Podcasts about kierkegaard

Why does condemnation feel like it's everywhere today?In this episode, John Ortberg explores a cultural shift: we no longer define a “good person” by love and character, but by holding the “right” opinions. The result? More judgment, more division, and less humility.Jesus offered a different path — a life marked by compassion, forgiveness, and what Kierkegaard called “blithe humility.” Like the birds and lilies, we can release the burden of controlling the world and trust God with it.The result is freedom, joy, and a life without condemnation.

In un mondo in cui tutto sembra cambiare continuamente, è sempre più difficile distinguere tra ciò che scegliamo davvero e ciò che semplicemente “va di moda”.In questo episodio riflettiamo su un fenomeno tanto diffuso quanto spesso invisibile: il conformismo. Attraverso esempi di vita quotidiana, riferimenti alla psicologia sociale e al pensiero di autori come Zygmunt Bauman, Herbert Marcuse e Søren Kierkegaard, esploriamo come le tendenze culturali, sociali e digitali influenzino il nostro modo di pensare, di scegliere e perfino di costruire la nostra identità.Seguire ciò che fanno tutti ci fa sentire al sicuro, ma può anche allontanarci dal nostro criterio personale. In un'epoca dominata da algoritmi, modelli replicati e aggiornamento continuo, recuperare uno sguardo critico diventa un atto di consapevolezza.Una riflessione su identità, libertà e responsabilità personale, per tornare a farsi una domanda semplice ma fondamentale:“Cosa va davvero per me?”Corsi di Coaching: https://www.lifecoachitaly.it/Il mio sito web: https://giovannagiuffredi.it/

Der Titel der heutigen Episode ist: »Künstliche Vernunft?«, und ich freue mich besonders, dass sich Jan Juhani Steinmann wieder zu einem Gespräch bereit erklärt hat. Wir spannen in dieser Episode einen weiten Bogen von der Frage, was Intelligenz, Bewusstsein und Selbstbewusstsein sind, welche Rolle Biologie, Leib und Körper sowie Theologie spielen können, um dann auf die Frage der künstlichen Intelligenz und Vernunft zu kommen. Was hat es mit der sogenannten Singularität und dem Transhumanismus auf sich, und warum könnte die Bevölkerungsentwicklung des Menschen eine wesentliche Rolle spielen? Am Ende legt Jan seine Vorstellung eines positiven Bildes des Zusammenspiels von Mensch und Technik dar. Dr. Juhani Steinmann ist in Bern geboren, mütterlicherseits Finne, ist Philosoph, Dichter und Theologe. Er hat Philosophie, Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaften, Politikwissenschaften sowie Theologie in Zürich, Berlin, St. Andrews, Heidelberg, Rom und Cambridge studiert. Forschungsaufenthalte wurden in Kopenhagen, Helsinki und Oxford durchgeführt. Unter der Betreuung von Prof. Konrad Paul Liessmann hat er 2021 an der Universität Wien in Philosophie promoviert. Zurzeit forscht er am Institut Catholique de Paris, an der Università di Roma LUMSA sowie an der Faculty of Divinity der University of Cambridge zur poetischen Phänomenologie im Kontext des Denkens von Kierkegaard, Nietzsche und Heidegger. Er ist ferner Begründer des Kollektivs Omnibus Omnia. Nebst wissenschaftlichen Publikationen in Philosophie und Theologie publiziert er auch Dichtung. Besonders möchte ich auch seine Bücher erwähnen, vorzugsweise: »Kritik der künstlichen Vernunft. Vorspiel eines Anathemas« und »Das Vorfaltenlicht. Die Alpen und das Valley«. Diese beiden Werke gehören zusammen, sind wie Geschwister zu betrachten. Das erste ist eine Techniktheologie/-philosophie, das zweite eine Technik- und Naturpoesie, da die Gedichte dazu im Silicon Valley und in den Alpen geschrieben wurden. Vorzugsweise deshalb, weil sie zum Thema des heutigen Gesprächs passen. Wir beginnen das Gespräch mit der Frage nach dem Begriff der Intelligenz. Wie kann man sich diesem Begriff nähern, der ja schon beim Menschen mit vielfältiger Bedeutung überladen ist — und dann wird er auch noch für künstliche Intelligenz verwendet? »Intelligenz ist eine Form der Vermittlung innerhalb von Relationen — also, es werden Dinge in ein Verhältnis zueinander gestellt.« Wie leitet sich daraus (beim Menschen) Selbstbewusstsein und Bewusstsein allgemein ab? »Der Mensch ist ja sicherlich das erste Wesen, das überhaupt eine Definition dieser Eigenschaften, die es an sich selbst bemerkt, geleistet hat. […] Intelligenz erkennt sich selbst durch den Menschen als jenem Wesen, das intelligent ist, oder zu sein scheint.« Was folgt daraus in theologisch/philosophischer Reflexion? Was bedeutet der Begriff Logos und wie steht er in Zusammenhang mit Intelligenz und Bewusstsein? Gibt es einen metaphysisch ur-ontologischen Garanten von Bedeutung? Ist Gott der Garant für die Vernünftigkeit der Vernunft? Oder sind diese Eigenschaften des Menschen schlicht emergente Phänomene, die aus der biologischen Komplexität seiner selbst entspringen? Ist die »künstliche Intelligenz« äquivalent zur menschlichen/biologischen Vernunft? Oder ist dies grundsätzlich zu anthropomorph gedacht? Wie ist der Zusammenhang zwischen diesen philosophisch/theologischen und operationalen Ansätzen der Intelligenz — etwa ausgedrückt durch Intelligenztests und dergleichen? Was bedeutet der Begriff des Geistes? Was sind die verschiedenen Modi der Rationalität, in denen Menschen operieren? Was ist dianoetisches und noetisches Denken? Gibt es eine göttliche — hypernoetische Dimension? Welche Rolle spielen Instinkt und Intuition? Wie nehmen wir Stimmungen wahr? Was hat es mit der Leiblichkeit auf sich? Zu welcher Leistung sind nun Algorithmen und Maschinen fähig? »Maschinen imitieren im Grunde Dianoia — zugleich aber simulieren sie noetische Vernunft« Was ist Behaviorismus, und wie hilft er, die aktuellen Entwicklungen zu verstehen? Ist der Mensch frei? Was bedeutet der Begriff der Freiheit überhaupt, besonders wenn man sich auf die sogenannte Willensfreiheit bezieht? Ziehen wir die Grenze zwischen Maschine und Mensch vielleicht nur darum, weil wir gekränkt sind, weil Maschinen nun etwas können, was wir für rein menschlich gehalten haben? Ist das vielleicht nur eine weitere Ergänzung zu den drei Kränkungen des Menschen nach Sigmund Freud? »Warum sollten wir uns selbst abschaffen, hinfällig machen?« Aber haben wir ab einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt überhaupt noch die Wahl? Was ist die Rolle des Leibes für Vernunft und Intelligenz und vor allem für die noetische Dimension? Was ist Informationismus? Sind Maschinen gar die nächste evolutionäre Stufe auf unserem Planeten? Kehren wir zur Frage der Freiheit und Willensfreiheit zurück. Ist das vielleicht eine Frage, die viel weniger philosophische Tiefe hat, als häufig dargestellt wird? Um Wittgenstein zu bemühen: »Die meisten Sätze und Fragen, welche über philosophische Dinge geschrieben worden sind, sind nicht falsch, sondern unsinnig.« Wie zeigt sich das, was wir Autonomie nennen, wie kann es sein, dass wir uns selbst als frei empfinden? »Das ist ja ein schönes Paradox der Freiheit, dass man sich freiwilliger Notwendigkeit hingibt. […] Freiheit ist eine Stimmung — man fühlt sich frei. […] Du willst ja nur, was du willst.« Was folgt daraus? »Wir sind schon immer gefangen in den Bedingungen unseres Hier-Seins. Und von innen — aus diesem System heraus — kann die Freiheit nicht bewiesen werden. So zumindest erscheint es uns.« Schopenhauer sagt: »Ich kann zwar tun, was ich will, aber nicht wollen, was ich will.« Ist dies eine Widerlegung der Freiheit — wie Schopenhauer es annimmt — oder kann man andere Schlüsse ziehen? Gibt es einen Grund anzunehmen, dass es Intelligenz nur beim Menschen, respektive in biologischen Systemen, gibt? Beziehungsweise, dass es überhaupt andere intelligente Wesen außerhalb von mir selbst gibt (die solipsistische Idee)? Was passiert aber mit verkörperter künstlicher Intelligenz, etwa in der Robotik? Sind Roboter nur Körper und kein Leib? Ist es ein Kategorienfehler, die biologische mit der kulturellen und technischen Evolution zu vergleichen? »Die Kultur hat den Menschen schon von der Evolution entfremdet.« Kommt die biologische Evolution zu einem Ende, und wird sie von neuen Gesetzmäßigkeiten abgelöst? Was ist das Zusammenspiel von Technik, Maschinen und Macht? Ist Technik co-evolutionär mit dem Menschen? Gibt es einen Sprung von der Humanität zur Transhumanität? Was versteht man unter (technologischem) Transhumanismus, und was sind die Ursprünge? Allgemeiner gefragt: Ist der Mensch eine Aporie, die man überwinden muss? Wie sieht es mit biologisch/technischen Mischformen, kybernetischen Organismen aus? Steuern wir auf eine Singularität zu, die in etwa so gelesen werden könnte: »Es gibt keinen Gott — programmieren wir doch die Superintelligenz als neuen Gott« So beantwortet Ray Kurzweil die Frage: Is there a god: »Not yet«. »Wir haben keinen Begriff, was auf uns zukommt. Das könnte die Abschaffung des Menschen bedeuten — oder vielleicht eine relativ gemäßigte Koexistenz. Aber wir dürfen es nicht unterschätzen.« Wie groß ist diese Gefahr? Ist es überhaupt eine Gefahr? Können wir diese Technologien kontrollieren und regulieren? »Ich sehe keinen Grund anzunehmen, warum wir obsolet sein möchten.« Wie wahrscheinlich ist das Entstehen einer Superintelligenz, die möglicherweise sogar global wirksam wird? Was wäre die Voraussetzung dafür? Aber selbst, wenn es zu keiner Singularität oder Superintelligenz kommt, ist die Menschlichkeit nicht schon durch die Integration in permanent verfügbare dianoetische Systeme gefährdet? Werden wir unsere Urteilskraft an die Maschine delegieren? Mit welchen Folgen? Außerdem dürfen fundamentale Prinzipien komplexer Systeme nicht vergessen werden: Führen mehr Daten etwa zu mehr Sicherheit oder zu mehr Unsicherheit? Und wie können wir das entscheiden? Woher kommt das Neue in die Welt? »Die Welt ist nicht nur ihre Messbarkeit. Sie ist nicht die Summe ihrer Daten. […] Die Welt ist immer mehr und anders, als sich in einem Ordnungssystem sagen lässt.« Zum Ende des Gesprächs folgt eine vielleicht unerwartete Abzweigung: Bevölkerungen kollabieren weltweit. Im Gegensatz zu den langjährigen Warnungen tritt also das Gegenteil einer Bevölkerungsexplosion mittel- und langfristig ein. Dies gilt praktisch weltweit und besonders in den Industrienationen. Eine dramatisch alternde und gleichzeitig schrumpfende Bevölkerung wird aber erhebliche Probleme haben, ihre ökonomische und militärische und damit geopolitische Position aufrechtzuerhalten. Wird daraus ein enormer Druck entstehen, Robotik und künstliche Intelligenz als Ersatz für fehlende Arbeitskraft zu entwickeln und einzusetzen? Übernehmen — mit Marx gesprochen — die Maschinen also irgendwann die proletarische Arbeit? Gibt es doch noch ein alternatives und hoffnungsfroheres Paradigma? Also zu den Paradigmen der: Humanität Transhumanität Theo-Humanität Was ist darunter zu verstehen? »Lasst uns doch gemeinsam uns vergöttlichen — ob es Gott gibt, oder nicht. Das macht uns zu würdevollen und schönen Wesen.« Wollen wir Technologien, die den Menschen als Idioten betrachten, oder die uns als Menschen erhöhen? Referenzen Andere Episoden Episode 147: Digitale Kolonie oder Souveränität? Ein Gespräch mit Wilfried Jäger und Kevin Mallinger Episode 143: Auf Sand gebaut? Episode 139: Komfortable Disruption Episode 137: Alles Leben ist Problemlösen Episode 134: Das Werdende, das ewig wirkt und lebt? Transzendent oder Transient Episode 132: Fragen an die künstliche Intelligenz — eine konstruktive Irritation Episode 129: Rules, A Conversation with Prof. Lorraine Daston Episode 125: Ist Fortschritt möglich? Ideen als Widergänger über Generationen Episode 123: Die Natur kennt feine Grade, Ein Gespräch mit Prof. Frank Zachos Episode 121: Künstliche Unintelligenz Episode 119: Spy vs Spy: Über künstlicher Intelligenz und anderen Agenten Episode 104: Aus Quantität wird Qualität Episode 98: Ist Gott tot? Ein philosophisches Gespräch mit Jan Juhani Steinmann Episode 85: Naturalismus — was weiß Wissenschaft? Episode 68: Modelle und Realität, ein Gespräch mit Dr. Andreas Windisch Fachliche Referenzen  Webseite und Lebenslauf von Jan Juhani Steinmann YouTube Kanal von Jan Juhani Steinmann Jan Juhani Steinmann, Kritik der künstlichen Vernunft, Lepanto (2025) Jan Juhani Steinmann, Das Vorfaltenlicht. Die Alpen und das Valley, Wieser Verlag (2025) Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781) Peter Sloterdijk, Kritik der zynischen Vernunft, Suhrkamp (1983) Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus logico-philosophicus (1922) Kränkungen der Menschheit, Sigmund Freud und folgende Andy Clark, Being There, MIT Press (1998) Steve Taylor, How a Flawed Experiment “Proved” That Free Will Doesn't Exist, Scientific American (2019)

The philosophers Kierkegaard and Camus left us more than just their formal works! Let's explore their private journals! ... Check out my new book! It's called: The Last Human: How Technology is Changing What it Means to be Humanhttps://www.amazon.com/Last-Human-Technology-Changing-Means/dp/1069510831/ 

On an excerpt from Soren Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846) that critiques Hegel's idea of logic (dialectic) and then argues for his own conception of "truth as subjectivity." In this first part, he's mostly focusing on Hegel. First (along with the rest of the world), K. denies Hegel's idea that logic is equivalent to physics (or biology, or any other analysis of what actually exists). Furthermore, the idea of a "system" is only one that (according to K) makes sense if you're looking down on the universe from God's perspective. Everything else is in progress: the object you're trying to know is changing, and you as subject are changing. Follow along, starting on PDF p. 2 (document p. 196). To get the other parts of this discussion, you'll need to support us at patreon.com/closereadsphilosophy⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Det særlige ved en ældgammel Kierkegaardsamling er, at værkerne findes rent fysisk: At de er tilgængelige for dansk Kierkegaardforskning. Det mener bl.a. forsker, Joakim Garff, som frygter, at gamle værker kan ende i udenlandsk varetægt. Snart bliver Kierkegaards bogsamling nemlig sat til salg på en international antikvarmesse i New York. K-Live taler med flere forskere, der begræder Kulturværdiudvalgets beslutning om at lade bøgerne sælge. Desuden kigger vi på den omdiskuterede dokumentarserie 'En ven, en morder', på et musikalsk generationsmøde og på lakrids som statusmarkør. Medvirkende: Joakim Garff, leder af Søren Kierkegaard Forskningscenteret ved Københavns Universitet. Mai-Brit Storm Thygesen, bistandsadvokat for Emilie Mengs mor. Signe Høirup Wille-Jørgensen, musiker. Pia Raug, musiker. Lars Richard Rasmussen, antropolog, Københavns Universitet. Anne Bollerslev, lakridsnørd med instagramprofilen LakridsPassion Vært: Morten Runge Producer: Linnea Albinus Lande Redaktør: Lasse Lauridsen

Kierkegaard reminds us that Jesus being crucified casts the human race in quite an unflattering light.

My guest on the show today is Jonny Thakkar. Jonny is an Assistant Professor in Political Science at Swarthmore College and one of the founding editors of The Point. He's the author of various articles, most recently “Beyond Equality” in the newest issue of the Point, and the 2018 book Plato as Critical Theorist.I asked Jonny on to talk about his late friend and mentor the philosopher and psychoanalyst Jonathan Lear, who was his advisor at the University of Chicago Committee on Social Thought and, as you'll hear in our discussion, his occasional advisor on matters of the heart.He wrote about Lear, after his death, along with a collection of other remembrances from friends and colleagues of Lear's:His own career path was so individual as to be impossible to emulate. Institutionally speaking, he had completed two undergraduate degrees, one in history and the other in philosophy, followed by two graduate degrees, the first a Ph.D. on Aristotle's logic under the supervision of Saul Kripke—a prodigy in contemporary logic and metaphysics who was only eight years older than Jonathan, had no expertise in Aristotle and only ever supervised one other dissertation—and the second a professional qualification in psychoanalysis that licensed him to treat patients clinically. His philosophical interlocutors were many and various, among them Plato, Aristotle, Kierkegaard, Freud, Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Williams, J. M. Coetzee and Marilynne Robinson, but he was no dilettante. He wanted to understand what it meant to be human, and he simply followed that question wherever it took him. Without end, I should add: he took up the study of ancient Hebrew in his mid-seventies because he had become so puzzled by the treatment of the prophet Balaam that he wanted to make sure he wasn't missing anything in translation!That ethos of constant self-development was central to what you might call Jonathan's philosophy of life. Some people use the term “perpetual student” pejoratively; for Jonathan, being open to learning from the world was the key to human flourishing. As he told matriculating undergraduates in a 2009 address, “the aim of education is to teach us how to be students.” In the preface to Open Minded, he wrote that achieving tenure at Cambridge in his twenties freed him from professional pressures to such an extent that he was forced to confront the meaning of his own existence. “I realized that before I died, I wanted to be in intimate touch with some of the world's greatest thinkers, with some of the deepest thoughts which humans have encountered. I wanted to think thoughts—and also to write something which mattered to me.”We talk about Lear's work, but also about what it means to be, or be influenced by, what Lear called a “local exemplar,” which is someone who has a profound influence on the people around him or her. An exemplar could be a real mentor in the classic sense, as Lear was for Jonny and other students of his, or a writer who affects other people just through text, which is how he functioned in my life. It could also be someone who just said or did something once or a few times that stays with us, imprints itself on us, and changes us in ways that unfold over time.So we talk about how Lear played that role in our lives, but also about the ways in which Thakkar may be playing the role of local exemplar, as a teacher, in the lives of his students, and more generally what it is about someone, or something, that makes it capable of influencing us in these ways.One reason we ended up in this space, I think, is that I've been wrestling a lot, lately, with the question of how writing does or doesn't influence people, because I'm writing a book, on relationships and therapy, that edges into the territory of self-help, and I've become moderately obsessed with not replicating the mistake that so many self-help books make on this front, which is thinking that in order to help people, the thing to do is give them straightforward advice on how to do or be better.This always seems to me like a fundamental misunderstanding of how texts change people, and in some ways an odd one to make in particular for the therapists and psychologists who write so many of these books. If anyone should understand that the human psyche is tricky and that real change tends be a product of close relationships and communal structures playing out over time, rather than advice distilled to words, it should be therapists.Texts do change people's lives, but it's indirect. They're poetic. They're narrative. They're allusive and elusive. They're not precision tools to achieve a predictable outcome in readers.Lear understood this. I asked him once if the style of his essays was deliberately looping and associative because he was trying to emulate something about the rhythms of psychoanalytic practice, and his response was surprise. I just try to write clearly, he said, and the more I think the more I believe him. I think there was something so integrated in the way he did all these things – teach, write, practice psychoanalysis – that his version of writing clearly became this thing that I perceived as indirect, and that it is because of this, in some sense, that his writing has the capacity to affect people in a way that most self-help literature doesn't.I didn't know Lear well, as a person, but he had, and continues to have, a big influence on me. That's even more the case for Jonny, as you'll hear. I don't think he's for everyone, but if he might be for you, I really encourage you to pick up one of his books or find one of his essays online. I'll drop in some links to a few of below. He was a remarkable person.Hope you enjoy. Peace.Jonathan Lear articles:* “Aims of Education”* “Inside and Outside the Republic”* “A Case for Irony”* “Wisdom Won from Illness” [this is actually the whole text of one of his books]* “Transience and hope: A return to Freud in a time of pandemic”* “Jumping from the Couch: An Essay on Phantasy and Emotional Structure”* “Can the virtuous person exist in the modern world?” This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit danieloppenheimer.substack.com/subscribe

"Now existence has racked him as hard as it can rack a person." (Kierkegaard). Sometimes all we can say, like Martin Luther, "I can do no other. God help me."

durée : 00:03:33 - Le Pourquoi du comment : philo - par : Frédéric Worms - Tel que Dom Juan chez Molière ou Don Giovanni de Mozart, le séducteur séduit dans son propre intérêt et finit malheureux, refusant ce que le penseur danois Søren Kierkegaard, dans "Journal d'un séducteur", appelle « le sérieux de l'amour ». - réalisation : Luc-Jean Reynaud

Kierkegaard writes in his book "Works of Love" that if you hold humanity up to the light, you will see the watermark of eternity. Regardless of what is written on the paper. We are made in the image of God. The Incarnation is the eternal God coming into the temporal world. What Soren calls "Perfect Ideality" in "Training in Christianity." We must treat others as glorious first before anything else.

Reconciliation, Becoming, and Public Trust in Real Estate Appraisal Reconciliation under USPAP SR 1-6 is often treated as a technical step at the end of the appraisal process. In practice, it is far more than a mechanical exercise. True reconciliation is not about averaging numbers or following software defaults—it is about professional judgment under uncertainty. USPAP requires appraisers to reconcile the quality and quantity of data, as well as the relevance and applicability of the valuation approaches used. This places reconciliation at the core of appraisal ethics, not just methodology. It is the moment where the appraiser must take responsibility not only for the final value conclusion, but for the reasoning that produced it. From a philosophical perspective, reconciliation reflects what Søren Kierkegaard described as “becoming”: the transition from following procedures to standing personally behind one's own choices. In this sense, reconciliation is an existential act. The appraiser cannot hide behind forms, templates, or algorithms. They must interpret conflicting evidence, assess uncertainty, and justify why certain data deserve greater credibility than others. This shift moves appraisal away from mechanical form-filling and toward intellectual accountability.  Appraisers are not fiduciaries in the legal sense, but they are stewards of public trust. Their primary obligation is not loyalty to the client, but loyalty to professional judgment, independence, and truth-seeking. Reconciliation is where data becomes knowledge, numbers become meaning, and appraisal becomes a genuinely ethical practice.

====================================================SUSCRIBETEhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNpffyr-7_zP1x1lS89ByaQ?sub_confirmation=1==================================================== DEVOCIÓN MATUTINA PARA JÓVENES 2026“DIFERENTENarrado por: Daniel RamosDesde: Connecticut, USAUna cortesía de DR'Ministries y Canaan Seventh-Day Adventist Church===================|| www.drministries.org ||===================16 de FebreroEn La Frontera De La FeAsí, fijamos nuestros ojos no en lo que se ve, sino en lo que no se ve. Porque lo que se ve es temporal, pero lo que no se ve es eterno (2 Corintios 4:18).En la frontera entre las dos Coreas, existe una zona intermedia que tiene 248 kilómetros de extensión y 4 de ancho. Se trata de una región creada en 1953, después de la guerra de Corea, cuyo propósito es mantener separados a ambos países en conflicto. Esta área es una tierra neutral que no pertenece a ninguno de los dos lados.En cuestiones de fe, muchas personas ocupan las fronteras. Allí se refugian aquellos que no pueden aceptar la existencia de Dios. Creen que la vida se reduce a lo que es material, palpable y visible. Para ellos, la fórmula de la existencia consiste en nacer, trabajar, acumular bienes y morir.El asunto se profundiza aún más cuando ocurren problemas graves, como la pérdida del empleo, la separación de los padres o la muerte de un ser querido. Entonces surgen preguntas como "Si Dios existe y es amor, ¿por qué sufrimos?" Ante la falta de respuestas plausibles, la fe cristiana pasa a ser vista como una muleta en manos de los débiles. La conclusión a la que muchos llegan es que, en la vida, lo importante es lo que vemos.En contra de este argumento, el filósofo Søren Kierkegaard contó la parábola de un hombre rico que paseaba en su lujoso, cálido y luminoso carruaje. Este era guiado por un campesino que, montado en su caballo, estaba expuesto al frío y a la oscuridad. Pero, precisamente, al estar acomodado cerca de la luz artificial interior, el hombre rico se perdió el paisaje de las estrellas en el cielo. Mientras tanto, el campesino, a pesar de sufrir las inclemencias del clima frío, pudo disfrutar de la gloriosa visión de esa noche.Hoy en día, parece que las luces artificiales de la ciencia, los medios y el materialismo están produciendo sombra sobre el mundo invisible que nos rodea. Liev Tolstói afirmó que los materialistas se equivocan al limitar la vida a sí misma. Tal vez tú seas uno de los que consideran lo visible como la realidad "máxima", la única realidad. ¡Cuidado! Es posible que las luces del mundo estén oscureciendo tu visión del Cielo.Mi invitación hoy es la siguiente: Abandona las fronteras de la fe y pásate al lado de Dios. Aunque no sientas ni entiendas, elige ver al Invisible. Esta visión "invertida" es la que realmente importa. 

Life for most of us is long enough to weigh what we believe and why. Yet, life is short in light of eternity. Too many people exchange what is passing for what is eternal. Kierkegaard reminds us it is a period of trial and examination. It comes to an end.

Episoden er en del av offentlig debatt prosjektet til USN som du kan høre mer om her: https://share.transistor.fm/s/0fe326d4 Alle er enige om at fagfolk må jobbe sammen for barnas beste. Men hva skjer når samarbeidet ikke fungerer? I denne episoden diskuterer fire studenter fra USN hva tverrfaglig samarbeid egentlig betyr i praksis, med utgangspunkt i en kronikk gruppa har skrevet. Vi utforsker rollekonflikt, ansvarsfraskrivelse og hva filosofen Kierkegaard kan lære oss om å hjelpe andre. Neste gang noen sier «vi må samarbeide mer», kanskje du heller bør spørre: hvordan kan vi samarbeide? Kilder:Pasient og brukerrettighetslovenHelsepersonell loven Barnevernloven Kierkegaard, S.  (2017, 10. februar). Visdomsord fra Søren Kierkegaard. Kildevangen. https://alkoholproblemer.com/visdomsord-fra-soren-kierkegaard/  

Singer-songwriter Jon Guerra joins Mark Labberton to explore devotional songwriting, public faith, and the tension between the kingdom of Jesus and American cultural power. Through music and reflection, Guerra considers how art can hold grief, courage, and hope together in turbulent times. "Love has a million disguises, but winning is simply not one." In this episode with Mark Labberton, Guerra reflects on songwriting as prayer, the call to love enemies, and artistic courage in moments of cultural crisis. Together they discuss devotional music, George Herbert's influence, the Beatitudes and American culture, citizenship and immigration imagery, increasing polarization, suffering and grace, and the vocation of Christian artists. Episode Highlights "Love has a million disguises, but winning is simply not one." "When Jesus says to love your enemies… he is giving us a means of survival." "This is not sentimentality… the only way to resist becoming what one hates." "My songwriting… would be a means of coming into contact with the invisible God." "Beauty puts us in contact with invisible things." About Jon Guerra Jon Guerra is a singer-songwriter based in Austin, Texas, known for devotional music that blends poetry, theology, and contemporary cultural reflection. His albums include Little Songs (2015), Keeper of Days (2020), Ordinary Ways (2023), and American Gospel. Guerra has also composed music for film, including Terrence Malick's A Hidden Life (2019). The son of immigrants from Cuba and Argentina, his work often explores themes of citizenship, prayer, justice, and the teachings of Jesus. His songwriting draws inspiration from figures like George Herbert and Howard Thurman, and seeks to connect spiritual devotion with public life. Helpful Links and Resources Jon Guerra website: https://www.jonguerramusic.com/ American Gospel album: https://jonguerra.bandcamp.com A Hidden Life film: https://www.searchlightpictures.com/ahiddenlife Jesus and the Disinherited by Howard Thurman: https://www.beacon.org/Jesus-and-the-Disinherited-P1781.aspx The Porter's Gate: https://www.portersgateworship.com/ Show Notes Devotional songwriting George Herbert influence on the pursuit of prayerful craft "Music for attending to the soul." Monday morning prayer music framing devotional practice Beauty and invisible realities in artistic experience American Gospel song introduction and cultural critique Beatitudes inversion in American culture "How do I give Christ a say in this conversation?" Love Your Enemies composition and album Jesus Howard Thurman's influence on enemy-love theology (Jesus and the Disinherited) Emotional formation through news, anger, and public life Death of ego and kingdom discipleship Kierkegaard and faith beyond ideology Worship as reordering power Kingdom of Jesus song and Pilate encounter Allegiance to a greater kingdom beyond nationalism Citizenship as foreignness imagery Immigrant family background shaping songwriting Citizens song written after 2017 inauguration "Come to you because I'm confused." Five-four musical structure expressing disorientation Groaning beauty and Romans 8 resonance Artists as "holy fools" naming reality Moltmann and theology near the cross Simone Weil: gravity and grace reflection "Love has a million disguises, but winning is simply not one." Hashtags #JonGuerra #DevotionalMusic #LoveYourEnemies #ChristianArt #AmericanGospel #PublicFaith #Jesus #Gospel #SpiritualFormation Production Credits Conversing is produced and distributed in partnership with Comment Magazine and Fuller Seminary.  

De är smarta och har kallats vår evolutionära spegelbild. Carl Magnus Juliusson håller ett försvarstal för papegojan och för upprepningen. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna.Vad är det för fel med att upprepa sig? Vad är det för fel med att upprepa sig? Vad är det för fel med att upprepa sig?När man upprepar sig är det som att man plötsligt får något omänskligt över sig. Man framstår som en robot, en hackig skivspelare – eller en papegoja. Det är som taget ur en tecknad film eller sci-fi-rulle. Huden lossnar och blottar en maskin.När man upprepar sig förskjuts också intresset från ordens innebörd till hur det sägs. Upprepning drar uppmärksamhet till sig. Man misstror den som talar. Hon tänker inte ”på riktigt”. Hon talar med någon annans ord. Någon annan talar genom henne.Bland roboten, skivspelaren och papegojan skiljer förstås den sistnämnda ut sig. Till skillnad från de andra är papegojan en levande varelse som du och jag.I litteraturhistorien har inget djur används lika mycket för att beteckna människor som själlöst repeterar, som talar utan att tänka. Som Lila i Elena Ferrantes Neapelkvartett utbrister apropå akademiker: ”De har inte en enda tanke i huvudet som är deras egen, som de har tänkt själva. De vet allt, men de vet ingenting”, säger hon. ”Om du hade varit där skulle du bara ha fått höra papegojor som tjattrade […]. Det gick inte att fatta ett ord av vad de sade och de fattade inte själva heller.”Det är bara ett av hudnratals, kanske tusentals exempel. Papegojan betecknar upprepning, tanklöshet. Det finns bara ett problem –papegojor är inte alls är korkade djur. De tros tvärtom vara näst smartast efter människan! Evolutionärbiologen Antone Martinho-Truswell menar att papegojan troligtvis var jordens mest intelligenta livsform under åtminstone 30 miljoner år innan människan kom in i bilden.Att fågeln används för att representera tanklöshet är ett missförstånd som kanske delvis kan förklaras av att myter är seglivade. Det var också relativt nyligen vetenskapen insåg hur intelligenta papegojor är – särskilt grå papegojor, aror och kakaduor. Och då har man ändå talat om papegojans kapacitet att imitera mänskligt tal i mer än 2000 år.Brytpunkten ägde rum på 1970-talet med en grå papegoja som hette Alex och en forskare som hette Irene Pepperberg. Hon sökte efter sätt att etablera kommunikation mellan människa och djur. Medan andra forskare tittade på chimpanser eller delfiner valde hon papegojor som de flesta var överens om var underlägsna däggdjur i intelligens och inte kapabla till mer än efterhärmning. Det slutade med att Irene Pepperberg studerade Alex i 30 år. Under den tiden lärde hon honom att med ord urskilja sju färger och fem former. Han lärde sig också begreppspar som samma-olika och större-mindre. Med andra ord kunde han alltså beskriva föremål i fråga om storlek, form och färg, samt på vilket sätt ett föremål skiljde sig från ett annat. Han visade klara tecken på att han också förstod innebörden av orden.Efter Pepperberg har papegojor varit föremål för betydligt mer forskning. Under 1980-talet visste man fortfarande nästan inget om papegojor i det vilda, som skiljer sig mycket från dem i fångenskap. Till exempel imiterar de inte. Det verkar tvärtom vara något de enbart gör för vår skull.Men visst är det imponerande hur många ord och stavelser en papegoja kan lära sig utan att själva förstå dem? Och vilket minne det förutsätter. Det finns även gott om experiment som visar att exempelvis kakaduor kan använda och tillverka verktyg. De har även ganska komplexa känsloliv. De kan hämnas om man slutar mata dem, de kan dansa, hålla takten (genomsnittligt lika bra som människan) och med en pinne slå på en trumma. Redan Darwin konstaterade att papegojor var musikaliska, hade känsla för melodi och kunde lära sig att vissla. Det är något de gör för sitt enkla nöjes skull – inte för att få någon belöning som exempelvis mat. Det är egenskaper som man inte kunnat se hos några andra djur, inte ens hos våra släktingar primaterna. I dag menar många forskare till och med att papegojor – trots att vi inte är nära släkt rent biologiskt – är mer lika oss människor än de flesta andra djur. Martinho-Truswell har kallat dem ”vår evolutionära spegelbild”. De lever länge – som vi. De är – vanligtvis – monogama. De är altriciala vilket betyder att nyfödda ungar är beroende av två föräldrar under en längre tid för mat, skydd och värme. Det är något som kännetecknar alla djur med mer komplexa hjärnor. Papegojor är med andra ord mycket intelligenta djur. Men de kan inte lära sig att tala som en människa. Deras intelligens manifesterar sig inte språkligt. Papegojor är intelligenta på ett annat sätt.Problemet med upprepning ligger med sagt inte hos dem – utan hos oss. Man kan fråga sig varför vi driver med papegojan, vad är det som känns så hotfullt? Vi har ju alla en gång utvecklats genom att efterapa vår omgivning – för att använda en annan djurliknelse. Vi har gjort det så ofta och effektivt att vi till slut börjat tänka själva. Eller är där oron sitter, att det vi uppfattar som självständiga tänkande subjekt i själva verket bara är komplexa nätverk av upprepningar? Allt vi säger och tänker bara omkastningar av sådant vi redan hört eller sett, men omarbetat till oigenkännlighet? Då blir papegojans eko en spöklik påminnelse som kan ge existentiell svindel. Försvarsmekanismerna träder in, skrattet, avfärdandet. Tjattrande papegojor… Men är det verkligen något att vara så rädd för? Upprepning är trots allt en stor del av all språklig kommunikation och imitation en förutsättning för vårt sociala liv. Och som Kierkegaard skriver är verklig upprepning samma slags rörelse som minne, men i motsatt riktning. Den riktar sig mot framtiden.Det varnas med rätta för att se på djuren med en antropomorf blick. Men som biologerna Catherine Toft och Timothy Wright påpekar syftar begreppet antropomorfism endast på när man felaktigt tillskriver andra arter mänskliga egenskaper. Och lika gravt och vanligt är antropocentrismen – att felaktigt lokalisera alla egenskaper vi betraktar som mänskliga till enbart människan. Forskningen har trots allt visat att papegojor är mest ”mänskliga” av alla fåglar. Och vem vet, kanske är människan det mest papegojlika av alla däggdjur. Men det är som framgått inte bara imitationen som gör oss lika. Och det är något vi borde vara stolta över. Vara stolta över. Vara stolta över…Carl Magnus Juliussonlitteraturvetare och kulturjournalist

Kierkegaard writes, "The world in which they crucify love and beg acquittal for a robber." The Resurrection of Jesus is both a physical reality and a spiritual necessity. For love is stronger than death.

Langeweile gilt oft als belangloses Gefühl oder als persönliches Versagen. Doch was, wenn sie ein ernstzunehmendes Signal ist? In dieser Pudelkern-Folge sprechen Albert und Jan mit der Soziologin und Langeweile-Forscherin Dr. Silke Ohlmeier über ein Gefühl, das unangenehm ist und gerade deshalb viel über unser Leben verrät. Silke erklärt, warum Langeweile nicht einfach „nichts zu tun haben“ bedeutet, sondern entsteht, wenn wir tätig sein wollen, es aber nicht können: wenn Sinn, Selbstwirksamkeit und innere Stimmigkeit fehlen. Im Gespräch geht es um situative und chronische Langeweile, um ihre psychologischen und gesellschaftlichen Ursachen und um die Frage, warum Langeweile ungleich verteilt ist. Die Philosophie liefert dabei Tiefenschärfe: von der existenziellen Leere bei Kierkegaard und Heidegger bis zur stoischen Kunst, Unvermeidliches auszuhalten. Eine Folge über Sinnverlust und Sinnsuche, über Muße und Überforderung und darüber, warum Langeweile kein Makel ist, sondern ein Hinweis darauf, dass etwas Wesentliches fehlt.

SPONSORS: 1) MIRACLE BRAND: Upgrade your sleep with Miracle Made—go to https://trymiracle.com/julian and use code JULIAN to save over 40% and get a free 3-piece towel set. 2) AMENTARA: Go to https://www.amentara.com/go/JULIAN and use code JD22 for 22% off your first order. JOIN PATREON FOR EARLY UNCENSORED EPISODE RELEASES: https://www.patreon.com/JulianDorey (***TIMESTAMPS in description below) ~ Jesse Hamel is a former Air Force Lt. Colonel & AC-130 Gunship Combat Aviator. He is now CEO of Victus Technologies, a drone warfare company he founded while studying at MIT. JESSE's LINKS: X: https://x.com/jhMITgunship VICTUS: https://www.getvictus.ai/ FOLLOW JULIAN DOREY INSTAGRAM (Podcast): https://www.instagram.com/juliandoreypodcast/ INSTAGRAM (Personal): https://www.instagram.com/julianddorey/ X: https://twitter.com/julianddorey JULIAN YT CHANNELS - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Clips YT: https://www.youtube.com/@juliandoreyclips - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Daily YT: https://www.youtube.com/@JulianDoreyDaily - SUBSCRIBE to Best of JDP: https://www.youtube.com/@bestofJDP ****TIMESTAMPS**** 0:00 – Intro 01:22 – Jesse's Air Force Background, 9/11, AC-130 Gunship, Combat Years 12:35 – Warfighters & Technology, Drones vs Human Trust, The Agentic Age 23:56 – West Coast Tech Power, CCP Exploiting Open Systems, Planning for 6G 34:31 – 6G, Humans & Machines, AI, Bio-Hybrid Hellscape 48:33 – AI Arms Race: U.S. vs China, Nuclear War 59:25 – Zooming Out on Power, Governance Problems, 1984, Corruption, Term Limits 01:12:20 – Palantir, War Has Changed, Bringing Our Team Home 01:22:00 – Snowden, Moral Tradeoffs, Combat, Mission Planning, Risk of Inaction 01:31:41 – Founders & Stress, Military, Resilience, Suffering, Slaying the Daily Dragon 01:41:45 – Turning Suffering Into Growth, Anxiety, CNS Limits, Breaking Bad Habits 01:57:03 – Mortality, Meaning, Being vs Doing, The Arc of Change 02:06:38 – AC-130 Squadrons, Dawn of Drone Warfare, Afghanistan, MQ-9 Integration 02:16:54 – Predators & Reapers, Psychological Cost of Killing, First Kill 02:27:21 – Moral Injury, The Charring of the Conscience, Faith, Kierkegaard, Purity of Heart 02:37:08 – Never Arriving at the Truth, Lifelong Learning 02:40:18 – Next Ep CREDITS: - Host, Editor & Producer: Julian Dorey - COO, Producer & Editor: Alessi Allaman - https://www.youtube.com/@UCyLKzv5fKxGmVQg3cMJJzyQ - In-Studio Producer: Joey Deef - https://www.instagram.com/joeydeef/ Julian Dorey Podcast Episode 377 - Jesse Hamel Music by Artlist.io Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This is the recording of my presentation of my paper, "Kierkegaard's Philosophical Fragments as Gilsonian Christian Philosophy," during the International Etienne Gilson Society satellite session at the American Catholic Philosophical Association 2015 conference. The recording also includes some lively discussion in the Q&A portion following my reading of the paper. In the paper, I discuss key features of Gilson's conception of Christian philosophy developed during the 1930s debates about the topic, examine why Kierkegaard would seem to be an unlikely prospect for Gilsonian Christian philosophy, but then argue that Kierkegaard's work Philosophical Fragments actually does fit Gilson's conception of Christian philosophy quite well. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3500 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Soren Kierkegaard's Philosophical Fragments - https://amzn.to/4bQbwtk

Starting in February of 2026, I will be leading an 8-week study on The Silmarillion. This course will include:Weekly reading companion videosWeekly live meetingsOngoing Discord chatsTo participate, become a Tier 3 patron at https://www.patreon.com/mythicmindBecome an annual patronage for a discount and to join more upcoming studies, including The Psychology of Søren Kierkegaard and a new study on C.S. Lewis.Watch the video of this overview here: https://youtu.be/CPS1seRUCQMFor a taste of related content, watch, "Sauron and the Passing Shadow," which was made for my Lord of the Rings study. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z13vMIk5j9wBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mythic-mind--5808321/support.

A Jewish Philosophy of Man: A Lecture Series by Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik Lecture 1: Delivered November 6, 1958 Judaism, and religion in general, is a cognitive venture, seeking to intellectually grasp the world, and is not merely an emotional or ethical gesture. Unlike the scientist, who, until recently, was mostly interested in knowing the outside world, and unlike other Western religions, which focused their attention on theology, Judaism is concerned mainly with Man. It stresses a religious anthropology, a religious doctrine of Man. Although Judaism is theocentric, it is “anthropo-oriented.” God remains a Deus-absconditus, hidden and unknowable. Our experience of God is antithetical, because we experience Him both as infinitely distant and intimately close. Christianity deals with this dichotomy by dividing between an unapproachable God-father and an accessible God-son. Judaism deals with the same dichotomy by dividing between our intellectual and emotional religious experiences of God. Judaism has no theology because intellectually God is an enigma, and all statements about God are understood not interpretively but normatively, as attributes for us to imitate. Therefore, Judaism's primary question is about Man, not God. Judaism's doctrine of man is guided by a series of questions, including, the problem of Man's dichotomy as being both part of and above the animal world, the question of what trait is Man's unique endowment, and, whether this unique characteristic is inborn or must be earned. Further questions include the relationship between solitary and communal existence, the problem of the dichotomy of mind and soul, and the question if Man is primarily a creature of intellect or of will. The lecture ends with responses to questions from the audience that include critiques of Buber, Kierkegaard, and Mordecai Kaplan's Reconstructionist Judaism. Jump to: 00:02:42 Not presenting a definitive philosophy of Judaism, but a subjective reflection 00:08:07 Religion as a cognitive gesture 00:21:30 Judaism's unique focus on understanding Man 00:33:32 Christian vs. Jewish approaches to the dichotomy of the Man-God experience 00:54:06 A list of the questions about Man that concern Judaism 01:04:56 Questions from the audience and responses Access lecture summaries and course materials at www.TraditionOnline.org/JPM The post JPM Lecture 1: Introduction to the Jewish Philosophy of Man first appeared on Tradition Online.

Je pojem duše dnes ešte adekvátny, alebo je presnejšie hovoriť o slobode a determinizme? Aký je rozdiel medzi filozofiou a vedou a prečo Heidegger tvrdil, že len filozofia myslí, zatiaľ čo veda nie? V čom je problematická karteziánska predstava tela a duše ako dvoch radikálne odlišných vecí a čo nové nás naučila v tejto veci plasticita mozgu? O týchto a ďalších otázkach sa Jakub rozpráva s českým filozofom Petrom Koubom.----more----

With this episode I'm joined again by Dr. Trey Martin as we conclude the conversation we began previously on the subject of idolatry and our lives lived before the only true and living God. There are things that can threaten the devotion we have to God, things that can become larger to us than they should In the first portion of this conversation, Dr. Martin helped us understand some definitions and biblical background surrounding idolatry, and in this second part we will begin to address some questions about how this is worked our in real life and ministry. If you've not listened to the first portion of this conversation, I encourage you to do so. One of the things that Dr. Martin did in that episode was to help us distinguish between real and metaphorical idols, and to see how metaphorical idols can be as damaging, if not more so, than physical ones. But here, now, we begin to turn the conversation away from the theoretical and more to the practical. We'll pick up the conversation with a question that moves us in that direction. We encourage you to also subscribe to our newsletter where, on third Mondays and at other times there may be additional content. You can do so here. You can help support this podcast by supporting us on Patreon. You can do so here. EPISODE NOTES Notes and resources relevant to this episode: For an explanation of the name and intention of these occasional interviews, read this, or listen to it here or here. Dr. Trey Martin The article that stimulated this conversation: A COUNTERFEIT IDOL: RESIGNATION AND FAITH IN TIMOTHY KELLER'S COUNTERFEIT GODS, by Dr. Trey Martin. Used by the kind permission from Covenant Theological Seminary. For information about the academic-pastoral journal Presbyterion, go to https://www.covenantseminary.edu/publications. Timothy Keller, The Reason for God Timothy Keller, Counterfeit Gods Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling C. S. Lewis, The Four Loves Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Life Together Sinclair Ferguson, The Whole Christ When you buy a book using a link on this page, Greatheart's Table receives a commission. Thank you for supporting this work! Podcast music provided by Cool Hand Luke and used with permission.Intro: “Holy Vanguard” / LyricsOutro: “Wonder Tour” / Lyrics / Video To find our more about Greatheart's Table, visit us here.

This video explores the theology, philosophy, and Christology of Martin Luther King Jr. I argue that he is best understood as a moderate American Unitarian.I mention Martin Luther King Jr., Martin Luther, Michael King Sr. (Martin Luther King Sr.), Schleiermacher, Paul of Samosata, William Ellery Channing, Paul Tillich, Henry Nelson Wieman, Coretta Scott King, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Karl Jaspers, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Walter Rauschenbusch, Mahatma Gandhi, Saint Augustine, Saint Anselm, Blaise Pascal, Os Guinness, Keith Ward, Desmond Tutu, Francis Collins, Christopher Hitchens, and more.

What if your entire life could pivot on a bold decision you never saw coming?Join Nicole McMackin as she sits down with serial entrepreneur and visionary, Liz Zaborowska, a first-generation American whose family's journey from communist Poland to her success in Silicon Valley is anything but ordinary. In this exclusive episode, Liz uncovers the mindsets, unexpected hardships and surprising “miracle moments” that fueled her rise, blending discipline with wild ambition and a heartfelt drive to help others.You'll learn the real secrets behind risk-taking, creating meaningful momentum and building abundance, even when the odds are stacked against you. Listen now to escape career stagnation, shatter outdated rules and unlock powerful tools for growth. If you're serious about upgrading your career and your life, the time is now. Don't miss authentic strategies and truth bombs you won't find anywhere else.Timestamped Highlights[00:00] – The “abundance mindset” her parents instilled and why giving wins over getting[00:05:01] – Running toward or away? How your upbringing shapes ambition[00:10:15] – Wild sacrifices of immigrant parents, and the untold risks behind starting over[00:18:02] – The dream derailed: How fainting in a veterinary clinic led to a business breakthrough[00:21:13] – The single Kierkegaard quote that transforms networking and your bank account[00:27:00] – Dot-com crash devastation: Losing everything, then learning the only lesson that matters[00:32:35] – Career “pivot points”: BMW or Outward Bound? The decisions that secretly set your destiny[00:38:34] – Crushing comfort zones: The pinky swear goal for 2026 that terrifies (and motivates)About The GuestLiz Zaborowska is a serial entrepreneur, executive advisor and high-impact consultant best known for helping companies, teams and individuals build category leadership. As founder and CEO of Bhava Communications, a top go-to-market agency, and Spring Catalyst, a business team optimization firm, she blends deep expertise in tech with an unwavering commitment to purpose-driven work. Liz's story – from first-gen American to Silicon Valley leader – is full of unexpected pivots and has inspired thousands to think bigger, move faster and build careers (and lives) they love.

Given the state of the world at the outset of 2026, Jamie and Jeremy discuss the Confederation's thoughts on the subject of despair. Laleema shares their view on the condition with regards to the mind, body, and spirit complexes, finding spiritual despair to be an absolutely necessary experience for the seeker. The task then becomes to work with our bodily and mental despair to transmute them into that of the spirit, where we can surrender our limitations of mind and body to the Creator and do Its will. The ideas of Søren Kierkegaard on despair are sprinkled in, and a Q'uo transcript from a few years sheds light on the operation of despair as part of a cycle in the life of love.Show NotesLaleema on despair (September 22, 2005)Sickness Unto Death (Kierkegaard, A&D Press, 2008)Q'uo on Empathy (First Channeling Intensive, Session 10: August 1, 2021)Q'uo on Witnessing Planetary Sorrow (Sixth Channeling Intensive, Session 19: November 4, 2024)Pluribus (Apple TV)Reality (Kingsley, Catafalque Press, 2020)Q'uo on the Cycle of Desire, Love, Despair, and Healing (First Channeling Intensive, Session 11: August 2, 2021)Auxhall on Freedom and Direction (March 12, 2023)All despair-related sessions on HARC (High Altitude Receiving Center)Working Notes (Substack)

Starting from the observation that we increasingly treat the body as a maintenance problem, a fitness project, or an optimisation surface, the episode unfolds a deeper thesis: real thinking has weight. It needs fatigue, rhythm, resistance, time, and gravity.Together, Detlef and Sophia revisit philosophers who literally thought on their feet — Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Walter Benjamin, and Merleau-Ponty — and contrast embodied thinking with AI's frictionless, tireless cognition.At the heart of the episode lies a simple but radical sentence:“AI thinks without weight. Humans think with gravity.”The conversation moves from philosophy to everyday life, from West Cork landscapes to the ethics of limits, and from abstraction to movement as “epistemic hygiene.”The episode closes with a new song by Los Inorgánicos:“The Body Is Not a Side Project” — a minimal, rhythmic reminder that gravity needs a body.Detlef Schlich is a rock musician, podcaster, visual artist, filmmaker, ritual designer, and media archaeologist based in West Cork. He is recognised for his seminal work, including a scholarly examination of the intersections between shamanism, art, and digital culture, and his acclaimed video installation, Transodin's Tragedy. He primarily works in performance, photography, painting, sound, installations, and film. In his work, he reflects on the human condition and uses the digital shaman's methodology as an alter ego to create artwork. His media archaeology is a conceptual and practical exercise in uncovering the unique aesthetic, cultural, and political aspects of media in culture.WEBSITE LINKS WAW Official YouTube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@WAWBand"The Niles Bittersweet Song" WAW BandcampSilent NightIn a world shadowed by conflict and unrest, we, Dirk Schlömer & Detlef Schlich, felt compelled to reinterpret 'Silent Night' to reflect the complexities and contradictions of modern life.https://studiomuskau.bandcamp.com/track/silent-nightWild Atlantic WayThis results from a trip to West Cork, Ireland, where the beautiful Coastal "Wild Atlantic Way" reaches along the whole west coast!https://studiomuskau.bandcamp.com/track/wild-atlantic-wayYOU TUBE*Silent Night Reimagined* A Multilayered Avant-Garde Journey by WAW aka Dirk Schlömer & Detlef Schlichhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAbytLSfgCwDetlef SchlichInstagramDetlef Schlich ArTEEtude I love West Cork Artists FacebookDetlef Schlich I love West Cork Artists Group ArTEEtudeYouTube Channelsvisual PodcastArTEEtudeCute Alien TV official WebsiteArTEEtude Detlef Schlich Det Design Tribal Loop Download here for free Detlef Schlich´s Essay about the Cause and Effect of Shamanism, Art and Digital Culturehttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/303749640_Shamanism_Art_and_Digital_Culture_Cause_and_EffectSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/arteetude-a-podcast-with-artists-by-detlef-schlich/donations

Esta noche cierro 2025 con un brindis que no es motivación: es mi filosofía de vida. Si te resuena la salud como libertad (no como obsesión), este vídeo es para ti.Activa tu cambio para 2026 aquí:https://tinyurl.com/ck4vj3k5En este vídeo te comparto cómo veo el mundo después de años leyendo y conversando con grandes voces (Nietzsche, Camus, Kierkegaard, Spinoza, Hume, Marco Aurelio, Foucault)… y aterrizándolo donde de verdad importa: en tu cuerpo, tu mente, tus decisiones y tu familia.- Nada es “azar caprichoso”: todo tiene causas (y si hay causas, hay palancas).- No somos robots racionales: somos emociones, historia y biología.- Nos entrenaron para ser pequeños: yo elijo no serlo.- No llamemos “destino” a lo que, en el fondo, es falta de decisión (sin culpa: con poder).- Libertad adulta: nadie va a vivir sano por ti… pero podemos sostenernos.

Do you have a Giraffe mindset or a Hippo state of mind? Soren Kierkegaard said that “The door of happiness opens inward.” Dr. Seuss said, “Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened.” Wait, did Dr. Seuss really say that? The Cranberries said, "Do you have to let it linger?" We think you do. We also think that Dr. Seuss didn't really say that, but we know who did. So come and Linger with us and bring in the New Year correctly. You'll be Happy you did.By the way we meant to post this Monday but due to some issues, we didn't get it posted in until actual New Years Eve so some of the dates/timeline we mentioned are no longer completely accurate.The song we used for the intro was "Happy Holidays (Beef Wellington Remix)" by Beef Wellington and 2003 Christmas Chill Inc. The ending song was "Make Someone Happy" by Jimmy Durante. We used "Linger" from The Cranberries. We also used "Baby It's Cold Outside" the original from the romantic comedy musical Neptune's Daughter released by MGM in 1949. We don't own any rights. Contact usLinktree: www.Linktr.ee/HappyLifeStudiosEmail: Podcast@HappyLife.StudioYo Stevo Hotline: (425) 200-HAYS (4297)Webpage: www.HappyLife.lol YouTube: www.YouTube.com/StevoHaysLinkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/steve-hays-b6b1186b/TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@happylifestudiosFacebook: www.Facebook.com/HappyLifeStudios Instagram: www.Instagram.com/HappyLife_Studios Twitter: www.x.com/stevehays If you would like to help us spread the HappyPayPal: www.PayPal.me/StevoHaysCash App: $HappyLifeStudiosZelle: StevoHays@gmail.comVenmo: @StevoHaysBuy Me A Coffee: buymeacoffee.com/HappyLifeStudioCheck: Payable to Hays Ministries or Steve Hays and send to 27240 213th Place S.E. Maple Valley, WA 98038

With this episode we begin another two part Rainy Day Conversation. These are quarterly conversations with smart and gracious people whose wisdom is brought to bear upon life and ministry and the church. The focus of this conversation, with Dr. Trey Martin, is how we as Christians and as pastors think about our affections in the wake of the late Dr. Tim Keller's helpful, but potentially confusing, teaching about idolatry. Are we over or under applying this teaching? I'm grateful to Dr. Martin, a man who has thought deeply about this, for joining in this conversation. The question is how the concept of idolatry can be helpful, and at times unhelpful, personally as we live our lives before God and pastorally as we lead our congregations to love and follow Jesus. In some quarters of the church it has become popular to label many things as ‘idols'. But are they? What might be gained, or lost, by seeing them in that way? How ought we to understand our affections? Can we love a thing without it being a god in place of God? In this first half of the conversation, we'll lay the groundwork for the practical application which will come in the second. We encourage you to also subscribe to our newsletter where, on third Mondays and at other times there may be additional content. You can do so here. You can help support this podcast by supporting us on Patreon. You can do so here. EPISODE NOTES Notes and resources relevant to this episode: For an explanation of the name and intention of these occasional interviews, read this, or listen to it here or here. Dr. Trey Martin The article that stimulated this conversation: A COUNTERFEIT IDOL: RESIGNATION AND FAITH IN TIMOTHY KELLER'S COUNTERFEIT GODS, by Dr. Trey Martin. Used by the kind permission from Covenant Theological Seminary. For information about the academic-pastoral journal Presbyterion, go to https://www.covenantseminary.edu/publications. Timothy Keller, The Reason for God Timothy Keller, Counterfeit Gods Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling C. S. Lewis, The Four Loves Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Life Together Sinclair Ferguson, The Whole Christ When you buy a book using a link on this page, Greatheart's Table receives a commission. Thank you for supporting this work! Podcast music provided by Cool Hand Luke and used with permission.Intro: “Holy Vanguard” / LyricsOutro: “Wonder Tour” / Lyrics / Video To find our more about Greatheart's Table, visit us here.

In this solo episode, I reflect on Lars von Trier's Melancholia—a film often described as dark or depressing, yet one I found strangely clarifying and alive.After briefly situating the film within von Trier's long career, I offer a grounded overview of its structure and themes before moving into deeper psychological and philosophical territory. Drawing on psychoanalysis and existential therapy, I explore how Melancholia portrays depression not simply as pathology, but as a slowing down—a descent into depth in a culture addicted to speed, optimism, and surface meaning.Using the work of James Hillman, Freud, Lacan, and existential thinkers like Kierkegaard and Heidegger, I reflect on melancholia as a confrontation with truth rather than something to be rushed past or fixed. The episode considers what the film can teach us about despair, authenticity, and what remains when familiar structures of meaning fall away.This is an episode about staying with difficult emotions long enough to listen—about refusing easy reassurance in favor of depth, honesty, and presence.

This week on Respect Life Radio, we welcome Dr. Dermot Curtin to explore his insightful Catholic Exchange article, “Faith as the Answer to this Age of Anxiety.” In a culture saturated with uncertainty, pressure, and existential doubt, Dr. Curtin offers a refreshing and profound Catholic perspective on how faith doesn't merely distract from our worries — it gives them meaning. Drawing on philosophy, theology and the wisdom of figures like Kierkegaard, he shows how our age's pervasive anxiety can become a gateway to deeper spiritual transformation and reliance on God's providence rather than the fragmented promises of the world. Tune in to be encouraged and challenged to see faith not as a quick fix, but as a steady horizon from which true peace and purpose emerge. To read the full article visit: https://catholicexchange.com/faith-as-the-answer-to-this-age-of-anxiety/

Minune! A apărut o nuvelă episoadă! Vom discuta despre Maladia Mortală (Sickness onto Death), cartea care i-a adus lui Kierkegaard titlul de "tăticul existențialismului", adică un precursor al lui Sartre și toți francezii cu țigareta între dinți. Întâmplător, după cum vom vedea, ne vom apleca și asupra întrebării who's your daddy, dar asta în altă ordine de idei... Vom încerca să definim sinele ca tensiune/opoziție care se conștientizează pe sine (știu, sună șpanky, dar voi explica) și vom identifica cele două mari tipuri de disperarea: disperarea slăbiciunii și disperarea sfidării. După care trecem la Noica și distincția dintre un sine și o sine! Ceva lejer așa, de sărbători, deci :__).Support the showhttps://www.patreon.com/octavpopa

Veja também em youtube.com/@45_graus Ludwig Krippahl é investigador e formador na área da bioinformática. Até 2022, foi professor de Ciência da Computação na FCT-NOVA, onde se doutorou em Bioquímica Estrutural (2003) e onde lecionou programação, bioinformática, aprendizagem automática e redes neuronais. Ensina também há muitos anos pensamento crítico. _______________ (0:00) Introdução (4:43) Filosofia e Ciência = Racionalidade | Escolásticos | Kierkegaard (24:02) Filosofia continental vs analítica | Ciência vs Humanidades | Literatura, poesia (39:47) Ética filosófica | Emoções ajudam ou atrapalham para sermos mais éticos? | Ética vs moral | The Beginning of Infinity, de David Deutsch (57:04) Crítica à ética racionalista (Roger Scruton) | AbortoSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Professor Bas van Fraassen argues science doesn't deliver literal truth about reality, meaning unobservable physics is merely a model. He also contends the self isn't a thing and that logic permits free will, ultimately sharing how he maintains faith in God without relying on metaphysics. As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe TIMESTAMPS: - 00:00 - Reality vs. Appearance - 08:40 - Scientific Realism vs. Anti-Realism - 16:30 - The "No Miracles" Argument - 22:26 - Common Sense Realism - 27:54 - Trusting Instruments vs. Theories - 34:22 - Kierkegaard's Call to Decision - 41:50 - Determinism is a Model - 48:50 - Sartre on Free Will - 56:47 - Causation Doesn't Exist in Physics - 01:05:47 - Language of Human Action - 01:15:54 - Tarski's Limitative Theorems - 01:23:50 - "I Am Not a Thing" - 01:34:20 - Rejecting Analytic Metaphysics - 01:40:17 - Does God Exist? - 01:50:50 - Disagreement on Monty Hall - 01:56:15 - Conversion to Catholicism LINKS MENTIONED: - The Scientific Image [Book]: https://amzn.to/499SA72 - Bas's Blog: https://basvanfraassensblog.home.blog/about-me-2/ - The Empirical Stance [Book]: https://amzn.to/3MWbKEK - Bas's Published Papers: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EBj6wCAAAAAJ&hl=en - Bas's Published Books: https://amzn.to/3L0njdw - Reality Is Not What It Seems [Book]: https://amzn.to/3YseMDe - Matthew Segall [TOE]: https://youtu.be/DeTm4fSXpbM - The "No Miracles" Argument: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/#MiraArgu - Bas On Closer To Truth: https://youtu.be/nQnQ9ndlYi4 - The Most Terrifying Philosopher I've Encountered [TOE]: https://youtu.be/BWYxRM__TBU - Curt Reads Plato's Cave [TOE]: https://youtu.be/PurNlwnxwfY - Avshalom Elitzur [TOE]: https://youtu.be/pWRAaimQT1E - Formal Philosophy [Paper]: https://archive.org/details/formalphilosophy00mont/page/n5/mode/2up - Robert Sapolsky [TOE]: https://youtu.be/z0IqA1hYKY8 - Time And Chance [Book]: https://amzn.to/4qb6tru - Aaron Schurger [TOE]: https://youtu.be/yDDgDSmfS6Q - Nancy Cartwright's Published Work: https://www.profnancycartwright.com/publications/books/ - Tim Maudlin [TOE]: https://youtu.be/fU1bs5o3nss - Elan Barenholtz & Will Hahn [TOE]: https://youtu.be/Ca_RbPXraDE - On The Electrodynamics Of Moving Bodies [Paper]: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/Einstein_graduate/pdfs/Einstein_STR_1905_English.pdf - The 'Twin Earth' Thought Experiment: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Hilary-Putnam#ref1204773 - Yang-Hui He [TOE]: https://youtu.be/spIquD_mBFk - The Nonexistent Knight [Book]: https://amzn.to/3XWxfrs - Wolfgang Smith [TOE]: https://youtu.be/vp18_L_y_30 - Neil deGrasse Tyson Doesn't Understand What "Belief" Means [Article]: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/i-dont-use-the-word-belief-and-scientific - The Monty Hall Problem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem - Daniel Dennett [TOE]: https://youtu.be/bH553zzjQlI - Michael Dummett: https://iep.utm.edu/michael-dummett/ - How To Define Theoretical Terms [Paper]: https://www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors/teaching/phi520_f2012/lewis-theoretical-terms.pdf - The Model-Theoretic Argument: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-sem-challenge/model-theory-completeness.html - Remembering Hilary Putnam [Article]: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/remembering-hilary-putnam-harvard-philosopher-and-religious-jew - Hilary Lawson: https://www.hilarylawson.com/biography/ - Language Isn't Just Low Resolution Communication: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/language-isnt-just-low-resolution Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Chasing Leviathan, PJ and Dr. Lambert Zuidervaart discuss his book, Adorno, Heidegger, and the Politics of Truth, tracing how his decades of work on Adorno led to a deep exploration of truth, art, and society. Dr. Zuidervaart explains why Adorno believed art reveals forms of truth that science and philosophy often miss—and how these insights expose what is “untrue” in modern capitalist culture.They unpack Adorno's critique of Hegel's idea that “the true is the whole,” his early engagement with Kierkegaard, and his fierce opposition to Heidegger's language of authenticity. The conversation highlights how education, the culture industry, and advertising shape identity, conformity, and our sense of what is possible.PJ and Dr. Zuidervaart also explore the connections between Adorno and Foucault on truth and power, discuss Freud's influence on Adorno's views of repression and sublimation, and consider whether a more truthful, humane society is still possible. Dr. Zuidervaart closes with an invitation to reflect on what in our society is truly worthwhile—and what must change for human flourishing.Make sure to check out Dr. Zuidervaart's book: Adorno, Heidegger, and the Politics of Truth

In this episode, I sit down with my friend and returning guest, Luke Grote, to explore one of the most intense, provocative, and fascinating chapters I've ever read. Luke recently sent me a chapter from his upcoming book — a piece he describes as the best work he's ever written — and after reading it, I have to agree. It's part theology, part philosophy, part psychoanalysis, and part prophetic critique, woven together with a raw emotional charge that grabbed me immediately.We talk about where inspiration really comes from, why the ego is fundamentally a distortion, and how most of us spend our lives sleepwalking inside an identity shaped by cultural conditioning, spiritual misunderstandings, and mimetic pressures. Luke explains why Kierkegaard is his model for doing theology, how despair is a universal condition, and why he believes the “self” we identify with is largely an illusion we need to transcend.We also explore the intensity — even the fury — in his writing. I ask him directly if this chapter was a kind of “manic rant,” and we dig into how his bipolar diagnosis shapes the way he sees the world, breaks from academic conformity, and refuses to internalize the “Name-of-the-Father” in the Lacanian sense. Luke talks openly about how this partial break from the symbolic order allows him to see through cultural structures most of us unconsciously obey.From there, we dive into the inseparable relationship between the personal and the political, the tension between detachment and engagement, and why Luke believes genuine social transformation requires a radical remaking of the self. We challenge evangelical moralism, progressive identity politics, and the idolatry of belief within Christianity — and ask what it means to wake up in a world where most people prefer to remain asleep.This conversation is dense, challenging, and deeply alive. If you're interested in ego-transcendence, the New Being, Kierkegaard, consciousness, spirituality, political critique, or what it means to become who you truly are, this episode will have a lot for you.

Episode Synopsis:Did the ideas of Søren Kierkegaard die along with him, or are the notions of existentialism and neo-orthodoxy persistent enough to maintain a stranglehold on society, long after their visionary author was put to rest?We talk about this and much more, including:What are some of the cognitive limitations in forming beliefs?How do the ideas of Søren Kierkegaard provide the rationale for accepting Satanic ideologies?Who was Søren Kierkegaard, and how does his idea of existentialism rule the world from the grave?How have the concepts of existentialism's “self-indentification” infected society today?What are some of the devastating consequences of adopting the ideals espoused by neo-orthodoxy, and even more importantly, what is neo-orthodoxy?Original Air DateNovember 26th, 2025Show HostsJason Spears & Christopher DeanOur PatreonConsider joining our Patreon Squad and becoming a Tier Operator to help support the show and get access to exclusive content like:Links and ResourcesStudio NotesA monthly Zoom call with Jason and Christopher And More…ORP ApparelMerch StoreConnect With UsLetsTalk@ORPpodcast.comFacebookInstagram

USPAP: The Moral Compass of the Appraiser, from Tim Andersen, The Appraiser's Advocate (tim@theappraisersadvocate.com).  This podcast is a powerful exploration of the ethical, philosophical, and professional foundations of real estate appraisal.  It draws on the Ethics Rule of USPAP — competence, independence, impartiality, objectivity, and protection of the public trust.   This podcast also reminds appraisers that valuation is more than a technical exercise.  Rather, it is also a moral act rooted in truth and professional integrity. Through vivid examples and the wisdom of Aristotle, Kant, Aquinas, Kierkegaard, and Dr. James Graaskamp, the document argues that law compels, ethics guide, but morals elevate.  And where does UAD 3.6 fall into all this? In today's far-too-busy appraisal world, Appraisers face daily pressures such as “hitting the number”.  Appraisers must manage ambiguous data, training apprentices, and navigating AI-driven technologies. This podcast reframes those pressures as moral choices.  Tim emphasizes character, duty, and the courage to tell the truth even when it costs business. It highlights the Mirror Test — would you be proud of your report if it were published tomorrow? — as a practical ethical benchmark. The document's emphasis on public trust aligns appraisal practice with the common good, showing that accurate and honest valuation sustains fair markets, consumer confidence, and societal justice. In an age of automation, it asserts that the human appraiser remains the moral center of valuation. Perfect for CE, coaching, and professional development, this work positions ethical appraisal practice as a blend of philosophy, duty, and disciplined judgment. And remember to keep your E&O insurance up-to-date, and an Administrative Law Attorney on speed dial.

Curt Jaimungal dives into Kierkegaard's three stages of life—aesthetic, ethical, and religious — showing how each promises freedom yet traps us in its own way. Through the lens of modern anxiety and constant choice, he explores why the “leap of faith” isn't blind irrationality but a way of living with authenticity when reason hits its limits. Sponsors: - As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e Timestamps: - 00:00 - Kierkegaard and Faith - 03:16 - The Three Stages - 05:10 - Anti-Helegianism - 10:52 - Self-Examination and "Knowing Thyself" Links mentioned: - The Most Terrifying Philosopher I've Encountered: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/the-most-terrifying-philosopher-ive - Soren Kierkegaard: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kierkegaard/ - Either/Or [Book]: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.504967/page/n125/mode/2up - Michael Sugrue On Kierkegaard: https://youtu.be/SMJc9UMzFSE - Hegelianism: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hegelianism - Max Tegmark [TOE]: https://youtu.be/-gekVfUAS7c - Sir Roger Penrose [TOE]: https://youtu.be/iO03t21xhdk - Curt's Presentation: https://youtu.be/3_lBPMc6JRY SUPPORT: - Become a YouTube Member (Early Access Videos): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join - Support me on Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal - Support me on Crypto: https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/de803625-87d3-4300-ab6d-85d4258834a9 - Support me on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=XUBHNMFXUX5S4 SOCIALS: - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs Guests do not pay to appear. Theories of Everything receives revenue solely from viewer donations, platform ads, and clearly labelled sponsors; no guest or associated entity has ever given compensation, directly or through intermediaries. #science Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Over the past two decades, the artist Theaster Gates has poured himself into his multifaceted practice that spans pottery, painting, sculpture, urban development, performance, archival research, and arts administration. Along the way, he has risen to become one of the most widely celebrated figures in the world of art, transforming abandoned, dormant buildings in Chicago's Grand Crossing neighborhood, on the city's South Side, into dynamic third spaces for social, cultural, and spiritual communion; linking his hometown of Chicago with Japan, where in 2004 he trained with master potters in the coastal city of Tokoname and has maintained a deep connection ever since; and effectively rescuing, recontextualizing, and resuscitating culturally significant archives.On this episode of Time Sensitive, our latest “site-specific” recording, Gates sits down with Spencer inside his personal library in Chicago to talk about his current exhibition, “Unto Thee,” at the University of Chicago's Smart Museum of Art (on view through Feb. 22, 2026); his forward-looking vision for his latest project, The Land School, which he and his Rebuild Foundation have reshaped into an arts incubator; and the vast, alchemic impacts of music on his life and work.Special thanks to our Season 12 presenting sponsor, Van Cleef & Arpels.Show notes: Theaster Gates[1:21] Dorchester Art and Housing Collaborative[5:07] The Land School (2025)[7:30] St. Laurence Elementary School[7:42] Solange Knowles[9:07] Stony Island Arts Bank[9:07] Rebuild Foundation[9:07] Black Cinema House[9:07] The Listening House[13:06] Jane Addams[13:06] Jane Jacobs[13:06] Jesse Jackson[13:23] Frederick Law Olmsted[13:23]  Huey P. Newton[13:31] Chicago Transit Authority[19:45] Cicero[23:24] Søren] Kierkegaard[23:24] Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel [25:31] “Unto Thee” (2025)[29:12] Fred Moten[29:29] “Art Histories” (2020)[35:18] Tokoname[42:26] “The Listening House” (2022)[49:29] “Afro-Mingei" (2024)[49:29] Mingei[51:24] Black is Beautiful and Black Arts movements[1:07:02] Theaster Gates's record collections[1:15:07] Martin Puryear[1:17:00] László Moholy-Nagy[1:17:00] Josef Albers[1:17:00] Carrie Mae Weems

====================================================SUSCRIBETEhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNpffyr-7_zP1x1lS89ByaQ?sub_confirmation=1==================================================== DEVOCIÓN MATUTINA PARA JÓVENES 2025“HOY ES TENDENCIA”Narrado por: Daniel RamosDesde: Connecticut, USAUna cortesía de DR'Ministries y Canaan Seventh-Day Adventist Church===================|| www.drministries.org ||===================16 de Noviembre¿Imitador o admirador?«Luego, Jesús llamó a la gente y a sus seguidores, y les dijo: "Si alguien quiere ser mi seguidor, tiene que renunciar a sí mismo, aceptar la cruz que se le da y seguirme». Marcos 8: 34, PDTEl 12 de octubre de 1971 se estrenó en Broadway el famoso y controversial musical Jesucristo Superestrella. Esta producción y presenta la vida y muerte de Jesús desde la perspectiva de Judas Iscariote, que ve a Jesús como un revolucionario político, a la vez que se muestra perturbado por la idea de un Jesús divino. En una parte del musical, Judas alude a Mateo 16: 13 cuando canta: ««Jesucristo, superestrella, ¿crees ser lo que ellos dicen que eres?».La idea que tengamos de Jesús de Nazaret determinará cómo nos relacionaremos con él. En el siglo XIX, el filósofo cristiano Søren Kierkegaard dividió a los cristianos en dos grupos: imitadores y admiradores: «Un imitador es o intenta ser lo  que admira y un admirador se mantiene distanciado, consciente o inconscientemente no se da cuenta de que lo que admira conlleva una exigencia sobre él».* Para este filósofo, Judas se convirtió en traidor precisamente porque era un admirador y «el admirador solo se encapricha de la grandeza de manera débil o egoísta; si hay algún inconveniente o peligro, se retira; si no puede hacerlo, se convierte en traidor para, al menos, escapar así de lo que antes admiraba».Unos años después de Kierkegaard, y escribiendo bajo inspiración divina, Elena G. de White dedicó un capítulo completo de El Deseado de todas las gentes a Judas Iscariote (te recomiendo leerlo). Allí, la señora White dice que Judas «no llegó al punto de entregarse plenamente a Cristo [...]. Creyó que podía conservar su propio juicio y sus opiniones» (p. 678) y, al darse cuenta de que los beneficios que Jesús ofrecía eran espirituales y no terrenales, «resolvió no unirse tan íntimamente con Cristo que no pudiese apartarse» (p. 680). Definitivamente, Judas admiraba a Jesús, pero no lo imitaba.Hoy Jesús continúa cautivando la admiración de las masas; pero al Maestro de Galilea nunca le ha importado contar o no con la admiración de las personas. Jesús siempre ha querido discípulos, y hoy te extiende la misma invitación que realizó hace dos mil años: «Sígueme» (ver Mateo 9: 9; 19: 21). ¿Qué respuesta le darás? ¿Serás tú un imitador o un admirador? 

Text us your questions!Is the drive to be better than others making us worse? We talk with theologian Miroslav Volf about his book The Cost of Ambition and explore why comparison-based striving saturates our schools, churches, workplaces, and politics. Volf separates healthy aspiration from superiority-seeking and makes a compelling case for excellence without domination, rooted in agape, i.e., unconditional love that affirms people beyond performance.We dig into the Christ hymn of Philippians 2 and why self-emptying is not weakness but a different kind of strength. Volf shows how resurrection and ascension empower humility rather than feed triumphalism and why honoring everyone is both a spiritual discipline and a democratic necessity. From the academy's “one-up” culture to the marketplace's imitation traps, he argues that obsessing over competitors blinds us to our unique gifts and corrodes joy. Even stalwart capitalists like Warren Buffett warn against competitor-fixation. Volf adds a deeper moral and theological critique as well, drawing on Paul's piercing question: What do you have that you did not receive?We also test his claims against Nietzsche's will to power, happiness research on social comparison, and the rise of Christian nationalism. Is Christ a moral stranger to our priorities? Volf challenges both sides of the aisle to recover mere humanity—Kierkegaard's vision of belovedness before achievement—and to practice agape toward others and ourselves. The result is a bracing, hopeful vision: strive for truth, craft, and contribution, not for status; pursue excellence as stewardship, not self-exaltation.If you're weary of the status treadmill yet still hungry to do meaningful work, this conversation will give you categories, language, and practices to recalibrate your aims. Listen, reflect, and share with someone who needs a healthier way to win. If the episode resonates, subscribe, leave a review, and let us know your thoughts.=====Want to support us?The best way is to subscribe to our Patreon. Annual memberships are available for a 10% discount.If you'd rather make a one-time donation, you can contribute through our PayPal. Other important info: Rate & review us on Apple & Spotify Follow us on social media at @PPWBPodcast Watch & comment on YouTube Email us at pastorandphilosopher@gmail.com Cheers!

I explore what Kierkegaard and others have identified as a primary antithesis of simplicity - busyness. A huge thanks to Seth White for the awesome music!Thanks to Palmtoptiger17 for the beautiful logo: https://www.instagram.com/palmtoptiger17/Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/thewayfourth/?modal=admin_todo_tourYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTd3KlRte86eG9U40ncZ4XA?view_as=subscriberInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/theway4th/ Kingdom Outpost: https://kingdomoutpost.org/My Reading List Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/21940220.J_G_ElliotPurity of Heart is to Will One Thing: https://www.religion-online.org/book/purity-of-heart-is-to-will-one-thing/The Anxious Generation: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/171681821-the-anxious-generation Thanks to our monthly supporters J Phillip Mast Laverne Miller Jesse Killion ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Links, in order of their mention on the podcast:Kierkegaard parable Andrew cites: From the Journal: Empty Nutshells...God would be loved. Therefore He wants Christians. To love God is to be a Christian...Now "man's" knavish interest consists in creating millions and millions of Christians, the more the better, all men if possible; for thus the whole difficulty of being a Christian vanishes, being a Christian and being a man amounts to the same thing, and we find ourselves where paganism ended. Christendom has mocked God and continues to mock Him—just as if to a man who is a lover of nuts, instead of bringing him one nut with a kernel, we were to bring him tons and millions...of empty nuts, and then make this show of our zeal to comply with his wish.Soren Kierkegaard, Attack Upon “Christendom” 1854-1855, translated with an introduction by Walter Lowrie, The Beacon Press, Boston, 1956. p. 156.John Frame, "Machen's Warrior Children" in Sung Wook Chung, ed., Alister E. McGrath and Evangelical Theology (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003).Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages.Rodney Stark, God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades.Jonathan Riley-Smith, The Crusades: A History. (Other histories of the Crusades by Riley-Smith.)Augustine, Confessions. (Warhorn published an excellent short biography of Augustine by Dr. Josh Congrove titled Behold My Heart: The Life and Legacy of Augustine. Congrove has his doctorate in classics and he recommends the following translations of the Confessions: to those who want simple English, either Henry Chadwick or John Ryan; but the best translation remains F. J. Sheed.Derek Thompson, "Everything Is Television: A theory of culture and attention."Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show.Richard Baxter, Autobiography.Richard Baxter, The Reformed Pastor.Lewis Bayly, The Practice of Piety.John Owen, D. D., A Discourse Concerning Evangelical Love, Church Peace, and Unity; With the Occasions and Reasons of Present Differences and Divisions about Things Sacred and Religious, (London: Doxman Newman, at the Kings-Armes in the Poultry, 1673).Christopher Clark, The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914.Paul Johnson, Modern Times Revised Edition: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties.Westminster Confession: Chapter XVII Of the Perseverance of the Saints | Chapter XVIII Of Assurance of Grace and SalvationWestminster Larger Catechism: Of the Perseverance of the Saints and Of Assurance of Grace and Salvation***Out of Our Minds Podcast: Pastors Who Say What They Think. For the love of Christ and His Church. Out of Our Minds is a production of New Geneva Academy. Are you interested in preparing for ordained ministry with pastors? Have a desire to grow in your knowledge and fear of God? Apply at www.newgenevaacademy.com. Master of Divinity / Bachelor of DivinityCertificate in Bible & TheologyIntro and outro music is Psalm of the King, Psalm 21 by My Soul Among Lions. Out of Our Minds audio, artwork, episode descriptions, and notes are property of New Geneva Academy and Warhorn Media, published with permission by Transistor, Inc. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Brent Billings, Reed Dent, and Josh Bossé talk about the capital vice known as sloth—or rather, acedia.David Hume's Moral Philosophy: The Natural Virtues — Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyMaking All Things New by Henri NouwenInside Out 2 (2024 film)Glittering Vices by Rebecca Konyndyk DeYoungAcedia & Me by Kathleen NorrisThe Message in the Bottle by Walker PercyBEMA 2: Knowing When to Say “Enough”1 Corinthians 3 — Reed Dent, Campus Christian FellowshipBEMA 400: Talmudic Matthew — SaltBEMA 401: Talmudic Matthew — LightBEMA 402: Talmudic Matthew — Lightly SaltedMark 11 (aroma reference) — Reed Dent, Campus Christian FellowshipWhere the Wild Things Are by Maurice SendakBEMA 136: Each OneThe Book of Delights by Ross Gay“Patient Trust” by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin“Followers, Not Admirers” by Søren Kierkegaard in Bread and Wine: Readings for Lent and EasterPrayer of St. Teresa of Avila — Catholic Health Association of the United StatesLost in the Cosmos by Walker PercyThe Sabbath by Abraham Joshua HeschelThe Screwtape Letters by C. S. LewisCalorie — WikipediaCanada Geese and Diet Dr. Pepper — The Anthropocene Reviewed

Burnout recovery isn't just about rest — it's about recalibration. This episode reveals how chronic appeasement and role fatigue drain your peace, and how to rebuild identity-based boundaries that restore real alignment from the inside out.If you feel constantly drained — no matter how much you rest — you're not broken. You're just leaking peace.In this episode of The Recalibration, Julie Holly explores the real reason burnout and decision fatigue linger: not overwork, but identity leaks — the subtle ways high-capacity humans trade authenticity for approval.From a psychology perspective, Julie unpacks how fight, flight, freeze, and fawn responses shape our nervous system patterns, and why chronic appeasement isn't humility — it's dysregulation. Drawing from Polyvagal Theory and the wisdom of philosopher Søren Kierkegaard, she explains how “the most common despair is to not be oneself” — and how that despair quietly erodes leadership, peace, and confidence.Through the story of Katharine Graham of The Washington Post, you'll see how alignment becomes courage in motion — how defining boundaries transforms fear of loss into integrity and influence.You'll also learn how to spot when you're performing peace instead of living it, and how to rebuild identity-first boundaries that protect presence without hardening your heart.Because peace isn't passive — it's protected. And every time you honor your truth instead of managing perception, you teach your nervous system that safety and authenticity can coexist.Today's Micro Recalibration — “The Leak Audit” Create three columns: Role. Relationship. Rhythm. Ask in each: “Where am I leaking peace?” Then write one clear boundary for each — a single sentence that honors who you've become. Peace doesn't grow through permission. It grows through protection.If this episode gave you language you've been missing, please rate and review the show so more high-capacity humans can find it. Explore Identity-Level Recalibration→ Follow Julie Holly on LinkedIn for more recalibration insights → Schedule a conversation with Julie to see if The Recalibration is a fit for you → Download the Misalignment Audit → Subscribe to the weekly newsletter → Join the waitlist for the next Recalibration cohort This isn't therapy. This isn't coaching. This is identity recalibration — and it changes everything.