Podcasts about Schelling

Romantiken lever i några av våra mest älskade barn- och ungdomsböcker. Eva-Lotta Hultén berättar om Maria Gripes filosofiska influenser. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna.”Allt levande hörer samman.” Orden formuleras på 1700-talet av Linnélärjungen Andreas Wiik, i ett brev till hans hemligt trolovade, Emelie. Deras korrespondens hittas på Selanderska gården i småländska Ringaryd långt senare av tre ungdomar. Av breven framgår att det ska finnas en antik egyptisk staty gömd någonstans på orten.Det finns ingen Linnélärjunge vid namn Andreas Wiik. Och ingen småländsk ort som heter Ringaryd. Men både mannen och platsen lever i Maria Gripes ”Tordyveln flyger i skymningen”.Tillsammans med ”Agnes Cecilia” är det den av hennes berättelser där de mystiska inslagen är starkast. Samhörighet över både tid och rum manifesterar sig och byggnader kan bära minnen och förmedla budskap. Särskilt i ”Tordyveln flyger i skymningen” bistår växter och djur i kommunikationen. Skalbaggar och krukväxter leder protagonisterna till viktiga ledtrådar på gåtans lösning – var finns statyn som Andreas Wiik hemförde från Egypten?Redan tidigare i sitt författarskap, också i sina mer realistiska berättelser, skildrade Maria Gripe en kommunikation med naturen, genom flera av sina karaktärer. Hugo, i ”Hugo och Josefin”, är en trygg skogsvarelse som kommer till människornas värld med ett budskap: skollärarinnan får veta att hon har hållits för lite i skogen och för mycket i skolan och att det är därför hon bekymrar sig så mycket. När Hugos för misshandel fängelsedömda far ­kommer på tal säger Hugo lugnt att ”Skogen ska en inte överge. Då går dä illa.”Också Loella i Pappa Pellerins dotter, är ett sagoväsen som hör ihop med naturen.Gripes biograf Ying Toijer Nilsson beskriver det så här: ”Den spåntäckta stugan är nästan osynlig, insnärjd i slingerväxter och med gräs på taket. Vädrets makter står på hennes sida, blixten laddar ur sig framför barnavårdsnämndens representanter, stigen är villsam och oländig, yrväder hindrar moderns bekanta som kommer för att hämta barnen.”I Gripes värld samspelar vi med naturen och talar med och genom den.Maria Gripe växte upp i Örebro men trivdes inte i stadens flickskola och när det var dags för vidare utbildning fick det bli Enskilda gymnasiet i Stockholm. Hon bodde inackorderad, och i rummet hon hyrde fanns filosofen Friedrich von Schellings samlade verk. Det är hans naturfilosofi som hon klär i Andreas Wiiks ord, och ger gestalt i Tordyveln flyger i skymningen.Schelling var verksam kring sekelskiftet 1800 och framåt och ingick i den intellektuella kretsen i staden Jena. Han räknas till de tyska idealisterna och romantikerna, vars idéer ofta ses som en motreaktion på upplysningen och den vetenskapliga revolutionen. Med den franske 1600-talsfilosofen René Descartes hade uppdelningen mellan den tänkande och den utsträckta substansen fått en strikt formulering. Ande och materia var åtskilda. Men den föreställningen medförde ett antal problem som Schelling noterade. Hur kan ett medvetande uppstå hos materia och hur kan ett levande jag påverka och påverkas av en död omgivning? ”Mellan sinnet och naturen finns en hemlig förbindelse”, menade Schelling. Men han gick längre än så.Mot den mekanistiska värld som upplysningen målat fram, där människor, djur och växter var att betrakta närmast som maskiner, ställde Schelling ett enhetligt världsallt – den ”allsjäl” som Maria Gripe låter Andreas Wiik skriva om i sina brev till Emelie. Schelling drar slutsatsen att allt levande därför kan kommunicera med, och genom allt annat som lever. En idé som han i sin tur kan ha hämtat inspiration till från de indiska vishetstexterna Upanishaderna. Där beskrivs en panteistisk värld där allt har en gemensam ande, brahman. Gud och naturen är ett.Allting, förklarade Schelling, i den andan, ”var förbundet med vartannat och utgjorde en enda universell organism” – från grodor till träd, stenar, insekter, floder och människor. Ande är osynlig natur, medan naturen är synlig ande – en central tes för romantikerna. I stället för total åtskillnad mellan jaget och naturen – dess motsats.Efter sin studentexamen läste Maria Gripe filosofi och religionshistoria vid Stockholms högskola och romantiken intresserade henne särskilt. Också Schiller, Novalis och Fichte går att spåra i hennes böcker. Liksom Atterbom och Schopenhauer. Gripe var beläst och ville få sina unga läsare att reflektera. Vilket breven till henne visar att hon också lyckades med. ”Den där Schopenhauer verkar bra. Var får man tag på hans böcker?”, skrev en ung läsare.I ”Tordyveln flyger i skymningen” låter hon huvudpersonerna Jonas, Annika och David – 13, 15 och 16 år gamla – samtala om de stora idéerna i Andreas Wiik brev. Brev som han hade bett Emelie att förvalta, och som hon gömt under en golvtilja. I ett meddelande till dem som hittar gömman ber hon att de ska lägga tillbaka Andreas skrifter igen, om deras tid är lika oförnuftig och oaktsam om livet som hennes egen. Är tiden mogen nu, funderar David, Jonas och Annika. Kanske är ingen tid redo för sådana tankar? Men kanske kan alla tider öppna sig för dem?Schelling var en oerhört populär föreläsare vid universitetet i Jena men hans idéer har gått stick i stäv med modernitetens förhärskande naturvetenskap och har kritiserats och förlöjligats, från hans egen tid fram till våra dagar. Samtidigt har han inspirerat tänkare över alla spektra. En av dem var Alexander von Humboldt. När Humboldt dog 1859 var han sin tids mest berömde vetenskapsman, med banbrytande forskning inom en hel rad naturvetenskapliga discipliner, och uppfinnare av några nya, som oceanografi och klimatologi. Hans levnadstecknare Andrea Wulf kallar honom för ”naturvetenskapernas Shakespeare.” Humboldt beskrev, i vännen Schellings anda, jorden som en organism som pulserade av liv, ett sammanhängande helt där allting är förbundet med vartannat i ett nät av organiskt liv. Det leder tankarna till James Lovelocks så kallade Gaiahypotes – att hela jorden fungerar som ett levande, sammanhängande system. Idag har denna tanke ett växande stöd inom naturvetenskapen. Samtidigt visar kvantfysiken på märkliga samband på partikelnivå över stora avstånd – och ny forskning på psykedelika, som ger starka upplevelser av att höra ihop med världsalltet, visar att detta har en positiv effekt vid depressioner.Schellings idéer om en förbunden värld tycks i vår tid komma till oss från olika håll. Hans tankar ser också ut att kunna bli ett viktigt verktyg för att finna nödvändiga nya förhållningssätt till, och förståelse av vår omvärld, i klimatkrisens tid. Allt levande hörer samman. Är vi mogna för att ta till oss den tanken? Är vi tillräckligt lyhörda för att följa de spår som tordyveln lägger ut?Eva-Lotta Hulténjournalist och författare

OpenClaw's meteoric rise—from a weekend Claude experiment to the fastest-growing open source AI project in the world—just culminated in Peter Steinberger joining OpenAI to build the next generation of personal agents. This episode unpacks the agentic inflection point, why OpenClaw became the Schelling point for builders, what Anthropic may have fumbled, and what it means for multi-agent futures, coding models, and the broader AI power struggle. In the headlines: GPT-5.3 Codex Spark's speed play, Google's upgraded Deep Think agent, DeepSeek V4 rumors, and Anthropic's $30B raise.Want to build with OpenClaw?LEARN MORE ABOUT CLAW CAMP: https://campclaw.ai/Brought to you by:KPMG – Discover how AI is transforming possibility into reality. Tune into the new KPMG 'You Can with AI' podcast and unlock insights that will inform smarter decisions inside your enterprise. Listen now and start shaping your future with every episode. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.kpmg.us/AIpodcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Rackspace Technology - Build, test and scale intelligent workloads faster with Rackspace AI Launchpad - ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://rackspace.com/ailaunchpad⁠⁠⁠⁠Blitzy - Want to accelerate enterprise software development velocity by 5x? ⁠https://blitzy.com/⁠Optimizely Agents in Action - Join the virtual event (with me!) free March 4 - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.optimizely.com/insights/agents-in-action/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠AssemblyAI - The best way to build Voice AI apps - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.assemblyai.com/brief⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LandfallIP - AI to Navigate the Patent Process - https://landfallip.com/Robots & Pencils - Cloud-native AI solutions that power results ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://robotsandpencils.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Agent Readiness Audit from Superintelligent - Go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://besuper.ai/ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠to request your company's agent readiness score.The AI Daily Brief helps you understand the most important news and discussions in AI. Subscribe to the podcast version of The AI Daily Brief wherever you listen: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://pod.link/1680633614⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Interested in sponsoring the show? sponsors@aidailybrief.ai

Alter ist keine Krankheit, die man heilen kann, aber muss das Leben deshalb mit den Jahren durch immer mehr Krankheiten immer beschwerlicher werden? Prof. Jörg Schelling über Vitalität und das Geheimnis des gesunden Älterwerdens.

Two cats fighting for control over my backyard appear to have settled on a particular chain-link fence as the delineation between their territories. This suggests that: Animals are capable of recognizing Schelling points Therefore, Schelling points do not depend on language for their Schelling-ness Therefore, tacit bargaining should be understood not as a special case of bargaining where communication happens to be restricted, but rather as the norm from which the exceptional case of explicit bargaining is derived. Summary of cat situation I don't have any pets, so my backyard is terra nullius according to Cat Law. This situation is unstable, as there are several outdoor cats in the neighborhood who would like to claim it. Our two contenders are Tabby Cat, who lives on the other side of the waist-high chain-link fence marking the back edge of my lot, and Tuxedo Cat, who lives in the place next-door to me. | || Tabby's || yard || (A) |------+...........+--------| (B) || | Tuxedo's| My yard | yard| ||| -- tall wooden fences.... short chain-link fence In the first [...] ---Outline:(00:43) Summary of cat situation(03:28) Why the fence?(04:00) If animals have Schelling points, then... --- First published: January 14th, 2026 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/uYr8pba7TqaPpszX5/backyard-cat-fight-shows-schelling-points-preexist-language --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

In this episode of The Distribution, Brandon Sedloff sits down with Chris Schelling for a deep dive into the evolving intersection of private markets, alternatives, and private wealth. Chris shares his unconventional path into investing, from studying psychology to becoming a longtime allocator and advisor across institutional and wealth channels. The conversation explores how private markets have matured, why education remains a critical gap in the wealth space, and what it really takes to allocate capital effectively in opaque and complex markets. Drawing on decades of experience meeting thousands of managers, Chris offers a clear-eyed perspective on risk, return dispersion, and the structural shifts reshaping private capital. They discuss: How psychology, behavior, and incentives shape decision-making in private markets The growing role of private wealth in alternatives and why institutional playbooks still matter Risks like adverse selection, return dispersion, and misaligned incentives in private investments Interval funds and why they can be effective tools for accessing private markets at scale Chris's outlook on private equity, private credit, hedge funds, venture, and real assets over the next two years Links: Aksia - https://www.aksia.com/ Chris on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/christopher-schelling/ Brandon on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/bsedloff/ Juniper Square - https://www.junipersquare.com/ Topics: (00:00:00) - Intro (00:03:12) - Chris' background and career (00:05:33) - The intersection of psychology and finance (00:07:30) - Understanding capital markets and alternatives (00:16:49) - The role of private markets in portfolios (00:31:15) - Understanding interval funds (00:32:36) - Managing risks and liquidity (00:34:01) - Challenges and strategies in fund management (00:35:25) - The importance of education in wealth management (00:37:33) - Adapting to market trends and client needs (00:39:55) - The role of large asset managers (00:43:43) - Private markets and wealth management (00:49:11) - Evaluating general partners (GPs) (00:52:35) - Current trends in alternative investments (01:00:23) - Conclusion and contact information

This holiday season, you'll see many charity fundraisers. I've already mentioned three, and I have another lined up for next week's open thread. Many great organizations ask me to signal-boost them, I'm happy to comply, and I'm delighted when any of you donate. Still, I used to hate this sort of thing. I'd be reading a blog I liked, then - wham, "please donate to save the starving children". Now I either have to donate to starving children, or feel bad that I didn't. And if I do donate, how much? Obviously no amount would fully reflect the seriousness of the problem. When I was a poor college student, I usually gave $10, because it was a nice round number; when I had more money, I usually gave $50, for the same reason. But then the next week, a different blog would advertise "please donate to save the starving children with cancer", and I'd feel like a shmuck for wasting my donation on non-cancerous starving children. Do I donate another $10, bringing my total up to the non-round number of $20? If I had a spare $20 for altruistic purposes, why hadn't I donated that the first time? It was all so unpleasant, and no matter what I did, I would feel all three of stingy and gullible and irrational. This is why I was so excited ten-odd years ago when I discovered the Giving What We Can Pledge. It's a commitment to give a certain percent of your income (originally 10%, but now there's also a 1-10% "trial" pledge) to the most effective charity you know. If you can't figure out which charity is most effective, you can just donate to Against Malaria Foundation, like all the other indecisive people. It's not that 10% is obviously the correct number in some deep sense. The people who picked it, picked it because it was big enough to matter, but not so big that nobody would do it. But having been picked, it's become a Schelling point. Take it, and you're one of the 10,000 people who's made this impressive commitment. If someone asks why you're not giving more, you can say "That would dilute the value of the Schelling point we've all agreed on and make it harder for other people to cooperate with us". The specific numbers and charities matter less than the way the pledge makes you think about your values and then yoke your behavior to them. In theory we're supposed to do this all the time. Another holiday institution, New Year's Resolutions, also centers around considering your values and yoking your behavior. But they famously don't work: most people don't have the willpower to go to the gym three times a week, or to volunteer at their local animal shelter on Sundays, or whatever else they decide on. That's why GWWC Pledge is so powerful. No willpower involved. Just go to your online banking portal, click click click, and you're done. Over my life, I don't know if I would say I've ever really changed my character or willpower or overall goodness/badness balance by more than a few percent. But I changed the amount I donated by a factor of ~ten, forever, with one very good decision. Unless you're a genius or a saint, your money is the strongest tool you have to change the world. 10% of an ordinary First World income donated to AMF saves dozens of lives over a career; even if you're a policeman or firefighter, you'll have trouble matching that through non-financial means. Unless you're Charlie Kirk or Heather Cox Richardson, no amount of your political activism or voting - let alone arguing on the Internet - will match the effect of donating to a politician or a cause you care about. And no amount of carpooling and eating vegan will help the climate as much as donating to carbon capture charities. Not an effective altruist? Think it's better to contribute to your local community, school, theater, or church? I'll argue with you later - but for now, my advice is the same. Have you thought really hard about how you should be contributing to your local community, school, theater, or church? (The fundraising letters my family used to get from our synagogue left little doubt about what form of contribution they preferred). Have you pledged some specific amount? You won't give beyond the $10-when-you-see-a-blog-fundraiser level unless you take a real pledge, registered by someone besides yourself - trust me, I've tested this. The GWWC website is mostly pitched at EAs. But if you like churches so much, you can probably get the same effect by pledging to God - and He keeps His own list, and offers His own member perks. To the degree that you care about changing the world beyond yourself and your family, in any direction, then the odds are good that this one decision - whether or not to take a binding charitable Pledge - matters more than every other decision you'll ever make combined. Maybe an order of magnitude more. It's something you can do right now, in five minutes. You shouldn't do it in five minutes; you should sit down and think about it hard and talk it over with your loved ones and make sure you're really planning to keep whatever pledge you make. But you could. And then every time you saw a charity fundraiser on a blog, you could think "Oh, sorry, I'm already living my life in accordance with my altruistic values, no thanks!" You wouldn't even have to worry about how much to donate. I don't even donate to half the fundraisers that I signal-boost! So if you have time this holiday season, and you're financially secure enough that it won't be a burden, think about whether there's some way you want the world to be different and better, whether there are charities that work on it, and whether you want to donate. Then, take the pledge. If you decide you want to do something but it's too stressful to figure out what, take a 3% trial pledge here, give it to Against Malaria Foundation, and come back next year to see if you're ready for the 10% version. UPDATE: Bentham's Bulldog also thinks you should take the pledge - here's his post. And I'll match his offer - take the full 10% pledge this month, and comment below so that I know about it, and I'll give you a free lifetime subscription to ACX. https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/the-pledge

Was könnte ich haben? Viele Menschen googlen erstmal nach möglichen Diagnosen oder fragen ChatGPT. Und auch Ärzte und Ärztinnen nutzen KI. Doch wie verändert künstliche Intelligenz die Medizin? Mit Hausarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling.

Die meisten Menschen möchten daheim sterben, nicht in der Klinik. Mit der modernen palliativmedizinischen Versorgung sind die Voraussetzungen gut. Der Hausarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling erklärt, was die Allgemeinmedizin beitragen kann.

Blutdruck, Cholesterinspiegel, Zuckerwerte, EKG... was bringen solche Check-ups beim Hausarzt? Zahlt die Kasse alles, was nötig und sinnvoll ist? Antworten vom Hausarzt und Prof. für Allgemeinmedizin Jörg Schelling.

Paola Capriolo"Il superfluo della vita"Carbonio Editorewww.carbonioeditore.itLa nobile Clara e il borghese Heinrich, spiriti inquieti in un mondo che non li comprende, decidono di stare insieme a dispetto di ogni regola, unendosi in un matrimonio segreto contro la volontà del padre di lei. Innamorati e felici, gli sposi vivono nascosti in un'angusta soffitta, nutrendosi di passione e sogni, assorti nella beatitudine di un dolce conversare, rinunciando al superfluo per godersi la vita nella sua poetica essenzialità. Ma l'inverno impietoso e la miseria spingono Heinrich a uno stravagante espediente che è anche un atto estremo e irrevocabile: bruciare la scala che li collega al mondo, scegliendo l'amore come unico rifugio, pur sapendo di condannarsi all'isolamento…Scritta nel 1839 e considerata dallo stesso autore una delle sue opere più riuscite, Il superfluo della vita è una novella delicata e luminosa, piena di arguzia e candore, in cui l'incanto della fiaba avvolge il mistero della vita, sospesa tra presente e passato, tra doveri e diletti, tra sogno e realtà.Ludwig Tieck (Berlino, 1773-1853) è stato un influente scrittore, traduttore, poeta e critico letterario tedesco, figura di spicco del Romanticismo. Nel 1799 diede vita insieme a Novalis, i fratelli Schlegel, Schelling e Fichte al circolo romantico di Jena, un punto di riferimento per la letteratura dell'epoca. Tra le sue opere più significative si annoverano i romanzi Storia del signor William Lovell (1796) e Le peregrinazioni di Franz Sternbald (1798), il racconto fiabesco Il biondo Eckbert (1797), le fiabe teatrali Il gatto con gli stivali (1797) e Il mondo alla rovescia (1798), le novelle Il fidanzamento (1823) e Il superfluo della vita (1839).Paola Capriolo, nata a Milano nel 1962, è autrice di numerosi libri di narrativa, da La grande Eulalia (Feltrinelli 1988) a Irina Nikolaevna o l'arte del romanzo (Bompiani 2023). Le sue opere sono tradotte in molti Paesi. Ha scritto saggi su Benn, Rilke e Thomas Mann e tradotto per diversi editori testi di Goethe, Kleist, Keller, Stifter, Schnitzler, Thomas Mann e Kafka. Dal 2018 fa parte della giuria del Premio italo-tedesco per la traduzione letterariaDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Folge 86: Etwas Gutes kann so simple sein! Nach dem erfolgreichen Buch „Salz, Fett, Säure, Hitze“ 2018, und der gleichnamigen Serie bei „Netflix“, kommt jetzt - 7 Jahre später – ein möglicher neuer Bestseller: „Etwas Gutes“ von Samin Nosrat. Die Kalifornierin mit iranischen Wurzeln präsentiert hier einen „Leitfaden für ein fröhliches Kochen und ein besseres Leben“. Hört hört! Los geht es mit einer Einführung in eine emotionale Kulinarik, hin zu 125 Ihrer Lieblingsrezepte und dazwischen immer wieder viele praktische Tipps und Ratschläge – u.a. wie man ein Gericht richtig zusammenstellt. Also nicht nur kochen sondern auch lesen! Viel Lesen. Keine leichte Kost, oder Gregor? Wer es einfacher mag, viel einfacher, der greife zu „Simple is best“ von Ralph Schelling. Der Schweizer „Bon Vivant“- der Schönen und Reichen (weil jetzt Mietkoch), hat seine Wurzeln in der Sterneküche. Aber genau davon hatte er – und sicher auch seine Kunden – irgendwann die Nase voll. Jetzt also bekocht der Barbara Streisand oder Lady Gaga ganz „simple“ – einfach. Einfach außergewöhnliche Rezepte sollen es sein. Aber geben sich die Stars und Sternchen mit Milchbrötchen, gegrillten Auberginen, Tomatennudeln oder Bananenbrot zufrieden? Patrick hat sich die 200 Seiten der Alltagsküche genau angesehen und dann haben sich die Beiden „Checker“ mit Ralph Schelling unterhalten. Bleibt einfach lecker! Hier gibt es die Bücher über Genialokal*: Etwas Gutes: https://tidd.ly/3LqTEu5 Simple is best: https://tidd.ly/4qQMxLz Ralphs Tipp (über Amazon): Das Familienessen: https://tinyurl.com/25apk4up Weitere Links: Samin Nosrat: https://ciaosamin.com/ Ralph Scheling: https://www.ralphschelling.com/ *Diese Links (Genialokal) sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommen wir von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Die Abnehmspritze: Sie wirkt nicht bei allen und wer sie absetzt, nimmt schnell wieder zu. Wie sinnvoll ist sie also für Diabetiker? Und kann moderne Technik vielleicht besser helfen? Mit Allgemeinarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling.

Bei den einen ist es die Laktose, andere vertragen kein Histamin, keine Fruktose, keine Vollkornprodukte oder keine Zusatzstoffe. Prof. Jörg Schelling sucht mit den Anrufenden nach Wegen, wie Essen dennoch wieder Spaß macht.

To celebrate the 10 Year Anniversary of the Outdoor Product Design & Development program at Utah State University, we are sharing conversations with alumni, faculty, and industry! Enjoy this conversation with OPDD alum and current Associate Footwear Designer at Xero Shoes, Ciera Schelling. Listen to these conversations on the Highlander Podcast. https://opdd.usu.edu/podcast The Highlander Podcast is sponsored by the Outdoor Product Design & Development program at Utah State University, a four-year, undergraduate degree training the next generation of product creators for the sports and outdoor industries. Learn more at opdd.usu.edu or follow the program on LinkedIn or Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/usuoutdoorproduct/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/opdd Discover the Outdoor Recreation Archive on Instagram or on USU's website. https://instagram.com/outdoorrecarchive https://library.usu.edu/archives/ora Subscribe to our ORA newsletter: https://outdoorrecarchive.substack.com/ Outdoor Recreation Archive Instagram https://www.instagram.com/outdoorrecarchive/?hl=en Episodes hosted, edited, and produced by Chase Anderson in beautiful Cache Valley, Utah. https://www.linkedin.com/in/chasewoodruffanderson/

Steven Pinker returns to Conversations with Tyler with an argument that common knowledge—those infinite loops of "I know that you know that I know"—is the hidden infrastructure that enables human coordination, from accepting paper money to toppling dictators. But Tyler wonders: if most real-world coordination works fine without recursively looping (a glance at a traffic circle), if these models break down with the slightest change in assumptions, and if anonymous internet posters are making correct but uncomfortable truths common knowledge when society might function better with noble lies, is Pinker's theory really capturing how coordination works—and might we actually need less common knowledge, not more? Tyler and Steven probe these dimensions of common knowledge—Schelling points, differential knowledge, benign hypocrisies like  a whisky bottle in a paper bag—before testing whether rational people can actually agree (spoiler: they can't converge on Hitchcock rankings despite Aumann's theorem), whether liberal enlightenment will reignite and why, what stirring liberal thinkers exist under the age 55, why only a quarter of Harvard students deserve A's, how large language models implicitly use linguistic insights while ignoring linguistic theory, his favorite track on Rubber Soul, what he'll do next, and more. Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video on the new dedicated Conversations with Tyler channel. Recorded September 12th, 2025. This episode was made possible through the support of the John Templeton Foundation. Other ways to connect Follow us on X and Instagram Follow Tyler on X Follow Steven on X Sign up for our newsletter Join our Discord Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.

Giovanna Pinna"Lettere sull'educazione estetica dell'uomo"Festival Filosofiawww.festivalfilosofia.itFestival Filosofia, CarpiVenerdì 19 settembre 2025, ore 10:00la lezione dei classiciGiovanna PinnaLettere sull'educazione estetica dell'uomodi Friedrich SchillerQuale ideale formativo incarna “l'anima bella” di Schiller? Questa lezione mostra come la figura dell'anima bella unisca rigore morale e inclinazione affettiva, indicando nella bellezza e nell'arte strumenti di libertà interiore dal valore universale.Giovanna Pinna è professoressa di Estetica e Filosofia teoretica presso l'Università del Molise, dove dal 2005 insegna anche Letteratura tedesca. È stata Research Fellow presso la Italian Academy for Advanced Studies (Columbia University), con una ricerca sul rapporto tra estetica e antropologia nella filosofia di Hegel. I suoi interessi di ricerca si concentrano sull'estetica letteraria e filosofica, con particolare attenzione alla cultura tedesca tra XVIII e XIX secolo. Ha pubblicato numerosi studi su autori quali G.W.F. Hegel, F.W.J. Schelling, F. Schiller, F. Schlegel, K.W.F. Solger, L. Tieck, di cui ha tradotto e curato edizioni sia in Italia sia in Germania. Si occupa di teorie estetiche moderne, della filosofia dell'idealismo tedesco, delle filosofie del sublime e del tragico e dei fondamenti antropologici dell'arte, approfondendo anche il rapporto arte-natura, la teoria della tragedia e del romanzo, l'estetica dell'immagine. Recentemente, ha sviluppato un nuovo filone di ricerca dedicato alla filosofia dell'invecchiamento e alla gerontologia umanistica. Di Friedrich Schiller ha tradotto e curato numerose opere, tra cui Il corpo e l'anima. Scritti giovanili (Roma 2012) e L'educazione estetica (nuova ed. riveduta e aggiornata, Palermo 2020, 1a ed. 2009). Tra i suoi libri: Senilità. Immagini della vecchiaia nella cultura occidentale (con Hans Georg Pott, Alessandria 2011); Introduzione a Schiller (Roma-Bari 2012).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Een heel klein beetje over de etappe, maar vooral over de soap bij UAE. Hoe heeft het zo kunnen escaleren tussen Juan Ayuso en de ploeg? En waarom moest het statement over het ontbinden van zijn contract midden in de Vuelta naar buiten worden gebracht? Niek Goedvolk bespreekt het in een nieuwe aflevering van In Het Wiel met Roxane Knetemann en Daniël Dwarswaard. Uiteraard ook aandacht voor de Simac Ladies Tour en het stoppen van Ide Schelling. En vergeet niet je ideeën voor het hervormen van de grote rondes naar ons in te sturen via Instagram! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kelsie Schelling drove from Denver to Pueblo, Colorado, to meet her boyfriend after revealing she was pregnant. Her car was found abandoned and she was never seen again. Get exclusive Killer Instinct content on my patreon : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/killerinstinct ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you like the show, telling a friend about it would be helpful! You can text, email, Tweet, or send this link to a friend: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/KillerInstinctPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow Savannah on IG: @savannahbrymer Follow Savannah on Twitter: @savannahbrymer Get exclusive Killer Instinct content on my patreon : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/killerinstinct ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you like the show, telling a friend about it would be helpful! You can text, email, Tweet, or send this link to a friend: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/KillerInstinctPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow Savannah on IG: @savannahbrymer Follow Savannah on Twitter: @savannahbrymer Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Deși romantismul îți poate evoca imagini sentimental-pornografice, în filosofie mișcarea romantică e cât se poate de 'badass', cel puțin în ceea ce privește curajul de a gândi altfel. Este o împotrivire, o revoltă, un război de secesiune, o încercare a unui grup mic de filosofi de a răsturna o întreagă tradiție europeană a raționalismului. În plus, toți încep cu "sch" (Schelling, Schlegel, Schiller...). Cartea pe care m-am bazat: https://humanitas.ro/humanitas/carte/originile-romantismului ____________________________________Puteți susține acest proiect:☞ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/octavpopa Varianta audio:☞ Spotify, Apple: https://podcastfilosofie.buzzsprout.comAlte nebunii: ☞ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/podcastuldefilosofie____________________________________Support the showhttps://www.patreon.com/octavpopahttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCC91fciphdkZyUquL3M5BiA

Dichtes Haar hätten wir alle gerne, am liebsten bis ins Alter. Vor allem als Frau! Doch natürlich nur auf dem Kopf! Körperbehaarung ist nicht mal bei allen Männern beliebt. Prof. Jörg Schelling erklärt, was wir tun können.

Wie verbindet Sigi Schelling Selbständigkeit und kulinarischen Exzellenz?

Eine Über- oder Unterfunktion der Schilddrüse, Knoten, Hashimoto oder Morbus Basedow - das kennen viele. Aber was macht eigentlich die Nebenschilddrüse? Hausarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling informiert über beide Organe.

In this conversation with Terry Pinkard, I discuss Hegel's famous Phenomenology of Spirit. Terry recently published a brilliant introductory guide to this famously difficult book [Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit: A Guide (2023)] which we use as our jumping off point. We discuss the origin of Hegel's book against the backdrop of its turbulent historical moment - the aftermath of the French Revolution and Napoleon's decisive victory at the Battle of Jena. At Jena Hegel too was writing alongside figures like Hölderlin, Schelling, Goethe, and Schiller. Terry clarifies common misreadings of Hegel, particularly the idea of Geist [spirit] as some kind of cosmic spirit or divine substance, emphasizing instead how Hegel understands his notion of Geist as something very concrete and social. Geist is the collective activity of reason unfolding in history. We also discuss Hegel's engagement with the scientific thought of his time, including the influence of Newton and Leibniz, and how their debates about force shaped his philosophy. The conversation traces key stages in the Phenomenology, from sense-certainty to understanding, and examines Hegel's distinctive view of freedom - not as mere individual choice, but as embedded in institutional and social practices. Finally, we consider what Terry might ask Hegel himself if given the chance. Prof. Terry Pinkard is a leading American philosopher and Hegel scholar, known for his influential work on German Idealism, phenomenology, and social philosophy. A professor at Georgetown University, he has written the definitive biography of Hegel (Hegel: A Biography 2000) and key interpretive works like Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason (1994) and Hegel's Naturalism (2011).  If you would like to study with me you can find more information about our online education MAs in Philosophy here at Staffordshire University. You can find out more information on our MA in Continental Philosophy via this link. Or, join our MA in Philosophy of Nature, Information and Technology via this link. Find out more about me here.  September intakes F/T or January intakes P/T. You can listen to more free back content from the Thales' Well podcast on TuneIn Radio, Player Fm, Stitcher and Pod Bean. You can also download their apps to your smart phone and listen via there. You can also subscribe for free on iTunes. Please leave a nice review.

Vita, pensiero filosofico e opere di Friedrich Schelling, filosofo ed esponente dell'idealismo tedesco.

Die Masernimpfung ist Pflicht in Deutschland, aber zudem gibt es viele Impfungen, die empfohlen sind und von den Kassen bezahlt werden. Von Tetanus bis Corona. Aber was ist für wen wann sinnvoll. Fragen Sie Prof. Jörg Schelling.

Etwa 3000 Menschenleben hat die Hitze 2024 gefordert - und der Klimawandel geht weiter. Wir werden mit heißeren Sommern zurechtkommen müssen. Prof. Jörg Schelling erklärt, wer gefährdet ist und wie man sich schützen kann.

Matthew David Segall, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness Department at California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco, and the Chair of the Science Advisory Committee for the Cobb Institute. He is a transdisciplinary researcher, writer, teacher, and philosopher applying process-relational thought across the natural and social sciences, as well as to the study of consciousness. He describes himself as a “process philosopher” and transdisciplinary researcher, reflecting his commitment to bridging multiple fields​. Segall's work builds on the metaphysical framework of Alfred North Whitehead, extending Whitehead's philosophy of organism into new domains of science, religion, and ecology. In doing so, Segall reinterprets the Western philosophical lineage – from ancient ideas of a world-soul to German Idealism and beyond – to articulate a participatory, organismic vision of nature. His philosophy portrays a cosmos ensouled with meaning and experience, challenging mechanistic materialism and inviting a renewed dialogue between science and spirit​. Segall integrates insights from Whitehead, Schelling, Goethe, and Steiner into a process worldview, develops an organic (panpsychist) cosmology, practices a bold transdisciplinary methodology, and engages public dialogues that embody a form of sacred activism on behalf of our living planet.TIMESTAMPS:(0:00) - Introduction (0:43) - History of Mind-Body Problem(7:40) - Critiquing Physicalism(12:55) - Quantum Theory Interpretations(16:14) - Addressing Illusionism & Scientism(22:00) - The Metaphysics of Prehension(28:14) - Panexperientialism in Physics(31:55) - Propositional Feelings(37:09) - What is Consciousness?(45:00) - Panexperientialism & Free Will(50:00) - Bridging Science & Philosophy(54:42) - Challenging the Cold/Dead Universe tale(1:00:39) - Misconceptions about Matt's work(1:04:20) - Telos(1:07:44) - Matt's Philosopher recommendations(1:13:00) - Mind At Large (Upcoming Events!)(1:17:40) - Conclusion EPISODE LINKS:- Matt's Website: https://footnotes2plato.com-  @Footnotes2Plato : http://www.youtube.com/@Footnotes2Plato- Physics Within the Bounds of Feeling Alone: https://footnotes2plato.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/physics-within-the-bounds-of-feeling-alone.pdf- Matt's X: https://x.com/ThouArtThat- Matt's Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/matthew.david.segall- Matt's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewdavidsegall- Matt's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/footnotes2platoCONNECT:- Website: https://tevinnaidu.com - Podcast: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/mindbodysolution- YouTube: https://youtube.com/mindbodysolution- Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu- Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu- LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu=============================Disclaimer: The information provided on this channel is for educational purposes only. The content is shared in the spirit of open discourse and does not constitute, nor does it substitute, professional or medical advice. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of listening/watching any of our contents. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk. Listeners/viewers are advised to conduct their own research and consult with their own experts in the respective fields.

This episode was recorded live at Schelling Point during Eth Denver 2025. In our fourth Rehash Hot Ones show, competitors Kevin Owocki, Disruption Joe, Sophia Dew, and Rena O'Brien battle it out for who has the spiciest takes on DAO governance, web3 funding, and the potential for AI to address challenges in crypto. Along the way, they brave increasingly spicy hot sauces, and audience members participate with their own hot takes as well while also engaging in the interactive spice challenge on stage. Finally, votes are tallied live on JokeRace and a winner is crowned. ⏳ TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 Intro 01:57 Panelist introductions 03:10 Rules and voting 04:28 Round 1: Does DAO Governance Work? 18:13 Round 2: Best Way to Fund Web3 Projects 27:43 Round 3: Can AI Fix Crypto? 37:35 Winner announced 

O idealismo alemão é um dos períodos mais ricos e complexos da história da filosofia, e seus quatro grandes representantes são Kant, Fichte, Schelling e Hegel. Este é também o contexto filosófico imediato do qual surgiu Karl Marx, pensador que desenvolve várias discussões abordadas por estes pensadores. Alguns idealistas alemães estão entre os filósofos mais complexos que podemos estudar na história da filosofia, como Kant e Hegel, por exemplo. Não tentaremos, por isso, abordar todos em apenas um episódio, mas faremos um recorte em Fichte e Hegel a fim de oferecer uma introdução acessível a alguns de seus principais temas políticos e sociais.- Curso "Filosofia para a vida: refletir para viver melhor": https://www.udemy.com/course/filosofia-para-a-vida-refletir-para-viver-melhor/?couponCode=2CF8DF1A6BC4492EE55F- Curso "Introdução à filosofia - dos pré-socráticos a Sartre": https://www.udemy.com/course/introducao-a-filosofia-dos-pre-socraticos-a-sartre/?couponCode=09119858437DF09EE684- Curso "Crítica da religião: Feuerbach, Nietzsche e Freud": https://www.udemy.com/course/critica-da-religiao-feuerbach-nietzsche-e-freud/?couponCode=66DD7D9B385722D0170B- Curso "A filosofia de Karl Marx - uma introdução": https://www.udemy.com/course/a-filosofia-de-karl-marx-uma-introducao/?couponCode=60AA3786461A5A581E44- Inscreva-se gratuitamente em nossa newsletter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://filosofiavermelha.org/index.php/newsletter/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Apoia.se: seja um de nossos apoiadores e mantenha este trabalho no ar: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://apoia.se/filosofiavermelha⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Nossa chave PIX: filosofiavermelha@gmail.com- Adquira meu livro: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.almarevolucionaria.com/product-page/pr%C3%A9-venda-duvidar-de-tudo-ensaios-sobre-filosofia-e-psican%C3%A1lise⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Meu site: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.filosofiaepsicanalise.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Clube de leitura: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWEjNgKjqqI⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Um dos objetivos deste episódio é desfazer uma enorme incompreensão sobre o idealismo alemão. Ao ouvir a palavra “idealismo”, muitos pensam se tratar de uma postura ingênua e distante do mundo, preocupada apenas com “ideias”, o que é um erro grosseiro. Mostraremos que principalmente Fichte e Hegel são a fonte de várias ideias de Marx, e que o idealismo alemão, de certo modo, não está muito distante do materialismo. Não é verdade que até Marx, os filósofos se limitaram apenas a interpretar o mundo, sem se preocupar com sua transformação.

Ultraschallgeräte gibt es in fast jeder Praxis. Dennoch werden Patienten oft ans MRT oder Röntgen verwiesen. Muss das immer sein? Dazu Prof. Jörg Schelling, Hausarzt und Allgemeinmediziner.

This is the third in a series of episodes with world-leading product management  experts about how we might build product management best practices into team leadership. Alex Komoroske spent years as either a Product Manager or Director of Product Management for platforms that most of us use every day: Chrome, Google Maps, Google Earth, and others. He then went on to lead corporate strategy at Stripe, another platform most of us use every day.  While at Google, Alex wrote an internal how-to called “Practical PM Stuff” that many Google PMs referred to as the Product Managers Bible.  It covered everything from basics like how to answer an email to esoterica like the difference between complexity and ambiguity or how Schelling points form in organizations. In this episode, Dart and Alex discuss:- Work as an ecosystem, not a machine- Indirect influence over direct control- How frameworks can kill creativity- The role of product management in work design- How companies stifle innovation- The power of riding momentum- Managers as curators, not controllers- Balancing autonomy and structure- Why great ideas bypass leadership- And other topics...Alex Komoroske is a product leader and systems thinker who specializes in platforms and ecosystems. Alex is known for his "Gardening Platforms" approach, which encourages guiding ecosystems toward greatness instead of controlling them. Now Co-CEO of Common Tools, he continues to explore how technology and organizations evolve.Resources Mentioned:Finite and Infinite Games, by James Carse: https://www.amazon.com/Finite-Infinite-Games-James-Carse/dp/1476731713The Stacy Barton conversation about Disney storytelling and work. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/immersive-experience-design-how-to-use-story-to-design/id1612743401?i=1000599527522 The Marty Cagan conversation about product management and work   https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/how-to-design-products-people-love-principles-and/id1612743401?i=1000668997003 The David Obstfeld conversation about brokering social networks and work https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/social-networks-the-1-predictor-of-economic/id1612743401?i=1000677462011 Connect with Alex:Website: https://www.komoroske.com/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alex-komoroske-6597336/Twitter: https://x.com/komoramaWork with Dart:Dart is the CEO and co-founder of the work design firm 11fold. Build work that makes employees feel alive, connected to their work, and focused on what's most important to the business. Book a call at 11fold.com.

Jim talks with Adam B. Levine about AI programming aids for non-techies and the future of Bitcoin. They discuss Adam's background as a "technical non-technical" person, the evolution from manual LLM prompting to using IDEs, Windsurf as an AI-first IDE, Claude 3.7's thinking mode, productivity improvements with AI coding tools, different platforms like Cursor and Cline, the "pure idea space" vs technical execution, the role of liberal arts people in tech teams, Bitcoin as digital gold, Schelling points in cryptocurrency, the US dollar as hegemonic currency, "pools of fools" theory, sovereign wealth funds moving into Bitcoin, El Salvador's Bitcoin investment, Texas and Wyoming considering sovereign Bitcoin funds, game theory of nation-state Bitcoin adoption, regulatory transitions, predictions about Bitcoin's future based on sovereign adoption, and much more. Episode Transcript The Diamond Age: Or, a Young Lady's Illustrated Primer, by Neal Stephenson Speaking of Bitcoin Podcast (formerly Let's Talk Bitcoin!) Adam B. Levine has spent over a decade pioneering disruptive technologies before they become mainstream. He launched one of the earliest Bitcoin podcasts, Let's Talk Bitcoin! (2013), founded Tokenly (2014)—one of the earliest companies exploring what could be done with blockchain tokens—and served as CoinDesk's first podcast editor (2019), hosting shows like Speaking of Bitcoin and Markets Daily. In 2021, he founded 330.ai, a startup building cutting-edge tools to boost creativity with AI.

Show Notes Professor Susan Long and Dr. Simon Western's conversation takes us on a journey into the roots of the unconscious, tracing its lineage from early philosophical thought to contemporary psychoanalysis. Susan challenges the dominant view that confines the unconscious to an individual and pathological framework, arguing instead for a more expansive understanding—one that is inherently social, cultural, and even ecological. She draws on thinkers like Schelling, whose work connects the unconscious with nature and spirit, suggesting that our inner depths are not isolated but enmeshed in the world around us. She critiques the ideological structures that shape how we perceive the unconscious, drawing on the Frankfurt School's insights into culture and power. At the heart of this discussion is the notion that creativity—so often seen as an individual gift—actually emerges from the collective unconscious, offering both potential and peril. This conversation invites us to consider the ethical dimension of confronting the unconscious, urging us to move beyond mere self-awareness and towards a deeper responsibility—to ourselves, our communities, and the wider world. Key Reflections The unconscious has historical roots that predate Freud. Schelling's work links the unconscious to nature and spirit. The unconscious is not just individual but also social and cultural. Creativity emerges from the collective unconscious. The Frankfurt School critiques how ideologies embed in culture. Human beings can be both creative and destructive. Neuroscience offers insights into the emotional aspects of the unconscious. The bicameral mind theory suggests a collective consciousness. Facing uncomfortable truths is an ethical responsibility. Individuality should not overshadow our connection to the community. Keywords unconscious, psychoanalysis, Schelling, Freud, social dynamics, creativity, Frankfurt School, group mind, nature, ethical responsibility Brief Bio Professor Susan Long is PhD Co-Lead and Research Lead at NIODA and former Professor of Creative and Sustainable Organisation at RMIT University, Melbourne. She supervises doctoral candidates, teaches in global programs such as INSEAD's Master of Coaching and Consulting (Singapore), and consults on leadership, organisational change, and executive coaching. A trained clinical psychologist and psychotherapist, Susan has a deep interest in the unconscious and its influence on individuals, groups, and organisations. She has served on advisory boards, including Comcare's Centre of Excellence for Research into Mental Health at Work, and was the founding President of Group Relations Australia. She is also a past President of the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organisations (ISPSO), where she contributed to advancing psychoanalytic approaches to leadership and organisational life. Her latest book, The Evolution of the Unconscious: Exploring Persons, Groups, Nature and Spirit, traces the historical development of unconscious thought, from early philosophical ideas to contemporary psychoanalysis. She explores how the unconscious operates not only within individuals but also within social, ecological, and spiritual dimensions. Through this lens, she challenges reductionist views and offers a broader, interconnected understanding.

In February of 2013, a 21-year-old woman mysteriously disappeared during a visit to see her on-again, off-again boyfriend after he told her he had a “surprise gift” for her. A subsequent investigation uncovered strange text messages, perplexing surveillance footage, and an important insider tip from an unsuspecting witness. This is the story of Kelsie Schelling.

Today we talk about the relationship between philosophy and religion. We talk about the duck-rabbit as a metaphor that may have something useful to teach us about the way we experience reality. We talk about the enormous difficulty of fully addressing the question: what is religion? We talk about Schelling's historical view of revelation and its connection to a possible new era of Christian religious practice. Hope you love it! :) Sponsors: Harry's: https://www.harrys.com/PHILOSOPHIZE Nord VPN: https://nordvpn.com/philothis Thank you so much for listening! Could never do this without your help.  Website: https://www.philosophizethis.org/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/philosophizethis  Social: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/philosophizethispodcast X: https://twitter.com/iamstephenwest Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/philosophizethisshow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Einmal großes Blutbild, bitte! Aber was wird da eigentlich untersucht? Und was sagen uns die Ergebnisse? Der Allgemeinmediziner Prof. Jörg Schelling beantwortet Fragen zu Blutwerten und erklärt, was unser Blut für Aufgaben hat.

In this episode, Ben Watkins sits down to discuss the Van Tillian tradition of presuppositional apologetics often found online along with objective idealism— an epistemological view often associated with Post-Kantians like Hegel, Fichte, and Schelling. Two claims of Van Til are challenged using the resources of objective idealism: Those two claims are (i) Christianity is a necessary condition to know anything at all and (ii) the Christian and the non-Christian have no neutral ground to resolve their disagreements. In addition to challenging these claims by appeal to a form of objective idealism, Ben also gives a brief exposition of the argument from divine hiddenness. Contrary to Van Til and other presuppositional apologetics, it is not the case everyone believes God exists. In fact, there are some people who do not believe God exists, and this fact is evidence for atheism over theism.

Immanuel Kant was popular at his death. The whole town emptied out to see him. His last words were "it is good". But was his philosophy any good? In order to find out, we dive into Chapter 7 of Conjectures and Refutations: Kant's Critique and Cosmology, where Popper rescues Kant's reputation from the clutches of the dastardly German Idealists. We discuss Deontology vs consquentialism vs virtue ethics Kant's Categorical Imperative Kant's contributions to cosmology and politics Kant as a defender of the enlightenment Romanticism vs (German) idealism vs critical rationalism Kant's cosmology and cosmogony Kant's antimony and his proofs that the universe is both finite and infinite in time Kant's Copernican revolution and transcendental idealism Kant's morality Why Popper admired Kant so much, and why he compares him to Socrates Quotes Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one's understanding without guidance from another. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! "Have courage to use your own understanding!" --that is the motto of enlightenment. - An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? (Translated by Ted Humphrey, Hackett Publishing, 1992) (Alternate translation from Popper: Enlightenment is the emancipation of man from a state of self-imposed tutelage . . . of incapacity to use his own intelligence without external guidance. Such a state of tutelage I call ‘self-imposed' if it is due, not to lack of intelligence, but to lack of courage or determination to use one's own intelligence without the help of a leader. Sapere aude! Dare to use your own intelligence! This is the battle-cry of the Enlightenment.) - C&R, Chap 6 What lesson did Kant draw from these bewildering antinomies? He concluded that our ideas of space and time are inapplicable to the universe as a whole. We can, of course, apply the ideas of space and time to ordinary physical things and physical events. But space and time themselves are neither things nor events: they cannot even be observed: they are more elusive. They are a kind of framework for things and events: something like a system of pigeon-holes, or a filing system, for observations. Space and time are not part of the real empir- ical world of things and events, but rather part of our mental outfit, our apparatus for grasping this world. Their proper use is as instruments of observation: in observing any event we locate it, as a rule, immediately and intuitively in an order of space and time. Thus space and time may be described as a frame of reference which is not based upon experience but intuitively used in experience, and properly applicable to experience. This is why we get into trouble if we misapply the ideas of space and time by using them in a field which transcends all possible experience—as we did in our two proofs about the universe as a whole. ... To the view which I have just outlined Kant chose to give the ugly and doubly misleading name ‘Transcendental Idealism'. He soon regretted this choice, for it made people believe that he was an idealist in the sense of denying the reality of physical things: that he declared physical things to be mere ideas. Kant hastened to explain that he had only denied that space and time are empirical and real — empirical and real in the sense in which physical things and events are empirical and real. But in vain did he protest. His difficult style sealed his fate: he was to be revered as the father of German Idealism. I suggest that it is time to put this right. - C&R, Chap 6 Kant believed in the Enlightenment. He was its last great defender. I realize that this is not the usual view. While I see Kant as the defender of the Enlightenment, he is more often taken as the founder of the school which destroyed it—of the Romantic School of Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. I contend that these two interpretations are incompatible. Fichte, and later Hegel, tried to appropriate Kant as the founder of their school. But Kant lived long enough to reject the persistent advances of Fichte, who proclaimed himself Kant's successor and heir. In A Public Declaration Concerning Fichte, which is too little known, Kant wrote: ‘May God protect us from our friends. . . . For there are fraudulent and perfidious so-called friends who are scheming for our ruin while speaking the language of good-will.' - C&R, Chap 6 As Kant puts it, Copernicus, finding that no progress was being made with the theory of the revolving heavens, broke the deadlock by turning the tables, as it were: he assumed that it is not the heavens which revolve while we the observers stand still, but that we the observers revolve while the heavens stand still. In a similar way, Kant says, the problem of scientific knowledge is to be solved — the problem how an exact science, such as Newtonian theory, is possible, and how it could ever have been found. We must give up the view that we are passive observers, waiting for nature to impress its regularity upon us. Instead we must adopt the view that in digesting our sense-data we actively impress the order and the laws of our intellect upon them. Our cosmos bears the imprint of our minds. - C&R, Chap 6 From Kant the cosmologist, the philosopher of knowledge and of science, I now turn to Kant the moralist. I do not know whether it has been noticed before that the fundamental idea of Kant's ethics amounts to another Copernican Revolution, analogous in every respect to the one I have described. For Kant makes man the lawgiver of morality just as he makes him the lawgiver of nature. And in doing so he gives back to man his central place both in his moral and in his physical universe. Kant humanized ethics, as he had humanized science. ... Kant's Copernican Revolution in the field of ethics is contained in his doctrine of autonomy—the doctrine that we cannot accept the command of an authority, however exalted, as the ultimate basis of ethics. For whenever we are faced with a command by an authority, it is our responsibility to judge whether this command is moral or immoral. The authority may have power to enforce its commands, and we may be powerless to resist. But unless we are physically prevented from choosing the responsibility remains ours. It is our decision whether to obey a command, whether to accept authority. - C&R, Chap 6 Stepping back further to get a still more distant view of Kant's historical role, we may compare him with Socrates. Both were accused of perverting the state religion, and of corrupting the minds of the young. Both denied the charge; and both stood up for freedom of thought. Freedom meant more to them than absence of constraint; it was for both a way of life. ... To this Socratic idea of self-sufficiency, which forms part of our western heritage, Kant has given a new meaning in the fields of both knowledge and morals. And he has added to it further the idea of a community of free men—of all men. For he has shown that every man is free; not because he is born free, but because he is born with the burden of responsibility for free decision. - C&R, Chap 6 Socials Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link Become a patreon subscriber here (https://www.patreon.com/Increments). Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here (https://ko-fi.com/increments). Click dem like buttons on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ) Follow the Kantian Imperative: Stop masturbating and/or/while getting your hair cut, and start sending emails over to incrementspodcast@gmail.com.

durée : 01:23:54 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Albane Penaranda, Mathias Le Gargasson, Antoine Dhulster - Par Michel Cazenave et Lucile Laveggi - Avec des lectures de Claude Bermann, Christine Brücher et Jacqueline Taouss - Réalisation Christiane Mallarmé - réalisation : Massimo Bellini

Naomi Fisher is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago. She earned her Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Notre Dame in 2016, and prior to that earned her M.S. in physics from UC Davis.Her research focuses on Kant and German Idealism and Romanticism, specifically the relationship between nature, freedom, and rationality in Kant and Schelling. Currently, she is working on projects related to the impact of Plato and Neoplatonism on Schelling's philosophy. She also has interests in the broader history of philosophy, philosophy of science, and philosophy of religion.In her talk, she discusses: The disconnect between epiphanies and everyday thoughtOn the function of imagination in philosophyThe philosophy of art according to SchellingManifesting the divine through the power of imaginationComparing Schelling's work to the RomanticsOn accessing transcendent realitiesTo learn more about Naomi, you can find her at: Website: https://naomifisher.weebly.com/ Email: naomi.luce@gmail.com This episode is sponsored by:John Templeton Foundation (https://www.templeton.org/)Templeton Religion Trust (https://templetonreligiontrust.org/)Support the show

As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe In today's episode of Theories of Everything, Curt Jaimungal speaks with Matthew Segall, a professor at the California Institute of Integral Studies, on the evolution of philosophical thought, linking ancient teachings on consciousness to modern scientific perspectives. We delve into the limitations of contemporary views of reality, paralleling them with the Ptolemaic model, and explore how an awareness of mortality can enrich our understanding of existence. Matthew argues for a shift toward introspection and self-inquiry in a society grappling with existential challenges, emphasizing that confronting mortality can foster a deeper sense of meaning in our lives. New Substack! Follow my personal writings and EARLY ACCESS episodes here: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com LINKED MENTIONED: •⁠ ⁠Matthew's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Footnotes2Plato •⁠ ⁠Matthew's Diagram of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Z1zY39EKbs •⁠ ⁠Matthew's talk with John Vervaeke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15akhXGHwzo •⁠ ⁠Critique of Pure Reason (book): https://www.amazon.com/Critique-Pure-Reason-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140447474 •⁠ ⁠Critique of Judgement (book): https://www.amazon.com/Critique-Judgement-Immanuel-Kant/dp/1545245673/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= •⁠ ⁠The Phenomenology of Spirit (book): https://www.amazon.com/Georg-Wilhelm-Friedrich-Hegel-Phenomenology/dp/1108730086 •⁠ ⁠1919 Eclipse (paper): https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rsnr.2020.0040 •⁠ ⁠Einstein/Bergson debate (article): https://www.faena.com/aleph/einstein-vs-bergson-the-struggle-for-time •⁠ ⁠The Principle of Relativity (book): https://www.amazon.com/Principle-Relativity-Alfred-North-Whitehead/dp/1602062188 •⁠ ⁠John Vervaeke's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@johnvervaeke •⁠ ⁠John Vervaeke on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVj1KYGyesI •⁠ ⁠Philip Goff on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmaIBxkqcT4 •⁠ ⁠Sabine Hossenfelder on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3y-Z0pgupg •⁠ ⁠Donald Hoffman on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmieNQH7Q4w •⁠ ⁠Karl Friston on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk4NZorRjCo •⁠ ⁠Iain McGilchrist on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9sBKCd2HD0 •⁠ ⁠Thomas Campbell on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kko-hVA-8IU •⁠ ⁠Noam Chomsky on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch? •⁠ ⁠v=3lcDT_-3v2k&list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlORiRfcaQe8ZdxKxF-e2BCY&index=3 •⁠ ⁠Michael Levin on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8iFtaltX-s&list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlN6E8KrxcYCWQIHg2tfkqvR&index=39 •⁠ ⁠Roger Penrose on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGm505TFMbU&list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlN6E8KrxcYCWQIHg2tfkqvR&index=16 •⁠ ⁠Neil Turok's lecture on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gwhqmPqRl4&list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlN6E8KrxcYCWQIHg2tfkqvR&index=35 •⁠ ⁠TOE's Consciousness Iceberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR4cpn8m9i0&ab_channel=TheoriesofEverythingwithCurtJaimungal •⁠ ⁠TOE's String Theory Iceberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4PdPnQuwjY Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 1:35 The Roots of Process Philosophy 4:47 The Rise of Nominalism 8:26 The Evolution of Substance 11:02 Descartes and the Dualist Divide 21:34 Kant's Copernican Revolution 33:08 The Nature of Knowledge 37:42 Hegel's Dialectic Unfolds 46:18 Schelling's Panpsychism 56:50 Whitehead's Organic Realism 1:22:17 The Bifurcation of Nature 1:31:38 The Emergence of Consciousness 1:38:37 The Nature of Self-Organization 1:53:40 Perspectives on Actuality and Potentiality 2:11:35 The Role of God in Process Philosophy 2:23:55 The Human Experience and Self-Inquiry 2:40:34 Reflections on Mortality and Meaning 2:47:44 The Shift from Substance to Process 2:58:02 Embracing Interconnectedness and Consciousness 3:00:49 The Call for Inner Exploration #science #philosophy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Christopher Satoor is a doctoral candidate (ABD) in the Department of Humanities at York University. His research focuses on Classical German philosophy of the 18th and 19th-century and the German idealist philosophies of Kant and Fichte, with an extra special concentration on Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling. Site: https://philpeople.org/profiles/christopher-satoor Satoor's podcast: https://www.youtube.com/ @TheYoungIdealist  ---Become part of the Hermitix community:Hermitix Twitter - / hermitixpodcast Support Hermitix:Patreon - / hermitix Donations: - https://www.paypal.me/hermitixpodHermitix Merchandise - http://teespring.com/stores/hermitix-2Bitcoin Donation Address: 3LAGEKBXEuE2pgc4oubExGTWtrKPuXDDLKEthereum Donation Address: 0x31e2a4a31B8563B8d238eC086daE9B75a00D9E74

✨ Subscribe to the Green Pill Podcast ✨ https://pod.link/1609313639

Indian Philosophy and Yoga in Germany by Owen Ware (Routledge, 2024) takes the reader on a tour through the reception of Yoga philosophies in nineteenth-century German and the early twentieth century. European luminaries like Schlegel, Hegel, von Günderrode, Schelling, Humbolt, and Müller all engaged with works like the Bhagavad Gītā and Yogā Sūtras, though in very different ways, some reading yogic thought as entailing a threatening nihilism, others lauding it as superlatively philosophical. Ware shows how their responses to Indian thought illuminates our understanding of post-Kantian philosophy and its anxieties over pantheism indebted to Spinoza. He concludes with two chapters on a range of Indian scholars from Swami Vivekananda to K. C. Bhattacharyya, exploring how their work engages with this history of European readings, grappling with themes of freedom, morality, and devotion in yoga. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Indian Philosophy and Yoga in Germany by Owen Ware (Routledge, 2024) takes the reader on a tour through the reception of Yoga philosophies in nineteenth-century German and the early twentieth century. European luminaries like Schlegel, Hegel, von Günderrode, Schelling, Humbolt, and Müller all engaged with works like the Bhagavad Gītā and Yogā Sūtras, though in very different ways, some reading yogic thought as entailing a threatening nihilism, others lauding it as superlatively philosophical. Ware shows how their responses to Indian thought illuminates our understanding of post-Kantian philosophy and its anxieties over pantheism indebted to Spinoza. He concludes with two chapters on a range of Indian scholars from Swami Vivekananda to K. C. Bhattacharyya, exploring how their work engages with this history of European readings, grappling with themes of freedom, morality, and devotion in yoga. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/philosophy

Indian Philosophy and Yoga in Germany by Owen Ware (Routledge, 2024) takes the reader on a tour through the reception of Yoga philosophies in nineteenth-century German and the early twentieth century. European luminaries like Schlegel, Hegel, von Günderrode, Schelling, Humbolt, and Müller all engaged with works like the Bhagavad Gītā and Yogā Sūtras, though in very different ways, some reading yogic thought as entailing a threatening nihilism, others lauding it as superlatively philosophical. Ware shows how their responses to Indian thought illuminates our understanding of post-Kantian philosophy and its anxieties over pantheism indebted to Spinoza. He concludes with two chapters on a range of Indian scholars from Swami Vivekananda to K. C. Bhattacharyya, exploring how their work engages with this history of European readings, grappling with themes of freedom, morality, and devotion in yoga. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/german-studies

In this podcast we meet Matt Segall, core faculty in the Philosophy, Cosmology and Consciousness Program at CIIS. We discuss the need for new methods of research beyond the limits of siloed disciplines producing interdisciplinary knowledge. In research, Matt speaks of the importance of disclosing one's own metaphysical groundings and epistemological assumptions in order to build frameworks of transdisciplinary engagement, which are spaces of discovery, creation and the invention of new concepts and languages. We also speak about Carl Jung, Rudolf Steiner relations to transdisciplinary pedagogy and end by discussing Matt's new book Crossing the Threshold: Etheric Imagination in the Post-Kantian Process Philosophy of Schelling and Whitehead. Matthew D. Segall, Ph.D, is a transdisciplinary researcher who teaches courses applying process-relational philosophy across various disciplines, including religious studies, philosophy of nature, philosophy of mind, and social and political theory. He has published on these and a wide range of other topics, including German idealism, the philosophy of time, psychedelics, theoretical biology, architecture, and media theory. Publications: Crossing the Threshold: Etheric Imagination in the Post-Kantian Process Philosophy of Schelling and Whitehead (2023) Physics of the World-Soul: Whitehead's Adventure in Cosmology (2021) The EWP Podcast credits: East-West Psychology Podcast Website Connect with EWP: Website • Youtube • Facebook Hosted by Stephen Julich (EWP Core Faculty) and Jonathan Kay (PhD candidate) Produced by: Stephen Julich and Jonathan Kay Edited and Mixed by: Jonathan Kay Introduction music: Mosaic, by Monsoon on the album Mandala Music at the end of the episode: Expansion, on the album Experiments of Truth, by Kayos Theory Introduction Voiceover: Roche Wadehra Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

We welcome philosopher Christopher Satoor for a discussion on the philosophy of Schelling, the great German idealist. We will focus our conversation on two Marxist critiques of Schelling in Lukács' The Destruction of Reason, to Engels' critique of Schelling from his notes on attending Schelling's lectures as a younger student. Christopher Satoor is an expert in German idealism and a strident Schellingian, so this conversation is sure to be of interest! Get access to the readings for this discussion and seminar with Dr. Satoor by joining our Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/posts/schelling-with-109208386). 

You asked…we're answering! Alexandra Schelling (of @toolboxforlove on Instagram) and I polled our communities for questions about navigating our significant other's families, and we're answering the questions in a two-part episode. Today's episode is all about navigating relational dynamics with our partner's family. Should we set boundaries with our partner's family? Should they? How to navigate with family's criticism? How to create connection with in-laws? We explore all of these topics and how to respond to them more mindfully. For more of Alexandra's work, check out: Her Instagram Her YouTube — If you're loving the podcast… JOIN THE YOU LOVE AND YOU LEARN PATREON COMMUNITY FOR $7/month. — Additional resources: Join Deconstruct the Doubts digital course here (instant + lifetime access) Click here to join the waitlist for the next cohort of Beyond the Doubts group coaching Download the free video training: The Single Most Important Lesson in Healing Relationship Anxiety Visit my website Connect with me on Instagram

You asked…we're answering! Alexandra Schelling (of @toolboxforlove on Instagram) and I polled our communities for questions about navigating our significant other's families, and we're answering the questions in a two-part episode. Today's episode is all about what's happening in our OWN mind when it relates to our partner's family. Expectation vs. reality (and the anxiety that causes), insecurities when we compare to other people's relationships with their in-laws, and feeling triggered by specific interactions. We explore all of these topics and how to respond to them more mindfully. Stay tuned next week for part two about setting boundaries with in-laws! For more of Alexandra's work, check out: Her Instagram Her YouTube — If you're loving the podcast… JOIN THE YOU LOVE AND YOU LEARN PATREON COMMUNITY FOR $7/month. — Additional resources: Join Deconstruct the Doubts digital course here (instant + lifetime access) Click here to join the waitlist for the next cohort of Beyond the Doubts group coaching Download the free video training: The Single Most Important Lesson in Healing Relationship Anxiety Visit my website Connect with me on Instagram