratie." 01:40:00 Wie sie mit Otto Schily über die Flüchtlingsfrage stritt. 01:50:00 "'Wir schaffen das' ist auch nichts anderes als 'Yes, we can'.“ 01:50:00 Ihr Leben als Kriegsreporterin 01:53:00 "Von Stefan Aust habe ich viel gelernt." 02:06:00 In Mossul im Irak-Krieg wurde es für sie zu gefährlich. 02:19:00 "Es muss nicht zwei Seiten geben zu 'Die Erde ist eine Scheibe'" 02:31:00 A oder B oder Weiter 02:38:00 „Trump oder Putin?“: „Fuck you!“ 02:39:00 Warum Borussia Dortmund? 02:51:00 „Manchmal möchte man nicht schreiben.“ 02:59:00 Was ist das beste alkoholfreie Bier? 03:01:00 Das Interview mit Thomas Hitzlsperger 03:13:00 "Sag mir, wie viele homosexuelle Schauspieler in Hollywood offen damit umgehen?" 03:14:00 Coming-out mit 20 03:21:00 "Man wird oft mit Stereotypen konfrontiert" 03:28:00 Wie sie vom Friedenspreis erfahren hat 03:38:00 Plötzlich wurde sie auf der Straße erkannt 03:39:00 Warum das Geräusch des Dschungels sie glücklich macht 03:44:00 Wie sie einmal vor 500.000 Menschen die "falsche Rede" hielt 03:52:00 Wie sie in Frankreich wahrgenommen wird 04:09:00 Der Tag, an dem Alfred Herrhausen von der RAF ermordet wurde 04:11:00 Als die RAF nach dem Attentat anrief 04:17:00 "Ich bin nicht besonders schnell" 04:20:00 Über die Glaubwürdigkeit der Medien 04:30:00 "Ich hatte immer Angst vor Fehlern." 04:48:00 Ihre Zweifel an der Glaubwürdigkeit eines Kronzeugen 04:50:00 Keine Steaks mehr 04:56:00 Ein Drama im Gaza-Streifen 05:01:00 "Manche Ereignisse sind so schrecklich, du willst nicht, dass sie stimmen." 05:03:00 Der tragische Fall einer Bloggerin und ihrer erfundenen Biografie Wen sollen wir noch unendlich lange befragen? Schreiben Sie uns gerne an allesgesagt@zeit.de. Produktion: Maria Lorenz/Pool Artists Fotografie: Meiko Herrmann Recherche: Hannah Schraven, Vincent Mank Redaktion: Mounia Meiborg

Gerade in Zeiten angeblicher Alternativlosigkeit sind Idee und Praxis des Anarchismus ein reicher Schatz aus dem wir schöpfen sollten. Im Gespräch mit Daniel Loick geht es um Geschichte, Gegenwart und mögliche Zukünfte des Anarchismus. Interessante & relevante Links: "Anarchismus zur Einführung" von Daniel Loick (Junus Verlag) https://www.junius-verlag.de/buecher/anarchismus Homapge von Daniel Loick https://danielloick.net/ weitere Publikationen von Daniel Loick https://danielloick.net/publikationen/ Buchkapitel von Daniel Loick "Aufgaben einer anarchistischen Sozialtheorie" https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-22275-8_15 Debatte zwischen Daniel Loick und Christoph Menke zur Frage von Recht & Gewalt http://tonargumente.org/talk/585/ umfangreiches Archiv klassischer anarchistischer Texte https://www.anarchismus.at die anarchistische (online) Bibliothek Wien https://anarchistischebibliothek.org Wiki Gabriel Kuhn (wird erwähnt zu Postanarchismus) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel_Kuhn Abdullah Öcalan "Demokratischer Konföderationalismus" http://www.freeocalan.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Abdullah-%C3%96calan-Demokratischer-Konf%C3%B6deralismus.pdf Wiki zu Kibbuzim https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbuz Hintergründe zum spanischen Bürgerkrieg https://www.anarchismus.at/texte-zur-spanischen-revolution-1936/die-pce/7707-die-auseinandersetzungen-zwischen-anarchisten-und-kommunisten "Die Idee des Sozialismus" von Axel Honneth zum Begriff der "sozialen Freiheit" https://www.suhrkamp.de/buecher/die_idee_des_sozialismus-axel_honneth_29824.html Wiki zu "Das Kapital im 21. Jahrhundert" von Thomas Piketty https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Kapital_im_21._Jahrhundert Frieder Vogelmann's Projekt "Alternative Gouvernementalitäten" https://www.frieder-vogelmann.net/public/project/alternative_governmentalities/ Begriffserklärung Gouvernementalität (Thomas Lemke) http://www.thomaslemkeweb.de/publikationen/Gouvernementalit%E4t%20_Kleiner-Sammelband_.pdf "Kritik des Regierens" - Michel Foucault https://www.suhrkamp.de/buecher/kritik_des_regierens-michel_foucault_29533.html   Wenn euch Future Histories gefällt, dann erwägt doch bitte eine Unterstützung auf Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories? Schreibt mir unter future_histories@protonmail.com und diskutiert mit auf Twitter (#FutureHistories): https://twitter.com/FutureHpodcast oder auf Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/FutureHistories/  www.futurehistories.today    

Wir müssen reden: Jürgen Habermas glaubt unbeirrt an die Kraft des besseren Arguments. Aber taugt dieses Credo noch für die Mediengesellschaft von heute? Zumindest als Ideal, sagen die Sozialphilosophen Axel Honneth und Martin Saar. Axel Honneth und Martin Saar im Gespräch mit René Aguigah www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Sein und Streit Hören bis: 19.01.2038 04:14 Direkter Link zur Audiodatei

According to some, politics as usual is being rejected across the globe and faith in neoliberalism is fracturing beyond repair. Leading political theorist Nancy Fraser, in conversation with Jacobin publisher Bhaskar Sunkara, dissected neoliberalism’s current crisis and asserted that we might be able to wrest new futures from its ruins. Fraser outlined the ways that global political, ecological, economic, and social breakdown—symbolised, but not caused, by Trump’s election—has destroyed faith that neoliberal capitalism is beneficial to the majority. Fraser drew from her book The Old is Dying and the New Cannot Be Born to explore how this faith was built through the late twentieth century by balancing two central tenets: recognition (who deserves rights) and distribution (who deserves income). When these began to fray, new forms of outsider populist politics emerged on the left and the right. These, Fraser argued, are symptoms of the larger crisis of hegemony for neoliberalism, a moment when, as Gramsci put it, “the old is dying and the new cannot be born.” Join Fraser and Sunkara and learn about this unique opportunity to build progressive populism into an emancipatory social force, one that may claim a new hegemony. Nancy Fraser is the Henry and Louise A. Loeb Professor of Philosophy and Politics at the New School for Social Research. She works on social and political theory, feminist theory, and contemporary French and German thought. She is co-author with Cinzia Arruzza and Ttihi Bhattacharya of Feminism for the 99%: A Manifesto and with Rahel Jaeggi of Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Other books include Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis, and Redistribution or Recognition: A Critical-Philosophical Exchange with Axel Honneth. Bhaskar Sunkara is the founding editor and publisher of Jacobin magazine and publisher of Catalyst: A Journal of Theory and Strategy. He is a former vice-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America, and the author of The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality. Recorded live at The Forum at Town Hall Seattle on May 10, 2019.

Seit ihrem Bestehen hat die Psychoanalyse immer wieder in sozial- und geisteswissenschaftliche Diskurse ausgestrahlt. Bereits in den 1930er Jahren versuchte der Kreis um Fromm und Horkheimer, Psychoanalyse für ein sozialwissenschaftliches und -philosophisches Forschungsprogramm zu erschließen. Dieser Versuch gehört nicht nur zu den ersten systematischen Vermittlungsbemühungen von Psychoanalyse und Gesellschaftstheorie. Er und seine theoretischen Verarbeitungen in den folgenden Generationen prägten darüber hinaus die sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektive auf die Psychoanalyse bis heute. Besonders trifft das auf die Stellung und Verwendung psychoanalytischer Konzepte in gesellschaftskritischen Ansätzen zu. Frank Schumann zeichnet jene gesellschaftskritische Rezeptionsgeschichte der Psychoanalyse innerhalb der Frankfurter Schule in den Hauptzügen nach. Dabei spannt er einen Bogen von dem ersten interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekt bis hin zu dem jüngsten Ansatz von Axel Honneth. Damit wird ein Blick auf die systematischen Auslassungen und Verengungen ermöglicht, die sich trotz der bald 90 Jahre währenden Auseinandersetzung bis heute erhalten haben. Mit Hilfe der immanent ansetzenden Kritik der Rezeptionsgeschichte zeigt er Perspektiven und Potenziale auf, die für eine aktuelle Zusammenarbeit von Psychoanalyse und kritischer Sozialwissenschaft bedeutsam sein können. Die vorgestellten Gedanken Schumanns gehen auf sein Dissertationsprojekt zurück, das er kürzlich an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena beendet hat.

Axel Honneth (f. 1949) er en hovedskikkelse i nyere kritisk samfundsteori. Hvis politik handler om fastsættelse og fordeling af værdier med gyldighed for et samfund, så er et afgørende spørgsmål, hvilke værdier og goder vi bør fordele. Bliv klogere på Honneths teorier om anerkendelse og frihed. Husk at abonnere på vores podcast, find os i iTunes eller i din podcast-afspiller. Læs mere om Djøfs podcasts

Kampen om anerkjennelse, inspirert av boken med samme navn og skrevet av Axel Honneth (1996), tar for seg tre former for anerkjennelse: kjærlighet, respekt for borgernes rettigheter i praksis og sosial verdsettelse. Til disse tre formene for anerkjennelse er det tilsvarende tre former for krenkelser: kroppslige krenkelser, nektelse av rettigheter og nedverdigelse av levemåter. Denne episoden av Den skjulte byrden, tar for seg hvordan anerkjennelse formidles via moralsk motiverte konflikter og kamp på individ, gruppe og samfunnsnivå. Selv om anerkjennelse er det etiske grunnlaget for alt hjelpearbeid, må vi må likevel aldri støtte et anerkjennelseskrav som medfører en krenkelse av et annet menneskets etiske autonomi, dvs maktmisbruk, vold eller overgrep. Dagens podkast varer i litt under 19 minutter.

Fjerde afsnit af Radio Information sætter fokus på Donald Trumps første 100 dage i Det Hvide Hus. Hurtig-analytiker og chefredaktør Rune Lykkeberg er i studiet. Kunstanmelder Pernille Matzen opfordrer dig til at kigge én gang til på statsministerportrættet af Helle Thorning-Schmidt. For har en kvinde med magt egentlig samme frihed til at vise ’mennesket bag’? Du får kvit og frit og uden stillingtagen tre argumenter for og tre imod at afskaffe blasfemiparagraffen– leveret loyalt af skribent David Rehling. Journalist Christian Bennike har talt med Jürgen Habermas’ favoritelev Axel Honneth, som har et par gode råd til en famlende socialisme. Det har vi også. Derfor har avisens helt egen lejlighedssangskribent Rasmus Bo Sørensen genbesøgt 1. maj-klassikeren Internationale og omskrevet den, så den passer bedre til en mere hjemligt orienteret dansk venstrefløj.  Tilmeld dig [...]

Fraser is the Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Philosophy and Politics at the New School for Social Research in New York and Professor II at the Centre for Gender Research at the University of Oslo. She also holds the Chair in Global Justice at the College d’etudes mondiales, Paris. A specialist in critical theory and political philosophy, Fraser’s most recent books are “Domination et anticipation: pour un renouveau de la critique, with Luc Boltanski” (2014); “Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: Nancy Fraser debates her Critics” (2014); and “Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis” (2013). Previous books include “Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space for a Globalizing World” (2008); “Adding Insult to Injury: Nancy Fraser Debates her Critics,” ed. Kevin Olson (2008); “Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange” (2003) with Axel Honneth; “Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition” (1997); and “Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory” (1989). Fraser’s work has been translated into more than twenty languages and was cited twice by the Brazilian Supreme Court (in decisions upholding marriage equality and affirmative action). She is currently working on a book called “Capitalism, Crisis, Critique: A Critical Theory for the 21st Century.”

How can we de-colonize critical theory from within, and reimagine the way it grounds its normative claims as well as the way it relates to post- and de-colonial theory? Amy Allen (Philosophy and Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Penn State University) takes up this project in her book The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory (Columbia Univ. Press, 2016). The work challenges the way that the Frankfurt School of critical theory constructs and deploys concepts of normativity, history, and progress, in the process offering rich interpretations of Jürgen Habermas, Axel Honneth, and Rainer Forst. Allen then turns to the work of Theodor Adorno and Michel Foucault in order to articulate a different perspective on these issues, one that enables a radical self-critique and de-colonization of critical theory. She concludes by exploring alternative means for critical theory to justify its normative claims as a way for it to more deeply engage with post- and de-colonial theory.

How can we de-colonize critical theory from within, and reimagine the way it grounds its normative claims as well as the way it relates to post- and de-colonial theory? Amy Allen (Philosophy and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Penn State University) takes up this project in her book The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory (Columbia Univ. Press, 2016). The work challenges the way that the Frankfurt School of critical theory constructs and deploys concepts of normativity, history, and progress, in the process offering rich interpretations of Jürgen Habermas, Axel Honneth, and Rainer Forst. Allen then turns to the work of Theodor Adorno and Michel Foucault in order to articulate a different perspective on these issues, one that enables a radical self-critique and de-colonization of critical theory. She concludes by exploring alternative means for critical theory to justify its normative claims as a way for it to more deeply engage with post- and de-colonial theory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

How can we de-colonize critical theory from within, and reimagine the way it grounds its normative claims as well as the way it relates to post- and de-colonial theory? Amy Allen (Philosophy and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Penn State University) takes up this project in her book The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory (Columbia Univ. Press, 2016). The work challenges the way that the Frankfurt School of critical theory constructs and deploys concepts of normativity, history, and progress, in the process offering rich interpretations of Jürgen Habermas, Axel Honneth, and Rainer Forst. Allen then turns to the work of Theodor Adorno and Michel Foucault in order to articulate a different perspective on these issues, one that enables a radical self-critique and de-colonization of critical theory. She concludes by exploring alternative means for critical theory to justify its normative claims as a way for it to more deeply engage with post- and de-colonial theory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Even for those among us who are not altogether convinced by Isaiah Berlin's famous essay "Two Concepts of Liberty," it has by now become commonplace to adopt a distinction between "negative" and "positive" liberties that largely coincides with the one he offered. In my lecture I defend the thesis that this bifurcation of the concept of freedom is incomplete in a significant respect, because it omits a third type, which I will call "social freedom." I proceed first by illustrating with some well-known examples how we must understand this third form of freedom, which cannot be performed by one subject alone, but rather requires the cooperation of others. In the second step I want to recall briefly the philosophical tradition in which this idea of "social freedom" has always had a central place. Finally, I delve into the systematic question of whether the suggested model of freedom in fact designates a third concept, which does not conform to the traditional bifurcated understanding. Axel Honneth is a professor of philosophy at the University of Frankfurt and Columbia University, and the director of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt. This talk, the Dewey Lecture in Law and Philosophy, was recorded on November 12, 2014.

Even for those among us who are not altogether convinced by Isaiah Berlin's famous essay "Two Concepts of Liberty," it has by now become commonplace to adopt a distinction between "negative" and "positive" liberties that largely coincides with the one he offered. In my lecture I defend the thesis that this bifurcation of the concept of freedom is incomplete in a significant respect, because it omits a third type, which I will call "social freedom." I proceed first by illustrating with some well-known examples how we must understand this third form of freedom, which cannot be performed by one subject alone, but rather requires the cooperation of others. In the second step I want to recall briefly the philosophical tradition in which this idea of "social freedom" has always had a central place. Finally, I delve into the systematic question of whether the suggested model of freedom in fact designates a third concept, which does not conform to the traditional bifurcated understanding. Axel Honneth is a professor of philosophy at the University of Frankfurt and Columbia University, and the director of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt. This talk, the Dewey Lecture in Law and Philosophy, was recorded on November 12, 2014.