Podcasts about mischiefs

In this episode of Pop Talks!, Snayhil and Antariksh are joined by the dynamic Amit Sadh. They delve into his passion for adventure sports, his incredible life journey, and his love for football. With candid insights into working with Salman Khan, Amit also shares some behind-the-scenes 'Bhai' Mischiefs. Stay tuned for a captivating conversation. Follow Snayhil on Instagram : Instagram (@snayhil)Follow Antariksh on Instagram: Instagram (@antariksht)Follow Amit on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theamitsadh/?hl=en Follow IVM Pop on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ivmpop/ Subscribe to IVM POP on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@IVMPop Listen to Pop Wrap, Has It Aged Well? and Just A Filmy Game Show on the IVM Pop feed which is available across platforms. Spotify | Apple Podcasts | JioSaavn | Gaana | Amazon Music The views, opinions, and statements expressed in the episodes of the shows hosted on the IVM Podcasts network are solely those of the individual participants, hosts, and guests, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of IVM Podcasts or its management. IVM Podcasts does not endorse or assume responsibility for any content, claims, or representations made by the participants during the shows. This includes, but is not limited to, the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information provided. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk. IVM Podcasts is not liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages arising out of or in connection with the use or dissemination of the content featured in the shows. Listener discretion is advised.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We introduce Louis Guittar and the first steps of one of the great pirate cruises. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Pennsylvania Assembly: Reply to the Governor by Ben Franklin: "In fine, we have the most sensible Concern for the poor distressed Inhabitants of the Frontiers. We have taken every Step in our Power, consistent with the just Rights of the Freemen of Pennsylvania, for their Relief, and we have Reason to believe, that in the Midst of their Distresses they themselves do not wish us to go farther. Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Such as were inclined to defend themselves, but unable to purchase Arms and Ammunition, have, as we are informed, been supplied with both, as far as Arms could be procured, out of Monies given by the last Assembly for the King's Use; and the large Supply of Money offered by this Bill, might enable the Governor to do every Thing else that should be judged necessary for their farther Security, if he shall think fit to accept it. Whether he could, as he supposes, “if his Hands had been properly strengthened, have put the Province into such a Posture of Defence, as might have prevented the present Mischiefs,” seems to us uncertain; since late Experience in our neighbouring Colony of Virginia (which had every Advantage for that Purpose that could be desired) shows clearly, that it is next to impossible to guard effectually an extended Frontier, settled by scattered single Families at two or three Miles Distance, so as to secure them from the insiduous Attacks of small Parties of skulking Murderers: But thus much is certain, that by refusing our Bills from Time to Time, by which great Sums were seasonably offered, he has rejected all the Strength that Money could afford him; and if his Hands are still weak or unable, he ought only to blame himself, or those who have tied them." In the document "Pennsylvania Assembly: Reply to the Governor" by Benjamin Franklin, the Assembly addresses the Governor's concerns regarding the protection of the inhabitants of Pennsylvania's frontiers, who were vulnerable to attacks. Franklin argues that the Assembly has done everything within its power to aid these frontier inhabitants, adhering to the principles of liberty and justice that the colony values. One of the most famous lines from this text is: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Here, Franklin underscores the delicate balance between security and freedom, suggesting that sacrificing fundamental liberties for the sake of temporary safety is a shortsighted and unworthy trade-off. Franklin further states that they have provided arms and ammunition to those who were willing but unable to defend themselves, using funds previously allocated for the King's use. He challenges the Governor's suggestion that more could have been done if only the Assembly had strengthened the Governor's hands further. Franklin points to the neighboring colony of Virginia as an example, noting that despite Virginia's efforts, it had proven extremely challenging to protect a dispersed frontier population from smaller, mobile groups of attackers. Finally, Franklin criticizes the Governor for his previous rejections of the Assembly's financial proposals. He argues that any shortcomings in the colony's defenses should be blamed on the Governor himself, or those who have restricted his actions, rather than the Assembly. In essence, the document serves as a robust defense of the Pennsylvania Assembly's actions and philosophy, making the case that they have acted both practically and ethically in their attempts to safeguard the frontier inhabitants, all while respecting the principles of liberty and justice. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/chrisabraham/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/chrisabraham/support

Albrecht Schuch, 37, Schauspieler Es kann klappen mit dem Ehrgeiz. Es kann gutgehen, auch in kreativen Jobs wie der Schauspielerei, nach Höherem zu streben und auf einen Punkt zuzusteuern, auf ein Image oder einen Preis. Vielleicht ist dieses berufliche Herangehen auch gar nicht so unüblich. Bei unserem heutigen Gast wirkt es anders, selbstverständlicher. Albrecht Schuch, Jahrgang 85, zählt zu den erfolgreichsten Schauspielern des Landes. Dafür sprechen die zahlreichen und hochkarätigen Auszeichnungen, die er für seine so unterschiedlichen Rollen erhalten hat. 2020 z.B., da gab’s allein 2 Deutsche Filmpreise. Gefolgt vom International Actors Award im letzten Jahr und dieses Jahr, mal schauen, ach, der Bayerische Filmpreis und was haben wir da noch….ach, klar, noch mal den Deutschen Filmpreis. Es sind aber auch prägnante Rollen, die dem gebürtigen Jenaer angeboten werden. Oder sind sie deshalb so gut, weil er sie verkörpert? Im NSU-Film „Die Täter“, in „Paula“, „Die Vermessung der Welt“, „Gladbeck“, Systemsprenger, "Lieber Thomas" über Thomas Brasch oder "Im Westen nichts Neues". Und irgendwie, darauf wollten wir hinaus, scheint er da so durchzugleiten, unangestrengt, begabt, dankbar, erfreut. Ist es so, Albrecht Schuch? Musikliste: Foo Fighters - My Hero / Harry Belafonte – Matilda / José Gonzales – Crosses / Talking Heads - Burning down the House / Nina Simone - Ain’t got no / I got Life / Souls of Mischiefs - 93’ - Til Infinity / Asa 808 + Daede - Love no matter what / Field Kit - Downward Rising | Diese Podcast-Episode steht unter der Creative Commons Lizenz CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

RadioEd is a biweekly podcast created by the DU Newsroom that taps into the University of Denver's deep pool of bright brains to explore new takes on today's top stories. Former County Clerk Tina Peters, who oversaw elections in rural Mesa County in western Colorado, made headlines around the country when her election conspiracy theories allegedly led to actions that brought about charges of attempting to influence a public servant, identity theft and several other felonies. Were her actions those of a rogue public servant, or were they tied to larger national trends? On this episode of RadioEd, Matt chats with Seth Masket, professor of political science and director of the Center on American Politics at the University of Denver, and Charles Ashby, a veteran reporter whose work in the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel helped unravel some of the convoluted details surrounding Peters' criminal case.Seth Masket is a professor of political science and the director of the Center on American Politics at the University of Denver. He is the author of Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020 (Cambridge, 2020), The Inevitable Party: Why Attempts to Kill the Party System Fail and How they Weaken Democracy (Oxford, 2016), and No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures (Michigan, 2009), as well as a co-author of a recent textbook on political parties. He studies political parties, campaigns and elections, and state legislatures. He contributes regularly at FiveThirtyEight, Mischiefs of Faction and the Denver Post. He is currently working on a book project examining the Republican Party's interpretations of the 2020 election and its preparations for 2024. Charles Ashby covers politics for the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel in western Colorado. He has nearly 45 years of experience covering politics in Colorado and has written stories for publications in Denver, Pueblo, Colorado Springs, Boulder, Longmont, Durango, Steamboat Springs, Montrose and Sterling, as well as work that has appeared in newspapers in Virginia, Nebraska and Florida. More information: Ashby's reporting on Tina Peters: Griswold decertifies Mesa County Election Equipment: https://www.gjsentinel.com/breaking/breaking_news/griswold-decertifies-mesa-county-election-equipment/article_02490f8e-fb8d-11eb-95d4-ebcb4e0b04ef.html Peters tweets conspiracy theory over election system: https://www.gjsentinel.com/news/western_colorado/peters-tweets-conspiracy-theory-over-election-system/article_3a73d404-4ec5-11eb-9597-1b5e0fdc20da.html Peters' cost to county: $1.3 million and rising: https://www.gjsentinel.com/news/western_colorado/peters-cost-to-county-1-3-million-and-rising/article_e2349914-f3ef-11ec-9755-cbda39e9db82.html Arrest warrant issued for Tina Peters: https://www.gjsentinel.com/news/western_colorado/arrest-warrant-issued-for-tina-peters/article_1976d4ee-03b5-11ed-baa3-978fbf3d366e.html Peters set to receive refund: https://www.gjsentinel.com/news/western_colorado/peters-set-to-receive-refund/article_6bf075b8-53d3-11ed-b554-d7da1a7d772a.html Recommended by Seth Masket: The most important attorney general and secretary of state races to watch: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/secretary-of-state-elections/ Has your state made it harder to vote: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/voting-restrictions-by-state/ Election denial in races for election administration positions: https://www.brennancenter.org/series/election-denial-races-election-administration-positions Security resources for election officials: https://www.eac.gov/election-officials/election-official-security

In this week's episode of Politics In Question, Seth Market joins Julia and James to consider how losing an election affects partisans. Market is a professor of political science and the director of the Center on American Politics at the University of Denver. He is the author of several books and articles on political parties, campaigns and elections, and state legislatures. His most recent book is Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020 (Cambridge 2020). Market contributes regularly at FiveThirtyEight, Mischiefs of Faction, and the Denver Post. He is currently working on a book project examining the Republican Party's interpretations of the 2020 election and its preparations for 2024.Who holds power in the Democratic and Republican parties after an election defeat? Does the location of power vary between the two parties? How do partisans explain losing an election? And how do party leaders and partisan activists try to frame election defeats to gain leverage on their intra-party rivals? These are some of the questions Seth, Julia, and James discuss in this week's episode.

In this week's episode of Politics In Question, Hans Noel joins Julia and James to talk about political parties. Noel is an associate professor in the Department of Government at Georgetown University, where he conducts research on political coalitions, political parties, and ideology. He is the author of Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America, and a co-author of The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Noel also blogs on political parties at Mischiefs of Faction and the Monkey Cage.How have events over the last decade shaped our understanding of political parties? Should we think about parties differently today than how we thought about them ten years ago? Why are the Democratic and Republican parties comprised of certain groups and interests? And does the conventional view of ideological polarization distort political reality when it comes to parties? These are some of the questions Hans, Julia, and James ask in this week's episode.Additional InformationPolitics in Question PodcastMore shows from The Democracy Group

In this week's episode of Politics In Question, Hans Noel joins Julia and James to talk about political parties. Noel is an associate professor in the Department of Government at Georgetown University, where he conducts research on political coalitions, political parties, and ideology. He is the author of Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America, and a co-author of The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Noel also blogs on political parties at Mischiefs of Faction and the Monkey Cage.How have events over the last decade shaped our understanding of political parties? Should we think about parties differently today than how we thought about them ten years ago? Why are the Democratic and Republican parties comprised of certain groups and interests? And does the conventional view of ideological polarization distort political reality when it comes to parties? These are some of the questions Hans, Julia, and James ask in this week's episode.

The combined creative talents of Phil Lord and Christopher Miller is one of the biggest forces in the animation industry at the moment, so today Alex and Jonathan take a look at four films they have had a hand in bringing to the big screen: Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (2009), 21 Jump Street (2012), The Lego Movie (2014), and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018). We discuss how Lord and Miller use their knowledge of popular story tropes to create comedy, what makes comedy age well or not, and what's in store for the duo in the future. Skip to: 6:55 – Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 29:20 – 21 Jump Street 44:05 – The Lego Movie 1:01:47 – Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse 1:28:29 – Overall 1:45:47 – Coming Attractions Coming Attractions: Being John Malkovich (1999) Adaptation. (2002) Where the Wild Things Are (2009) Her (2013) For more information, visit the blog: https://thefilmlings.wordpress.com/2021/09/01/lord-and-miller/ Support the Show! Patreon: https://patreon.com/thefilmlings Ko-fi: https://ko-fi.com/thefilmlings

This is an interview with Dr. Chuck DeGroat about his newest book, "When Narcissism Comes to Church." We talk about the signs of narcissism, how it hurts the church, and the process of healing.Chuck is a Professor at Western Theological Seminary in Holland, Michigan. You can connect with Chuck by going to his website - www.chuckdegroat.net.Chuck's book, "When Narcissism Comes to Church"10 Signs of Narcissism - Centering all decision-making on themselves- Impatience or an inability to listen to others- Delegating without giving proper authority or with too many limits- Feelings of entitlement- Feeling threatened or intimidated by other talented staff- Needing to be the best and brightest in the room- Inconsistency and impulsiveness- Praising and withdrawing- Intimidating others- Fauxnerability (a faux or fake vulnerability)QUOTES from the book:[narcissists are] “mirror-hungry,” using their audiences and followers as a mirror to reflect back praise and admiration. The narcissistic leader’s hidden shame and pervasive sense of emptiness is alleviated, perhaps only for a little while, by the applause of an adoring crowd or the affection of a devoted follower."I've never seen systemic health emerge apart from the leader (or leaders) going on their own transformational journey."“I am convinced that the missional fervor and rise in church planting we’ve witnessed since the 1980s can be correlated with a growing prevalence of narcissism. Nowhere have I seen the narcissism-shame dynamic more pronounced than among church planters, some of whom have become megachurch pastors. Some church planting assessments I’ve seen practically invite narcissistic leadership. My work in this area as a therapist, pastor, consultant, psychological assessor, and professor over many years persuades me that the narcissism in many young men in particular is baptized as spiritual giftedness in a way that does great disservice to them and ignores deep wells of shame and fragility lurking within” (p. 8).DeGroat says, “When I started doing psychological assessments for pastors and church planters, I saw that narcissistic traits were often presented as strengths. Narcissism can be interpreted as confidence, strong leadership, clear vision, a thick skin… A colleague of mine often says that ministry is a magnet for a narcissistic personality – who else would want to speak on behalf of God every week” (p. 19)DeGroat writes, “In my own work, which includes fifteen years of psychological testing on pastors, the vast majority of ministerial candidates test on the spectrum of cluster B DSM-V personality disorders, which feature narcissistic traits most prominently... The rates are even higher among church planters” (p. 19).DeGroat observes, “Narcissistic pastors are anxious and insecure shepherds who do not lead the sheep to still waters but into hurricane winds. I’ve attended and spoken at dozens of pastor’s conferences and I see this anxiety abuzz in the comparison and competition, the showmanship and dress, the addiction to substances and fitness and social media and approval” (p. 20).He writes, “The Exodus story allows us to see ourselves, and our congregations, as pilgrims on a healing journey. It invites us to see the enslavement that keeps us from thriving. It invites us to be brave enough to cry out to God. It invites to the risky journey, fleeing what is familiar for an unpredictable path ahead. It invites us to have patience in the face of a long and winding wilderness road. It invites us to lament in the face of continued pain. It invites us to resolve to enter a new land, a hope-filled place of flourishing. Indeed, all stories of transformation necessarily take us on a cruciform (cross-shaped) journey imitating the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, as we become participants in his suffering in order to experience his resurrection” (p. 133).DeGroat observes, “Many of us find ourselves too busy, too habituated to the demands of modern life, too out of touch with deeper emotions to take our stories seriously and to embark on a healing journey... Healing requires radical honesty with ourselves and the courage to follow through on the wilderness path [to healing]. Perhaps the two most important components of healing trauma are awareness and intentionality. Because trauma thrives in the shadows, awareness and intentionality are often neglected for self-promotion, disconnection, and self-sabotage” (p. 141).OTHER BOOKS MENTIONED:"Leaving Egypt: Finding God in the Wilderness Places," by Chuck DeGroat"In the Name of Jesus," by Henri Nouwen"On the Mischiefs of Self-Ignorance and the Benefits of Self-Acquaintance," by Richard Baxter"A Church Called Tov: Forming a Goodness Culture That Resists Abuses of Power and Promotes Healing," by Scot McKnight

This is an interview with Dr. Chuck DeGroat about his newest book, "When Narcissism Comes to Church." We talk about the signs of narcissism, how it hurts the church, and the process of healing.Chuck is a Professor at Western Theological Seminary in Holland, Michigan. You can connect with Chuck by going to his website - www.chuckdegroat.net.Chuck's book, "When Narcissism Comes to Church"10 Signs of Narcissism - Centering all decision-making on themselves- Impatience or an inability to listen to others- Delegating without giving proper authority or with too many limits- Feelings of entitlement- Feeling threatened or intimidated by other talented staff- Needing to be the best and brightest in the room- Inconsistency and impulsiveness- Praising and withdrawing- Intimidating others- Fauxnerability (a faux or fake vulnerability)QUOTES from the book:[narcissists are] “mirror-hungry,” using their audiences and followers as a mirror to reflect back praise and admiration. The narcissistic leader's hidden shame and pervasive sense of emptiness is alleviated, perhaps only for a little while, by the applause of an adoring crowd or the affection of a devoted follower."I've never seen systemic health emerge apart from the leader (or leaders) going on their own transformational journey."“I am convinced that the missional fervor and rise in church planting we've witnessed since the 1980s can be correlated with a growing prevalence of narcissism. Nowhere have I seen the narcissism-shame dynamic more pronounced than among church planters, some of whom have become megachurch pastors. Some church planting assessments I've seen practically invite narcissistic leadership. My work in this area as a therapist, pastor, consultant, psychological assessor, and professor over many years persuades me that the narcissism in many young men in particular is baptized as spiritual giftedness in a way that does great disservice to them and ignores deep wells of shame and fragility lurking within” (p. 8).DeGroat says, “When I started doing psychological assessments for pastors and church planters, I saw that narcissistic traits were often presented as strengths. Narcissism can be interpreted as confidence, strong leadership, clear vision, a thick skin… A colleague of mine often says that ministry is a magnet for a narcissistic personality – who else would want to speak on behalf of God every week” (p. 19)DeGroat writes, “In my own work, which includes fifteen years of psychological testing on pastors, the vast majority of ministerial candidates test on the spectrum of cluster B DSM-V personality disorders, which feature narcissistic traits most prominently... The rates are even higher among church planters” (p. 19).DeGroat observes, “Narcissistic pastors are anxious and insecure shepherds who do not lead the sheep to still waters but into hurricane winds. I've attended and spoken at dozens of pastor's conferences and I see this anxiety abuzz in the comparison and competition, the showmanship and dress, the addiction to substances and fitness and social media and approval” (p. 20).He writes, “The Exodus story allows us to see ourselves, and our congregations, as pilgrims on a healing journey. It invites us to see the enslavement that keeps us from thriving. It invites us to be brave enough to cry out to God. It invites to the risky journey, fleeing what is familiar for an unpredictable path ahead. It invites us to have patience in the face of a long and winding wilderness road. It invites us to lament in the face of continued pain. It invites us to resolve to enter a new land, a hope-filled place of flourishing. Indeed, all stories of transformation necessarily take us on a cruciform (cross-shaped) journey imitating the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, as we become participants in his suffering in order to experience his resurrection” (p. 133).DeGroat observes, “Many of us find ourselves too busy, too habituated to the demands of modern life, too out of touch with deeper emotions to take our stories seriously and to embark on a healing journey... Healing requires radical honesty with ourselves and the courage to follow through on the wilderness path [to healing]. Perhaps the two most important components of healing trauma are awareness and intentionality. Because trauma thrives in the shadows, awareness and intentionality are often neglected for self-promotion, disconnection, and self-sabotage” (p. 141).OTHER BOOKS MENTIONED:"Leaving Egypt: Finding God in the Wilderness Places," by Chuck DeGroat"In the Name of Jesus," by Henri Nouwen"On the Mischiefs of Self-Ignorance and the Benefits of Self-Acquaintance," by Richard Baxter"A Church Called Tov: Forming a Goodness Culture That Resists Abuses of Power and Promotes Healing," by Scot McKnight

This week on the Get More Smarter Podcast,  it may be 2021 but it sure FEELS like 2020??? The Boebert Report turned out to be a pretty prescient segment, Michael Bennet introduces a big big bill in the US Senate, but why? We're still saying "WHAT THE BUCK?!" as a large portion of his congressional district wants to leave Colorado and join Wyoming, despite the lies and the spin, the economy is still suffering (but not for the reasons right wingers are telling us) and we interview Speaker of the House Alec Garnett about the status of the Colorado Legislature. LinksPresident Biden Makes a Joke (Aaron Rupar, Twitter)Meet Some Of The 4,600 Colorado Republicans Who Quit The Party After The US Capitol Riot (CPR News, 1/27/21)How Do Republicans Solve Their Qaucus Problem? (Colorado Pols, 1/27/21)Does a Party Lose for Doing Too Much or Too Little? (Seth Masket, Mischiefs of Faction, 1/26/20)Campaign Kicks Off To Give Wyoming Weld-Sized Package (1/22/21)Science Messes Up GOP Talking Points (Again) (Colorado Pols, 1/25/21)-----Hosts: Jason Bane | Ian SilveriiProducer: Ethan BlackMusic: Breakmaster CylinderSubscribe wherever you get your podcasts and leave us a review if you Got More Smarter. Send all angry and non-angry rants to angryrants@getmoresmarter.com.

Cris & Franky talk about some of the most mischievous moments they did when they were younger. From experimental drugs and car crashes. Listen now for what crazy moment they been through. Support the Podcast via our New Patreon @ Patreon/great in theoryFollow us on our Instagram : GreatIntheoryTwitter: Greatintheory_Facebook: GreatintheoryGIT Aid: Instagram: Ruvi.Cake, Get your custom strawberry and pastry for this valentine.Thank you all for your support. Get bonus content on Patreon See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this week’s episode of Politics In Question, Seth Masket joins Julia, Lee, and James to discuss the future of the Democratic Party. Masket is professor of political science and director of the Center on American Politics at the University of Denver. He is the author of numerous books and articles about political parties, elections, state politics, and, on occasion, Star Wars. He is also the founder of the political science blog, Mischiefs of Faction. His most recent book, Learning From Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020, examines how Democrats’ perceptions of why they lost in 2016 shaped their behavior in the 2020 presidential election.How did Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss to Donald Trump influence Democrats’ decision to nominate Joe Biden in 2020? To what extent do broad narratives impact voters’ perceptions of what is at stake in elections? Do those narratives also impact the behavior of elected officials in-between elections? And if election narratives have this kind of power, does that create a feedback loop that inhibits serious change? These are some of the questions that Seth, Julia, Lee, and James discuss in this week’s episode.

The topic of today's episode is, “How Does the House of Representatives Organize Itself for a New Congress?” My guest is https://politics.catholic.edu/faculty-and-research/faculty-profiles/green-matthew/index.html (Dr. Matthew Green), an extraordinarily accomplished scholar of the U.S. Congress. He has been a professor of politics at Catholic University in Washington, D.C. since 2005, and he received his doctorate from Yale. Matt has authored or coauthored six books, the most recent of which is https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/legislative-hardball/37488C1E94117DFBFF924E5B67188E07 (Legislative Hardball). The first book-length examination of the tactics and effectiveness of the House Freedom Caucus. Matt is also a regular contributor to “https://www.mischiefsoffaction.com/ (Mischiefs of Factions),” a blog about political parties. And he has written about Congress elections and other topics in the Washington Post, Roll Call, and The Hill.

In this week’s episode of Politics In Question, Julia, Lee, and James discuss what happened in this year’s  election and what it means for American democracy. How should Americans interpret the results of the election? Should they be worried about Republicans’ ongoing efforts to change the outcome? And what do the election results reveal about the future of the Democratic and Republican parties? These are some of the questions Julia, Lee, and James ask in this week’s episode. Julia Azari, “For 4 years I’ve written that Trump was a disjunctive leader. Now I’m not so sure,” Mischiefs of Faction (November 10, 2020).

The outcome of the 2020 Election is beginning to take shape, but many of us still have questions about the results, where polling went wrong, how massive turnout still led to a very divided electorate, and what it means for our country as President Donald Trump openly undermines election results. In Episode 19 we meet with Julia Azari, a political science professor at Marquette University, contributor at FiveThirtyEight, and blogger at Mischiefs of Faction, to break down the election results and where our country goes from here. Non-Compliant Host Jay Edelson, the Founder and CEO of a prominted plaintiff's firm, and Julia will answer listener questions and help provide clarity as votes are still being counted in key states for Joe Biden.

- We interview the first woman in line for the Trump rally who drove five days from Florida to be there. Justin asks about masks.- A trip to the former Black Wall Street to reflect on Juneteenth- Interview with Seth Masket (FiveThirtyEight, Mischiefs of Faction) who defends the photo op and is dragged into a WAY too granular conversation about John Hickenlooper's Senate primary because Justin can't shut up about it.

ABOUT THIS EPISODE Political scientists (and returning Tatter guests) Julia Azari and Seth Masket join me to talk about how the Republican Party has changed in recent years, and the meaning and consequences of those changes, including the impact on the Democratic Party and on (little-d) democratic values. LINKS --Julia Azari's Marquette University profile (https://www.marquette.edu/political-science/directory/julia-azari.php) --Seth Masket's University of Denver profile (https://www.du.edu/ahss/polisci/facultystaff/masket_seth.html) --"The Trump presidency thrives on norms," by Julia Azari (from the Mischiefs of Faction) (https://www.mischiefsoffaction.com/post/the-trump-presidency-thrives-on-norms?fbclid=IwAR0UhFHThgoIgPhzYEF93-5El9Uv0wp-j8pxj-43LYglu0jCkbLLJPvErbI) --"The case for Democratic recklessness," by Seth Masket (from the Pacific Standard) (https://psmag.com/news/the-case-for-democratic-recklessness?fbclid=IwAR0O2h_Kc2spBnBlZQ6xQ9wjfkKDfETGNDJkNNq-EGBgHjNfjNKryJw7ZOM) --The Bulwark podcast (hosted by Charlie Sykes) (https://podcast.thebulwark.com/) Special Guests: Julia Azari and Seth Masket.

James references Martin Van Buren’s 1827 letter to Thomas Ritchie in which he outlines his plans for the creation of a new Democratic Party. Julia mentions her recent Mischiefs of Faction piece reacting to Super Tuesday. Lee reminds listeners that the two-party system exacerbates the problems in how we pick presidential nominees and references his new book, Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America.

ABOUT THIS EPISODE What's the impact of money on electoral politics? For instance, how does reliance on large numbers of small donors affect a candidate's appeal to voters? As more candidates recruit more financial support from large numbers of donors online, what's the impact on political parties? Does it further weaken them? I discuss such issues as these--and more, including race, gender, and campaign finance--with Marquette University political scientist Julia Azari and USC law professor Abby Wood. LINKS --Abby Wood's USC profile (https://gould.usc.edu/faculty/?id=71046) --Julia Azari's Marquette U. profile (https://www.marquette.edu/political-science/directory/julia-azari.php) --"Mischiefs of Faction" political science blog (https://www.mischiefsoffaction.com/) --Azari's FiveThirtyEight profile (https://fivethirtyeight.com/contributors/julia-azari/) --"Campaign Finance Disclosure" (by Abby Wood, in the Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2018) (https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113428) --"Democrats might have the stronger party. They also have a harder job." (by Julia Azari, for the Mischiefs of Faction, 2020) (https://www.mischiefsoffaction.com/post/democrats-might-have-the-stronger-party-they-also-have-a-harder-job) --"From AOC to shining sea: Justice Democrats want to be the Left's Tea Party" (from The Economist, 2020) (https://www.economist.com/united-states/2020/01/11/justice-democrats-want-to-be-the-lefts-tea-party) Special Guests: Abby Wood and Julia Azari.

ABOUT THIS EPISODE Julia Azari is a political scientist at Marquette University, as well as a frequent contributor to FiveThirtyEight. Seth Masket is a political scientist at the University of Denver, and a contributor to Vox.com's Mischiefs of Faction. The three of us talked about the prospects of impeaching Donald Trump, the potential aftermath, and why it all matters. LINKS --Julia Azari's Marquette University profile (https://www.marquette.edu/political-science/directory/julia-azari.php) --Seth Masket's University of Denver profile (https://www.du.edu/ahss/polisci/facultystaff/masket_seth.html) --"The Trump Era Has Pushed Scholars to the Limits of Our Understanding," by Julia Azari (guest blogger) at Balkinization (https://balkin.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-trump-era-has-pushed-scholars-to.html) --"'Impeachment Will Help Republicans' And Other Myths," by Seth Masket, in Pacific Standard (https://psmag.com/ideas/impeachment-will-help-republicans-and-other-myths) --A recent chat about impeachment, at FiveThirtyEight (including Azari) (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/pelosi-is-going-after-barr-and-rejecting-impeachment-is-that-a-smart-plan/) Special Guests: Julia Azari and Seth Masket.

Today, our participants speak about some of the mischiefs they did in the past, as the show is about misbehavior. First, Paula Henriquez-Karmis retells Ewen Blain's adaptation of Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves. After, Paula explains the rules of a naughty game she plaid with her class in secondary school. She also recounts Romy Boutin St-Pierre's discussion with her young friend about misbehaving. Finally, Paula reads Méli, a tale written by Anne-Chantal Wybo and selected by her cousin Véronique Nazair-Blanc. We will also be listening to music to appease our minds. Sleep well.

Today, our participants speak about some of the mischiefs they did in the past, as the show is about misbehavior. First, Paula Henriquez-Karmis retells Ewen Blain’s adaptation of Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves. After, Paula explains the rules of a naughty game she plaid with her class in secondary school. She also recounts Romy Boutin St-Pierre’s discussion with her young friend about misbehaving. Finally, Paula reads Méli, a tale written by Anne-Chantal Wybo and selected by her cousin Véronique Nazair-Blanc. We will also be listening to music to appease our minds. Sleep well.

En længe ventet dag er kommet i Blandede bånds historie.Jesper har inviteret sin gode ven og musikeren Jacob Bellens i studiet. Jacob Bellens er bl.a kendt som frontman i bands som I Got You On Tape, Murder m.m. Jacob og Jæwer giver dig en musikleksion af dimensioner.Nyd to timer i selskab med Jacob og Jæwer, som giver dig to timers utroligt hyggelig radio fyldt med utroligt dejlig fredagsmusik. Du serveres for new wave, britpop og elektroniske musikskatte, som passer perfekt til den kommende weekend.A/T/O/S – TreesSouls of Mischiefs – 93 ‘Til InfinityAmen Dunes – Blue RoseAnne Linnet – En AndenWar on Drugs – Red EyesPussy Riot – Make America Great AgainPional – Of My MindMark Kozelek & Jimmy LaValle – By The Time That I AwokeThe Seshen – Colors CollideSonic Youth – BubblegumLapalux – FlickeringKaytranada, Craig David – Got It GoodLTJ Bukem – Suspended SpaceJohnson – Ryge Og KnepJadu Heart – Late NightKESI – FølelsenStereo MC's – Step It UpCrystal Waters – Gypsy WomanJoomanji – Where Are You?Robert Wyatt – At Least I Am Free

Seth Masket, political scientist and professor at the University of Denver, sees something ominous in the background of the Star Wars Holiday Special. He wrote about the politics of the campy Star Wars program in Mischiefs of Faction, a blog for Vox. The piece is called Amusing Ourselves Into Tyranny, sound familiar?  Before the interview, Swara and Stephen react to news of Disney pulling out of their deal with Netflix and the promise of a Disney streaming service. Is this capitalism run amok or the best thing that's ever happened? Join us for the discussion.    Follow Seth Masket on Twitter @Smotus Swara @SwaraSalih1 Stephen @stephen_kent89 and Beltway Banthas @BeltwayBanthas

Seth Masket, political scientist and professor at the University of Denver, sees something ominous in the background of the Star Wars Holiday Special. He wrote about the politics of the campy Star Wars program in Mischiefs of Faction, a blog for Vox. The piece is called Amusing Ourselves Into Tyranny, sound familiar?  Before the interview, Swara and Stephen react to news of Disney pulling out of their deal with Netflix and the promise of a Disney streaming service. Is this capitalism run amok or the best thing that's ever happened? Join us for the discussion.    Follow Seth Masket on Twitter @Smotus Swara @SwaraSalih1 Stephen @stephen_kent89 and Beltway Banthas @BeltwayBanthas Get full access to Geeky Stoics at www.geekystoics.com/subscribe

This week on the horrorcast, the guys review 1988's Killer Klowns from Outer Space. Naturally, that leads to a discussion of the nuances between Kid Rock and the Teddybears, a Canadian movie about beer, and an argument about dog deaths. Follow on Twitter: twitter.com/AtoZHorror Email us: atozhorror@gmail.com Get Horror Amino App: aminoapps.com/c/horror/ Music by: SP CE: @wearespce

The Mischiefs of Faction meet in Chicago to discuss: -The 2016 election and Hillary Clinton's over- or under-performance. -The state of American party coalitions. -Trump's relations with Congress.

Stephen interviews Seth Masket, a professor of political science at Denver University, author and founder of Mischiefs of Faction (VOX). Seth has written a lot in the past about the politics of Star Wars and he was kind enough to come on Beltway Banthas and share his thoughts on the political aims of Star Wars. Get full access to Geeky Stoics at www.geekystoics.com/subscribe

Stephen interviews Seth Masket, a professor of political science at Denver University, author and founder of Mischiefs of Faction (VOX). Seth has written a lot in the past about the politics of Star Wars and he was kind enough to come on Beltway Banthas and share his thoughts on the political aims of Star Wars.

Associate GPPR interview editor, Kenny French, spoke with Professor Jonathan Ladd about the election. Dr. Ladd is an associate professor in the McCourt School of Public Policy and the Department of Government at Georgetown and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. He is on the editorial boards of Political Behavior and American Politics Research , an associate editor of Research & Politics and a co-editor of Vox.com's political science blog Mischiefs of Faction. His book, Why Americans Hate the Media and How it Matters, won the Goldsmith Book Prize from Harvard University's Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy and the McGannon Award for Social and Ethical Relevance in Communications Policy Research. The conversation covers whether or not this election is different and, if it is, what makes it different, specifically focusing on the popularity of outsider candidates, such as Donald Trump. The conversation also takes a look at the role of the media and polling in both the political and policy realms.

Episode 8 is on fire! We bring you headliners Yohan Marshall & the Mischiefs having a fun chat with Mae and sharing some exclusive acoustic versions of their songs, you can only hear them here! And we've got Chennai rock band Tails on Fire (rawr!) to start you off. Switching gears, the song that "maed" Mae's day is Fuzzy Logic's deep house/disco track "Money Talks" and we've got a Maed Abroad song by Mandeep Sethi that we just love!  Info: Tails on Fire (Chennai rock band) Song: Move Album: Tails on Fire https://www.facebook.com/tailsonfireband https://soundcloud.com/tailsonfireband Fuzzy Logic (Deep house, garage & nu disco producer from Mumbai) Song: Money Talks Album: Money Talks https://www.facebook.com/fuzzylogicsounds http://www.arfaaz.com/personal/fuzz/ Mandeep Sethi (rapper & emcee from Los Angeles) Song: So Ja Album: Ajna Chakra Mixtape @mandeepsethi https://mandeepsethi.bandcamp.com/ https://www.youtube.com/user/MandeepSethiVEVO Yohan Marshall & The Mischiefs https://www.facebook.com/yohanmarshallofficial http://www.oklisten.com/album/your_silence

Tonight the mysterious Homeless man (David Ault), Noel (Lyn Cullen), the waitress help Jack find the meaning of his life in the Christmas Cafe and we get to meet "Santa's Kitty" from Misfits Audio