Podcasts about Schelling

Unser Gesundheitswesen ist eines der teuersten der Welt. Aber das Geld wird nicht effizient eingesetzt. Zum Beispiel gibt es Überversorgung. Schadet das Patienten und Patientinnen? Erfahrungen von Hausarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling.

Marco Filoni"La Russia e l'Occidente"Fëdor TjutčevAdelphiwww.adelphi.itUn libro che parla di geopolitica molto prima che questa avesse un nome – indispensabile per capire la Russia di oggi alla luce di quella di quasi due secoli fa.A cura di Marco FiloniCon un saggio di Massimo Cacciari«Per la prima volta in Europa si levò la voce ferma e coraggiosa dell'opinione pubblica russa». Con queste lapidarie parole lo scrittore Ivan Sergeevič Aksakov accolse una serie di articoli apparsi in Germania e in Francia sul finire degli anni Quaranta dell'Ottocento e destinati a suscitare una vasta eco in Occidente. L'autore di quelle pagine anonime, che osavano rivolgersi all'Europa con inaudita libertà e dignità, era Fëdor Tjutčev. Diplomatico, poeta ammirato da Puškin e da Turgenev, da Dostoevskij e da Tolstoj, uomo di grandi vizi e virtù, Tjutčev era animato da un entusiasmo senza limiti per la sua Russia, che – credeva fermamente – sarebbe diventata un grande impero, capace di unire tutti i popoli slavi di fede ortodossa. Ancora oggi, se si vogliono comprendere le mire espansionistiche di quel paese, è agli scritti politici di Tjutčev che occorre volgere lo sguardo. Fra le sue «intuizioni storiche» – come le definisce il teologo Georgij Florovskij –, spiccano l'agonia della civiltà occidentale, la questione romana e il Papato, il ruolo della censura e dell'autocrazia zarista, fino alla previsione di una catastrofica guerra che l'Occidente avrebbe scatenato contro la Russia uscendone sconfitto, e che avrebbe segnato l'inizio di un nuovo capitolo della Storia. Temi, come salta agli occhi, di bruciante attualità.Appartenente a una famiglia dell'aristocrazia moscovita, Fëdor Ivanovič Tjutčev (1803-1873) fu diplomatico oltre che eminente poeta, e dopo aver iniziato la carriera nel Collegio degli Affari esteri di Pietroburgo operò come incaricato speciale a Monaco di Baviera – dove frequentò Heine, Schelling e gli ambienti del Romanticismo tedesco – e a Torino, dove visse dal 1837 al 1839. Nel 1836 alcune sue liriche furono pubblicate dalla rivista di Puškin «Il contemporaneo», suscitando i primi, ampi consensi. Nel 1844 tornò definitivamente in Russia, mentre la sua fama di poeta cresceva dopo i riconoscimenti tributatigli da Turgenev, Fet, Dobroljubov.Marco Filoni insegna filosofia politica all'Università Link di Roma. Ha insegnato e svolto ricerca al Politecnico di Milano, all'Istituto di Studi Superiori dell'Università di Bologna e all'École Normale Supérieure di Parigi. Nel 2022 è stato nominato titolare del programma di ricerca Éclaireurs della Fondation Robert de Sorbon di Parigi. Tra i suoi libri: Anatomia di un assedio. La paura nella città (Skira 2019); L'azione politica del filosofo. La vita e il pensiero di Alexandre Kojève (Bollati Boringhieri 2021); Il calcolo della paura (Einaudi 2021); Lineamenti di una fenomenologia del diritto (Marsilio 2024).Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Throughout this series we have pulled apart science by science to show how the Aryan hypothesis works. We have now reached the continent of the unconscious, with it, neurology, psychiatry and psychology etc. We are getting ready to storm the castle that is Carl Gustav Jung.We start with the "invention of the self" during the Sturm & Drang, Goethe‘s urtype and degeneration theory, introduce Schelling as the first irrationalist continue with the forbidden secrets Mesmer revealed about the ancien régime and the role he played in the french revolution.We also present and I read in full a forgotten fragment of Hölderlin, Marx' favorite poet and best friend of Hegel, who it would seem, before the Nazis deemed it a fake, first coined the term Communism, 236 years ago at a small chapel on a romantic hill at the feet of the alps.

Herpes-zoster-Impfung in der zweiten Lebenshälfte Viele ältere Menschen fühlen sich fit und jünger als sie sind: 60 ist das neue 40. Beeinflusst das die Impfempfehlungen mit Blick auf Gürtelrose? Dieser Frage geht die aktuelle Folge der Podcast-Serie „O-Ton Allgemeinmedizin Extra“ mit Professor Dr. Jörg Schelling, Martinsried, nach. Die häufigste Ursache für eine Gürtelrose ist die Schwächung des Immunsystems im Alter – auch bei Menschen, die sich jünger fühlen als das im Reisepass angegebene Alter. Darüber hinaus steigern auch chronische Erkrankungen wie Diabetes, Rheuma oder chronische Atemwegserkrankungen das Risiko an Herpes zoster (HZ) zu erkranken. Eine Gürtelrose kann die Lebensqualität erheblich beeinträchtigen Ältere und chronisch Kranke sind nicht nur häufiger von Gürtelrose betroffen, sondern sie haben auch ein höheres Risiko für schwere Verläufe und bei bis zu einem Drittel kommt es zu einer Post-Zoster-Neuralgie. Das Ausmaß mit dem die HZ-bedingten neuropathischen Schmerzen die Lebensqualität beeinträchtigen können, wird jedoch häufig unterschätzt. Die Impfung schützt Die STIKO empfiehlt eine Impfung gegen Herpes zoster für alle Personen im Alter von mindestens 60 Jahren. Menschen mit einer schweren Grunderkrankung können bereits ab einem Alter von 18 Jahren zu Lasten der GKV geimpft werden. Um die bisher unzureichende Impfquote zu steigern, empfiehlt Schelling, das Thema Impfen bei jedem Patientenkontakt anzusprechen und ggf. mehr als eine Impfung bei einem Termin zu verabreichen. Diese Podcast-Episode ist mit freundlicher Unterstützung von GSK entstanden. https://bit.ly/4hoYfbK

Stefano Poggi"Il mito dell'istante"I filosofi davanti al tempo: da Schelling a DerridaAnders Solferinowww.solferinolibri.itLa riflessione sul problema del tempo è uno dei temi fondamentali della tradizione filosofica occidentale.Ma gli ultimi due secoli – l'Ottocento e il Novecento – ne hanno visto una profonda trasformazione. Gli sviluppi dell'indagine scientifica si sono intrecciati con la maturazione di una inedita concezione della soggettività e della coscienza. Sono state riprese e affrontate con nuovi occhi questioni antichissime, in primo luogo quella già posta da sant'Agostino («Cos'è davvero il tempo? Lo so, ma non lo so spiegare »). Ci si è interrogati sui modi in cui il tempo viene vissuto, misurato, narrato, condiviso. È così apparso con sempre maggior chiarezza che il tempo è la realtà dello stesso nostro esistere, che il tempo – come scrive Borges – «è la sostanza di cui sono fatto». Per questo, del tempo, parliamo sempre come di un divenire, di un fluire. Un divenire, un fluire apparso non di rado come una successione di istanti. Istanti in cui fermare il tempo, arrestarlo nell'attimo «così bello» del Faust, riuscire in un'impresa che però, di fronte ai nuovi saperi scientifici, appare destinata a ridursi in speranza, a rivelarsi un'illusione. L'istante non esiste. E, se esiste, forse altro non può essere che l'eternità.Partendo da Hegel e Schelling per arrivare a Bergson, Russell, Heidegger e senza dimenticare i grandi «narratori del tempo» come Proust e Joyce, Stefano Poggi racconta gli episodi di una storia che non ci è presente in tutta la sua decisiva importanza perché è spesso sotterranea, ma che ha inciso nel profondo sulla nostra stessa identità di uomini moderni.Stefano Poggi ha insegnato Storia della filosofia all'Università di Firenze, è stato presidente della Società Filosofica Italiana e ha diretto «Intersezioni. Rivista di storia delle idee». Tra i suoi numerosi libri ricordiamo: La logica, la mistica, il nulla (2006), La vera storia della Regina di Biancaneve (2007), I viaggi dei filosofi (2010), L'io dei filosofi e l'io dei narratori (2011), L'anima e il cristallo (2014), Il colore e l'ombra (2019), Individuo e destino (2025).Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Wer je einen Schlaganfall erlitten hat, weiß: Das darf kein 2. Mal passieren. Was kann Reha leisten und was kann man selbst zur Vorsorge beitragen? Die Internistin Dr. Wajima Safi und der Hausarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling antworten.

Today on Scope Conditions: when the bombs don't go off, the war isn't over.We tend to think of peace as beginning when the bombs stop falling. But as our guest today shows us, this is only half the story. Over the course of the Vietnam War, the United States engaged in massive bombing in Cambodia. Between 1965 and 1973, the U.S. dropped 500,000 tons of explosives there — more than the combined weight of every man, woman, and child in the country. Dr. Erin Lin, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the Ohio State University, set out to understand the continued impacts of this cataclysmic bombing campaign on Cambodian society. A landmark 2011 study had given us a partial answer: it had concluded that US bombing had no measurable long-term effects on economic outcomes in Southeast Asia. For years, that finding set the terms of the debate.In her award-winning book, When the Bombs Stopped: The Legacy of War in Rural Cambodia, published by Princeton University Press, Erin pushes back. She argues that those analyses were looking at the wrong level — that district-level aggregates conceal devastating effects on individual households and farms. More than that, they were looking at only half the intervention. It's the bombs that didn't detonate — an estimated 26 million cluster munitions still embedded in the soil — that are shaping life today in rural Cambodia.Erin spent years farming alongside families, combing through declassified military records, and building some of the most granular data ever assembled on the American bombing campaign. Her creative multi-method research design allows her to trace the dramatic long-term consequences of unexploded ordinance for the economic livelihood of Cambodian farmers.We talk with Erin about the many ironies laced through her findings: that cluster munitions are most likely to fail in soft, fertile soil, meaning Cambodia's most agriculturally valuable land is also its most contaminated; that bomb contamination can paradoxically shield farmers from predatory land seizures by political elites; and that unexploded ordnance, rather than forging solidarity among those living with it, tends to deepen ethnic divisions within villages.We hope you learn from this conversation. To stay informed about future episodes, follow us on X and Bluesky @scopeconditions and check out our website, scopeconditionspodcast.com, where you can also find references to all the academic works we discuss. And if you like the show, please rate and review us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.We note that we recorded this interview before the recent US-Israeli war with Iran. Now, here's our conversation with Erin Lin.Works cited in this episodeBiddle, Steven. 2004. Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton University Press.Brooks, Rosa. 2014. “Cross-Border Targeted Killings: ‘Lawful but Awful'?” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 38:233–50.________. 2014. “Drones and the International Rule of Law.” Ethics & International Affairs 28(1):83–103. ________. 2016. How Everything Became War and the Military Became Everything: Tales from the Pentagon. Simon and Schuster.Horowitz, Michael C. 2010. The Diffusion of Military Power. Princeton University Press.Lyall, Jason, and Isaiah Wilson. 2009. “Rage against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars.” International Organization 63(1):67–106.Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam. 2010. Democracies at War. Princeton University Press.Pape, Robert A. 2014. Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War. Cornell University Press.Schelling, Thomas. 2008. Arms and Influence. Yale University Press.Sheehan, Neil. 1971. “Should We Have War Crime Trials?” New York Times Book Review. 

Chris joined me for a conversation on Friedrich Schelling & German Idealism! In spite of his prominence, Schelling tends to be underdiscussed in popular philosophy circles when it comes to the German Idealist tradition. In this episode, we talk about his essay Philosophical Inquiries into the Essence of Human Freedom, the dialectic of potencies that develops out of nature-philosophy, and the relation of Schelling's ideas to those of his school friends at Tubingen - two gentlemen you may or may not have heard of, named Hegel and Holderlin. The three of them were enthusiastic about the French Revolution, and planted a "freedom tree", around which they danced and sang "Hen Kai Pain" - "One and All" - the watchword of Hellenistic pantheists. Schelling's late lectures were attended by everyone from Kierkegaard to Burckhardt to Engels to Bakunin; his views on myth (centering on Apollo and Dionysus) likely influenced Nietzsche, and his notion of the dark ground as a ceaseless impulsive striving echoes in the work of Schopenhauer. At the end of the episode, we have a brief discussion about Chris' thoughts on Deleuze, a philosopher he has drifted away from, and some of the pitfalls of post-structuralist thinking.Christopher, on how to read Schelling's Freedom Essay: https://epochemagazine.org/77/freedom-god-and-ground-an-introduction-to-schellings-1809-freedom-essay/Papers Referenced: Exceeding Reason: Freedom and Religion in Schelling and Nietzsche by Dennis Vanden AuweeleNietzsche, German Idealism and Its Critics (DeGruyter)

Grippe, Corona, Gürtelrose - wogegen soll man sich impfen lassen? Und was ist mit Tetanus, Keuchhusten etc. - braucht man die als erwachsener Mensch noch? - Prof. Jörg Schelling informiert über Impfungen für Erwachsene.

Romanticism gets treated like a synonym for nostalgia, and German Idealism gets shrunk to a few brand-name thinkers. We push back on both habits by talking with Christopher Satoor, a York University doctoral candidate and founder of the Young Idealist series, about what really happens when philosophy, poetry, art, and science collide in Jena.Schelling sits at the center of that collision. We dig into why his Naturphilosophie is neither “woo” nor a quaint premodern science lesson, but a serious attempt to rebuild our concept of nature after Cartesian mechanism. That means thinking in terms of living processes, hidden forces, and organic organization, and then asking what it does to our view of mind, creativity, and embodiment when “nature is visible spirit and spirit is invisible nature.” Along the way, we unpack the rift with Fichte, the shadow cast by Hegel, and how later caricatures and missing translations shaped Schelling's reputation in English-language philosophy.We also take the political and ethical questions seriously: what the Freedom Essay contributes to debates about evil, freedom, and the limits of purely dialectical stories of progress, and why Schelling's later “positive philosophy” focuses on existence, facticity, and the question of why there is something rather than nothing. Finally, we connect the stakes to the present, where climate change and environmental catastrophe demand a less mechanized picture of the world and a more holistic way of thinking across disciplines.If you enjoy deep dives into German Romanticism, German Idealism, Schelling, Kant, Fichte, Hegel, philosophy of nature, and freedom, subscribe, share this with a friend who argues about materialism, and leave a review with the biggest idea you're still wrestling with.Send us Fan Mail Musis by Bitterlake, Used with Permission, all rights to BitterlakeSupport the showCrew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on YoutubeCurrent Patreon at the Sponsor Tier: Jordan Sheldon, Mark J. Matthews, Lindsay Kimbrough, RedWolf, DRV, Kenneth McKee, JY Chan, Matthew Monahan, Parzival, Adriel Mixon, Buddy Roark, Daniel Petrovic,Julian

Acquista il mio nuovo libro, “Anche Socrate qualche dubbio ce l'aveva”: https://amzn.to/3wPZfmCUltima puntata dedicata a Schelling, in cui esploriamo la sua concezione – importantissima – dell'arte.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/dentro-alla-filosofia--4778244/support.

Acquista il mio nuovo libro, “Anche Socrate qualche dubbio ce l'aveva”: https://amzn.to/3wPZfmCLa storia va in una direzione chiara, secondo Schelling, sintesi di libertà e necessità. Ecco come.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/dentro-alla-filosofia--4778244/support.

Francis J. Gavin, chair of the TNSR editorial board, joins us to discuss his article, "Strategic Stability and Its Limits: Reflections on Schelling." Gavin explains why Thomas Schelling remains foundational to nuclear strategy despite being an economist, and argues that "strategic stability" is often invoked without clear definition. He highlights tensions between mutual vulnerability and US extended deterrence and nonproliferation goals, and describes contradictions between Schelling's writings on arms control and coercion. Gavin critiques simplified historical lessons about surprise attack and inadvertent war shaping stability theory, traces how Cold War political constraints drove US nuclear posture, and urges policymakers to put politics and state interests first when assessing nuclear risks and emerging technologies such as AI, cyber, autonomy, and biotechnology. Hosts: Sheena Chestnut Greitens and Ryan Vest Producer: Jordan Morning

Acquista il mio nuovo libro, “Anche Socrate qualche dubbio ce l'aveva”: https://amzn.to/3wPZfmCDopo aver parlato della Natura, è il momento di parlare dello Spirito per come lo concepisce Schelling.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/dentro-alla-filosofia--4778244/support.

Acquista il mio nuovo libro, “Anche Socrate qualche dubbio ce l'aveva”: https://amzn.to/3wPZfmCSchelling ci parla della natura, con tratti di grande modernità ma anche con qualche contraddizione.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/dentro-alla-filosofia--4778244/support.

Acquista il mio nuovo libro, “Anche Socrate qualche dubbio ce l'aveva”: https://amzn.to/3wPZfmCIniziamo a parlare di Schelling, il secondo grande esponente dell'idealismo tedesco. E iniziamo partendo dal suo tentativo di coniugare Fichte e Spinoza.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/dentro-alla-filosofia--4778244/support.

Also available in markdown at theMultiplicity.ai/blog/schelling-goodness. This post explores a notion I'll call Schelling goodness. Claims of Schelling goodness are not first-order moral verdicts like "X is good" or "X is bad." They are claims about a class of hypothetical coordination games in the sense of Thomas Schelling, where the task being coordinated on is a moral verdict. In each such game, participants aim to give the same response regarding a moral question, by reasoning about what a very diverse population of intelligent beings would converge on, using only broadly shared constraints: common knowledge of the question at hand, and background knowledge from the survival and growth pressures that shape successful civilizations. Unlike many Schelling coordination games, we'll be focused on scenarios with no shared history or knowledge amongst the participants, other than being from successful civilizations. Importantly: To say "X is Schelling-good" is not at all the same as saying "X is good". Rather, it will be defined as a claim about what a large class of agents would say, if they were required to choose between saying "X is good" and "X is bad" and aiming for a mutually agreed-upon answer. This distinction is crucial [...] ---Outline:(01:59) This essay is not very skimmable(03:44) Pro tanto morals, is good, and is bad(06:39) Part One: The Schelling Participation Effect(13:52) What makes it work(15:50) The Schelling transformation on questions(19:10) Part Two: Schelling morality via the cosmic Schelling population(21:12) Scale-invariant adaptations(22:54) An example: stealing(30:32) Recognition versus endorsement versus adherence(31:34) The answer frequencies versus the answer(33:59) Ties are rare(35:06) Is the cosmic Schelling answer ever knowable with confidence?(36:02) Schelling participation effects, revisited(38:03) Is this just the mind projection fallacy?(39:42) When are cosmic Schelling morals easy to identify?(42:59) Scale invariance revisited(44:03) A second example: Pareto-positive trade(47:45) Harder questions and caveats(50:01) Ties are unstable(51:43) Isnt this assuming moral realism?(53:07) Dont these results depend on the distribution over beings?(54:41) What about the is-ought gap?(56:29) Tolerance, local variation, and freedom(58:25) Terrestrial Schelling-goodness(59:42) So what does good mean, again?(01:01:08) Implications for AI alignment(01:06:15) Conclusion and historical context(01:09:16) FAQ(01:09:20) Basic misunderstandings(01:12:20) More nuanced questions --- First published: February 28th, 2026 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/TkBCR8XRGw7qmao6z/schelling-goodness-and-shared-morality-as-a-goal --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Send a textAs institutional investing in private markets makes its way into the wealth channel, advisors and investors are being asked to think differently about liquidity, access, and portfolio construction.In this episode, Dan sits down with Chris Schelling, Managing Director at Aksia, to explore what happens when institutional discipline meets retail reality, and how private markets are evolving as a result.Together, they discuss:Why private markets are becoming more accessible to wealth clients, and what's driving adoptionThe structural differences between institutional and retail portfolios when allocating to alternativesHow evergreen and semi-liquid vehicles work and why they are often preferable for retail investorsWhat advisors should understand about diligence, liquidity, and valuation as these strategies move downstreamDisclosures and DisclaimersThe views expressed by the host and guest are their own and are for informational and educational purposes only. Neither the host nor guest is acting as a registered representative for any specific investment strategy, and this discussion should not be construed as a recommendation or endorsement of any investment.Support the show

Long-term investing can feel more difficult when headlines are loud and markets seem unpredictable.  What happens when investors stop reacting to daily noise and start thinking like institutions that plan decades ahead? In this episode, Robert Curtiss welcomes Chris Schelling, CAIA, Managing Director at Aksia, to explore how private markets have shaped institutional portfolios and why some individual investors may now gain access to approaches like those used by institutions, depending on account type, regulatory eligibility, and minimum investment requirements. They break down private equity, private credit, liquidity planning, diversification across vintages, and the importance of manager selection.  The conversation also touches on volatility, long-term return expectations, and what advisors and investors should look for when evaluating alternative investments. Key takeaways: How institutional investors approach private markets — and what does that mean for access and implementation for individual investors with long-term horizons and diversified portfolios Why private equity and private credit returns differ from public markets over multi-year periods The role of liquidity planning and why private investments are not truly locked up for a decade Why manager selection matters more in private markets than in public equities How simplified structures have made private investments easier for individual investors to access And more! Resources: Educational videos (bottom of the page) Connect with Chris Schelling: LinkedIn: Christopher Schelling Website: Aksia Connect with Robert Curtiss: rcurtiss@seia.com (626) 795-2944 About Robert Curtiss  LinkedIn: Robert Curtiss Facebook: Robert Curtiss SEIA LinkedIn: SEIA About Our Guest: Chris Schelling is an investor, advisor, and published author. With degrees in psychology, business, and finance, Chris is an expert at incorporating insights from behavioral finance into investment decision-making. During his 20+ year tenure in the investment industry, building portfolios, mostly focused on alternatives, Chris has met with over 4,000 managers and allocated roughly $7 billion, generating top quartile to top decile returns across hedge funds, real assets, private credit, and private equity.

Romantiken lever i några av våra mest älskade barn- och ungdomsböcker. Eva-Lotta Hultén berättar om Maria Gripes filosofiska influenser. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna.”Allt levande hörer samman.” Orden formuleras på 1700-talet av Linnélärjungen Andreas Wiik, i ett brev till hans hemligt trolovade, Emelie. Deras korrespondens hittas på Selanderska gården i småländska Ringaryd långt senare av tre ungdomar. Av breven framgår att det ska finnas en antik egyptisk staty gömd någonstans på orten.Det finns ingen Linnélärjunge vid namn Andreas Wiik. Och ingen småländsk ort som heter Ringaryd. Men både mannen och platsen lever i Maria Gripes ”Tordyveln flyger i skymningen”.Tillsammans med ”Agnes Cecilia” är det den av hennes berättelser där de mystiska inslagen är starkast. Samhörighet över både tid och rum manifesterar sig och byggnader kan bära minnen och förmedla budskap. Särskilt i ”Tordyveln flyger i skymningen” bistår växter och djur i kommunikationen. Skalbaggar och krukväxter leder protagonisterna till viktiga ledtrådar på gåtans lösning – var finns statyn som Andreas Wiik hemförde från Egypten?Redan tidigare i sitt författarskap, också i sina mer realistiska berättelser, skildrade Maria Gripe en kommunikation med naturen, genom flera av sina karaktärer. Hugo, i ”Hugo och Josefin”, är en trygg skogsvarelse som kommer till människornas värld med ett budskap: skollärarinnan får veta att hon har hållits för lite i skogen och för mycket i skolan och att det är därför hon bekymrar sig så mycket. När Hugos för misshandel fängelsedömda far ­kommer på tal säger Hugo lugnt att ”Skogen ska en inte överge. Då går dä illa.”Också Loella i Pappa Pellerins dotter, är ett sagoväsen som hör ihop med naturen.Gripes biograf Ying Toijer Nilsson beskriver det så här: ”Den spåntäckta stugan är nästan osynlig, insnärjd i slingerväxter och med gräs på taket. Vädrets makter står på hennes sida, blixten laddar ur sig framför barnavårdsnämndens representanter, stigen är villsam och oländig, yrväder hindrar moderns bekanta som kommer för att hämta barnen.”I Gripes värld samspelar vi med naturen och talar med och genom den.Maria Gripe växte upp i Örebro men trivdes inte i stadens flickskola och när det var dags för vidare utbildning fick det bli Enskilda gymnasiet i Stockholm. Hon bodde inackorderad, och i rummet hon hyrde fanns filosofen Friedrich von Schellings samlade verk. Det är hans naturfilosofi som hon klär i Andreas Wiiks ord, och ger gestalt i Tordyveln flyger i skymningen.Schelling var verksam kring sekelskiftet 1800 och framåt och ingick i den intellektuella kretsen i staden Jena. Han räknas till de tyska idealisterna och romantikerna, vars idéer ofta ses som en motreaktion på upplysningen och den vetenskapliga revolutionen. Med den franske 1600-talsfilosofen René Descartes hade uppdelningen mellan den tänkande och den utsträckta substansen fått en strikt formulering. Ande och materia var åtskilda. Men den föreställningen medförde ett antal problem som Schelling noterade. Hur kan ett medvetande uppstå hos materia och hur kan ett levande jag påverka och påverkas av en död omgivning? ”Mellan sinnet och naturen finns en hemlig förbindelse”, menade Schelling. Men han gick längre än så.Mot den mekanistiska värld som upplysningen målat fram, där människor, djur och växter var att betrakta närmast som maskiner, ställde Schelling ett enhetligt världsallt – den ”allsjäl” som Maria Gripe låter Andreas Wiik skriva om i sina brev till Emelie. Schelling drar slutsatsen att allt levande därför kan kommunicera med, och genom allt annat som lever. En idé som han i sin tur kan ha hämtat inspiration till från de indiska vishetstexterna Upanishaderna. Där beskrivs en panteistisk värld där allt har en gemensam ande, brahman. Gud och naturen är ett.Allting, förklarade Schelling, i den andan, ”var förbundet med vartannat och utgjorde en enda universell organism” – från grodor till träd, stenar, insekter, floder och människor. Ande är osynlig natur, medan naturen är synlig ande – en central tes för romantikerna. I stället för total åtskillnad mellan jaget och naturen – dess motsats.Efter sin studentexamen läste Maria Gripe filosofi och religionshistoria vid Stockholms högskola och romantiken intresserade henne särskilt. Också Schiller, Novalis och Fichte går att spåra i hennes böcker. Liksom Atterbom och Schopenhauer. Gripe var beläst och ville få sina unga läsare att reflektera. Vilket breven till henne visar att hon också lyckades med. ”Den där Schopenhauer verkar bra. Var får man tag på hans böcker?”, skrev en ung läsare.I ”Tordyveln flyger i skymningen” låter hon huvudpersonerna Jonas, Annika och David – 13, 15 och 16 år gamla – samtala om de stora idéerna i Andreas Wiik brev. Brev som han hade bett Emelie att förvalta, och som hon gömt under en golvtilja. I ett meddelande till dem som hittar gömman ber hon att de ska lägga tillbaka Andreas skrifter igen, om deras tid är lika oförnuftig och oaktsam om livet som hennes egen. Är tiden mogen nu, funderar David, Jonas och Annika. Kanske är ingen tid redo för sådana tankar? Men kanske kan alla tider öppna sig för dem?Schelling var en oerhört populär föreläsare vid universitetet i Jena men hans idéer har gått stick i stäv med modernitetens förhärskande naturvetenskap och har kritiserats och förlöjligats, från hans egen tid fram till våra dagar. Samtidigt har han inspirerat tänkare över alla spektra. En av dem var Alexander von Humboldt. När Humboldt dog 1859 var han sin tids mest berömde vetenskapsman, med banbrytande forskning inom en hel rad naturvetenskapliga discipliner, och uppfinnare av några nya, som oceanografi och klimatologi. Hans levnadstecknare Andrea Wulf kallar honom för ”naturvetenskapernas Shakespeare.” Humboldt beskrev, i vännen Schellings anda, jorden som en organism som pulserade av liv, ett sammanhängande helt där allting är förbundet med vartannat i ett nät av organiskt liv. Det leder tankarna till James Lovelocks så kallade Gaiahypotes – att hela jorden fungerar som ett levande, sammanhängande system. Idag har denna tanke ett växande stöd inom naturvetenskapen. Samtidigt visar kvantfysiken på märkliga samband på partikelnivå över stora avstånd – och ny forskning på psykedelika, som ger starka upplevelser av att höra ihop med världsalltet, visar att detta har en positiv effekt vid depressioner.Schellings idéer om en förbunden värld tycks i vår tid komma till oss från olika håll. Hans tankar ser också ut att kunna bli ett viktigt verktyg för att finna nödvändiga nya förhållningssätt till, och förståelse av vår omvärld, i klimatkrisens tid. Allt levande hörer samman. Är vi mogna för att ta till oss den tanken? Är vi tillräckligt lyhörda för att följa de spår som tordyveln lägger ut?Eva-Lotta Hulténjournalist och författare

OpenClaw's meteoric rise—from a weekend Claude experiment to the fastest-growing open source AI project in the world—just culminated in Peter Steinberger joining OpenAI to build the next generation of personal agents. This episode unpacks the agentic inflection point, why OpenClaw became the Schelling point for builders, what Anthropic may have fumbled, and what it means for multi-agent futures, coding models, and the broader AI power struggle. In the headlines: GPT-5.3 Codex Spark's speed play, Google's upgraded Deep Think agent, DeepSeek V4 rumors, and Anthropic's $30B raise.Want to build with OpenClaw?LEARN MORE ABOUT CLAW CAMP: https://campclaw.ai/Brought to you by:KPMG – Discover how AI is transforming possibility into reality. Tune into the new KPMG 'You Can with AI' podcast and unlock insights that will inform smarter decisions inside your enterprise. Listen now and start shaping your future with every episode. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.kpmg.us/AIpodcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Rackspace Technology - Build, test and scale intelligent workloads faster with Rackspace AI Launchpad - ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://rackspace.com/ailaunchpad⁠⁠⁠⁠Blitzy - Want to accelerate enterprise software development velocity by 5x? ⁠https://blitzy.com/⁠Optimizely Agents in Action - Join the virtual event (with me!) free March 4 - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.optimizely.com/insights/agents-in-action/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠AssemblyAI - The best way to build Voice AI apps - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.assemblyai.com/brief⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LandfallIP - AI to Navigate the Patent Process - https://landfallip.com/Robots & Pencils - Cloud-native AI solutions that power results ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://robotsandpencils.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Agent Readiness Audit from Superintelligent - Go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://besuper.ai/ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠to request your company's agent readiness score.The AI Daily Brief helps you understand the most important news and discussions in AI. Subscribe to the podcast version of The AI Daily Brief wherever you listen: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://pod.link/1680633614⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Interested in sponsoring the show? sponsors@aidailybrief.ai

Alter ist keine Krankheit, die man heilen kann, aber muss das Leben deshalb mit den Jahren durch immer mehr Krankheiten immer beschwerlicher werden? Prof. Jörg Schelling über Vitalität und das Geheimnis des gesunden Älterwerdens.

Two cats fighting for control over my backyard appear to have settled on a particular chain-link fence as the delineation between their territories. This suggests that: Animals are capable of recognizing Schelling points Therefore, Schelling points do not depend on language for their Schelling-ness Therefore, tacit bargaining should be understood not as a special case of bargaining where communication happens to be restricted, but rather as the norm from which the exceptional case of explicit bargaining is derived. Summary of cat situation I don't have any pets, so my backyard is terra nullius according to Cat Law. This situation is unstable, as there are several outdoor cats in the neighborhood who would like to claim it. Our two contenders are Tabby Cat, who lives on the other side of the waist-high chain-link fence marking the back edge of my lot, and Tuxedo Cat, who lives in the place next-door to me. | || Tabby's || yard || (A) |------+...........+--------| (B) || | Tuxedo's| My yard | yard| ||| -- tall wooden fences.... short chain-link fence In the first [...] ---Outline:(00:43) Summary of cat situation(03:28) Why the fence?(04:00) If animals have Schelling points, then... --- First published: January 14th, 2026 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/uYr8pba7TqaPpszX5/backyard-cat-fight-shows-schelling-points-preexist-language --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

In this episode of The Distribution, Brandon Sedloff sits down with Chris Schelling for a deep dive into the evolving intersection of private markets, alternatives, and private wealth. Chris shares his unconventional path into investing, from studying psychology to becoming a longtime allocator and advisor across institutional and wealth channels. The conversation explores how private markets have matured, why education remains a critical gap in the wealth space, and what it really takes to allocate capital effectively in opaque and complex markets. Drawing on decades of experience meeting thousands of managers, Chris offers a clear-eyed perspective on risk, return dispersion, and the structural shifts reshaping private capital. They discuss: How psychology, behavior, and incentives shape decision-making in private markets The growing role of private wealth in alternatives and why institutional playbooks still matter Risks like adverse selection, return dispersion, and misaligned incentives in private investments Interval funds and why they can be effective tools for accessing private markets at scale Chris's outlook on private equity, private credit, hedge funds, venture, and real assets over the next two years Links: Aksia - https://www.aksia.com/ Chris on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/christopher-schelling/ Brandon on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/bsedloff/ Juniper Square - https://www.junipersquare.com/ Topics: (00:00:00) - Intro (00:03:12) - Chris' background and career (00:05:33) - The intersection of psychology and finance (00:07:30) - Understanding capital markets and alternatives (00:16:49) - The role of private markets in portfolios (00:31:15) - Understanding interval funds (00:32:36) - Managing risks and liquidity (00:34:01) - Challenges and strategies in fund management (00:35:25) - The importance of education in wealth management (00:37:33) - Adapting to market trends and client needs (00:39:55) - The role of large asset managers (00:43:43) - Private markets and wealth management (00:49:11) - Evaluating general partners (GPs) (00:52:35) - Current trends in alternative investments (01:00:23) - Conclusion and contact information

This holiday season, you'll see many charity fundraisers. I've already mentioned three, and I have another lined up for next week's open thread. Many great organizations ask me to signal-boost them, I'm happy to comply, and I'm delighted when any of you donate. Still, I used to hate this sort of thing. I'd be reading a blog I liked, then - wham, "please donate to save the starving children". Now I either have to donate to starving children, or feel bad that I didn't. And if I do donate, how much? Obviously no amount would fully reflect the seriousness of the problem. When I was a poor college student, I usually gave $10, because it was a nice round number; when I had more money, I usually gave $50, for the same reason. But then the next week, a different blog would advertise "please donate to save the starving children with cancer", and I'd feel like a shmuck for wasting my donation on non-cancerous starving children. Do I donate another $10, bringing my total up to the non-round number of $20? If I had a spare $20 for altruistic purposes, why hadn't I donated that the first time? It was all so unpleasant, and no matter what I did, I would feel all three of stingy and gullible and irrational. This is why I was so excited ten-odd years ago when I discovered the Giving What We Can Pledge. It's a commitment to give a certain percent of your income (originally 10%, but now there's also a 1-10% "trial" pledge) to the most effective charity you know. If you can't figure out which charity is most effective, you can just donate to Against Malaria Foundation, like all the other indecisive people. It's not that 10% is obviously the correct number in some deep sense. The people who picked it, picked it because it was big enough to matter, but not so big that nobody would do it. But having been picked, it's become a Schelling point. Take it, and you're one of the 10,000 people who's made this impressive commitment. If someone asks why you're not giving more, you can say "That would dilute the value of the Schelling point we've all agreed on and make it harder for other people to cooperate with us". The specific numbers and charities matter less than the way the pledge makes you think about your values and then yoke your behavior to them. In theory we're supposed to do this all the time. Another holiday institution, New Year's Resolutions, also centers around considering your values and yoking your behavior. But they famously don't work: most people don't have the willpower to go to the gym three times a week, or to volunteer at their local animal shelter on Sundays, or whatever else they decide on. That's why GWWC Pledge is so powerful. No willpower involved. Just go to your online banking portal, click click click, and you're done. Over my life, I don't know if I would say I've ever really changed my character or willpower or overall goodness/badness balance by more than a few percent. But I changed the amount I donated by a factor of ~ten, forever, with one very good decision. Unless you're a genius or a saint, your money is the strongest tool you have to change the world. 10% of an ordinary First World income donated to AMF saves dozens of lives over a career; even if you're a policeman or firefighter, you'll have trouble matching that through non-financial means. Unless you're Charlie Kirk or Heather Cox Richardson, no amount of your political activism or voting - let alone arguing on the Internet - will match the effect of donating to a politician or a cause you care about. And no amount of carpooling and eating vegan will help the climate as much as donating to carbon capture charities. Not an effective altruist? Think it's better to contribute to your local community, school, theater, or church? I'll argue with you later - but for now, my advice is the same. Have you thought really hard about how you should be contributing to your local community, school, theater, or church? (The fundraising letters my family used to get from our synagogue left little doubt about what form of contribution they preferred). Have you pledged some specific amount? You won't give beyond the $10-when-you-see-a-blog-fundraiser level unless you take a real pledge, registered by someone besides yourself - trust me, I've tested this. The GWWC website is mostly pitched at EAs. But if you like churches so much, you can probably get the same effect by pledging to God - and He keeps His own list, and offers His own member perks. To the degree that you care about changing the world beyond yourself and your family, in any direction, then the odds are good that this one decision - whether or not to take a binding charitable Pledge - matters more than every other decision you'll ever make combined. Maybe an order of magnitude more. It's something you can do right now, in five minutes. You shouldn't do it in five minutes; you should sit down and think about it hard and talk it over with your loved ones and make sure you're really planning to keep whatever pledge you make. But you could. And then every time you saw a charity fundraiser on a blog, you could think "Oh, sorry, I'm already living my life in accordance with my altruistic values, no thanks!" You wouldn't even have to worry about how much to donate. I don't even donate to half the fundraisers that I signal-boost! So if you have time this holiday season, and you're financially secure enough that it won't be a burden, think about whether there's some way you want the world to be different and better, whether there are charities that work on it, and whether you want to donate. Then, take the pledge. If you decide you want to do something but it's too stressful to figure out what, take a 3% trial pledge here, give it to Against Malaria Foundation, and come back next year to see if you're ready for the 10% version. UPDATE: Bentham's Bulldog also thinks you should take the pledge - here's his post. And I'll match his offer - take the full 10% pledge this month, and comment below so that I know about it, and I'll give you a free lifetime subscription to ACX. https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/the-pledge

Was könnte ich haben? Viele Menschen googlen erstmal nach möglichen Diagnosen oder fragen ChatGPT. Und auch Ärzte und Ärztinnen nutzen KI. Doch wie verändert künstliche Intelligenz die Medizin? Mit Hausarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling.

Die meisten Menschen möchten daheim sterben, nicht in der Klinik. Mit der modernen palliativmedizinischen Versorgung sind die Voraussetzungen gut. Der Hausarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling erklärt, was die Allgemeinmedizin beitragen kann.

Blutdruck, Cholesterinspiegel, Zuckerwerte, EKG... was bringen solche Check-ups beim Hausarzt? Zahlt die Kasse alles, was nötig und sinnvoll ist? Antworten vom Hausarzt und Prof. für Allgemeinmedizin Jörg Schelling.

Paola Capriolo"Il superfluo della vita"Carbonio Editorewww.carbonioeditore.itLa nobile Clara e il borghese Heinrich, spiriti inquieti in un mondo che non li comprende, decidono di stare insieme a dispetto di ogni regola, unendosi in un matrimonio segreto contro la volontà del padre di lei. Innamorati e felici, gli sposi vivono nascosti in un'angusta soffitta, nutrendosi di passione e sogni, assorti nella beatitudine di un dolce conversare, rinunciando al superfluo per godersi la vita nella sua poetica essenzialità. Ma l'inverno impietoso e la miseria spingono Heinrich a uno stravagante espediente che è anche un atto estremo e irrevocabile: bruciare la scala che li collega al mondo, scegliendo l'amore come unico rifugio, pur sapendo di condannarsi all'isolamento…Scritta nel 1839 e considerata dallo stesso autore una delle sue opere più riuscite, Il superfluo della vita è una novella delicata e luminosa, piena di arguzia e candore, in cui l'incanto della fiaba avvolge il mistero della vita, sospesa tra presente e passato, tra doveri e diletti, tra sogno e realtà.Ludwig Tieck (Berlino, 1773-1853) è stato un influente scrittore, traduttore, poeta e critico letterario tedesco, figura di spicco del Romanticismo. Nel 1799 diede vita insieme a Novalis, i fratelli Schlegel, Schelling e Fichte al circolo romantico di Jena, un punto di riferimento per la letteratura dell'epoca. Tra le sue opere più significative si annoverano i romanzi Storia del signor William Lovell (1796) e Le peregrinazioni di Franz Sternbald (1798), il racconto fiabesco Il biondo Eckbert (1797), le fiabe teatrali Il gatto con gli stivali (1797) e Il mondo alla rovescia (1798), le novelle Il fidanzamento (1823) e Il superfluo della vita (1839).Paola Capriolo, nata a Milano nel 1962, è autrice di numerosi libri di narrativa, da La grande Eulalia (Feltrinelli 1988) a Irina Nikolaevna o l'arte del romanzo (Bompiani 2023). Le sue opere sono tradotte in molti Paesi. Ha scritto saggi su Benn, Rilke e Thomas Mann e tradotto per diversi editori testi di Goethe, Kleist, Keller, Stifter, Schnitzler, Thomas Mann e Kafka. Dal 2018 fa parte della giuria del Premio italo-tedesco per la traduzione letterariaDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Die Abnehmspritze: Sie wirkt nicht bei allen und wer sie absetzt, nimmt schnell wieder zu. Wie sinnvoll ist sie also für Diabetiker? Und kann moderne Technik vielleicht besser helfen? Mit Allgemeinarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling.

Bei den einen ist es die Laktose, andere vertragen kein Histamin, keine Fruktose, keine Vollkornprodukte oder keine Zusatzstoffe. Prof. Jörg Schelling sucht mit den Anrufenden nach Wegen, wie Essen dennoch wieder Spaß macht.

To celebrate the 10 Year Anniversary of the Outdoor Product Design & Development program at Utah State University, we are sharing conversations with alumni, faculty, and industry! Enjoy this conversation with OPDD alum and current Associate Footwear Designer at Xero Shoes, Ciera Schelling. Listen to these conversations on the Highlander Podcast. https://opdd.usu.edu/podcast The Highlander Podcast is sponsored by the Outdoor Product Design & Development program at Utah State University, a four-year, undergraduate degree training the next generation of product creators for the sports and outdoor industries. Learn more at opdd.usu.edu or follow the program on LinkedIn or Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/usuoutdoorproduct/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/opdd Discover the Outdoor Recreation Archive on Instagram or on USU's website. https://instagram.com/outdoorrecarchive https://library.usu.edu/archives/ora Subscribe to our ORA newsletter: https://outdoorrecarchive.substack.com/ Outdoor Recreation Archive Instagram https://www.instagram.com/outdoorrecarchive/?hl=en Episodes hosted, edited, and produced by Chase Anderson in beautiful Cache Valley, Utah. https://www.linkedin.com/in/chasewoodruffanderson/

Steven Pinker returns to Conversations with Tyler with an argument that common knowledge—those infinite loops of "I know that you know that I know"—is the hidden infrastructure that enables human coordination, from accepting paper money to toppling dictators. But Tyler wonders: if most real-world coordination works fine without recursively looping (a glance at a traffic circle), if these models break down with the slightest change in assumptions, and if anonymous internet posters are making correct but uncomfortable truths common knowledge when society might function better with noble lies, is Pinker's theory really capturing how coordination works—and might we actually need less common knowledge, not more? Tyler and Steven probe these dimensions of common knowledge—Schelling points, differential knowledge, benign hypocrisies like  a whisky bottle in a paper bag—before testing whether rational people can actually agree (spoiler: they can't converge on Hitchcock rankings despite Aumann's theorem), whether liberal enlightenment will reignite and why, what stirring liberal thinkers exist under the age 55, why only a quarter of Harvard students deserve A's, how large language models implicitly use linguistic insights while ignoring linguistic theory, his favorite track on Rubber Soul, what he'll do next, and more. Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video on the new dedicated Conversations with Tyler channel. Recorded September 12th, 2025. This episode was made possible through the support of the John Templeton Foundation. Other ways to connect Follow us on X and Instagram Follow Tyler on X Follow Steven on X Sign up for our newsletter Join our Discord Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.

Giovanna Pinna"Lettere sull'educazione estetica dell'uomo"Festival Filosofiawww.festivalfilosofia.itFestival Filosofia, CarpiVenerdì 19 settembre 2025, ore 10:00la lezione dei classiciGiovanna PinnaLettere sull'educazione estetica dell'uomodi Friedrich SchillerQuale ideale formativo incarna “l'anima bella” di Schiller? Questa lezione mostra come la figura dell'anima bella unisca rigore morale e inclinazione affettiva, indicando nella bellezza e nell'arte strumenti di libertà interiore dal valore universale.Giovanna Pinna è professoressa di Estetica e Filosofia teoretica presso l'Università del Molise, dove dal 2005 insegna anche Letteratura tedesca. È stata Research Fellow presso la Italian Academy for Advanced Studies (Columbia University), con una ricerca sul rapporto tra estetica e antropologia nella filosofia di Hegel. I suoi interessi di ricerca si concentrano sull'estetica letteraria e filosofica, con particolare attenzione alla cultura tedesca tra XVIII e XIX secolo. Ha pubblicato numerosi studi su autori quali G.W.F. Hegel, F.W.J. Schelling, F. Schiller, F. Schlegel, K.W.F. Solger, L. Tieck, di cui ha tradotto e curato edizioni sia in Italia sia in Germania. Si occupa di teorie estetiche moderne, della filosofia dell'idealismo tedesco, delle filosofie del sublime e del tragico e dei fondamenti antropologici dell'arte, approfondendo anche il rapporto arte-natura, la teoria della tragedia e del romanzo, l'estetica dell'immagine. Recentemente, ha sviluppato un nuovo filone di ricerca dedicato alla filosofia dell'invecchiamento e alla gerontologia umanistica. Di Friedrich Schiller ha tradotto e curato numerose opere, tra cui Il corpo e l'anima. Scritti giovanili (Roma 2012) e L'educazione estetica (nuova ed. riveduta e aggiornata, Palermo 2020, 1a ed. 2009). Tra i suoi libri: Senilità. Immagini della vecchiaia nella cultura occidentale (con Hans Georg Pott, Alessandria 2011); Introduzione a Schiller (Roma-Bari 2012).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Een heel klein beetje over de etappe, maar vooral over de soap bij UAE. Hoe heeft het zo kunnen escaleren tussen Juan Ayuso en de ploeg? En waarom moest het statement over het ontbinden van zijn contract midden in de Vuelta naar buiten worden gebracht? Niek Goedvolk bespreekt het in een nieuwe aflevering van In Het Wiel met Roxane Knetemann en Daniël Dwarswaard. Uiteraard ook aandacht voor de Simac Ladies Tour en het stoppen van Ide Schelling. En vergeet niet je ideeën voor het hervormen van de grote rondes naar ons in te sturen via Instagram! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kelsie Schelling drove from Denver to Pueblo, Colorado, to meet her boyfriend after revealing she was pregnant. Her car was found abandoned and she was never seen again. Get exclusive Killer Instinct content on my patreon : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/killerinstinct ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you like the show, telling a friend about it would be helpful! You can text, email, Tweet, or send this link to a friend: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/KillerInstinctPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow Savannah on IG: @savannahbrymer Follow Savannah on Twitter: @savannahbrymer Get exclusive Killer Instinct content on my patreon : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/killerinstinct ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you like the show, telling a friend about it would be helpful! You can text, email, Tweet, or send this link to a friend: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/KillerInstinctPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow Savannah on IG: @savannahbrymer Follow Savannah on Twitter: @savannahbrymer Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Deși romantismul îți poate evoca imagini sentimental-pornografice, în filosofie mișcarea romantică e cât se poate de 'badass', cel puțin în ceea ce privește curajul de a gândi altfel. Este o împotrivire, o revoltă, un război de secesiune, o încercare a unui grup mic de filosofi de a răsturna o întreagă tradiție europeană a raționalismului. În plus, toți încep cu "sch" (Schelling, Schlegel, Schiller...). Cartea pe care m-am bazat: https://humanitas.ro/humanitas/carte/originile-romantismului ____________________________________Puteți susține acest proiect:☞ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/octavpopa Varianta audio:☞ Spotify, Apple: https://podcastfilosofie.buzzsprout.comAlte nebunii: ☞ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/podcastuldefilosofie____________________________________Support the showhttps://www.patreon.com/octavpopahttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCC91fciphdkZyUquL3M5BiA

Dichtes Haar hätten wir alle gerne, am liebsten bis ins Alter. Vor allem als Frau! Doch natürlich nur auf dem Kopf! Körperbehaarung ist nicht mal bei allen Männern beliebt. Prof. Jörg Schelling erklärt, was wir tun können.

Eine Über- oder Unterfunktion der Schilddrüse, Knoten, Hashimoto oder Morbus Basedow - das kennen viele. Aber was macht eigentlich die Nebenschilddrüse? Hausarzt Prof. Jörg Schelling informiert über beide Organe.

Die Masernimpfung ist Pflicht in Deutschland, aber zudem gibt es viele Impfungen, die empfohlen sind und von den Kassen bezahlt werden. Von Tetanus bis Corona. Aber was ist für wen wann sinnvoll. Fragen Sie Prof. Jörg Schelling.

Etwa 3000 Menschenleben hat die Hitze 2024 gefordert - und der Klimawandel geht weiter. Wir werden mit heißeren Sommern zurechtkommen müssen. Prof. Jörg Schelling erklärt, wer gefährdet ist und wie man sich schützen kann.

Matthew David Segall, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness Department at California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco, and the Chair of the Science Advisory Committee for the Cobb Institute. He is a transdisciplinary researcher, writer, teacher, and philosopher applying process-relational thought across the natural and social sciences, as well as to the study of consciousness. He describes himself as a “process philosopher” and transdisciplinary researcher, reflecting his commitment to bridging multiple fields​. Segall's work builds on the metaphysical framework of Alfred North Whitehead, extending Whitehead's philosophy of organism into new domains of science, religion, and ecology. In doing so, Segall reinterprets the Western philosophical lineage – from ancient ideas of a world-soul to German Idealism and beyond – to articulate a participatory, organismic vision of nature. His philosophy portrays a cosmos ensouled with meaning and experience, challenging mechanistic materialism and inviting a renewed dialogue between science and spirit​. Segall integrates insights from Whitehead, Schelling, Goethe, and Steiner into a process worldview, develops an organic (panpsychist) cosmology, practices a bold transdisciplinary methodology, and engages public dialogues that embody a form of sacred activism on behalf of our living planet.TIMESTAMPS:(0:00) - Introduction (0:43) - History of Mind-Body Problem(7:40) - Critiquing Physicalism(12:55) - Quantum Theory Interpretations(16:14) - Addressing Illusionism & Scientism(22:00) - The Metaphysics of Prehension(28:14) - Panexperientialism in Physics(31:55) - Propositional Feelings(37:09) - What is Consciousness?(45:00) - Panexperientialism & Free Will(50:00) - Bridging Science & Philosophy(54:42) - Challenging the Cold/Dead Universe tale(1:00:39) - Misconceptions about Matt's work(1:04:20) - Telos(1:07:44) - Matt's Philosopher recommendations(1:13:00) - Mind At Large (Upcoming Events!)(1:17:40) - Conclusion EPISODE LINKS:- Matt's Website: https://footnotes2plato.com-  @Footnotes2Plato : http://www.youtube.com/@Footnotes2Plato- Physics Within the Bounds of Feeling Alone: https://footnotes2plato.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/physics-within-the-bounds-of-feeling-alone.pdf- Matt's X: https://x.com/ThouArtThat- Matt's Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/matthew.david.segall- Matt's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewdavidsegall- Matt's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/footnotes2platoCONNECT:- Website: https://tevinnaidu.com - Podcast: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/mindbodysolution- YouTube: https://youtube.com/mindbodysolution- Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu- Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu- LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu=============================Disclaimer: The information provided on this channel is for educational purposes only. The content is shared in the spirit of open discourse and does not constitute, nor does it substitute, professional or medical advice. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of listening/watching any of our contents. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk. Listeners/viewers are advised to conduct their own research and consult with their own experts in the respective fields.

This episode was recorded live at Schelling Point during Eth Denver 2025. In our fourth Rehash Hot Ones show, competitors Kevin Owocki, Disruption Joe, Sophia Dew, and Rena O'Brien battle it out for who has the spiciest takes on DAO governance, web3 funding, and the potential for AI to address challenges in crypto. Along the way, they brave increasingly spicy hot sauces, and audience members participate with their own hot takes as well while also engaging in the interactive spice challenge on stage. Finally, votes are tallied live on JokeRace and a winner is crowned. ⏳ TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 Intro 01:57 Panelist introductions 03:10 Rules and voting 04:28 Round 1: Does DAO Governance Work? 18:13 Round 2: Best Way to Fund Web3 Projects 27:43 Round 3: Can AI Fix Crypto? 37:35 Winner announced 

This is the third in a series of episodes with world-leading product management  experts about how we might build product management best practices into team leadership. Alex Komoroske spent years as either a Product Manager or Director of Product Management for platforms that most of us use every day: Chrome, Google Maps, Google Earth, and others. He then went on to lead corporate strategy at Stripe, another platform most of us use every day.  While at Google, Alex wrote an internal how-to called “Practical PM Stuff” that many Google PMs referred to as the Product Managers Bible.  It covered everything from basics like how to answer an email to esoterica like the difference between complexity and ambiguity or how Schelling points form in organizations. In this episode, Dart and Alex discuss:- Work as an ecosystem, not a machine- Indirect influence over direct control- How frameworks can kill creativity- The role of product management in work design- How companies stifle innovation- The power of riding momentum- Managers as curators, not controllers- Balancing autonomy and structure- Why great ideas bypass leadership- And other topics...Alex Komoroske is a product leader and systems thinker who specializes in platforms and ecosystems. Alex is known for his "Gardening Platforms" approach, which encourages guiding ecosystems toward greatness instead of controlling them. Now Co-CEO of Common Tools, he continues to explore how technology and organizations evolve.Resources Mentioned:Finite and Infinite Games, by James Carse: https://www.amazon.com/Finite-Infinite-Games-James-Carse/dp/1476731713The Stacy Barton conversation about Disney storytelling and work. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/immersive-experience-design-how-to-use-story-to-design/id1612743401?i=1000599527522 The Marty Cagan conversation about product management and work   https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/how-to-design-products-people-love-principles-and/id1612743401?i=1000668997003 The David Obstfeld conversation about brokering social networks and work https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/social-networks-the-1-predictor-of-economic/id1612743401?i=1000677462011 Connect with Alex:Website: https://www.komoroske.com/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alex-komoroske-6597336/Twitter: https://x.com/komoramaWork with Dart:Dart is the CEO and co-founder of the work design firm 11fold. Build work that makes employees feel alive, connected to their work, and focused on what's most important to the business. Book a call at 11fold.com.

Jim talks with Adam B. Levine about AI programming aids for non-techies and the future of Bitcoin. They discuss Adam's background as a "technical non-technical" person, the evolution from manual LLM prompting to using IDEs, Windsurf as an AI-first IDE, Claude 3.7's thinking mode, productivity improvements with AI coding tools, different platforms like Cursor and Cline, the "pure idea space" vs technical execution, the role of liberal arts people in tech teams, Bitcoin as digital gold, Schelling points in cryptocurrency, the US dollar as hegemonic currency, "pools of fools" theory, sovereign wealth funds moving into Bitcoin, El Salvador's Bitcoin investment, Texas and Wyoming considering sovereign Bitcoin funds, game theory of nation-state Bitcoin adoption, regulatory transitions, predictions about Bitcoin's future based on sovereign adoption, and much more. Episode Transcript The Diamond Age: Or, a Young Lady's Illustrated Primer, by Neal Stephenson Speaking of Bitcoin Podcast (formerly Let's Talk Bitcoin!) Adam B. Levine has spent over a decade pioneering disruptive technologies before they become mainstream. He launched one of the earliest Bitcoin podcasts, Let's Talk Bitcoin! (2013), founded Tokenly (2014)—one of the earliest companies exploring what could be done with blockchain tokens—and served as CoinDesk's first podcast editor (2019), hosting shows like Speaking of Bitcoin and Markets Daily. In 2021, he founded 330.ai, a startup building cutting-edge tools to boost creativity with AI.

Show Notes Professor Susan Long and Dr. Simon Western's conversation takes us on a journey into the roots of the unconscious, tracing its lineage from early philosophical thought to contemporary psychoanalysis. Susan challenges the dominant view that confines the unconscious to an individual and pathological framework, arguing instead for a more expansive understanding—one that is inherently social, cultural, and even ecological. She draws on thinkers like Schelling, whose work connects the unconscious with nature and spirit, suggesting that our inner depths are not isolated but enmeshed in the world around us. She critiques the ideological structures that shape how we perceive the unconscious, drawing on the Frankfurt School's insights into culture and power. At the heart of this discussion is the notion that creativity—so often seen as an individual gift—actually emerges from the collective unconscious, offering both potential and peril. This conversation invites us to consider the ethical dimension of confronting the unconscious, urging us to move beyond mere self-awareness and towards a deeper responsibility—to ourselves, our communities, and the wider world. Key Reflections The unconscious has historical roots that predate Freud. Schelling's work links the unconscious to nature and spirit. The unconscious is not just individual but also social and cultural. Creativity emerges from the collective unconscious. The Frankfurt School critiques how ideologies embed in culture. Human beings can be both creative and destructive. Neuroscience offers insights into the emotional aspects of the unconscious. The bicameral mind theory suggests a collective consciousness. Facing uncomfortable truths is an ethical responsibility. Individuality should not overshadow our connection to the community. Keywords unconscious, psychoanalysis, Schelling, Freud, social dynamics, creativity, Frankfurt School, group mind, nature, ethical responsibility Brief Bio Professor Susan Long is PhD Co-Lead and Research Lead at NIODA and former Professor of Creative and Sustainable Organisation at RMIT University, Melbourne. She supervises doctoral candidates, teaches in global programs such as INSEAD's Master of Coaching and Consulting (Singapore), and consults on leadership, organisational change, and executive coaching. A trained clinical psychologist and psychotherapist, Susan has a deep interest in the unconscious and its influence on individuals, groups, and organisations. She has served on advisory boards, including Comcare's Centre of Excellence for Research into Mental Health at Work, and was the founding President of Group Relations Australia. She is also a past President of the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organisations (ISPSO), where she contributed to advancing psychoanalytic approaches to leadership and organisational life. Her latest book, The Evolution of the Unconscious: Exploring Persons, Groups, Nature and Spirit, traces the historical development of unconscious thought, from early philosophical ideas to contemporary psychoanalysis. She explores how the unconscious operates not only within individuals but also within social, ecological, and spiritual dimensions. Through this lens, she challenges reductionist views and offers a broader, interconnected understanding.

In February of 2013, a 21-year-old woman mysteriously disappeared during a visit to see her on-again, off-again boyfriend after he told her he had a “surprise gift” for her. A subsequent investigation uncovered strange text messages, perplexing surveillance footage, and an important insider tip from an unsuspecting witness. This is the story of Kelsie Schelling.

Today we talk about the relationship between philosophy and religion. We talk about the duck-rabbit as a metaphor that may have something useful to teach us about the way we experience reality. We talk about the enormous difficulty of fully addressing the question: what is religion? We talk about Schelling's historical view of revelation and its connection to a possible new era of Christian religious practice. Hope you love it! :) Sponsors: Harry's: https://www.harrys.com/PHILOSOPHIZE Nord VPN: https://nordvpn.com/philothis Thank you so much for listening! Could never do this without your help.  Website: https://www.philosophizethis.org/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/philosophizethis  Social: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/philosophizethispodcast X: https://twitter.com/iamstephenwest Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/philosophizethisshow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe In today's episode of Theories of Everything, Curt Jaimungal speaks with Matthew Segall, a professor at the California Institute of Integral Studies, on the evolution of philosophical thought, linking ancient teachings on consciousness to modern scientific perspectives. We delve into the limitations of contemporary views of reality, paralleling them with the Ptolemaic model, and explore how an awareness of mortality can enrich our understanding of existence. Matthew argues for a shift toward introspection and self-inquiry in a society grappling with existential challenges, emphasizing that confronting mortality can foster a deeper sense of meaning in our lives. New Substack! Follow my personal writings and EARLY ACCESS episodes here: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com LINKED MENTIONED: •⁠ ⁠Matthew's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Footnotes2Plato •⁠ ⁠Matthew's Diagram of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Z1zY39EKbs •⁠ ⁠Matthew's talk with John Vervaeke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15akhXGHwzo •⁠ ⁠Critique of Pure Reason (book): https://www.amazon.com/Critique-Pure-Reason-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140447474 •⁠ ⁠Critique of Judgement (book): https://www.amazon.com/Critique-Judgement-Immanuel-Kant/dp/1545245673/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= •⁠ ⁠The Phenomenology of Spirit (book): https://www.amazon.com/Georg-Wilhelm-Friedrich-Hegel-Phenomenology/dp/1108730086 •⁠ ⁠1919 Eclipse (paper): https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rsnr.2020.0040 •⁠ ⁠Einstein/Bergson debate (article): https://www.faena.com/aleph/einstein-vs-bergson-the-struggle-for-time •⁠ ⁠The Principle of Relativity (book): https://www.amazon.com/Principle-Relativity-Alfred-North-Whitehead/dp/1602062188 •⁠ ⁠John Vervaeke's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@johnvervaeke •⁠ ⁠John Vervaeke on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVj1KYGyesI •⁠ ⁠Philip Goff on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmaIBxkqcT4 •⁠ ⁠Sabine Hossenfelder on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3y-Z0pgupg •⁠ ⁠Donald Hoffman on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmieNQH7Q4w •⁠ ⁠Karl Friston on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk4NZorRjCo •⁠ ⁠Iain McGilchrist on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9sBKCd2HD0 •⁠ ⁠Thomas Campbell on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kko-hVA-8IU •⁠ ⁠Noam Chomsky on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch? •⁠ ⁠v=3lcDT_-3v2k&list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlORiRfcaQe8ZdxKxF-e2BCY&index=3 •⁠ ⁠Michael Levin on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8iFtaltX-s&list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlN6E8KrxcYCWQIHg2tfkqvR&index=39 •⁠ ⁠Roger Penrose on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGm505TFMbU&list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlN6E8KrxcYCWQIHg2tfkqvR&index=16 •⁠ ⁠Neil Turok's lecture on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gwhqmPqRl4&list=PLZ7ikzmc6zlN6E8KrxcYCWQIHg2tfkqvR&index=35 •⁠ ⁠TOE's Consciousness Iceberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR4cpn8m9i0&ab_channel=TheoriesofEverythingwithCurtJaimungal •⁠ ⁠TOE's String Theory Iceberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4PdPnQuwjY Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 1:35 The Roots of Process Philosophy 4:47 The Rise of Nominalism 8:26 The Evolution of Substance 11:02 Descartes and the Dualist Divide 21:34 Kant's Copernican Revolution 33:08 The Nature of Knowledge 37:42 Hegel's Dialectic Unfolds 46:18 Schelling's Panpsychism 56:50 Whitehead's Organic Realism 1:22:17 The Bifurcation of Nature 1:31:38 The Emergence of Consciousness 1:38:37 The Nature of Self-Organization 1:53:40 Perspectives on Actuality and Potentiality 2:11:35 The Role of God in Process Philosophy 2:23:55 The Human Experience and Self-Inquiry 2:40:34 Reflections on Mortality and Meaning 2:47:44 The Shift from Substance to Process 2:58:02 Embracing Interconnectedness and Consciousness 3:00:49 The Call for Inner Exploration #science #philosophy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Christopher Satoor is a doctoral candidate (ABD) in the Department of Humanities at York University. His research focuses on Classical German philosophy of the 18th and 19th-century and the German idealist philosophies of Kant and Fichte, with an extra special concentration on Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling. Site: https://philpeople.org/profiles/christopher-satoor Satoor's podcast: https://www.youtube.com/ @TheYoungIdealist  ---Become part of the Hermitix community:Hermitix Twitter - / hermitixpodcast Support Hermitix:Patreon - / hermitix Donations: - https://www.paypal.me/hermitixpodHermitix Merchandise - http://teespring.com/stores/hermitix-2Bitcoin Donation Address: 3LAGEKBXEuE2pgc4oubExGTWtrKPuXDDLKEthereum Donation Address: 0x31e2a4a31B8563B8d238eC086daE9B75a00D9E74