Podcasts about lewiston tribune

Lewiston Tribune reporter Trevor Junt joins the crew to talk takeaways from Idaho's second spring scrimmage.

Dr. Eggleston has been writing opinion pieces for The Lewiston Tribune that have led him to be reviewed by the Washington Medical Commission. NBA Hall-of-Famer John Stockton joins Dr. Eggleston in a lawsuit against the Washington State AG and the Washington Medical Commission with legal counsel including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Sign up for The FLF Conference 2024 (Prodigal America)https://flfnetwork.com/prodigal-america/

Dr. Eggleston has been writing opinion pieces for The Lewiston Tribune that have led him to be reviewed by the Washington Medical Commission. NBA Hall-of-Famer John Stockton joins Dr. Eggleston in a lawsuit against the Washington State AG and the Washington Medical Commission with legal counsel including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Sign up for The FLF Conference 2024 (Prodigal America)https://flfnetwork.com/prodigal-america/

Dr. Eggleston has been writing opinion pieces for The Lewiston Tribune that have led him to be reviewed by the Washington Medical Commission. NBA Hall-of-Famer John Stockton joins Dr. Eggleston in a lawsuit against the Washington State AG and the Washington Medical Commission with legal counsel including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Sign up for The FLF Conference 2024 (Prodigal America)https://flfnetwork.com/prodigal-america/

A gag order, also known as a judicial gag order, is a legal order issued by a judge that restricts or prohibits certain individuals involved in a legal case from speaking about or disclosing certain information to the public or the media. It is typically employed to ensure a fair trial or to protect the integrity of ongoing legal proceedings.The purpose of a gag order is to prevent potential prejudice or bias that may arise from pretrial publicity or excessive media coverage.By limiting the dissemination of information, a gag order aims to safeguard the right of the accused to a fair trial and maintain the impartiality of the jury.A judge may impose a gag order on various parties involved in a case, including the prosecution, defense attorneys, witnesses, and even the media. The specific terms and scope of a gag order can vary, but it commonly restricts individuals from discussing case-related details, evidence, or opinions outside of the courtroom.Gag orders can be broad, prohibiting all communication on a case, or they can be more specific, focusing on certain topics or individuals. Violating a gag order can result in contempt of court charges, fines, or other legal consequences.While gag orders are intended to protect the legal process, they can also raise concerns about freedom of speech and the public's right to information. However, judges may consider the potential impact on the fairness of the trial or the privacy rights of those involved when deciding to issue a gag order.After hearing from all parties involved over the past few weeks, Judge John Judge has made a gag order ruling and he has decided that the gag order was way too broad and way too vague. In this episode, we take a look at the changes he made to the gag order and what will remain the same.(commercial at 6:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge keeps gag order in place in Kohberger case, with alterations | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

A gag order, also known as a judicial gag order, is a legal order issued by a judge that restricts or prohibits certain individuals involved in a legal case from speaking about or disclosing certain information to the public or the media. It is typically employed to ensure a fair trial or to protect the integrity of ongoing legal proceedings.The purpose of a gag order is to prevent potential prejudice or bias that may arise from pretrial publicity or excessive media coverage.By limiting the dissemination of information, a gag order aims to safeguard the right of the accused to a fair trial and maintain the impartiality of the jury.A judge may impose a gag order on various parties involved in a case, including the prosecution, defense attorneys, witnesses, and even the media. The specific terms and scope of a gag order can vary, but it commonly restricts individuals from discussing case-related details, evidence, or opinions outside of the courtroom.Gag orders can be broad, prohibiting all communication on a case, or they can be more specific, focusing on certain topics or individuals. Violating a gag order can result in contempt of court charges, fines, or other legal consequences.While gag orders are intended to protect the legal process, they can also raise concerns about freedom of speech and the public's right to information. However, judges may consider the potential impact on the fairness of the trial or the privacy rights of those involved when deciding to issue a gag order.After hearing from all parties involved over the past few weeks, Judge John Judge has made a gag order ruling and he has decided that the gag order was way too broad and way too vague. In this episode, we take a look at the changes he made to the gag order and what will remain the same.(commercial at 6:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge keeps gag order in place in Kohberger case, with alterations | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

Friday pod, Hour 2− BREAKING NEWS: Andre Iguodala officially announces his retirement after 19 NBA seasons.− Lewiston Tribune writer Teren Kowatsch previews Lewis & Clark St.− The Fab 5 Friday picks

Ever since Bryan Kohberger was arrested on December 30th of 2022, things have been evolving quickly in the case against him. In this episode we take a look at where things currently stand and what issues might till need to be addressed before the now postponed trial gets underway.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Questions about the Kohberger case | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

Ever since Bryan Kohberger was arrested on December 30th of 2022, things have been evolving quickly in the case against him. In this episode we take a look at where things currently stand and what issues might till need to be addressed before the now postponed trial gets underway.(commercial at 10:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Questions about the Kohberger case | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

A gag order, also known as a judicial gag order, is a legal order issued by a judge that restricts or prohibits certain individuals involved in a legal case from speaking about or disclosing certain information to the public or the media. It is typically employed to ensure a fair trial or to protect the integrity of ongoing legal proceedings.The purpose of a gag order is to prevent potential prejudice or bias that may arise from pretrial publicity or excessive media coverage.By limiting the dissemination of information, a gag order aims to safeguard the right of the accused to a fair trial and maintain the impartiality of the jury.A judge may impose a gag order on various parties involved in a case, including the prosecution, defense attorneys, witnesses, and even the media. The specific terms and scope of a gag order can vary, but it commonly restricts individuals from discussing case-related details, evidence, or opinions outside of the courtroom.Gag orders can be broad, prohibiting all communication on a case, or they can be more specific, focusing on certain topics or individuals. Violating a gag order can result in contempt of court charges, fines, or other legal consequences.While gag orders are intended to protect the legal process, they can also raise concerns about freedom of speech and the public's right to information. However, judges may consider the potential impact on the fairness of the trial or the privacy rights of those involved when deciding to issue a gag order.After hearing from all parties involved over the past few weeks, Judge John Judge has made a gag order ruling and he has decided that the gag order was way too broad and way too vague. In this episode, we take a look at the changes he made to the gag order and what will remain the same.(commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge keeps gag order in place in Kohberger case, with alterations | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

A gag order, also known as a judicial gag order, is a legal order issued by a judge that restricts or prohibits certain individuals involved in a legal case from speaking about or disclosing certain information to the public or the media. It is typically employed to ensure a fair trial or to protect the integrity of ongoing legal proceedings.The purpose of a gag order is to prevent potential prejudice or bias that may arise from pretrial publicity or excessive media coverage.By limiting the dissemination of information, a gag order aims to safeguard the right of the accused to a fair trial and maintain the impartiality of the jury.A judge may impose a gag order on various parties involved in a case, including the prosecution, defense attorneys, witnesses, and even the media. The specific terms and scope of a gag order can vary, but it commonly restricts individuals from discussing case-related details, evidence, or opinions outside of the courtroom.Gag orders can be broad, prohibiting all communication on a case, or they can be more specific, focusing on certain topics or individuals. Violating a gag order can result in contempt of court charges, fines, or other legal consequences.While gag orders are intended to protect the legal process, they can also raise concerns about freedom of speech and the public's right to information. However, judges may consider the potential impact on the fairness of the trial or the privacy rights of those involved when deciding to issue a gag order.After hearing from all parties involved over the past few weeks, Judge John Judge has made a gag order ruling and he has decided that the gag order was way too broad and way too vague. In this episode, we take a look at the changes he made to the gag order and what will remain the same.(commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge keeps gag order in place in Kohberger case, with alterations | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

Brian, Dallas and Marten are back for another season of Tubs At The Club, presented by Snake River Stampede Whiskey! Joined today by Trevan Pixley (@TreebTalks) of the Lewiston Tribune! This show they talk about#BigSkyFB Media Day, The Polls, All Conference Team, and stories to watch out for come conference play! Maybe even the return of an old segment......

On this episode of MWMH, we discuss the murder of Anita Knutson and the decades long investigation to catch her killer. https://linktr.ee/murderwithmyhusband TW*SUICIDE Case Sources: Nbcnews.com, “Eight Years After Brutal Murder, Sister Still Looking for Answers,” by Rachel Trost, April 17, 2015   Nbcnews.com, “Arrest made in 2007 murder of Anita Knutson in Minot, North Dakota,” by Veronica Fulton, March 16, 2022, updated March 18, 2022   KFYRTV, “Update: suspect charged in killing of Anita Knutson posts bond, as new details emerge in investigation,” by Grace Kraemer and Joe Skurzewski, March 17, 2022   Kxnews, kxnet.com, “Nichole Rice's pretrial conference and arraignment,” by Kyara Brown, September 8, 2022, updated September 9, 2022   KEYZAM 660 News Radio, Keyzradio.com, “New Details Emerge About Nichole Rice, Suspect in 2007 Slaying of Minot State University Student Anita Knutson,” by cmstester, March 24, 2022   Thedailybeast.com, “'Belligerently Drunk' Ex-Roommate Admitted to Murdering College Student, Cops Say,” by Pilar Melendez, March 17, 2022   Law & Crime, “Woman Accused of Stabbing 18-Year-Old Roommate to Death in Their Apartment More Than 15 Years Ago Enters Plea,” by Alberto Luperon, September 9, 2022   The Washington Post, “A college student was stabbed to death 14 years ago. Police have charged her then-roommate with murder,” by Jaclyn Peiser, March 21, 2022   Findagrave.com, Anita May Knutson   Findagrave.com, Daniel Dean “Rico” Knutson   Popculturecrime.medium.com, “North Dakota Cold Case: Who Killed Anita Knutson?” by Pop Culture Crime, August 7, 2020   Lewiston Tribune, “Woman charged in 2007 death of 18-year-old roommate,” from Wire Service Reports, March 18, 2022   KFYR, “Update: suspect charged in killing of Anita Knutson posts bond, as new details emerge in investigation,” by Grace Kraemer and Joe Skurzewski, March 17, 2022   KFYR, “Defense calling for more DNA evidence in Anita Knutson death investigation,” by Joe Skurzewki, March 23, 2023   Park Rapids Enterprise, “Minot college student's slaying in 2007 remains a mystery,” by news@parkrapidsenterprise.com, June 4, 2012   Heavy.com, “Nichole Rice, Anita Knutson Murder Suspect: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know,”   True Crime Daily, “North Dakota cold-case mystery: Who killed Anita Knutson?” no author provided, March 1, 2016   Minot Daily News, “Cold case solved,” by Jill Schramm, March 17, 2022   Minot Daily News, “Knutson murder suspect failed to appear in 2012 court,” by Shalon Baer Gee, March 22, 2022   Minot Daily News, “Trial set for accused Anita Knutson killer,” by Charles Crane, September 9, 2022   Minot Daily News, “Nichole Rice pretrial conference continued,” by Charles Crane, June 8, 2023   The Dakotan, mydakotan.com, “Cold Justice Targets Killer,” by Kim Fundingsland, October 12, 2022   The Dakotan, mydatokan.com, “Anita Knutson Murder Case Delayed Again,” by Kim Fundingland, February 10, 2023   The Dakotan, Mydakotan.com, “Killer Classmate or Friend,” by Kim Fundinsgland, May 26, 2022   Affidavit of Probable Cause, written by Mikali Talbott   Am100theflag.com, “Gag order…” by Ty Schonert, June 23, 2023   Google maps   Thoughtcatalog.com, “A Woman Went To A Funeral To Berate A Grieving Mother, It Turns Out Her Daughter Might Be The Murderer,” by Chrissy Stockton, April 13, 2022   Inforum.com, “Report for 2007 Minot murder case suggests alternate suspect's DNA wasn't tested“ by April Baumgarten, March 29, 2023   Inforum.com, “Roommate's arrest 15 years after Anita Knutson's killing reopened ‘a terrible wound,' friend says,” by Robin Heubner, March 18, 2022   Oxygen.com, “Who Killed Anita Knutson? The 100th Episode Of ‘Cold Justice' Looks Into 2007 North Dakota Stabbing,” by Joe Dziemianowicz, October 1, 2022   Assisted research and writing by Diane Birnholz Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In May 2005, a man was driving along I-90 in Idaho when he came across a brother and sister playing in the front yard of their house. The man pulled his car off to the side of the road in order to watch the children more closely. The children, Dylan and Shasta Groene, had no idea they were being watched. They had no idea that the man who was watching them, Joseph Duncan III, would continue watching the family for several days, learning their habits and studying the layout of the house with night vision goggles before coming into the home to commit heinous acts upon the Groene family. Connect with Us!Audio Editing/Mastering Provided by: Jonathan Mejia-Naveda (Email: jontheeditor96@gmail.com)_______________________________Witnesses outline killer pedophile's life in WashingtonIdaho Suspect Will Face Death PenaltyShasta Groene won't have to testify | KOMOSerial killer of 5, including two young boys, dies in hospital awaiting federal execution | Trending | fox23.comIdaho jury hears horrid detail of family murders | king5.comShasta Groene violates probation for endangering child | Local News | idahopress.comJury sees tape of sole survivor in Idaho slayingsSuspect pleads guilty to kidnapping Shasta Groene, killing her brother Dylan in 2005Testimony details excruciating suffering, torture of Duncan's victimsDuncan discusses Shasta Groene in recent letter | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comShasta's Story: Shasta Groene's new path 10 years after tragedy | News | khq.com'I woke up feeling like my soul was finally free': Shasta Groene speaks out following the death of Joseph Duncan | ktvb.comThe Wolf Lodge Murders — Groene Family Massacre and Child AbductionsI was kidnapped and abused for 7 weeks aged 8 by ‘night-vision' serial killer – my guilt after he murdered my family

A gag order, also known as a judicial gag order, is a legal order issued by a judge that restricts or prohibits certain individuals involved in a legal case from speaking about or disclosing certain information to the public or the media. It is typically employed to ensure a fair trial or to protect the integrity of ongoing legal proceedings.The purpose of a gag order is to prevent potential prejudice or bias that may arise from pretrial publicity or excessive media coverage.By limiting the dissemination of information, a gag order aims to safeguard the right of the accused to a fair trial and maintain the impartiality of the jury.A judge may impose a gag order on various parties involved in a case, including the prosecution, defense attorneys, witnesses, and even the media. The specific terms and scope of a gag order can vary, but it commonly restricts individuals from discussing case-related details, evidence, or opinions outside of the courtroom.Gag orders can be broad, prohibiting all communication on a case, or they can be more specific, focusing on certain topics or individuals. Violating a gag order can result in contempt of court charges, fines, or other legal consequences.While gag orders are intended to protect the legal process, they can also raise concerns about freedom of speech and the public's right to information. However, judges may consider the potential impact on the fairness of the trial or the privacy rights of those involved when deciding to issue a gag order.After hearing from all parties involved over the past few weeks, Judge John Judge has made a gag order ruling and he has decided that the gag order was way too broad and way too vague. In this episode, we take a look at the changes he made to the gag order and what will remain the same.(commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge keeps gag order in place in Kohberger case, with alterations | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

A gag order, also known as a judicial gag order, is a legal order issued by a judge that restricts or prohibits certain individuals involved in a legal case from speaking about or disclosing certain information to the public or the media. It is typically employed to ensure a fair trial or to protect the integrity of ongoing legal proceedings.The purpose of a gag order is to prevent potential prejudice or bias that may arise from pretrial publicity or excessive media coverage.By limiting the dissemination of information, a gag order aims to safeguard the right of the accused to a fair trial and maintain the impartiality of the jury.A judge may impose a gag order on various parties involved in a case, including the prosecution, defense attorneys, witnesses, and even the media. The specific terms and scope of a gag order can vary, but it commonly restricts individuals from discussing case-related details, evidence, or opinions outside of the courtroom.Gag orders can be broad, prohibiting all communication on a case, or they can be more specific, focusing on certain topics or individuals. Violating a gag order can result in contempt of court charges, fines, or other legal consequences.While gag orders are intended to protect the legal process, they can also raise concerns about freedom of speech and the public's right to information. However, judges may consider the potential impact on the fairness of the trial or the privacy rights of those involved when deciding to issue a gag order.After hearing from all parties involved over the past few weeks, Judge John Judge has made a gag order ruling and he has decided that the gag order was way too broad and way too vague. In this episode, we take a look at the changes he made to the gag order and what will remain the same.(commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge keeps gag order in place in Kohberger case, with alterations | Local and regional news | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

In late November 1989, college freshman Mandy Stavik returned to her hometown of Acme, Washington to celebrate the holidays with her family. On the afternoon of November 24, the day after Thanksgiving, Mandy told her family she was going for a run. When she still hadn't returned that evening, her mother became concerned and called around to her friends, but none had heard from her. When she still hadn't returned the next morning, the panic set in, and the search began.For three days, the residents of Acme, Washington undertook an increasingly desperate search for Mandy Stavik and were heartbroken when her body was eventually located in the shallow water of the Nooksack River. Local police began an intense investigation, but after months of dead ends and dwindling leads, the case wound down and eventually went cold.Mandy Stavik's death would likely have remained unsolved, were it not for a tenacious cold case detective, who in 2009 began running old DNA samples against samples collected from suspects over the last two decades.Thank you to the fantastical David White for research assistanceReferencesAssociated Press. 1989. "Amanda Stavik's brother also died tragically." Lewiston Tribune, December 1.Ferm, Carol. 1989. "A flood of memories, a torrent of tears." The Bellingham Herald, December 3: 1.—. 1989. "Community's sense of peace is shattered." The Bellingham Herald, November 29: 1.—. 1989. "Family and friends keep a vigil of hope." The Bellingham Herald, November 26: 11.—. 1989. "Loss angers, saddens classmate." The Bellingham Herald, November 29: 2.—. 1989. "Reward offered." The Bellingham Herald, November 27: 1.—. 1989. "Teen presumed kidnapped." The Bellingham Herald, November 26: 1.Ferm, Carol, and Cathy Logg. 1989. "Search for missing teen continues." The Bellingham Herald, November 27: 1.—. 1989. "Stavik's body found in Nooksack." The Bellingham Herald, November 28: 1.Logg, Cathy. 1989. "Clues elusive in Stavki's death." The Bellingham Herald, November 29: 1.—. 1989. "Investigators get many tips in Stavik case." The Bellingham Herald, December 1: 13.—. 1989. "Police issue a warning about human predators." The Bellingham Herald, December 20: 11.—. 1989. "Sheriff seeks pudgy-faced man for questioning in Stavik case." The Bellingham Herald, December 3: 13.—. 1990. "Stavik case awaits tests." The Bellingham Herald, March 20: 1.—. 1992. "Stavik 'suspect' files suit." The Bellingham Herald, March 21: 1.—. 1990. "Garment ID'd tentatively as Mandy's." The Bellingham Press, January 28: 15.Mittendorf, Robert. 2017. "Arrest in 1989 killing - sheriff credits DNA." The Bellingham Herald, December 14: A1.Pratt, Denver. 2018. "Defense challenges DNA evidence in '89 slaying." The Bellingham Herald, August 11: A1.—. 2019. "Defense in murder trial opening: 'No one knows what happened to Ms. Stavik'." The Bellingham Herald, May 11: A1.—. 2017. "First-degree murder charge filed in 1989 kiling of Stavik." The Bellingham Herald, December 15: A1.—. 2019. "'I wanted to do the right thing for Mandy,' Bass' co-worker testifies." The Bellingham Herald, May 17: A1.Sirken, Alec. 2016. How two moms chatting at a water park helped crack a Thanksgiving cold case murder. July 16. Accessed May 18, 2023. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mandy-stavik-case-how-two-moms-chatting-at-a-water-park-helped-crack-thanksgiving-cold-case-murder/.State of Washington vs. Timothy Bass. 2021. 80156-2-I (The Court of Appeals for the State of Washington, June 1)See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

A nationwide campaign is underway to limit the influence of hunters in crafting wildlife policy. The movement has gained traction in recent years as proponents work to restructure state game commissions to be less responsive to the wishes of hunters. “This movement has really spread throughout the country,” Joe Mullin told MeatEater. Mullin works for the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation as the Northeastern States Manager, and he reports that he's observed “a more concerted, organized, and accelerated effort” to pass bills that remodel game commissions along less hunter-friendly lines. Director of State Policy and Stewardship for Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, Tim Brass, has also been tracking this movement. “Historically, sportsmen have had a big voice, and we're concerned not only that we're losing some of the voices we have had, but in some cases the people that they're putting on the commissions under the ‘sportsman's' name are questionable in terms of their credentials as hunters and anglers,” he said in an interview with MeatEater. Mullin identified efforts in Washington State, Maryland, Vermont, New Hampshire, Colorado, New Mexico, and Oregon that would make it easier to install anti-hunting proponents on the governing bodies meant to manage game species. Wildlife for All, an environmental nonprofit, most clearly articulates the ideas that underwrite these efforts. Organized by current and former employees of the Humane Society, the Sierra Club, Wildearth Guardians, Animal & Earth Advocates, and Project Coyote (among others), Wildlife for All describes the current system of wildlife management as “outdated.” “The hallmarks of this outdated system are a focus on producing a harvestable surplus of game animals under an agricultural model [and] preference given to consumptive wildlife users (hunters, anglers and trappers) over the broader public,” Wildlife for All says on its website. They seek to replace the current model with one based on the “public trust doctrine,” which they define as including a responsibility to protect “all life.” If their efforts are successful, Mullin warns that the voices of hunters and anglers will be diminished. “If game commissions don't have adequate representation from the outdoor sporting community, decisions will likely be made to the detriment of hunters, trappers, recreational shooters. There'd be no safeguards to prevent obstructionism at that point,” he said. Overthrowing the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation For over 80 years, hunters and anglers have formed the bedrock of the American system of conservation funding. This “user pays, public benefits” structure has allowed the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation to become the world's most successful conservation framework, and hunters and anglers nationwide have contributed over $25.5 billion. This money has been used to save wetlands and bring species like turkeys and whitetail deer back from the brink of extinction. State game commissions work with state wildlife agencies to manage a state's natural resources, and many have statutory mandates to set hunting seasons, maximize hunting opportunities, and set bag limits. Game commissioners are appointed in a variety of ways, but many also require a certain level of representation from the hunting community. (Some, for example, require commissioners to hold hunting or fishing licenses for a certain number of years before being considered for the position.) But recent legislation would seek to change that system. In Maryland, for example, House Bill 188 was endorsed by the Humane Society would require representatives from the “wildlife preservation” and “passive wildlife recreation communities” to serve on the state's Wildlife Advisory Commission. “This bill is giving a diverse set of stakeholders seats at the table on this commission,” bill sponsor Delegate Julie Palakovich Carr said. In New Mexico, House Bill 486 takes the “public trust” language from Wildlife for All and uses it to rewrite state wildlife policy. Instead of providing for “an adequate and flexible system” to “provide and maintain an adequate supply of game and fish,” this new system would manage the state's wildlife “as a public trust resource with intrinsic and ecological value, as well as for the benefit, use, food supply and nonconsumptive enjoyment of all.” Wildlife for All praises a similarly worded New Mexico bill as an example of the kind of statutory changes the group would like to see in all states. Washington State has become a lightning rod for this issue as some members of the Wildlife Commission seek to change the “overarching principles” that dictate how game is managed in the state. Commissioner Lorna Smith recently introduced a draft outline for a new wildlife management plan that she says will radically change how game species are managed. “It's the overarching principles and background that we're going to update significantly with things like my issues page. We're not just putting a new cover on the old game management plan,” she said at a February 17 meeting of the Special Wildlife Committee. The outline includes topics such as “Changing Faces, Changing Values, Changing Funding Support” and “Confounding Factors to Managing Hunting to ‘Optimal' Levels.” Another point would classify coyotes and ground squirrels as managed species, though none of the commissioners argued that these species are in trouble. “We need to look at species where now there are no regulations dealing with limitations on hunting or killing these species,” said commissioner Melanie Rowland. “I don't know how you would define hunting differently. I think that's something we should consider.” These states aren't alone. Georgia is considering a bill that some see as a Trojan horse for limiting the influence of hunters. Vermont considered a bill last year that would have stripped the Fish and Wildlife Board of its rulemaking authority and allowed a wider variety of entities to appoint members. A New Hampshire bill would have reduced the number of years a member of the fish and game commission was required to hold a resident fishing, hunting, or trapping license. Missouri, Nebraska, and Michigan have also introduced legislation in recent years intending to alter the composition and/or nomination process for commissions. Many commissioners oppose these efforts, of course. Washington State commissioner Jim Anderson cautioned his colleagues about their plan to rewrite the game management document. “I think the hunting public doesn't want to see all the efforts that have gone on in the past cast aside as something that's seen as new and better,” he said. “The way that is worded strikes me as being a negative way of talking about hunting.” Sportsmen's Alliance filed a lawsuit this week against Washington State commissioner Lorna Smith, but not directly for her actions while on the committee. They say Washington law prohibits someone from serving on the commission while holding another elected or appointed office (Smith is currently a member of the Jefferson County Planning Commission). “We view this lawsuit as the initial step of a long but important process to bring sanity and decency back to wildlife decision-making in Washington," Todd Adkins, vice president of government affairs at the Sportsmen's Alliance said. "It all starts here, but trust me, it won't end here." Changing the Composition of State Game Agencies Certain hunting groups have voiced support for some aspects of this agenda. Hunters of Maryland, for example, joined with the Sierra Club to support HB 188. “Wildlife belongs to no one person, wildlife belongs to the citizenry,” said spokesman William R. Miles. “Diverse individuals, groups and organizations, who want a broader advisory voice in how Maryland's DNR manages wildlife, is a good thing and should be afforded every opportunity.” It's also worth noting that “public trust” is a key tenet of the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, and this doctrine has been used to guarantee hunters and anglers access to land, water, and wildlife. Many hunters, especially public land hunters, would agree that no one owns wildlife, including those who harvest animals for food. It is unclear, however, whether Wildlife for All's interpretation of the “public trust doctrine” aligns with its traditional meaning. Their desire to abolish wildlife commissions and represent “non-consumptive users” in proportion to their demographic in the general population is certainly out of step with how the public trust doctrine has traditionally been implemented. Mullin also argues that efforts to change the composition of state game agencies will make it “easier for obstructionist behavior.” As hunters have seen in Washington State, it only takes a few commissioners to make proceedings grind to a halt. “Rather than the commissions getting down to brass tacks, shaking up the composition would lower the door for anti-sportsmen to make their way in,” Mullin said. Washington State commissioner Kim Thorburn expressed a similar concern in an interview with The Lewiston Tribune. “They don't want to admit their decisions are based on their own advocacy biases,” she said of fellow commissioners Smith and Rowland, “so they have the tactic of paralyzing the staff effort, demanding impossible workloads of them and, when they come back (with products), saying, ‘That isn't what we asked for.'” Ultimately, both Brass and Mullin believe that anti-hunting groups see changing the makeup of game commissions as stepping stones toward their larger goals. “The anti-hunting community is seeing these commissions as a vehicle to make changes in conjunction with legislative efforts and ballot initiatives. It's another vessel that they see to carry out their objectives,” Mullin said. More Than One Kind of Anti-Hunting A state game commission can be politicized against hunters in more ways than one. Brass pointed out that commissions can harm hunters if they favor landowners or outfitters over public land users. He's also concerned about national campaigns that seek to cut off Pittman-Robertson funding, which have been pushed from both the right side of the aisle and the left. Wherever these threats may arise, it's crucial for hunters, anglers, and all outdoor enthusiasts to stay engaged in the process, Brass said. He encouraged hunters to show up at commission meetings, be good spokespeople, and build relationships. Even if a commissioner doesn't agree with hunters on most issues, it's still important to engage. “We need to show up at those commission meetings to make sure the sportsmen's voice is still heard. We have the opportunity to hold them accountable by being there and helping to offer up good, well-reasoned arguments,” Brass said. Hunters should use their voices to ensure their commissions make decisions based on science–not personal vendettas. “In the end, if they're not basing their decisions on science and the wildlife biologists' recommendations and they're attacking hunters because they just don't like it, that is really problematic,” Brass said. “Representative or not, we can't have that. We're going down a pretty slippery slope.” On a larger scale, hunters can do more to tell the full story of habitat and conservation funding, MeatEater's Director of Conservation, Ryan Callaghan, said. Those stories can combat misinformation about hunters that some commissioners use to advocate for anti-hunting policies. “It is our responsibility as hunters to promote the work we do,” Callaghan said. “Great whitetail habitat or sage grouse habitat or bear habitat is great habitat for a wide host of wildlife that falls under the ‘non-consumptive' label. We hunters know that a tag in the pocket does not represent a dead animal. I have a pillowcase full of expensive tags that have never been notched. It's our responsibility to make sure people know those stories too.”      

Brian & Marten have a Fall Camp Update with Teren Kowatsch of the Lewiston Tribune. Thank you to our Patreons! The show would not be possible without you! Club Card: Dan Krotzer, Jonathan Zinnel, Kurt Borchardt, Matthew Janicek, Nick Weber. Tub Token: Hunter Hawkins, Josh Yon, Martin Arnzen, Nick Davis, Nickolaus Stutzman, Steve Kurtz Premium Drink Token: Chad Curtis, Chuck Caswell, Dave Ellison, Gaylen Wood, James Gannon, Josh Starkey, Michael Farrell, Rick Sparks, Ron Woodman, Ryan Kruger, Taylor Cash, Tom Kendall, Todd Glindeman. Well Token: Dan Martson, Patrick Frerks, Randy White Join us (and our OnlyTubs Discord) by subscribing to our Patreon! www.patreon.com/tubsattheclub

This week we're in Idaho discussing a case that detectives said looked like it was straight out of a horror film. Then, we'll talk about the lengths some will go to for revenge. Buckle up and join us on this dark and twisted ride through the Gem State. You may now join us on Patreon or buy us a Cocktail. Be sure to subscribe on Apple and leave a review, or, email us at unitedstatesofmurder@gmail.com Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter! If you're in the Little Rock area be sure to check out Charlee's Good Time Drinkery and tell them the girls from US of M sent you! Check out our website www.unitedstatesofmurder.com Interested in your own digital "If I Go Missing" file? Get 20% off here: HelpYouFind.Me and be sure to use promo code USOFM Sources: Oxygen, Const Japan, The Lewiston Tribune, Evil Lives Here, Case Files, the Cinemaholic Music by Pixabay --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/unitedstatesofmurder/support

Brian, Dallas and Marten talk Spring Football with Stephan Wiebe of the Lewiston Tribune! Thank you to our Patreons! The show would not be possible without you! Club Card: Dan Krotzer, Jonathan Zinnel, Kurt Borchardt, Matthew Janicek, Nick Weber Tub Token: Hunter Hawkins, Joeyvee, Josh Yon, Martin Arnzen, Nick Davis, Nickolaus Stutzman, Steve Kurtz Premium Drink Token: Robert Borisch, Chad Curtis, Chuck Caswell, Dave Ellison, Gaylen Wood, James Gannon, Josh Starkey, Michael Farrell, Rick Sparks, Ron Woodman, Ryan Kruger, Taylor Cash, Tom Kendall, Todd Glindeman Well Token: Dan Martson, Jamie Hill, Nate Mink, Patrick Frerks, RackofTits69, Randy White Join us (and our OnlyTubs Discord) by subscribing to our Patreon! www.patreon.com/tubsattheclub Show Sponsor: Hughes River Expeditions www.hughesriver.com

“I can't believe we're here,” more than one legislator noted this week while discussing COVID vaccines and business interests. Idaho reporters will fill you in on what we might expect out of this legislative session: Betsy Russell of the Idaho Press, James Dawson of Boise State Public Radio, and Bill Spence of the Lewiston Tribune join Logan Finney to discuss wide ranging legislative proposals.

Co-hosts Kellen and Mikailah catch up on the adventures of the Lewiston Tribune covergirl herself. Join them as they recap Mikailah's awesome experiences in the past week. Plus, enjoy a quick history lesson or two from the duo. More than anything, TAKE CARE OF YOUR PERSONAL WELLBEING.  Be sure to check out Beadwork by Mikailah for the latest custom art and jewelry! https://www.instagram.com/beadworkbymikailah/ (https://www.instagram.com/beadworkbymikailah/) https://www.beadworkbymikailah.com/ (https://www.beadworkbymikailah.com) https://www.instagram.com/indigenouscreatives/ (https://www.instagram.com/indigenouscreatives/) https://www.indigenouscreatives.com/ (https://www.indigenouscreatives.com) https://www.facebook.com/Indigenous-Creatives-LLC-108422948362128   Find out more about Kellen! https://www.instagram.com/trenaloriginal/ (https://www.instagram.com/trenaloriginal/) https://www.trenaloriginal.com/ (https://www.trenaloriginal.com) Shout out to Izzy for the music on our show. Follow the links below to check him out. https://www.instagram.com/___izzy._/ https://music.apple.com/us/album/range/1562540217?i=1562540219

25 year old Yakama woman Alillia "La La" Minthorn went missing in May 2019 from Toppenish, WA.  She told her sister "If I don't make it back, come look for me."  La La's last words would haunt her sister, Tanya, as La La never came home alive.   Sources: thevanished.org - A project of the Yakima Herald-Republic which is dedicated to the missing and murdered indigenous women of the Yakama reservation. The site shares cases and stories of these women as well as resources for who to contact if a loved one goes missing. Also used other news sources - The Lewiston Tribune, Yakima Herald, Seattle Times, which primarily provided coverage of the trial www.yakama.com for the history of the reservation www.morelaw.com - Trial information https://insatiabletc.tumblr.com/post/189675097527/this-is-alillia-lala-minthorn-a-25-year-old  https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/06/16/jordan-stevens-castilleja-tavern-burned-murder/  https://apnews.com/article/wa-state-wire-yakima-shootings-trials-874d4e4c598602bc712f49807b43367b  https://www.yakimaherald.com/thevanished/witnesses-tell-jurors-how-events-unfolded-in-reservation-shooting-death-of-toppenish-woman/article_735f9fae-99af-5316-ba8b-a03ea367d18b.html https://www.yakimaherald.com/news/crime_and_courts/jury-finds-stevens-guilty-of-first-degree-murder-in-shooting-death-of-toppenish-woman-on/article_1146826b-90d0-56cc-8026-e58d96963da9.html https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/crime/if-i-dont-make-it-back-come-look-for-me-yakama-woman-told-her-sister-before-she-was-killed/ https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/times-watchdog/amid-a-crime-wave-on-yakama-reservation-confusion-over-a-checkerboard-of-jurisdictions/ https://www.yakimaherald.com/news/crime_and_courts/yakamas-declare-public-safety-crisis-call-for-harsher-punishment-for/article_4c70c658-0db9-11e8-a62b-3b99209b37f1.html https://lmtribune.com/northwest/fire-destroys-yakima-bar-days-after-owner-testified-in-federal-murder-trial/article_494e1008-67bf-5c7a-af5a-f52955c0e18a.html https://www.valleyhillsfh.com/obituaries/Alillia-Minthorn/#!/Obituary   https://www.facebook.com/alilliamintho.lala.7  https://www.yaktrinews.com/activists-respond-to-news-of-missing-yakama-woman-found-dead/

In the last couple of weeks Idaho has seen a downward trend in new coronavirus cases, but August is barely in the rearview and was the state's deadliest month so far. At the same time, t he Lewiston Tribune is reporting a spike in cases on the Nez Perce Reservation a s K-12 schools reopen in various forms across the state, and universities try to keep campuses safe . Ahead of the Labor Day weekend doctors caution against letting down our guard against the disease.

Episode 1798 of the Vietnam Veteran News Podcast will feature a story about a Vietnam Veteran that was honored in a different manner. The story appeared in the Lewiston Tribune and was titled: Airport christens newly completed runway. It was … Continue reading → The post 1798 – Vietnam Vet opens new Lewiston, ID runway appeared first on .

Craft Brew News 05/15/20(Courtesy of Brewbound.com)Craft Beer Festivals Across the Country Go Virtual During COVID-19 PandemicThe COVID-19 pandemic has altered nearly every facet of life and commerce, but one particular area stands to be gutted more than almost any other: large scale events.In the beer industry alone, event casualties are numerous. The Brewers Association has now canceled three of its marquee events, including the annual Craft Brewers Conference in San Antonio, Texas, SAVOR beer and food pairing event in Washington, D.C., and HomebrewCon in Nashville, Tennessee. The Great American Beer Festival, the BA’s largest consumer-facing event and the largest beer festival and competition in the U.S., is still slated to take place September 24-27 in Denver, Colorado. Popular regional beer festivals have also pulled the plug on their 2020 events, including the Oregon Brewers Festival in Portland, Oregon, Bend Brewfest in Bend, Oregon, and Great Taste of the Midwest in Madison, Wisconsin.Without its annual mid-May Oklahoma Craft Beer Summit — a reliable fundraiser — the Craft Brewers Association of Oklahoma (CBOA) was facing a potential loss of thousands of dollars. A creative solution was needed.CBOA treasurer and COOP Ale Works director of sales and marketing Sean Mossman told Brewbound. “Just one day, kind of organically, it was like, ‘Hey, what if we move this online? What if we made this virtual?’” “Well, that would be cool, but then it’s just a conversation — how do we do beer? How do we make this a beer festival?”The Oklahoma Craft Beer Summit ’20 Quarantine Edition was born and planned in about a week, with the blessing of the Alcoholic Beverage Law Enforcement (ABLE) Commission of Oklahoma, Mossman said.Tickets for the sold-out virtual festival on May 15 came with a plethora of beers to sample and an evening of guided tastings and panel discussions about styles, brewing and the beer industry. Guests purchased tickets that included a kit of 24 beers from breweries across Oklahoma. Kits could be retrieved at designated pickup locations strategically placed across the state, where IDs would be checked against tickets, a provision of the ABLE Commission.With the help of sponsors and “monstrously low overhead,” Mossman said the virtual festival has helped the CBOA raise multiple times more money than a traditional in-person festival.“We’re spending about $3,000 to raise about $50,000, so we’re pretty fortunate,” he said. “This would take us probably three festivals to generate this much revenue. And really, our only real expense as a guild is probably our lobbyists at the Capitol. We’re pretty self-governed and self-run, but that is our biggest expense, and it’s the most necessary expense.”Untappd will also host a virtual beer festival online on June 13 and 14.Participants have the option of two experiences — one with beer shipped to them and one in which they purchase their own. The Drinking Socially Package costs $89.99 and includes 11 beers to samples during two virtual panels, $10 gift cards to the Untappd merchandise store and Half Time Beverage, the event’s retail partner and beer shipper. Beer packages can be shipped to ZIP codes in 28 states and Washington, D.C., according to local laws.The Stay at Home Stream package costs $15 and includes access to the virtual panels and is available everywhere.A portion of sales from both tickets will be donated to the Restaurant Strong Fund, which supports out-of-work service industry employees.Harpoon Brewery’s annual five-mile road race has taken runners through the streets of the brewery’s Boston neighborhood for 18 years, but this weekend, the 19th edition of the fundraising race will be virtual.The company’s website said “Run, walk, pushrim, handcycle, or skip 5 miles on Sunday, May 17th from your house, on a treadmill or on a trail using proper safety precautions,”.Entrants received a printable bib to wear during their run and a race bag filled with gifts from sponsors in the mail. Some race packages included T-shirts and beer and a ticket to a festival at the brewery in the future. The race raises funds for the Angel Fund for ALS Research.More than 3,000 runners have signed up, according to director of digital strategy Megan Baker.California ABC Investigation Finds Delivery Apps Allowing Minors to Order AlcoholAn investigation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) found that third-party delivery services are “routinely delivering alcoholic beverages to minors,” according to an industry advisory posted by the regulatory agency and reported on by the the Washington Post and The Verge.The ABC wrote “Most concerning is that minors are routinely able to purchase alcohol through delivery from restaurants,”. “There have been instances in which the licensee’s own employees have done so, but a far greater rate has been evident among third-party delivery services. Licensees are responsible for these unlawful deliveries, and the Department encourages licensees to review the practices of these services and their reliance on them.”The ABC added that it has found that employees of third-party delivery services are “largely” ignoring guidelines setup to prevent the sale of alcohol to minors.In the advisory, the ABC reminded licensees that they are ultimately responsible for the delivery of alcoholic beverages away from their premises, even if those deliveries are made on their behalf by third-party services, and are “subject to arrest and criminal prosecution.” “This is so no matter what assurances the delivery service may have provided to the licensee,” the ABC stated.Idaho-Based Hardware Brewing Company Defies Executive Order, Risks LicenseKendrick, Idaho-based brewpub Hardware Brewing Company is at risk of losing its alcoholic beverage license after reopening in defiance of Gov. Brad Little’s executive order shutting down bars and restaurants, the Lewiston Tribune reported, citing a letter sent to the brewpub by the Idaho State Police.Although Little’s reopening plan would allow Hardware Brewing to open potentially on May 16 as part of a second wave of business reopenings if the state doesn’t record a significant increase in COVID-19 cases, the brewpub reopened to the public on May 1, including Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin.Hardware co-owners Morgan, Doug and Christine Lohman discussed reopening on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News program Monday night. Christine Lohman explained that Hardware attempted “to survive on takeout” but there wasn’t enough business.“It is a destination place,” she said. “They do not drive 35 miles or more for me to come out in a hazmat suit and hand them a burger, so we’re starving slowly.”The conversation spilled over to the brewpub’s Facebook page, where the Hardware account stated: “This virus is totally overblown and is not killing the productive and healthy in our society.”Morgan Lohman told Ingraham that the family has hired San Francisco-based lawyer Harmeet Dhillon to represent the company. Dhillon specializes in “commercial litigation, employment law, First Amendment rights and election law matters,” according to her firm’s website.Craft Beer Storm Website: www.craftbeerstorm.com*** A Top 20 Podcast in Food on iTunes ***Subscribe to Craft Beer Storm Podcast iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/craft-beer-storm/id1438117278?mt=2Michael Beara is the Host of Craft Beer Storm and Founder/Brewer at Beara Brewing Co. in Portsmouth, NH*** Interested in starting your own brewery? Our Portsmouth, NH TURNKEY facility is for sale! Follow link for more info:https://www.neren.com/Listing/2800-Lafayette-Rd-12A/5cdda2dabf34cb9150a7faebIf your Company, Hotel or Restaurant wants to book a CraftBeer Weekend or Craft Beer Evening for your guests or employees send an email to Michael@craftbeerstorm.com Michael BearaFounder/BrewerHost of "Craft Beer Storm" Podcastmichael@craftbeerstorm.comLinked In: https://www.linkedin.com/in/craft-beer-storm-podcast-30776075/**LISTEN to our Craft Beer Storm Podcast and share with a friend**Craft Beer Storm Podcast iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/craft-beer-storm/id1438117278Craft Beer Storm You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp3PVuCGmywNWlGFh0N0ukg?view_as=subscriberCraft Beer Storm Podcast Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/podcast-center-la-2/craft-beer-stormCraft Beer Storm Linked In: https://www.linkedin.com/in/craft-beer-storm-podcast-30776075/Craft Beer Storm Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/craftbeerstorm/Craft Beer Storm Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/craftbeerstorm/

Packed episode this week. California State Universities announce no fall classes a day after the Big Sky Conference announces decisions on fall sports will be by individual schools. Will the UC schools follow? Griz Chalk talk reactions from 2003 Little Brown Stein. Financial updates, Next weeks guest announcement and so much more!

We interview Colton Clark of the Lewiston Tribune. What don't we cover? Recruiting, His writing, attendance, coaching, HATERS GONNA HATE and even some FBS v FCS (everyone's favorite)

Idaho Reports sits down with Senate Assistant Majority Leader Chuck Winder and House Assistant Majority Leader Brent Crane to discuss insurrections, compromise, and what it will take to go home. Wayne Hoffman of the Idaho Freedom Foundation and House Assistant Minority Leader Ilana Rubel discuss minority voices and how to get to yes. Former Lt. Gov. David Leroy, Bill Spence of the Lewiston Tribune, Kevin Richert of Idaho Ed News, and Betsy Russell of the Spokesman-Review join the pundits.

A ... busy week to say the least for Washington State football. We digest it all with the Spokesman-Review's Jacob Thorpe and then preview this week's upcoming opponent, the Idaho Vandals, with Theo Lawson of the Lewiston Tribune. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A ... busy week to say the least for Washington State football. We digest it all with the Spokesman-Review's Jacob Thorpe and then preview this week's upcoming opponent, the Idaho Vandals, with Theo Lawson of the Lewiston Tribune. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A ... busy week to say the least for Washington State football. We digest it all with the Spokesman-Review's Jacob Thorpe and then preview this week's upcoming opponent, the Idaho Vandals, with Theo Lawson of the Lewiston Tribune. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Idaho Reports explores how discussions over public lands have morphed over the last century. House Majority Leader Mike Moyle shares his thoughts on taxes and health care plans, and Rep. Melissa Wintrow discusses her rape kit legislation. Bill Spence of the Lewiston Tribune joins the pundits to talk about urban renewal, health care, Democratic frustration and more.