Podcasts about software patents

All Paul Graham essay's, brought to life in audio format. This is a third party project, independent from Paul Graham, and produced by Wondercraft AI.

Patenting IoT means knowing your intellectual property rights. JiNan Glasgow George, Patent Attorney at Neo IP, joins the IoT For All Podcast to discuss intellectual property rights in IoT and tech. She covers intellectual property in early stage companies, the benefits of intellectual property protection, when to start a patent application, first-to-file versus first-to-use, how hard it is to get a patent, how having intellectual property boosts a company's valuation, intellectual property in the Metaverse, who owns AI-generated content, and how IoT companies can attract investors. JiNan Glasgow George has built her career from engineering to patent law and investment by transforming ideas into assets and connecting innovators to the resources they need to impact society for good. She believes that everyone has the power to create - and her work globally has focused on creating positive impact through intellectual property (IP) rights and data. A Patent Attorney and former Patent Examiner with the US Patent & Trademark Office, JiNan is an IP attorney with experience across a wide range of technology fields, serving clients in the US and internationally. JiNan is also the CEO and co-founder of Patent Forecast, a business intelligence SaaS company that provides insights for investors and executives, serial entrepreneurs, and innovators - giving vision ahead of market data using patent data and AI. Neo IP is an Intellectual Property law firm that helps innovators, inventors and entrepreneurs transform their ideas to reality and supports them with resources they need—investments, people, and connections. Neo IP does extensive work with investors and founders in the IoT space and related topics including digital twins.  Discover more about IP and IoT at https://www.iotforall.com More about Neo IP: https://neoipassets.com More about Patent Forecast: https://www.patentforecast.com/ Connect with JiNan: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jinan-glasgow-george-3784548/  Key Questions and Topics from this Episode: (00:00) Welcome to the IoT For All Podcast (00:56) Introduction to JiNan and Neo IP (01:50) Intellectual property in early stage companies (04:22) The benefits of intellectual property protection (06:37) When to start a patent application (07:22) First-to-file versus first-to-use (08:32) How hard is it to get a patent? (10:53) How having intellectual property boosts valuation (12:52) Intellectual property in the metaverse (14:58) AI generated content ownership (18:06) How can IoT companies attract investors? (20:06) What are you most excited about in 2H 2023? (21:34) 2023 Eclipse IP Futures Conference (22:38) Learn more and follow up  SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL: https://bit.ly/2NlcEwm​ Join Our Newsletter: https://www.iotforall.com/iot-newsletter Follow Us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/iotforall Check out the IoT For All Media Network: https://www.iotforall.com/podcast-overview

Software patents are intellectual property (IP) that gives the holder exclusive rights to an invention or innovation in software. The government grants software patents to the inventor or creator of a new and useful software invention, which grants them exclusive rights to prevent others from making, using, selling, or importing that invention for a set period of time, typically 20 years from the filing date of the patent application. In this solo episode, Dwight discusses everything related to software patents and IPs and the pros and cons of establishing one for your business. Tune in now to see if this is something you should consider.

An Ubuntu expiration date approaches, openSUSE has a new handy solution, and the container security issue that remains unfixed.

An Ubuntu expiration date approaches, openSUSE has a new handy solution, and the container security issue that remains unfixed.

In this episode, Alan Macek & Geoff Mowatt, Partners at the law firm, DLA Piper shares:What patents are (provisional, non-provisional, patent pending)How businesses can determine if they have something patentableHow patents can help or hurt businessesProfitLed host, Melissa Kwan, Alan, and Geoff also discusses:What are some common misconceptions about patents?How can a business determine if they have something that is patentable?What's the process for filing for a patent and what does it cost?When should companies start thinking about patents?DLA Piper is a global law firm capable of taking care of the most important legal needs of clients wherever they do business.Contact ProfitLed Tweet us at @profitledfm. Find show notes of each episode on ProfitLed.fm. Connect with our host, Melissa on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Twitter. Thanks for listening!This podcast was brought to you by eWebinar.

Linus Tech Tips blows it again, and we clean up. Plus, we push System76's updated Thelio Workstation to the breaking point.

What the heck is going on? Fedora is dropping features, GNOME is getting Iced, and the mistake we'll never make again. We've got a lot to sort out.

From patents to privacy to export control, innovations in artificial intelligence present attorneys with significant career opportunities. David and Jenn from Morgan Lewis explain how AI impacts their work and advise on ways students can prepare for future work. More on David Sanker & Jenn Wang. SPEAKERS David Sanker, Wayne Stacy, Jenn Wang Wayne Stacy 00:00 Welcome, everyone to Berkeley Center for Law and Technology's Career Podcast. I'm Wayne Stacy, the Executive Director for BCLT. And today we have two attorneys from the the law firm of Morgan Lewis, David Sanger and Jenn Wang. And we wanted to talk with him a little bit today about what the the practice of law looks like around artificial intelligence. It is, especially artificial intelligence and patents, and what is a, what is a practitioner do for day to day? And what does it practice gonna look like over the next decade? So, David, I'll start with you. You know, tell us a little bit about your background and what your legal practice looks like. David Sanker 00:48 Oh, thank you. Yeah. So fortunately, I was able to go to Berkeley Law a few years ago. And while I was at Berkeley Law, I was a summer associate at Morgan Lewis. And I started my work, thinking that I was going to focus on patent litigation. And I did mostly patent litigation. But I also did quite a bit of patent prosecution. Sort of an ancillary basis. And then, so I saw a lot of familiarity with with the patent litigation side, as well as the patent prosecution side. And after about four years that I've been doing exclusively, patent prosecution work. Prior to law school, I actually did software development for 12 years. So I have a lot of background in software. And that has been very, very helpful. Most people don't have that much background before they go into patent law. So that's, that's, that's my, my background and how about Jenn, why don't you say a little bit about what you do. Jenn Wang 01:55 Yeah. So I work with David Sanger, together on patent prosecution. So we do a lot of software hardware, different kind of technology or patent applications and do prosecution. But my background comes from technical background comes from undergraduate in finance and a graduate degree in electrical engineering, then I also worked in our technology company for three and a half years. Then I come to law school, and I'm working in a law company together at the same time. So I'm in the part time in Santa Clara. It's not Berkeley, but it's close neighbor. Then after graduation, I start to practice full time on patent prosecution. It has been like six years, so kind of close to your law school students. So I may have a lot of experience in terms of early career development to share with you. So that's my background. Thank you. Wayne Stacy 03:00 So one of the things I heard when I was at the PTO you talk with with new companies, and they would inevitably say, well, we read on the internet, that software isn't patentable. So we didn't worry about software patents. And, you know, the first time I heard it, I thought it was an anomaly. Oh, here's a company that didn't didn't talk to anybody. But then we started looking across the country between all the regional directors, and it came up over and over again. And so we started looking, and you can find a lot of information on the web that says, you know, software's basically not patentable. And then if it's not patentable, that means there's no real career path in it. For people looking to do software patent work, what do you have to say to that?

Do you write "new and original" code that is "useful" and has a "non-obvious function"? If so, your code may qualify for a patent. A patent can help prevent other people from using or selling your software. That said, which engineer among us isn't write new and original code every day? Software patents are weird and fuzzy and open for way too much interpretation. And, in the software industry, they seem to give "patent trolls" a lot of unpleasant leverage.This week, the crew - which has absolutely no legal training whatsoever - talk about patents, copyrights, research & development tax credits, building software, job hopping, and best practices. And, if you don't care at all about software patents, level-up your view of the world with this quote from Adam:People don't burn-out from too much work, they burn-out from too much unfulfilling work.Notes & LinksSoftware Patent or Copyright: Everything You Need to KnowLegal Notes: What's the Deal with ReactJS's Licensing Scheme?How to Qualify for R&D Tax Credits: The Four-Part TestFollow the show! Our website is workingcode.dev and we're @WorkingCodePod on Twitter and Instagram. Or, leave us a message at (512) 253-2633‬ (that's 512-253-CODE). New episodes drop weekly on Wednesday.And, if you're feeling the love, support us on Patreon.

Join Sal Daher's Investment Syndicate: Click to Join Peter Fasse comes from a family of patent attorneys. He is a highly respected partner at Fish & Richardson, the storied Boston-based (now global) firm that represented Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison and the Wright Brothers. Peter’s work continues that tradition by representing some of the leading technological innovators of today. Peter also invests as an angel in technology companies. In this practical and accessible conversation he revealed valuable insights and resources for founders and investors in technology companies. He also relayed some interesting and instructive stories of intellectual property success and calamity. Among the topics covered were: Introduction by Sal Daher of the Interview with Peter Fasse, Patent Attorney Peter Fasse Bio Young Cornell Grad in Textiles & Fabrics Becomes Patent Office Examiner Peter Fasse’s Practice In What Areas Is it Important to Have Patents and Why? Software Patents, Why Have Them and Why Not? Supreme Court Taking Harsh Views on Patents Patent Attorney Horror Stories – Theft, Suicide, Rogue Wave, Bear Mauling & Hasty Firing How Institutions Can Claim Intellectual Property of Employees Freedom to Operate – Should Be a Big Concern for Tech Startup Founders & Investors “There's a common misconception that if you have a patent on something, that it allows you to practice and commercialize that invention, but that's not true.” Different Levels of Freedom to Operate Analysis Two Extreme Freedom to Operate Cases & Outcomes Strong IP Position a Vital Ingredient in Sale of Tech Startups Mass Tech Transfer Center (MTTC) Is a Great Resource for Technology Startups Transcytos & SQZ Biotech Most Patents Are Not Commercially Viable, But Fish & Richardson Has a Special Package for Highly Promising Startups – Fish Steps Unsolicited Client Testimonial for Peter Fasse! Why Investing Through a Vehicle Rather than Directly Can Make Sense Trade Secrets – Formula for Coca Cola Trademarks – Frequently Overlooked Trouble with Chinese Partners – Capital Controls & Theft of Intellectual Property

Ep. 25 - Robert Plotkin - "Leveraging Software Patents Strategically & the Value of Mindfulness" by Louder Co.

Ben provides a 30-thousand foot review of patent eligibility and the Supreme Court's 2014 decision refining this body of law, through the lens of a recent Federal Circuit case finding that Ubisoft's patent on a mobile device application for self-guided guitar lessons is not eligible for patent protection.

From the low-end to the high-end we try out both ends of the Linux hardware spectrum. Wes reviews the latest XPS 13, and Chris shares his thoughts on the Pinebook Pro. Plus a really cool new feature in Linux 5.7, and we get some answers to the recent GNOME patent settlement from the source. Special Guests: Dan Johansen and Drew DeVore.

The GNOME Foundation fights back in its patent battle, Firefox 70 is here, and Ghost has its biggest release yet.

In this episode, Athul K. Acharya, an impact litigation associate at BraunHagey & Borden LLP, discusses his article "Abstraction in Software Patents (and How to Fix It)" which is published in the John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law. Acharya begins by explaining what the "abstract-ideas" doctrine is and the role it plays in patent eligibility. He describes what software patents protect and why the present particular conceptual problems for patent eligibility. And he provides a novel way of determining whether software patent claims should be eligible. He closes by reflecting on how junior legal scholars can draw on their non-legal background. Acharya is on Twitter at @AthulKAcharya.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On this episode, I speak with patent attorney Bryant Lee. Bryant explains what a patent is and how startups should be thinking about what they can and cannot patent. We also talk about the timing of patents and how to create a patent strategy for the long term.Bryant Lee is the co-founder of Cognition IP and the author of Software Patents for Startups.This podcast is presented by The Law Office of Alex Mejias.DISCLAIMER: I am a lawyer, but not your lawyer. This podcast does not constitute legal advice. If you are considering applying for a patent you should contact a qualified patent attorney.

The three of us debate when to go full serverless, and if ditching servers is worth the cost. Plus the battle against the Cult of Swift gains new allies.

Apple wades into controversy after filing some Swift-related patents and we explore WebAssembly and its implications for the open web. Plus the latest on Mike's road to Rust, some great feedback, and more!

Software Patents and Patent Eligibility – Interview With Gene Quinn the IP Watchdog – Cannabis Trademark Issues – EPO G1/15 Enlarged Boards of Appeal – IP Fridays – Episode 73 See the website of Gene Quinn http://www.ipwatchdog.com

Software patents have been dubious since their inception — not just in principle, but legally too. Past rulings have called their validity into serious question, and now an opinion from a prominent pro-patent judge has called for people to admit that they simply shouldn't exist. This week, we discuss what this opinion means for the (hopefully short) future of software patents.

In the podcast this week... We talk about taking internet connections for granted and languages on the internet.And in the off tangent, patents.Download the episode here. Support us on Patreon (pretty please).---The Link Dump Camicri Cube ServerThe Internet Isn't Available in Most LanguagesUbuntu MATE Welcome on transifexThe Difference between the United Kingdom, Great Britain and England ExplainedSleeping DogsSoftware Patents in the Philippines Listen and Subscribe...  we're @thirdworldlinux and @chFourteen on twitterwe're also on Google+but if you're oldschool, email uscontact@channelfourteen.com linux@channelfourteen.com --- 

The IP Watchdog Gene Quinn is explaining the current state of software patents and Brian Dorn of Barnes & Thornburg is summarizing a very interesting discussion with United States Representative Erik Paulsen he moderated on the topic of life science and patents.     IP FRIDAYS   Co-Presenters: Rolf Claessen and Kenneth Suzan   Episode 21 – February [...]

Carl and Richard talk to Jonathan Zuck about the state of software patents today. The conversation starts out talking about some of the craziness around software patents - patent trolls, extortion-like letters and the like. Jonathan talks about the changes made by the US to patent law in 2012, and how the biggest challenge today is cleaning up poorly written patents from the DotComBoom era. Also mentioned is a document for application developers created by ACT Online for what to do if you receive a patent demand letter. Check out the links in the show description for the document!Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/net-rocks/donations

Carl and Richard talk to Jonathan Zuck about the state of software patents today. The conversation starts out talking about some of the craziness around software patents - patent trolls, extortion-like letters and the like. Jonathan talks about the changes made by the US to patent law in 2012, and how the biggest challenge today is cleaning up poorly written patents from the DotComBoom era. Also mentioned is a document for application developers created by ACT Online for what to do if you receive a patent demand letter. Check out the links in the show description for the document!Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/net-rocks/donations

Are software patents on balance a good or a bad thing? Are cellphones this generation's cigerette? And would you give a pile of money to a teenager to start businesses in lieu of going to college? Scott and Anders talk about these things and "Dumb and Dumber" in this week's episode.

Bradley and Karen welcome special co-presenter and guest, Aaron Williamson, to discuss the OpenBSD email regarding purported FBI backdoors. In the main segment, they discuss the amicus brief filed by SFLC (where Aaron and Karen work) in the Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB USA Supreme Court case. Show Notes: Segment 0 (00:37) Aaron brought up a message forwarded to the OpenBSD developers list by Theo de Raadt. This story has been covered widely online. (02:50) Aaron mentioned that Glyn Moody wrote a blog post about what issues about “Open Source” security this raises. (04:06) Bradley mentioned the gnuftp/Savannah site crack that occurred in 2003 and its security implications. Those seeking more information on this can read the slashdot coverage, Savannah forum posts, the CERT advisory and even the missing files still on the GNU FTP site. (05:21) Bradley again mentioned Thompson's hack which he loves to mention when security issues come up (06:26). Karen mentioned SFLC's medical devices paper, Killed by Code: Software Transparency in Implantable Medical Devices, which she loves to mention. (08:23) Bradley mentioned the Debian/Ubuntu OpenSSL bug that occurred in mid-2008, which was widely discussed online. (10:18) Bradley mentioned a case in 2000 where the FBI was able to open a mobster's PGP mail merely by getting his passphrase. (12:49) Bradley offers an even-money bet that there are no FBI-inserted bugs in OpenBSD. (13:46) Segment 1 (14:18) The canonical page on Wikipedia for what Karen and Bradley are on FaiF says they are presenters, rather than hosts. (15:06) Aaron and Karen's organization, the Software Freedom Law Center, announced that they filed an amicus brief in the Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB case. (16:30) Despite the beliefs of a Jeopardy! contestant last month, “Maria” is Sonia Sotomayor's middle name. Antonin Scalia's middle name is “Gregory” (17:20) Bradley again reviewed the issues of classical vs. church pronunciations. (19:20) Bradley asked Aaron if what was being sold in this case was equivalent to the Cornballer as introduced on the television show, Arrested Development. (20:30) Bradley mentioned that on FaiF 0x02, they discussed the issue of how higher courts consider issues of law more than the detailed facts of the case. (23:30) RMS's speech, The Danger of Software Patents, is available as a transcript and audio (ogg) (35:22) Aaron mentioned Newegg's brief, which is a reseller. (40:50) Aaron mentioned the SCOTUS blog summary which included links to other amici briefs. (41:01) Bradley referenced Don's staff answer to their boss, Don, in the Kids in the Hall movie, Brain Candy. (45:57) Final (54:16) Aaron, Karen and Bradley are discussing the alternative lyrics to the Stars and Stripes Forever. (54:20) These show notes are Copyright © 2010, Karen Sandler and Bradley M. Kuhn of Free as in Freedom, and are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 3.0 Unported license (CC-By-SA-3.0 Unported). Send feedback and comments on the cast to . You can keep in touch with Free as in Freedom on our IRC channel, #faif on irc.freenode.net, and by following Conservancy on on Twitter and and FaiF on Twitter. Free as in Freedom is produced by Dan Lynch of danlynch.org. Theme music written and performed by Mike Tarantino with Charlie Paxson on drums. The content of this audcast, and the accompanying show notes and music are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 license (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Bradley and Karen welcome special co-presenter and guest, Aaron Williamson, to discuss the OpenBSD email regarding purported FBI backdoors. In the main segment, they discuss the amicus brief filed by SFLC (where Aaron and Karen work) in the Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB USA Supreme Court case. Show Notes: Segment 0 (00:37) Aaron brought up a message forwarded to the OpenBSD developers list by Theo de Raadt. This story has been covered widely online. (02:50) Aaron mentioned that Glyn Moody wrote a blog post about what issues about “Open Source” security this raises. (04:06) Bradley mentioned the gnuftp/Savannah site crack that occurred in 2003 and its security implications. Those seeking more information on this can read the slashdot coverage, Savannah forum posts, the CERT advisory and even the missing files still on the GNU FTP site. (05:21) Bradley again mentioned Thompson's hack which he loves to mention when security issues come up (06:26). Karen mentioned SFLC's medical devices paper, Killed by Code: Software Transparency in Implantable Medical Devices, which she loves to mention. (08:23) Bradley mentioned the Debian/Ubuntu OpenSSL bug that occurred in mid-2008, which was widely discussed online. (10:18) Bradley mentioned a case in 2000 where the FBI was able to open a mobster's PGP mail merely by getting his passphrase. (12:49) Bradley offers an even-money bet that there are no FBI-inserted bugs in OpenBSD. (13:46) Segment 1 (14:18) The canonical page on Wikipedia for what Karen and Bradley are on FaiF says they are presenters, rather than hosts. (15:06) Aaron and Karen's organization, the Software Freedom Law Center, announced that they filed an amicus brief in the Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB case. (16:30) Despite the beliefs of a Jeopardy! contestant last month, “Maria” is Sonia Sotomayor's middle name. Antonin Scalia's middle name is “Gregory” (17:20) Bradley again reviewed the issues of classical vs. church pronunciations. (19:20) Bradley asked Aaron if what was being sold in this case was equivalent to the Cornballer as introduced on the television show, Arrested Development. (20:30) Bradley mentioned that on FaiF 0x02, they discussed the issue of how higher courts consider issues of law more than the detailed facts of the case. (23:30) RMS's speech, The Danger of Software Patents, is available as a transcript and audio (ogg) (35:22) Aaron mentioned Newegg's brief, which is a reseller. (40:50) Aaron mentioned the SCOTUS blog summary which included links to other amici briefs. (41:01) Bradley referenced Don's staff answer to their boss, Don, in the Kids in the Hall movie, Brain Candy. (45:57) Final (54:16) Aaron, Karen and Bradley are discussing the alternative lyrics to the Stars and Stripes Forever. (54:20) These show notes are Copyright © 2010, Karen Sandler and Bradley M. Kuhn of Free as in Freedom, and are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 3.0 Unported license (CC-By-SA-3.0 Unported). Send feedback and comments on the cast to . You can keep in touch with Free as in Freedom on our IRC channel, #faif on irc.freenode.net, and by following Conservancy on identi.ca and and Twitter. Free as in Freedom is produced by Dan Lynch of danlynch.org. Theme music written and performed by Mike Tarantino with Charlie Paxson on drums. The content of this audcast, and the accompanying show notes and music are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 license (CC BY-SA 4.0).

In der 22. Sendung von /dev/radio geht es um die Gefahren die Softwarepatente bergen. Richard M. Stallman, der Gründer der FSF hielt am 4.11. an der UNI Ulm einen Vortrag über "The Danger of Software Patents", diesem Vortrag liegt die Radiosendung zugrunde. Softwarepatente stehen kurz vor der EU-weiten Zulassung. Warum es keine Gründe für Softwarepatente gibt und was das Coden von Programmen mit Komponieren von Symphonien zu tun hat hört ihr bei uns.