Podcasts about pleadings

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of civil procedure, focusing on key concepts such as jurisdiction, venue, pleadings, discovery, and various pretrial and post-trial motions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these elements for aspiring legal professionals, particularly in the context of the bar exam and practical legal practice.TakeawaysCivil procedure is essential for understanding the legal system.Jurisdiction is the court's authority to hear a case.Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived and is fundamental.Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity and an amount in controversy over $75,000.Supplemental jurisdiction allows related state claims to be heard in federal court.Removal is a process for defendants to transfer cases from state to federal court.Personal jurisdiction ensures defendants have sufficient connections to the forum state.Venue determines the most appropriate location for a lawsuit.Pleadings frame the dispute and must meet specific standards.Discovery is a critical phase for gathering evidence and information.civil procedure, jurisdiction, venue, pleadings, discovery, summary judgment, personal jurisdiction, diversity jurisdiction, removal, legal process

This lecture provides a comprehensive overview of civil procedure, focusing on key concepts such as jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, venue, pleadings, discovery, and pretrial and post-trial motions. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these elements for effective litigation and bar exam preparation.TakeawaysCivil procedure is foundational for understanding litigation.Subject matter jurisdiction is critical and cannot be waived.Federal question jurisdiction must be clear in the complaint.Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity and a monetary threshold.Personal jurisdiction is about the court's power over parties.General jurisdiction allows for any claims against a defendant.Minimum contacts are essential for establishing jurisdiction.Discovery is vital for gathering evidence and information.Summary judgment can resolve cases without a trial if no disputes exist.Pretrial and post-trial motions are key for managing litigation effectively.Civil Procedure, Jurisdiction, Personal Jurisdiction, Venue, Pleadings, Discovery, Pretrial Motions, Bar Exam, Legal Education, Litigation

The imbalance of power in the courtroom is often very real whether that's a David vs. Goliath battle pitting a small-firm plaintiff against a corporate giant, or a situation where a judgment-proof or anonymous defendant evades accountability. The scales of justice are sometimes uneven. Guests Marcus Chatterton and Fred Tecce are veteran litigators who have found themselves in countless courtroom skirmishes opposing all manner of large and small businesses in a variety of corporate, patent, trademark, criminal, and personal injury issues. They explain how tech can help balance an imbalance of resources. Deep pockets may have been an advantage, whether that's in the form of available manpower or the ultimate ability to pay a claim. But that doesn't have to be the case. Modern, novel legal approaches and today's tech tools can help level the playing field as software programs can analyze mountains of evidence that used to require hours of poring through boxes of paper that could overwhelm small firms. “Technology assisted review” is a growing field. Will AI further help attorneys battle an information dump in discovery or chase down anonymous actors and follow online breadcrumbs? The key is pairing legal skills and experience with tech, not only learning to use the newest tools but also learning to explain the findings and methodology to a judge and jury. Technology is changing everything from the way you prepare for trial to the way you present your case. Whether you're a “Goliath” with a duty to assemble and turn over mountains of discovery, or a “David” faced with digging through that evidence and uncovering precedents that back your client, tech tools are blazing a new trail. Resources: “The Prelitigation Advantage: Leveraging AI for Discovery and Pleadings,” by Nicole Black, ABA JournalNational Institute for Trial AdvocacyThomson Reuters Legal TechnologyWestlawOncue Legal Presentation Software“WIPO Guide to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)”“PGA Golfer Phil Mickelson Sues to Find Source of 'Defamation'”American Bar AssociationAmerican Bar Association Litigation Section 

The imbalance of power in the courtroom is often very real whether that's a David vs. Goliath battle pitting a small-firm plaintiff against a corporate giant, or a situation where a judgment-proof or anonymous defendant evades accountability. The scales of justice are sometimes uneven. Guests Marcus Chatterton and Fred Tecce are veteran litigators who have found themselves in countless courtroom skirmishes opposing all manner of large and small businesses in a variety of corporate, patent, trademark, criminal, and personal injury issues. They explain how tech can help balance an imbalance of resources. Deep pockets may have been an advantage, whether that's in the form of available manpower or the ultimate ability to pay a claim. But that doesn't have to be the case. Modern, novel legal approaches and today's tech tools can help level the playing field as software programs can analyze mountains of evidence that used to require hours of poring through boxes of paper that could overwhelm small firms. “Technology assisted review” is a growing field. Will AI further help attorneys battle an information dump in discovery or chase down anonymous actors and follow online breadcrumbs? The key is pairing legal skills and experience with tech, not only learning to use the newest tools but also learning to explain the findings and methodology to a judge and jury. Technology is changing everything from the way you prepare for trial to the way you present your case. Whether you're a “Goliath” with a duty to assemble and turn over mountains of discovery, or a “David” faced with digging through that evidence and uncovering precedents that back your client, tech tools are blazing a new trail. Resources: “The Prelitigation Advantage: Leveraging AI for Discovery and Pleadings,” by Nicole Black, ABA JournalNational Institute for Trial AdvocacyThomson Reuters Legal TechnologyWestlawOncue Legal Presentation Software“WIPO Guide to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)”“PGA Golfer Phil Mickelson Sues to Find Source of 'Defamation'”American Bar AssociationAmerican Bar Association Litigation Section  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Short-Answer QuizWhat is the fundamental purpose of personal jurisdiction, and what constitutional provision provides its basis?Personal jurisdiction ensures a court has the authority to compel a defendant to appear and litigate in the forum. Its constitutional basis lies in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, preventing individuals from being unfairly haled into court in distant or unconnected locations.Explain the difference between general and specific personal jurisdiction, providing a brief example of how each might arise.General jurisdiction exists when a defendant's contacts with the forum state are so continuous and systematic that they can be sued there for any claim, even if unrelated to those contacts (e.g., a corporation with its headquarters in a state). Specific jurisdiction arises when the lawsuit directly relates to the defendant's specific contacts with the forum state (e.g., a contract dispute stemming from a sale made in the state).What are the two primary bases for subject matter jurisdiction in federal courts, and what is a key requirement for each?The two primary bases are federal question jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction. For federal question jurisdiction, the plaintiff's claim must arise under federal law and be evident in the well-pleaded complaint. For diversity jurisdiction, the case must be between citizens of different states (or a state and a foreign national) with an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000, and there must be complete diversity of citizenship.How does venue differ from jurisdiction, and what is the primary goal of venue rules?Jurisdiction concerns a court's power to hear a case (either over the person or the subject matter), while venue dictates the specific geographic district where the case should be heard. The primary goal of venue rules is to ensure a convenient and appropriate location for the litigation, considering factors like the parties' residences and where the events occurred.Describe the key elements that must be included in a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.A complaint must contain a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for the relief sought by the pleader.How have the Twombly and Iqbal Supreme Court decisions impacted the federal pleading standard?These decisions raised the pleading standard beyond mere notice pleading, requiring complaints to contain sufficient factual allegations to state a claim that is plausible on its face. This means the factual narrative must be more detailed and suggest a likelihood of liability, rather than just reciting the elements of a cause of action.What are the two main ways a defendant can respond to a complaint after being served? Briefly explain each.A defendant can file an answer, which requires them to admit or deny each of the plaintiff's allegations and assert any affirmative defenses they may have. Alternatively, a defendant can file a pre-answer motion under Rule 12(b), which raises legal objections to the complaint, such as lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to state a claim.List three examples of affirmative defenses a defendant might assert in their answer.Examples of affirmative defenses include the statute of limitations (the lawsuit was filed after the legal deadline), res judicata (the issue has already been decided by a court), and estoppel (the plaintiff is prevented from asserting a claim due to their prior conduct or statements).Under what circumstances can a party amend their pleading "as a matter of course"?A party can amend their pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving the original pleading, or if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.

This lecture on federal civil procedure outlines the initial stages of litigation. It begins by explaining jurisdiction, focusing on the court's power over parties (personal jurisdiction) and the types of cases it can hear (subject matter jurisdiction). The discussion then moves to venue, detailing where a case should be properly filed for trial. The lecture further examines pleadings, covering the initial complaint and the defendant's response, including motions and answers. Finally, it addresses the process of amending pleadings, which allows for changes as a case progresses. The goal is to provide a foundational understanding of these crucial procedural elements.

Today's episode is another roundup of how trial judges are playing whack-a-mole with the Trump administration, and how all of it fits in with Trump's plan to usurp Congress's power to reshape the country in his image. Plus, we've got some crazy stories featuring the Interim US Attorney for DC trying to strongarm Georgetown University, a blast from the past with bigoted Kentucky court clerk Kim Davis, and a subscriber bonus on an obscure Civ Pro rule that Trump plans to use to make terrible losing arguments in court.   Links:   Ermold v. Davis [Sixth Circuit Opinion, Gay Marriage Clerk Case] https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca6.151496/gov.uscourts.ca6.151496.6015541768.2.pdf   AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. Department of State (DC docket) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69627654/aids-vaccine-advocacy-coalition-v-united-states-department-of-state/   Harris v. Bessent DC Circuit appeal https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69704122/cathy-harris-v-scott-bessent/   Some asshole is signing your name to stupid letters https://www.loweringthebar.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/browns_letter_1974.pdf Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod  

When a party is served with an initial pleading in a divorce or family law case, they must file a response. The rules vary by state, but each jurisdiction has specific deadlines within which the response must be filed. It's essential to adhere to these deadlines to avoid legal consequences.This podcast is based on an article on our Family Law Headquarters blog titled: What's an answer to initial pleadings?To learn more or to schedule an initial consultation for a divorce or family law matter, call 855-805-0595 or email info@stangelawfirm.com.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/family-law-talk--6410781/support.

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! Today, as part of our "Listen and Learn" series, we're discussing a topic from Civil Procedure – specifically, when is a pleading conclusory under the Twombly/Iqbal standard for assessing Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss. In this episode, we discuss: Overview of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) Legal conclusions vs. factual allegations Analysis of a hypothetical case involving motions to dismiss Resources: "Listen and Learn" series (https://barexamtoolbox.com/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-archive-by-topic/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-explaining-individual-mee-and-california-bar-essay-questions/#listen-learn) Podcast Episode 208: Listen and Learn – Motions to Dismiss a Case (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-208-listen-and-learn-motions-to-dismiss-a-case/) Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/550/544/) Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/556/662/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-286-listen-and-learn-conclusory-pleadings-under-rule-12b6-civ-pro/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Jared Jaskot of Jaskot Law in Baltimore discusses how to ethically and effectively use artificial intelligence (AI) in an immigration firm, excerpted from MCLE's 6/6/2024 live webcast: Practical Uses for AI in Trial Preparation & Legal Practice. The full program is available as an on-demand webcast or an MP3 here.  Get 24/7 instant access to hundreds of related eLectures like this one—and more—with a subscription to the MCLE OnlinePass. Learn more at www.mcle.org/onlinepass and start your free trial today! Connect with us on socials!Instagram: mcle.newenglandX (Formerly Twitter): MCLENewEnglandLinkedIn: Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (MCLE│New England)Facebook: MCLE New EngalndThreads: mcle.newnengland

Navigating the Complexities of Pleadings in DivorceIn this episode of "How to Split a Toaster" – part three of our Your Divorce Case series – Seth Nelson and Pete Wright dive into the intricate world of divorce proceedings, focusing on the crucial role of pleadings. Seth and Pete aim to demystify the legal jargon and provide valuable insights to help listeners navigate their divorce cases more effectively.We explore the emotional and legal significance of filing for divorce, discussing the various documents involved, such as petitions, counter-petitions, and answers. They shed light on the importance of properly drafting and filing these documents, as they set the stage for the entire divorce process. The hosts also delve into the nuances of residency requirements and how they can impact the court's jurisdiction over a case.Questions we answer in this episode:What are pleadings and why are they important in a divorce case?How can the way pleadings are drafted influence the outcome of your divorce?What should you consider when deciding whether to file for divorce first?Key Takeaways:Pleadings are crucial documents that set the foundation for your entire divorce case.It's essential to work with your lawyer to ensure your pleadings accurately reflect your goals and desires.Understanding the legal terminology and process can help you make informed decisions throughout your divorce.This episode provides a wealth of information for anyone considering or currently going through a divorce. By breaking down complex legal concepts and offering practical advice, Seth and Pete empower listeners to take a more active role in their divorce cases and work towards achieving the best possible outcome for themselves and their families.Links & NotesSchedule a consult with SethGot a question you want to ask on the show? Click here! (00:00) - Welcome to How to Split a Toaster (02:04) - Pleadings (03:09) - The Filing (05:34) - A Pleading (06:50) - Petition and Answer and Counter Petition (11:04) - Residency (15:42) - Notice Pleadings (17:57) - Amended Positions (22:37) - Getting Pleadings Right (26:11) - Boilerplate Items (30:32) - When Pleadings are Closed (32:23) - Your Answer (38:19) - Wrap Up Establishing trust with Co-Parents can be difficult when alcohol abuse is involved. Use Soberlink as an opportunity to improve co-parenting arrangements. Visit their site to learn more and get a promo code for $50 off.

Chapter 5 explores the foundational and procedural documents essential to civil litigation, focusing on the complaint, answer, joinder of parties, and additional mechanisms like intervention and interpleader. These elements are critical in shaping the trajectory of a lawsuit, ensuring that all relevant parties and claims are efficiently and fairly addressed. Here is a detailed summary of the key sections: 5.1 The Complaint. The complaint is the foundational document in a lawsuit, initiating legal proceedings by outlining the plaintiff's claims and the basis for the court's jurisdiction. It typically includes: Caption: Identifies the court, parties, and case number. Jurisdictional Statement: Establishes the court's authority over the case. Statement of Facts: Provides a detailed narrative of the facts giving rise to the claims. Claims for Relief: Specifies the legal grounds for the plaintiff's claims. Prayer for Relief: Requests specific remedies or damages from the court. The complaint sets the litigation in motion and frames the issues for the court to resolve, ensuring that the defendant is properly informed of the claims against them. 5.2 The Answer. The answer is the defendant's formal response to the complaint, addressing each allegation and asserting defenses. It typically includes: Admissions and Denials: Responds to each allegation in the complaint, either admitting, denying, or stating a lack of sufficient information to respond. Affirmative Defenses: Asserts legal defenses that, if proven, would negate the plaintiff's claims. Counterclaims: Allows the defendant to assert claims against the plaintiff, seeking affirmative relief or damages. The answer is crucial for establishing the defendant's position and framing the issues for litigation. It prevents default judgment and shapes the direction of the defense. 5.3 Joinder of Parties. Joinder rules allow for the inclusion of additional parties in a lawsuit to promote judicial efficiency by resolving related claims and parties in a single proceeding. The key types include: Permissive Joinder: Allows multiple parties to join together if their claims arise from the same transaction or occurrence and involve common questions of law or fact. Compulsory Joinder: Requires certain parties to be included if their absence would prevent the court from granting complete relief or impair their ability to protect their interests. Joinder rules help reduce multiple lawsuits, streamline discovery, ensure consistency in rulings, and provide comprehensive resolutions to disputes. 5.4 Intervention and Interpleader. These mechanisms allow third parties to become involved in ongoing litigation when they have a significant interest in the outcome or when property or funds are subject to multiple claims. Intervention: Allows third parties to join a lawsuit. It can be as of right (when the third party has a significant interest) or permissive (when the court allows the third party to join at its discretion). Interpleader: Enables a party holding property or money subject to multiple claims to initiate a lawsuit to determine the rightful owner, preventing multiple lawsuits and ensuring fair resolution of competing claims. These mechanisms ensure that all relevant parties can participate in the resolution of disputes, promoting fairness and judicial efficiency. Conclusion. Chapter 5 emphasizes the importance of foundational legal documents and procedural mechanisms in civil litigation. The complaint and answer set the stage for litigation, defining the issues and establishing the positions of the parties. Joinder rules, intervention, and interpleader further enhance the process by ensuring that all relevant parties and claims are efficiently addressed in a single proceeding, promoting judicial economy and fairness. Understanding and effectively utilizing these tools is crucial for legal practitioners to navigate the complexities of civil litigation and achieve just outcomes for their clients. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Summary of Chapter 5 Chapter 5 explores the foundational and procedural documents essential to civil litigation, focusing on the complaint, answer, joinder of parties, and additional mechanisms like intervention and interpleader. These elements are critical in shaping the trajectory of a lawsuit, ensuring that all relevant parties and claims are efficiently and fairly addressed. Here is a detailed summary of the key sections: The Complaint The complaint is the foundational document in a lawsuit, initiating legal proceedings by outlining the plaintiff's claims and the basis for the court's jurisdiction. It typically includes: Caption: Identifies the court, parties, and case number. Jurisdictional Statement: Establishes the court's authority over the case. Statement of Facts: Provides a detailed narrative of the facts giving rise to the claims. Claims for Relief: Specifies the legal grounds for the plaintiff's claims. Prayer for Relief: Requests specific remedies or damages from the court. The complaint sets the litigation in motion and frames the issues for the court to resolve, ensuring that the defendant is properly informed of the claims against them. The Answer. The answer is the defendant's formal response to the complaint, addressing each allegation and asserting defenses. It typically includes: Admissions and Denials: Responds to each allegation in the complaint, either admitting, denying, or stating a lack of sufficient information to respond. Affirmative Defenses: Asserts legal defenses that, if proven, would negate the plaintiff's claims. Counterclaims: Allows the defendant to assert claims against the plaintiff, seeking affirmative relief or damages. The answer is crucial for establishing the defendant's position and framing the issues for litigation. It prevents default judgment and shapes the direction of the defense. Joinder of Parties. Joinder rules allow for the inclusion of additional parties in a lawsuit to promote judicial efficiency by resolving related claims and parties in a single proceeding. The key types include: Permissive Joinder: Allows multiple parties to join together if their claims arise from the same transaction or occurrence and involve common questions of law or fact. Compulsory Joinder: Requires certain parties to be included if their absence would prevent the court from granting complete relief or impair their ability to protect their interests. Joinder rules help reduce multiple lawsuits, streamline discovery, ensure consistency in rulings, and provide comprehensive resolutions to disputes. Intervention and Interpleader. These mechanisms allow third parties to become involved in ongoing litigation when they have a significant interest in the outcome or when property or funds are subject to multiple claims. Intervention: Allows third parties to join a lawsuit. It can be as of right (when the third party has a significant interest) or permissive (when the court allows the third party to join at its discretion). Interpleader: Enables a party holding property or money subject to multiple claims to initiate a lawsuit to determine the rightful owner, preventing multiple lawsuits and ensuring fair resolution of competing claims. These mechanisms ensure that all relevant parties can participate in the resolution of disputes, promoting fairness and judicial efficiency. Conclusion Chapter 5 emphasizes the importance of foundational legal documents and procedural mechanisms in civil litigation. The complaint and answer set the stage for litigation, defining the issues and establishing the positions of the parties. Joinder rules, intervention, and interpleader further enhance the process by ensuring that all relevant parties and claims are efficiently addressed in a single proceeding, promoting judicial economy and fairness. Understanding and effectively utilizing these tools is crucial for legal practitioners to navigate the complexities of civil litigation and achieve just outcomes for their clients. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Summary of Chapter 5 Chapter 5 explores the foundational and procedural documents essential to civil litigation, focusing on the complaint, answer, joinder of parties, and additional mechanisms like intervention and interpleader. These elements are critical in shaping the trajectory of a lawsuit, ensuring that all relevant parties and claims are efficiently and fairly addressed. Here is a detailed summary of the key sections: The Complaint The complaint is the foundational document in a lawsuit, initiating legal proceedings by outlining the plaintiff's claims and the basis for the court's jurisdiction. It typically includes: Caption: Identifies the court, parties, and case number. Jurisdictional Statement: Establishes the court's authority over the case. Statement of Facts: Provides a detailed narrative of the facts giving rise to the claims. Claims for Relief: Specifies the legal grounds for the plaintiff's claims. Prayer for Relief: Requests specific remedies or damages from the court. The complaint sets the litigation in motion and frames the issues for the court to resolve, ensuring that the defendant is properly informed of the claims against them. The Answer The answer is the defendant's formal response to the complaint, addressing each allegation and asserting defenses. It typically includes: Admissions and Denials: Responds to each allegation in the complaint, either admitting, denying, or stating a lack of sufficient information to respond. Affirmative Defenses: Asserts legal defenses that, if proven, would negate the plaintiff's claims. Counterclaims: Allows the defendant to assert claims against the plaintiff, seeking affirmative relief or damages. The answer is crucial for establishing the defendant's position and framing the issues for litigation. It prevents default judgment and shapes the direction of the defense. Joinder of Parties Joinder rules allow for the inclusion of additional parties in a lawsuit to promote judicial efficiency by resolving related claims and parties in a single proceeding. The key types include: Permissive Joinder: Allows multiple parties to join together if their claims arise from the same transaction or occurrence and involve common questions of law or fact. Compulsory Joinder: Requires certain parties to be included if their absence would prevent the court from granting complete relief or impair their ability to protect their interests. Joinder rules help reduce multiple lawsuits, streamline discovery, ensure consistency in rulings, and provide comprehensive resolutions to disputes. Intervention and Interpleader These mechanisms allow third parties to become involved in ongoing litigation when they have a significant interest in the outcome or when property or funds are subject to multiple claims. Intervention: Allows third parties to join a lawsuit. It can be as of right (when the third party has a significant interest) or permissive (when the court allows the third party to join at its discretion). Interpleader: Enables a party holding property or money subject to multiple claims to initiate a lawsuit to determine the rightful owner, preventing multiple lawsuits and ensuring fair resolution of competing claims. These mechanisms ensure that all relevant parties can participate in the resolution of disputes, promoting fairness and judicial efficiency. Conclusion Chapter 5 emphasizes the importance of foundational legal documents and procedural mechanisms in civil litigation. The complaint and answer set the stage for litigation, defining the issues and establishing the positions of the parties. Joinder rules, intervention, and interpleader further enhance the process by ensuring that all relevant parties and claims are efficiently addressed in a single proceeding, promoting judicial economy and fairness. Understanding and effectively utilizing these tools is crucial for legal practitioners to navigate the complexities of civil litigation and achieve just outcomes for their clients. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A new MP3 sermon from Ballymena Free Presbyterian Church is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: The Pleadings of a Persistent Mother - Part 3 Speaker: Rev. Andrew Stewart Broadcaster: Ballymena Free Presbyterian Church Event: Prayer Meeting Date: 6/25/2024 Bible: Matthew 15:21-28 Length: 39 min.

A new MP3 sermon from Ballymena Free Presbyterian Church is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: The Pleadings of a Persistent Mother - Part 3 Speaker: Rev. Andrew Stewart Broadcaster: Ballymena Free Presbyterian Church Event: Prayer Meeting Date: 6/25/2024 Bible: Matthew 15:21-28 Length: 39 min.

A new MP3 sermon from Ballymena Free Presbyterian Church is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Pleadings of a Persistent Mother - Part 2 Speaker: Rev. Andrew Stewart Broadcaster: Ballymena Free Presbyterian Church Event: Bible Study Date: 6/4/2024 Bible: Matthew 15:21-28 Length: 39 min.

Legal Conclusions are Not Allegations of Fact Post 4734 Zox LLC ("Zox") appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of West American Insurance Company. The district court held that West American had no duty to defend or indemnify Zox in an underlying trademark dispute between Zox and a group of entrepreneurs known as the "Zox Brothers" ("the Zox Litigation"). Zox contends the district court erred because the Zox Brothers sought damages for three potentially covered claims: (1) malicious prosecution; (2) disparagement; and (3) use of an "advertising idea." In ZOX LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, v.  West American Insurance Company; et al., No. 23-55125, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (February 9, 2024) the Ninth Circuit resolved the dispute. ANALYSIS Under California law, a liability insurer owes a broad duty to defend its insured against claims that potentially seek damages within the coverage of the policy. Coverage turns not on the technical legal cause of action pleaded by the third party but on the facts alleged. While the duty to defend is broad, an insurer will not be compelled to defend its insured when the potential for liability is tenuous and farfetched. To determine whether the duty to defend was triggered, the Ninth Circuit was compelled to compare the allegations in the Zox Brothers' pleadings ("the Pleadings") with the terms of West American's Insurance Policy ("the Policy"). Malicious Prosecution To plead a malicious prosecution claim, the Zox Brothers must plead facts to prove that an underlying action was initiated or maintained (i) by, or at the direction of, [Zox] and pursued to a legal termination in favor of the Zox Brothers; (ii) without probable cause; and (iii) with malice. The Zox Brothers did not plead facts, nor provide extrinsic evidence, to satisfy any of the requisite elements of a malicious prosecution claim. The Pleadings did not trigger coverage for malicious prosecution. Disparagement To plead a disparagement claim, the Zox Brothers must plead facts to show a false or misleading statement that (1) specifically refers to the Zox Brothers' product or business and (2) clearly derogates that product or business. The Ninth Circuit was required to look past labels and at the facts alleged. Zox was unable to cite a single factual pleading in support of a disparagement claim. Appropriation of Advertising Ideas Where there is a duty to defend, there may be a duty to indemnify; but where there is no duty to defend, there cannot be a duty to indemnify. ZALMA OPINION The Ninth Circuit applied the clear and unambiguous language of the policy to the "facts" alleged; found that the allegations were mostly speculative or based on legal conclusions, failure to allege facts to support the three claims failed and, therefore, the Ninth Circuit had no choice but to affirm the summary judgment find no duty to defend nor a duty to indemnify. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/publish/post/107007808 Go to Newsbreak.com  https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01 Go to X @bzalma; Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg;  Go to the Insurance Claims Library – http://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support

Pleadings and discovery are the essential steps of any litigation process, and New Jersey workers' compensation law is no exception. In this episode “Pleadings and Discovery (https://loisllc.com/webinar/pleadings-and-discovery/),” Greg Lois (https://loisllc.com/attorney/greg-lois/) will help you learn how to effectively and efficiently handle the various pleadings and discovery tools that are available in New Jersey workers' compensation cases. Don't miss this opportunity to learn from the best and enhance your career. How to attend these webinars live and ask questions Join us for our monthly webinars on New York and New Jersey workers' compensation law. Register for a Construction Defense Webinar (https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7649060921835510031) Register for a Civil Litigation Webinar (https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/2939203908210686476) Register for a New York Workers' Compensation Webinar (12PM SESSION) (https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/8126129122765451535) Register for a New York Workers' Compensation Webinar (3PM SESSION) (https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7249849108834235650) Register for a New Jersey Workers' Compensation Webinar (https://register.gotowebinar.com/register/5291331929217948419) Schedules and Information Handout materials are provided in advance of each session. The webinar courses follow the "life cycle" of a claim and correspond to chapters in the Workers' Compensation Handbooks (https://loisllc.com/publications/) offered by the Firm. Webinar Archive * View archive of prior Workers' Compensation and Civil Litigation webinars (https://loisllc.com/webinars/archive/) Disclaimer This webinar is not legal advice! The materials presented by this webinar/podcast and any affiliated website are for informational purposes only and are not offered as legal advice as to any particular matter. No viewer/listener/reader should act on the basis of these materials without seeking appropriate professional advice as to the particular facts and applicable law involved. The materials are not represented to be correct, complete, or up-to-date. Opinions presented by this video/podcast are the opinions of the author. Neither the use of this web site nor the transfer of information to or from this web site shall create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between Greg Lois, the presenter in the video/podcast, or LOIS LAW FIRM LLC and any person. You should not send any confidential information to this web site until after you have entered into a written agreement for the performance of legal services.

Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! Today, in our "Listen and Learn" series, we're discussing the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure – more specifically Rule 15, which deals with the instances in which a party can amend their pleading. In this episode we discuss: A quick refresh on the statute of limitations The three major circumstances under which a party is likely to seek to amend their complaint Amending a party's pleading before the statute of limitations has run out How a plaintiff establishes that their amended complaint relates back to the original filing, if the statute of limitations has run out A look at the cases Krupski v. Costa Crociere and Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, in which the plaintiffs sought to amend their complaints Analyzing two hypos from previous California bar exams Resources: "Listen and Learn" series (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/law-school-toolbox-podcast-substantive-law-topics/#listen-learn) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2011 (https://nwculaw.edu/pdf/bar/July%202011%20Essays%20and%20Sample%20Answers.pdf) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, February 2013 (https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/gbx/February-2013-CBX%20Selected%20Answers%20Essays.pdf) Krupski v. Costa Crociere (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/560/538/) Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-3rd-circuit/1039805.html) Download the Transcript  (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/episode-435-listen-and-learn-amendments-to-pleadings-civ-pro/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/law-school-toolbox-podcast/id1027603976) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Law School Toolbox website (http://lawschooltoolbox.com/contact). If you're concerned about the bar exam, check out our sister site, the Bar Exam Toolbox (http://barexamtoolbox.com/). You can also sign up for our weekly podcast newsletter (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/get-law-school-podcast-updates/) to make sure you never miss an episode! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! Today, in our "Listen and Learn" series, we're discussing the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure – more specifically Rule 15, which deals with the instances in which a party can amend their pleading. In this episode, we discuss: A quick refresh on the statute of limitations The three major circumstances under which a party is likely to seek to amend their complaint Amending a party's pleading before the statute of limitations has run out How a plaintiff establishes that their amended complaint relates back to the original filing, if the statute of limitations has run out A look at the cases Krupski v. Costa Crociere and Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, in which the plaintiffs sought to amend their complaints Analyzing two hypos from pervious California bar exams  Resources: "Listen and Learn" series (https://barexamtoolbox.com/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-archive-by-topic/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-explaining-individual-mee-and-california-bar-essay-questions/#listen-learn) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2011 (https://nwculaw.edu/pdf/bar/July%202011%20Essays%20and%20Sample%20Answers.pdf) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, February 2013 (https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/gbx/February-2013-CBX%20Selected%20Answers%20Essays.pdf) Krupski v. Costa Crociere (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/560/538/) Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-3rd-circuit/1039805.html) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-246-listen-and-learn-amendments-to-pleadings-civ-pro/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Pleadings and Pretrial Procedures. Complaints and Answers. Pleadings are formal documents filed with the court that outline the parties' primary claims and defenses. They set the stage for the litigation and define the scope of the dispute. Complaints. The complaint is the initial pleading filed by the plaintiff, which starts the lawsuit. It serves several key purposes: Statement of Jurisdiction: The complaint must explain why the court has jurisdiction to hear the case. Allegation of Facts: It should contain a clear and concise statement of the facts, laying out the plaintiff's case. Each fact must be alleged in a separate paragraph. Claims or Causes of Action: The complaint should articulate the legal theories under which the plaintiff seeks relief. Each claim should be stated separately. Demand for Relief: It concludes with a demand for judgment or relief, which may include monetary damages, injunctive relief, or declaratory judgment. Answers. The answer is the defendant's response to the complaint. It must be filed within a specific time frame, usually 21 days if the defendant is served within the United States. The answer serves several purposes: Responding to Allegations: The defendant must admit, deny, or state that they lack knowledge to respond to each allegation in the complaint. Asserting Defenses: The answer can include any defenses to the plaintiff's claims, such as statute of limitations, lack of jurisdiction, or failure to state a claim. Counterclaims and Crossclaims: The defendant may also raise counterclaims against the plaintiff or crossclaims against co-defendants. Motions. Motions are requests made to the court asking for a specific order or ruling. They are a critical aspect of pretrial procedures. Motion to Dismiss. A Motion to Dismiss, under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, asks the court to dismiss the case for specified reasons, such as: Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Arguing that the court does not have the authority to hear the case. Lack of Personal Jurisdiction: Claiming that the court does not have power over the defendant. Improper Venue: Asserting that the case is in the wrong court location. Failure to State a Claim: Arguing that even if all the allegations are true, the law does not provide a remedy. If a Motion to Dismiss is granted, the plaintiff may be allowed to amend the complaint to address the deficiencies. Motion for Summary Judgment. A Motion for Summary Judgment, under Rule 56, is filed when one party believes that there are no material facts in dispute and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This motion can be filed by either the plaintiff or the defendant and is often submitted after discovery. The court will grant a summary judgment if the moving party demonstrates that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Amendments and Rule 11 Sanctions. Amendments. Under Rule 15, parties are allowed to amend their pleadings to correct errors, add claims or defenses, or respond to developments in the case. Amendments must be made with the court's permission and the opposing party's consent, especially if made after certain deadlines. Rule 11 Sanctions. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ensures that pleadings, motions, and other papers are filed for proper purposes and have a legal basis. Under Rule 11, when an attorney or party submits a pleading, they certify that: The Document is Not for Improper Purpose: Such as harassment, unnecessary delay, or needless increase in the cost of litigation. Legal Contentions are Warranted: The claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or a non-frivolous argument for modifying the law. Factual Contentions and Denials: The factual contentions have or will likely have evidentiary support. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Fusebox 239: “Seasons Pleadings”” 28:30 – Show Intro, Season's Sneezings, Timo's Holiday Awful-ring, A Pause In The Disaster, Clip From Fusebox 219: “The Frankenstein Martini”, Clip From Fusebox 214: “Brain Organoids”, Clip From Fusebox 229: “Meet Kyle The Kinkajou”, Clip From Fusebox 217: “Color Bars”, Fusebox ID, Grindhouse Resurrection Spot 3, Fusebox Liner ID, Clip […]

Welcome to today's 'AI Lawyer Talking Tech' podcast! In this episode, we will explore the myriad ways in which artificial intelligence is revolutionizing the legal landscape. From admissibility of rap lyrics as evidence in criminal trials and the implications for artistic expression, to the complexities of copyright preemption and the use of AI in big tech legal battles, we will delve into the intersection of AI and the law. Join us as we dissect the latest AI-related legal developments, regulations, and challenges, and consider the far-reaching impact of AI on the legal profession. From Art to Evidence: The Admissibility of Rap Lyrics in Criminal Trials13 Dec 2023Vanderbilt JETLawShould Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)13 Dec 2023Technology & Marketing Law BlogThe LegalTech Renaissance: The Perfect Time to Build and Back AI-Powered Legal Solutions13 Dec 2023Legaltech on MediumA Proposed Likeness Law Paves the Way for a New Federal Right of Action13 Dec 2023Global IP & Technology Law BlogNew AI Executive Order: Employers Be Aware of AI Use Impacting Hiring, Workplace Safety, Union Protection, and More12 Dec 2023GenAI-LexologyThe Power of AI: How is artificial intelligence transforming financial services?13 Dec 2023Inside Tech LawNAVIGATING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE: EXAMINING SOLUTIONS TO THE RISKS POSED BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE…13 Dec 2023Legaltech on MediumWhat Are Different Types of Pleadings in Law – Explained12 Dec 2023MatterSuite By CaseFoxArtificial intelligence and trade secrets12 Dec 2023GenAI-LexologyJoin Justia Webinars for an Introduction to the Law of Content Creation07 Dec 2023Legal Marketing & Technology BlogNew UK guidelines for judges using AI chatbots are a mess13 Dec 2023Popular ScienceComcast's Legal Battle With Key '10G' Tech Vendor Gets Even More Interesting13 Dec 2023Next TV RSS FeedShould Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)13 Dec 2023Technology & Marketing Law BlogAI in 2024: Monitoring New Regulation and Staying in Compliance With Existing Laws13 Dec 2023SkaddenRed Teaming for AI: How Big Law Firms Stress-Test Generative Models13 Dec 2023JDJournalMeta Knew About Legal Issues With AI Training, Authors' Suit Claims13 Dec 2023Publishers LunchWhat Is the Future of Big Law?13 Dec 2023US News & World ReportHow City firms can counter the threat of the Big Four13 Dec 2023LexisNexis UKPodcast Dec 13, 2023 Pioneers and Pathfinders: Unlocking AI's Potential in Lawyer Development13 Dec 2023Seyfarth ShawLawyering in the Age of Artificial Intelligence13 Dec 2023beSpacificMaximizing Visibility: Innovative Marketing Strategies for Law Firms13 Dec 2023Market Business News.comA Proposed Likeness Law Paves the Way for a New Federal Right of Action13 Dec 2023LexBlogAderant Unveils New Onyx Capabilities to Improve Client Terms Review Process13 Dec 2023AccessWDUNGenerative AI legal industry leaders meeting: New report and calls to action13 Dec 2023Legal IT InsiderEnglish Judges Receive First-Ever Guidance on AI Use in Legal System13 Dec 2023BollyinsideEmerging Issues in AI: Testimony to Illinois House Judiciary (Civil) and Cybersecurity Committees13 Dec 2023LexBlogRFE Investment Partners IX and Knox Capital Invest in BryteBridge, a Leading Outsourced Compliance and Legal Services Company13 Dec 2023YourCentralValley.comRFE Investment Partners IX and Knox Capital Invest in BryteBridge, a Leading Outsourced Compliance and Legal Services Company13 Dec 2023WRIC TV

You need to know the right prayer point to pray

What will the seminar cover?The Strategy of Pleadings was the second of four education events in 2023 co-hosted by Queensland Young Lawyers and Level Twenty Seven Chambers. Oliver Cook (Level Twenty Seven Chambers) and Jayleigh Sargent (16 Quay Central) facilitated this session.Topics covered:- The purpose of pleadings- Advocacy through pleadings- Strategic approaches to pleadings Who should watch?The session was targeted at those up to PQE 5 years but more experienced lawyers will find it a helpful a refresher. PRESENTERSOliver Cook (Barrister, Level Twenty Seven Chambers)Oliver joined Level Twenty Seven Chambers from Herbert Smith Freehills, having worked in the firm's Brisbane and Tokyo offices. He advises and appears for parties in a multitude of sectors, including franchising, insurance, consumer protection, construction, government and insolvency. Having worked on large-scale national and cross-border commercial disputes, including class actions and arbitrations, Oliver is familiar with heavy and complex cases involving the coordination of large teams of lawyers and experts in various jurisdictions, often requiring the adoption of eDiscovery, litigation databases and remote legal hearing technology. He is a contributing author to the LexisNexis publication Court Forms, Precedents and Pleadings Queensland and on the steering committee of ACICA45 which organises activities for early career professionals interested in arbitration. Jayleigh Sargent (Barrister, 16 Quay Central)Following over six years working in disputes and insolvency at a boutique litigation firm and then a national firm, Jayleigh was called to the Bar in 2022. Her practice as a barrister centres on commercial, corporate and insolvency litigation, with particular experience in property and contractual disputes. MATERIALSThe presentation was recorded as a live seminar/webinar. The video recording, PowerPoint and transcript are published here.'Preparing for Trial' was the first event. You can catch up here.Did you miss previous seminars? Check out the seminar archive on Level Twenty Seven Chambers' website for the video recordings and associated materials produced by the speakers.Want to join future seminars live, in person or online? Register your interest.Website: www.level27chambers.com.au

This week on Redirect Matthew and I are joined by Professor Michael Kagan (@MichaelGKagan) from UNLV about pleadings in immigration court. It has become accepted as part of immigration law "culture" that allegations are admitted to at the beginning of removal proceedings in order to move things along and maintain cordial relations with immigration judges and ICE prosecutors, but is this always best practice? Should practitioners approach these matters more carefully? (Spoiler alert, yes)  Help keep the show alive by becoming a patron at patreon.com/redirect. Give us a follow on Twitter (@yakimaabogado, @MattArchambeau1) and tell your friends about the show.   

Support the showIf you would like to discuss legal topics in person, join Law Schoolers Pro at https://lawschoolers.com/law-schoolers-pro/Disclaimers:1. Nearly all of our episodes are unedited. We want to give you raw footage which means that there will be bumps, dings, and some pops.2. The information contained in these episodes are for educational purposes only, not to be used as legal advice.3. If the information is used as legal advice, Law Schoolers is not liable for any legal outcomes.

Prince Andrew was hoping that his daughters would be able to pull on some heartstrings that he wasn't able to find when talking with his brother Charles, the future king. Unfortunately for Andrew, it didn't work out as he envisioned.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1661788/prince-andrew-royal-comeback-prince-charles-beatrice-eugenie

Prince Andrew was hoping that his daughters would be able to pull on some heartstrings that he wasn't able to find when talking with his brother Charles, the future king. Unfortunately for Andrew, it didn't work out as he envisioned.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1661788/prince-andrew-royal-comeback-prince-charles-beatrice-eugenie

Follow gm PodcastTwitter: @gmdecryptWebsite: Decrypt.coEmail: MatthewAaron@Decrypt.coNews Links

Prince Andrew was hoping that his daughters would be able to pull on some heartstrings that he wasn't able to find when talking with his brother Charles, the future king. Unfortunately for Andrew, it didn't work out as he envisioned. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1661788/prince-andrew-royal-comeback-prince-charles-beatrice-eugenie

Prince Andrew was hoping that his daughters would be able to pull on some heartstrings that he wasn't able to find when talking with his brother Charles, the future king. Unfortunately for Andrew, it didn't work out as he envisioned. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1661788/prince-andrew-royal-comeback-prince-charles-beatrice-eugenie

A new MP3 sermon from Providence Baptist Chapel is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Tender Pleadings Subtitle: Gospel Message Speaker: Oliver Wyncoll Broadcaster: Providence Baptist Chapel Event: Sunday - PM Date: 7/24/2022 Bible: Malachi 1 Length: 31 min.

Molly is out today, but don't worry- we still have crypto news to cover. Crypto firm Voyager Digital filed for bankruptcy (2:14), and crypto loan company Celsius paid some debts (10:43). Finally, Jason takes some questions in today's Ask Jason segment (25:35)! Voyager Bankruptcy Filing: https://cases.stretto.com/public/x193/11753/PLEADINGS/1175307062280000000036.pdf (0:00) Jason introduces today's show! (2:14) Crypto Update: Voyager Digital filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy late last night (9:31) Embroker - Get an extra 10% off insurance for your business at https://Embroker.com/twist (10:43) Celsius just unlocked 2000 “wrapped Bitcoin” (~$40M worth) by paying down ~$183M of debt to another crypto lender (24:21) Thorne - Personalized, science-back wellness. Get 10% off your first order at thorne.com/u/TWIST. (25:35) Ask Jason: Jason answers your questions (26:27) Would you ever apply to Shark Tank as a judge or create your own version with the besties? (29:23) Trying to bootstrap as long as possible, but when is it ok to quit your day job? (34:16) Indochino - Get $50 off any purchase of $399 or more by using code TWIST at checkout https://www.indochino.com (35:34) When a previous investment asks for more money, how do you decide whether or not to double down? (41:56) I'm about to raise a seed round… should growth be the target or generating positive cash flow? (45:04) What current FAANG CEOs would you like to interview? What insights would you look for? (48:00) What are “pre” and “post” money? (48:43) Do you entertain pro-rata multiples? (58:31) How is the electric bike effort going? (1:04:00) What Gen Z startups have excited you from the OK Boomer segment or your staff? (1:11:31) Outro + Plugs

VLOG: Just after JPM Chase v. Tesla on Elon Musk's tweet about taking Telsa private. Chase filed a letter seeking to move for judgment on the pleadings, but @SDNYLIVE Judge Gardephe said case is not susceptible to that. So, Tesla's counterclaim goes fwd...

Mark Wheat- Sunday AM - April 3 2022- -Certain Pleadings- Luke 22-31-34

Pastor J. Bryant Lagoe Wednesday Evening 3/23/22

Pastor J. Bryant Lagoe Wednesday Evening 3/9/22

Gal. 4:12-20

In this lecture we will discuss the complaint. Derivative work from the following original:Roger C. Park and Douglas D. McFarland, Computer-Aided Exercises in Civil Procedure, Published by CALI eLangdell Press. Available under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 License. This derivative work is licensed the same as the original.

General rules regarding pleadings

Errata and addenda for "Cold Hard Cash"; "Hold Fast What Thou Hast"; "Spirit Princess"; "Milking It for All It's Worth"; "Pleadings from Asbury Park" and "The Centers of All Things." Script at https://order-of-the-jackalope.com/errata-1/ Follow us on social media @orderjackalope.

This week: the amazing story of Laura Biggar, the Anna Nicole Smith of 1901, and her crazy plot to steal an inheritance that may or may not have been rightfully hers. https://order-of-the-jackalope.com/pleadings-from-asbury-park/ Thanks to Walter Shapiro's "Hustling Hitler" for introducing us to this crazy story! Follow us on Twitter, Tumblr, Instagram & Reddit @orderjackalope.

Hon. Ronald J. Hedges uses his experience as a litigator and past US Magistrate Judge to cover best practices for the Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, also known as the "stop, look, and listen" rule.