Podcasts about ip law

Kevin Werbach interviews Dale Cendali, one of the country's leading intellectual property (IP) attorneys, to discuss how courts are grappling with copyright questions in the age of generative AI. Over 30 lP awsuits already filed against major generative AI firms, and the outcomes may shape the future of AI as well as creative industries. While we couldn't discuss specifics of one of the most talked-about cases, Thomson Reuters v. ROSS -- because Cendali is litigating it on behalf of Thomson Reuters -- she drew on her decades of experience in IP law to provide an engaging look at the legal battlefield and the prospects for resolution.  Cendali breaks down the legal challenges around training AI on copyrighted materials—from books to images to music—and explains why these cases are unusually complex for copyright law. She discusses the recent US Copyright Office report on Generative AI training, what counts as infringement in AU outputs, and what is sufficient human authorship for copyirght protection of AI works. While precedent offers some guidance, Cendali notes that outcomes will depend heavily on the specific facts of each case. The conversation also touches on how well courts can adapt existing copyright law to these novel technologies, and the prospects for a legislative solution. Dale Cendali is a partner at Kirkland & Ellis, where she leads the firm's nationwide copyright, trademark, and internet law practice. She has been named one of the 25 Icons of IP Law and one of the 100 Most Influential Lawyers in America. She also serves as an advisor to the American Law Institute's Copyright Restatement project and sits on the Board of the International Trademark Association. Transcript Thompson Reuters Wins Key Fair Use Fight With AI Startup Dale Cendali - 2024 Law360 MVP Copyright Office Report on Generative AI Training

For many, the journey to IP law is circuitous. And that's undoubtedly true for Wolf Greenfield Shareholder Dan Young and Technology Specialist Colin White. Both had interesting careers outside of the legal industry before helping biotech companies tackle their most complex IP challenges.In this episode of IP Talk with Wolf Greenfield, Dan and Colin offer insight into their journeys, what led to an interest in IP, how they apply non-legal skills today and other interesting insights. This episode is part one in a series about unexpected paths to IP law. 01:21 - Dan and Colin on what they did before transitioning into IP law03:44 - How each decided to enter the IP law sector05:45 - Transferable skills they've taken from their previous careers and now use today07:49 - Challenges Dan and Colin faced upon making the jump09:29 - Dan and Colin's advice to someone interested in transitioning to IP law

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 466. https://youtu.be/JAwxQTrPDII Re .@NSKinsella has proposed a number of patent reforms if we decide as a society not to abolish the patent system. This is, in my view, a more plausible way forward (politically) instead of demanding the abolition of patents.https://t.co/q3a0U2HQJ6 In this annotated extract, I… https://t.co/Jm36N2kjxa pic.twitter.com/Fs1caiVven — Sanjeev Sabhlok (@sabhlok) June 4, 2025 Sabhlok's markup of my proposals: See How to Improve Patent, Copyright, and Trademark Law and “Reducing the Cost of IP Law,” Mises Daily (2010). See also Tabarrok's Launching the Innovation Renaissance: Statism, not renaissance How to Improve Patent, Copyright, and Trademark Law by Stephan Kinsella on February 1, 2011 [From my Webnote series] This is included as ch. 41 of Stephan Kinsella, ed., The Anti-IP Reader: Free Market Critiques of Intellectual Property (Papinian Press, 2023). See also proposals for reform in “Reducing the Cost of IP Law”; also Do Business Without Intellectual Property (Liberty.me, 2014); KOL164 | Obama's Patent Reform: Improvement or Continuing Calamity?: Mises Academy (2011). And FDA and Patent Reform: A Modest Proposal *** From my Mises blog post a year ago: How to Improve Patent, Copyright, and Trademark Law Archived comments (below) January 13, 2010 by Stephan Kinsella As I note in my article “Radical Patent Reform Is Not on the Way,” Mises Daily (Oct. 1, 2009), there is a growing clamor for reform of patent (and copyright) law, due to the increasingly obvious injustices resulting from these intellectual property (IP) laws. However, the various recent proposals for reform merely tinker with details and leave the essential features of the patent system intact. Patent scope, terms, and penalties would still be essentially the same. In the second article of this two-part series, “Reducing the Cost of IP Law,” Mises Daily, published today, I propose various reforms to the existing patent system–short of abolition–that would significantly reduce the costs and harm imposed by the patent system while not appreciably, or as significantly, reducing the innovation incentives and other purported benefits of the patent system. I list these changes below in generally descending order of importance, without elaboration, as they are discussed further in “Reducing the Cost of IP Law”: Patent Law Reduce the Patent Term Remove Patent Injunctions/Provide Compulsory Royalties Add a Royalty Cap/Safe Harbor Reduce the Scope of Patentable Subject Matter Provide for Prior-Use and Independent-Inventor Defenses Instantly Publish All Patent Applications Eliminate Enhanced Damages Add a Working/Reduction to Practice Requirement1 Provide for Advisory Opinion Panels Losing Patentee Pays Expand Right to Seek Declaratory Judgments Exclude IP from Trade Negotiations [update: add a fair-use defense2 reinvogorate the reverse doctrine of equivalents defense ] Other Changes Increase the threshold for obtaining a patent Increase patent filing fees to make it more difficult to obtain a patent Make it easier to challenge a patent's validity at all stages Require patent applicants to specify exactly what part of their claimed invention is new and what part is “old” (e.g., by the use of European-style “characterized in that “claims) Require patent applicants to do a search and provide an analysis showing why their claimed invention is new and nonobvious (patent attorneys really hate this one) Limit the number of claims Limit the number of continuation applications Remove the presumption of validity that issued patents enjoy—e.g. a utility model or “petty patent” system, in which patent applications are examined only minimally and receive narrower protection; this type of IP right is already available in some countries) (( Reducing the Cost of IP Law; Tabarrok's Launching ...

Behind every pixel, mechanic, and character design lies a hidden battlefield where intellectual property law shapes the games we play. From energy drinks to tattoos, the unlikely legal showdowns that define modern gaming are stranger than fiction.Play IP Sidequest Showdown. An escape-room-style game inspired by this episode. Drop a comment if you cracked the code. Monster Energy's aggressive pursuit of any game title containing the word "monster" forced Ubisoft to abandon "Gods and Monsters" despite zero connection to beverages. When NBA 2K rendered LeBron James's tattoos with perfect detail, the copyright holders demanded millions—only to have the courts rule that realistic depictions qualify as fair use. And who knew that the shattered glass texture in Resident Evil was actually a photographer's copyrighted work, leading to one of the largest copyright claims ever filed by a single artist against a game studio?The patent wars are equally fascinating. Nintendo secured a $30 million settlement from fellow Japanese developer Colopl over touch controls—yes, the way your finger moves across a screen can be proprietary. Sega claimed ownership of gacha mechanics where duplicate characters fuse to unlock abilities. And Palworld's "Pokémon with guns" approach triggered Nintendo's legal team to pursue patent infringement rather than the expected copyright route.Even legends aren't immune. Diego Maradona discovered his likeness in Pro Evolution Soccer without permission, leading to a lawsuit that transformed into a sponsorship deal. Meanwhile, Call of Duty successfully defended using Humvees in-game without a license, establishing crucial First Amendment protections for realistic depictions in interactive entertainment.These cases reveal the invisible forces shaping what makes it to our screens. Next time you're playing your favorite game, remember that behind every design decision might be a legal battle that determined not just how the game looks, but how it fundamentally works. The gaming industry's most consequential battles happen in courtrooms, not on our screens.Ready to explore more? Remember to try our IP Sidequest Showdown game on our website and see if you can navigate the legal labyrinth yourself.Send us a text

Haynes Boone Partners  Lee Johnston, Kelsey Schmidt and Robert Ziemian continue their insightful discussion on the intersection of intellectual property (IP) and employment law.The attorneys explore the challenges and best practices surrounding employee mobility and the protection of confidential information. They discuss strategies for handling departing employees, including the importance of restrictive covenants and IT safeguards. The episode also delves into the complexities of side hustles, licensing agreements and the potential legal pitfalls when employees bring proprietary knowledge from previous employers.Listen to learn how to effectively manage IP and employment issues and gain practical advice on drafting enforceable agreements to protect your company's valuable assets.

In this episode of The Legal Landscape, join Haynes Boone Partners Lee Johnston, Kelsey Schmidt and Robert Ziemian as they delve into the intersection of intellectual property (IP) and employment law.  The trio explores the issues surrounding the protection and management of intellectual property and confidential information in the workplace, discussing the importance of restrictive covenants, non-disclosure agreements and the challenges of ensuring IP ownership when employees innovate. The episode also covers practical advice for employers on updating employment agreements and handbooks to safeguard proprietary information.

Your nice hosts get a crash course on video game IP law from lawyer and MinnMax cohort, Haley MacLeon. We learn about incorporating, publishing agreements, the difference between a lot of commonly used terms like "copyright", and the joys of contract templates. MinnMax - MinnMaxGame Informer Revival - Game InformerVideo Game IP LawMarketingMisc.ProductionThe $10 Million Lawsuit That Hinges On An Oxford Comma - Anna King, NPRVideo Game Publishing Agreement Market Report 2025 - Kellen Voyer & Haley MacLean, Voyer Law CorporationHaley MacLeonGuestHaley is a Canadian lawyer who advises clients on tech, corporate and intellectual property law. She previously worked as a journalist in the video game industry and continues her work with video game companies, now as a lawyer. In her free time, she appears on numerous gaming podcasts and video content.External link@haleyfax on TwitchVoyer Law Corporation

Alicia van der Walt , Partner at Adams & Adams joined Clarence on World Intellectual Property Day to discuss how IP rights and innovation policies empower creators, innovators, and entrepreneurs in the music industry and beyond Views and News with Clarence Ford is the mid-morning show on CapeTalk. This 3-hour long programme shares and reflects a broad array of perspectives. It is inspirational, passionate and positive. Host Clarence Ford’s gentle curiosity and dapper demeanour leave listeners feeling motivated and empowered. Known for his love of jazz and golf, Clarrie covers a range of themes including relationships, heritage and philosophy. Popular segments include Barbs’ Wire at 9:30am (Mon-Thurs) and The Naked Scientist at 9:30 on Fridays. Listen live – Views and News with Clarence Ford is broadcast weekdays between 09:00 and 12:00 (SA Time) https://www.primediaplus.com/station/capetalk Find all the catch-up podcasts here https://www.primediaplus.com/capetalk/views-and-news-with-clarence-ford/audio-podcasts/views-and-news-with-clarence-ford/ Subscribe to the CapeTalk daily and weekly newsletters https://www.primediaplus.com/competitions/newsletter-subscription/ Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: www.facebook.com/CapeTalk   CapeTalk on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@capetalk   CapeTalk on Instagram: www.instagram.com/capetalkza  CapeTalk on X: www.x.com/CapeTalk  CapeTalk on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Riley finally dragged Luke onto the podcast so he can rant about AI, free of Linus. Happy Easter? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

NVIDIA gets caught up in the trade war, the titans of Twitter/X debate intellectual property law — and the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust case against Meta kicks off in court.We're digging into all of it on today's Tech Bytes: Week in Review. Marketplace's Meghan McCarty Carino speaks with Anita Ramaswamy, columnist at The Information, about what we learned in week one of Meta's monopoly trial.

NVIDIA gets caught up in the trade war, the titans of Twitter/X debate intellectual property law — and the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust case against Meta kicks off in court.We're digging into all of it on today's Tech Bytes: Week in Review. Marketplace's Meghan McCarty Carino speaks with Anita Ramaswamy, columnist at The Information, about what we learned in week one of Meta's monopoly trial.

Trump gives Apple a giant break with wide-ranging tariff exemptions Car safety experts at NHTSA, which regulates Tesla, axed by DOGE Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk would like to 'delete all IP law' 5 things to know about Meta's upcoming FTC trial Meta's New Tech Wants You Using Phones in Theaters Trump Orders Investigation into Former Cybersecurity Chief Beyond Showerheads: Trump's Attempts to Kill Appliance Regulations Cause Chaos Microsoft rolls out Recall AI in preview to Copilot+ PCs, after delaying the feature twice, from June 2024 and October 2024, over security and privacy concerns The Dire Wolf Isn't Back—But Here's What 'De-Extinction' Tech Can Actually Do Trump White House budget proposal eviscerates science funding at NASA Linda McMahon just handed A.1. steak sauce an unbelievable opportunity Researcher uncovers dozens of sketchy Chrome extensions with 4 million installs Vizio Shows What Happens When U.S. Fascism And TV Ensh*ttification Meet Host: Leo Laporte Guests: Sam Abuelsamid, Allyn Malventano, and Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ Download or subscribe to This Week in Tech at https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-tech Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: ZipRecruiter.com/Twit threatlocker.com/twit NetSuite.com/TWIT expressvpn.com/twit bitwarden.com/twit

Trump gives Apple a giant break with wide-ranging tariff exemptions Car safety experts at NHTSA, which regulates Tesla, axed by DOGE Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk would like to 'delete all IP law' 5 things to know about Meta's upcoming FTC trial Meta's New Tech Wants You Using Phones in Theaters Trump Orders Investigation into Former Cybersecurity Chief Beyond Showerheads: Trump's Attempts to Kill Appliance Regulations Cause Chaos Microsoft rolls out Recall AI in preview to Copilot+ PCs, after delaying the feature twice, from June 2024 and October 2024, over security and privacy concerns The Dire Wolf Isn't Back—But Here's What 'De-Extinction' Tech Can Actually Do Trump White House budget proposal eviscerates science funding at NASA Linda McMahon just handed A.1. steak sauce an unbelievable opportunity Researcher uncovers dozens of sketchy Chrome extensions with 4 million installs Vizio Shows What Happens When U.S. Fascism And TV Ensh*ttification Meet Host: Leo Laporte Guests: Sam Abuelsamid, Allyn Malventano, and Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ Download or subscribe to This Week in Tech at https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-tech Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: ZipRecruiter.com/Twit threatlocker.com/twit NetSuite.com/TWIT expressvpn.com/twit bitwarden.com/twit

Tamany is a University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Graduate and works as the Founding Partner of California IP Law. Tamany's journey is far from typical, graduating college with a degree in Biology, but after an experience in Washington DC, Tamany would switch course to the Law route, leading to a career full of success! Tamany and I start prior to her introduction to Pennsylvania Carey Law School, where she would delve into her story, going from the doctor route to the Law route. When she finally arrived at Pennsylvania Carey Law School, her first year of law school was as good as it gets, only focusing on school for the first time in her life and getting to experience a completely different experience from what she was used to. Throughout her time at Law School, Tamany would talk about the various experiences she had, landing on Patent and Intellectual Property Law, and her love and immense ability with Civil Procedure, to guide her future career decisions. Following that, Tamany would talk about her journey to the various major positions she has held, as well as speaking on other lawyers she had met throughout her time who didn't come from the top law schools but hustled and had an extreme level of care for what they were doing. Her advice was to be like them and take every day in law as another day to make an impact in the world. Finally, we would discuss what Tamany does today as the founding partner of her firm, California IP Law. Tamany discussed her experience opening her firm and the successes and struggles that came with it. In the end, Tamany's high-level experience in the Law offers insights of extreme value for all my friends out there. You don't want to miss this one! Tamany's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tamanyvinsonbentzCalifornia IP Law: http://www.caiplawyer.com/Tamany's TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tamanyvinsonbentzBe sure to check out the Official Sponsors for the Lawyers in the Making Podcast:Rhetoric - takes user briefs and motions and compares them against the text of opinions written by judges to identify ways to tailor their arguments to better persuade the judges handling their cases. Rhetoric's focus is on persuasion and helps users find new ways to improve their odds of success through more persuasive arguments. Find them here: userhetoric.comThe Law School Operating System™ Recorded Course - This course is for ambitious law students who want a proven, simple system to learn every topic in their classes to excel in class and on exams. Go to www.lisablasser.com, check out the student tab with course offerings, and use code LSOSNATE10 at checkout for 10% off Lisa's recorded course!Start LSAT - Founded by former guest and 21-year-old super-star, Alden Spratt, Start LSAT was built upon breaking down barriers, allowing anyone access to high-quality LSAT Prep. For $110 you get yourself the Start LSAT self-paced course, and using code LITM10 you get 10% off the self-paced course! Check out Alden and Start LSAT at startlsat.com and use code LITM10 for 10% off the self-paced course!Lawyers in the Making Podcast is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Lawyers in the Making Podcast at lawyersinthemaking.substack.com/subscribe

To start the year off with a new season of Under the Wig, Joie and Krisha sat down with Dave Stewart from Bennett. David is Bennett's Head of IP Law, and was the 4th President of the Murdoch Student Law Society! In this episode, Dave shares all his stories from starting up Murdoch Student Law Society, funny stories, and all the things MSLS used to do.

Recording of an on site event that took place at University of Vienna on February 28.Programme:14:00: Welcome/Opening remarks byUniv.-Prof. Dr. Nikolaus ForgóHead of the Department of Innovation and Digitalisation in Law of the University of Vienna14:15-15:30: Part I - AI GovernanceKeynote byDr. Klaus SteinmaurerExecutive Director at the Telecommunications and Postal Services at Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH, Viennafollowed by a panel, moderated byClara Saillant, LL.M.Research AssociateDepartment of Innovation and Digitalisation in Law of the University of Viennawith contributions fromMMag. Elisabeth WagnerDeputy Commissioner of the Austrian Data Protection AuthorityProf. Dr. Peggy ValckeCo-Director of Centre for IT & IP Law at KU Leuven,Executive Board Member at theBelgian Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunicationsfollowed byDiscussion and Q&A15:45-17:15: Part II - AI LiteracyKeynote byDr. Elora Fernandes (remote)Postdoctoral Researcher at Centre for IT & IP Law at KU Leuvenfollowed by a panel, moderated byUniv.-Ass. Mag. Adriana WinkelmeierDepartment of Innovation and Digitalisation in Law of the University of Viennawith contributions fromCeyhun Necati Pehlivan, LL.M.Counsel and Head of Technology, Media Telecommunications and Intellectual Property Group at Linklaters, MadridEditor-in-chief of Global Privacy Law Review at Wolters KluwerDr. Jeanette GorzalaVice Chair, AI Board of the Austrian GovernmentFounder, ACT AI NOWDr. Lukas FeilerPartner at Baker McKenzie, ViennaDr. Sonja Dürager, LL.M.Partner at bpv Hügel, Salzburgfollowed byDiscussion and Q&AThe increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems into various aspects of our daily lives continue raising concerns about their potential adverse effects on society, democracy, fundamental rights, and the rule of law. In response, various governance frameworks have emerged across different jurisdictions to address the challenges posed by AI. Notably, the European Union's AI Act, which entered into force on 1 August 2024, stands out as the first legislation of its kind to introduce comprehensive rules governing the development and deployment of AI systems in the EU. However, understanding the complexities and nuances of this legislation remains a significant challenge.The Department of Innovation and Digitalisation in Law of the University of Vienna is therefore delighted to invite you to the first event in a series of three dedicated to exploring the implications, opportunities, and challenges presented by the AI Act. The event series is organised on the occasion of the launch of the books "EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: A Commentary" and "AI Governance and Liability in Europe: A Primer" by Wolters Kluwer, edited by Ceyhun Necati Pehlivan, Nikolaus Forgó and Peggy Valcke. The first event of the series in Vienna will bring together leading experts, academics and policymakers in the field to discuss AI literacy measures and the governance structure under the AI Act. The next two events in Brussels and Madrid will be further dedicated to different aspects of the AI Act, providing a comprehensive overview of and encouraging diverse dialogue on the new regulatory framework for AI in the EU.Speakers: Link: https://id.univie.ac.at/news-und-events/detailansicht-news-und-events/news/untangling-the-eu-artificial-intelligence-act-ai-literacy-and-governance-1/

Copyright claims against AI companies just got a potential boost. A U.S. federal judge last week handed down a summary judgment in a case brought by tech conglomerate Thomson Reuters against legal tech firm Ross Intelligence. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Fans of record-breaking blockbuster Chinese movie Ne Zha 2 are making significant waves in the derivatives market, clearing out retailer inventories and even creating DIY character-shaped dolls and food items. 中国破纪录票房大片《哪吒2》的粉丝们在衍生品市场掀起巨大波澜，清空了零售商的库存，甚至自制角色玩偶和食品。 Since the film's debut on the first day of the Chinese New Year, which was Jan 29 this year, sales of its collectibles, ranging from mystery toy boxes and cards to fridge magnets and badges, have reportedly topped 50 million yuan ($6.97 million) on Taobao, a leading e-commerce platform in China. 自今年1月29日（农历新年第一天）上映以来，据报道，其衍生品在淘宝（中国领先的电商平台）上的销售额已突破5000万元人民币（约合697万美元），包括盲盒玩具、卡片、冰箱贴和徽章等。 This sequel to the 2019 hit Ne Zha, with inspirations derived from Chinese mythological tales, has already drawn over 200 million cinema-goers, the highest number in the country's film history. 作为2019年爆款电影《哪吒》的续集，这部取材于中国神话故事的影片已吸引超过2亿观影人次，创下中国电影史上的最高纪录。 The film became an instant holiday box office hit thanks to its contemporary re-imagination of Ne Zha, a well-known mythical figure with extraordinary powers, and via its intriguing plot twists. 这部电影通过对哪吒这一拥有非凡力量的著名神话人物的现代重塑以及引人入胜的剧情转折，迅速成为春节档票房爆款。 Customers inquiring about toys featuring characters from the film are often left disappointed at stores across China. A salesperson at a trendy toy store in downtown Nanjing in East China's Jiangsu province said even display samples were sold out. "We expect to restock items like laser cards later." 在中国各地的商店，询问电影角色玩具的顾客常常失望而归。江苏省南京市市中心一家潮流玩具店的销售人员表示，甚至连展示样品都已售罄。“我们预计稍后会补货激光卡片等商品。” Notably, Hunan Sunny & Sandy Toys Manufacturer Co Ltd, the film's sole licensed manufacturer of 3D food-grade plastic toys in China, reported sales of over 450,000 mystery toy box sets through live-streaming in just 11 days -- ranking first in terms of the sales of board-game merchandise on the video platform. In addition, more than 10 million of these sets have been sold through offline partnerships. 值得注意的是，湖南阳光与沙地玩具制造有限公司（该片在中国唯一授权的3D食品级塑料玩具制造商）报告称，仅11天通过直播销售了超过45万套盲盒玩具，在视频平台的桌游类商品销售中排名第一。此外，通过线下合作伙伴销售了超过1000万套。 Yang Zhenlin, assistant to the company's chairman, said their factory workshops had to resume operations ahead of schedule after the Spring Festival holiday, with their hundreds of staff members working tirelessly to replenish inventory. "We had great confidence in the film even before its release, so we promptly secured the copyright," Yang told Xinhua. 该公司董事长助理杨振林表示，春节假期后，工厂车间不得不提前复工，数百名员工加班加点补充库存。“我们在电影上映前就对其充满信心，因此迅速获得了版权。”杨振林对新华社表示。 This week, on e-commerce platforms, some stores have gradually restored supplies. Businesses in the second-hand market have remained brisk. 本周，在电商平台上，部分商店已逐步恢复供应。二手市场的交易依然活跃。 Fans have also discovered that the gold bracelets they had purchased after the first Ne Zha film came out in 2019, with designs inspired by the "universe ring" on Ne zha's arm, have tripled in value on the second-hand market, thanks to both the success of Ne Zha 2 and a higher gold price. 粉丝们还发现，他们在2019年第一部《哪吒》电影上映后购买的金手镯，其设计灵感来自哪吒手臂上的“乾坤圈”，由于《哪吒2》的成功和金价上涨，在二手市场上的价值已翻了三倍。 Some fans have gone so far as to make their own versions of it, using wood, plasticine, flour and even thread. Coinciding with the Lantern Festival on Feb 12, netizens shared creative improvisations of Ne Zha-shaped glutinous rice dumplings, a festive food. 一些粉丝甚至用木头、橡皮泥、面粉甚至线自制了哪吒角色。2月12日元宵节当天，网友们分享了以哪吒为灵感的创意汤圆，这是一种节日食品。 Miao Lingyi, a 10-year-old girl living in East China's Shanghai, expressed her admiration for the character Ao Bing, the son of the Dragon King, stating her desire to use her pocket money to buy a collectible featuring him. "I really love the character and I don't mind waiting a while for the collectible," she said. 居住在上海市的10岁女孩缪灵怡（音译）表达了对龙王之子敖丙这一角色的喜爱，并表示希望用零花钱购买相关收藏品。“我真的很喜欢这个角色，我不介意等一段时间再买到收藏品。”她说。 According to experts, the film's huge success stemming from its captivating plot and stunning special effects, has evoked emotional attachment and resonance with characters among its audiences, while some related products feature limited edition designs -- thereby enhancing their value as collectibles and stimulating consumer purchasing enthusiasm. 专家表示，这部电影的巨大成功源于其引人入胜的剧情和震撼的特效，激发了观众对角色的情感共鸣，而一些相关产品采用限量版设计，从而提升了其收藏价值，刺激了消费者的购买热情。 Ye Guofu, founder of MINISO, a Chinese retailer known for its fashionable but affordable household products, said that Chinese consumers' growing focus on emotional value attached to commodities, particularly among the younger generations, is expected to further drive the consumption of IP-featured products, such as those related to domestic animated films and games. 名创优品（以时尚且价格实惠的家居产品闻名的中国零售商）创始人叶国富表示，中国消费者对商品情感价值的日益关注，尤其是在年轻一代中，预计将进一步推动IP衍生品的消费，例如与国产动画电影和游戏相关的产品。 With this lucrative market rapidly expanding, experts have stressed the importance of both IP innovation and product quality, while warning against risks of market irregularities and intellectual property rights violations. 随着这一利润丰厚的市场迅速扩张，专家强调了IP创新和产品质量的重要性，同时警告市场乱象和知识产权侵权的风险。 Law professor Zheng Ning with Communication University of China suggested that market regulators strengthen oversight to combat potential price gouging and the sale of substandard products -- thereby ensuring a more orderly market environment. 中国传媒大学法学教授郑宁建议，市场监管部门应加强监管，打击哄抬价格和销售劣质产品的行为，从而确保更有序的市场环境。 Zhao Liangshan, a lawyer in Northwest China's Shaanxi province, cautioned that handcrafted items made for personal use are not allowed for commercial purposes. 陕西省律师赵良山（音译）提醒，个人手工制作的物品不得用于商业用途。 As Ne Zha 2 enters international markets, Hunan Sunny & Sandy Toys Manufacturer Co Ltd aims to target global markets -- particularly in Asia, North America and Europe. 随着《哪吒2》进入国际市场，湖南阳光与沙地玩具制造有限公司计划瞄准全球市场，特别是亚洲、北美和欧洲。 The film is set to be screened in various countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Egypt, Singapore, Japan and the Republic of Korea, with premieres in Los Angeles and Sydney having received positive responses from professionals and fans alike. 该片将在多个国家上映，包括美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰、南非、埃及、新加坡、日本和韩国，洛杉矶和悉尼的首映式已获得专业人士和粉丝的积极反响。

Send us a textTo learn more, please visit Amineddoleh & Associates LLC and view Leila Amineddoleh performing Chopin Polonaise, Op. 26, No. 1 and Liszt Liebestraum No. 3.Show Notes:1:00 Amineddoleh's background and work in music and law4:00 Patty Gerstenblith 7:00 building Amineddoleh & Assoc.8:45 Amineddoleh's work with Greece 10:00 perspective as musician aids in work as attorney to other artists 11:00 Amineddoleh's experience with plagiarism 14:20 Amineddoleh's practice15:45 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act19:50 artists' perspectives in hiring an attorney 22:50 Jerry Alonzo: what brings artists to seek out Amineddoleh26:00 return of golden coffin of Nedjemankh 31:45 use of AI 36:30 AI-assisted Beatles song 37:45 analogy of photography to AI outputs38:20 Japanese photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto 39:45 suit over copyright of monkey selfie 41:45 Thaler v. USCO 44:30 Rupali Gujral: negotiating on a client's behalf48:30 Stefania Salles Bruins: history of art collecting52:30 Bruins: Amineddoleh's balancing of legal and musical practices54:00 Amineddoleh's perspective on sharing her music and performing56:30 Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2  played by Bugs Bunny 57:20 Amineddoleh's performance of Chopin Polonaise, Op. 26, No. 1 and Liszt Liebestraum No. 3 59:00 under-appreciated composer Brahms 1:01:20 injustices in art law1:04:30 Amineddoleh's definition of justice - access1:06:00 John Cage's 4'33” Please share your comments and/or questions at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.comTo hear more episodes, please visit Warfare of Art and Law podcast's website.To leave questions or comments about this or other episodes of the podcast and/or for information about joining the 2ND Saturday discussion on art, culture and justice, please message me at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.com. Thanks so much for listening!© Stephanie Drawdy [2024]

This year has been a rollercoaster for trade secrets and non-compete law. We've seen major legal battles at both the federal and state levels impacting employers across the nation. In this episode of Spilling Secrets, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Peter A. Steinmeyer, Daniel R. Levy, Katherine G. Rigby, A. Millie Warner, and Erik W. Weibust recap 2024's most significant updates, including the Federal Trade Commission's non-compete ban, the National Labor Relations Board's general counsel memo, state-level trends, and much more. Visit our site for this week's Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw371 Subscribe - https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe/. Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com. This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Part 1 of 4: Jon Chee hosts Kate Neville, Partner at Marshall Gerstein—a law firm with over 60 years of expertise in delivering sophisticated intellectual property advice and legal services to leading businesses, research institutions, universities, and entrepreneurs worldwide. Kate, an accomplished attorney with a doctoral background in microbiology and immunology, specializes in global patent prosecution and strategic management. With over a decade of experience, she works with biotech startups, big pharma, and non-profits. Kate has been recognized as a "World's Leading Patent Practitioner" by IAM magazine since 2013, an Illinois Super Lawyer since 2018, and is included in The Best Lawyers in America© for Patent Law.

In this episode of On Record PR, sponsored by Lawline, Jennifer Simpson Carr goes on record with Sean Douglass, associate attorney at Panitch Schwarze, to discuss the impact of AI-generated content on intellectual property law. Learn More Sean M. Douglass is a seasoned Intellectual Property Attorney with extensive experience in patent and trademark development, prosecution, and portfolio management. With a deep expertise in a range of technical fields including computer science, financial technology, healthcare technology, blockchain, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and telecommunications, Sean excels in navigating the complex landscape of IP law to safeguard and advance clients' innovations.

On this episode, associates discuss the relevance of Trademark Law at one of America's biggest annual music festivals - Coachella.

None of this episode is legal advice. We're joined by IP attorney Sam Doesntwantrealnameincluded, and we discuss the legality of stealing Scarlett Johannson's voice for your AI, or if she can sue you for one billion dollars (trick question: its always legal to sue in America!). Also, listener questions about copyrighting the internet, answered with varying degrees of legal fidelity. Find Us Online  Twitter: https://twitter.com/wowiftruepod Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wowiftrue Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/wowiftrue Website: https://wowiftrue.com/ Email: wowiftruepod@gmail.com About Us  Wow If True was created by Isabel J. Kim and Amanda Silberling. Our editors are Allison Mills and David Newtown. Wow If True is a member of Multitude, a podcast collective, production studio and ad sales provider.    

Send us a Text Message.Show notes:1:20 background and work in IP law and technology2:20 blog article, “What can internet history teach us?”3:25 IP issues emerging in the age of AI5:10 inevitability of AI6:40 global regulation of AI8:25 Emily Gould - which body would handle global regulation of AI11:00 Council of Europe's adoption of first AI international treaty 11:50 Gould - UK proposal to expand text and data mining exception to cover commercial uses 14:55 transparency issues 18:40 Gould - response - need for legislation20:20 authorship question 21:40 THJ Systems v. Sheridan (THJ Systems Ltd. v. Sheridan [2023] EWCA Civ 1354, [2024] E.C.D.R. 4, CA, 20 November 2023) is of great interest because it confirms the test for originality in copyright law in the UK after Brexit.22:55 Li v. Liu, Case Number: (2023) Jing 0491 Min Chu No. 11279, Beijing Internet Court, 27 November 202325:00 NFTs25:30 Thaler v. Perlmutter and USCO, USCA Case #23-5233  29:30 continued utility of copyright 32:40 AI copyright suits in the US36:30 cultural impact of AI models' accelerated training capabilities 38:20 view of whether there is a future for careers in art42:50 tools like spawning.ai for artists' protections 43:00 opt ins versus opt outs43:50 technological protections like Glaze and Nightshade 45:15 difficulty of implementing opt ins 47:45 injustices in the AI age and definition of justice50:33 mark that Andres hopes to make with his work53:40 Stefania Salles-Bruins - IP protection for AI software and outputsPlease share your comments and/or questions at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.comTo hear more episodes, please visit Warfare of Art and Law podcast's website.Music by Toulme.To view rewards for supporting the podcast, please visit Warfare's Patreon page.To leave questions or comments about this or other episodes of the podcast and/or for information about joining the 2ND Saturday discussion on art, culture and justice, please message me at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.com. Thanks so much for listening!© Stephanie Drawdy [2024]

In this week's episode of SheEO Lead-In, host Rebecca Jones engages in a thought-provoking discussion with Licia Vaughn from DLA Piper.Licia and Rebecca delve into the various challenges women in law face, including balancing work and family responsibilities, seeking diverse perspectives, and building confidence. They emphasize the importance of mentorship, collaboration, and modeling a supportive work culture to create a high-achieving environment for women.The conversation explores the value of personal relationships, technology utilization, and continual improvement. Licia shares her experiences navigating career changes and pursuing passion-driven growth. She also highlights DLA Piper's initiatives to promote gender diversity and inclusion, such as the annual Women in IP Law educational seminar and networking program and the firm's Mansfield 6.0 Certified Plus status.Thank you for being a part of the SheEO Lead-In community!

Hosts Michael Snyder and Joseph Gushue kick off a two-part series on artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on intellectual property (IP) rights in an individual's persona. They delve into generative AI, explaining how it creates text, images, and voices that closely mimic human attributes, and discuss the right of publicity, a legal doctrine that protects an individual's likeness and voice from unauthorized commercial use. The hosts explore AI's portrayal of humans in pop culture, citing films like Terminator 2, S1m0ne, and Her to illustrate AI's potential to replicate human beings. These examples set the stage for a deeper understanding of the real-world implications of AI in the realm of IP. Michael and Joe explain how generative AI models, trained on vast amounts of data, produce human-like outputs, highlighting the complexities of AI in the context of IP rights. They discuss historical and contemporary cases, such as Bette Midler vs. Ford Motor Company, Tom Waits vs. Frito-Lay, and the recent controversy involving Scarlett Johansson and OpenAI, to underscore the significance of the right of publicity in the age of AI. The episode wraps up with reflections on the ongoing concerns with new technology and IP rights, noting these issues have recurred throughout history with each technological leap. This is Part One of a two-part series. Stay tuned for Part Two.   Key Moments: 00:52 Episode Overview: Part One of a Two-Parter on Generative AI 02:57 Artificial Intelligences Replicating Human Attributes in Pop Culture 10:37 Defining Generative AI 14:55 Introduction to the Right of Publicity 25:48 Scarlett Johansson and OpenAI's Sky 32:45 Takeaways & Looking Ahead to Part 2 For full show notes and to explore more episodes, please visit www.vklaw.com/newsroom-podcasts. You can stay connected with us on Facebook, Linkedin or Twitter, and Instagram using the handle @volpeandkoenig.

  What a fine line between protectible invention and expression (as opposed to public domain idea and unprotected material) in AI-generated content? This, in turn, leads us to question just how “involved” AI can be in an invention and writing with a human still claiming ownership of the results. AI is quickly reshaping industries, but as AI capabilities grow, the issues of ownership and IP become more complicated. The USPTO's guidelines now allow patents for human-instigated AI inventions, but not AI as the sole inventor. The use of AI is also creating new ethical boundaries with bots like ChatGPT potentially generating content that inadvertently exposes company trade secrets. Is this plagiarism or are we heading into a future where nearly everything belongs to the public as public domain? Professor Michael Risch and host Jack Russo scrutinize the contentious question of software patents, debating the degree of human involvement in AI inventions and the implications on IP rights generally. Is human intention and direction enough to generate IP rights if most of the “work” is produced automatically through AI?   https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2024/06/26/genai-is-rapidly-making-its-way-into-law-schools/  https://futurism.com/the-byte/trump-delivered-speech-ai?utm_term=Futurism%20//%2006.28.24&utm_campaign=Futurism_Actives_Newsletter&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email   Jack Russo Managing Partner Jrusso@computerlaw.com www.computerlaw.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackrusso "Every Entrepreneur Imagines a Better World"®️  

What can we learn about law from a sci-fi TV show? Rocky Dhir welcomes Leela Madan, Hope Shimabuku, and Catherine Rifai to talk about Netflix's “Black Mirror” and the potential ethical implications of AI-fueled technology in the real world. Many now question how the rapid developments of AI tech should be regulated and held accountable. The group explores ethical rules and existing laws that could apply to different scenarios—both real and imagined.

What can we learn about law from a sci-fi TV show? Rocky Dhir welcomes Leela Madan, Hope Shimabuku, and Catherine Rifai to talk about Netflix's “Black Mirror” and the potential ethical implications of AI-fueled technology in the real world. Many now question how the rapid developments of AI tech should be regulated and held accountable. The group explores ethical rules and existing laws that could apply to different scenarios—both real and imagined.

Why does an $850 billion pharma company obtain only 50 patents per year?Steve Caltrider, Chief IP Counsel at Dana Farber Cancer Institute, brings over 35 years of experience building valuable pharma patent portfolios and championing patent policies that promote innovation. Before Dana Farber, Steve rose to the role of General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly. Steve has also served on the USPTO's Public Patent Advisory Committee and is currently the Chair of the ABA Section of IP Law.In this episode, Steve shares the story of why and how he relied on data to reduce Eli Lilly's patent portfolio, and explains why obtaining less patents is likely the better strategy for many large companies.He also discusses the critical role of IP in getting medical innovations to patients, the potentially catastrophic impact of the administration's march-in proposal, and his take on various developing patent policy issues.Selected Topics* IP's indispensable role in commercialization* Section 101 mess hindering development of diagnostics & potentially reducing drug costs* Data-driven patent strategies in the pharmaceutical industry* Impact of excessive USPTO fees on start-ups and smaller companies* How IP strategy differs at academic research institutions versus major pharmaceutical companies* Successfully navigating a career in patent law as in-house counsel* Role of outside counsel* Why all patent attorneys should pay attention to patent policy developmentsNotable, QuotableOn the role of IP in ensuring that medical research reaches patients“It's roughly a billion dollars to develop that drug and actually make it accessible to patients as a drug. No one's going to make that investment without IP. My role at the institute is to protect that discovery so that somebody will make that investment. Without the investment, it's just going to sit in the laboratory and it's not going to go anywhere and it won't reach patients.”On the impact of march-in proposal on non profits like Dana-Farber“I've already had partners tell us: I'm willing to sponsor your research, I'm willing to help fund your research, but it can't have any federally funded funding associated with it. Well, that can be catastrophic to us.”ABA-IPL Chair's Town Hall: Planning a Better Patent SystemRegister for “Session 6: How Far Can, And Should , USPTO Rulemaking Proceed in Addressing Issues of Double Patenting”: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/intellectual_property_law/events_cle/aba-ipl-chairs-town-hall/ This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.voiceofip.com

“We look at legal protections proportionally, both to the size of your business and to the risk” ~ Autumn Witt Boyd   In this episode of The Widest Net Podcast, Pam is joined by Autumn Witt Boyd, a legal powerhouse who shifted from battling copyright and business issues in courtrooms to founding The AWB Firm in 2015, whose mission is to empower entrepreneurs to build, protect, and scale their businesses without the legal headache.  With her extensive legal expertise, Autumn simplifies complex legal jargon and provides actionable advice to help entrepreneurs navigate the intricacies of copyrights, trademarks, and licensing. Autumn's straightforward approach in this episode and wealth of knowledge make legal protection accessible, ensuring that entrepreneurs can safeguard their businesses with confidence.   Here's what you can expect from this episode:  Discover how copyright and trademark protection can safeguard your business's unique creations and brand identity Uncover the nuances of creating online courses while navigating the intricacies of copyright laws Explore the significance of licensing agreements in protecting and monetizing your intellectual property Differentiate between licensing and franchising to make informed decisions for your business expansion strategies Find out how using AI and trademarking work together…or not Remember we all need each other - life and work is better together.   Resources mentioned in this episode: 2024 Online Business Legal Report The AWB Firm Website The AWB Firm - Instagram The AWB Firm - Facebook Autumn Witt Boyd - LinkedIn The Widest Net Book by Pamela Slim   Connect with The Widest Net Podcast If you haven't done so already, subscribe to the podcast. Published episodes will come directly to your favorite podcast app.  If you enjoyed the show, please rate it on Apple Podcasts with a short review. Doing so will help me reach more entrepreneurs and small business owners just like you.  Connect with Pam directly on LinkedIn

Navigating the Intersection of Intellectual Property, Publicity, and Privacy Rights In this lecture, we explore the complex landscape of rights of publicity and privacy, delving into their definitions, legal frameworks, key cases, the relationship between these rights and intellectual property, and the challenges posed by the digital age. Definition and Scope of Rights of Publicity Rights of Publicity refer to the right of an individual to control and monetize their own identity, particularly their name, likeness, image, and other personally identifiable elements. This right allows individuals to prevent unauthorized commercial use of their persona. The scope of these rights can vary significantly by jurisdiction but generally covers: Name Voice Signature Photograph Other distinctive personal aspects The right is primarily aimed at protecting the commercial value derived from fame or public recognition, ensuring that individuals can control if, how, and where their identity is used for commercial purposes. Legal Frameworks and Key Cases Rights of publicity are governed by state law in the United States, leading to a variety of interpretations and applications. For instance, California has very strong publicity rights that extend posthumously, while other states may have more limited protections or none at all for deceased individuals. Key Cases Include: Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum: Established the basis for the modern right of publicity in the United States. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.: Affirmed the right of an individual to control the commercial use of their performance. In other jurisdictions, rights of publicity might be protected under broader privacy laws or specific personality rights legislation. Relationship Between Privacy Rights and IP Privacy rights and rights of publicity often intersect but serve different purposes. While privacy rights protect individuals from unwanted intrusion into their private lives and unauthorized dissemination of personal information, rights of publicity are more about controlling the economic use of one's identity. Intellectual Property and Publicity Rights: Publicity rights can often be licensed and assigned, similar to other forms of intellectual property. The clash between copyright and publicity rights can arise when copyrighted works feature real individuals, such as in biopics or documentaries. Challenges in the Digital Age The advent of digital media and technology poses new challenges for the enforcement and conceptualization of privacy and publicity rights: Social Media: Platforms where personal images and videos can be widely disseminated and commercialized pose unique challenges for controlling the use of one's image. Deepfakes and AI: Technologies that can realistically replicate an individual's likeness and voice raise significant concerns for unauthorized uses. Global Reach: The internet enables the global distribution of content, complicating jurisdictional boundaries and the enforcement of rights. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Trade Secrets In Chapter 4 of our Intellectual Property Law lecture series, we explored the concept of trade secrets, a crucial form of intellectual property that protects sensitive business information which can give a company a competitive advantage. This chapter discussed the definition, key features, legal protection strategies, and the challenges involved in safeguarding trade secrets. Definition and Scope of Trade Secrets A trade secret encompasses any form of knowledge or information that is: Not generally known or readily accessible to the relevant business circles or the public. Derives economic value from its secrecy (the information provides a competitive advantage). Subject to reasonable steps taken by the rightful holder of the information to keep it secret, including the use of confidentiality agreements. The types of information that can qualify as trade secrets are broad and varied, including formulas, manufacturing processes, designs, instruments, patterns, and even lists of suppliers and clients. Duration of Protection Trade secrets are unique among intellectual property rights in that they do not expire as long as the information remains confidential and continues to meet the criteria for trade secret protection. This indefinite duration can provide significant advantages to businesses, offering long-term protection without the need for renewal processes associated with patents and trademarks. Key Features of Trade Secrets No Registration Required: Unlike patents and trademarks, trade secrets do not require registration for protection. This absence of formal registration can be advantageous, avoiding disclosure of the secret to the public and reducing compliance costs. Protection Through Secrecy: The protection of trade secrets is inherently tied to their secrecy. Businesses must implement reasonable security measures to protect such information. This can include physical security measures, digital security practices, and legal instruments like non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). Legal Frameworks: Various national laws and international agreements provide a framework for the protection of trade secrets. In the United States, for instance, the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) provides a federal cause of action for trade secret theft. Enforcement and Legal Remedies Enforcement of trade secrets primarily occurs through civil legal actions. If a trade secret is misappropriated, the owner can seek: Injunctive Relief: To prevent further disclosure and use of the trade secret. Monetary Damages: Compensation for economic harm caused by the breach, which might include actual losses and unjust enrichment damages. Exemplary Damages: In cases of willful and malicious misappropriation, courts may award punitive damages. Challenges in Protecting Trade Secrets Protecting trade secrets presents several challenges: Internal Threats: Employees, who are typically the primary handlers of sensitive information, can become potential sources of trade secret leaks. External Threats: Industrial espionage, hacking, and other forms of cyber theft pose significant risks. Global Challenges: In a globalized economy, protecting trade secrets across jurisdictions can be complex due to varying legal protections and enforcement mechanisms. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Dive into the evolving world of generative AI with Adaya Esteban as she engages Álvaro Bourkaib, partner at Cuatrecasas, in a riveting discussion. They'll unpack the legal nuances of generative AI's impact on professionals and creative works. This episode aims to shed light on how generative AI is reshaping the creative process, authorship, and the IP legal frameworks governing its outputs.See www.mckinsey.com/privacy-policy for privacy information

As college basketball madness sweeps across the nation this March, we're seizing the opportunity to explore the intriguing intersection of trade secrets law and the sports world. In this episode of Spilling Secrets, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Peter A. Steinmeyer, James P. Flynn, Daniel R. Levy, and Susan Gross Sholinsky appeal to both sports fans and lawyers alike to examine the strategic use of non-compete agreements across various sports. From scrutinizing non-competes in football and dissecting no-poaching arrangements in golf to unraveling compelling trade secrets in boxing, the team embarks on an examination of the legal dynamics shaping competitive sports. Spilling Secrets is a special monthly podcast series about the future of non-compete and trade secrets law. Visit our site for this week's Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw338 Subscribe - https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe/. Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com. This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Dive into the rich history of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) with this episode of IP Goes Pop!®, guided by USPTO historian Rebecca Oakes and co-hosted by Intellectual Property Attorneys Michael Snyder and Joseph Gushue. Explore the USPTO's impact on innovation and the integration of patent rights into the Constitution, highlighted through connections to pop culture icons like National Treasure and Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure. Rebecca shares insights into the USPTO's archives, the digitization of historical patents, and the agency's ongoing efforts to chronicle America's innovation story. The episode invites listeners to discover the USPTO's resources, offering a glimpse into the past and its influence on modern intellectual property protections. Concluding with an inspirational message, the episode emphasizes the role of history in shaping future innovations. Tune into IP Goes Pop!® for more episodes that blend intellectual property insights with pop culture. Connect with USPTO social: Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Twitter (X) Key Moments: (01:15) US Patent Office Episodes with IP Goes Pop (01:24) IP in Pop-Culture History: Famous Movies  TV Shows (08:02) Introducing USPTO Historian Rebecca Oakes (13:07) History of Patent Models (Required through 1870's) (14:43) Curating History & Henry Baker (24:03) Initiatives the Patent Office Does to Protect its History (27:43) USPTO Resources for History (31:33) Final Thoughts For full show notes and to explore more episodes, please visit www.vklaw.com/newsroom-podcasts. You can stay connected with us on Facebook, Linkedin or Twitter, and Instagram using the handle @volpeandkoenig.

#MakingDataSimplePodcast welcomes Robert Plotkin author of The Genie in the Machine and Founding Partner of Blueshift IP.  Can AI be patented?  Computer Automated Inventing Is Revolutionizing Law and Business.  Part 2.00:50 Patenting an Algorithm06:05 The Method for Patentability13:37 Patent Files versus Approvals16:09 Patent Costs20:25 The Future of AI 29:28 Finding Robert Plotkin30:58 Biggest Misconception on IP Law 32:52 Technology for MindfulnessLinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/robertplotkinWebsite: blueshiftip.comWant to be featured as a guest on Making Data Simple?  Reach out to us at almartintalksdata@gmail.com and tell us why you should be next.  The Making Data Simple Podcast is hosted by Al Martin, WW VP Technical Sales, IBM, where we explore trending technologies, business innovation, and leadership ... while keeping it simple & fun. 

#MakingDataSimplePodcast welcomes Robert Plotkin author of The Genie in the Machine and Founding Partner of Blueshift IP.  Can AI be patented?  Computer Automated Inventing Is Revolutionizing Law and Business.  Part 2.00:50 Patenting an Algorithm06:05 The Method for Patentability13:37 Patent Files versus Approvals16:09 Patent Costs20:25 The Future of AI 29:28 Finding Robert Plotkin30:58 Biggest Misconception on IP Law 32:52 Technology for MindfulnessLinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/robertplotkinWebsite: blueshiftip.comWant to be featured as a guest on Making Data Simple?  Reach out to us at almartintalksdata@gmail.com and tell us why you should be next.  The Making Data Simple Podcast is hosted by Al Martin, WW VP Technical Sales, IBM, where we explore trending technologies, business innovation, and leadership ... while keeping it simple & fun. 

Join us on an enlightening journey with Leela Madan, the energizing founder of Madan Law PLLC. Transitioning from her role as a corporate chemist to a patent attorney, Leela provides us with an intriguing view into the world of business law, guiding businesses to safeguard themselves from liabilities.In this compelling conversation, we traverse Leela's unique career path, revealing the power of networking and resilience in business. With her candid and approachable demeanor, Leela shares her strategies for launching her law firm, ultimately attributing her success to her outgoing nature. We explore the concept of paying oneself first and the importance of structuring a competitive compensation package without compromising on a non-toxic work environment. Through Leela's experiences, gain a deep understanding of how a team that shares the same goals can lay the groundwork for a thriving business. Be sure to follow @houstonmadepodcast on Instagram!EPISODE CREDITSGuest - Leela Madan // Madan Law PLLCProduced, and Hosted by Rusty GatesSpecial Thanks to Luke BrawnerMusic by Old Friends, New FriendsArtwork in collaboration w/ Mac Ryan Creative© 2023 Rusty Gates Media and Milieu Media Group, LLC

It's no secret that Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools have experienced a rapid growth in 2023. This makes it a pivotal time to test the contours of the laws that protect literary and artistic work when put up against AI. Today's guest Stuart Levi joins me today to talk aboue the challenges AI poses to the current framework of copyright laws. This week, episode 185 of the Tech Intersect™ Podcast is about the intersection of copyright and AI. POWERED BY ADVANTAGE EVANS™ ACADEMY Navigate your way from cash to crypto with Digital Money Demystified. Dive into the definitive guide on crypto myths and truths by Professor Tonya M. Evans. This isn't just a book; it's a roadmap to the decentralized web's future of work, wealth, and creativity. Head over to DigitalMoneyDemystified.com and embark on your crypto journey today! Stuart Levi is a recognized tech transactions and IP Law stalwart. He has pioneered work in Web3 and Digital Assets, Intellectual Property and Technnology, AI, Cybersecurity and Data Privacy, shaping some of the tech world's biggest deals Topics Stuart and I go over in this episode include:Who can claim ownership when AI is involved in the creation of the work.Copyright law cases navigating the evolving landscape of AI.  Guidelines around the amount of human contribution required as it applies to ownership.Infringement claims in cases where copyrighted works are used in the training and aiding an AI model's output. The fine line between fair use and infringement will begin to be worked out in upcoming years. Thank you for listening! If you enjoyed this episode, take a screenshot of the episode to post in your stories and tag me! And don't forget to follow, rate, and review the podcast and tell me your key takeaways!CONNECT WITH STUART LEVI:LinkedInSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom LLP and Affiliates CONNECT WITH DR. TONYA M. EVANS:Questions and requests: hello@techintersectpodcast.com Follow: Twitter @AtTechIntersect | Instagram @TechIntersect Web: Tech Intersect Podcast  Connect for exclusive content: https://advantageevans.activehosted.com/f/6 RESOURCES:Buy the Book + Leave 5 Star Review Digital Money DemystifiedConsulting, Courses and Community: DigitalMoneyDemystified.comDMD Weekly Investor Digest: Subscribe to My Substack Buy my book, Digital Money Demystified, and join the insider membership at https://digitalmoneydemystified.com/ today!Regulate & The Rabbit Hole by Notty Prod licensed via Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Produced by Tonya M. Evans for Advantage Evans, LLC

Show Notes:0:00 Yelena Khajekian1:30 Warhol v Goldsmith decision by SCOTUS 3:00 USCO NOI's Question 84:00 Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 593 U.S. ___ (2021)4:20 liability question4:45 Emily Gould - fair use6:30 Alan Robertshaw - Warhol court's focus on use of the work7:50 Khajekian - artists' perspective on Warhol decision9:00 Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)10:20 confusion of fair use analysis and court's aesthetic analysis12:00 USCO NOI's Question about fair use 13:00 Robertshaw - UK's fair dealing analysis15:50 Gould - big players like Getty 17:45 text and data mining exception20:10 Drawdy - private contracting as a solution21:00 Robertshaw - Getty22:15 Khajekian - conceptual art25:55 Warhol's 2 Cir decision 26:50 Gould & Khajekian - Richard Prince decision held not fair use27:20 Khajekian - equity issue28:40 Gould - UK courts' emphasis on purpose, e.g., Stormtrooper helmet case 30:30 Drawdy - amount and substantiality of use31:10 Gould - Australian case about Men at Work's use of folk song Kookaburra in its pop song Down Under32:20 Robershaw - dispute over Vanilla Ice's Ice Ice Baby33:00 Ed Sheeran  34:15 Getty case pending in UK35:00 Khajekian - international versus US issues 37:30 Robershaw - test that contemplates level of effort or end result regarding AI output40:30 Gould - risks involved with AI40:50 EU's application-based approach 41:10 AI for medical applications41:55 detecting forgeries will still require humans, e.g., conflicting AI results regarding Raphael42:50  implicit bias in AI43:15 dogs detecting forgeries 43:40 chickens detecting shapesPlease share your comments and/or questions at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.comTo hear more episodes, please visit Warfare of Art and Law podcast's website.To view rewards for supporting the podcast, please visit Warfare's Patreon page.To leave questions or comments about this or other episodes of the podcast and/or for information about joining the 2ND Saturday discussion on art, culture and justice, please message me at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.com. Thanks so much for listening!© Stephanie Drawdy [2023]

In patent and copyright law, injunctions are now a subject of significant policy debate. Innovators say they are unable to stop predatory infringement. Creators state they are unable to stop large-scale piracy websites. If so, this undermines the rewards promised by the intellectual property system and devalues the commercial assets that drive the global innovation economy in new technologies and creative works. Others state that intellectual property owners use injunctions to hold up innovation or chill legitimate commercial activity. This panel will discuss the role of injunctions in facilitating or constraining commercialization of patented technologies and copyrighted works, and what the current state of the law portends for the future, such as in the development of next-generation innovations like AI and its use of creative works.Featuring:Hon. John W. Holcomb, United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaProf. Kristen Jakobsen Osenga, Austin E. Owen Research Scholar & Professor of Law, The University of Richmond School of LawMs. Laurie Self, Senior Vice President & Counsel, Government Affairs, QualcommMs. Laura Sheridan, Head of Patent Policy, GoogleModerator: Hon. Ryan T. Holte, U.S. Court of Federal Claims; Jurist-In-Residence Professor of Law, The University of Akron School of LawOverflow: Chinese Room

Nina and Corinna — who between them comprise one-and-a-half Jews — discuss recent events in the Middle East, after a brief detour about IP Law and its discontents. We confuse Robert Redford with Paul Newman, compare synagogues and mosques with Starbuck's and Dunkin' Donuts, and learn the difference between philo-semites and hebephiles. Then we get dark. Do people hate Jews more than we thought?  Does Israel commit atrocities, or military actions? Are young people nihilists? Forgive us, for despite the smoothest segues in podcasting, we know not what we do. Links: This Land Is Mine (short animation): https://youtu.be/8tIdCsMufIY?si=ttwMH8SPCxpM0OI2 The Exodus Song: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theme_of_Exodus Exodus (movie): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exodus_(1960_film) Seder-Masochism (movie): https://sedermasochism.com/download/ Nina's Twitter thread about Jews vs Zionists: https://twitter.com/ninapaley/status/1711371708190330934 --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/heterodorx/support

- Julian Dorey Podcast GEAR: https://www.23point5.com/creator/Julian-Dorey-9826?tab=Featured  - Support Our Show on PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/JulianDorey  (***TIMESTAMPS in description below) ~ Keir Bradford-Grey & David Perry are both attorneys. Keir is a Partner at Montgomery McCracken and was formerly the chief defender of the Defender Association of Philadelphia. David is a partner at Blank Rome where he specializes in IP Law. Both Bradford-Grey and Perry have been supporting Tyree Wallace's Fight for Freedom. Bradford-Grey is Tyree's chief defense attorney. SIGN PETITION FOR TYREE: https://www.change.org/p/free-tyree-wallace  Tyree Wallace Website: https://www.freetyreewallace.com/  Tyree IG: https://rb.gy/iye00  Tyree Keynote (Starts at 39:10): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5_XjW6zckA  ***TIMESTAMPS*** 0:00 - Background on Tyree Wallace 3:21 - Keir Bradford-Grey Intros herself 7:52 - David Perry Intros himself 12:41 - John Kang's Murder Story 17:31 - Appeals Process; Court Appointed Lawyer vs Public Defender 21:46 - Clemency vs Pardon; Dark Days for Tyree 25:52 - Julian's calls with Tyree in Prison 28:55 - Julian talks about a prison guard he spoke with; Tyree works on Prison Hospice 33:29 - Gamification of Prosecutors 38:46 - WITNESS 1: Brian Brooks (The Liar) 49:42 - Keir analyses Brian Brooks' situation 53:51 - Brian Brooks gets bailed out and tricks Tyree 59:30 - Tyree gets arrested; Witness says he wasn't there; Tyree's terrible lawyer 1:04:19 - Timeline of case; Government had ZERO hard evidence 1:09:11 - WITNESS 2: James Davis 1:12:54 - THE WITNESS WHO NEVER WAS: Muldrow 1:17:10 - The trial begins; How cross examination of Brooks went down 1:20:44 - WITNESS 3: Sheriff John Hamilton 1:25:20 - John's background as prison guard 1:32:58 - Murder trials happen so frequently without media coverage 1:34:15 - How often did a witness ever tell Sheriff they lied? 1:36:42 - When Tyree first contacted John 1:39:07 - What happened the day Brian Brooks testified & what happened right after 1:44:43 - The Terrifying Holmesburg Prison; “Little Mikey” Story 1:47:34 - John always wondered what happened after Brooks' testimony 1:52:44 - The Trial Judge: Judge Greenspan 1:56:45 - The Dead Prisoner w/ white shoes story 2:00:18 - John's message to Tyree 2:03:50 - The judge who soiled himself; My Cousin Vinny; “One bad decision away”  2:07:24 - “I was an expert at picking juries”; Uneven justice system 2:12:32 - Institutionalized Prisoners & M3ntal H3alth 2:16:12 - John's final reflection 2:19:26 - Keir breaks down Tyree's appeals process 2:24:01 - The witnesses who have reached out to offer testimony for Tyree, Shackleford coming forward story 2:27:22 - Why is Shackleford afraid to testify?; Tyree's thoughts on Shackleford 2:34:01 - Julian appeals to the audience 2:35:33 - Tyree's polygraph test; Tyree wants complete innocence 2:39:21 - Keir talks about conversations with Brian Brooks 2:45:26 - The family of the victim have moved on; Woman who testified for Father's murderers story 2:50:17 - The attention on the case is brewing towards a real breakthrough 2:52:58 - How donated money helps Tyree 2:55:08 - Putting yourself in Tyree's shoes ~ Get $150 Off The Eight Sleep Pod Pro Mattress / Mattress Cover (USING CODE: “JULIANDOREY”): https://eight-sleep.ioym.net/trendifier Julian's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/julianddorey ~ Music via Artlist.io ~ Julian Dorey Podcast Episode 159 - Keir Bradford-Grey & David Perry (Free Tyree Wallace Episode)

Sarah Acton is the Chief Marketing Officer at BILL and brings more than 25 years of experience in marketing and brand-building work in both consumer and business markets. She had an interest in marketing early on and started her career in media buying, then went back to business school, moved into consumer packaged goods, spent some time on the agency side, and eventually opened her own small business. After that, she returned to technology, where she was responsible for global brand oversight during pivotal periods of growth at LinkedIn and consumer marketing leadership at Yahoo!, then led both marketing and sales at Athos, a wearables company in the athletic performance space. She has now been with BILL for the past 18 months. Sarah believes one of the roles of marketing is to build and reinforce trust with your customers and the market at large, and she is grateful to be immersed in a culture of people who have a shared respect for small businesses as well as a shared connection to the mission and values that matter to her.In this episode, Alan and Sarah discuss what her marketing department is doing to help drive discovery, connection, and trust with BILL's customers and how the integrity she learned when she was running her own small business helps inform the way she operates with BILL today. BILL is an all-in-one financial operations platform serving small businesses with all the "messy back office financial things". They recently underwent a rebrand to satiate an appetite to bring more humanity into the operation. Despite being a tech company, at the end of the day, it is just a group of humans serving another group of humans in the deeply personal space of operating a small business. Marketing to small businesses falls somewhere between B2B and B2C, making it complex to message and connect with their diverse range of scope and scale. BILL's role is not only about managing the day-to-day operations but also helping its customers fuel growth and understand cash flow. Sarah tells us BILL saves their customers between 50% to 75% of their time spent on financial operations, allowing them to invest more in the things that align with their mission and passion."Brand strategy is not independent of company strategy. It is in service of company strategy."In this episode, you'll learn:How being a small business owner impacted Sarah's marketing careerThe importance of your team having a shared connection to the mission and valuesWhy marketing to small businesses is so complex and diverseKey Highlights: [01:45] Early childhood apprenticeship in IP Law[03:15] Sarah's path to BILL[08:30] Pattern recognition and pulling levers[10:15] What does BILL do?[13:30] Why rebrand now?[15:50] What is next for Bill?[19:15] Small businesses are complex and unique. How do you market to all of them?[23:00] What is the role of marketing?[26:30] Culture and team building at BILL[30:30] The impact of owning her own business[34:15] Advice to her younger self[35:30] Be obsessed with your customers.[37:50] The shift in how we reach, teach, and influence[40:50] The opportunity to experiment endlessly Thank you to our sponsor:PartnerHero: to waive set-up fees, go to https://www.partnerhero.com/marketingtoday and mention “Marketing Today” during onboarding!Looking for more?Visit our website for links to resources mentioned in this episode and ways to connect with the guest! Become a member today and listen ad-free, visit https://plus.acast.com/s/marketingtoday. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

“Make sure you have that patent before you disclose it because you don't want someone else to make money off of all of that R&D and research and development that you've put into that product.” In Season 6, Episode 03 of the Boss Uncaged Podcast, S.A. Grant sits down with the Founder and Owner of Virtual IP Law, Keri Sicard.

In this compelling episode, we delve into the mind of Steven Weigler, a distinguished attorney and former prosecutor, who has crafted a unique blend of hard and soft skills to deliver holistic legal services. Steven provides an in-depth look into his journey from prosecuting serious crime in Miami to representing entrepreneurs in distress, bringing empathy and a robust knowledge of the law.Listen as Steven expounds on his methodology, seamlessly integrating human empathy, the study of law, zealous advocacy, and a commitment to his clients. He emphasizes the importance of listening, understanding, and adapting to the diverse needs of his clients, always putting himself in their shoes to gain a profound understanding of their circumstances.One of the key takeaways from this conversation is Steven's belief in a holistic approach to his work. His dedication to staying abreast of the evolving landscape of the law and his insistence on zealous advocacy demonstrate his commitment to delivering comprehensive and well-rounded representation.Steven also gives us a glimpse into his personal life, revealing how his interests and passions outside of work shape his professional life. From his love for travel and music to his enthusiasm for competitive sports, Steven's diverse interests infuse a unique perspective into his legal practice.Furthermore, Steven shares his personal strategies for maintaining a work-life balance, which include maintaining a regular routine and practising journaling. His attention to his social-emotional well-being inspires entrepreneurs and professionals alike, emphasizing the importance of self-care in pursuing professional success.This episode is a must-listen for entrepreneurs seeking to understand the intricate blend of soft and hard skills required in law practice and empathy's role in client relations. Steven's insights into law and life will leave listeners inspired and enlightened.