Podcasts about philosophize

Unconscious. Subconscious. Pre-conscious. Shadowed consciousness. Altered consciousness. Just look at all the ways we can not be conscious. To get at this, there are a lot of methods to approach what we know - but don't know that we know. We could spend an entire lifetime probing into this unawareness (and some people do). Classify it. Codify it. Poke and prod. Philosophize. Create a double blind study. Look under taboo-rocks, and then under the earth that supports that rock, then under that, all the way to hot lava. Metaphorically, of course... Enter YOUR labyrinth at: BeWhoYouAre.com   Request: I recorded this book for a podcast platform so that you can listen for free. Please rate, dowload, and share with a friend to help us help others with their stories. Thank you!    About Me, Robin Rice: As an author and story philosopher, I know that the way a story is told changes the reality around it. My intention is to write books that stay with my readers long after they've closed the last chapter. As a story strategist, I have worked with bestselling authors to help them reach the Top-100-Of-The-Year lists, including Oprah, Time Magazine, and others. I also work with high-profile leaders who are effectively changing our world at scale. I have created social change projects that have traveled the globe, including #stopthebeautymadess and #yourholidaymom. Now, for the first time, I am sharing my personal story of awakening to greater consciousness. Like all impactful stories, it's really about you. Join me as a trustworthy guide on the journey to uncover your own rich truths. Together, we can shape the story you've been waiting to tell yourself and the world. Learn more about me at RobinRice.com. 

Bounce back from injuries and setbacks by recasting progress as a reward

This episode is about Guy Debord's idea of the spectacle: a social system where life is mediated by images and appearances. It's not just about watching TV or scrolling through social media—though those are clear examples—but about how everything in society becomes a performance, a show. The spectacle turns real, lived experiences into representations, where appearances matter more than substance. It's a world where being has turned into appearing, and we are constantly performing, not living. Inspired by: The Philosophize this Podcast  Society of the Spectacle

Welcome back! This week, after the normal Rigmarole (the heat, clothes, gaming, movies, cars); Ron asks what happened to famous artists and philosophers?; Chris asks what some of our vacation memories are. As always please like, subscribe, and share with your friends. Come join the discussions on the Discord Channel (https://discord.gg/TbxA7gcUky) and follow us on Twitter, @cltruitt22. Thanks and take care!

Welcome to the Circle of the World Podcast! Join Harrison, George, and Jeffrey as we continue our coverage of Joe Abercrombie's First Law series! For this season, we read through Best Served Cold, the first standalone novel in Joe's Great Leveller trilogy! This week we cover No More Delays and All Business. We appreciate all your emails and comments but those messages keep interrupting me. No really, that's quite enough. Would you all stop?! I am trying to philosophize!Meme of the week:https://www.reddit.com/r/HouseOfTheMemeMaker/comments/1dsd18z/whys_everyone_so_down_on_leo/Music Credit: Maszy MusicLeave us a commentSupport the Show.

Na, ihr Dachlatten? Könnt ihr ein paar Mitleidsgroschen wechseln? Dann schiebt euch zwei Pizzen rein und bringt mal eure Spiegelneuronen on fire, es wird wieder Zeit für eine Shitshow inklusive Wetten und Poledance. Tja, da schaut ihr wie Joe Biden, was? Heute geht's um innere und äußere Feinde, um Teenager ohne Werkzeug und seltsame Gerüche im Büro. Gras oder Knoblauch? Oder Schweiß?! Wir nehmen euch mit zur gruseligen Mickey Mouse und zur Mutter von Iris' Ex-Freund, die ein unreflektiertes Arschloch war. Aber nicht wertlos, das ist niemand! Also, was ist Phase? Struggelt ihr mit Isolation und ähnlichen Dingen? Nichts gegen Social Media, ja? Glaubt ihr, dass es Kult ohne Feindbild geben kann? Philosophize this! In dieser Folge gibt's Heftigkeit mit Zuckerguss und Vernichtungswillen in Einbahnstraßen. Wir machen einen Termin bei C.G. Jung, da werden wir schon erwartet. Fühlt euch bitte nicht angegriffen. Wir starten zusammen in eine Ära der Abneigungen, projizieren und introjizieren, werden Ingenieur unseres sozialen Umfeldes und verzeihen alles radikal. Zum Schluss sogar uns selbst. Im Schmerz geeint, ist ja alles nur eine Geschichte... Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos und Rabatte: https://linktr.ee/CoupleOf

Steven West is the host of "Philosophize This!" one of the world's most popular philosophy podcasts. Listen to it here.

Watch the tier list on the Hate Meditations YouTube page: https://www.youtube.com/@hatemeditations3712 Albums featured: Incantation - Diabolical Conquest Nile - Amongst the Catacombs of Nephren-Ka Master - Faith is in Season Gorguts - Obscura Bolt Thrower - Mercenary Unholy - Rapture Dark Funeral - Vobiscum Satanas Gorgoroth - Destroyer, or About How to Philosophize with the Hammer Primordial - A Journey's End Aeternus - ...and So the Night Became Branikald - Хмель мизантропии Dimmu Borgir - Godless Savage Garden Slayer - Diabolus in Musica Deeds of Flesh - Inbreeding the Anthropophagi Septic Flesh - A Fallen Temple Krabathor - Orthodox Opeth - My Arms, Your Hearse Exhumed - Gore Metal Behemoth - Pandemonic Incantations Morbid Angel - Formulas Fatal to the Flesh Angelcorpse - Exterminate

Talos Principle 2 writers Jonas and Verena Kyratzes kick back and explain the inspirations and ideas central to the philosophical identity of this year's greatest first-person puzzle experience, while JM and Jared make toilet jokes.

Looking back at highlights from past episodes of the Catholic Culture Podcast and Criteria: The Catholic Film Podcast. Full episodes below: Catholic Culture Podcast Ep. 65—Reason with Stories, Philosophize with Your Life (Vision of the Soul Pt. III)—James Matthew Wilson https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/ep-64-reason-with-stories-philosophize-with-your-life-vision-soul-pt-iii-james-matthew-wilson/ Ep. 73—St. John Henry Newman's Aesthetics—Fr. Guy Nicholls, Cong. Orat. https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/ep-73-st-john-henry-newmans-aesthetics-fr-guy-nicholls-cong-orat/ Criteria: The Catholic Film Podcast   Robert Bolt's Man for All Seasons: Christian saint or “hero of selfhood”? https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/robert-bolts-man-for-all-seasons-christian-saint-or-hero-selfhood/ Community on the Margins: Stagecoach (1939) w/ Anthony Esolen https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/stagecoach-1939/ DONATE to make this show possible! http://catholicculture.org/donate/audio Go to Catholic Culture's website for tons of written content, including news, articles, liturgical year info, and a vast library of documents: https://www.catholicculture.org

可以搜索公号【璐璐的英文小酒馆】或者添加【luluxjg2】咨询课程or加入社群，查看文稿和其他精彩内容哦~ Hi everyone, and welcome back to your favorite segment Global Village. 欢迎回来你们最喜欢的板块【小酒馆·大世界】. Actually today in our studio welcome back an old friend, some of you probably remember we had this philosophy segment called Let's Philosophize? 可能还有一些小伙伴记得原来你们很喜欢的一个板块叫做【知乎哲也】，是讲哲学问题的, 当时就有很多人喜欢这个板块的嘉宾主播TJ, so TJ, welcome back. Hi, Lulu. I'm very glad to be back with you after a long hiatus. I mean you have been really busy, right? I thought the reason why I invited TJ to this segment rather than Let's Philosophize is because he has some interesting life updates to share. Like before in this segment earlier this year, if some of you still remember, we talked to Brad about his move to Japan. And TJ, you were in China in Beijing before COVID and during the COVID years you were back in the UK, and now you're in America. Right, O'er land of the free and the home of the brave as they call it. I'm just trying to get used to the culture shock of being in another place. I call it my third childhood. I had my first childhood in England, my second childhood in China. Now I'm learning everything again, right? Completely different environment. I'm sure this is going to be a very interesting talk. But first things first, let's start with where exactly are you? I mean the United States is a big place. Where are you? The area that I'm in is called the Midwest. The Midwest is the area that's seen as almost like the suburbs of America. It's lots of corn. People are supposed to be very friendly and they've been very nice to me so far. And it's somewhere that seemed to have a community and family values. Which state are you in?So the state that I'm in is called Indiana. Indiana, okay. Are you in like a big city at least or are you like really in suburbs or even countryside of America? So it's one of the strange things really that I'm in a town called Bloomington, which has under 100,000 people. So it is quite small. It's like a village in China.Right. You can bike around very easily. And the interesting thing about Bloomington to me is that its almost half of the entire population is to do with the university, right, its teachers, students or staff. This is my next question and I'm sure a lot of you want to ask this question. Why are you in America? It's a good question, right? Especially as I focus on early Chinese philosophy. So it's a strange place. It's essentially it's because my supervisor in China told me to come here. We have some of the best researchers that focus on early Taoist thought and early Confucian thought in all of the western world. Let me get this straight. You now move from China or from the UK to America to study Chinese philosophy? Yes. That is true. I know it seems very strange. But the degree you're doing right now is your PhD right, your doctorate? Right. I'm doing a PhD.For those of you who don't really know TJ's really interesting educational background, Let me fill you in. TJ has got two master's degrees, right? One from the UK one, from China, from Fudan university. Yes, that's right. Can you tell us a little bit about that like what degree did you like, what major did you do it in what field?My undergraduate degree I did in Leeds in England that's philosophy. Then I went to Beijing Normal university and did some language courses at Beijing Normal University. After that, I did my teacher training. It was in Manchester but it's the Cambridge certification, right? That's not as impressive as it sounds for the listeners that are easily “fooled”. And then a master at Birmingham and then as another master of Fudan, now a PhD in America. So you're just one of those like perpetual students. Right, right. I think I do grow up slowly. It takes a long time for me to grow up.

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius & Germanicus philosophize about Kyiv "pleading fir ammo."  Michael Vlahos. Friends of History Debating Society. https://www.ft.com/content/9e68f9d6-0c0e-4d71-adc0-9a95fc57ad4d

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and Germanicus philosophize about "armistice" and the Ukraine conflict:. Michael Vlahos. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/02/us/politics/biden-putin-ukraine-talks.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Join me for a drink as we Philosophize while having a beer; Get stood up by the Chicago White Sox ; And special guest Vince Cotroneo, the Oakland Athletics' play-by-play radio announcer, joins us to talk about sports broadcasting. Drink: Third Party Tripel (Belgian - Style Ale) from Denizens Brewing Co. in Silver Spring, Maryland Instagram: Hipster Baseball Podcast Twitter: @HBP4040 Intro and Outro music: DeCarlo

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and Germanicus philosophize about provxy wars escalations. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety Michael Vlahos. https://peacediplomacy.org/2022/10/17/americas-perilous-choice-in-ukraine-how-proxy-war-accelerates-a-great-power-decline/

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and Germanicus philosophize about The Odyssey in the Realm of the Dead, Chapter Eleven: and the conversations with Agamemnon and Achilles. Michael Vlahos. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety

Stephen West from the juggernaut Philosophize This! podcast joins Mark and Bill to learn to say no and talk about reason vs. emotion in grounding ethics. What do the voices in your head (or at your lunch table) say to you? Mark philosophizes at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Bill improvises (and teaches) at chicagoimprovstudio.com. Hear more at philosophyimprov.com. Support the podcast to get all our post-game discussions and other bonus stuff.

Stephen West from the juggernaut Philosophize This! podcast joins Mark and Bill to learn to say no and talk about reason vs. emotion in grounding ethics. What do the voices in your head (or at your lunch table) say to you? Mark philosophizes at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Bill improvises (and teaches) at chicagoimprovstudio.com. Hear more at philosophyimprov.com. Support the podcast to get all our post-game discussions and other bonus stuff.

《知乎哲也》板块，由受到大家喜爱的哲学小哥TJ和主播璐璐一起探讨哲学那些事儿~ 公号【璐璐的英文小酒馆】可以搜索英语全文稿哦~Hi, everyone. And welcome back to Let's Philosophize. 欢迎回来【知乎哲也】. Hi TJ. Hi Lulu. Thanks for having me back. What's the question you're gonna ask me today？ Lulu, do you think that we should kill people to save other people？Okay! That is a rather strange question. Do you mean like killing bad people？Well, I mean they might be bad people, but uh, it's hard to know, right？What I'm talking about is a philosophy problem called The Trolley Problem. I don't know if you've heard of it before. 电车问题, but enlighten us anyway. So, it's from a 1967 philosophy paper by a philosopher called Philippa Foot, and she said I'll use her words and it's a little bit academic but I think it should be okay.“it may rather be supposed that he is the driver of a runaway tram [trolley] which he can only steer from one narrow track on to the other; five men are working on one track and one man on the other; anyone on the track he enters is bound to be killed.”就是说有这么一个失控的有轨电车, 然后在这个司机现在有1个选择要做, 就是两边的这2个铁轨在他自己在的这条轨上有5个人, 然后另外1条轨上有1个人, 如果他不变轨, 他就会直接把这5个人弄死。如果他要做一步操作, 变到另外一条轨道上, 就会杀死另外一条轨道上的那个人。So, this is the famous trolley problem. Well, if that is the question, you're gonna ask me, I would say I will change track because killing one person is better than killing five people？Right, and that's a very intuitive logic, right？That 90% of people that you ask, say that uh, they would do the same thing, that they would switch the track, kill five people. And of course, we assuming these men are all working on the tracks, they do the same job. We don't know about their families, right？They all have families but five families unless this one man has a very very big family, I think the odds are that similar numbers of people will be upset per person, so it seems to make sense that you pick 5 over 1. Sounds like simple math, right？But not all the philosophers agree with that.

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gauis and Germanicus philosophize: What if Putin departed?  Michael Vlahos. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and Germanicus philosophize if American can disengage from 250 years of pointless European warfare. Michael Vlahos.

The Bhagavad-gita is universally renowned as the jewel of India's spiritual wisdom. Spoken by Lord Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead to His intimate disciple Arjuna, the Gita's seven hundred concise verses provide a definitive guide to the science of self realization. No other philosophical or religious work reveals, in such a lucid and profound way, the nature of consciousness, the self, the universe and the Supreme. His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada is uniquely qualified to present this English translation and commentary on Bhagavad-gita. He is the world's foremost Vedic scholar and teacher, and he is also the current representative of an unbroken chain of fully self-realized spiritual masters begining with Lord Krishna Himself. Thus, unlike other editions of the Gita, this one is presented as it is--without the slightest taint of adulteration or personal motivation. This edition is certain to stimulate and enlighten with its ancient yet thoroughly timely message | find links where to read: sravanamdiaries.com/bhagavad-gita-as-it-is/

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. 1902 Henryk Siemiradzki (1843–1902) @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and Germanicus philosophize upon assassination escalation from Nero to Putin Michael Vlahos. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/06/14/how-nasty-was-nero-really

In 2019 the Leicester City Council granted preliminary approval to place a statue of Joe Orton in the city's cultural quarter. With the help of celebrities such as Ian McKellen, Stephen Fry and Alec Baldwin, the Joe Orton Statue Appeal raised over ₤100,000 in a short time. But in 2020 statues of problematic historical figures were toppled throughout England and Leicester found itself embroiled in a controversy over whether or not to remove a statue of accused racist, and sexual predator Mahatma Gandhi. The Gandhi statue was spared, but when word got out that Joe Orton was a sex tourist who made several trips to Morocco to sleep with pubescent boys, a debate erupted in the Leicester City Council. In this final episode of Season 2 we report what's going on in Leicester and contemplate the question: Must one have been ethically pure to be publicly commemorated in metal or stone?

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and Germanicus philosophize on the Succession struggle from the 1st Century AD Julians to the 21st Century AD White House. Michael Vlahos. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and Germanicus philosophize about Succession struggles from Rome to Washington. Michael Vlahos. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety

In this episode of the Parker's Pensées podcast, Joe Schmid came back on to discuss the books that helped us learn how to do philosophy and that first got us interested in philosophy. We discuss our favorites in the history of philosophy, philosophy in general, phil of religion, metaphysics, epistemology, phil mind, free will, phil language, political philosophy, value theory, and logic. Sure we may have over looked some others. find more from Joe here: https://www.josephschmid.com/ If you like this podcast, then support it on Patreon for $3, $5 or more a month. Any amount helps, and for $5 you get a Parker's Pensées sticker and instant access to all the episode as I record them instead of waiting for their release date. Check it out here: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/parkers_pensees If you want to give a one-time gift, you can give at my Paypal: https://paypal.me/ParkersPensees?locale.x=en_US Check out my merchandise at my Teespring store: https://teespring.com/stores/parkers-penses-merch Check out my blog posts: https://parkersettecase.com/ Check out my Parker's Pensées YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYbTRurpFP5q4TpDD_P2JDA Check out my other YouTube channel on my frogs and turtles: https://www.youtube.com/c/ParkerSettecase Check me out on Twitter: https://twitter.com/trendsettercase Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/parkers_pensees/ --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/parkers-pensees/support

《知乎哲也》板块，由受到大家喜爱的哲学小哥TJ和主播璐璐一起探讨哲学那些事儿~ 公号【璐璐的英文小酒馆】可以搜索英语全文稿哦~Hi, everyone. And welcome back to 【Let's Philosophize】.欢迎回来《知乎哲也》.Hi, TJ. Hey, Lulu. Good to see you again. Good to see you. TJ, I know that every time you ask me a question to start our discussion, can I ask you a question this time? Yeah, of course, go ahead. Have you been following up on one of the top trending news on Chinese social media about what happened in Tangshan? Yeah, I've seen the video, and I've read a few different opinions online, a lot of people have been talking about it. One topic that has come up is the topic of self-defense, should we do it, how should we do it, and how much should we do it? So I thought we can talk about self-defense from a philosophical point of view. Yeah, of course. It's good to look at these real life situations in philosophy because I know sometimes it's very abstract. And self-defense is a situation that we have to face on our own. The police, they can't be everywhere all the time, and I don't think we would want the police to be everywhere all the time either, that would make us uncomfortable. So it means there's always that chance that we meet these situations where we have to defend ourselves. And of course, there's the practical side of that, the martial arts and all different kinds of strategies that we can use to defend ourselves. But there's also the question of what should we do? You know, how should we treat people? Exactly. So when we talk about self-defense, it's always good to look at this from a moral point of view, in terms of what should we do if we want to be good people. And the first thing we can look at is the deservingness of the person. So should this person be harmed? We might say yes, sometimes we might say no. So if we use a simple example of hitting somebody, so I'm a reasonably healthy man, if a child hits me, most people would say that child does not deserve to be hit by me, right, that I can't just hit the child.Okay. Deservingness就是正当性. Should they be harmed? So you just give the example of a child, maybe also people who have mental illness? Right, mental illness or maybe even if they're very drunk, we changed the rules for people if they're drunk too. I'm not sure I agree with the drunk thing because that was actually one of the big issue here. Some people were mentioning in this incident that happened in China saying all these people were drunk, you know how drunk people are. But being drunk, if you are mentally all right, like if you're not mentally ill, then being drunk really shouldn't be your get out of jail free card. It shouldn't be your excuse. Exactly. I think there's different levels of drunkenness as well, just like mental health, if you feel a little bit down one day, that doesn't mean that you can do anything you want. And the same thing with drunkenness, I remember my sister punched me in the face when she was very, very drunk, but she also couldn't stand up at that point, she couldn't stand up straight, she didn't know where she was. So I think that these… in this case, I don't think we can say that these men were so drunk that they didn't know what they were doing, right? Yeah.I don't think they have that kind of excuse. They don't look mentally unhealthy to me. It seems like that they are normal adults, right, that we would expect them to behave better than what they did. 《知乎哲也》板块，由受到大家喜爱的哲学小哥TJ和主播璐璐一起探讨哲学那些事儿~ 公号【璐璐的英文小酒馆】可以搜索英语全文稿哦~

《知乎哲也》板块，由受到大家喜爱的哲学小哥TJ和主播璐璐一起探讨哲学那些事儿~ 公号【璐璐的英文小酒馆】可以搜索英语全文稿哦~Hi, everyone. And welcome back to 【Let's Philosophize】.欢迎回来《知乎哲也》.Hi, TJ. Hey, Lulu. Good to see you again. Good to see you. TJ, I know that every time you ask me a question to start our discussion, can I ask you a question this time? Yeah, of course, go ahead. Have you been following up on one of the top trending news on Chinese social media about what happened in Tangshan? Yeah, I've seen the video, and I've read a few different opinions online, a lot of people have been talking about it. One topic that has come up is the topic of self-defense, should we do it, how should we do it, and how much should we do it? So I thought we can talk about self-defense from a philosophical point of view. Yeah, of course. It's good to look at these real life situations in philosophy because I know sometimes it's very abstract. And self-defense is a situation that we have to face on our own. The police, they can't be everywhere all the time, and I don't think we would want the police to be everywhere all the time either, that would make us uncomfortable. So it means there's always that chance that we meet these situations where we have to defend ourselves. And of course, there's the practical side of that, the martial arts and all different kinds of strategies that we can use to defend ourselves. But there's also the question of what should we do? You know, how should we treat people? Exactly. So when we talk about self-defense, it's always good to look at this from a moral point of view, in terms of what should we do if we want to be good people. And the first thing we can look at is the deservingness of the person. So should this person be harmed? We might say yes, sometimes we might say no. So if we use a simple example of hitting somebody, so I'm a reasonably healthy man, if a child hits me, most people would say that child does not deserve to be hit by me, right, that I can't just hit the child.Okay. Deservingness就是正当性. Should they be harmed? So you just give the example of a child, maybe also people who have mental illness? Right, mental illness or maybe even if they're very drunk, we changed the rules for people if they're drunk too. I'm not sure I agree with the drunk thing because that was actually one of the big issue here. Some people were mentioning in this incident that happened in China saying all these people were drunk, you know how drunk people are. But being drunk, if you are mentally all right, like if you're not mentally ill, then being drunk really shouldn't be your get out of jail free card. It shouldn't be your excuse. Exactly. I think there's different levels of drunkenness as well, just like mental health, if you feel a little bit down one day, that doesn't mean that you can do anything you want. And the same thing with drunkenness, I remember my sister punched me in the face when she was very, very drunk, but she also couldn't stand up at that point, she couldn't stand up straight, she didn't know where she was. So I think that these… in this case, I don't think we can say that these men were so drunk that they didn't know what they were doing, right? Yeah.I don't think they have that kind of excuse. They don't look mentally unhealthy to me. It seems like that they are normal adults, right, that we would expect them to behave better than what they did. 《知乎哲也》板块，由受到大家喜爱的哲学小哥TJ和主播璐璐一起探讨哲学那些事儿~ 公号【璐璐的英文小酒馆】可以搜索英语全文稿哦~

In this episode we discuss if the US democracy is on track to break. In short we think yes. We discuss a history of governance systems and possible things that could be done to change the course. Here are some of the things mentioned: Transforming Power Relationships: Leadership, Risk, and Hope: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43654046 Stephen West and Philosophize this: https://www.philosophizethis.org/ The Open Society and Its Enemies - Book by Karl Popper: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Society_and_Its_Enemies Contact us at info@cloudstreaks.com

《知乎哲也》板块，由受到大家喜爱的哲学小哥TJ和主播璐璐一起探讨哲学那些事儿~ 公号【璐璐的英文小酒馆】可以搜索英语全文稿哦~Welcome back to 【Let's Philosophize】. 欢迎回来《知乎哲也》。In the previous episode, we were talking to TJ about “doubting and knowing”, let's continue with that topic.Yeah. Depends on the context, depending on what you represent, depending on the historical limitations, geographical limitations, cultural limitations, political limitations, you see, kind of like a relative fact or relative truth. So this is the argument of whether there is ultimate truth in the world. Yes, exactly. And how do we find that truth if things are quite relative？So… this already sounds quite difficult and it's… but there's three more to go. The next one is criticism of any theory like Descartes. He's very critical…Foundationalism. Yeah, it's a very big challenge because if you have a foundation, then you have to prove that foundation. Exactly. Actually this was what I wanted to ask you when you mentioned Descartes' foundationalism. 刚才TJ讲笛卡尔的基础主义的时候, 我就特别想问, 就是说If you assume, for example, the foundation of all the other things, of your entire belief system, for example, is “he loves me, we have a good relationship” , if this is your foundation, then all of your subsequent thinking is built on thinking he definitely loves me, this is the truth. But what if that is not the truth. Then your entire belief system collapses, right？Right.So, isn't that the problem with foundationalism？How can you make sure that foundation is solid？ Exactly. Exactly. And this is the problem with all of philosophy really is that we just keep doubting. You try to find some foundation, but then you have to doubt the foundation. And you need more proof.It's difficult being a philosopher, isn't it？Yeah. Yeah. It's quite difficult. So far, we've talked about the dissent among experts, 专家之间的异议; Number two, we talked about relativism, 相对主义, so people are restricted by different context, their background; Number three is foundationalism, 基础主义, so you have to doubt the foundation. There're two more. I think the next one to talk about is infinite regress. This is just what happens if we don't have a foundation. If we can't have a foundation, then you just keep asking why. Infinite regress是无限后退. Does that mean, for example, you say, fundamental belief he loves me. How can you be sure he loves you？Then you doubt that. And then you just keep going down that rabbit hole. Keep asking yeah, but how can you prove that？But how can you prove that？But how can you prove that？Exactly.That's the infinite regress. Yeah, the best way of thinking about the infinite regress, I think is children, because children are often the infinite regress, you say Go to bed and they say Why.They ask difficult questions.Right. Go to bed. Why？Because you need to sleep. Why do I need to sleep? To be healthy. Why do I need to be healthy? Otherwise you get sick. Why will I get sick？Right...You can see that this will go on for a very long time until like Descartes, you eventually say because I told you so, right? Or for Descartes because God told you so, you need…Exactly.You need some authority. This does sound like a rabbit hole that you just fall into. Yeah, so we have one more.Right. And the last one is usually called coherentism. 融贯论. What is coherentism？

《知乎哲也》板块，由受到大家喜爱的哲学小哥TJ和主播璐璐一起探讨哲学那些事儿~ 公号【璐璐的英文小酒馆】可以搜索英语全文稿哦~Welcome back to 【Let's Philosophize】. 欢迎回来《知乎哲也》。In the previous episode, we were talking to TJ about “doubting and knowing”, let's continue with that topic.Yeah. Depends on the context, depending on what you represent, depending on the historical limitations, geographical limitations, cultural limitations, political limitations, you see, kind of like a relative fact or relative truth. So this is the argument of whether there is ultimate truth in the world. Yes, exactly. And how do we find that truth if things are quite relative？So… this already sounds quite difficult and it's… but there's three more to go. The next one is criticism of any theory like Descartes. He's very critical…Foundationalism. Yeah, it's a very big challenge because if you have a foundation, then you have to prove that foundation. Exactly. Actually this was what I wanted to ask you when you mentioned Descartes' foundationalism. 刚才TJ讲笛卡尔的基础主义的时候, 我就特别想问, 就是说If you assume, for example, the foundation of all the other things, of your entire belief system, for example, is “he loves me, we have a good relationship” , if this is your foundation, then all of your subsequent thinking is built on thinking he definitely loves me, this is the truth. But what if that is not the truth. Then your entire belief system collapses, right？Right.So, isn't that the problem with foundationalism？How can you make sure that foundation is solid？ Exactly. Exactly. And this is the problem with all of philosophy really is that we just keep doubting. You try to find some foundation, but then you have to doubt the foundation. And you need more proof.It's difficult being a philosopher, isn't it？Yeah. Yeah. It's quite difficult. So far, we've talked about the dissent among experts, 专家之间的异议; Number two, we talked about relativism, 相对主义, so people are restricted by different context, their background; Number three is foundationalism, 基础主义, so you have to doubt the foundation. There're two more. I think the next one to talk about is infinite regress. This is just what happens if we don't have a foundation. If we can't have a foundation, then you just keep asking why. Infinite regress是无限后退. Does that mean, for example, you say, fundamental belief he loves me. How can you be sure he loves you？Then you doubt that. And then you just keep going down that rabbit hole. Keep asking yeah, but how can you prove that？But how can you prove that？But how can you prove that？Exactly.That's the infinite regress. Yeah, the best way of thinking about the infinite regress, I think is children, because children are often the infinite regress, you say Go to bed and they say Why.They ask difficult questions.Right. Go to bed. Why？Because you need to sleep. Why do I need to sleep? To be healthy. Why do I need to be healthy? Otherwise you get sick. Why will I get sick？Right...You can see that this will go on for a very long time until like Descartes, you eventually say because I told you so, right? Or for Descartes because God told you so, you need…Exactly.You need some authority. This does sound like a rabbit hole that you just fall into. Yeah, so we have one more.Right. And the last one is usually called coherentism. 融贯论. What is coherentism？

Another savage night Camouflaged in neon You could use a friend To lean on The stranger inside Is a white-veiled bride Sinking in the altar she's standing on And the upside of numbness Is that your conscience Has become Teflon Van Ronk doesn't live here anymore And the avant garde in the record store Philosophize about being reborn In a time more pure Once was, but nevermore Nevermore Chorus: The holy water and vodka, circle the same drain In the name of a sadness never given a name The paralysis is an expression a shame Some sadness never given a name You wish there was a face That smiled just for you Brighter than the Broadway lights Illuminating eighth-avenue But you aren't meaningful in the machinery A tuxedoed guitar, praising the secular god And methods to justify the thievery Rebel or Machiavelli What revolution do you want to sell me? The bones of a skinned fish Glitter above the avenue And it only took a few drinks To accept it never mattered what was true When nothing applies to you Nothing applies to you You

Yaron Brook joins me for a discussion on Ayn Rand's philosophy of Objectivism where we discover how Reason has created progress, freedom, and the pursuit to a good life. This series will loosely follow Ayn Rand's written work "The Virtue of Selfishness."Be sure to check out NYDIG, one of the most important companies in Bitcoin: https://nydig.com/ GUESTYaron's Twitter: https://twitter.com/yaronbrookYaron's Show: https://yaronbrookshow.com/The Virtue of Selfishness: http://ikesharpless.pbworks.com/f/AynRand-TheVirtueofSelfishness.pdf PODCASTPodcast Website: https://whatismoneypodcast.com/Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-what-is-money-show/id1541404400 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/25LPvm8EewBGyfQQ1abIsE?si=wgVuY16XR0io4NLNo0A11A&nd=1RSS Feed: https://feeds.simplecast.com/MLdpYXYITranscript: OUTLINE00:00:00 “What is Money?” Intro00:00:08 The Differences Between Intrinsic, Objective, and Subjective Values00:07:22 Objectivism and Similarities with Austrian Theory of Economics00:13:08 Distinguishing Humans as Conceptual From Perceptual00:17:13 Language and Time are Products of Conceptual Thinking00:22:10 Go Beyond Staying Alive to Living as Human Beings00:29:48 NYDIG00:30:56 Does Rand Accept Pursuing Self-Interest by Exploiting Another?00:35:44 Governments Should Have Limited Roles; Focus on Eliminating Violence00:41:14 How Do You Express Vigilance on Governments?00:44:19 The Free Market of Currency Without Centralized Intervention00:49:58 Good and Evil Exist Because Humans Have Reason and Can Ignore Reason00:57:50 Learning to Philosophize, Think, and Create01:05:20 Consider Philosophy: “Bitcoin Can't Win Unless it Has the Right Ideas”01:12:40 “What is Money?” OutroSOCIALBreedlove Twitter: https://twitter.com/Breedlove22WiM? Twitter: https://twitter.com/WhatisMoneyShowLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/breedlove22/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/breedlove_22/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@breedlove22?lang=enAll My Current Work: https://linktr.ee/breedlove22 WRITTEN WORKMedium: https://breedlove22.medium.com/Substack: https://breedlove22.substack.com/ WAYS TO CONTRIBUTEBitcoin: 3D1gfxKZKMtfWaD1bkwiR6JsDzu6e9bZQ7Sats via Strike: https://strike.me/breedlove22Sats via Tippin.me: https://tippin.me/@Breedlove22Dollars via Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/RBreedloveDollars via Venmo: https://venmo.com/code?user_id=1784359925317632528The "What is Money?" Show Patreon Page: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=32843101&fan_landing=true RECOMMENDED BUSINESSESWorldclass Bitcoin Financial Services: https://nydig.com/Join Me At Bitcoin 2023, pre-order your tickets now: https://b.tc/conference/2023Automatic Recurring Bitcoin Buying: https://www.swanbitcoin.com/breedlove/Buy Bitcoin in a Tax-Advantaged Account: https://www.daim.io/robert-breedlove/Buy Your Dream Home without Selling Your Bitcoin with Ledn: https://ledn.io/en/?utm_source=breedlove&utm_medium=email+&utm_campaign=substack

When quoting Immanuel Kant, Frédéric Lenoir stated in a French Canadian television interview that we no longer dare to ask ourselves essential questions as we get older because we know the answers to be difficult." And perhaps he is right. But could it also be that we prevent ourselves from asking them because we are afraid to do so, or better yet, because we don't know how to go about it? Here's is my take on how to go about it. Music by Infraction on Bandcamp Photo by Nikola Ancevski on Unsplash

Photo: Statue of Vercingétorix by Mouly @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and Germanicus Philosophize about the  Decapitation of Kings from Vercingetorix to Putin. Michael Vlahos. #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/solomon-islands-reassures-australia-as-it-works-on-china-security-deal/ar-AAVu0sp

we talk about what it means to be minimalistic vs simplistic, consumeristic culture, and why it is detrimental to have so much stuff!

The philosophy world has turned on poor, innocent Freidrich Nietzsche, calling him a 'reactionary' and 'proto-fascist' and 'incel' (probably), but YouTuber Jonas Ceika (aka CCK Philosophy)is here to bring him back, jamming his deeply anti-egalitarian thought into that of Karl Marx, who literally invented being nice. Can he make a convincing case that these two thinkers are compatible? Spoilers: yes. Music by Wormrot and Holy Fawn. Transvalue all values by giving us your money to spend on anime swords here: https://www.patreon.com/DeathSentence

Photo:   Man Hunt: based on a 1939 novel Rogue Male.  Lang fled Germany into exile in 1933 and this was the first of his four anti-Nazi films, @Batchelorshow #Londinium90AD: Gaius and and Germanicus philosophize over Fritz Lang's 1945 Man Hunt presentation of political assassination. Michael Vlahos. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_Hunt_(1941_film)

Correction: I keep referring to "Philosophize this". So this is a correction. That is another show. The ABC show that I have been listening to is "The Philosopher's Zone". The Philosopher's Zone: https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/philosopherszone/ Learner Centered Design Education: https://rawslearn.wordpress.com/

The Hawkins Brothers have a conversation about a range of topics, but somehow it always settles back to D&D. Weird. Support this podcast

The Team draws nearer to their destination. Can they overcome the elements of the Gleaming Waste, or will they fail and be buried in the sands of time. Catch us live on Thursdays 6pm EST at https://www.twitch.tv/bardsofnewyork​​​ Follow us on Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/bardsofnewyork Podcast available by the following Monday wherever you catch your pods. https://linktr.ee/bardsofnewyork​​ Moments: Should the party brave the storm? Spoiler alert: they brave the storm. Ember asks for help. The calm after the storm. I'm tired of these M.F.ing worms in this M.F.ing Desert. The worm has a price. Arrival at the outpost. Cora collapsing curse. Philosophize about time with a door. Banshee's Wail. Woody Minshew as Dungeon Master Drew Nauden as Ryujin Hannah Minshew as Lilith Will Champion as Kallias Dan Krackhardt as Leonidas Kyle Knight as Ember Bards of New York has three wonderful DMs who are available to run a campaign for you and your friends. For more information and to sign up for our DM for Hire service, head to www.bardsofny.com Tell a friend Spread some joy We love you Thank you to the talented artists who graciously let us use their music. For more info on their work, follow the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jh-ZlCF5_X_-W-VHz6rwqB1gdF0qKC3NuRkMs-1Jp0E/edit --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/bardsofny/support

The Team draws nearer to their destination. Can they overcome the elements of the Gleaming Waste, or will they fail and be buried in the sands of time. Catch us live on Thursdays 6pm EST at https://www.twitch.tv/bardsofnewyork​​​ Follow us on Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/bardsofnewyork Podcast available by the following Monday wherever you catch your pods. https://linktr.ee/bardsofnewyork​​ Moments: Should the party brave the storm? Spoiler alert: they brave the storm. Ember asks for help. The calm after the storm. I'm tired of these M.F.ing worms in this M.F.ing Desert. The worm has a price. Arrival at the outpost. Cora collapsing curse. Philosophize about time with a door. Banshee's Wail. Woody Minshew as Dungeon Master Drew Nauden as Ryujin Hannah Minshew as Lilith Will Champion as Kallias Dan Krackhardt as Leonidas Kyle Knight as Ember Bards of New York has three wonderful DMs who are available to run a campaign for you and your friends. For more information and to sign up for our DM for Hire service, head to www.bardsofny.com Tell a friend Spread some joy We love you Thank you to the talented artists who graciously let us use their music. For more info on their work, follow the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jh-ZlCF5_X_-W-VHz6rwqB1gdF0qKC3NuRkMs-1Jp0E/edit

The knowledge of using tools is effectively the knowledge of how we extend our bodies beyond are given physiology. Kyle Keough is a powerlifting coach and a student of philosophy, and writes about the barbell in a similar manner. We discussed philosophers like Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Michel Foucault, and what they can tell us about powerlifting and its own evolution.

We conclude the language series by considering the final question: Do words actually mean anything? This may sound like a strange question to ask, considering the many aspects of language we've covered over the last eight episodes, but when we look closely at language and words, the answer is not obvious. We unpack the question from the perspective of Jacques Derrida, the 20th century French philosopher whose work established the controversial field of deconstruction. Show NotesThe Here and Now Podcast Language SeriesDerrida on Language – Philosophy NowDeconstruction - WikipediaDerrida and Words – Philosophize This! Stephen WestHow to deconstruct almost anything – Chip MorningstarThe Here and Now Podcast on FacebookThe Here and Now Podcast on TwitterSend me an emailSupport the show (https://www.patreon.com/thehereandnowpodcast)

Nietzsche is a controversial person to say the least. His works are easily misinterpreted, and with such lines as "God is dead", it's no surprise. Fortunately, the guys are back this week to break down the last work he submitted to a publisher, Twilight of the Idols: or How to Philosophize with a Hammer, with an emphasis on his discussion on Socrates.   Producer's note: Greg does not have syphilis. 

The guys have one of Aaron's oldest friends on the podcast, Mason from the Philosopher and the Comedian podcast. They catch up on things and talk life, love, fatherhood, anxiety and almost everything in between! Enjoy and don't forget to check us out on Youtube!

Watch the episode on Crunchyroll!

Welcome back to a new season of the Church Planter Talks. We kick off this new season with a deep philosophical talk. Many young men are nervous about taking the reigns and determining their own church philosophy. We discuss the pitfalls and positives of this touchy subject. Any input you have would be welcomed over at our facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ChurchPlanterTalks/ Our website: https://www.churchplantertalks.com/