Podcasts about Suppression

The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: University of North Texas, UNT, continues to lose in court over its systematic oppression of conservative thought and conservatives. Why, I have asked for years now, does Governor Greg Abbott keep reappointing the same regents who allow for this very far-Left and illegal behavior at UNT? Is Abbott really fake, as some critics charge, on these basic issues?Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Shallow and wrong thinking praised by Lubbock County Judge Parrish. Commissioner Dalby should know better. You cannot solve a problem until the source/cause of such is determined. Otherwise you are only fixing things downstream from the source — which is no fix.Campaign news: Cornyn says he's spoken to Trump about a potential endorsement: ‘If he endorsed me, the race would be over' – how arrogant and expected of the career swamp swimmer. Former Galveston Mayor Joe Jaworski to run again for Texas attorney general Democrat nomination TX15 – Democratic doctor challenging GOP Rep. Monica De La Cruz TX28 – DOJ to Continue Bribery Case Against Congressman Henry Cuellar GOP AG candidate Aaron Reitz took $100K donation from doctor accused of millions in fraud CPAC endorses Aaron Reitz for Texas Attorney General Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates.www.PrattonTexas.com

Si cette suppression n'est pas la mesure majeure du plan budgétaire de François Bayrou, elle est la plus concrète et symbolique. En touchant à des droits acquis, elle masque d'autres mesures moins visibles mais tout aussi, voire plus, importantes. Mention légales : Vos données de connexion, dont votre adresse IP, sont traités par Radio Classique, responsable de traitement, sur la base de son intérêt légitime, par l'intermédiaire de son sous-traitant Ausha, à des fins de réalisation de statistiques agréées et de lutte contre la fraude. Ces données sont supprimées en temps réel pour la finalité statistique et sous cinq mois à compter de la collecte à des fins de lutte contre la fraude. Pour plus d'informations sur les traitements réalisés par Radio Classique et exercer vos droits, consultez notre Politique de confidentialité.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

durée : 00:04:53 - L'invité de "ici Maine" - La suppression de deux jours fériés annoncé par le Premier ministre mardi comme une mesure phare pour réduire le déficit de la France est un "épouvantail" qui cache des mesures visant à "taper dans la poche des Français" estime la députée sarthoise LFI de la 4e circonscription Elise Leboucher. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

durée : 00:15:15 - Journal de 18h - Précisions ministère par ministère du coût des propositions hier de François Bayrou. Avec quelles conséquences également pour les services publics ?

durée : 00:15:15 - Journal de 18h - Précisions ministère par ministère du coût des propositions hier de François Bayrou. Avec quelles conséquences également pour les services publics ?

Avec : Catherine Quérard est la présidente du Groupement des Hôtelleries & Restaurations de France (GHR). - Chaque matin, Matthieu Belliard reçoit un invité au cœur de l'actualité.

Sera-t-il demandé aux salariés de travailler gratuitement ou non, avec la suppression de deux jours fériés ? Ce sera l'objet d'un arbitrage, probablement après de longues négociations. Selon la ministre du Travail Astrid Panosyan-Bouvet, le fonctionnement de la suppression des jours fériés se basera sur celui du lundi de Pentecôte. Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

In this episode, we break down the difference between true behavior change and simple behavior suppression. Learn why shutting down a dog's reactions might look like progress—but often hides emotional distress, confusion, or fear. We'll talk about the long-term fallout of using suppression-based training and what to do instead if you want a dog who feels safe, confident, and connected.dogspeak101.comdogspeakgeek.thinkific.com

In this episode, the host unpacks a tangled web of allegations surrounding the Trump administration's handling of Jeffrey Epstein files. Insiders, including Trump's attorneys, claim critical evidence naming powerful figures is being suppressed to protect reputations. The discussion highlights conflicting public statements from Trump—first denying the files, then accusing Obama and Hillary of creating them—fueling further suspicion. The episode also delves into disturbing reports of child labor and trafficking at California farms employing unaccompanied minors, linking cartels, political donations, and exploitation. Guests argue the crisis has deep ties to failed immigration enforcement and political cover-ups. Finally, the show explores why, despite bipartisan outrage over Epstein and child exploitation, accountability remains elusive—and how social media is reshaping what the public knows.

Drs. Hope Rugo, Sheri Brenner, and Mikolaj Slawkowski-Rode discuss the struggle that health care professionals experience when terminally ill patients are suffering and approaches to help clinicians understand and respond to suffering in a more patient-centered and therapeutic way. TRANSCRIPT Dr. Hope Rugo: Hello, and welcome to By the Book, a monthly podcast series from ASCO that features engaging conversations between editors and authors of the ASCO Educational Book.  I'm your host, Dr. Hope Rugo. I'm director of the Women's Cancers Program and division chief of breast medical oncology at the City of Hope Cancer Center, and I'm also the editor-in-chief of the Educational Book. On today's episode, we'll be exploring the complexities of grief and oncology and the struggle we experience as healthcare professionals when terminally ill patients are suffering. Our guests will discuss approaches to help clinicians understand and respond to suffering in a more patient-centered and therapeutic way, as outlined in their recently published article titled, “Oncology and Suffering: Strategies on Coping With Grief for Healthcare Professionals.” I'm delighted today to welcome Dr. Keri Brenner, a clinical associate professor of medicine, palliative care attending, and psychiatrist at Stanford University, and Dr. Mikołaj Sławkowski-Rode, a senior research fellow in philosophy in the Humanities Research Institute at the University of Buckingham, where he also serves as director of graduate research in p hilosophy. He is also a research fellow in philosophy at Blackfriars Hall at the University of Oxford and associate professor at the University of Warsaw.  Our full disclosures are available in the transcript of this episode. Dr. Brenner and Dr. Sławkowski-Rode, thanks for being on the podcast today. Dr. Keri Brenner: Great to be here, Dr. Rugo. Thank you so much for that kind introduction. Dr. Mikołaj Sławkowski-Rode: Thank you very much, Dr. Rugo. It's a pleasure and an honor. Dr. Hope Rugo: So I'm going to start with some questions for both of you. I'll start with Dr. Brenner. You've spoken and written about the concept of suffering when there is no cure. For oncologists, what does it mean to attune to suffering, not just disease? And how might this impact the way they show up in difficult conversations with patients? Dr. Keri Brenner: Suffering is something that's so omnipresent in the work of clinical oncology, and I like to begin by just thinking about what is suffering, because it's a word that we use so commonly, and yet, it's important to know what we're talking about. I think about the definition of Eric Cassell, who was a beloved mentor of mine for decades, and he defined suffering as the state of severe distress that's associated with events that threaten the intactness of a person. And my colleague here at Stanford, Tyler Tate, has been working on a definition of suffering that encompasses the experience of a gap between how things are versus how things ought to be. Both of these definitions really touch upon suffering in a person-centered way that's relational about one's identity, meaning, autonomy, and connectedness with others. So these definitions alone remind us that suffering calls for a person-centered response, not the patient as a pathology, but the panoramic view of who the patient is as a person and their lived reality of illness. And in this light, the therapeutic alliance becomes one of our most active ingredients in care. The therapeutic alliance is that collaborative, trusting bond as persons that we have between clinician and patient, and it's actually one of the most powerful predictors of meaningful outcomes in our care, especially in oncologic care.  You know, I'll never forget my first day of internship at Massachusetts General Hospital. A faculty lecturer shared this really sage insight with us that left this indelible mark. She shared, “As physicians and healers, your very self is the primary instrument of healing. Our being is the median of the medicine.” So, our very selves as embodied, relationally grounded people, that's the median of the medicine and the first most enduring medicine that we offer. That has really borne fruit in the evidence that we see around the therapeutic alliance. And we see this in oncologic care, that in advanced cancer, a strong alliance with one's oncologist truly improves a patient's quality of life, treatment adherence, emotional well-being, and even surpasses structured interventions like psychotherapeutic interventions. Dr. Hope Rugo: That's just incredibly helpful information and actually terminology as well, and I think the concept of suffering differs so much. Suffering comes in many shapes and forms, and I think you really have highlighted that. But many oncologists struggle with knowing what to do when patients are suffering but can't be fixed, and I think a lot of times that has to do with oncologists when patients have pain or shortness of breath or issues like that. There are obviously many ways people suffer. But I think what's really challenging is how clinicians understand suffering and what the best approaches to respond to suffering are in the best patient-centered and therapeutic way. Dr. Keri Brenner: I get that question a lot from my trainees in palliative care, not knowing what to do. And my first response is, this is about how to be, not about knowing what to do, but how to be. In our medical training, we're trained often how to think and treat, but rarely how to be, how to accompany others. And I often have this image that I tell my trainees of, instead of this hierarchical approach of a fix-it mentality of all we're going to do, when it comes to elements of unavoidable loss, mortality, unavoidable sufferings, I imagine something more like accompaniment, a patient walking through some dark caverns, and I am accompanying them, trying to walk beside them, shining a light as a guide throughout that darkness. So it's a spirit of being and walking with. And it's so tempting in medicine to either avoid the suffering altogether or potentially overidentify with it, where the suffering just becomes so all-consuming like it's our own. And we're taught to instead strike a balance of authentic accompaniment through it. I often teach this key concept in my palli-psych work with my team about formulation. Formulation is a working hypothesis. It's taking a step back and asking, “Why? Why is this patient behaving in this manner? What might the patient's core inner struggle be?” Because asking that “why” and understanding the nuanced dimensions of a patient's core inner struggle will really help guide our therapeutic interactions and guide the way that we accompany them and where we choose to shine that light as we're walking with them. And oftentimes people think, “Well Keri, that sounds so sappy or oversentimental,” and it's not. You know, I'm just thinking about a case that I had a couple months ago, and it was a 28-year-old man with gastric cancer, metastatic disease, and that 28-year-old man, he was actually a college Division I athlete, and his dad was an acclaimed Division I coach. And our typical open-ended palliative care questions, that approach, infuriated them. They needed to know that I was showing up confident, competent, and that I was ready, on my A-game, with a real plan for them to follow through. And so my formulation about them was they needed somebody to show up with that confidence and competence, like the Division I athletes that they were, to really meet them and accompany them where they were on how they were going to walk through that experience of illness. Dr. Hope Rugo: These kinds of insights are so helpful to think about how we manage something that we face every day in oncology care. And I think that there are many ways to manage this.  Maybe I'll ask Dr. Sławkowski-Rode one question just that I think sequences nicely with what you're talking about.  A lot of our patients are trying to think about sort of the bigger picture and how that might help clinicians understand and support patients. So, the whole concept of spirituality, you know, how can we really use that as oncology clinicians to better understand and support patients with advanced illness, and how can that help patients themselves? And we'll talk about that in two different ways, but we'll just start with this broader question. Dr. Mikołaj Sławkowski-Rode: I think spirituality, and here, I usually refer to spirituality in terms of religious belief. Most people in the world are religious believers, and it is very intuitive and natural that religious beliefs would be a resource that people who help patients with a terminal diagnosis and healthcare professionals who work with those patients appeal to when they try to help them deal with the trauma and the stress of these situations.  Now, I think that the interesting thing there is that very often the benefit of appealing to a religious belief is misunderstood in terms of what it delivers. And there are many, many studies on how religious belief can be used to support therapy and to support patients in getting through the experience of suffering and defeating cancer or facing a terminal diagnosis. There's a wealth of literature on this. But most of the literature focuses on this idea that by appealing to religious belief, we help patients and healthcare practitioners who are working with them get over the fact and that there's a terminal diagnosis determining the course of someone's life and get on with our lives and engaging with whatever other pursuits we might have, with our job if we're healthcare practitioners, and with the other things that we might be passionate about in our lives. And the idea here is that this is what religion allows us to do because we sort of defer the need to worry about what's going to happen to us until the afterlife or some perspective beyond the horizon of our life here.  However, my view is – I have worked beyond philosophy also with theologians from many traditions, and my view here is that religion is something that does allow us to get on with our life but not because we're able to move on or move past the concerns that are being threatened by illness or death, but by forming stronger bonds with these things that we value in our life in a way and to have a sense of hope that these will be things that we will be able to keep an attachment to despite the threat to our life. So, in a sense, I think very many approaches in the field have the benefit of religion upside down, as it were, when it comes to helping patients and healthcare professionals who are engaged with their illness and treating it. Dr. Hope Rugo: You know, it's really interesting the points that you make, and I think really important, but, you know, sometimes the oncologists are really struggling with their own emotional reactions, how they are reacting to patients, and dealing with sort of taking on the burden, which, Dr. Brenner, you were mentioning earlier. How can oncologists be aware of their own emotional reactions? You know, they're struggling with this patient who they're very attached to who's dying or whatever the situation is, but you want to avoid burnout as an oncologist but also understand the patient's inner world and support them. Dr. Keri Brenner: I believe that these affective, emotional states, they're contagious. As we accompany patients through these tragic losses, it's very normal and expected that we ourselves will experience that full range of the human experience as we accompany the patients. And so the more that we can recognize that this is a normative dimension of our work, to have a nonjudgmental stance about the whole panoramic set of emotions that we'll experience as we accompany patients with curiosity and openness about that, the more sustainable the work will become. And I often think about the concept of countertransference given to us by Sigmund Freud over 100 years ago. Countertransference is the clinician's response to the patient, the thoughts, feelings, associations that come up within us, shaped by our own history, our own life events, those unconscious processes that come to the foreground as we are accompanying patients with illness. And that is a natural part of the human experience. Historically, countertransference was viewed as something negative, and now it's actually seen as a key that can unlock and enlighten the formulation about what might be going on within the patient themselves even. You know, I was with a patient a couple weeks ago, and I found myself feeling pretty helpless and hopeless in the encounter as I was trying to care for them. And I recognized that countertransference within myself that I was feeling demoralized. It was a prompt for me to take a step back, get on the balcony, and be curious about that because I normally don't feel helpless and hopeless caring for my patients. Well, ultimately, I discovered through processing it with my interdisciplinary team that the patient likely had demoralization as a clinical syndrome, and so it's natural many of us were feeling helpless and hopeless also accompanying them with their care. And it allowed us to have a greater interdisciplinary approach and a more therapeutic response and deeper empathy for the patient's plight. And we can really be curious about our countertransferences. You know, a few months ago, I was feeling bored and distracted in a family meeting, which is quite atypical for me when I'm sharing serious illness news. And it was actually a key that allowed me to recognize that the patient was trying to distract all of us talking about inconsequential facts and details rather than the gravitas of her illness.  Being curious about these affective states really allows us to have greater sustainability within our own practice because it normalizes that human spectrum of emotions and also allows us to reduce unconscious bias and have greater inclusivity with our practice because what Freud also said is that what we can't recognize and say within our own selves, if we don't have that self-reflective capacity, it will come out in what we do. So really recognizing and having the self-awareness and naming some of these emotions with trusted colleagues or even within our own selves allows us to ensure that it doesn't come out in aberrant behaviors like avoiding the patient, staving off that patient till the end of the day, or overtreating, offering more chemotherapy or not having the goals of care, doing everything possible when we know that that might result in medically ineffective care. Dr. Hope Rugo: Yeah, I love the comments that you made, sort of weaving in Freud, but also, I think the importance of talking to colleagues and to sharing some of these issues because I do think that oncologists suffer from the fact that no one else in your life wants to hear about dying people. They don't really want to hear about the tragic cases either. So, I think that using your community, your oncology community and greater community within medicine, is an important part of being able to sort of process. Dr. Keri Brenner: Yes, and Dr. Rugo, this came up in our ASCO [Education] Session. I'd love to double click into some of those ways that we can do this that aren't too time consuming in our everyday practice. You know, within palliative care, we have interdisciplinary rounds where we process complex cases. Some of us do case supervision with a trusted mentor or colleague where we bring complex cases to them. My team and I offer process rounds virtually where we go through countertransference, formulation, and therapeutic responses on some tough cases.  You know, on a personal note, just last week when I left a family meeting feeling really depleted and stuck, I called one of my trusted colleagues and just for 3 minutes constructively, sort of cathartically vented what was coming up within me after that family meeting, which allowed me to have more of an enlightened stance on what to do next and how to be therapeutically helpful for the case. One of my colleagues calls this "friend-tors." They coined the phrase, and they actually wrote a paper about it. Who within your peer group of trusted colleagues can you utilize and phone in real time or have process opportunities with to get a pulse check on where what's coming up within us as we're doing this work? Dr. Hope Rugo: Yeah, and it's an interesting question about how one does that and, you know, maintaining that as you move institutions or change places or become more senior, it's really important.  One of the, I think, the challenges sometimes is that we come from different places from our patients, and that can be an issue, I think when our patients are very religious and the provider is not, or the reverse, patients who don't have religious beliefs and you're trying to sort of focus on the spirituality, but it doesn't really ring true. So, Dr. Sławkowski-Rode, what resources can patients and practitioners draw on when they're facing death and loss in the absence of, or just different religious beliefs that don't fit into the standard model? Dr. Mikołaj Sławkowski-Rode: You're absolutely right that this can be an extremely problematic situation to be in when there is that disconnect of religious belief or more generally spiritual engagement with the situation that we're in. But I just wanted to tie into what Dr. Brenner was saying just before. I couldn't agree more, and I think that a lot of healthcare practitioners, oncologists in particular who I've had the pleasure to talk to at ASCO and at other events as well, are very often quite skeptical about emotional engagement in their profession. They feel as though this is something to be managed, as it were, and something that gets in the way. And they can often be very critical of methods that help them understand the emotions and extend them towards patients because they feel that this will be an obstacle to doing their job and potentially an obstacle also to helping patients to their full ability if they focus on their own emotions or the burden that emotionally, spiritually, and in other ways the illness is for the patient. They feel that they should be focusing on the cancer rather than on the patient's emotions. And I think that a useful comparison, although, you know, perhaps slightly drastic, is that of combat experience of soldiers. They also need to be up and running and can't be too emotionally invested in the situation that they're in. But there's a crucial difference, which is that soldiers are usually engaged in very short bursts of activity with the time to go back and rethink, and they often have a lot of support for this in between. Whereas doctors are in a profession where their exposure to the emotions of patients and their own emotions, the emotions of families of patients is constant. And I think that there's a great danger in thinking that this is something to be avoided and something to compartmentalize in order to avoid burnout. I think, in a way, burnout is more sure to happen if your emotions and your attachment to your patients goes ignored for too long. So that's just following up on Keri's absolutely excellent points. As far as the disconnect is concerned, that's, in fact, an area in which I'm particularly interested in. That's where my research comes in. I'm interested in the kinds of connections that we have with other people, especially in terms of maintaining bonds when there is no spiritual belief, no spiritual backdrop to support this connection. In most religious traditions, we have the framework of the religious belief that tells us that the person who we've lost or the values that have become undermined in our life are something that hasn't been destroyed permanently but something that we can still believe we have a deep connection to despite its absence from our life. And how do you rebuild that sense of the existence of the things that you have perceivably lost without the appeal to some sort of transcendent realm which is defined by a given religion? And that is a hard question. That's a question, I think, that can be answered partly by psychology but also partly by philosophy in terms of looking at who we are as human beings and our nature as people who are essentially, or as entities that are essentially connected to one another. That connection, I believe, is more direct than the mediation of religion might at first suggest. I think that we essentially share the world not only physically, it's not just the case that we're all here, but more importantly, the world that we live in is not just the physical world but the world of meanings and values that helps us orient ourselves in society and amongst one another as friends and foes. And it is that shared sense of the world that we can appeal to when we're thinking about retaining the value or retaining the connection with the people who we have lost or the people who are helping through, go through an experience of facing death. And just to finish, there's a very interesting question, I think, something that we possibly don't have time to explore, about the degree of connection that we have with other people. So, what I've just been saying is something that rings more true or is more intuitive when we think about the connections that we have to our closest ones. We share a similar outlook onto the world, and our preferences and our moods and our emotions and our values are shaped by life with the other person. And so, appealing to these values can give us a sense of a continued presence. But what in those relationships where the connection isn't that close? For example, given the topic of this podcast, the connection that a patient has with their doctor and vice versa. In what sense can we talk about a shared world of experience? Well, I think, obviously, we should admit degrees to the kind of relationship that can sustain our connection with another person. But at the same time, I don't think there's a clear cutoff point. And I think part of emotional engagement in medical practice is finding yourself somewhere on that spectrum rather than thinking you're completely off of it. That's what I would say. Dr. Hope Rugo: That's very helpful and I think a very helpful way of thinking about how to manage this challenging situation for all of us.  One of the things that really, I think, is a big question for all of us throughout our careers, is when to address the dying process and how to do that. Dr. Brenner, you know, I still struggle with this – what to do when patients refuse to discuss end-of-life but they're very close to end of life? They don't want to talk about it. It's very stressful for all of us, even where you're going to be, how you're going to manage this. They're just absolutely opposed to that discussion. How should we approach those kinds of discussions? How do we manage that? How do you address the code discussion, which is so important? You know, these patients are not able to stay at home at end-of-life in general, so you really do need to have a code discussion before you're admitting them. It actually ends up being kind of a challenge and a mess all around. You know, I would love your advice about how to manage those situations. Dr. Keri Brenner: I think that's one of the most piercing and relevant inquiries we have within our clinical work and challenges. I often think of denial not as an all-or-nothing concept but rather as parts of self. There's a part of everyone's being where the unconscious believes it's immortal and will live on forever, and yet we all know intellectually that we all have mortality and finitude and transience, and that time will end. We often think of this work as more iterative and gradual and exposure based. There's potency to words. Saying, “You are dying within days,” is a lot higher potency of a phrase to share than, “This is serious illness. This illness is incurable. Time might be shorter than we hoped.” And so the earlier and more upstream we begin to have these conversations, even in small, subtle ways, it starts to begin to expose the patient to the concept so they can go from the head to the heart, not only knowing their prognosis intellectually but also affectively, to integrate it into who they are as a person because all patients are trying to live well while also we're gradually exposing them to this awareness of mortality within their own lived experience of illness. And that, ideally, happens gradually over time. Now, there are moments where the medical frame is very limited, and we might have short days, and we have to uptitrate those words and really accompany them more radically through those high-affective moments. And that's when we have to take a lot of more nuanced approaches, but I would say the more earlier and upstream the better. And then the second piece to that question as well is coping with our own mortality. The more we can be comfortable with our own transience and finitude and limitations, the more we will be able to accompany others through that. And even within my own life, I've had to integrate losses in a way where before I go in to talk to one of my own palliative care patients, one mantra I often say to myself is, “I'm just a few steps behind you. I don't know if it's going to be 30 days or 30 years, but I'm just a few steps behind you on this finite, transient road of life that is the human experience.” And that creates a stance of accompaniment that patients really can experience as they're traversing these tragedies. Dr. Hope Rugo: That's great. And I think those are really important points and actually some pearls, which I think we can take into the clinic. I think being really concrete when really the expected life expectancy is a few days to a couple of weeks can be very, very helpful. And making sure the patients hear you, but also continuing to let them know that, as oncologists, we're here for them. We're not abandoning them. I think that's a big worry for many, certainly of my patients, is that somehow when they would go to hospice or be a ‘no code', that we're not going to support them anymore or treat them anymore. That is a really important process of that as well. And of course, engaging the team makes a big difference because the whole oncology team can help to manage situations that are particularly challenging like that. And just as we close, I wanted to ask one last question of you, Dr. Brenner, that suffering, grief, and burnout, you've really made the point that these are not problems to fix but dimensions that we want to attend to and acknowledge as part of our lives, the dying process is part of all of our lives. It's just dealing with this in the unexpected and the, I think, unpredictability of life, you know, that people take on a lot of guilt and all sorts of things about, all sorts of emotions. And the question is now, people have listened to this podcast, what can they take back to their oncology teams to build a culture that supports clinicians and their team at large to engage with these realities in a meaningful and sustainable way? I really feel like if we could build the whole team approach where we're supporting each other and supporting the patients together, that that will help this process immeasurably. Dr. Keri Brenner: Yes, and I'm thinking about Dr. Sławkowski-Rode's observation about the combat analogy, and it made me recognize this distinction between suppression and repression. Repression is this unconscious process, and this is what we're taught to do in medical training all the time, to just involuntarily shove that tragedy under the rug, just forget about it and see the next patient and move on. And we know that if we keep unconsciously shoving things under the rug, that it will lead to burnout and lack of sustainability for our clinical teams. Suppression is a more conscious process. That deliberate effort to say, “This was a tragedy that I bore witness to. I know I need to put that in a box on the shelf for now because I have 10 other patients I have to see.” And yet, do I work in a culture where I can take that off the shelf during particular moments and process it with my interdisciplinary team, phone a friend, talk to a trusted colleague, have some trusted case supervision around it, or process rounds around it, talk to my social worker? And I think the more that we model this type of self-reflective capacity as attendings, folks who have been in the field for decades, the more we create that ethos and culture that is sustainable because clinician self-reflection is never a weakness, rather it's a silent strength. Clinician self-reflection is this portal for wisdom, connectedness, sustainability, and ultimately transformative growth within ourselves. Dr. Hope Rugo: That's such a great point, and I think this whole discussion has been so helpful for me and I hope for our audience that we really can take these points and bring them to our practice. I think, “Wow, this is such a great conversation. I'd like to have the team as a whole listen to this as ways to sort of strategize talking about the process, our patients, and being supportive as a team, understanding how we manage spirituality when it connects and when it doesn't.” All of these points, they're bringing in how we process these issues and the whole idea of suppressing versus sort of deciding that it never happened at all is, I think, very important because that's just a tool for managing our daily lives, our busy clinics, and everything we manage. Dr. Keri Brenner: And Dr. Rugo, it's reminding me at Stanford, you know, we have this weekly practice that's just a ritual where every Friday morning for 30 minutes, our social worker leads a process rounds with us as a team, where we talk about how the work that we're doing clinically is affecting us in our lives in ways that have joy and greater meaning and connectedness and other ways that might be depleting. And that kind of authentic vulnerability with one another allows us to show up more authentically for our patients. So those rituals, that small 30 minutes once a week, goes a long way. And it reminds me that sometimes slowing things down with those rituals can really get us to more meaningful, transformative places ultimately. Dr. Hope Rugo: It's a great idea, and I think, you know, making time for that in everybody's busy days where they just don't have any time anymore is important. And you don't have to do it weekly, you could even do something monthly. I think there's a lot of options, and that's a great suggestion. I want to thank you both for taking your time out for this enriching and incredibly helpful conversation. Our listeners will find a link to the Ed Book article we discussed today, which is excellent, in the transcript of this episode. I want to thank you again, Dr. Brenner and Dr. Sławkowski-Rode, for your time and for your excellent thoughts and advice and direction. Dr. Mikołaj Sławkowski-Rode: Thank you very much, Dr. Rugo. Dr. Keri Brenner: Thank you. Dr. Hope Rugo: And thanks to our listeners for joining us today. Please join us again next month on By the Book for more insightful views on topics you'll be hearing at the education sessions from ASCO meetings and our deep dives on new approaches that are shaping modern oncology. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Follow today's speakers:      Dr. Hope Rugo @hope.rugo Dr. Keri Brenner @keri_brenner Dr. Mikolaj Slawkowski-Rode @MikolajRode Follow ASCO on social media:      @ASCO on X (formerly Twitter)      ASCO on Bluesky     ASCO on Facebook      ASCO on LinkedIn      Disclosures:     Dr. Hope Rugo: Honoraria: Mylan/Viatris, Chugai Pharma Consulting/Advisory Role: Napo Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Bristol Myer Research Funding (Inst.): OBI Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Hoffman La-Roche AG/Genentech, In., Stemline Therapeutics, Ambryx Dr. Keri Brenner: No relationships to disclose Dr. Mikolaj Slawkowski-Rode: No relationships to disclose    

Under the new presidential administration, public health policy is taking a new direction. With RFK Jr. now serving as the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, significant changes are underway — particularly in areas like vaccinations, environmental health, and more.  What might this mean for Americans? Mark Nathaniel Mead, MSc, returns to the podcast to share his insights… Mark is a trained epidemiologist, public health research scientist, and science editor. As a writer, he has contributed to an array of publications, including Natural Health, Utne Reader, American Health, and Integrative Cancer Therapies. In the past months, he has been releasing thought-provoking research papers assessing the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 Modified mRNA “vaccines.” Hit play to find out: The purpose of the most recent Senate hearing regarding the corruption of science and federal health agencies. The ways in which the COVID-19 narrative has been suppressed and kept from the public. The benefits of removing COVID shots from children's vaccine schedules. How virus variants “outsmart” vaccinations.   Want to keep up with Mark online? Follow his LinkedIn here! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: http://apple.co/30PvU9C Keep up with M. Nathaniel Mead socials here: X : https://x.com/SelfHealingOptn  YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@marknathanielmead595 

Today's show is brought to you by these great sponsors: Riverbend Ranch Riverbend Ranch has been around for 35 years, selecting cattle that have higher marbling and tenderness than any other beef. You cannot get this beef in your grocery store. Riverbend Ranch ages their beef for 21 days and you'll find it more tender and flavorful than even the finest restaurants. So, if you're ready to have the best steak of your life, head to https://www.riverbendranch.com. Use promo code: SEAN to get $20 of your first order. Delta Rescue Delta Rescue is one the largest no-kill animal sanctuaries. Leo Grillo is on a mission to help all abandoned, malnourished, hurt or suffering animals. He relies solely on contributions from people like you and me. If you want to help Leo to continue his mission of running one of the best care-for-life animal sanctuaries in the country please visit Delta Rescue at: https://deltarescue.org/ It's Thursday, which means we have an excellent panel show for you! President Trump's cabinet meeting continues to pay in dividends as we unpack all the wins from each department. One is not getting enough attention is deregulation, removing the red tape is going to help Americans and American businesses absolutely flourish. This will take time but the U.S. economy is poised to benefit tremendously. As Putin displays his resistance to a peaceful solution in Ukraine, President Trump has pledged to arm Ukraine. This has MAGA split as many view Zelensky as a corrupt dictator and want no part in continuing to fund him in the war with Russia. Outside of the dangerous rhetoric from Democrats and media outlets, MAGA is not divided on ICE removing dangerous illegal immigrants. Caroline Downey argues the administration should go even harder with illegal workers, as cheap labor creates an underclass that suppresses the wages on jobs Americans would be otherwise willing to take. Suppression of the Epstein files have enraged some in the MAGA world as many believe there is certainly a list. Alan Dershowitz has confirmed there is a list and it is protecting powerful people. Our panel weighs in on it all! Featuring: Steve Cortes Founder | League of American Workers https://www.amworkers.com/ Jenn Pellegrino Chief Spokesperson and Senior Director of Media Affairs | AFPI https://www.americafirstpolicy.com/ Caroline Downey Staff Writer | National Review Senior Fellow | Independent Women's Forum https://www.nationalreview.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- 1️⃣ Subscribe and ring the bell for new videos: https://youtube.com/seanmspicer?sub_confirmation=1 2️⃣ Become a part of The Sean Spicer Show community: https://www.seanspicer.com/ 3️⃣ Listen to the full audio show on all platforms: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-sean-spicer-show/id1701280578 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/32od2cKHBAjhMBd9XntcUd iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-the-sean-spicer-show-120471641/ 4️⃣ Stay in touch with Sean on social media: Facebook: https://facebook.com/seanmspicer Twitter: https://twitter.com/seanspicer Instagram: https://instagram.com/seanmspicer/ 5️⃣ Follow The Sean Spicer Show on social media: Facebook: https://facebook.com/seanspicershow Twitter: https://twitter.com/seanspicershow Instagram: https://instagram.com/seanspicershow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Aujourd'hui, Jean-Loup Bonnamy, Bruno Poncet et Barbara Lefebvre débattent de l'actualité autour d'Alain Marschall et Olivier Truchot.

durée : 00:05:04 - L'invité de "ici Maine" - À l'occasion du Bal de l'été ce mercredi soir au Plongeoir Cité du cirque du Mans, le directeur Richard Fournier explique pourquoi la 25e édition du festival Le Mans fait son cirque sera avancée au mois de mai, en 2026. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

Dirk Laibach, global senior product manager for water mist at Johnson Controls, covers potential fire risks associated with industrial fryers, the differences between CO2 and water mist technologies, and the role detection plays in fire suppression systems. Headshot courtesy of Laibach

I finally sat down with Melissa Kupsch, founder of RMDY Collective, to dive into a healing modality that's long been overlooked on this show—homeopathy. Melissa brings a powerful mix of personal story, clinical experience, and spiritual insight to this conversation. We talk about the foundational principle of homeopathy (like cures like) and how highly diluted natural substances can stimulate the body's vital force to heal. She shares how a single remedy transformed her sister's life-threatening condition and recounts her own mind-blowing detox after taking just one dose.We get into the suppressed history of homeopathy, from its origins in the 1700s to its widespread use in US hospitals—until the powers that be saw its potential and shut it down. Melissa explains why homeopathy poses a threat to the pharmaceutical model, how remedies are made, and what makes them so powerful—even though there's "nothing" in them.Beyond the science, Melissa speaks to the spiritual and emotional healing that unfolds when the vital force is restored. If you've ever been skeptical about homeopathy—or curious about why it's been so marginalized—this episode will open your mind. I walked away more inspired than ever to dig deeper into this ancient, energetic form of healing. Visit rmdycollective.org/lukestorey and use code LUKE for 10% off.DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for educational purposes only and not intended for diagnosing or treating illnesses. The hosts disclaim responsibility for any adverse effects from using the information presented. Consult your healthcare provider before using referenced products. This podcast may include paid endorsements.THIS SHOW IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY:KORRECT | Go to korrectlife.com/luke and use code LUKE to get 15% off.MAGNESIUM BREAKTHROUGH | You can use the code LUKE10 for 10% off at bioptimizers.com/luke.LEELA QUANTUM TECH | Go to lukestorey.com/leelaq and use the code LUKE10 for 10% off their product line.BEAM MINERALS | Use code LUKE for 20% off your order at beamminerals.com.MORE ABOUT THIS EPISODE:(00:00:00) What Is Homeopathy & How Does It Actually Work?(00:26:03) The Hidden History—and Suppression—of Homeopathy(00:40:41) Homeopathy, Spirit, and the Battle for Consciousness(00:58:58) Fertility, Ancestral Healing, & Hormonal Rebalancing(01:18:19) Breaking Addiction & Rewiring the Psyche(01:42:51) The Rebirth of Homeopathy & a New Paradigm of Healing(02:09:04) Homeopathy, Psychedelics, & Spiritual HealingResources:• Website: rmdycollective.org • Instagram: instagram.com/thathomeopath • Facebook: facebook.com/thathomeopath • TikTok: tiktok.com/@thathomeopath...

durée : 00:25:27 - 8h30 franceinfo - La députée La France insoumise des Bouches-du-Rhône était l'invitée du "8h30 franceinfo", vendredi 4 juillet 2025. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

With another 'prominent New Zealander' in the headlines over unnamed charges, Wellington media lawyer Steven Price joins Emile Donovan to discuss how name suppression works.

Ce lundi 30 juin, Frédéric Simottel a reçu Cédric Ingrand, directeur général de Heavyweight Studio ; Bruno Guglielminetti, journaliste et animateur de « Mon Carnet de l'actualité numérique » et Salime Nassur, fondateur de Maars. Ils se sont penchés sur une IA prête à sacrifier des humains pour ne pas être remplacée, la suppression par le Canada de sa taxe numérique ciblant les GAFAM et la déclaration de cessation de paiements du fleuron français des cœurs artificiels, Carmat, dans l'émission Tech & Co, la quotidienne, sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez la en podcast.

Content managed by ContentSafe.coSupport the show

Fire is a means of control and has been deployed or constrained to levy power over individuals, societies, and ecologies. In Burn Scars: A Documentary History of Fire Suppression, from Colonial Origins to the Resurgence of Cultural Burning (Oregon State UP, 2024), Pomona College professor Char Miller has edited a collection of documents and essays tracing the history of fire and human interactions in the West and across North America. Indigenous people in California and elsewhere used fire for their own benefit, allowing naturally occurring wildfires to replenish landscapes, and controlling "light burns" to better suit their own hunting, gathering, and agricultural means. It was only with the arrival of first the Spanish and then other European and American settlers that fire took on a decidedly "uncivilized" connotation. As Americans instituted fire regimes across the continent, wildfires grew larger and forests unhealthier. It's only been in recent years that Native people, using traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and settler forest science have begun to combine as a means of restoring fires as a central component of forest health. Char Miller is the W.M. Keck Professor of Environmental Analysis and History at Pomona College. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

Fire is a means of control and has been deployed or constrained to levy power over individuals, societies, and ecologies. In Burn Scars: A Documentary History of Fire Suppression, from Colonial Origins to the Resurgence of Cultural Burning (Oregon State UP, 2024), Pomona College professor Char Miller has edited a collection of documents and essays tracing the history of fire and human interactions in the West and across North America. Indigenous people in California and elsewhere used fire for their own benefit, allowing naturally occurring wildfires to replenish landscapes, and controlling "light burns" to better suit their own hunting, gathering, and agricultural means. It was only with the arrival of first the Spanish and then other European and American settlers that fire took on a decidedly "uncivilized" connotation. As Americans instituted fire regimes across the continent, wildfires grew larger and forests unhealthier. It's only been in recent years that Native people, using traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and settler forest science have begun to combine as a means of restoring fires as a central component of forest health. Char Miller is the W.M. Keck Professor of Environmental Analysis and History at Pomona College. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Fire is a means of control and has been deployed or constrained to levy power over individuals, societies, and ecologies. In Burn Scars: A Documentary History of Fire Suppression, from Colonial Origins to the Resurgence of Cultural Burning (Oregon State UP, 2024), Pomona College professor Char Miller has edited a collection of documents and essays tracing the history of fire and human interactions in the West and across North America. Indigenous people in California and elsewhere used fire for their own benefit, allowing naturally occurring wildfires to replenish landscapes, and controlling "light burns" to better suit their own hunting, gathering, and agricultural means. It was only with the arrival of first the Spanish and then other European and American settlers that fire took on a decidedly "uncivilized" connotation. As Americans instituted fire regimes across the continent, wildfires grew larger and forests unhealthier. It's only been in recent years that Native people, using traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and settler forest science have begun to combine as a means of restoring fires as a central component of forest health. Char Miller is the W.M. Keck Professor of Environmental Analysis and History at Pomona College. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Fire is a means of control and has been deployed or constrained to levy power over individuals, societies, and ecologies. In Burn Scars: A Documentary History of Fire Suppression, from Colonial Origins to the Resurgence of Cultural Burning (Oregon State UP, 2024), Pomona College professor Char Miller has edited a collection of documents and essays tracing the history of fire and human interactions in the West and across North America. Indigenous people in California and elsewhere used fire for their own benefit, allowing naturally occurring wildfires to replenish landscapes, and controlling "light burns" to better suit their own hunting, gathering, and agricultural means. It was only with the arrival of first the Spanish and then other European and American settlers that fire took on a decidedly "uncivilized" connotation. As Americans instituted fire regimes across the continent, wildfires grew larger and forests unhealthier. It's only been in recent years that Native people, using traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and settler forest science have begun to combine as a means of restoring fires as a central component of forest health. Char Miller is the W.M. Keck Professor of Environmental Analysis and History at Pomona College. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/native-american-studies

Fire is a means of control and has been deployed or constrained to levy power over individuals, societies, and ecologies. In Burn Scars: A Documentary History of Fire Suppression, from Colonial Origins to the Resurgence of Cultural Burning (Oregon State UP, 2024), Pomona College professor Char Miller has edited a collection of documents and essays tracing the history of fire and human interactions in the West and across North America. Indigenous people in California and elsewhere used fire for their own benefit, allowing naturally occurring wildfires to replenish landscapes, and controlling "light burns" to better suit their own hunting, gathering, and agricultural means. It was only with the arrival of first the Spanish and then other European and American settlers that fire took on a decidedly "uncivilized" connotation. As Americans instituted fire regimes across the continent, wildfires grew larger and forests unhealthier. It's only been in recent years that Native people, using traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and settler forest science have begun to combine as a means of restoring fires as a central component of forest health. Char Miller is the W.M. Keck Professor of Environmental Analysis and History at Pomona College. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/environmental-studies

Fire is a means of control and has been deployed or constrained to levy power over individuals, societies, and ecologies. In Burn Scars: A Documentary History of Fire Suppression, from Colonial Origins to the Resurgence of Cultural Burning (Oregon State UP, 2024), Pomona College professor Char Miller has edited a collection of documents and essays tracing the history of fire and human interactions in the West and across North America. Indigenous people in California and elsewhere used fire for their own benefit, allowing naturally occurring wildfires to replenish landscapes, and controlling "light burns" to better suit their own hunting, gathering, and agricultural means. It was only with the arrival of first the Spanish and then other European and American settlers that fire took on a decidedly "uncivilized" connotation. As Americans instituted fire regimes across the continent, wildfires grew larger and forests unhealthier. It's only been in recent years that Native people, using traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and settler forest science have begun to combine as a means of restoring fires as a central component of forest health. Char Miller is the W.M. Keck Professor of Environmental Analysis and History at Pomona College. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-west

Victims of sexual abuse will get the final say on whether their attackers get permanent name suppression. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith spoke to Corin Dann.

Le flex office, ou bureau flexible, est une organisation du travail dans laquelle les salariés n'ont plus de poste de travail attitré. Concrètement, au lieu d'avoir un bureau fixe, chacun s'installe chaque jour dans l'espace de travail disponible selon ses besoins : open space, salle de réunion, espace calme, zone de coworking, etc. En 2024, 26 % des salariés sont en flex office.Voici les grandes caractéristiques du flex office :1. Suppression du bureau personnelLes salariés n'ont plus de bureau dédié. Ils rangent leurs affaires dans des casiers personnels ou les transportent au quotidien.2. Espaces partagés et modulablesLes bureaux sont organisés par zones d'usage (collaboration, concentration, réunions informelles…), souvent avec des outils numériques pour réserver un poste à l'avance.3. Objectif : optimisation de l'espaceLe flex office permet aux entreprises de réduire leurs coûts immobiliers, en adaptant les surfaces aux besoins réels. En moyenne, un poste de travail n'est occupé que 60 % du temps (télétravail, réunions, déplacements…), ce qui rend possible cette mutualisation.4. Encourager la mobilité et la collaborationEn changeant régulièrement de place, les salariés croisent plus de collègues, ce qui favorise les échanges transversaux et casse les silos hiérarchiques.5. Effets contrastés sur le bien-êtreLe flex office séduit certaines entreprises, mais il suscite aussi des critiques :Perte de repères ou de sentiment d'appartenance,Manque d'intimité ou de confort,Stress logistique (chercher un poste, gérer ses affaires personnelles…).Ces points ont été confirmés par plusieurs études, notamment une étude de 2021 menée par l'Université de Leeds (Royaume-Uni), qui souligne une baisse du sentiment d'appartenance et une augmentation du stress perçu chez les employés en flex office. En France, une enquête menée en 2022 par OpinionWay pour CD&B indique que 61 % des salariés en flex office regrettent de ne plus avoir de poste fixe, et 48 % disent que cela nuit à leur concentration.En résumé, le flex office est une forme d'organisation spatiale du travail pensée pour plus de souplesse, mais qui exige aussi autonomie, discipline et outils numériques adaptés. Il est souvent associé au télétravail et aux nouvelles méthodes de travail agiles, mais son impact dépend fortement de son mode de mise en œuvre et de l'accompagnement des équipes. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Air Date 6/21/2025 The Monthly-ish Mix™ is here to get you caught up on recent news without being overwhelming! This month, we're focusing on the way authoritarian movements operate across multiple fronts simultaneously to reshape society.  Be part of the show! Leave us a message or text at 202-999-3991, message us on the infamous Signal at the handle bestoftheleft.01, or email Jay@BestOfTheLeft.com Full Show Notes BestOfTheLeft.com/Support (Members Get Bonus Shows + No Ads!) Use our links to shop Bookshop.org and Libro.fm for a non-evil book and audiobook purchasing experience! Join our Discord community! PART 1: ECONOMIC CONTROL (00:01:20) #1707 Tariffied: Exposing Trump's Artless Deal (00:26:46) #1713 Yes, GOP Policies Really Are That Bad: Trump's Corruption and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (00:49:50) #1716 The Fight for Workers: Oligarchy and its Bipartisan Enablers PART 2: INFORMATION CONTROL (01:12:17) #1711 How It Started, How It's Going: Assessing the Flooded Zone Full of Shit (01:34:36) #1714 Trump's Anti-Knowledge Agenda is Inviting the Next Authoritarian Dark Age PART 3: SOCIAL CONTROL (01:57:51) #1708 Rent Asunder: From the Moderation of Pope Francis to Extremism of JD Vance, the Catholic Church is Deeply Divided (02:12:57) #1710 The past is never dead. It's not even past. Race, Religion, Culture and the Stories we Tell (02:30:51) #1712 Eugenics Redux: A Gilded Age Ideology Brought Back for the Second Gilded Age (02:53:26) #1715 The Weaponization of Antisemitism and Counterproductive Violence   Produced by Jay! Tomlinson Visit us at BestOfTheLeft.com Listen Anywhere! BestOfTheLeft.com/Listen Listen Anywhere! Follow BotL: Bluesky | Mastodon | Threads | X Like at Facebook.com/BestOfTheLeft Contact me directly at Jay@BestOfTheLeft.com

L'émission 28 minutes du 20/06/2025 Ce vendredi, Renaud Dély décrypte l'actualité en compagnie de nos clubistes : Rokhaya Diallo, journaliste, autrice et réalisatrice, Jean Quatremer, correspondant européen de "Libération", Paul Melun, essayiste et fondateur du think tank "Souverains demain", ainsi que le dessinateur de presse Thibaut Soulcié.Suppression des ZFE : l'écologie en panne alors que la maison brûle ?Mardi 17 juin, l'Assemblée nationale a adopté en première lecture le projet de loi sur la simplification de la vie économique. Ce texte, censé simplifier l'activité des entreprises, s'accompagne d'un retour en arrière sur certaines mesures écologiques prises ces dernières années. Le texte prévoit la suppression des zones à faibles émissions (ZFE), ces zones urbaines où les véhicules les plus polluants ne peuvent pas circuler. Le député écologiste Charles Fournier dénonce un texte aux "obsessions anti-écolos", tandis que le Rassemblement national se félicite d'une victoire "contre l'écologie punitive". Alors que cette suppression des ZFE se concrétise, un collectif de scientifiques affirme que limiter le réchauffement à 1,5 °C par rapport à l'ère préindustrielle "n'est désormais plus atteignable". L'écologie est-elle en panne ? La loi du plus fort est-elle devenue la règle de l'ordre mondial ? Le 13 juin, Israël lançait une série de frappes sur des sites stratégiques militaires et nucléaires iraniens au nom d'une guerre "préventive", un principe qui n'est pas reconnu par le droit international. L'État hébreu continue parallèlement de bombarder quotidiennement la bande de Gaza. La Russie refuse de négocier sérieusement avec l'Ukraine, actant sa volonté jusqu'au-boutiste dans ce conflit qui dure depuis plus de trois ans. Sur le Vieux continent, la question du réarmement s'impose. L'ONU, qui tente de régir le droit international depuis la fin de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, semble paralysée dans une position d'impuissance et limitée par de simples déclarations sans sanctions. Les relations internationales sont-elles vouées à se plier à la loi du plus fort ?Nous recevons la romancière belge Daphné Tamage pour la sortie de "Bruxelles" (aux éditions L'Arbre qui marche). Dans cet ouvrage hybride, à mi-chemin entre le roman et le guide touristique, l'autrice raconte sa ville natale, où elle déambule à l'occasion de l'enterrement d'un mentor. Les pages mêlent anecdotes, lexique bruxellois et itinéraires de visites. Donald Trump a raccourci sa visite au Canada, à l'occasion d'une réunion du G7 ce lundi 16 juin. Emmanuel Macron a justifié le départ de son homologue américain par une éventuelle négociation autour d'un cessez-le-feu entre Israël et l'Iran. Visiblement, il n'en est rien : "Que ce soit intentionnel ou non, Emmanuel ne comprend jamais rien", a asséné Donald Trump en guise de réponse. C'est le duel de la semaine de Frédéric Says. Dimanche 15 juin, Nicolas Sarkozy s'est vu privé de sa légion d'honneur suite à sa condamnation pour corruption dans l'affaire des écoutes. Il a toutefois annoncé faire appel de cette décision auprès de la Cour européenne des droits de l'Homme. Pour l'heure, les réseaux sociaux s'enflamment sur le cas de l'ancien président de la République, mis en cause dans de nombreux scandales politiques. C'est le Point com de Paola Puerari.Depuis 1984, l'affaire Grégory est un cold case qui ne trouve pas de résolution. Ce mercredi 18 juin pourtant, la cour d'assises en charge de l'affaire a annoncé procéder à l'interrogatoire de Jacqueline Jacob, grande-tante du petit garçon. Les enquêteurs la soupçonnent d'être le corbeau qui s'est targué de son assasinat dans une lettre anonyme envoyée à sa famille. C'est l'histoire de la semaine de Claude Askolovitch.Enfin, ne manquez pas la Une internationale sur la guerre en Ukraine ; les photos de la semaine soigneusement sélectionnées par nos invités, ainsi que Dérive des continents de Benoît Forgeard !28 minutes est le magazine d'actualité d'ARTE, présenté par Élisabeth Quin du lundi au jeudi à 20h05. Renaud Dély est aux commandes de l'émission le vendredi et le samedi. Ce podcast est coproduit par KM et ARTE Radio. Enregistrement 20 juin 2025 Présentation Renaud Dély Production KM, ARTE Radio

Aujourd'hui, Emmanuel de Villiers, Mourad Boudjellal et Zohra Bitan débattent de l'actualité autour d'Alain Marschall et Olivier Truchot.

Episode Link: https://open.spotify.com/show/3f8YJAs522S0319YvAYT8T,DMT—The Spirit Molecule—has been called a gateway to other dimensions, a divine transmitter, and the most powerful psychedelic known to science. But if this natural compound holds the key to human consciousness, why is it still suppressed? In this episode of Conspiracy Files, we uncover the hidden history, mysterious research, and growing belief that someone—or something—doesn't want us to know what DMT really unlocks.Connect with The Conspiracy Files Podcast:

Vincent Trémolet de Villers analyse le vote de la loi de simplification qui a vu la suppression des zones à faibles émissions (ZFE) malgré l'opposition du président Macron. Il explique comment ce vote révèle les tensions au sein de la majorité présidentielle et les reconfigurations politiques en cours, avec un clivage marqué entre la droite et la gauche.Notre équipe a utilisé un outil d'Intelligence artificielle via les technologies d'Audiomeans© pour accompagner la création de ce contenu écrit.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Pascal Praud revient pendant deux heures, sans concession, sur tous les sujets qui font l'actualité. Vous voulez réagir ? Appelez-le 01.80.20.39.21 (numéro non surtaxé) ou rendez-vous sur les réseaux sociaux d'Europe 1 pour livrer votre opinion et débattre sur grandes thématiques développées dans l'émission du jour.Vous voulez réagir ? Appelez-le 01.80.20.39.21 (numéro non surtaxé) ou rendez-vous sur les réseaux sociaux d'Europe 1 pour livrer votre opinion et débattre sur grandes thématiques développées dans l'émission du jour.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

In this episode of Nursing Uncharted, we dive into the critical topic of mental health for nurses. Ann is joined by Dr. Matt Boland to discuss the importance of acknowledging and addressing mental health challenges within the nursing profession, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Together, they explore key concepts such as emotional regulation, the effects of suppression, coping with trauma, and recognizing signs of distress. The episode also highlights practical self-care strategies, the value of seeking professional help, and the necessity of fostering supportive work environments for healthcare professionals.Chapters00:00 – Mental Health Awareness for Nurses02:56 – Understanding Emotional Regulation06:01 – Navigating Stressful Situations08:59 – The Impact of Suppression on Mental Health12:01 – Coping with Trauma in Nursing14:49 – Recognizing Signs of Distress18:02 – The Importance of Self-Care20:56 – Practical Strategies for Emotional Well-Being23:46 – Seeking Professional Help27:06 – Building a Supportive Work Environment30:07 – Final Thoughts and ResourcesAbout Dr. Matt BolandDr. Matthew Boland is a university lecturer and licensed clinical psychologist. He completed his PhD at the University of Nevada and a clinical research fellowship at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine. Dr. Boland conducts structured assessments and psychotherapy with medical patients and mental health consumers. He teaches university courses and supervises psychiatric residents conducting psychotherapy in a medical school setting. Additionally, he works as a forensic expert witness in civil and criminal legal cases.Dr. Boland is a published researcher in the areas of trauma/posttraumatic stress and emotional regulation in anxiety and depression. He provides peer reviews for scientific journals and medical reviews for Healthline.com network sites. He is also featured in informational videos on mental health topics as “Dr. Matt B.” In his spare time, he enjoys skiing and hiking in the Sierras, sailing, working on his surfing skills, and traveling to his favorite destinations.Websites: bridgepsych.info & mattbphd.comLinkedIn: @dr-mattbInstagram: @dr.mattbFacebook: @dr.mattbYouTube: @dr-mattb Celebrate Nurses Month with us on Instagram @AMNNurse! About AnnAnn King, a seasoned travel nurse with a remarkable 14-year track record, has dedicated the past 13 years to specializing in Neonatal ICU. Ann has been traveling with AMN Healthcare for 4.5 years, enriching her expertise with diverse experiences. Currently residing in San Diego, Ann not only thrives in her nursing career but also serves as the host of the Nursing Uncharted podcast, where she shares invaluable insights and stories from the world of nursing. Connect with Ann on Instagram @annifer05 No Better Place than CA! Book your assignment in the Golden State Today! Level up your career today! Find your dream travel assignment! Support for every step. Learn more about AMN Healthcare's EAP Program. Share the opportunity and refer a friend today! Ready to start your next travel assignment in the Golden State? Browse CA Jobs! Episode Sponsor:We're proudly sponsored by AMN Healthcare, the leader in healthcare staffing and workforce solutions. Explore their services at AMN Healthcare. Discover job opportunities and manage your assignments with ease using AMN Passport. Download the AMN Passport App today! Join Our Communities: WebsiteYouTubeInstagramApple PodcastsSpotifyLinkedInFacebook Powered by AMN Healthcare

This episode Leairis is back and we catch up on our year so far, Leairis discuss her comic books and her kick starters. Then we do a deep dive into Black Women being the most sexual suppressed women. We discuss why black women don't do gangbangs and the body type the black community pushes publicly and what she deals with being Biracial and more.Want More Content? 2 ways to get it1. Subscribe my Savage Smoke Sessions on Spotify ( $4.99 a month)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/smokethisova/subscribe⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠2. Become A Premium SmokerSubscribe to the Premium Smoke Room On Loyalfans⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.loyalfans.com/PremiumSmokeRoom⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Want More Content. Become a Premium Smoker⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠for 5 Premium Podcasts , Special Events and More $25.99 a monthSponsored ByHottest Adult Mag Online⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://eroticismmagazine.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Hottest Adult Film Company⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠blusherotica.com/videos⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Best Scented Candles On The Net⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠thekinkycandleco.etsy.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Queen Of Law ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/dividenqueen/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠PassDat Inhalation Partners: https://www.teepublic.com/user/the-inhaling-potnasPorn/ Music/ Social Media⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://allmylinks.com/pornrapstar⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Get The Merch:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.bonfire.com/store/s-t-o-merch-store/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Guest: Leairis https://x.com/Leairis3leairis.com

David & Sherie finish talking about desires and our role in changing desires to better match the life we want to live. We want to move from knowing a thing to wanting a thing to loving a thing, and we talk about the final steps to do this. Here are all the steps in the process and the bold ones are covered in this episode:Understand what virtue really isStrengthen Your Why & Define your PurposeGenuinely pursue loving virtue with energy, vigor, and effort!Create experiences of loving virtue in triggering situations through visualizingSee Others as Souls, Not ObjectsShift from Suppression or avoidance to Acceptance and SubstitutionExpect Struggles, But Keep GoingSpiritual Practices

“Meeting your own goals is self-care. Dopamine is healing.” Topics Discussed Autoimmune issues in women & internal progress Suppression, toxic relationships & chronic illness How herbalism helped reverse years of health issues Emotional trauma as a root cause of physical symptoms Stress, stagnation & the root of chronic symptoms Autoimmunity & energetic misalignment Subconscious triggers in motherhood Postpartum crashes after fertility success “Suppression might be more dangerous than alcohol, because you carry it 24/7.” Show Notes Summary Hello Beautiful, Monica here, and today we're going there. Deep. Raw. No fluff. Tania the Herbalist joins me for a truth-bomb-packed convo that will stop you in your tracks (and maybe call you out gently while doing it). We talk about why so many women with autoimmune issues are stuck in survival mode, chasing healing from every angle, supplements, diets, protocols, but still not getting better. Tanya opens up about puking from anxiety every morning, insomnia that felt like a life sentence, and the moment she realized her body was begging her to stop suppressing. Not fixing, feeling. This isn't about another green smoothie or fertility-friendly tea. It's about emotional constipation. About how not speaking your truth, staying in the wrong relationships, and never making real progress for you, not your kids, your boss, or your to-do list, is silently wrecking your immune system. We're unpacking what it really means to live in survival mode while chasing fertility goals, snapping at your partner, catching every cold, ruminating over laundry like it's life or death. It's not just stress. It's your soul suffocating under default energy loops and outdated purpose narratives. We're not here to slap another “modality” on the wound. We're here to ask: What stories are you playing on repeat while folding your laundry? What do you believe about success, and does it actually excite you? This convo will challenge you, shake you up, and (lovingly) drag your nervous system out of its emotional junk drawer. So hit play and let's dive into what's really keeping your body in a holding pattern, and how to finally shift it. “Healing happens when you stop externalizing the problem and remember who the f*ck you are.” Timestamps 01:44 Understanding why a significant number of women suffer from autoimmune illnesses. 03:50 Tanya's rock-bottom moment with anxiety, insomnia & burnout and her journey into herbalism. 07:09 The toxicity of unspoken relationships and how suppression breaks you. 10:23 The power of mirror works in helping you face your inner demons and find healing. 15:20 The everyday energy that shapes your life and why joylessness and stagnation are the real fertility killers. 20:11 What success actually looks like and how to reverse engineer it. 21:35 Understanding that kids don't fix you - they show you where you're broken. 23:19 Postpartum crashes & the cost of not healing before motherhood. “The body will scream until you listen. The signs are everywhere; you just keep overriding them.” Full Transcript on the Blog: https://www.findingfertility.co/blog/part-one-with-tania-khazaal  Connect with Tania Khazaal https://www.instagram.com/taniatheherbalist/ Let's Do This Together

Quantum computing and sensing are emerging markets, but they are already worth well over $1 billion. How is growth looking? Some trends may surprise you, including a shift to on-prem quantum computers. Has AI really stolen quantum's thunder, or is it about to synergistically help our industry and qubit counts grow? Join host Konstantinos Karagiannis for a wide-ranging chat with Celia Merzbacher, where they discuss solid global research from QED-C.  For more information on QED-C, visit https://quantumconsortium.org/.  Visit Protiviti at www.protiviti.com/US-en/technology-consulting/quantum-computing-services  to learn more about how Protiviti is helping organizations get post-quantum ready.  Follow host Konstantinos Karagiannis on all socials: @KonstantHacker and follow Protiviti Technology on LinkedIn and Twitter: @ProtivitiTech.                 Questions and comments are welcome!  Theme song by David Schwartz, copyright 2021.  The views expressed by the participants of this program are their own and do not represent the views of, nor are they endorsed by, Protiviti Inc., The Post-Quantum World, or their respective officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, shareholders, or subsidiaries.  None of the content should be considered investment advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or as an endorsement of any company, security, fund, or other securities or non-securities offering. Thanks for listening to this podcast. Protiviti Inc. is an equal opportunity employer, including minorities, females, people with disabilities, and veterans.  

In This Episode: We explore what it really means to let your spouse know you beyond surface communication and into emotional truth. We'll talk about the difference between empathy and vulnerability, how stuffing emotions can quietly stall your repair. The Importance of vulnerability that real connection can't happen without it.What You'll Learn:How your nervous system tries to protect you—and what healing asks insteadWhy emotional honesty is necessary for rebuilding connectionReal-life examples of letting your spouse know you againPractical steps for stepping into safe vulnerabilityThank you for tuning in!We're here to support couples healing from infidelity and betrayal, offering encouragement, practical skills, and expertise each week. As certified relational recovery coaches, we are passionate about guiding you toward hope, empathy, and lasting healing.Stay connected with us and access all the resources we offer—coaching sessions, groups, and more—by visiting this link.Your Hosts:Hali RoderickCertified Relational Recovery CoachTICC, ACC, APSATS CPC, ERCEM-C, Brainspotting PractitionerRead Hali's BioStephanie HambyCertified Relational Recovery CoachMCLC, ACC, APSATS CPC, ERCEM-CRead Stephanie's BioWe look forward to journeying with you!Learning Vulnerability - allowing your spouse to know you.Different than empathy Stepping out of our old protective mechanismsStopping stuffing the emotions

Marc Brackett, Ph.D., is the founding director of the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence and a professor in the Yale Child Study Center. He is the author of the bestselling book Permission to Feel. His research focuses on how emotions influence learning, decision-making, relationships, and mental health. Marc also developed RULER, a widely used program for teaching emotional intelligence in schools.In our conversation we discuss:(00:00) - Definition of emotional intelligence (01:26) - IQ vs. EQ (04:54) - Quantifying EQ (11:30) - 5 key benefits of emotional intelligence (22:28) - EQ is malleable and learnable (32:01) - The role of ‘Uncle Marvin' (38:14) - Suppression vs. regulation (43:25) - Consequences of suppressing your emotions (47:46) - You can be the Uncle Marvin (56:59) - Understanding emotions (01:01:32) - Dealing with imposter syndrome (01:05:23) - AI and emotional support (01:11:00) - Final takeaways Learn more about Dr. BrackettWebsite - https://marcbrackett.com/Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_BrackettInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/marc.brackett/?hl=enApp - https://howwefeel.org/New Book - https://www.amazon.com/Dealing-Feeling-Your-Emotions-Create/dp/1250329590Watch full episodes on: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/@seankim⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Connect on IG: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://instagram.com/heyseankim

Click here to read the episode highlights.   The "Living with Heart" Podcast is brought to you by Chip Dodd Resources (www.chipdodd.com) and The Voice of the Heart Center (vothcenter.com). Contact Bryan Barley for coaching at bryan@vothcenter.com.  God has created “woman” with extraordinary gifts. These gifts that need to be encouraged and  expanded. Women have for centuries been minimized and diminished, sometimes mistakenly using God as the “reason” and “right” to do so.   A man has a responsibility to honor his spouse with encouragement, and with the security that  supports the expansion of her gifts.   Conclusive Main Points of “Understanding a Woman's Heart,” Episodes #63-#69 before sharing the importance of the Hebrew word Ezer, which is used to refer to  women in the Bible  The Need to Listen:  A great sadness in many marriages is that the man actually doesn't truly listen. So often, he is so  “busy” attempting to “prove” himself, “earn” love through performance, and mistakenly  equating being respected with actually being controlling, that he ends up being responsible FOR her rather than response-able TO her.  Episodes #32 and Episode #43.    The man often believes that:  If she has feelings, he has to fix them, rather than listen to them.  If she is in a “mood” or thinking “negatively,” he has to change it, rather than be curious  about her.  If she is behaving in ways that he doesn't understand, he has to stop it, rather than  question her to find out more.  If he is going to be emotionally connected to her and get his own needs met, he must  “read her mind,” which discounts actually listening to what she is saying, rather than  simply being humble enough to believe what she is saying.  Suppression of Expression = Depressing the Heart  If the man doesn't learn the “art” of listening to the woman (Episode #68 and Episode #69) he will be participating in suppressing the person that God created to be fully alive. The “fruit” produced by a woman who is fully alive, will be diminished.  “You are on earth. There is no cure for that.” Samuel Beckett:  Regardless of the mistakes that all humans make in relationship, we are inevitably and  inextricably created for relationship and its benefits. Mistakes and pain in relationship are  always going to be part and parcel of marriage. Each person must be able to relate to suffering and what it is like to be a human being on this earth. Each person must develop great tolerance  for being imperfect. This side of heaven, there is no perfect.   Click here to continue reading the episode highlights.

David & Sherie continue talking about desires and our role in changing desires to better match the life we want to live. We want to move from knowing a thing to wanting a thing to loving a thing, and we talk about additional steps to do this. Here are the steps in the process and the bold ones are covered in this episode:Understand what virtue really isStrengthen Your Why & Define your PurposeGenuinely pursue loving virtue with energy, vigor, and effort!Create experiences of loving virtue in triggering situations through visualizingSee Others as Souls, Not ObjectsShift from Suppression or avoidance to Acceptance and SubstitutionExpect Struggles, But Keep GoingSpiritual Practices

In response to the government's declarations submitted on January 17, 2025 (Dkt. 131), Sean Combs' legal team reiterates their arguments in favor of his Motion for a Hearing, Suppression, and Other Relief (Dkt. 97). The defense asserts that the government's submission fails to address critical procedural and substantive issues related to the evidence in question. Specifically, they highlight inconsistencies and potential constitutional violations in the methods used to obtain evidence against Mr. Combs, calling into question its admissibility. The defense maintains that these deficiencies warrant a full evidentiary hearing to safeguard Mr. Combs' rights under due process.Additionally, the defense emphasizes that suppression of certain evidence is not only appropriate but necessary to ensure a fair trial. They argue that the government's declarations lack sufficient justification to refute claims of improper conduct and overreach by law enforcement. By filing this response, Mr. Combs' counsel seeks to underscore the importance of addressing these legal flaws promptly and thoroughly, urging the court to grant the requested relief to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.135.0.pdf

In response to the government's declarations submitted on January 17, 2025 (Dkt. 131), Sean Combs' legal team reiterates their arguments in favor of his Motion for a Hearing, Suppression, and Other Relief (Dkt. 97). The defense asserts that the government's submission fails to address critical procedural and substantive issues related to the evidence in question. Specifically, they highlight inconsistencies and potential constitutional violations in the methods used to obtain evidence against Mr. Combs, calling into question its admissibility. The defense maintains that these deficiencies warrant a full evidentiary hearing to safeguard Mr. Combs' rights under due process.Additionally, the defense emphasizes that suppression of certain evidence is not only appropriate but necessary to ensure a fair trial. They argue that the government's declarations lack sufficient justification to refute claims of improper conduct and overreach by law enforcement. By filing this response, Mr. Combs' counsel seeks to underscore the importance of addressing these legal flaws promptly and thoroughly, urging the court to grant the requested relief to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.135.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This week on Podcast UFO, host Martin Willis speaks with constitutional attorney and longtime disclosure advocate Danny Sheehan about the explosive new white paper from the New Paradigm Institute (NPI), Disinformation: The U.S. Government's Suppression of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena and Advanced Science. Written by NPI's Kevin Wright, the paper details how U.S. government agencies have used secrecy, disinformation, and classification to suppress knowledge of UAPs and advanced technologies. He believes that the "National Security State" (refers to the collection of institutions, laws, and personnel within a country dedicated to formulating, enforcing, and ensuring the continuity of its national security policy) is suppressing evidence when it comes to the UAP Topic.SHOW NOTESBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/podcast-ufo--5922140/support.

This is one of the most blatantly evil documents I've seen recently. They expect you to give money to get your TLM back.Sources:https://www.returntotradition.orgSponsored by Fidei Email:https://www.fidei.emailContact Me:Email: return2catholictradition@gmail.comSupport My Work:Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/AnthonyStineSubscribeStarhttps://www.subscribestar.net/return-to-traditionBuy Me A Coffeehttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/AnthonyStinePhysical Mail:Anthony StinePO Box 3048Shawnee, OK74802Follow me on the following social media:https://www.facebook.com/ReturnToCatholicTradition/https://twitter.com/pontificatormax+JMJ+

This is one of the most blatantly evil documents I've seen recently. They expect you to give money to get your TLM back.Sources:https://www.returntotradition.orgSponsored by Fidei Email:https://www.fidei.emailContact Me:Email: return2catholictradition@gmail.comSupport My Work:Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/AnthonyStineSubscribeStarhttps://www.subscribestar.net/return-to-traditionBuy Me A Coffeehttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/AnthonyStinePhysical Mail:Anthony StinePO Box 3048Shawnee, OK74802Follow me on the following social media:https://www.facebook.com/ReturnToCatholicTradition/https://twitter.com/pontificatormax+JMJ+

In this high yield podcast, I discuss confirmatory testing for a host of endocrine related pathologies. The USMLEs love to test these in familiar and unfamiliar situations that occasionally step out of classic norms. I highlight a few of these scenarios and permutations so you’re well versed and ready to tackle whatever presents on your … Continue reading DIP Ep 602: Endocrine Thinking (Stimulation and Suppression Tests)