Podcasts about sara r

Svenningsen læser en artikel i Aarhus Stiftstidende om Jydske Asyl som en rekreativ perle. Det får ham op af stolen og hen til skrivebordet, for hans erfaringer som patient på asylet er helt anderledes. Svenningsen vil smadre det 'pæne' billede, han oplever omverdenen har, af sindssygeanstalten. Han vil fortælle om den vold, han selv har set og drabet på Gandrup, som han har hørt om. Men det er én mand mod en institution, som er anerkendt og opbygget med stor omhu og efter de mest moderne psykiatriske behandlingsprincipper. Medvirkende: Svend Nielsen, projektleder AAB Arbejdernes Andelsboligforening Signe Düring, historiker Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært Line Keller, historiker Klaus Nielsen, professor i psykologi på Aarhus Universitet Tilrettelæggelse og klip: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen Indtaling: Morten Søgaard Redaktører: Hanne Barslund og Carsten Nielsen

Det var formentlig ikke noget, Svenningsen selv vidste. Men der var flere patienter fra Jydske Asyl, som beskrev den problematiske institutionskultur, som Svenningsen fremlægger. I Rigsarkivets gemmer ligger patientbreve fra en melankolsk præstedatter og en falsk spansk greve, som viser, at Svenningsen ikke stod alene med sin kritik af asylet. Medvirkende: Signe Düring, historiker Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært Line Keller, historiker Klaus Nielsen, professor i psykologi på Aarhus Universitet Tilrettelæggelse og klip: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen Indtaling: Morten Søgaard og Michael Plejdrup Redaktører: Hanne Barslund og Carsten Nielsen

Det er en juni aften i 1907. På sindssygehospitalet Jydske Asyl i Aarhus står patienten Jens Gandrup og synger den franske nationalmelodi iført en laset skjorte. Gandrups tilstand er kun blevet værre, siden han blev indlagt på asylet for tre måneder siden. Næste morgen findes han død. En af de andre indlagte på Jydske Asyl, Ludvig Svenningsen, hører om Gandrups pludselige død. Svenningsen har gennem længere tid haft en nagende oplevelse af, at asylet er et voldeligt og farligt sted for de indlagte, og han mistænker plejepersonalet for at være skyld i Gandrups død. Medvirkende: Signe Düring, historiker Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært Line Keller, historiker Klaus Nielsen, professor i psykologi på Aarhus Universitet Tilrettelæggelse og klip: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen Indtaling: Morten Søgaard Redaktører: Hanne Barslund og Carsten Nielsen

En lille gruppe af slavegjorte møder en søndag i 1733 op med brænde til soldaterne på fortet på St. Jan. Bag ryggen har de gemt sukkerknive. En massakre er under opsejling. Slaveoprøret på St. Jan ryster hele det vestindiske plantagesystem, hvor tusindvis af afrikanere holdes i slaveri under dansk flag. MEDVIRKENDE: Anna Monica Villa, medfortæller og indbygger St. Thomas. David March, indbygger St. Jan. Samantha Nordholt Aagaard, historiker med speciale i dansk-vestindisk historie. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært. Luca Lele Rasmussen, indtaling. Produceret af Rikke Precht og Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. Redaktører: Hanne Barslund og Carsten Nielsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Jomfruøerne blev solgt til USA i 1917 og er i dag en turistmagnet. De to forhold har gjort livet svært for øernes egen særlige historie og kulturarv, mener kunstneren Ama Dennis, der med sin fotokunst udfører sit eget stille oprør. De danske arkivarer Ruth og Asbjørn kæmper også for at bevare øernes lokale historie, når de er med til at udfylde hullerne i Rigsarkivets dokumentation af det slavesamfund, Danmark skabte i Vestindien. MEDVIRKENDE: Anna Monica Villa, medfortæller og indbygger, St. Thomas. Ruth Hedegaard, arkivar. Asbjørn Hellum, arkivar. Ama Dennis, kunstner og indbygger, St. Thomas. La Vaughn Belle, kunstner St. Croix. Samantha Nordholt Aagaard, historiker med speciale i dansk-vestindisk historie. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært. Produceret af Rikke Precht og Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. Redaktører: Hanne Barslund og Carsten Nielsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Kunstneren La Vaughn Belle er optaget af fortællingen om Queen Mary: En stærk og fandenivoldsk kvinde, der i 1878 gik forrest i arbejderoprøret "The Fireburn" og protesterede mod de slavelignende forhold, plantagearbejderne levede under. Mary Thomas, også kaldet Queen Mary, er en heltinde på Jomfruøerne i dag. Men hun var også straffefangen Hezekiah Smiths mor. MEDVIRKENDE: Anna Monica Villa, medfortæller og indbygger St. Thomas. La Vaughn Belle, kunstner og indbygger St. Croix. Ames Joeseph, indbygger St. Croix. Samantha Nordholt Aagaard, historiker med speciale i dansk-vestindisk historie. Ellie Fischer, skoleelev. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært. Produceret af Rikke Precht og Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. Redaktører: Hanne Barslund og Carsten Nielsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Det er 1904. Hezekiah Smith, der bor på den dansk-vestindiske ø St. Croix, er blevet forladt af sin samlever, Consuela. Hun er flygtet fra et voldeligt forhold og bor nu på plantagen 'Bettys Hope' hos sin bedstemor. Hezekiah hører, at Consuela har fundet en anden, og han opsøger hende på sukkerplantagen. MEDVIRKENDE: Anna Monica Villa, medfortæller og indbygger St. Thomas. Ames Joeseph, indbygger St. Croix . Samantha Nordholt Aagaard, historiker med speciale i dansk-vestindisk historie. Anna Katrine Nagel, afdelingsleder Horsens Fængselsmuseum Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært. Luca Lele Rasmussen, indtaling. Produceret af Rikke Precht og Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. Redaktører: Hanne Barslund og Carsten Nielsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Author of a lovely variety of historical romances, Sara R. Turnquist has something for everyone--including a cool split-time series that has me mesmerized. Listen in to learn more! note: links may be affiliate links that provide me with a small commission at no extra expense to you.  I knew I'd be interested in Sara's books when I perused Amazon, but oh my gravy, I had no idea of the variety she offered. By the middle of our discussion, I'd already bought two of the audiobooks. This isn't uncommon, however, my eagerness to get started before we even finished talking? Yeah.  *whistles. I didn't... I didn't...   Laura, the Tycoon's Daughter by Sara R. Turnquist She is in a hopeless situation. He has sworn off love. Can they find hope in each other and, possibly, a way out of their personal prisons? Laura Millington is the daughter of a prominent railroad tycoon, but that luxury comes at a price. Her father's intentions are to use her as a pawn, steal her choices, and press her into a mold she can't seem to fit. When her curious nature and desire for justice finds her caught up in the middle of a train run gone wrong, can she stand for the truth even if it places her in opposition to her powerful father? Jack Patterson has been betrayed by love. And he is determined to never risk his heart again. The vulnerable, strong-willed Laura intrigues him more than he's allowed since his heartbreak. Can he overcome his reluctance? Moreover, will he be able to protect her from the man who would see her future dashed? Crossing paths with train engineer Casey Jones and his heroic act of self-sacrifice, will Laura and Jack find a way to stand side by side against the overwhelming forces keeping them apart? Learn more about Sara on her WEBSITE and follow her on GoodReads and BookBub. Like to listen on the go? You can find Because Fiction Podcast at: Apple  Castbox  Google Play Libsyn  RSS Spotify Amazon and more!

Samuel Sutter, Sara Rösti, 2. Tim 3,10-13

Sæson 2 af Forbrydelsens anatomi om mordet på Maren, hendes sønner og Skov-Christian er slut. Men hvis du gerne vil gå videre med sagen på egen hånd, så kan du få inspiration i det her ekstra afsnit. Medvirkende: Martin Schmidt-Nielsen; bibliotekar. Birgit S. Hansen; borgmester Frederikshavn Kommune. Rikke Precht; vært og tilrettelægger. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen; vært og tilrettelægger.

Part 2 of our chat with Sara R. Phillips. In this episode, we discuss how TENI survived having no funding, the mountains moved to get the Gender Recognition Act passed, what it's like to live in Ireland as a Trans person, and what she hopes for the future. Researched by Emer McGinnity. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sara R. Phillips is a Human Rights campaigner, former chairperson of TENI and played a pivotal role in the introduction of the Gender Recognition Act in 2015. She is also an archivist, an avid music fan, and an all-round fascinating person. In Part 1, we talk about growing up in 1970s Ireland, coming out as her authentic self in the 1990s, and taking over as chairperson of TENI in 2012. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hearing about risk is hard. Interpreting risk is even harder, but deciding which risks are comfortable for you is an essential part of birth!Meagan and Julie discuss how to tell the difference between relative and absolute risk, and what kind of conversations to have with your provider to help you better understand what the numbers mean. They also quote many stats and risk percentages around topics like blood transfusions, uterine rupture, eating during labor, epidurals, Pitocin, AROM, and episiotomies.  And if you don't feel comfortable with accepting a certain risk, that is OKAY. We support your birthing in the way that feels best to you!Risk of Uterine Rupture with Vaginal Birth after Cesarean in Twin GestationsJournal of Perinatal Education ArticleWhat are the chances of being struck by lightning?Needed WebsiteHow to VBAC: The Ultimate Prep Course for ParentsFull Transcript under Episode Details 02:52 Review of the Week06:08 Determining acceptable risk for you and your provider 08:00 Absolute versus relative risk15:21 More conversations need to happen25:29 Risk of blood transfusion in VBAC, second C-section, and third C-section30:37 Understanding the meaning of statistical significance 32:05 “The United States is intervention intensive” 36:27 Eating during labor and the risk of aspiration under anesthesia43:03 Epidurals, Pitocin, AROM, episiotomies, and C-section percentages44:43 The perspective of birth doulas and birth photographersMeagan: Hello, hello everybody. Guess who I have today? Julie!Julie: Hello. Meagan: Hello. It's so good to have you on today. Julie: Of course. It's always fun to be here. Meagan: It really is. It's so fun. When we sit and chat before, it just feels so comfortable like that is the norm still for me even though it has been a while, it just feels so normal and I love it. I miss you and I love you and I am so excited to be here with you today. You guys, we are going to talk a little bit about risk. We know that in the VBAC world, there's a lot of risk that comes up. I should say a lot of talk about risk that comes up whether it be is it safe to even have a VBAC? Is it safe to be induced? What are our real risks of uterine rupture? Is it safe to VBAC with an epidural or without an epidural? What about at home out of the hospital? Is that safe? I don't know. Let's talk about that today. Julie: Let's talk about it. Meagan: Let's talk about it. I think it's really important to note that no matter what— and we're going to talk about this for sure today, but no matter what, you have to take the risks that you are presented and that is given and still decide what's best for you. That risk doesn't mean that is what you have to or can't do. Right? So I think while you are listening, be mindful or kind of keep that in the back of your mind of, “Okay, I'm hearing. I'm learning.” Let's figure out what this really means and then let's figure out what's truly best for you and your baby.02:52 Review of the WeekI do have a Review of the Week so I want to hurry and read that, then Julie and I will dive into risk and assessing. Julie: Dun dun, we're ready. Meagan: We are ready. Okay, holy cow. This is a really long review, so—Julie: You can do it. Meagan: Thank you to Sara R-2019 on Apple Podcasts for leaving this review. I love how Julie was like, “You can do it,” because she knows that I get ahead of what I'm reading in my mind and then I can't read, so let's see how many times it takes to read this review. Julie: You've got this. Meagan: Okay. It says, “A balanced and positive perspective.” It says, “As a physician myself I think it is unusual to find balanced resources for patients that represent the medical facts but also the patient experience and correct for some of the inaccuracies in medicine. This podcast does an amazing job of striking this balance!“I had an emergency C-section with my daughter 2 years ago. Despite understanding that the CS was medically appropriate and my professional experience, I still found the whole experience to be mildly traumatic and disappointing. This podcast was the main resource I used to help prepare for my second child's birth and my plan to have a VBAC. I am now holding my new baby in my arms with so much pride, love, self-confidence, and trust because I had a smooth and successful VBAC.“I am thankful for this podcast which gave me ideas, confidence, strength, and a sense of community in what is otherwise a very isolating experience. I especially appreciate the variety of stories that are shared, including VBAC attempts that result in another C section so that we can all prepare ourselves for the different outcomes. No matter what happens we are strong women and have a welcome spot in this community, even when we may feel alone with our thoughts and fears. Thank you, Julie and Meagan!Julie: Aw, I love that. Meagan: Yes, that was phenomenal. Congratulations Sara R-2019. If you are still listening here, congratulations and we are so happy for you and thank you for your amazing review. 06:08 Determining acceptable risk for you and your providerMeagan: All right, Julie. Are you ready? Julie: Here we go. Here we go. Can I talk for a minute about something you mentioned before the review? You were talking about risk and how it's not a one-size-fits-all because we were talking about this before. We all know that the uterine rupture risk is anywhere between .2%-1% or whatever depending on the study and what you look at. The general consensus among the medical community is .5%-1% is kind of where we are sitting, right? Now, some people might look at that risk and be like, “Heck yeah. That's awesome. Let's do this,” especially when you look at a lower risk than that that it's a catastrophic rupture. Some people might look at those numbers and be like, “This feels safe. Let's go.” Some people might look at those numbers and be like, “This feels scary. I just want to schedule a C-section.” Meagan: No, thank you. Julie: And that's okay. It is okay. However you approach risk and however you look at it is okay. We're not here to try and sway anybody. Obviously, we're The VBAC Link, so we are going to be big advocates for VBAC access, right? But we're also advocates for having all of the information so you can make the best decision no matter what that looks like. But also, I think another very important part of that is finding a provider whose view of risk is similar to your view of risk so that you guys have a similar way to approach things because if you find a provider who thinks that 1% risk of VBAC is really scary, it's not going to go good for you if you think a 1% risk for a VBAC is acceptable. So yeah, I just want to lay that out there in the beginning. Meagan, you touched on it in the beginning, but I feel like provider choice in risk is really important there. Meagan: It is. Julie: For sure. 08:00 Absolute versus relative riskMeagan: It is and also, one of the things we wanted to talk a lot about is absolute risk versus relative. So many times when people, not even just the actual percentage or 1 out of 5 is shared, it's the way it's shared. The way the words are rolling off of the tongue and coming out can be shared in a scarier way so when we say 1 out of 5, you're like, “Okay, that's a very small number. I could easily be one of those 5's.” It's the way these providers sometimes say it.  A lot of the time, that's based on their own experience because now they are like, “Well, I am sharing this number, but I'm sharing a little extra behind the number because I've had the experience that was maybe poor or less ideal.” Does this make sense? Julie: Yeah. Meagan: Sometimes the way we say things makes that number seem even bigger or even worse or scarier. Julie: Right. It really comes down to absolute risk versus relative risk, right? Relative is your risk in relation to another thing that has risk. Absolute risk is the actual number. It's like 1 in 10. That is an absolute risk. You have a 1 in 100 chance of uterine rupture. That is an absolute risk. Your chance of uterine rupture doubles after three Cesareans. That's not true. That's not true. But that's a relative risk. I really like the example that I feel is really common for people to relate to is stillbirth after X amount of weeks. Evidence-Based–Meagan: That's a huge one. Julie: Yeah, it's a big one that gets thrown around all of the time and it sounds really scary when people say it. I love Evidence Based Birth. They have this whole article about due dates and risks associated with due dates and why due dates should really be adjusted and look at differently. They don't say that. They just present all of the data, but what I really like about that is they have a section here about stillbirth and they talk about absolute risk versus relative risk. I feel like that would be a great thing to start with. I'm just going to read it because it's so well-written. They said, “If someone said that the risk of having a stillbirth at 42 weeks compared to 41 weeks is 94% higher, then that sounds like a lot.” Your risk of stillbirth doubles at 42 weeks than if you were to just get induced at 41 weeks. Your baby is twice as likely to be stillborn if you go to 42 weeks. Meagan: Terrifying. Julie: Okay? 94% higher. That's almost double. That is scary. For me, I'd be like, “Uh, yeah. That is super scary.” Meagan: Done. Sign me up for induction. Julie: Right? Sign me up for induction. But when you consider the actual risks or the absolute risks, let's just talk about those numbers. 1.7 per 1,000 births if they are at 41 weeks. Stillbirth is 1.7 per 1000 births. At 42 weeks, it's 3.2 per 1000 so it's a .17% chance versus a .3% chance so you are still looking at really, really, really small numbers there. So yeah, it's true. 3.2 is almost double of 1.7 if you do the math. Sometimes math is hard so that's fine. We have to get out the calculator sometimes, but while it's true to say the risk of stillbirth almost doubles at 42 weeks, it could be kind of misleading if you're not looking at the actual numbers behind it. So I think that it's really important when we're talking about risks and the numbers and statistics to understand that there are different ways of measuring them and different ways of looking at them and different ways of how they're even calculated sometimes. So depending on how you look at them, you could even come up with different risks or different rates which can really sway your decision. We're not talking about a 5%-10% double which is still true. It's still double, but it's just a really small number. Now, I also want to do a plug-in for people who have been in that .3%. It might as well be 100%. I can't even imagine the trauma of having to have a loss like that. I can't. I have supported parents through that. I have documented families like that and documented their sweet babies for them. I can't imagine the pain that goes with that. But I also think it is very important to look at the actual numbers when you are making a decision. Now, maybe that .32% is too high for you and that's okay, but maybe it's not and that is a risk you are willing to accept. I feel like approaching it like that is so much better. If somebody ever says to you, “This risk of that is double” or whatever, I don't know. I'm just going to make up some random stuff here like, “If you drive in your car to school, you have a 1 in 10 chance of getting in a car crash but if you drive on a Wednesday, your risk doubles so now you have a 2 in 10 chance or 1 in 5 chance of getting in the car crash,” so maybe you would want to avoid driving to school on Wednesdays, but maybe you wouldn't. But if you say you're risk is higher of dying in a car crash if you go to school on Wednesdays, they would be like, “I'm not leaving the house on Wednesdays or ever.” I'm not leaving the house today because it's so dog-gone cold and I'm warm in my blanket. I don't know. I feel like looking at it like that. Actually, 1 in 10 is really high for getting in a car crash, but I don't know. I just feel like looking at that is really important for providers telling you, “Oh, your risk of uterine rupture doubles if we use Pitocin so I'm not going to use Pitocin.” Okay, we're looking at a small increase to an already small risk. We know that any type of artificial induction could lead to an increased risk of uterine rupture especially if it's mismanaged, but what we do know is that it's not– I don't want to say that because that might be wrong. When you are presented with the actual numbers, yes. It might double. I don't know what the actual numbers are, to be honest off the top of my head. I feel like maybe it doubles, but if you are already looking at a .2% to a .4% or a .5% to a 1% chance, what's the tradeoff there? What are your risks of just scheduling a repeat C-section instead of doing an induction? Is that worth it to you? What are the risks associated with repeat Cesareans? Are they bigger than that of using Pitocin to induce labor? What is that compared to the other one because there is another that is relative risk? The absolute risk is what the percentage is. I'm not even going to say the number. But if there's a risk of rupture using Pitocin relative to the risks that come with repeat Cesareans, those are risks that are relative to each other, so how does that compare? Because when we talk about it in just that singular form or that singular amount of risk without considering the other risks that might be associated with it because of the decisions we made from that risk– am I making sense here? Then you know, I don't know. I feel like there is just a lot more conversation to have sometimes when we are talking about risk. 15:21 More conversations need to happenMeagan: Yes. There are. There is a ton more conversation and that is what I feel like we don't see happening. There's a quick conversation. Studies show that 7 minutes are spent in our prenatal visits which is not a lot of time to really dive into the depths of risk that we are talking about when we say, “We can't induce you because Pitocin increases–”. This is another thing I've noticed is significantly. You have a serious–. Again, it comes down to the words we are using. Sometimes in these prenatal visits with our providers, we do not have the time to actually break down the numbers and we're just saying, “Well, you have a significantly higher risk with Pitocin of uterine rupture so we won't do that.” When we hear significantly, what do we do? We're like, “Ahh, that is big.” You know? Julie: Yeah. Meagan: We're just not having the conversation of risk enough and again, it's kind of being skewed sometimes by words and emotion. We were talking about this before. I remember we made a post– I don't know, probably a year and a half ago maybe. It seems like a while ago about the risk of complications in a repeat Cesarean meaning you have a C-section and then instead of going for a VBAC, you go for a repeat Cesarean which as you know, if you've been with us, is totally fine and respected here from The VBAC Link. A lot of the time, we don't talk– and when I say we, I mean the world. We don't talk about the actual risk of having a repeat Cesarean, right? Don't you feel like that, Julie? I don't know. As a doula, I feel like our clients who want to go for VBAC know a little bit more of the risk of having a VBAC, but they have not been discussed at all really with the risk surrounding a repeat Cesarean. We made a post talking about the risks of repeat Cesarean and I very vividly remember a lot of people coming at us with feeling that we were fearmongering.Julie: Or shaming. Meagan: Shaming, yep. A lot of people were feeling shamed or disrespected. People would say, “You claim to be CBAC supportive, but here you are making these really, really scary numbers.” Anyway, looking at that post and going into what we've talked about, in some of those posts, we did say things like, “You are going to have a 1 out of 10 chance of X, Y, Z,”Julie: Or twice as likely to need this. Twice as likely to need a blood transfusion or 5x more likely to have major complications. Things like that. Meagan: Yeah. We would say things like that. I remember specifically in regards to miscarriage. It's a very, very sensitive topic, but there are risks there. So a lot of people were triggered. In the beginning, we talked about the way providers say things and the way they put them out on paper and the absolute risk versus the relative and way they do that. We're guilty of that too. Right here at The VBAC Link, we were like, “This is the chance. These are the chances. You are 5x more likely to X, Y, Z.” So know that I don't want to make it sound like we are shaming anybody else for the different ways that they give the message of risk. Am I making sense? Julie: Yeah, and you know what? I feel like sometimes it's just about giving people the benefit of the doubt. We want to give providers the benefit of the doubt just because it's probably something that they've continuously heard and spoken and that's okay because we do it too sometimes. We go on that thing like, “Oh my gosh, maternal death.” I think the risk of maternal death is 10x higher in a C-section than it is in a VBAC which sounds really scary and makes me never ever want to have a C-section again, but when you look at that, it's .00001% to .0001% or whatever is 10x more. It is such a small level of risk, but it is higher. I feel like trying to look at both absolute and relative risk for any given thing together is really, really important. Yeah. Give people the benefit of the doubt. Give us the benefit of the doubt. We are in such an awful cultural climate right now where it's easy for people, especially on social media to jump on the attack train for anybody when we feel triggered or when we feel like people are being unjust to us or to other people and I hate that so stinking bad. Whenever I catch myself with those feelings, I try to take a step back and I've actually gotten pretty good at that, but it's so easy for us to get on that bandwagon of just railing against people who present information in certain ways or railing people without getting all of the information about that person.Before I go off too much on a soapbox in that direction, yeah. I feel like your provider when they are saying those things is probably not trying to coerce you into anything. Our providers, especially our hospital providers are incredibly overworked. They are incredibly stressed. Their time management skills have got to be off the charts because they are so overloaded with everything and they just don't have time to automatically sit down and explain things. But you know what I have found? Most of them, when you stop them and ask questions, they are more than happy to answer and explain. Sometimes, they are just repeating things they have heard all the time or that they have learned at some point or another without giving them a second glance. Do you know what? We all do that too. Me, Meagan, you listening right now. We all do that. We hear things. We regurgitate them. We hear things. We regurgitate them and we don't even think about questioning or challenging those things until somebody else brings it up to us to question or challenge those things. So, don't be afraid to ask your provider for more information or ask them what the real numbers are to those things. I have a really special place in my heart for our CBAC moms because there are lots of things that they are working through, so many emotional things, but I challenge not just people who have had a repeat Cesarean that was unwanted, but people just in all life, when something triggers you online, stop and explore that. Stop and question because that is probably an area of your life that you could use a little healing and work on. It could be a little bit of work. It could be a lot of work, but usually, when something triggers you, it's a challenge to look into it more because there is something that your body and mind have an unhealthy relationship with that needs to be addressed. Julie: Anyways, circling it back to risk. Meagan, take it away. Meagan: I just want to drop a shameless plug on our radical acceptance episodes that we did, so kind of piggybacking off of what she just said. We dive into that a little bit deeper in our radical acceptance episode. It really is so hard and like what she said, our heart goes out to moms that have a scheduled C-section that didn't want to schedule a C-section or felt like they were in a corner or felt like that was the best option, but not the option they wanted. There are so many feelings, but definitely go listen to radical acceptance part one and part two. 25:29 Risk of blood transfusion in VBAC, second C-section, and third C-sectionMeagan: I just want to quickly go down a couple of little risks. Blood transfusion– we have a 1.89% or 1 in 53 chance of a blood transfusion with a VBAC. To me, 1.89% is pretty low, to me, but it might not be to some. I don't know, Julie. How do you say the other? Okay, then blood transfusion in a repeat Cesarean is 1.65% in the second C-section. It's lower. So for vaginal birth, it's higher. I'm not good at math. Julie: No, vaginal birth, yeah. That's true. So 1 in 53 for VBAC versus a 1 in 65 for a repeat Cesarean. Yes, right. Meagan: For a third Cesarean, the chances of a blood transfusion go to 2.26%. Julie: Yes, so it's like 50% higher than if you have a VBAC for the third Cesarean, but it's slightly lower for the second C-section. See? I feel like we could have talked about this before, but I don't know if we say it often enough. When you are talking about overall risk for VBAC versus C-section, when you are looking at just the second birth, right? So first birth was a C-section, what are you going to do for your second birth? The risks overall are pretty similar for vaginal birth versus Cesarean. The overall total risk is pretty similar as far as your chances of having major complications and things like that. But when you get into three, four, five, six C-sections and vaginal births, that's when you really start to see significant changes in those risks. See? I used the word “significant” again, but we're going to talk about where the more C-sections you have, the higher your chances of having complications you have. The more vaginal births you have, your chances of complications actually go down. So when you are looking at if you want more than two kids, that might be something that you want to consider. If you are done with two kids, then that might be something that is not as big of a player in your choices. So yeah. Meagan: Yeah. Then there are things like twins. So when I was talking about it earlier, the word significantly, there was a systematic– I almost said something– systemic. Julie: Systemic review? Meagan: Yeah, see? I can't say it correctly. I can't. Published– oh, I'm trying to remember when it was published. We will get it in the show notes. It talks about the risk of uterine rupture with twins and it does say. It says “significantly higher in women with twin gestation”. That's kind of hard, I feel like because again, like we were saying, some reviews and studies and blogs and all of these things wouldn't say the word significantly. They may share a different one. I'm going to see if I can find the actual– maybe Julie can help me while I'm talking– study. Okay, it says three out of four studies in a group of zero cases of uterine rupture. Notably, the study with the largest patient population reported cases of uterine rupture in both groups and demonstrated a significantly greater risk of uterine rupture in the VBAC group. Meanwhile, the other three studies found no significant difference between rates of uterine rupture among groups 31-33. Nevertheless, the study shows that electing–”Okay, so I'm just going to say. It says, “Electing to have a PRCD reduces but does not eliminate the small risk of uterine rupture.” So what I'm reading here is that in some of them, it showed significantly greater, but then in 3 out of 4 reviews, and I don't even know actually how many people were in each of these reviews, but in 4 reviews, one had a greater risk and three didn't really show much of a difference, but we see that in the very beginning right here. “Uterine rupture is significantly higher in women with twins.” What do you think? If you are carrying twins and you see that, Julie, significantly higher enters into the vocabulary at all, what do you think?Julie: Well, I think I would want to schedule a C-section for my twins, probably. Meagan: Probably. 30:37 Understanding the meaning of statistical significance Julie: I want to just go off on a little tangent here for a second. I think it's really important when we are talking about studies that we know what statistically significant means because sometimes if you don't know much about digging into studies and things like that which I'm not going to go into too much right now– Meagan: It's difficult. Julie: It is difficult. It's really hard which is why I'm not going to go into it because I feel like we could have a whole hour-long podcast just for that. Statistically significant really just means that the difference or the increase or the change that they are looking into is not likely to be explained by chance or by random numbers which is why when you have a larger study, the results are more likely to be statistically significant because there is less room for error basically. A .1% increase can be just as statistically significant as a 300% increase because it just comes down to whether they are confident that it is a result that is not related to any chance or external environmental factors. I feel like it's really important to clarify that just because something is statistically significant doesn't mean that it's big, catastrophic, or a lot, it just means that it's not likely to be due to chance or anything random. 32:05 “The United States is intervention intensive.” Meagan: Yeah. I love that. Okay. There was one other thing I wanted to share. This was published in the Journal of Perinatal Education and it is a little more dated. It's been 10 years or so, but I just wanted to read it because it was really interesting to me. It doesn't even exactly go with risk and things, but it just talks about your chances which I guess, to me– do you know what I”m trying to say? Julie: They kind of go hand in hand. Meagan: To me, at least, they do. So when I read this, I was like, “Well, this is interesting.” I just wanted to drop it here and I think it's more just eye-opening. It says, “Maternity care in the United States is intervention intensive.” Now, if we didn't know this already, I don't know where I've been in the doula world for the last 10 years. Right? You guys, as doulas, obviously, we're not medical professionals, but as doulas, we see a lot of intervention and a lot of intervention that is completely unnecessary and a lot of intervention that leads to traumatic birth, unexpected or undesired outcomes and then they lead to other unnecessary interventions. It's the cascade. We talk about the domino effect or the cascade of interventions, but this is real so for them to type out, “Maternity care in the United States is intervention intensive–”Julie: You're like, “Yeah, where have you been?” Not you, but the writer. Meagan: Yeah, the writer. Yeah. It says, “The most recent national survey–” Now, again keep in mind it is 2024. This has been a minute since this was written. Julie: About 10+ years. Meagan: 10-12 years. Just keep that in mind. But it was interesting to me that even 10-12 years ago, this was where we were at because I feel like since I started as a doula, I've seen the interventions increase– the inductions, the unnecessary Cesareans increase a lot. Julie: Some of them, yeah. Yeah, especially inductions and Pitocin. Meagan: Not all of the time. I cannot tell you that in 10 out of 10 births that I attend, this is the case but through the years of me beginning doula work and what I have witnessed, it's increased. At least here in Utah, it seems that it has increased. It says, “The most recent national survey of women's pregnancy, birth, and postpartum experience reports that for women who gave birth in June 2011-2012,” so a little bit ago, “89% of women experienced electronic fetal monitoring.” Okay. Julie: That seems actually low to me for hospital births. Meagan: It does seem low because to me–Julie: I wonder if there had been a ton of stop and drops or something. Meagan: I don't know, but I agree. 89%. I feel like the second you get into the hospital, no matter VBAC or not, they want to monitor your baby. Julie: Strapped onto the monitor, yeah. Meagan: It says, “66% continuously.” So out of the 89%, it says 66% were continuously meaning they didn't do the intermittent every 30 minutes to an hour checking on baby for a quick 15 minutes to get another baseline, they just left that monitor on them which makes me wonder why. Usually, when a client of mine goes in and has that, they're like, “Oh, your baby had a weird decel so we are going to leave the monitor on longer,” and then they don't say anything. They just keep it on there. Maybe that's– I don't know. It says, “62% received intravenous fluids.” Julie: IV fluids. Meagan: Which to me, is also a lot. 36:27 Eating during labor and the risk of aspiration under anesthesiaMeagan: “79% experienced restrictions on eating.” 79%. You guys, we need to eat. We need to fuel our bodies. We are literally running a marathon times five in labor. We shouldn't be not eating, but 79% which doesn't surprise me, and “60% experienced restrictions on drinking in labor.” Why? Why are we being restricted from drinking and eating in labor unless we have other plans for how labor may go? Julie: That's exactly what it is. They're preparing you for an emergency Cesarean. That's what they're doing. That's exactly what restricting non-IV fluids is. It's not only that, but it is preparing you for the incredibly low risk of you having to go under general anesthesia, and then even people that go under general anesthesia have an incredibly low risk of aspirating and that is what it's coming down to. Don't even get me started on all of the flaws in all of the studies that went over aspiration during general anesthesia anyway because they are so significantly flawed that we are basing denying women energy and fuel during labor based on flawed studies that are incredibly outdated and on incredibly low risk during an incredibly already low risk. I mean, you probably don't want to down a cheeseburger while you're having a baby. I don't know. Maybe me. Just kidding. Even I didn't want a cheeseburger, but I wanted some little snacks, and some water to keep you hydrated. Yes. Oh my goodness. Let's please stop this. Sorry. Stepping off the soapbox. Meagan: You know, there is a provider here. I actually can't remember her name. It was way back in the beginning of my doula career and actually, it was in an area that is not one of my more common areas to serve. It was outside of my serving area. Anyway, we were at a birth and there was an induction. I remember being in there with her and the provider, an OB, walks in and is like, “Hey, how are you doing?” He was so friendly and kind and asked some questions like, “How are you feeling? What are you thinking about this?” Then she was getting ready to leave and she turned back and said, “Hey. I just thought about this. Have you eaten anything?” The mom was like, “No.” She was like, “Uh, you need to eat.” Julie: Yeah!Meagan: She had an epidural at this point. The mom was like, “Wait, what?” She was like, “You need to eat.” I literally remember my jaw falling, but had to keep my mouth up because I didn't want to look like I was weird. Anyway, I said, “That's something I've not usually heard from an OB especially after someone's had an epidural.” She was like, “Oh, I am very passionate about this.” She was like, “When I was finishing up school and graduating,” she had to write some big thing. Julie: Her dissertation probably. Meagan: Time capsule, I don't even remember what it was called. Some really, really big thing. She was like, “I specifically found passion about the lack of eating and drinking in labor.” She was like, “I did all of this stuff and what I found was you are more likely–” Here comes risk. “You are more likely to be struck in the head twice by lightning–” This is what she said. “Twice by lightning than you are to aspirate in a Cesarean after having an epidural.” Julie: I love this lady. Who is it? Meagan: I can't remember. I will have to text my client. Julie: Where was it? What hospital? Meagan: It was up in Davis County. Julie: Oh, interesting. Meagan: It was not an area for me. I said, “Whoa, really?” She said, “Yeah. You need to get that girl some food.” I was like, “Done. 100%.” Julie: More likely to get struck by lightning. Meagan: More likely to get struck by lightning twice in the head than you are to aspirate in a Cesarean after receiving an epidural. That stuck with me forever. Literally, here we are 10 years later. Julie: I love that because first of all–Meagan: I don't have documentation to prove that. She just said that. Julie: That is 100% relative risk. Aspirating during a C-section relative to getting struck by lightning twice. So that's cool. What are the numbers? I know that the numbers are super incredibly low and I feel like when you put in context like that, getting struck by lightning twice, I don't know anybody that's been struck by lightning once and who has been alive to tell about it. I know of a friend whose sister got struck by lightning and died when she was very young. I only know one person in my entire life who has been struck by lightning. Meagan: I just looked it up really quick. I don't even know if this is credible. I literally just looked it up really quickly. It says that the odds that one will be struck by lightning in the US during one's lifetime is 1 in 15,300. Julie: Wow. Meagan: Okay. Julie: So twice that is 1 in 30,000. That's a freaking low risk. Anyway, what I'm saying is that I love that OB first of all. I feel like from what I've read about aspiration under general anesthesia during a C-section seems right in line with those numbers and those chances because it's so rare, it's almost unheard of especially now with all of the technology that we have. It's fine because I'm not going to go on that soapbox. I love that. I love that analogy and that we're talking about that because 10 years from now or when our daughters are having babies, they're going to talk about how their poor moms couldn't eat when they were in labor because of the policies just like we talk about the twilight sleep and how our poor grandmas had to undergo twilight sleep when our moms were being born. I feel like that's just going to be one of those things where we will look back and be like, “What were we thinking?” 43:03 Epidurals, Pitocin, AROM, episiotomies, and C-section percentagesMeagan: Okay, I'm going to finish this off. It says, “67% of women who gave birth vaginally had an epidural during labor and 37% were given Pitocin to speed up their labors.” Sorry, but come on. That also may go to show, that we're going to do an epidural episode as well, that epidural maybe does really slow down labor. Maybe it really does impact the body's response to continuing labor in a natural way, so 31% of those people had to have help and assistance. It says, “20% of women had their membranes artificially ruptured,” which means they broke your bag of water artificially with the little whatever, breaking bag water hook thing versus it breaking spontaneously. Julie: Amniohook. Is it an amniohook? Meagan: Amniohook, yeah. “17% of women had an episiotomy.” I don't know. Julie: I feel like those numbers are probably lower now. Meagan: I think that's changed, yeah. “31% had a Cesarean.”Julie: That is right in line with the national average. Meagan: It is, still. “The high use of these interventions reflects a system-wide maternity care philosophy expecting trouble. There is an increasing body of research that suggests that the routine use of these interventions rather than decreasing the risk of trouble in labor and birth actually increases complications for both women and their babies.” 44:43 The perspective of birth doulas and birth photographersJulie: I believe it. Do you know what? Can I just get on another tangent here because I know that you all love my tangents? I really wish that somebody somewhere would do something and I don't know what that something is, to get the voices of birth doulas and birth photographers heard because this is why. Doulas and birth photographers– I've said this before. We see births in all of the places. We have a really, really unique point of view about birth in the United States because we attend births at home. We attend unassisted births. We attend births at home with unlicensed providers. We attend births at home and births at birth centers with licensed providers. We attend in-hospital births with midwives and we attend in-hospital births with OB/GYNs and some of us are lucky enough to attend out-of-hospital births with OB/GYNs because there are a handful of them floating around. We see birth in every single variety that it takes in the United States. I really wish that someone somewhere would do something to get those voices lifted and amplified because I feel like yes, a lot of that is going to be anecdotal, but I feel like the stories there have so much value with the state of our system in the relationship between home and hospital birth, how birth transfers happen when births need to be transported to hospitals, the mental health of the people giving birth, the providers and the care, and all of that. I feel like, like I said, somebody should do something to do something with all of that information that we all carry with us. I think it could provide so much value somewhere, right? I don't know what yet, but if anybody has an idea, message me. Find me on Instagram at @juliefrancombirth. Find me. Message me if you have any ideas. Maybe write a book or something. I don't know. Meagan: I've wanted to do an episode and title it “From a Doula's Perspective”. We could do that from a birth photographer and all that, but it's crazy. It's crazy. Julie: We see it all. Meagan: There was a birth just the other day with one of our sweet, dear clients where the provider was saying things that seemed scary even though the evidence of what was happening was really not scary, went into a scheduled induction, and the way they were handling it, I felt so guilty as a doula and I was like, “This is going to turn Cesarean. This is not good.” Sure enough, it did and it broke my heart because I was like, “None of that needed to happen,” but again, it goes to us deciding what's best for us. That mom had to decide what was best for her with the facts that we were giving, what the doctor was giving, and all of these things. Again, we don't judge anyone for the way they birth, but it's sometimes so hard to see people not get the birth they wanted or desired, or to have people literally doubt their ability because someone said something to them. Julie: Yeah. Meagan: You know–Julie: Yeah. I agree. It's just interesting. Anyways. Meagan: We are getting off our topic of risk, but risk is a hard conversation to have because there are different numbers. It can be presented differently and like I said, it can also have a tone to it that adds a whole other perspective. So know that if you are given a risk, it's okay to research that and question it and see if that really is the real risk and if that's the evidence-based information. We like to provide them here like we were saying earlier. We may be guilty and I hope you guys stick with us if we share some that might be a little jarring on both sides of the VBAC and C-section, but we love you. We're here for you. We understand risks are scary. They are also hard to break down and understand, but we are here for you. I love you guys and yeah. Anything else, Julie?Julie: No. I just want to say be kind to each other. Give each other the benefit of the doubt. Do everything you can to make the best decisions for you. Trust your intuition and find the right support team. We're all just trying to do our best– us at The VBAC Link, you as parents, providers as providers, and if you feel like you need to make a change, make it. Meagan: Make it. All right, okay everybody. We'll talk to you later. Julie: Bye!ClosingWould you like to be a guest on the podcast? Tell us about your experience at thevbaclink.com/share. For more information on all things VBAC including online and in-person VBAC classes, The VBAC Link blog, and Meagan's bio, head over to thevbaclink.com. Congratulations on starting your journey of learning and discovery with The VBAC Link.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/the-vbac-link/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Nyheden om det lovløse Vendsyssel er landet på kongens bord. Han sender en af sine berygtede kommissionsdomstole afsted, og det får store konsekvenser. Ikke bare for de skyldige bag drabet på Maren og hendes familie, men for hele herredet. Medvirkende: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen: vært og tilrettelægger. Martin Schmidt-Nielsen: bibliotekar og historieentusiast. Lars Andersen: lektor i moderne i historie, Aalborg Universitet med speciale i kriminalsager fra 1800-tallet. Janne Bak: besøgschef Voergaard Slot. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht, tilrettelægger. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. Klip og lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Heiberg kæmper med at få folk til at tale i Stagsted. Ingen vil rigtig fortælle, hvad de så og hørte den aften, hvor Maren, hendes sønner og Skov-Christian blev banket ihjel. Men de færreste savner dem. Medvirkende: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen: vært og tilrettelægger Martin Schmidt-Nielsen: bibliotekar og historieentusiast Lars Andersen: lektor i moderne i historie, Aalborg Universitet med speciale i kriminalsager fra 1800-tallet. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht, tilrettelægger Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. Klip og lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Aviserne skriver om drabssagen i Stagsted, og uret tikker for Heiberg, hvis han vil opklare sagen uden kongens indblanding. Heiberg presser på for at få hans hovedmistænkte til at tilstå. Medvirkende: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen: vært og tilrettelægger. Martin Schmidt-Nielsen: bibliotekar og historieentusiast. Lars Andersen: lektor i moderne i historie, Aalborg Universitet. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht, tilrettelægger. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. Klip og lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Drabsmændene er dømt til livstid i tugthus for deres forbrydelse mod Maren, hendes sønner og Skov-Christian. Men hvorfor bliver de hyldet for deres ugerning på en mindesten, som stadig står i Stagsted i dag? Medvirkende: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen: vært og tilrettelægger. Martin Schmidt-Nielsen: bibliotekar og historieentusiast. Lars Andersen: lektor i moderne i historie, Aalborg Universitet. Birgit Hansen, borgmester (S) Frederikshavn kommune. Preben Tamborg Pedersen, efterkommer. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht, tilrettelægger. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. Klip og lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

En kold morgen i november 1841 bliver fire maltrakterede lig fundet ved et fattighus i Vendsyssel. Alle er blevet tævet ihjel. Herredsfogeden Heiberg er på sit livs sværeste sag: Hvem har dræbt de fire mennesker fra fattighuset, og hvorfor skulle de dø på så grusom en måde? Gennem 6 episoder undersøger bibliotekar Martin Schmidt-Nielsen og journalist Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, hvordan klasseskel kunne være altafgørende for din skæbne i 1840'ernes Danmark. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht, tilrettelægger. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. Klip og lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Endelig står et vidne frem og giver Heiberg et navn, der kan føre ham videre i efterforskningen. Samtidig får han etableret et billede af de fire ofres sølle liv og kriminelle levned før forbrydelsen. Medvirkende: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen: vært og tilrettelægger. Martin Schmidt-Nielsen: bibliotekar og historieentusiast. Lars Andersen: lektor i moderne i historie, Aalborg Universitet. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht, tilrettelægger. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. Klip og lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen. forbrydelsens@dr.dk

Sara Reeves, the former resident psychic and educator from the Night Owl podcast joins us to share the wisdom she has garnered from her interactions with the other side. As the founder of 'The Metaphysical U' and the voice behind the 'MP Unleashed' podcast, Sara recounts the critical moments that shaped her path and offers insights into embracing our intuitive selves.  Sara tells stories of unusual happenings within her home, and we discuss the significance of acknowledging young family members with psychic gifts. This episode is not only about recognizing our own abilities but also about the support systems that help us navigate them. During our chat with Sara, we delve into the practicalities of connecting with spirit guides, fostering mental well-being, and the intricacies of teaching psychic skills. Whether you're looking to better understand your own experiences or to develop latent abilities, Sara Reeves is a lighthouse guiding you through the mystical fog.To learn more about Sara, find a mediumship course, or book a reading:https://www.metaphysicalu.com/ Support the show-- SUBSCRIBE in your preferred podcast app!-- Follow @clairvoyagingpodcast on Instagram.-- Send us an email: clairvoyagingpodcast@gmail.com-- Become a Clairvoyager and get access to exclusive extras!Looking to book a distance Reiki session with Lauren?https://www.hellolaurenleon.com/

Att alltid bygga klädhögar på golvet eller aldrig bråka med någon offentligt? Att ha hyfsat bordsskick eller inte? Att följa eller skita i regler? Vilka livsregler har du? I veckans avsnitt rotar vi fram våra mesta käpphästar och minsta bryenden när vi funderar på vad som är viktigt eller inte så viktigt i våra liv. Vi får oxå ett första gästspel av vår kära Sara Rönne, eftersom Lotta är väldigt nyfiken på hennes viktigaste livsregler. Ekorredaktionen varvar Miss World-kompatibla självklarheter med sånt som kanske inte är så väntat i våra livsregler - har du funderat på dina? -------------- Vilka är dina livsregler? Dela med dig i vår avsnittstråd i facebookgruppen

En pedagogisk läs- och skrivutredning hjälper till identifiera vilka pedagogiska insatser på skol-, grupp- och individnivå som möter elevens behov. Frågeställningen i en läs- och skrivutredning kan också ge svar på om svårigheterna handlar om generella läs- och skrivsvårigheter eller dyslexi. I det här samtalet deltar Sara Rådbo, specialpedagog som arbetar övergripande i Knivsta kommun med just pedagogiska utredningar av läs- och skrivsvårigheter och Ylva Schön, rådgivare och talesperson på SPSM med lång erfarenhet av pedagogiska utredningar kring läs- och skrivsvårigheter. Samtalsledare är Erika Bergman, pressekreterare på SPSM.

Sara Rós er 35 ára eiginkona og móðir tveggja einhverfra drengja. Hún átti sjálf erfitt andlega á unglingsárum og leiddist út í neyslu vímuefna. 18 ára eignaðist hún son sem breytti öllu. Sara og eiginmaður hafa þurft að berjast við kerfið sem hefur brugðist báðum sonum þeirra á alla mögulega vegu.

Sara R. Reeves is a practicing medium in Central Texas and  She is known for her work with the Night Owl - True Ghost Stories and other podcasts. She is also the founder of Metaphysicalu (MPU) where she and other MPU practitioners teach and mentor those who want to develop their intuitive abilities. This is Sara's story. For more content and to support the show please visit https://www.patreon.com/MPUnleashedEmail: info@mpunleashed.com Important links:https://www.mpunleashed.comhttp://instagram.com/mpunleashedhttps://www.youtube.com/@mpunleashed23https://www.tiktok.com/@mpunleashed?_t=8fFbo6ois5H&_r=1https://www.metaphysicalu.com For more content and to support the show visit https://www.patreon.com/MPUnleashedEmail: info@mpunleashed.comImportant links:https://www.mpunleashed.comhttp://instagram.com/mpunleashedhttps://www.youtube.com/@mpunleashed23https://www.tiktok.com/@mpunleashed?_t=8fFbo6ois5H&_r=1https://www.metaphysicalu.com

Kong Christian den 8. kan ikke vende det blinde øje til den forfærdelige forbrydelse i Ejby, og han sender derfor landets skarpeste forhørsdommer afsted for at rydde op. Dommeren hedder Peter Munthe Brun og er kendt for at skaffe resultater, koste hvad det vil. Medvirkende: Søren Møgelvang Nielsen, forfatter. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært og tilrettelægger. Lars Andersen, lektor i historie på Aalborg Universitet med speciale i 1800-tallets kriminelle netværk. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht. Klip og Lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen.

Forhørsdommer Peter Munthe Brun indsnævrer kredsen af mistænkte og har fem navne på blokken. Men er det hælerkongen, forbrydergeniet, sadisten eller en af de andre, som er skyldig i mord? Medvirkende: Søren Møgelvang Nielsen, forfatter. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært og tilrettelægger. Lars Andersen, lektor i historie på Aalborg Universitet med speciale i 1800-tallets kriminelle netværk. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht. Klip og Lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen.

Intensiv forhørsteknik er Munthe Bruns spidskompetence, og det sidste redskab han har i kassen for at kunne knække morderne og fremtvinge en tilståelse. Sagen nærmer sig sin afslutning. Medvirkende: Søren Møgelvang Nielsen, forfatter. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært og tilrettelægger. Lars Andersen, lektor i historie på Aalborg Universitet med speciale i 1800-tallets kriminelle netværk. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht. Klip og Lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen.

De skyldige får landets strengeste straf og skal halshugges ved daggry på galgebakken i Roskilde. Men det er ikke kun morderne, der mærker hammeren. Venslev-røvernes dage er talte. Medvirkende: Søren Møgelvang Nielsen, forfatter. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært og tilrettelægger. Lars Andersen, lektor i historie på Aalborg Universitet med speciale i 1800-tallets kriminelle netværk. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht. Klip og Lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen.

Den stille husmandsejer Niels Jørgensen ligger i grøftekanten i Ejby Ådal næsegrus i jorden med hovedet slået til plukfisk. Tilbage i huset ligger hans kone Marie og 12-årige søn Jørgen i en blodpøl. Samfundet skræmmes fra vid og sans af det brutale trippelmord. Lovløsheden er nået til den yderste grænse. Medvirkende: Søren Møgelvang Nielsen, forfatter. Sara Røjkjær Knudsen, vært og tilrettelægger. Lars Andersen, lektor i historie på Aalborg Universitet med speciale i 1800-tallets kriminelle netværk. Redaktører: Carsten Nielsen og Hanne Barslund. I redaktionen: Rikke Precht. Klip og Lyddesign: Sara Røjkjær Knudsen.

Londonda niyə bir çox muzeylər ödənişsizdir?"Yol Əhvalatı"nda qonaq olan Sara Rəcəbli London və Mançester şəhərlərindən, Londonun fikirlərini dəyişdirməsindən, dünyanın ən böyük kitabxanasında olmasından, həmçinin ingilislərin məşhur çay adətlərindən danışdı.

Topic: 01 Japan's plummeting birth rates - a national crisis Topic: 02 Childhood Depression/Mental Health Awareness Day Presenter: Imam Daniyal Ahmad & Imam Mubariz Amini Guest: 01. Professor Janet Hunter 02. Dr. Satona Suzuki Organisation 03. Dr Saeed Nazir Researchers: Barirah, Saba, Sara (R), Arriba & Areebah Producer: Isha Ahmad

Topic discussing: Autism Acceptance Month, Days of Forgiveness and Climate Crisis Presenter: Mb Sheikh Sammar Ahmad Mb Jalees Ahmad Segment 1: Autism Acceptance Month - Understanding our fellow human beings Intro.: Professor Angela Hassiotis is a professor of Psychiatry of Intellectual Disability (also called Learning Disability in the UK) based at the Division of Psychiatry, University College London. She also works as consultant Psychiatrist at the Camden Learning Disability Service where she sees patients who have mental health difficulties and supervises doctors in training. There, she also advocates and supports people with intellectual disabilities, many of whom may also be autistic. Segment 2: 2nd Ashra of Ramadhan- Days of Forgiveness Intro. Imam Ibrahim Noonan Sahib was graduate from both Christian and Islamic theology & Philosophy. Studied Intercultural Theology & interreligious Studies at Trinity College Dublin. BA Th, Mphil. Segment 3: Climate Crisis - Are we too late? Intro. Chris is a Professor of Climate Science in the Department of Geography at University College London. He runs UCL's MSc in Climate Change and teaching revolves around the Physics of climate and how we model the climate. His main research focus is how well Model-captures of the climate of the geologic past, but he also looks at putting error bars of Future projections. Guests Caller: Professor Angela- Hassiotis Professor of Psychiatry of Intellectual Disability, University College London Dr Emma Jenks- Research Associate specialising in autistic students' mental health, University of Bristol Imam Ibrahim Noonan- Missionary of the Ahmadiyya Association UK Saba Ahmedi- Missionary of the Ahmadiyya Association UK Chris Brierley- Professor of Climate Science at UCL Researchers: Isha, Ine, Arriba, Sara (R), Produced by: Producer: Ine, Isha

“Now, my disability isn't a hindrance. It's a celebration of what I can do.” -Sara R. Vogler   Art is life. Life is Art. So says Sara's email signature- heart AND soul. If Sara's journey thus far was a painting, there would be no painting more beautiful and inspiring than her true story work of art. Sara was born in Krakow, Poland with a severe form of a rare genetic disorder called TARSA syndrome. The condition means she was born without a radius bone in either forearm, causing her mobility in her hands and arms to be severely impaired. Sara and her family eventually moved to the US where she underwent 17 different surgeries, but Sara and her family we mission driven from the start with an underlying motto of “be the best you can be- no matter what”. Sara is an operation professional with over 10 year of success in all spheres of the government, has 2 degrees, is a Reiki Master, artist, poet, and now, a CrossFit competitor. Her family is creative to the core, encouraging Sara and her creative pursuits in art and poetry and even created a documentary sharing Sara's journey and mission thus far (a must see). This is an incredible story of a champion's mindset, true resilience, and a no excuse- SUPER humble varsity human, absolutely living as the best version on themselves on the daily. Sara is a leader (and influencer:), inspiring us all to do really hard things. All the fist bumps to Sara- we can't wait to see what you do next.   Highlights: Over coming adversity. Creativity and healing. The importance of community and family support. Fitness, wellness, and fun. Competing on and off the field. Trailblazers in the disability rights movement. CrossFit. Facing challenges and believing in something bigger. Youth programs and impact. Sara R. Vogler is a strong and energetic program operation professional with a demonstrated history of over 10 years working in all spheres of government.  Vogler has a Bachelor's degree in International Relations/Political Science from California State University, Sacramento as well as graduating from College of the Canyons with an Associate of Arts degree.  In her personal time, Vogler is an artist, a poet, a Reiki Master, and an avid CrossFit athlete where Vogler competed in the first ever Women's Upper Extremity division for the 2021 CrossFit Open ranking 35th out of 50th competitors. @voguepoet https://djvogue.wixsite.com/artislife You Tube video: https://youtu.be/MpVKWKGVQkU   Connect with T&T: IG: @TurmericTequila Facebook: @TurmericAndTequila TikTok: @TurmericTequila Website: www.TurmericAndTequila.com   Host: Kristen Olson IG: @Madonnashero Website: www.KOAlliance.com

I det här avsnittet fortsätter Linda att berätta om Kreatörsakademin (du kan signa upp dig på väntelistan här) och Alexandra berättar om sin nya succé-freebie "Planera dina sociala medier 2023" (signa upp för att få den gratis här) Dessutom pratar de om att man får göra precis som man vill, att man måste stjäla med stil om man ska stjäla och... såklart... vad enda problemet med Sara Rönne är. Om du vill läsa Saras blogginlägg så gör du det här.

Great news! Sara är gravid så nu får vi ett riktigt gravidavsnitt med allt vad det innebär! Hur påverkas huden av graviditeten, Saras berg och dalbana, vad kommer få följa med i BB-väskan och vi får självklart Saras hudvårdshjältar nu när huden inte är sig lik. Produkterna som nämns i avsnittet hittar du på Hudspecialisten.se: Poddavsnitt 144: Sara är gravid!

Yngre eller äldre killar? Det är frågan. I dagens avsnitt pratar vi om varför äldre killar måste slänga sin garderob, om dramat från förra veckan samt Saras otroliga prank på Malin. Vi går även live på Tiktok och besvarar era lyssnarfrågor. Om ni har några frågor eller behöver hjälp med problem kan ni självklart slidea in i DM på @kulikombo, eller via våra privata konton @saramelinasundberg och @malinmarjam. Instagram: kulikombo Tiktok: kulikombo Email: kulikombo@gmail.com

Sara found herself in position no pet owner ever wants to be in.  Her rescue kitten was mysteriously ill, and she was facing a mountain of veterinary expenses.  Looking back on the at time today, though, Sara has found her peace of mind, knowing she did everything that she could to help.    My Story is a weekly podcast where we sit down with everyday folks like yourself to talk about how using the CareCredit credit card has helped improve their lives. Check in every Tuesday for new stories at carecredit.com/mystory or subscribe on your favorite podcast app.   CareCredit is a health, wellness and personal care credit card that has helped millions of people through promotional financing options and is accepted at hundreds of thousands of provider and retail locations nationwide.  Learn more at carecredit.com.

Linda turnerar runt på konserter och Alexandra har campat. Ännu ett semesteravsnitt, varsågod att lyssna! 

26 artistas, firman el disco doble "Jaén canta a Jaén", una producción de Paco Ortega. Sabina, Zahara, Carmen Linares, Valderrama, Karina, Amparo Sánchez (Amparanoia), Chico Pérez, Ana Corbel, Virginia Maestro, Alis, Ángeles Toledano, Raphael, Sara Ráez, o Guadalupe Plata, participan en este proyecto. José Mª Pascual, propone la lectura de "60 grados norte. Un viaje en busca de mi hogar" del escritor Malachy Tallack, publicado por Editorial Volcano. Escuchar audio

I det här avsnittet är Sara Rönne med och pratar om bloggen och dess värde. Nu är det dags att damma av de gamla bloggarna, och som Sara säger "Adapt or die".  

A la salud mental hay que darle la importancia que se merece y esto es lo que hacen Leticia Gimeno, Sara Ródes y Jimena Moreno al crear su proyceto: Typ Community.  Un espacio para conocerse, sanarse y revolucionar el bienestar. ( Código para su programa de salud: LAAGAM10TYP )

Host Derek E. Silva joins Dr. Sara R. Jordan, the former Senior Researcher, Artificial Intelligence and Ethics, at the Future of Privacy Forum. They take a deep dive into data ethics, the impact of artificial intelligence on human society, and how we can better safeguard our privacy online.

After talking BDSM and Erotic Fiction on Livestream Sunday, Sara R. Stewart stuck around for this conversation. Enjoy! Catch her episode of Livestream Sunday on Replay here: https://youtu.be/2umweQQThIw ::: B O O K S - B Y - A D R I A N ::: Newsletter: https://www.booksbyadrian.com/newsletter Website: https://www.booksbyadrian.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/booksbyadrian Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/booksbyadrian/ Merch Store: https://books-by-adrian.creator-spring.com/ ::: S O C I A L - M E D I A ::: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/books_by_adrian/ Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/booksbyadrian Twitter: https://twitter.com/booksadrian TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@booksbyadrian ::: Y O U T U B E - S E R I E S - P L A Y L I S T S ::: Livestream Sunday (Season Four): https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8ktY0QCXsNmi6aIr-L7vX1VFfJI9qCt3 Type Writers Podcast: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8ktY0QCXsNntLs6U_EHoqozH6xpd4GYM Chronicles: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8ktY0QCXsNmuuID-9Yg2yOjquCOuQlEa Breaking Bad Commentary: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8ktY0QCXsNkrHqB9u4lbSb0QTgGxoic0 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: S A R A - R - S T E W A R T ::: Author Read Books: https://books2read.com/u/49nVYY Website: https://sararstewarts.com/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SaraRStewartAuthor Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/author_sararstewart/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/SaraRStewart1 Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/20534290.Sara_R_Stewart BookBub: https://www.bookbub.com/authors/sara-r-stewart TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@sararstewartauthor?lang=en Amazon Author Page: https://www.amazon.com/Sara-R-Stewart/e/B088BZ75PJ?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1&qid=1633736012&sr=8-1 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/typewriterspodcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/typewriterspodcast/support

I veckans avsnitt av Ofiltrerat möter jag inspiratören Sara Rönne - tidigare igenkänd som ”Träningsglädje”. Vårat samtal kommer att handla om Saras orädda inställning till mycket, att hon gärna kastar sig ut och hur det påverkar hennes beslut. Sara berättar om flyttar, relationer, uppbrott, nya människor och hur hon avslutade en lång relation vid 35 års ålder. Vi pratar om vad som händer mellan 30 och 40 och vilket ord som leder henne genom det nya året. Det och mycket mer i veckans avsnitt av Ofiltrerat. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Pedro Guerra ha programado un cartel “Canción de Autor” para esta semana con artistas españoles como Dani Flaco, Sara Ráez, Ainoa Buitrago, Vicky Gastelo o Pablo Moreno a quien volvemos a recibir hoy en el estudio. La representación internacional correrá a cargo de Liuba María Hevia. Y también nos visita una vez más Rodrigo Leâo para hablarnos de su nuevo disco ‘A Estranha Beleza Da Vida’, que cuenta con la participación de Kurt Wagner (Lambchop), Martirio o Suso Sáiz entre otros. DISCO 1 PAUL SIMON One Man's Ceiling Is Another Man's Floor (ORDENADOR) DISCO 2 DE LOS SANTOS  Cómo estás (ORDENADOR) DISCO 3 RODRIGO LEÃO O Maestro (10) DISCO 5 RODRIGO LEÃO Who Can Resist (featuring Kurt Wagner) (ORDENADOR) DISCO 4 RODRIGO LEÃO Friend of a Friend (feat. Michelle Gurevich)(ORDENADOR) DISCO 6 PABLO MORENO Ahora sé (ORDENADOR) DISCO 7 PABLO MORENO Eres Amor (ORDENADOR) DISCO 8 PABLO MORENO Imposible (ORDENADOR) Escuchar audio

Del jueves 14 al sábado 16, la Fundación SGAE propone un nuevo ciclo de canción de autor que aúna artistas consagradas con nuevo talento por descubrir. Hablamos con algunas de ellas, que nos citan en la sala Berlanga, donde tendrá lugar el ciclo cuyo programador es el cantautor canario Pedro Guerra. En Toro (Zamora) concluye entre hoy y mañana el Zaranda Folk, un festival que cuenta para cada día con Pedraza y Entavía. Estrenamos el disco “Vientos de Salmor”, donde el también canario Pablo Díaz reivindica e pito herreño, un instrumento de viento característico de la isla del Hierro, de la que es natural. Con una polka catalana para terminar, este es el contenido musical de hoy: Dani Flaco, “Fuego Malabar”, Sara Ráez, “Abrazo gigante”, Luiba María Hevia, “Como un ángel que despierta”, Ainoa Buitrago, “La apuesta”; Pablo Moreno, “Ahora sé”, Vicky Gastelo, “Mami dice que”, Pedraza, “Dantza” (con Kepa Junkera); Entavía, “La peregrina”; Pablo Díaz, “Folias del aire” y Vientos del salmor”; y RIU, “Polka de Al Tall”. Escuchar audio

lovethylawyer.comA transcript of this podcast is easily available at lovethylawyer.com.Go to https://www.lovethylawyer.com/blog for transcripts.https://www.saradiamondattorney.com/Sara Diamond discusses law, life, astrology, meditation and sociology in this interview.  Her path to and through law is different than most. I really enjoyed our discussion. Sara refers to this book:https://foonberglaw.com/how-to-start-build-a-law-practice-6/ Sara's Wikipedia:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sara_Diamond_(sociologist) Louis Goodman www.louisgoodman.com louisgoodman2010@gmail.com 510.582.9090  Musical theme by Joel Katz, Seaside Recording, Maui Technical support: Bryan Matheson, Skyline Studios, Oakland  We'd love to hear from you.  Send us an email at louisgoodman2010@gmail.com. Please subscribe and listen. Then tell us who you want to hear and what areas of interest you'd like us to cover.  Please rate us and review us on Apple Podcasts.   

Bu dəfəki qonağım dəyərli insan, sosial sahibkarlıqda öz sözünü söyləmiş şəxs Sara xanım Rəcəbli ilə ölkəmizdəki sosial sahibkarlıqdan danışdıq.