Podcasts about tasks

Rich Tasks are a powerful lesson structure and can be challenging to implement effectively. In this episode, Pam and Kim discuss the preparation and approach needed to facilitate a successful Rich Task.Talking points:Know your content, know your studentsImportance of knowing who engages or shuts down, students' prior math experiences, who seeks extra challenge, and what's going on in their lives.Need to set expectationsUnderstanding the vertical and the horizontal math progressionsShifting your goals in real time Try Problem Strings firstLinks:FREE DMR Registration LinkMath is Figureoutable BlogPam's BooksCheck out Pam's social mediaTwitter: @PWHarrisInstagram: Pam Harris_mathFacebook: Pam Harris, author, mathematics educationLinkedin: Pam Harris Consulting LLC 

What if the biggest reason clients and employees stay has nothing to do with pricing, pay, or perks? In this episode, we explore how understanding why each visit matters transforms ordinary pet care into meaningful service. We discuss the difference between simply completing tasks and delivering genuine care, and how giving your team client context changes the way they show up. We also share two practical systems that strengthen both employee engagement and client retention. Together, we'll discover how purpose and feedback create a healthier business for everyone involved. Main topics: Finding purpose behind visits Task quality versus care Client context for teams Feedback strengthens retention Building meaningful systems Main takeaway: "The walk is just the delivery mechanism. The freedom we give families is the product." We're not simply walking dogs or scooping litter boxes. We're giving someone the confidence to travel, attend a wedding, recover from surgery, work a long shift, or finally take the vacation they've been putting off. Every visit represents a person who is trusting us with something deeply important. When our teams understand why they're showing up—not just what they're supposed to do—the quality of care naturally changes. And when we consistently share client feedback with the people who earned it, purpose becomes something they can see, not just hear about. Purpose creates better care. Better care creates stronger relationships. And stronger relationships build businesses that last. Links: Check out our Starter Packs See all of our discounts!

In this episode of the Lead Ministry Podcast, Josh Denhart and Bill Van Kirk unpack the difference between dumping, delegating, and discipling volunteers. They explore why rushed handoffs create confusion and turnover, how clear systems protect both quality and people, and why the highest form of ministry multiplication requires passing on more than a task — it requires passing on the heart behind the work.If you've ever returned from vacation to discover that a volunteer misunderstood an assignment, or wondered why capable people keep burning out around you, this episode will help you build a better handoff and a healthier team.KEY TOPICS COVEREDDumping vs. Delegating vs. Discipling – Recognizing three very different kinds of ministry handoffClarity Before Handoff – Why details, examples, and a dry run prevent avoidable failureBuild Once, Reap Repeatedly – Creating systems that serve volunteers for yearsThe Be-With Factor – Passing on your heart through time, questions, and shared ministryKEY QUOTE“The cost that you pay to delegate properly and disciple thoroughly is worth it.”SCRIPTURE REFERENCESMark 3:14 – Jesus appointed the twelve so they might be with Him and be sent outEphesians 4:11-12 – Ministry leaders equip God's people for the work of ministryTAKEAWAYDelegation may complete a task, but discipleship builds a person. Slow down before the handoff, provide the clarity a volunteer needs, and invest enough time for them to understand both what to do and why it matters.CALL TO ACTIONWe hope this episode encourages and equips you. Share it with a friend and stay tuned for more resources each week.STAY CONNECTED FOR MORE RESOURCESVisit our website: http://leadministry.comFollow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LeadVolunteersFind us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/leadvolunteers

In today's episode of Culture Camp, Jason is joined again by David Spader and Leigh Quinn of Potentia, and they discuss the challenges and strategies for leading family businesses. They emphasize the importance of using the Prodaptive leadership process to manage emotional situations rationally. The process involves determining favorability (whether a situation is favorable or unfavorable) and diagnosing root causes using the BET model (Behavior, Environment, Task). They highlight the significance of understanding individual performance levels (L1-L5) and adapting leadership styles accordingly. The conversation underscores the need for clear, intentional communication to foster success and satisfaction in family business dynamics.Tweetable Quotes:"Emotions are going to happen whether we want them to occur or not." - David Spader"All business have to be success-oriented." - Leigh QuinnConnect with David Spader and Lee Quinn:On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/potentia-david-spader-5627655/https://www.linkedin.com/in/leigh-quinn-jr-a017oa69/ Visit Potentia-assesments.com: https://potentia-assessments.com/If you found value in this episode, please leave a rating and review, also, don't forget to share it with a friend! Remember to follow us on Instagram for more!

12 - Will the WNBA start accepting trans players after a media wave surrounding Sophie Cunnigham's comments was started over the weekend? 1210 - Side - Whatever happened to…? 1220 - Rosie O'Donnell is coming back to The View! Where is the Rizzo statue? More on the WNBA's media frenzy this weekend. 1240 - And we're having major malfunctions in the studio to finish the hour. 1 - After many technical difficulties, Linda Kerns is able to join us today. When did Elvis fall off? What did she think of Al Schmidt's interview with Dom on Friday? What else can PA be doing to get voting registration and election codes back on track? Why is Al Schmidt's passiveness hurting Pennsylvanians? Why would Josh Shapiro want a chaotic voting system here? 120 - Returning to the men in women's sports debate as it relates to the NBA. Your calls. 135 - Reading some of your answers off Twitter. What's thoughtful about weaponized compassion, ESPN? 140 - More calls. 150 - What is the new fear in Iran and what is the answer for Trump to get out of this scenario? Your calls. 2 - Dan Bartkowiak, the Chief Strategy Officer PA Family Council, is here today after it was revealed that over 30 million dollars of taxpayer money is still being spent on sex-rejection procedures on minors. How does continuing something like this help anyone politically? What other problems is this program causing for parents and children? 215 - Dom's Money Melody! 225 - Is Kamala Harris gearing up for 2028 already? Your calls. 240 - How will women ever buy groceries in NYC? More calls. 250 - The Lightning Round!

From a massive balance sheet to the way the Fed communicates, Fed Chair's Kevin Warsh's new task forces will take a comprehensive look at U.S. monetary policy. Macroeconomist Joe Santos weighs in on the complicated work of reform now before the Fed.

BIG STORY: Kent DeCardenas & a Fort Worth Citizen's Data Center Task ForceTell City Council we need a Data Center Citizen Task ForceProposed task force would advise Fort Worth leaders, council on data center regulationsCan proposed data center moratorium in Fort Worth lead to meaningful, long-term solutions?Data centers require substantial water, energy. Sustainable practices, technology can lessen impactSHORT STORY 1: Tim O'Hare's Ongoing Voter SuppressionTarrant County considers cutting 140 Election Day polling sites for NovemberLetter to County Commissioners about polling sitesSHORT STORY 2: FWISD Takeover UpdatesFort Worth ISD says threats, not social media posts, prompted principal's reassignment / FWISD didn't prove claims against principal reassigned after Sharia law posts, documents showFederal judge declines to reinstate Muslim educator as Fort Worth ISD principal / Judge denies former Fort Worth ISD principal's request to be reinstatedAs Fort Worth ISD reports near full staffing, parents demand increased transparency / How Fort Worth ISD filled teaching vacancies after more than 1,000 resignationsFort Worth ISD applies for TEA waiver to keep hiring uncertified teachersWhy Fort Worth ISD wants to ban campaign donations to trustee candidates by its vendorsPropaganda Proofing by Mindia WhittierInside Peter Licata's Doctoral Dissertation by Barry ShlachterSHORT STORY 3: TCU Student Deported by ICETCU student arrested in Arlington was deported to El Salvador, DHS confirmsGoFundMe for Luis AndradeTestimonials about ICE custody conditionsWINS: Fort Worth nonprofit shares design concept transforming former KKK site into cultural hubMount Gilead Baptist Church's legacy to be preserved through performing art centerThe Fort Worth railroad turns 150Made in Tarrant: Comics store opens as safe space for marginalized individuals, gamers, artistsFort Worth nonprofit supporting college students now guides a new group — their parentsFort Worth Botanic Garden receives prestigious nationwide accreditationFort Worth begins update to the city's 2003 Historic Preservation PlanWorld Cup transportation plan successful as 40,000 use rail, charter buses, officials saidSasha Bass steps down as new leader takes charge of Fort Worth's Sundance Square / Fort Worth's Sundance Square names new CEO as Sasha Bass steps asideLOSSES: Harrison Mantas is leaving the Star-Telegram. Food insecurity outpaces regional population growth / 1.4 million in DFW face hunger as Tarrant Area Food Bank braces for funding cuts Tarrant confirms first human case of West Nile Virus this year Fort Worth firm involved in plans for new Persian Gulf refinery ACTIONS: August 4 - Tarrant County Commissioner's Court (Petition)August 4 - Fort Worth City Council Worksession (Letter)August 4 - Nicole Collier's Public School eventAugust 5 - Talarico rally in Fort WorthAugust 5 - 817 Gather at the Table -District 8 (RSVP)August 11 - Fort Worth's data center policy voteAugust 17 - Focus Local PAC's new candidate recruitment eventAugust 19 - CDFW's Transit AcademyAugust 25 - Black Mountain data center vote Join the 817 Gather Discord, donate to the 817 Gather, and follow us on Instagram & TikTok.

The classroom and new entrants into funeral service have changed. In this insightful conversation, Leili McMurrough discusses the balancing act of connecting while completing required tasks and why understanding this is crucial. Enjoy this preview of our upcoming Momentum: A Women's Leadership Accelerator event! Momentum: A Women's Leadership Accelerator

Are you ready to stop just gathering a crowd and start truly fulfilling the Great Commission?This lesson challenges Christian leadership to move beyond the "lake model" of stationary attendance and embrace a "river model" that advances the Kingdom to every nation.Rev Paul Jeyachandran reveals the divine mandate to make, mobilise, and multiply disciples, shifting the church's focus from simple addition to exponential spiritual multiplication.By examining Jesus' master plan of evangelism, you will learn how to transition from "partial obedience" to a surrendered life that reproduces Christ-like values through intentional discipleship, association, and delegation.Whether you are involved in pastor training or mentoring a few, this session provides the biblical framework and Holy Spirit empowerment needed to finish the task.Equip yourself to become a disciple-maker who raises the next generation of faithful leaders and drives authentic church growth.#greatcommission #Discipleship #ChristianLeadership #ChurchGrowth #MakingDisciples #Sermon #KingdomAdvancement #IDMC #PastorTraining #RevPaulJeyachandran

One Task, One Mind by Ven. Ohun Lee. Washington D.C. Temple of Won Buddhism. July, 26 2026

Abi and Matt watch tv. 

More fallout from FIFA's private equity plan. AP correspondent Donna Warder reports.

Today's audio is a replay of the final group coaching call in 31 to Thriving, all about your mindset and energy when it comes to your money, sales and pricing. In my 9 years of coaching, I have noticed three very sneaky unwanted emotions that have a negative effect on all things money management. In this training, we re-frame them, and I share three exercises to help you shift out of these less than ideal energies. Throughout the 31 days of July, I'll be dropping daily audio trainings on all things mindset, money, sales, marketing, brand building and the courageous action required to blow your own mind! Join 31 to Thriving here if you'd like to be in the vibes, ask your questions, get accountability and smash the start to the second half of the year! Enjoy! If you'd love to learn more about the work I do, check out my website here. If you have any takeaways or learnings please do drop me an email tara@thethrivingbusinesswoman.com or drop me a DM on Instagram. I always love to hear your thoughts on each episode! You can find me here.   See you next week for another episode! Don't forget to subscribe and leave a rating or review so more people can find this podcast, and if it helped you today, please do share with someone who could benefit from it.   Keep thriving!

With Bryan off to the great white north, Anderson and Avery dig into some TV Vault with reviews of Half Man, Chainsaw Man, Task and Presumed Innocent! ⁠Amazon Click-fessions⁠ ⁠Loaded for Bear New Promo Video!⁠ ⁠The Film Vault on Youtube⁠ ⁠TFV Patreon is Here for Even More Film Vault⁠ ⁠Anderson's new doc: Loaded for Bear⁠ ⁠Atty's Antiques⁠ ⁠Baldywood Newsletter⁠ Featured Artist: Big Fok ⁠The Film Vault on Twitch⁠ ⁠Buy Bryan's Book Shrinkage Here⁠ ⁠The Film Vaulters⁠ ⁠“Kubrick is Everywhere” Shirt⁠ CONNECT WITH US: ⁠Instagram: @AndersonAndBryan⁠ ⁠Facebook.com/TheFilmVault⁠ ⁠Twitter: @TheFilmVault⁠ ⁠HAVE A CHAT WITH ANDY HERE⁠ ⁠ATTY & ANDY: DIRECTED BY A FOUR-YEAR-OLD⁠ ⁠Subscribe Atty and Andy's Youtube Channel Here⁠ THE COLD COCKLE SHORTS ⁠RULES OF REDUCTION⁠ ⁠MORMOAN⁠ ⁠THE CULT OF CARANO⁠ Please⁠ Give Groupers a Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score Here⁠ Please⁠ Rate It on IMDB Here⁠ ⁠The Blu-ray, US⁠ ⁠The Blu-ray, International⁠ Groupers is now available on these platforms. On⁠ Amazon⁠ On⁠ Google Play ⁠ On⁠ iTunes⁠ On⁠ Youtube⁠ On⁠ Tubi⁠ On⁠ Vudu⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Our inadequacy doesn't disqualify us from God's calling—it positions us to depend on His strength.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Most building automation professionals know how to work inside a BAS. Fewer know what keeps that BAS running behind the scenes. When Windows services or scheduled tasks stop working, the symptoms often appear in the BAS, but the root cause lives deeper in the operating system. Knowing where to look can help you troubleshoot faster, reduce downtime, and become the technician others rely on when systems refuse to cooperate. In Episode #555 of the Smart Buildings Academy Podcast, you'll learn why these Windows features play such a critical role in building automation and what you should understand before the next service interruption. Topics Covered • What Windows services are and why BAS platforms depend on them • The settings that influence how services behave during startup and failures • How Task Scheduler automates critical BAS operations • Where to look when scheduled tasks or services stop working • Why reading system logs is one of the most valuable troubleshooting habits you can develop The more you understand what's happening beneath your BAS, the more confident you'll be when diagnosing issues that others overlook.

Jon Herold digs into a notable fact sheet released jointly by the heads of the ODNI, NSA, CIA, and DHS, which formally confirms that China's voter data theft meets the official definition of election interference rather than mere influence. He plays a clip of John Solomon previewing more upcoming disclosures on FBI and intelligence community abuses, plus Trump's own comments respecting Biden's pardon of Fauci while insisting Biden's presidency itself lacked legitimacy. Other topics include Trump threatening to temporarily pull Todd Blanche's AG nomination over GOP holdouts, a new CNN poll showing voters favor a wholesale congressional shakeup, a Politico report on lopsided disaster aid approvals by state political leaning, and rising mortgage rates. Sponsor reads, Vegas conference ticket news, and a lively chat session round out a dense Thursday show.

Carly scrolls LinkedIn and sees a friend announcing new funding and a tenth hire. The comments are exploding. Carly feels a pang of envy, then realizes something odd. She doesn't actually want any of it.That contradiction is the heart of this episode. Joe and Carly dig into why solopreneurs still feel the pull of a scoreboard they deliberately walked away from, and what to do about it.In this episodeWhy wanting recognition doesn't mean you made the wrong choiceJoe's literal nightmare about a conference table full of new hiresThe difference between "rank me highly" pride and "I did good work" prideWhy nobody celebrates a casserole, a swim lesson, or an empty grocery storeThe question that settles it, would you trade freedom back for recognitionJoe's thought experiment borrowed from a friend who quit smoking cold turkeyYour challenge, write your own definition of recognitionIf you know someone building a Life-First business, send them this episode. Subscribe wherever you listen, and leave a five-star review to help more Life-First solopreneurs find the show.

Dr. Tom Curran shares insights on the Scripture passages: Martha and Mary (Luke 10: 38-42) and The Raising of Lazarus. (John 11: 1-44) Tom explores themes, such as: the practicality of hospitality, prioritizing a relationship with Jesus, doing what is “necessary,” radiating Christ in the world, and more!

Should the American Pope debate the American president about good and evil? The shameless Trump, one suspects, would relish a noisy cage match with a rival American celebrity. But Leo XIV has quietly declined the invitation — a refusal that the Catholic scholar Jack Hanson insists is neither cowardice nor convenience. Rather, as Hanson argues in this month's Harper's cover story, “Radical Reformation,” it's because the church has become the last global institution able to provide a coherent moral compass for our rootless times. The great irony, Hanson notes, is that the church was the first victim of the legitimacy conflagration now engulfing every other institution. His history begins in 1870, when Rome lost the Papal States and, for the first time in a millennium, had no earthly kingdom to defend. Ever since, the church has been reorienting itself — lately, against political, economic and military power. That opposition to worldly power was always a strand within the apostolic tradition, Hanson reminds us. Thus the Gospel's “antinomian communists” who stayed behind in plague cities, Thomas More's attack on private property, the 1891 Rerum Novarum, Dorothy Day, liberation theology. What's new is that the Vatican itself has embraced this political tradition of questioning Caesar. Then came 9/11. In the war on terror, Hanson argues, the secular West redefined its enemy not as a rival religion but as religion itself — and the church stopped being Western civilization's moral crown jewel. John Paul II's opposition to the Iraq War was a preview. Leo XIV's 40,000-word encyclical on AI — Magnifica Humanitas, complete with an apology for the church's role in slavery — is a more mature realization of this radical reformation. No wonder, then, that Leo has no interest in a cage match with Trump. “A direct debate with a president who's going to be out of office in a couple of years isn't in his interest. It's too small a task,” Hanson explains. As the latest in a very long line of God's representatives on earth, Leo is playing the long game. He can afford to wait out a noisy Caesar or two. Five Takeaways •       The Last Moral Voice. Institutional legitimacy — of churches, states, the organs of governance and community — is in free fall, and the great historical irony, Hanson argues, is that the Catholic Church was the first institution to face that crisis. When Rome lost the Papal States in 1870, it lost a thousand years of political centrality and has been reorienting itself ever since. Over the last twenty years, the church has ceased to see the West as its spiritual home and reconfigured itself as a genuinely global institution — positioned, almost paradoxically, against power as such. Which is how the paragon of institutional crisis has returned as maybe the last moral voice on the global stage.•       The Radical Tradition Was Always There. The subversive strain Hanson traces runs from the Gospel itself — the early Christians as “antinomian communists” who held everything in common and stayed behind in plague cities — through Thomas More's attack on the enclosures (the first great critique of private property in Western history), Leo XIII's 1891 Rerum Novarum, Dorothy Day's Catholic Worker, and Latin American liberation theology. Hanson doesn't flinch from the two Thomas Mores problem — the property radical was also a persecutor of heretics — because the church is full of sinners; you wouldn't need one otherwise. What's new is that the Vatican itself now orients toward the radical tradition rather than serving as the avatar of institutional power.•       9/11 Drove the Wedge. For most of the twentieth century the secular West treated the church as a civilizational feather in its cap. The war on terror changed that: the enemy was recast not as a rival religion but as religion as such — the new atheism was its rhetorical arm — and John Paul II's vociferous opposition to the Iraq War marked the rupture. Beneath it all, the secularization thesis (societies modernize, therefore secularize) had collapsed, its death usually dated to Iran in 1979. Reason and faith, Hanson argues, are far more intertwined than the twentieth century assumed — and, not coincidentally, the church and the left hit their historical nadirs together and are now showing signs of life together.•       Magnifica Humanitas: Arguing with the Machines. Leo XIV's 40,000-word encyclical on AI and humanity is remarkable, Hanson suggests, less for its conclusions than for its method: reasoned, humane argument addressed to people of all goodwill, in an age of universal bombast — from a leader with no personal stake in the outcome. It includes an apology for the church's involvement in slavery, an acknowledgment that the church itself once practiced the exclusionary humanism it now warns against. While subway billboards advise companies to “stop hiring human beings,” the church's real power, Hanson argues, is the legitimation of popular dissent: since Vatican II redefined the church as the People of God, the pope's voice works by inspiring people to find their own.•       Too Small a Task. Was the American pope elected to counter the American president? “His name wasn't mentioned once,” a conclave cardinal insisted — a denial Andrew files next to Casablanca's “shocked, shocked.” Either way, Leo refuses a direct debate with Trump, and Hanson insists this is the harder path, not the easier one: the pope aims to beat Trump on a higher register, shaping consciences in America and across the globe rather than winning a news cycle against a president who'll be gone in a couple of years. As for the evangelical prosperity gospel wing of MAGA: essentially in schism, Hanson says — not much to do with historical Christianity, politically or theologically. About the Guest Jack Hanson received his PhD in religious studies from Yale in 2024 and has taught there. His essays and criticism on religion, politics, and literature have appeared in Harper's and elsewhere. His cover essay, “Radical Reformation: The Catholic Church's Progressive Revival,” appears in the current issue of Harper's Magazine, the oldest continuously published monthly in America. He lives in upstate New York. References: •       “Radical Reformation: The Catholic Church's Progressive Revival” by Jack Hanson — the cover essay of the current Harper's Magazine.•       On Statesmanship by Steven B. Smith — yesterday's Keen On conversation on the crisis of secular authority, which opens this one.•       Rerum Novarum (1891) — Leo XIII's encyclical on capital and labor, the founding document of modern Catholic social teaching.•       Magnifica Humanitas — Leo XIV's 40,000-word encyclical on AI, technology, and the human person, including its apology for the church's involvement in slavery.•       Dorothy Day and the Catholic Worker — the American wing of the radical tradition Hanson traces.•&nb...

Pastor Caleb Kinney Wednesday Evening 7/29/26

Show Notes: Why Everything Still Comes Back to You—even With a Good Team You may have good people, solid software, regular meetings, and even a few SOPs—but somehow, every important decision, problem, and handoff still comes back to you. In this episode of The TriMetric Roadmap Podcast, Scott Landis and Jeff Jacob unpack Freedom Lever number three: Run It — Operational Infrastructure and Intelligent Systems. The problem in many founder-led companies is not that the team is incapable. The deeper issue is often that the business lacks the structure, systems, decision rights, and execution rhythm that allow good people to perform without constant founder involvement. Important information lives in people's heads. Accountability is unclear. Handoffs break down. Decisions get pushed upward. And the founder remains responsible for connecting all the dots. Scott and Jeff explain that every business already has systems—even if those systems are informal, inefficient, or built around the founder's memory and instincts. The right question is not whether you have a system. It is whether the system is effective, scalable, and capable of operating without you. Jeff shares examples of how better systems created immediate operational improvements for clients. One company reduced an invoicing process from ten days to one day. Another was able to hold a board meeting with accurate, current financials during the first week of the month because the supporting systems were already in place. The episode also explores why systems cannot simply be copied from another company. Effective infrastructure must account for the founder's strengths, the people on the team, the business model, and the company's specific constraints. That is why the process begins with diagnosis. BFA's TriMetric approach examines: Business Health Executive Performance Life Quality The findings reveal where the business is weak and which systems will create the greatest improvement in performance, profitability, value, and founder freedom. Scott and Jeff also discuss the growing role of intelligent systems and AI agents. The purpose of AI is not simply to replace employees. Used well, AI can remove repetitive work, improve information flow, reduce friction, and free people to contribute at a higher level. An AI readiness audit can help identify: Tasks that consume unnecessary time Repetitive work that can be automated Information bottlenecks Areas where AI agents could support the founder or leadership team Systems that need to be improved before automation is added The goal is not more technology or more complexity. The goal is a company with clear roles, reliable processes, strong accountability, effective handoffs, and intelligent systems that help the team execute consistently without everything depending on the founder. Because a business does not run without you simply because you hired good people. It runs without you when the right infrastructure allows those people to succeed. Join the next Founder Roundtable at GetBFA.com. Next episode: Grow It — Growth Engine and Revenue Strategy, where Scott and Jeff discuss how to build a more predictable and profitable revenue engine.

Every website and app I've worked on has eventually developed the same problem. It accumulates content, features, navigation options, and stakeholder requests until everything is apparently important. Of course, when everything is important, nothing is. You end up with a homepage trying to please 14 departments, navigation labels negotiated by committee, and an interface that gives the refund policy the same prominence as whatever users came to do in the first place. Which is a slightly peculiar way to design something for humans. This is why I've relied on top task analysis for years. Find the few things that deserve attention Top task analysis identifies the tasks, questions, and features your audience values most. Rather than asking people whether they like a particular idea, it forces them to prioritize what matters. That distinction is useful because people can want many things in theory. But when they have to choose, a much smaller set usually rises to the top. Those top tasks give you an evidence-based foundation for decisions such as: What should appear prominently on a landing page Which features deserve attention in an app How a website's information architecture should be organized What information belongs in a dashboard Which stakeholder requests can safely sit further down the list It won't make the political conversations completely disappear, sadly. But “our users ranked this above that” is a considerably stronger position than “I feel this button should be bigger.” Why a normal survey isn't enough A traditional survey can collect what people say they want, but the result is often another long list. You've discovered 47 things your audience cares about and somehow made the original problem worse. Well done, everyone. Top task analysis adds prioritization. Participants choose the 5 tasks that matter most to them and then rank those choices. That gives you a clearer picture of relative importance rather than a pile of individually reasonable requests. The approach can work for all sorts of digital products. On an ecommerce site, tasks might include checking delivery charges, tracking an order, or arranging a return. On a marketing site, they might be understanding pricing, comparing options, or finding evidence that a product works. In an application, they might be the handful of features people use every day. Once you know what sits at the top, you can design around those priorities and fit the smaller tasks around them. I've built a free app to make this easier Although top task analysis is valuable, running one has traditionally involved a slightly awkward collection of survey tools, spreadsheets, and manual cleanup. I've spent enough of my life staring at those spreadsheets, so I built a dedicated Top Task Analysis app instead. It is 100% free, and I intend to keep it that way. You can create a survey, add a few sample tasks, and share it with your audience. Participants select their 5 most important tasks, add missing options for others to choose, and then prioritize their selections. The admin area shows which tasks matter most, and you can compare the priorities of different audience groups. You can also rename, merge, or remove responses as you clean up the results, rather than performing spreadsheet surgery and hoping you haven't accidentally deleted Western Europe. If you'd like to understand the process before creating a survey, I've also written a step-by-step guide to running a top task analysis. It covers gathering tasks, recruiting participants, analyzing the results, and using what you learn. The difficult bit remains reassuringly human The app will collect and organize the evidence, but it won't decide what your interface should become. You still need to interpret the results, balance competing needs, and make sensible design choices. That is a good thing. We already have enough tools claiming to replace judgment while producing dashboards nobody reads. But top task analysis gives that judgment somewhere solid to start. It replaces a surprising amount of guesswork with direct evidence about what your audience came to do, and it makes prioritization conversations much easier to have.Try the free Top Task Analysis app A small Product Hunt-shaped favor I'm also launching the app on Product Hunt today, complete with a short video showing how it works. If you have a moment, please take a look at the launch and let me know what you think there. View the app on Product Hunt I'd genuinely value your first impressions, so if you have a moment, please leave a comment on Product Hunt. In particular, I'd love to know: Whether you can see a situation where you'd use it How you'd like to use it Whether there are any features you think are missing And once you've had a chance to try it properly, ongoing feedback is equally welcome. If you run a survey and discover something confusing, missing, or mildly irritating, please let me know. I built this to make a useful research approach easier to adopt, so real-world grumbling is far more useful than polite applause.

Today on Art of the Cut, Amy Duddleston, ACE and Keiko Deguchi, ACE, the Emmy-nominated editors of HBO's Task.Amy's been on Art of the Cut in the past to discuss Mare of Easttown for which she received two Emmy nominations and won an ACE Eddie. Her other work includes the feature film, High Art, and TV series including The Umbrella Academy, American Gods, and Dexter.Keiko's work includes Love and War, We the Animals, and Hustle.Today on the show, a discussion of pacing a show up without losing important character moments, regulating the emotion of a scene by choosing the specific temperature of a performance, and how a resolving chord in music offers a lesson in editing.If you're interested in reading along with the podcast, check out the BorisFX blog site, where you can also see exclusive images, the trailer and a timeline from one of the episodes.borisfx.com/blog/aotc

The task force held a series of forums this week. Now the city wants to hear from people who could not attend.

If you're an ADHDish business owner who would like to get more done in less time, you'll want to join us in Optimize Your ADHD BrainLearn more and apply here: http://www.lifepixuniversity.com/oybTake the assessment to see how strong each of your thinking skills are: https://www.lifepixuniversity.com/cfSee how much your thinking skills are costing you: https://www.lifepixuniversity.com/calculatorIf you're new to my channel, my name is ST Rappaport. The day I improved one thinking skill I realized I could save 23 hours a week and improve my revenue with less work. Since then I've been obsessed with helping ADHDish business owners improve their own thinking skills so they can get more done in less time. (Hello more income and more inner peace

Get AudioBooks for Free Best Self-improvement Motivation Discover Your Life's Task Before It's Too Late | Motivation Find your true purpose before it's too late. This inspiring motivational speech helps you gain clarity, take action, and create a meaningful, successful life. ⁠We Need Your Love & Support ❤️ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Get 3 Audiobooks Free -

This final episode of our Confidence series ties everything together: the inner work of accepting discomfort and self-doubt, defusing from self-critical thoughts, and clarifying values now becomes the foundation for outer action. You can build confidence through the daily practice of taking small committed actions, again and again, in alignment with your values, even when you don't feel ready.  We'll dig into strategies like psychological flexibility: the ability to be present with thoughts, feelings, and sensations without letting them stop you from doing what matters. With that flexibility, we can shift from self-focused attention (consumed by what others are thinking, picking apart your own performance in real time) to task-focused attention. Self-focused attention takes the prefrontal cortex partially offline and redirects computing power to threat-detection and self-monitoring. Shifting attention to the task brings it back online. You think more clearly. You respond more flexibly. You perform closer to the level you're actually capable of. The practice is simple to describe and genuinely hard to do: when you notice self-focused attention taking over, pause, ask "What does this moment call for?" and do the next best thing, imperfectly. You'll get pulled back into self-monitoring. That's okay. That's actually the practice. That's where the real strength is built.    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek. The podcast is best paired with the Joy Lab Program (get your 7-day free trial!). Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating (Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North and your donations are tax-deductible).    Listen & follow the Joy Lab Podcast on your favorite listening app:  Spotify | Apple | YouTube      Sources and Notes for our Element of Confidence: Joy Lab Program: Take the next leap in your wellbeing journey with step-by-step practices to help you build and maintain the elements of joy in your life. Start your 7-day free trial now. Episodes in this series: Not Feeling Confident & Want to Know How to Increase Confidence In Yourself? Start By Seeing Confidence as Trust, Not a Feeling [ep. 273] Building Confidence with Mindful Acceptance (even when anxiety, self-doubt, & the harsh inner-critic show up) [ep. 274] You Are Not Your Thoughts: Cognitive Defusion for Confidence & to Change Your Relationship With Self-Critical Thoughts [ep. 275]  Confidence, Motivation, & Values: Focusing on Direction, Not Perfection [ep.276] Self-Focused vs. Task-Focused Attention & How Great Things Are Done by a Series of Small Things[ep. 277] Book: The Confidence Gap by Russ Harris, PhD Book: Confidence Culture by Shani Orgad, PhD & Rosalind Gill, PhD Bandura. Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Access here. Baumeister et al. Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles? Access here. Donnelly et al. Do people know how others view them? Two approaches for identifying the accuracy of metaperceptions. Access here. Hayes et al. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a Unified Model of Behavior Change. Access here. More about Victor Frankl's work from VFIA.   Full transcript here   Common Questions: Q: How do I actually start building confidence when I don't feel confident at all? A: Start with small committed actions (not big goals) that are aligned with your values and take those small actions even when you feel doubtful or uncomfortable. These small actions are the most important starting point, they collect evidence your nervous system can learn from (I can do it!), and the feeling of confidence can follow those small actions.   Q: Why does my anxiety get worse when I'm in the middle of doing something I care about? A: That's self-focused attention. Your energy and focus gets redirected from the task to self-monitoring and threat-detection; this episode explains the neuroscience, introduces the shift to task-focused attention, and gives you a simple one-question reset to bring your prefrontal cortex back online.   Key moments: [00:00] Welcome to the final episode of the Confidence series — committed action, the last step [00:30] Recap of the series: Ep. 274 (being with discomfort), Ep. 275 (unhooking from thoughts), Ep. 276 (clarifying values) — now it's time to act [01:00] Quoting Dr. Russ Harris: "The actions of confidence come first; the feelings of confidence come later." [01:30] Henry: up until now, we've done the inner work — now it's time for the outer work [02:00] Committed action: moving toward what matters even when uncomfortable, doubtful, or uncertain [02:30] ACT's psychological flexibility: being present with thoughts, feelings, and sensations without letting them stop you [03:30] The amygdala learns through action: "Oh, I just handled that. This isn't as dangerous as I thought." Over time the alarm quiets — not because you forced it, but because you gave it evidence that you can do hard things [04:30] Aimee: psychological flexibility is at the heart of courage and confidence — it's not the absence of self-doubt, it's the ability to be with it [06:00] Experiencing anxiety during a task is not a reliable predictor of performance — that is liberating [07:00] The real performance problem: not the anxiety, but the anxiety about the anxiety — self-focused attention [07:30] Self-focused attention: running assessments about being judged, picking apart your performance in real time, obsessing over the shaky voice or red patches [08:00] Russ Harris's hands-over-eyes metaphor: your thoughts are your hands — self-focused attention is covering your eyes with them [09:30] Cognitive defusion creates the space — unhook from the thoughts, shift attention to the task [10:00] The task-focused question: "What does this moment call for? What can I do right now?" [11:00] Self-focused attention takes the prefrontal cortex partially offline; shifting to task-focused attention brings the prefrontal cortex back online — clearer thinking, more flexibility, better performance [12:30] You don't have to wait until self-critical thoughts stop — you can have them AND shift your attention to the task [14:00] You'll get pulled back into self-focus — that's okay; that's another repetition, another chance to reset [15:30] This is why Joy Lab's experiments lean on mindfulness — the practice of returning attention is the whole skill [16:00] Rather than big hairy audacious goals — work on what we've already built: defusing thoughts, clarifying values, task-focused attention [17:30] As confidence builds in one area, it spreads to others — "I can do hard things" becomes a foundation [19:00] Confidence is not a destination — it's an ongoing practice; some days self-doubt is louder, and the practice is showing up anyway [20:00] Dr. Anne Wilson Schaef: "Perfectionism is not a quest for the best. It is a pursuit of the worst in ourselves." [20:30] Small imperfect actions are part of the best of who we are — that resilient nature to take small steps that build [20:45] Joy Lab final Experiment for the Element of Confidence is available [21:00] Closing wisdom from Vincent van Gogh: "Great things are done by a series of small things brought together."    Like and follow Joy Lab on Socials:  Instagram Linkedin Facebook YouTube   Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program. Please see our terms for more information. If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

How should Christians think about justice?In this episode of Hope Now: Not Only Weekends, we welcome the United States Attorney for the Western District of Tennessee for an honest conversation about the Memphis Safe Task Force, violent crime, public safety, and biblical justice.Beyond discussing crime reduction and community partnerships, we explore what it means to view public service as a calling from God—and why removing what harms people can be one of the greatest expressions of love.If you've wondered how faith intersects with government, justice, and caring for your city, this episode is for you.

AI is transforming the way organizations work, but successful AI adoption starts with understanding the work itself. In this episode of the Performance Matters podcast, Bob Mosher welcomes back Dr. Con Gottfredson to explore the emerging concept of task intelligence and why understanding work at the job-task level is critical for organizations seeking to leverage AI effectively. Together, Bob and Con discuss why many skills-based initiatives have struggled, how task intelligence provides a more practical path forward, and why organizations must move beyond a technology-first approach. They explore how AI can augment human performance, the importance of maintaining the right human-AI balance, and how methodologies like Rapid Workflow Analysis help organizations identify which tasks can be automated, augmented, or require human expertise. A must-listen for L&D leaders, business leaders, and anyone navigating the future of work, AI, and human performance. Listen or download the episode today!   Have questions about this content or another resource on the site? Let us know! Use this form to let us know you're interested in scheduling a call with a member of the team. We're always happy to discuss your current, future, or aspirational initiatives in real-time. For more 5 Moments of Need resources, visit our website, join the conversation, and subscribe to this podcast so as not to miss a single episode. Copyright © 2026 by APPLY Synergies, LLC | All Rights Reserved. 

The group seeks public input before it makes recommendations about public safety concerns in the city later this year.

You are the product. So why are you the last thing on your own to do list?Daffney Allwein has spent 20 years working with over 700 CEOs, executives, and high performers on what she calls a whole-person approach to health. Not the fluffy kind. She's talking physical fitness, nervous system regulation, and mental fitness, and how all three quietly decide whether your business grows or stalls.In this episode, Daffney joins Carly and Joe to unpack why solopreneurs fall into the productivity trap of optimizing themselves instead of their business, what's actually happening in the body of a stressed-out founder, and why the people who thrive are the ones willing to stop working in the business long enough to work on it.She also gets honest about the seasons that tested her own advice, including years of failed IVF, a first pregnancy, and moving an entire in person practice virtual during COVID. Her response every time? Double down on herself.In this episodeEat for joy, not for your feelings, and what that actually meansWhy the nervous system is a security system shaped by your environment, relationships, and geographyThe productivity trap that has solopreneurs billing every hour instead of building a businessThe real difference between people who thrive and people who plateauWhy bringing in the right person is an investment, not a line itemPostpartum, perimenopause, and the health gaps professional women are navigating with almost no supportWhy your brain physically rewires after having a child, and why "bouncing back" was never the goalBusy is an illusion, and the clock exercise that proves itWhy 15 minutes between meetings is enough, and nobody knows if you reapplied your deodorantCross training, marathon prep, and why doing the same workout daily breaks you down fastestThe quote on health that reframes everything about successConnect with DaffneyWebsite and free two-minute quiz: Lift Pro WellnessPodcast: Don't F*ing ShrinkIf this episode hit home, leave us a five-star review and share it with a solopreneur who needs to hear it.

with DEQ Director Sonja Nowakowski The post Big Hole River Repairs and Energy Task Force Findings first appeared on Voices of Montana.

David Soria Parra is an Engineering Lead at Anthropic and one of the core maintainers of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). We explore the biggest evolution of the protocol since its launch, and why MCP is becoming the foundation for the next generation of AI agents.We discuss why MCP is moving toward stateless communication, what developers misunderstand about state, sessions, and transport layers, and how lessons from real-world deployments at massive scale have shaped the protocol's future. We also dive into MCP v2, SDK migrations, protocol design, extension architecture, governance, developer experience, and how Anthropic thinks about balancing simplicity with long-term flexibility.Along the way, we explore progressive disclosure, tool search, programmatic tool calling, context bloat, forward compatibility, long-running AI tasks, protocol evolution, open-source governance, observability, and why the future of AI infrastructure will depend on designing protocols that can evolve without breaking the ecosystem.Timestamps:[00:00] Introduction[01:59] Why MCP Had to Become Stateless[04:28] The Tradeoffs of Stateless Design[06:13] What We Learned About Agent State[08:04] Sessions, Models & Implicit State[09:33] Migrating to MCP v2[12:19] Lessons from HTTP & Open Source Standards[18:16] Shipping Fast Without Breaking Everything[20:35] The Future Complexity of MCP[22:44] Core Features vs Extensions[26:47] Progressive Disclosure Explained[28:16] Solving Context Bloat[30:50] Why Tool Search Beats Progressive Disclosure[32:10] The Biggest MCP Anti-Pattern[34:25] Designing for Forward Compatibility[38:41] Why "Tasks" Matter[40:53] JSON, Tokens & Better Tool Calling[44:44] Observability & Tracing AI Agents[47:34] Will MCP Ever Be Finished?[50:22] What's Next for MCP

Listen to Pastor Jim Aderman's sermon for July 26, 2026, taken from 1 Corinthians 3:5-11. The post Be Busy with YOUR Task – Sermon for July 26, 2026 appeared first on St. Andrew Lutheran Church.

AI is changing the conversation around legacy modernisation, but successful transformation demands far more than powerful models and automated code generation. It requires engineering discipline, governance, and a clear-eyed view of where AI genuinely adds value and where it doesn't.On a recent episode of Tech Transformed, host Christina Stathopoulos, founder of Dare to Data, sat down with Shodhan Sheth, Enterprise Modernisation Platform and Cloud Lead, and Alessio Ferri, Lead Software Engineer, both part of Thoughtworks' Global Legacy Modernisation Service Development Team, to unpack exactly that.Legacy Modernisation With AIThe conversation around AI in legacy modernisation is often muddied by marketing noise. As Sheth puts it, "value and hype can coexist". Overpromising doesn't automatically mean a technology is worthless. The real question for technology leaders is whether AI meaningfully improves the cost-time-value equation for a specific problem.This will always start with problem-solution fitness: has someone already solved a comparable challenge with AI, and does the proposed use case genuinely fit that pattern? As Sheth notes, "most things can be judged by cost, time, and value", which is a simple but effective filter for cutting through the noise.Rethinking Legacy ModernisationGenerative AI is inherently probabilistic, while enterprise software has always relied on deterministic, predictable behaviour. Ferri unpacks this tension by separating two very different use cases: using AI to build systems, and embedding AI within operational systems.When AI writes code, inconsistency is manageable; developers review, test and refine the output before it ships. Production systems are a different matter entirely, where unpredictable behaviour carries real operational risk. As Ferri explains, "AI in production requires different guardrails than AI for building."The practical answer is controlled use. AI might suggest alternative products in a marketplace, for instance, while deterministic rules still guarantee that only in-stock items are ever shown. This lets AI add value within a firm, enterprise-grade constraints.Why AI Alone Won't Modernise Legacy SystemsTechnology is only part of the story. Sheth is clear that modernisation is fundamentally about change, and change is hard, especially across large enterprises with tangled, interconnected systems. Tasks that resist automation are often the hardest, like upskilling teams, explaining complex trade-offs, and winning buy-in; these cannot be solved with code alone. These human and organisational factors are routinely underestimated. Where the impact of a change is broad, he also advises either aligning teams properly across the business or breaking the change into smaller, more manageable pieces, a strategy that reduces resistance and smooths the path to adoption.If you would like to learn more about this, visit Thoughtworks or connect with both Sheth and Ferri on LinkedIn.TakeawaysApplying AI to modernise complex enterprise systems.Distinguishing hype from practical AI applications.Balancing probabilistic AI with deterministic enterprise software.Organisational and leadership challenges in AI modernisation.Building control, traceability, and abstractions in AI workflows.Advice for CIOs and CTOs on AI adoption.Chapters00:00 Introduction to AI and Legacy Modernisation01:18 Meet the Experts: Shodhan and Alessio02:47 Distinguishing Hype from Value in AI05:51 The Tension Between Probabilistic and Deterministic Systems10:13 The Human Element in Modernisation17:12 AI's Role in Enterprise Transformation19:26 Distinguishing Hype from Value in AI22:13 Probabilistic vs Deterministic Systems27:45 People and Processes in Modernisation29:03 Lessons in AI for Legacy Modernisation

In which we look at the daunting task facing John B Hood when he assumed command of the Army of Tennessee, and we set the stage for the Battle of Peachtree Creek. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

For years, "Django and async" came with an asterisk. The docs themselves warned you off it. Scary performance notes, a story that felt half-finished. Well, that story just got rewritten, literally, and the person who rewrote it is here to tell you why the old framing was wrong. Carlton Gibson is a former Django Fellow, sat on the security team for eight years, and he's on the steering council. On this episode we get into the async topic doc rewrite, what actually remains versus what was just fear, the new Tasks framework in 6.0, DB-level cascades and fetch modes landing in 6.1, and why free-threading is the bet that's about to pay off big for Django. If you've been told Django's async story isn't ready, this is the episode that puts that myth to bed. Episode sponsors Sentry Error Monitoring, Code talkpython26 Python in Production Talk Python Courses Links from the show DjangoCon Europe: djangocon.eu PyCon Italia: pycon.it Django on the Med: djangomed.eu Django Mantle: noumenal.es PyPI: pypi.org release notes: docs.djangoproject.com on_delete: docs.djangoproject.com Fetch modes: docs.djangoproject.com HttpRequest.multipart_parser_class: docs.djangoproject.com async topic doc: docs.djangoproject.com docs: docs.djangoproject.com DEP 14: github.com django-tasks: github.com django-tasks-local: github.com Celery: docs.celeryq.dev PEP 703: peps.python.org free-threading HOWTO: docs.python.org PEP 779: peps.python.org ASGI: docs.djangoproject.com PGBouncer: www.pgbouncer.org Channels: channels.readthedocs.io sync_to_async / async_to_sync: docs.djangoproject.com noumenal.es: noumenal.es Django Chat: djangochat.com @carlton@fosstodon.org: fosstodon.org Article: Cutting Python Web App Memory Over 31%: mkennedy.codes Watch this episode on YouTube: youtube.com Episode #556 deep-dive: talkpython.fm/556 Episode transcripts: talkpython.fm Theme Song: Developer Rap

What drives your day? Your calendar or your to-do list? Or perhaps your boss? The answer to that question will determine whether you are or will be productive each day.  Links: Email Me | Twitter | Facebook | Website | Linkedin   Learn more about the Time Sector System here Get Your Copy Of Your Time, Your Way: Time Well Managed, Life Well Lived Plan Your Week With Me: The Weekly Planning Matrix. The Working With… Weekly Newsletter Carl Pullein Learning Centre Carl's YouTube Channel Carl Pullein Coaching Programmes Subscribe to my Substack  The Working With… Podcast Previous episodes page   Script |426 Hello, and welcome to episode 426 of the Your Time, Your Way Podcast. A podcast to answer all your questions about productivity, time management, self-development, and goal planning. My name is Carl Pullein, and I am your host of this show.  If you were to look at the paper planners of the 1980s and 1990s, you would instantly see they were all built around your calendar. Some of the more sophisticated planners had a to-do list and a place to keep notes. Most were just a vertical list of times and the day's date with a small area at the bottom for notes.  And there was a reason for that. People working in the 20th century understood that no matter what you wanted to do each day, it would require time.  Dropping your kids off at school likely involved a twenty-minute detour on your regular commute. Restocking your paper-clip box would require you to walk to the stationery cupboard to fill it, another ten minutes, and then there was all the travelling around to meet people. (No Teams or Zoom in those days). Needs drove how we managed our time, and your diary was the only tool that could prevent you from overloading yourself. You could see in an instant whether you could sit down and type out the report or proposal. Because, given that there were no smartphones or tablets, and laptops were prohibitively expensive, you also had to be in the right place in order to do much of your work. I fondly remember the days when I left work at the end of the day, and there was no way a client, colleague or boss could contact me until I arrived for work the next day. My work Email was only on my work desktop, and that was in the office.  Now, somewhere along the timeline, those barriers have been broken down. Your work can, and does, follow you home.  I recently saw a before-and-after picture of people sitting around a resort swimming pool in the 1990s and one in the 2020s.  In the 1990s, people were sitting around the pool talking or reading a book. In the 2020s, people were staring at their phones. No talking, no books. Just eyes glued to a screen.  It's quite sad really to see. It's also why your clients, colleagues and bosses are on holiday with you.  If you're carrying your work life on your phone, then there's no escape at all. It would require a superhuman effort to avoid occasionally looking at your emails and messages. I know some people can do it; most cannot.  Today's episode is about how to put your calendar back to where it belongs: being your primary productivity and time management tool.  So, to get us started, let me hand you over to the recently returned Mystery Podcast Voice for this week's question.  This week's question comes from Judy. Judy asks, Hi Carl, I've heard you say many times that your calendar should be your primary productivity tool. I really struggle with that because I have so many tasks to do, and so I find myself beginning and ending my day in my task manager. Do you have any suggestions on how to make my calendar my primary focus? Hi Judy, thank you for your question. There is a problem with task managers today, and that is their sophistication.  Before we went digital, if you used a to-do list, you needed to handwrite it each day. While this may not have been very convenient, it forced you to only write out the tasks that needed to be done.  Remembering to watch a TV show or read a newspaper article would rarely, if ever, be written on a to-do list unless it was something you genuinely wanted to do.  Even then, when I think back, I knew that The A Team would be on a Saturday at 6:00 pm, and that Ally McBeal was on a Sunday night at 9:00 pm. And I was always at home at those times, and if I wasn't, because there were no streaming services, I wasn't going to see the show then unless I set the video recorder, and to do that you needed a doctorate in Theoretical Physics. Today's digital To-do lists are fantastic. You can add tags and labels, set start and due dates, make tasks recurring, and create multiple lists.  All great features.  And if your to-do list can do all that, what's the point of using a calendar? You can put events and date reminders into your task manager and have one single place to see everything you have to do.  Doing things this way immediately poses a problem, though. You remove the time constraints a calendar gives you.  With a calendar, you can see your day as a whole. You get your 24 hours, and if you tried to over-schedule yourself, you would instantly see it with multiple appointments at the same time. You can then act and reschedule things or cancel a meeting or two. With a task manager, you cannot see that. All you get is a list of things to do. And if you're not curating that list each day, the list just gets longer and longer.  Then you find important must-do tasks get lost among low-value, would-like-to-do-someday tasks. This then requires a lot of time to sort and organise.  But rather more damaging is what this does to your sense of control. Maintaining all this in your task manager creates a sense of overwhelm, and the increase in decision-making required leaves you feeling exhausted at the end of the day.  When you use your calendar as your primary productivity tool, you only need to decide what type of work you will do at any given time in the day.  For example, imagine it's the tax reporting season, and you need to get all your finances in order. Not a small task, and something you likely need four or five hours to complete.  If you were to have a task in your task manager that says “do taxes”, that'll be a task you will keep rescheduling. It's not a pleasant task to do, and you know it will take you four or five hours to do.  However, if you managed this on your calendar, you could schedule a couple of hours on Saturday morning one weekend and a further two hours the following weekend. Now you know you have the time protected. All you have to do is turn up and do the work.  Not turning up and doing it is an entirely different problem. That's not respecting your calendar, which is never a good habit to have.  One other thing you will notice about scheduling this kind of work on your calendar is you see it there well before the time, and that helps you to mentally prepare for the task.  Perhaps you decide to get all the paperwork ready on the Friday evening so you are ready to go first thing Saturday.  On a task list, a task like this will likely be buried away somewhere, and you only see it when you do your daily planning that day.  I've always found historical figures' to-do lists fascinating. People like President Eisenhower, Leonardo Da Vinci, Johnny Cash, John Lennon, Maya Angelou and Margaret Thatcher's to-do lists never contained any dates.  Now, people like President Eisenhower and Margaret Thatcher had diary secretaries. These were people who managed their calendars and informed them at the start and end of each day what their schedule was for that day.  This is something I've found Siri and Alexa superb at. I can walk into my office in the morning and ask what my appointments for the day are. I can also ask them to block out time tomorrow or Friday for doing a specific piece of work.  With AI coming on board, that feature can only get better. If I say to Siri, “schedule a deep work session on Friday morning at 9:30”, Siri will inform me that the cleaner will be coming at 9:30 am, and I can decide to keep the focus session or change it to a time I will not be interrupted.  Each week I write a script for this podcast. I usually do this on a Thursday morning after my meetings. Today, my last meeting was cancelled, so I was able to get to writing earlier.  I haven't needed to look at my to-do list once yet, and it's already 11:00 am. My day began at 8:00 am with a one-hour meeting. It finished at 9:30 am. Originally, my plan was to finish my meetings at 10:15 and begin writing at 10:30 am. As it happened, because of the cancellation, I was able to begin writing at 9:45.  I don't need to change my calendar; I knew that once my meetings were finished, my next task was to write. So I did.  So where should a task list fit into your overall system?  Task managers are great at collecting stuff you have to do. Far better than calendars, as a calendar will demand a date at the very least. Task managers don't need a date. You just add a task to the inbox, and there it will sit until you decide to do something with it.  If you follow the Time Sector System, you process your task manager every 24 to 48 hours, and when you do so, you decide when you will do the task. It will either be this week, next week, later this month or next month.  On your calendar, you protect time for the different categories of work you do. For instance, if you write proposals, then you would have time protected on your calendar for writing proposals. You will likely also have time set aside for dealing with your communications (emails and messages, etc.), and admin.  Then at the appointed time, you use the tags or labels in your task manager to pull up the tasks that match that category of work.  That's an oversimplification of the system. If you want to learn more about the Time Sector System, I recommend checking out the course I have for it. I will put the details in the show notes.  This ensures you are not over-scheduling yourself or attempting to do more than you can do. It also teaches you to say no. You can see whether or not you have the time and space to do the work being asked of you. If you consistently follow this method, backlogs no longer grow, and you stay reasonably on top of your work, although being on top of your work at all times is rarely achievable.  The biggest, more positive change you could make to your productivity system is to put your calendar back in its proper place. Namely, make your calendar your primary productivity tool and use your task manager as a support tool that tells you what to do when you sit down to work.  I should add that for some of you this change will be uncomfortable. If you've allowed your calendar to fill up with meetings, leaving you no time to do the work you are meant to do, sticking your head in the sand and ignoring it won't make the problem go away.  This is when you may have to have a conversation with your boss. More than five hours of meetings a day, and you're not going to be able to do much work beyond responding to messages. When you take into account toilet breaks, making coffee, and your lunchtime, there's not going to be much time left for anything else.  I hope that has helped, Judy. Thank you for your question.  And thank you to you too for listening. It just remains for me now to wish you all a very, very productive week.   

Reflections from host Sarah Olivieri ... The Trap of Being the Most Capable Person in the Room There is a particular kind of nonprofit leader who is very good at almost everything. They can build the budget. They can write the grant. They can run the intake, fix the database, cover the front desk, and close the books when the bookkeeper leaves. When something breaks, they already know how to fix it, so they do. This is where nonprofit CEO leadership capacity quietly becomes the ceiling on the entire organization. When the most capable person keeps doing the work, the organization can only grow as large as that one person's hours. Everything routes through them. Every decision waits for them. And because they are competent, nobody notices the bottleneck until the organization is straining against it. This looks like a time management problem or a delegation problem, when in fact it's a leadership design problem. Let's talk about how to fix it. A Leader Who Has Made the Shift A version of this comes up almost every time I talk with a leader who is running a good organization and running themselves into the ground to do it. I had a conversation recently with Janelle Miller Moravek, who has led a growing mental health organization since 2009. She has been the fundraiser, the strategist, the operator, and the person who learned every function the hard way. And she has arrived somewhere most leaders need to go, but don't even realize yet. She knows how much to know, and she knows when to take her hands off. Know Enough to Be Dangerous There is a level of knowledge every CEO needs about every function of their organization. Not enough to run it. Enough to tell whether it is being run well. If you know nothing about your finances, you cannot tell a good accountant from a bad one. If you know nothing about your fundraising, you cannot tell whether your development director is stuck or coasting. You do not need to do the work. You need to know enough to provide real oversight. This is the balance that trips people up. Leaders tend to land at one of two extremes. Either they know a function so well that they cannot stop doing it, or they know it so poorly that they cannot supervise it. Neither one is oversight. Oversight lives in the middle, where you know enough to be dangerous and then let go of the doing. The truth is, most leaders overshoot toward doing because doing feels productive and supervising feels like nothing. Sitting in a meeting you do not strictly need to attend, reading a book, walking through the building, thinking about what is coming in eighteen months. None of that feels like work. All of it is the work. The Most Important Job Nobody Schedules The single most valuable thing a CEO can do is figure out what is around the corner that nobody else sees yet. When you plan for that, you are ahead of everyone. When you are ahead, your organization makes a bigger impact with less scramble. I call it brain time. The problem is that brain time never makes it onto the calendar, because everything else is louder. The payroll approval, the bank call that only the CEO is allowed to make, the fire that flared up this morning. Those tasks are real, and someone has to clear them so the rest of the team can move. But they are not the job. They are the price of admission to the job. When leaders let the loud, clearable tasks crowd out the quiet, high-value thinking, the organization loses its ability to see around corners. It becomes reactive. It handles what is in front of it and gets blindsided by what was predictable all along. Leadership You Can Buy Before You Can Afford It Here is the move that changes the math for organizations in the one-to-five-million range. You can bring in leadership without adding it to your management structure. When you outsource a function to a strong fractional or contracted firm, whether that is finance, HR, IT, or billing, you are not just buying task execution. You are buying leadership. A good outsourced finance team does not wait for you to direct them. They lead you. They tell you what you are missing. They bring a level of expertise you could never afford to hire full-time and could never provide yourself. This is what lets a leadership team stay lean. Janelle runs a nearly three-million-dollar organization with a management structure of two people, herself and a deputy director, because the CFO brain, the HR strategy, the billing compliance, and the fundraising all live with expert partners outside the building. The leadership is baked in. The payroll taxes, the turnover, the recruiting, the risk of getting a specialized compliance task wrong, all of that belongs to someone whose actual job it is. One line from that conversation has stayed with me: "It really hampered our growth before we outsourced." What I appreciate about this framing is that it names the mechanism. When a leader hoards functions they are not expert in, the organization does not just carry the cost of their learning curve. It carries the cost of everything that leader could have been doing instead. The growth that never happens is the most expensive line item, and it never shows up on any budget. Delegating Outcomes, Not Just Tasks There is a difference between handing someone a task and handing someone a result. Task delegation is "process this batch of invoices." Outcome delegation is "own our financial health and tell me when something is off." Most leaders get comfortable with the first and never make it to the second. So they stay busy checking work instead of free to lead. This is the shift from managing tasks to distributing outcomes and decisions across the organization. The shift usually becomes possible when the right person is in the right seat. And the right person is almost never the one with the most polished resume. It is the one with learning agility and curiosity, the one who can grow into responsibility you have not even defined yet. Hire for that, and you can eventually hand over not just the doing but the deciding. That is what frees a visionary leader to actually be one. I say this to clients constantly, and I had to learn it on myself first. For years my rule was that just because I can do something does not mean I should. I am a highly capable person. If I keep doing everything I am capable of, I will hold my own organization back, and I will not be a very happy human either. The capability is not the question. The choice about where to point it is. What Changes When You Stop Being the Doer When a leader stops being the doer, the whole organization stops waiting on one person. Decisions get made closer to the work. The team develops instead of stalling. And the leader finally has room for the thinking that only they can do. The heaviness that comes from being the answer to every question starts to lift. The work has not disappeared. It is finally sitting where it belongs. The organization stops being an extension of one person's stamina and starts being a system that can carry its own weight. That is what staying power actually looks like. It is not a heroic leader holding everything together. It is a structure built so that no single person has to. The Marathon This is not about doing less work. It is about doing the work that only you can do. Nonprofits can grow past the founder's capacity. They can build leadership they could not otherwise afford. They can run without one person anchoring every decision. Not by that person working harder. By building an organization that no longer needs them to. About the Guest Janelle Miller Moravek is a nonprofit leader & mental health advocate. She has led Youth & Family Counseling as Executive Director since 2009, driving its growth and impact across Lake County, Illinois. With a deep commitment to increasing access to mental health services, she oversees strategy, programming, and operations while fostering strong partnerships throughout the community. Janelle also plays a key leadership role in the region, serving on the board of the Lake County Alliance for Human Services and co-chairing the Lake County Behavioral Health Action Team. Her prior experience includes development roles at Carmel Catholic High School and Barat College. She holds a BA in French Studies from Wesleyan University and lives in Libertyville with her husband and three children. Connect with Janelle: Website: CounselingForAll.org/  LinkedIn: Linkedin.com/in/janelle-miller-moravek-903a815b/ Janelle's profile: accessspeakers.biz/speaker/janelle-miller-moravek-nonprofit-leader-mental-health-advocate/ Be sure to subscribe to Inspired Nonprofit Leadership so that you don't miss a single episode, and while you're at it, won't you take a moment to write a short review and rate our show? It would be greatly appreciated! Let us know the topics or questions you would like to hear about in a future episode. You can do that and follow us on LinkedIn.

In this episode of the Observatory Podcast, Scott and LaRae Wright sit down for a short, intimate conversation about prayer—not as a rule-bound ritual, but as a living practice shaped by words, intention, gratitude, and alignment. They unpack how prayer can evolve beyond fear-based asking, and why the language we use—internally and out loud—can land as either medicine or venom. If you've ever felt conflicted about prayer, spirituality, or how to “talk to the Divine,” this episode offers a grounded reframe you can actually use.Timestamps[00:00:18] Scott introduces the topic: prayer (and why this conversation may surprise you)[00:01:20] Setting the scene: a quiet Sunday afternoon, post–Valentine's Day reflections[00:04:39] Scott shares a moment from his men's group that sparked this episode[00:08:39] What prayer meant growing up: structure, habit, and fear-based “asking”[00:10:07] When prayer feels like a ritual—or a task—instead of communication[00:13:30] Reframing prayer: intention, energy, and how words shape experience[00:19:34] Gratitude as a shared frequency: how prayer can create resonance[00:20:58] Scott reads a prayer that shifted his relationship with “prayer language”[00:24:39] “Toxic positivity”: when words sound good but aren't aligned underneath[00:29:20] The line that hits: “no venom passes my lips” and why it matters[00:30:16] Venom as poison: what words can do once they're released[00:34:46] Emotional regulation, balance, and not getting stuck in heavy energy[00:39:05] Closing takeaway: your words are either venom or medicineNotable Quotes“It felt more like a ritual or maybe a task. Task that I had to do.” – Scott Wright [10:07]“Well, it creates a resonance like a song would. Those words create a resonance.” – LaRae Wright [19:48]“So no venom passes my lips and no destruction results from my speech.” – Scott Wright [21:50]“That venom is like poison. It's not retractable.” – Scott Wright [30:16]“Just everyone pay attention to your words. Pay attention to whether they are venom or medicine.” – Scott Wright [39:05]Relevant links:Subscribe to the podcast: Apple PodcastProduced by NC Productions

Why is it so hard to stop one task and move on to the next when you have ADHD? In this episode of ADHD Support Talk Radio, Tara McGillicuddy and Lynne Edris explore the hidden challenge of ADHD transitions. What may look like procrastination, distraction, poor motivation, or lack of discipline may actually be difficulty shifting your attention, energy, and focus from one activity to another. Tara and Lynne discuss physical, mental, emotional, role, and time transitions—and why everyday activities such as getting out of bed, leaving the house, taking a shower, winding down at night, or returning to work after an interruption can feel surprisingly difficult. You'll discover: ✅ Why task switching creates friction for the ADHD brain ✅ How transition warnings and layered timers can help ✅ Why interruptions can disrupt focus, memory, and communication ✅ How to create a simple re-entry plan before stepping away ✅ Why identifying the next action makes restarting easier ✅ How awareness can reduce shame and self-blame Learn how to recognize transition friction and make stopping, starting, and shifting gears easier. Learn more about Tara McGillicuddy: https://www.taramcgillicuddy.com ADHD events, classes, and resources: https://www.addclasses.com Learn more about Lynne Edris: https://www.coachingaddvantages.com Take Lynne's Productivity Breakthrough Quiz: https://www.productivitybreakthroughquiz.com

Does choosing a life-first solo business mean you're lazy? Carly and Joe say absolutely not, and in this episode they explain why.They dig into where the lazy story really comes from, tracing hustle culture from chill seventies hippie vibes to the money-obsessed yuppies of the eighties, and how that conditioning taught us to equate visible sacrifice with worth. From the outside, a life-first business can look like doing less, fewer hours, no team, no big launches. But the truth is the opposite. Laziness is the avoidance of effort. Life-first is the intentional allocation of effort.Carly shares a personal story about her and her husband seeing downtime completely differently, and how fifteen years of his perspective reshaped how she views rest and efficiency. Joe brings his own history of sleeping in the lab and feeling accomplished for it, and why he calls that mindset a warped one he still works to overcome.The conversation also gets honest about the flip side. Sometimes life-first becomes a costume for fear or procrastination. The hosts share the gut-check questions every solopreneur should ask to make sure a boundary is really a boundary and not just avoidance of something hard.The takeaway is simple. Lazy has no plan. Life-first is all plan, all design.In this episodeWhere hustle culture actually came fromThe real difference between lazy and life-firstWhy dinner with your family can count as your workThe gut check to know if you're avoiding hard thingsHow to redefine success on your own termsIf this episode spoke to you, share it with a fellow solopreneur and leave us a five-star review!

Before leaders can redesign their organizations with AI, they have to reconsider how they personally think, work, and make decisions.In this special episode of Unlearn, Barry O'Reilly shares the opening chapter of the audiobook edition of Artificial Organizations, narrated in his own voice. After hearing from readers who wanted another way to experience the book, Barry spent four days in the studio bringing its ideas and stories to life. The process was rewarding, demanding, and personal. As someone who is dyslexic, reading every word aloud required a different kind of focus from delivering a keynote, teaching a workshop, or hosting a podcast conversation.Barry then takes listeners into the central argument of the book: organizations often begin AI adoption with licenses, pilots, and tools while leaving leadership behavior and decision-making systems unchanged. Drawing from his own experiments, leadership research, and work with senior teams across North America, Europe, and Asia, he explains why meaningful AI transformation starts with human traits, high-value tasks, and the judgment leaders must preserve before selecting technology.Key TakeawaysAI should strengthen judgment, not simply increase output: Machines can process and synthesize information at a scale no individual can match, but leaders still have to decide what matters. The opportunity is to use AI to prepare, capture, and pressure-test thinking so human attention stays focused on consequential decisions.Start with traits, then tasks, then tools: Barry's 3T model begins with how a leader naturally thinks, creates, communicates, and decides. Only after identifying the tasks where that judgment creates the most value should leaders choose tools to support the work.Decision velocity must be paired with decision advantage: Decision velocity is how quickly a leader moves from question to insight, decision, and action. Decision advantage is the quality and depth of context behind that choice; speed without insight creates chaos, while insight without timely action becomes irrelevant.Most leadership time is allocated away from leadership value: Barry describes an 80/20 mismatch in which meetings, updates, administration, and context reconstruction consume most of a leader's time, while the greatest value comes from framing problems, evaluating tradeoffs, and making high-stakes decisions.Organizational AI adoption begins with personal behavior change: Broad mandates, task forces, and tool rollouts are often the wrong starting point. Leaders build more credible adoption when they experiment in their own workflows, share what they learn, and make new behaviors visible to their teams.Additional InsightsPresence can be more valuable than productivity: Barry's first AI experiment used a meeting assistant to capture and synthesize conversations. The practical gain was not only faster preparation and follow-up; it allowed him to stop carrying every detail in his head and remain fully present during critical discussions.Experience becomes a liability when it is not augmented: The instincts and institutional knowledge that helped leaders succeed can become limiting when they are treated as sufficient. Experience keeps compounding only when leaders combine it with broader recall, faster synthesis, and continuous testing.Senior leaders need psychological safety to learn: Barry's executive study found that leaders preferred one-on-one coaching and small peer cohorts over large workshops or self-paced courses. Being a beginner is uncomfortable at senior levels, so smaller environments make experimentation and honest questions easier.New capacity should create thinking space, not more workload: In the Progeny case study, AI reduced the effort required to capture meetings, actions, owners, and deadlines. CEO Peter Nevsky framed the resulting capacity as time for strategic thought and better decisions rather than an invitation to place people on a faster operational treadmill.The unit of change is the judgment inside a role: AI may automate parts of a project manager's, analyst's, or executive's work while increasing the importance of interpretation, challenge, and decision quality. The role may remain, but the judgment required within it changes.Episode Highlights00:00 – Episode Introduction & Why I Created the AudiobookBarry introduces this special preview of the Artificial Organizations audiobook, shares why he chose to narrate it himself, and explains why leaders need a different approach to AI adoption through the 3T framework: Traits, Tasks, and Tools.04:33 – A Quick Favor Before We BeginBarry invites listeners to leave an Amazon review, recommend the audiobook to their network, and help more leaders discover its ideas.05:16 – Preface: Why the Way We Work Is BrokenBarry introduces the central challenge facing modern organizations: leaders are overwhelmed by information, while better decisions remain harder than ever.07:11 – Judgment Under PressureBarry explores why more data, more tools, and more technology haven't created better leadership, arguing that the real constraint is our ability to process information and make sound judgments.10:07 – The First AI Leadership ExperimentA simple experiment with an AI meeting assistant transformed Barry's leadership by improving clarity, presence, and decision-making, leading to a new perspective on AI's role.12:00 – AI as Judgment InfrastructureBarry reframes AI as more than a productivity tool, explaining how it strengthens judgment, improves decisions, and helps leaders focus on what matters most.16:07 – Part One: The Judgment ConstraintBarry introduces the first section of the book, explaining why AI creates little value unless it changes how leaders think, decide, and lead.18:08 – Chapter One: Your Legacy Is Now Your LiabilityBarry examines why experience alone is no longer enough and how decision velocity and continuous learning are becoming the defining advantages of modern leadership.22:20 – The AI ROI Blind SpotBarry challenges the common focus on efficiency and cost reduction, arguing that AI's greatest value lies in helping leaders make better and faster decisions.28:16 – From Linear Leadership to Exponential InnovationBarry explains why traditional leadership models struggle in the AI era and why organizations must adopt new ways of learning, experimenting, and making decisions.34:10 – What Makes an Artificial OrganizationBarry defines artificial organizations and shares how leaders can replace memory-based management with shared judgment systems that accelerate decision-making and collaboration.40:09 – The New Leadership DivideBarry explores the widening gap between leaders who actively experiment with AI and those who continue relying on legacy ways of working, and why that difference will compound over time.43:15 – Where to StartBarry explains why successful AI transformation begins with personal experimentation, encouraging leaders to model new behaviors before scaling change across their organizations.45:15 – Closing ReflectionsBarry concludes the first chapter, thanks listeners for joining this special audiobook preview, and invites them to continue the journey with Artificial Organizations.FAQsQ1. Is this Unlearn episode an audiobook preview?Yes. This special episode includes Barry O'Reilly's recorded introduction followed by the opening chapter of the audiobook edition of Artificial Organizations, narrated by Barry himself. He explains why the audio edition was created, what recording the book required, and how its ideas connect to his work with executive leaders and teams.Q2. What is an artificial organization?An artificial organization is a company that deliberately combines human and machine intelligence to redesign how context is captured, information is synthesized, and decisions are made. Instead of adding AI to the edges of existing workflows, it builds judgment infrastructure into how the organization operates.Q3. How can leaders use AI to make better decisions?Leaders can use AI to capture conversations, summarize context, test assumptions, explore scenarios, prepare for meetings, and identify unresolved actions. This reduces the information leaders must carry mentally and gives them more capacity to focus on tradeoffs, consequences, and high-value judgment.Q4. What is the difference between decision velocity and decision advantage?Decision velocity is the speed at which a leader moves from a question to insight, decision, and action. Decision advantage is the quality, accuracy, and depth of context behind that decision. Strong leadership requires both because speed without insight creates chaos, while insight without action loses relevance.Q5. Why do many enterprise AI initiatives fail to create business value?They often begin with tool purchases, pilots, and mandates without redesigning how work, context, and judgment flow through the...

In this conversation, Lee sits down with two of Unleashing Leaders' top change agents, Skye Connors and Emily LaPorta, to tackle a problem every high performer eventually hits: too many priorities, not enough hours. Skye and Emily built UL's internal SOP for handling conflicting task requests and walk through how it works, from the physical warning signs of overload to the tiebreakers that step in when two tasks conflict. Feeling overloaded usually means you're trusted with more, not that you're falling short. Lee, Skye, and Emily break down the prioritization shortcuts that quietly wreck teams: First in, first out. Last in, first out. Whoever screams the loudest. And the fallback of declaring "everything is priority one," which just pushes the decision onto your team, leaving them to default to whatever's easiest. What UL actually uses instead is a framework that sorts commitments by required, desired, and optional, weighs critical path and impact, and falls back on real tiebreakers, like prior commitment and relative priority, when everything else ties. Emily closes with a reminder that this gets easier with practice: "Am I required?" and "What is the impact?" stop needing a checklist and become instinct.   Additional Resources Attend Unleashing Leaders University: https://unleashingleadersuniversity.com/curriculum Learn more about Unleashing Leaders: https://unleashingleaders.com/ Follow Unleashing Leaders on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/unleashingleaders Connect with Lee on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leeallenscott/ Follow Unleashing Leaders on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UnleashingLeaders/ Follow Unleashing Leaders on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/unleashingleaders/   Key Takeaways: Feeling overloaded is a sign of trust and competence, not a warning sign of failure. Notice the physical tell (tight chest, racing heart) before it drives a bad decision. First in, first out, last in, first out, and "whoever screams loudest" all fail as standalone strategies. Declaring everything priority one pushes the decision to your team, and they'll default to whatever seems easiest, leaving the hard stuff undone. Sort every ask into required, desired, or optional before you commit to it. When priorities truly tie, fall back on real tiebreakers like prior commitment and relative project priority. With practice, questions like "Am I required?" and "What is the impact?" stop needing a checklist and become instinct.  

One thing that a lot of people with vestibular disorders notice is how fatiguing or challenging different tasks become over time.  What's happening is your brain is trying to process multiple inputs (or even tasks) at the same time.  For those with vestibular disorders, it becomes more difficult because your body is trying to process more information—and it’s also now having to work double time to keep you upright. Multitasking and task switching are a part of daily life, but it comes with costs. And those with vestibular disorders often notice this more but aren't quite sure how to make it go away. But this episode is here to help! In this episode, we'll dig into: Why tasks feel manageable alone but become overwhelming when combined How multitasking and task switching are similar and different What the “switch cost” is and how it adds up over time for those with vestibular disorders What percentage of people with vestibular conditions experience cognitive symptoms like brain fog How the central nervous system and cerebral cortices matter for cognitive symptoms Why spatial awareness demands extra resources when you have a vestibular disorder How balance exercises in VRT are designed to gradually scale up task demands Why errors are actually part of healing with a vestibular condition Why rest and recovery are essential when you’re adding in more cognitive or physical tasks Task switching and multitasking are hard for everyone! A vestibular disorder just adds an extra layer—it doesn’t mean things can’t improve, but it does take time, space, and grace. You're doing more things than you think and certainly doing more than you take credit for. Links Mentioned: Vestibular Group Fit (code GROUNDED at checkout for 15% off!): https://thevertigodoctor.com/vestibular-group-fit Free Resources: ⁠The 4 Steps to Managing Vestibular Migraine: https://thevertigodoctor.myflodesk.com/cb5js0y78n ⁠The PPPD Management Masterclass⁠: https://thevertigodoctor.myflodesk.com/new-pppd ⁠What your Partner Should Know About Living with Dizziness⁠: https://thevertigodoctor.myflodesk.com/partnership ⁠The FREE Mini VGFit Workout⁠: https://thevertigodoctor.myflodesk.com/minifit ⁠The FREE POTS – safe Workouts⁠: https://thevertigodoctor.myflodesk.com/pots Connect with Dr. Madison (@TheVertigoDoctor): https://instagram.com/thevertigodoctor Work with Dr. Madison: For 1:1 Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy, email madison@thevertigodoctor.com Otherwise, I'll see ya in Vestibular Group Fit! Connect with Dr. Jenna (@dizzy.rehab.therapist): https://www.instagram.com/dizzy.rehab.therapist/ Learn about the Oak Method: http://thevertigodoctor.com/why-vestibular-group-fit Love what you heard?Consider leaving a review on your favorite podcast platform to help us reach more vestibular warriors like you! This podcast is for informational purposes only and may not be the best fit for you and your personal situation. It shall not be construed as medical advice. The information and education provided here is not intended or implied to supplement or replace professional medical treatment, advice, and/or diagnosis. Always check with your own physician or medical professional before trying or implementing any information read here. Citations  McGrath, Kim. “The “Switch Cost” of Multitasking.” Wake Forest News, 16 Apr. 2024, news.wfu.edu/2024/04/16/the-switch-cost-of-multitasking/. Asuako, P. A. G., Stojan, R., Bock, O., Mack, M., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2025). Multitasking: does task-switching add to the effect of dual-tasking on everyday-like driving behavior?. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 10(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00611-y Smith, L. J., Wilkinson, D., Bodani, M., & Surenthiran, S. S. (2024). Cognition in vestibular disorders: state of the field, challenges, and priorities for the future. Frontiers in neurology, 15, 1159174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1159174 ————————————— task switching and multitasking, things to help with brain fog, vestibular migraine brain fog, what causes brain fog and dizziness, vestibular disorders, vestibular group fit, living with vestibular migraine, living with chronic dizziness, sensory overload, spatial awareness, cognitive abilities

Andrew Giuliani, Executive Director of the White House Task Force for the FIFA World Cup 2026, joins Sid to talk about the rousing success the 2026 World Cup was here in North America, following yesterday's final match between Argentina and Spain at MetLife Stadium that saw Spain hoist its second World Cup trophy.

WarRoom Battleground EP 1048: NATO Discussion With Geopolitical Expert David T Pyne, Deputy Director Of The EMP Task Force