Podcasts about noah's flood

Was Noah's Flood local just a local flood, and does it really matter what we believe about it? Find out why Noah's Flood being a global flood is key to the gospel message! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/answerstv/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/answerstv/support

This week we're seeing that the global flood really happened—God's Word is clear on that! And there's even secular confirmation.

Some have declared that there is absolutely no evidence of a global flood on earth, while others contend it's all around us. How can there be such a divide on the issue, even among Bible believers? Explore these issues in this enlightening and visually rich investigation of Noah's Ark. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/answerstv/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/answerstv/support

Dr. Tasman Walker discusses Noah's Flood and Biblical Geology. http://biblicalgeology.net/ www.creation.com

Na sep na gim luat ciang tawl dam ki sam // Health talk.Kawikawi + Pai zel ding // chin gospel songs.

Today, Ray Comfort explains to us that evolution makes the Noah's Ark story possible. Unfortunately, he didn't count on the methane...Sources:The Anchor Bible - Genesis (E.A. Speiser) Second Edition, 1978 pp 52Baraminology: https://bit.ly/3eOmnVqBaraminology—Classification of Created Organisms: https://bit.ly/33j61PmSpecies concept: https://bit.ly/3ek3PxfGenome-wide data substantiate Holocene gene flow from India to Australia: https://bit.ly/3nPGAhOPhylogeny of the caniform carnivora: evidence from multiple genes: https://bit.ly/3h4QTNyA phylogenetic blueprint for a modern whale: https://bit.ly/3ulZWO0Methane production by domestic animals, wild ruminants, other herbivorous fauna, and humans: https://bit.ly/33lqBP4How would sea level change if all glaciers melted?: https://on.doi.gov/2Z5xgKGHow much water is in the atmosphere?: https://bit.ly/3h1xop9Original Video: https://bit.ly/3nOxG43Cards:Mantle Minerals Make Moses Moist!:https://youtu.be/jBOF6M353kA

Genesis 07Noah and the Flood (v 1-24)Support the show (https://www.eservicepayments.com/cgi-bin/Vanco_ver3.vps?appver3=Fi1giPL8kwX_Oe1AO50jRiyQtOyGk4k_EcVQYcCBuEehjXsUKRLlmI4vCU4-rZZZ2EvVVAEjqawDomKT1pbouVpn5a3cpHzCC-lHLmLDXQg=&ver=3)

Grand Canyon is often used as evidence for gradualism and evolution, however, examining the canyon shows that catastrophe, rather than time, carved it. Join us as we explore the Canyon via river raft. The geology of Grand Canyon testifies to the massive catastrophe that caused its formation.

Today we look at the Gilgamesh Epic and how it correlates to the Genesis account of Noah's Flood. We'll also look at other evidence for the Flood.

Join us a we take a careful look at the story of the Flood through new lenses that Jesus enables us to wear. Discover where the natural cause of the flood could have originated, resulting in an event that God was unable to prevent from destroying the earth.

Join us a we take a careful look at the story of the Flood through new lenses that Jesus enables us to wear.

A new MP3 sermon from Church of The Vine is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Noah's Flood: A New Covenant Drama (Genesis 6:9-8:19) Subtitle: Genesis Speaker: Patrick Burger Broadcaster: Church of The Vine Event: Sunday Service Date: 7/5/2020 Bible: Genesis 6:9-8:19 Length: 39 min.

All this will be best viewed through a true biblical cosmology: If you are a rock nerd who loves the Lord... for $5 You can get this, and 72 other videos, and a bunch of PDF's @ https://isgenesishistory.com/conference/ Dr. Kurt Wise provides an explanation for the worldwide distribution of Pre-Cambrian and Cambrian fossils, including Ediacaran, Dickinsonia, and the Cambrian explosion. Dr. Kurt Wise earned his BA in geology from the University of Chicago, and his MA and PhD degrees in paleontology from Harvard University. He founded and directed the Center for Origins Research at Bryan College and taught biology there for 17 years. He then led the Center for Theology and Science at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary for 3 years, before founding and directing the Center for Creation Research and teaching biology at Truett McConnell University for the last 7 years. His fieldwork has included research in early Flood rocks in the Death Valley region, late Flood rocks in Wyoming, and post-Flood caves in Tennessee. ~~~~~~~ Contact or follow me @ BeGoodBroadcast@gmail.com Twitter @WinInHim --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/begoodbroadcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/begoodbroadcast/support

All this will be best viewed through a true biblical cosmology: If you are a rock nerd who loves the Lord... for $5 You can get this, and 72 other videos, and a bunch of PDF's @ https://isgenesishistory.com/conference/ Dr. Kurt Wise provides an explanation for the worldwide distribution of Pre-Cambrian and Cambrian fossils, including Ediacaran, Dickinsonia, and the Cambrian explosion. If you like this lecture from the 2017 IGH Conference, you can get it and over 70 more at: https://isgenesishistory.com/conference/. Learn more about the film "Is Genesis History?" and get more resources at http://www.isgenesishistory.com/ The question of how a global Flood could happen is an important area of research for modern creation scientists. One of the theories used to explain this process was developed by a number of scientists featured in the film.* It is known as “Catastrophic Plate Tectonics” and has a great deal of explanatory power concerning the geophysical processes behind the global catastrophe. During the 2017 IGH Conference, Dr. Kurt Wise explored the impact of the global flood on the earth in a series of three in-depth lectures. This lecture on the “geophysics of the flood,” the third in the series, provides a fascinating look at the processes behind the global flood. (Here is a technical paper on the same topic by the six scientists.) If you've not seen the documentary yet, here are ways to watch Is Genesis History featuring Kurt Wise and 12 other scientists and scholars: https://isgenesishistory.com/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/begoodbroadcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/begoodbroadcast/support

The story of Noah and the flood has been described by many people as a "myth". This show addresses that question briefly by comparing the flood story with the Epic of Gilgamesh and the other 200 flood stories from cultures across the continents of the world. Secondly the show deals with the question: Since the flood seems to be a legitimate event in history, why would atheists want to deny it? Well, because 2300 years after it Jesus spoke about it and so did the Apostle Peter. And what they had to say about it sends a shiver down our spines. Is something similar perhaps on its way?Thirdly, this episode will provide some comfort for those going through a difficult time. Many of us have been placed in challenging times. The story of Noah provides so many positive tips on staying afloat when it feels like you are sinking. 

Week 2 of our series "Sunday School" Website: experienceredemption.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/redemptionchurchperrysburg Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/redemption_toledo/

Many centuries before the emergence of the scientific consensus on climate change, people began to imagine the existence of a global environment: a natural system capable of changing humans and of being changed by them. In After the Flood: Imagining the Global Environment in Early Modern Europe (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), Lydia Barnett traces the history of this idea back to the early modern period, when the Scientific Revolution, the Reformations, the Little Ice Age, and the overseas expansion of European empire, religion, and commerce gave rise to new ideas about nature and humanity, and their intersecting histories. Recovering a forgotten episode in the history of environmental thought, Barnett brings to light the crucial role of religious faith and conflict in fostering new ways of thinking about the capacity of humans and nature to change each other on a planetary scale. In the hands of Protestant and Catholic writers from across Europe and its American colonies, the biblical story of Noah's Flood became a vehicle for imagining the power of sin to wreck the world, the dangers of overpopulation, the transformative effects of shifting landforms on the course of human history, and the impact of a changing climate on human bodies, health, and lives. Following Noah's Flood as a popular topic of debate through long-distance networks of knowledge from the late sixteenth through the early eighteenth centuries, Barnett reveals how early modern earth and environmental sciences were shaped by gender, evangelism, empire, race, and nation. After the Flood illuminates the hidden role and complicated legacy of religion in the emergence of a global environmental consciousness. Interviewed by Lukas Rieppel. Visit my personal website here, or find me on twitter here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Many centuries before the emergence of the scientific consensus on climate change, people began to imagine the existence of a global environment: a natural system capable of changing humans and of being changed by them. In After the Flood: Imagining the Global Environment in Early Modern Europe (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), Lydia Barnett traces the history of this idea back to the early modern period, when the Scientific Revolution, the Reformations, the Little Ice Age, and the overseas expansion of European empire, religion, and commerce gave rise to new ideas about nature and humanity, and their intersecting histories. Recovering a forgotten episode in the history of environmental thought, Barnett brings to light the crucial role of religious faith and conflict in fostering new ways of thinking about the capacity of humans and nature to change each other on a planetary scale. In the hands of Protestant and Catholic writers from across Europe and its American colonies, the biblical story of Noah's Flood became a vehicle for imagining the power of sin to wreck the world, the dangers of overpopulation, the transformative effects of shifting landforms on the course of human history, and the impact of a changing climate on human bodies, health, and lives. Following Noah's Flood as a popular topic of debate through long-distance networks of knowledge from the late sixteenth through the early eighteenth centuries, Barnett reveals how early modern earth and environmental sciences were shaped by gender, evangelism, empire, race, and nation. After the Flood illuminates the hidden role and complicated legacy of religion in the emergence of a global environmental consciousness. Interviewed by Lukas Rieppel. Visit my personal website here, or find me on twitter here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Many centuries before the emergence of the scientific consensus on climate change, people began to imagine the existence of a global environment: a natural system capable of changing humans and of being changed by them. In After the Flood: Imagining the Global Environment in Early Modern Europe (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), Lydia Barnett traces the history of this idea back to the early modern period, when the Scientific Revolution, the Reformations, the Little Ice Age, and the overseas expansion of European empire, religion, and commerce gave rise to new ideas about nature and humanity, and their intersecting histories. Recovering a forgotten episode in the history of environmental thought, Barnett brings to light the crucial role of religious faith and conflict in fostering new ways of thinking about the capacity of humans and nature to change each other on a planetary scale. In the hands of Protestant and Catholic writers from across Europe and its American colonies, the biblical story of Noah's Flood became a vehicle for imagining the power of sin to wreck the world, the dangers of overpopulation, the transformative effects of shifting landforms on the course of human history, and the impact of a changing climate on human bodies, health, and lives. Following Noah's Flood as a popular topic of debate through long-distance networks of knowledge from the late sixteenth through the early eighteenth centuries, Barnett reveals how early modern earth and environmental sciences were shaped by gender, evangelism, empire, race, and nation. After the Flood illuminates the hidden role and complicated legacy of religion in the emergence of a global environmental consciousness. Interviewed by Lukas Rieppel. Visit my personal website here, or find me on twitter here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Many centuries before the emergence of the scientific consensus on climate change, people began to imagine the existence of a global environment: a natural system capable of changing humans and of being changed by them. In After the Flood: Imagining the Global Environment in Early Modern Europe (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), Lydia Barnett traces the history of this idea back to the early modern period, when the Scientific Revolution, the Reformations, the Little Ice Age, and the overseas expansion of European empire, religion, and commerce gave rise to new ideas about nature and humanity, and their intersecting histories. Recovering a forgotten episode in the history of environmental thought, Barnett brings to light the crucial role of religious faith and conflict in fostering new ways of thinking about the capacity of humans and nature to change each other on a planetary scale. In the hands of Protestant and Catholic writers from across Europe and its American colonies, the biblical story of Noah's Flood became a vehicle for imagining the power of sin to wreck the world, the dangers of overpopulation, the transformative effects of shifting landforms on the course of human history, and the impact of a changing climate on human bodies, health, and lives. Following Noah's Flood as a popular topic of debate through long-distance networks of knowledge from the late sixteenth through the early eighteenth centuries, Barnett reveals how early modern earth and environmental sciences were shaped by gender, evangelism, empire, race, and nation. After the Flood illuminates the hidden role and complicated legacy of religion in the emergence of a global environmental consciousness. Interviewed by Lukas Rieppel. Visit my personal website here, or find me on twitter here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Many centuries before the emergence of the scientific consensus on climate change, people began to imagine the existence of a global environment: a natural system capable of changing humans and of being changed by them. In After the Flood: Imagining the Global Environment in Early Modern Europe (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), Lydia Barnett traces the history of this idea back to the early modern period, when the Scientific Revolution, the Reformations, the Little Ice Age, and the overseas expansion of European empire, religion, and commerce gave rise to new ideas about nature and humanity, and their intersecting histories. Recovering a forgotten episode in the history of environmental thought, Barnett brings to light the crucial role of religious faith and conflict in fostering new ways of thinking about the capacity of humans and nature to change each other on a planetary scale. In the hands of Protestant and Catholic writers from across Europe and its American colonies, the biblical story of Noah's Flood became a vehicle for imagining the power of sin to wreck the world, the dangers of overpopulation, the transformative effects of shifting landforms on the course of human history, and the impact of a changing climate on human bodies, health, and lives. Following Noah's Flood as a popular topic of debate through long-distance networks of knowledge from the late sixteenth through the early eighteenth centuries, Barnett reveals how early modern earth and environmental sciences were shaped by gender, evangelism, empire, race, and nation. After the Flood illuminates the hidden role and complicated legacy of religion in the emergence of a global environmental consciousness. Interviewed by Lukas Rieppel. Visit my personal website here, or find me on twitter here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What we can learn from Noah's flood

"The Hovind Theory" blends scientific observations with Scripture in an explanation of what could have caused Noah's Flood, the Ice Age, the formation of coal, mountain ranges and the Grand Canyon.

This week we had a special, interactive event led by Sue Jones. Sue is a scientist, and educator, part of the spiritual leadership team at Hope and founder for Creation Family Science.Sue shares her passion for science and points out how the evidence found in the ground aligns with the Bible’s description of Noah’s flood.

Presented by Dr. John Ashton, a professor of chemistry and biomedical science and author of 14 books. Listen to Dr. John Ashton explain how science is challenging evolution and supporting the Biblical account of creation.

Different Cultures Speak Of A Great Flood. Is There Any Truths To It --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/jeff-watson-media/support

George Noory and researcher Freddy Silva explore his hypothesis that aliens sent an asteroid to wipe out evil giants that were destroying human civilization during Noah's time, and that stories of Greek gods may have actually been about the aliens. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers

Spiritual growth requires obedience.

Aaron discusses the nature of the flood of Noah’s day (Gen. 6-9).

My windshield wiper idea, Noah and the flood and much more!

Message on the time between Noah and Abraham - by Pastor Rob Carlson

Message from Genesis 8 by Pastor Rob Carlson

Is the Genesis Flood true history or just a fable? There is scientific evidence for the Flood.

What we can learn about God and ourselves from the account of the Flood in Noah’s day.

Love God. Love People.

- Decay and refutation of the Genesis minimalist paradigm for interpreting geology.    - What do contemporary young Earth creationists think happened during this epoch of human history (c. 1700-1830)?    - Do they think about it at all?    - Do they think that it was a conspiracy or open rebellion, a force of will to reject the Bible?- Late 18th / early 19th century debate over the age of the Earth    - Change in status of fossils of extinct species from a doubted claim to a means of dating strata        - In Steno's time, the fact that shells of many extinct species clearly do not belong to living animals was considered a telling argument in favor of their abiotic origin.        - By the early 19th century, enough work had been done on systematic stratigraphy across Europe that geologists recognized a number of extinct fossil groupings that could be found in a variety of places, and the conviction grew that these assemblages were the remains of living communities that existed at specific intervals in Earth's past.        - In turn, using fossil assemblages to cross-correlate rocks across Europe and eventually across the rest of the planet allowed the erection and refinement of the geological timescale that we still use today.    - Hutton: "we can see no vestige of a beginning, no prospect of an end"        - Criticized as bringing back Aristotelian eternalism, but Hutton defends his statement as a comment on the limitations of what we can observe- Final burst of "diluvialist" theory in the 1820s    - "Drift", including "erratic" boulders, gravels, and sands in places contemporary streams and gravity could not have left them (e.g. on hillsides)    - Some such deposits of gravel and sand in Europe and a few other places scattered across the world, particularly in caves, held recent fossils; these were bundled up together and held to be products of either Noah's Flood or a similar flood at a different, somewhat earlier date.    - No human remains found in these deposits (at the time the debate was being resolved, at any rate).- Lyell begins publishing "Principles of Geology" in 1830    - Pushes the Huttonian theme of uniformitarianism to its extreme.    - Lumps Genesis minimalists, diluvialists, catastrophists, and even directionalists together    - Lyell's uniformitarianism was never accepted in absolute completeness        - Even before the advent of thermodynamics in the 19th century, it was still common sense that the Earth is cooling down with time.- What happened to the evidence once taken as proof of diluvialism?    - The gradual, halting acceptance of ice ages as the source of "drift"- Where did the debate go from there?    - Direct reference to Genesis as a historical reference for geological events died out of the living stream of geological debate.    - Physicists, and devotees of the new discipline of geophysics, began to look for ways to constrain the Earth's age with the means available to late 19th century physics. The name of William Thomson, later Lord Kelvin, is most remembered today for essentially issuing ultimata to stratigraphers and paleontologists based on his cooling histories of the Sun and the Earth. A tug of war ensued between geologists in these old subdisciplines, whose estimates of the required time for the deposition, uplift, and erosion of strata ran into the hundreds of millions of years, and the physicists, who thought that 100 million years was roughly the longest conceivable time allowable.    - Of course, the physicists were wrong; their estimates of the age of the Earth were yet another area where the advent of 20th century physics (radioactivity, which ultimately is a quantum physics effect) overturned previous thought:        - First, radioactivity heats the interior of the Earth--and nuclear fusion drives the Sun--meaning that the old estimates of cooling lifetimes were meaningless.        - Second, radioactivity gives us many ways of actually calculating numeric ages of minerals and rocks.        -The upshot for the debate between young Earth creationists and geologists.    - It pays to keep in mind that the radiometric dating line of evidence for the long age of the Earth came very, very late in the history of geology. It's not a primary argument, certainly not historically, and perhaps not even scientifically, for an age of the Earth that radically transcends 6,000 years.    - Geology, like physics, chemistry, and biology, was born in the 17th century, in an intellectual climate steeped in Biblical minimalism. There was no shortage of geologists who *wanted* a global Genesis flood to have existed and left evidence of its passing. They were argued, or even argued themselves out of this belief, very reluctantly.    - It's also worth taking some time to think:        - Does the text of Genesis demand a global flood? Really? We are that sure of the definitions of the words and the history of the text?        - Is a God that presided over the ad hoc instantaneous creation of a complex planet any greater in concept than the God that created a whole universe and the laws that govern its growth and change over 13 billion years?

- Competitor paradigms in early geology, their conceptual and thematic relationships to Noah's Flood.    - Catastrophism and its inverse, uniformitarianismHutton, in some circles (especially Anglo-American ones) considered the father of geology, was a curious hybrid (from our point of view, anyway) of philosophical convictions. On the one hand, and what makes him famous and venerated among geologists today, is his methodology and core assumption that processes happening on the contemporary Earth are the same processes that have shaped it throughout its history. This idea was worked up and spread broadly by Lyell.    On the other hand, he expressed a thoroughgoing sense of teleology...that the world was set up in such a way so as to maintain its surface condition fit for animal life.Controversy between "catastrophists" and "uniformitarians / actualists"    Cowper, "The Task": "[God] was mistaken in the date he gave to Moses" (Cowper himself is castigating these scholars)    The putative tension that people like Cowper, Steno, Pascal, even arguably Aquinas felt between science,        mathematics, philosophy and their faith    How has this played into the widespread notion that faith and reason are opposed?    Cf. the tension between being Christian and being a soldier        "Deists" like Werner and Hutton discard the rigid post-Reformation sola scriptura straitjacket, yet they become just as dogmatic about their own theories.

With acknowledgments to A. Hallam and his Great Geological Controversies18th century: it becomes more and more possible and even fashionable to discard the minimalist Scriptural timescaleNevertheless, Western thought is so thoroughly steeped in Christianity that every major development is either an extension (subconscious or not) of a Christian theme or a deliberate rejection of one.- Decay and refutation of the Genesis minimalist paradigm for interpreting geology.    - "Diluvialism", the theory that either Noah's Flood as a global phenomenon c. 3000 BC or a similar worldwide flood at a more loosely defined point in Earth's history- Competitor paradigms in early geology, their conceptual and thematic relationships to Noah's Flood.    - Neptunism, vulcanism, plutonismThe difficulty of even finding good outcrops to come to solid conclusions about geological questionsControversy between the "neptunists", "vulcanists", and "plutonists" revolves around a very limited number of observations at key field localities in west-central Europe:    Flat-lying basalts in Saxony sandwiched into a sedimentary sequence    Volcanoes in Italy, especially Vesuvius (the most accessible and famous)    Extinct but still recognizable volcanoes in Auvergne, in France, where basalt cones and flows overlie huge thicknesses of granite

Bill and I start off by discussing some of the reasons why there is such animosity against faith and such a tendency to credit the claim that science and religion are mutually incompatible. I think we miss a great deal of the point if we do not take into account the relentless critique Christianity has mounted OF ITSELF over the past half millennium. The Reformation splintered the Christian nations and sparked unprecedented bloodshed between Christians. There had been terrible episodes before, but these wars, culminating in the Thirty Years' War, were on a new scale. The massive hypocrisy of Christians killing Christians, and the continuing hypocrisy of Christian clergy enjoying positions of wealth and privilege in both Catholic and Protestant nations, sparked further critique, leading to the Enlightenment and modern liberalism and progressivism. I ask you...do you think anything like modern progressivism, which bases itself on advocating for the poor and the repressed, could have arisen except as a Christian critique of Christianity? In any case, we continue down to the present to be living in the dwindling, waning days of that union between Church and State, even in the US, and the scandals from that are still with us, as we know this month in Pennsylvania and with the spectacle of Cardinal McCarrick. That provides powerful impetus to look for other sticks to beat Christianity with. It doesn't help that there are also people, in numbers enough to be visible, who really do espouse a form of religion that is contradictory to science. The Bible itself makes no claim to be the only book worth knowing, but the post-Reformation world has quite a few people willing to make that claim on its behalf. Turning back to the intellectual issues within the debate itself, I bring up the question: why does so much of the fracas around science vs. the Bible center on biology, when the real question is the Bible vs. geology? Biologists have no real basis for determining the rate and overall progress of evolution if they were not given access to the fossil record and geological time scale...by geologists. Further, there is a great deal more of the Bible that makes claims about geology than about biology. (It's still an extremely small fraction, but of that small fraction...) In fact, as the science of geology got started with people like Nicolaus Steno (his sketch of a shark and shark's teeth is the image for this episode), one of their first tasks was to try to evaluate the record of stones and sediment for evidence of Noah's Flood. One of the first crises in geology was dealing with the failure of this quest to find evidence for a global flood (which may or may not be an accurate translation of the intent of the writer of that part of Genesis, but that's another story).

In this program Dr. Scripture answers a couple questions from listeners.  Is Dr. Scripture a presuppositionalist (if you don't know what that is--listen to the program), and does God make mistakes?

Sovereign Grace Bible Church of Ada, OK

"Noah's Flood" Pastor Randy Wilson

Keaton Halley from Creation Ministries International speaks this morning on Noah's Flood. Did it happen? Was it possible? Is there proof?

De-Creation: Noah's Flood by Providence Church

Episode 85 features part two of January’s monthly listener-directed Q&A podcast. Join Phil Baker and BDK as they continue answering your questions on a wide variety of Biblical topics. We dig deep into the virtual listener mail bag and cover such questions as: how much emphasis you would put on the book of First Enoch to help unlock some of the more cryptic key themes in scripture? Is it possible to figure exactly how many years ago Noah's Flood happened? Can we clarify the roles of the different members of the “unholy trinity” of Revelation? Do we need to be re-baptized if we fall away from the Faith and then come back? Is infant baptism Biblical? What did the early church teach about baptism? Is Christ’s name Jesus, Yeshua, or Joshua? Will God hear our prayers for salvation or deliverance if we use the wrong name? What does 1 Corinthians 5:5 mean when it says Paul is turning over someone to satan for the destruction of the flesh in order to be saved? Why does God allow suffering and evil to exist in this world? These are just a few of the questions up for discussion. Show notes: Download Omega Frequency on iTunes Listen To The Fourth Watch Radio Network Visit Phil Baker Online Read Phil’s Blog Purchase A Copy Of NEW: Wineskins And The Simple Words Of Christ Vist Mark Combs Online Order A Signed Copy Of "END The Beginning" Directly From Mark Listen To Episode 42 - Examining the Evidence of Noah’s Ark With Mark Combs

Join Kevin, Nancy and Tyler as they explore the biblical myth of Noah's flood with a geologist from Houston TX also called Kevin The Kevins are taking over Did a global flood ever happened? Could it? What does the evidence say? Listen in as our expert explain to our crew what does geology say about the biblical myth? Nancy delivers us another This Day in History We chit chat about the Dakota pipeline protest And apparently the end of the world will happen Aug 21st 2017...again

[Episode 35] Where did our 7 day week come from? What do the 10 Commandments have to do with Genesis 1-2? We take a dive into the end of Creation Week and meet some animals that help us picture this along the way. Legends remembering Noah's Flood wrap up this jam packed show!

Subject: Genesis 7:1-22 Speaker or Performer: R.G. Murray Scripture Passage(s): Genesis 7:1-22 Date of Delivery: April 24, 2016

"Where Did The Floodwaters Go?" That's the title of today's episode, which has Genesis 8:5-14 as its main text. One common objection to believing the validity of Noah's Flood is the perceived dilemma as to where would all of the floodwaters go at the end of the flood. In today's episode, we'll examine that situation and discover that it really isn't as difficult to explain as some skeptics might propose.

"The Waters Break Forth." That's the title of today's episode, which has Genesis 7:1-12 as its main text. This episode discusses the distinction between the clean and unclean animals, and considers the sources of the waters necessary to cover the earth during Noah's Flood. And then the episode ends on a fun note by discussing the possible name of Noah's wife as preserved in Chinese oral tradition.

There's plenty of talk on radio, but with 20twenty you'll find Life, Culture & Current events from a Biblical perspective. Interviews, stories and insight you definately won't hear in the mainstream media. This feed contains selected content from 20twenty, heard every weekday morning. See www.vision.org.au for more details Help Vision to keep 'Connecting Faith to Life': https://vision.org.au/donate See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark Kline :: Creekside Church :: Sunday, June 7, 2015 Sin brings pain to God and judgment to the world, a judgment that can only be escaped by God’s grace. Mark Kline begins with a short overview of what we've covered in our series on Genesis so far, and then presents a fascinating and truthful lesson on the time leading up to Noah's Flood from Genesis 6:1-8. In a corrupt society, though sinner like Noah, how can we walk faithfully with a patient and just God and be "preachers of righteousness" in our day? Mark also includes a brief but enlightening theological view on the roles of angels and demons in this curious passage.

Family Life Church

Family Life Church

2 Peter 3:5-7  Study Notes  Pictures

The Young Earth Creation movement claim that the Bible and science show that the world is only a little over 6000 years old. In the first of two debates Justin Brierley hears from a leading UK "young earther" who claims that the rock and fossil record were laid down by the flood of Noah, and a paleontologist who argues that science is clear that they were laid down over millions of years of evolutionary history. Andy Macintosh is Professor of Thermodynamics and Combustion Theory at the University of Leeds. He is a leading British Young Earth Creationist. He debates with Robert Asher, a paleontologist at the Museum of Zoology in Cambridge, and the author of “Evolution and belief: Confessions of a religious paleontologist”. For more faith debates visit www.premier.org.uk/unbelievable Join the conversation via Facebook and Twitter For Resources recommended by Andy McIntosh http://www.truthinscience.org.uk Origins: Examining the Evidence Origins: Examining the EvidenceRadioactive Dating: Research confirming the Biblical Record For Robert Asher http://people.ds.cam.ac.uk/rja58/ Evolution & belief: Confessions of a religious paleontologist Feathered Dinosaurs: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences Vol. 33 Get the MP3 podcast of Unbelievable? http://ondemand.premier.org.uk/unbelievable/AudioFeed.aspx or Via Itunes You may also enjoy: Unbelievable? 17 June 2012 - Do we live on an old or young earth? Andy McIntosh, Hugh Ross, Stephen Lloyd & Ken Samples

March 2, 2014 - Evening Message Various Passages

February 23, 2014 - Evening Message Genesis 6-7

February 16, 2014 - Evening Message Genesis 6

Episode #297: Best of I Didn’t Know That!: Best argument against evolution; where are the fossils from Noah's Flood; Could Adam comprehend the meaning of death?

The push and pull between religion and science has shaped advances in geology from the beginning. David Montgomery set out to debunk Noah’s Flood; instead he discovered this biblical story was the plate tectonics of its day. He tells us how the evolution of landscapes and geological processes shape ecology and humanity. And, how we should read rocks for the stories they tell about who we are and where we came from.

Krista Tippett interviewed geologist David R. Montgomery on July 3, 2013. This interview is included in the show ‘Reading the Rocks.’ Download the mp3 of the produced show at onbeing.org.

Episode #260: Skeptics Challenge ENCODE's Accuracy; Where are the fossils from Noah's Flood?; Human and Primate fingerprints, evolution or shared design?

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Many geologists do not believe the Bible because of the story of Noah's Flood. I struggled with trying to make geology and Scripture agree as a young geologist. However, I found that geology does support the Flood! This presentation will discuss some of those evidences along with thinking about what our response should be as Christians.

Fact or Fiction? If you haven't already done so, please update your iTunes settings to ensure you receive all our new content each week. Visit www.rockymountbaptistchurch.com/resources/itunes-podcast-settings.pdf for more information.

Fact or Fiction? If you haven't already done so, please update your iTunes settings to ensure you receive all our new content each week. Visit www.rockymountbaptistchurch.com/resources/itunes-podcast-settings.pdf for more information.

Multiverse and Design Arguments, Traducianism, Noah's Flood

Was Noah's flood global or local? Did the Flood in Noah's time really cover the entire earth?

The King James Bible teaches that the entire earth was flooded in the times of Noah, sceptics have wondered how this could have happened and what is the proof, get the answers you need in this audio, a humorous and educational presentation. this is Dr.Hovind's theory of how the flood happened.. Video is avaliable at www.drdino.com the video is called THE HOVIND THEORY

A new MP3 sermon from The Underground Christian Network is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: How did Noah's flood happen? a theory Subtitle: video avaliable at drdino.com Speaker: Dr. Kent Hovind Broadcaster: The Underground Christian Network Event: Special Meeting Date: 10/13/1997 Bible: Genesis 1 Length: 89 min.