Podcasts about Patent attorney

I am Rolf Claessen and my co-host Ken Suzan and I are welcoming you to episode 177 of our podcast IP Fridays! Today's interview guest is Dr. Ernst-Peter Heilein, who is a German and European patent attorney, the founder of HEILEIN IP LAW, and a long-time IP leader at BSH Home Appliances. He is the mastermind behind the BSH v. Electrolux decision of the European Court of Justice about long-arm jurisdiction in Europe that has the whole patent world stirring in Europe at the moment! But before we jump into this fascinating interview, I have news for you! Emboline v. AorticLab (UPC Court of Appeal) The UPC Court of Appeal has clarified for the first time how a conditional revocation counterclaim should be handled, in a dispute over Emboline’s embolic protection patent EP 2 129 425 against AorticLab. A defendant can validly make its revocation counterclaim conditional on infringement being found first, meaning no ruling on the counterclaim is needed if the infringement claim fails, as the Munich Local Division had held. The Court of Appeal also closed a related gap: if the claimant appeals a non-infringement finding, the counterclaimant may conditionally appeal the unresolved counterclaim too. AorticLab missed its own appeal deadline and can now at best seek re-establishment of rights, while Emboline has already appealed the non-infringement finding. FujiFilm v. Kodak (UPC Court of Appeal) Following the closely watched long-arm jurisdiction ruling of June 2, the UPC Court of Appeal, chaired by Rian Kalden, has now granted FujiFilm an injunction against Kodak in a second proceeding. The Court upheld the limited printing plate patent and found that Kodak’s Sonora XTRA 3 plate infringes it. Kodak can no longer sell or use that plate in Germany. OpenAI v. EUIPO (General Court of the EU, T-555/25) The General Court’s Eighth Chamber dismissed OpenAI’s action against the EUIPO decision to partially cancel the OPENAI trademark. The partial refusal for classes 9, 42, and 45 rests decisively on Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR, the descriptiveness ground. For a significant part of the English-speaking public, “OPENAI” directly conveys that the goods or services are provided using freely accessible artificial intelligence. Dental Monitoring v. Align Technology (CAFC) On July 7, 2026, the Federal Circuit confirmed that AI and deep-learning patent claims covering dental image analysis are not patent-eligible under Section 101. Simply training a “deep learning device” on a specific dataset does not amount to a patent-eligible technical solution. Publisher v. Google (Munich I Regional Court) The Munich I Regional Court issued a preliminary injunction barring Google from spreading false factual claims about a publishing company in its AI Overviews. A search query combining the company’s name with the German term for “fraud scheme” had triggered an AI-generated summary containing entirely fabricated accusations of subscription traps. KPN v. Oppo (Federal Court of Justice, X ZR 103/24) On July 1, the Federal Court of Justice dismissed KPN’s appeal against the revocation of a central claim of its LTE patent EP 2 291 033. Oppo had successfully challenged the claim, leaving KPN’s infringement action against Oppo’s German distribution entity without a legal basis for now. BSH v. Electrolux: What the ECJ Ruling Means for Your Company’s Patent Enforcement Strategy A vacuum cleaner from 2001 has reshaped the European patent landscape. That sounds like an overstatement. It isn’t. For IP Fridays, I spoke with Dr. Ernst-Peter Heilein, founder of HEILEIN IP LAW and long-time Senior IP Leader at BSH Home Appliances. He guided the case BSH v. Electrolux from its first strategic idea all the way to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice, a case that earned the 2025 Managing IP Award as “Europe Impact Case of the Year.” For managing directors, IP heads, and R&D leaders at German Mittelstand companies, this case is not a legal footnote. It changes where you can enforce your patents, and it changes where you yourself can be sued if your company operates across several European markets. That is what this article is about. Background: How a Patent Dispute Became an ECJ Case The invention dates back to 2001 and concerns a new vacuum cleaner technology. In 2006, BSH identified what it believed was an unauthorized use of that invention and contacted Electrolux to clarify the situation. The European patent was granted in 2009 and validated in a number of European countries. Nobody, Heilein says, could have imagined at the time that this matter would eventually reach the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice almost twenty years later. In late 2018, BSH successfully defended the patent through opposition and appeal proceedings before the European Patent Office. In 2019, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf found that certain Electrolux vacuum cleaner models infringed the patent. A classic milestone win, the kind that occurs regularly in patent practice. Except the patent had been validated in many countries. Winning in Germany did not solve the enforcement problem everywhere else. Heilein describes the starting point in very concrete terms: how do you enforce a patent that exists in many countries without filing a separate lawsuit in every single one? And how do you prevent claims from becoming time-barred while you work that out? Running parallel proceedings in multiple countries is not just legally complex. It consumes time, personnel, and money that a mid-sized company rarely has in that quantity to spare. This is exactly where the real value of this case for you begins. From the outset, this was never an academic debate about jurisdiction. It was a question that every company holding rights in more than one country eventually faces: how do you enforce your rights efficiently without burning your budget on ten parallel proceedings? Brussels Ia Regulation: The Underrated Article 4 While searching for a solution, the BSH team came across Article 4 of the Brussels Ia Regulation. The underlying idea is simple: a person can generally be sued in the country where that person is based. In the BSH case, that pointed toward the Swedish home court, because Electrolux is headquartered in Stockholm. For a long time, this rule played no real role in patent practice. The widely held view was that cross-border patent litigation in Europe was effectively dead the moment a defendant challenged the validity of the patent. Anyone wanting to enforce a patent across several countries appeared to have no choice but to litigate country by country. Heilein and his team questioned that assumption instead of simply accepting it. This is the point I find most instructive: challenging accepted assumptions in your own field is often the difference between a standard solution and a strategic one. In 2020, the team decided to file the action in Sweden, aware that they were looking at a possibility, not a guarantee. Cross-Border Enforcement: The Three Questions Referred to Luxembourg After Electrolux challenged the validity of the patents, the Swedish home court declared itself not competent to hear the case. BSH appealed, and the Swedish Court of Appeal agreed to refer three questions to the European Court of Justice. The first question addressed the core problem: does a home court that would otherwise have jurisdiction over an infringement claim lose that jurisdiction simply because the defendant argues the patent is invalid? The second question concerned a feature common to many legal systems, including Germany’s, where infringement and validity are decided in separate proceedings. The third question originally concerned Turkey. Today, most people immediately think of the United Kingdom, and some even think of US patents. Originally, the question was simpler: do the same jurisdiction rules apply to patents from countries outside the European Union? The fact that the ECJ first assigned the case to a Chamber of seven judges and later referred it to the Grand Chamber of 15 judges already signaled how much weight the Court placed on these questions. The Judgment: What the ECJ Actually Decided A home court does not automatically lose jurisdiction simply because the defendant argues the patent is invalid. For many years, the opposite was widely assumed to be settled law. The ECJ made clear that this reading was too narrow. The court where the defendant is based can generally continue to hear the infringement case. One point matters for how you read this ruling: questions concerning the validity of a European patent still fall to the national courts of the country for which the patent was granted, as provided in Article 24(4) of the Brussels Ia Regulation. What is new is that the infringement case does not automatically collapse the moment validity is challenged. The home court keeps control of the overall proceeding. For patents from EU Member States, the home court does not automatically lose jurisdiction. It assesses the validity challenge. If it looks strong, the home court may stay the infringement case. If it looks weak, the home court may proceed. For patents from non-EU countries, the home court may stay the case if a validity proceeding is already pending there, drawing on Articles 33 and 34 of the Brussels Ia Regulation. The result is a considerably more flexible system than most observers expected . Patents from Outside the EU: Long-Arm Jurisdiction The part of the judgment with the greatest international reach concerns patents from countries outside the EU. The ECJ ruled that the special jurisdiction rule for patent validity generally does not apply to non-European patents. That means the general rule can apply instead, opening the door for infringement claims based on non-European patents to be brought before a home court where the defendant is based in the EU. Commentators quickly started calling this “long-arm jurisdiction.” One clarification matters here, because it tends to get lost in the public discussion: the ECJ did not say that a European home court can revoke or invalidate a foreign patent. That remains a matter for the authorities and courts of the country that granted it. What the ECJ said is that a European home court may assess the claims between the parties. That distinction is essential to how you should read this ruling. Consequences in Practice: Fujifilm, Regeneron, and Onesta Three recent cases show how quickly practice is already adapting to the new possibilities. Fujifilm v. Kodak: the Düsseldorf Local Division of the Unified Patent Court accepted jurisdiction over the UK part of a European patent even before the ECJ delivered its judgment, building on reasoning the Advocate General had already signaled in the BSH case. In June 2026, the UPC Court of Appeal further developed that approach based on the principles confirmed in BSH. Regeneron v. Formycon: the Munich home court applied the BSH framework and granted a Europe-wide injunction based on a European patent, one of the first examples of a national home court putting the BSH logic into practice. Onesta v. BMW: this case shows the debate has moved well beyond Europe. After Onesta attempted to assert two US patents before the Munich home court, BMW obtained an anti-suit injunction from a Texas federal court. Judge Albright took the view that US patents should generally be decided by US courts. The injunction was directed against Onesta, not against the Munich court, and Onesta has appealed the Texas decision. The Munich home court stayed the proceeding but did not reject its own jurisdiction. Whether a European home court can ultimately decide infringement claims based on US patents remains an open question, one that has turned from a European jurisdiction issue into an international jurisdiction conflict. What This Means for Your Company Heilein sums up twenty years of litigation in three lessons, and I share this assessment without reservation when advising my Mittelstand clients. First: patent enforcement has become more international. National litigation still matters, but companies should think across borders from the very beginning, not only once the first cease-and-desist letter has been sent. Second: choice of forum now carries real strategic weight. Where you bring a case can matter just as much as the legal arguments themselves. Third: long-term commitment pays off. Major developments rarely result from a single filing or a single hearing. They come from pursuing a clear strategy consistently over many years. For you as a managing director, R&D lead, or Head of IP at an innovative Mittelstand company, this translates into two concrete points. First, if you hold rights in several European countries and a competitor infringes them, you no longer necessarily have to fund five or six parallel national proceedings. A single action at the infringer’s home base can be the economically smarter option. Second, and this side of the ruling gets less attention in public discussion, if your company is based in Germany and operates across several countries, you can now be sued at your own home base over patent infringement claims tied to activities in other countries. That risk belongs in every freedom-to-operate analysis and in every assessment tied to acquisitions or market entry. Here is the full transcript of the interview: Host Today's interview guest is Dr. Ernst-Peter Heilein. If you don't know Ernst-Peter, he is a German and European patent attorney, the founder of HEILEIN IP LAW, and a long-time IP leader at BSH Home Appliances. Thank you for being on IP Fridays. Answer Yeah, great to be here! BLOCK 1 – THE PERSON BEHIND THE CASE Host When looking at your career, one thing stands out: you never really followed the traditional path of either private practice or industry. Er, how did your professional journey begin, actually? Answer My professional roots are actually in private practice. After qualifying as a Patent Attorney, I worked in private practice and fairly early founded my own law firm, which later became HEILEIN IP LAW. Host So you never completely left private practice behind? Answer Exactly. In 2005, I had the opportunity to take on additional responsibilities on the BSH side. There, I was able to build and lead a new unit within the IP organization. The team was responsible for patents in the small appliances business, as well as global design and trademark protection. At the same time, I helped build an international network of internal and external IP counsel and coordinated their work. Host That still sounds fairly like traditional IP work. When did international disputes become part of your career? Answer Over time, my focus gradually shifted from traditional IP protection to strategic enforcement. That included anti-counterfeiting activities, global trademark and design matters, and cross-border patent disputes. Host So your work became more about enforcing rights rather than simply obtaining and managing them, right? Answer Exactly. And that development eventually led me to play a strategic role in the case BSH Home Appliances versus Electrolux, a case that still accompanies me today. Host Looking back now — from private practice, to building an international IP organization, and eventually becoming involved in a case before the European Court of Justice — did you ever imagine that path? Answer No, not at all. Looking back, this combination of private practice, responsibilities on the business side, and international enforcement experience turned out to be very useful when our case eventually reached the European Court of Justice. BLOCK 2 – HOW IT ALL STARTED Host Yeah, talking about this case. The case BSH versus Electrolux started long before it reached the European Court of Justice. When did the story actually begin? Answer The story actually begins much earlier than most people would expect. The invention itself dates back to 2001 and concerns a new vacuum cleaner technology. In 2006, we identified what we believed to be an unauthorized use of the invention and contacted Electrolux to clarify the situation. The European patent in suit was granted in 2009 and validated in a number of European countries. At the time, nobody could have imagined that this would eventually lead to a decision of the European Court of Justice almost twenty years later. Host Wow, 20 years! That's a long time. So, at first this was simply a normal patent dispute? Answer Yes, absolutely! After many years of opposition and appeal proceedings before the European Patent Office, we were finally able to defend the patent successfully in late 2018. Less than one year later, in the summer of 2019, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf found that certain Electrolux vacuum cleaner models infringed the patent. Host Er, at that point, one might think, that the patent owner had achieved its goal, right? Answer That is what many people would think. But that judgment did not bring the dispute to an end. A new challenge emerged. The patent had been validated in many European countries. Winning in one country, like Germany, did not automatically solve the enforcement issue in all the other countries. Host What was the practical problem then? Answer We were facing a very simple question: How do we enforce a patent that exists in many countries? And how do we prevent claims from becoming time-barred without filing separate infringement actions in every single country? Doing that would not only be legally complex. It would also require a huge amount of time, effort, and money. Host That sounds less like a major legal question and more like a business problem. Answer Exactly. At the beginning, this was not an academic discussion about jurisdiction. It was a very practical business question. How can we enforce our rights efficiently without running parallel lawsuits all over Europe? That was the real challenge we were trying to solve. BLOCK 3 – THE IDEA OF A CENTRAL ACTION Host So, how did the idea of one central action emerge? Answer While looking for possible solutions, we came across Article 4 of the Brussels Ia Regulation. The idea behind that rule is very simple. In general, a person can be sued in the country where that person is based. In our case, that pointed us toward the Swedish home court because Electrolux is based in Stockholm. Host That sounds like a fairly ordinary jurisdiction rule. Answer Yes. And that was exactly what made it interesting. Article 4 is the general rule. The question was whether that rule could also be used for patent infringement claims covering several countries. Host Was that a common approach at the time? Answer No. Quite the opposite. Many people believed that cross-border patent litigation in Europe was effectively dead. Host That sounds rather dramatic. Why did people think that? Answer Because there was a widely held view that a central patent case could be stopped as soon as the defendant challenged the validity of the patent. As a result, many companies assumed they had no real choice but to litigate country by country. Host Yet you decided to look at the issue differently. Answer Yes. Sometimes it is worth taking a fresh look at accepted assumptions. We felt that Article 4 might play a much more important role than many people believed. Host So at that point, you already saw an opportunity, right? Answer Yes, we saw a possibility! Not a guarantee. But we believed there was a strong legal basis for bringing all claims before the Swedish home court. Host And that eventually led to the lawsuit being filed in Sweden, right? Answer Exactly. In 2020, we decided to file the action in Sweden. That followed our success before the European Patent Office in late 2018 and in the Düsseldorf infringement proceedings in 2019. At that stage, our objective was very practical. We were simply trying to find an efficient way to enforce rights that exist in many countries. Host At that point, you already think the case might end up before the European Court of Justice? Answer No. Not at all. We were focused on solving a business problem. The idea that the case would eventually reach the European Court of Justice came much later. BLOCK 4 – THE OBSTACLE: GAT v. LuK Host You mentioned that, er, many people believed cross-border patent litigation in Europe was no longer a realistic option. Why was that? Answer The main reason was an earlier decision of the European Court of Justice known as GAT versus LuK, decided in 2006. For many years, that decision was understood to mean that a home court could lose its ability to hear a patent infringement case as soon as the defendant challenged the validity of the patent. In practice, that understanding made many cross-border patent cases extremely difficult. As a result, many people believed that cross-border patent litigation was not effective. Host And yet you decided to follow exactly that path, right? Answer Yes. Sometimes it is worth questioning assumptions that have been accepted for many years. We believed that Article 4 of the Brussels Ia Regulation played a more important role than many people thought. That is why, in 2020, we decided to file the case in Sweden. Host And at that point, did you already realize that the case might eventually reach the European Court of Justice? Answer No. Not at all. Our goal was simply to find a practical solution to a real enforcement problem. The idea that this would eventually become a case before the European Court of Justice was far from our minds. BLOCK 5 – THE QUESTIONS REFERRED TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Host So, how did the case eventually reach the European Court of Justice then? Answer After we filed the lawsuit in Sweden in 2020, Electrolux challenged the validity of the patents. The Swedish home court then concluded that it could not hear the case and declared itself not competent to proceed. We appealed that decision, because the issues were important and affected far more than just our case. We suggested that several questions should be referred to the European Court of Justice. The Swedish Court of Appeal agreed and sent those questions to Luxembourg. Host So, what were these main questions? Answer At the heart of the case, there were three questions: First: if a home court has jurisdiction over a patent infringement case, does it lose that jurisdiction simply because the defendant argues that the patent is invalid? Second: Does it make a difference if the national legal system requires validity issues to be decided in a separate proceeding? And third: Do this jurisdiction rules also apply to patents from countries outside the European Union? Host The third question sounds particularly interesting. Answer Yes, at the time, the discussion in our case focused on Turkey. Today, many people immediately think about the United Kingdom, and some even think about US patents. But originally, the question was much simpler. We wanted to know, whether the same jurisdiction rules also apply when patents from non-European countries are involved. Host And, did you realize how important that third question might become? Answer No, certainly not to that extent. At the beginning, most of the discussion focused on the relationship between the different jurisdiction rules within Europe. Only later did it become clear that the European Court of Justice’s answers might have consequences far beyond the European Union. Host So, how did the European Court of Justice react then? Answer That was actually quite interesting. The European Court of Justice first heard the case before a Chamber of seven judges. Later, it referred the case to the Grand Chamber of 15 judges. That already showed that the European Court of Justice considered the issues to be important. And when the judgment finally came out, some of the answers were very different from what many observers had expected. BLOCK 6 – THE DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Host Let’s talk about the European Court of Justice’s answers. What was, in your view, the most important part of the decision? Answer The most important point was this: A home court does not automatically lose jurisdiction just because the defendant argues that the patent is invalid. For many years, many people believed exactly the opposite. The European Court of Justice made it clear that this understanding was too narrow. The home court where the defendant is based can generally continue to hear the infringement case. That is really the key message of the decision. Host Why is that so important? Answer Because it gives new momentum to cross-border patent enforcement in Europe. Before this decision, many people assumed that a defendant could effectively stop a central infringement case simply by challenging the validity of the patent. The European Court of Justice made clear that this is not automatically the case. Host Does that mean the home court hearing the infringement case will now also decide whether the patent is valid? Answer No, and that is a very important point. The European Court of Justice confirmed that questions about the validity of a European patent should still be decided by the national courts of the country for which the patent was granted, as provided for in Article 24(4) of the Brussels Ia Regulation. What is new, is that the infringement case does not automatically fall apart because of a validity challenge. The home court can keep control of the overall case. Host So, how does that work in practice? Answer The European Court of Justice gives the home court some flexibility. For patents from Member States of the European Union, the home court does not automatically lose its power if the defendant says the patent is invalid. The home court can look at the validity challenge. If it seems strong, the home court may stay the infringement case. If it seems weak, the home court may continue the infringement case. For patents from countries outside the European Union, the home court may also stay the case if there is already a validity case pending in that country. In such situations, Articles 33 and 34 of the Brussels Ia Regulation may apply. That creates a much more flexible system than many people expected. Host Er, we have discussed the implications for patents from Member States of the European Union, but a lot of attention has been given to another part of the decision, that we already talked about briefly, namely patents from countries outside the European Union. Answer Absolutely, and that may be the part of the judgment with the biggest international impact. Host Why? Answer Because the European Court of Justice decided that the special jurisdiction rule for patent validity does not generally apply to patents from non-European countries. In simple terms, that means the general rule can still apply. And that opens the possibility of bringing infringement cases based on non-European patents before the home court where the defendant is based in the European Union. Host That sounds like a very far-reaching statement. Answer It is. That is why many commentators started talking about what is often called “long-arm jurisdiction.” In other words, a European home court may, under certain circumstances, deal with infringement claims relating to patents from countries outside the European Union. Host So, many listeners may now wonder: Can a Swedish or a German home court really decide a dispute involving a British or Turkish patent? Answer Ah, we need to be careful here. The European Court of Justice did not say that a European home court can cancel or revoke a foreign patent. That remains a matter for the authorities and national courts of the country that granted the patent. What the European Court of Justice said is that a European home court may assess the claims between the parties in a dispute. That is an important distinction. Host Did you realize during the proceedings how important this part of the decision might become? Answer Not to this extent. We started with a very practical enforcement problem. Only later did it become clear that the European Court of Justice’s answers might have consequences far beyond the original case. Today, the decision is discussed not only in connection with Turkish patents, but also British patents and even possible claims involving US patents. Host If you had to summarize the decision in one sentence, and I know, this is a very difficult task, what would that sentence be? Answer The European Court of Justice did not re-invent cross-border patent enforcement in Europe. But after many years, it clearly gave it much more room to develop. BLOCK 7 – THE REACTION OF THE IP COMMUNITY Host So, how was the decision received after it was published? Answer Ah, the reaction was very strong. It quickly became clear that many people saw the decision as much more than just another patent case. Many articles and commentaries described it as an important development in European patent litigation. Host Did that surprise you? Answer To some extent, yes. Of course, we knew that the questions referred to the European Court of Justice were important. But I was surprised by how quickly the decision became a major topic of discussion across the European patent community. Host Er, you later presented the decision at several conferences yourself, right? Answer Yes. The discussion started right away. I had the opportunity to discuss and present the case at several conferences and events, including the annual VPP conference in Germany and the Ingolstadt Patent Symposium. I recently received an invitation to serve as a panel speaker on cross-border litigation at the AIPPI World Congress 2026 in Hamburg. What struck me most was that both internal and external IP counsel were trying to understand the practice consequences of the decision. Host So, what was the question you were asked most often? Answer Almost always the same one: How far does this decision really go? People wanted to know whether this was simply a correction of earlier case law or whether it marked the beginning of a new phase in cross-border patent enforcement. Host And what did you say? Answer I would describe it as: neither a revolution nor a minor adjustment. The European Court of Justice did not rewrite the system. But it clearly changed the balance between the different jurisdiction rules. That is why I believe the decision will continue to be discussed for many years, both in practice and in academia. Host Er, one year later, the case received the Managing IP Award as the “Europe Impact Case of the Year.” What did that recognition mean to you? Answer First of all, it was a great honor for everyone involved. But for me, the most important thing was the message behind the award. The award showed that the decision affects much more than the parties involved in the case. It has an impact on European patent practice as a whole. And it also shows that the underlying jurisdiction questions reach far beyond patent law. They are relevant whenever companies have to enforce rights across borders in an increasing international world. That is what makes this case special. Host You often describe this case as a team effort. Answer Absolutely. A case of this size is never the work of one person. Many people contributed over many years. On the BSH side, team members from different functions played an important role throughout the proceedings. And we worked closely with external advisors in several countries. So I see the award as recognition of a shared achievement rather than an individual success. Host Looking at the discussions today, would you say the debate is over? Answer Not at all. I actually think we are only at the beginning. There are still many practical questions that home courts will have to answer in the coming years. That is exactly why the decision remains so interesting. BLOCK 8 – WHAT DOES THE DECISION MEAN IN PRACTICE? Host Let’s move from legal theory to practical business implications. What does this decision mean for patent owners and companies? Answer In my view, the biggest change is strategic. Patent owners now have better opportunities to bring cross-border disputes together in one central proceeding. At the same time, companies need to be aware that they may face claims at their European headquarters covering activities in several countries. So the decision creates opportunities, but it also creates new risks. Host That sounds really like a significant shift; right? Answer I would call it a rebalancing rather than a revolution. The European Court of Justice did not create a completely new system. But it made clear that the general rule — suing a defendant where it is based — plays a much bigger role than many people had assumed. As a result, the court at the defendant’s home base becomes much more important strategically. Host In the patent community, people often talk about cases such as Fujifilm v. Kodak, or Regeneron v. Formycon or Onesta v. BMW. Why are those cases attracting so much attention now? Answer Because they show how quickly practice is already adapting to the new possibilities. Fujifilm was important because it was one of the first UPC cases to test the logic that was later confirmed in BSH. At that time, the BSH case was already pending before the European Court of Justice, and the Advocate General had expressed a view that pointed in that direction. Against that background, the Düsseldorf Local Division accepted jurisdiction over the UK part of a European patent even before the European Court of Justice delivered its judgment. In June 2026, based on the principles confirmed in BSH, the UPC Court of Appeal further developed that approach. Host And what happened in Regeneron v. Formycon ? Answer In the Regeneron case, the Munich home court applied the approach confirmed in BSH and granted a Europe-wide injunction based on a European patent. That was one of the first examples of a national home court using the BSH framework in practice. That demonstrates that the decision is not just an academic discussion. It already has practical consequences. Host And what about the Onesta case? Answer The Onesta case shows that the debate has moved beyond Europe. After Onesta attempted to assert two U.S. patents before the Munich home court, BMW obtained an anti-suit injunction from a Texas federal court. Judge Albright took the view that U.S. patents should generally be decided by U.S. courts. The Onesta case therefore illustrates that the limits of the BSH logic are now being tested internationally. Host Did that end the proceedings in Munich? Answer Not necessarily. What makes the case interesting is that the Texas injunction was directed against Onesta, not against the Munich home court. At the same time, Onesta appealed Judge Albright’s decision in the United States. The Munich home court therefore decided to stay the case for the time being. Importantly, however, the Munich home court did not reject its own jurisdiction. So, at least for the moment, the underlying question remains open. Host Can a European home court ultimately decide infringement claims based on U.S. patents? Answer That question has not yet been answered. But the case has already shown that such an attempt can trigger strong reactions outside Europe. In that sense, the debate has moved from a European jurisdiction question to an international jurisdiction conflict. Host For our audience of internal and external IP counsel, what are the main lessons from this decision? Answer For me, there are three key takeaways. First: Patent enforcement has become more international. National litigation remains important, but companies should think across borders from the very beginning. Second: The choice of forum is becoming more important. Where you bring a case may be just as important as the legal arguments themselves. And third: Long-term commitment matters. This case shows that major developments rarely happen because of a single filing or a single hearing. They usually result from pursuing a clear strategy consistently over many years. Host Do you think this decision will also influence the Unified Patent Court, the UPC? Answer Yes, I believe so. The decision fits into a broader trend toward more centralized patent litigation. Both, the UPC and the BSH decision are driven by the same idea: Handling cross-border disputes more efficiently and more consistently. What is interesting is that many of the questions were faced in BSH versus Electrolux are now reappearing in a new form before the UPC. Cases like Fujifilm versus Kodak show that the discussion about jurisdiction, scope, and cross-border effects is far from over. Institutions may be new. But the underlying challenge remains the same: How do we enforce patents effectively across borders? Host Some commentators even see this as a step toward a more independent European patent judiciary. Do you agree? Answer To some extent, yes. Professor Hanns Ullrich, who supervised my doctoral studies on the legal protection of a then new semiconductor technology many years ago, recently observed that the UPC is gradually developing its own European case law.[DH1] I think that is — again — a very accurate observation. If you look at the developments since BSH and the first UPC decisions, you can see that European patent litigation is becoming more connected. National courts will remain important. But at the same time, we are seeing a more integrated European patent system taking shape. How far that development will go remains to be seen. Host Looking back on the entire journey — from a vacuum cleaner patent, through litigation in several countries, all the way to the European Court of Justice and an award-winning decision — what is your personal conclusion? Answer My main conclusion is that innovation needs effective legal protection. But it also requires the willingness to challenge established assumptions and explore new approaches. For me, the BSH versus Electrolux case shows that persistence, teamwork, a willingness to challenge accepted assumptions, and a long-term strategic view can sometimes lead to developments that go far beyond the original dispute. BLOCK 9 – THE PERSON BEHIND THE DECISION Host Ernst-Peter, today we have talked a lot about jurisdiction, patent enforcement, and European case law. When you look back at this journey, which has lasted almost twenty years, what impressed you most? Answer Probably the realization that major developments rarely follow a straight line. When we started thinking about the case, we were dealing with a very practical problem. Nobody said: Let’s create a landmark decision of the European Court of Justice. We were simply looking for a reasonable and practical solution for a company. The fact that this would eventually lead to a decision with Europe-wide impact was something nobody could foresee at the time. Host Were there moments when you thought the case might fail? Answer Of course. Whenever a case lasts many years, there will be setbacks, new questions, and unexpected developments. That is exactly why persistence is so important. In the end, success is often not about one filing or one hearing. It is about staying focused on a clear objective over a long period of time. Host You often talk about teamwork. Is that one of the main lessons from this case? Answer Absolutely. A case of this size requires commitment from many people and institutes over many years. On the BSH side, my role was to help maintain the strategic direction and long-term commitment that such a case requires. At the same time, experts from different functions within BSH contributed technical expertise, testing, documentation, and practical support throughout the proceedings. On the legal side, Roman Sedlmaier and his team at IP-Counsels Gigerich & Sedlmaier (IPCGS) helped develop the cross-border litigation strategy and the overall case architecture. Our Swedish litigation team then carried the arguments through all stages of the proceedings. Looking back, it was the combination of institutional commitment, technical expertise, strategic leadership, well-designed case architecture, and consistent execution that made the difference. Host One final question. What advice would you give to young internal or external IP counsel? Answer Stay curious: Don’t be afraid to question accepted assumptions. Be patient: Intellectual property is usually a marathon, not a sprint. And never forget that every patent dispute involves an invention, a business, and many people who have worked hard to bring that innovation to market. For me, that connection between technology, law, and strategy is what still makes this profession so fascinating today. Host Ernst-Peter, thank you very much for joining us today on IP Fridays. Answer Thank you. It was a pleasure to be here.

Send us Fan Mail"What if someone is able to figure out a way to use your technology in 10 years and they made all the money in the world?"It's not everyday that you get to pick the brain of a patent attorney, but do you know the ins and outs of what they do? Austin will walk you through the entire process, but also let you know that engineering school is where it all started for him. So how did a smoke detection system and wireless doorbells bring us to where we are today?Tune in to episode 234 as Austin explains how important names are for products, breaks down the longevity of patents and much more!For more information:Website: https://bondererpatents.com/Instagram: @austin_the_patent_attorneyLinkedIn: Austin BondererYouTube: ⁨@AustinThePatentAttorney⁩ Facebook: The Law Office of Austin Bonderer, Patent Attorney Support the show

#SecurityConfidential #DarkRhiinoSecurityTiffini Smith is a strategic legal executive and board advisor with over 20 years of experience in privacy, cybersecurity, and AI governance. A U.S. Patent Attorney with bar admissions in the U.S. and England & Wales, she helps organizations navigate everything from breach preparedness to the EU AI Act. Tiffini has led global legal teams and provided global cybersecurity legal advice, including addressing issues such as incident response readiness, vendor risk programs, AI model risk reviews, and board-level briefings, and is known for translating complex legal and cyber risk into actionable guidance for executives. She also authors a newsletter.00:00 Intro02:28 Our Guest05:48 Regulation across states and countries09:48 Cybersecurity regulation culturally14:00 Employee training and teaching them the Why 23:07 How do you mitigate against AI?25:00 CISOs don't understand how the business works29:11 Does being compliant actually reduce your exposure? 34:00 Regulations on AI in your business50:10 More about Tiffini----------------------------------------------------------------------To learn more about Tiffini visit https://www.linkedin.com/in/tiffini-smith/To learn more about Dark Rhiino Security visit https://www.darkrhiinosecurity.com----------------------------------------------------------------------

Send a textIt's that time of year again!! Where WOMEN are celebrated all month long. In celebration of Women's History Month, I am resharing my replay worthy episodes! If 2026 is the year you're planning to launch a business in the new year, expand your brand, or finally bring that idea to life, this episode is your blueprint.For this D.C.W.A REWIND I had the opportunity to chop it up with Patent Attorney #CharlenaThorpe | she breaks down the legal essentials every entrepreneur and creator needs to understand before launching their brand or idea to the world. From trademarks and patents to protecting your content, products, and innovations, Charlena makes the complex world of intellectual property clear, practical, and actionable.We talk about the biggest mistakes new founders make, how to safeguard your ideas before you share them, and the steps you should take now to avoid costly problems later. This is the episode that helps you stand on business and protect the business you're standing on like T.I does for Tiny!! Remember to subscribe, download, leave a comment, rate this podcast, and SHARE. xo- Candi HussleFollow On Social MediaInstagram: @DopeChickWithAmbitionThreads: @DopeChickWithAmbitionShop podcast Merch: https://www.dopechickwithambitionmerch.com/#PatentAttorney #TrademarkAttorney #Ideas #WorkingMom #intellectualproperty #AI #Lawyers #Aicompanion #Protectyourbrands #protectyourideas #Patents #PatentLaw #BlackLawyers #Innovations #ArtificialIntelligence #BusinessLaw #Businessadvice #Businesspodcast #podcastforwomen #legaladvice #Podcast #TiandTiny #Womeninlaw Support the show

#SecurityConfidential #DarkRhiinoSecurityTiffini Smith is a strategic legal executive and board advisor with over 20 years of experience in privacy, cybersecurity, and AI governance. A U.S. Patent Attorney with bar admissions in the U.S. and England & Wales, she helps organizations navigate everything from breach preparedness to the EU AI Act. Tiffini has led global legal teams and provided global cybersecurity legal advice, including addressing issues such as incident response readiness, vendor risk programs, AI model risk reviews, and board-level briefings, and is known for translating complex legal and cyber risk into actionable guidance for executives. She also authors a newsletter.00:00 Intro02:28 Our Guest05:48 Regulation across states and countries09:48 Cybersecurity regulation culturally14:00 Employee training and teaching them the Why 23:07 How do you mitigate against AI?25:00 CISOs don't understand how the business works29:11 Does being compliant actually reduce your exposure? 34:00 Regulations on AI in your business50:10 More about Tiffini----------------------------------------------------------------------To learn more about Tiffini visit https://www.linkedin.com/in/tiffini-smith/To learn more about Dark Rhiino Security visit https://www.darkrhiinosecurity.com----------------------------------------------------------------------

Artificial intelligence has been raising foundational questions for patent law long before generative tools entered the mainstream. In this episode of Clause 8, host Eli Mazour speaks with Wen Xie, U.S. Patent Attorney and Founder of Lux Lumen Intellectual Property, about how legal thinking around AI, inventorship, and patent eligibility has evolved—and where it appears to be heading.The conversation traces early debates sparked by the DABUS cases, which framed AI inventorship as a question of whether a machine could be named as an inventor. While those cases clarified that U.S. patent law requires a human inventor, they also highlighted a more practical issue that remains unresolved: how to evaluate human contribution when AI tools play a role in the inventive process, including in areas such as industrial design.The episode also examines the USPTO's shifting approach to AI-related inventions, from post-Alice uncertainty to more recent Section 101 guidance and new USPTO Director's John Squires Ex parte Desjardins PTAB decision. Wen discusses how applicants can position AI inventions as genuine technological improvements, avoid overreliance on “black box” disclosures, and manage Section 112 risks.The discussion concludes with a forward-looking look at using AI tools for patent practice, the USPTO's new pilot for AI-powered pre-examination search, and what these developments mean for practitioners and innovators navigating a rapidly changing IP landscape.Watch the full episode or listen on your favorite podcast app—and subscribe to the new Clause 8 YouTube channel for bonus content.Presented by Tradespace – where ideas take flight.Chapters00:01 – Wen Xie's early interest in AI and patent law02:10 – AI disruption before ChatGPT: imaging, medicine, and automation04:56 – How AI reshaped Wen's legal career05:55 – DABUS, Thaler, and the AI inventorship debate08:56 – Human contribution vs. AI output10:40 – Should companies restrict inventors from using AI?11:59 – What in-house counsel should ask about AI use14:20 – Duty of candor, recordkeeping, and litigation risk18:06 – Section 101 and AI as technological improvement22:50 – USPTO guidance, PTAB trends, and examiner behavior32:01 – Section 112 issues and describing machine learning33:40 – Using generative AI in patent drafting39:40 – Advice for junior attorneys in an AI-driven practiceDisclaimer This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.voiceofip.com

Send us a textHey DCWA Fam!! We're closing out 2025 with a powerful final episode, one designed to set you up for a smarter, stronger, and more protected 2026. If you're planning to launch a business in the new year, expand your brand, or finally bring that idea to life, this episode is your blueprint.Patent Attorney #CharlenaThorpe joins the pod to break down the legal essentials every entrepreneur and creator needs to understand before stepping into 2026. From trademarks and patents to protecting your content, products, and innovations, Charlena makes the complex world of intellectual property clear, practical, and actionable.We talk about the biggest mistakes new founders make, how to safeguard your ideas before you share them, and the steps you should take now to avoid costly problems later. This is the episode that helps you stand on business and protect the business you're standing on.If you're serious about building something real in 2026, this conversation is for you.Ep 148: Standing on Business: How to Protect Your Brand & Ideas with Patent Attorney Charlena ThorpeRemember to subscribe, download, leave a comment, rate this podcast, and SHARE. xo- Candi HussleFollow On Social MediaInstagram: @DopeChickWithAmbitionThreads: @DopeChickWithAmbitionShop podcast Merch: https://www.dopechickwithambitionmerch.com/#PatentAttorney #TrademarkAttorney #Ideas #WorkingMom #intellectualproperty #AI #Lawyers #Aicompanion #Protectyourbrands #protectyourideas #Patents #PatentLaw #BlackLawyers #Innovations #ArtificialIntelligence #BusinessLaw #Businessadvice #Businesspodcast #podcastforwomen #legaladvice #Podcast #Christmaseve #Womeninlaw 

This week on The Inventress Podcast I am joined by Eli Mazour, patent attorney and host of the Clause 8 podcast!Listen to the audio version of "The Inventress Podcast" on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart Radio, and other major podcast platforms by visiting this link: theinventresspodcast - Listen on YouTube, Spotify - Linktree and don't forget to rate, review and subscribe wherever you listen.Follow "The Inventress" on social media:Lisa Ascoleselisaascolese@the_inventressHave a new product or idea and need help? Book a consultation with Lisa Ascolese "The Inventress" and take your product from concept to fruition. Email Lisa@InventingAtoZ.com or visit www.InventingAtoZ.com

Ryan Phelan is a partner and patent attorney at Marshall Gerstein. He discusses his journey from a background in computer science and fintech to becoming a prominent IP attorney serving clients in the MedTech industry and beyond. He shares insights on the importance of protecting intellectual property, especially for startups, and the burgeoning role of AI in medical technology. This succinct yet fascinating conversation highlights the critical intersection of law, technology, and medical innovation. Guest links: https://www.marshallip.com | https://www.patentnext.com/  Charity supported: Sleep in Heavenly Peace Interested in being a guest on the show or have feedback to share? Email us at theleadingdifference@velentium.com.  PRODUCTION CREDITS Host: Lindsey Dinneen Editing: Marketing Wise Producer: Velentium   EPISODE TRANSCRIPT Episode 058 - Ryan Phelan [00:00:00] Lindsey Dinneen: Hi, I'm Lindsey and I'm talking with MedTech industry leaders on how they change lives for a better world. [00:00:09] Diane Bouis: The inventions and technologies are fascinating and so are the people who work with them. [00:00:15] Frank Jaskulke: There was a period of time where I realized, fundamentally, my job was to go hang out with really smart people that are saving lives and then do work that would help them save more lives. [00:00:28] Diane Bouis: I got into the business to save lives and it is incredibly motivating to work with people who are in that same business, saving or improving lives. [00:00:38] Duane Mancini: What better industry than where I get to wake up every day and just save people's lives. [00:00:42] Lindsey Dinneen: These are extraordinary people doing extraordinary work, and this is The Leading Difference. Hello, and welcome back to another episode of The Leading Difference podcast. I'm your host, Lindsey, and I am so looking forward to my conversation today with Ryan Phelan. Ryan is a partner and patent attorney at the Chicago based intellectual property law firm, Marshall Gerstein, where he counsels medtech companies on protecting their valuable IP. Ryan ultimately believes that AI is an important technology to embrace, but cautions medical device and related companies to approach it pragmatically, developing a policy to govern and protect intangible assets and innovation. All right. Well, thank you so much for being here, Ryan. I'm so excited to speak with you today. [00:01:29] Ryan Phelan: Yeah. Thank you for having me. Thank you, Lindsey. [00:01:31] Lindsey Dinneen: Of course. Well, I'd love if you'd start off by sharing a little bit about your background and what led you to medtech. [00:01:39] Ryan Phelan: Sure, absolutely. So I'm an attorney by trade. And I started off in probably a different place than most people in MedTech, but I have a computer science degree and I worked in industry first for Accenture, doing a lot of programming and consulting in the FinTech world. So, high frequency trading and programming some pretty complicated data algorithms in order to trade stocks and bonds and securities, and things like this. That let me see aspects of intellectual property that people were doing with respect to the code I was writing. So I got curious with IP and law, and that led me to law school, Northwestern Law, in pursuing a joint JD, MBA program, which I finished in 2010. And I went into IP law with a passion for technology, pretty much in the computing space. And then in the last decade or so, IP practitioners, not unlike doctors, like to practice in specific areas and one of the ones that I focused on is software medical devices. And so that, that kind of led me into the realm of medtech. [00:02:48] Lindsey Dinneen: Very nice. Okay. So you have had such an interesting career trajectory and I'm wondering, back in the day, say you're a six year old Ryan, could six year old Ryan have predicted that you would be a lawyer and particularly intellectual property? [00:03:04] Ryan Phelan: Absolutely not. I mean, first of all nobody in my family, at least immediate family, was a lawyer. And so going to law school was not on the radar. I grew up in Louisiana in a small town, basically farm life, so certainly technology and stuff like that wasn't available in the city. But I did have a passion for things that were tech. I was certainly a kid that loved to take things apart and put them back together and build all kinds of Legos and stuff like that. So that basic kind of STEM acumen or desire was always there from the beginning. And so, as I, I grew up and got exposed to more things, certainly in college, it became kind of a passion. And so, I ended up doing that. We did have some medical issues in my family, including cardiac and cancer and stuff like that. So, those types of things always hit home with me and you're getting to a chance to kind of lean into medtech, at least on the software side, with medtech devices that include or incorporate medical technology became very interesting to me personally. [00:04:07] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah, of course. And so going back just a smidgen when you decided to go into law and you know, you've come from this background that was the software engineering and you've got this fintech background and you have all of these amazing skill sets already, what led you specifically to say, "Okay, I want to focus on intellectual property, and so this is going to be my, my sweet spot." [00:04:33] Ryan Phelan: Yeah. So when you go to law school, you get exposed to a lot of different classes. In fact, in your first year law school, you're required to take a bunch of baseline courses like criminal law and all these things. And so you quickly figure out what you like and what you don't like. And so for me, a computer science degree is always kind of the beating heart of what I loved. And so I wanted to, I tended to like, classes that were up that alley, so to speak. And the IP course that I took was definitely there because it was all about technology, inventions, people making things, and how those inventions played out in court. So I found my greatest joy in law school to be in those classes. So I spoke up the most in class and did the best. There's common saying that "you should do things that you love because you never have to work a day in your life" kind of thing. So I always try to think about that, and certainly fun today because I practice in IP and picked that direction. [00:05:27] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah, absolutely. So, in addition to all of the other credentials you have, you are also a published author and you are a speaker. And I would love if you would share maybe a little bit more about how you got into being a thought leader as well in your industry and how that path has taken you. [00:05:51] Ryan Phelan: Yeah, for sure. It's the same kind of thing. I've always liked to write as well. And I feel that when I write about something, I really get to understand it. And so in my field, there's a lot of stuff happening all the time. Like a court will come out with a new case, an IP and medtech or AI or something like this, and I really like to dig into it to figure out how can I use this court decision as a tool for clients, or how does this change things up? What will clients ask me questions going forward, or how can this be an interesting topic to either write about or to speak about? And so, I try to learn when I'm reading, and then I write it, and that teaches me, and I think and hope that others get a benefit from that too when I publish, so. [00:06:34] Lindsey Dinneen: Yes, of course. Of course. And you are also, if I'm not mistaken, an adjunct professor. So, first of all, do you sleep? And second of all, tell me more about this as well, please. [00:06:47] Ryan Phelan: Yeah, so I'm an adjunct professor at Northwestern Law. I teach a course on patenting software inventions. I do sleep because it's only once a year for a power week. You know, I think it's like three days out of the year. There's the long classes, they're like a few hours each, but we pack in several 30 minute core sessions into a day. So one day, maybe we'll go for three hours or two hours. And, you know, we will get the benefit of several weeks of coursework by doing all of that at once in those three days. And so, I teach on that. We teach fundamentals of patenting softwares and inventions, which includes medtech software devices. For example, the FDA classifies software, medical inventions in, in, in certain ways, like their software as a medical device where you have the software only such as, you have database with medical data and you're either formatting it or storing it or processing in some unique way, or you have software in a medical device where you actually have a physical device. It's a cardiac device where the software is running or at least partially running that device. And so we talk about ways to, to patent those inventions primarily with US law. So. [00:07:59] Lindsey Dinneen: Very nice. So specifically thinking about your medtech clients, because I know you probably have clients in many industries, but specifically in medtech, what are some of the common mistakes you see medtech companies making? Especially say, you know, an earlier startup or something like that, when maybe they haven't thought through an aspect that really should be thought through a little bit earlier in the process. What are some common things that you see that people should be aware of? [00:08:27] Ryan Phelan: Yeah, I mean, easily one of them is not filing a patent application early. And if they are a startup company and they have their biggest selling product, or what they think will be their biggest selling product, and they don't file a patent application on it, that could be bad because you have one year to get to the patent office with that, at least in the U. S. to file something once it's been publicly disclosed. And if you miss that deadline, then effectively you're allowing your competitors to copy it. And if you're a startup company, the last thing you want is for your product to become extremely successful and then a big Fortune 500 company gets wind of it, figures out you don't have a patent, and then just starts making it themselves and it takes away your market share. So that would be, you know, I think that's every inventor of startups like worst nightmare, right? So, getting that patent on file before the deadline is pretty important. [00:09:22] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah, of course. Now, I noticed you had recently written an article on LinkedIn about when to file this patent. And I know part of maybe some concerns that might arise are, "Well, we don't necessarily want this to be in public awareness yet." So how do you walk that line between "This is our IP, we're really trying to keep it very tight," versus, "But I also need this protection, this legal protection." So how do you navigate things like that? [00:09:54] Ryan Phelan: Yeah, so the point at which you need to make your invention publicly available or to disclose it because you need to, you know, maybe you're going to pitch competition and you need to show your invention on like a PowerPoint deck in front of hundreds of people. Then that's probably a good point to start thinking about filing a patent application if you're still developing it, and it's like in your basement, so to speak, and nobody's seen it. It's still secret then. You don't need to necessarily file a patent application at that point. Although, there's a funny thing in patent law where, if you have an idea, sometimes there's somebody else thinking about it too, and the first one to get the patent office, wins, and so, you certainly don't want to wait around too long and find out years later that you filed your patent application the day after somebody else. This actually happened with Thomas Edison and the light bulb and he had lots of fights about the other person that was claiming the same thing that lost, and we don't remember his name today because of that. So anyway, so that's one thing to keep in mind when you're starting out. [00:10:54] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah. Well, and speaking of those kinds of stories, are there any that particularly stand out to you as you've worked with all of these incredible clients who have seriously life changing products they're creating. Are there any that really stand out to you in your memory as affirming, "Oh my goodness, this is why I'm here. This is why I'm doing what I'm doing." [00:11:17] Ryan Phelan: Yeah, for sure. One that stands out is one in the opioid or the narcotics market. In my family, we have an individual who is unfortunately affected by this. And so, I had a client that reached out to me to create a VR program that helps to eliminate or to reduce cravings in this field. And that one was really impactful because using technology and non pharmaceutical way in order to reduce cravings for people that are struggling with addiction of some type, I felt to be very important. So I thoroughly enjoyed working with that inventor and helping to, to create that patent application for that invention. [00:11:59] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah, of course. Yeah. Thank you for sharing about that. I think sometimes those really personal connection kinds of stories are the ones that really stick in your mind because it, it helps to have this moment of realization, like you know that what you do matters, of course, but then having that extra layer of confirmation that "Yes, this is helping somebody who could literally be a family member or a close friend or relative" is really impactful. [00:12:25] Ryan Phelan: Exactly. [00:12:26] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah. So considering all of the industries that you currently serve, and of course, you have this incredibly varied background, which can only be wonderful to draw on from this rich history and experience of yours. What are some interesting crossovers you see between industries that can be useful in terms of, maybe one industry approaches something in a way that you've seen could actually really benefit folks in medtech or vice versa. Are you seeing trends like that? [00:12:59] Ryan Phelan: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, one of the biggest ones that I can think of now is artificial intelligence coming into play with medtech. I mean, certainly, medtech kind of runs the gamut of, you know, like, like we mentioned before software only to physical devices that incorporate software. And so AI is interesting because you can load it and AI model onto one of these physical devices, or you can have an AI model that's medtech based sitting on a server somewhere that can help doctors look or find particular cause or whatnot like that, based on symptoms that a patient may walk into, or maybe there's a device, like a needle, that allows that has an AI model on it that helps with injection or something like this. And so, these AI tools are becoming smarter. And I think that they help in the field of medtech and they require a different level of expertise with these inventions to not only create them because they're complex, but also to bring them to market because they require specific FDA regulations. Even the FDA right now is trying to figure out AI. They have approved several AI devices, but it usually comes down to, you know, is your AI device going to change in the near future because you're going to update the model? And if so, does that change it enough to require like a new submission? So the fact that AI moves so rapidly doesn't really mix well with the FDA's process of approving the device and having it set in stone at that approval state. [00:14:30] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah. So where do you anticipate that this will take medical devices? Do you think it'll become so naturally ingrained in many of them that it's just sort of part of our reality, or do you think we'll still have those --what do we want to call them-- not AI functionality devices? [00:14:48] Ryan Phelan: Yeah, I think both will exist. You know, certainly a spectrum of these devices, right? Certainly there's surgical tools that exist now that have hundreds of years, or a hundred years, just in different, maybe better forms. So, those will stay, stick around. The AI assisted ones, I'm sure will find their niche, and live alongside the the existing tools. [00:15:10] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah, absolutely. If you could narrow it down, what would be maybe your top piece of advice for a MedTech startup founder from your perspective, in your role? [00:15:23] Ryan Phelan: Yeah, I guess the number one would be again to, you know, make sure you're not giving away your crown jewels. Have your patent filed before you step out. If you're trying to raise money, just be careful that you're not sharing information publicly. You have to share with a potential investor, consider an NDA or if they won't sign an NDA, you can file a provisional patent application with the patent office. That shows that you have something on file before you talk to others. And as long as you describe the invention sufficiently in the four corners of your provisional application, then that's often the best way to protect yourself going out. So I think, as an IP attorney, that, that would be the number one advice that I would give a startup company in the medtech space. [00:16:10] Lindsey Dinneen: That's incredible. Thank you for that. That's really appreciated advice. So, it's so interesting because when I was looking at your LinkedIn profile, of course you have all of this incredible experience, and one thing actually really stood out to me, and that was that at least at some point you have been a and --I'm sure you've done this throughout your career multiple times-- but a pro bono lawyer for Lawyers for the Creative Arts. And I was curious about that and how you got involved, and can you share a little bit about that journey? [00:16:40] Ryan Phelan: Yeah. So LCA or Lawyers for the Creative Arts is an organization here in Chicago that deals with artists of limited means. You know, usually they have some type of basic issue that they want handled and it mainly deals with IP. Typically, I work on a different capacity for these because I see them as like kind of fun learning opportunities. I usually work in the copyright space and the clients that I work with need help either filing a copyright for maybe a piece of art that they've created, or maybe have a question about how their IP is being used or sold in some way, and they need to figure out if their IP has been infringed. And so, we'll work with them in a pro bono capacity to help write a letter to a company or to file a copyright registration and things like that. [00:17:28] Lindsey Dinneen: Well, as a, as my side thing as also an artist, I just want to say thank you because it is so great that you're doing things like that for the artist community. It is not always easy. So, oh, that's great, appreciate it. Yeah. So as you look towards your own future, what are you excited about say in the next year or two? [00:17:50] Ryan Phelan: Very excited to see how, I guess, AI is playing out with medtech. You're seeing regulations and guidelines coming out that The United States Patent and Trademark Office and also the Copyright Office about how these laws will impact artists. I've sat on a panel with the Copyright Office and the United States Patent and Trademark Office as they're thinking through these decisions and putting out these guidelines. There is questions about, is the new administration going to change things up with respect to guidance and guidelines that have come out. So, you know, artists are looking at AI is like a tool, like a paintbrush. And the law is kind of looking at it, obviously from the legal perspective and it doesn't seem like those two things are aligned yet. There's common in, in history that the law typically lags the technology by, you know, a decade or two or more. And so that's certainly the case with AI. For example, there is a famous -- I wouldn't call it a case-- but a denial of a copyright registration at the copyright office for a gentleman that had created an AI piece of artwork, won the Colorado state fair, I think in 2022, and tried to file a copyright registration, but was denied. And he told the copyright office, basically he had entered in 500 plus prompts in order to generate, or at least partially generate, this work of art, but was still denied . Not because of his effort, just because of the way the law is written under current copyright statutes. And so, things like that seem to be, at least from a policy perspective, incorrect. And so it'd be great to see exciting how this plays out. Will Congress care enough to change it or how will artists be impacted under these types of laws and policy considerations going forward? [00:19:35] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah, absolutely. So pivoting the conversation a little bit just for fun, imagine that you were to be offered a million dollars masterclass on anything you want. It can be within your industry or part of your amazing background, or it could be about something entirely different. What would you choose to teach? [00:19:55] Ryan Phelan: Yeah. Wow. You know, I guess I would teach what I'm currently teaching. Cause I, I do enjoy the class I teach now. I'm at Northwestern, my alma mater, which I love. It's down the street from the office, get to go in same place where I went to school and teach the law and things that I do every day, which is patenting software inventions, including the medtech space. If I could get a million dollars to teach what I do now, that would be wonderful, in this hypothetical, so. [00:20:22] Lindsey Dinneen: Right. I love it. Excellent. And how do you wish to be remembered after you leave this world? [00:20:30] Ryan Phelan: Wow. I hope people remember me as someone who was fun loving and enjoyed tech and hopefully brought some information to the world that helped them in some way. [00:20:42] Lindsey Dinneen: Yeah, of course. And final question, what is one thing that makes you smile every time you see or think about it? [00:20:51] Ryan Phelan: Oh, wow. I guess there's a lot of stuff. I also like to do some type of sports. Currently, the ski season is ending, so I certainly enjoy skiing, so when I see or think about that's one of those things, and now coming is the golf season, so I transitioned into that. We're looking forward to some good weather here, finally, in Chicago. It was 80 degrees last week, and it snowed yesterday, so things are changing from golf to ski season, but one of those is always fun, so. [00:21:17] Lindsey Dinneen: That's awesome. That's fantastic. Yeah. If folks who are listening are in a position, would there be a way for them to get in contact with you and then how early should they do that actually? [00:21:31] Ryan Phelan: Yeah. There's multiple stages. They can get in touch with me anytime they want. You can always find me at our firm's website, Marshall Gerstein. Or if you want to, you can go to patentnext.com, just patent and the word next. com. That's my blog that I write on typically, and it has my contact information there, including my email address. [00:21:51] Lindsey Dinneen: Perfect. Well, thank you so much. Well, Ryan, it has been a joy to speak with you today. I really appreciate you sharing a little bit about your career and your insights, your advice, especially appreciate that for MedTech founders who might, you know, not quite know where to start with this whole legal element that they really need to consider. So I really appreciate you sharing kind of when and how to do that. And we're excited to be making a donation on your behalf, as a thank you for your time today, to Sleep in Heavenly Peace, which provides beds for children who don't have any in the United States. So thank you for choosing that charity to support. And thank you again so much for being here. This has been a wonderful conversation, and I just wish you the most continued success as you work to change lives for a better world. [00:22:41] Ryan Phelan: Thank you, Lindsey. My pleasure. Happy to be here too. Thank you for having me. [00:22:44] Lindsey Dinneen: Of course. And for our listeners, thank you so much for tuning in. If you're feeling as inspired as I am, I'd love it if you'd share this episode with a colleague or two, and we'll catch you next time. [00:22:56] Ben Trombold: The Leading Difference is brought to you by Velentium. Velentium is a full-service CDMO with 100% in-house capability to design, develop, and manufacture medical devices from class two wearables to class three active implantable medical devices. Velentium specializes in active implantables, leads, programmers, and accessories across a wide range of indications, such as neuromodulation, deep brain stimulation, cardiac management, and diabetes management. Velentium's core competencies include electrical, firmware, and mechanical design, mobile apps, embedded cybersecurity, human factors and usability, automated test systems, systems engineering, and contract manufacturing. Velentium works with clients worldwide, from startups seeking funding to established Fortune 100 companies. Visit velentium.com to explore your next step in medical device development.

How do you patent health tech inventions in today's challenging IP landscape, especially when AI is reshaping the game? We explore the complex world of patenting health technology inventions with Ryan Phelan, U.S. Patent Attorney and Partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP. Health tech innovations, from AI-powered diagnostic tools to surgical robotics, often face unique patent hurdles. This is especially true under the U.S. Patent Office's evolving guidelines.  What you'll learn: Why many health tech patents get rejected as "organizing human activity" Proven strategies and workarounds to successfully patent healthcare IT and software-driven medical devices The explosive growth of AI patents in healthcare and what it means for innovators  Tips for healthcare startups and executives to protect their breakthroughs and intellectual property If you're working in healthcare innovation, med tech, medical device development, AI in health, or intellectual property law, this episode offers essential insights to help you safeguard your inventions. Find Ryan's work at: www.marshallip.com Subscribe and stay at the forefront of the digital healthcare revolution. Watch the full video on YouTube @TheDigitalHealthcareExperience The Digital Healthcare Experience is a hub to connect healthcare leaders and tech enthusiasts. Powered by Taylor Healthcare, this podcast is your gateway to the latest trends and breakthroughs in digital health. Learn more at taylor.com/digital-healthcare About Us: Taylor Healthcare empowers healthcare organizations to thrive in the digital world. Our technology streamlines critical workflows such as procedural & surgical informed consent with patented mobile signature capture, ransomware downtime mitigation, patient engagement and more. For more information, please visit imedhealth.com   The Digital Healthcare Experience Podcast: Powered by Taylor Healthcare Produced by Naomi Schwimmer  Hosted by Chris Civitarese Edited by Eli Banks Music by Nicholas Bach  

I'm your host and coaching teammate, Shauna Griffiths, and I'm grateful to bring you another conversation with an impactful leader. This edition features International IP Attorney, Professor & Partner at Gearhart Law, David Postolski.   David is an IP and Patent Attorney who is dedicated his career to helping inventors, emerging companies, innovators, creators, artists, designers, entrepreneurs, and small to large companies on their journey to understand, protect, strategize, monetize, enforce their intellectual property including patents, trademarks and copyrights. The way he operates with an unwavering commitment to educating and empowering entrepreneurs compelled me to have him on the show after the first 10 minutes of our first conversation.  David's joy, passion and compassion come through loud and clear in this episode and with everything he does. His unconventional approach to his craft is refreshing and I'm grateful to shine light on him and share him with you here.  Tune-in to hear about:  Protecting your IP Entrepreneurs Leveraging Vulnerability is a Strength  David's Unconventional Approach  Why His Believes in Free Consultations  Breaking Down Complex Ideas  The Relativity of Fear Embracing Vulnerability in Loss AND MORE!  We hope you enjoy this episode, and we look forward to hearing your feedback! LEADERSHIP IS A SPORT & IT'S GAMETIME

Craig Weiss is a leading Entrepreneur, Investor, and an Author. Currently, he is the Managing Partner of Flagstaff Ventures, where he brings entrepreneur-focused perspective to the venture capital field as one of the few institutional investors to have both built a unicorn as a CEO and also identified and invested in an early-stage startup that has achieved unicorn status. Craig has been a 3i Member since 2023.In this episode, Craig discusses his experience writing two books on Israel's War of Independence, coining the concept of a "karmapreneur," and finding deep community value in Зі. He reveals how spiritual and commercial aims merge to create both financial and societal impact.Listen to the podcast to learn more about:Lessons from Authorship: Through archival research, interviews, and declassified military documents, Craig uncovered overlooked historical narratives-an approach he sees as mirroring the diligence required in startup investing.Pivoting from Patent Attorney to CEO: How a background in patent law primed Craig for evaluating inventions and led to growing a vaping-tech startup that helped bring about a near smoke-free generation.Integrating Business & Spirituality: Craig reflects on seeing seemingly different domains—venture investing, intellectual life, and moral purpose—as fundamentally connected, guiding his vision for future “karmapreneurs.”Craig's Books:I Am My Brother's Keeper: American Volunteers in Israel's War for Independence 1947-1949Fighting Back: Stan Andrews and the Birth of the Israeli Air ForceDocumentary:Above and Beyond (2014 documentary featuring Craig Weiss)Craig's Professional Links:Flagstaff Ventures (Craig Weiss's Venture Firm)Craig Weiss LinkedInAdditional References from Conversation:Reason.com article covering Sen. Rockefeller's vaping remarksCast a Giant Shadow (1966 film about Mickey Marcus, mentioned in episode)3i Members Links:3i Members Official Website3i Members LinkedIn

Send us a textThe AI Patent Attorney, Robert Plotkin is back!  Founding partner of Blueshift IP and author of AI Armor and The Genie in the Machine.  Robert outlines the new gold rush and how to take advantage of it.02:59 Meet Robert Plotkin Again06:56 Robert's Brand 09:21 Why do Another Book11:33 What Can be Patented?14:18 Patent Attorneys19:10 Coca-Cola23:19 Patent Litigation26:23 Ignoring Copyrights2847 Open Source vs Patents30:32 4 Stages for IP Protection37:45 The Best Tech Patent40:38 The New Gold Rush 43:10 Is AI Liable49:20 Who Should Read the Book?50:52 Where to Reach Robert51:25 Wrap UpLinkedin: linkedin.com/in/robertplotkinWebsite: https://www.blueshiftip.comWant to be featured on Making Data Simple? Reach out at almartintalksdata@gmail.com and share why you should be our next guest. Hosted by Al Martin, AI Enthusiast, Trusted Advisor, and Curious Technologist, the Making Data Simple podcast brings you actionable insights from the leaders shaping AI, data, and innovation.#MakingDataSimple #AIInnovation #PatentLaw #RobertPlotkin #BlueshiftIP #AIArmor #TheGenieInTheMachine #TechLeadership #IntellectualProperty #FutureOfAI #AITrends #InnovationStrategyWant to be featured as a guest on Making Data Simple? Reach out to us at almartintalksdata@gmail.com and tell us why you should be next. The Making Data Simple Podcast is hosted by Al Martin, WW VP Technical Sales, IBM, where we explore trending technologies, business innovation, and leadership ... while keeping it simple & fun.

Send us a textThe AI Patent Attorney, Robert Plotkin is back!  Founding partner of Blueshift IP and author of AI Armor and The Genie in the Machine.  Robert outlines the new gold rush and how to take advantage of it.02:59 Meet Robert Plotkin Again06:56 Robert's Brand 09:21 Why do Another Book11:33 What Can be Patented?14:18 Patent Attorneys19:10 Coca-Cola23:19 Patent Litigation26:23 Ignoring Copyrights2847 Open Source vs Patents30:32 4 Stages for IP Protection37:45 The Best Tech Patent40:38 The New Gold Rush 43:10 Is AI Liable49:20 Who Should Read the Book?50:52 Where to Reach Robert51:25 Wrap UpLinkedin: linkedin.com/in/robertplotkinWebsite: https://www.blueshiftip.comWant to be featured on Making Data Simple? Reach out at almartintalksdata@gmail.com and share why you should be our next guest. Hosted by Al Martin, AI Enthusiast, Trusted Advisor, and Curious Technologist, the Making Data Simple podcast brings you actionable insights from the leaders shaping AI, data, and innovation.#MakingDataSimple #AIInnovation #PatentLaw #RobertPlotkin #BlueshiftIP #AIArmor #TheGenieInTheMachine #TechLeadership #IntellectualProperty #FutureOfAI #AITrends #InnovationStrategyWant to be featured as a guest on Making Data Simple? Reach out to us at almartintalksdata@gmail.com and tell us why you should be next. The Making Data Simple Podcast is hosted by Al Martin, WW VP Technical Sales, IBM, where we explore trending technologies, business innovation, and leadership ... while keeping it simple & fun.

Simon Borger, a physicist turned patent attorney, is interviewed by Yuval Boger. They discuss the evolving intellectual property landscape in quantum technologies. Simon shares insights on global patent trends, the role of startups versus large companies, and the challenges of filing patents for quantum innovations. They explore how to balance academic publishing with IP protection, the rising influence of European filings, and the surprising nuances of Chinese patent strategies, and much more.

Startups have to be mindful of intellectual property, patents, and trademarks., and it's important to make sure that you have this covered. One person who knows this area very well is Justin Woods, European Patent Attorney with FR Kelly, and I recently spoke with him. Justin talks about his background, what FR Kelly does, the European Patent Office, machine learning artificial intelligence patents, the three main areas of IP and more. More about Justin Woods: Justin is a seasoned European patent attorney with over two decades of experience at the forefront of the European patent system. His unique perspective stems from his prior role as an examiner at the European Patent Office (EPO), making him one of the few attorneys who have worked on both sides of the patent application process.  As a leading expert in computer-implemented inventions, Justin has been instrumental in navigating the complex landscape of machine learning and artificial intelligence patents. His deep understanding of the relevant case law and his ability to secure grants for AI-related applications have solidified his reputation as a trusted authority in the field.

Startups have to be mindful of intellectual property, patents, and trademarks., and it's important to make sure that you have this covered. One person who knows this area very well is Justin Woods, European Patent Attorney with FR Kelly, and I recently spoke with him. Justin talks about his background, what FR Kelly does, the European Patent Office, machine learning artificial intelligence patents, the three main areas of IP and more. More about Justin Woods: Justin is a seasoned European patent attorney with over two decades of experience at the forefront of the European patent system. His unique perspective stems from his prior role as an examiner at the European Patent Office (EPO), making him one of the few attorneys who have worked on both sides of the patent application process. As a leading expert in computer-implemented inventions, Justin has been instrumental in navigating the complex landscape of machine learning and artificial intelligence patents. His deep understanding of the relevant case law and his ability to secure grants for AI-related applications have solidified his reputation as a trusted authority in the field. See more podcasts here.

What is a patent post-grant supplemental reexamination? Once your patent has been issued, sometimes you might want to have the Patent Office take a second a look to see if it really should have been issued in the first place. Why would you want to do this? One reason is that it can make invalidating your patent harder to do by others, and second, you can avoid the dreaded "Fraud on the Patent Office." Listen to the episide to find out more!   Connect with Adam Diament E-mail: adiament@nolanheimann.com   Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament   Phone/Text: (424)281-0162   YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5cTADZzJfPoyQMjnW-rtRw Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trademarkpatentlaw/   LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-diament-j-d-ph-d-180a005/   Amazon Book Page: https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B005SV2RZC/allbooks?ingress=0&visitId=831aff71-513b-4158-ad73-386ede491e93

Mr. Ben Peeler provides his services to clients for real property, intellectual property, and general corporate matters. As a licensed Patent Attorney, Mr. Peeler is eligible to prosecute patent applications to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of his clients. Mr. Peeler also has experience assisting clients with trademark and copyright issues in […]

Mr. Ben Peeler provides his services to clients for real property, intellectual property, and general corporate matters. As a licensed Patent Attorney, Mr. Peeler is eligible to prosecute patent applications to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of his clients. Mr. Peeler also has experience assisting clients with trademark and copyright issues in […] The post Patent Attorney Ben Peeler appeared first on Business RadioX ®.

SO MANY OF YOU ASKED FOR IT!! And we deliver! This week we have @ChristaLaser on, not only a Patent Attorney, but also a PROFESSOR for patent and IP law to talk all about Prior Art and what it means for patents, specifically the @BambuLab and @Stratasys lawsuits that are currently ongoing. Christa has an event for makers Oct. 9th at 11am ET: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/intellectual-property-law-for-makers-tickets-1018863376787? https://christalaser.com Some about Professor Laser: Professor Christa Laser began teaching at Cleveland State University College of Law after nearly a decade of practice experience as an intellectual property litigator at the Washington, D.C. offices of law firms WilmerHale and Kirkland & Ellis LLP. She has deep expertise in patents, trademarks, copyrights, false advertising, pharmaceutical litigation and regulation, and technology law. She has represented leading life sciences and technology companies in all stages of trial and appellate matters and consulted on legislative changes to intellectual property laws. Professor Laser's research focuses on intellectual property and innovation. Her patent law scholarship has been cited by numerous scholars, by judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court. Her research envisions an intellectual property system that supports innovation, investment, and competition across all technology areas. Professor Laser was the World Champion of the Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition. Prior to law school, she worked as a scientific researcher, where her work studying protein dynamics of photosynthesis using genetically modified bacteria and laser spectroscopy was published in the prestigious journal Science. She was also a medalist at the National Championships and North American Cup in fencing. Main channel video on Stratasys vs. Bambu Lab: https://youtu.be/ZrNMiSZPsNA A HUGE Thank you to the Filament Sponsor of these streams, @printedsolid ! Check them out: https://printedsolid.com __________________________________ Do you have an idea you want to get off the ground? Reach out to the Making Awesome Podcast through https://3DMusketeers.com/podcast and someone will get you set up to be a guest!

How can inventors protect their ideas while still bringing them to market?   In episode 163, Dr. James Bryant interviews Wayne Carroll, a patent attorney and host of the Leveraging Inspiration Podcast. Wayne shares his journey from engineer to patent attorney, offering invaluable insights for inventors and entrepreneurs. He discusses the delicate balance between protecting intellectual property and monetizing ideas, the challenges of entrepreneurship, and the importance of faith in business. Wayne provides practical advice on patenting processes, common mistakes inventors make, and strategies for protecting innovative ideas.   [00:00 - 09:59] From Engineering to Patent Law: Wayne's Inspiring Journey Wayne's grandfather's patents inspired his career path Transition from electronics engineering to patent law Overcoming barriers to find the right professional direction   [10:00 - 13:57] The Rollercoaster of Entrepreneurship: Lessons Learned Starting a firm without business training led to initial struggles Adapting to economic challenges during the 2008 financial crisis Importance of resilience and flexibility in business   [13:58 - 17:05] Protecting Your Inventions: Strategies and Pitfalls The value of hiring a business coach for entrepreneurs Zero hidden fees policy in patent and trademark filing Common mistakes inventors make when seeking patents   [17:06 - 20:20] The Patent Process: What Inventors Need to Know Alternative ways to protect ideas beyond patents Timeline and challenges in the patent application process Understanding rejection rates and examination procedures   [20:21 - 21:30] Balancing Entrepreneurship and Family Life Wayne's experience of maintaining a strong marriage while running a business The importance of having a supportive partner in entrepreneurial endeavors Approaching the empty nester stage and enjoying shared activities   [21:31 - 25:30] Faith, Mistakes, and Growth in Business The role of faith in guiding business decisions Learning from mistakes and moving forward The importance of delegating, eliminating, and automating tasks   [25:31 - 29:32] The Future of Patents and AI Artificial intelligence's impact on patent law The importance of confidentiality in protecting inventions Changes in patent filing regulations and their implications   Key Quotes:    "We help inventors who have ideas as well as business people with a brand that they want to protect." - Wayne Carroll   "You're going to make mistakes if you're an entrepreneur... Don't beat yourself up." - Wayne Carroll   Engineer's Blueprint for success: https://www.engineeryoursuccessnow.com/engineers-blueprint/   Let's connect! Find me on my LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. I'd love to hear from you.   Sign Up for the Email List: https://bit.ly/3QFzcWW    You have the strength of a hero within you. Check out my website, www.engineeryoursuccessnow.com, and learn how to unlock your potential and achieve success both in business and in life.  

How can inventors protect their ideas while still bringing them to market?   In episode 163, Dr. James Bryant interviews Wayne Carroll, a patent attorney and host of the Leveraging Inspiration Podcast. Wayne shares his journey from engineer to patent attorney, offering invaluable insights for inventors and entrepreneurs. He discusses the delicate balance between protecting intellectual property and monetizing ideas, the challenges of entrepreneurship, and the importance of faith in business. Wayne provides practical advice on patenting processes, common mistakes inventors make, and strategies for protecting innovative ideas.   [00:00 - 09:59] From Engineering to Patent Law: Wayne's Inspiring Journey Wayne's grandfather's patents inspired his career path Transition from electronics engineering to patent law Overcoming barriers to find the right professional direction   [10:00 - 13:57] The Rollercoaster of Entrepreneurship: Lessons Learned Starting a firm without business training led to initial struggles Adapting to economic challenges during the 2008 financial crisis Importance of resilience and flexibility in business   [13:58 - 17:05] Protecting Your Inventions: Strategies and Pitfalls The value of hiring a business coach for entrepreneurs Zero hidden fees policy in patent and trademark filing Common mistakes inventors make when seeking patents   [17:06 - 20:20] The Patent Process: What Inventors Need to Know Alternative ways to protect ideas beyond patents Timeline and challenges in the patent application process Understanding rejection rates and examination procedures   [20:21 - 21:30] Balancing Entrepreneurship and Family Life Wayne's experience of maintaining a strong marriage while running a business The importance of having a supportive partner in entrepreneurial endeavors Approaching the empty nester stage and enjoying shared activities   [21:31 - 25:30] Faith, Mistakes, and Growth in Business The role of faith in guiding business decisions Learning from mistakes and moving forward The importance of delegating, eliminating, and automating tasks   [25:31 - 29:32] The Future of Patents and AI Artificial intelligence's impact on patent law The importance of confidentiality in protecting inventions Changes in patent filing regulations and their implications   Key Quotes:    "We help inventors who have ideas as well as business people with a brand that they want to protect." - Wayne Carroll   "You're going to make mistakes if you're an entrepreneur... Don't beat yourself up." - Wayne Carroll   Engineer's Blueprint for success: https://www.engineeryoursuccessnow.com/engineers-blueprint/   Let's connect! Find me on my LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. I'd love to hear from you.   Sign Up for the Email List: https://bit.ly/3QFzcWW    You have the strength of a hero within you. Check out my website, www.engineeryoursuccessnow.com, and learn how to unlock your potential and achieve success both in business and in life.  

How can inventors protect their ideas while still bringing them to market?   In episode 163, Dr. James Bryant interviews Wayne Carroll, a patent attorney and host of the Leveraging Inspiration Podcast. Wayne shares his journey from engineer to patent attorney, offering invaluable insights for inventors and entrepreneurs. He discusses the delicate balance between protecting intellectual property and monetizing ideas, the challenges of entrepreneurship, and the importance of faith in business. Wayne provides practical advice on patenting processes, common mistakes inventors make, and strategies for protecting innovative ideas.   [00:00 - 09:59] From Engineering to Patent Law: Wayne's Inspiring Journey Wayne's grandfather's patents inspired his career path Transition from electronics engineering to patent law Overcoming barriers to find the right professional direction   [10:00 - 13:57] The Rollercoaster of Entrepreneurship: Lessons Learned Starting a firm without business training led to initial struggles Adapting to economic challenges during the 2008 financial crisis Importance of resilience and flexibility in business   [13:58 - 17:05] Protecting Your Inventions: Strategies and Pitfalls The value of hiring a business coach for entrepreneurs Zero hidden fees policy in patent and trademark filing Common mistakes inventors make when seeking patents   [17:06 - 20:20] The Patent Process: What Inventors Need to Know Alternative ways to protect ideas beyond patents Timeline and challenges in the patent application process Understanding rejection rates and examination procedures   [20:21 - 21:30] Balancing Entrepreneurship and Family Life Wayne's experience of maintaining a strong marriage while running a business The importance of having a supportive partner in entrepreneurial endeavors Approaching the empty nester stage and enjoying shared activities   [21:31 - 25:30] Faith, Mistakes, and Growth in Business The role of faith in guiding business decisions Learning from mistakes and moving forward The importance of delegating, eliminating, and automating tasks   [25:31 - 29:32] The Future of Patents and AI Artificial intelligence's impact on patent law The importance of confidentiality in protecting inventions Changes in patent filing regulations and their implications   Key Quotes:    "We help inventors who have ideas as well as business people with a brand that they want to protect." - Wayne Carroll   "You're going to make mistakes if you're an entrepreneur... Don't beat yourself up." - Wayne Carroll   Engineer's Blueprint for success: https://www.engineeryoursuccessnow.com/engineers-blueprint/   Let's connect! Find me on my LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. I'd love to hear from you.   Sign Up for the Email List: https://bit.ly/3QFzcWW    You have the strength of a hero within you. Check out my website, www.engineeryoursuccessnow.com, and learn how to unlock your potential and achieve success both in business and in life.  

How can inventors protect their ideas while still bringing them to market?   In episode 163, Dr. James Bryant interviews Wayne Carroll, a patent attorney and host of the Leveraging Inspiration Podcast. Wayne shares his journey from engineer to patent attorney, offering invaluable insights for inventors and entrepreneurs. He discusses the delicate balance between protecting intellectual property and monetizing ideas, the challenges of entrepreneurship, and the importance of faith in business. Wayne provides practical advice on patenting processes, common mistakes inventors make, and strategies for protecting innovative ideas.   [00:00 – 09:59] From Engineering to Patent Law: Wayne's Inspiring Journey Wayne's grandfather's patents inspired his career path Transition from electronics engineering to patent law Overcoming barriers to find the right professional direction   [10:00 – 13:57] The Rollercoaster of Entrepreneurship: Lessons Learned Starting a firm without business training led to initial struggles Adapting to economic challenges during the 2008 financial crisis Importance of resilience and flexibility in business   [13:58 – 17:05] Protecting Your Inventions: Strategies and Pitfalls The value of hiring a business coach for entrepreneurs Zero hidden fees policy in patent and trademark filing Common mistakes inventors make when seeking patents   [17:06 – 20:20] The Patent Process: What Inventors Need to Know Alternative ways to protect ideas beyond patents Timeline and challenges in the patent application process Understanding rejection rates and examination procedures   [20:21 – 21:30] Balancing Entrepreneurship and Family Life Wayne's experience of maintaining a strong marriage while running a business The importance of having a supportive partner in entrepreneurial endeavors Approaching the empty nester stage and enjoying shared activities   [21:31 – 25:30] Faith, Mistakes, and Growth in Business The role of faith in guiding business decisions Learning from mistakes and moving forward The importance of delegating, eliminating, and automating tasks   [25:31 – 29:32] The Future of Patents and AI Artificial intelligence's impact on patent law The importance of confidentiality in protecting inventions Changes in patent filing regulations and their implications   Key Quotes:    “We help inventors who have ideas as well as business people with a brand that they want to protect.” – Wayne Carroll   “You're going to make mistakes if you're an entrepreneur… Don't beat yourself up.” – Wayne Carroll   Engineer's Blueprint for success: https://www.engineeryoursuccessnow.com/engineers-blueprint/   Let's connect! Find me on my LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. I'd love to hear from you.   Sign Up for the Email List: https://bit.ly/3QFzcWW    You have the strength of a hero within you. Check out my website, www.engineeryoursuccessnow.com, and learn how to unlock your potential and achieve success both in business and in life.  

What are the key differences between a patent attorney and a patent agent? In this episode, Jamie and Samar dispel the myths surrounding patent attorneys and patent agents. They specify the qualifications a patent attorney and patent agent must have and what actions fall under their jurisdictions, respectively.  Takeaways:Both patent attorneys and agents are required to take the patent bar exam, which qualifies them to represent people in front of the USPTO. Patent agents are restricted strictly to the legal representation of clients in front of the patent office. However, patent attorneys can operate anywhere the law and the patent office intersect. Regarding more complex legal consultations that are not confined to the patent office, an attorney is often better equipped to handle them. Generally, attorneys charge more than agents, but this varies depending on the agent's or attorney's experience and market.Timestamps:0:00 - Introduction 2:11 - How do patent agents get registration numbers?2:49 - Patent bar exams 4:00 - Qualifications to take the exam4:45 - What can agents and attorneys do and not do?5:50 - Cost differences6:56 - Appeal Briefs 7:49 - At what stage do you need to get an attorney?8:50 - Closing thoughts

Send us a Text Message.Finding a streamer talking about selling on Amazon at night is not easy. Figured I'd start streaming and answer any of your Amazon questions. Or if you're looking for a job I can give job advice. If you're an agency ask me agency questions. I own a 20-million dollar ARR agency called My Amazon Guy.→ Use Data Dive with code MAG for exclusive savings!↳ https://2.datadive.tools/subscription/subscribe?ref=otkxnwu&coupon=MAG-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Join My Amazon Guy on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28605816/Follow us:Twitter: https://twitter.com/myamazonguyInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/stevenpopemag/Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/myamazonguys/Please subscribe to the podcast at: https://podcast.myamazonguy.comApple Podcast:  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/my-amazon-guy/id1501974229Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4A5ASHGGfr6s4wWNQIqyVwTimestamps:0:00 - Introduction and Stream Setup00:41 - Overview of the AMA Topics 01:10 - Viral Twitch Story and Its Impact 04:32 - Starting Overwatch Game 05:25 - Playing Junkrat and Stream Interaction 06:02 - Advice on Finding a Patent Attorney 07:02 - Overcoming Policy Violation Abuse on Amazon 08:24 - Managing Amazon Reviews and Account Setup 09:29 - Risks of Review Generation on Amazon 10:45 - Effective PPC Strategies 14:20 - Improving Amazon Listings 18:55 - Handling Negative Feedback 22:30 - Tips for Amazon Product Launch 26:10 - Utilizing Amazon Seller Central Tools 30:00 - Enhancing Product Images 34:15 - Understanding Amazon's A9 Algorithm 38:40 - Customer Service Best Practices 43:05 - Leveraging Amazon Advertising 47:30 - Competitor Analysis on Amazon 52:00 - Stream Recap and Key Takeaways 57:15 - Addressing Viewer Questions 1:01:50 - Scaling Your Amazon Business 1:06:20 - Common Amazon Seller Mistakes 1:10:40 - Advanced Amazon FBA Tactics 1:15:10 - Building a Brand on Amazon 1:19:45 - Effective Inventory Management 1:24:10 - Amazon Seller Account Health 1:28:30 - Utilizing Amazon Data and Analytics 1:32:50 - Responding to Live Chat Questions 1:37:15 - Trends in E-commerce 1:41:40 - Maximizing Profit Margins 1:46:10 - Final Q&A Session 1:50:45 - Closing Remarks and Stream EndSupport the Show.

In this episode, Amith and Mallory sit down with Robert Plotkin, an AI patent attorney and author of "AI Armor." Robert shares his insights on intellectual property (IP) and its evolving landscape in the AI era. He discusses the importance of IP in building competitive advantages and strategies for associations to leverage their assets, such as content and data, to create a "moat" against competitors. The conversation also delves into topics like AI-generated inventions, patentability, and the potential for associations to develop AI co-pilots or assistants leveraging their expertise and brand recognition. Robert's book, ‘AI Armor,' is available on Amazon here:https://amzn.in/d/aSwZr0i Free bonus content is available here:https://blueshiftip.com/aiarmorRobert Plotkin will also be one of our keynote speakers at digitalNow 2024. For a 10% discount off of registration please use discount code POD when signing up. See you there!

What's the most up-to-date info and expectations surrounding patents and IP in 2024?  A snippet from the Invent With Me Podcast!Spotify⬇️https://open.spotify.com/show/2YAZqvv...Apple⬇️https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...Invent with me is the first place to go when you need motivation to fire up your best self and create your invention! Remember, we took the punches so that you don't have to!In this snippet from Episode 22, Marcus and Grant sit down with Omid of the Omni Legal Group!⬇️https://omnilegalgroup.com/Today we discuss what the cost of a patent is. We learned that simple mechanical inventions are less expensive than confusing IP that includes tech. Fees usually include government filing fees and professional drawings. Omid informs us that the majority of patents may get kicked back at least once. Omid also talks about how the slow patent process shouldn't slow you down and it is smart to market and sell your product long before the patent is issued or the product is patented.To Patent or Not to Patent.. Fellow Entrepreneur and patent attorney, Omid Khalifeh, breaks it down.  Today's guest is Omid Khalifeh - Owner and founder of Omni Legal Group - Omnilegalgroup.com - a full service firm covering Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Cyber Law, Trade Secret Law and Mediation.  After over 20 episodes of talking about our opinions and experiences with patents -  we get down to the brass tacks of if and when you should patent your idea and everything surrounding that.  -Breaking down what a patent is and why the patent system was put into place.    -If you're going to apply for a patent - when should you do it?  What time frames are involved before, during and after and what's involved in a good application?  -How long does it take for your patent to get reviewed, how much does it cost, are there additional steps and costs involved.  If all goes well, when can you expect to get it awarded?-When filing a provisional patent yourself is a good idea, what protections will it give you, if any and when filing it yourself can harm you.-A touch on trademarks and branding - how to name your product/company in a way that will make it easier to get a registered trademark.  Breakdown why Marcus' Quick Tie Down Anchors got rejected. -Grant shares his new idea - Omid Reacts.. -NDA's - what are they? Does downloading a simple one from the internet afford you any protections? When this can get you in trouble.www.torkstrap.comwww.quicktiedownanchors.com

It was episode 25, way back in January 2020, when Tim last joined us to talk about Athalonz. A lot has changed with the shoe company based in the Phoenix Valley. After they did a fantastic job getting their shoes into the hands of some of the best athletes on the planet, when it comes to the Champions Tour and Long Drive competitions, a little thing called Covid happened. There were a lot of small brands, like Athalonz, that didn't make it through Covid. But as a smaller, direct-to-consumer shoe company with some outstanding tech, they were able to weather the storm.Several years later, they've launched a new shoe, the Mana Mangrove Pro, and have a second version of their successful EnVe line coming.But that might not be the most significant news regarding Athalonz.  Some of you might not know that Tim Markison is a successful, no, VERY successful Patent Attorney with hundreds of patents. Many of which are involved with Athalonz. And one of the major brands in the shoe business is using their patented technology in their shoes. This was incredibly interesting, and we are eager to hear the outcome of the litigation when it starts in March. We'll be sure to have Tim back on after the ruling so he can tell us more about it.If you enjoy learning about smaller brands and how they are doing their part to bring advancements to the tech we use to play golf, this will be a great listen. We want to thank Tim for taking the time out of his busy schedule to chat with us about what's new with Athalonz, and we're looking forward to seeing what they accomplish with their new shoes in 2024.Links for the Episode:Athalonz: https://www.athalonz.com/Athalonz on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/athalonz/Athalonz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/athalonz/Bernhard Langer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_LangerIf you haven't checked out our NEW YouTube channel, please do and hit that Subscribe Button for us! More content is coming to that channel as Matt learns the ins and outs of making better videos. Each week, we're posting the show on there as well.https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU6nN8pqtQrhmgBgPbkkDwAWe have a new partnership with The Golf Stop. Be sure to stop by their new facility and check it out! It's a great spot to get in some practice, hang out, and get in some swings with the boys or the fam!https://thegolfstop.com/Please check out one of our show supporters, FN3P Golf. You can save some money using our code "CDPODCAST" at checkout.https://bit.ly/3yWe9plAs was mentioned earlier, we've moved our show from Riverside to StreamYard and are excited about the future. If you like what you're seeing, here's a link to check out the software:  CDP STREAMYARD REFERRAL LINKhttps://streamyard.com/pal/c/4We hope you enjoy this week's episode, and if you do, please consider leaving us a review on either Spotify or iTunes. Thank You!

A Start of the Year Exclusive Interview with Inventor, Patent Attorney, and PhD in Physics, Boris Tankhilevich. We discuss MAGTERA. 

Join us on an enlightening journey with Leela Madan, the energizing founder of Madan Law PLLC. Transitioning from her role as a corporate chemist to a patent attorney, Leela provides us with an intriguing view into the world of business law, guiding businesses to safeguard themselves from liabilities.In this compelling conversation, we traverse Leela's unique career path, revealing the power of networking and resilience in business. With her candid and approachable demeanor, Leela shares her strategies for launching her law firm, ultimately attributing her success to her outgoing nature. We explore the concept of paying oneself first and the importance of structuring a competitive compensation package without compromising on a non-toxic work environment. Through Leela's experiences, gain a deep understanding of how a team that shares the same goals can lay the groundwork for a thriving business. Be sure to follow @houstonmadepodcast on Instagram!EPISODE CREDITSGuest - Leela Madan // Madan Law PLLCProduced, and Hosted by Rusty GatesSpecial Thanks to Luke BrawnerMusic by Old Friends, New FriendsArtwork in collaboration w/ Mac Ryan Creative© 2023 Rusty Gates Media and Milieu Media Group, LLC

#MakingDataSimplePodcast welcomes Robert Plotkin author of The Genie in the Machine and Founding Partner of Blueshift IP. Can AI be patented?  Computer-Automated Inventing Is Revolutionizing Law and Business.  Part 1.01:29 Robert Plotkin, Patent Attorney 07:32 Arriving in the Patent Field 12:00 Coolest Invention?14:18 Advice for Law Students19:17 What IS a Patent?  The Process28:57 Top Priorities32:14 Is Patent Law Ready for AI?37:10 The Wild West : "Grow Faster than The Damage"41:43 Large Language Model RegulationLinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/robertplotkinWebsite: blueshiftip.comWant to be featured as a guest on Making Data Simple?  Reach out to us at almartintalksdata@gmail.com and tell us why you should be next.  The Making Data Simple Podcast is hosted by Al Martin, WW VP Technical Sales, IBM, where we explore trending technologies, business innovation, and leadership ... while keeping it simple & fun. 

#MakingDataSimplePodcast welcomes Robert Plotkin author of The Genie in the Machine and Founding Partner of Blueshift IP. Can AI be patented?  Computer-Automated Inventing Is Revolutionizing Law and Business.  Part 1.01:29 Robert Plotkin, Patent Attorney 07:32 Arriving in the Patent Field 12:00 Coolest Invention?14:18 Advice for Law Students19:17 What IS a Patent?  The Process28:57 Top Priorities32:14 Is Patent Law Ready for AI?37:10 The Wild West : "Grow Faster than The Damage"41:43 Large Language Model RegulationLinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/robertplotkinWebsite: blueshiftip.comWant to be featured as a guest on Making Data Simple?  Reach out to us at almartintalksdata@gmail.com and tell us why you should be next.  The Making Data Simple Podcast is hosted by Al Martin, WW VP Technical Sales, IBM, where we explore trending technologies, business innovation, and leadership ... while keeping it simple & fun. 

Welcome to another insightful episode of the Compassionate Capitalist Show with host, Karen Rands. Today, we're privileged to have patent attorney and CEO of Blue Iron, Russ Krajec, on the show. Russ will debunk myths and misconceptions about patents. Expect to dive deep into the importance of aligning patents with your business roadmap, with emphasis on the value of data-driven patents vs. prophetic patents. Through interesting examples, Karen and Russ will show how to avoid others' mistakes and when patent management is done right, how companies can monetize patents for growth capital, preserving equity value for their share holders.  Finally, you won't want to miss Russ's enlightening journey into patent law and angel investing. So, tune in for an episode that promises to be filled with actionable insights on the nuances of patent writing, and much more!  5 Insights You Will Gain:  1. Misconceptions and Myths of Patents  - Understanding the role of a patent attorney and their liability concerns  - The misconceptions of revealing too much information in patent description versus the actual claims   2. Explaining the Patent Process    - Understanding data-driven patents vs prophetic patents    - Role of proper market analysis and customer engagement to establish patent relevance and commercialization    - Importance of clarity in the description and writing understandable claims to help in the patent approval process  3. Valuation and Monetizing of Patents    - Importance of mapping patents to business roadmap    - Monetizing patents as a startup financing tool    - Concept of IP-backed loans for companies    - Determining true patent value versus overestimated value    - Use of loans based on real patent valuation 4. Lessons for Startups and Entrepreneurs    - Importance of startups owning all rights to their software and product designs    - Challenges startups face in getting quality legal services    - Explanation of the "patent picket fence" strategy    - Importance of selective patent pursuit due to limited financial resources 5. Highlighting The Importance of Effective Patenting    - Importance of patenting specific product features that make it unique    - Example of iPhone's slide to unlock patent    - Discouraging the use of provisional patent applications    - Understanding the lifespan limit of a patent and strategies to extend patent life  For the basics of types of patents that Karen referenced in the intro:   ARTICLE:   https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/what-are-the-different-types-of-patents Get in touch with Russ, registered patent attorney, CEO of Blue Iron IP Web: BlueIronIP.com Author of "Investing In Patents" and an active angel investor.  Russ offered listeners a copy of his book for free! Send him an email with your address to  russ.krajec AT blueironip.com Connect on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/krajec/ Host of the Patent Myths Podcast TimeStamp:  00:02 In this episode, the host discusses patents with patent attorney Russ Krajek. They dispel myths and share enlightening information about investing in patents.  04:52 Russ started as a patent attorney, experience with angel investing, and how he got into IP backed loans for companies with revenue. 07:34 Understanding the business is crucial. Validating the solution before wasting money on patents.  Critical to know what is novel and has customer appeal 19:04 Choosing a provisional patent application suggests low expectations to the investor. 21:29 When hiring a patent attorney, it's the entrepreneur's responsibility to ensure the job is done well. Attorney's don't advise, they do what you ask.  24:31 Patent attorney advises getting patents early and often due to risk of someone filing first. However, there is a possibility of prior art invalidating the patent if you share to much in your description. 27:51 Patents pending for a decade, not immune, appealed three times, clarity of patent writing is imperative to avoid costly legal interpretation. 34:20 As patents approach expiration, they lose value to acquirers, limiting a company's time to increase valuation.  Strategies to extend value.  40:12 Large firms often use inexperienced attorneys for patent filings, resulting in poor quality work. The same applies to attorneys handling contract and intellectual property matters. Issues are often discovered during due diligence for investors. 43:57 Patent value often inflated in pre money startups; realistic worth is far lower until market validation is established.  46:31 For angel investment, we look at the whole company, but mainly focus on the founder's ability to grow the invested capital. Imagine the feeling of investing in a way that had massive impact and a potential pay you back 10x your money. The time is now to find out if Angel Investing / CrowdFunding Investing is the wealth creation strategy for you.  Take action on Karen's offer to learn how to invest with confidence in entrepreneurs and sign up (FREE FOR NOW) the new Compassionate Capitalist Wealth Maximizing System.--Intro to Angel Investing and Crowdfunding Investing Training.  http://dothedeal.org Karen Rands is the leader of the Compassionate Capitalist Movement™ and author of the best selling investment primer: Inside Secrets to Angel Investing: Step-by-Step Strategies to Leverage Private Equity Investment for Passive Wealth Creation.  She is an authority on creating wealth through investing and building successful businesses that can scale and exit rich.  Karen is an enthusiastic speaker on these topics for corporations, economic development groups, angel investor networks, and professional  business networks.   About Karen https://www.karenrands.co/about-karen-rands/ Visit http://Kugarand.com and learn more about the Compassionate Capitalist Wealth Maximizer System™.  Read about the Due Diligence Services, Investor Relations, Capital Strategies, Capital Access, and Capital Readiness Coaching serviced offered by her firm, Kugarand Capital Holdings.  The Compassionate Capitalist Show™ is a Podcast on YouTube.  Please visit and subscribe and share.  It is great to watch Karen and her guests live, in action.  The whole library of podcasts and interviews since 2020 can be found there by category or chronological. https://bit.ly/CCSyoutubepod     

Curiosity is a super power and it's what drives everything we are doing here at Did I tell you... Lost ball marker, great podcast. Albi loses his prized ball marker earlier in the day but ends the day with three new buddies that solve his ball marker woes once and for all.   Albi and Panda catch-up with the founders of the hottest new golf gift launching this holiday season... Marker Locker. They share how through their own creative inspiration, they were able to develop the concept, design, refine, and launch all within less than a 12 month period.  It's not only a remarkable story, it's also inspiring to anyone who is driven to create. 3 new spirit animals join the shed:Honey Badger, Kangeroo #2, GOAT (KID) DITYAMA also launches the first of many contests... this one is for the hard to get Marker Lockers!  We are giving away 6 of these initially. Listen to the podcast for the secret word provided during the podcast for an easy way to multiply your chances to win. https://gleam.io/e90QE/dityamafm-giveawayAlbi learns the hard way that these guys are damn good putters, good sticks over all, and also learns more importantly...  great dudes who share the passion for golf. This episode has a little bit for everyone: 00:00:29 "People call me Albi"00:07:23 Lost ball marker, great podcast.The timestamp in the podcast where it starts to say "Creating a unique golf accessory" is 00:13:22. Creating a unique golf accessory.00:15:48 Ball markers as collectible items.00:23:55. Think outside the box.00:24:12 The podcast discusses a golf challenge.00:29:48. Can a human swallow a golf ball 00:37:12 Reverse sandbaggers are controversial.00:39:19 Importance of honesty in golf.00:50:07 Predicting animal battles is entertaining.01:00:05 Albi Brain /  random questions.01:05:10 Life is full of unexpected moments.01:09:12 Golf cart etiquette is important.01:18:26 John Daly 01:24:08 Swing aids require active use.

Getting a patent attorney for your patent? Don't miss this advice from inventor Stephen Key, who has more than a dozen patents. He's also litigated his patents in federal court! He offers advice about getting a patent attorney you can trust — one who has your best interests at heart. Contact me - stephenkey@inventright.com. It's very important to be prepared when you decide you want to file a non-provisional patent. But it's also extremely important to find a patent attorney, or patent agent that has your best interest. Learn how to make money from your ideas. Free Resources to help you sell your ideas: https://inventright.com/free-inventor... Do you need help? https://inventright.com/services/ Stephen Key's books: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Stephen... Read our articles for Forbes, Inc., and Entrepreneur: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenkey/ https://www.inc.com/author/stephen-key https://www.entrepreneur.com/author/s... Connect with us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenmkey/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/invent/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/inventrightllc Visit inventRight.com. Call: +1 (650) 793-1477 Hi, this is Stephen Key and Andrew Krauss. We are here to help you make money from your ideas. We started our company inventRight over two decades ago to teach people how to license (aka rent) their ideas to companies in exchange for royalties. This process is called “product licensing.” On our channel, we show you exactly how you to take an idea and license it to companies in exchange for passive income. Today, you do not have to start a business to make money from an idea. With product licensing, you don't have to write a business plan, raise money, manufacture, market, sell, or distribute any longer. Visit our website inventRight.com for more information. If you have a product idea and need some help, please contact us at: Phone: +1 (650) 793-1477 Toll Free: +1 (800) 701-7993 Email: support@inventright.com Email us: stephen@inventright.com andrew@inventright.com Learn how to start a business, how to become an entrepreneur, how to protect intellectual property, how to patent an invention, how to stop people from stealing your ideas, how to prototype an idea, how to contact companies looking for ideas, how to design a product, how to make a sell sheet, how to make a promo video, how to negotiate a licensing agreement, how to get a higher royalty rate, how to do market research, and how to work with inventRight. Stephen Key and Andrew Krauss are the cofounders of inventRight, a coaching program for entrepreneurs that has helped people from more than 65 countries license their ideas for new products. They are also the cofounders of Inventors Groups of America, an organization that hosts a free, popular monthly educational meeting for inventors online. They have more than 20 years of experience guiding people to become successful entrepreneurs. New videos every week, including interviews with successful entrepreneurs. Learn from the best! Pitch us your story to be featured on inventRightTV: youtube@inventright.com. Get your own inventing coach by contacting inventRight at #1-800-701-7993 or by visiting https://www.inventright.com/contact. inventRight, LLC. is not a law firm and does not provide legal, patent, trademark, or copyright advice. Please exercise caution when evaluating any information, including but not limited to business opportunities; links to news stories; links to services, products, or other websites. No endorsements are issued by inventRight, LLC., expressed or implied. Depiction of any trademarks/logos does not represent endorsement of inventRight, LLC, its services, or products by the trademark owner. All trademarks are registered trademarks of their respective companies. Reference on this video to any specific commercial products, process, service, manufacturer, company, or trademark does not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by inventRight, LLC or its hosts. This video may contain links to external websites that are not provided or maintained by or in any way affiliated with inventRight, LLC. Please note that the inventRight LLC. does not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

Former Associate Editors Vanessa Wang and Amy Qi discuss what case law proposes as to the privilege issue within the context of patent practice. Specifically, Vanessa and Amy analyze the issue through an in-house patent attorney perspective.

Want to save money and learn to invent right? Learn tips and strategies from Patent Attorney Neha Goyal. Learn how to make money from your ideas. Free Resources to help you sell your ideas: https://inventright.com/free-inventor... Do you need help? https://inventright.com/services/ Stephen Key's books: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Stephen... Read our articles for Forbes, Inc., and Entrepreneur: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenkey/ https://www.inc.com/author/stephen-key https://www.entrepreneur.com/author/s... Connect with us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenmkey/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/invent/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/inventrightllc Visit inventRight.com. Call: +1 (650) 793-1477 Hi, this is Stephen Key and Andrew Krauss. We are here to help you make money from your ideas. We started our company inventRight over two decades ago to teach people how to license (aka rent) their ideas to companies in exchange for royalties. This process is called “product licensing.” On our channel, we show you exactly how you to take an idea and license it to companies in exchange for passive income. Today, you do not have to start a business to make money from an idea. With product licensing, you don't have to write a business plan, raise money, manufacture, market, sell, or distribute any longer. Visit our website inventRight.com for more information. If you have a product idea and need some help, please contact us at: Phone: +1 (650) 793-1477 Toll Free: +1 (800) 701-7993 Email: support@inventright.com Email us: stephen@inventright.com andrew@inventright.com Learn how to start a business, how to become an entrepreneur, how to protect intellectual property, how to patent an invention, how to stop people from stealing your ideas, how to prototype an idea, how to contact companies looking for ideas, how to design a product, how to make a sell sheet, how to make a promo video, how to negotiate a licensing agreement, how to get a higher royalty rate, how to do market research, and how to work with inventRight. Stephen Key and Andrew Krauss are the cofounders of inventRight, a coaching program for entrepreneurs that has helped people from more than 65 countries license their ideas for new products. They are also the cofounders of Inventors Groups of America, an organization that hosts a free, popular monthly educational meeting for inventors online. They have more than 20 years of experience guiding people to become successful entrepreneurs. New videos every week, including interviews with successful entrepreneurs. Learn from the best! Pitch us your story to be featured on inventRightTV: youtube@inventright.com. Get your own inventing coach by contacting inventRight at #1-800-701-7993 or by visiting https://www.inventright.com/contact. inventRight, LLC. is not a law firm and does not provide legal, patent, trademark, or copyright advice. Please exercise caution when evaluating any information, including but not limited to business opportunities; links to news stories; links to services, products, or other websites. No endorsements are issued by inventRight, LLC., expressed or implied. Depiction of any trademarks/logos does not represent endorsement of inventRight, LLC, its services, or products by the trademark owner. All trademarks are registered trademarks of their respective companies. Reference on this video to any specific commercial products, process, service, manufacturer, company, or trademark does not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by inventRight, LLC or its hosts. This video may contain links to external websites that are not provided or maintained by or in any way affiliated with inventRight, LLC. Please note that the inventRight LLC. does not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

Going Long Podcast SERIES HIGHLIGHT Episode 329:  From Patent Attourney to a Multi-Family Powerhouse To see the Video Version of today's conversation just CLICK HERE. In the conversation with today's guest, Jade Laye, you'll learn the following:   [00:31 - 04:02] Jade's profile, in Billy's guest introduction. [04:02 - 11:33] The backstory and decisions made that led Jade to this point in his journey. [11:33 - 17:45] Jade explains the point in his life when he considered the 2 important questions around becoming a patent attorney and a landlord.  [17:44 - 24:30] What it was that helped Jad to feel comfortable about investing out of state. [24:30 - 28:19] What things you should be looking for in a particular market Location to let you know that it is potentially a great area to invest in for when you are moving into long distance real estate investing and out of state investing.  [28:19 - 32:39] How Jade is able to use his experience from single-family investing to great success now in his larger scale multi-family investments, and how he is able to do all this while in a busy and demanding profession. [32:39 - 37:33] Some of the reasons why Jade decided to continue with his full time job while already making a decent amount of income from his investments.  [37:33 - 41:49] Jade talks about the potential barriers for entry into the world of multifamily investment, the mindset that is needed to get past those barriers and the benefits that can be derived from that. [41:49 - 41:49] Jade explains the types of people that he is helping through his company, Laye Investments LLC. Here's what Jade shared with us during today's conversation:   Where in the world Jade is based currently: Houston, Texas. The most positive thing to happen in the past 24 hours: Just closed on a deal for a second home with his wife! Favourite European City: Rome, Italy. A mistake that Jade would like you to learn from so that you don't have to pay full price:  Stay humble, no matter how experienced you think you are - you WILL make mistakes. Do your best to fix them, and move on. Book Recommendation: The Bible, especially the book of Proverbs.    Be sure to reach out and connect with Jade Laye by using the info below: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jade.laye  Email: jade.laye@layeinvestments.com    Start taking action TODAY so that you can gain more Education and Control over your financial life.   To see the Video Version of today's conversation just CLICK HERE.   Are you an Accredited Investor that's tired of getting crushed by paying so much in income tax? Find out how we're helping others like you keep Uncle Sam out of your pocket. Go to https://www.firstgencp.com/goinglong   Be sure to connect with Billy!  He's made it easy for you to do…Just go to any of these sites:   Website: www.billykeels.com Youtube: billykeels Facebook: Billy Keels Fan Page Instagram: @billykeels Twitter: @billykeels LinkedIn: Billy Keels

In this episode you will discover: What is a patent? How soon should you invest in patent protection? What you need to know about design patents for digital companiesWhat the advantages founders gain from talking to a patent attorney Key Takeaways: A patent gives you the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing your invention. It is a defensive measure to make sure that your work is protected. Invest in patent protection for your idea before publicly disclosing it without a confidentiality agreement so that you won't risk losing your rights. Once you disclose your invention publicly, you'll have one year to file for a patent. Creating an interesting graphical user interface for an app, for example, can be protected under design patents. That's a way for companies to protect the user interface for some applications. Anybody can file a provisional application with the PTO, but it's still more advantageous to talk to a patent attorney since they will make sure that the claims are as broad as possible to cover all possible different iterations. “USPTO is a ‘first-to-file' system. So it's not necessarily first to invent, it's whoever's in the door first.  So if they are about to disclose it at a trade show, or to prospective investors, then they want to make sure that their patent is in the office.” - Giordana MahnResources: Fish & Richardson Attorneys Author IAM Article "Neglect Begets Opportunity in Femtech IP": https://www.fr.com/insights/thought-leadership/articles/fish-richardson-attorneys-author-iam-article-neglect-begets-opportunity-in-femtech-ip/ Protecting Your Femtech IP(Webinar): https://www.fr.com/insights/webinars/protecting-your-femtech-ip/ The Basics of Design Patents(Webinar):https://www.fr.com/insights/webinars/the-basics-of-design-patents/ Successful Patent Strategies for Digital Health and Digital Therapeutics(Webinar): https://www.fr.com/insights/webinars/successful-patent-strategies-for-digital-health-and-digital-therapeutics/ Fish & Richardson: https://www.fr.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/giordana-mahn-32832212/ Women Of Wearables: https://www.womenofwearables.com/ Learn more from Carrie and Rebecca: Healthcare Insights (a monthly deep dive into specific topics for innovators): https://nixongwiltlaw.com/healthcare-insightsTelehealth/Virtual Care Mgmt Update (a biweekly LinkedIn newsletter tracking legal and policy changes across the nation): https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/telehealth-virtual-care-update-6901900767960068096/ Website: https://nixongwiltlaw.com/  Carrie on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/carrienixon/ Rebecca on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rebeccagwilt/NGL on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nixon-gwilt-law/  

JP Errico has developed an incredible amount of IP in the medical space. On the way he has built, financed, sold, and taken companies public. His venture, electroCore, has attracted funding from top-tier investors like American Investment Holdings, Easton Capital Investment Group, Tullis Health Investors, and Knoll Capital Management.

Patenting IoT means knowing your intellectual property rights. JiNan Glasgow George, Patent Attorney at Neo IP, joins the IoT For All Podcast to discuss intellectual property rights in IoT and tech. She covers intellectual property in early stage companies, the benefits of intellectual property protection, when to start a patent application, first-to-file versus first-to-use, how hard it is to get a patent, how having intellectual property boosts a company's valuation, intellectual property in the Metaverse, who owns AI-generated content, and how IoT companies can attract investors. JiNan Glasgow George has built her career from engineering to patent law and investment by transforming ideas into assets and connecting innovators to the resources they need to impact society for good. She believes that everyone has the power to create - and her work globally has focused on creating positive impact through intellectual property (IP) rights and data. A Patent Attorney and former Patent Examiner with the US Patent & Trademark Office, JiNan is an IP attorney with experience across a wide range of technology fields, serving clients in the US and internationally. JiNan is also the CEO and co-founder of Patent Forecast, a business intelligence SaaS company that provides insights for investors and executives, serial entrepreneurs, and innovators - giving vision ahead of market data using patent data and AI. Neo IP is an Intellectual Property law firm that helps innovators, inventors and entrepreneurs transform their ideas to reality and supports them with resources they need—investments, people, and connections. Neo IP does extensive work with investors and founders in the IoT space and related topics including digital twins.  Discover more about IP and IoT at https://www.iotforall.com More about Neo IP: https://neoipassets.com More about Patent Forecast: https://www.patentforecast.com/ Connect with JiNan: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jinan-glasgow-george-3784548/  Key Questions and Topics from this Episode: (00:00) Welcome to the IoT For All Podcast (00:56) Introduction to JiNan and Neo IP (01:50) Intellectual property in early stage companies (04:22) The benefits of intellectual property protection (06:37) When to start a patent application (07:22) First-to-file versus first-to-use (08:32) How hard is it to get a patent? (10:53) How having intellectual property boosts valuation (12:52) Intellectual property in the metaverse (14:58) AI generated content ownership (18:06) How can IoT companies attract investors? (20:06) What are you most excited about in 2H 2023? (21:34) 2023 Eclipse IP Futures Conference (22:38) Learn more and follow up  SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL: https://bit.ly/2NlcEwm​ Join Our Newsletter: https://www.iotforall.com/iot-newsletter Follow Us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/iotforall Check out the IoT For All Media Network: https://www.iotforall.com/podcast-overview

Rob Gerlach is one of the smartest people I know and is a good friend of mine. He's a registered Patent Attorney, Intellectual Property aficionado, and the Executive Director of Technology Transfer and Commercialization at Wichita State University. What fascinates me the most about Rob is the rate at which he consumes information-- he reads so many books and listens to so many podcasts-- with a level of efficiency that is mind-boggling. If you enjoyed this episode please share it with a friend. It helps us out a lot: https://podcasts.apple.com/vg/podcast/real-conversations/id1594231832 Jacob's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thejacoboc/ Rob's Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rob-gerlach-17103b7b/

We've covered many topics since we started this podcast, but we haven't ever had an episode dedicated to intellectual property.Until now.Today's guest, JiNan Glasgow George, is an inventor, entrepreneur, patent attorney, and an author. She also happens to be a world-renowned expert on intellectual property with a history of advising startups and entrepreneurs on the subject.She joins Henry and Rusty for a lively discussion about who owns ideas, the ethics of patent trolling, and the role entrepreneurs play in transforming ideas to assets that multiply their businesses. ----Like this episode?Give us a rating, share the show with your network, and follow along for more great content every week.

In today's special episode recorded LIVE at ClioCon I spoke with Kevin Buckley of the Torrey Pines Law Group. Kevin is an accomplished international patent attorney & executive. He founded Torrey Pines Law Group in 2013 to help his clients bring lifesaving, enduring, and commercially valuable technologies to market after previously working in Big Law. He recently earned the Clio Reisman Award for Best Growth Story for his work and the work of his law firm during the Covid 19 pandemic. Kevin is a graduate of US San Diego where he studied Biochemistry and the University of Pittsburg School of Law. In our conversation we discuss the importance of finding what you are good at, what patent attorneys do (and how that has changed through his career), the importance of connecting business/law/science especially in today's historical moment, and why they best skill to learn is how to constantly learn from the smart people around you. This episode is sponsored, edited, and engineered by LawPods, a professional podcast production company for busy attorneys. *** Want to Support the Podcast in 2 minutes or less? Leave a Review (this helps the algorithm connect me to new listeners) Subscribe on iTunes or Spotify Purchase How I Lawyer Merchandise Share on LinkedIn or Twitter

Jubin Dana is a Registered Patent Attorney with over 25 years of experience. He is the owner and main shareholder of Dana Legal Services. He and his team provide legal counsel in all matters related to intellectual property, including obtaining patents through the US Patent Office, Patent Law, Intellectual Property Law, Trademark Law, Copyright Law, Startup Law, and Negotiation. Here are some of the beneficial topics covered on this week's show: Understand the difference between a patent, copyright, and trademark. Why is a patent a negative right? Common mistake business owners make is doing it themselves. What happens when you register a trademark?  The secret to “trade secrets.”  Connect with Jubin Dana: Website: https://danalegalservices.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/ThePatentGuru_ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thepatentguru/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thepatentguru/?ref=py_c LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dana-legal-services/ Connect with Gary: Website: sbadvisors.cc/ Facebook: facebook.com/SmallBusinessAdvisors LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/gary-d-heldt-jr-388a051/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Yuri Eliezer is the Managing Partner at Founders Legal. Eliezer's primary work is balanced between being a Managing Partner and a Patent Attorney. He specializes in preparing, developing, and executing strategies for securing patents nationally and internationally along with focusing on the development of high-value IP portfolios.Founders Legal is a Corporate & Intellectual Property Law Firm based in Atlanta, Georgia that focuses on matters in the areas of Intellectual Property, Transactional, Corporate, and Securities law. Connect with Yuri on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/techpatents/Visit Founders Legal Website: https://founderslegal.com/On This Episode, We Discuss... - Building Equity in Your Law Firm- The Creation of a Patent Portal- The Four Guiding Lights- Obtaining Good Results for Your Clients