Podcasts about personal jurisdiction

Kick off the New Year with a bonus episode of The Legal Department! This episode features a lively discussion with Allison Freedman and Hallie Ritzu, the hosts of the popular legal podcast, Personal Jurisdiction. They interview Stacy Bratcher, Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer for Cottage Health, to get her insights on succeeding as in-house counsel.Stacy shares her unique career journey, from her early days in government to her current leadership role. She offers advice on cultivating curiosity, the importance of building strong relationships in the legal field, and why your first job doesn't have to define your career path. Tune in for valuable perspectives and inspiration for lawyers at all stages of their careers.

This lecture provides a comprehensive overview of personal jurisdiction in civil procedure. It explains the concept's definition, constitutional basis (primarily the Due Process Clause), and different types (in personam, in rem, quasi in rem). Key Supreme Court cases like International Shoe, Burger King, and Daimler are examined to illustrate jurisdictional tests and the distinction between specific and general jurisdiction. Finally, the lecture discusses the impact of modern issues like the internet and global commerce on jurisdictional principles, including the "sliding scale" test for websites and challenges related to social media and blockchain technology. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Summary of Chapter 3: Personal Jurisdiction. Chapter 3 focuses on the concept of personal jurisdiction, which is a court's authority to make legal decisions affecting the parties involved in a lawsuit. Personal jurisdiction ensures that defendants are not unfairly brought into court in a state with which they have no meaningful connection. Key Points Covered: What is Personal Jurisdiction? Personal jurisdiction refers to a court's power over the individuals or entities involved in a lawsuit. It is essential for establishing the court's authority and ensuring due process. The Constitutional Basis for Personal Jurisdiction Rooted in the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, personal jurisdiction requires sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state, purposeful availment of the state's laws, and that exercising jurisdiction is reasonable and fair. Long-Arm Statutes State long-arm statutes extend personal jurisdiction to non-residents based on activities such as transacting business, committing a tort, or owning property in the state. These statutes ensure defendants can be brought to court in states where they have sufficient contacts. Service of Process Service of process is the formal procedure to notify defendants of legal actions. Methods include personal service, substituted service, service by mail, and service by publication. Proper service is crucial for establishing personal jurisdiction and ensuring due process. Consent and Waiver Defendants can consent to personal jurisdiction explicitly through forum selection clauses or implicitly by participating in activities within the forum state. Waiver occurs when defendants fail to timely raise a jurisdictional defense, thereby forfeiting their right to contest it. Challenging Personal Jurisdiction Defendants can challenge personal jurisdiction through motions to dismiss, arguing that the court lacks jurisdiction due to insufficient contacts. Special appearances can be made specifically to contest jurisdiction without submitting to the court's authority for other matters. Successful challenges result in dismissal or transfer of the case to a court with proper jurisdiction. Understanding personal jurisdiction is critical for ensuring that legal proceedings are fair and that defendants are not subjected to litigation in inappropriate forums. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Summary of Chapter 3: Personal Jurisdiction. Chapter 3 focuses on the concept of personal jurisdiction, which is a court's authority to make legal decisions affecting the parties involved in a lawsuit. Personal jurisdiction ensures that defendants are not unfairly brought into court in a state with which they have no meaningful connection. Key Points Covered: What is Personal Jurisdiction? Personal jurisdiction refers to a court's power over the individuals or entities involved in a lawsuit. It is essential for establishing the court's authority and ensuring due process. The Constitutional Basis for Personal Jurisdiction Rooted in the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, personal jurisdiction requires sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state, purposeful availment of the state's laws, and that exercising jurisdiction is reasonable and fair. Long-Arm Statutes State long-arm statutes extend personal jurisdiction to non-residents based on activities such as transacting business, committing a tort, or owning property in the state. These statutes ensure defendants can be brought to court in states where they have sufficient contacts. Service of Process Service of process is the formal procedure to notify defendants of legal actions. Methods include personal service, substituted service, service by mail, and service by publication. Proper service is crucial for establishing personal jurisdiction and ensuring due process. Consent and Waiver Defendants can consent to personal jurisdiction explicitly through forum selection clauses or implicitly by participating in activities within the forum state. Waiver occurs when defendants fail to timely raise a jurisdictional defense, thereby forfeiting their right to contest it. Challenging Personal Jurisdiction Defendants can challenge personal jurisdiction through motions to dismiss, arguing that the court lacks jurisdiction due to insufficient contacts. Special appearances can be made specifically to contest jurisdiction without submitting to the court's authority for other matters. Successful challenges result in dismissal or transfer of the case to a court with proper jurisdiction. Understanding personal jurisdiction is critical for ensuring that legal proceedings are fair and that defendants are not subjected to litigation in inappropriate forums. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Then all Israel gathered together to David at Hebron and said, “Behold, we are your bone and flesh. In times past, even when Saul was king, it was you who led out and brought in Israel. And Yahweh your God said to you, ‘You shall be shepherd of my people Israel, and you shall be prince over my people Israel.' ” - 1 Chronicles 11:1-2   This Episode's Links and Timestamps: 00:24 – 1 Chronicles 11 06:37 – Thoughts on the Reading 32:36 - If Paul's Epistle to the Galatians was Published in Christianity Today – The Sacred Sandwich 41:49 - Pittsburgh police announce they won't answer most calls from 3AM to 7AM due to staffing issues. Come see how many officers will even be working at night. – Jesse James, NTB 1:00:34 - Ken Buck Retiring Early, Further Shrinking GOP's House Majority – Daniel Chaitin, DW 1:08:51 - Feds Equate Typical Conservative Views With ‘Violent Extremism' In Financial Surveillance, House Weaponization Committee Finds – Megan Basham, DW 1:15:23 - Canadian law would allow judges to hand down life sentences for "speech crimes" (no, this isn't a joke) – Harris Rigby, NTB 1:18:37 - Overview of Personal Jurisdiction and Due Process – Constitution Annotated 1:24:22 - Fortress Building in Negative World – Timon Cline and Clifford Humphrey, American Reformer --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/garrett-ashley-mullet/message

Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction refers to a court's authority to hear a case based on the nature of the dispute. It's a threshold issue that determines whether a court can adjudicate a particular matter. There are two primary forms of subject matter jurisdiction: federal jurisdiction and state jurisdiction. Federal and State Jurisdiction. Federal jurisdiction pertains to cases involving federal laws, treaties, or the US Constitution. Federal courts also hear cases where the United States government is a party. The authority of federal courts is derived from Article III of the Constitution and various federal statutes. State jurisdiction, on the other hand, is much broader. State courts typically handle cases involving state laws, including family law, real estate, probate, and most contract and tort cases. State courts can also hear cases involving federal law, provided they don't exclusively fall under federal jurisdiction. A key aspect of subject matter jurisdiction is that it cannot be waived or consented to by the parties. If a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, any judgment or order it issues is void. Federal Question Jurisdiction. Federal question jurisdiction exists when a plaintiff's claim arises under federal law. This concept is rooted in Article III, Section 2 of the US Constitution and is codified in 28 USC § 1331. A case can be brought in federal court if it involves the interpretation or application of a federal statute, a constitutional issue, or a federal treaty. The 'well-pleaded complaint' rule is central to federal question jurisdiction. This rule stipulates that the federal question must be present in the plaintiff's original complaint; it cannot be based solely on a potential defense or a counterclaim. Diversity Jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction, as outlined in 28 USC § 1332, gives federal courts the authority to hear cases where the parties are citizens of different states or a foreign country and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. This type of jurisdiction aims to provide a neutral forum for parties from different states or countries. For diversity purposes, a party's citizenship is determined by their domicile, not merely their residence. Corporations are considered citizens of both the state where they are incorporated and the state where they have their principal place of business. Supplemental Jurisdiction. Supplemental jurisdiction allows federal courts to hear additional claims that are related to those within their original jurisdiction, even if the related claims would not independently qualify for federal jurisdiction. Codified in 28 USC § 1367, this concept is grounded in judicial efficiency, allowing related claims to be heard in a single proceeding. Supplemental jurisdiction applies when the additional claims share a "common nucleus of operative fact" with the claims that invoked original federal jurisdiction. However, courts have discretion to reject supplemental jurisdiction if it would overshadow the original basis for jurisdiction or raise complex state law issues. Personal Jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction refers to a court's power over the parties involved in the litigation. Without personal jurisdiction, a court cannot bind a party to its decisions. Traditional Basis of Personal Jurisdiction. Historically, courts could establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant if they were physically present in the state, domiciled in the state, or had consented to the jurisdiction. These traditional bases ensured that defendants had a clear connection to the state where the court was located. Long-arm statutes enable courts to reach beyond their state's borders to exercise jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. These statutes vary by state but generally allow courts to assert jurisdiction over non-residents who have certain types of contacts with the state, such as committing a tortious act within the state or doing business in the state. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In the 12th episode of "The Newfangled Lawyer Podcast," host Patrick Patino engages in a conversation with Hallie Ritzu, who refuses to confine herself to a single identity. This enlightening episode delves deeply into Hallie's unique journey, perspectives, and experiences, providing listeners with a multifaceted look into her life, career, and diverse interests. Hallie Ritzu shares her insights and experiences from running her own law firm, where she brings creativity and innovation to the forefront of her legal practice. Listeners are treated to a glimpse of Hallie's resilience and willingness to explore new opportunities, including her decision to leave a large law firm and venture into entrepreneurship, teaching, and her love for reading. What sets this episode apart is Hallie's candid acknowledgment that being an attorney does not define her entire identity or calling. Instead, she embraces the idea that the legal profession offers a multitude of possibilities, allowing legal professionals to explore diverse interests and paths. Her story serves as a compelling testament to the richness and fulfillment that can be found within the legal world when one embraces their multifaceted nature. Whether you're an attorney seeking inspiration, a legal professional curious about new perspectives, or simply someone intrigued by the legal field, this thought-provoking discussion is sure to provide valuable insights and inspiration. Join Patrick and Hallie as they explore the depths of the legal profession and discover how to fully embrace the multitudes within it. About Hallie Hallie Ritzu is an attorney and the founder of Olive Avenue LLC, an estate planning law firm based in Chicago, Illinois. Hallie is also the co-host of Personal Jurisdiction, a podcast featuring conversations with lawyers about their journeys before, during, and after law school. She's a graduate of Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, Middlebury College, and the College of Charleston. https://www.linkedin.com/in/hallieritzu/ https://www.oliveavenue.law

Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (2023) Majority Opinion Access additional resources for this case on oyez.org. Follow What SCOTUS Wrote Us for audio of Supreme Court opinions. Anywhere you listen to podcasts.

In this episode, we explore the transformative experience of law school clinics and their pivotal role in shaping the careers of aspiring lawyers. Today, we have the privilege of hearing from three exceptional graduates of Loyola Law School of Los Angeles' Ninth Circuit Clinic: Tina Kuang, Sydney Wong, and Molly Okamura. Under the guidance of our host, M.C. Sungaila, these talented alumni share their remarkable journeys, where they, along with their law school teammates, took on the challenge of briefing, arguing, and ultimately prevailing in immigration appeals before the esteemed Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Their stories exemplify how participation in law school clinics can sharpen legal skills, nurture professional growth, and accelerate careers in the legal arena.This episode also marks an exciting collaboration between the Portia Project and the Personal Jurisdiction podcast. Together, we strive to shed light on the significance of law school clinics, judicial externships, and judicial clerkship experiences, illuminating the path for future law students to find their own trajectories of success. Tune in for a captivating exploration of the possibilities that unfold when ambition, mentorship, and opportunity intertwine in the pursuit of legal excellence.

Episode 265 where we talk about Personal Jurisdiction in the Billy Mitchell case, Lone Mushroom, the Torment Nexus, Indie World Showcase, Nintendo’s 1991 Price-fixing, and more! Join the conversation with us LIVE every Tuesday on twitch.tv/2nerdsinapod at 9pm CST. Viewer questions/business inquiries can be sent to 2nerdsinapodcast@gmail.com Follow us on twitter @2NerdsInAPod for gaming news! […]

Join three experienced practitioners to hear about recent developments in the law of personal jurisdiction in Massachusetts and around the country. Topics include the Supreme Court's recent decisions on general and specific jurisdiction, recent noteworthy developments in Massachusetts and the First Circuit, and practical tips for deciding whether and how to pursue a personal jurisdiction defense. (2/28/23)   Questions? Inquiries about program materials? Contact Alan I. Johnson at ajohnson@bostonbar.org

In this final episode of 2022, I decided to share a little bit about how I lawyer. Yes, after 96 episodes as your host, I thought it fitting to end year 2 of the podcast with a little bit more about what I do, why I do it, and how I do it well (or try to). As the host of the show I really like finding interesting guests and asking the questions. I am a bit weary about being the guest. But a few months ago my friends at the Personal Jurisdiction Podcast (Hallie Ritzu & Allison Freedman) asked if I would come on there incredible podcast and tell my story--and now I am sharing that interview here.  We discuss my path to the law; my time clerking, in private practice, and now teaching at Georgetown Law; what I've learned from How I Lawyer; and so much more. I am very grateful to Hallie and Allison for letting me share this interview on my feed and hope you'll subscribe to their show wherever you get your podcasts. I'll be back in January 2023 with new and exciting interviews. Happy New Year friends! Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.com Our Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod. Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridge License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

For our 45th episode and the final episode of Season 3, we speak with Adria Kimbrough, Laura Rose, and A.J. Bellido de Luna, three of the mock trial coaches who appeared on the Class Action with Katie Phang podcast. We thought it would be great to hear from Adria, Laura, and AJ to learn more about their career journeys, why they have dedicated their time to coaching mock trial teams, and the advice they have for aspiring lawyers. Adria, Laura, and A.J. help us to end Season 3 with a bang! Don't miss this special conversation with our friends from Class Action. Show Notes for Episode 45: Class Action with Katie Pfang is an immersive 12 part documentary podcast series about the next generation of lawyers, heard through the voices of law students competing in mock trial tournaments around the country.​ You can listen to Class Action on iHeart, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you like to listen!  Adria Kimbrough is the Student Recruiting Manager in the Marshall-Motley Scholars Program at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Previously, Adria was a Pre-Law Advisor at Dillard University in New Orleans and served as one of the University's Mock Trial Team coaches. Professor Kimbrough is a graduate of Talledega College and the University of Cincinnati College of Law. Laura Rose is an Associate Professor of Law and the Heidepriem Trial Advocacy Fellow at the University of South Dakota Knudson School of Law. Professor Rose is a graduate of Stetson University and Stetson University College of Law.  A.J. Bellido de Luna is the Assistant Dean for Advocacy Programs and Hardy Service Professor of Law at St. Mary's University School of Law in San Antonio, Texas. He teaches Trial Advocacy and Arbitration and directs the law school's Advocacy Program National Team. A.J. is a graduate of University of Maryland School of Law and Johns Hopkins University. Learn more about and listen to Class Action with Katie Pfang by visiting the Class Action website. You can also follow Class Action on Instagram. Class Action with Katie Pfang is a production of Sound Argument and iHeartMedia. Thank you to producers Lisa Gray and Kevin Huffman for pitching this collaboration to us!  Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.com Find us on Twitter @PersonalJxPod Personal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast.  We use Riverside.FM to record our episodes.  Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor. Our Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod. Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridge License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license About Personal Jurisdiction: Join co-hosts Allison Freedman and Hallie Ritzu as we talk to a variety of people within the first 10ish years of practice to hear about their journeys to fulfilling careers and the advice they have for getting there. From government to start-ups; politics to academia; in-house to legal aid—we'll get the scoop on what it's really like to work in different areas of the law, so you can chart your own course for success.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jeena Cho is a Legal Mindfulness Consultant and Coach. Prior to becoming a fulltime mindfulness coach in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, Jeena was an Assistant State Attorney at the Hillsborough County State Attorney's Office and a longtime partner at JC Law Group PC, where she practiced bankruptcy law in California. Jeena is co-author of The Anxious Lawyer - an 8 Week Guide to a Joyful and Satisfying Law Practice. She also frequently contributes to publications such as Forbes, Bloombreg BNA, and Above the Law, where she shares her views, perspective, and tips on mindfulness, meditation, and so much more. Jenna graduated from the University of Buffalo in 2000 and the University of Buffalo School of Law in 2003.Connect with Jeena on LinkedIn.Follow Jeena on Twitter.Learn more about and purchase your copy of The Anxious Lawyer: An 8-Week Guide to a Happier, Saner Law Practice Using Meditation by Jeena Cho and Karen Gifford.Try Jeena's meditation that we shared with you in the Due Diligence portion of the Episode HERE. Learn more about Jeena Cho, her work and how she may be able to help you and/or your organization develop a mindfulness practice by checking out Jeena's website.  Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comFind us on Twitter @PersonalJxPodPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. We use Riverside.FM to record our episodes. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

We check in on some Court-related news and developments and Dan gives Will a hard time for his recent bold claim about the conservative justices. We then dig deep into Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., a fascinating personal jurisdiction case being argued in the November sitting.

Noah Nix is a third year law student at the University of Georgia School of Law in Athens, Georgia. Currently, Noah is serving as a legal intern in the Appellate & Trial Groups at the office of the Federal Public Defender for the Districts of Colorado and Wyoming. He is based in the Denver, Colorado office. Noah will graduate from law school in spring 2023.During his time at the University of Georgia School of Law, Noah has argued in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals as part of the Appellate Litigation Clinic at UGA Law. After law school, Noah will serve as a law clerk on the Colorado Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Noah is a graduate of Fordham University where he earned his Bachelor of Science degree and where he was a Division 1 athlete. Connect with Noah on LinkedIn.Follow Noah on Twitter.Noah mentioned a few books during our discussion - Check them out below:Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption by Bryan StevensonThe New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander Half American by Matthew F. DelmontFind us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comFind us on Twitter @PersonalJxPodPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Jonah Perlin teaches legal practice and advanced legal writing courses at Georgetown Law as a full-time Associate Professor of Law, Legal Practice. Before teaching at Georgetown Law, Jonah worked at Williams & Connolly LLP in Washington, D.C. where he specialized in complex civil litigation in the United States and abroad. While at Williams & Connolly he also taught advanced legal writing at the Law Center as an Adjunct Professor. Professor Perlin clerked for Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.He received his J.D., magna cum laude, from Georgetown in 2012, where he was an Articles Editor for the Georgetown Law Journal and a law fellow in the Legal Research and Writing Program. He received his A.B., magna cum laude, from Princeton University and his A.M. in Religious Studies from the University of Chicago Divinity School where he studied contemporary Jewish and Christian ethics.Jonah started the How I Lawyer Podcast in January 2021 in order to share the stories from lawyers across the profession about what they do, why they do it, and how they do it well. The goal of the podcast is to create permissionless networking opportunities at scale for the benefit of future law students, current law students, new lawyers, and seasoned practitioners.He lives in Washington, D.C. with his wife Debra and two young daughters. Learn more about Every Night is Pizza Night, the children's book by J. Kenji López-Alt that Jonah mentioned during the episode.Connect with Jonah on LinkedIn.Follow Jonah on Twitter.Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comFind us on Twitter @PersonalJxPodPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Mark Feldman is a Senior Litigation Attorney at the National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) in Washington, D.C. Prior to his time at NIJC, he was both a Staff Attorney and Senior Attorney at the Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, also in Washington, D.C., and a Law Fellow through the Equal Justice Initiative in Montgomery, Alabama. Mark clerked on both the United States District Court for the Central District of California and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He is a 2014 graduate of Stanford Law School and a 2007 graduate of the University of Michigan. Connect with Mark on LinkedInFind us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Sharonmoyee Goswami is a Partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City. Sharonmoyee's practice focuses on intellectual property, antitrust and litigation involving complex scientific issues.She is a graduate of Princeton University (2009) and New York University School of Law (2012, Order of the Coif., magna cum laude). Sharonmoyee clerked for the Honorable Timothy B. Dyk on the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C.Connect with Sharonmoyee on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comFollow us on Twitter @PersonalJxPodPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Wookie Kim is the legal director at the ACLU of Hawaii. He is also a Lecturer in Law at the University of Hawaii at Manoa William S. Richardson School of Law. Prior to his time in Hawaii, Wookie was an Associate at Quinn Emanuel in Washington DC and clerked for the Honorable Catherine C. Blake in the District of Maryland. Wookie is a 2009 graduate of Yale University and a 2014 graduate of Harvard Law School. Learn more about Wookie's near-death experience in Colorado via his Blog - Wookie Runs America. Connect with Wookie on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Nathan Brenner is an attorney at the Federal Trade Commission in Washington, D.C. Before joining the FTC, Nathan worked at the U.S. Department of Justice in the Antitrust Division. He also clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Nathan is a 2008 graduate of Boston University and a 2014 graduate of the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law. Connect with Nathan on LinkedIn.Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Abimbola Oladokun is Lead Counsel of General Litigation at Meta, formerly known as Facebook. Before her in-house role at Meta, Abimbola worked at two big law firms—one in Chicago and the other in California—where she focused on white-collar investigations and complex commercial litigation. She is a 2010 graduate of the University of Chicago and a 2015 graduate of the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law. Connect with Abimbola on LinkedInFind us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

In personam is a Latin phrase meaning "against a particular person". In a lawsuit in which the case is against a specific individual, that person must be served with a summons and complaint (E&W known as Particulars of Claim (CPR 1999) to give the court jurisdiction to try the case, and the judgment applies to that person and is called an "in personam judgment". In personam is distinguished from in rem, which applies to property or "all the world" instead of a specific person. This technical distinction is important to determine where to file a lawsuit and how to serve a defendant. In personam means that a judgment can be enforceable against the person wherever he or she is. On the other hand, if the lawsuit is to determine title to property (in rem) then the action must be filed where the property exists and is only enforceable there. In rem jurisdiction ("power about or against 'the thing'") is a legal term describing the power a court may exercise over property (either real or personal) or a "status" against a person over whom the court does not have in personam jurisdiction. Jurisdiction in rem assumes the property or status is the primary object of the action, rather than personal liabilities not necessarily associated with the property. A quasi in rem legal action (Latin, "as if against a thing") is a legal action based on property rights of a person absent from the jurisdiction. In the American legal system the state can assert power over an individual simply based on the fact that this individual has property (bank account, debt, share of stock, land) in the state. Quasi in rem jurisdiction does not have much function in the United States any longer. However, in very specific cases, quasi in rem jurisdiction can still be effective. A quasi in rem action is commonly used when jurisdiction over the defendant is unobtainable due to their absence from the state. Any judgment will affect only the property seized, as in personam jurisdiction is unobtainable. Of note, in a quasi in rem case the court may lack personal jurisdiction over the defendant, but it has jurisdiction over the defendant's property. The property could be seized to obtain a claim against the defendant. A judgment based on quasi in rem jurisdiction generally affects rights to the property only between the persons involved and does not "bind the entire world" as does a judgment based on "jurisdiction in rem". --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

David Lat is a lawyer turned writer and commentator on the legal profession. David is a graduate of Harvard College (1996) and Yale Law School (1999). He clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1999-2000), worked as a litigation associate at the New York law firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, & Katz, and served as an Assistant United States Attorney in Newark, New Jersey. David is the voice of Underneath Their Robes, a blog he started in 2004 about the federal judiciary. David is also the founder of Above the Law, the legal news website we all know and love for its transparency about law schools, law firms, and the legal profession. After leaving Above the Law in 2019, David worked with Lateral Link, a legal recruiting firm. David created Original Jurisdiction in 2020 and now dedicates himself to writing full-time via that platform.  Learn more about David Lat here. Check out David's website and subscribe to his newsletter, Original Jurisdiction. Follow David on Twitter. Connect with David on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Personal jurisdiction is a court's jurisdiction over the parties, as determined by the facts in evidence, which bind the parties to a lawsuit, as opposed to subject-matter jurisdiction, which is jurisdiction over the law involved in the suit. Without personal jurisdiction over a party, a court's rulings or decrees cannot be enforced upon that party, except by comity; for example, to the extent that the sovereign which has jurisdiction over the party allows the court to enforce them upon that party. A court that has personal jurisdiction has both the authority to rule on the law and facts of a suit and the power to enforce its decision upon a party to the suit. In some cases, territorial jurisdiction may also constrain a court's reach, such as preventing hearing of a case concerning events occurring on foreign territory between two citizens of the home jurisdiction. A similar principle is that of standing or locus standi, which is the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case. International principles. Since there is no world government which all countries recognize to arbitrate disputes over jurisdiction, sovereign powers can find themselves in conflict over which is the more appropriate venue to hear a case, or which country's laws should apply. These conflicts are sometimes resolved de facto by physical factors, such as which country has physical possession of a defendant or property, or sometimes by use of physical police or military force to seize people or property. A country with loose rule of law – for example an absolute monarchy with no independent judiciary – may arbitrarily choose to assert jurisdiction over a case without citing any particular justification. Such assertion can cause problems, such as encouraging other countries to take arbitrary actions over foreign citizens and property, or even provoking skirmishes or armed conflict. In practice, many countries operate by one or another principles, either in written law or in practice, which communicate when the country will and will not assert jurisdiction: treaty jurisdiction — An international treaty explicitly decides the issue. territorial principle — A country asserts jurisdiction over people, property, and events taking place on its own territory. nationality principle — A country asserts jurisdiction over the conduct of its citizens, anywhere in the world. passive personality principle — A country asserts jurisdiction over acts committed against its citizens, anywhere in the world. protective principle — A country asserts jurisdiction over issues that affect its interests, such as conspiracies to overthrow its government, or resources critical to its economy (such as access to an international waterway) universal jurisdiction — A country asserts jurisdiction over certain acts committed by anyone, anywhere in the world. Usually reserved for exceptionally serious crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

This month, June 2022, tune in for our Student Clinic Spotlight Series! During this series, we're featuring students from law schools around the country who have participated in a variety law school clinics.  Over the past two seasons of the show, many of our guests have talked about the impact that clinic work has had on their career trajectories and work experience. So, we've decided to chat with students who are in the thick of a clinic experience and hear more about advice they have for law students. Whether you're thinking about doing a clinic in law school, learning more about what law school clinics do, or hearing from students who have lots of wisdom to share, this series is for you! In this week's episode, we talk to Analy Ayala, a rising 3L at the University of Illinois College of Law. Analy is a student attorney in the Immigration Law Clinic. She has also worked as a career advising associate in the Office of Career Planning at U of I College of Law. Analy is active in the LatinX Law Students Association. This summer, Analy is a summer associate in the Chicago office of Faegre Drinker. Connect with Analy on LinkedIn.Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.

This episode is also available as a blog post: https://tcpaworld.com/2022/06/24/happyness-a-court-in-a-tcpa-case-just-gave-one-of-the-cleanest-explanations-of-personal-jurisdiction-i-have-ever-seen-and-it-makes-me-smile/

This month, June 2022, tune in for our Student Clinic Spotlight Series! During this series, we're featuring students from law schools around the country who have participated in a variety law school clinics.  Over the past two seasons of the show, many of our guests have talked about the impact that clinic work has had on their career trajectories and work experience. So, we've decided to chat with students who are in the thick of a clinic experience and hear more about advice they have for law students. Whether you're thinking about doing a clinic in law school, learning more about what law school clinics do, or hearing from students who have lots of wisdom to share, this series is for you! In this week's episode, we talk to Francisco J. Maldonado Andreu who just graduated from The George Washington University Law School in Washington, D.C. During law school, Francisco participated in the Civil and Human Rights Law Clinic, he was the Co-President of the Latin American Law Student Association, and he was active in Lambda Law. Connect with Francisco on LinkedIn. Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.

This month, June 2022, tune in for our Student Clinic Spotlight Series! During this series, we're featuring students from law schools around the country who have participated in a variety law school clinics.  Over the past two seasons of the show, many of our guests have talked about the impact that clinic work has had on their career trajectories and work experience. So, we've decided to chat with students who are in the thick of a clinic experience and hear more about advice they have for law students. Whether you're thinking about doing a clinic in law school, learning more about what law school clinics do, or hearing from students who have lots of wisdom to share, this series is for you! In this week's episode, we talk to Jessica Paduganan who just graduated from The University of Michigan Law School. During law school, Jessica participated in the Civil-Criminal Litigation Clinic and the Workers' Rights Clinic, the Michigan Law Review, and the First Generation Law Students group. Connect with Jessica on LinkedIn. Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.

This month, June 2022, tune in for our Student Clinic Spotlight Series! During this series, we're featuring students from law schools around the country who have participated in a variety law school clinics.  Over the past two seasons of the show, many of our guests have talked about the impact that clinic work has had on their career trajectories and work experience. So, we've decided to chat with students who are in the thick of a clinic experience and hear more about advice they have for law students. Whether you're thinking about doing a clinic in law school, learning more about what law school clinics do, or hearing from students who have lots of wisdom to share, this series is for you! In this week's episode, we talk to Derick Wallace who just graduated from The George Washington University Law School in Washington, D.C. During law school Derick participated in the Small Business & Community Economic Development Clinic and was the President of the Black Law Students Association (BLSA). Connect with Derick on LinkedIn. Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.

Special guest Cassandra Robertson, the John Deaver Drinko – BakerHostetler Professor of Law at Case Western Law School. Hosted by Scott Dodson.

This month, May 2022, How I Lawyer is teaming up with the Personal Jurisdiction Podcast (https://www.personaljxpod.com/) to feature five interviews on the important topic of mental health in the legal profession. This is the final episode in this series. Thanks to the Personal Jurisdiction team for joining me in this important work. In this week's episode I speak with Doron Gold who is a psychotherapist and former practicing lawyer (primarily in the area of family law) from Toronto, Canada. Doron works primarily with lawyers, law students, and judges as well as other professionals. His personal experience working in the legal profession, coupled with his many years of experiences working with lawyers in distress at the Ontario Lawyers' Assistance Program (OLAP) give him a unique and valuable perspective on the challenges faced by these individuals. In addition to treating lawyers, Doron presents regularly on issues related to mental health for lawyers. He is a graduate of York University and York University's Osgoode Hall Law School and the University of Windsor from which he holds a Masters of Social Work. You can learn more about him and his work on Twitter @DoronJGold. In the episode we discuss his personal path from lawyer to therapist, the mental health challenges that lawyers often face, ways that lawyers can and should find help, why perfectionism is so common in legal professionals (and the challenges resulting from this perfectionism), the importance of thinking about "how you feel as opposed to how should you feel," learning about yourself and the real (as opposed to perceived) expectations of those around you, the power of therapy when you find the right person to talk to, techniques for finding the right person to talk to, the difference between feedback and criticism, the benefit of "finding your people" and building community, the value of showing kindness when you see a meaningful change in a friend or colleague, and more. This episode is sponsored, edited, and engineered by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys.

This month, May 2022, the Personal Jurisdiction and the How I Lawyer Podcasts are teaming up to feature five interviews on the important topic of mental health in the legal profession.In this week's episode, the fifth and final episode in this series, Jonah speaks with Doron Gold, a psychotherapist and former practicing lawyer (primarily in the area of family law) from Toronto, Canada. Doron works primarily with lawyers, law students, and judges as well as other professionals. His personal experience working in the legal profession, coupled with his many years of experiences working with lawyers in distress at the Ontario Lawyers' Assistance Program (OLAP) give him a unique and valuable perspective on the challenges faced by these individuals. In addition to treating lawyers, Doron presents regularly on issues related to mental health for lawyers. He is a graduate of York University and York University's Osgoode Hall Law School and the University of Windsor from which he holds a Masters of Social Work. You can learn more about him and his work on Twitter @DoronJGold. In the episode, Jonah and Doran discuss Doron's personal path from lawyer to therapist, the mental health challenges that lawyers often face, ways that lawyers can and should find help, why perfectionism is so common in legal professionals (and the challenges resulting from this perfectionism), the importance of thinking about "how you feel as opposed to how should you feel," learning about yourself and the real (as opposed to perceived) expectations of those around you, the power of therapy when you find the right person to talk to, techniques for finding the right person to talk to, the difference between feedback and criticism, the benefit of "finding your people" and building community, the value of showing kindness when you see a meaningful change in a friend or colleague, and more.Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Find out more about Jonah Perlin and the #HowILawyer podcast here. And follow Jonah on Twitter here. This episode is sponsored, edited, and engineered by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys.Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor. 

**This month, May 2022, How I Lawyer is teaming up with the Personal Jurisdiction Podcast (https://www.personaljxpod.com/) to feature five interviews on the important topic of mental health in the legal profession. This is episode #4 in this collaboration. Learn more here.** In today's episode, Personal Jurisdiction hosts Hallie Ritzu and Allison Freedman speak with Dr. Diana Uchiyama who is a lawyer & psychologist helping people struggling with mental health and substance use issues as the the Executive Director of the Illinois Lawyers' Assistance Program. Dr. Diana was previously the Administrator of Psychological Services for DuPage County and worked for the Kane County Diagnostic Center, as both a Staff Psychologist and Juvenile Drug Court Coordinator. She also has an extensive background doing court ordered psychological, sanity, fitness, and sex offender evaluations and therapy. She has implemented numerous changes to court ordered programs both in Kane and DuPage County and is a certified trauma informed care trainer. Prior to obtaining her masters and doctorate in Clinical Psychology, Dr. Uchiyama was an Assistant Public Defender in Cook County. She obtained her law degree from Pepperdine University School of Law. If you enjoy this episode, please make sure to sign up for future episodes at www.howilawyer.com or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Stay tuned next week for my interview with another truly inspirational lawyer turned psychotherapist, the Lawyer Therapist Doron Gold. The How I Lawyer Podcast is sponsored by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys. Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media.

This month, May 2022, the Personal Jurisdiction and the How I Lawyer Podcasts are teaming up to feature five interviews on the important topic of mental health in the legal profession. In the fourth episode in the series, Hallie and Allison chat with Dr. Diana Uchiyama, the Executive Director of the Illinois Lawyers' Assistance Program, about the mental health struggles she has identified among those in the legal profession and what we can all do to build healthy habits to support our own mental health journeys. Dr. Diana is the Executive Director of the Illinois Lawyers' Assistance Program, a not-for-profit organization that helps Illinois lawyers, judges, law students, and their families concerned about alcohol or substance use or dependency, mental health issues including depression, anxiety, and suicidal thinking, or stress-related issues such as compassion fatigue and burnout. The Illinois Lawyers' Assistance Program offers many different resources for law students, lawyers, and judges, including group meetings, virtual CLEs, and free and confidential consultations. Learn more here. Prior to joining LAP, Dr. Diana was the Administrator of Psychological Services for DuPage County. Dr. Diana was an Assistant Public Defender in Cook County for over a decade. Dr. Diana earned her B.A. from the University of Illinois, her JD from Pepperdine University School of Law, her MS in Clinical Psychology from Benedictine University and her Doctor of Clinical Psychology from Midwestern University. Connect with Illinois Lawyers' Assistance Program on Twitter and on LinkedInConnect with Dr. Diana on LinkedIn. Learn more about the work of the Illinois Lawyers' Assistance Program here. Find out more about Jonah Perlin and the #HowILawyer podcast here. And follow Jonah on Twitter here. Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.

Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! In today's "Listen and Learn" episode, we look at the various ways of establishing whether a court has jurisdiction over the parties in a lawsuit. In this episode we discuss: Establishing personal jurisdiction through traditional bases The difference between "domicile" and "presence" Long-arm statutes and ties to the forum state The two parts of the constitutional analysis General jurisdiction and specific jurisdiction Analyzing two hypos from previous California bar exams Structuring an answer to a personal jurisdiction question Resources: “Listen and Learn” series (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/law-school-toolbox-podcast-substantive-law-topics/#listen-learn) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, February 2004 (https://nwculaw.edu/pdf/bar/February%202004%20Essays%20and%20Sample%20Answers.pdf) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2016 (https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/gbx/July2016_CBXSelectedAnswers_EssayQuestions1-6_R.pdf) Podcast Episode 218: Listen and Learn – Supplemental Jurisdiction (Civ Pro) (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-218-listen-and-learn-supplemental-jurisdiction-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 263: Listen and Learn – Subject Matter Jurisdiction (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-263-listen-and-learn-subject-matter-jurisdiction/) Download the Transcript  (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/episode-343-listen-and-learn-personal-jurisdiction-civ-pro/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/law-school-toolbox-podcast/id1027603976) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Law School Toolbox website (http://lawschooltoolbox.com/contact). If you're concerned about the bar exam, check out our sister site, the Bar Exam Toolbox (http://barexamtoolbox.com/). You can also sign up for our weekly podcast newsletter (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/get-law-school-podcast-updates/) to make sure you never miss an episode! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

**This month, May 2022, How I Lawyer is teaming up with the Personal Jurisdiction Podcast (https://www.personaljxpod.com/) to feature five interviews on the important topic of mental health in the legal profession. Learn more here.** In today's episode I speak with Brian Cuban. Brian is a Dallas-based attorney, keynote speaker, writer, and addiction recovery advocate. Brian has been in long-term recovery from alcohol, cocaine and bulimia since April of 2007. Brian is well known and speaks across the country at law schools & law firms both to tell his story and to offer advice on how our profession can better improve mental health awareness, awareness of substance abuse problems, and building more compassionate communities. He is the author of three books: Shattered Image, the Addicted Lawyer, and most recently his debut novel: The Ambulance Chaser. In our conversation, Brian candidly shared his personal story from addiction to recovery; what he recommends to individuals who are struggling & those who want to support them, and suggestions for the legal profession and legal education writ large. **Please note this episode does cover several topics that some might find disturbing including substance abuse, eating disorders, and suicide.** This episode is sponsored, edited, and engineered by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys.

Connect with Brian Cuban on Twitter and on LinkedIn.Learn more about Brian by visiting his website. Find out more about Jonah Perlin and the #HowILawyer podcast here. And follow Jonah on Twitter here. This episode is sponsored, edited, and engineered by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys.Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.

**This month, May 2022, How I Lawyer is teaming up with the Personal Jurisdiction Podcast (https://www.personaljxpod.com/) to feature five interviews on the important topic of mental health in the legal profession. Learn more here.** In today's episode Personal Jurisdiction hosts Hallie Ritzu and Allison Freedman speak with University of Michigan Law Professors Bridgette Carr and Vivek Sankaran. Bridgette Carr is a Clinical Professor of Law and the Associate Dean for Strategic Initiatives at the University of Michigan Law School. She is also the founding director of the Law School's Human Trafficking Clinic, the first clinical law program solely devoted to addressing this issue comprehensively. Bridgette is also a first generation college graduate who wasn't sure law school was for her. She didn't so a journal or apply for a clerkship, and instead spent her spare time during law school working at a local legal aid office and an asylum shelter. Despite now being an expert on human trafficking, Bridgette hadn't heard of human trafficking work until after she graduated from law school. Vivek Sankaran is also a Clinical Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. He directs both the Child Advocacy Law Clinic and the Child Welfare Appellate Clinic, through which law students represent children and parents in trials and appellate proceedings. He is also a father of three boys, he loves coaching youth sports, and he is learning to play the guitar. Together they teach a course that they created called “Finding a Fulfilling Life in the Law” at the University of Michigan Law School. In it, they ask students to consider what they want out of life after law school and how they can create that life. The course applies innovative principles of problem solving to the concept of designing your life in and beyond law school. Bridgette and Vivek also recently launched an exciting new business—LawLifeProf Coaching—to help lawyers in practice build a toolbox for a fulfilling life. In their conversation they discuss why being curious, trying new things, and staying connected to people you care about can help you to design a fulfilling life in the law. There is no yellow brick road, there is no checklist - but Bridgette and Vivek share many pieces of advice and personal reflections for anyone who is not quite fulfilled in their career. If you enjoy this episode, please make sure to sign up for future episodes at www.howilawyer.com or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Stay tuned next week for my interview with author, activist, and motivational speaker, Brian Cuban. The How I Lawyer Podcast is sponsored by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys.

This month, May 2022, the Personal Jurisdiction and the How I Lawyer Podcasts are teaming up to feature five interviews on the important topic of mental health in the legal profession. In the second episode in the series, Hallie and Allison chat with University of Michigan Law School Professors Bridgette Carr and  Vivek Sankaran about how to design a fulfilling life in the law, while in law school and beyond. Connect with Bridgette on Twitter and on LinkedInConnect with Vivek on Twitter and on LinkedInLearn more about the Finding a Fulfilling Life in the Law Course designed and taught by Bridgette and Vivek at University of Michigan Law School. The course asks students to consider what they want out of life after law school and how they can create that life. The course applies innovative principles of problem solving to the concept of designing your life in and beyond law school. Bridgette and Vivek also recently launched an exciting new business—LawLifeProf Coaching—to help lawyers in practice build a toolbox for a fulfilling life. Learn more about Bridgette and Vivek's LawLifeProfs coaching business. Bridgette Carr is a Clinical Professor of Law and the Associate Dean for Strategic Initiatives at the University of Michigan Law School. She is also the founding director of the Law School's Human Trafficking Clinic, the first clinical law program solely devoted to addressing this issue comprehensively. Bridgette is also a first generation college graduate who wasn't sure law school was for her. She didn't so a journal or apply for a clerkship, and instead spent her spare time during law school working at a local legal aid office and an asylum shelter. Despite now being an expert on human trafficking, Bridgette hadn't heard of human trafficking work until after she graduated from law school.  Vivek Sankaran is also a Clinical Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. He directs both the Child Advocacy Law Clinic and the Child Welfare Appellate Clinic, through which law students represent children and parents in trials and appellate proceedings. He is also a father of three boys, he loves coaching youth sports, and he is learning to play the guitar. Find out more about Jonah Perlin and the #HowILawyer podcast here. And follow Jonah on Twitter here. Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.

**This month, May 2022, How I Lawyer is teaming up with the Personal Jurisdiction Podcast (https://www.personaljxpod.com/) to feature five interviews on the important topic of mental health in the legal profession. Learn more here.** In today's episode I speak with Professor Heidi Brown who is the Director of the Legal Writing Program at Brooklyn Law School. Having grappled with extreme performance anxiety as a law student, attorney, and new law professor, Heidi ultimately untangled her fears, and embraced authenticity as a powerful asset in teaching and practicing law. She is the author of two fantastic books on the subject, The Introverted Lawyer: A Seven-Step Journey Toward Authentically Empowered Advocacy, and Untangling Fear in Lawyering: A Four-Step Journey Toward Powerful Advocacy. Professor Brown's brand new book, The Flourishing Lawyer, analogizes law students and lawyers to athletes and performers & offers a fresh lens through which to view the palpable challenge of enriching and safeguarding well-being in the legal profession—an approach that (1) champions individual and collective strengths, rather than stigmatizing purported weaknesses, and (2) redefines “character and fitness to practice law” as attributes we can, and must, actively and continuously cultivate, as individuals and legal communities. She recently earned her master's degree in Applied Positive Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania and holds a BA and JD from the University of Virginia. In our conversation we discuss her path in the law and her decision to study topics related to mental health and success in the legal profession, staying true to yourself as a lawyer, the difference between introversion and social anxiety, techniques from athletes and performers that can be applied to a career in the law, and so much more. If you enjoy this episode, please make sure to sign up for future episodes at www.howilawyer.com or to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. This episode is sponsored, edited, and engineered by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys.

Professor Heidi Brown recently earned her master's degree in Applied Positive Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania and holds a BA and JD from the University of Virginia.Connect with Professor Heidi Brown on LinkedIn and on Twitter. Visit her online at http://www.theintrovertedlawyer.com And here https://www.theflourishinglawyer.orgFind out more about Jonah Perlin and the #HowILawyer podcast here. And follow Jonah on Twitter here. This episode is sponsored, edited, and engineered by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys.Find Personal Jurisdiction online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Personal Jurisdiction's logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.

Ally Coll is the President and Co-Founder of the Purple Campaign, a non-profit organization whose mission is to address workplace harassment. She is an attorney and a nationally recognized expert on gender equality in the workplace and the #MeToo movement. Prior to founding the Purple Campaign, Ally was a litigator in private practice in Washington D.C. where she also spent time on Capitol Hill as an aide in both the U.S. House and Senate. During the 2016 election she joined Hillary Clinton's legal team in headquarters as the Deputy Director of Voter Protection.Ally is also an Adjunct Professor at George Mason University, where she teaches civil rights law. She is a 2007 graduate of Tulane University and a 2016 graduate of Harvard Law School. Learn more about the mission of the Purple Campaign.Check out Ally's testimony in support of the Judiciary Accountability Act.Connect with Ally on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Juan Perla is a partner at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP in New York City. His practice focuses on appellate work and international dispute resolution. He is a graduate of Andrews University (BA, 2003), University of Southern California (MPA, 2006), and the University of California Berkeley School of Law (JD, 2012). He served as a law clerk for the Honorable C. Darnell Jones II on the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Honorable Luis Felipe Restrepo on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Learn more about the United States v. Vaello-Madero case pending before the Supreme Court.Connect with Juan on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

David Dormon is General Counsel at Downtown Music Holdings. He is based in Los Angeles. Prior to his time at Downtown Music, he was an associate at the law firms of Reed Smith (2021 - 2022), Vedder Price (2016 - 2018), and Katten (2014 - 2016). David is a graduate of Tufts University and the University of Chicago Law School. Connect with David on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Lindsay Dubin is a Staff Attorney at Defenders of Wildlife in Washington, D.C. Prior to her job in D.C., she worked at the Environmental Law & Policy Center in Chicago, IL. She is a 2007 graduate of Cornell University and a 2014 graduate of Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law. Connect with Lindsay on LinkedIn.Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! In today's "Listen and Learn" episode, we look at the various ways of establishing whether a court has jurisdiction over the parties in a lawsuit. In this episode, we discuss: Establishing personal jurisdiction through traditional bases The difference between "domicile" and "presence" Long-arm statutes and ties to the forum state The two parts of the constitutional analysis General jurisdiction and specific jurisdiction Analyzing two hypos from previous California bar exams Structuring an answer to a personal jurisdiction question Resources: “Listen and Learn” series (https://barexamtoolbox.com/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-archive-by-topic/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-explaining-individual-mee-and-california-bar-essay-questions/#listen-learn) The Brainy Bar Bank: Streamlining Bar Study (https://barexamtoolbox.com/brainy-bar-bank/) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, February 2004 (https://nwculaw.edu/pdf/bar/February%202004%20Essays%20and%20Sample%20Answers.pdf) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2016 (https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/gbx/July2016_CBXSelectedAnswers_EssayQuestions1-6_R.pdf) International Shoe Co. v. Washington (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Shoe_Co._v._Washington) Podcast Episode 33: Tackling an MEE Civil Procedure Question (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-33-tackling-an-mee-civil-procedure-question/) Podcast Episode 72: Tackling a California Bar Exam Essay: Civil Procedure (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-72-tackling-a-california-bar-exam-essay-civil-procedure/) Podcast Episode 92: Listen and Learn – Subject Matter Jurisdiction (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-92-listen-and-learn-subject-matter-jurisdiction/) Podcast Episode 111: Listen and Learn – Introduction to Supplemental Jurisdiction (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-111-introduction-to-supplemental-jurisdiction-civ-pro/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-169-listen-and-learn-personal-jurisdiction-civ-pro/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Emily Thomas is Senior Counsel at Hyatt Hotels Corporation in Chicago. Prior to her role at Hyatt, Emily was an associate in the real estate group at Katten in Chicago.  Emily is a 2008 graduate of American University and a 2014 graduate of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law. Connect with Emily on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license  

Suhas Subramanyam is a Delegate of the Virginia House of Delegates. He represents District 87 which comprises Loudon County and Prince William County. He has served Virginia since 2020. Suhas has also acted as counsel for a number of startups.Prior to serving Virginia, he was a Policy Advisor & Special Assistant for Technology for the White House during the Obama Administration. He is a 2008 graduate of Tulane University and a 2013 graduate of Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law. Connect with Suhas on LinkedIn.Connect with Suhas on Twitter.Connect with Suhas on Facebook. Visit Suhas for Virginia.Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Chloe is Senior Counsel at Longroad Energy. You can find out more about the work Longroad does here. Chloe Rossen is a graduate of Tufts University (2008) and Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law (2014). Connect with Chloe on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license 

Leah Litman is a Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. She teaches and writes on constitutional law, federal courts, and federal sentencing. Her research examines unidentified and implicit values that are used to structure the legal system, the federal courts, and the legal profession. Leah's scholarship has appeared in several top law reviews. Her work also appears in popular media, including The New York Times and Slate. Leah is also the co-host of Strict Scrutiny, a popular podcast about the United States Supreme Court and the legal culture that surrounds it. Strict Scrutiny has a different voice–one that celebrates the contributions and opinions of women and people of color. She is the co-creator of Women Also Know Law, a tool to promote the work of women and non-binary academics.  Leah also maintains an active pro bono practice. For example, she was part of the litigation team in Garcia v. United States, one of the successful challenges to the rescission of the DACA program, for which the team was recognized as California Lawyers of the Year. Prior to her position at Michigan Law School, Leah clerked on the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and on the United States Supreme Court. Following her clerkships, she worked at WilmerHale in D.C. She was a Climenko Fellow and Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School, and an Assistant Professor at the University of California, Irvine, School of Law.  Leah has won several awards for her teaching--in 2021 Michigan Law students awarded her the L.Hart Wright Teaching Award, and in 2019 she won the Professor of the Year Award while at the UC Irvine School of Law.  Leah is a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Michigan Law School.Follow Leah on Twitter @LeahLitman and @StrictScrutiny_and @WomenKnowLawListen to the Strict Scrutiny Podcast here and learn more about Strict Scrutiny here. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPodAnd on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license    

Donya Khadem is a judicial law clerk on the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Previously, she was a judicial law clerk on the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. She is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin at Madison (2015) and the University of Michigan Law School (2019).Connect with Donya on LinkedIn. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPod And on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Support the work of Social Change by donating, volunteering your time, and following Social Change on social media to keep updated on the important work they're doing. Visit Social Change online at https://socialchange.siteFollow Social Change on Twitter @CHIsocialchange,  Instagram @CHIsocialchange and Facebook Connect with Todd Belcore on LinkedIn. Learn more about the Equal Justice Works Fellowship that Todd was a part of after law school. As an EJW Fellow, Todd worked at the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law in Chicago where he focused on litigating, organizing, educating, and crafting legislation to ensure that individuals with criminal records are not unjustly denied employment or occupational licenses.Todd is a graduate of the University of Michigan and Northwestern University School of Law.Todd also makes an impact by mediating disputes and teaching law students how to transform systems to make them equity-centered via a class called "The New Jim Crow" (that he teaches at Northwestern Law and University of Chicago Law School).As a result of Todd's commitment to transforming lives and communities, he has received 23 honors, including the ABA's National Outstanding Young Lawyer of the Year and the White House's Champion of Change Awards. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPod And on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

All opinions in this episode are those of Katherine Leung, personally, and not intended to be attributed to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).Katherine Leung is a Field Attorney at the National Labor Relations Board in Washington, D.C. Katherine is a graduate of Wellesley College (2014) and Harvard Law School (2017). Connect with Katherine on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/katherineeleung/ Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.comOn Twitter @PersonalJxPod And on Instagram @PersonalJxPodcastPersonal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with Simplecast. Our logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is edited by Scott Donnell at Run and Drum Media https://www.runanddrummedia.comOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Get excited for Season 2 by catching up on the great episodes from Season 1. During Season 1, we talked to: 

Please note that the content in this podcast reflects Amy Chapple's opinions only and not the opinions of AbbVie. Amy Chapple is U.S. Commercial Brand Counsel at AbbVie in Deerfield, Illinois. She is a 2014 graduate of University of Illinois Chicago School of Law and a 2007 graduate of Loyola University of Chicago. We tried some new things in this episode with Amy. Let us know what you think! We'd LOVE to hear from you. Email us at personaljxpod@gmail.com or tweet at us @personaljxpod Our Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-licenseOur logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with SimpleCast. Find us online at www.personaljxpod.com and on Twitter @PersonalJxPod 

Alissa Lietzow is a 2007 graduate of the College of Charleston in Charleston, South Carolina and a 2010 graduate of the Charleston School of Law. She is the Executive Director of Charleston Pro Bono Legal Services.Visit Charleston Pro Bono Legal Services online at https://charlestonprobono.orgCharleston Pro Bono is also on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/charlestonprobono/ Visit the Charleston School of Law here: https://charlestonlaw.edu Our Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-licenseOur logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with SimpleCast. Find us online at www.personaljxpod.com and on Twitter @PersonalJxPod 

My Khanh Ngo is a 2017 graduate of Yale Law School and a 2013 graduate of Yale University (B.A. Political Science, International Studies). Check out the Appellate Project - https://theappellateproject.org/ - a resource for students of color interested in appellate work.During Due Diligence, we discussed the concept of saying no and how it can be helpful (and some even argue, essential) to success. Learn more about this perspective in the following articles: "You can do anything, but you can't do everything." Fascinating study from Farnam Street: https://fs.blog/2011/09/steve-jobs-saying-no/And another along the same lines - Saying No to the Non-Essential: https://fs.blog/2018/03/speed-velocity/ Warren Buffett: "Really Successful People Say No to Almost Everything" - https://medium.com/accelerated-intelligence/warren-buffett-really-successful-people-say-no-to-almost-everything-ab78832ffebc?utm_source=pocket_mylistThoughts on the good that can come from quitting something from NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/20/style/quit-job.html?referringSource=articleShare&utm_source=pocket_mylistAnd this interesting take on Cold Calling Emails from Morning Brew: https://www.morningbrew.com/daily/stories/2020/07/15/not-suck-cold-emailing?utm_source=pocket_mylistOur Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-licenseOur logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor.Personal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with SimpleCast. Find us online at www.personaljxpod.com and on Twitter @PersonalJxPod 

During this episode, Anna discussed research she has done regarding law student happiness. She provided a couple of articles for our listeners. Check them out here:Kennon M. Sheldon and Lawrence S. Krieger, Understanding the Negative Effects of Legal Education on Law Students: A Longitudinal Test of Self-Determination Theory, available at https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2007_SheldonKrieger_PSPB.pdfKennon M. Sheldon and Lawrence S. Krieger, What Makes Lawyers Happy?: A Data- Driven Prescription to Redefine Professional Success, available at https://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/83-Geo-Wash-L-Rev-554.pdfMarquette University Law School: https://law.marquette.edu/Anna Fodor at Marquette University Law School: https://law.marquette.edu/faculty-and-staff-directory/detail/6126061Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.com and on Twitter @PersonalJxPod Our Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-licenseOur logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor. Personal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with SimpleCast. 

Sumbul Siddiqui is the Mayor of the City of Cambridge Massachusetts. She is a 2014 graduate of Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law and a 2010 graduate of Brown University.Mayor Siddiqui's City of Cambridge website: https://www.cambridgema.gov/Departments/citycouncil/citycouncilmembers/sumbulsiddiquiMayor Siddiqui's reelection website: https://www.votesumbul.comFollow Mayor Siddiqui on Twitter: @MayorSiddiquiCheck out information about Cambridge's Guaranteed Income Pilot Here: https://www.cambridgema.gov/Departments/mayorsoffice/News/2021/04/guaranteedincomepilotinitiativeIf you want to learn more about what the Mayor and Vice Mayor do on the day-to-day, check out "Women are Here" - Mayor Siddiqui's podcast with Cambridge's Vice-Mayor, Alanna Mallon - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/women-are-here/id1341060679Mayor Siddiqui participated in Emerge Massachusetts, an organization that works "[t]o increase the number of Democratic women leaders from diverse backgrounds in public office through recruitment, training, and providing a powerful network." Find out more here: https://ma.emergeamerica.org. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.com and on Twitter @PersonalJxPod Our Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-licenseOur logos were designed by Lizzie Lorek.Personal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with SimpleCast.  

Link to the University of Michigan Law School's Civil-Criminal Litigation Clinic where Allison is a Clinical Fellow:  https://michigan.law.umich.edu/academics/experiential-learning/clinics/civil-criminal-litigation-clinic Our Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-licenseOur logos were designed by Lizzie L. O'Connor. Personal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with SimpleCast. Find us online at https://www.personaljxpod.com and on Twitter @PersonalJxPod 

On this week's episode, Los Angeles product liability litigation partner Alina Mooradian discusses the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Ford Motor Company v. Montana and its possible effect on future personal jurisdiction cases.

This episode is also available as a blog post: https://tcpaworld.com/2021/08/11/ninth-circuit-weighs-in-on-when-to-challenge-personal-jurisdiction-over-claims-of-absent-class-members/

Our Theme Song is Pleasant Porridge by Kevin MacLeod.Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/7614-pleasant-porridgeLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-licenseOur logos were designed by Lizzie Lorek.Personal Jurisdiction is powered and distributed with SimpleCast. 

TUNE IN EVERY TUESDAY AT 7 PM EST CALL IN TO (425) 569-5169 or (563) 999-3615 GET REMEDY AT akiemel.com BECOME A PREMIUM MEMBER HERE akiemel.com CHECK OUT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL HERE

That's right, Hulkamaniacs.  This week's supersized episode covers this year's Wrestelmania while covering the past, present and future implications that Ford Motor Company v. Bandemere has on personal jurisdiction.  A time stamp would be pointless, but there's a surprising amount of law that is certainly more than I originally intended.

What does the U.S. Supreme Court's March 25 decision regarding personal jurisdiction in the Ford cases mean for litigants and litigation across the country? Join McGlinchey attorneys Rasch Brown, Gary Hebert, and Brian LeCompte for the fourth installment in their series on the changing landscape of general personal jurisdiction.

Personal Jurisdiction  (Specific) upheld.Support the show (https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus)

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments on two potentially groundbreaking personal jurisdiction cases known as “the Ford cases.” In this third episode from our series on Personal Jurisdiction, Rasch Brown, Gary Hebert, and Brian LeCompte (New Orleans) discuss their take on what they heard from the litigants and from the bench.

This episode is a tutorial that puts the doctrine of personal jurisdiction into some broader context. I offer a little bit of history and offer some big-picture framing that might help you with your mastery of this subject. Notice that there is a separate episode that focuses on applying the doctrine to a given set of facts--that episode is called 12(b)(6) in Practice.  The episodes do not really overlap, except to the extent that they both address one of the most important topics in a Civil Procedure course.

In the second installment of More with McGlinchey’s series on personal jurisdiction, Rasch Brown, Gary Hebert, and Brian LeCompte discuss the potentially groundbreaking Ford cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. Given recent Court precedent, is personal jurisdiction forever changed? How far will the Court go on this? This episode presents the Ford cases in some detail, discusses potential outcomes, and closes with commentary as to the impact of various outcomes. To listen to all episodes of More with McGlinchey, visit us at mcglinchey.com/podcast. If you have a question or would like to propose a topic, we would love to hear from you at podcast@mcglinchey.com.

This episode is about the 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The episode gives an overview of the following jurisdictional bases: Congressional Statutes (S), Federal Rule 4(k)(1)(B) and 4(k)(2) (R), Personal Service (S), Waiver (W), Status (S), Consent/Forum Selection Clauses (C), General Jurisdiction (G), and Specific Jurisdiction (S).

How is it that in 2020, we are still discussing personal jurisdiction? Wasn't this decided in the last century? What has changed? These questions have become increasingly relevant following sea change decisions in Goodyear, Daimler, and Bristol Myers. In this episode, McGlinchey Stafford members Rasch Brown, Gary Hebert, and Brian LeCompte discuss these questions and more as we await what promises to be a landmark ruling in a case involving Ford from the U.S. Supreme Court. To listen to all episodes of More with McGlinchey, visit us at mcglinchey.com/podcast. If you have a question or would like to propose a topic, we would love to hear from you at podcast@mcglinchey.com.

Halyard Health v. Kimberly Clark 2nd DCABrian and Shant discuss a declaratory relief action in a matter that arises out of Michael Avenatti’s Kimberly Clark Case.  The issue is whether Delaware or California law dictates which defendant is responsible for a punitive damages award granted to the plaintiffs.  Safechuck v. MJJ Productions 2nd DCABrian and Shant discuss childhood sexual assault lability of a 3rd party non-perpetrator and whether a revival statute applies to two adults over the age of majority.  AB 218 recently amended the statute of limitations under CCP 340.1, and claims can now be brought before the victim’s 40th birthday.  Even if an action was previously dismissed, the issue of whether the amended statute applies is determined by the finality of the underlying dismissed action. Warwick Ca. Corp v. Applied Underwriters 1st DCABrian and Shant discuss an appeal from a statement of decision issued by a trial court.  A statement of decisions is not an automatically appealable order because it is not a judgment that has can be entered or enforced.  It can be a precurser to a judgment but here no judgment was ever entered.  Shayan v. Spine Care & Orthopedic Physicians 2nd DCABrian and Shant discuss an interpleader action where a client had to compete with the other creditors for the remainder of the settlement.  Ultimately, the opposition did not show up to the interpleader action and subsequent counsel sought to vacate under a 473(b) motion. Failing to appear for a trial does not warrant relief.

Because everybody needs a little PJ in their life.

In this episode Dean Emeritus and Professor of Law, Michelle Simon explains Personal Jurisdiction. In addition to walking us through the different aspects of the issue, Dean Simon lays out a no-fail way to answer personal jurisdiction questions you may face on an exam. Hint: Read the questions very very carefully!

Zoe Niesel, assistant professor, director of the Law Success Program and co-director of the Legal Research and Writing Program at St. Mary’s University School of Law, discusses her research on defining personal jurisdiction in the age of internet contacts. She was on campus in March of 2018 as part of the law school's speaker exchange.

48: A Sliding Scale Approach to Specific Personal Jurisdiction? by

This week's episode covers a topic that will either (a) make you think differently about an important component of the American civil justice system, or (b) make you bored and confused.  Brett and Nazim are hoping for the former as they cover general personal jurisdiction concepts, why law students are afraid of personal jurisdiction, and how all that comes together in the case of BNSF Railway Co. v Tyrell.  Law starts at (08:39).

Jess and Josh discuss who is the rightful owner of Thor's Hammer, each from different legal theories. Josh discusses the civil procedure issues from Ant-Man issue 2 and where Tony Stark could sue Scott Lang. Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/thelegalgeeks)

14 OCT 2011: The Future of Personal Jurisdiction, by Lea Brilmayer

Suffolk Law Assistant Dean and Professor of Law Christopher Gibson discusses Judge Gertner's September 2010 decision and issues surrounding personal jurisdiction. Click here to read Dean Gibson's article on this topic.

Introduction to the litigation process.

Introduction to the litigation process.

Introduction to courts and court systems.

Introduction to courts and court systems.