Podcasts about Jesper

I veckans avsnitt möter vi tv-profilen och entreprenören Mia Parnevik, som bjuder på ett öppet och underhållande samtal om livet bakom rubrikerna – och om självbiografin som kom att bli hennes eget ”terapiår”.Vi pratar om allt från flytten till USA som 18-åring till hur det var att bygga ett eget mansion och leva ett liv där resor upptar 27 veckor om året. Mia delar sina tankar om lycka, självkänsla och hur mental styrka avgör ens välmående. Hon berättar också om hur klimakteriet för första gången fick henne att tappa fotfästet – och hur nära det faktiskt var att allt slutade riktigt illa.Dessutom får vi en inblick i relationen med Jesper: varför de väljer att förnya sina löften, vilka nycklar de hittat till ett långvarigt och lyckligt äktenskap, och hur deras resa tillsammans format henne. Mia berättar även om vikten av att följa sin passion – drivkraften bakom att hon nu tagit klivet in i entreprenörslivet på allvar.Det här är ett avsnitt fyllt av skratt, värme och fantastiska historier, men också djupa insikter. Ett samtal du verkligen inte vill missa!Följ Mia Parnevik här.Köp Mia Parneviks självbiografi här.Läs mer om Framgångsakademin här.Ta del av Framgångsakademins kurser.Beställ "Mitt Framgångsår".Följ Alexander Pärleros på Instagram.Följ Alexander Pärleros på Tiktok.Bästa tipsen från avsnittet i Nyhetsbrevet.I samarbete med Convendum.I samarbete med Convendum. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I veckans avsnitt möter vi tv-profilen och entreprenören Mia Parnevik, som bjuder på ett öppet och underhållande samtal om livet bakom rubrikerna – och om självbiografin som kom att bli hennes eget ”terapiår”.Vi pratar om allt från flytten till USA som 18-åring till hur det var att bygga ett eget mansion och leva ett liv där resor upptar 27 veckor om året. Mia delar sina tankar om lycka, självkänsla och hur mental styrka avgör ens välmående. Hon berättar också om hur klimakteriet för första gången fick henne att tappa fotfästet – och hur nära det faktiskt var att allt slutade riktigt illa.Dessutom får vi en inblick i relationen med Jesper: varför de väljer att förnya sina löften, vilka nycklar de hittat till ett långvarigt och lyckligt äktenskap, och hur deras resa tillsammans format henne. Mia berättar även om vikten av att följa sin passion – drivkraften bakom att hon nu tagit klivet in i entreprenörslivet på allvar.Det här är ett avsnitt fyllt av skratt, värme och fantastiska historier, men också djupa insikter. Ett samtal du verkligen inte vill missa!Följ Mia Parnevik här.Köp Mia Parneviks självbiografi här.Läs mer om Framgångsakademin här.Ta del av Framgångsakademins kurser.Beställ "Mitt Framgångsår".Följ Alexander Pärleros på Instagram.Följ Alexander Pärleros på Tiktok.Bästa tipsen från avsnittet i Nyhetsbrevet.I samarbete med Convendum.I samarbete med Convendum. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I veckans avsnitt är Jesper och Elina experter på experter. Jesper djupdyker i idén om "post-truth" och förklarar varför politiker plötsligt blev så intresserade av sanning. Elina pratar om experterna i medier, som plötsligt kan förflytta sitt expertområde och anses vara kunniga inom lite allt möjligt; trans, folkbildning, brott... Trots att alla vill ha experter verkar ingen gilla expertis på riktigt. Elina ringer upp människorättsjuristen Abdi Hassan och frågar varför politiker slutat lyssna på sakkunniga. Och sist men inte minst: Elina och Jesper avslöjar vilka ämnen de själva är rädda att få frågor om.    Jinglar: Gerald Lombano Klippare: Joel Zettergren

Supergrappig en spannend fictie-avontuur over meester Jesper en zijn klas. Uitgegeven door Witte Leeuw Spreker: Jesper Hesseling

Medverkande i detta avsnitt är: Poki, Jesper och Fredrik.I detta avsnitt bjuder vi på samtal om spel, film och mycket mer - Allt i en för tidig Julklapp från oss till er! Läs längst ner för kommande avsnitt!Spel & spelrelaterat som tas upp:Bionic Bay,Project Diablo 2,KARMA: The Dark World,Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT GAMING OC 16G BANG FOR YOUR BUCK-GPU,Soundcore Sleep A30 Smart ANC Earbuds,LEGO Game Boy,Utawarerumono: Prelude the Fallen,Double Dragon Revive,Film/TV/Anime/Musik som tas upp:Wandance,Beheneko: The Elf-Girl's Cat is Secretly an S-Ranked Monster!,Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood, Monster,Stranger Things Säsong 5 - första intryck (avsnitt 1-4),Övrigt som tas upp:Q & A för podden; Gällande live-service-spel, Julklappstips och ljudkvalitet för poddar - och vad som rekommenderas. Vi river även snabbt av "Månadens spelsläpp" för december och januari. Detta och mycket mer i dagens säsongsavslutning!SÄSONGSAVSLUTNING - ordinarie avsnitt tillbaka först den 25 Januari 2026.Kommande avsnitt:535 - RETRO GOTY 2009536 - JULAVSNITT - Metacritic the game - Xmas 2025 edition!537 - JULAVSNITT - Ice vs 90-talet (Julavsnitt)538 - RETRO GOTY 2010 (nyårsavsnitt)539 - Game of the Year 2025 Part 1540 - Game of the Year 2025 Part 2541 - BINGO GOTY 2025

Im aktuellen Podcast des Brettspiel-News-Teams moderiert Dennis die vierte Folge in neuer Besetzung und ist zusammen mit René, Jesper und Philipp am Tisch.Die Episode beginnt mit einem Ausblick auf die kommenden Feiertagsfolgen, darunter spezielle Weihnachts- und Rückblick-Folgen, in denen die besten Spiele des Jahres diskutiert werden. Die Gastgeber zeigen sich jedoch auch offen für kreative Ideen, um die Spielerfahrung während der Feiertage zu bereichern, und denken über potenzielle Themen nach, die den Zuhörern spannende Anregungen bieten könnten. Ein besonderer Fokus liegt auf den Spielen, die die Gastgeber kürzlich gespielt haben. Die Runde sprudelt förmlich über vor Ideen und Anregungen.Dennis präsentiert das Partyspiel "Ultraviolett", eine kreative und witzige Erfahrung, bei der die Spieler Geschichten zeichnen, ohne zu sehen, was sie zeichnen. Der Einsatz von UV-Stiften sorgt für besonderen Spaß, da die Qualität der Zeichnungen durch die Unkenntnis über das Geschaffene radikal beeinträchtigt wird, was zu amüsanten Ergebnissen führt. Das Spiel scheint gut geeignet zu sein, um bei einem geselligen Abend unter Freunden das Lachen herauszulocken, auch wenn der Zeichenstil dabei eher rudimentär bleibt.Es folgt eine Vorstellung von Jespers Spiel "Der Hobbit - Hin und zurück", einem Roll-and-Ride-Spiel, das die Geschichte von Bilbo Beutlin thematisiert. Jeder Spieler zeichnet seinen Weg durch die Abenteuer der Zwerge, was durch das Ziehen von bestimmten Würfeln und den Aufbau von Verbindungen im Spiel umgesetzt wird. Die simplicistische Familienfreundlichkeit wird kritisiert, da die ersten Kapitel des Spiels als zu einfach wahrgenommen werden, aber die Hoffnung bleibt, dass sich die Komplexität in späteren Kapiteln entfalten könnte.In der Mitte der Episode wechselt das Thema auf "The Witcher: Old World", ein kooperatives Abenteuer, das sich um Charakterentwicklung und Deckbuilding dreht. Die Spieler schlüpfen in die Rollen von Hexern und gehen auf Jagd nach Trophäen und Abenteuern. Während die Interaktionen mit der Spielwelt für Aufregung sorgen, wird auch hier über den administrativen Aufwand und die mögliche Frustration diskutiert, die mit dem Spieldesign einhergehen können. Die Downtime wird besprochen, wobei das Spielprinzip und das Material ihnen jedoch gut gefallen.Die Hosts teilen auch ihre Erfahrungen mit kleineren, schnellen Spielen wie "Slide", ein einfaches und unterhaltsames Spiel, bei dem präsentierte Kärtchen geschoben werden, um Punkte zu sammeln. Hier wird ein hohes Maß an Interaktion und Motivation betont, was es perfekt für Familie und Freunde macht.Das Gespräch endet mit der Vorstellung des Spiels "Orapa Mine", das als eine anspruchsvolle Abwandlung von "Schiffe Versenken" beschrieben wird, wobei die Spieler durch kluges Fragen versuchen, die Position von Kristallen in einem Raster zu ermitteln. Diese kreative Herangehensweise wird als frisch und ansprechend präsentiert und gestaltet sich leicht verständlich, ideal für schnelle Duelle zwischen zwei Spielern.Mit dieser vielseitigen Sammlung an Spielen endet die Episode, und die Gastgeber freuen sich darauf, kommende Geschehnisse in weiteren Folgen zu diskutieren und dabei ihre Erfahrungen mit verschiedenen Spielewelten zu teilen.

Strong demand and cheap debt are a potent combination for both domestic and international investors looking to grow their presence in Japan's hotel industry. This month's check in on the Asia Pacific region is a conversation with STR's Jesper Palmqvist and CBRE's Steve Carroll focusing on that topic, along with the rebound in Hong Kong and Australia's recent cricket success against England.

Jonte, Ingo och Jesper kör onsdag! Vi pratar om ordvitsar i olika nivåer, film från 80-talet, allsång på skansen, sprit och mycket mer! Godmorgon merch finns nu på www.gamang.se!Följ Godmorgon på Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/godmorgonpodd/

East. It's been a long time since I've seen the Storm. Some internal engine of the universe has wound down. Only our tribe matters.The Twelfth Supplemental Frequency from Observable Radio, a found footage podcast from Cameron Suey, Phil van Hest, Purpurina, and Wendy Hector.The EnsemblePhil van HestWritten by Cameron SueyProduced by Cameron Suey, Phil van Hest, Purpurina, and Wendy HectorEdited by Cameron SueyArt by Karrin FletcherPsychology Consultant - Elisa Leal, Psy.D (CA PSY28330)Our Theme Music is: The Backrooms by MyuuAdditional Music provided by Tim Kulig, the artists at Epidemic SoundMaking the Trip Home - American LegionLoner on a Cliff - Johan GlossnerOpen Minds - Johan GlossnerUnder the Dark Sky - Johan GlossnerArizona - Lennon HuttonWhispers of the Wasteland - Victor LundbergA Wasteland Lullaby - Victor LundbergDesert Moon Serenade - TellsonicDesert Wind - TellsonicRaised by Wolves - TellsonicWhere Daylight Falls Silent - TellsonicShootout - Roy Edwin WilliamsSFX by Epidemic Sound or artists at Freesound.org covered under the following licenses:creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Observable Radio is made by humans, and all performances are subject to the NAVA AI rider. No portion of this audio may be used to train AI.Special Thanks to Cathleen, Jon, Tid, Russ, Kalasin, Rick, Brianna, Zach, Jesper and all our patrons and listeners.Visit the Observable Radio Company Store at observableradio.com/store. There you'll find stickers, enamel pins, t-shirts, on sale and shipping anywhere in the world.Observable Radio is listener supported. If you would like to contribute towards our production costs as well as get access to behind the scenes information, and an ad-free early release feed of this show, you can do so at: patreon.com/observableradio

Let's be honest – the occlusion after Aligner cases can be a little ‘off' (even after fixed appliances!) How do you know if your patient's occlusion after aligner treatment is acceptable or risky? What practical guidelines can general dentists follow to manage occlusion when orthodontic results aren't textbook-perfect? Jaz and Dr. Jesper Hatt explore the most common challenges dentists face, from ClinCheck errors and digital setup pitfalls to balancing aesthetics with functional occlusion. They also discuss key strategies to help you evaluate, guide, and optimize occlusion in your patients, because understanding what is acceptable and what needs intervention can make all the difference in long-term treatment stability and patient satisfaction. https://youtu.be/e74lUbyTCaA Watch PDP250 on YouTube Protrusive Dental Pearl: Harmony and Occlusal Compatibility Always ensure restorative anatomy suits the patient's natural occlusal scheme and age-related wear. If opposing teeth are flat and amalgam-filled, polished cuspal anatomy will be incompatible — flatten as needed to conform. Need to Read it? Check out the Full Episode Transcript below! Key Takeaways Common mistakes in ClinCheck planning often stem from occlusion issues. Effective communication and documentation are crucial in clinical support. Occlusion must be set correctly to ensure successful treatment outcomes. Understanding the patient’s profile is essential for effective orthodontics. Collaboration between GPs and orthodontists can enhance patient care. Retention of orthodontic results is a lifelong commitment. Aesthetic goals must align with functional occlusion in treatment planning. Informed consent is critical when discussing potential surgical interventions. The tongue plays a crucial role in orthodontic outcomes. Spacing cases should often be approached as restorative cases. Aligners can achieve precise spacing more effectively than fixed appliances. Enamel adjustments may be necessary for optimal occlusion post-treatment. Retention strategies must be tailored to individual patient needs. Case assessment is vital for determining treatment complexity. Highlights of this episode: 00:00 Teaser 00:59 Intro 02:53  Pearl – Harmony and Occlusal Compatibility 05:57 Dr. Jesper Hatt Introduction 07:34 Clinical Support Systems 10:18 Occlusion and Aligner Therapy 20:41 Bite Recording Considerations 25:32 Collaborative Approach in Orthodontics 30:31 Occlusal Goals vs. Aesthetic Goals 31:42 Midroll 35:03 Occlusal Goals vs. Aesthetic Goals 35:25 Challenges with Spacing Cases 42:19 Occlusion Checkpoints After Aligners 50:17 Considerations for Retention 54:55 Case Assessment and Treatment Planning 58:14 Key Lessons and Final Thoughts 01:00:19 Interconnectedness of Body and Teeth 01:02:48 Resources for Dentists and Case Support 01:04:40 Outro Free Aligner Case Support!Send your patient's case number and get a full assessment in 24 hours—easy, moderate, complex, or referral. Plus, access our 52-point planning protocol and 2-min photo course. No uploads, no cost. [Get Free Access Now] Learn more at alignerservice.com If you enjoyed this episode, don't miss: Do's and Don'ts of Aligners [STRAIGHTPRIL] – PDP071 #PDPMainEpisodes #OcclusionTMDandSplints #OrthoRestorative This episode is eligible for 1 CE credit via the quiz on Protrusive Guidance. This episode meets GDC Outcomes A and C. AGD Subject Code: 370 ORTHODONTICS (Functional orthodontic therapy) Aim: To provide general dentists with practical guidance for managing occlusion in aligner therapy, from bite capture to retention, including common pitfalls, functional considerations, and case selection. Dentists will be able to – Identify common errors in digital bite capture and occlusion setup. Understand the impact of anterior inclination and mandibular movement patterns on occlusal stability. Plan retention strategies appropriate for aligner and restorative cases. Click below for full episode transcript: Teaser: The one thing that we always check initially is the occlusion set correct by the aligner company. Because if the occlusion is not set correctly, everything else just doesn't matter because the teeth will move, but into a wrong position because the occlusion is off from the beginning. I don't know about you, but if half the orthodontists are afraid of controlling the root movements in extraction cases, as a GP, I would be terrified. Teaser:I don’t care if you just move from premolar to premolar or all the teeth. Orthodontics is orthodontics, so you will affect all the teeth during the treatment. The question’s just how much. Imagine going to a football stadium. The orthodontist will be able to find the football stadium.  If it’s a reasonable orthodontist, he’ll be able to find the section you’re going to sit in, and if he’s really, really, really good, he will be able to find the row that you’re going to sit in, but the exact spot where you are going to sit… he will never, ever be able to find that with orthodontics. Jaz’s Introduction: Hello, Protruserati. I’m Jaz Gulati. Welcome back to your favorite dental podcast. I’m joined today by our guest, Dr. Jesper Hatt. All this dentist does is help other dentists with their treatment plans for aligners. From speaking to him, I gather that he’s no longer practicing clinically and is full-time clinical support for colleagues for their aligner cases. So there’s a lot we can learn from someone who day in day out has to do so much treatment planning and speaking to GDPs about their cases, how they’re tracking, how they’re not tracking, complications, and then years of seeing again, okay, how well did that first set of aligners actually perform? What is predictable and what isn’t? And as well as asking what are the most common errors we make on our ClinChecks or treatment plan softwares. I really wanted to probe in further. I really want to ask him about clinical guidelines for occlusion after ortho. Sometimes we treat a case and whilst the aesthetics of that aligner case is beautiful, the occlusion is sometimes not as good. So let’s talk about what that actually means. What is a not-good occlusion? What is a good occlusion? And just to offer some guidelines for practitioners to follow because guess what? No orthodontist in the world is gonna ever get the occlusion correct through ortho. Therefore, we as GPs are never gonna get a perfect textbook occlusion, but we need to understand what is acceptable and what is a good guideline to follow. That’s exactly what we’ll present to you in this episode today. Dental PearlNow, this is a CE slash CPD eligible episode and as our main PDP episode, I’ll give you a Protrusive Dental Pearl. Today’s pearl is very much relevant to the theme of orthodontics and occlusion we’re discussing today, and it’s probably a pearl I’ve given to you already in the past somewhere down the line, but it’s so important and so key. I really want to just emphasize on it again. In fact, a colleague messaged me recently and it reminded me of this concept I’m about to explain. She sent me an image of a resin bonded bridge she did, which had failed. It was a lower incisor, and just a few days after bonding, it failed. And so this dentist is feeling a bit embarrassed and wanted my advice. Now, by the way, guys, if you message me for advice on Instagram, on Facebook, or something like that, it’s very hit and miss. Like my priorities in life are family, health, and everything that happens on Protrusive Guidance. Our network. If you message me outside that network, I may not see it. The team might, but I may not see it. It’s the only way that I can really maintain control and calm in my life. The reason for saying this, I don’t want anyone to be offended. I’m not ignoring anyone. It’s just the volume of messages I get year on year, they’re astronomical. And I don’t mind if you nudge me. If you messaged me something weeks or months ago and I haven’t replied, I probably haven’t seen it. Please do nudge me. And the best place to catch me on is Protrusive Guidance. If you DM me on Protrusive Guidance, home of the nicest and geekiest dentists in the world, that’s the only platform I will log in daily. That’s our baby, our community. Anyway, so I caught this Facebook message and it was up to me to help this colleague. And one observation I made is that the lower teeth were all worn. The upper teeth were really worn, but this resin bonded bridge pontic, it just looked like a perfect tooth. The patient was something like 77 or 80. So it really made me think that, okay, why are we putting something that looks like a 25-year-old’s tooth in a 77-year-old? But even forgetting age and stuff, you have to look at the adjacent teeth in the arch. Is your restoration harmonious with the other teeth in the arch, and of course is the restoration harmonious with what’s opposing it? Because it’s just not compatible. So part one of this pearl is make sure any restoration you do, whether it’s direct or indirect, is harmonious with the patient’s arch and with the opposing teeth and with their occlusal scheme. Because otherwise, if you get rubber dam on and you give your 75-year-old patient beautiful composite resin, it’s got all that cuspal fissure pattern and anatomy, and you take that rubber dam off and you notice that all the other teeth are flat and the opposing teeth are flat amalgams, guess what? You’re gonna be making your composite flat, whether you like it or not. You created a restoration that’s proud, right? That’s why you did not conform to the patient’s own arch or existing anatomical scheme. So the part B of this is the thing that I get very excited to talk about, right? So sometimes you have a worn dentition, but then you have one tooth that’s not worn at all. It’s like that in-standing lateral incisor, right? Think of an upper lateral incisor that’s a bit in-standing, and you see some wear on all the incisors, but that lateral incisor does not have any wear in it because it was never in the firing line. It was never in function. It was never in parafunction. Now, if you give this patient aligners or fixed appliances, you’re doing ortho and you’re now going to align this lateral incisor. So it’s now gonna eventually get into occlusion and it will be in the functional and parafunctional pathways of this patient. Do you really think you can just leave that incisor be? No. It’s not gonna be compatible with the adjacent teeth. It’s not going to be compatible with the opposing tooth and the occlusal scheme. So guess what? You have to get your bur out or your Sof-Lex disc out, and you have to bake in some years into that tooth. Or you have to build up all the other teeth if appropriate for that patient. You’ve just gotta think about it. And I hope that makes sense so you can stay out of trouble. You’re not gonna get chipping and you can consent your patient appropriately for enamel adjustment, which is something that we do talk about in this episode. I think you’re in for an absolute cracker. I hope you enjoy. I’ll catch you in the outro. Main Episode: Doctor Jesper Hatt, thank you so much for coming to Protrusive Dental Podcast. We met in Scandinavia, in Copenhagen. You delivered this wonderful lecture and it was so nice to connect with you then and to finally have you on the show. Tell us, how are you, where in the world are you, and tell us about yourself. [Jesper] Well, thank you for the invitation, first of all. Well, I’m a dentist. I used to practice in Denmark since I originally come from Denmark. My mother’s from Germany, and now I live in Switzerland and have stopped practicing dentistry since 2018. Now I only do consulting work and I help doctors around the world with making their aligner business successful. [Jaz] And this is like probably clinical advice, but also like strategic advice and positioning and that kinda stuff. Probably the whole shebang, right? [Jesper] Yeah. I mean, I have a team around me, so my wife’s a dentist as well, and I would say she’s the expert in Europe on clear aligners. She’s been working for, first of all, our practice. She’s a dentist too. She worked with me in the practice. We practiced together for 10 years. Then she became a clinical advisor for Allion Tech with responsibility for clinical support of Scandinavia. She was headhunted to ClearCorrect, worked in Basel while I was doing more and more consulting stuff in Denmark. So she was traveling back and forth, and I considered this to be a little bit challenging for our family. So I asked her, well, why don’t we just relocate to Switzerland since ClearCorrect is located there? And sure we did. And after two years she told me, I think clinical support, it’s okay. And I like to train the teams, but I’d really like to do more than that because she found out that doctors, they were able to book a spot sometime in the future, let’s say two weeks out in the future at a time that suited the doctors… no, not the doctors, ClearCorrect. Or Invisalign or whatever clear aligner company you use. So as a doctor, you’re able to block the spot and at that time you can have your 30 minutes one-on-one online with a clinical expert. And she said it’s always between the patients or administrative stuff. So they’re not really focused on their ClearCorrect or clear aligner patient. And so they forget half of what I tell them. I can see it in the setups they do. They end up having to call me again. It doesn’t work like that. I would like to help them. [Jaz] It’s a clunky pathway of mentorship. [Jesper] Yes. And so she wanted to change the way clinical support was built up. So we do it differently. We do it only in writing so people can remember what we are telling them. They can always go back in the note and see what’s been going on, what was the advice we gave them, and we offer this co-creation support where we take over most of the treatment planning of the ClearCorrect or Clear Aligner or Spark or Invisalign or Angel Aligner treatment planning. So we do all the digital planning for the doctor, deliver what we think would be right for the patient based on the feedback we initially got from the doctor. And then the doctor can come back and say, well, I’d like a little more space for some crowns in the front, or I would like the canines to be in a better position in order to achieve immediate post disclusion. And so we can go into this discussion back and forth and adjust the digital setup in a way that is more realistic and predictable and do it all for the doctors. So they, on an average, they spend four to six hours less chair time when they use that kind of service compared to if they do everything themselves. And on top of that, you can put your planning time. She was responsible for that and it works quite well. I still remember when we initially got on all these online calls and we would see fireworks in the background and confetti coming down from the top and all of that. [Jaz] Exactly. So excuse that little bit, but okay. So essentially what you’re doing is, for an aligner user myself, for example, you’re doing the ClinChecks, you are helping, supporting with the ClinChecks, the planning. And I’ve got a lot of questions about that. The first question I’ll start with, which is off the script, but there’s probably a hundred different mistakes that could happen in a ClinCheck, right? But what is the most repeatable, predictable, common mistake that you’ll see when a new user sends a case to you to help them with their planning? What’s the most common mistake that you will see in a setup? [Jesper] Two things, actually. The one thing that we always check initially is the occlusion set correct by the aligner company. Because if the occlusion is not set correctly, everything else just doesn’t matter because the teeth will move but into a wrong position because the occlusion is off from the beginning. And so we always check that as the first part. How does this— [Jaz] So let’s talk about that ’cause that might be confusing for a younger colleague because they’re like, hey, hang on a minute. I scanned the bite left and right. What do you mean the occlusion is wrong? Because surely that gets carried through into what I see on the ClinCheck. So what do you think is the mechanism for this to happen? [Jesper] Two different reasons. I’m from a time when I graduated in 2003, so that was before digital dentistry. So when I went to the Pankey Institute and learned everything about functional occlusion and all of that stuff, I also found out that most of my patients, when I put silicone impression material between the teeth and asked the patients to bite together, they would always protrude a little bit unless I instructed them to bite hard on the posterior teeth. And when we got the scanners, when we put a scanner into the cheek and pull the cheek, most patients, when we asked them to bite together to do the intraoral scan of the bite, they also protruded a little bit, not much, but enough to set the bite wrong. So that is the one challenge when the technicians of the aligner companies put the models together. The other challenge is that some of the aligner companies, they let the technicians set the models. We always, as the first thing when we see a case, we always look at the photos, the clinical photos. And that’s why the clinical photos have to be of great quality. So we look at the clinical photos of the patient— [Jaz] And also in those clinical photos, Jesper, you have to coach them correctly to bite. You have to notice if they’re biting wrong even in the photos ’cause then it just duplicates the error. And that’s why good photography and actually being able to coach the patient is so imperative. [Jesper] Yes, that’s correct. But we compare the two and usually if we see a difference, we ask the doctor, is what we see in the photo correct, or is what we see on the digital models correct? And because we don’t like differences. So that would be the first step to look for. And what’s the second? The second thing is that when you look at the setup, the anterior teeth are usually—I’m trying to show you—the anterior teeth are very, very steep. Typically with aligners it’s a lot easier to tip the crowns. So when you have a class II patient, deviation one, where the anteriors are in a forward position, proclined, and you have a lot of space between the anteriors of the maxilla and the mandible, then the easiest thing on a digital setup is to just retrocline the anteriors of the upper to make them fit the lowers, which you could then procline a little bit, but usually you have very steep relationships between the two and this— [Jaz] So you’re more likely to restrict the envelope of function, functional interference anteriorly. You are obviously reducing the overjet, but you may end up reducing like a wall contact rather than an elegant, more open gate. [Jesper] Yes. And there’s another dimension to this because when we work with orthodontics, one of the most important things to look for is actually the profile of the patient. Because let’s say I’m trying to illustrate this now, so I hope you get a 90— [Jaz] So describe it for our audio listeners as well. So we’re looking at a profile view of Jesper. [Jesper] Yes. So I’m turning the side to the camera. I hope you can see my profile here. So let’s say I had flared anterior maxillary teeth and I wanted to retrocline them. It would have an effect on my upper lip, so the lip would fall backwards if I just retrocline everything. And every millimeter we move the anteriors in the maxilla in a posterior direction, we will have a potential lip drop of three millimeters. In addition, if we don’t get the nasolabial angulation correct, we risk the lower face will simply disappear in the face of the patient. So soft tissue plays a role here, so we cannot just retrocline the teeth. It looks great on the computer screen, but when it comes to reality, we’ll have a functional challenge. We’ll have a soft tissue support challenge, and in addition we’ll have long-term retention challenges as well. Because when you have a steep inclination, the anterior teeth in the mandible, they don’t have any kind of support. They will not be stopped by anything in the maxillary teeth, which you would if you had the right inclination between the teeth, which would be about 120 degrees. So why do aligner companies always set the teeth straight up and down in the anterior part? We wondered about this for years. We don’t have a strict answer. We don’t know exactly why it’s like this, but I have a hunch. I think there are two things to it. First of all, the easiest thing to do with aligners is to move the crown, so we can just tip the teeth. You take them back, you make a lot of IPR, and then you just tip them so they’re retroclined. Secondly, all aligner companies, they come from the United States. And in the United States there is a higher representation of class III patients. Now why is that important? All our patients can be put into two different categories in regards to how they move their mandible. They are the crocodiles that only open and close, like move up and down, and then we have the cows. And then we have the cows that move the mandible around, or the camels. I mean, every camel, if you’ve seen a camel chew, it’s just moving from side to side. [Jaz] Horses as well. Horses as well. [Jesper] They kind of do that. [Jaz] But I’m glad you didn’t say rats ’cause it’s more elegant to be a crocodile than a rat. [Jesper] Exactly. And I usually say we only tell the crocodiles. So why is this a challenge and why isn’t it a challenge with class III patients? Well, all real class III patients act like crocodiles, so they don’t move them side to side. From a functional perspective, it’s really not a problem having steep anterior inclination or steep relationships as long as you have a stable stop where the anteriors—so the anteriors will not elongate and create the red effect. So they just elongate until they hit the palate. If you can make a stop in the anterior part of the occlusion, then you’ll have some kind of stability with the class III patients. But with class II patients, we see a lot more cows. So they move the mandible from side to side and anterior and back and forth and all… they have the mandible going all kinds of places. And when they do that, we need some kind of anterior guidance to guide the mandible. I usually say the upper jaw creates the framework in which the mandible will move. So if the framework is too small, we fight the muscles. And whenever we fight the muscles, we lose because muscles always win. It doesn’t matter if it’s teeth, if it’s bone, if it’s joints, they all lose if they fight the muscles— [Jaz] As Peter Dawson would say, in the war between teeth and muscles or any system and muscles, the muscles always win. Absolutely. And the other analogy you remind me of is the maxilla being like a garage or “garage” from UK, like a garage. And the mandible being like the car, and if you’re really constrained, you’re gonna crash in and you’re gonna… everything will be in tatters. So that’s another great way to think about it. Okay. That’s very, very helpful. I’m gonna—’cause there’s so much I wanna cover. And I think you’ve really summed up nicely. But one thing just to finish on this aspect of that common mistake being that the upper anteriors are retroclined, really what you’re trying to say is we need to be looking at other modalities, other movements. So I’m thinking you’re saying extraction, if it’s suitable for the face, or distalisation. Are you thinking like that rather than the easier thing for the aligners, which is the retrocline. Am I going about it the right way? [Jesper] Depends on the patient. [Jaz] Of course. [Jesper] Rule of thumb: if you’re a GP, don’t ever touch extraction cases. Rule of thumb. Why? Because it is extremely challenging to move teeth parallel. So you will most—especially with aligners—I mean, I talk with a very respected orthodontist once and I asked him, well, what do you think about GPs treating extraction cases where they extract, you know, two premolars in the maxilla? And he said, well, I don’t know how to answer this. Let me just explain to you: half of my orthodontist colleagues, they are afraid of extraction cases. And I asked them why. Because it’s so hard to control the root movement. Now, I don’t know about you— [Jaz] With aligners. We’re specifically talking about aligners here, right? [Jesper] With all kinds of orthodontic appliances. [Jaz] Thank you. [Jesper] So now, I don’t know about you, but if half the orthodontists are afraid of controlling the root movements in extraction cases, as a GP, I would be terrified. And I am a GP. So I usually say, yeah, sometimes you will have so much crowding and so little space in the mandible, so there’s an incisor that is almost popped out by itself. In those cases, yes. Then you can do an extraction case. But when we’re talking about premolars that are going to be extracted, or if you want to close the space in the posterior part by translating a tooth into that open space, don’t. It’s just the easiest way to end up in a disaster because the only thing you’ll see is just teeth that tip into that space, and you’ll have a really hard time controlling the root movements, getting them corrected again. [Jaz] Well, thank you for offering that guideline. I think that’s very sage advice for those GPs doing aligners, to stay in your lane and just be… the best thing about being a GP, Jesper, is you get to cherry pick, right? There’s so many bad things about being a GP. Like you literally have to be kinda like a micro-specialist in everything in a way. And so sometimes it’s good to be like, you know what, I’ll keep this and I’ll send this out. And being selective and case selection is the crux of everything. So I’m really glad you mentioned that. I mean, we talked and touched already on so much occlusion. The next question I’m gonna ask you then is, like you said, a common error is the bite and how the bite appears on the ClinCheck or whichever software a dentist is using. Now, related to bite, vast majority of orthodontic cases are treated in the patient’s existing habitual occlusion, their maximum intercuspal position. Early on in my aligner journey, I had a patient who had an anterior crossbite. And because of that anterior crossbite, their jaw deviated. It was a displaced—the lower jaw displaced. And then I learned from that, that actually for that instance, perhaps I should not have used an MIP scan. I should have used more like centric relation or first point of contact scan before the displacement of the jaw happens. So that was like always in my mind. Sometimes we can and should be using an alternative TMJ position or a bite reference other than MIP. Firstly, what do you think about that kind of scenario and are there any other scenarios which you would suggest that we should not be using the patient’s habitual occlusion for their bite scan for planning orthodontics? [Jesper] Well, I mentioned that I was trained at the Pankey Institute, and when you start out right after—I mean, I spent 400 hours over there. Initially, I thought I was a little bit brainwashed by that because I thought every single patient should be in centric relation. Now, after having put more than 600 patients on the bite appliance first before I did anything, I started to see some patterns. And so today, I would say it’s not all patients that I would get into centric relation before I start treating the teeth. But when we talk about aligner therapy and orthodontic treatment, I think it’s beneficial if you can see the signs for those patients where you would say, hmm, something in the occlusion here could be a little bit risky. So let’s say there are wear facets on the molars. That will always trigger a red flag in my head. Let’s say there are crossbites or bite positions that kind of lock in the teeth. We talked about class III patients before, and I said if it’s a real skeletal-deviation class III patient, it’s a crocodile. But sometimes patients are not real class III skeletal deviation patients. They’re simply being forced into a class III due to the occlusion. That’s where the teeth fit together. So once you put aligners between the teeth and plastic covers the surfaces, suddenly the patients are able to move the jaws more freely and then they start to seat into centric. That may be okay. Usually it is okay. The challenge is consequences. So when you’re a GP and you suddenly see a patient moving to centric relation and you find out, whoa, on a horizontal level there’s a four- to six-millimeter difference between the initial starting point and where we are now, and maybe we create an eight-millimeter open bite in the anterior as well because they simply seat that much. And I mean, we have seen it. So is this a disaster? Well, it depends. If you have informed the patient well enough initially and said, well, you might have a lower jaw that moves into a different position when we start out, and if this new position is really, really off compared to where you are right now, you might end up needing maxillofacial surgery, then the patient’s prepared. But if they’re not prepared and you suddenly have to tell them, you know, I think we might need maxillofacial surgery… I can come up with a lot of patients in my head that would say, hey doctor, that was not part of my plan. And they will be really disappointed. And at that point there’s no turning back, so you can’t reverse. So I think if you are unsure, then you are sure. Then you should use some kind of deprogramming device or figure out where is centric relation on this patient. If there isn’t that much of a difference between maximum intercuspation and centric— [Jesper] Relation, I don’t care. Because once you start moving the teeth, I don’t care if you just move from premolar to premolar or all the teeth. Orthodontics is orthodontics, so you will affect all the teeth during the treatment. The question’s just how much. And sometimes it’s just by putting plastic between the teeth that you will see a change, not in the tooth position, but in the mandibular position. And I just think it’s nicer to know a little bit where this is going before you start. And the more you see of this—I mean, as I mentioned, after 600 bite appliances in the mouths of my patients, I started to see patterns. And sometimes in the end, after 20 years of practicing, I started to say, let’s just start, see where this ends. But I would always inform the patients: if it goes totally out of control, we might end up needing surgery, and there’s no way to avoid it if that happens. And if the patients were okay with that, we’d just start out. Because I mean, is it bad? No. I just start the orthodontic treatment and I set the teeth as they should be in the right framework. Sometimes the upper and the lower jaw don’t fit together. Well, send them to the surgeon and they will move either the upper or the lower jaw into the right position, and then we have it. No harm is done because we have done the initial work that the orthodontist would do. But I will say when I had these surgical patients—let’s say we just started out with aligners and we figured, I can’t control this enough. I need a surgeon to look at this—then I would send them off to an orthodontist, and the orthodontist and the surgeon would take over. Because then—I mean, surgical patients and kids—that’s the second group of patients besides the extraction cases that I would not treat as a GP. ‘Cause we simply don’t know enough about how to affect growth on kids. And when it comes to surgery, there’s so much that is… so much knowledge that we need to know and the collaboration with the surgeons that we’re not trained to handle. So I think that should be handled by the orthodontists as well. [Jaz] I think collaborative cases like that are definitely specialist in nature, and I think that’s a really good point. I think the point there was informed consent. The mistake is you don’t warn the patient or you do not do the correct screening. So again, I always encourage my guests—so Jesper, you included—that we may disagree, and that’s okay. That’s the beauty of dentistry. So something that I look for is: if the patient has a stable and repeatable maximum intercuspal position, things lock very well, and there’s a minimal slide—like I use my leaf gauge and the CR-CP is like a small number of leaves and the jaw hardly moves a little bit—then there’s no point of uncoupling them, removing that nice posterior coupling that they have just to chase this elusive joint position. Then you have to do so many more teeth. But when we have a breakdown in the system, which you kind of said, if there’s wear as one aspect, or we think that, okay, this patient’s occlusion is not really working for them, then we have an opportunity to do full-mouth rehabilitation in enamel. Because that’s what orthodontics is. And so that’s a point to consider. So I would encourage our GP colleagues to look at the case, look at the patient in front of you, and decide: is this a stable, repeatable occlusion that you would like to use as a baseline, or is there something wrong? Then consider referring out or considering—if you’re more advanced in occlusion studies—using an alternative position, not the patient’s own bite as a reference. So anything you wanna add to that or disagree with in that monologue I just said there? [Jesper] No, I think there’s one thing I’d like the listeners to consider. I see a lot of fighting between orthodontists and GPs, and I think it should be a collaboration instead. There’s a lot of orthodontists that are afraid of GPs taking over more and more aligner treatments, and they see a huge increase in the amount of cases that go wrong. Well, there’s a huge increase of patients being treated, so there will be more patients, just statistically, that will get into problems. Now, if the orthodontist is smart—in my opinion, that’s my opinion—they reach out to all their referring doctors and they tell them, look, come in. I will teach you which cases you can start with and which you should refer. Let’s start there. Start your aligner treatments. Start out, try stuff. I will be there to help you if you run into problems. So whenever you see a challenge, whenever there’s a problem, send the patient over to me and I’ll take over. But I will be there to help you if anything goes wrong. Now, the reason this is really, really a great business advice for the orthodontists is because once you teach the GPs around you to look for deviations from the normal, which would be the indication for orthodontics, the doctors start to diagnose and see a lot more patients needing orthodontics and prescribe it to the patients, or at least propose it to the patients. Which would initially not do much more than just increase the amount of aligner treatments. But over time, I tell you, all the orthodontists doing this, they are drowning in work. So I mean, they will literally be overflown by patients being referred by all the doctors, because suddenly all the other doctors around them start to diagnose orthodontically. They see the patients which they haven’t seen before. So I think this is—from a business perspective—a really, really great thing for the orthodontists to have a collaboration with this. And it’ll also help the GPs to feel more secure when they start treating their patients. And in the end, that will lead to more patients getting the right treatment they deserve. And I think that is the core. That is what’s so important for us to remember. That’s what we’re here for. I mean, yes, it’s nice to make money. We have to live. It’s nice with a great business, but what all dentists I know of are really striving for is to treat their patients to the best of their ability. And this helps them to do that. [Jaz] Ultimate benefactor of this collaborative approach is the patient. And I love that you said that. I think I want all orthodontists to listen to that soundbite and take it on board and be willing to help. Most of them I know are lovely orthodontists and they’re helping to teach their GPs and help them and in return they get lots of referrals. And I think that’s the best way to go. Let’s talk a little bit about occlusal goals we look for at the end of orthodontics. This is an interesting topic. I’m gonna start by saying that just two days ago I got a DM from one of the Protruserati, his name is Keith Curry—shout out to him on Instagram—and he just sent me a little message: “Jaz, do you sometimes find that when you’re doing alignment as a GP that it’s conflicting the orthodontic, the occlusal goal you’re trying to get?” And I knew what I was getting to. It’s that scenario whereby you have the kind of class II division 2, right? But they have anterior guidance. Now you align everything, okay, and now you completely lost anterior guidance. And so the way I told him is that, you know what, yes, this is happening all the time. Are we potentially at war between an aesthetic smile and a functional occlusion? And sometimes there’s a compromise. Sometimes you can have both. But that—to achieve both—needs either a specialist set of eyes or lots of auxiliary techniques or a lot more time than what GPs usually give for their cases. So first let’s touch on that. Do you also agree that sometimes there is a war between what will be aesthetic and what will be a nice functional occlusion? And then we’ll actually talk about, okay, what are some of the guidelines that we look for at the end of completing an aligner case? [Jesper] Great question and great observation. I would say I don’t think there’s a conflict because what I’ve learned is form follows function. So if you get the function right, aesthetics will always be great. Almost always. I mean, we have those crazy-shaped faces sometimes, but… so form follows function. The challenge here is that in adult patients, we cannot manipulate growth. So a skeletal deviation is a skeletal deviation, which means if we have a class II patient, it’s most likely that that patient has a skeletal deviation. I rarely see a dental deviation. It happens, but it’s really, really rare. So that means that in principle, all our class II and chronic class III patients are surgical patients. However, does that mean that we should treat all our class II and class III patients surgically? No, I don’t think so. But we have to consider that they are all compromise cases. So we need to figure a compromise. So initially, when I started out with my occlusal knowledge, I have to admit, I didn’t do the orthodontic treatment planning. I did it with Heller, and she would give me feedback and tell me, I think this is doable and this is probably a little bit challenging. If we do this instead, we can keep the teeth within the bony frame. We can keep them in a good occlusion. Then I would say, well, you have a flat curve of Spee. I’d like to have a little bit of curve. It’s called a curve of Spee and not the orthodontic flat curve of Spee. And then we would have a discussion back and forth about that. Then initially I would always want anterior coupling where the anterior teeth would touch each other. I have actually changed that concept in my mind and accepted the orthodontic way of thinking because most orthodontists will leave a little space in the anterior. So when you end the orthodontic treatment, you almost always have a little bit of space between the anterior teeth so they don’t touch each other. Why? Because no matter what, no matter how you retain the patient after treatment, there will still be some sort of relapse. And we don’t know where it’ll come or how, but it will come. Because the teeth will always be positioned in a balance between the push from the tongue and from the cheeks and the muscles surrounding the teeth. And that’s a dynamic that changes over the years. So I don’t see retention as a one- or two-year thing. It’s a lifelong thing. And the surrounding tissues will change the pressure and thereby the balance between the tongue and the cheeks and where the teeth would naturally settle into position. Now, that said, as I mentioned initially, if we fight the muscles, we’ll lose. So let’s say we have an anterior open bite. That will always create a tongue habit where the patient positions the tongue in the anterior teeth when they swallow because if they don’t, food and drink will just be splashed out between the teeth. They can’t swallow. It will just be pushed out of the mouth. [Jaz] So is that not like a secondary thing? Like that tongue habit is secondary to the AOB? So in those cases, if you correct the anterior open bite, theoretically should that tongue posture not self-correct? [Jesper] Well, we would like to think so, but it’s not always the case. And there’s several reasons to it. Because why are the teeth in the position? Is it because of the tongue or because of the tooth position? Now, spacing cases is one of those cases where you can really illustrate it really well. It looks really easy to treat these patients. If we take away all the soft tissue considerations on the profile photo, I mean, you can just retract the teeth and you close all the spaces—super easy. Tipping movements. It’s super easy orthodontically to move quickly. Very easy as well. However, you restrict the tongue and now we have a retention problem. So there are three things that can happen. You can bond a retainer on the lingual side or the palatal side of the teeth, upper, lower—just bond everything together—and after three months, you will have a diastema distal to the bonded retainer because the tongue simply pushes all the teeth in an anterior direction. [Jaz] I’ve also seen—and you’ve probably seen this as well—the patient’s tongue being so strong in these exact scenarios where the multiple spacing has been closed, which probably should have been a restorative plan rather than orthodontic plan, and the retainer wire snaps in half. [Jesper] Yes, from the tongue. [Jaz] That always fascinated me. [Jesper] Well, you’ll see debonding all the time, even though you sandblast and you follow all the bonding protocol. And debonding, breaking wires, diastemas in places where you think, how is that even possible? Or—and this is the worst part—or you induce sleep apnea on these patients because you simply restrict the space for the tongue. So they start snoring, and then they have a total different set of health issues afterwards. So spacing—I mean, this just illustrates the power of the tongue and why we should always be careful with spacing cases. I mean, spacing cases, in my opinion, are always to be considered ortho-restorative cases. Or you can consider, do you want to leave some space distal to the canines? Because there you can create an optical illusion with composites. Or do you want to distribute space equally between the teeth and place veneers or crowns or whatever. And this is one of those cases where I’d say aligners are just fabulous compared to fixed appliances. Because if you go to an orthodontist only using fixed appliances and you tell that orthodontist, please redistribute space in the anterior part of the maxilla and I want exactly 1.2 millimeters between every single tooth in the anterior segment, six years later he’s still not reached that goal because it just moves back and forth. Put aligners on: three months later, you have exactly—and I mean exactly—1.2 millimeters of space between each and every single tooth. When it comes to intrusion and extrusion, I would probably consider using fixed appliances rather than aligners if it’s more than three millimeters. So every orthodontic system—and aligners are just an orthodontic system—each system has its pros and cons, and we just have to consider which system is right for this patient that I have in my chair. But back to the tongue issue. What should we do? I mean, yes, there are two different schools. So if you have, let’s say, a tongue habit that needs to be treated, there are those that say we need to get rid of the tongue habit before we start to correct the teeth. And then there are those that say that doesn’t really work because there’s no room for the tongue. So we need to create room for the tongue first and then train the patient to stop the habit. Both schools and both philosophies are being followed out there. I have my preferred philosophy, but I will let the listener start to think about what they believe and follow their philosophy. Because there is nothing here that is right or wrong. And that is— [Jaz] I think the right answer, Jesper, is probably speak to that local orthodontist who’s gonna be helping you out and whatever they recommend—their religion—follow that one. Because then at least you have something to defend yourself. Like okay, I followed the way you said. Let’s fix it together now. [Jesper] That’s a great one. Yeah, exactly. [Jaz] Okay, well just touching up on the occlusion then, sometimes we do get left with like suboptimal occlusions. But to be able to define a suboptimal occlusion… let’s wrap this occlusion element up. When we are completing an orthodontic case—let’s talk aligners specifically—when the aligners come off and the fixed retainers come on, for example, and the patient’s now in retention, what are some of the occlusal checkpoints or guidelines that you advise checking for to make sure that, okay, now we have a reasonably okay occlusion and let things settle from here? For example, it would be, for me, a failure if the patient finishes their aligners and they’re only holding articulating paper on one side and not the other side. That’s for me a failure. Or if they’ve got a posterior open bite bilaterally. Okay, then we need to go refinement. We need to get things sorted. But then where do you draw the line? How extreme do you need to be? Do you need every single tooth in shim-stock foil contact? Because then we are getting really beyond that. We have to give the adaptation some wiggle room to happen. So I would love to know from your learning at Pankey, from your experience, what would you recommend is a good way for a GP to follow about, okay, it may not be perfect and you’ll probably never get perfect. And one of the orthodontists that taught me said he’s never, ever done a case that’s finished with a perfect occlusion ever. And he said that to me. [Jesper] So—and that’s exactly the point with orthodontics. I learned that imagine going to a football stadium. The orthodontist will be able to find the football stadium. If it’s a reasonable orthodontist, he’ll be able to find the section you’re going to sit in. And if he’s really, really, really good, he will be able to find the row that you’re going to sit in. But the exact spot where you are going to sit, he will never, ever be able to find that with orthodontics. And this is where settling comes in and a little bit of enamel adjustments. [Jaz] I’m so glad you said that. I’m so glad you mentioned enamel adjustment. That’s a very dirty word, but I agree with that. And here’s what I teach on my occlusion courses: what we do with aligners essentially is we’re tampering with the lock. Let’s say the upper jaw is the lock. It’s the still one. We’re tampering with the key, which is the lower jaw—the one that moves—we tamper with the key and the lock, and we expect them both to fit together at the end without having to shave the key and to modify the lock. So for years I was doing aligners without enamel adjustment ’cause my eyes were not open. My mind was not open to this. And as I learned, and now I use digital measuring of occlusion stuff and I seldom can finish a case to get a decent—for my criteria, which is higher than it used to be, and my own stat—is part of my own growth that’s happened over time is that I just think it’s an important skill that GPs are not taught and they should be. It’s all about finishing that case. And I think, I agree with you that some adjustment goes a long way. We’re not massacring enamel. It’s little tweaks to get that. [Jesper] Exactly. I like the sound there because sometimes you hear that “ahh,” it doesn’t really sound right, but “tsst,” that’s better. [Jaz] That’s the one. You know, it reminds me of that lecture you did in Copenhagen. You did this cool thing—which I’ve never seen anyone do before. You sat with one leg over the other and you said, okay guys, bite together. Everyone bit together. And then you swapped the legs so the other leg was over the other and bite together. And then you said, okay, whose occlusion felt different? And about a third of the audience put their hand up, I think. Tell us about that for a second. [Jesper] Well, just promise me we go back to the final part because there are some things we should consider. [Jaz] Let’s save this as a secret thing at the end for incentive for everyone to listen to the end—how the leg position changes your occlusion. Let’s talk about the more important thing. I digressed. [Jesper] Let’s talk about the occlusal goals because I think it’s important. I mean, if you do enamel adjustments in the end—so when we finish the treatment, when we come to the last aligner in the treatment plan—I think we should start by breaking things down to the simplest way possible. Start by asking the patient: are you satisfied with the way the teeth look? Yes or no? If she’s satisfied, great. How do you feel about the occlusion? “Well, it fits okay.” Great. Now the patient is happy. There’s nothing she wants to—or he wants to—change. Then you look at the occlusion. Now, it is important to remember that what we see on the computer screen, on the aligner planning tools, will never, ever correspond 100% to what we see in the mouth of the patient. And there are several reasons for that. But one of the things that we have found to be really interesting is that if you take that last step and you say, okay, the occlusion doesn’t fit exactly as on the screen, but it’s kind of there… if you use that last step and you don’t do a re-scan for a retainer, but you use the last step of the aligner treatment as your reference for your aligner retainer… We sometimes see that over six months, if the patient wears that aligner 22 hours a day for another three to six months, the teeth will settle more and more into the aligner and create an occlusion that looks more and more like what you see on the screen. Which to me just tells me that the biology doesn’t necessarily follow the plan everywhere in the tempo that we set throughout the aligner plan. But over time, at the last step, if it’s just minor adjustments, the teeth will actually move into that position if we use the last stage as a reference for the retainer. Now, if we do a scan at that point and use that as a reference for creating an aligner retainer, then we just keep the teeth in that position. Now, if the teeth are a little bit more off— [Jaz] I’m just gonna recap that, Jesper, ’cause I understood what you said there, but I want you to just make sure I fully understood it. When we request, for example, Align, the Vivera retainer, it gives you an option: “I will submit a new scan” or “use the last step.” And actually I seldom use that, but now I realize you’re right. It makes sense. But then on the one hand, if the occlusion is—if the aesthetics are good and the patient’s occlusion feels good, what is your own judgment to decide whether we’re still going to allow for some more settling and occlusal changes to happen over a year using the Vivera retainers based on the ClinCheck last-aligner profile, rather than, okay, let’s just retain to this position? What is making you do the extra work, extra monitoring? [Jesper] To me, it’s not extra monitoring. It’s just basic. I mean, it’s just part of my protocol. I follow the patients. And honestly, to me, it’s just time-saving to just use the last step in the aligner. Because I mean, if the plan is right and if the teeth have been tracking well, they should be in that position. Why do I then need to re-scan for Vivera retainers or for other kinds of retainers? Now, if the occlusion is a little bit more off—and in a minute you’ll probably ask me when do I see which is which, and I can’t really tell you; it’s about experience—but that’s the beauty of this. If I see there’s a little bit more deviation and I like some teeth, the occlusion isn’t really good on one side compared to the other side, I would rather have a bonded retainer from first premolar to first premolar in the mandible, combined with a Hawley or Begg or something like that retainer for the upper. And you can order them with an acrylic plate covering some of the anterior teeth so they keep that position, but that allows the teeth to settle. And over three months you should see some kind of improvement. If you don’t see enough improvement and let’s say you still have a tendency for a kind of an open bite on one side, you can always add some cross elastics, put some buttons on the upper, on the lower, instruct the patient to use these, and then in three months you will have the occlusion you want. Now, once that is established—you have that kind of occlusion—you need to keep the teeth there for at least six months before you do some kind of equilibration or enamel adjustment. Because if you do the enamel adjustment right after you have reached your final destination for the teeth, the teeth will still settle and move. So you do the equilibration, two weeks later everything looks off again. You do the equilibration, two weeks later things have changed again. So I prefer to wait six months before I do the final equilibration. Now, in this equation what we’ve been talking about here, it goes from very simple to more and more complex. And then we have to consider, well, did I expand the mandible posterior segment? If so, I can’t just use a bonded retainer on the lower and I need to add something to keep the teeth out there in combination with whatever I want in the upper. Do I want to keep the Begg retainer or the Hawley, or do I want to change to something differently? So these kinds of considerations have to be there from the beginning of the treatment because, I mean, it costs additional money to order a Begg retainer compared to just an aligner. [Jaz] A Begg retainer is the same as Hawley? [Jesper] Well, no. It has a little different design. [Jaz] Oh, a Begg as in B-E-G-G? [Jesper] Yes. [Jaz] Yeah, got it. Got it. Okay. [Jesper] And then in Denmark we use the Jensen retainer, which is a Danish invention, which goes from canine to canine or from first premolar to first premolar but with a different type of wire which keeps the teeth more in place compared to a round wire. So there are different variations. The most important part here is it allows the posterior teeth to settle so they can move, which they can’t in an aligner to the same degree at least. Now, this is all really nice in teeth that only need to be moved into the right position, but most of our patients are adult patients, or they should at least be adult patients. Most of my patients were more than 30 years old. So if you have a patient with anterior crowding and you move the teeth into the right position where the teeth should be, the teeth are in the right position, but they still look ugly because they have been worn anteriorly by the position they were in when they were crooked. So when we position them, we still need to do some restorative work. Then what? We still need to retain those teeth. The patient wants to be finished now as fast as possible, so we can’t wait the six months to make the final touches. So we have to figure out: what do we do? And then we have to think of some kind of retention strategy to keep the teeth in place during that restorative procedure. And I mean, at the end of an aligner treatment or any orthodontic treatment, two days is enough to have relapse in some patients. Some patients it’s not a problem. The teeth are just there to stay in the same position for three months, and then they start to move a little bit around. But other patients—I mean, you just have to look away and then go back to the teeth and they’re in a different position. You can’t know what kind of patient you have in your chair right now. So you have to consider the way you plan your restorative procedure in regards to how you retain the teeth during that phase. So if you want to do anterior composites or veneers, do it all at once. Put in a bonded retainer, scan, and get your aligner retainer as fast as possible. Or use a Begg or a Hawley or something like that that’s a little bit more flexible. If you want to do crowns, then we have a whole different challenge and then we have to consider how do we then retain the teeth. [Jaz] Okay. Well I think that was lovely. I think that gives us some thoughts and ideas of planning sequence of retention, which is the ultimate thing to consider when it comes to occlusion. Okay, yeah, you get the occlusion, but how do you retain it? But in many cases, as the patient’s wearing aligners, the occlusion is embedding in and is fine. And you take off the aligners, the patient’s happy with how it looks. They bite together. It feels good. You are happy that yes, both sides of the mouth are biting together. Now, it might not be that every single contact is shim-hold, but you got, let’s say, within 20 microns, 40 microns, okay? Then some bedding happens. In that kind of scenario, would you be happy to say, okay, I’m gonna scan your teeth as they are because I’m happy with the occlusion, the occlusal goals are good, and they’re near enough the ClinCheck, and go for the retainers to that position? Or is your default preference as a clinician to go for the Vivera or equivalent based on the last aligner, on the ClinCheck projection? [Jesper] I would still go for the last aligner because I think the planning I’ve done is probably a little bit more precise than what I see clinically. However, I still expect that I will have to do a little bit of enamel reshaping at the end after six months, but that’s okay. I mean, the changes are so small, so you can still use the last aligner or the Vivera retainer that you already have ordered. So it’s not that much of a problem. [Jaz] Which goes back to your previous point: if it’s a big deviation, then you’ve gotta look at the alternative ways, whether you’re gonna go for refinement or you’re gonna allow some occlusal settling with a Hawley and a lower fixed-retainer combination, or the elastics like you said. Okay. Just so we’re coming to the end of the podcast—and I really enjoyed our time—I would like to delve deep into just a final thing, which is a little checklist, a helpful checklist for case assessment that you have for GDPs. [Jesper] Yeah, thank you. First of all, one of the big challenges in a GP practice is being able to take a full series of clinical photos in two minutes without assistance. I think most dentists struggle with that, but that is a foundational prerequisite to any aligner treatment. Once you have the photos, I would sit down with the photos and I would consider six different steps. One: is this a patient that I could treat restoratively only? Because that would be the simplest for me to do. Next, moving up in complexity: would be, do I need periodontal crown lengthening? Or next step would be: do I need to change the vertical dimension, or is there something about centric relation that I should consider? Moving up a little bit on the complexity: are there missing teeth? Do I need to replace teeth with implants? Next step would be orthodontics. So this is step five. The next most complex case we can treat is actually an aligner case—orthodontics in general. And the last part would be: are the teeth actually in the right position in the face of the patient, or do I need surgery to correct the jaw position? So these six steps, I think they’re helpful to follow to just think, how can I break this case down into more easy, digestible bits and pieces to figure out what kind of patient I have in front of me? Now, if you consider it to be an orthodontic case or ortho-restorative case, here comes the challenge: case selection. How do you figure out is this an easy, moderate, complex, or referral case? And here’s the trick: do 500 to 1000 treatment plans or treatments with clear aligners. And then you know. But until then, you really don’t. This is where you should rely on someone you can trust who can help you do the initial case selection. Because you can have two identical patients—one is easy and one is super complex—but they look the same. So it’s really nice if you have done less than 500 cases to have someone who can help you with the case selection. And I don’t say this to sell anything, because we don’t charge for that. Because it’s so essential that we don’t do something that is wrong or gives us a lot of challenges and headaches in the practice. I mean, the practice runs really fast and lean-oriented, so we need to make things digestible, easy to work with. And I think that’s really important. [Jaz] It goes full circle to what we said before about having that referral network, staying in your lane, knowing when to refer out, cherry-picking—it all goes back full circle with that. And not even orthodontics, but restorative dentistry—case selection is just imperative in everything we do. [Jesper] Yes. And there is—we always get the question when we do courses and we do consulting—can’t you just show me a couple of cases that are easy to start with? And it works with implants, kind of. But with orthodontics where we move—I mean, we affect all the teeth—it’s just not possible. I know the aligner companies want to show you some where you say, you can only just do these kinds of cases and they are really easy. The fact is they’re not. But they want to sell their aligners. [Jaz] I get it. They are until they’re not. It’s like that famous thing, right? Everyone’s got a plan until they get punched in the face. So yeah, it can seemingly be easy, but then a complication happens and it’s really about understanding what complications to expect, screening for them, and how you handle that. But thanks so much. Tell us—yeah, go on, sorry. [Jesper] There are three things I’d like to end on here. So, first of all, we’ve been talking together for about an hour about a topic that, if you want to take postgraduate education, it takes three years to become an orthodontist. And there is a reason it takes three to four years. However, I want to encourage the listener to think about this: Mercedes has never, ever excused last year’s model. Meaning that they always strive for perfection. So if we go into the practice and we do the very best we can every single day, there is no way we can go back and excuse what we

Dagens episode er med Jesper Feldthaus der investerer i konverteringssager samt fix&flip i Københavnsområdet. Jesper deler ud af sine erfaringer med konvertering fra erhverv til bolig og de udfordringer det bærer med sig. Vil du lave effektiv due diligence af ejendomme eller finde investeringsmuligheder off-market? Opret en gratis prøveadgang på https://app.resights.dk/joinus

Kom til træning med Jesper fra Styrk Odense, og hør hvordan han får træningen til at hænge sammen med et travlt liv som far.Vil du også se den uredigerede træningsvideo, uden podcast-snak indover? Så fortæl os det i en kommentar, så lægger vi den op.Få en uforpligtende snak om din målsætning lige her:https://styrkmig.dk/booking/Bliv medlem af Træningstimens gruppe på FB, og få svar på dine spørgsmål om træning og kost:https://www.facebook.com/groups/traeningstimen

Medverkande i detta avsnitt är: Poki, Jesper och Fredrik.I detta avsnitt bjuder vi på samtal om spel, film och mycket mer - Allt i en för tidig julklapp från oss till er: Of Ash and Steel,Octopath traveler 0,Anno 117: Pax Romana, A Game About Feeding A Black Hole Demo,Cleared Hot,Monsters are Coming! Rock & Road,Hyrule Warriors: Age of Imprisonment,Tales of Xillia Remastered,Dragon Quest 1+2 HD - 2D Remake,Film/TV/Anime/Musik som tas upp:Frankenstein,The Last Samurai standing,My Gift Lvl 9999 Unlimited Gacha: Backstabbed in a Backwater Dungeon, I'm Out for Revenge!,Pluribus,Övrigt som tas upp:Q & A för podden; Gällande The Game Awards och våra tankar gällande Valves Steam MachineKom med i vår Discord här! - Nördliv på iTunes – Nördliv på Spotify

Jesper såg en föreställning om vänskap med Filip och Fredrik och dagen efter såg Erik en tonsatt föreställning med Björn Gustafsson. I detta avsnitts används en redovisningsövning som Erik utvecklat i sin undervisning för att beskriva och utvärdera nämnda framträdanden.

When Jesper Brodin landed a job as IKEA's purchase manager in Pakistan, he was only 26. And had no idea he was the only applicant. He's now spent 30 years with the iconic Swedish brand - since 2017, as CEO of Ingka Group, which runs most IKEA stores. During that time, he's led two major transformations - taking the company digital and making it more eco-friendly. Now, as he steps down from his role, he tells Evan Davis about the lessons he learned from IKEA's legendary founder, Ingvar Kamprad. And why he's planning to buy himself a new guitar.(Image: Jesper Brodin. Credit: JOEL SAGET/AFP via Getty Images)

Denne gang skal det handle om foder til fjerkræ og derfor har Claus og Anders inviteret Jesper Kjærulff med i studiet. Jesper er salgschef for fjerkræsfoder, han er vild med jagt og fiskeri, og så elsker han at arbejde i en branche i udvikling og med fuld fart frem. Fjerkræsbranchen er kendetegnet ved systematik og data - og i Danmark har vi faktisk ét af de bedste systemer til at behandle den data der indsamles, og det er blandt andet derfor at fjerkræsproduktionen er så effektiv. I 2015 købte Hornsyld Købmandsgaard den fabrik, hvor de producerer alt deres foder til slagtekyllinger, og vi skal bl.a. tale om AX3. Vi tager også en snak om fjerkræsproduktionen generelt i Danmark, som er verdensledende og i fremgang. Branchen oplever nemlig en opblomstring i disse år, fordi produktionsformen passer godt til et ‘moderne familieliv' - hvor næsten alt kan planlægges, og klimaaftrykket er meget lavere end andre animalske produkter. Velkommen til Købmandsgaarden, hvor Anders Lau fra Landbrugspodcasten og Claus Damsbo, som er slagschef ved Hornsyld Købmandsgaard, inviterer dig med ind i foderproduktionen i Danmark. Anders og Claus har inviteret en række spændende gæster, som kommer forbi studiet, og sætter fokus på deres fagområder. Købmandsgaarden præsenteres i samarbejde med Hornsyld Købmandsgaard.

Jesper var 27 år när han avslutade sitt liv. Nu vill mamma Annica och morfar Valle hjälpa andra anhöriga i samma situation. Mikael Blomberg vände en svår depression med hjälp av läraren Jenny Bergström när han gick i åttan - nu föreläser de om det. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app.

Vi dykker direkte ned i den nye habitatkonsekvensvurdering om Tangeværket, og spoiler: Det ser ikke for godt ud for Gudenåen, når man sætter en prop i Danmarks længste vandløb.Så skal vi til Schweiz, hvor forskere har opdaget, at bævere hjælper flagermus – deres dæmninger skaber hotspots af insektliv, som flagermusene elsker.Havet kalder også: droner og SnotBots gør det nemmere end nogensinde at overvåge hvaler, indsamle DNA og følge dem uden at forstyrre.I USA er de store rovdyr på vej tilbage: pumaer, brunbjørne og grå ulve breder sig igen – men effekten på økosystemerne er mindre dramatisk end mange tror.De hurtige nyheder byder på verdens vilde hunde og et dybt suk over, at aardvark-huler kan være arnested for fremtidige pandemier.Der er El Quizzo Bondo, og Jesper skriver ind med en fascinerende tilføjelse om jomfrufødsler hos komodovaraner – inklusive eksemplet fra London Zoo.Vamos – og giv lige en bæverdæmning et klap.—Skriv jer op på www.10er.dk og støt programmet med en lille donation, så ville vi være yderst taknemmelige: https://10er.com/dendyrisketime—IG: instagram.com/dendyrisketimeMBK: instagram.com/kallebkimAH: instagram.com/alexanderholmdk—Produceret hos PodAmok STUDIOGrafik af Rikke Blicher // instagram.com/rblicher/Musik af Rasmus Voss // instagram.com/fantastic_mr_voss/—Tidskoder:00:00 - Dagens programoversigt01:39 - Snik snak13:59 - Tangeværket25:03 - Bævere i Schweiz30:41 - SnotBots34:29 - Hvis man ikke skyder dør, så dør der færre42:25 - De hurtige nyheder46:43 - Ugens dyrequiz50:35 - Spørgsmål fra lytterne Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Daniel diskuterer tredje afsnit af Vince Gilligans nye sci-fi-epos 'Plur1bus' med forfatter Jesper W. Lindberg. Titlen er 'Grenade' - og der bliver kastet flere "granater" i afsnittet, både i fysisk og mental forstand.  I afsnit 3 er Carol stadig ved at affinde sig med sin nye situation, hvor hele verden er indtaget af en mystisk lykke-epidemi. Ydermere kan man glæde sig en Sammensværgelsen-exclusive! Vi har nemlig fået nys om, at en dansker har været til casting på dette afsnit! BEMÆRK: Vi spoiler afsnittet. Så det før, du lytter! Følg med i de kommende uge, hvor Daniel hver fredag / lørdag vil analysere og tale om ugens aktuelle episode med en eller flere gæster.

Het is een van de ergste dingen die je als persoon kan overkomen: je kind verliezen. Uit onderzoek blijkt dat het rouwproces in dit soort situaties het meest intens en langdurig is van alle rouwprocessen en veel relaties onder druk zetten.  Te gast zijn twee ouders die dit allebei meemaakten: Lilly Buurke, in 2012 overleed haar zoon Jesper op 12 jarige leeftijd door een verkeersongeval. Zij is voorzitter van de lotgenoten vereniging OOK, wat staat voor Ouders Overleden Kinderen.  Bert Slot verloor drie jaar geleden zijn 18-jarige dochter Adinda door een ongeluk met een waterscooter. Zijn vrouw en hij hebben baat gehad bij de lotgenotengroep van OOK en nu is hij zelf begeleider geworden van zo'n gespreksgroep. 

I denne episode af Rig på Viden har vi besøg af Jesper Rangvid, professor i finansiering på CBS og aktuel med bogen Rentefald. Han fortæller historien om det markante rentefald fra 1980 til 2020. Hvad drev udviklingen. Hvad gjorde de lave renter ved vores gæld, boligmarked, aktier og ulighed. Og hvordan blev Danmark påvirket.Vi taler også om fremtiden. Jesper peger på seks kræfter der vil forme renterne de kommende år, fire der trækker dem ned og to der skubber op. Alt sammen med stor betydning for både investorer, boligejere og økonomien som helhed.En klar og brugbar samtale om økonomiens vigtigste pris og hvor vores verden er på vej hen.Følg os på LinkedIn:André: www.linkedin.com/in/andréthormann/Intro musik:Deadly Roulette by Kevin MacLeodLink: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3625-deadly-rouletteLicense: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Vi kaster os over den tredje og sidste originale X-Files-roman forfattet af Kevin J. Anderson.  Det er body horror-fortællingen 'Antibodies', eller på dansk 'Antistoffer'. Romanen følger Mulder og Scully, der kommer på sporet af et biologisk eksperiment, som ikke kun har reddet en 12-årig dreng, men også forvandlet en mand til et omvandrende monster. Vi diskuterer romanen i selskab med forfatter Jesper W. Lindberg.

What happens when unschooled teens meet college systems, exams, and external expectations? Jesper and Cecilie Conrad speak with Missy Willis about how adolescents raised with freedom step into formal learning without losing curiosity or confidence. The conversation follows family transitions, changing homes, and the moment when rigor and motivation finally align.

The guys are joined by Michael Foster and Jesper to discuss their work in putting together the Functional Female Officer Report and save the PCA from downgrade.https://www.savethepca.com/

Null null mot Estland i Tallinn. FFK og Leeds hører hjemme i øverste, selvsagt. Braut på YouTube. Hvordan stå på en sparkesykkel. Når lagde Jesper sist.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Onsdag kl. 20.00 tager Skjern Håndbold hjemme imod Bjerringbro-Silkeborg i den danske herreliga. Et uhyre vigtigt opgør for to mandskaber, der ikke har fået den start på sæsonen, mange havde forventet. Vi bruger den kamp som afsæt for en premiere på et helt nyt format med taktisk analyse. “Det taktiske værksted” er et nyt format, hvor vi vil forsøge at gå i dybden med taktiske elementer i spillet. EHF Master Coach Jesper Fredin var med os på både lyd og video før onsdagens kamp i denne første udgave af “Det taktiske værksted”. Vi vil så gerne blive bedre, så send os endelig dine kommentarer og observationer, så vi forhåbentlig kan gøre det endnu bedre næste gang. Gæst: Jesper Bach Fredin Vært: Thomas Ladegaard *Udsendelsen er bragt i samarbejde med Sparekassen Kronjylland og Sparinvest*

In this episode, STR's Jesper Palmqvist shares his observations from the recent HICAP conference in Singapore about how hotel investors are looking at deal opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region.

The Crisis. The Phantom is fast, but I know my limits. The glow of missiles and moonlight. Mold has no claim to the apple.The Eleventh Supplemental Frequency from Observable Radio, a found footage podcast from Cameron Suey, Phil van Hest, Purpurina, and Wendy Hector.The EnsemblePurpurinaWritten by Cameron SueyProduced by Cameron Suey, Phil van Hest, Purpurina, and Wendy HectorEdited by Cameron SueyArt by Karrin FletcherPsychology Consultant - Elisa Leal, Psy.D (CA PSY28330)Our Theme Music is: The Backrooms by MyuuAdditional Music provided by Tim Kulig, the artists at Epidemic SoundDrone of Tension - Elm LakeWhere It All Ended - EnigmanicThe Calling Card - Martin LandstromA Grey Day - Guto LucenaStale - Elin PielGet Moving - Water MirrorsSFX provided by Epidemic Sound and the artists at Freesound.orgAdditional SFX and Music covered under the following licenses:creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Special Thanks to Cathleen, Jon, Tid, Russ, Kalasin, Rick, Brianna, Zach, Jesper and all our patrons and listeners. Thank you for listening, and stay tuned.With the help of our Patrons we've launched the Observable Radio Company Store at observableradio.com/store. There you'll find stickers, enamel pins, t-shirts, on sale and shipping anywhere in the world.Observable Radio is listener supported. If you would like to contribute towards our production costs and payment for our voice actors, as well as get access to behind the scenes information, extra production material, and an ad-free, early release feed of this show, you can do so at: patreon.com/observableradio

In this episode of the Innovation Storytellers Show, I sit down with Jesper Kamp, Regional Director for Europe at Atom Computing, to explore how quantum computing is redefining what's possible in innovation. Jesper and I first met at TechBBQ in Copenhagen, surrounded by thousands of entrepreneurs, scientists, and visionaries. Our conversation picks up where that meeting left off, inside the historic Niels Bohr Institute, where we dive into how this extraordinary technology will change the way we analyze data, design products, and solve the world's biggest challenges. Jesper shares his remarkable journey from diplomacy to deep tech, describing how his twenty-five years at the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs led him to roles in Silicon Valley, China, Turkey, and beyond. Now at Atom Computing, he's helping Europe harness the world's most powerful quantum systems to accelerate discovery and innovation across industries, from pharmaceuticals to materials science. This isn't a technical lecture. It's a conversation about what every innovator, product leader, and entrepreneur needs to know about the quantum era that's arriving faster than most people realize. Jesper explains how quantum and classical computing will soon work hand in hand, why companies must prepare their teams now, and how the next wave of breakthroughs will come from those ready to experiment early. If you've ever wondered how quantum computing will shape your world, this episode will leave you rethinking the future of innovation itself.  

Think of page one as real estate—and claim as much of it as possible. Jesper Nissen breaks down modern parasite SEO: leveraging high-authority platforms (YouTube, Instagram, X/Twitter Articles, Perplexity/Qwen pages, etc.) to rank quickly for branded, local, and long-tail keywords. We cover indexing workflows, daisy-chain linking, exact-match domain plays, and the content + link velocity patterns that are working now.Guest Jesper Nissen — SEO educator, link-building practitioner, founder of SchemaWriter.ai and the cloud-stacking platform YACSS; speaker at POFU Live / SEO Rockstars; MSc in Physics (U. of Copenhagen). Guest Links Website: https://jespernissen.com/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@JesperNissenSEO X (Twitter): https://x.com/jespernissenseo?lang=enWhat You'll LearnParasite SEO, 2025 edition: Why page-one results increasingly favor social UGC, news, and authority domains—and how to ride that DA for fast wins. Platforms that still rank: Jesper's current leaderboard (e.g., Qwen, Perplexity) and what changed for Claude Artifacts.Local + long-tail focus: How to use Facebook/Instagram posts, YouTube videos & community posts, and X Articles to own branded and geo-keywords.Indexing workflow: Indexing services + social “daisy-chain” links to accelerate discovery.EMD plays: Exact-match domains (service+city and SaaS feature terms) and smart, steady link velocity patterns.Social → Search shift: Why Instagram and Facebook posts have started surfacing in Google (July 2025 change) and how to write posts to rank. Timestamps00:00 — Owning page one like “real estate”02:16 — Parasite SEO vs. traditional guest posts08:45 — Reddit's link-out limits & why Jesper moved on14:58 — Claude Artifacts surge (and why it cooled)18:02 — What's working now: Quen & Perplexity pages21:35 — Indexing flow: drip pings + social link bursts26:40 — Meta shift: FB/IG posts in Google (local SEO gold) 31:55 — Exact-match domains + link velocity math46:55 — Shorts as TOF magnets; long-form as sales letter51:40 — Priming YouTube with low-CPC X ads (global)Jesper's Parasite SEO Playbook (Step-by-Step)Pick a target query (branded, local, or long-tail).Publish across high-DA surfaces:YouTube (video + Community post), X/Twitter (Articles), Instagram, Facebook Page, plus AI page builders (e.g., Quen, Perplexity).Front-load keywords in social posts (especially the first words of FB/IG captions for cleaner URLs/titles).Daisy-chain internal links: point your X Article to the IG/FB/YouTube/AI pages to aid indexing.Kick indexing via reputable ping/index services, then add lightweight social links to nudge crawl.Measure and iterate: keep winners, replace laggards, expand with adjacent long tails.Exact-Match Domain (EMD) Mini-FrameworkWhen to use: service+city rank-and-rent, or narrowly defined SaaS use-cases.Build: one-page lander, fast crawl path, 5–10 quality links/month early, layer socials & citations; avoid unnatural velocity spikes.Why it works: high topical alignment + clean intent matching. (Jesper's background in cloud stacking/YACSS and SchemaWriter.ai complements this with structured data & internal “powerstack” patterns.) SponsorThis episode is brought to you by Graphed — the AI-native analytics platform that builds dashboards from plain English. Connect GA4, ads, CRM, GSC, and Sheets to get KPI boards in minutes. Learn more: https://graphed.com/

Efter många missöden och en lång dags resa mot natt sätter sig Glenn, Linus och Jesper och får prata av sig om lite jävla TV-spel.

Medverkande i detta avsnitt är: Fredrik, Jesper och Danny. I detta avsnitt bjuder vi på samtal om spel, film och mycket mer - allt i ett trevligt J-DOG sällskap! Spel som tas upp:Cronos: The New Dawn,BALL x PIT,Pokémon Legends: Z-A,Trails in the Sky the 1st Chapter,Digimon Story Time Stranger,Keeper,Cronos: The New Dawn,Film/TV som tas upp:Planes, Trains & Automobiles,Twin Peaks,Splinter Cell: Deathwatch (första halvan av säsongen),Kom med i vår Discord här! - Nördliv på iTunes – Nördliv på Spotify

2013 wurde er für seinen Blues mit positiven Kritiken überschüttet. Zwei Jahre später ging Jesper Munk nach Berlin, um sich musikalisch neu zu erfinden. Gerade ist er in Bayern auf Tour. Wir wiederholen ein Gespräch vom Mai 2024.

Så var det att använda mer hel- och halvfabrikat i matlagningen. Vi testade också torkad pasta och konserverade tomater. Vad ska man köpa? Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Jesper Lindkvist har testat hel- och halvfabrikat. Pulversåser, kryddpåsar för att göra paneng-curry och indisk curry, och färdiga kylda rätter. – Och korv stroganoff som färdig pulvermix. Förvånansvärt god!– Kryddpåsar handlar mer om att spara tankekraft än att spara tid, säger Jesper. Det tar ungefär lika lång tid att tillaga. Grönsakerna ska hackas och det ska koka ihop.En favorit är pulvermos. Ett alternativ till snabbmakaronerna i småbarnsfamiljen. Pulvermoset har också fått dryga ut när det inte fanns tillräckligt med vanlig potatis till mos. Andra favoriter är färdigkokt vakuumförpackat ris för att snabbt kunna göra fried rice. Och färdighackade grönsaker. Man kan snabbt lägga till en näve i en rätt. Nån annan gör hackandet och Jesper kan ägna sig åt det han tycker är kul: att krydda.Jesper gillar att laga vidare på helfabrikat. T ex låta en färdigkryddat tomatsås gå ner i köttfärssåsen. Kylda pastasåser och soppor går också bra att bygga vidare på.– Så kan jag tänka mig att laga mat framöver när jag inte har tid.Tomas Tengby har testat 20 sorters torkad pasta och 42 olika konserverade tomater (passerade, krossade och hela).– Den billigaste pastan var inte så dålig som jag trodde, säger Tomas. Men lägger man några kronor extra och köper bronsvalsad torkad pasta så får man mer smak och trevligare konsistens.De billigaste tomaterna bör undvikas. Passerade och hela tomater har jämnare kvalitet än krossade. Och vill man ha riktigt bra kvalitet är hela San Marzano-tomater ett tips. Även hela cocktail-tomater.

827 Show Notes: https://wetflyswing.com/827 Presented by:   Visit Idaho, Fish The Fly, Jackson Hole Fly Company, Patagonia Ever wonder why some anglers swear by tube flies or why that little hitch on the surface can make a salmon go wild? Today, we're hanging out with Jesper Fohrmann, the creative mind behind Fishmadman and one of the most passionate salmon anglers out there. Jesper's spent decades chasing Atlantic salmon and sea trout across Denmark, Norway, and the UK, perfecting flies and techniques that have earned a cult following from Scandinavia to Newfoundland. We dig into why tube flies can outfish hooks, what makes the riffle hitch so deadly in cold water, and how Jesper approaches leaders, rods, and presentation. Plus, we talk about his favorite patterns, the Scandinavian underhand style, and how all of it connects to steelhead fishing around the world.   Show Notes: https://wetflyswing.com/827

Poddprofilen, juristen och sportvetaren Jesper Ekstedt återvänder efter många års frånvaro till Bakom Ryggen för att sätta ena halvan av Aftonbladets starkaste power-couple på den beryktade pottan! Fotbollskrönikören Simon Bank har länge verkat som en nagel i ögat på både Sebastian och Jesper men en incident med en engelsk accent fick tillslut bägaren att rinna över. Hård ton, personliga påhopp och vilda spekulationer. Dvs allt man önskar av ett avsnitt Bakom Betalvägg PUNKT!Prenumerera på Bakom Betalvägg via Underproduktion.se för att höra hela avsnittet!

Elina har varit på bokmässan och snackat sill med Håkan Juholt. Hon rapporterar till Jesper om folkmordspropaganda, rädda kulturchefer och vad tv4 har för likhet med bokmässans ledning. Klippare: Joel Zettergren Jinglar: GErald Lombano

HV-podden träffar Jesper Fast som berättar om sin NHL-karriär, att ha Martin St. Louis som pingiskompis och sitt nya liv inom hockeyn.

I somras gjorde Peg Parnevik delar av svenska folket rasande genom att uppträda i hotpants för kungafamiljen. Det var inte första gången hon väckte irritation. Som reality-tv-stjärna och nepobaby har hon vant sig vid näthat. Nu ger hon ut sitt första album, "Äldsta barnet", där hon rör sig mellan bubbelgummig disco och akustisk folkpop. Hemmma hos Strage pratar hon bland annat om att växa upp i Florida: "Jag var 14, emo och gick på en konservativ kristen skola med en massa republikaner. Min största dröm var att flytta till LA eller New York och bara vara mig själv och inte gå i skoluniform och spela lacrosse." Hon berättar också om sin kärlek till My Chemical Romance och Bikini Kill, om att känna sig mer och mer svensk, om sin pappa Jesper som döpte barnen efter golfturneringar och golfredskap, om varför hon får mest kritik från äldre kvinnor, om när Rebecca & Fiona försökte få henne att bli socialist, om att falla för arbetslösa killar, om att sälja sina egna acneplåster och om drömmen att raka av sig håret och starta ett riot grrrl-projekt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Menys Nina Frogneborn gav sig i uppdrag att under en månad äta 500 gr grönsaker och frukt om dagen. Kostrådet som kan hålla folksjukdomarna borta. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. – Hur svårt kan det vara? tänkte Nina Frogneborn.Svårare än man tror. 500 gr är en hel del.Det kan vara frukt, grönsaker, rotsaker, bär. Färskt, fryst eller fermenterat. Däremot får inte potatis eller baljväxter räknas in. De har egna kategorier.Livsmedelsverket har sedan 1999 rekommenderat att vi ska äta minst 500 gr grönsaker och frukt om dagen. Ändå är det bara 11 procent av oss som kommer upp i den mängden.Åsa Brugård Konde, nutritionist på Livsmedelsverket, förklarar tankarna bakom kostråden. I Sverige är ohälsosamma matvanor, efter tobak, den största riskfaktorn för ohälsa. De stora folksjukdomarna cancer, hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar och övervikt beror till stor del på vad vi äter. Mer än 100 000 fall av cancer och hjärt- och kärlsjukdom kan förebyggas varje år om alla vuxna äter i linje med Livsmedelsverkets kostråd.Ninas uppdrag skulle vara i en månad. Nu har hon snart hållit på i två månader.– Det är svårt att sluta, säger hon.Hon berättar hur hon tog sin an uppgiften i ett samtal med matentusiasten Jesper Lindkvist och Menys Tomas Tengby.Nästa vecka redovisar Jesper och Tomas sina uppdrag. Jesper har maxat användningen av hel- och halvfabrikat i hemmet, och Tomas har testat 20 olika sorters penne och 42 förpackningar konserverade tomater (passerade, krossade och hela) för att se vad det är för skillnad på dem.

Hallaien! Vi er tilbake og det med to gjester i studio, en gammel kjenning, Jesper, før kjent som Heteropikk fra "Krølla laken" og Marius fra programmet "Snakkes". Lurer du på hva som gir rizz og hva vi synes om datingapper, er det bare å lytte! Daniela er for første gang bak spakene, så hennes kjærlighet for sørlendinger blir så klart tatt opp

Although this podcast is called "The Film Scorer", every so often it's nice to chat with someone who does significant work in another medium instead. Today, that someone is Jesper Kyd (Hitman, Assassin's Creed). Jesper has been scoring for games for over thirty years, working on some of the biggest video game franchises around. But he's also worked on a number of films (like the Indian films Tumbbad and Crazxy), leading to the best answer I've ever gotten to the question "what's the difference between scoring for video games and movies?" Jesper's latest score is for Warhammer 40,000: Darktide. In fact, Jesper has been scoring this game for years - it first came out in November 2022, and with new maps, characters, events, and other updates he keeps writing new music for it. The result is four separate releases, the latest of which was just in August of this year, about 25 minutes of dark industrial electronic music for running and gunning. I must have spent a dozen hours listening to those releases getting ready for this interview, and let me tell you: I was ready to join the 40th millennia's endless war. Jesper's score for Warhammer 40,000: Darktide (Volumes 1-4), and much of his other music, is available on all major platforms. You can find out more about Jeremiah on his website.

Wie so viele Ausnahmetalente musste auch Jesper Munk, 2013 anlässlich seines Debütalbums "For In My Way It Lies" als "Wunderkind des Blues" gefeiert, bald die schmerzhafte Erfahrung machen, dass im Musik-Business wenig Interesse an Leidenschaft, künstlerischer Weiterentwicklung oder gar Wagnissen besteht. Im scheinbar unauflösbaren Konflikt zwischen Erwartungshaltung von außen einer-, und dem Wunsch nach authentischer Selbstverwirklichung andererseits, gerieten sowohl seine Karriere als auch er selbst zeitweilig ins Schlingern. Doch dem 33-jährigen gebürtigen Münchner ist gelungen, woran andere zerbrachen: eine künstlerische Neuerfindung, die sich im 2024er Album "Yesterdaze" manifestierte, und in deren Zuge er auch eine gesunde, kreative Haltung zum von eingangs erwähnten Problemen beinahe überschatteten eigenen Frühwerk entwickeln konnte. Dies spiegelt sich auch im dieser Tage erscheinenden neuen Doppelalbum "Best Of … Live" wider, mitgeschnitten teils bei Club-Gigs mit seiner Begleitband The Cassette Heads, teils bei einem Konzert mit dem Deutschen Filmorchester Babelsberg im Potsdamer Nikolaisaal. Darauf gibt es nämlich ein Wiederhören mit beseelt neubelebten "Vintage"-Hits wie "Morning Coffee", "Blue Shadows" oder "Reeperbahn". Wie das Programm bei den Konzerten seiner nächste Woche startenden Tour aussehen wird, die neben dem neuen Live-Album auch das zehnjährige Jubiläum seines Erfolgsalbums "Claim" in den Mittelpunkt stellt, erfahren wir heute Abend, wenn uns Jesper Munk im studioeins besucht – kleines Live-Set selbstredend inklusive.

Before. The heat makes them sluggish. These days are proof. There is work to be done.The Tenth Supplemental Frequency from Observable Radio, a found footage podcast from Cameron Suey, Phil van Hest, Purpurina, and Wendy HectorThe EnsembleWritten by Cameron SueyProduced by Cameron Suey, Phil van Hest, Purpurina, and Wendy HectorEdited by Cameron SueyArt by Karrin FletcherPsychology Consultant - Elisa Leal, Psy.D (CA PSY28330)Our Theme Music is: The Backrooms by MyuuAdditional Music provided by Tim Kulig, the artists at Epidemic SoundDouble Crossed in Johnson City - American LegionDark Before Dawn - Will HarrisonDevil Done Me Wrong - Will HarrisonSweet Treat - Will HarrisonMountain Shadows - Wanderer's TroveBackroad Blues - Roots and RecognitionCounty Line - Roots and RecognitionSFX provided by Epidemic Sound and the artists at Freesound.orgAdditional SFX and Music covered under the following licenses:creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Special Thanks to Cathleen, Jon, Tid, Russ, Kalasin, Rick, Brianna, Zach, Jesper and all our patrons and listeners. Thank you for listening, and stay tuned.With the help of our Patrons we've launched the Observable Radio Company Store at observableradio.com/store. There you'll find stickers, enamel pins, t-shirts, on sale and shipping anywhere in the world.Observable Radio is listener supported. If you would like to contribute towards our production costs and payment for our voice actors, as well as get access to behind the scenes information, extra production material, and an ad-free, early release feed of this show, you can do so at: patreon.com/observableradio

This week I'm joined once again by Dutch ATP player Jesper de Jong, who has continued his steady rise on the professional circuit.Since our last chat, Jesper has broken into the top 100, reached his first ATP final at the Swedish Open, and played a key role for the Netherlands in Davis Cup. We talk about what feels different now that he's inside the top 100, the lessons he's learned from the tour grind, and how he balances results with enjoying the process. Jesper also shares insights from training blocks in Bali, the unforgettable match that sealed his top 100 spot, and what he's learned from his girlfriend, a professional speed skater.If you're curious about the mindset and habits behind steady, sustainable progress, this episode is a great listen.FabioThis podcast is sponsored by ASICS. ASICS is a Japanese company founded in 1949 to give more people the opportunity to experience how sports and movement can have a positive impact on mental well-being.To learn more about ASICS visit their website here: https://www.asics.com/nl/en-nl/sports/tennis/Find us on Social Media:Instagram: Instagram.com/FunctionalTennisTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@functionaltennis

Welcome back to the EUCVC Summit Talks, where we bring you behind-the-scenes conversations with the founders, corporates, and investors shaping Europe's venture collaboration landscape.In this episode, Jeppe Høier sits down with Jesper Bang Olsen, Partner at BEAM, and Kerk Wichmann, VP of Corporate Strategy at Jungheinrich and Managing Partner at Uplift Ventures. Together, they unpack the realities of corporate venture building: why corporates need to separate venture initiatives from the mothership, how to anchor strategically, and what it takes to balance startup agility with industrial scale.From governance and champions to customer infiltration and fast decision-making, this is a candid look at how leading corporates are building real ventures—not just innovation playgrounds.

After eight years at the helm of Ingka Group, the operating entity behind home-furnishing giant IKEA, CEO Jesper Brodin is stepping down. Brodin joins Rapid Response to explain why now was the right time to make the move, and shares how he's steered IKEA through a whirlwind of changes, from rising tariffs to shifting public sentiments around DEI and ESG, as well as an evolving relationship between global business and governments. Brodin also reveals why sleep may be the most overlooked leadership tool, and the pros and cons of having a 200-year business plan. Visit the Rapid Response website here: https://www.rapidresponseshow.com/See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Vårt husband Kulturlabbets Poporkester är tillbaka och tillsammans firar vi in hösten! Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Ett nyfiket och underhållande aktualitetsprogram med lyssnaren i fokus.I höst ska lyssnaren Janne äntligen få flytta in i en egen lägenhet på ett seniorboende för HBTQ-personer, och Johan berättade att han efter ett tufft år ska få åka på utlandsresa med familjen och bara ta det lugnt. Dessutom får vi ljuvlig musik från Hampus, Lisa, Jesper och Linnea från Kulturlabbet!

When I first connected with Jason Trew (callsign: TOGA), I knew this conversation would challenge some assumptions about where design thinking belongs. Jason is an Air Force fighter pilot and strategy leader turned professor. What emerged from our conversation wasn't just another story about design thinking adoption, but a deeper exploration of what he sees happening when we distinguish between capital-D Design Thinking and lowercase-d design thinking, and why that distinction matters for everyone trying to create meaningful change. Jason's journey from F-15 pilot to design educator reveals something crucial about how design thinking transforms not just what we do, but who we become as problem solvers. His work with thousands of Air Force officers, his deployment experiences in classified operations centers, and his current role (*at the time of recording) teaching at the Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD) offer unique insights into how design thinking functions when the stakes are genuinely high. Listen to Learn About: What's the critical difference between capital-D Design Thinking and lowercase-d design thinking, and why does this distinction matter for practitioners? How can design thinking principles function effectively in highly structured, high-stakes environments where traditional approaches dominate? What role does psychological safety ("feeling safe, supported, and stretched in meaningful ways") play in enabling creative problem-solving? How do we balance the need for systematic approaches with the emergent, integrative nature of actual design work? When should leaders prioritize conditioning people into a "ready stance" versus teaching specific design methods? Our Guest Col Jason "TOGA" Trew (US Air Force, retired) represents a fascinating intersection of military leadership, academic rigor, and design practice. After graduating from the U.S. Air Force Academy and flying F-15s, Jason spent his final military decade revolutionizing how the Air Force approaches strategy education and leadership development. He earned a PhD in the history of technology, served as Dean and Vice Commandant of the Air Force Leadership School, and led design teams for Space Force education initiatives. Now a Professor of Design* Management at the Savannah College of Art and Design, Jason brings a unique perspective on what happens when design thinking meets organizational realities where failure isn't an option. (*At the time of recording.) Episode Highlights [02:10] Jason's journey from F-15 fighter pilot to design educator through strategy school and a PhD in technology history [03:30] Discovery of a book dedicated to Icarus as hero rather than cautionary tale, sparking interest in playfulness complementing practicality [04:20] How design thinking became curriculum at Air Force Leadership School serving 4,000 students annually [05:10] Jason's certification in Lego Serious Play for facilitating innovation sprints and strategic thinking workshops [07:20] The crucial distinction between capital-D Design Thinking and lowercase-d design thinking [09:00] Capital-D focuses on activities and checklists; lowercase-d develops embodied sensibility for knowing what to do next [11:40] Design thinking as conditioning people into a ready stance for handling surprise rather than teaching linear processes [13:00] Why Jason believes design thinking changes the people involved, with problem-solving as bonus rather than primary goal [14:40] How design thinking shifts perception to see multiple options beyond binary choices [15:30] Jason's approach to ambiguous assignments that allows students to surprise him with creative solutions [17:30] Learning design principles that avoid constraining student intelligence for the sake of rigid academic standards [18:50] Design thinking's spillover effects on leadership and education beyond formal design practice [22:40] Design thinking as fundamentally human activity connected to living well and building better communities [25:10] Coffee shop door story illustrating how design changes your eyes to see problems everywhere [26:40] Design as integrative discipline that's undisciplined in the best academic sense [28:40] Framework of design as expedient - practical, opportunistic, and contextual rather than optimal [30:00] Why expedient design requires ethical sensibility to guide this human superpower responsibly [32:30] Jason's faith that if we designed current systems, we can design something better [36:40] Deployment story of creating psychological safety in classified military operations center [38:30] Using Lego as thermoplastic polymer strategic thinking tool to overcome initial skepticism [39:00] Daily check-ins asking team members if they feel safe, supported, and stretched in meaningful ways [41:10] Danger of treating organizational roles as reality rather than abstractions of actual people [43:30] Failed redesign of Air Force Leadership School and lessons about empathy work threading through entire processes [46:00] Dawan's diagnostic questions about organizational readiness and past innovation attempts [48:30] Strategy for identifying key voices—influencers, critics, curmudgeons, and creators—in organizations [49:00] Power of storytelling as diagnostic tool and method for strategic thinking [50:40] Interest in story casting and narrative intelligence using physical artifacts like Lego Serious Play [51:00] Connection to UN Principles for Responsible Management Education and sustainable development goals [52:40] Jason's call for partnership in bringing design skills to local and systemic governance challenges Questions to Help You Go Deeper Learning What surprised you most about Jason's distinction between capital-D and lowercase-d design thinking, and how does this change your understanding of design thinking's role in organizations? Which aspects of Jason's "expedient" framework for design seem most valuable for your context — the practical, opportunistic, or contextual elements? How does Jason's experience with ambiguous assignments challenge your current approach to giving direction or defining success criteria? Leading Where in your organization would Jason's "safe, supported, and stretched in meaningful ways" framework create the most value for team performance? How might you help your team understand the difference between learning design methods and developing a design sensibility? What would success look like if you implemented Jason's approach to activating the full diversity already present in your team? Applying What's one small experiment you could run next week with leaving an assignment or challenge more open-ended? Which current organizational challenge could you address by focusing on conditioning people's "ready stance" rather than teaching them specific methods? How could you adapt Jason's storytelling diagnostic approach to better understand your team's readiness for change? Practicing How will you build the habit of distinguishing between roles/responsibilities (abstractions) and the full capabilities of people in those roles? What support or resources do you need to practice Jason's approach of setting conditions rather than controlling outcomes? Who could you partner with to practice the kind of empathy work Jason describes as threading through entire processes? Resources Books We Discussed Experiencing Design - Jason's top recommendation for understanding how activities yield experiences that yield ways of being in the world. Liedtka, Jeanne, Karen Hold, and Jessica Eldridge. Experiencing Design: The Innovator's Journey. Columbia Business School Publishing, 2021. Creating Wicked Students - About giving students practice with authority and ambiguity in classroom settings. Hanstedt, Paul. Creating Wicked Students: Designing Courses for a Complex World. Stylus Publishing, 2018. Tools We DiscussedLego Serious Play - Certification and facilitation methods for strategic thinking workshops The Archipelago of Design - Security professionals using design approaches.  COM-B Behavior Change Model - Capability, Opportunity, Motivation framework for behavior change. Michie, Susan, et al. "The Behaviour Change Wheel: A New Method for Characterising and Designing Behaviour Change Interventions." Implementation Science, vol. 6, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1-12. Keep LearningResearch Nigel Cross and Bryan Lawson's work on how designers think.  Cross, Nigel. Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Academic Press, 2011. Lawson, Bryan. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. 4th ed., Architectural Press, 2005. Explore participatory design and co-creation methodologies. Schuler, Douglas, and Aki Namioka, editors. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993. Simonsen, Jesper, and Toni Robertson, editors. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, 2013. Investigate narrative intelligence Mateas, Michael, and Phoebe Sengers, editors. Narrative Intelligence. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003. (Advances in Consciousness Research, vol. 46) UN Principles for Responsible Management Education and sustainable development goals. United Nations Global Compact. Principles for Responsible Management Education. UN Global Compact Office, 2007. Deepen Your Learning Design Council UK + Systemic Design + Design in Government with Cat Drew — DT101 E78 Complements Jason's insights about bringing design to structured environments Cognitive Bias + Ethics + Dreaming the Future of Design with David Dylan Thomas — DT101 E112 Works with this episode to understand different approaches to design education Instructional Design + Adult Learning Experiences with Holly Owens — DT101 E134 Builds on Jason's themes about creating conditions for creative problem-solving

Zac Clark interviews Jesper Myrfors, Magic: The Gathering's first art director. Jesper shares his journey into the gaming industry, emphasizing the importance of diversity in art and the need for artists to receive recognition and fair compensation. He reflects on the evolution of Magic's art, the impact of corporate influence on the gaming industry, and offers advice for aspiring artists. The discussion also touches on the future of Dungeons & Dragons and the challenges it faces in a changing market.